American Red Cross (2021). Facts about blood and blood types. www.redcrossblood.org/donate-blood/blood-types.html (accessed August 12, 2021).Google Scholar

Ballantyne, J. (2000). Serology. In Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences, ed. Seigel, J. A.. San Diego, CA: Academic Press/Elsevier.Google Scholar

American Red Cross (2021). Facts about blood and blood types. www.redcrossblood.org/donate-blood/blood-types.html (accessed August 12, 2021).Google Scholar

Ballantyne, J. (2000). Serology. In Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences, ed. Seigel, J. A.. San Diego, CA: Academic Press/Elsevier.Google Scholar

Bromwich, M. R. (2007). Final Report of the Independent Investigator for the Houston Police Department Crime Laboratory and Property Room. Washington, DC: Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP.Google Scholar

Gaensslen, R. E., Bell, S. C., and Lee, H. C. (1987). Distributions of genetic markers in United States populations. 1. Blood group and secretor systems. Journal of Forensic Sciences 32(4): 1016–1058.Google Scholar

Gaensslen, R. E., Bell, S. C., and Lee, H. C. (1987). Distributions of genetic markers in United States populations. 2. Isoenzyme systems. Journal of Forensic Sciences 32(5): 1348–1381.Google Scholar

Mitra, R., Mishra, N., and Rath, G. P. (2014). Blood groups systems. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia 58(5): 524–528.Google Scholar

Wang, L., Chen, M., Wang, F., et al. (2020). A 21-plex system of STRs integrated with Y-STR DYS391 and ABO typing for forensic DNA analysis. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences 52(1): 16–26.Google Scholar

WorldAtlas (2021). World population by percentage of blood types. www.worldatlas.com/articles/what-are-the-different-blood-types.html (accessed August 18, 2021).Google Scholar

Wraxall, B. G. D., and Culliford, B. J. (1968). A thin-layer starch gel method for enzyme typing of bloodstains. Journal of the Forensic Science Society 8(2–3): 81–82.Google Scholar

Gill, P., and Werrett, D. J. (1987). Exclusion of a man charged with murder by DNA fingerprinting. Forensic Science International 35(2–3): 145–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

National Institute of Justice (2000). The Future of Forensic DNA Typing: Predictions of the Research and Development Working Group. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.Google Scholar

National Research Council (1992). DNA Technology in Forensic Science. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/1866.Google Scholar

National Research Council (1996). The Evaluation of Forensic DNA Evidence. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/5141.Google Scholar

University of Leicester (2009). The history of genetic fingerprinting. https://le.ac.uk/dna-fingerprinting/history (accessed August 15, 2021).Google Scholar

Venter, C. H. (2020). A critical review of the current state of forensic science knowledge and its integration in legal systems. PhD thesis, University of South Africa.Google Scholar

Wagner, J. K. (2013). Out with the “junk DNA” phrase. Journal of Forensic Sciences 58(1): 292–294.Google Scholar

Zagorski, N. (2006). Profile of Alec J. Jeffreys. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103(24): 8918–8920.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gasiorowski-Denis, E. (2016). The mystery of the Phantom of Heilbronn. ISOFOCUS July/August 2016. www.iso.org/news/2016/07/Ref2094.html (accessed August 18, 2021).Google Scholar

Ogawa, H., Hiroshige, Y., Yoshimoto, T., Ishii, A., and Yamamoto, T. (2018). STR genotyping from a dry-cleaned skirt in a sexual assault case. Journal of Forensic Sciences 63(4): 1291-1297.Google Scholar

Royal Society of Edinburgh (2017). Forensic DNA Analysis: A Primer for Courts. Edinburgh: RSE. https://royalsociety.org/~/media/about-us/programmes/science-and-law/royal-society-forensic-dna-analysis-primer-for-courts.pdf (accessed August 19, 2021).Google Scholar

Scientific Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods (2020). SWGDAM Quality Assurance Standards Documents, 2020 Quality Assurance Standards. www.swgdam.org/publications (accessed August 19, 2021).Google Scholar

Bieber, F. R., Buckleton, J. S., Budowle, B., Butler, J. M., and Coble, M. D. (2016). Evaluation of forensic DNA mixture evidence: protocol for evaluation, interpretation, and statistical calculations using the combined probability of inclusion. BMC Genetics 17(1): 125. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-016-0429-7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Graversen, T., Mortera, J., and Lago, G. (2019). The Yara Gambirasio case: combining evidence in a complex DNA mixture case. Forensic Science International: Genetics 40: 52–63.Google Scholar

