Abel, N. H. 1826. Auflösung einer mechanischen Aufgabe. J. Reine Angew. Math., 1, 153–157.Google Scholar

Ainsworth, Gareth. 2013. The attenuated magnetic ray transform on surfaces. Inverse Probl. Imaging, 7(1), 27–46.Google Scholar

Ainsworth, Gareth, and Assylbekov, Yernat M. 2015. On the range of the attenuated magnetic ray transform for connections and Higgs fields. Inverse Probl. Imaging, 9(2), 317–335.Google Scholar

Andersson, Joel, and Boman, Jan. 2018. Stability estimates for the local Radon transform. Inverse Prob., 34(3), 034004, 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arbuzov, È. V., Bukhgeĭm, A. L., and Kazantsev, S. G. 1998. Two-dimensional tomography problems and the theory of A-analytic functions [translation of Algebra, Geometry, Analysis and Mathematical Physics (Russian) (Novosibirsk, 1996), 6–20, 189, Izdat. Ross. Akad. Nauk Sibirsk. Otdel. Inst. Mat., Novosibirsk, 1997; MR1624170 (99m:44003)]. Siberian Adv. Math., 8(4), 1–20.Google Scholar

Assylbekov, Yernat M., and Dairbekov, Nurlan S. 2018. The X-ray transform on a general family of curves on Finsler surfaces. J. Geom. Anal., 28(2), 1428–1455.Google Scholar

Assylbekov, Yernat M., and Stefanov, Plamen. 2020. Sharp stability estimate for the geodesic ray transform. Inverse Prob., 36(2), 025013, 14.Google Scholar

Assylbekov, Yernat M., Monard, François, and Uhlmann, Gunther. 2018. Inversion formulas and range characterizations for the attenuated geodesic ray transform. J. Math. Pures Appl. (9), 111, 161–190.Google Scholar

Bagby, T., and Gauthier, P. M. 1992. Uniform approximation by global harmonic functions. Pages 15–26 of: Approximation by Solutions of Partial Differential Equations (Hanstholm, 1991). NATO Adv. Sci. Inst. Ser. C Math. Phys. Sci., vol. 365. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Bal, Guillaume. 2019. Introduction to Inverse Problems. University of Chicago, lecture notes. Available at: www.stat.uchicago.edu/~guillaumebal/publications.htmlGoogle Scholar

Bateman, Harry. 1910. The solution of the integral equation connecting the velocity of propagation of an earthquake wave in the interior of the Earth with the times which the disturbance takes to travel to the different stations on the Earth's surface. Philos. Mag., 19, 576–587.Google Scholar

Belishev, M. I. 2003. The Calderon problem for two-dimensional manifolds by the BC- method. SIAM J. Math. Anal., 35(1), 172–182.Google Scholar

Bergh, Jöran, and Löfström, Jörgen. 1976. Interpolation Spaces: An Introduction. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, No. 223. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York.Google Scholar

Bernšteĭn, I. N., and Gerver, M. L. 1978. A problem of integral geometry for a family of geodesics and an inverse kinematic seismics problem. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 243(2), 302–305.Google Scholar

Bers, Lipman. 1948. On rings of analytic functions. Bull. Am. Math. Soc., 54, 311–315.Google Scholar

Betelú, Santiago, Gulliver, Robert, and Littman, Walter. 2002. Boundary control of PDEs via curvature flows: the view from the boundary. II. vol. 46. Special issue dedicated to the memory of Jacques-Louis Lions.Google Scholar

Bohr, Jan. 2021. Stability of the non-abelian X-ray transform in dimension ≥3. J. Geom. Anal., 31, 11226–11269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bohr, Jan, and Paternain, Gabriel P. 2021. The transport Oka-Grauert principle for simple surfaces. arXiv:2108.05125.Google Scholar

Boman, Jan. 1993. An example of nonuniqueness for a generalized Radon transform. J. Anal. Math., 61, 395–401.Google Scholar

Boman, Jan, and Quinto, Eric Todd. 1987. Support theorems for real-analytic Radon transforms. Duke Math. J., 55(4), 943–948.Google Scholar

Boman, Jan, and Sharafutdinov, Vladimir. 2018. Stability estimates in tensor tomography. Inverse Probl. Imaging, 12(5), 1245–1262.Google Scholar

Boman, Jan, and Strömberg, Jan-Olov. 2004. Novikov's inversion formula for the attenuated Radon transform—a new approach. J. Geom. Anal., 14(2), 185–198.Google Scholar

