Crossref Citations
This Book has been
cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Gérard, Philippe
1995.
Droit et démocratie.
p.
299.
Morgan, Kenneth O.
2008.
Corridor or cul de sac ? The House of Lords as a corridor of power.
Observatoire de la société britannique,
p.
225.
Guidi, Marco E.L.
2008.
“Everybody to count for one, nobody for more than one”.
Revue d’études benthamiennes,
Morgan, Kenneth O.
2008.
Corridor or cul de sac ? The House of Lords as a corridor of power.
Observatoire de la société britannique,
p.
225.
Todorov, Antony
2009.
Y a-t-il démocratie sans participation ?.
SociologieS,
Bentz, Anne-Sophie
2010.
Les réfugiés tibétains en Inde.
p.
233.
Landemore, Hélène
2013.
Deliberation, cognitive diversity, and democratic inclusiveness: an epistemic argument for the random selection of representatives.
Synthese,
Vol. 190,
Issue. 7,
p.
1209.
Tazdaït, Tarik
and
Nessah, Rabia
2013.
Le paradoxe du vote.
p.
197.
Landemore, Hélène
and
Bandini, Aude
2014.
Pourquoi le grand nombre est plus intelligent que le petit nombre, et pourquoi il faut en tenir compte.
Philosophiques,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 2,
p.
283.
Kaçer, Murat
2017.
“DEMOKRATİK PLATONCULUK”: JOHN STUART MİLL'İN SİYASİ DÜŞÜNCESİNDE ÇOĞUL OY.
HUMANITAS - Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi,
p.
315.
Kiely, Ray
2017.
From Authoritarian Liberalism to Economic Technocracy: Neoliberalism, Politics and ‘De-democratization’.
Critical Sociology,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 4-5,
p.
725.
Mulvad, Andreas Møller
and
Stahl, Rune Møller
2018.
From Financial Crisis to Social Change.
p.
171.
Hinze, Jakob
2019.
Does epistemic proceduralism justify the disenfranchisement of children?.
Journal of Global Ethics,
Vol. 15,
Issue. 3,
p.
287.
Gautier, Claude
2020.
Voir et connaître la société.
p.
389.
Eliasz, Katarzyna
and
Załuski, Wojciech
2020.
Libertas: On the unity of the concept of freedom.
Revus,
Blunt, Gwilym David
2020.
The case for epistocratic republicanism.
Politics,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 3,
p.
363.
Vergés, Joan
2021.
In a democracy, what makes an external self-determination claim reasonable? Some reflections on the moral aspect of the question.
Las Torres de Lucca. International Journal of Political Philosophy,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 18,
p.
19.
Kumar, Sunny
2021.
Is Indian sedition law colonial? J. F. Stephen and the jurisprudence on free speech.
The Indian Economic & Social History Review,
Vol. 58,
Issue. 4,
p.
477.
Stahl, Rune Møller
2021.
From Depoliticisation to Dedemocratisation: Revisiting the Neoliberal Turn in Macroeconomics.
New Political Economy,
Vol. 26,
Issue. 3,
p.
406.
Blodgett-Ford, S. J.
2021.
Human Enhancements and Voting: Towards a Declaration of Rights and Responsibilities of Beings.
Philosophies,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 1,
p.
5.