Agrawal, A., & Goyal, S. (2001). Group size and collective action: Third party monitoring in common pool resources. Comparative Political Studies, 34(1), 63–93.Google Scholar

Agrawal, A., & Ostrom, E. (2001). Collective action, property rights, and decentralization in resource use in India and Nepal. Politics & Society, 29(4), 485–514.Google Scholar

Agarwal, A., Narain, S., & Sharma, A. (2017). The global commons and environmental justice – climate change. In Thompson, P. (Ed.), Environmental Justice (pp. 171–199). Routledge, New York.Google Scholar

Aksoy, B., & Palma, M. A. (2019). The effects of scarcity on cheating and in-group favoritism. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 165, 100–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alcock, J. (1993). Exadaptations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16(2), 283–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Althor, G., Watson, J. E., & Fuller, R. A. (2016). Global mismatch between greenhouse gas emissions and the burden of climate change. Scientific Reports, 6(1), 20281–20286.Google Scholar

Altman, I., & Low, S. (1992). Place Attachment. Human Behavior and Environment, 1st Edition. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amiot, C. E., & Bastian, B. (2015). Toward a psychology of human-animal relations. Psychological Bulletin, 141(1), 6–47.Google Scholar

Anderies, J. M., & Janssen, M. A. (2013). Robustness of social? ecological systems: Implications for public policy. Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 513–536.Google Scholar

Anderies, J. M., Janssen, M. A., Bousquet, F., Cardenas, J. C., Castillo, D., Lopez, M. C., … & Wutich, A. (2011). The challenge of understanding decisions in experimental studies of common pool resource governance. Ecological Economics, 70(9), 1571–1579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, B., & McFarlane, C. (2011). Assemblage and geography. Area, 43(2), 124–127.Google Scholar

Andersson, K. (2006). Understanding decentralized forest governance: An application of the institutional analysis and development framework. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 2(1), 25–35.Google Scholar

Andersson, K. P., & Ostrom, E. (2008). Analyzing decentralized resource regimes from a polycentric perspective. Policy Sciences, 41(1), 71–93.Google Scholar

Andersson, K. P., Chang, K., & Molina-Garzón, A. (2020). Voluntary leadership and the emergence of institutions for self-governance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(44), 27292–27299.Google Scholar

Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. The Economic Journal, 100(401), 464–477.Google Scholar

Andreoni, J., & Vesterlund, L. (1997). Which is the Fair Sex? Gender Differences in Altruism. University of Wisconsin, Madison, Mimeo.Google Scholar

Appiah, A. (2008). Experiments in Ethics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Araral, E. (2014). Ostrom, hardin and the commons: A critical appreciation and a revisionist view. Environmental Science & Policy, 36, 11–23.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. (1958). The Human Condition, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Athanases, S. Z., & Sanchez, S. L. (2020). “A Caesar for our time”: Toward empathy and perspective-taking in new teachers’ drama practices in diverse classrooms. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 25(2), 236–255.Google Scholar

Aumann, R., & Shapley, L. (1976). Long-term competition: A game-theoretic analysis. Mimeo, Hebrew University. Reprinted in: Megiddo, N. (Ed.), 1994. Essays in Game Theory in Honor of Michael Maschler (pp. 1–15). Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar

Bain, P. G., Hornsey, M. J., Bongiorno, R., & Jeffries, C. (2012). Promoting pro-environmental action in climate change deniers. Nature Climate Change, 2(8), 600–603.Google Scholar

Bal, P. M., & Veltkamp, M. (2013). How does fiction reading influence empathy? An experimental investigation on the role of emotional transportation. PLoS One, 8(1), e55341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baland, J.-M., & Platteau, J.-P. (1996). Halting Degradation of Natural Resources: Is There a Role for Rural Communities? Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Barazza, J. A., & Zak, P. J. (2013). Chapter 18. Oxytocin instantiates empathy and produces prosocial behaviours. In Choleris, E., Pfaff, D. W., & Kavaliers, M. (Eds.), Oxytocin, Vasopressin and Related Peptides in the Regulation of Behaviour (pp. 331–342). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Barclay, P. (2012). Harnessing the power of reputation: Strengths and limits for promoting cooperative behaviors. Evolutionary Psychology, 10(5), 147470491201000509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Barclay, P., & van Vugt, M. (2015). The evolutionary psychology of human prosociality: Adaptations, byproducts, and mistakes. In Schroeder, D. A., & Graziano, W. G. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Prosocial Behavior (pp. 37–60). Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Barraza, J., & Zak, P. (2009). Empathy toward strangers triggers oxytocin release and subsequent generosity. New York Academy of Sciences, 1167(1), 182–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bartels, K., & Turnbull, N. (2019). Relational public administration: A synthesis and heuristic classification of relational approaches. Public Management Review, 1–23.Google Scholar

Batavia, C., Bruskotter, J. T., Jones, J. A., Vucetich, J. A., Gosnell, H., & Nelson, M. P. (2018). Nature for whom? How type of beneficiary influences the effectiveness of conservation outreach messages. Biological Conservation, 228, 158–166.Google Scholar

Batson, C. D. (1987). Prosocial motivation: Is it ever truly altruistic? In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 65–122). New York: Academic.Google Scholar

Batson, C. D. (Ed.), (2011). Altruism in Humans (p. 329). Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Batson, C. D., & Moran, T. (1999). Empathy‐induced altruism in a prisoner’s dilemma. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(7), 909–924.Google Scholar

Batson, C. D., & Shaw, L. L. (1991). Evidence for altruism: Toward a pluralism of prosocial motives. Psychological Inquiry, 2(2), 107–122.Google Scholar

Batson, C. D., Ahmad, N., Lishner, D. A., Tsang, J., Snyder, C. R., & Lopez, S. J. (2002). Chapter 35. Empathy and altruism. In Snyder, C. R., & Lopez, S. J. (Eds.), Handbook of Positive Psychology (pp. 161–174). Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Batson, C. D., Chang, J., Orr, R., & Rowland, J. (2002). Empathy, attitudes, and action: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group motivate one to help the group? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(12), 1656–1666.Google Scholar

Batson, C. D., Duncan, B. D., Ackerman, P., Buckley, T., & Birch, K. (1981). Is empathic emotion a source of altruistic motivation? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(2), 290.Google Scholar

Batson, C. D. et al., (2002). “Empathy, attitudes, and action: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group motivate one to help the group?” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(12), 1656–1666., doi:10.1177/014616702237647.Google Scholar

Batson, C. D., Pate, S., Lawless, H., Sparkman, P., Lambers, S., & Worman, B. (1979). Helping under conditions of common threat: Increased “we-feeling” or ensuring reciprocity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 42(4), 410–414.Google Scholar

Baumol, W. J., & Oates, W. E. (1988). The Theory of Environmental Policy, 2nd Ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar

Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 611–639.Google Scholar

Benhabib, S. (1987). General and concrete others. In Benhabib, S., & Cornell, D. (Eds.), Feminism as Critique (pp. 77–96). Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Benhabib, S. (1992). Situating the Self: Gender, Community, and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar

Benjamin, P., Lam, W. F., Ostrom, E., & Shivakoti, G. (1994). Institutions, Incentives and Irrigation in Nepal. Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar

Bennett, R. (2003). Factors underlying the inclination to donate to particular types of charity. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 8(1), 12–29.Google Scholar

Berchin, I. I., Valduga, I. B., Garcia, J., & de Andrade, J. B. S. O. (2017). Climate change and forced migrations: An effort towards recognizing climate refugees. Geoforum, 84, 147–150.Google Scholar

Berenguer, J. (2007). “The effect of empathy in proenvironmental attitudes and behaviors.” Environment & Behavior, 39(2):269–283.Google Scholar

Berkes, F. (2002). Cross-scale institutional linkages: Perspectives from the bottom up. In Ostrom, E., Dietz, T., Dolsak, N., Stern, P. C., Stonich, S., & Weber, E. U. (Eds.), The Drama of the Commons (pp. 293–321). National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

Berkes, F. (2017). Sacred Ecology. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar

Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2000). Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications, 10(5), 1251–1262.Google Scholar

Bern, C. et al. (1993). Risk factors for mortality in the Bangladesh cyclone of 1991. Bull World Health Organ, 71(1), 73.Google Scholar