Burago, Dmitri, and Ivanov, Sergei. 2010. Boundary rigidity and filling volume minimality of metrics close to a flat one. Ann. Math. (2), 171(2), 1183–1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burago, Dmitri, and Ivanov, Sergei. 2013. Area minimizers and boundary rigidity of almost hyperbolic metrics. Duke Math. J., 162(7), 1205–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Croke, Christopher. 2014. Scattering rigidity with trapped geodesics. Ergodic Theory Dyn. Syst., 34(3), 826–836.Google Scholar

Croke, Christopher B. 1990. Rigidity for surfaces of nonpositive curvature. Comment. Math. Helv., 65(1), 150–169.Google Scholar

Croke, Christopher B. 1991. Rigidity and the distance between boundary points. J. Differ. Geom., 33(2), 445–464.Google Scholar

Croke, Christopher B. 2004. Rigidity theorems in Riemannian geometry. Pages 47–72 of: Geometric Methods in Inverse Problems and PDE Control. IMA Vol. Math. Appl., vol. 137. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Croke, Christopher B., and Herreros, Pilar. 2016. Lens rigidity with trapped geodesics in two dimensions. Asian J. Math., 20(1), 47–57.Google Scholar

Croke, Christopher B., and Sharafutdinov, Vladimir A. 1998. Spectral rigidity of a compact negatively curved manifold. Topology, 37(6), 1265–1273.Google Scholar

Dairbekov, N. S., and Sharafutdinov, V. A. 2010. Conformal Killing symmetric tensor fields on Riemannian manifolds. Mat. Tr., 13(1), 85–145.Google Scholar

Dairbekov, Nurlan S. 2006. Integral geometry problem for nontrapping manifolds. Inverse Probl., 22(2), 431–445.Google Scholar

Dairbekov, Nurlan S., Paternain, Gabriel P., Stefanov, Plamen, and Uhlmann, Gunther. 2007. The boundary rigidity problem in the presence of a magnetic field. Adv. Math., 216(2), 535–609.Google Scholar

Daudé, Thierry, Kamran, Niky, and Nicoleau, François. 2019. Non-uniqueness results for the anisotropic Calderón problem with data measured on disjoint sets. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble), 69(1), 119–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Desai, Naeem M., Lionheart, William R. B., Sales, Morten, Strobl, Markus, and Schmidt, Søren. 2020. Polarimetric neutron tomography of magnetic fields: uniqueness of solution and reconstruction. Inverse Probl., 36(4), 045001, 17.Google Scholar

Donaldson, S. K. 1992. Boundary value problems for Yang-Mills fields. J. Geom. Phys., 8(1–4), 89–122.Google Scholar

Donaldson, Simon. 2011. Riemann Surfaces. Oxford Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 22. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar

Dos Santos Ferreira, David, Kenig, Carlos E., Salo, Mikko, and Uhlmann, Gunther. 2009. Limiting Carleman weights and anisotropic inverse problems. Invent. Math., 178(1), 119–171.Google Scholar

Dos Santos Ferreira, David, Kurylev, Yaroslav, Lassas, Matti, and Salo, Mikko. 2016. The Calderón problem in transversally anisotropic geometries. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS), 18(11), 2579–2626.Google Scholar

Duistermaat, J. J., and Hörmander, L. 1972. Fourier integral operators. II. Acta Math., 128(3-4), 183–269.Google Scholar

Eskin, G. 2004. On non-abelian Radon transform. Russ. J. Math. Phys., 11(4), 391–408.Google Scholar

Eskin, Gregory, and Ralston, James. 2003. Inverse boundary value problems for systems of partial differential equations. Pages 105–113 of: Recent Development in Theories & Numerics. World Scientific Publishing, River Edge, NJ.Google Scholar

Eskin, Gregory, and Ralston, James. 2004. On the inverse boundary value problem for linear isotropic elasticity and Cauchy-Riemann systems. Pages 53–69 of: Inverse Problems and Spectral Theory. Contemp. Math., vol. 348. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.Google Scholar

Farkas, H. M., and Kra, I. 1992. Riemann Surfaces. Second edn. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 71. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar

Finch, David, and Uhlmann, Gunther. 2001. The x-ray transform for a non-abelian connection in two dimensions. vol. 17. Special issue to celebrate Pierre Sabatier's 65th birthday (Montpellier, 2000).Google Scholar

