Andreassen, R. (2017). New kinships, new family formations and negotiations of intimacy via social media sites. Journal of Gender Studies, 26(3), 361–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2017.1287683CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyd, D. (2014). It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Cahn, N. R. (2013). The New Kinship: Constructing Donor-Conceived Families. NYU Press.Google Scholar

Davies, K. (2015). Siblings, stories and the self: the sociological significant of young people’s sibling relationships. Sociology, 49(4): 679–695.Google Scholar

Frith, L., Blyth, E., Crawshaw, M., & van den Akker, O. (2018). Searching for ‘relations’ using a DNA linking register by adults conceived following sperm donation. BioSocieties, 13(1), 170–189. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-017-0063-2Google Scholar

Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Hertz, R. (2009). Turning strangers into kin: Half-siblings and anonymous donors. In Nelson, M.K. and Garey, A.I. (Eds.), Who’s Watching?: Daily Practices of Surveillance among Contemporary Families. Vanderbilt University Press, pp. 156–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv17vf76w.13Google Scholar

Hertz, R. & Mattes, J. (2011). Donor-shared siblings or genetic strangers: New families, clans and the internet. Journal of Family Issues, 32(9), 1129–1155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x11404345CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hertz, R., & Nelson, M. K. (2019). Random Families: Genetic Strangers, Sperm Donor Siblings, and the Creation of New Kin. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hertz, R, Nelson, M. K., & Kramer, W. (2017). Donor sibling networks as a vehicle for expanding kinship: a replication and extension. Journal of Family Issues, 38(2), 248–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x16631018Google Scholar

Indekeu, A., Bolt, S. H., & Maas, A. J. B. M. (2021). Meeting multiple donor half siblings: psychosocial challenges. Human Fertility, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2021.1872804Google ScholarPubMed

Jamieson, L. (2011), Intimacy as a concept: explaining social change in the context of globalization or another form of ethnocentricism? Sociological Research Online. 16(4), 151–163. Org.uk/16/4/15.html>10.5153/sro.2497Google Scholar

Mamo, L., & Alston-Stepnitz, E. (2015). Queer intimacies and structural inequalities: new directions in stratified reproduction. Journal of Family Issues, 36(4), 519–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513x14563796Google Scholar

McKinnon, S. (2015). Productive paradoxes of the assisted reproductive technologies in the context of new kinship. Journal of Family Isses, 36(4), 461–479 https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X14563799CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nordqvist, P. (2017). Genetic thinking and everyday living: on family practices and family imaginaries. The Sociological Review, 65(4): 865–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Powell, B. Blozendahl, C., Geist, C., & Steelman, L.C. (2010). Counted Out: Same-Sex Relationships and American’s Definitions of Family. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Scheib, J. E., McCormick, E., Benward, J., & Ruby, A. (2020). Finding people like me: contact among young adults who share an open-identity sperm donor. Human Reproduction Open, 2020(4) 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoaa057Google Scholar

Stacey, J. (2011). Unhitched Love: Marriage, and Family Values from Western Hollywood to Western China. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Strathern, M. (1992). Reproducing the Future: Anthroplogy, Kinship and the Assisted Reproductive Technologies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Weston, K. (1991), Families We Choose: Lesbian, Gays, Kinship. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

ANZICA (2012). Guidelines for professional standards of practice: donor linking counseling. www.fertilitysociety.com.au/wp-content/uploads/20120504-anzica-guidelines-donor-linking-final-version.pdfGoogle Scholar

Blyth, E. (2012). Discovering the ‘facts of life’ following anonymous donor insemination. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 26(2), 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebs006CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolt, S. H., Notermans, C., van Brouwershaven, A. C., Maas, A. J. B. M., & Indekeu, A. (2021). The ongoing work of kinship among donor half-siblings in the Netherlands. BioSocieties. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-021-00259-zGoogle Scholar

Crawshaw, M., Daniels, K., Adams, D., Bourne, K., van Hooff, J. A. P., Kramer, W., Pasch, L., & Thorn, P. (2016). Emerging models for facilitating contact between people genetically related through donor conception: a preliminary analysis and discussion. Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online, 1(2), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2015.10.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freeman, T., Jadva, V., & Slutsky, J. (2016). Sperm donors limited: psychosocial aspects of genetic connections and the regulation of offspring. In Golombok, S., Scott, R., Appleby, J. B., Richards, M. & Wilkinson, S. (Eds.), Regulating Reproductive Donation (pp. 165–184). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316117446Google Scholar

Freeman, T., Jadva, V., Tranfield, E., & Golombok, S. (2016). Online sperm donation: a survey of the demographic characteristics, motivations, preferences and experiences of sperm donors on a connection website. Human Reproduction, 31(9), 2082–2089. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew166Google Scholar