Bertin, P., Nera, K., Hamer, K., Uhl-Haedicke, I., & Delouvée, S. (2021). Stand out of my sunlight: The mediating role of climate change conspiracy beliefs in the relationship between national collective narcissism and acceptance of climate science. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(5), 738–758.Google Scholar

Bevir, M., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (2022). All you need is… a network: The rise of interpretive public administration. Public Administration, 100(1), 149–160.Google Scholar

Biermann, F., & Möller, I. (2019). Rich man’s solution? climate engineering discourses and the marginalization of the Global South. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 19(2), 151–167.Google Scholar

Billen, G., Garnier, J., & Barles, S. (2012). History of the urban environmental imprint: Introduction to a multidisciplinary approach to the long-term relationships between Western cities and their hinterland.Google Scholar

Binngiesser, J., Wilhelm, C., & Randler, C. (2013). Attitudes towards animals among German children and adolescents. Anthrozoös, 26, 325–339.Google Scholar

Birdsall, N. (1980). Population growth and poverty in the developing world. Population Bulletin, 35(5), 1–48.Google Scholar

Bodin, Ö., & Crona, B. I. (2009). The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference? Global Environmental Change, 19(3), 366–374.Google Scholar

Bohnet, I., & Frey, B. S. (1999). Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games: Comment. American Economic Review, 89(1), 335–339.Google Scholar

Bolderdijk, J. W., Steg, L., Geller, E. S., Lehman, P. K., & Postmes, T. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of monetary versus moral motives in environmental campaigning. Nature Climate Change, 3, 413–416. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1767Google Scholar

Bolton, G., & Katok, E. (1995). An experimental test for gender differences in beneficent behavior. Economics Letters, 48(3–4), 287–92.Google Scholar

Bolton, G. E., & Ockenfels, A. (2000). ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. American Economic Review, 90(1), 166–193.Google Scholar

Bouckaert, G. (2012). Trust and public administration. Administration, 60(1), 91–115.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice (translated by R. Nice). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Boy, J., Pandey, A. V., Emerson, J., Satterthwaite, M., Nov, O., & Bertini, E. (2017). Showing people behind data: Does anthropomorphizing visualizations elicit more empathy for human rights data? In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 5462–5474).Google Scholar

Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2002). Group beneficial norms can spread rapidly in a structured population. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 215(3), 287–296.Google Scholar

Bredicean, C., Tamasan, S. C., Lungeanu, D., Giurgi-Oncu, C., Stoica, I. P., Panfil, A. L., … & Patrascu, R. (2021). Burnout toll on empathy would mediate the missing professional support in the COVID-19 outbreak. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 14, 2231.Google Scholar

Broome, J. (2008). The ethics of climate change. Scientific American, 298(6), 96–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Brüggemann, M., Elgesem, D., Bienzeisler, N., Gertz, H. D., & Walter, S. (2020). Mutual group polarization in the blogosphere: Tracking the hoax discourse on climate change. International Journal of Communication, 14, 24.Google Scholar

Brügger, A. (2020). Understanding the psychological distance of climate change: The limitations of construal level theory and suggestions for alternative theoretical perspectives. Global Environmental Change, 60, 102023.Google Scholar

Brügger, A., Morton, T. A., & Dessai, S. (2016). “Proximising” climate change reconsidered: A construal level theory perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 46, 125–142.Google Scholar

Brugnach, M., De Waard, S., Dubois, D., & Farolfi, S. (2021). Relational quality and uncertainty in common pool water management: An exploratory lab experiment. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bruner, J. (1987). Life as Narrative. Social Research, 54(1), 11–32.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. (2003). The narrative construction of reality. In Mateas, M., & Sengers, P. (Eds.), Narrative Intelligence (pp. 41–62). John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Buber, M. (1937). I and Thou, transl. by Ronald Gregor Smith, Edinburgh: T. and T. Scribners, New York. Originally published in.Google Scholar

Burt, C. D., & Strongman, K. (2005). Use of images in charity advertising: Improving donations and compliance rates. International Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 8(8), 571–580.Google Scholar

Burt, R. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior 22, 345–423. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

CAF, Charities Aid Foundation (2021). CAF World Giving Index 2021, Charities Aid Foundation, London. www.cafonline.org/docs/default-source/about-us-research/cafworldgivingindex2021_report_web2_100621.pdfGoogle Scholar

Camerer, C. F., & Thaler, R. H. (1995). Anomalies: Ultimatums, dictators and manners. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(2), 209–219.Google Scholar

Campbell, W. K., Bush, C. P., Brunell, A. B., & Shelton, J. (2005). Understanding the social costs of narcissism: The case of the tragedy of the commons. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(10), 1358–1368.Google Scholar

CČapek, S. M. (2010). Foregrounding nature: An invitation to think about shifting nature–city boundaries. City & Community, 9(2), 208–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Capstick, S., Lorenzoni, I., Corner, A., & Whitmarsh, L. (2014). Prospects for radical emissions reduction through behavior and lifestyle change. Carbon Management, 5(4), 429–445.Google Scholar

Carlsson, L., & Sandström, A. (2008). Network governance of the commons. International Journal of the Commons, 2(1), 33–54.Google Scholar

Carré, A., Stefaniak, N., D’Ambrosio, F., Bensalah, L., & Besche-Richard, C. (2013). The basic empathy scale in adults (BES-A): Factor structure of a revised form. Psychological Assessment, 25(3), 679–691. doi:10.1037/a003229Google Scholar

Chan, A. A. H. (2012). Anthropomorphism as a conservation tool. Biodiversity and Conservation, 21(7), 1889–1892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chu, H., & Yang, J. Z. (2018). Taking climate change here and now–mitigating ideological polarization with psychological distance. Global Environmental Change, 53, 174–181.Google Scholar

Cialdini, R. B., Darby, B. K., & Vincent, J. E. (1973a). Transgression and altruism: A case for hedonism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 70, 666–677.Google Scholar

Cialdini, R. B., Darby, B. K., & Vincent, J. E. (1973b). Transgression and altruism: A case for hedonism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 9(6), 502–516.Google Scholar

Cochard, F., Le Gallo, J., Georgantzis, N., & Tisserand, J. C. (2021). Social preferences across different populations: Meta-analyses on the ultimatum game and dictator game. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 90(February), 101613.Google Scholar

Cockburn, J., Rosenberg, E., Copteros, A., Cornelius, S. F. A., Libala, N., Metcalfe, L., & van der Waal, B. (2020). A relational approach to landscape stewardship: Towards a new perspective for multi-actor collaboration. Land, 9(7), 224.Google Scholar

Coleman, E. A., & Steed, B. C. (2009). Monitoring and sanctioning in the commons: An application to forestry. Ecological Economics, 68(7), 2106–2113.Google Scholar

Comte, A. (1851). Système de politique positive. Carilian-Goeury, Paris.Google Scholar

Constantino, S. M., & Weber, E. U. (2021). Decision-making under the deep uncertainty of climate change: The psychological and political agency of narratives. Current Opinion in Psychology, 42, 151–159.Google Scholar

Cooke, G., & Muir, R. (Eds.), (2012). The Relational State: How Recognising the Importance of Human Relation-Ships Could Revolutionise the Role of the State. Institute for Public Policy Research, London.Google Scholar

Cox, M., Villamayor-Tomas, S., Ban, N. C., Epstein, G., Evans, L., Fleischman, F., … & Schoon, M. (2020). From concepts to comparisons: A resource for diagnosis and measurement in social-ecological systems. Environmental Science & Policy, 107, 211–216.Google Scholar

Crona, B. I. (2006). Supporting and enhancing development of heterogeneous ecological knowledge among resource users in a Kenyan Seascape. Ecology & Society 11, 32.Google Scholar

Cunningham, R., Cvitanovic, C., Measham, T., Jacobs, B., Dowd, A. M., & Harman, B. (2016). Engaging communities in climate adaptation: The potential of social networks. Climate Policy, 16(7), 894–908.Google Scholar

Curran, B. J., Jenkins, M. A., & Tedeschi, P. (2019). Chapter 14: The global and cross-cultural reach of trauma-informed animal-assisted interventions. In Tedeschi, P., & Jenkins, M. A. (Eds.), Transforming Trauma: Resilience and Healing through Our Connections with Animals (pp. 423–462). Purdue University Press, Lafayette, Indiana.Google Scholar

Curto-Millet, D., & Corsín Jiménez, A. (2022). The sustainability of open source commons. European Journal of Information Systems, 1–19. DOI:10.1080/0960085X.2022.2046516.Google Scholar

