Book contents
- Author and Audience in Vitruvius’ De architectura
- Greek Culture in the Roman World
- Frontispiece
- Author and Audience in Vitruvius’ De architectura
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Plates
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 Greek Knowledge and the Roman World
- 2 The Self-Fashioning of Scribes
- 3 House and Man
- 4 Art Display and Strategies of Persuasion
- 5 The Vermilion Walls of Faberius Scriba
- Epilogue
- Bibliography
- Index Locorum
- General Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 November 2017
Book contents
- Author and Audience in Vitruvius’ De architectura
- Greek Culture in the Roman World
- Frontispiece
- Author and Audience in Vitruvius’ De architectura
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Plates
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 Greek Knowledge and the Roman World
- 2 The Self-Fashioning of Scribes
- 3 House and Man
- 4 Art Display and Strategies of Persuasion
- 5 The Vermilion Walls of Faberius Scriba
- Epilogue
- Bibliography
- Index Locorum
- General Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Author and Audience in Vitruvius' De architectura , pp. 195 - 223Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Alexander, W. H. (1942) “The Enigma of Horace’s Mother,” Classical Philology 37: 385–397.Google Scholar
Allison, P. (2004) Pompeian Households: An Analysis of the Material Culture. Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. C. (2014) “Architect and Patron,” in Ulrich, R. B. and Quenemoen, C. K. (eds.), A Companion to Roman Architecture. Malden, MA and Oxford: 127–139.Google Scholar
Anderson, W. S. (1974) “Autobiography and Art in Horace,” in Galinsky, G. K. (ed.), Perspectives of Roman Poetry: A Classics Symposium. London: 33–56.Google Scholar
Anderson, W. S. (1995) “Horatius Liber, Child and Freedman’s Son,” Arethusa 28: 151–164.Google Scholar
André, J.-M. (1985) “Le prologue scientifique et la rhétorique: les préfaces de Vitruve,” Bulletin de l’Association Guillaume Budé: Lettres d’humanité 44: 375–384.Google Scholar
André, J.-M. (1987) “Le rhétorique dans les préfaces de Vitruve. Le statut culturel de la science,” Filologia e forme letterarie, studi offerti a Francesco della Corte 3. Urbino: 265–289.Google Scholar
Anguissola, A. (2012) Difficillima Imitatio: Immagine e lessico delle copie tra Grecia e Roma. Rome.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. (1986) “Horatius Eques et Scriba: Satires 1.6 and 2.7,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 116: 255–288.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. (2004) “Horace’s Epistles 1 and Philodemus,” in Armstrong, D. (ed.), Vergil, Philodemus and the Augustans. Austin: 267–298.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. (2010) “The Biographical and Social Foundations of Horace’s Poetic Voice,” in Davis, G., (ed.), A Companion to Horace. Malden and Oxford: 7–33.Google Scholar
Ash, R. (2013) “Drip-feed Invective: Pliny, Self-fashioning, and the Regulus Letters,” in Marmodoro, A. and Hall, J. (eds.), The Author’s Voice in Classical and Late Antiquity. Oxford: 207–232.Google Scholar
Asper, M. (2007) Griechische Wissenschaftstexte: Formen, Funktionen, Differenzierungsgeschichten. Philosophie der Antike 25. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Baldwin, B. (1990) “The Date, Identity and Career of Vitruvius,” Latomus 49.2: 425–434.Google Scholar
Baltrusch, E. (1989) Regimen Morum: Die Reglementierung des Privatlebens der Senatoren und Ritter in der Römischen Republik und frühen Kaiserzeit. Vestigia XLI. Munich.Google Scholar
Barkan, L. (2000) “The Heritage of Zeuxis: Painting, Rhetoric and History,” in Payne, A., Kuttner, A., and Smick, R. (eds.), Antiquity and Its Interpreters. Cambridge, UK: 99–109.Google Scholar
Barresi, M. (1989) “Vitruvio e Plinio il Vecchio: per una lettura comparata,” Quaderni di storia dell’archittetura e restauro 1: 43–50.Google Scholar
Bartman, E. (1988) “Decor et Duplicatio: Pendants in Roman Sculptural Display,” American Journal of Archaeology 92: 211–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartman, E. (1991) “Sculptural Display and Collecting in the Private Realm,” in Gazda, E. K. (ed.), Roman Art in the Private Sphere: New Perspectives on the Architecture and Decor of the Domus, Villa and Insula. Ann Arbor: 71–88.Google Scholar
Barton, T. S. (1994) Power and Knowledge: Astrology, Physiognomics, and Medicine under the Roman Empire. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Bastet, F. L. and de Vos, M. (1979) Proposta per classificazione del terzo stile pompeiano. Rome.Google Scholar
Bek, L. (1976) “Antithesis: A Roman Attitude and Its Changes as Reflected in the Concept of Architecture from Vitruvius to Pliny the Younger,” in Ascani, K., Fischer-Hansen, T., Johansen, F., Jensen, S. S., and Skydsgaard, J. E. (eds.), Studia Romana in Honorem Petri Krarup Septuagenarii. Odense: 154–166.Google Scholar
Benöhr, H.-P. (1986) “Das Faberianum negotium: Schuldenbereinigung zur Zeit Ciceros,” Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Romanistische Abteilung 103: 275–320.Google Scholar
Berg, B. (1997) “Cicero’s Palatine House and Clodius’ Shrine of Liberty: Alternative Emblems of the Republic in Cicero’s De Domo Sua,” in Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 8, Collection Latomus 239: 122–143.Google Scholar
Bergmann, B. (1994) “The Roman House as Memory Theater: The House of the Tragic Poet in Pompeii,” Art Bulletin 76: 225–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergmann, B. (1995) “Greek Masterpieces and Roman Recreative Fictions,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 97: 79–120.Google Scholar
Bettini, M. (1999) The Portrait of the Lover, tr. Gibbs, L.. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Beyen, H. G. (1938) Pompejanische Wanddekoration vom zweiten bis zum vierten Stil (vol. 1). The Hague.Google Scholar
Bodel, J. (1997) “Monumental Villas and Villa Monuments,” Journal of Roman Archaeology 10: 5–35.Google Scholar
Bodel, J. (2012) “Villaculture,” in Becker, J. A. and Terrenato, N. (eds.), Roman Republican Villas: Architecture, Context, and Ideology. Papers and Monographs of the American Academy in Rome 32. Ann Arbor: 61–68.Google Scholar
Boëthius, A. (1939) “Vitruvius and the Roman Architecture of His Age,” in DRAGMA: Festschrift für M.P. Nilsson. Acta Instituti Romani Regni Sueciae 1. Lund: 114–143.Google Scholar
Bonner, S. F. (1949) Roman Declamation in the Late Republic and Early Empire. Liverpool.Google Scholar
Bowditch, P. L. (2001) Horace and the Gift Economy of Patronage. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Bradley, M. (2004) “The Colour ‘Blush’ in Ancient Rome,” in Cleland, L. and Stears, K. (eds.), Colour in the Ancient Mediterranean World. Oxford: 117–121.Google Scholar
Bragantini, I. (2015) “Roman Painting in the Republic and Early Empire,” in Pollitt, J. J. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Painting in the Classical World. Cambridge, UK: 302–369.Google Scholar
Brilliant, R. (1984) Visual Narratives: Storytelling in Etruscan and Roman Art. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Brilliant, R. (1998) “Some Reflections on the ‘New Roman Art History,’” Journal of Roman Archaeology 11: 557–565.Google Scholar
Brink, C. O. (1965) On Reading a Horatian Satire: An Interpretation of Sermones II 6. Sydney.Google Scholar
Brink, C. O. (1972) “Ennius and the Hellenistic Worship of Homer,” American Journal of Philology 93.4: 547–567.Google Scholar
Brink, C. O. (ed.) (1982) Horace on Poetry, III: Epistles, Book II: The Letters to Augustus and Florus, with comm. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Broughton, T. R. S. (1952). The Magistrates of the Roman Republic, Vol. II: 99 B.C.–31 B.C. New York.Google Scholar
Brown, F. E. (1963) “Vitruvius and the Liberal Art of Architecture,” Bucknell Review 11.4: 99–107.Google Scholar
Bruneau, P. (1982) Pavimenta poenica. Mélanges de l’École française de Rome - Antiquité 94: 639–655.Google Scholar
Brunt, P. A. (1980) “Free Labour and Public Works at Rome,” Journal of Roman Studies 70: 81–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunt, P. A. (1982) “Nobilitas and Novitas,” Journal of Roman Studies 72: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calame, C. (1986) “Nature humaine et environnement, le racisme bien tempéré d’Hippocrate,” in Bérard, C. (ed.), Sciences et racisme. Lausanne: 75–99.Google Scholar
Callebat, L. (1994a) “La Tradition Vitruvienne au Moyen Age et à la Renaissance: Eléments d’Interpretation,” International Journal of the Classical Tradition 1: 3–14.Google Scholar
Callebat, L. (1994b) “Rhétorique et architecture dans le ‘de architectura’ de Vitruve,” Collection de l’École française de Rome 192: 31–46.Google Scholar
Callebat, L. (2003) “La notion d’auctoritas dans le De architectura de Vitruve,” Voces 14: 113–120.Google Scholar
Callebat, L. (ed.) (2004) Vitruve, De l’architecture, Livre 6, with tr. and comm. Paris.Google Scholar
Callebat, L. and Fleury, P. (eds.) (1986) Vitruve, De l’architecture, Livre 10, with tr. and comm. Paris.Google Scholar
Callebat, L. and Gros, P. (eds.) (1999) Vitruve, De l’architecture, Livre 2, with tr. and comm. Paris.Google Scholar
Cam, M.-T. (1995) “Commentaire,” in Liou, B., Zuinghedau, M., and Cam, M.-T. (eds.), Vitruve, De L’architecture, Livre 7. Paris.Google Scholar
Carandini, A. (1989) “La villa romana e la piantagione schiavistica,” in Schiavone, A. and Momigliano, A. (eds.), Storia di Roma 4. Turin: 101–200.Google Scholar