Hertz, R., Nelson, M. K., & Kramer, W. (2017). Donor sibling networks as a vehicle for expanding kinship: A replication and extension. Journal of Family Issues, 38(2), 248–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X16631018CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hertz, R., & Nelson, M. K. (2019). Random Families: Genetic Strangers, Sperm Donor Siblings and the Creation of New Kin. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190888275.001.0001Google Scholar

Hudson, N. (2017). Making ‘assisted world families’? Parenting projects and family practices in the context of globalized gamete donation. Sociological Research Online, 22(2), 48–58. DOI: 10.5153/sro.4246CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Indekeu, A., Bolt, S., Maas, A. (2021a). Meeting multiple same-donor offspring: psychosocial challenges. Human Fertility, 25(4), 677–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2021.1872804Google Scholar

Indekeu, A., & Hens, K. (2019). Part of my story: the meaning and experiences of genes and genetics for sperm donor-conceived offspring. New Genetics & Society, 38(1), 18–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2018.1549476 Open AccessGoogle Scholar

Indekeu, A., Maas, A. J. B. M., McCormick, E., Benward, J., & Scheib, J. (2021b). Factors associated with searching for people related through donor conception among donor-conceived people, parents and donors: a systematic review. F&S Reviews, 2(2), 93–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xfnr.2021.01.003Google Scholar

Jadva, V., Freeman, T., Kramer, W., & Golombok, S. (2010). Experiences of offspring searching for and contacting their donor siblings and donor. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 20(4), 523–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.01.001Google Scholar

Janssens, P. M. W., Simons, A. H. M., Van Kooij, R. J., Blokzijl, E., & Dunselman, G. A. J. (2006). A new Dutch Law regulating provision of identifying information of donors to offspring: background, content and impact. Human Reproduction, 21(4), 852–856. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dei407Google Scholar

Johnson, L., Bourne, K., & Hammarberg, K. (2012). Donor conception legislation in Victoria, Australia: the ‘Time to Tell’ campaign, donor-linking and implications for clinical practice. Journal of Law and Medicine, 19(4), 803–19.Google ScholarPubMed

Kelly, F. J., & Dempsey, D. J. (2016). Experiences and motives of Australian single mothers by choice who make early contact with their child’s donor relatives. Medical Law Review, 24(4), 571–590. https://doi-org.kuleuven.e-bronnen.be/10.1093/medlaw/fww038Google Scholar

Montuschi, O., & Ellis, J. (2020). Continuing the Conversation: Talking with Young People and Adults 12yrs and Up. Donor Conception Network.Google Scholar

Mroz, J. (2011). One sperm donor, 150 offspring. New York Times. www.nytimes.com/2011/09/06/health/06donor.htmlGoogle Scholar

Mroz, J. (2021). The case of the serial sperm donor. New York Times. www.nytimes.com/2021/02/01/health/sperm-donor-fertility-meijer.htmlGoogle Scholar

Scheib, J. E., McCornick, E., Benward, J., & Ruby, A. (2020). Finding people like me: contact among young adults who share an open-identity donor. Human Reproduction Open, 2020(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoaa057CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scheib, J. E., & Ruby, A. (2009). Beyond consanguinity risk: developing donor birth limits that consider psychosocial risk factors. Fertility and Sterility, 91(5), 91, e12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.12.071CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schopler, J. H., & Galinsky, M. J. (1993). Support groups as open systems: a model for practice and research. Journal of Health and Social Work, 18(3), 195–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wright, K. (2016). Limiting offspring numbers: can we justify regulation? In Golombok, S., Scott, R., Appleby, J. B., Richards, M. & Wilkinson, S. (Eds.), Regulating Reproductive Donation (pp. 185–204). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316117446Google Scholar

Almeling, Rene. 2011. Sex Cells: The Medical Market for Eggs and Sperm. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Applegarth, Linda D., Kaufman, Nancy L., Josephs-Sohan, Mitasha, Christos, Paul J., and Rosenwaks, Zev. 2016. ‘Parental Disclosure to Offspring Created with Oocyte Donation: Intentions versus Reality’. Human Reproduction, June. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Besson, S. 2007. ‘Enforcing the Child’s Right to Know Her Origins: Contrasting Approaches Under the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the European Convention on Human Rights’. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 21 (2): 137–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebm003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

BICA. 2019. ‘Guidelines for Good Practice in Fertility Counselling’. York: BICA.Google Scholar

Blyth, Eric, and Farrand, Abigail. 2004. ‘Anonymity in Donor-Assisted Conception and the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child’. The International Journal of Children’s Rights 12 (2): 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carsten, Janet. 2000. ‘“Knowing Where You’ve Come from”: Ruptures and Continuities of Time and Kinship in Narratives of Adoption Reunions’. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 6 (4): 687–703.Google Scholar