Czap, N. V., Czap, H. J., Banerjee, S., & Burbach, M. E. (2019). Encouraging farmers’ participation in the conservation stewardship program: A field experiment. Ecological Economics, 161(July), 130–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Czap, N., Czap, H., Lynne, G., & Burbach, M. (2015). Walk in my shoes: Nudging for empathy conservation. Ecological Economics, 118, 147–158.Google Scholar

Daly, H. E. (1984). Alternative strategies for integrating economics and ecology. In Jansson, A.-M. (Ed.), Integration of Economy and Ecology: An Outlook for the Eighties (pp. 19–29). University of Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar

Daly, H. E., CobbJr, J. B., & Cobb, J. B. (1994). For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy Toward Community, The Environment, and a Sustainable Future (No. 73). Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Daly, H. (1993). Steady-state economics: A new paradigm. New Literary History 24(4), 811–816.Google Scholar

Darian, J. C., Tucci, L., Newman, C. M., & Naylor, L. (2015). An analysis of consumer motivations for purchasing fair trade coffee. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 27(4), 318–327.Google Scholar

Davis, J. E. (Ed.), (2012). Stories of Change: Narrative and Social Movements. SUNY Press, Albany, NY.Google Scholar

Davis, M. H. (2015). Empathy and prosocial behavior. In Schroeder, D. A., & Graziano, W. G. (Eds.), Oxford Library of Psychology (pp. 282–306). The Oxford handbook of prosocial behavior. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Dawes, C. T., Loewen, P. J., & Fowler, J. H. (2011). Social preferences and political participation. The Journal of Politics, 73(3), 845–856.Google Scholar

Dawes, R. M., & Thaler, R. H. (1988). Anomalies: Cooperation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2(3), 187–197.Google Scholar

De Moor, T., & Tukker, A. (2015). Survival without sanctioning: The relationship between institutional resilience and methods of dealing with free-riding on early modern Dutch commons. Jahrbuch für Geschichte des ländlichen Raumes, 12(2015), 175–206.Google Scholar

De Moor, T., Farjam, M., Van Weeren, R., Bravo, G., Forsman, A., Ghorbani, A., & Dehkordi, M. A. E. (2021). Taking sanctioning seriously: The impact of sanctions on the resilience of historical commons in Europe. Journal of Rural Studies, 87, 181–188.Google Scholar

De Moor, T., Laborda-Pemán, M., Lana-Berasain, J. M., Van Weeren, R., & Winchester, A. (2016). Ruling the commons. Introducing a new methodology for the analysis of historical commons. International Journal of the Commons, 10(2), 529–588.Google Scholar

de Waal, F. B. M. (2008). Putting the altruism back into altruism: The evolution of empathy. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 279–300. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093625Google Scholar

Decety, J. (2011). Neuroscience of empathic responding. In Stephanie, L., & Brown, R. (Eds.), Moving Beyond Self-Interest: Perspectives from Evolutionary Biology, Neuroscience, and the Social Sciences, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Decety, J., & Grèzes, J. (2006). The power of simulation: Imagining one’s own and other’s behavior. Brain Research, 1079(1), 4–14.Google Scholar

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar

Deer, L., Fire, J.,& Erdoes, R. (1972). Lame Deer, Seeker of Visions, Life of a Sioux Medicine Man. Simon & Schuster, New York.Google Scholar

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press, London.Google Scholar

DeWall, C. N., & Baumeister, R. F. (2006). Alone but feeling no pain: Effects of social exclusion on physical pain tolerance and pain threshold, affective forecasting, and interpersonal empathy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(1), 1–15.Google Scholar

Dierwechter, Y., & Taufen Wessells, A. (2013). The uneven localisation of climate action in metropolitan Seattle. Urban Studies, 50(7), 1368–1385.Google Scholar

Dietz, T. (2015). Altruism, self-interest, and energy consumption. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112, 1654–1655. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1423686112Google Scholar

Dietz, T., & Henry, A. D. (2008). Context and the commons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(36), 13189–13190.Google Scholar

Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302(5652), 1907–1912.Google Scholar

Dillahunt, T., Becker, G., Mankoff, J., & Kraut, R. (2008, May). Motivating environmentally sustainable behavior changes with a virtual polar bear. In Pervasive 2008 Workshop Proceedings (Vol. 8, pp. 58–62). Workshop held at the 6th International Conference on Pervasive Computing, May 19th, 2008, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar

Dodge, J., Ospina, S. M., & Foldy, E. G. (2005). Integrating rigor and relevance in public administrationscholarship: The contribution of narrative inquiry. Public Administration Review, 65(3), 286–300.Google Scholar

Dodge, J., Saz-Carranza, A., & Ospina, S. M. (2019). Narrative inquiry in public network research. In Joris, V. J., Keast, R., & Koliba, C. (Eds.), Networks and Collaboration in the Public Sector (pp. 82–106). Routledge, London.Google Scholar

Dodman, D., Hayward, B., Pelling, M., Castan, B. V., Chow, W., Chu, E., … & Ziervogel, G. (2022). Chapter 6: Cities, settlements and key infrastructure. In Pörtner, H.-O. et al. (Eds.), Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Domantay, J. (1953). The turtle fisheries in turtle islands. Bull. Fish. Soc. Philippines, 3–4, 3–27.Google Scholar

Domes, G., Heinrichs, M., Michel, A., Berger, C., & Herpertz, S. C. (2007). Oxytocin improves ‘Mind-Reading’ in humans. Biological Psychiatry, 61(6), 731–733.Google Scholar

Dr Dog (2021). AnimalsAsia webpage at www.animalsasia.org/hk-en/our-work/cat-and-dog-welfare/what-we-do/dr-dog.html. Accessed June 30, 2021.Google Scholar

Druckman, J. N., Klar, S., Krupnikov, Y., Levendusky, M., & Ryan, J. B. (2022). (Mis) estimating affective polarization. The Journal of Politics, 84(2), 1106–1117.Google Scholar

Dubois, G., Sovacool, B., Aall, C., Nilsson, M., Barbier, C., Herrmann, A., … & Sauerborn, R. (2019). It starts at home? Climate policies targeting household consumption and behavioral decisions are key to low-carbon futures. Energy Research & Social Science, 52, 144–158.Google Scholar

Durkheim, E. (1893). (1964). The Division of Labor in Society (G. Simpson, Trans.). Free Press, New York.Google Scholar

Eckel, C., & Grossman, P. (1998). Are women less selfish than men: Evidence from dictator experiments. Economic Journal, May 1998a, 108(448), 726–735.Google Scholar

Eckerman, I. (2005). The Bhopal Saga–Causes and Consequences of the World’s Largest Industrial Disaster. Universities Press, Hyderabad, India. doi:10.13140/2.1.3457.5364. ISBN 978-81-7371-515-0.Google Scholar

Eklund, J., Andersson- Straberg, T., & Hansen, E. M. (2009). “I’ve also experienced loss and fear”: Effects of prior similar experience on empathy. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50(1), 65–69.Google Scholar

Empatico (2019). Empatico 2018–2019 Evaluation Study. Working paper, unpublished manuscript at https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GUh8FSgP25TWY2YJED4Kn5pNaiTPamQn/view?pli=1. Accessed June 1, 2022.Google Scholar

Enfield, N. J., & Levinson, S. C. (2006). Roots of Human Sociality. Berg, New York.Google Scholar

Ernstson, H., So¨ rlin, S., & Elmqvist, T. (2009). Social movements and ecosystem services- the role of social network structure in protecting and managing urban green areas in stockholm. Ecology & Society, 13, 39.Google Scholar

Falk, A., Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2002). Appropriating the Commons: A Theoretical Explanation. In Ostrom, E., et al. (Eds.), The Drama of the Commons. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

Federici, S. (2011). Feminism and the Politics of the Commons. www.bakonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/FEDERICI_Feminism-and-the-Politics-of-the-Commons_FORMER-WEST-2016.pdf. Accessed May 1, 2022.Google Scholar

Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (2006). Chapter 8. The economics of fairness, reciprocity and altruism–experimental evidence and new theories. In Kolm, S-C., & Ythier, J. M. (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity (pp. 615–691). North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Feinberg, A., Hooijschuur, E., Rogge, N., Ghorbani, A., & Herder, P. (2021). Sustaining collective action in urban community gardens. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 24(3), 3. doi: 10.18564/jasss.4506Google Scholar

