Acker, C. 2002. Femmes, fêtes et philosophie en Grèce ancienne. Paris: Harmattan.Google Scholar

Adamson, P. 2016. A History of Philosophy without Any Gaps: Philosophy in the Islamic World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Adamson, P. 2022a. Don’t Think for Yourself: Authority and Belief in Medieval Philosophy. South Bend: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar

Adamson, P. 2022b. ‘Macrina’s Method: Reason and Reasoning in Gregory of Nyssa’s On Soul and Resurrection’, in Schulz, J. and Wilberding, J. (eds.), Women and the Female in Neoplatonism. Leiden: Brill, pp. 255–75.Google Scholar

Addey, C. 2014. Divination and Theurgy in Neoplatonism: Oracles of the Gods. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Addey, C. 2018a. ‘Plato’s Women Readers’, in Tarrant, H. et al. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Plato in Antiquity. Leiden; Boston: Brill, pp. 411–32.Google Scholar

Addey, C. 2018b. ‘Sosipatra: Prophetess, Philosopher and Theurgist: Reflections on Divination and Epistemology in Late Antiquity’, in Evans, R. (ed.), Prophets and Profits: Ancient Divination and Its Reception. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 144–62.Google Scholar

Aelian, . 1959. De Natura Animalium, A. F. Scholfield (tr.). Loeb Classical Library 449. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Allais, L. 2016. ‘Problematizing Western Philosophy as One Part of Africanising the Curriculum’, South African Journal of Philosophy 35(4): 537–45.Google Scholar

Allen, C. G. 1975. ‘Plato on Women’, Feminist Studies 2: 131–38.Google Scholar

Allen, R. E. (tr.). 1991. Dialogues of Plato, ii: Symposium. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Annas, J. 1976. ‘Plato’s Republic and Feminism’, Philosophy 51: 307–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antognazza, M. R. 2015. ‘The Benefit to Philosophy of the Study of its History’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23(1): 161–84.Google Scholar

Appell, L. 1988. ‘Menstruation among the Rungus of Borneo: An Unmarked Category’, in Buckley, T. and Gottlieb, P. (eds.), Blood Magic: The Anthropology of Menstruation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Appleton, N. 2017. Shared Characters in Jain, Buddhist and Hindu Narrative: Gods, Kings, and Other Heroes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Arenson, K. 2016. ‘Epicureans on Marriage as Sexual Therapy’, Polis 33: 291–311.Google Scholar

Aristotle, 1942. Generation of Animals, A. L. Peck (tr.). London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1984. Historia Animalium, D’A. W. Thompson (tr.) in Barnes, J. (ed.), Complete Works of Aristotle, vol. 1. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 1991. History of Animals Books VII–X, D. M. Balme (tr.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Armstrong, A. (tr.). 1984. Plotinus in Seven Volumes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Asmis, E. 1996. ‘The Stoics on Women’, in Ward, J. (ed.), Feminism and Ancient Philosophy. New York: Routledge, pp. 68–92.Google Scholar

Athanassiadi, P. (ed. and tr.). 1999. Damascius. The Philosophical History. Athens: Apamea.Google Scholar

Baltzly, D. (tr.). 2009. Proclus: Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus. Vol. 4: Proclus on the World Soul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Baltzly, D. 2013. ‘Proclus and Theodore of Asine on Female Philosopher-Rulers: Patriarchy, Metempsychosis and Women in the Neoplatonic Commentary Tradition’, Ancient Philosophy 33: 403–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ban, Z. 2013a. ‘Memorial to Empress Dowager Deng’, in Fan, Y. et al. (eds.), The Book of the Later Han (Houhanshu 後漢書), vol. 84. Reprinted with modern Chinese translation, introduction, notes, commentary in Lianke, Wen et al. Xinyi Houhanshu. Taipei: Sanmin shuju.Google Scholar

Ban, Z. 2013b. ‘Petition for a Replacement for My Elder Brother Chao’ in Fan, Y. et al. (eds.), The Book of the Later Han (Houhanshu 後漢書), vol. 48. Reprinted with modern Chinese translation, introduction, notes, commentary in Lianke, Wen et al. Xinyi Houhanshu. Taipei: Sanmin shuju.Google Scholar

Ban, Z. 2018. ‘Lessons for Women’, in Pang-White, A. A. (tr. and ed.), The Confucian Four Books for Women – A New Translation of the Nü Sishu and the Commentary of Wang Xiang. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 29–67.Google Scholar

Ban, Z. 2021a. ‘Rhapsody on a Journey to the East’, in Xiao, T. (ed.), Wenxuan 文選 (aka Zhaoming wenxuan 昭明文選), vol. 3. https://ctext.org/library.pl?if=en&res=91990.Google Scholar

Ban, Z. 2021b. ‘Rhapsody on Needle and Thread’, in Ouyang, X. (ed.), Yiwen leiju 藝文類聚, vol. 65. https://ctext.org/library.pl?if=en&res=5982.Google Scholar

Barker, A. 2015. ‘Pythagorean Harmonics’, in Huffman, C. A. (ed.), A History of Pythagoreanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 185–203.Google Scholar

Bartoš, H. 2021. ‘Aristotle’s Biology and Early Medicine’, in Connell, S. M. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle’s Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bartsch, S. 2006. The Mirror of the Self: Sexuality, Self-knowledge, and the Gaze in the Early Roman Empire. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Bartsch, S., and Wray, D. (eds.). 2009. Seneca and the Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bar On, B.-A. 1994. Engendering Origins. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Beagon, P. M. 1995. ‘The Cappadocian Fathers, Women and Ecclesiastical Politics’, Vigiliae Christianae 49(2): 165–79.Google Scholar

Belo, C. 2009. ‘Some Considerations on Averroes’ Views Regarding Women and Their Role in Society’, Journal of Islamic Studies 20: 1–20.Google Scholar

Benhabib, S. 1986/87. ‘The Generalized and the Concrete Other: The Kohlberg-Gilligan Controversy and Feminist Theory’, in Benhabib, S. and Cornell, D. (eds.), Praxis International, Special Issue On Feminist Theory, pp. 38–60; Reprinted in Kittay, E. F. and Meyers, D. (eds.). Women and Moral Theory. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 154–78.Google Scholar

Benson, P. J. 1992. The Invention of the Renaissance Woman: The Challenge of Female Independence in the Literature and Thought of Italy and England. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Bernasconi, R. 1997. ‘Philosophy’s Paradoxical Parochialism: The Reinvention of Philosophy as Greek,’ in Ansell-Pearson, K., Parry, B., and Squires, J. (eds.), Cultural Readings of Imperialism. London: Lawrence and Wishart, 212–26.Google Scholar

Berthelot, M. 1888. Collection des Alchemistes Grecs. Paris: George Steinheil.Google Scholar

Black, B. 2007a. The Character of the Self in Ancient India: Priests, Kings, and Women in the Early Upaniṣads. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Black, B. 2007b. ‘Eavesdropping on the Epic: Female Listeners in the Mahābhārata’, in Brodbeck, S. and Black, B. (eds.), Gender and Narrative in the Mahābhārata. London: Routledge, pp. 53–78.Google Scholar

Black, B. 2013. ‘Draupadī in the Mahābhārata’, Religion Compass, 7(5): 169–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black, B. 2015a. ‘Dialogue and Difference: Encountering the Other in Indian Religious and Philosophical Sources’, in Black, B. and Patton, L. (eds.), Dialogue in Early South Asian Religions: Hindu, Buddhist, and Jain Traditions. Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 243–57.Google Scholar

Black, B. 2015b. ‘The Upanishads’, The Internet Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, ISSN 2161-0002. https://iep.utm.edu/.Google Scholar

Black, B. 2017. ‘The Upaniṣads and the Mahābhārata’, in Cohen, S. (ed.), The Upaniṣads: A Complete Guide. New York: Routledge, pp. 186–99.Google Scholar

Black, B. 2021a. In Dialogue with the Mahābhārata. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Black, B. 2021b. ‘Through the Eyes of Ulūpī: A Distinctive Snake Perspective in the Mahābhārata’, Journal of Hindu Studies 15: 83–105.Google Scholar