Criminal Justice Information Services. Frequently asked questions on CODIS and NDIS. www.fbi.gov/services/laboratory/biometric-analysis/codis/codis-and-ndis-fact-sheet (accessed August 19, 2021).Google Scholar

Royal Society of Edinburgh (2017). Forensic DNA Analysis: A Primer for Courts. Edinburgh: RSE. https://royalsociety.org/~/media/about-us/programmes/science-and-law/royal-society-forensic-dna-analysis-primer-for-courts.pdf (accessed August 19, 2021).Google Scholar

Scientific Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods (2019). Recommendations of the SWGDAM Ad Hoc Working Group on Genotyping Results Reported as Likelihood Ratios. SWGDAM. www.swgdam.org/publications (accessed August 19, 2021)Google Scholar

Torres, Y., Flores, I., Prieto, V., et al. (2003). DNA mixtures in forensic casework: a 4-year retrospective study. Forensic Science International 134(2–3): 180–186.Google Scholar

Xiao, C., Jiang, Y. W., and Liang, M. (2019). Using the information embedded in the mixed profiles to assist in determining the identity of the deceased and the suspect in a deficiency case. Forensic Science International 300: E13–E19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Basset, P. and Castella, V. (2018). Lessons from a study of DNA contaminations from police services and forensic laboratories in Switzerland. Forensic Science International: Genetics 33: 147–154.Google Scholar

Gill, P. (2016). Analysis and implications of the miscarriages of justice of Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito. Forensic Science International: Genetics 23: 9–18.Google Scholar

Gill, P. (2019). DNA evidence and miscarriages of justice. Forensic Science International 294: E1–E3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gosch, A., and Courts, C. (2019). On DNA transfer: the lack and difficulty of systematic research and how to do it better. Forensic Science International: Genetics 40: 24–36.Google Scholar

Gosch, A., Euteneuer, J., Preuss-Wössner, J., and Courts, C. (2020). DNA transfer to firearms in alternative realistic handling scenarios. Forensic Science International: Genetics 48: 102355.Google Scholar

Kanokwongnuwut, P., Kirkbride, K. P., and Linacre, A. (2018). Detection of latent DNA. Forensic Science International: Genetics 37: 95–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Meakin, G. E., Butcher, E. V., van Oorschot, R. A. H., and Morgan, R. M. (2017). Trace DNA evidence dynamics: an investigation into the deposition and persistence of directly- and indirectly-transferred DNA on regularly-used knives. Forensic Science International: Genetics 29: 38–47.Google Scholar

Smith, P. A. (2016). When DNA implicates the innocent. Scientific American 314(6): 11–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0616-11.Google Scholar

Thornbury, D., Goray, M., and van Oorschot, R. A. H. (2021). Indirect DNA transfer without contact from dried biological materials on various surfaces. Forensic Science International: Genetics 51: 102457.Google Scholar

van Oorschot, R. A. H., Szkuta, B., Meakin, G. E., Kokshoorn, B, and Goray, M. (2019). DNA transfer in forensic science: a review. Forensic Science International: Genetics 38: 140–166.Google Scholar

Abarno, D., Sobieraj, T., Summers, C., and Taylor, D. (2019). The first Australian conviction resulting from a familial search. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences 51: S56–S59.Google Scholar

Byard, R. W. (2020). The execution of the Romanov family at Yekatarinberg. Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology 16(3): 552–556.Google Scholar

Coble, M. D., Loreille, O. M., Wadhams, M. J., et al. (2009). Mystery solved: the identification of the two missing Romanov children using DNA analysis. PLoS One 4(3): e4838. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004838.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Davis, L. (1998). Mitochondrial DNA: State of Tennessee v. Paul Ware. GenePrint. www.promega.com/~/media/Files/Resources/Profiles%20In%20DNA/103/Mitochondrial%20DNA%20State%20of%20Tennessee%20v%20Paul%20Ware.ashx (accessed August 19, 2021).Google Scholar

Gill, P., Ivanov, P. L., Kimpton, C., et al. (1994). Identification of the Romanov family by DNA analysis. Nature Genetics 6(2): 130–135.Google Scholar

Ivanov, P. L., Wadhams, M. J., Roby, R. K., et al. (1996). Mitochondrial DNA sequence heteroplasmy in the Grand Duke of Russia Georgij Romanov establishes the authenticity of the remains of Tsar Nicholas II. Nature Genetics 12(4): 417–420.Google Scholar