Finch, David V. 2003. The attenuated x-ray transform: recent developments. Pages 47–66 of: Inside Out: Inverse Problems and Applications. Math. Sci. Res. Inst. Publ., vol. 47. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Folland, Gerald B. 1995. Introduction to Partial Differential Equations. Second edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Forster, Otto. 1981. Lectures on Riemann Surfaces. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 81. Springer-Verlag, New York-Berlin. Translated from the German by Bruce Gilligan.Google Scholar

Funk, P. 1913. Über Flächen mit lauter geschlossenen geodätischen Linien. Math. Ann., 74(2), 278–300.Google Scholar

Gallot, Sylvestre, Hulin, Dominique, and Lafontaine, Jacques. 2004. Riemannian Geometry. Third edn. Universitext. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar

Gorenflo, Rudolf, and Vessella, Sergio. 1991. Abel Integral Equations. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1461. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Analysis and Applications.Google Scholar

Graham, C. Robin, Guillarmou, Colin, Stefanov, Plamen, and Uhlmann, Gunther. 2019. X-ray transform and boundary rigidity for asymptotically hyperbolic manifolds. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble), 69(7), 2857–2919.Google Scholar

Guillarmou, Colin. 2017a. Invariant distributions and X-ray transform for Anosov flows. J. Differ. Geom., 105(2), 177–208.Google Scholar

Guillarmou, Colin. 2017b. Lens rigidity for manifolds with hyperbolic trapped sets. J. Am. Math. Soc., 30(2), 561–599.Google Scholar

Guillarmou, Colin, and Lefeuvre, Thibault. 2019. The marked length spectrum of Anosov manifolds. Ann. Math. (2), 190(1), 321–344.Google Scholar

Guillarmou, Colin, and Mazzucchelli, Marco. 2018. Marked boundary rigidity for surfaces. Ergod. Theory Dyn. Syst., 38(4), 1459–1478.Google Scholar

Guillarmou, Colin, and Monard, François. 2017. Reconstruction formulas for X-ray transforms in negative curvature. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble), 67(4), 1353–1392.Google Scholar

Guillarmou, Colin, and Sá Barreto, Antônio. 2009. Inverse problems for Einstein manifolds. Inverse Probl. Imaging, 3(1), 1–15.Google Scholar

Guillarmou, Colin, and Tzou, Leo. 2011. Calderón inverse problem with partial data on Riemann surfaces. Duke Math. J., 158(1), 83–120.Google Scholar

Guillarmou, Colin, Paternain, Gabriel P., Salo, Mikko, and Uhlmann, Gunther. 2016. The X-ray transform for connections in negative curvature. Comm. Math. Phys., 343(1), 83–127.Google Scholar

Guillarmou, Colin, Lassas, Matti, and Tzou, Leo. 2020. X-ray transform in asymptotically conic spaces. International Mathematics Research Notices, Nov.Google Scholar

Guillarmou, Colin, Mazzucchelli, Marco, and Tzou, Leo. 2021. Boundary and lens rigidity for non-convex manifolds. Am. J. Math., 143(2), 533–575.Google Scholar

Guillemin, Victor. 1975. Some remarks on integral geometry. Technical Report, MIT.Google Scholar

Guillemin, Victor. 1976. The Radon transform on Zoll surfaces. Adv. Math., 22(1), 85–119.Google Scholar

Guillemin, Victor. 1985. On some results of Gel'fand in integral geometry, in Pseudodifferential Operators and Applications (edited by Tréves, F.), 149–155, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 43, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence RI.Google Scholar

Guillemin, Victor, and Kazhdan, David. 1980a. Some inverse spectral results for negatively curved 2-manifolds. Topology, 19(3), 301–312.Google Scholar

Guillemin, Victor, and Kazhdan, David. 1980b. Some inverse spectral results for negatively curved n-manifolds. Pages 153–180 of: Geometry of the Laplace Operator (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Univ. Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, 1979). Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., XXXVI. American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I.Google Scholar

Guillemin, Victor, and Sternberg, Shlomo. 1977. Geometric Asymptotics. Mathematical Surveys, No. 14. American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I.Google Scholar

Gunning, Robert C., and Rossi, Hugo. 1965. Analytic Functions of Several Complex Variables. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar

Hall, Brian. 2015. Lie Groups, Lie Algebras, and Representations. Second edn. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 222. Springer, Cham. An elementary introduction.Google Scholar