Callebat, L. (1990) “Domus aristocratiche sopra le mura e il pomerio del Palatino,” in La Grande Roma dei Tarquini. Rome: 97–99.Google Scholar
Carey, S. (2003) Pliny’s Catalogue of Culture: Art and Empire in the Natural History. Oxford.Google Scholar
Chase, G. D. (1897) “The Origin of Roman Praenomina,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 8: 103–184.Google Scholar
Ciapponi, L. A. (1960) “Il ‘De architectura’ di Vitruvio nel primo umanesimo,” Italia Medioevale e Umanistica 3: 59–99.Google Scholar
Ciotta, G. (ed.) (2003) Vitruvio nella cultura architettonica antica, medievale e moderna: atti del convegno internazionale de Genova, 5–8 novembre 2001, vol. II: Età moderna. Genoa.Google Scholar
Citroni, M. (2000) “The Memory of Philippi in Horace and the Interpretation of Ep. 1.20.23,” Classical Journal 96.1: 27–56.Google Scholar
Citroni, M. (2013) “Horace’s Epistle 2.1: Cicero, Varro, and the Ancient Debate about the Origins and Development of Latin Poetry,” in Farrell, J. and Nelis, D. (eds.), Augustan Poetry and the Roman Republic. Oxford: 180–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citroni Marchetti, S. (1991) Plinio il Vecchio e la tradizione del moralismo romano. Pisa.Google Scholar
Clarke, G. (2003) Roman House – Renaissance Palaces: Inventing Antiquity in Fifteenth-Century Italy. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. R. (1991) The Houses of Roman Italy, 100 B.C.–A.D. 250: Ritual, Space, and Decoration. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. R. (2005) “Augustan Domestic Interiors: Propaganda or Fashion?” in Galinsky, K. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Augustus. Cambridge, UK: 264–280.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. R. (2014) “Domus/Single Family House,” in Ulrich, R. B. and Quenemoen, C. K., (eds.), A Companion to Roman Architecture. Malden, MA and Oxford: 342–362.Google Scholar
Clarke, K. (1999) Between Geography and History: Hellenistic Constructions of the Roman World. Oxford.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. (1977) “Public Building in Rome between the Second Punic War and Sulla,” Papers of the British School at Rome 45: 1–23.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. (1989) “La casa dell’aristocrazia romana secundo Vitruvio,” in Geertman, H. and de Jong, J. J. (eds.), Munus non Ingratum: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Vitruvius’ De Architectura and the Hellenistic and Republican Architecture. Leiden: 178–187.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. (1991) “I Sanniti a Fregellae,” in La Romanisation du Samnium aux IIe et Ier siècles av. J.- C. Actes du Colloque, Naples 4–5 nov. 1988. Naples: 177–185.Google Scholar
Cohen, B. (1984) “Some Neglected Ordines: The Apparitorial Status Group,” in Nicolet, C. (ed.), Des Ordres à Rome. Paris: 23–60.Google Scholar
Colish, M. L. (1990) The Stoic Tradition from Antiquity to the Early Middle Ages (vol. 1). Leiden.Google Scholar
Corbeill, A. (1996) Controlling Laughter: Political Humor in the Late Roman Republic. Princeton.Google Scholar
Cornell, T. J. (1995) The Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (ca. 1000–264 BC). London.Google Scholar
Cotte, M., Susini, J., Metrich, N., Moscato, A., Gratziu, C., Bertagnini, A., and Pagano, M. (2006) “Blackening of Pompeian Cinnabar Paintings: X-ray Microspectroscopy Analysis,” Analytical Chemistry 78: 7484–7492.Google Scholar
Courrént, M. (2004) “‘Non est mirandum.’ Vitruve et la résistance à l’étonnement,” in Bianchi, O., Mudry, P., and Thévenaz, O. (eds.), Mirabilia: Conceptions et représentations de l’extraordinaire dans le monde antique: actes du colloque international, Lausanne, 20–22 mars 2003. Bern: 265–278.Google Scholar
Courrént, M. (2011a) De architecti scientia: idée de nature et theorie de l’art dans le De architecture de Vitruve. Caen.Google Scholar
Courrént, M. (2011b) “Tenuitas cum bona fama: éthique et architecture dans le De architectura de Vitruve,” Cahiers des Études Anciennes 48: 219–236.Google Scholar
Courrént, M. (2016) “Vitruve et les Naturales Quaestiones: La Théorie de la Matière dans le de Architectura,” in Cuomo, S. and Formisano, M. (eds.), Vitruvius: Text, Architecture, Reception. Arethusa 49.2: 251–262.Google Scholar
Cowan, R. W. (2006) “The Land of King Mane: A Pun at Horace, Odes 1.22.15,” Classical Quarterly 56.1: 322–324.Google Scholar
Craig, C. P. (1986) “Cato’s Stoicism and the Understanding of Cicero’s Speech for Murena,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 116: 229–239.Google Scholar
Craig, C. P. (2004) “Audience Expectations, Invective, and Proof,” in Powell, J. and Patterson, J. (eds.), Cicero the Advocate. Oxford: 197–213.Google Scholar
Craig, C. P. (2007) “Self-restraint, Invective, and Credibility in Cicero’s First Catilinarian Oration,” American Journal of Philology 128: 335–339.Google Scholar
Cucchiarelli, A. (2001) La satire e il poeta: Orazio tra Epodi e Satire. Biblioteca di Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 17. Pisa.Google Scholar
Cuomo, S. (2011) “Skills and Virtues in Vitruvius’ Book 10,” in Formisano, M. and Böhme, H. (eds.), War in Words: Transformations of War from Antiquity to Clausewitz. Transformationen der Antike, Bd 19. Berlin: 309–332.Google Scholar
Cuomo, S. (2016) “Tacit Knowledge in Vitruvius,” in Cuomo, S. and Formisano, M. (eds.), Vitruvius: Text, Architecture, Reception. Arethusa 49.2: 125–143.Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G. (2009) “On the ‘Artemidorus’ Papyrus,” Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 171: 27–43.Google Scholar
D’Arms, J. (1970) Romans on the Bay of Naples: A Social and Cultural Study of the Villas and Their Owners from 150 B.C. to A.D. 400. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
D’Evelyn, M. M. (2012) Venice and Vitruvius: Reading Venice with Daniele Barbaro and Andrea Palladio. New Haven.Google Scholar
David, J.-M. (2007) “Ce que les Verrines nous apprennent sur les scribes de magistrats à la fin de la République,” in Dubouloz, J. and Pittia, S. (eds.), La Sicile de Cicéron: Lectures des Verrines. Besançon: 35–56.Google Scholar
Davidovits, F. (2007) ‘The Making of Ptolemaic Egyptian Blue Pigment in Latin Texts’, in Goyon, J.-C. and Cardin, C. (eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Egyptologists, Volume 2. Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta 150. Leuven: 367–371.Google Scholar
Davidson, J. (1997) Courtesans and Fishcakes: The Consuming Passions of Classical Athens. London.Google Scholar
De Angelis, F. (2015) “Greek and Roman Specialized Writing on Art and Architecture,” in Marconi, C. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Art and Architecture. Oxford: 41–69.Google Scholar
De Stefani, C. (2000) “Fenice di Colofone fr. 2 Diehl3: Introduzione, Testo Critico, Commento,” Studi Classici e Orientali 47.2: 81–121.Google Scholar
Deniaux, E. (1987) “De l’ambitio à l’ambitus: la lieux de la propagande et de la corruption électorale à la fin de la Républic,” in L’urbs: espace urbain et histoire (1er siècle av. J.-C. –IIIe siècle ap. J.-C.) Actes du colloque international organisé par le Centre national de la recherche scientifique et l’École française de Rome (Rome, 8–12 mai 1985), Collection de l’École française de Rome 98: 279–304.Google Scholar
Deniaux, E. (2011) “Patronage,” in Rosenstein, N. and Morstein-Marx, R., (eds.) A Companion to the Roman Republic. Malden and Oxford: 401–420.Google Scholar
Dettmer, H. (1997) Love by the Numbers: Form and Meaning in the Poetry of Catullus. New York.Google Scholar
Dickmann, J.-A. (1997) “The Peristyle and the Transformation of Domestic Space in Hellenistic Pompeii,” in Laurence, R. and Wallace-Hadrill, A. (eds.), Domestic Space in the Roman World: Pompeii and Beyond. Portsmouth, R.I.: 121–136.Google Scholar
Diederich, S. (2007) Römische Agrarhandbücher zwischen Fachwissenschaft, Literatur und Ideologie. Berlin.Google Scholar
Dionisotti, A. C. (1988) “Nepos and the Generals,” Journal of Roman Studies 78: 35–49.Google Scholar
Dobson, B. (1966) “The Praefectus Fabrum in the Early Principate,” in Garrett, M. G. and Dobson, B. (eds.), Britain and Rome: Essays Presented to Eric Birley on His Sixtieth Birthday. Kendal: 61–84.Google Scholar
Dubois-Pelerin, É. (2008) Le luxe privé à Rome et en Italie au Ier siècle après J.-C. Naples.Google Scholar
Dugan, J. (2005) Making a New Man: Ciceronian Self–fashioning in the Rhetorical Works. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dwyer, E. (1991) “The Pompeian Atrium House in Theory and Practice,” in Gazda, E. K. (ed.), Roman Art in the Private Sphere: New Perspectives on the Architecture and Decor of the Domus, Villa and Insula. Ann Arbor: 25–48.Google Scholar
Dyson, M. (1980) “Avarice and Discontent in Horace’s First Satire,” Classical Quarterly 30.1: 133–139.Google Scholar
Eastaugh, N., Walsh, V., Chaplin, T., and Siddall, R. (2004) Pigment Compendium: A Dictionary of Historical Pigments. Oxford.Google Scholar
Edmunds, L. (1994) “Review of N. Rudd (ed.) (1993) Horace 2000: A Celebration,” Bryn Mawr Classical Review 94.2.20.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. (1997) “Unspeakable Professions: Public Performance and Prostitution in Ancient Rome,” in Hallett, J. P. and Skinner, M. B. (eds.), Roman Sexualities. Princeton: 66–95.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. (2003) “Incorporating the Alien: The Art of Conquest,” in Edwards, C. and Woolf, G. (eds.), Rome the Cosmopolis. Cambridge, UK: 44–70.Google Scholar