Marquez, M. C., Caballero, P. A. B., and Domingo, C. N. (2021). Application of mitochondrial DNA as a tool in the forensic field: update and new perspectives in mtDNA analysis. In Forensic DNA Analysis: Technological Developments and Innovative Applications, ed. Pilli, E. and Berti, A.. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 113–146.Google Scholar

Melton, T. (2016). Mitochondrial DNA: profiling. In A Guide to Forensic DNA Profiling, ed. Bader, S. and Jamieson, A.. New York: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 397–405.Google Scholar

NBC News (2003) Judge: DNA found in Peterson’s boat admissible. NBC, November 17, 2003. www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna3474357 (accessed August 28, 2021).Google Scholar

Pereira, V., and Gusmao, L. (2021). The X-chromosomal STRs in forensic genetics: X chromosome STRs. In Forensic DNA Analysis: Technological Developments and Innovative Applications, ed. Pilli, E. and Berti, A.. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 91–112.Google Scholar

Royal Society of Edinburgh (2017). Forensic DNA Analysis: A Primer for Courts. Edinburgh: RSE. https://royalsociety.org/~/media/about-us/programmes/science-and-law/royal-society-forensic-dna-analysis-primer-for-courts.pdf (accessed August 19, 2021).Google Scholar

Vergani, D. (2021). The Y-chromosomal STRs in forensic genetics: Y chromosome STRs. In Forensic DNA Analysis: Technological Developments and Innovative Applications, ed. Pilli, E. and Berti, A.. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 77–90.Google Scholar

Wang, L., Chen, M., Wang, F., et al. (2020). A 21-plex system of STRs integrated with Y-STR DYS391 and ABO typing for forensic DNA analysis. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences 52(1): 16–26.Google Scholar

Ballard, D., Winkler-Galicki, J., and Wesoly, J. (2020). Massive parallel sequencing in forensics: advantages, issues, technicalities, and prospects. International Journal of Legal Medicine 134(4): 1291–1303.Google Scholar

Barrientos, L. S., Crespi, J. A., Fameli, A., et al. (2016). DNA profile of dog feces as evidence to solve a homicide. Legal Medicine 22: 54-57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Borsting, C., Pererira, V., Andersen, J. D., and Morling, N. (2016). Single nucleotide polymorphism. In A Guide to Forensic DNA Profiling, ed. Jamieson, A. and Bader, S.. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 205–222.Google Scholar

Bruijns, B., Tiggelaar, R., and Gardeniers, H. (2018). Massively parallel sequencing techniques for forensics: a review. Electrophoresis 39(21): 2642–2654.Google Scholar

Butler, J. M., David, V. A., O’Brien, S. J., and Menotti-Raymond, M. A. (2002). The MeowPlex: a new DNA test using tetranucleotide STR markers for the domestic Cat. Profiles in DNA 5(2), 7–10.Google Scholar

Decker, R. S., and Kerns, T. L. (2020). The FBI’s Amerithrax Task Force and the advent of microbial forensics. In Microbial Forensics (Third Edition), ed. Budowle, B., Schutzer, S. and Morse, S. A.. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 11–23.Google Scholar

de Knijff, P. (2019). From next generation sequencing to now generation sequencing in forensics. Forensic Science International: Genetics 38: 175–180.Google Scholar

Forlani, G., and Petrollino, D. (2021). A comprehensive molecular approach to the detection of drug-type versus fiber-type hemp varieties. Forensic Science International: Genetics 52: 102464.Google Scholar

Genome Reference Consortium. Human Build 38 patch release 14 (GRCh38.p14). www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/assembly/GCA_000001405.29 (accessed April 12, 2022).Google Scholar

Gettings, K. B., Aponte, R. A., Vallone, P. M., and Butler, J. M. (2015). STR allele sequence variation: current knowledge and future issues. Forensic Science International: Genetics 18: 118–130.Google Scholar

Gettings, K. B., Borsuk, L. A., Steffen, C. R., Kiesler, K. M., and Vallone, P. M. (2018). Sequence-based US population data for 27 autosomal STR loci. Forensic Science International: Genetics 37: 106–115.Google Scholar

Gin, K., Tovar, J., Bartelink, E. J., et al. (2020). The 2018 California wildfires: integration of rapid DNA to dramatically accelerate victim identification. Journal of Forensic Sciences 65(3): 791–799.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jackson, P. J. (2020). Microbial forensic investigation of the anthrax letter attacks: how the investigation would differ using today’s technologies. In Microbial Forensics (Third Edition), ed. Budowle, B., Schutzer, S. and Morse, S. A.. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 25–32.Google Scholar