Ferraro, P. J., & Price, M. K. (2013). Using nonpecuniary strategies to influence behavior: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(1), 64–73.Google Scholar

Ferraro, P. J., Miranda, J. J., & Price, M. K. (2011). The persistence of treatment effects with norm-based policy instruments: Evidence from a randomized environmental policy experiment. American Economic Review, 101(3), 318–322. www.doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.3.318.Google Scholar

Fischer, C. (2014). “Slumming It.” In Blog: Made in America. Boston Review. http://bostonreview.net/blog/claude-fischer-made-america-alice-goffman-slum-ethnography. Accessed June 14, 2021.Google Scholar

Fisher, R., Ury, W. L., & Patton, B. (2011). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. Penguin, New York.Google Scholar

Fiske, S. T. (2009). From dehumanization and objectification, to rehumanization: Neuroimaging studies on the building blocks of empathy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1167, 31.Google Scholar

Flood, M., Dresher, M., Tucker, A., & Device, F. (1950). Prisoner’s dilemma: Game theory. Experimental Economics (p. 54). Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, California.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977. Vintage, New York.Google Scholar

Friedman, D., & McAdam, D. (1992). Collective identities and activism: networks, choices, and the life of a social movement. In Morris, A. D., & Mueller, C. (Eds.), Frontiers of Social Movement Theory (pp. 156–173). Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar

Frischmann, B. M., Madison, M. J., & Strandburg, K. J. (Eds.), (2014). Governing Knowledge Commons. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fultz, J., Batson, C. D., Fortenbach, V. A., McCarthy, P. M., & Varney, L. L. (1986). Social evaluation and the empathy-altruism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(4), 761–769.Google Scholar

Furnham, A. (1995). The just world, charitable giving and attitudes to disability. Personal and Individual Differences, 19, 577–583.Google Scholar

Gabriel, Y. (2010). Beyond scripts and rules: Emotion, fantasy and care in contemporary service work. In Emotionalizing Organizations and Organizing Emotions (pp. 42–62). Palgrave Macmillan, London.Google Scholar

Galinsky, A. D., Maddux, W. W., Gilin, D., & White, J. B. (2008). Why it pays to get inside the head of your opponent: The differential effects of perspective taking and empathy in negotiations. Psychological Science, 19(4), 378–384.Google Scholar

Garner, B. (2017). Communicating social support during crises at the farmers’ market: A social exchange approach to understanding customer?farmer communal relationships. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 41(4), 422–430.Google Scholar

Gatiso, T. T., Vollan, B., & Nuppenau, E. A. (2015). Resource scarcity and democratic elections in commons dilemmas: An experiment on forest use in Ethiopia. Ecological Economics, 114, 199–207.Google Scholar

Geiger, N., Swim, J. K., & Glenna, L. (2019). Spread the green word: A social community perspective into environmentally sustainable behavior. Environment and Behavior, 51(5), 561–589.Google Scholar

Genevsky, A., Västfjäll, D., Slovic, P., & Knutson, B. (2013). Neural underpinnings of the identifiable victim effect: Affect shifts preferences for giving. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(43), 17188–17196.Google Scholar

Gerlak, A. K., & Heikkila, T. (2007). Collaboration and institutional endurance in US water policy. PS: Political Science & Politics, 40(1), 55–60.Google Scholar

Gibson, C., Williams, J., & Ostrom, E. (2005). Local enforcement and better forests. World Development, 33(2), 273–284.Google Scholar

Giest, S., & Howlett, M. (2014). Understanding the pre-conditions of commons governance: The role of network management. Environmental Science & Policy, 36, 37–47.Google Scholar

Gilligan, C. (1982) In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Gilligan, C. (1993). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Gladwin, D. (2020) Digital storytelling going viral: using narrative empathy to promote environmental action. Media Practice and Education, 21(4), 275–288. DOI:10.1080/25741136.2020.1832827Google Scholar

González, E. R., Lejano, R. P., Vidales, G., Conner, R. F., Kidokoro, Y., Fazeli, B., & Cabrales, R. (2007). Participatory action research for environmental health: Encountering Freire in the urban barrio. Journal of Urban Affairs, 29(1), 77–100.Google Scholar

Goodall, J. (1986). The Chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of Behaviour. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161–78.Google Scholar

Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510.Google Scholar

Graziano, W. G., Habashi, M. M., Sheese, B. E., & Tobin, R. M. (2007). Agreeableness, empathy, and helping: A person× situation perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(4), 583.Google Scholar

Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701–721Google Scholar

Grossman, P. J., & Eckel, C. C. (2015). Giving versus taking for a cause. Economics Letters, 132(July), 28–30.Google Scholar

Gu, X., Gao, Z., Wang, X., Liu, X., Knight, R. T., Hof, P. R., & Fan, J. (2012). Anterior insular cortex is necessary for empathetic pain perception. Brain, 135(9), 2726–2735.Google Scholar

Gubler, M., Brügger, A., & Eyer, M. (2019). Adolescents’ perceptions of the psychological distance to climate change, its relevance for building concern about it, and the potential for education. In Filho and Helmstock (Eds.), Climate Change and the Role of Education (pp. 129–147). Springer Nature, Cham, Switzerland.Google Scholar

Guilbeault, D., Becker, J., & Centola, D. (2018). Social learning and partisan bias in the interpretation of climate trends. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(39), 9714–9719.Google Scholar

Gutiérrez, N. L., Hilborn, R., & Defeo, O. (2011). Leadership, social capital and incentives promote successful fisheries. Nature, 470(7334), 386–389.Google Scholar

Gutierrez-Velez, V. H., & MacDicken, K. (2008). Quantifying the direct social and governmental costs of illegal logging in the Bolivian, Brazilian, and Peruvian Amazon. Forest Policy and Economics, 10(4), 248–256.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action (Vol. 2). Beacon Press, Boston, Mass.Google Scholar

Hafstead, M. (2019). Carbon Pricing 101. Online article (June 6, 2019; updated March 3, 2020) at www.rff.org/publications/explainers/carbon-pricing-101/. Accessed on June 1, 2022.Google Scholar

Hahn, E. R., & Garrett, M. K. (2017). Preschoolers’ moral judgments of environmental harm and the influence of perspective taking. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 53, 11–19.Google Scholar

Hamilton, J. T. (1995). Pollution as news: Media and stock market reactions to the toxics release inventory data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28(1), 98–113.Google Scholar

Hand, L. C. (2021). A virtuous hearer: An exploration of epistemic injustice and an ethic of care in public encounters. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 43(1), 117–133.Google Scholar

Harbaugh, W. T., Mayr, U., & Burghart, D. R. (2007). Neural responses to taxation and voluntary giving reveal motives for charitable donations. Science, 316(5831), 1622–1625.Google Scholar

Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248.Google Scholar

Harris, A. C., & Madden, G. J. (2002). Delay discounting and performance on the prisoner’s dilemma game. The Psychological Record, 52, 429–440.Google Scholar

Harrod, H. L. (2000). The Animals Came Dancing: Native American Sacred Ecology and Animal Kinship. University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar

Harvey, D. (2009). Social Justice and the City. University of Georgia, Athens.Google Scholar

Heinz, N., & Koessler, A. K. (2021). Other-regarding preferences and pro-environmental behaviour: An interdisciplinary review of experimental studies. Ecological Economics, 184, 106987.Google Scholar

Henrich, J. P., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Fehr, E., Camerer, C., & Gintis, H. (Eds.), (2004). Foundations of Human Sociality: Economic Experiments and Ethnographic Evidence from Fifteen Small-scale Societies. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hernández, B., Suárez, E., Corral-Verdugo, V., & Hess, S. (2012). The relationship between social and environmental interdependence as an explanation of proenvironmental behavior. Human Ecology Review, 19(1), 1–9.Google Scholar

Hernández, D., Chang, D., Hutchinson, C., Hill, E., Almonte, A., Burns, R., … & Evans, D. (2018). Public housing on the periphery: Vulnerable residents and depleted resilience reserves post-hurricane sandy. Journal of Urban Health, 95(5), 703–715.Google Scholar

Hess, C., & Ostrom, E. (2005). A Framework for Analyzing the Knowledge Commons: A chapter from Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice.Google Scholar

Hibbert, S., Smith, A., Davies, A., & Ireland, F. (2007). Guilt appeals: Persuasion knowledge and charitable giving. Psychology & Marketing 24(8), 723–742.Google Scholar