Effe, B. (1977) Dichtung und Lehre: Untersuchungen zur Typologie des antiken Lehrgedichts. Zetemata 69. Munich.Google Scholar
Ehrhardt, W. (1987) Stilgeschichtliche Untersuchungen an römischen Wandmalereien: Von der späten Republik bis zur Zeit Neros. Mainz am Rhein.Google Scholar
Elmore, J. (1917a) “The H Symbol in Cicero Att. xiii. 33.2,” Classical Philology 12.3: 305–306.Google Scholar
Elmore, J. (1917b) “Professor Reid on Cicero: Att. xiii. 33.1 and Fam. xvi. 23.1,” Classical Philology 12.4: 431–434.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. (1994) “Constructing Decadence: The Representation of Nero as Imperial Builder,” in Elsner, J. and Masters, J. (eds.), Reflections of Nero: Culture, History and Representation. London: 112–127.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. (1995) Art and the Roman Viewer: The Transformation of Art from the Pagan World to Christianity. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. and Meyer, M. (eds.) (2014) Art and Rhetoric in Roman Culture. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Engemann, J. (1967) Architekturdarstellungen des frühen zweiten Stils: Illusionistische römische Wandmalerei der ersten Phase und ihre Vorbilder in der realen Architektur. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Fane-Saunders, P. (2016) “Pliny the Elder: An Early Reader of Vitruvius,” in Sanvito, P. (ed.), Vitruvianism: Origin and Transformations. Berlin: 65–81.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. (1998) Literature and Religion at Rome: Cultures, Contexts, and Beliefs. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. (2002) “Una cum scriptore meo. Poetry, Principate and the Traditions of Literary History in the Epistle to Augustus,” in Woodman, T. and Feeney, D. (eds.), Traditions and Contexts in the Poetry of Horace. Cambridge, UK: 172–187.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. (2016) Beyond Greek: The Beginnings of Latin Literature. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Feller, R. L. (1967) “Studies on the Darkening of Vermilion by Light,” National Gallery of Art, Report and Studies in the History of Art 1: 99–111.Google Scholar
Ferriss-Hill, J. (2011) “A Stroll with Lucilius: Horace, Satires 1.9 Reconsidered,” American Journal of Philology 132.3: 429–455.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. (1995) Catullan Provocations: Lyric Poetry and the Drama of Position. London.Google Scholar
Fleury, P. (2011) ‘Vitruve et le métier d’ingénieur,’ Cahier des études anciennes 48: 7–34.Google Scholar
Fögen, T. (2009) Wissen, Kommunikation und Selbstdarstellung: Zur Struktur und Charakteristik römischer Fachtexte der frühen Kaiserzeit. Zetemata 134. Munich.Google Scholar
Fögen, T. (2013) “Scholarship and Competitiveness: Pliny the Elder’s Attitude towards His Predecessors in the Naturalis Historia,” in Asper, M. and Kanthak, A.-M. (eds.), Writing Science: Medical and Mathematical Authorship in Ancient Greece. Berlin: 83–107.Google Scholar
Fontaine, M. (2014) “A Note on Philolaches’ Simile of the House in Plautus’ Mostellaria,” in Perysinakis, I. and Karakasis, E. (eds.) Plautine Trends: Studies in Plautine Comedy and Its Reception. Berlin: 143–148.Google Scholar
Formisano, M. (2016) “Reading Dismemberment: Vitruvius, Dinocrates, and the Macrotext,” in Cuomo, S. and Formisano, M. (eds.), Vitruvius: Text, Architecture, Reception. Arethusa 49.2: 145–159.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, E. (2007) Plautine Elements in Plautus (Plautinisches im Plautus), with tr. Drevikovsky, T. and Muecke, F.. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fraser, P. M. (1970) “Aristophanes of Byzantion and Zoilus Homeromastix in Vitruvius,” Eranos 68: 115–122.Google Scholar
Frazel, T. D. (2005) “‘Furtum’ and the Description of Stolen Objects in Cicero in Verrem 2.4,” American Journal of Philology 126.3: 363–376.Google Scholar
Freccero, A. (2002) Encausto and Ganosis: Beeswax as Paint and Coating During the Roman Era and its Applicability in Modern Art, Craft, and Conservation. Göteborg Studies in Conservation 9. Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Frederiksen, M. W. (1966) “Cicero, Caesar and the Problem of Debt,” Journal of Roman Studies 56.1–2: 128–141.Google Scholar
Frei-Stolba, R. (2005) “‘Praefectus fabrum a consule’: zu einer neuen Inschriff aus Philippi,” in Spickermann, W. et al. (eds.), Rom, Germanien und das Reich: Festschrift zu Ehren von Rainer Wiegels anlässlich seines 65. Geburtstages. St. Katharinen: 300–317.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. (2001) Satires of Rome: Threatening Poses from Lucilius to Juvenal. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Frischer, B. (1991) Shifting Paradigms: New Approaches to Horace’s Ars Poetica. Atlanta.Google Scholar
Gaggiotti, M. (1988) Pavimenta poenica marmore Numidico constrata. Africa Romana 5: 215–221.Google Scholar
Gamberini, M. C., Baraldi, C., Palazzoli, F., Ribechini, E., and Baraldi, P. (2008) “MicroRaman and Infrared Spectroscopic Characterization of Ancient Cosmetics,” Vibrational Spectroscopy 47: 82–90.Google Scholar
Garnsey, P. and Woolf, G. (1989) “Patronage of the Rural Poor in the Roman World,” in Wallace-Hadrill, A. (ed.), Patronage in Ancient Society. London: 153–170.Google Scholar
Gazda, E. K. (1995) “Roman Sculpture and the Ethos of Emulation: Reconsidering Repetition,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 97: 121–156.Google Scholar
Gazda, E. K. (2002) “Introduction: Beyond Copying: Artistic Originality and Tradition,” in Gazda, E. K. (ed.), The Ancient Art of Emulation. Rome: 1–24.Google Scholar
Geertman, H. (1994) “Teoria e attualità della progettistica architectonica di Vitruvio,” in Gros, P. (ed.), Le projet de Vitruve: Objet, destinataires et réception du De architectura. Collection de l’École française de Rome 192. Rome: 7–30.Google Scholar
Gettens, R. J., Feller, R. L. and Chase, W. T. (1972) “Vermilion and Cinnabar,” Studies in Conservation 17.2: 45–69.Google Scholar
Gleason, M. (1995) Making Men: Sophists and Self-Presentation in Ancient Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. (2011) “Roman Comedy Gets Back to Basics,” Journal of Roman Studies 101: 206–221.Google Scholar
Goldman, R. (2013) Color-Terms in Social and Cultural Context in Ancient Rome. Piscataway.Google Scholar
Gowers, E. (1993) The Loaded Table: Representations of Food in Roman Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gowers, E. (2003) “Fragments of Autobiography in Horace Satires 1,” Classical Antiquity 22.1: 55–91.Google Scholar
Gowers, E. (2009) “A cat may look at a king: Difference and indifference in Horace, Satire 6,” in Urso, G. (ed.), Ordine e sovversione nel mondo greco e romano: Atti del convegno internazionale, Cividale del Friuli, 25–27 settembre 2008. Pisa: 301–316.Google Scholar
Grahame, M. (1997) “Public and Private in the Roman House: The Spatial Order of the Casa del Fauno,” in Domestic Space in the Roman World: Pompeii and Beyond. Journal of Roman Archaeology S.S. 22: 137–164.Google Scholar
Gratwick, A. S. (2002) “A Matter of Substance: Cato’s Preface to the De Agri Cultura,” Mnemosyne 55.1: 41–72.Google Scholar
Green, C. M. C. (1997) “Free as a Bird: Varro De Re Rustica 3,” American Journal of Philology 118: 427–448.Google Scholar
Green, C. M. C. (2012) “The Shepherd of the People: Varro on Herding for the Villa Publica in De re rustica 2,” in Becker, J. A. and Terrenato, N. (eds.), Roman Republican Villas: Architecture, Context, and Ideology. Papers and Monographs of the American Academy in Rome 32. Ann Arbor: 32–44.Google Scholar
Green, S. J. (2014) Disclosure and Discretion in Roman Astrology: Manilius and his Augustan Contemporaries. Oxford.Google Scholar
Greenidge, A. J. H. (1894) Infamia: Its Place in Roman Public and Private Law. Oxford.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. (2007) “Gods and Religion,” in Harrison, S. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Horace. Cambridge, UK: 181–194.Google Scholar
Grimal, P. (1953) Le siècle des Scipions: Rome et l’hellénisme au temps des guerres puniques. Paris.Google Scholar
Grimal, P. (1968) Hellenism and the Rise of Rome, tr. Sheridan, A. M. and Wartenburg, C.. London.Google Scholar
Grimal, P. (1976) “La maison de Simon et celle de Théopropridès dans la Mostellaria,” in L’Italie préromaine et la Rome républicaine: Mélanges offerts à Jacques Heurgon. Collection de l’École française de Rome 27. Paris: 371–386.Google Scholar
Gros, P. (1976) “Les premières générations d’architectes hellénistiques à Rome,” in L’Italie préromaine et la Rome républicaine: Mélanges offerts à Jacques Heurgon. Collection de l’École française de Rome 27. Paris: 387–410.Google Scholar
Gros, P. (1978a) Architecture et société à Rome et en Italie centro-méridionale aux deux derniers siècles de la République. Brussels.Google Scholar
Gros, P. (1978b) “Le dossier vitruvien d’Hermogénès,” Mélanges de l’École française de Rome - Antiquité 90: 687–703.Google Scholar
Gros, P. (1979) “La rhétorique des ordres dans l’architecture classique,” in Chevallier, R. (ed.), Colloque sur la rhétorique. Calliope 1. Paris: 333–347.Google Scholar
Gros, P. (1983) “Statut social et rôle culturel des architectes (periode héllenistique et augustéenne),” in Architecture et Société, Collection de l’École française de Rome 66: 425–452.Google Scholar