Black, B. 2022. ‘Politics without Fear: King Janaka and Sovereignty in the Mahābhārata’, Religions 13(10): 898. doi.org/10.3390/rel13100898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blackstone, K. R. 1998. Women in the Footsteps of the Buddha. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Blair, E. D. 2012. Plato’s Dialectic on Woman: Equal, Therefore Inferior. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Blundell, S. 1995. Women in Ancient Greece. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bonelli, M. 2020. Filosofe, Maestre e Imperatrici. Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.Google Scholar

Bose, C. K. 2017. ‘The El-Lahun gynaecological papyrus’, Hektoen International: A Journal of Medical Humanities 9(2). https://hekint.org/2017/01/27/the-el-lahun-gynecological-papyrus/.Google Scholar

Boyle, A. J. 1997. Tragic Seneca: An Essay in the Theatrical Tradition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bremmer, J. M. 1990. ‘Adolescents, Symposion, and Pederasty’, in Murray, O. (ed.), Sympotica. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 135–49.Google Scholar

Brill, S. 2015. ‘Animality and Sexual Difference in the Timaeus’, in Bell, J. and Naas, M. (eds.), Plato’s Animals: Gadflies, Horses, Swans, and Other Philosophical Beasts. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 161–75.Google Scholar

Brill, S. and McKeen, C. Forthcoming. The Routledge Handbook on Women and Ancient Greek Philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Broadie, S. 2019. ‘Practical Truth in Aristotle’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 57: 249–72.Google Scholar

Brodbeck, S., and Black, B. 2007. Gender and Narrative in the Mahābhārata. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Brown, V. (ed.). 2001. Famous Women. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Brown, W. 1988. ‘Supposing Truth Were a Woman: Plato’s Subversion of Masculine Discourse’, Political Theory 16: 594–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buchan, M. 1999. Women in Plato’s Political Theory. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. 1992. The Orientalising Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Burrus, V. 2000. ‘Begotten, Not Made’: Conceiving Manhood in Late Antiquity. Redwood: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Burrus, V. 2001. ‘Is Macrina a Woman? Gregory of Nyssa’s Dialogue on the Soul and Resurrection’, in Ward, G. (ed.), The Companion to Postmodern Theology. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 249–64.Google Scholar

Bury, R. G. 1932. The Symposium of Plato. Edited with Introduction, Critical Notes and Commentary. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Heffer.Google Scholar

Busch, A. 2009. ‘Dissolution of the Self in the Senecan Corpus’, in Bartsch, S. and Wray, D. (eds.), Seneca and the Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 255–82.Google Scholar

Buxton, R., and Whiting, L. 2020. Philosopher Queens. London: Unbound.Google Scholar

Caizzi, F. D. 1993. ‘The Porch and the Garden: Early Hellenistic Images of the Philosophical Life’, in Bulloch, A., Gruen, E., Long, A. A., and Stewart, A. (eds.), Images and Ideologies: Self-Definition in the Hellenistic World. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 303–29.Google Scholar

Calame, C. 1999. The Poetics of Eros in Ancient Greece. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Callahan, V. W. (tr.) 1967. The Fathers of the Church: St. Gregory of Nyssa Ascetical Works. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar

Cameron, A., and Long, J. 1993. Barbarians and Politics at the Court of Arcadius. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Cantor, L. 2022. ‘Thales – the “First Philosopher”? A Troubled Chapter in the Historiography of Philosophy’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy. DOI: 10.1080/09608788.2022.2029347.Google Scholar

Castelli, E. 1986. ‘Virginity and Its Meaning for Women’s Sexuality in Early Christianity’, Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion 2(1): 61–88.Google Scholar

Castner, C. 1982. ‘Epicurean Hetairai as Dedicants to Healing Deities?’, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 23: 51–57.Google Scholar

Centrone, B. 1990. Pseudopythagorica Ethica. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar

Centrone, B. 2014. ‘The Pseudo-Pythagorean Writings’, in Huffman, C. A. (ed.), A History of Pythagoreanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 315–40.Google Scholar

Chakrabarti, A. 2014. ‘Just Words: An Ethics of Conversation in the Mahābhārata’, in Chakrabarti, A. and Bandyopadhyay, S. (eds.), Mahābhārata Now: Narration, Aesthetics, Ethics. New Delhi: Routledge, pp. 244–83.Google Scholar

Chakravarti, U. 2014. ‘Who Speaks for Whom? The Queen, the Dāsī and Sexual Politics in the Sabhāparvan’, in Chakrabarti, A. and Bandyopadhyay, S. (eds.), Mahābhārata Now: Narration, Aesthetics, Ethics. New Delhi: Routledge, pp. 132–52.Google Scholar

Chemello, A. 1983. ‘La donna, il modello, l’immaginario: Moderata Fonte e Lucrezia Marinella’, in Zancan, M. (ed.), Nel cerchio della luna: figure di donna in alcuni testi del XVI secolo. Venice: Marsilio, pp. 59–170.Google Scholar

Chouinard, I., McConaughey, Z., Medeiros Ramos, A., and Noel, R. (eds.) 2021. Women’s Perspectives on Ancient and Medieval Philosophy. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christensen, A. B. 2020. ‘Epicureans on Friendship, Politics, and Community’, in Arenson, K. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Hellenistic Philosophy. New York: Routledge, pp. 307–18.Google Scholar

Cixous, H. 1976. ‘The Laugh of the Medusa’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 1: 875–93.Google Scholar

Clark, E. A. 1998. ‘The Lady Vanishes: Dilemmas of a Feminist Historian after the “Linguistic Turn”’, Church History, 67(1), 1–31.Google Scholar

Clay, D. 2009. ‘The Athenian Garden’, in Warren, J. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 9–28.Google Scholar

Cohen, S. 2008. Text and Authority in the Older Upaniṣads. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Cohen, S. 2018. The Upanishads. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Cole, S. 1981. ‘Could Greek Women Read and Write?’ Women’s Studies 8: 129–55. Reprinted in Foley, H. (ed.), Reflections of Women in Antiquity. London: Routledge, pp. 219–45.Google Scholar

Connell, S. M. 2016. Aristotle on Female Animals: A Study of the Generation of Animals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Connell, S. M. 2019. ‘Nurture and Parenting in Aristotelian Ethics’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 2: 119.Google Scholar

Connell, S. M. 2021. ‘Women in Science’, in Whitmarsh, T. (ed.), Oxford Classical Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://oxfordre.com/classics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.001.0001/acrefore-9780199381135-e-8584;jsessionid=6B7B03197DD49A5F6441B84586BD8D3B.Google Scholar

Cooper, J. M. (ed.) 1997. Plato. Complete Works. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar

Cooper, J. M. 2012. Pursuits of Wisdom: Six Ways of Life in Ancient Philosophy from Socrates to Plotinus. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Cox Miller, P. 1983. Biography in Late Antiquity: A Quest for the Holy Man. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Cox Miller, P. 2000. ‘Strategies of Representation in Collective Biography: Constructing the Subject as Holy’, in Hägg, T., Rousseau, P., and Høgel, C., (eds.), Greek Biography and Panegyric in Late Antiquity. Oakland: University of California Press, pp. 209–55.Google Scholar

Craik, E. 2015. The Hippocratic Corpus: Content and Context. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Crawford, F. S. (ed.) 1953. Averroes. Averrois Cordubensis Commentarium magnum in Aristotelis De anima libros. Cambridge, MA: Mediaeval Academy of America.Google Scholar

Dalmiya, V. and Mukherji, G. 2018. ‘Introduction: To Do’, in Bhattacharya, S. C., Dalmiya, V., and Mukherji, G. (eds.), Exploring Agency in the Mahābhārata: Ethical and Political Dimensions of Dharma. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar

D’Angour, A. 2019. Socrates in Love: The Making of a Philosopher. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Darling, D. 2004. The Universal Book of Mathematics: From Abracadabra to Zeno’s Paradoxes. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Deakin, M. A. B. 2007. Hypatia of Alexandria. Mathematician and Martyr. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar

Dean-Jones, L. 1992. ‘The Politics of Pleasure: Female Sexual Appetite in the Hippocratic Corpus’, Helios 19: 72–91.Google Scholar

Dean-Jones, L. 1994. Women’s Bodies in Ancient Greek Science. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Dean-Jones, L. 1995. ‘Autopsia, Historia, and What Women Know: The Authority of Women in Hippocratic Gynaecology’, in Bates, D. (ed.), Knowledge and the Scholarly Medical Traditions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 41–59.Google Scholar

