Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T22:38:14.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Divided Families and Devalued Citizens: Money Matters in Mixed-Status Families in the Netherlands

from Part III - Citizenship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 November 2021

By
Judith de Jong  and
Betty de Hart
Edited by
Tesseltje de Lange ,
Willem Maas  and
Annette Schrauwen
Tesseltje de Lange
Affiliation:
Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen
Willem Maas
Affiliation:
York University, Toronto
Annette Schrauwen
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Amsterdam
Get access

Summary

Undocumented immigrants are affected by citizenship boundaries, complicating their everyday lives. Precarious working conditions, social welfare, and security thoroughly impede their opportunities. However, understudied is the family context in which precarious immigrants live. Even though immigration and citizenship laws are directed towards individuals, they often affect the intimate domains of the family. The commonly held belief that criminalizing immigration would protect citizens while punishing immigrants denies the tight links that exists between these groups in practice. This chapter presents ‘spillover effects’ that the weaker legal status of the undocumented partner may have on the stronger legal status of the citizen or permanent resident partner in the European context. From a legal perspective, the effects of restrictions play out along several domains: access and treatment by welfare and social security, housing, and family law. Studying legal anomalies may serve as a lens to grasp the financial consequences of the distinctions between citizens and noncitizens.

Keywords

citizenshipsocial welfareundocumented migrantspillover effectslegal anomalies
Type
Chapter
Information
Money Matters in Migration
Policy, Participation, and Citizenship
 , pp. 297 - 316
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Bridget. 2015. Migration, Precarity, and Global Governance. Challenges and Opportunities for Labour. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 68–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Bridget. 2014. ‘Exclusion, Failure, and the Politics of Citizenship’. RCIS Working Paper 2014/1.Google Scholar
Anderson, Bridget. 2013. Us and Them? The Dangerous Politics of Immigration Control. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Bridget. 2011. ‘Citizenship, Deportation and the Boundaries of Belonging’. Citizenship Studies 15, no. 5: 547–563. At https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2011.583787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ataç, Ilker and Rosenberger, Sieglinde. 2019. ‘Social Policies as a Tool of Migration Control’. Journal of Immigrant and Refugee Studies 17, no. 1 Routledge: 1–10. At https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2018.1539802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berneri, Chiara. 2018. ‘Family Reunification between Static EU Citizens and Third Country Nationals: A Practical Way to Help Families Caught in the Current Immigration Crisis’. European Journal of Migration and Law 20, no. 3: 289–313. At https://doi.org/10.1163/15718166–12340028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhard, K. Judith, Luin Goldring, Young, Julie, Berinstein, Carolina, and Wilson, Beth. 2007. ‘Living with Precarious Legal Status in Canada: Implications for the Well-Being of Children and Families’. Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees 24, no 2: 101–115. At https://doi.org/10.25071/1920–7336.21388.Google Scholar
Bhabha, Jacqueline. 2004. ‘The “Mere Fortuity” of Birth? Are Children Citizens?’ Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 15, no 2: 91–117. At www.muse.jhu.edu/article/170544.Google Scholar
Boeles, Pieter. 2019. ‘Wat Is de Ruimte Voor Intrekking van Verblijfsvergunningen Met Terugwerkende Kracht?’ [What is the Room for Withdrawing a Residence Permit with Retroact?] Asiel & Migrantenrecht 3: 95–109. At https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/what-is-the-room-for-withdrawing-a-residence-permit-with-retroact, accessed 27 November 2020.Google Scholar
Bonjour, Saskia and Betty, de Hart. 2020. ‘Intimate Citizenship: Introduction to the Special Issue on Citizenship, Membership and Belonging in Mixed-Status Families’. Identities 1–17. At https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2020.1737404.Google Scholar
Bonjour, Saskia and Duyvendak, Jan Willem. 2018. ‘The “Migrant with Poor Prospects”: Racialized Intersections of Class and Culture in Dutch Civic Integration Debates’. Ethnic and Racial Studies 41, no. 5: 882–900. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1339897.Google Scholar
Bosniak, Linda. 2006. The Citizen and the Alien. Dilemmas of Contemporary Membership. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Castañeda, Heide and Andrea Melo, Milena. 2014. ‘Health Care Access for Latino Mixed-Status Families: Barriers, Strategies, and Implications for Reform’. American Behavioral Scientist 58, no. 14: 1891–1909. At https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764214550290.Google Scholar
Chauvin, Sébastien, Garcés-Mascareñas, Blanca, and Kraler, Albert. 2013. ‘Employment and Migrant Deservingness’. International Migration 51, no. 6: 80–85. At https://doi:10.1111/imig.12123.Google Scholar