Gros, P. (1988) “Notes sur les illustrations du De architectura,” in Guillaume, J. (ed.), Les traités d’architecture à la Renaissance. Paris: 57–59.Google Scholar
Gros, P. (1989) “L’auctoritas chez Vitruve: contribution à l’étude de la sémantique des ordres dans le De architectura,” in Geertman, H. and de Jong, J. J. (eds.), Munus non Ingratum: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Vitruvius’ De Architectura and the Hellenistic and Republican Architecture. Leiden: 126–133.Google Scholar
Gros, P. (1994) “Munus non ingratum: le traité vitruvien et la notion de service,” in Gros, P. (ed.), Le projet de Vitruve: Objet, destinataires et réception du De architectura. Collection de l’École française de Rome 192. Rome: 75–90.Google Scholar
Gros, P. (1996) “Les illustrations du De architectura de Vitruve: histoire d’un malentendu,” in Nicolet, C. (ed.), Les littératures techniques dans l’Antiquité romaine. Entretiens sur l’Antiquité classique 42. Geneva: 19–44.Google Scholar
Gros, P. (1997) “Vitruvio e il suo tempo,” in Gros, P. (ed.), Vitruvio, De Architectura (2 vols.), with tr. and comm. Romano, E. and Corso, A.. Turin: ix–lxxvii.Google Scholar
Gros, P. (2016) “Conclusions,” in Cuomo, S. and Formisano, M. (eds.), Vitruvius: Text, Architecture, Reception. Arethusa 49.2: 353–369.Google Scholar
Gros, P. (ed.), with Corso, A. and Romano, E. (tr. and comm.) (1997) Vitruvio, De Architectura (2 vols.). Turin.Google Scholar
Gunderson, E. (2000) Staging Masculinity: The Rhetoric of Performance in the Roman World. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. (1998) The Politics of Latin Literature: Writing, Identity, and Empire in Ancient Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. (2016) “Art and Oikeiosis in Book 2 of Vitruvius De architectura,” in Cuomo, S. and Formisano, M. (eds.), Vitruvius: Text, Architecture, Reception. Arethusa 49.2: 299–316.Google Scholar
Hallett, C. H. (2001) “Response to R. Tybout ‘Roman Wall-Painting and Social Significance,’” Journal of Roman Archaeology 14: 414–416.Google Scholar
Hannah, P. (2004) “The Cosmetic Use of Red Ochre (Miltos),” in Cleland, L. and Stears, K., with Davies, G. (eds.), Colour in the Ancient Mediterranean World. British Archaeological Reports International Series 1267. Oxford: 100–105.Google Scholar
Hansen, M. F. (2003) The Eloquence of Appropriation: Prolegomena to an Understanding of Spolia in Early Christian Rome. Rome.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (1993) “Ut pictura poesis? Horace and the Visual Arts,” in Rudd, N. (ed.), Horace 2000: A Celebration. Essays for the Bimillennium. London: 120–139.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. (1992) “Fuscus the Stoic: Horace, Odes 1.22 and Epistles 1.10,” Classical Quarterly 42: 543–547.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. (2007) “Horatian Self-Representations,” in Harrison, S. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Horace. Cambridge, UK: 22–35.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. (2013) “Author and Speaker(s) in Horace’s Satires 2,” in Marmodoro, A. and Hill, J., (eds.), The Author’s Voice in Classical and Late Antiquity. Oxford: 153–171.Google Scholar
Harvey, P. (1979) “Catullus 114–115: Mentula, Bonus Agricola,” Historia 28.3: 329–345.Google Scholar
Haselberger, L. (1989) “Die Zeichnungen in Vitruvs De architectura. Zur Illustration antiker Schriften über das Konstruktionswesen,” in Geertman, H. and de Jong, J. J. (eds.), Munus non Ingratum: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Vitruvius’ De Architectura and the Hellenistic and Republican Architecture. Leiden: 69–71.Google Scholar
Haselberger, L. (1999) “Old Issues, New Research, Latest Discoveries: Curvature and Other Classical Refinements,” in Haselberger, L. (ed.), Appearance and Essence: Refinements of Classical Architecture. Philadelphia: 1–68.Google Scholar
Hedreen, G. (2016) The Image of the Artist in Archaic and Classical Greece. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Hellmann, M.-Chr. (1999) Choix d’inscriptions architecturales grecques, with tr. and comm. Lyon.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. (2004) Morals and Villas in Seneca’s Letters: Places to Dwell. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Hénin, E. (2011) “Parrhasius and the Stage Curtain: Theatre, Metapainting and the Idea of Representation in the Seventeenth Century,” in van Eck, C. and Bussels, S. (eds.), Theatricality in Early Modern Art and Architecture. Hoboken: 49–61.Google Scholar
Hine, H. M. (2009) “Subjectivity and Objectivity in Latin Scientific and Technical Literature,” in Taub, L. and Doody, A. (eds.), Authorial Voices in Greco-Roman Technical Writing. Trier: 13–30.Google Scholar
Hölscher, T. (2004) The Language of Images in Roman Art, tr. Snodgrass, A. and Künzl-Snodgrass, A.-M.. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Hook, B. (2000) “Nothing Within Which Passeth Show: Character and ‘Color’ in Senecan Tragedy,” in Harrison, G. (ed.), Seneca in Performance. London: 53–72.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. (1982) “Cornelius Nepos,” in Kenney, E. J. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Classical Literature (vol. 2). Cambridge, UK: 290–292.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. (1989) Cornelius Nepos: A Selection, Including the Lives of Cato and Atticus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. (1998) “The First Person Singular in Horace’s Carmina,” in Knox, P. E. and Foss, C. (eds.), Style and Tradition: Studies in Honor of Wendell Clausen. Stuttgart and Leipzig: 40–54.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (2013) Greek to Latin: Frameworks and Contexts for Intertextuality. Oxford.Google Scholar
Huxley, G. L. (1967) “The Medism of Caryae,” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 8: 29–32.Google Scholar
Isager, J. (1991) Pliny on Art and Society: The Elder Pliny’s Chapters on the History of Art. New York.Google Scholar
Janson, T. (1964) Latin Prose Prefaces: Studies in Literary Conventions. Studia Latina Stockholmiensia 13. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Jones, D. (2006) The Bankers of Puteoli: Finance, Trade and Industry in the Roman World. Stroud.Google Scholar
de Jonge, C. C. (2008) Between Grammar and Rhetoric: Dionysius of Halicarnassus on Language, Linguistics, and Literature. Leiden.Google Scholar
Jonkers, E. J. (1963) Social and Economic Commentary on Cicero’s De Lege Agraria Orationes Tres. Leiden.Google Scholar
Joshel, S. R. (1992) Work, Identity and Legal Status at Rome: A Study of the Occupational Inscriptions. London.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. A. (ed.) (1995) C. Suetonius Tranquillus: De Grammaticis et Rhetoribus, with tr. and comm. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. A. (1997) “The Shame of the Romans,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 127: 1–19.Google Scholar
Katz, J. T. (2000) “Egnatius’ Dental Fricatives (Catullus 39.20),” Classical Philology 95.3: 338–348.Google Scholar
Keane, C. (2002) “Satiric Memories: Autobiography and the Construction of Genre,” Classical Journal 97.3: 215–231.Google Scholar
Keune, K. and Boon, J. J. (2005) “Analytical Imaging Studies Clarifying the Process of the Darkening of Vermilion in Paintings,” Analytical Chemistry 77: 4742–4750.Google Scholar
Kindstrand, J. (1976) Bion of Borysthenes: A Collection of the Fragments with Introduction and Commentary. Uppsala.Google Scholar
Knapp, C. (1917) “References to Painting in Plautus and Terence,” Classical Philology 12.2: 143–157.Google Scholar
König, A. (2007) “Knowledge and Power in Frontinus’ On Aqueducts,” in König, J. and Whitmarsh, T. (eds.), Ordering Knowledge in the Roman World. Cambridge, UK: 177–205.Google Scholar
König, A. (2009) “From Architect to Imperator: Vitruvius and His Addressee in the De Architectura,” in Taub, L. C. and Doody, A. (eds.), Authorial Voices in Greco-Roman Technical Writing. Trier: 31–52.Google Scholar
König, A. (2016) “Tracing the Ebb and Flow of de Architectura 8,” in Cuomo, S. and Formisano, M. (eds.), Vitruvius: Text, Architecture, Reception. Arethusa 49.2: 161–181.Google Scholar
König, J. (2009) “Conventions of Prefatory Self-Presentation in Galen’s On the Order of My Books,” in Gill, C., Whitmarsh, T., and Wilkins, J. (eds.), Galen and the World of Knowledge. Cambridge, UK: 35–58.Google Scholar
König, J. (2011) “Self-Promotion and Self-Effacement in Plutarch’s Table Talk,” in Klotz, F. and Oikonomopoulou, A. (eds.), The Philosopher’s Banquet: Plutarch’s Table Talk in the Intellectual Culture of the Roman Empire. Oxford: 179–203.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (2000) “Self, Sex, and Empire in Catullus: The Construction of a Decentered Identity,” in Botas, V. B. et al. (eds.), La Intertextualidad griega y latina. Madrid: 213–231.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (2007) “The Contemporary Political Context,” in Skinner, M. (ed.), A Companion to Catullus. Malden, MA and Oxford: 72–91.Google Scholar
Koster, S. (1980) Die Invektive in der griechischen und römischen Literatur. Meisenheim an Glan.Google Scholar
Kragelund, P. (2000) “Nero’s Luxuria, in Tacitus and in the Octavia,” Classical Quarterly N.S. 50.2: 494–515.Google Scholar
Kreeb, M. (1985) “Das delische Wohnhaus. Einzelprobleme,” Archäologischer Anzeiger: 95–111.Google Scholar
Krostenko, B. A. (2001a) “Arbitraria Vrbanitas: Language, Style and Characterization in Catullus cc. 39 and 37,” Classical Antiquity 20.2: 239–272.Google Scholar