Cosson, Barbara, Dempsey, Deborah, and Kelly, Fiona. 2021. ‘Secret Shame – Male Infertility and Donor Conception in the Wake of Retrospective Legislative Change’. Men and Masculinities, 25 (3): 497–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X211038329.Google Scholar

Crawshaw, Marilyn. 2008. ‘Prospective Parents’ Intentions Regarding Disclosure Following the Removal of Donor Anonymity’. Human Fertility 11 (2): 95–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dempsey, Deborah. 2010. ‘Conceiving and Negotiating Reproductive Relationships: Lesbians and Gay Men Forming Families with Children’. Sociology 44 (6): 1145–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dempsey, Deborah, Nordqvist, Petra, and Kelly, Fiona. 2022. ‘Beyond Secrecy and Openness: Telling a Relational Story about Children’s Best Interests in Donor-Conceived Families’. BioSocieties 17: 527–48. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-021-00225-9.Google Scholar

Freeman, T., and Golombok, S.. 2012. ‘Donor Insemination: A Follow-up Study of Disclosure Decisions, Family Relationships and Child Adjustment at Adolescence’. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 25 (2): 193–203.Google Scholar

Frith, Lucy. 2001. ‘Beneath the Rhetoric: The Role of Rights in the Practice of Non-Anonymous Gamete Donation’. Bioethics 15 (5–6): 473–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8519.00255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gilman, Leah, and Nordqvist, Petra. 2018. ‘Organizing Openness: How UK Policy Defines the Significance of Information and Information Sharing about Gamete Donation’. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 32 (3): 316–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/eby014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grace, Victoria M., and Daniels, Ken. 2007. ‘The (Ir)Relevance of Genetics: Engendering Parallel Worlds of Procreation and Reproduction’. Sociology of Health & Illness 29 (5): 692–710.Google Scholar

Graham, Susanna, Mohr, Sebastian, and Bourne, Kate. 2016. ‘Regulating the “Good” Donor: The Expectation and Experiences of Sperm Donors in Denmark and Victoria, Australia’. In Regulating Reproductive Donation, edited by Golombok, Susan, Scott, Rosamund, John B. Appleby, , Richards, Martin, and Wilkinson, Stephen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ilioi, Elena, Blake, Lucy, Jadva, Vasanti, Roman, Gabriela, and Golombok, Susan. 2017. ‘The Role of Age of Disclosure of Biological Origins in the Psychological Wellbeing of Adolescents Conceived by Reproductive Donation: A Longitudinal Study from Age 1 to Age 14’. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 58 (3): 315–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12667.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Klotz, Maren. 2014. (K) Information: Gamete Donation and Kinship Knowledge in Germany and Britain. Vol. 32. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar

Mason, Jennifer. 2004. ‘Personal Narratives, Relational Selves: Residential Histories in the Living and Telling’. The Sociological Review 52 (2): 162–79.Google Scholar

May, Vanessa. 2013. Connecting Self to Society: Belonging in a Changing World. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Mohr, Sebastian. 2018. Being a Sperm Donor: Masculinity, Sexuality, and Biosociality in Denmark. New York: Berghahn Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nachtigall, Robert D., Becker, Gay, Szkupinski Quiroga, Seline, and Tschann, Jeanne M.. 1998. ‘The Disclosure Decision: Concerns and Issues of Parents of Children Conceived through Donor Insemination’. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 178 (6): 1165–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70318-7.Google Scholar

Nachtigall, Robert D., Tschann, Jeanne M., Szkupinski Quiroga, Seline, Pitcher, Linda, and Becker, Gay. 1997. ‘Stigma, Disclosure, and Family Functioning among Parents of Children Conceived through Donor Insemination’. Fertility and Sterility 68 (1): 83–89.Google Scholar

Nordqvist, Petra. 2014. ‘The Drive for Openness in Donor Conception: Disclosure and the Trouble with Real Life’. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 28 (3): 321–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nordqvist, Petra, and Gilman, Leah. 2022. Donors: Curious Connections in Donor Conception. London: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar

Smart, Carol. 2007. Personal Life: New Directions in Sociological Thinking. Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Adams, D., & Lorbach, C. (2012). Accessing donor conception information in Australia: A call for retrospective access. Journal of Law and Medicine, 19(4), 707–721.Google Scholar

Allan, S. (2017). Donor Conception and the Search for Information: From Secrecy and Anonymity to Openness. Abingdon: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar

Barnwell, A. (2019). Family secrets and the slow violence of social stigma. Sociology, 53(6), 1111–1126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038519846443CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beeson, D. R., Jennings, P. K., & Kramer, W. (2011). Offspring searching for their sperm donors: How family type shapes the process. Human Reproduction, 26(9), 2415–2424. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der202Google Scholar