Hirsh, J. B., & Dolderman, D. (2007). Personality predictors of consumerism and environmentalism: A preliminary study. Personality and individual differences, 43(6), 1583–1593.Google Scholar

Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. L. (1996). Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games. The American Economic Review, 86(3), 653–660.Google Scholar

Hofmokl, J. (2010). The Internet commons: Towards an eclectic theoretical framework. International Journal of the Commons, 4(1), 226–250.Google Scholar

Hollstein, B. (2011). Qualitative Approaches. The Sage Handbook of Social Network Analysis, 404–416.Google Scholar

Homer-Dixon, T. F. (2010). Environment, scarcity, and violence. In Environment, Scarcity, and Violence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (1972). Dialectic of Enlightenment: Max Horkheimer and Theodor W. Adorono. Seabury Press, New York.Google Scholar

Hourdequin, M. (2010). Climate, collective action and individual ethical obligations. Environmental Values, 19(4), 443–464.Google Scholar

Howlett, M. (2019). Designing Public Policies: Principles and Instruments. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar

Howlett, M., Mukherjee, I., & Woo, J. J. (2018). Thirty years of research on policy instruments. In Handbook on Policy, Process and Governing. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK.Google Scholar

Hulme, M. (2021). Climate (Key Ideas in Geography). Routledge, New York.Google Scholar

Ingram, M., Ingram, H., & Lejano, R. (2019). Environmental action in the Anthropocene: The power of narrative-networks. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(5), 492–503.Google Scholar

IPCC (2022). Summary for policymakers. In Pörtner, H.-O., Roberts, D. C., Poloczanska, E. S., Mintenbeck, K., Tignor, M., Alegría, A., Craig, M., Langsdorf, S., Löschke, S., Möller, V., & Okem, A. (Eds.), Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [H.-O. Pörtner, D. C. Roberts, M. Tignor, E. S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem, B. Rama (Eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar

IPS, Innovate Public Schools (2019). SELA Rising, Fighting for Educational Justice for Latino Students in Southeast Los Angeles, Innovate Public Schools, Los Angeles at https://innovateschools.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/SELA-Rising-Final-Report-2019_English_compressed.pdf. Accessed June 1, 2022.Google Scholar

Jager, W., Janssen, M. A., De Vries, H. J. M., De Greef, J., & Vlek, C. A. J. (2000). Behaviour in commons dilemmas: Homo economicus and Homo psychologicus in an ecological-economic model. Ecological Economics, 35(3), 357–379.Google Scholar

Jamieson, K. H., & Cappella, J. N. (2008). Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Janssen, M. A., & Anderies, J. M. (2011). Governing the commons: Learning from field and laboratory experiments. Ecological Economics, 70(9), 1569–1620.Google Scholar

Johnson, S. C., Baxter, L. C., Wilder, L. S., Pipe, J. G., Heiserman, J. E., & Prigatano, G. P. (2002). Neural correlates of self-reflection. Brain, 125, 1808–1814.Google Scholar

Johnston, B. M., & Glasford, D. E. (2018). Intergroup contact and helping: How quality contact and empathy shape outgroup helping. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(8), 1185–1201.Google Scholar

Jones, C., Hine, D. W., & Marks, A. D. (2017). The future is now: Reducing psychological distance to increase public engagement with climate change. Risk Analysis, 37(2), 331–341. doi.org/10.1111/risa.12601.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., Ritov, I., Schkade, D., Sherman, S. J., & Varian, H. R. (1999). Economic preferences or attitude expressions?: An analysis of dollar responses to public issues. In Elicitation of Preferences (pp. 203–242). Springer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Kapembwa, J., & Wells, J. (2016). Climate justice for wildlife: A rights-based account. Intervention or protest: Acting for nonhuman animals, 359–390.Google Scholar

Keller, A., Marsh, J. E., Richardson, B. H., & Ball, L. J. (2022). A systematic review of the psychological distance of climate change: Towards the development of an evidence-based construct. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 81, 101822.Google Scholar

Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2016). Cooperation and discord in global climate policy. Nature Climate Change, 6(6), 570–575.Google Scholar

Keysers, C., & Gazzola, V. (2006). Towards a unifying neural theory of social cognition. Progress in Brain Research, 156, 379–401.Google Scholar

Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. (2000). Public management and policy networks: Foundations of a network approach to governance Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory, 2(2): 135–158.Google Scholar

Klimecki, O. M., Leiberg, S., Ricard, M., & Singer, T. (2014). Differential pattern of functional brain plasticity after compassion and empathy training. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(6), 873–879.Google Scholar

Kogut, T., & Ritov, I. (2005). The “identified victim” effect: An identified group, or just a single individual? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18(3), 157–167.Google Scholar

Kogut, T., & Ritov, I. (2011). Chapter 8. The identifiable victim effect: Causes and boundary conditions. In Oppenheimer, D. M., & Olivola, C. Y. (Eds.), The Science of Giving: Experimental Approaches to the Study of Charity (pp. 133–148). Psychology Press, New York.Google Scholar

Kohlberg, L. (1974). The claim to moral adequacy of a highest stage of moral judgment. The Journal of Philosophy, 70(18), 630–646.Google Scholar

Kohler-Evans, P., & Candice, D. B. (2015) “Compassion: How do you teach it?” Journal of Education and Practice, 6(11), 33–37. doi: 2222–288X.Google Scholar

Koliba, C., & Koppenjan, J. (2016). Managing networks and complex adaptive systems. In Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (Eds.), Public Management and Governance (pp. 262–274). Routledge, London.Google Scholar

Koliba, C. J., Meek, J. W., Zia, A., & Mills, R. W. (2017). Governance Networks in Public Administration and Public Policy. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar

Kolleck, N., Well, M., Sperzel, S., & Jörgens, H. (2017). The power of social networks: How the UNFCCC secretariat creates momentum for climate education. Global Environmental Politics, 17(4), 106–126.Google Scholar

Krupp, D. B., DeBruine, L. M., & Barclay, P. (2008). A cue of kinship promotes cooperation for the public good. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 49–55.Google Scholar

Kumar, S. (2004). Victims of gas leak in Bhopal seek redress on compensation. British Medical Journal, 2004, 329. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.329.7462.366-b (Published 12 August 2004).Google Scholar

Ladak, A., Wilks, M., & Anthis, J. R. (2021). Extending Perspective Taking to Non-Human Groups. Preprint www.sentienceinstitute.org/downloads/Perspective%20taking%20and%20nonhuman%20groups%20-%20preprint.pdf. Accessed June 1, 2022.Google Scholar

Laird-Benner, W., & Ingram, H. (2010). Sonoran desert network weavers: Surprising environmental successes on the US/Mexico Border. Environment, 53(1), 6–17.Google Scholar

Lame, D., John, F., & Erdoes, R. (1972). Lame Deer, Seeker of Visions, Life of a Sioux Medicine Man, Simon & Schuster, New York.Google Scholar

Lamm, C., Batson, C. D., & Decety, J. (2007). The neural substrate of human empathy: Effects of perspective-taking and cognitive appraisal. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(1), 42–58.Google Scholar

Lamm, C., Meltzoff, A. N., & Decety, J. (2010). How do we empathize with someone who is not like us? A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(2), 362–376.Google Scholar

Lamm, C., Nusbaum, H. C., Meltzoff, A. N., & Decety, J. (2007). What are you feeling? Using functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess the modulation of sensory and affective responses during empathy for pain. PLoS One, 2(12), e1292.Google Scholar

Lee, J. A., & Murnighan, J. K. (2001). The empathy-prospect model and the choice to help. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(4), 816–839.Google Scholar

Lee, T., & Van de Meene, S. (2012). Who teaches and who learns? Policy learning through the C40 cities climate network. Policy Sciences, 45(3), 199–220.Google Scholar

Leiserowitz, A. (2006). Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change, 77(1), 45–72.Google Scholar

Leiserowitz, A. (2019). 17. Building public and political will for climate change action. In A Better Planet (pp. 155–162). Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.Google Scholar

Lejano, R. (2006). Frameworks for Policy Analysis: Merging Text and Context. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar

Lejano, R. (2007). Peace Games: Theorizing about Transboundary Conservation. Peace Parks: Conservation and Conflict Resolution (pp. 41–54). MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Lejano, R. (2008). The phenomenon of collective action: Modeling institutions as structures of care. Public Administration Review, 68(3), 491–504.Google Scholar