Helgason, Sigurdur. 1999. The Radon Transform. Second edn. Progress in Mathematics, vol. 5. Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Helgason, Sigurdur. 2011. Integral Geometry and Radon Transforms. Springer, New York.Google Scholar

Herglotz, G. 1907. Über das Benndorfsche Problem der Fortpflanzungsgeschwindigkeit der Erdbebenstrahlen. Physikalische Zeitschrift, 8, 145–147.Google Scholar

Hilger, A., Manke, I., and Kardjilov, N. et al. 2018. Tensorial neutron tomography of three-dimensional magnetic vector fields in bulk materials. Nat. Commun., 9, 4023.Google Scholar

Hofer, Helmut. 1985. A geometric description of the neighbourhood of a critical point given by the mountain-pass theorem. J. London Math. Soc. (2), 31(3), 566–570.Google Scholar

Hörmander, Lars. 1983–1985. The Analysis of Linear Partial Differential Operators. I–IV. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences]. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar

Hubbard, John Hamal. 2006. Teichmüller Theory and Applications to Geometry, Topology, and Dynamics. Vol. 1. Matrix Editions, Ithaca, NY. Teichmüller theory, With contributions by Adrien Douady, William Dunbar, Roland Roeder, Sylvain Bonnot, David Brown, Allen Hatcher, Chris Hruska and Sudeb Mitra, With forewords by William Thurston and Clifford Earle.Google Scholar

Ilmavirta, Joonas. 2014. On the Broken Ray Transform. Ph.D. thesis, University of Jyväskylä, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Report 140. advisor: Mikko Salo.Google Scholar

Ilmavirta, Joonas. 2016. Coherent quantum tomography. SIAM J. Math. Anal., 48(5), 3039–3064.Google Scholar

Ilmavirta, Joonas, and Monard, Francois. 2019. 4. Integral Geometry on Manifolds with Boundary and Applications. De Gruyter, Berlin. Pages 43–114.Google Scholar

Ilmavirta, Joonas, and Paternain, Gabriel P. 2020. Broken Ray Tensor Tomography with One Reflecting Obstacle.Google Scholar

Ilmavirta, Joonas, and Salo, Mikko. 2016. Broken ray transform on a Riemann surface with a convex obstacle. Comm. Anal. Geom., 24(2), 379–408.Google Scholar

Ivanov, Sergei. 2010. Volume comparison via boundary distances. Pages 769–784 of: Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians. Volume II. Hindustan Book Agency, New Delhi.Google Scholar

Jakobson, Dmitry, and Strohmaier, Alexander. 2007. High energy limits of Laplacetype and Dirac-type eigenfunctions and frame flows. Comm. Math. Phys., 270(3), 813–833.Google Scholar

Jost, Jürgen. 2017. Riemannian Geometry and Geometric Analysis. Seventh edn. Universitext. Springer, Cham.Google Scholar

Katchalov, Alexander, Kurylev, Yaroslav, and Lassas, Matti. 2001. Inverse Boundary Spectral Problems. Chapman & Hall/CRC Monographs and Surveys in Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 123. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar

Kazantsev, S. G., and Bukhgeim, A. A. 2007. Inversion of the scalar and vector attenuated X-ray transforms in a unit disc. J. Inverse Ill-Posed Probl., 15(7), 735–765.Google Scholar

Kenig, Carlos, and Salo, Mikko. 2013. The Calderón problem with partial data on manifolds and applications. Anal. PDE, 6(8), 2003–2048.Google Scholar

Kenig, Carlos, and Salo, Mikko. 2014. Recent progress in the Calderón problem with partial data. Pages 193–222 of: Inverse Problems and Applications. Contemp. Math., vol. 615. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.Google Scholar

Knieper, Gerhard. 2002. Hyperbolic dynamics and Riemannian geometry. Pages 453–545 of: Handbook of Dynamical Systems, Vol. 1A. North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Koch, Herbert, Rüland, Angkana, and Salo, Mikko. 2021. On Instability Mechanisms for Inverse Problems. Ars Inven. Anal. 2021, Paper No. 7, 93 pp. 35 (49).Google Scholar

Krishnan, Venkateswaran P. 2009. A support theorem for the geodesic ray transform on functions. J. Fourier Anal. Appl., 15(4), 515–520.Google Scholar

Krishnan, Venkateswaran P. 2010. On the inversion formulas of Pestov and Uhlmann for the geodesic ray transform. J. Inverse Ill-Posed Probl., 18(4), 401–408.Google Scholar