Krostenko, B. A. (2001b) Cicero, Catullus, and the Language of Social Performance. Chicago.Google Scholar
Kuttner, A. (1993) “Vitruvius and the Second Style,” Journal of Roman Archaeology 6: 341–347.Google Scholar
Kuttner, A. (1995a) Dynasty and Empire in the Age of Augustus: The Case of the Boscoreale Cups. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Kuttner, A. (1995b) “Republican Rome Looks at Pergamon,” Harvard Studies in the Classical Philology 97: 157–178.Google Scholar
La Penna, A. (1989) “La legittimazione del lusso privato da Ennio a Vitruvio: Momenti, Problemi, Personaggi,” Maia 41: 3–34.Google Scholar
Lafon, X. (ed.) (1981) L’art decoratif à Rome à la fin de la République et au début du Principat Rome. Rome.Google Scholar
Lafon, X. (1989) “Vitruve et les villas ‘de son temps,’” in Geertman, H. and de Jong, J. J. (eds.), Munus non Ingratum: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Vitruvius’ De Architectura and the Hellenistic and Republican Architecture. Leiden: 188–193.Google Scholar
Laird, A. (1993) “Sounding out Ecphrasis: Art and Text in Catullus 64,” Journal of Roman Studies 83: 18–30.Google Scholar
Laird, A. (1996) “Ut figura poesis: Writing Art and the Art of Writing in Augustan Poetry,” in Elsner, J. (ed.), Art and Text in Roman Culture. Cambridge, UK: 75–102.Google Scholar
Lapatin, K. D. S. (2001) Chryselephantine Statuary in the Ancient Mediterranean World. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lapatin, K. D. S. (2008) “Luxus,” in Mattusch, C. C. (ed.), Pompeii and the Roman Villa: Art and Culture Around the Bay of Naples. Washington, DC: 31–51.Google Scholar
Lauter, H. (1975) “Zur Siedlungsstruktur Pompejis in samnitischer Zeit,” in Andreae, B. and Kyrieleis, H. (eds.), Neue Forschungen in Pompeji. Recklinghausen: 147–154.Google Scholar
Leach, E. W. (1969) “De Exemplo Meo Ipse Aedificato: An Organizing Idea in the Mostellaria,” Hermes 97: 318–332.Google Scholar
Leach, E. W. (1971) “Horace’s Pater Optimus and Terence’s Demea: Autobiographical Fiction and Comedy in Serm. 1.4,” American Journal of Philology 92: 616–632.Google Scholar
Leach, E. W. (1988) The Rhetoric of Space: Literary and Artistic Representations of Landscape in Republican and Augustan Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar
Leach, E. W. (1997) “Oecus on Ibycus: Investigating the Vocabulary of the Roman House,” in Bon, S. and Jones, R. (eds.), Sequence and Space in Pompeii. Oxford: 50–72.Google Scholar
Leach, E. W. (2004) The Social Life of Painting in Ancient Rome and on the Bay of Naples. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Leen, A. (1991) “Cicero and the Rhetoric of Art,” American Journal of Philology 112.2: 229–245.Google Scholar
Lepik-Kopaczynska, W. (1958) “Colores floridi und austeri in der antiken Malerei,” Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 73: 79–99.Google Scholar
Lewis, R. G. (2006) Asconius: Commentaries on Speeches by Cicero, with tr. and comm. Oxford.Google Scholar
Liou, B. and Zuinghedau, M. (eds.) with Cam, M.-Th. (comm.) (2003) Vitruve, De l’architecture, Livre 7. with tr. Paris.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1987) The Revolutions of Wisdom: Studies in the Claims and Practice of Ancient Greek Science. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Long, P. O. (1991) “Invention, Authorship, ‘Intellectual Property,’ and the Origin of Patents: Notes Toward a Conceptual History,” Technology and Culture 32.4: 846–884.Google Scholar
Long, P. O. (2001) Openness, Secrecy, Authorship: Technical Arts and the Culture of Knowledge from Antiquity to the Renaissance. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. (2002) “Horace, Cicero, and Augustus, or the Poet Statesman at Epistles 2.1.265,” in Feeney, D. and Woodman, T. (eds.), Traditions and Contexts in Horace. Cambridge, UK: 158–171; 237–243.Google Scholar
Luce, T. J. (1995) “Livy and Dionysius,” Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar 8: 225–239.Google Scholar
Mangani, G. (1983) “La macchina dei climi: enciclopedismo, geografia, economia scritturale,” Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica N.S. 14.2: 131–152.Google Scholar
Mariotti, I. (1992) “La prima scena della Mostellaria di Plauto,” Museum Helveticum 49.2: 105–123.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. (1993) “Introduction,” in Martindale, C. and Hopkins, D. (eds.), Horace Made New: Horatian Influences on British Writing from the Renaissance to the Twentieth Century. Cambridge, UK: 1–26.Google Scholar
Marvin, M. (1983) “Freestanding Sculptures from the Baths of Caracalla,” American Journal of Archaeology 87: 347–384.Google Scholar
Marvin, M. (1989) “Copying in Roman Sculpture: The Replica Series,” Retaining the Original: Multiple Originals, Copies, and Reproductions. Studies in the History of Art 20: 29–45.Google Scholar
Marvin, M. (2008) The Language of the Muses: The Dialogue Between Roman and Greek Sculpture. Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Masterson, M. (2004) “Status, Pay, and Pleasure in the De Architectura of Vitruvius,” American Journal of Philology 125.3: 387–416.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. G. (2005) “The Impracticability of Latin ‘Kunstprosa,’” in Reinhardt, T., Lapidge, M., and Adams, J. N. (eds.), Aspects of the Language of Latin Prose. Oxford: 195–210.Google Scholar
McCombie, D. (2002) “Philostratus, Histoi, Imagines, 2.28: Ekphrasis and the Web of Illusion,” in Elsner, J. (ed.), The Verbal and the Visual: Cultures of Ekphrasis in Antiquity. Ramus 31: 146–157.Google Scholar
McCormack, J. K. (2000) “The darkening of cinnabar in sunlight,” Mineralium Deposita 35: 796–798.Google Scholar
McDermott, W. C. (1941) “Varro Murena,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 72: 255–265.Google Scholar
McDermott, W. C. (1983) “Mamurra, eques Formianus,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 126: 292–307.Google Scholar
McEwen, I. K. (2011) “Virtù-vious: Roman Architecture, Renaissance Virtue,” Cahier des études anciennes 48: 255–283.Google Scholar
McIntosh, G. (2003) Re-Thinking the Roman Domus: How Architects and Orators Construct Self, Space and Language. Diss. The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
McKay, A. G. (1978) Vitruvius, Architect and Engineer: Buildings and Building Techniques in Augustan Rome. Basingstoke.Google Scholar
Meißner, B. (1999) Die technologische Fachliteratur der Antike: Struktur, Überlieferung und Wirkung technischen Wissens in der Antike (ca. 400 v. Chr. –ca. 500 n. Chr.). Berlin.Google Scholar
Meyer, R. (2010) “The Conservation of the Frescoes from Boscoreale in the Metropolitan Museum,” in Bergmann, B., De Caro, S., Mertens, J. R., and Meyer, R. (eds.), Roman Frescoes From Boscoreale: The Villa of Publius Fannius Synistor in Reality and Virtual Reality. The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin 67.4: 33–46.Google Scholar
Miles, M. (2008) Art as Plunder: The Ancient Origins of Debate About Cultural Property. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Millar, F. (1988) “Cornelius Nepos, ‘Atticus’ and the Roman Revolution,” Greece & Rome 35.1: 40–55.Google Scholar
Milnor, K. L. (2002) “Playing House: Stage, Space and Domesticity in Plautus’s Mostellaria,” Helios 29.1: 3–25.Google Scholar
Milnor, K. L. (2005) Gender, Domesticity and the Age of Augustus: Inventing Private Life. Oxford.Google Scholar
Moatti, C. (1997) La Raison de Rome: Naissance de l’esprit critique à la fin de la République. Paris.Google Scholar
Moles, J. (2007) “Philosophy and Ethics,” in Harrison, S. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Horace. Cambridge, UK: 165–180.Google Scholar
Molisani, G. (1971) “Lucius Cornelius Quinti Catuli architectus,” Rendiconti Accademia dei Lincei 26: 41–49.Google Scholar
Mommsen, T. (1848) “De Apparitoribus Magistratum Romanorum,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 6: 1–57.Google Scholar
Morales, H. (1996) “The Torturer’s Apprentice: Parrhasius and the Limits of Art,” in Elsner, J. (ed.), Art and Text in Roman Culture. Cambridge, UK: 182–209.Google Scholar
Morgan, M. H. (1906) “On the Language of Vitruvius,” Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 41.23: 467–502.Google Scholar
Most, G. (2011) “Principate and System,” in Schmitz, T. A. and Wiater, N. (eds.), The Struggle for Identity: Greeks and Their Past in the First Century BCE. Stuttgart: 163–179.Google Scholar
Muenzer, F. (1928) “Mamurra,” Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft 14.1: cols. 966–967.Google Scholar
Murphy, T. (1998) “Cicero’s First Readers: Epistolary Evidence for the Dissemination of His Works,” Classical Quarterly N.S. 48.2: 130–145.Google Scholar
Murphy, T. (2004) Pliny the Elder’s Natural History: The Empire in the Encyclopedia. Oxford.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. S. (2003) “Appropriation,” in Nelson, R. S. and Shiff, R. (eds.), Critical Terms for Art History, Second Edition. Chicago: 160–173.Google Scholar
Netz, R. (2009) Ludic Proof: Greek Mathematics and the Alexandrian Aesthetic. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Netz, R. (2015) “Were There Epicurean Mathematicians?” in Inwood, B. (ed.), Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 49. Oxford: 283–320.Google Scholar
Newlands, C. (2013) “Architectural Ecphrasis in Roman Poetry,” in Papanghelis, T. D., Harrison, S. J., and Frangoulidis, S. (eds.), Generic Interfaces in Latin Literature: Encounters, Interactions, and Transformation. Berlin: 55–78.Google Scholar