Lejano, R. (2023). Economies with other-regarding actors: An exploration (in process).Google Scholar

Lejano, R. P., & Kan, W. S. (2022a). Relationality: The Inner Life of Public Policy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Open access book: www.cambridge.org/core/elements/relationality/609FF3DF88BCADAA726208EE3E6F536EGoogle Scholar

Lejano, R. P., & Kan, W. S. (2022b). IPCC and the City: The need to transition from ideology to climate justice. Journal of Planning Education and Research (online).Google Scholar

Lejano, R. P. (2006). Theorizing peace parks: Two models of collective action. Journal of Peace Research, 43(5), 563–581.Google Scholar

Lejano, R. P. (2017). Assemblage and relationality in social-ecological systems. Dialogues in Human Geography, 7(2), 192–196.Google Scholar

Lejano, R. P. (2019a). Relationality and social-ecological systems: Going beyond or behind sustainability and resilience. Sustainability, 11(10), 2760.Google Scholar

Lejano, R. P. (2019b). Ideology and the narrative of climate skepticism. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 100(12), ES415-ES421.Google Scholar

Lejano, R. P. (2021). Relationality: An alternative framework for analysing policy. Journal of Public Policy, 41(2), 360–383.Google Scholar

Lejano, R. P., & Ingram, H. (2009). Collaborative networks and new ways of knowing. Environmental Science & Policy, 12(6), 653–662.Google Scholar

Lejano, R. P., & Ingram, H. (2012). Modeling the commons as a game with vector payoffs. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 24(1), 66–89.Google Scholar

Lejano, R. P., & Nero, S. J. (2020). The Power of Narrative: Climate Skepticism and the Deconstruction of Science. Oxford University Press, New York, USA.Google Scholar

Lejano, R. P., Araral, E., & Araral, D. (2014). Interrogating the commons: Introduction to the special issue. Reflecting on a legacy. Environmental Sciences and Policy, 36, 1–7.Google Scholar

Lejano, R. P., Ingram, H. M., Whiteley, J. M., Torres, D., & Agduma, S. J. (2007). The importance of context: Integrating resource conservation with local institutions. Society & Natural Resources, 20(2), 177–185.Google Scholar

Lejano, R., Chui, E., Lam, T., & Wong, J. (2018). Collective action as narrativity and praxis: Theory and application to Hong Kong’s urban protest movements. Public Policy and Administration, 33(3), 260–289.Google Scholar

Lejano, R., Guo, J., Lian, H., & Yin, B. (2018). A Phenomenology of Institutions: Relationality and Governance in China and Beyond. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar

Lejano, R., Ingram, M., & Ingram, H. (2013). The Power of Narrative in Environmental Networks. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Lejano, R., Ingram, M., & Ingram, H. (2018). Narrative in the policy process. In Handbook on Policy, Process and Governing (pp. 309–326). Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK.Google Scholar

Lejano, R., Kan, W., & Chau, C. (2020). “The hidden disequities of carbon trading: Carbon emissions, air toxics, and environmental justice,” Frontiers in Environmental Science (online) doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.593014.Google Scholar

Levinas, E. (1961). Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority (trans: Lingis, Alphonso).Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, C. (1966). The Savage Mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

Levitt, S. D., & List, J. A. (2007). What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? Journal of Economic Perspectives. 21(2):153–174.Google Scholar

Lindeboom, W., Alam, N., Begum, D., & Streatfield, P. K. (2012). The association of meteorological factors and mortality in rural Bangladesh, 1983–2009. Global Health Action, 5:61–73.Google Scholar

Loreman, T. (2011). Kindness and empathy in pedagogy. In Love as Pedagogy (pp. 15–31). SensePublishers.Google Scholar

Lorenzoni, I., & Pidgeon, N. (2006). Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives. Climatic Change, 77:73–95.Google Scholar

Lu, H. (2021). Exposure to victim portrayals: The role of multiple emotions in influencing collective action intentions for environmental justice. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 11(4), 548–560.Google Scholar

Maiella, R., La Malva, P., Marchetti, D., Pomarico, E., Di Crosta, A., Palumbo, R., … & Verrocchio, M. C. (2020a). The psychological distance and climate change: A systematic review on the mitigation and adaptation behaviors. Frontiers in Psychology, 2459.Google Scholar

Maiella, R., La Malva, P., Marchetti, D., Pomarico, E., Di Crosta, A., Palumbo, R., … & Verrocchio, M. C. (2020b). The psychological distance and climate change: A systematic review on the mitigation and adaptation behaviors. Frontiers in Psychology, 11:568899Google Scholar

Majdandžic´, J., Amashaufer, S., Hummer, A., Windischberger, C., & Lamm, C. (2016). The selfless mind: How prefrontal involvement in mentalizing with similar and dissimilar others shapes empathy and prosocial behavior. Cognition, 157, 24–38.Google Scholar

Mandalaki, E., & Fotaki, M. (2020). The bodies of the commons: Towards a relational embodied ethics of the commons. Journal of Business Ethics, 166(4), 745–760.Google Scholar

Mansbridge, J. (2014). The role of the state in governing the commons. Environmental Science & Policy, 36, 8–10.Google Scholar

Mansbridge, J. J. (1990). On the relation of altruism and self-interest. In Mansbridge, J. J. (Ed.), Beyond Self-interest. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

Mansbridge, J. J. (Ed.), (1990). Beyond Self-interest. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

Marcuse, H. (1964). One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Beacon Press, Boston.Google Scholar

Margaret, J., & King, M. J. (1996). The audience in the wilderness: The Disney nature films. Journal of Popular Film and Television 24.2, 60–68.Google Scholar

Markowitz, E. M., Slovic, P., Västfjäll, D., & Hodges, S. D. (2013). Compassion fade and the challenge of environmental conservation. Judgment and Decision making, 8(4), 397–406.Google Scholar

Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24(4): 503–15.Google Scholar

McClough, D., Ewing, R., & Schertzer, S. (2015). To pay or not to pay: An empirical examination of the effect of injunctive norms on charitable donations. The Journal of Economics and Politics, 22(1), 99–118.Google Scholar

McCreary, J. J., Marchant, G. J., & Davis, A. S. (April, 2018). The anatomy of empathy. In Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.Google Scholar

McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2011). The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. The Sociological Quarterly, 52(2), 155–194.Google Scholar

McDonald, R. I., Chai, H. Y., & Newell, B. R. (2015). Personal experience and the ‘psychological distance’of climate change: An integrative review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44, 109–118.Google Scholar

McGinnis, M., & Ostrom, E. (1992). Design principles for local and global commons. The International Political Economy and International Institutions, 2, 465–493.Google Scholar

McPherson, J. M. (1997). For Cause and Comrades: Why Men Fought in the Civil War. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Meinshausen, M., Lewis, J., McGlade, C., Gütschow, J., Nicholls, Z., Burdon, R., … & Hackmann, B. (2022). Realization of Paris Agreement pledges may limit warming just below 2° C. Nature, 604(7905), 304–309.Google Scholar

Miele, M., Wilder, M., Ingram, M., Migrane, E., Schein, R., & Prytherch, D. (2015). The power of narrative in environmental networks (2013), by Lejano, R., Ingram, M., & Ingram, H. [Book Review]. AAG Annals Review of Books, 3(2), 99–108.Google Scholar

Mifune, N., Hashimoto, H., & Yamagishi, T. (2010). Altruism toward in-group members as a reputation mechanism. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(2), 109–117.Google Scholar

Militz, T. A., & Foale, S. (2017). The “Nemo Effect”: Perception and reality of Finding Nemo’s impact on marine aquarium fisheries. Fish and Fisheries, 18(3), 596–606.Google Scholar

Mill, J. S. (1859, 2002). On Liberty. published in 2002 by Dover Publications, Mineola, New York. Originally published in 1859 by J. W. Parker, London.Google Scholar

Miller, D. T. (1977). Personal deserving versus justice for others: An exploration of the justice motive. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13: 1–13.Google Scholar

Miller, D. T., & Prentice, D. A. (2016). Changing norms to change behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 339–361.Google Scholar

Miller, J. J., Cooley, M., Niu, C., Segress, M., Fletcher, J., Bowman, K., & Littrell, L. (2019). Support, information seeking, and homophily in a virtual support group for adoptive parents: Impact on perceived empathy. Children and Youth Services Review, 101, 151–156.Google Scholar