King, T. E., Gonzalez Fortes, G., Balaresque, P., et al. (2014). Identification of the remains of King Richard III. Nature Communications 5: 5631.Google Scholar

Linacre, A. (2021). Animal forensic genetics. Genes 12(4): 515.Google Scholar

National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health (2020). The Human Genome Project. www.genome.gov/human-genome-project (accessed August 19, 2021).Google Scholar

SASA [Scottish Agricultural Science Agency]. Wildlife crime. www.sasa.gov.uk/wildlife-environment/wildlife-crime (accessed April 12, 2022).Google Scholar

Schleimer, A., Frantz, A. C., Lang, J., Reinert, P. and Heddergott, M. (2016). Identifying a hunter responsible for killing a hunting dog by individual-specific genetic profiling of wild boar DNA transferred to the canine during the accidental shooting. Forensic Science Medicine and Pathology 12(4): 491–496.Google Scholar

Thermo Fisher Scientific (2021). FBI approves Thermo Fisher Scientific’s rapid DNA solution for use in law enforcement booking stations. Cision PR Newswire, July 8, 2021. www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/fbi-approves-thermo-fisher-scientifics-rapid-dna-solution-for-use-in-law-enforcement-booking-stations-301327486.html (accessed August 29, 2021).Google Scholar

Tillmar, A., Fagerholm, S. A., Staaf, J., Sjolund, P., and Ansell, R. (2021). Getting the conclusive lead with investigative genetic genealogy: a successful case study of a 16 year old double murder in Sweden. Forensic Science International: Genetics 53: 102525.Google Scholar

US Fish and Wildlife Service. Clark R. Bavin National Fish and Wildlife Forensics Laboratory. www.fws.gov/law-enforcement/clark-r-bavin-national-fish-and-wildlife-forensics-laboratory (accessed April 12, 2022).Google Scholar

Vidaki, A., and Kayser, M. (2017). From forensic epigenetics to forensic epigenomics: broadening DNA investigative intelligence. Genome Biology 18(1): 238.Google Scholar

Vidaki, A., and Kayser, M. (2018). Recent progress, methods and perspectives in forensic epigenetics. Forensic Science International: Genetics 37: 180–195.Google Scholar

Yamamuro, T., Segawa, H., Kuwayama, K., et al. (2021). Rapid identification of drug-type and fiber-type cannabis by allele specific duplex PCR. Forensic Science International 318: 110634.Google Scholar

Arnold, C. (2020). The controversial company using DNA to sketch the faces of criminals. Nature 585: 178–181.Google Scholar

Barrio, P. A., Crespillo, M., Luque, J. A., et al. (2018). GHEP-ISFG collaborative exercise on mixture profiles (GHEP-MIX06). Reporting conclusions: results and evaluation. Forensic Science International: Genetics 35: 156–163.Google Scholar

Butler, J. M., Iver, H., Press, R., et al. (2021). DNA Mixture Interpretation: A NIST Scientific Foundation Review (NISTIR 8351-DRAFT). Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology, US Department of Commerce.Google Scholar

Butler, J. M., Kline, M. C., and Coble, M. D. (2018). NIST interlaboratory studies involving DNA mixtures (MIX05 and MIX13): variation observed and lessons learned. Forensic Science International: Genetics 37: 81–94.Google Scholar

Coble, M. D., and Bright, J. A. (2019). Probabilistic genotyping software: an overview. Forensic Science International: Genetics 38: 219–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dror, I. E., and Hampikian, G. (2011). Subjectivity and bias in forensic DNA mixture interpretation. Science & Justice 51(4): 204–208.Google Scholar

Egel, B. (2018). Here’s the string of crimes tied to the East Area Rapist in years of California terror. The Sacramento Bee, April 18, 2018.Google Scholar

Ge, J. Y., and Budowle, B. (2021). Forensic investigation approaches of searching relatives in DNA databases. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 66(2): 430–443. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14615.Google Scholar

Gill, P., Kirkham, A., and Curran, J. (2007). LoComatioN: a software tool for the analysis of low copy number DNA profiles. Forensic Science International 166(2–3): 128–138.Google Scholar