Nichols, M. F. (2009a) “Social Status and the Authorial Personae of Horace and Vitruvius,” in Houghton, L. and Wyke, M. (eds.), Perceptions of Horace: A Roman Poet and His Readers. Cambridge, UK: 109–122.Google Scholar
Nichols, M. (2009b) Vitruvius and the Rhetoric of Display: Wall Painting, Domestic Architecture, and Roman Self-Fashioning. Diss. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nichols, M. (2010) “Contemporary Perspectives on Luxury Building in Second-Century BC Rome,” Papers of the British School at Rome 78: 39–61.Google Scholar
Nichols, M. (2013) “Persius,” in Buckley, E. and Dinter, M. T. (eds.), A Companion to the Neronian Age. Malden, MA and Oxford: 258–274.Google Scholar
Nichols, M. (2016) “Vitruvius on Vermilion: Faberius’s Domestic Decor and the Invective Tradition,” in Cuomo, S. and Formisano, M. (eds.), Vitruvius: Text, Architecture, Reception. Arethusa 49.2: 317–333.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. (2007) “Horace: Life and Chronology,” in Harrison, S. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Horace. Cambridge, UK: 7–21.Google Scholar
Novara, A. (1994) “Faire oeuvre utile: La mesure de l’ambition chez Vitruve,” in Gros, P. (ed.), Le projet de Vitruve: Objet, destinataires et réception du De architectura, Collection de l’École française de Rome 192: 47–61.Google Scholar
Novara, A. (2005) Auctor in Bibliotheca: Essai sur les textes préfaciels de Vitruve et une philosophie latine du Livre. Paris.Google Scholar
Nutton, V. (2009) “Galen’s Authorial Voice: A Preliminary Enquiry,” in Taub, L. and Doody, A. (eds.), Authorial Voices in Greco-Roman Technical Writing. Trier: 53–62.Google Scholar
Nylander, E. N. (1992) Prefaces and Problems in Vitruvius’ De architectura. Diss. Fil. lic. University of Gotenburg.Google Scholar
O’Gorman, E. (2004) “Cato the Elder and the Destruction of Carthage,” Helios 31: 97–122.Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, T. M. (2007) “Walking with Odysseus: The Portico Frame of the Odyssey Landscapes,” American Journal of Philology 128.4: 497–532.Google Scholar
Ober, J. (1998) Political Dissent in Democratic Athens: Intellectual Critics of Popular Rule. Princeton.Google Scholar
Ober, J. (2000) “The Orators,” in Rowe, C., Schofield, M., and Harrison, S. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought. Cambridge, UK: 130–141.Google Scholar
Oksanish, J. (2011) Building the Principate: A Literary Study of Vitruvius’ de Architectura. Diss. Yale.Google Scholar
Oksanish, J. (2016) “Vitruvius and the Programmatics of Prose,” in Cuomo, S. and Formisano, M. (eds.), Vitruvius: Text, Architecture, Reception. Arethusa 49.2: 263–280.Google Scholar
Oksanish, J. (forthcoming a) “The Elusive Middle: Vitruvius’ Mediocracy of Virtue,” Yale Classical Studies.Google Scholar
Oksanish, J. (forthcoming b) Vitruvian Man.Google Scholar
Olson, K. (2009) “Cosmetics in Roman Antiquity: Substance, Remedy, Poison,” Classical World 102.3: 291–310.Google Scholar
Onians, J. (1988) Bearers of Meaning: The Classical Orders in Antiquity, the Middle Ages, and the Renaissance. Princeton.Google Scholar
Onians, J. (1990) “Quintilian and the Idea of Roman Art,” in Henig, M. (ed.), Architecture and Architectural Sculpture in the Roman Empire. Oxford University Committee for Archaeology Monograph 29: 1–9.Google Scholar
Opelt, I. (1965) Die lateinischen Schimpfwörter und verwandte sprachliche Erscheinungen: Eine Typologie. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Osgood, J. (2006) Caesar’s Legacy: Civil War and the Emergence of the Roman Empire. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Owens, W. M. (2001) “Plautus’ Satire of Roman Ideals in ‘Rudens,’ ‘Amphitruo,’ and ‘Mostellaria,’” in Tylawsky, E. and Weiss, C. G. (eds.), Essays in Honor of Gordon Williams: Twenty-Five Years at Yale. New Haven: 213–227.Google Scholar
Paananen, U. (1972) Sallust’s Politico-Social Terminology: Its Use and Biographical Significance. Helsinki.Google Scholar
Pagliara, P. N. (1986) “Vitruvio da testo a canone,” in Settis, S. (ed.), Memoria dell’antico nell’arte italiana 3. Turin: 3–85.Google Scholar
Pavlovskis, Z. (1973) Man in an Artificial Landscape: The Marvels of Civilization in Imperial Roman Literature. Leiden.Google Scholar
Payne, A. A. (1999) The Architectural Treatise in the Italian Renaissance. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Peirano, I. (2010) “Hellenized Romans and Barbarized Greeks. Reading the End of Dionysius of Halicarnassus, Antiquitates Romanae,” Journal of Roman Studies 100: 32–53.Google Scholar
Pellechia, L. (1992) “Architects Read Vitruvius: Renaissance Interpretations of the Atrium of the Ancient House,” Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 51: 377–416.Google Scholar
Perry, E. (2002) “Rhetoric, Literary Criticism, and the Roman Aesthetics of Artistic Imitation,” in Gazda, E. K. (ed.), The Ancient Art of Emulation. Rome: 153–172.Google Scholar
Perry, E. (2005) The Aesthetics of Emulation in the Visual Arts of Ancient Rome. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Pesando, F. (1997) ‘Domus’: Edilizia privata ed società pompeiana fra III e I secolo a.C. Ministero per i Beni Culturali ed Ambientali, Soprintendenza Archeologica di Pompei, Monografie 12. Rome.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. (1968) History of Classical Scholarship: From the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age. Oxford.Google Scholar
Platt, V. (2009) “Where the Wild Things Are: Locating the Marvellous in Augustan Wall-Painting,” in Hardie, P. (ed.), Paradox and the Marvellous in Augustan Literature and Culture. Oxford: 41–74.Google Scholar
Pollitt, J. J. (1974) The Ancient View of Greek Art: Criticism, History and Terminology. London.Google Scholar
Pollitt, J. J. (1978) “The Impact of Greek Art on Rome,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 108: 155–174.Google Scholar
Pollitt, J. J. (1997) “Review of Elsner, J. Art and the Roman Viewer: The Transformation of Art from the Pagan World to Christianity,” Journal of Hellenic Studies 117: 265–266.Google Scholar
Pollitt, J. J. (2001) The Art of Rome c. 753 B.C.–A.D. 337: Sources and Documents. London.Google Scholar
Pollitt, J. J. (2015) “Painting in Greek and Greco-Roman Art Criticism,” in Pollitt, J. J. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Painting in the Classical World. Cambridge, UK: 288–301.Google Scholar
Powell, J. U. (1925) Collectanea Alexandrina: Reliquiae minores poetarum graecorum aetatis ptolemaicae, 323–146 A.C. Oxford.Google Scholar
Preisshofen, F. and Zanker, P. (1970–1971) “Reflex einer eklektischen Kunstanschauung beim Auctor ad Herennium,” Dialoghi di Archeologia 4–5: 100–119.Google Scholar
Purcell, N. (1983) “The Apparitores: A Study in Social Mobility,” Papers of the British School at Rome 51: 125–173.Google Scholar
Purcell, N. (1987) “Town in Country and Country in Town,” in Ancient Roman Villa Gardens. Dumbarton Oaks Colloquium on the History of Landscape Architecture 10: 187–203.Google Scholar
Purcell, N. (1995) “The Roman Villa and the Landscape of Production,” in Cornell, T. J. and Lomas, K. (eds.), Urban Society in Roman Italy. New York: 151–179.Google Scholar
Purcell, N. (2001) “The ordo scribarum: A Study in the Loss of Memory,” Mélanges de l’École française de Rome - Antiquité 113.2: 633–674.Google Scholar
Raeder, J. (1988) “Vitruv, de Architectura VI 7 (aedificia Graecorum) und die hellenistische Wohnhaus- und Palastarchitektur,” Gymnasium 95: 316–368.Google Scholar
Ramsey, J. T. (1994) “The Senate, Mark Antony, and Caesar’s Legislative Legacy,” Classical Quarterly N.S. 44.1: 130–145.Google Scholar
Randolph, C. B. (1925) “Horace and the Scriptus Quaestoribus,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 56: 130–149.Google Scholar
Rawson, E. (1972) “Cicero the Historian and Cicero the Antiquarian,” Journal of Roman Studies 62: 33–45.Google Scholar
Reay, B. (2005) “Agriculture, Writing and Cato’s Aristocratic Self-fashioning,” Classical Antiquity 24.2: 331–361.Google Scholar
Reay, B. (2012) “Cato’s De agri cultura and the Spectacle of Expertise,” in Becker, J. A. and Terrenato, N. (eds.), Roman Republican Villas: Architecture, Context, and Ideology. Papers and Monographs of the American Academy in Rome 32. Ann Arbor: 61–68.Google Scholar
Reitz-Joosse, B. (2016) “The City and the Text in Vitruvius’s de Architectura,” in Cuomo, S. and Formisano, M. (eds.), Vitruvius: Text, Architecture, Reception. Arethusa 49.2: 183–197.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. (1992) The Garden of Priapus: Sexuality and Aggression in Roman Humor. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ridgway, B. S. (1999) Prayers in Stone: Greek Architectural Sculpture (600-100 BCE). Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Riggsby, A. (2016) “Vitruvius and the Limits of Proportion,” in Cuomo, S. and Formisano, M. (eds.), Vitruvius: Text, Architecture, Reception. Arethusa 49.2: 281–297.Google Scholar
Rimell, V. (2013) “The Best a Man Can Get: Grooming Scipio in Seneca Epistle 86,” Classical Philology 108: 1–20.Google Scholar
Rimell, V. (2015) The Closure of Space in Roman Poetics: Empire’s Inward Turn. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Roby, C. (2016) Technical Ekphrasis in Greek and Roman Science and Literature: The Written Machine Between Alexandria and Rome. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Roche, P. (2012) “Self-Representation and Performativity,” in Braund, S. and Osgood, J. (eds.), A Companion to Persius and Juvenal. Malden, MA and Oxford: 190–216.Google Scholar