Miralles, A., Raymond, M., & Lecointre, G. (2019). Empathy and compassion toward other species decrease with evolutionary divergence time. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1–8.Google Scholar

Mirra, N. (2018). Educating for Empathy: Literacy Learning and Civic Engagement. Teachers College Press, New York.Google Scholar

Morell, M. F. (2014). 8 Governance of Online Creation Communities for the Building of Digital Commons: Viewed through the. Governing knowledge commons, 281.Google Scholar

Morrissey, L., & Boswell, J. (2023). Finding common ground. European Journal of Political Theory, 22(1), 141–160.Google Scholar

Mulgan, G. (2012). Government with the people: The outlines of a relational state. In Cooke, G., & Muir, R. (Eds.), The Relational State: How Recognising the Importance of Human Relationship could Revolutionise the Role of the State. Institute for Public Policy Research, London.Google Scholar

Mumford, L. (1961). The City in History: Its Origins, Its Transformations, and Its Prospects (Vol. 67). Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, New York.Google Scholar

Munson, S., Kotcher, J., Maibach, E., Rosenthal, S. A., & Leiserowitz, A. (2021). The role of felt responsibility in climate change political participation. Oxford Open Climate Change, 1(1), kgab012.Google Scholar

Naegele, H. (2020). Where does the Fair Trade money go? How much consumers pay extra for Fair Trade coffee and how this value is split along the value chain. World Development, 133, 105006.Google Scholar

Nakagawa, Y., & Saijo, T. (2021). A visual narrative for taking future generations’ perspectives. Sustainability Science, 16(3), 983–1000.Google Scholar

Nash, J. (1950). Non-Cooperative Games. A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of Princeton University in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Princeton University, Princeton.Google Scholar

Nash, J. (1951). Non-cooperative games. Annals of Mathematics, 286–295.Google Scholar

Natarajan, U. (2021). Environmental justice in the Global South. In Atapattu, S. A., Gonzalez, C. G., & Seck, S. L. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Environmental Justice and Sustainable Development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Nayak, P. K., & Berkes, F. (2022). Evolutionary Perspectives on the Commons: A Model of Commonisation and Decommonisation. Sustainability, 14(7), 4300.Google Scholar

Nieto-Romero, M., Valente, S., Figueiredo, E., & Parra, C. (2019). Historical commons as sites of transformation. A critical research agenda to study human and more-than-human communities. Geoforum, 107, 113–123.Google Scholar

Nobis, N. (2009). The “Babe” vegetarians: Bioethics, animal minds and moral methodology. In Shapshay, S. (Ed.), Bioethics at the Movies (pp. 56–73). Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar

Noddings, N. (1995). Teaching themes of care. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 675–675.Google Scholar

Noddings, N. (2013). Caring: A Relational Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. C. (1990). Love’s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature, Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York.Google Scholar

O’Connell, S. M. (1995). Empathy in chimpanzees: Evidence for theory of mind? Primates, 36(3), 397–410.Google Scholar

O’Dell, L. 2008. Representations of the “damaged” child: “child saving” in a British children’s charity ad campaign. Children and Society 22: 383–392. DOI:10.1111/j.1099-0860.2007.00114.xGoogle Scholar

Ogunseitan, O. A. (2005). Topophilia and the quality of life. Environmental Health Perspectives, 113(2), 143–148.Google Scholar

Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Ortiz-Riomalo, J. F., Koessler, A. K., & Engel, S. (2021). Inducing perspective-taking for prosocial behaviour in natural resource management. Available at SSRN 3773752.Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. (1987). Institutional arrangements for resolving the commons dilemma: Some contending approaches. Conference paper. Conference:The Question of the Commons. The Culture and Ecology of Communal Resources, 46th National Conference of the American Society for Public Administration, Indianapolis, Indiana, March 23–27, 1985, 250–265.Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. (2000). Crowding out citizenship. Scandinavian Political Studies, 23(1), 3–16.Google Scholar

Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review, 100(3), 641–672.Google Scholar

Ostrom, E., & Janssen, M. A. (2004). Multi-level governance and resilience of social-ecological systems. In Globalisation, Poverty and Conflict (pp. 239–259). Springer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., Walker, J., Agrawal, A., & Runge, C. F. (1995). Rules, games, and common-pool resources. Journal of Economic Literature, 33(3), 1393–1393.Google Scholar

Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., Walker, J., Walker, J. M., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, Games, and Common-pool Resources. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Ostrom, E., & Nagendra, H., 2006. Insights on linking forests, trees, and people from the air, on the ground, and in the laboratory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103(51), 19, 224–19, 331.Google Scholar

Ostrom, V. (1999) “Polycentricity”. In McGinnis, M. (Ed.), Polycentricity and Local Public Economies: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis (pp. 52–74). University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Pagdee, A., Kim, Y.-S., & Daugherty, P. J., 2006. What makes community forest management successful: A meta-study from community forests throughout the world. Society and Natural Resources 19(1), 33–52.Google Scholar

Pahl, S., & Bauer, J. (2013). Overcoming the distance: Perspective taking with future humans improves environmental engagement. Environment and Behavior, 45(2), 155–169.Google Scholar

Paul, E. S., & Serpell, J. A. (1996). Obtaining a new pet dog: Effects on middle childhood children and their families. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 47, 17–29.Google Scholar

Perez-Rodriguez, M. M., Mahon, K., Russo, M., Ungar, A. K., & Burdick, K. E. (2015). Oxytocin and social cognition in affective and psychotic disorders. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 25(2), 265–282.Google Scholar

Perez-Rodriguez, M. M., Mahon, K., Russo, M., Ungar, A. K., & Burdick, K. E. (2015). Oxytocin and social cognition in affective and psychotic disorders. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 25(2), 265–282.Google Scholar

Peth, D., Mußhoff, O., Funke, K., & Hirschauer, N. (2018). Nudging farmers to comply with water protection rules-experimental evidence from Germany. Ecological Economics, 152, 310–321.Google Scholar

Pfattheicher, S., Sassenrath, C., & Schindler, S. (2016). Feelings for the suffering of others and the environment: Compassion fosters proenvironmental tendencies. Environment and Behavior, 48(7).Google Scholar

Pilny, A., Poole, M. S., Reichelmann, A., & Klein, B. (2017). A structurational group decision-making perspective on the commons dilemma: Results from an online public goods game. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 45(4), 413–428.Google Scholar

Polletta, F. (1998). Contending stories: Narrative in social movements. Qualitative Sociology 21(4), 419–446.Google Scholar

Polski, M. M., & Ostrom, E. (2017). An institutional framework for policy analysis and design. In Cole, D. H., & McGinnis, M. D. (Eds.), Elinor Ostrom and the Bloomington School of Political Economy: A Framework for Policy Analysis (Vol. 3). Lexington Books, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

Poteete, A. R., Janssen, M. A., & Ostrom, E. (2010). Working Together: Collective Action, the Commons, and Multiple Methods in Practice. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Powell Walter, W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12(2), 295–336.Google Scholar

Preis, M. A., Kröner-Herwig, B., Schmidt-Samoa, C., Dechent, P., & Barke, A. (2015). Neural correlates of empathy with pain show habituation eects. An fMRI study. PLoS One, 10, e0137056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137056Google Scholar

Preston, S. D., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2002). Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 25, 1–72.Google Scholar

Preston, S. D., Liao, J. D., Toombs, T. P., Romero-Canyas, R., Speiser, J., & Seifert, C. M. (2021). A case study of a conservation flagship species: The monarch butterfly. Biodiversity and Conservation, 30(7), 2057–2077.Google Scholar

Prguda, E., & Neumann, D. L. (2014). Inter-human and animal-directed empathy: A test for evolutionary biases in empathetic responding. Behavioural processes, 108, 80–86.Google Scholar

Prokop, P., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2010). Effects of having pets at home on children’s attitudes toward popular and unpopular animals. Anthrozoös, 23(1), 21–35.Google Scholar

Prokop, P., Prokop, M., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2008). Effects of keeping animals as pets on children’s concepts of vertebrates and invertebrates. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 431–449.Google Scholar

Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K., & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3(1), 57–83.Google Scholar

Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252.Google Scholar

Pulido, L. (2015). Geographies of race and ethnicity: White supremacy vs white privilege in environmental racism research. Progress in Human Geography, 39(6), 809–17.Google Scholar