Chauvin, Sébastien, Robledo, Manuela Salcedo, Koren, Timo, and Illidge, Joël. 2019. ‘Class, Mobility and Inequality in the Lives of Same-Sex Couples with Mixed Legal Statuses’. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 1–17. At https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2019.1625137.Google Scholar
Daly, Mary. 2000. The Gender Division of Welfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Genova, Nicholas P. 2002. ‘Migrant “Illegality” and Deportability in Everyday Life’. Annual Review of Anthropology 31: 419–447. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.31.040402.085432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Hart, Betty. 2003. Onbezonnen Vrouwen. Gemengde Relaties in het Nationaliteitsrecht en het Vreemdelingenrecht. Amsterdam: Aksant.Google Scholar
Eggebø, Helga. 2010. ‘The Problem of Dependency: Immigration, Gender, and the Welfare State’. Social Politics 17, no. 3: 295–322. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxq013.Google Scholar
Engbersen, Godfried, van der Leun, Joanne, Staring, Richard, and Kehla, Jude. 2003. De Ongekende Stad 2: Inbedding En Uitsluiting van Illegale Vreemdelingen. Amsterdam: Boom.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gosta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press and Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fix, E. Michael and Zimmerman, Wendy. 1999. ‘All Under One Roof: Mixed-Status Families in an Era of Reform’. International Migration Review 35, no. 2: 397–419. At https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747–7379.2001.tb00023.x.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Melanie. 2019. ‘“My Passport is Just My Way Out of Here.” Mixed-Immigration Status Families, Immigration Enforcement and the Citizenship Implications’. Identities, 1–19.Google Scholar
Kalir, Barak and Wissink, Lieke. 2016. ‘The Deportation Continuum: Convergences Between State Agents and NGO Workers in the Dutch Deportation Field’.Citizenship Studies 20, no. 1: 34–49. At https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2015.1107025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanstroom, Daniel and Brinton Lykes, M., eds. 2015. The New Deportations Delirium: Interdisciplinary Responses. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Koning, Edward A. 2020. ‘Accommodation and New Hurdles: The Increasing Importance of Politics for Immigrants’ Access to Social Programmes in Western Democracies’. Social Policy and Administration, https://browzine.com/libraries/320/journals/9184/articles-in-press?showArticleInContext=doi%3A10.1111%2Fspol.12661Google Scholar
Kritzman-Amir, Tally and Spijkerboer, Thomas. 2013. ‘On the Morality and Legality of Borders: Border Politics and Asylum Seekers’. Harvard Human Rights Journal 26, no. 24: 0–39.Google Scholar
López, Jane Lilly. 2015. ‘“Impossible Families”: Mixed-Citizenship Status Couples and the Law’. Law and Policy 37, no. 1–2: 93–118. At https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12032.Google Scholar
Maas, Willem. 2008. ‘Migrants, States, and EU Citizenship’s Unfulfilled Promise’. Citizenship Studies 12, no. 6: 583–596.Google Scholar
Nicholls, J. Walter. 2016. ‘Producing-Resisting National Borders in the United States, France and The Netherlands’. Political Geography 51: 43–52. At https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2015.12.001.Google Scholar
Pluymen, Manon. 2008. Niet Toelaten Betekent Uitsluiten: Een Rechtssociologisch Onderzoek naar de Rechtvaardiging en Praktijk van Uitsluiting van Vreemdelingen van Voorzieningen. Den Haag: Boom Juridische Uitgeverij.Google Scholar
Romero, Mary. 2015. ‘Foreword’. In Schueths, April and Lawston, Jodie, eds., Living Together, Living Apart: Mixed Status Families and US Immigration Policy. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Sabates-Wheeler, Rachel and Feldman, Rayah. 2011. ‘Introduction: Mapping Migrant Welfare onto Social Provisioning’. In Sabates-Wheeler, Rachel and Feldman, Rayah, eds., Migration and Social Protection: Claiming Social Rights Beyond Borders. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sassen, Saskia. 2014. Expulsions: Brutality and Complexity in the Global Economy. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schueths, M. April. 2012. ‘“Where Are My Rights?” Compromised Citizenship in Mixed-Status Marriage: A Research Note’. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare 39, no. 4: 97–109.Google Scholar
Schuster, Liza. 2005. ‘The Continuing Mobility of Migrants in Italy: Shifting between Places and Statuses’. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 31, no. 4: 757–774. At https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830500109993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Scott C.. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven: Yale University.Google Scholar
Van Eijl, Corrie. 2012. Tussenland: Illegaal in Nederland, 1945-2000. Hilversum: Verloren.Google Scholar
Van Houdt, Friso, Suvarierol, Semin, and Schinkel, Willem. 2011. ‘Neoliberal Communitarian Citizenship: Current Trends towards “Earned Citizenship” in the United Kingdom, France and the Netherlands’. International Sociology 26, no. 3: 408–432. At https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580910393041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Walsum, Sarah. 2008. The Family and the Nation: Dutch Family Migration Policies in the Context of Changing Family Norms. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×