Krishnan, Venkateswaran P., and Quinto, Eric Todd. 2015. Microlocal analysis in tomography. Pages 847–902 of: Handbook of Mathematical Methods in Imaging. Vol. 1, 2, 3. Springer, New York.Google Scholar

Krishnan, Venkateswaran P., and Stefanov, Plamen. 2009. A support theorem for the geodesic ray transform of symmetric tensor fields. Inverse Probl. Imaging, 3(3), 453–464.Google Scholar

Kuchment, Peter. 2014. The Radon Transform and Medical Imaging. CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics, vol. 85. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar

Lassas, Matti, and Uhlmann, Gunther. 2001. On determining a Riemannian manifold from the Dirichlet-to-Neumann map. Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. (4), 34(5), 771–787.Google Scholar

Lassas, Matti, Taylor, Michael, and Uhlmann, Gunther. 2003a. The Dirichlet-to- Neumann map for complete Riemannian manifolds with boundary. Comm. Anal. Geom., 11(2), 207–221.Google Scholar

Lassas, Matti, Sharafutdinov, Vladimir, and Uhlmann, Gunther. 2003b. Semiglobal boundary rigidity for Riemannian metrics. Math. Ann., 325(4), 767–793.Google Scholar

Lassas, Matti, Liimatainen, Tony, and Salo, Mikko. 2020. The Poisson embedding approach to the Calderón problem. Math. Ann., 377(1-2), 19–67.Google Scholar

Lee, John M. 1997. Riemannian Manifolds. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 176. Springer-Verlag, New York. An introduction to curvature.Google Scholar

Lee, John M., and Uhlmann, Gunther. 1989. Determining anisotropic real-analytic conductivities by boundary measurements. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 42(8), 1097–1112.Google Scholar

Lefeuvre, Thibault. 2020. Local marked boundary rigidity under hyperbolic trapping assumptions. J. Geom. Anal., 30(1), 448–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lefeuvre, Thibault. 2021. Geometric Inverse Problems on Anosov Manifolds. Online notes available at: https://thibaultlefeuvre.files.wordpress.com/2021/04/survey-geometric-inverse-problems.pdf.Google Scholar

Lehtonen, Jere, Railo, Jesse, and Salo, Mikko. 2018. Tensor tomography on Cartan- Hadamard manifolds. Inverse Probl., 34(4), 044004, 27.Google Scholar

Leonhardt, Ulf, and Philbin, Thomas. 2010. Geometry and Light. Dover Publications, Inc., Mineola, NY. The science of invisibility.Google Scholar

Lerner, Nicolas. 2019. Carleman Inequalities. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], vol. 353. Springer, Cham. An introduction and more.Google Scholar

Manakov, S. V., and Zakharov, V. E. 1981. Three-dimensional model of relativistic- invariant field theory, integrable by the inverse scattering transform. Lett. Math. Phys., 5(3), 247–253.Google Scholar

Markoe, Andrew, and Quinto, Eric Todd. 1985. An elementary proof of local invertibil- ity for generalized and attenuated Radon transforms. SIAM J. Math. Anal., 16(5), 1114–1119.Google Scholar

Mazzucchelli, Marco. 2012. Critical Point Theory for Lagrangian Systems. Progress in Mathematics, vol. 293. Birkhäuser/Springer Basel AG, Basel.Google Scholar

Merry, Will, and Paternain, Gabriel P. 2011. Inverse Problems in Geometry and Dynamics. https://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~gpp24/ipgd(3).pdf.Google Scholar

Michel, René. 1978. Sur quelques problèmes de géométrie globale des géodésiques. Bol. Soc. Brasil. Mat., 9(2), 19–37.Google Scholar

Michel, René. 1981/82. Sur la rigidité imposée par la longueur des géodésiques. Invent. Math., 65(1), 71–83.Google Scholar

Monard, François. 2014. Numerical implementation of geodesic X-ray transforms and their inversion. SIAM J. Imaging Sci., 7(2), 1335–1357.Google Scholar

Monard, François. 2016a. Efficient tensor tomography in fan-beam coordinates. Inverse Probl. Imaging, 10(2), 433–459.Google Scholar

Monard, François. 2016b. Inversion of the attenuated geodesic X-ray transform over functions and vector fields on simple surfaces. SIAM J. Math. Anal., 48(2), 1155–1177.Google Scholar

Monard, François, and Paternain, Gabriel P. 2020. The geodesic X-ray transform with a GL(n,ℂ)-connection. J. Geom. Anal., 30(3), 2515–2557.Google Scholar