Dean-Jones, L. 2012. ‘Clinical Gynecology and Aristotle’s Biology: The Composition of HA X’, Apeiron 45: 180–99.Google Scholar

Dean-Jones, L. 2018. ‘Female Patients,’ in Pormann, P. E. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hippocrates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 246–62.Google Scholar

Dean-Jones, L. Forthcoming. Historia Animalium Book X: Aristotle Endoxon, Topos, and Dialectic On Failure to Reproduce. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

de Beauvoir, S. 1949/1952. The Second Sex. Translated and edited by Parshley, H. M.. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar

De Cesaris, G., and Horky, P. S. 2018. ‘Hellenistic Pythagorean Epistemology’, in Verde, F. and Catapano, M. (eds.), special issue of Lexicon Philosophicum: Hellenistic Theories of Knowledge: 221–62.Google Scholar

Deming, W. 2004. Paul on Marriage and Celibacy: The Hellenistic Background of 1 Corinthians 7. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans.Google Scholar

Denzey Lewis, N. 2014. ‘Living Images of the Divine: Female Theurgists in Late Antiquity’, in Stratton, K. B. and Kalleres, D. S. (eds.), Daughters of Hecate: Women and Magic in the Ancient World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 274–93.Google Scholar

Derrida, J. 1972. ‘Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences’, in Macksey, R. and Donato, E. (eds.), The Structuralist Controversy: The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 247–65.Google Scholar

Deslauriers, M. 2012. ‘Women, Education, and Philosophy,’ in James, S. L. and Dillon, S. (eds.), A Companion to Women in the Ancient World. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 343–53.Google Scholar

Des Places, E. 1987. Jamblique. Protreptique. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

De Temmerman, K. 2016. ‘Ancient Biography and Formalities of Fiction,’ in De Temmerman, D. and Demoen, D. (eds.), Writing Biography in Greece and Rome: Narrative Technique and Fictionalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 2–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dhand, A. 2007. ‘Paradigms of the Good in the Mahābhārata: Śuka and Sulabhā in Quagmires of Ethics’, in Brodbeck, S. and Black, B. (eds.), Gender and Narrative in the Mahābhārata. London: Routledge, pp. 258–78.Google Scholar

Dhand, A. 2008. Woman as Fire, Woman as Sage: Sexual Ideology in the Mahābhārata. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Dhand, A. 2018. ‘Karmayoga and the Vexed Moral Agent’, in Bhattacharya, S. C., Dalmiya, V., and Mukherji, G. (eds.), Exploring Agency in the Mahābhārata: Ethical and Political Dimensions of Dharma. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 81–106.Google Scholar

Dickason, A. 1973–74. ‘Anatomy and Destiny: The Role of Biology in Plato’s View of Women’, Philosophical Forum 5: 44–53.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. 1985. ‘Female Principles in Platonism’, Itaca 1, 107–23.Google Scholar

Diogenes Laertius, . 1925/1972. Lives of Eminent Philosophers (D.L.) tr. R. D. Hicks. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Dodds, E. R. 1945. ‘Plato and the Irrational’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 65: 16–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donnison, D. 1988. Midwives and Medical Men: A History of the Struggle for the Control of Childbirth. New Barnet: Historical Publications.Google Scholar

Dotson, K. 2012. ‘How Is This Paper Philosophy?’, Comparative Philosophy 3(1): 3–29.Google Scholar

Dover, K. 1978. Greek Homosexuality. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Dover, K. 1980. Plato: Symposium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Doyle, N. 2018. Maternal Bodies: Redefining Motherhood in Early America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Drury, J. L. 2005. ‘Gregory of Nyssa’s Dialogue with Macrina: The Compatibility of Resurrection of the Body and Immortality of the Soul’, Theology Today 62(2): 210–22.Google Scholar

du Bois, P. 1988. Sowing the Body: Psychoanalysis and Ancient Representations of Women. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

du Bois, P. 1994. ‘The Platonic Appropriation of Reproduction’, in Tuana, N. (ed.), Feminist Interpretations of Plato. University Park: Pennslyvania State University Press, pp. 139–57.Google Scholar

Dunhill, A. (tr.). 1999. Lucrezia Marinella: The Nobility and the Excellence of Women and the Defects of Men. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Dutsch, D. M. 2020. Pythagorean Women Philosophers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dzielska, M. 1995. Hypatia of Alexandria, tr. F. Lyra. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Elm, S. 1994. ‘Virgins of God’: The Making of Asceticism in Late Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

El Murr, D. 2020. ‘Eristic, Antilogy, and the Equal Disposition of Men and Women (Resp. 5. 453b–454c)’, Classical Quarterly 70(1): 85–100.Google Scholar

Eusebius of Caesarea, . 1903. Praeparatio Evangelica (PE), tr. E. H. Gifford. Oxford: Typographeo Academico.Google Scholar

Evans, N. 2006. ‘Diotima and Demeter as Mystagogues in Plato’s Symposium’, Hypatia 21(2): 1–27.Google Scholar

Falk, Nancy. 1977. ‘Draupadī and the Dharma’, in Gross, R. M. (ed.), Beyond Androcentrism: New Essays on Women and Religion. Missoula: Scholars Press, pp. 89–114.Google Scholar

Fan, Y. et al. 范曄 (eds.). 2021. The Book of the Later Han (Houhanshu 後漢書), 120 or 130 vols. (depending on editions). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_the_Later_Han, or https://ctext.org/hou-han-shu/zh. Reprinted with modern Chinese translation, introduction, notes, commentary in Lianke, Wen et al. 2013. Xinyi Houhanshu. Taipei: Sanmin shuju.Google Scholar

Faucette, A. 2014. ‘Fucking the Binary for Social Change: Our Radically Queer Agenda’, Counterpoints: The Gay Agenda: Claiming Space, Identity, Justice 437: 73–88.Google Scholar

Festugière, A. J. (ed.) 1970. Proclus: Commentaire sur la République. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.Google Scholar

Fitch, J. G. 2009. Seneca’s Hercules Furens: A Critical Text with Introduction and Commentary. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, J. L. 2002. ‘Nun Befuddles King, Shows Karmayoga Does Not Work: Sulabhā’s Refutation of King Janaka at MBh 12.308’, Journal of Indian Philosophy 30(6): 641–77.Google Scholar

Flemming, F. 2007. ‘Women, Writing and Medicine in the Classical World’, Classical Quarterly 5: 257–79.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. 1985. A History of Sexuality: The Use of Pleasure, vol 2. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Frank, G. 2000. ‘Macrina’s Scar: Homeric Allusion and Heroic Identity in Gregory of Nyssa’s Life of Macrina’, Journal of Early Christian Studies 8(3): 511–30.Google Scholar

Frede, D. 1993. ‘Out of the Cave: What Socrates Learnt from Diotima’, in Rosen, R. M. and Farrell, J. (eds.), Nomodeiktes: Greek Studies in Honour of Martin Ostwald. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 397–422.Google Scholar

Frede, D. 2018. ‘Equal But Not Equal: Plato and Aristotle on Women as Citizens’ in Santas, G. and Anagnostopoulos, G. (eds.), Democracy, Justice, and Equality in Ancient Greece: Historical and Philosophical Perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 287–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freeland, C. A. 1998. Feminist Interpretations of Aristotle. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Fricker, M., and Hornsby, J. (eds.). 2000. The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Frischer, B. 1982. The Sculpted Word: Epicureanism and Philosophical Recruitment in Ancient Greece. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Gadamer, H.-G. 1985. Philosophical Apprenticeships. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Galinsky, K. 1972. The Herakles Theme: The Adaptations of the Hero in Literature from Homer to the Twentieth Century. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Gardner, C. 2000. ‘The Remnants of the Family: The Role of Women and Eugenics in Republic V’, History of Philosophy Quarterly 17: 217–35.Google Scholar

Gaut, B. 1998. ‘Just Joking: The Ethics and Aesthetics of Humour’, Philosophy and Literature 22(1): 55–68.Google Scholar

Gertz, S. 2014. ‘Dream Divination and the Neoplatonic Search for Salvation’, in Russell, D. A. and Nesselrath, H.-G. (eds.), On Prophecy, Dream and Human Imagination. Synesius, De insomniis. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 111–24.Google Scholar

Gertz, S. 2020. ‘“A Mere Geometer?” Hypatia in the Context of Alexandrian Neoplatonism’, in Norman, D. L. and Petkas, A. (eds.), Hypatia of Alexandria. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 133–51.Google Scholar