Blyth, E., Crawshaw, M., Frith, L., & Jones, C. (2012). Donor-conceived people’s views and experiences of their genetic origins: A critical analysis of the research evidence. Journal of Law and Medicine, 19(4).Google Scholar

Boss, P. (2007). Ambiguous loss theory: Challenges for scholars and practitioners. Family Relations, 56(2), 105–110.Google Scholar

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2020). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238Google Scholar

Broom, A., Kenny, K., & Kirby, E. (2018). On waiting, hauntings and surviving: Chronicling life with cancer through solicited diaries. The Sociological Review, 66(3), 682–699. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026117719216Google Scholar

Broom, A., Lewis, S., Parker, R., Williams Veazey, L., Kenny, K., Kirby, E., Kokanović, R., Lwin, Z., & Koh, E.-S. (2021). Personhood, belonging, affect and affliction. The Sociological Review, 69(5), 1051–1071. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380261211019266CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carsten, J. (2007). Connections and disconnections of memory and kinship in narratives of adoption reunions in Scotland. Ghosts of Memory: Essays on Remembrance and Relatedness, 83–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470692301.ch4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cosson, B., Dempsey, D., & Kelly, F. (2021). Secret shame – Male infertility and donor conception in the wake of retrospective legislative change. Men and Masculinities, 25(3), 497–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X211038329CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daniels, K. (2020). The perspective of adult donor conceived persons. In Beier, K., Brügge, C., Thorn, P., & Wiesemann, C. (Eds.), Assistierte Reproduktion mit Hilfe Dritter (pp. 443–459). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60298-0_29Google Scholar

Darroch, F., & Smith, I. (2021). Establishing identity: How direct‐to‐consumer genetic testing challenges the assumption of donor anonymity. Family Court Review, 59(1), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12553CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dempsey, D. (2006). Beyond choice: Family and kinship in the Australian lesbian and gay “baby boom” [PhD thesis]. La Trobe University.Google Scholar

Dempsey, D., Kelly, F., Horsfall, B., Hammarberg, K., Bourne, K., & Johnson, L. (2019). Applications to statutory donor registers in Victoria, Australia: Information sought and expectations of contact. Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online, 9, 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2019.08.002Google Scholar

Dingle, S. (2021). Brave New Humans: The Dirty Reality of Donor Conception. Hardie Grant Books.Google Scholar

Eng, D. L. (2010). The Feeling of Kinship: Queer Liberalism and the Racialization of Intimacy. Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Freeman, T., Bourne, K., Jadva, V., & Smith, V. (2014). Making connections: Contact between sperm donor relations. In Relatedness in Assisted Reproduction: Families, Origins and Identities (pp. 270–295). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Frith, L., Blyth, E., Crawshaw, M., & van den Akker, O. (2018a). Secrets and disclosure in donor conception. Sociology of Health & Illness, 40(1), 188–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12633CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Frith, L., Blyth, E., Crawshaw, M., & van den Akker, O. (2018b). Searching for “relations” using a DNA linking register by adults conceived following sperm donation. BioSocieties, 13(1), 170–189. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-017-0063-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gordon, A. F. (2008). Ghostly Matters: Haunting and the Sociological Imagination. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Gordon, A. F., Hite, K., & Jara, D. (2020). Haunting and thinking from the Utopian margins: Conversation with Avery Gordon. Memory Studies, 13(3), 337–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698020914017CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halberstam, J. J., & Halberstam, J. (2005). In a Queer Time and Place: Transgender Bodies, Subcultural Lives. New York University Press.Google Scholar

Harrigan, M. M., Dieter, S., Leinwohl, J., & Marrin, L. (2014). Redefining family: An analysis of adult donor-conceived offspring’s discursive meaning-making. Iowa Journal of Communication, 46(1), 16–32.Google Scholar

Hewitt, G. (2002). Missing links: Identity issues of donor conceived people. Journal of Fertility Counselling, 9, 14–19.Google Scholar

Indekeu, A. (2015). Parent’s expectations and experiences of resemblance through donor conception. New Genetics and Society, 34(4), 398–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2015.1098525CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Indekeu, A., & Hens, K. (2019). Part of my storyThe meaning and experiences of genes and genetics for sperm donor-conceived offspring. New Genetics and Society, 38(1), 18–37.Google Scholar

Jadva, V. (2021). Sibling relationships across families created through assisted reproduction. In Brothers and Sisters (pp. 171–184). Springer.Google Scholar