Monard, François, Stefanov, Plamen, and Uhlmann, Gunther. 2015. The geodesic ray transform on Riemannian surfaces with conjugate points. Comm. Math. Phys., 337(3), 1491–1513.Google Scholar

Monard, François, Nickl, Richard, and Paternain, Gabriel P. 2019. Efficient nonparametric Bayesian inference for X-ray transforms. Ann. Statist., 47(2), 1113–1147.Google Scholar

Monard, François, Nickl, Richard, and Paternain, Gabriel P. 2021a. Consistent inversion of noisy non-Abelian x-ray transforms. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 74(5), 1045–1099.Google Scholar

Monard, François, Nickl, Richard, and Paternain, Gabriel P. 2021b. Statistical guarantees for Bayesian uncertainty quantification in non-linear inverse problems with Gaussian process priors. Ann. Statist. 49 (2021), no. 6, 3255–3298.Google Scholar

Muhometov, R. G. 1977. The reconstruction problem of a two-dimensional Riemannian metric, and integral geometry. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 232(1), 32–35.Google Scholar

Muhometov, R. G. 1981. On a problem of reconstructing Riemannian metrics. Sibirsk. Mat. Zh., 22(3), 119–135, 237.Google Scholar

Nakamura, G., and Uhlmann, G. 2002. Complex geometrical optics solutions and pseudoanalytic matrices. Pages 305–338 of: Ill-posed and Inverse Problems. VSP, Zeist.Google Scholar

Natterer, F. 2001. The Mathematics of Computerized Tomography. Classics in Applied Mathematics, vol. 32. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA. Reprint of the 1986 original.Google Scholar

Novikov, R. G. 2002a. On determination of a gauge field on ℝ^d from its non-abelian Radon transform along oriented straight lines. J. Inst. Math. Jussieu, 1(4), 559–629.Google Scholar

Novikov, R. G. 2014. Weighted Radon transforms and first order differential systems on the plane. Mosc. Math. J., 14(4), 807–823, 828.Google Scholar

Novikov, Roman. 2019. Non-abelian Radon transform and its applications. Pages 115–128, of: The Radon Transform: The First 100 Years and Beyond.Google Scholar

Novikov, Roman, and Sharafutdinov, Vladimir. 2007. On the problem of polarization tomography. I. Inverse Problems, 23(3), 1229–1257.Google Scholar

Novikov, Roman G. 2002b. An inversion formula for the attenuated X-ray transformation. Ark. Mat., 40(1), 145–167.Google Scholar

Oksanen, Lauri, Salo, Mikko, Stefanov, Plamen, and Uhlmann, Gunther. 2020. Inverse Problems for Real Principal Type Operators. To appear in Amer. J. Math.Google Scholar

Otal, Jean-Pierre. 1990. Le spectre marqué des longueurs des surfaces à courbure négative. Ann. Math. (2), 131(1), 151–162.Google Scholar

Palais, Richard S. 1959. Natural operations on differential forms. Trans. Am. Math. Soc., 92, 125–141.Google Scholar

Paternain, Gabriel P. 1999. Geodesic Flows. Progress in Mathematics, vol. 180. Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Paternain, Gabriel P. 2009. Transparent connections over negatively curved surfaces. J. Mod. Dyn., 3(2), 311–333.Google Scholar

Paternain, Gabriel P. 2013. Inverse problems for connections. Pages 369–409 of: Inverse Problems and Applications: Inside Out. II. Math. Sci. Res. Inst. Publ., vol. 60. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Paternain, Gabriel P., and Salo, Mikko. 2018. Carleman Estimates for Geodesic X-ray Transforms. To appear in Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup.Google Scholar

Paternain, Gabriel P., and Salo, Mikko. 2020. The Non-Abelian X-ray Transform on Surfaces. To appear in J. Differ. Geom..Google Scholar

Paternain, Gabriel P., and Salo, Mikko. 2021. A sharp stability estimate for tensor tomography in non-positive curvature. Math. Z., 298(3-4), 1323–1344.Google Scholar

Paternain, Gabriel P., Salo, Mikko, and Uhlmann, Gunther. 2012. The attenuated ray transform for connections and Higgs fields. Geom. Funct. Anal., 22(5), 1460–1489.Google Scholar

Paternain, Gabriel P., Salo, Mikko, and Uhlmann, Gunther. 2013. Tensor tomography on surfaces. Invent. Math., 193(1), 229–247.Google Scholar

