Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T11:43:41.364Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Health parameters in tail biters and bitten pigs in a case–control study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2012

C. Munsterhjelm ,
O. Simola ,
L. Keeling ,
A. Valros  and
M. Heinonen
C. Munsterhjelm*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Environment and Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
O. Simola
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Biosciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
L. Keeling
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Environment and Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
A. Valros
Affiliation:
Department of Production Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
M. Heinonen
Affiliation:
Department of Production Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
*
E-mail: camilla.munsterhjelm@helsinki.fi
Get access

Abstract

Health in relation to tail-biting behaviour was investigated on a problem farm. Quartets (n = 16) of age- and gender-matched fattening pigs including a tail biter (TB, n = 16), a victim (V, n = 16), a control in the same pen (Ctb, n = 10) and a control in a pen where no tail biting was observed (Cno, n = 14) were chosen by direct behavioural observation. Haematological and clinicochemical analyses, autopsy and histological examination of 16 different tissues were carried out. Tail lesion severity was evaluated both macroscopically, on the basis of inspection, and histologically, in the sagittally cut tail. Category effects were tested using Friedman's ANOVA by Ranks, Cochran's Q or a repeated-measure GLM and, if significant, pair-wise tests were conducted using Wilcoxon Signed Ranks or McNemar's Test. The number of received tail bites correlated better with histological than with macroscopic tail lesion scoring because of deep inflammation beneath healthy skin in some cases. Most individuals had mild inflammatory lesions in internal organs suggestive of generalized activation of the immune system, and 30% of the animals were anaemic, possibly because of systemic spread of infectious agents. V had more severe respiratory organ lesions and higher serum protein concentrations than all other categories of pigs. Liver- and muscle-specific enzymes (alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase and creatine kinase) differed between categories. In conclusion, most animals had signs of generalized activation of the immune system, possibly because of systemic spread of infectious agents. V pigs suffered from more severe inflammatory lesions than TB, Ctb or Cno. Deep infections may exist under healthy skin in the tail of bitten pigs.