Jadva, V., Freeman, T., Kramer, W., & Golombok, S. (2010). Experiences of offspring searching for and contacting their donor siblings and donor. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 20(4), 523–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.01.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kelly, F. (2010). An alternative conception: The legality of home insemination under Canada’s Assisted Human Reproduction Act. Canadian Journal of Family Law, 26(1), 149–170.Google Scholar

Klotz, M. (2016). Wayward relations: Novel searches of the donor-conceived for genetic kinship. Medical Anthropology, 35(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2015.1012615Google Scholar

Lambert, C. (2020). The ambivalence of adoption: Adoptive families’ stories. Sociology, 54(2), 363–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038519880107Google Scholar

Macmillan, C. M., Allan, S., Johnstone, M., & Stokes, M. A. (2021). The motivations of donor-conceived adults for seeking information about, and contact with, sperm donors. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 43(1), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.04.005Google Scholar

Macpherson, I. (2019). Ethical reflections about the anonymity in gamete donation. Human Reproduction, 34(9), 1847–1848. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez142Google Scholar

Mason, J. (2004). Personal narratives, relational selves: Residential histories in the living and telling. The Sociological Review, 52(2), 162–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2004.00463.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Misztal, B. (2003). Theories of Social Remembering. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).Google Scholar

Morgan, D. (2011). Rethinking Family Practices. Springer.Google Scholar

Newman, C. E., Persson, A., Prankumar, S., Lea, T., & Aggleton, P. (2020). Experiences of family belonging among two generations of sexually diverse Australians. Family Relations, 69(2), 292–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12411Google Scholar

Newsweek. (1934, May 12). “Ghost” fathers: Children provided for the childless. Newsweek, 3(19), 16.Google Scholar

Newton, G. (2022). Doing reflexivity in research on donor conception: Examining moments of bonding and becoming. In Shaw, R. M. (Ed.), Reproductive Citizenship: Technologies, Rights and Relationships. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Newton, G., Drysdale, K., Zappavigna, M., & Newman, C. E. (2023) Truth, proof, sleuth: trust in direct-to-consumer DNA testing and other sources of identity information among Australian donor-conceived people. Sociology, 57(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385221091184CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newton, G., & Southerton, C. (2023) Situated talk: A method for a reflexive encounter with #donorconceived on TikTok. Media International Australia, 186(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X211064646Google Scholar

Newton, G., Zappavigna, M., Drysdale, K., & Newman, C. E. (2022) Memes as bonding icons for belonging in donor-conceived people. Social Media and Society, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211069055.Google Scholar

Nixon, R. (2011). Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674061194Google Scholar

Nordqvist, P. (2011). “Dealing with sperm”: Comparing lesbians’ clinical and non-clinical donor conception processes. Sociology of Health & Illness, 33(1), 114–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2010.01279.xGoogle Scholar

Nordqvist, P. (2014). The drive for openness in donor conception: Disclosure and the trouble with real life. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 28(3), 321–338. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebu010Google Scholar

Nordqvist, P. (2017). Genetic thinking and everyday living: On family practices and family imaginaries. The Sociological Review, 65(4), 865–881. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026117711645Google Scholar

Pearce, R. (2018). Trans temporalities and non-linear ageing. In King, A., Almack, K., Suen, Y.-T., & Westwood, S. (Eds.), Older Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans People: Minding the Knowledge Gaps (1st ed.). Routledge.Google Scholar

Power, J., Perlesz, A., Brown, R., Schofield, M., Pitts, M., McNair, R., & Bickerdike, A. (2010). Diversity, tradition and family: Australian same-sex attracted parents and their families. Gay and Lesbian Issues and Psychology Review, 6(2), 66.Google Scholar

Ribbens McCarthy, J. (2012). The powerful relational language of “family”: Togetherness, belonging and personhood. The Sociological Review, 60(1), 68–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2011.02045.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riggs, D. W. (2008). Lesbian mothers, gay sperm donors, and community: Ensuring the well-being of children and families. Health Sociology Review, 17(3), 226–234.Google Scholar

Rodino, I. S., Burton, P. J., & Sanders, K. A. (2011). Donor information considered important to donors, recipients and offspring: An Australian perspective. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 22(3), 303–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.11.007Google Scholar

Rowland, R. (1985). The social and psychological consequences of secrecy in artificial insemination by donor (AID) programmes. Social Science & Medicine, 21(4), 391–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(85)90219-9Google Scholar

Scheib, J. E., Ruby, A., & Benward, J. (2017). Who requests their sperm donor’s identity? The first ten years of information releases to adults with open-identity donors. Fertility and Sterility, 107(2), 483–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.10.023Google Scholar

Scott, S. (2018). A sociology of nothing: Understanding the unmarked. Sociology, 52(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038517690681Google Scholar

Smart, C. (2007). Personal Life: New Directions in Sociological Thinking. Polity.Google Scholar

