Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- 1 Auslander–Reiten Theory of Finite-Dimensional Algebras
- 2 τ-tilting Theory – an Introduction
- 3 From Frieze Patterns to Cluster Categories
- 4 Infinite-dimensional Representations of Algebras
- 5 The Springer Correspondence
- 6 An Introduction to Diagrammatic Soergel Bimodules
- 7 A Companion to Quantum Groups
- 8 Infinite-dimensional Lie Algebras and Their Multivariable Generalizations
- 9 An Introduction to Crowns in Finite Groups
- 10 An Introduction to Totally Disconnected Locally Compact Groups and Their Finiteness Conditions
- 11 Locally Analytic Representations of p-adic Groups
- References
8 - Infinite-dimensional Lie Algebras and Their Multivariable Generalizations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: aN Invalid Date NaN
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- 1 Auslander–Reiten Theory of Finite-Dimensional Algebras
- 2 τ-tilting Theory – an Introduction
- 3 From Frieze Patterns to Cluster Categories
- 4 Infinite-dimensional Representations of Algebras
- 5 The Springer Correspondence
- 6 An Introduction to Diagrammatic Soergel Bimodules
- 7 A Companion to Quantum Groups
- 8 Infinite-dimensional Lie Algebras and Their Multivariable Generalizations
- 9 An Introduction to Crowns in Finite Groups
- 10 An Introduction to Totally Disconnected Locally Compact Groups and Their Finiteness Conditions
- 11 Locally Analytic Representations of p-adic Groups
- References
Summary
The loop algebra, consisting of Laurent polynomials valued in a Lie algebra, admits a non-trivial central extension for each choice of invariant pairing on it. This affine Lie algebra and its cousin, the Virasoro algebra, are foundational objects in representation theory and conformal field theory. A natural question then arises: do there exist multivariable, or higher dimensional, generalizations of the affine algebra?
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Modern Trends in Algebra and Representation Theory , pp. 273 - 316Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
[1]Ayala, D., Francis, J. and Tanaka, H. L. 2017. Factorization homology of stratified spaces. Selecta Math. (N.S.), 23(1), 293–362.Google Scholar
[2]Bakalov, Bojko, D’Andrea, Alessandro, and Kac, Victor G. 2001. Theory of finite pseudoalgebras. Adv. Math., 162(1), 1–140.Google Scholar
[3]Baranovsky, Vladimir. 2008. A universal enveloping for L∞-algebras. Math. Res. Lett., 15(6), 1073–1089.Google Scholar
[4]Beem, Christopher, Lemos, Madalena, Liendo, Pedro, Peelaers, Wolfger, Rastelli, Leonardo, and van Rees, Balt C. 2015. Infinite chiral symmetry in four dimensions. Comm. Math. Phys., 336(3), 1359–1433.Google Scholar
[5]Beilinson, Alexander, and Drinfeld, Vladimir. 2004. Chiral algebras. American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, vol. 51. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar
[6]Boardman, J. M. and Vogt, R. M. 1973. Homotopy invariant algebraic structures on topological spaces. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 347. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York.Google Scholar
[7]Borcherds, Richard E. 1986. Vertex algebras, Kac-Moody algebras, and the Monster. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 83(10), 3068–3071.Google Scholar
[8]Bruegmann, Daniel. 2020. Vertex Algebras and Costello-Gwilliam Factorization Algebras.Google Scholar
[9]Costello, Kevin, and Gwilliam, Owen. 2017. Factorization algebras in quantum field theory. Vol. 1. New Mathematical Monographs, vol. 31. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
[10]Faonte, Giovanni, Hennion, Benjamin, and Kapranov, Mikhail. 2019. Higher Kac– Moody algebras and moduli spaces of G-bundles. Advances in Mathematics, 346, 389–466.Google Scholar
[11]Frenkel, Edward. 2007. Langlands correspondence for loop groups. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 103. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
[12]Frenkel, I. B. 1985. Representations of Kac-Moody algebras and dual resonance models. Pages 325–353 of: Applications of group theory in physics and mathematical physics (Chicago, 1982). Lectures in Appl. Math., vol. 21. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI.Google Scholar
[13]Fuks, D. B. 1986. Cohomology of infinite-dimensional Lie algebras. Contemporary Soviet Mathematics. Consultants Bureau, New York. Translated from the Russian by A. B. Sosinski˘ı.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Gelfand, I. M. and Fuks, D. B. 1968. Cohomologies of the Lie algebra of vector fields on the circle. Funkcional. Anal. i Prilozˇen., 2(4), 92–93.Google Scholar
[15]Getzler, E. 1994. Two-dimensional topological gravity and equivariant cohomology. Comm. Math. Phys., 163(3), 473–489.Google Scholar
[16]Gwilliam, Owen, and Williams, Brian R. 2018. Higher Kac–Moody algebras and symmetries of holomorphic field theories.Google Scholar
[17]Gwilliam, Owen, and Williams, Brian R. 2021. A survey of holomorphic field theory. To appear.Google Scholar
[18]Hennion, Benjamin, and Kapranov, Mikhail. 2018. Gelfand–Fuchs cohomology in algebraic geometry and factorization algebras.Google Scholar
[19]Hinich, Vladimir. 2001. DG coalgebras as formal stacks. J. Pure Appl. Algebra, 162(2-3), 209–250.Google Scholar
[20]Hinich, Vladimir, and Schechtman, Vadim. 1993. Homotopy Lie algebras. Pages 1–28 of: I. M. Gelfand Seminar. Adv. Soviet Math., vol. 16. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI.Google Scholar
[21]Huybrechts, Daniel. 2005. Complex geometry. Universitext. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. An introduction.Google Scholar
[23]Kac, Victor. 1998. Vertex algebras for beginners. Second edn. University Lecture Series, vol. 10. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI.Google Scholar
[24]Kac, Victor G. and Wakimoto, Minoru. 1994. Integrable highest weight modules over affine superalgebras and number theory. Pages 415–456 of: Lie theory and geometry. Progr. Math., vol. 123. Birkha¨user Boston, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
[25]Kapranov, Mikhail. 2021. Conformal maps in higher dimensions and derived geometry. 2.Google Scholar
[26]Lada, Tom, and Markl, Martin. 1995. Strongly homotopy Lie algebras. Comm. Algebra, 23(6), 2147–2161.Google Scholar
[27]Lada, Tom, and Stasheff, Jim. 1993. Introduction to SH Lie algebras for physicists. Internat. J. Theoret. Phys., 32(7), 1087–1103.Google Scholar
[28]Loday, Jean-Louis, and Vallette, Bruno. 2012. Algebraic operads. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], vol. 346. Springer, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
[31]Pressley, Andrew, and Segal, Graeme. 1986. Loop groups. Oxford Mathematical Monographs. The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York. Oxford Science Publications.Google Scholar
[32]Saberi, Ingmar, and Williams, Brian R. 2019. Superconformal algebras and holomorphic field theories. arXiv:1910.04120.Google Scholar
[33]Saberi, Ingmar, and Williams, Brian R. 2020. Twisted characters and holomorphic symmetries. Lett. Math. Phys., 110(10), 2779–2853.Google Scholar
[34]Williams, Brian R. Holomorphic sigma-models and their symmetries. Thesis (Ph.D.)–Northwestern University.Google Scholar
[35]Williams, Brian R. 2021. On the local cohomology of holomorphic vector fields. To appear.Google Scholar