Giannantoni, G. (ed.). 1990. Socratis et Socraticorum Reliquiae (SSR). 4 vols. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar

Gilligan, C. 1982. In A Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Ginsberg, L. 2016. ‘Jocasta’s Catilinarian Oration (Sen. Phoen. 632–43)’, Classical Journal 4: 483–94.Google Scholar

Gloyn, L. 2017. The Ethics of the Family in Seneca. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gordon, P. 2004. ‘Remembering the Garden: The Trouble with Women in the School of Epicurus’, in Fitzgerald, J., Obbink, D., and Holland, G. (eds.), Philodemus and the New Testament World. Leiden: Brill, pp. 221–43.Google Scholar

Gordon, P. 2012. The Invention and Gendering of Epicurus. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Granholm, P. 2012. ‘Alciphron: Letters of the Courtesans’, unpublished PhD thesis, Uppsala University.Google Scholar

Grant, J. 1994. Fundamental Feminism: Contesting the Core Concepts of Feminist Theory. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Graver, M. 2001. Cicero on the Emotions: Tusculan Disputations 3 and 4. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Griffin, C. 2020. Beyond Gender Binaries: An Intersectional Orientation to Communication and Identities. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. 1976. Seneca: A Philosopher in Politics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. 1986a. ‘Philosophy, Cato, and Roman Suicide: I’, Greece & Rome 33: 64–77.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. 1986b. ‘Philosophy, Cato, and Roman Suicide: II’, Greece & Rome 33: 192–202.Google Scholar

Guarducci, M. 1974. ‘La Statua di “Sant Ippolito” in Vaticano’, Rendiconti, Pontificia Accademia Romana di Archeologia 47: 163–90.Google Scholar

Hadot, P. 1987. Philosophy as a Way of Life, Davidson, A. (ed.) M. Chase (tr.). Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hallisey, C. 2015. Therigatha: Poems of the First Buddhist Women. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Halperin, D. 1989. ‘Why Is Diotima a Woman?’, in Halperin, D. (ed.), One Hundred Years of Homosexuality. New York: Routledge, pp. 113–53.Google Scholar

Hanson, A. 1991. ‘Continuity and Change: Three Case Studies in Hippocratic Gynaecological Therapy and Theory’, in Pomeroy, S. (ed.), Women’s History and Ancient History. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, pp. 73–110.Google Scholar

Haraway, D. 1991. ‘Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective’, in Haraway, D., Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 183–201.Google Scholar

Harich-Schwarzbauer, H. (ed. and tr.) 2011. Hypatia. Die spätantiken Quellen. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Harrison, V. S. 2012. Eastern Philosophy: The Basics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Harry, C., and Polansky, R. 2016. ‘Plato on Women’s Natural Ability: Revisiting Republic V and Timaeus 41e3–44d2 and 86b1–92c3’, Apeiron 49: 261–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haslanger, S. 2008. ‘Changing the Ideology and Culture of Philosophy: Not by Reason (Alone)’, Hypatia 23(2): 210–23.Google Scholar

Hawley, R. 1994. ‘The Problem of Women Philosophers in Ancient Greece’, in Archer, L. J., Fischler, S., and Wyke, M. (eds.), Women in Ancient Societies: An Illusion of the Night. New York: Routledge, pp. 70–87.Google Scholar

He, Z. 2013. ‘On the Revenge of Women’, in Liu, L., Karl, R., and Ko, D. (tr. and eds.), The Birth of Chinese Feminism: Essential Texts in Transnational Theory. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 105–68.Google Scholar

Helleman, W. E. 2001. ‘Cappadocian Macrina as Lady Wisdom’, Studia Patristica 37: 86–102.Google Scholar

Henry, D., and Nielsen, K. 2015. ‘Introduction’, in Bridging the Gap between Aristotle’s Science and Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar

Henry, M. 1997. Prisoner of History: Aspasia of Miletus and her Biographical Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hill, L. 2001. ‘The First Wave of Feminism: Were the Stoics Feminists?’ History of Political Thought 22: 13–40.Google Scholar

Hiltebeitel, A. 2000. ‘Draupadī’s Question’, in Hiltebeitel, A. and Erndl, K. (eds.), Is the Goddess a Feminist? The Politics of South Asian Goddesses. New York: New York University Press, pp. 113–22.Google Scholar

Hine, H. (tr.). 2014. ‘Consolation to Marcia’, in Lucius Annaeus Seneca: Hardship & Happiness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hippocrates, . 2010–18. Works, Volumes IX–XI, tr. P. Potter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press [Loeb].Google Scholar

Holmes, B. 2013. ‘In Strange Lands. Disembodied Authority and the Role of the Physician in the Hippocratic Corpus and Beyond’, in Asper, M. (ed.), Writing Science. Medical and Mathematical Authorship in Ancient Greece. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 431–72.Google Scholar

Horky, P. S. 2015. ‘Pseudo-Archytas’ Protreptics? On Wisdom in its Contexts’, in Nails, D. and Tarrant, H. (eds.), Second Sailing. Helsinki: Societas Scientiarum Fennica, pp. 21–40.Google Scholar

Horky, P. S. 2020. ‘Anonymus Iamblichi, On Excellence (Peri Aretēs): A Lost Defense of Democracy’, in Wolfsdorf, D. (ed.), Early Greek Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 262–92.Google Scholar

Hösle, V. 2012. The Philosophical Dialogue: A Poetics and Hermeneutics, tr. Steven Rendall. South Bend: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Hotz, K. G. 2001. ‘Speaking Funk: Womanist Insights into the Lives of Syncletica and Macrina’, in Holmes, E. A. and Farley, W., (eds.), Women, Writing, Theology: Transforming a Tradition of Exclusion. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, pp. 71–94.Google Scholar

Howard, V. R. 2019. The Bloomsbury Research Handbook of Indian Philosophy and Gender. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Howe, J. 2020. The Routledge Handbook of Islam and Gender. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Huffman, C.A. (ed.). 2014. A History of Pythagoreanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Huffman, C. A. 2019a. Aristoxenus of Tarentum. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Huffman, C. A. 2019b. ‘Pythagoreanism’, in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/pythagoreanism/.Google Scholar

Huizenga, A. 2013. Moral Education for Women in the Pastoral and Pythagorean Letters. Boston: Brill.Google Scholar

Hult, D. F. (tr.) 2010. Debate of the Romance of the Rose. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hultsch, F. O. 1882. Griechische und römische Metrologie. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar

Humbert, J. 1960. Syntaxe Grecque. Paris: Librairie C. Klincksieck.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, D. S., and Johnson, M. R. 2005. ‘Authenticating Aristotle’s Protrepticus’, Oxford Studies of Ancient Philosophy 29: 193–293.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, D. S., and Johnson, M. R. 2017. Aristotle’s Protrepticus. Unpublished.Google Scholar

Hutton, S. 2019. ‘Women, Philosophy, and the History of Philosophy’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 27(4): 684–701.Google Scholar

Idema, W., and Grant, B. (eds.) 2004. The Red Brush: Writing Women of Imperial China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Centre.Google Scholar

Iles Johnstone, S. 2016. ‘Sosipatra and the Theurgic Life: Eunapius Vitae Sophistorum 6.6.5–6.9.24’, in Rüpke, J. and Spickermann, W. (eds.), Reflections on Religious Individuality. Greco-Roman and Judaeo-Christian Texts and Practices. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 99–117.Google Scholar

Irigaray, L. 1989. ‘Sorcerer Love: A Reading of Plato’s Symposium, Diotima’s Speech’, Hypatia 3(3): 32–44.Google Scholar

Jacobs, W. 1978. ‘Plato on Emancipation and the Traditional Family’, Apeiron 12: 29–31.Google Scholar

Jamison, S. 1996. Sacrificed Wife, Sacrificer’s Wife: Women, Ritual, and Hospitality in Ancient India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jayne, S. (tr.). 1944. Marsilio Ficino’s Commentary on Plato’s Symposium. Columbia: University of Missouri.Google Scholar

Johnson, M. P. 1998. ‘Daughter, Sister, Philosopher, Angel: The Life and Influence of St. Macrina the Younger’, Diakonia 31(3): 176–86.Google Scholar

Johnson, M. 2015. ‘Aristotle’s Architectonic Sciences’, in Ebrey, D. (ed.), Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 163–86.Google Scholar