Paternain, Gabriel P., Salo, Mikko, and Uhlmann, Gunther. 2014a. Spectral rigidity and invariant distributions on Anosov surfaces. J. Differ. Geom., 98(1), 147–181.Google Scholar

Paternain, Gabriel P., Salo, Mikko, and Uhlmann, Gunther. 2014b. Tensor tomography: progress and challenges. Chin. Ann. Math. Ser. B, 35(3), 399–428.Google Scholar

Paternain, Gabriel P., Salo, Mikko, and Uhlmann, Gunther. 2015a. Invariant distributions, Beurling transforms and tensor tomography in higher dimensions. Math. Ann., 363(1-2), 305–362.Google Scholar

Paternain, Gabriel P., Salo, Mikko, and Uhlmann, Gunther. 2015b. On the range of the attenuated ray transform for unitary connections. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN, 4, 873–897.Google Scholar

Paternain, Gabriel P., Salo, Mikko, Uhlmann, Gunther, and Zhou, Hanming. 2019. The geodesic X-ray transform with matrix weights. Am. J. Math., 141(6), 1707–1750.Google Scholar

Pestov, L. N., and Sharafutdinov, V. A. 1987. Integral geometry of tensor fields on a manifold of negative curvature. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 295(6), 1318–1320.Google Scholar

Pestov, Leonid, and Uhlmann, Gunther. 2004. On characterization of the range and inversion formulas for the geodesic X-ray transform. Int. Math. Res. Not., 80, 4331–4347.Google Scholar

Pestov, Leonid, and Uhlmann, Gunther. 2005. Two dimensional compact simple Riemannian manifolds are boundary distance rigid. Ann. Math. (2), 161(2), 1093–1110.Google Scholar

Pressley, Andrew, and Segal, Graeme. 1986. Loop Groups. Oxford Mathematical Monographs. The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York. Oxford Science Publications.Google Scholar

Quinto, Eric Todd. 2006. An introduction to X-ray tomography and Radon transforms. Pages 1–23 of: The Radon Transform, Inverse Problems, and Tomography. Proc. Sympos. Appl. Math., vol. 63. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.Google Scholar

Romanov, V. G. 1967. Reconstructing a function by means of integrals along a family of curves. Sibirsk. Mat. Ž., 8, 1206–1208.Google Scholar

Romanov, V. G. 1987. Inverse Problems of Mathematical Physics. VNU Science Press, b.v., Utrecht. With a foreword by V. G. Yakhno, Translated from the Russian by L. Ya. Yuzina.Google Scholar

Royden, H. L. 1956. Rings of analytic and meromorphic functions. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 83, 269–276.Google Scholar

Sakai, Takashi. 1996. Riemannian Geometry. Translations of Mathematical Monographs, vol. 149. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI. Translated from the 1992 Japanese original by the author.Google Scholar

Salo, Mikko, and Uhlmann, Gunther. 2011. The attenuated ray transform on simple surfaces. J. Differ. Geom., 88(1), 161–187.Google Scholar

Sepanski, Mark R. 2007. Compact Lie Groups. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 235. Springer, New York.Google Scholar

Serre, Jean-Pierre. 1951. Homologie singulière des espaces fibrés. Applications. Ann. Math. (2), 54, 425–505.Google Scholar

Sharafutdinov, V. A. 1994. Integral Geometry of Tensor Fields. Inverse and Ill-posed Problems Series. VSP, Utrecht.Google Scholar

Sharafutdinov, V. A. 1997. Integral geometry of a tensor field on a surface of revolution. Sibirsk. Mat. Zh., 38(3), 697–714, iv.Google Scholar

Sharafutdinov, V. A. 2000. On the inverse problem of determining a connection on a vector bundle. J. Inverse Ill-Posed Probl., 8(1), 51–88.Google Scholar

Sharafutdinov, V. A. 2011. The geometric problem of electrical impedance tomography in the disk. Sibirsk. Mat. Zh., 52(1), 223–238.Google Scholar

Sharafutdinov, Vladimir. 2007. Variations of Dirichlet-to-Neumann map and deformation boundary rigidity of simple 2-manifolds. J. Geom. Anal., 17(1), 147–187.Google Scholar

Sharafutdinov, Vladimir, Skokan, Michal, and Uhlmann, Gunther. 2005. Regularity of ghosts in tensor tomography. J. Geom. Anal., 15(3), 499–542.Google Scholar