Roller, M. (1997) “Color-blindness: Cicero’s Death, Declamation, and the Production of History,” Classical Philology 92: 109–130.Google Scholar
Romano, E. (1994) “Dal De officiis a Vitruvio, da Vitruvio a Orazio: il dibattito sul lusso edilizio,” in Gros, P. (ed.), Le projet de Vitruve. Objet, destinataires et réception du De architectura. Collection de l’École française de Rome 192. Rome: 63–73.Google Scholar
Romano, E. (1997) “Fra astratto e concreto. La lingua di Vitruvio,” in Gros, P. (ed.), Vitruvio, De Architectura (2 vols.), with tr. and comm. Corso, A. and Romano, E.. Turin: lxxix-xcv.Google Scholar
Romano, E. (2011) “Vitruvio fra Storia e Antiquaria,” Cahier des études anciennes 48: 201–217.Google Scholar
Romano, E. (2016) “Between Republic and Principate: Vitruvius and the Culture of Transition,” in Cuomo, S. and Formisano, M. (eds.), Vitruvius: Text, Architecture, Reception. Arethusa 49.2: 335–351.Google Scholar
Roscalla, F. (2006) “Storie di plagi e di plagiari,” in Roscalla, F. (ed.), L’autore e l’opera: attribuzioni, appropriazioni, apocrifi nella Grecia antica. Atti del convegno internazionale (Pavia, 27–28 maggio 2005). Memorie e atti di convegni 34. Pisa: 69–102.Google Scholar
Rouland, N. (1979) Pouvoir politique et dépendance personnelle dans l’Antiquité romaine: Genèse et rôle des rapports de clientèle. Collection Latomus 166. Brussels.Google Scholar
Rouveret, A. (1989) Histoire et imaginaire de la peinture ancienne (Ve siècle av. J.-C.– Ier siècle ap. J.-C.). Bibliothèque des Écoles françaises d’Athènes et de Rome 274. Rome.Google Scholar
Rowland, I. D. (2014b) “Vitruvius and His Influence,” in Ulrich, R. B. and Quenemoen, C. K. (eds.), A Companion to Roman Architecture. Malden, MA and Oxford: 412–425.Google Scholar
Rowland, I. D. and Howe, T. N. (eds. and tr.) (1999) Vitruvius: Ten Books on Architecture, with additional comm. Dewar, M. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Rudd, N. (1976) “Theory: Sincerity and Mask,” in Lines of Inquiry: Studies in Latin Poetry. Cambridge, UK: 145–181.Google Scholar
Rudd, N. (ed.) (1989) Horace: Epistles, Book II and Epistle to the Pisones (Ars Poetica), with comm. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Rudd, N. (1994) “Response to L. Edmunds (1994) ‘Review of N. Rudd (ed.) (1993) Horace 2000: A Celebration,’” Bryn Mawr Classical Review 94.06.03.Google Scholar
Rudd, N. (2007) “Review of S. Harrison (2007) The Cambridge Companion to Horace,” Bryn Mawr Classical Review 07.05.25.Google Scholar
Rutledge, S. (2012) Ancient Rome as a Museum: Power, Identity, and the Culture of Collecting. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Sailor, D. (2006) “Dirty Linen, Fabrication, and the Authorities of Livy and Augustus,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 136.2: 329–388.Google Scholar
Sallmann, K. (1984) “Bildungsvorgaben des Fachschriftstellers, Bemerkungen zur Pädagogik Vitruvs,” in Vitruv-Kolloquium des Deutschen Archäologen-Verbandes e. V., durchgeführt an der Technischen Hochschule Darmstadt 17. bis 18. Juni 1982. Herausgegeben von H. Knell & B. Wesenberg, Schriften des Deutschen Archäologen-Verbandes Band 8. Darmstadt: 11–26.Google Scholar
Santini, C. and Scivoletto, N. (1990) Prefazioni, prologhi, proemi di opera tecnico-scientifiche latine (vol 1). Rome.Google Scholar
Sauerwein, I. (1970) Die leges sumptuariae als römische Maßnahme gegen den Sittenverfall. Diss. Hamburg.Google Scholar
Sauron, G. (1994) Quis Deum? L’expression plastique des idéologies politiques et religieuses à Rome à la fin de la République et au début du principat. Bibliothèque des Écoles françaises d’Athènes et de Rome 285. Rome.Google Scholar
Schlegel, C. (2000) “Horace and His Fathers: Satires 1.4 and 1.6,” American Journal of Philology 121.1: 93–119.Google Scholar
Schmitter, P. (1975) “Compulsory Schooling at Athens and Rome?: A Contribution to the History of Hellenistic Education,” American Journal of Philology 96.3: 276–289.Google Scholar
Schrijvers, P. H. (1989) “Vitruve et la vie intellectuelle de son temps,” in Geertman, H. and de Jong, J. J. (eds.), Munus non Ingratum: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Vitruvius’ De Architectura and the Hellenistic and Republican Architecture. Leiden: 13–21.Google Scholar
Schuler, S. (1999) Vitruv im Mittelalter: Die Rezeption von “De architectura” von der Antike bis in die Frühe Neuzeit. Cologne.Google Scholar
Scodel, R. (2010) “Iambos and Parody,” in Clauss, J. and Cuypers, M. (eds.), A Companion to Hellenistic Literature. Hoboken: 251–266.Google Scholar
Scullard, H. H. (1960) “Scipio Aemilianus and Roman Politics,” Journal of Roman Studies 50.1 and 2: 59–74.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, W. B. (1949) “Plautine Chronology,” American Journal of Philology 70.4: 376–383.Google Scholar
Segal, E. (1974) “The Business of Roman Comedy,” in Galinsky, G. K. (ed.), Perspectives of Roman Poetry: A Classics Symposium. London.Google Scholar
Senseney, J. R. (2011) The Art of Building in the Classical World: Vision, Craftsmanship, and Linear Perspective in Greek and Roman Architecture. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (ed.) (1999) Cicero. Letters to Atticus (vol. 4), with tr. London.Google Scholar
Sharrock, A. (1996) “Representing Metamorphosis,” in Elsner, J. (ed.), Art and Text in Roman Culture. Cambridge, UK: 103–130.Google Scholar
Sharrock, A. (2009) Reading Roman Comedy: Poetics and Playfulness in Plautus and Terence. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Skydsgaard, J. E. (1968) Varro the Scholar: Analecta Romana Instituti Danici Suppl. 4. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Smith, R. R. R. (1988) “Simulacra Gentium: The Ethne from the Sebasteion at Aphrodisias,” Journal of Roman Studies 78: 50–77.Google Scholar
Sontheimer, L. (1908) Vitruvius und seine Zeit: Eine literarhistorische Untersuchung. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Squire, M. (2010) “Making Myron’s Cow Moo? Ecphrastic Epigram and the Poetics of Simulation,” American Journal of Philology 131: 589–634.Google Scholar
Squire, M. (2013) “Apparitions Apparent: Ekphrasis and the Parameters of Vision in the Elder Philostratus’ Imagines,” Helios 40.1–2: 97–140.Google Scholar
Squire, M. (2015) “Aesthetics and Latin Literary Reception,” in Friedland, E. A. and Sobocinski, M. G., with Gazda, E. K. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Roman Sculpture. Oxford: 589–605.Google Scholar
St. Clair, A. (2003) Carving as Craft: Palatine East and the Greco-Roman Bone and Ivory Carving Tradition. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Stroup, S. C. (2010) Catullus, Cicero, and the Society of Patrons: The Generation of the Text. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Stroup, S. C. (2013) “‘When I Read My Cato, It is as if Cato Speaks’: The Birth and Evolution of Cicero’s Dialogic Voice,” in Marmodoro, A. and Hill, J., (eds.), The Author’s Voice in Classical and Late Antiquity. Oxford: 123–151.Google Scholar
Stückelberger, A. (1994) Bild und Wort. Das illustrierte Fachbuch in der antiken Naturwissenschaft, Medizin und Technik. Mainz am Rhein.Google Scholar
Sullivan, M. B. (2016) “Poetic Justice: Iambos, Fable, and Horace’s First Epode,” in Stocks, C. and Bather, P. (eds.), Horace’s Epodes: Contexts, Intertexts, and Reception. Oxford: 85–102.Google Scholar
Tabarroni, G. (1971–1972) “Vitruvio nella storia della scienza e della tecnica,” Memorie dell’Accademia della Scienze, Classe di Scienze Morali 66: 1–37.Google Scholar
Tanner, J. (2006) The Invention of Art History in Ancient Greece: Religion, Society and Artistic Rationalisation. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Tatum, J. (2007) “Social Commentary and Political Invective,” in Skinner, M. (ed.), A Companion to Catullus. Malden, MA and Oxford: 333–353.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. R. (1925) “Horace’s Equestrian Career,” American Journal of Philology 46: 161.Google Scholar
Terrenato, N. (2001) “The Auditorium Site in Rome and the Origins of the Villa,” Journal of Roman Archaeology 14: 5–31.Google Scholar
Terrenato, N. (2012) “The Enigma of ‘Catonian’ Villas: The De agri cultura in the Context of Second-Century BC Italian Architecture,” in Becker, J. A. and Terrenato, N. (eds.), Roman Republican Villas: Architecture, Context, and Ideology. Papers and Monographs of the American Academy in Rome 32. Ann Arbor: 69–93.Google Scholar
Teuffel, W. S. with Schwabe, L. (rev.) (1881) Geschichte der Römischen Literatur, 4 Aufl. (2 vols.). Leipzig.Google Scholar
Teuffel, W. S. with Schwabe, L. (rev. and enl.) and Warr, G. C. W. (trans.) (1891) Teuffel’s History of Roman Literature, 5th edition. (2 vols.). London.Google Scholar
Thielscher, P. (1961) “Vitruvius,” Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft 9a.1: cols. 427–489.Google Scholar
Thomas, E. (2007) Monumentality and the Roman Empire: Architecture in the Antonine Age. Oxford.Google Scholar
Thomas, E. (2014) “On the Sublime in Architecture,” in Elsner, J. and Meyer, M. (eds.), Art and Rhetoric in Roman Culture. Cambridge, UK: 37–88.Google Scholar
Tomei, P. (1943) “Appunti sull’estetica di Vitruvio,” Bollettino del reale Istituto di Archeologia e Storia dell’ Arte 10: 57–73.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, R. A. (1989) “Vitruvius and Hermogenes,” in Geertman, H. and de Jong, J. J. (eds.), Munus non Ingratum: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Vitruvius’ De Architectura and the Hellenistic and Republican Architecture. Leiden: 71–75.Google Scholar