Kalligas, P. 1997. ‘Forms of Individuals in Plotinus: A Re-Examination’, Phronesis 42: 206–27.Google Scholar

Karamanolis, G. 2006. Plato and Aristotle in Agreement? Platonists on Aristotle from Antiochus to Porphyry. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Kennedy, R. F. 2014. Immigrant Women in Athens: Gender, Ethnicity, and Citizenship in the Classical City. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kennedy, R. F. 2015. ‘Elite Citizen Women and the Origins of the Hetaira in Classical Athens’, Helios 42(1): 61–79.Google Scholar

Ker, J. 2009. The Deaths of Seneca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kersey, E. M. 1989. Women Philosophers: A Bio-critical Sourcebook. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar

King, H. 1985. ‘From Parthenos to Gyne: the dynamics of category’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of London.Google Scholar

King, H. 1986. ‘Agnodike and the Profession of Medicine’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 32(212): 53–77.Google Scholar

King, H. 1998. Hippocrates’ Woman: Reading the Female Body in Ancient Greece. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

King, M. L. 1991. Women of the Renaissance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kingsley, P. 1995. Ancient Philosophy, Mystery, and Magic: Empedocles and Pythagorean Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kittay, E. F., and Meyers, D. (eds.). 1987. Women and Moral Theory. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 154–78.Google Scholar

Kolsky, S. D. 2001. ‘Moderata Fonte, Lucrezia Marinella, Giuseppe Passi: An Early Seventeenth-Century Feminist Controversy’, The Modern Language Review 96: 973–89.Google Scholar

Kroll, W. (ed.). 1899. Procli Diadochi in Platonis rem publicam commentarii, vol.I. Leipzig: Nabu Press.Google Scholar

Kutash, E. 2011. The Ten Gifts of the Demiurge. Proclus’ Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus. Bristol: Classical Press.Google Scholar

Laale, H. W. 2011. Ephesus (Ephesos): An Abbreviated History from Androclus to Constantine XI. Bloomington, IN: Westbow.Google Scholar

Lagarde, B. 1973. ‘Le De differentiis de Pléthon d’après l’autographe de la Marcienne’. Byzantion 43: 312–43.Google Scholar

Lampe, K. 2015. The Birth of Hedonism: The Cyrenaic Philosophers and Pleasure as a Way of Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Lampe, K. 2016. ‘The Life of Aristippus in the Socratic Epistles: Three Interpretations’, in Hanink, J. and Fletcher, R. (eds.), Creative Lives in Classical Antiquity: Poets, Artists, and Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 198–218.Google Scholar

Lefkowitz, M. R., and Fant, M. B. (eds.). 2005. Women’s Life in Greece and Rome: A Source Book in Translation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Leitao, D. D. 2012. The Pregnant Male as Myth and Metaphor in Classical Greek Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lerner, R. (tr.) 1974. Averroes on Plato’s Republic. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Lesser, H. 1979. ‘Plato’s Feminism’. Philosophy 54: 113–17.Google Scholar

Leunissen, M. 2021. ‘Empiricism and Hearsay in Aristotle’s Zoological Collection of Facts’, in Connell, S. M. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle’s Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Liddell, H. G., Scott, R., and Jones, H. S. 1940. A Greek-English Lexicon. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Lindquist, S. E. 2008. ‘Gender at Janaka’s Court’, Journal of Indian Philosophy 36: 405–26.Google Scholar

Lindsay, J. 1970. The Origins of Alchemy in Greco-Roman Egypt. London: Muller.Google Scholar

Littré, E. 1839–61. Oeuvres complètes d’Hippocrates. Paris: J. B. Baillière [L.].Google Scholar

Liu, L., Karl, R., and Ko, D. (tr. and eds.) 2013. The Birth of Chinese Feminism: Essential Texts in Transnational Theory. New York: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. 1983. Science, Folklore, and Ideology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. 1987. ‘Empirical Research in Aristotle’s Biology,’ in Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 53–64.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. 2005. ‘“Philosophy”: What Did the Greeks Invent and Is It Relevant to China?’ Extrême-orient, Extrême-occident 27: 149–60.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. 2014. ‘Pythagoras’, in Huffman, C. A. (ed.), A History of Pythagoreanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 24–45.Google Scholar

Loraux, N. 1987. Tragic Ways of Killing a Woman, tr. A. Forster. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Lovibond, S. 2000. ‘Feminism in Ancient Philosophy: The Feminist Stake in Greek Rationalism’, in Fricker, M. and Hornsby, J. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 10–28.Google Scholar

Lutz, C. 1947. ‘Musonius Rufus: The Roman Socrates’, Yale Classical Studies 10: 1–147.Google Scholar

MacIntyre, A. 1999. Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Macksey, R., and Donato, E. (eds.) 1972. The Structuralist Controversy: The Languages of Criticism and the Sciences of Man. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Macris, C. 2002. ‘Jamblique et la Littérature Pseudo-Pythagoricienne’, in Mimouni, S. C. (ed.), Apocryphité. Turnhout: Brepols, pp. 77–129.Google Scholar

Macris, C. 2012. ‘Périctionè (d’Athènes?)’, in Goulet, R. (ed.), Dictionnaire des Philosophes Antiques V. Paris: CNRS, pp. 231–34.Google Scholar

Malherbe, A. J. (ed.). 1977/2006. The Cynic Epistles: A Study Edition. Missoula, MT: Scholars Press for the Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar

Malinar, A. 2007. ‘Arguments of a Queen: Draupadī’s View on Kingship’, in Brodbeck, S. and Black, B. (eds.), Gender and Narrative in the Mahābhārata. London: Routledge, pp. 79–96.Google Scholar

Mann, S., and Cheng, Y. (eds.) 2001. Under Confucian Eyes: Writings on Gender in Chinese History. Berkeley; Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Mann, W.-R. 1996. ‘The Life of Aristippus’, in Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 78: 97–119.Google Scholar

Mann, W.-R. 2006. ‘Learning How to Die: Seneca’s Use of Aeneid 4.653 at Epistulae Morales 12.9’, in Volk, K. and Williams, G. (eds.), Seeing Seneca Whole: Perspectives on Philosophy, Poetry and Politics. Leiden: Brill, pp. 104–22.Google Scholar

Mann, W.-R. 2015. ‘“You’re Playing You Now”: Helvidius Priscus as a Stoic Hero’, in Volk, K. and Williams, G. (eds.), Roman Reflections: Studies in Latin Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 213–37.Google Scholar

Mannebach, E. 1961. Aristippi et cyrenaicorum fragmenta. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Manning, C. E. 1973. ‘Seneca and the Stoics on the Equality of the Sexes’, Mnemosyne 26: 170–77.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J., and Runia, D. 1997. Aëtiana I. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Manuli, P. 1983. ‘Donne masculine, femmine sterili, vergini perpetue: La ginecologia greca tra Ippocrate e Sorano’, in Campese, S., Manuli, P., and Sissa, G. (eds.), Madre Materia. Turin: Boringhieri, 149–204.Google Scholar

Marinella, L. 1600, 1601, 1621. La nobilta et eccellenza delle donne co’ difetti et mancamenti de gli huomini. Venice: Presso Gio.Google Scholar

Marshack, A. 1972. The Roots of Civilization: The Cognitive Beginning of Man’s First Art, Symbol. and Notation. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Matilal, B. K. 2002. ‘Dharma and Rationality’, in Ganeri, J. (ed.), Ethics and Epics: Philosophy, Culture, and Religion. The Collected Essays of Bimal Krishna Matilal, vol. 2. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, pp. 79–96.Google Scholar

Mauch, M. 1997. Senecas Frauenbild in den Philosophischen Schriften. Frankfurt: P. Lang.Google Scholar

McKeen, C. 2006. ‘Why Women Must Guard and Rule in Plato’s Kallipolis’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87: 527–48.Google Scholar

McKirahan, R. D. 1994. Philosophy before Socrates. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar

Mcnary-Zak, B. 2005. ‘Gregory of Nyssa and His Sister Macrina: A Holy Alliance’, Cithara 45(1): 3–12.Google Scholar

Ménage, G. 1984. The History of Women Philosophers. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar

Menn, S. 2002. ‘Plato and the Method of Analysis’, Phronesis 47: 193–223.Google Scholar