Smith, A. K., Persson, A., Drysdale, K., Bryant, J., Valentine, K., Wallace, J., Hamilton, M., Gray, R. M., & Newman, C. E. (2021). Family imaginaries in the disclosure of a blood‐borne virus. Sociology of Health & Illness. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13316Google Scholar

Swanson, K. W. (2012). Adultery by doctor: Artificial insemination, 1890–1945. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 87(2), 44.Google Scholar

Adair, V., & Rogan, C. (1998). Infertility and parenting: The story so far. In Adair, V. & Dixon, R. (Eds.), The Family in Aotearoa/New Zealand (pp. 260–283). Auckland: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar

Baker, M. (2005). Medically assisted conception: Revolutionizing family or perpetuating a nuclear and gendered model? Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 36(4), 521–543. https://doi.org/10.3138/jcfs.36.4.521Google Scholar

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar

Coney, S., & Else, A. (1999). Protecting Our Future: The Case for Greater Regulation of Assisted Reproductive Technology. Auckland: Women’s Health Action Trust.Google Scholar

Cram, F., & Pitama, S. (1998). Ko tōku whānau, ko tōku mana. In Adair, V. & Dixon, R. (Eds.), The Family in Aotearoa/New Zealand (pp. 130–157). Auckland: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar

Daniels, K. (2007). Donor gametes: Anonymous or identified? Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 21(1), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.09.010Google Scholar

Daniels, K., & Douglass, A. (2008). Access to genetic information by donor offspring and donors: Medicine, policy and law in New Zealand. Medicine and Law, 27, 131–146.Google Scholar

Daniels, K., & Lewis, G. M. (1996). Openness of information in the use of donor gametes: Developments in New Zealand. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 14(1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646839608405859Google Scholar

Daniels, K. R., Kramer, W., & Perez-y-Perez, M. V. (2012). Semen donors who are open to contact with their offspring: Issues and implications for them and their families. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 25, 670–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.09.009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Durie, M. (2008). Bioethics in research: The ethics of indigeneity. Paper presented at the Ninth Global Forum on Bioethics in Research. http://gfbr9.hrc.govt.nz/articleGoogle Scholar

Durie-Hall, D., & Metge, J. (1992). Kua Tutū Te Puehu, Kia Mau: Maori aspirations and family law. In Heneghan, M. & Atkin, B. (Eds.), Family Law Policy in New Zealand (pp. 54–82). Auckland: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ellis, J., & Irwin, R. (2002). Oocyte Recipients and Donors: Choosing a Relationship, Auckland, New Zealand: Fertility Associates. Unpublished paper.Google Scholar

Foaese, A. (2017). Pasifika Women’s Experiences of Infertility in Canterbury and Wellington [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Otago.Google Scholar

Gibson, H. (2021). Kin-making in the Reproductive Penumbra: Surrogacy in Aotearoa New Zealand [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Te Herenga Waka/Victoria University of Wellington.Google Scholar

Glover, M., & Rousseau, B. (2007). ‘Your child is your whakapapa’: Māori considerations of assisted human reproduction and relatedness. SITES: New Series, 4(2), 117–136. https://doi.org/10.11157/sites-vol4iss2id76Google Scholar

Glover, M. (2008). Māori Attitudes to Assisted Human Reproduction: An Exploratory Study. Auckland: University of Auckland, Department of Social & Community Health.Google Scholar

Glover, M., McKree, A., & Dyall, L. (2009). Assisted reproduction: Issues for Takatāpui (New Zealand Indigenous non-heterosexuals). Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 5(4), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/15504280903263702Google Scholar

Hargreaves, K., & Daniels, K. (2007). Parents’ dilemmas in sharing donor insemination conception stories with their children. Children & Society, 21, 420–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2006.00079.xGoogle Scholar

Hertz, R., Nelson, M. K., & Kramer, W. (2015). Sperm donors describe the experience of contact with their donor-conceived offspring. Facts, Views & Vision in ObGyn, 7(2), 91–100.Google Scholar

Kerekere, E. (2017). Part of the Whānau: The Emergence of Takatāpui Identity – He Whāriki Takatāpui [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Victoria University of Wellington.Google Scholar

Lovelock, K. (2010). Conceiving reproduction: New reproductive technologies and the redefinition of kinship narrative in New Zealand society. Anthropological Forum, 20(2), 125–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.2010.487296Google Scholar

MacManus, J. (2017). Meet the couple who tried to get sperm on Reddit. https://thespinoff.co.nz/parenting/17-10-2017/meet-the-couple-who-tried-to-get-sperm-on-reddit/ (accessed 20 September 2021).Google Scholar