Torelli, M. (1990) “La formazione della villa,” in Momigliano, A. and Schiavone, A. (eds.), Storia di Roma. 2, L’impero mediterraneo. 1, La repubblica imperiale. Torino: 123–132.Google Scholar
Torelli, M. (1999) Tota Italia: Essays in the Cultural Formation of Roman Italy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Torelli, M. (2012) “The Early Villa: Roman Contributions to the Development of a Greek Prototype” in Becker, J. A. and Terrenato, N. (eds.), Roman Republican Villas: Architecture, Context, and Ideology. Papers and Monographs of the American Academy in Rome 32. Ann Arbor: 8–31.Google Scholar
Totelin, L. M. V. (2012) “And to End on a Poetic Note: Galen’s Authorial Strategies in the Pharmacological Books,” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43.2: 307–315.Google Scholar
Toynbee, J. M. C. (1934) The Hadrianic School: A Chapter in the History of Greek Art. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Treggiari, S. (1999) “The Upper-Class House as Symbol and Focus of Emotion in Cicero,” Journal of Roman Archaeology 12: 33–56.Google Scholar
Tröster, M. (2008) Themes, Character and Politics in Plutarch’s Life of Lucullus: The Construction of a Roman Aristocrat. Historia Einzelschriften 201. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Tybout, R. A. (1989) Aedificiorum Figurae: Untersuchungen zu den Architekturdarstellungen des frühen zweiten Stils. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Tybout, R. A. (2001) “Roman Wall-Painting and Social Significance,” Journal of Roman Archaeology 14: 33–56.Google Scholar
Urmson, J. (1997) “Plato and the Poets,” in Kraut, R. (ed.), Plato’s Republic: Critical Essays. Lanham: 223–234.Google Scholar
Valladares, H. (2014) “Pictorial Paratexts: Floating Figures in Roman Wall Painting,” in Jansen, L. (ed.), The Roman Paratext: Frame, Texts, Readers. Cambridge, UK: 176–205.Google Scholar
Van Buren, A. W. (1932) “Further Pompeian Studies,” Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome 10: 7–54.Google Scholar
Van der Blom, H. (2010) Cicero’s Role Models: The Political Strategy of a Newcomer. Oxford.Google Scholar
Van der Eijk, P. (1997) “Towards a Rhetoric of Ancient Scientific Discourse: Some Formal Characteristics of Greek Medical and Philosophical Texts (Hippocratic Corpus, Aristotle),” in Bakker, E. (ed.) Grammar as Interpretation: Greek Literature in Its Linguistic Contexts. Leiden: 77–129.Google Scholar
Van Eck, C. (2007) Classical Rhetoric and the Visual Arts in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Van Hook, L. (1905) The Metaphorical Terminology of Greek Rhetoric and Literary Criticism. Diss., Chicago.Google Scholar
Vasaly, A. (1993) Representations: Images of the World in Ciceronian Oratory. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Volk, K. (2010) “Literary Theft and Roman Water Rights in Manilius’ Second Proem,” Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 65: 187–197.Google Scholar
von Staden, H. (1994) “Author and Authority. Celsus and the Construction of a Scientific Self,” in Vázquez Buján, M. E. (ed.), Tradición e innovación de la medicina latina de la antigüedad y de la alta edad media. Santiago de Compostela: 103–117.Google Scholar
Vout, C. (1996) “The Myth of the Toga: Understanding the History of Roman Dress,” Greece & Rome 43.2: 204–220.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1988a) “Greek Knowledge, Roman Power,” Classical Philology 83: 224–233.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1988b) “The Social Structure of the Roman House,” Papers of the British School at Rome 56: 43–97.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1990a) “Pliny the Elder and Man’s Unnatural History,” Greece & Rome 37: 80–96.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1990b) “The Villa as a Cultural Symbol,” in Frazer, A. (ed.), The Roman Villa: Villa Urbana. Philadelphia: 43–53.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1997) “Rethinking the Roman atrium house,” in Laurence, R. and Wallace-Hadrill, A. (eds.), Domestic Space in the Roman World: Pompeii and Beyond. Portsmouth, R.I.: 219–240.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1998) “Mutatio Morum: The Idea of a Cultural Revolution,” in Habinek, T. and Schiesaro, A. (eds.), The Roman Cultural Revolution. Cambridge, UK: 3–22.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (2005) “Mutatas Formas: The Augustan Transformation of Roman Knowledge,” in Galinsky, K. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Augustus. Cambridge, UK: 55–84.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (2008) “Vitruvius: Building Roman Identity,” in Rome’s Cultural Revolution. Cambridge, UK: 144–210.Google Scholar
Warmington, E. H. (1938) Remains of Old Latin. III. Lucilius, The Twelve Tables. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Webb, R. (2006) “The Imagines as a Fictional Text: Ekphrasis, Apatê and Illusion,” in Constantini, M. et al. (eds.), Le Défi de l’arte: Philostrate, Callistrate, et l’image sophistique. Rennes: 113–136.Google Scholar
Webb, R. (2009) Ekphrasis, Imagination and Persuasion in Ancient Rhetorical Theory and Practice. Farnham, UK and Burlington, VT.Google Scholar
Welch, K. (1995) “The Office of Praefectus Fabrum in the Late Republic,” Chiron 25: 131–145.Google Scholar
Welch, K. E. (2006) “Domi Militiaeque: Roman Domestic Aesthetics and War Booty in the Republic,” in Dillon, S. and Welch, K. E. (eds.), Representations of War in Ancient Rome. Cambridge, UK: 91–161.Google Scholar
Wesenberg, B. (1984) “Augustusforum und Akropolis,” Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 99: 161–185.Google Scholar
Wesenberg, B. (1989) “Griechisches und Römisches in der vitruvianischen Architektur: ein Beitrag zur Quellenfrage,” in Geertman, H. and de Jong, J. J. (eds.), Munus non Ingratum: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Vitruvius’ De Architectura and the Hellenistic and Republican Architecture. Leiden: 76–84.Google Scholar
West, D. (1975) “Of Mice and Men: Horace, Satires 2.6.77–117,” in Woodman, T. and West, D. (eds.), Quality and Pleasure in Latin Poetry. Cambridge, UK: 67–80.Google Scholar
Whitehorne, J. E. G. (1969) “The Ambitious Builder,” Journal of the Australasian Universities Language and Literature Association 31: 28–39.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (2009) “Greece and Rome,” in Boys-Stones, G., Graziosi, B., and Vasunia, P. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Hellenic Studies. Oxford: 114–128.Google Scholar
Williams, C. A. (2016) “The Rhetoricity of Gender and the Ideal of Mediocritas in Vitruvius’s de Architectura,” in Cuomo, S. and Formisano, M. (eds.), Vitruvius: Text, Architecture, Reception. Arethusa 49.2: 227–249.Google Scholar
Williams, G. (1995) “Libertino Patre Natus: True or False?” in Harrison, S. J. (ed.), Homage to Horace: a Bimillenary Celebration. Oxford: 296–313.Google Scholar
Wilson Jones, M. (2015) “Greek and Roman Architectural Theory,” in Marconi, C. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Art and Architecture. Oxford: 41–69.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (1987) “Conspicui Postes Tectaque Digna Deo: The Public Image of Aristocratic and Imperial Houses in the Late Republic and Early Empire,” in L’Urbs: espace urbain et histoire. Collection de l’École française de Rome 98. Rome: 393–413.Google Scholar
Woodman, T. (1974) “Exegi Monumentum. Horace, Odes 3.30,” in Woodman, T. and West, D. (eds.), Quality and Pleasure in Latin Poetry. Cambridge, UK: 115–128.Google Scholar
Woolf, G. (2007) “Provincial Perspectives,” in Galinsky, K. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Augustus. Cambridge, UK: 106–129.Google Scholar
Wulfram, H. (2001) Literarische Vitruvrezeption in Leon Battista Albertis ‘De re aedificatoria’. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Wulfram, H. (2013) “Von Alexander Lernen. Augustus und die Künste bei Vitruv und Horaz,” Hermes 141.3: 263–282.Google Scholar
Wyke, M. (1994) “Woman in the Mirror: The Rhetoric of Adornment in the Roman World,” in Archer, L., Fischler, S., and Wyke, M. (eds.), Women in Ancient Societies. ‘An Illusion of the Night.’ Basingstoke: 134–151.Google Scholar
Yarrow, L. (2006) “Lucius Mummius and the Spoils of Corinth,” Scripta Classica Israelica 25: 57–70.Google Scholar
Yerkes, S. R. (2005) “‘Living Architecture’: Living Column and Vegetal Urn. Shared Motifs in Roman Wall Painting and ‘Neo-Attic’ Furnishings,” in Pollini, J. (ed.), Terra Marique: Studies in Art History and Marine Archaeology in Honor of Anna Marguerite McCann. Oxford: 149–168.Google Scholar
Yona, S. (2015) “Some Epicurean Aspects of Horace’s Upbringing in Sermones 1.4,” Classical Philology 110: 227–251.Google Scholar
Zanda, E. (2011) Fighting Hydra-Like Luxury: Sumptuary Regulation in the Roman Republic. London.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. (1988) The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus, tr. Shapiro, A.. London.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. (1999) Pompeii: Public and Private Life, tr. Schneider, D. L.. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Zarmakoupi, M. (2014b) “Private Villas: Italy and the Provinces,” in Ulrich, R. B. and Quenemoen, C. K. (eds.), A Companion to Roman Architecture. Malden, MA and Oxford: 363–380.Google Scholar