Stefanov, Plamen. 2008. A sharp stability estimate in tensor tomography. Page 012007 of: Journal of Physics: Conference Series, (Vol 124: Proceeding of the First International Congress of the IPIA).Google Scholar

Stefanov, Plamen, and Uhlmann, Gunther. 2004. Stability estimates for the X-ray transform of tensor fields and boundary rigidity. Duke Math. J., 123(3), 445–467.Google Scholar

Stefanov, Plamen, and Uhlmann, Gunther. 2005. Boundary rigidity and stability for generic simple metrics. J. Am. Math. Soc., 18(4), 975–1003.Google Scholar

Stefanov, Plamen, and Uhlmann, Gunther. 2009. Local lens rigidity with incomplete data for a class of non-simple Riemannian manifolds. J. Differ. Geom., 82(2), 383–409.Google Scholar

Stefanov, Plamen, Uhlmann, Gunther, and Vasy, Andras. 2016. Boundary rigidity with partial data. J. Am. Math. Soc., 29(2), 299–332.Google Scholar

Stefanov, Plamen, Uhlmann, Gunther, Vasy, Andras, and Zhou, Hanming. 2019. Travel time tomography. Acta Math. Sin. (Engl. Ser.), 35(6), 1085–1114.Google Scholar

Stefanov, Plamen, Uhlmann, Gunther, and Vasy, András. 2021. Local and global boundary rigidity and the geodesic X-ray transform in the normal gauge. Ann. Math. (2), 194(1), 1–95.Google Scholar

Stein, Elias M. 1993. Harmonic Analysis: Real-variable Methods, Orthogonality, and Oscillatory Integrals. Princeton Mathematical Series, vol. 43. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. With the assistance of Timothy S. Murphy, Monographs in Harmonic Analysis, III.Google Scholar

Stein, Elias M., and Weiss, Guido. 1971. Introduction to Fourier Analysis on Euclidean Spaces. Princeton Mathematical Series, No. 32. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Strichartz, Robert S. 1982. Radon inversion—variations on a theme. Am. Math. Monthly, 89(6), 377–384, 420–423.Google Scholar

Struwe, Michael. 1996. Variational Methods. Second edn. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete (3) [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas (3)], vol. 34. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Applications to nonlinear partial differential equations and Hamiltonian systems.Google Scholar

Taylor, Michael E. 2011. Partial Differential Equations I. Basic Theory. Second edn. Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol. 115. Springer, New York.Google Scholar

Thorbergsson, Gudlaugur. 1978. Closed geodesics on non-compact Riemannian manifolds. Math. Z., 159(3), 249–258.Google Scholar

Uhlmann, Gunther. 2004. The Cauchy data and the scattering relation. Pages 263–287 of: Geometric Methods in Inverse Problems and PDE Control. IMA Vol. Math. Appl., vol. 137. Springer, New York.Google Scholar

Uhlmann, Gunther. 2014. Inverse problems: Seeing the unseen. Bull. Math. Sci., 4(2), 209–279.Google Scholar

Uhlmann, Gunther, and Vasy, András. 2016. The inverse problem for the local geodesic ray transform. Invent. Math., 205(1), 83–120.Google Scholar

Vertgeĭm, L. B. 1991. Integral geometry with a matrix weight and a nonlinear problem of the reconstruction of matrices. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 319(3), 531–534.Google Scholar

Vertgeĭm, L. B. 2000. Weighted integral geometry of matrices. Sibirsk. Mat. Zh., 41(6), 1325–1337, ii.Google Scholar

Ward, R. S. 1988. Soliton solutions in an integrable chiral model in 2 + 1 dimensions. J. Math. Phys., 29(2), 386–389.Google Scholar

Warner, Frank W. 1983. Foundations of Differentiable Manifolds and Lie Groups. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 94. Springer-Verlag, New York-Berlin. Corrected reprint of the 1971 edition.Google Scholar

Wen, Haomin. 2015. Simple Riemannian surfaces are scattering rigid. Geom. Topol., 19(4), 2329–2357.Google Scholar

Wiechert, E., and Geiger, L. 1910. Bestimmung des Weges der Erdbebenwellen im Erdinnern. I. Theoretisches. Physik. Zeitschr., 11, 294–311.Google Scholar

Zhou, Hanming. 2017. Generic injectivity and stability of inverse problems for connections. Comm. Partial Differ. Equ., 42(5), 780–801.Google Scholar