Mesytas, S. 2012. ‘Iamblichus’ Exegesis of Parmenides’ Hypotheses and His Doctrine of Divine Henads’, in Afonasin, E., Dillon, J., and Finamore, J. (eds.), Iamblichus and the Foundations of Late Platonism. Leiden: Brill, pp. 151–76.Google Scholar

Momigliano, A. 1971. ‘Second Thoughts on Greek Biography’, Mededelingen der Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Afd. Letterkunde 34(7): 245–57.Google Scholar

Momigliano, A. 1987. On Pagans, Jews, and Christians. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar

Momigliano, A. 1993. The Development of Greek Biography: Expanded Edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Monfasani, J. 2002. ‘Marsilio Ficino and the Plato-Aristotle Controversy’, in Allen, M. J. B. and Rees, V. (eds.), Marsilio Ficino: His Theology, His Philosophy, His Legacy. Leiden: Brill, pp. 179–202.Google Scholar

Montepaone, C. 2011. Pitagoriche. Bari: Edipuglia.Google Scholar

Motto, A. L. 1972. ‘Seneca on Women’s Liberation’, Classical World 65: 155–57.Google Scholar

Motto, A. L., and Clark, J. R. 1981. ‘Maxima Virtus in Seneca’s Hercules Furens’, Classical Philology 76: 101–17.Google Scholar

Mozans, H. J. (J. A. Zahm). 1913. Women of Science. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar

Muehlberger, E. 2012. ‘Salvage: Macrina and the Christian Project of Cultural Reclamation’, Church History, 81(2): 273–97.Google Scholar

Nails, D. 1989. ‘The Pythagorean Women Philosophers: Ethics of the Household’, in Boudouris, K. J. (ed.), Ionian Philosophy. Athens: International Association for Greek Philosophy, pp. 291–97.Google Scholar

Noy, D. 2013. ‘Matchmaker’, in Bagnall, R. S. et al. (eds.), The Encyclopaedia of Ancient History. Oxford: Blackwell, 43–44.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. 1979. The Fragility of Goodness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. 1986. ‘Therapeutic Arguments: Epicurus and Aristotle’, in Schofield, M. and Striker, G. (eds.), The Norms of Nature: Studies in Hellenistic Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 31–74.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. 2002. ‘The Incomplete Feminism of Musonius Rufus: Platonist, Stoic, and Roman’, in Nussbaum, M. and Sihvola, J. (eds.), The Sleep of Reason: Erotic Experience and Sexual Ethics in Ancient Greece and Rome. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: pp. 283–326.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. 2009. The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Nye, A. 1989. ‘The Hidden Host: Irigaray and Diotima at Plato’s Symposium’ Hypatia: French Feminist Philosophy 3(3): 45–61.Google Scholar

Nye, A. 1990. ‘The Subject of Love: Diotima and her Critics’, Journal of Value Inquiry 24: 135–53.Google Scholar

O’Brien, C. 2016. ‘Plotinus on the Soul’s logos as the Structuring Principle of the World’, in Halfwassen, J., Dangel, T., and O’Brien, C. (eds.), Seele und Materie im Neuplatonismus. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter, pp. 105–35.Google Scholar

O’Brien Wicker, K. (tr.). 1987. Porphyry. To Marcella. Atlanta: Scholars Press.Google Scholar

Okin, S. 1977. ‘Philosopher Queens and Private Wives: Plato on Women and the Family’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 6: 345–69.Google Scholar

Okin, S. 1979. Women in Western Political Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Okin, S. 1989. Justice, Labour and the Family. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Olson, G., Horn-Schott, M., Hartley, D., Schmidt, R. L. (eds.). 2019. Beyond Gender: An Advanced Introduction to the Futures of Feminist and Sexuality Studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

O’Meara, D. 2003. Platonopolis. Platonic Political Philosophy in Late Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

OutlawJr., L. T. 2017. ‘Africana Philosophy’, in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/africana/.Google Scholar

Ouyang, X. 歐陽詢 (ed.). 2021. Yiwen leiju 藝文類聚, 100 vols. https://ctext.org/library.pl?if=en&res=5982.Google Scholar

Pang-White, A. A. 2016. The Bloomsbury Research Handbook of Chinese Philosophy and Gender. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Pang-White, A. A. (tr. and ed.). 2018. The Confucian Four Books for Women: A New Translation of the Nü Sishu and the Commentary of Wang Xiang. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Panizza, L., and Wood, S. (eds.) 2000. A History of Women’s Writing in Italy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Park, P. 2013. Africa, Asia, and the History of Philosophy. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Patai, R. 1982. ‘Maria the Jewess: Founding Mother of Alchemy’, Ambix 29: 177–97.Google Scholar

Patton, L. 2007. ‘How Do You Conduct Yourself? Gender and the Construction of a Dialogical Self in the Mahābhārata’, in Brodbeck, S. and Black, B. (eds.), Gender and Narrative in the Mahābhārata. London: Routledge, pp. 97–109.Google Scholar

Pelikan, J. 1993. Christianity and Classical Culture: The Metamorphosis of Natural Theology in the Christian Encounter with Hellenism. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Pellò, C. 2018. ‘Women in Early Pythagoreanism’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar

Penella, R. J. 1990. Greek Philosophers and Sophists in the Fourth Century A.D. Studies in Eunapius of Sardis. Cairns: Francis Cairns.Google Scholar

Perioli, E. 1997. ‘Gregory of Nyssa and the Neoplatonic Doctrine of the Soul’, Vigiliae Christianae 51(2): 117–39.Google Scholar

Petkas, A. 2020. ‘Hypatia and the Desert. A Late Antique Defense of Classicism’, in Norman, D. L. and Petkas, A.. (eds.), Hypatia of Alexandria. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 7–29.Google Scholar

Piccione, R. M. 1999. ‘Caratterizzazione di lemmi nell’Anthologion di Giovanni Stobeo. Questioni di metodo’, Rivista di Filologia e Istruzione Classica 127: 139–75.Google Scholar

Pines, S. 1975. ‘Aristotle’s Politics in Arabic Philosophy’, Israel Oriental Studies 5: 150–60.Google Scholar

Plant, I. M. 2004. Women Writers in Ancient Greece and Rome: An Anthology. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar

Plass, P. 1978. ‘Plato’s Pregnant Lover’, Symbolae Osloenses 53, 47–55.Google Scholar

Plato, . 1973. Theaetetus, tr. J. MacDowell. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pomeroy, S. B. 1974. ‘Feminism in Book V of Plato’s Republic’, Apeiron 8: 33–35.Google Scholar

Pomeroy, S. B. 1975. Goddesses, Whores, Wives, and Slaves. New York: Schocken.Google Scholar

Pomeroy, S. B. 1978. ‘Plato and the Female Physician (Republic 454d2)’, American Journal of Philology 99(4): 496–500.Google Scholar

Pomeroy, S. B. 2013. Pythagorean Women: Their History and Writings. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Press, G. A. (ed.). 2000. Who Speaks for Plato? Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Protasi, S. 2020. ‘Teaching Ancient Women Philosophers: A Case Study’, Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 6(3): 1–26.Google Scholar

Ramelli, I. 2009. Hierocles the Stoic: Elements of Ethics, Fragments, and Excerpts, tr. D. Konstan. Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar

Ram-Prasad, C. 2018. Human Being, Bodily Being: Phenomenology from Classical India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Reeser, T. W. 2016. Setting Plato Straight: Translating Ancient Sexuality in the Renaissance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Reeve, C. D. C. 1998. Aristotle: Politics. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar

Reisman, D. C. 2004. ‘Plato’s Republic in Arabic: A Newly Discovered Passage’, Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 14: 263–300.Google Scholar

Rettig, G. F. 1876. Platons Symposion. Halle: Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses.Google Scholar

Reydams-Schils, G. 2005. The Roman Stoics: Self, Responsibility, and Affection. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Reydams-Schils, G. (ed.). 2011. Thinking through Excerpts. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar

Riddle, J. M. 1992. Contraception and Abortion from the Ancient World to the Renaissance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Riginos, A. S. 1976. Platonica. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Rist, J. M. 1965. ‘Hypatia’, Phoenix 19(3): 214–25.Google Scholar

Roded, R. 1999. Women in Islam and the Middle East: A Reader. London: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar

Romano, F. 2006. Giamblico. Summa Pitagorica. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar

Rosán, L. J. 1949. The Philosophy of Proclus. The Final Phase of Ancient Thought. New York: Cosmos.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, E. I. J. (ed. and tr.). 1969. Averroes’ Commentary on Plato’s Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Roth, C. P. 1992. ‘Platonic and Pauline Elements in the Ascent of the Soul in Gregory of Nyssa’s Dialogue On the Soul and Resurrection’, Vigiliae Christianae 46: 20–30.Google Scholar

Roth, C. P. 1993. On the Soul and Resurrection. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary.Google Scholar

Rousselle, A. 1988. Porneia: On Desire and the Body in Antiquity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Rowe, C. J. 1998. Plato: Symposium. Liverpool: Aris and Phillips.Google Scholar

Rowett, C. 2014. ‘The Pythagorean Society and Politics’, in Huffman, C. A. (ed.), A History of Pythagoreanism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 112–30.Google Scholar

Ruddick, S. 1980. ‘Maternal Thinking’, Feminist Studies 6: 342–67.Google Scholar

Saffrey, H. D., and Westerink, L. G. (ed. and tr.). 1981. Proclus. Théologie Platonicienne 4. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Salamon, G. 2009. ‘Justification and Queer Method, or Leaving Philosophy’, Hypatia, 24(1): 225–30.Google Scholar

Saxonhouse, A. 1976. ‘The Philosopher and the Female in the Political Thought of Plato’, Political Theory 4: 195–212.Google Scholar

Saxonhouse, A. 1984. ‘Eros and the Female in Greek Political Thought: An Interpretation of the Symposium’, Political Theory 12, 5–27.Google Scholar

Saxonhouse, A. 1985. Women in the History of Political Thought: Ancient Greece to Machiavelli. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Saxonhouse, A. 1992. Fear of Diversity: The Birth of Political Science in Ancient Greek Thought. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Sayeed, A. 2013. Women and the Transmission of Religious Knowledge in Islam. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schott, R. M. 2006. ‘Feminism and the History of Philosophy’, in Alcoff, L. M. and Kittay, E. F. (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Feminist Philosophy. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 43–63.Google Scholar

Schultz, J. 2019a. ‘Conceptualizing the ‘Female’ Soul – a Study in Plato and Proclus’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 27(5): 883–901.Google Scholar

Schultz, J. 2019b. ‘Mütterliche Ursachen in Proklos’ Metaphysik’, Philologus 163(2): 250–73.Google Scholar

Schultz, J. 2019c. ‘Die proklische Diotima. Philosophie, Religion und das Weibliche’, Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter 22: 75–98.Google Scholar

Schultz, J. 2022. ‘Beyond the Binary Distinction? Athena and Other Virgin Goddesses in Proclus’ Metaphysics’, in Layne, D. A. and Elbert Decker, J. (eds.), Otherwise Than the Binary: New Feminist Readings of Ancient Philosophy and Culture. New York: SUNY Press, 263–95.Google Scholar

Sedley, D. 1997. ‘“Becoming Like God” in the Timaeus and Aristotle’, in Calvo, T. and Brisson, L. (eds.), Interpreting the Timaeus-Critias. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag, pp. 327–39.Google Scholar

Segonds, A. Ph. (ed. and tr.) 1985. Proclus. Sur le Premier Alcibiade de Platon 1–2. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Sheather, M. 1995. ‘The Eulogies on Macrina and Gorgonia: Or, What Difference Did Christianity Make?’, Pacifica Theological Studies 8: 22–39.Google Scholar

Sheffield, F. C. C. 2017. ‘Eros and the Pursuit of Form’, in Destrée, P. and Gianopoulou, Z. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Plato’s Symposium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 125–42.Google Scholar

Sheffield, F. C. C. 2021. ‘Moral Motivation in Plato’s Republic? Philia and Return to the Cave’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 59: 79–105.Google Scholar

Shelton, J.-A. 1995. ‘Persuasion and Paradigm in Seneca’s Consolatio ad Marciam 1–6’, Classica et Mediaevalia 46: 157–88.Google Scholar

Silvas, A. M. 2008. Macrina the Younger: Philosopher of God. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar

Smith, J. W. 2000. ‘Macrina, Tamer of Horses and Healer of Souls: Grief and the Therapy of Hope in Gregory of Nyssa’s De Anima et Resurrectione’, Journal of Theological Studies 52(1): 37–60.Google Scholar

Smith, J. W. 2004. ‘A Just and Reasonable Grief: The Death and Function of a Holy Woman in Gregory of Nyssa’s Life of Macrina’, Journal of Early Christian Studies. 12(1): 57–84.Google Scholar

Smith, L. 2011. ‘The Kahun Gynaecological Papyrus: Ancient Egyptian Medicine’, BMJ Sexual and Reproductive Health 37(1): 54–55.Google Scholar

Smith, N. D. 1983. ‘Plato and Aristotle on the Nature of Women’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 21: 467–78.Google Scholar

Snyder, J. 1989. The Woman and the Lyre: Women Writers in Classical Greece and Rome. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Sogno, Ch., and Watts, E. J. 2018. ‘Epistolography’, in McGill, S. and Watts, E. (eds.), A Companion to Late Antique Literature. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons, pp. 389–400.Google Scholar

Spelman, E. 1982. ‘Woman as Body: Ancient and Contemporary Views’, Feminist Studies, 8(1): 109–31.Google Scholar

Steenkamp, V. 2003. ‘Traditional Herbal Remedies Used by South African Women for Gynaecological Complaints’, Ethnopharmocology 86(1): 97–108.Google Scholar

Sukthankar, V. S. et al. (eds.) 1933–66. The Mahābhārata for the First Time Critically Edited,19 vols. Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute.Google Scholar

Sullivan, B. 2016. ‘An Overview of Mahābhārata Scholarship: A Perspective on the State of the Field’, Religion Compass 10(7): 165–75.Google Scholar

Sutton, N. 1999. ‘An Exposition of Early Sāṃkhya, A Rejection of the Bhagavad Gītā and a Critique of the Role of Women in Hindu Society: The Sulabhā-Janaka-Saṃvāda’, Annal of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute 80: 55–65.Google Scholar

Swancutt, D. 2006. ‘Still before Sexuality: “Greek” Androgyny, the Roman Imperial Politics of Masculinity and the Roman Invention of the Tribas’, in Penner, T. and Vander Stichele, C. (eds.), Mapping Gender in Ancient Religious Discourses. Leiden: Brill, pp. 11–61.Google Scholar

Syros, V. 2008. ‘A Note on the Transmission of Aristotle’s Political Ideas in Medieval Persia and Early-Modern India. Was There Any Arabic or Persian Translation of the Politics?’, Bulletin de Philosophie Médiévale 50: 303–9.Google Scholar

Tanaseanu-Döbler, I. 2012. ‘Synesios und die Theurgie’, in Seng, H. and Hoffmann, L. M. (eds.), Synesios von Kyrene. Politik – Literatur – Philosophie. Turnhout: Brepols, pp. 201–31.Google Scholar

Tanaseanu-Döbler, I. 2013. ‘Sosipatra – Role Models for Pagan Divine Women in Late Antiquity’, in Dzielska, M. and Twardowska, K.. (eds.), Divine Men and Women in the History and Society of Late Hellenism. Cracow: Jagiellonian University Press, pp. 123–49.Google Scholar

Tarrant, H. (tr.) 2006. Proclus. Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus. Vol. 1: Proclus on the Socratic State and Atlantis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tarrant, H. (tr.) 2017. Proclus. Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus Vol. 6: Proclus on the Gods of Generation and the Creation of Humans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, R. C. 2004. ‘Improving on Nature’s Exemplar: Averroes’ Completion of Aristotle’s Psychology of Intellect’. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 47: 107–30.Google Scholar

Temkin, O. 1956. Soranus: Gynaecology. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Thesleff, H. 1961. An Introduction to the Pythagorean Writings of the Hellenistic Period. Åbo: Åbo Akademi.Google Scholar

Thesleff, H. 1965. The Pythagorean Texts of the Hellenistic Period. Åbo: Åbo Akademi.Google Scholar

Thesleff, H. 1971. ‘On the Problem of Doric Pseudo-Pythagorica. An Alternative Theory of Date and Purpose’, in von Friitz, K. (ed.), Pseudoepigraphia I. Pseudopythagorica. Lettres de Platon Litterature Pseudepigraphique Juive, vol. 18. Vandouvres: Foundation Hardt, pp. 59–102.Google Scholar