Keywords

tail bitinghealthhistologyhaematologyclinical chemistry
Type
Behaviour, welfare and health
Information
animal , Volume 7 , Issue 5 , May 2013 , pp. 814 - 821
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baetz, AL, Mengeling, WL 1971. Blood constituent changes in fasted swine. American Journal of Veterinary Research 32, 1491–1499.Google Scholar
Blackshaw, JK 1981. Some behavioural deviations in weaned domestic pigs: persistent inguinal nose thrusting, and tail and ear biting. Animal Production 33, 315–332.Google Scholar
Boyd, JW 1983. The mechanisms relating to increases in plasma enzymes and isoenzymes in diseases of animals. Veterinary Clinical Pathology 12, 9–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brunberg, E, Wallenbeck, A, Keeling, LJ 2011. Tail biting in fattening pigs: associations between frequency of tail biting and other abnormal behaviours. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 133, 18–25.Google Scholar
Doumas, BT, Watson, WA, Biggs, H 1971. Albumin standards and the measurement of serum albumin with bromcresol green. Clinica Chimica Acta 31, 87–96.Google Scholar
Duncan, IJH, Fraser, D 1997. Understanding animal welfare. In Animal Welfare (ed. MA Appleby and BO Hughes), pp. 19–31. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Edwards, SA 2006. Tail biting in pigs: understanding the intractable problem. The Veterinary Journal 171, 367–369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elbers, ARW, Tielen, MJM, Snijders, JMA, Cromwijk, WAJ, Hunneman, WA 1992. Epidemiological studies on lesions in finishing pigs in the Netherlands. I. Prevalence, seasonality and interrelationship. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 14, 217–231.Google Scholar
Evans, RJ 1994. Porcine haematology: reference ranges and the clinical value of haematological examination in the pig. The Pig Journal 32, 52–57.Google Scholar
Fabiny, DL, Ertigshausen, G 1971. Automated reaction rate method for determination of serum creatinine with CentrifiChem. Clinical Chemistry 17, 696–700.Google Scholar
Friendship, RM, Henry, SE 1992. Cardiovascular system, hematology and clinical chemistry. In Diseases of swine, 7th edition (ed. AD Leman, BE Straw, WD Mengeling, S D'Allaire and DJ Taylor), pp. 5–11. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA.Google Scholar
Friendship, RM, Lumsden, JH, McMillan, I, Wilson, MR 1984. Hematology and biochemistry reference values for Ontario swine. Canadian Journal of Comparative Medicine 48, 390–393.Google Scholar
Fritchen, R, Hogg, A 1983. Preventing tail-biting in swine (anti-comfort syndrome). Historical materials from University of Nebraska-Lincoln extension G75-245. University of Nebraska, USA.Google Scholar
Gutmann, I, Bergmeyer, HU 1974. Determination of urea with glutamate dehydrogenase as indicator enzyme. In Methods of enzymatic analysis (ed. HU Bergmeyer), pp. 1794–1798, vol 4, 2nd edition. Academic Press Inc., New York, USA.Google Scholar
Hart, BL 1988. Biological bases of the behavior of sick animals. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 12, 123–137.Google Scholar
Huey, RJ 1996. Incidence, location and interrelationships between the sites of abscesses recorded in pigs at a bacon factory in Northern Ireland. The Veterinary Record 138, 511–514.Google Scholar
Huynh, H, Mandeville, GK 1979. Validity conditions in repeated measures designs. Psychological Bulletin 86, 964–973.Google Scholar
International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) 1983/4. IFCC methods for the measurement of catalytic concentration of enzymes, Part 5. IFCC method for alkaline phosphatase (orthophosphoric-monoesterphosphohydrolase, alkaline optimum, EC 3.1.3.1). Journal of Clinical Chemistry & Clinical Biochemistry 21, 731–748.Google Scholar
IFCC 2002/3. IFCC primary reference procedures for the measurement of catalytic activity concentrations of enzymes at 37°C, Part 2. Reference procedure for the measurement of catalytic concentrations of creatine kinase. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine 40, 635–642.Google Scholar
IFCC 2002/5. IFCC primary reference procedures for the measurement of catalytic activity concentrations of enzymes at 37°C, Part 4. Reference procedure for the measurement of catalytic concentration of alanine aminotransferase. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine 40, 718–724.Google Scholar
IFCC 2002/6. IFCC primary reference procedures for the measurement of catalytic activity concentrations of enzymes at 37°C, Part 5. Reference procedure for the measurement of catalytic concentration of aspartate aminotransferase. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine 40, 725–733.Google Scholar
IFCC 2002/7. IFCC Primary reference procedures for the measurement of catalytic activity concentrations of enzymes at 37°C, Part 6. Reference procedure for the measurement of catalytic concentrations of gamma-glutamyltransferase. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine 40, 734–738.Google Scholar
Kramer, JW, Hoffmann, WE 1997. Clinical enzymology. In Clinical biochemistry of domestic animals, 5th edition (ed. JJ Kaneko, JW Harvey and ML Bruss), pp. 303–325. Academic Press Inc., San Diego, California, USA.Google Scholar
Lumsden, JH 1998. “Normal” or reference values: questions and comments. Veterinary Clinical Pathology 27, 102–106.Google Scholar
Moinard, C, Mendl, M, Nicol, CJ, Green, LE 2003. A case control study of on-farm risk factors for tail biting in pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 81, 333–355.Google Scholar
Niemi, JK, Sinisalo, A, Valros, A, Heinonen, M 2011. The timing and treatment of tail biting in fattening pigs. In Book of abstracts of the 24th NJF Congress, (ed. J Hultgren, P Persson, E Nadeau and F Fogelberg) pp. 66–71. Nordic Association of Agricultural Scientists, Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
Odink, J, Smeets, JFM, Visser, IJR, Sandman, H, Snijders, JMA 1990. Hematological and clinicochemical profiles of healthy swine and swine with inflammatory processes. Journal of Animal Science 68, 163–170.Google Scholar
Sihvo, H-K, Simola, O, Munsterhjelm, C, Syrjä, P 2011. Systemic spread of infection in tail bitten pigs. In Cutting edge pathology 2011. Proceedings of the ESVP ECVP ESTP Meeting, p. 53. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
Simonsen, HB, Klinken, L, Bindseil, E 1991. Histopathology of intact and docked pigtails. British Veterinary Journal 147, 407–412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tennant, BC 1997. Hepatic function. In Clinical biochemistry of domestic animals, 5th edition (ed. JJ Kaneko, JW Harvey and ML Bruss), pp. 327–352. Academic Press Inc., San Diego, California, USA.Google Scholar
Wallgren, P, Lindahl, E 1996. The influence of tail biting on performance of fattening pigs. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 37, 453–460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van der Meulen, JH, Kuipers, H, Drukker, J 1991. Relationship between exercise-induced muscle damage and enzyme release in rats. Journal of Applied Physiology 71, 999–1004.Google Scholar
Weichselbaum, TE 1946. An accurate and rapid method for the determination of proteins in small amounts of blood serum and plasma. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 16, 40–49.Google Scholar