Government Accountability Office (2021). Forensic technology: algorithms strengthen forensic analysis, but several factors can affect outcomes. GAO-21-435SP. Washington, DC: Government Accountability Office. www.gao.gov/products/gao-21-435sp (accessed August 19, 2021).Google Scholar

Greytak, E. M., Moore, C., and Armentrout, S. L. (2019). Genetic genealogy for cold case and active investigations. Forensic Science International 299: 103–113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jouvenal, J. (2021). A secret algorithm is transforming DNA evidence. This defendant could be the first to scrutinize it. Washington Post, July 13, 2021.Google Scholar

Kamb, L. (2021). DNA puts a name to one of the last unidentified victims of the Green River Killer. Seattle Times, January 25, 2021.Google Scholar

Katsanis, S. H. (2020). Pedigrees and perpetrators: uses of DNA and genealogy in forensic investigations. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 21: 535–564.Google Scholar

Kayser, M. (2015). Forensic DNA phenotyping: predicting human appearance from crime scene material for investigative purposes. Forensic Science International: Genetics 18: 33–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kennett, D. (2019). Using genetic genealogy databases in missing persons cases and to develop suspect leads in violent crimes. Forensic Science International 301: 107–117.Google Scholar

Kling, D., Phillips, C., Kennett, D., and Tillmar, A. (2021). Investigative genetic genealogy: current methods, knowledge and practice. Forensic Science International: Genetics 52: 102474.Google Scholar

Krimsky, S. (2022). Understanding DNA Ancestry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Maguire, C. N., McCallum, L. A., Storey, C., and Whitaker, J. P. (2014). Familial searching: a specialist forensic DNA profiling service utilising the National DNA Database (R) to identify unknown offenders via their relatives. The UK experience. Forensic Science International: Genetics 8(1): 1–9.Google Scholar

Mateen, R. M., Sabar, M. F., Hussain, S., Parveen, R., and Hussain, M. (2021). Familial DNA analysis and criminal investigation: usage, downsides and privacy concerns. Forensic Science International 318: 110576.Google Scholar

Miller, G. (2010). Familial DNA testing scores a win in serial killer case. Science 329(5989): 262. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.329.5989.262.Google Scholar

Moran, G. (2019). Murder case that highlighted DNA analysis controversy ends with plea to reduce charge, release. San Diego Union Tribune, December 9, 2019.Google Scholar

Moran, K. S. (2018). Damned by DNA: balancing personal privacy with public safety. Forensic Science International 292: E3–E4.Google Scholar

Mortera, J. (2020). DNA mixtures in forensic investigations: the statistical state of the art. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application 7: 111–142.Google Scholar

Pham-Hoai, E., Crispino, F., and Hampikian, G. (2014). The first successful use of a low stringency familial match in a French criminal investigation. Journal of Forensic Sciences 59(3): 816–819.Google Scholar

Plemel, E. (2019). Genetic genealogy and its use in criminal investigations: are we heading towards a universal genetic database? Dalhousie Journal of Interdisciplinary Management 15. https://doi.org/10.5931/djim.v15i0.8983.Google Scholar

President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (2016). Forensic Science in the Criminal Courts: Ensuring Scientific Validity of Feature Comparison Methods. Washington, DC: PCAST.Google Scholar

President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (2017). Addendum to Forensic Science in the Criminal Courts: Ensuring Scientific Validity of Feature Comparison Methods. Washington DC, PCAST.Google Scholar

Press, R. (2019) DNA Mixtures: A Forensic Science Explainer. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology, US Department of Commerce. www.nist.gov/feature-stories/dna-mixtures-forensic-science-explainer (accessed April 8, 2022).Google Scholar

Samuel, G., and Prainsack, B. (2019). Civil society stakeholder views on forensic DNA phenotyping: balancing risks and benefits. Forensic Science International: Genetics 43: 102157.Google Scholar

Scientific Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods (2020). Overview of investigative genetic genealogy. SWGDAM. www.swgdam.org/publications (accessed August 19, 2021).Google Scholar

Scudder, N., McNevin, D., Kelty, S. F., Walsh, S. J., and Robertson, J. (2018). Forensic DNA phenotyping: developing a model privacy impact assessment. Forensic Science International: Genetics 34: 222–230.Google Scholar

St. John, P. (2020). The untold story of how the Golden State Killer was found. Los Angeles Times, December 8, 2020.Google Scholar

US Department of Justice (2019). United States Department of Justice Interim Policy Forensic Genetic Genealogical DNA Analysis and Searching. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.Google Scholar