Rabe, B. G. (2018). Can We Price Carbon? MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Rabin, M. (1993). Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. The American Economic Review, 83(5), 1281–1302.Google Scholar

Rabinovich, A., Morton, T. A., Postmes, T., & Verplanken, B. (2009). Think global, act local: The effect of goal and mindset specificity on willingness to donate to an environmental organization. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 391e399.Google Scholar

Rapley, J. (2013). Understanding Development: Theory and Practice in the Third World. Routledge, New York.Google Scholar

Rapoport, A. (1974). Prisoner’s dilemma – recollections and observations. In Game Theory as a Theory of a Conflict Resolution (pp. 17–34). Springer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Belknap Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Reddy, S. (2018). “Plastic Pollution Affects Sea Life Throughout the Ocean,” Pew Charitable Trusts online report, at www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/articles/2018/09/24/plastic-pollution-affects-sea-life-throughout-the-ocean. Accessed September 17, 2021.Google Scholar

Reed, K. A., Wehner, M. F., & Zarzycki, C. M. (2022). Attribution of 2020 hurricane season extreme rainfall to human-induced climate change. Nature Communications, 13(1), 1–6.Google Scholar

Rees, W., & Wackernagel, M. (2008). Urban ecological footprints: Why cities cannot be sustainable – and why they are a key to sustainability. In Urban Ecology (pp. 537–555). Springer, Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Ricoeur, P. (1976). Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning. TCU Press, Fort Worth.Google Scholar

Ricœur, P. (1983). Time and Narrative (Vols. 1, 2, and 3). (trans. K. Blamey and D. Pellauer), University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

Ricoeur, P. (1988). Time and Narrative (Vol. 3). University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

Ricoeur, P. (1991). Narrative identity. Philosophy Today, 35(1), 73–81.Google Scholar

Ridley, M. (2003). The Agile Gene. HarperCollins, Toronto.Google Scholar

Rilling, J. K., DeMarco, A. C., Hackett, P. D., Thompson, R., Ditzen, B., Patel, R. et al. (2012). Effects of intranasal oxytocin and vasopressin on cooperative behavior and associated brain activity in men. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 37, 447–467. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.07.013Google Scholar

Rock, J., & Gilchrist, E. (2021). Creating empathy for the more-than-human under 2 degrees heating. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 1–9.Google Scholar

Rode, J., G’omez-Baggethun, E., Krause, T. (2015). Motivation crowding by economic incentives in conservation policy: A review of the empirical evidence. Ecological Economics, 117, 270–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.11.019.Google Scholar

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar

Rogge, N., Theesfeld, I., & Strassner, C. (2018). Social sustainability through social interaction – a national survey on community gardens in Germany. Sustainability, 10(4), 1085.Google Scholar

Rosenbloom, D., Markard, J., Geels, F. W., & Fuenfschilling, L. (2020). Why carbon pricing is not sufficient to mitigate climate change – and how “sustainability transition policy” can help. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(16), 8664–8668.Google Scholar

Rubinstein, A. (1979). Equilibrium in supergames with the overtaking criterion. Journal of Economic Theory, 21(1), 1–9.Google Scholar

Rumble, A. C., Van Lange, P. A., & Parks, C. D. (2010). The benefits of empathy: When empathy may sustain cooperation in social dilemmas. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(5), 856–866.Google Scholar

Sacchi, S., Riva, P., & Aceto, A. (2016). Myopic about climate change: Cognitive style, psychological distance, and environmentalism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 65, 68–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2016.03.006Google Scholar

Sandström, A., & Rova, C. (2009). The network structure of adaptive governance-A single case study of a fish management area. International Journal of the Commons, 4(1).Google Scholar

Sandström, A., 2008. Policy Networks: The Relation Between Structure and Performance. Department of Business Administration and Social Sciences, Lulea? University of Technology, Lulea?, Sweden. Schneider, M., Scholz, J., Lubell, M., Mindruta.Google Scholar

Sandström, E., Ekman, A. K., & Lindholm, K. J. (2017). Commoning in the periphery–The role of the commons for understanding rural continuities and change. International Journal of the Commons, 11(1):508–531.Google Scholar

Sarangi, S. (2002). Crimes of Bhopal and the global campaign for justice. Social Justice, 29(89), 47–52.Google Scholar

Sassenrath, C., Diefenbacher, S., Pfattheicher, S., & Keller, J. (2021). The potential and limitations of empathy in changing health-relevant affect, cognition and behaviour. European Review of Social Psychology, 1–34.Google Scholar

Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2011). Personally relevant climate change: The role of place attachment and local versus global message framing in engagement. Environment and Behavior, 45(1), 60–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511421196.Google Scholar

Schelling, T. C. (1968). The life you save may be your own. In Chase, S. (Ed.), Problems in Public Expenditure Analysis (pp. 127–162). Brookings Institute, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

Schilke, O., Reimann, M., & Cook, K. S. (2021). Trust in social relations. Annual Review of Sociology, 47, 239–259.Google Scholar

Schlager, E. (1999). A comparison of frameworks, theories, and models of policy processes. Theories of the Policy Process, 1, 233–260.Google Scholar

Schlager, E., & Cox, M. (2018). The IAD framework and the SES framework: An introduction and assessment of the Ostrom workshop frameworks. In Theories of the Policy Process (pp. 215–252). Routledge.Google Scholar

Schlegel, S. A. (2003). Wisdom from a Rainforest: The Spiritual Journey of an Anthropologist. University of Georgia Press, Athens, Georgia.Google Scholar

Schmidt, J. J., & Dowsley, M. (2010). Hunting with polar bears: Problems with the passive properties of the commons. Human Ecology, 38(3), 377–387.Google Scholar

Schneider, M., Scholz, J., Lubell, M., Mindruta, D., & Edwardsen, M. (2003). Building consensual institutions: Networks and the national estuary program. American Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 143–158.Google Scholar

Schön, D. A., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar

Schuldt, J. P., Rickard, L. N., & Yang, Z. J. (2018). Does reduced psychological distance increase climate engagement? On the limits of localizing climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 55, 147–153.Google Scholar

Schultz, P. W. (2000). Empathizing with nature: The effects of perspective taking on concern for environmental issues. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 391–406.Google Scholar

Schumann, K., Zaki, J., & Dweck, C. S. (2014). Addressing the empathy deficit: Beliefs about the malleability of empathy predict effortful responses when empathy is challenging. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(3), 475.Google Scholar

Schwan, S., Grajal, A., & Lewalter, D. (2014). Understanding and engagement in places of science experience: Science museums, science centers, zoos, and aquariums. Educational Psychologist, 49(2), 70–85.Google Scholar

Schwartz, S. H. (1970). Normative explanations of helping behavior: a critique, proposal, and empirical test. In Macaulay, J., & Berkowitz, L. (Eds.), Altruism and Helping Behavior. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar

Scott, K. E., & Graham, J. A. (2015). Service-learning: Implications for empathy and community engagement in elementary school children. Journal of Experiential Education, 38(4), 354–372.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. (1977). Rational fools: A critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 317–344.Google Scholar

Sen, A. K. (2009). The Idea of Justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Severson, A. W., & Coleman, E. A. (2015). Moral frames and climate change policy attitudes. Social Science Quarterly, 96(5), 1277–1290.Google Scholar

Sevillano, V., Aragonés, J. I., & Schultz, P. W. (2007). Perspective taking, environmental concern, and the moderating role of dispositional empathy. Environment and Behavior, 39(5), 685–705.Google Scholar

Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Aharon-Peretz, J., & Perry, D. (2009). Two systems for empathy: A double dissociation between emotional and cognitive empathy in inferior frontal gyrus versus ventromedial prefrontal lesions. Brain, 132(3), 617–627.Google Scholar

Shapiro, I., Richardson, S., McClurg, S., & Sokhey, A. (2020). Discussion networks in political decision making. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics.Google Scholar

Sheeder, R. J., & Lynne, G. D. (2011). Empathy-conditioned conservation: “Walking in the shoes of others” as a conservation farmer. Land Economics, 87(3), 433–452.Google Scholar

Singer, T., Seymour, B., O’Doherty, J. P., Stephan, K. E., Dolan, R. D. et al. (2006). Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others. Nature, 439, 466–469.Google Scholar

Singh, S. P., & Swanson, M. (2017). How issue frames shape beliefs about the importance of climate change policy across ideological and partisan groups. PLoS One, 12(7), e0181401.Google Scholar