Marriot, L., & Sim, D. (2015). Indicators of inequality for Māori and Pacific people. Journal of New Zealand Studies, 20, 24–50.Google Scholar

Mason, J. (2008). Tangible affinities and real-life fascination of kinship. Sociology, 42(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038507084824Google Scholar

McRae, K. O., & Nikora, L. W. (2006) Whāngai: Remembering, understanding and experiencing. MAI Review, 1, 1–18.Google Scholar

National Women’s Health. (2021). Public funding. National Women’s Health https://nationalwomenshealth.adhb.govt.nz/our-services/fertility/public-funding/ (accessed 19 October 2021).Google Scholar

Nordqvist, P. (2014). Bringing kinship into being: Connectedness, donor conception and lesbian parenthood. Sociology, 48(2), 268–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038513477936Google Scholar

Nordqvist, P. (2019). Kinship: How being related matters in personal life. In V. May, V. & Nordqvist, P. (Eds.), Sociology of Personal Life (2nd ed., pp 46–59). London: Red Globe Press.Google Scholar

Nordqvist, P. (2019a). Un/familiar connections: On the relevance of a sociology of personal life for exploring egg and sperm donation. Sociology of Health & Illness, 41(3), 601–615. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12862Google Scholar

Nordqvist, P., & Smart, C. (2014). Relative Strangers: Family Life, Genes and Donor Conception. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

O’Neill, K., Hamer, H. P., & Dixon, R. (2012). ‘A lesbian family in a straight world’: The impact of the transition to parenthood on couple relationships in planned lesbian families. Women’s Studies Journal, 26(2), 39–53.Google Scholar

Pihama, L. (2012). Experiences of Whānau Māori within fertility clinics. In Reynolds, P. & Smith, C. (Eds.), The Gift of Children: Māori and Infertility (pp. 203–234). Wellington: Huia Publishers.Google Scholar

Pūtaiora Writing Group. (2010). Te Ara Tika: Guidelines for Māori Research Ethics: A Framework for Researchers and Ethics Committee Members. Auckland: Health Research Council of New Zealand.Google Scholar

Reynolds, P., & Smith, C. (2012). Introduction: He Kākano: Māori and assisted reproductive technologies. In Reynolds, P. & Smith, C. (Eds.), The Gift of Children: Māori and Infertility (pp. xiii–xix). Wellington: Huia Publishers.Google Scholar

Righarts, A., Dickson, N. P., Ekeroma, A., Gray, A. R., Parkin, L., & Gillett, W. R. (2021). The burden of infertility in New Zealand: A baseline survey of prevalence and service use. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 61, 439–447. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13323Google Scholar

Salmond, A. (2012). Ontological quarrels: Indigeneity, exclusion and citizenship in a relational world. Anthropological Theory, 12(2), 115–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499612454119Google Scholar

Shaw, R. M. (2020). Should surrogate pregnancy arrangements be enforceable in Aotearoa New Zealand? Policy Quarterly, 16(1), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.26686/pq.v16i1.6351Google Scholar

Shaw, R. M. (2015). Ethics, Moral Life and the Body. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Shaw, R. (2007). The gift-exchange and reciprocity of women in donor-assisted conception. The Sociological Review, 55(2), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00706.xGoogle Scholar

Shaw, R. M., & Fehoko, E. (2022). Epistemic injustice and Body Mass Index: Examining Māori and Pacific women’s access to fertility treatment in Aotearoa New Zealand. Fat Studies. Online first. https://doi:10.1080/21604851.2022.2063507Google Scholar

Smith, C. (2012). Tamaiti Whāngai and fertility. In Reynolds, P. & Smith, C. (Eds.), The Gift of Children: Māori and Infertility (pp. 143–202). Wellington: Huia Publishers.Google Scholar

Surtees, N. (2017). Narrating Connections and Boundaries: Constructing Relatedness in Lesbian Known Donor Familial Configurations [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. University of Canterbury.Google Scholar

Te Aka Matua o te Ture/Law Commission (2021). Te Kōpū Whāngai: He Arotake: Review of Surrogacy. Wellington: NZLC.Google Scholar

Waldby, C. (2019). The Oocyte Economy; The Changing Meaning of Human Eggs. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Barnes, L. W. (2014). Conceiving Masculinity: Male Infertility, Medicine, and Identity. Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Bartholomaeus, C., & Riggs, D. W. (2020). Transgender and non-binary Australians’ experiences with healthcare professionals in relation to fertility preservation. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 22(2), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2019.1580388Google Scholar

Blumer, M. L., Ansara, Y. G., & Watson, C. M. (2013). Cisgenderism in family therapy: How everyday clinical practices can delegitimize people’s gender self-designations. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 24(4), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/08975353.2013.849551Google Scholar