Thumiger, C. 2017. A History of the Mind and Mental Health in Classical Greek Medical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tong, R., and Botts, T. F. (eds.). 2017. Feminist Thought: A More Comprehensive Introduction. 5th ed. New York: Westview.Google Scholar

Torre, C. 2000. Il matrimonio del Sapiens: Ricerche sul de Matrimonio di Seneca. Università di Genova, Facoltà di lettere, Dipartimento di archeologia, filologia classica e loro tradizioni.Google Scholar

Totelin, L. 2009. Hippocratic Recipes: Oral and Written Transmission of Pharmacological Knowledge in Fifth and Fourth Century Greece. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Totelin, L. 2016. ‘Technologies of Knowledge: Pharmacology, Botany, and Medical Recipes’, Oxford Handbook Online. doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935390.013.94.Google Scholar

Totelin, L. 2017. ‘The Third Way’, in Lemhaus, L. and Martelli, M. (eds.), Collecting Recipes: Byzantine and Jewish Pharmacology in Dialogue. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 103–22.Google Scholar

Totelin, L. 2018. ‘Therapeutics’, in Pormann, P. E. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hippocrates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 200–16.Google Scholar

Totelin, L. 2020. ‘Do No Harm: Phanostrate’s Midwifery Practice’, Technai: An International Journal for Ancient Science and Technology 11: 129–43.Google Scholar

Townshend, M. 2017. The Woman Question in Plato’s Republic. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Trott, A. M. 2019. Aristotle on the Matter of Form. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Tuana, N. (ed.). 1994. Feminist Interpretations of Plato. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Tuana, N., and Cowling, W. 1994. ‘The Presence and Absence of the Feminine in Plato’s Philosophy’, in Tuana, N. (ed.), Feminist Interpretations of Plato. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, pp. 243–70.Google Scholar

Ulacco, A. 2016. ‘The Appropriation of Aristotle in the Ps-Pythagorean Treatises’, in Falcon, A. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Aristotle in Antiquity. Leiden: Brill, pp. 202–17.Google Scholar

Ulacco, A. 2017. Pseudopythagorica Dorica. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Usener, H. 1963. Epicurea. Rome: L’Erma di Bretschneider.Google Scholar

van Buitenen, J. A. B. (tr.) 1975. The Mahābhārata: 2. The Book of the Assembly Hall; 3. The Book of the Forest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Van Geytenbeek, A. C. 1962. Musonius Rufus and Greek Diatribe, tr. B. L. Hijmans. Assen: Van Gorcum & Co.Google Scholar

Vanita, R. 2003. ‘The Self Is Not Gendered: Sulabhā’s Debate with King Janaka’, National Women’s Studies Association Journal 15(2): 76–93.Google Scholar

Vlastos, G. 1989. ‘Was Plato a Feminist?’, Times Literary Supplement, March 17–23.Google Scholar

Vlastos, G. 1994. ‘Was Plato a Feminist?’, in Tuana, N. (ed.), Feminist Interpretations of Plato. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, pp. 11–25.Google Scholar

von Oehler, F. 1858. Gregor von Nyssa. Leipzig: Engelmann.Google Scholar

Waithe, M. E. 1987a. ‘Diotima of Mantinea’, in Waithe, M. E. (ed.), A History of Women Philosophers, vol. I, Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 83–117.Google Scholar

Waithe, M. E. (ed.), 1987b. A History of Women Philosophers Volume 1: 600 BC–500 AD. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Waithe, M. E. 2015. ‘From Canon Fodder to Canon-Formation: How Do We Get There from Here?’ The Monist 98: 21–33.Google Scholar

Wang, R. R. (ed.) 2003. Images of Women in Chinese Thought and Culture. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar

Wang, Y. X. et al. 2020. ‘Menstrual Cycle Regularity and Length across the Reproductive Lifespan and Risk of Premature Mortality: Prospective Cohort Study’, British Medical Journal 371. 10.1136/bmj.m3464.Google Scholar

Ward, J. K. 1996. Feminism and Ancient Philosophy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Wardy, R. 2002. ‘The Unity of Opposites in Plato’s Symposium’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 23, 1–61.Google Scholar

Warren, J. 2009. ‘Diogenes Laërtius, Biographer of Philosophy’, in König, J. and Whitmarsh, T. J. G. (eds.), Ordering Knowledge in the Roman Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 133–49.Google Scholar

Warren, K. J. 2009. An Unconventional History of Western Philosophy: Conversations Between Men and Women Philosophers. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Watts, E. J. 2017. Hypatia. The Life and Legend of an Ancient Philosopher. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wawrytko, S. A. 2019. ‘Women on Love: Idealisation in the Philosophies of Diotima and Murasaki Shikibu’, Philosophy East and West 68(4): 1314–44.Google Scholar

Wender, D. 1973. ‘Plato: Misogynist, Paedophile, Feminist’, Arethusa, 6(1): 75–90.Google Scholar

West, M. L. 1971. Early Greek Philosophy and the Orient. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Westerink, L. G. (ed. and tr.). 1959. Damascius. Lectures on the Philebus, Wrongly Attributed to Olympiodorus. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

Westerink, L. G. (ed. and tr.). 1977. The Greek Commentaries on Plato’s Phaedo. Vol. II Damascius. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

Westerink, L. G., and Combès, J. (ed. and tr.). 1986–91. Damascius. Traité des premiers principes 1–3. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Westerink, L. G., and Combès, J. (ed. and tr.). 2002–3. Damascius. Commentaire du Parménide de Platon 1–4. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

White, D. G. 2009. Sinister Yogis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Whitmarsh, T. (ed.). 2021. Oxford Classical Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Whitmarsh, T., and Thompson, S. 2013. The Romance between Greece and the East. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wider, K. 1986. ‘Women Philosophers in the Ancient Greek World: Donning the Mantle’, Hypatia 1: 21–62.Google Scholar

Wilcox, A. 2006. ‘Exemplary Grief: Gender and Virtue in Seneca’s Consolations to Women’, Helios 33: 73–100.Google Scholar

Williams, R. 1993. ‘Macrina’s Deathbed Revisited: Gregory of Nyssa on Mind and Passion’, in Wickham, L. R. and Bammel, C. P. (eds.), Christian Faith and Greek Philosophy in Late Antiquity: Essays in Tribute to George Christopher Stead. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar

Winkler, J. J. 1990. ‘Laying down the Law: The Oversight of Men’s Sexual Behaviour in Classical Athens’, in Winkler, J. J (ed.). The Constraints of Desire: the Anthropology of Sex and Gender in Ancient Greece, 45–70. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Woodhouse, C. M. 1986. George Gemistos Plethon: The Last of the Hellenes. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Wolfskeel, C. 1987. ‘Makrina’, in Waithe, M. E. (ed.), A History of Women Philosophers: Ancient Women Philosophers 600 B.C.–500 A.D. New York: Springer, pp. 139–68.Google Scholar

Wray, D. 2009. ‘Seneca and Tragedy’s Reason’, in Bartsch, S. and Wray, D. (eds.), Seneca and the Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 237–54.Google Scholar

Wright, W. C. (ed. and tr.). 1922. Philostratus and Eunapius. The Lives of the Sophists. London: William Heinemann.Google Scholar

Xiao, T. 蕭統 (ed.). 2021. Wenxuan 文選 (aka Zhaoming wenxuan 昭明文選), 60 vols. https://ctext.org/library.pl?if=en&res=91990.Google Scholar

Zaslavsky, C. 1992. ‘Women as the First Mathematicians’, ISGE Newsletter: International Study Group on Ethnomathematics 7(1). https://web.nmsu.edu/~pscott/isgem71.htm.Google Scholar

Zhmud, L. 2019. ‘What Is Pythagorean in the Pseudo-Pythagorean Literature?’, Philologus 163: 72–94.Google Scholar

Zhu, X. 1270. Zhuzi yulei 朱子語類 (Classified Conversations of Zhu Xi), ed. Jingde, Li 黎靖德, 140 vols. https://ctext.org/zhuzi-yulei/zh.Google Scholar

Zintzen, C. 1972. ‘Alte Virtus Animosa Cadit: Gedanken zur Darstellung des Tragischen in Senecas Hercules Furens’, in Lefèvre, E. (ed.), Senecas Tragödien. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, pp. 149–209.Google Scholar