Bonan, S., Chapel‐Lardic, E., Rosenblum, O., Dudkiewicz‐Sibony, C., Chamouard, L., Wolf, J. P., … & Drouineaud, V. (2021). Characteristics and intentions of heterosexual couples comprising a transgender man awaiting sperm donation to conceive a child. Andrology, 9(6), 1799–1807. https://doi-org/10.1111/andr.13103Google Scholar

Califia, P. (2000, 20 June). Family values. The Village Voice. Retrieved from www.villagevoice.com/2000/06/20/family-values/Google Scholar

Charter, R., Ussher, J. M., Perz, J., & Robinson, K. (2018). The transgender parent: Experiences and constructions of pregnancy and parenthood for transgender men in Australia. International Journal of Transgenderism, 19(1), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2017.1399496Google Scholar

Connell, R. (1995). Masculinities. Polity Press.Google Scholar

Dempsey, D., Nordqvist, P., & Kelly, F. (2021). Beyond secrecy and openness: Telling a relational story about children’s best interests in donor-conceived families. BioSocieties, 17(1), 527–548. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-021-00225-9Google Scholar

Epstein, R. (2018). Space invaders: Queer and trans bodies in fertility clinics. Sexualities, 21(7), 1039–1058. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460717720365Google Scholar

Fausto-Sterling, A. (2000). Sexing the Body. Basic Books.Google Scholar

Gagnon, J. & Simon, W. (1973). Sexual Conduct. Hutchinson.Google Scholar

Gill, R., Henwood, K., & McLean, C. (2005). Body projects and the regulation of normative masculinity. Body & Society, 11(1), 37–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X05049849Google Scholar

Goedeke, S., & Payne, D. (2010). A qualitative study of New Zealand fertility counsellors’ roles and practices regarding embryo donation. Human Reproduction, 25(11), 2821–2828. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deq233Google Scholar

James-Abra, S., Tarasoff, L. A., Green, D., Epstein, R., Anderson, S., Marvel, S., … & Ross, L. E. (2015). Trans people’s experiences with assisted reproduction services: A qualitative study. Human Reproduction, 30(6), 1365–1374. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev087Google Scholar

Lampe, N. M., Carter, S. K., & Sumerau, J. E. (2019). Continuity and change in gender frames: The case of transgender reproduction. Gender & Society, 33(6), 865–887. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243219857979Google Scholar

Lothstein, L. M. (1988). Female-to-male transsexuals who have delivered and reared their children. Annals of Sex Research, 1(1), 151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moore, L. J. (2008). Sperm Counts: Overcome by Man’s Most Precious Fluid. New York University Press.Google Scholar

Nordqvist, P. (2021). Telling reproductive stories: Social scripts, relationality and donor conception. Sociology, 55(4), 677–695. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038520981860Google Scholar

Pearce, R., & White, F. R. (2019). Beyond the pregnant man: Representing trans pregnancy in A Deal With The Universe. Feminist Media Studies, 19(5), 764–767. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2019.1630925Google Scholar

Riggs, D.W. (2013). Transgender men’s self-representations of bearing children post-transition. In Green, F. & Friedman, M. (Eds.), Chasing Rainbows: Exploring Gender Fluid Parenting Practices (pp. 62–71). Demeter Press.Google Scholar

Riggs, D.W. (2014). What makes a man? Thomas Beattie, embodiment, and ‘mundane transphobia’. Feminism and Psychology, 24, 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353514526221Google Scholar

Riggs, D.W., Pearce, R., Pfeffer, C.A., Hines, S., Ray White, F., & Ruspini, E. (2020). Men, trans/masculine, and non-binary people’s experiences of pregnancy loss: An international qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03166-6Google Scholar

Riggs, D. W., Pfeffer, C. A., Pearce, R., Hines, S., & White, F. R. (2021). Men, trans/masculine, and non-binary people negotiating conception: normative resistance and inventive pragmatism. International Journal of Transgender Health, 22(1–2), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2020.1808554Google Scholar

Von Doussa, H., Beauchamp, J., Goldner, S., & Zipper, B. (2021). Reflections and (un) learnings on supporting transgender and gender diverse people and their families in a mental health family service new to this work. Psychotherapy and Counselling Journal of Australia, 8(2). https://pacja.org.au/2020/12/reflections-and-unlearnings-on-supporting-transgender-and-gender-diverse-people-and-their-families-in-a-mental-health-family-service-new-to-this-work-2/Google Scholar

Wallace, J. (2010). The manly art of pregnancy. In Bornstein, K. & Bergman, S. Bear (Eds.), Gender Outlaws: The Next Generation (pp. 188–94). Seal Press.Google Scholar

Weston, K. (1997). Families We Choose: Lesbians, Gays, Kinship. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar