Aalto, P. (1949) Untersuchungen über das lateinische Gerundium und Gerundivum (Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia).Google Scholar

Aarne, A. (1910) Verzeichnis der Märchentypen, Folklore Fellows Communications 3 (Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia).Google Scholar

Aarne, A. and Thompson, S. (1961) The Types of the Folktale: A Classification and Bibliography, Folklore Fellows Communications 184 (Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia).Google Scholar

Adema, S. M. (2017) Speech and Thought in Latin War Narratives: Words of Warriors (Leiden: Brill).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adler, W. (2009) ‘The Cesti and Sophistic Culture in the Severan Age,’ in Wallraff, M. and Mecella, L. (eds.), Die Kestoi des Julius Africanus und ihre Überlieferung (Berlin: De Gruyter), 1–15.Google Scholar

Adorjáni, Z. (2014) Pindars sechste olympische Siegesode. Text, Einleitung und Kommentar, Mnemosyne Supplement 370 (Leiden: Brill).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ager, S. L. (1993) ‘Why War?: Some Views on International Arbitration in Ancient Greece’, Echos du Monde Classique/Classical Views 37, 1–13.Google Scholar

Ahl, F. (1984) ‘The Art of Safe Criticism in Greece and Rome’, AJPh 105, 174–208.Google Scholar

Akujärvi, J. (2005) Researcher, Traveller, Narrator: Studies in Pausanias’ Periegesis (Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International).Google Scholar

Akujärvi, J. (2012) ‘One and “I” in the Frame Narrative: Authorial Voice, Travelling Persona and Addressee in Pausanias’ Periegesis’, CQ 62, 327–58.Google Scholar

Allan, R. J., de Jong, I. J. F., and de Jonge, C. C. (2017) ‘From Enargeia to Immersion: The Ancient Roots of a Modern Concept’, Style 51, 34–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allison, G. (2017) Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’s Trap? (New York: Houghton Mifflin).Google Scholar

Aly, W. (1969) Volksmärchen, Sage und Novelle bei Herodot und seinen Zeitgenossen, 2nd, revised ed., ed. Huber, L. (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).Google Scholar

Ampolo, C. (1994) ‘La città dell’eccesso: Per la storia di Sibari fino al 510 a.C.’, in Stazio, A. and Ceccoli, S. (eds.), Sibari e la Sibaritide. Atti del trentaduesimo convegno di studi sulla Magna Grecia, Taranto–Sibari 7–12 ottobre 1992 (Naples: Istituto per la storia e l’archeologia della Magna Grecia), 213–54.Google Scholar

Anderson, G. (1986) Philostratus: Biography and Belles Lettres in the Third Century A.D. (London: Routledge).Google Scholar

Anderson, G. (2018) The Realness of Things Past: Ancient Greece and Ontological History (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Anderson, J. G. C. (1938) Tacitus: Germania (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Anderson, M., Cairns, D., and Sprevak, M. (eds.) (2019) Distributed Cognition in Classical Antiquity, The Edinburgh History of Distributed Cognition, vol. 1 (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press).Google Scholar

Andrewes, A. (1962) ‘The Mytilene Debate: Thucydides 3.36–49’, Phoenix 16, 64–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrews, J. A. (2000) ‘Cleon’s Hidden Appeals’, CQ 50, 45–62.Google Scholar

Archibald, Z. H. (1998) The Odrysian Kingdom of Thrace: Orpheus Unmasked (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Armayor, O. K. (1978a) ‘Did Herodotus Ever Go to the Black Sea?’, HSCP 82, 45‒62.Google Scholar

Armayor, O. K. (1978b) ‘Did Herodotus Ever Go to Egypt?’, Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt 15, 59‒73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armayor, O. K. (1980) ‘Sesostris and Herodotus’ Autopsy of Thrace, Colchis, Inland Asia Minor, and the Levant’, HSCP 84, 51‒74.Google Scholar

Armayor, O. K. (1985) Herodotus’ Autopsy of the Fayoum: Lake Moeris and the Labyrinth of Egypt (Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben).Google Scholar

Armstrong, P. (ed.) (2013) Authority in Byzantium, Publications of the Centre for Hellenic Studies, King’s College London, 14 (Farnham: Ashgate).Google Scholar

Ash, R. (2007) Tacitus Histories II (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Ash, R. (2018) Tacitus Annals Book XV (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Asheri, D. (1988) ‘Carthaginians and Greeks’, in Boardman, J., Hammond, N. G. L., Lewis, D. M., and Ostwald, M. (eds.), The Cambridge Ancient History, vol. 4: Persia, Greece, and the Western Mediterranean c. 525 to 479 BC² (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 766–75.Google Scholar

Asheri, D., Lloyd, A., and Corcella, A. (2007) A Commentary on Herodotus Books I–IV, ed. Murray, O. and Moreno, A. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Asmis, E. (1986) ‘Psychagogia in Plato’s Phaedrus’, Illinois Classical Studies 11, 153–72.Google Scholar

Astin, A. (1978) Cato the Censor (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Athanassaki, L. (1990) ‘Mantic Vision and Diction in Pindar’s Victory Odes’ (PhD thesis, Brown University).Google Scholar

Athanassaki, L. (2003) ‘A Divine Audience for the Celebration of Asopichus’ Victory in Pindar’s Fourteenth Olympian Ode’, in Bakewell, G. W. and Sickinger, J. P. (eds.), Gestures: Essays in Ancient History, Literature and Philosophy Presented to Alan L. Boegehold on the Occasion of His Retirement and His Seventy-Fifth Birthday (Oxford: Οxbow Books), 3–15.Google Scholar

Athanassaki, L. (2009) [=Αθανασάκη Λ.] ἀείδετο πὰν τέμενος. Οι χορικές παραστάσεις και το κοινό τους στην αρχαϊκή και πρώιμη κλασική περίοδο (Herakleion: University of Crete Press).Google Scholar

Athanassaki, L. (2014) ‘The Creative Impact of the Occasion: Pindar’s Songs for the Emmenids and Horace’s Odes 1.2 and 4.2’, in Cairns, D. and Scodel, R. (eds.), Defining Greek Narrative (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press), 197–225.Google Scholar

Athanassaki, L. (2018) ‘ἐν ζαθέῳ χρόνῳ: Ritual Interaction of Mortals and Immortals in Pindaric Choral Performance’, in Athanassaki, L., Nappa, C., and Vergados, A. (eds.), Gods and Mortals in Greek and Latin Poetry: Studies in Honor of Jenny Strauss Clay, Ariadne Supplement 2, 81–117.Google Scholar

Athanassaki, L. (2022) ‘The Lyric Chorus’, in Swift, L. (ed.), A Companion to Greek Lyric Poetry (Oxford: Wiley Blackwell), 3–18.Google Scholar

Avlamis, P. (2019) ‘Contextualizing Quintus: The Fall of Troy and Cultural Uses of the Paradoxical Cityscape in Posthomerica 13’, TAPA 149, 149–208.Google Scholar

Avotins, I. (1978) ‘The Date and the Recipient of the Vitae Sophistarum of Philostratus’, Hermes 106, 242–7.Google Scholar

Babbitt, F. C. (1936) Plutarch’s Moralia V (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Badian, E. (1966) ‘The Early Historians’, in Dorey, T. A. (ed.), Latin Historians (London: Routledge), 1–38.Google Scholar

Badian, E. (1993) ‘Thucydides and the Outbreak of the Peloponnesian War’, in Badian, E. (ed.), From Plataea to Potidaea: Studies in the History and Historiography of the Pentekontaetia (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press), 125–62.Google Scholar

Bady, C. (2021) ‘La Rome des pepaideumenoi. Mobilité, patronage et sociabilité des élites intellectuelles hellénophones dans la Rome du Haut-Empire (31 av. J.-C.–235 ap. J.-C.)’ (doctoral thesis, Paris X – Nanterre).Google Scholar

Baier, T. (2005) ‘Autobiographie in der späten römischen Republik’, in Reichel, M. (ed.), Antike Autobiographien: Werke – Epochen – Gattungen (Cologne: Böhlau), 123–42.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. M. (1981) The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays (Austin: University of Texas Press).Google Scholar

Bakker, E. J. (2002) ‘The Marking of History: Herodotus’ Historiēs apodexis’, in Bakker, E. J., de Jong, I. J. F., and van Wees, H. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus (Leiden: Brill), 1–32.Google Scholar

Bakker, E. J. (ed.) (2017) Authorship and Greek Song: Authority, Authenticity, and Performance (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar

Balot, R., Forsdyke, S., and Foster, E. (eds.) (2017) The Oxford Handbook of Thucydides (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Baragwanath, E. (2008) Motivation and Narrative in Herodotus (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Baragwanath, E. (2013) ‘Herodotos and the Avoidance of Hindsight’, in Powell, A. (ed.), Hindsight in Greek and Roman History (Swansea: Classical Press of Wales), 25–48.Google Scholar

Baragwanath, E. and de Bakker, M. (eds.) (2012a) Myth, Truth, and Narrative in Herodotus (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baragwanath, E. and de Bakker, M. (2012b) ‘Introduction’, in Baragwanath, E. and de Bakker, M. (eds.), Myth, Truth, and Narrative in Herodotus (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 1‒57.Google Scholar

Baraz, Y. (2020) Reading Roman Pride (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Barker, E., Bouzarovski, S., Pelling, C., and Isaksen, L. (eds.) (2016) New Worlds out of Old Texts: Developing Techniques for the Spatial Analysis of Ancient Narratives (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Barlow, J. (1998) ‘Noble Gauls and Their Other in Caesar’s Propaganda’, in Welch, K. and Powell, A. (eds.), Julius Caesar as Artful Reporter: The War Commentaries as Political Instruments (London: Duckworth; Swansea: Classical Press of Wales), 139–70.Google Scholar

Barnes, Jonathan (ed.) (1984) The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, 2 vols. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Barnes, Julian (1984) Flaubert’s Parrot (London: Cape).Google Scholar

Barrett, A. A. (2020) Rome Is Burning: Nero and the Fire That Ended a Dynasty (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Barrett, J. (2002) Staged Narrative: Poetics and the Messenger in Greek Tragedy (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar

Barwick, K. (1951) Caesars Bellum Civile. Tendenz, Abfassungszeit und Stil (Berlin: Akademie Verlag).Google Scholar

Barwick, K. (1967) ‘Zur Entstehungsgeschichte des Bellum Gallicum’, in Rasmussen, D. (ed.), Caesar (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft), 255–78.Google Scholar

Bascom, W. (1975) ‘The Forms of Folklore: Prose Narratives’, The Journal of American Folklore 307, 3–20.Google Scholar

Batstone, W. (2018) ‘Caesar Constructing Caesar’, in Grillo, L. and Krebs, C. B. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Writings of Julius Caesar (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 43–57.Google Scholar

Batstone, W. and Damon, C. (2006) Caesar’s Civil War (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Beagon, M. (2005) The Elder Pliny on the Human Animal: Natural History Book 7 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Beck, H. and Walter, U. (eds.) (2001) Die frühen römischen Historiker. 1: Von Fabius Pictor bis Cn. Gellius (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft).Google Scholar

Bell, A. and Ensslin, A. (2011) ‘“I know what it was. You know what it was”: Second-Person Narration in Hypertext Fiction’, Narrative 19, 311–29.Google Scholar

Benardete, S. (1969) Herodotean Inquiries (Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands).Google Scholar

Bernard, S., Damon, C., and Grey, C. (2014) ‘Rhetorics of Land and Power in the Polla Inscription (CIL 1² 638)’, Mnemosyne 67, 953–985.Google Scholar

Berry, D. (2008) ‘Letters from an Advocate: Pliny’s “Vesuvius” Narratives (Epistles 6.16, 6.20)’, Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar 13, 297–313.Google Scholar

Billault, A. (2000) L’univers de Philostrate (Bruxelles: Latomus).Google Scholar

Billows, R. A. (2009) Julius Caesar: The Colossus of Rome (London: Routledge).Google Scholar

Biriotti, M. and Miller, N. (eds.) (1993) What Is an Author? (Manchester: Manchester University Press).Google Scholar

Birke, D. (2015) ‘Author, Authority and “Authorial Narration”: The Eighteenth-Century English Novel as a Test Case’, in Birke, D. and Köppe, T. (eds.), Author and Narrator: Transdisciplinary Contributions to a Narratological Debate (Berlin: De Gruyter), 99–111.Google Scholar

Blänsdorf, J. (1995) Fragmenta Poetarum Latinorum Epicorum et Lyricorum praeter Ennium et Lucilium, post Wilhelm Morel novis curis adhibitis edidit Carolus Buechner (ed. tertiam auctam cur. Jürgen Blänsdorf) (Stuttgart: Teubner).Google Scholar

Bleckmann, B. (2006) Fiktion als Geschichte: Neue Studien zum Autor der Hellenika Oxyrhynchia und zur Historiographie des vierten vorchristlichen Jahrhunderts (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).Google Scholar

Bleicken, J. (1998) Augustus: Eine Biographie (Berlin: Alexander Fest Verlag).Google Scholar

Block, E. (1982) ‘The Narrator Speaks: Apostrophe in Homer and Vergil’, TAPA 92, 7–21.Google Scholar

Blösel, W. (2012) ‘Thucydides on Themistocles: A Herodotean Narrator?’, in Foster, E. and Lateiner, D. (eds.), Thucydides and Herodotus (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 215–40.Google Scholar

Boedeker, D. (1987) ‘The Two Faces of Demaratus’, Arethusa 20, 185–201.Google Scholar

Boedeker, D. (1996) ‘Heroic Historiography: Simonides and Herodotus on Plataea’, Arethusa 29, 223–42.Google Scholar

Boedeker, D. (2002) ‘Epic Heritage and Mythical Patterns in Herodotus’, in Bakker, E. J., de Jong, I. J. F., and van Wees, H. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus (Leiden: Brill), 97–116.Google Scholar

Boedeker, D. (2003) ‘Pedestrian Fatalities: The Prosaics of Death in Herodotus’, in Derow, P. and Parker, R. C. T. (eds.), Herodotus and His World: Essays from a Conference in Memory of George Forrest (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 17–36.Google Scholar

Boedeker, D. (2006) ‘Voiceless Victims, Memorable Deaths in Herodotus’, CQ 56, 393–403.Google Scholar

Boedeker, D. (2011) ‘Persian Gender Relations as Historical Motives in Herodotus’, in Rollinger, R., Truschnegg, B., and Bichler, R. (eds.), Herodot und das Persische Weltreich = Herodotus and the Persian Empire, Akten des 3. Internationalen Kolloquiums zum Thema Vorderasien im Spannungsfeld klassischer und altorientalischer Überlieferungen, Innsbruck, 24.–28. November 2008, Classica et Orientalia 3 (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz), 211–35.Google Scholar

Boedeker, D. (2015) ‘Two Tales of Spartan Envoys’, in Clark, C., Foster, E., and Hallett, J. (eds.), Kinesis: The Ancient Depiction of Gesture, Motion, and Emotion: Essays for Donald Lateiner (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press), 103–115.Google Scholar

Bollansée, J. (2005) ‘Historians of Agathocles of Samus: Polybius on Writers of Historical Monographs’, in Schepens, G. and Bollansée, J. (eds.), The Shadow of Polybius: Intertextuality as a Research Tool in Greek Historiography: Proceedings of the International Colloquium, Leuven, 21–22 September 2001 (Leuven: Peeters), 237–53.Google Scholar

Bolte, J. and Polívka, J. (1915) Anmerkungen zu den Kinder- und Hausmärchen der Brüder Grimm, 2nd ed., vol. 2 (Leipzig: Theodor Weicher).Google Scholar

Bonheim, H. (1983) ‘Narration in the Second Person’, Recherches Anglaises et Américaines Strasbourg 16, 69–80.Google Scholar

Bosworth, A. (2003) ‘Plus ça change … : Ancient Historians and Their Sources’, ClAnt 22, 167–198.Google Scholar

Boter, G. (2015) ‘The Title of Philostratus’ Life of Apollonius of Tyana’, JHS 135, 1–7.Google Scholar

Botermann, H. (2007) ‘Gallia pacata – perpetua pax. Die Eroberung Galliens und der “gerechte Krieg”’, in Baltrusch, E. (ed.), Caesar (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft), 137–58.Google Scholar

Bowie, A. M. (2007) Herodotus Histories Book VIII. Cambridge Greek and Latin Classics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Bowie, E. L. (2009) ‘Philostratus: The Life of a Sophist’, in Bowie, E. L. and Elsner, J. (eds.), Philostratus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 19–32.Google Scholar

Bradley, P. J. (2010) ‘Irony and the Narrator in Xenophon’s Anabasis’, in Gray, V. J. (ed.), Xenophon: Oxford Readings in Classical Studies (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 520–52.Google Scholar

Branscome, D. (2010) ‘Herodotus and the Map of Aristagoras’, ClAnt 29, 1–44.Google Scholar

Branscome, D. (2013) Textual Rivals: Self-Presentation in Herodotus’ Histories (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).Google Scholar

Breed, B., Keitel, E., and Wallace, R. (eds.) (2018) Lucilius and Satire in Second-Century BC Rome (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Briant, P. (2002) From Cyrus to Alexander: A History of the Persian Empire, trans. Peter T. Daniels (Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns).Google Scholar

Brillante, C. (1986) ‘Il sogno nella riflessione dei presocratici’, MD 16, 9–53.Google Scholar

Brock, R. (2003) ‘Authorial Voice and Narrative Management in Herodotus’, in Derow, P. and Parker, R. C. T. (eds.), Herodotus and His World: Essays from a Conference in Memory of George Forrest (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 3–17.Google Scholar

Brosius, M. (2000) The Persian Empire from Cyrus II to Artaxerxes I (London: London Association of Classical Teachers).Google Scholar

Brown, T. S. (1958) Timaeus of Tauromenium (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar

Brugnone, M. A. (1995) ‘In margine alle tradizioni ecistiche di Massalia’, PdP 50, 46–66.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. (1976) Arrian. Anabasis Alexandri Books i–iv, Loeb Classical Library 236 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. (1993) ‘The Megarian Decree’, in Brunt, P. A. (ed.), Studies in Greek History and Thought (Oxford: Clarendon Press), 1–16.Google Scholar

Brunyé, T. T., Ditman, T., Mahoney, C. R., Augustyn, J. S., and Taylor, H. A. (2009) ‘When You and I Share Perspectives: Pronouns Modulate Perspective Taking during Narrative Comprehension’, Psychological Science 20, 27–32.Google Scholar

Brunyé, T. T., Ditman, T., Mahoney, C. R., and Taylor, H. A. (2011) ‘Better You Than I: Perspectives and Emotion Simulation during Narrative Comprehension’, Journal of Cognitive Psychology 23, 659–66.Google Scholar

Brunyé, T. T., Ditman, T., Giles, G.E., Holmes, A., and Taylor, H.A. (2016) ‘Mentally Simulating Narrative Perspective Is Not Universal or Necessary for Language Comprehension’, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 42, 1592–605.Google Scholar

Büchner, K. (1960) Sallust (Heidelberg: Winter).Google Scholar

Bühler, K. (1982) ‘The Deictic Field of Language and Deictic Words’, in Jarvella, R. J. and Klein, W. (eds.), Speech, Place, and Action: Studies of Deixis and Related Topics (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell), 9–30.Google Scholar

Bundy, E. L. (1962) Studia Pindarica, I–II: The Eleventh Olympian Ode: The First Isthmian Ode (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (1979) Structure and History in Greek Mythology and Ritual (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (1985 [2013]) ‘Herodot über die Namen der Götter: Polytheismus als historisches Problem’, MH 43, 121–32, translated in Munson, R. V. (ed.), Herodotus: Oxford Readings in Classical Studies, vol. 2 (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 198–209.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (1990) ‘Herodot als Historiker fremder Religionen’, in Nenci, G. and Reverdin, O. (eds.), Hérodote et les peuples non grecs, Entretiens sur l’antiquité classique 35 (Vandoeuvres-Geneva: Fondation Hardt), 1‒39.Google Scholar

Burkert, W. (1991) Wilder Ursprung. Opferritual und Mythos bei den Griechen (Berlin: Wagenbach).Google Scholar

Burton, P. J. (2008) ‘Livy’s Preface and Its Historical Context’, Scholia 17, 70–91.Google Scholar

Butler, T. (2003) ‘Ἐμπειρία in Aristotle’, SJPh 41, 329–50.Google Scholar

Byre, C. S. (1991) ‘The Narrator’s Addresses to the Narratee in Apollonius Rhodius’ Argonautica’, TAPA 121, 215–27.Google Scholar

Calame, C. (2003) Myth and History in Ancient Greece: The Symbolic Creation of a Colony, trans. D. W. Berman (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Calame, C. (2005) Masks of Authority: Fiction and Pragmatics in Ancient Greek Poetics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar

Calboli, G. (2003) Marci Porci Catonis Oratio pro Rhodiensibus² (Bologna: Pàtron).Google Scholar

Cameron, A. (2004) Greek Mythography in the Roman World (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, J. (1981) ‘Teach Yourself How to Be a General’, JRS 77, 13–29.Google Scholar

Candau, J. M. (2011) ‘Republican Rome: Autobiography and Political Struggle’, in Marasco, G. (ed.), Political Autobiographies and Memoirs in Antiquity: A Brill Companion (Leiden: Brill), 121–59.Google Scholar

Canfora, L. (1971) ‘Il ciclo storico’, Belfagor 26, 653–70.Google Scholar

Canfora, L. (1972) Totalità e selezione nella storiografia classica (Rome: Laterza).Google Scholar

Canfora, L. (1991) ‘L’inizio della storia secondo i Greci’, QS 33, 5–19.Google Scholar

Canter, H. V. (1932) ‘Conflagrations in Ancient Rome’, CJ 27, 270–88.Google Scholar

Cartledge, P. and Greenwood, E. (2002) ‘Herodotus as a Critic: Truth, Fiction, Polarity’, in de Jong, I. J. F. and van Wees, H. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus (Leiden: Brill), 351–71.Google Scholar

Caterine, C. L. (2015) ‘Si credere velis: Lucan’s Cato and the Reader of the Bellum Civile’, Arethusa 48, 339–67.Google Scholar

Cawkwell, G. (1997) Thucydides and the Peloponnesian War (London: Routledge).Google Scholar

Ceccarelli, P. (2016) ‘Charon of Lampsakos (262)’, in Brill’s New Jacoby (Leiden: Brill), online publication.Google Scholar

Ceulemans, R. and De Leemans, P. (2015) On Good Authority: Tradition, Compilation and the Construction of Authority in Literature from Antiquity to the Renaissance (Turnhout: Brepols).Google Scholar

Chadwick, H. (2001) The Church in Ancient Society: From Galilee to Gregory the Great (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chamberlain, D. (1999) ‘“We the others”: Interpretive Community and Plural Voice in Herodotus’, ClAnt 20, 5–34.Google Scholar

Chambers, R. (1984) Story and Situation: Narrative Seduction and the Power of Fiction (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).Google Scholar

Champion, C. B. (2004) Cultural Politics in Polybius’ Histories (Berkeley: University of California Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chandler, C. (2006) Philodemus On Rhetoric. Books 1 and 2: Translation and Exegetical Essays (London: Routledge).Google Scholar

Chaniotis, A. (2019) ‘Epigraphy of the Night’, in Norena, C. F. and Papazarkadas, N. (eds.), From Document to History: Epigraphic Insights into the Greco-Roman World (Leiden: Brill), 13–36.Google Scholar

Chantraine, P. (1968) Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque: Histoire des mots, vol. 1 (Paris: Klincksieck).Google Scholar

Chaplin, J. D. (2000) Livy’s Exemplary History (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Chaplin, J. D. and Kraus, C. S. (eds.) (2009) Livy: Oxford Readings in Classical Studies (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Chassignet, M. (2002) Caton. Les Origines. Fragments (Paris: Les Belles Lettres).Google Scholar

Chassignet, M. (2003) ‘La naissance de l’autobiographie à Rome: Laus sui ou apologia de vita sua?’, REL 81, 65–78.Google Scholar

Chassignet, M. (2004) L’annalistique romaine, vol. 3: L’annalistique récente, l’autobiographie politique (Paris: Les Belles Lettres).Google Scholar

Chassignet, M. (2018) ‘Caesar and Roman Historiography Prior to the Commentarii’, in Grillo, L. and Krebs, C. B. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Writings of Julius Caesar (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 249–62.Google Scholar

Chlup, J. T. (2006) ‘The Rhetoric of Authority: Alcibiades’ Speech to the Spartans in Thucydides’, CEA 42, 299–325.Google Scholar

Christ, M. R. (1994) ‘Herodotean Kings and Historical Inquiry’, ClAnt 13, 167–202.Google Scholar

Christes, J. (1986) ‘Lucilius’, in Adamietz, J. (ed.), Die römische Satire (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft), 57–122.Google Scholar

Christes, J. (1989) ‘Der frühe Lucilius und Horaz. Eine Entgegnung’, Hermes 117, 321–6.Google Scholar

Christes, J. and Garbugino, G. (2015) Lucilius, Satiren, Lateinisch und Deutsch (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft).Google Scholar

Civiletti, M. (2002) Filostrato. Vite dei sofisti (Milan: Bompiani).Google Scholar

Clarke, K. (1999) Between Geography and History: Hellenistic Constructions of the Roman World (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Clarke, K. (2003) ‘Polybius and the Nature of Late Hellenistic Geography’, in Yanguas, J. S. and Pagola, E. T. (eds.), Polibio y la Península Ibérica, Revisiones de Historia Antigua 4 (Vitoria: Universidad del País Vasco, Servicio Editorial), 69–87.Google Scholar

Clarke, K. (2018) Shaping the Geography of Empire: Man and Nature in Herodotus’ Histories (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Closs, V. M. (2016) ‘Neronianis Temporibus: The So-Called Arae Incendii Neroniani and the 64 Fire in Rome’s Monumental Landscape’, JRS 106, 102–23.Google Scholar

Closs, V. M. (2020) While Rome Burned: Fire, Leadership, and Urban Disaster in the Roman Cultural Imagination (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).Google Scholar

Cluett, R. (2003) ‘In Caesar’s Wake: The Ideology of the Continuators’, in Cairns, F. and Fantham, E. (eds.), Caesar against Liberty: Perspectives on His Autocracy (Cambridge: Cairns), 118–31.Google Scholar

Cluett, R. (2009) ‘The Continuators: Soldiering Oon’, in Griffin, M. (ed.), A Companion to Julius Caesar (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell), 192–205.Google Scholar

Coarelli, F. (1978) ‘La statue de Cornélie, mère des Gracques et la crise politique à Rome au temps de Saturninus’, in Zehnacker, H. (ed.) Le dernier siècle de la république romaine et l’époque augustéenne (Strasbourg: Association pour l’étude de la civilisation romaine), 13–28.Google Scholar

Cobet, J. (2002) ‘The Organization of Time in the Histories’, in Bakker, E. J., de Jong, I. J. F., and van Wees, H. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus (Leiden: Brill), 387–412.Google Scholar

Cogan, M. (1981) ‘Mytilene, Plataea and Corcyra: Ideology and Policy in Thucydides, Book Three’, Phoenix 35, 1–21.Google Scholar

Cohen, D. (2005) ‘Theories of Punishment’, in Gagarin, M. and Cohen, D. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Greek Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 170–90.Google Scholar

Collingwood, R. G. (1946) The Idea of History (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Collins, J. H. (1972) ‘Caesar as Political Propagandist’, in Temporini, H. (ed.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, vol. I.1 (Berlin: De Gruyter), 922–66.Google Scholar

Collins, J. H. (2012) ‘Prompts for Participation in Early Philosophical Texts’, in Minchin, E. (ed.), Orality, Literacy and Performance in the Ancient World, Mnemosyne Supplement 335 (Leiden: Brill), 151–82.Google Scholar

Connor, W. R. (1962) ‘Charinus’ Megarean Decree’, AJPh 53, 225–46.Google Scholar

Connor, W. R. (1984) Thucydides (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Conti, N. (2006) Natale Conti’s Mythologiae, trans. and ed. J. Mulryan and S. Brown, 2 vols. (Tempe, AZ: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies).Google Scholar

Cook, B. (2004) ‘Plutarch’s “Many Other” Imitable Events: Mor. 814B and the Statesman’s Duty’, in de Blois, L., Bons, J., Kessels, T., and Schenkeveld, D. M. (eds.), The Sstatesman in Plutarch’s Works: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of the International Plutarch Society, Nijmegen/Castle Hernen, May 1–5, 2002, vol. 1: Plutarch’s Statesman and His Aftermath: Political, Philosophical, and Literary Aspects, Mnemosyne Supplement 250 (Leiden: Brill), 201–10.Google Scholar

Cooley, A. (2014) ‘Paratextual Perspectives upon the Senatus Consultum de Cn. Pisone Patre’, in Jansen, L. (ed.), The Roman Paratext: Frame, Texts, Reader (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 143–55.Google Scholar

Cornell, T. J. (2009) ‘Cato the Elder and the Origins of Roman Autobiography’, in Smith, C. and Powell, A. (eds.), The Lost Memoirs of Augustus and the Development of Roman Autobiography (Swansea: Classical Press of Wales), 15–40.Google Scholar

Cornell, T. J., Bispham, E., Rich, J. W., and Smith, C. J. (eds.) (2013) The Fragments of the Roman Historians, 3 vols. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Courtney, E. (1995) Musa Lapidaria. A Selection of Latin Verse Inscriptions, American Classical Studies, no. 36 (Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press).Google Scholar

Courtney, E. (2003) The Fragmentary Latin Poets, revised ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Cowan, R. (2018) ‘You Too: The Narratology of Apostrophe and Second-Person Narrative in Virgil’s Georgics’, Arethusa 51, 269–98.Google Scholar

Croce, B. (1921 [1919]) Teoria e storia della storiografia, 2nd ed., trans. D. Ainslie as Theory and History of Historiography (London: Wentworth Press).Google Scholar

Cugusi, P. (1970) Epistolographi Latini Minores, 2 vols. (Turin: Paravia).Google Scholar

Cugusi, P. (1973) ‘Le più antiche lettere papiracee latine’, Atti della Accademia delle Scienze di Torino 107, 641–92.Google Scholar

Cugusi, P. and Sblendorio Cugusi, M. T. (2001) Opere di Marco Porcio Catone Censore, vol. 1 (Turin: UTET).Google Scholar

D’Alessio, G. B. (2020) ‘Dancing with the Dogs: Mimetic Dance and the Hyporcheme (on Pind. fr. *107 M = Simonides 255 Poltera)’, in Agócs, P. and Prauscello, L. (eds.), Simonides Lyricus. Essays on the ‘Other’ Classical Choral Lyric Poet, CCJ Supplement 42 (Cambridge: Cambridge Philological Society), 59–80.Google Scholar

Damon, C. (1994) ‘Caesar’s Practical Prose’, CJ 89, 183–94.Google Scholar

Damon, C. (2003) Tacitus Histories Book I (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Damon, C. (2010) ‘Déjà vu or déjà lu? History as Intertext’, Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar 14, 375–88.Google Scholar

D’Angour, A. (1997) ‘How the Dithyramb Got Its Shape’, CQ 47, 331–51.Google Scholar

Dannenberg, H. P. (2004) ‘A Poetics of Coincidence in Narrative Fiction’, Poetics Today 25, 399–436.Google Scholar

Dannenberg, H. P. (2008) Coincidence and Counterfactuality: Plotting Time and Space in Narrative Fiction (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press).Google Scholar

Darbo-Peschanski, C. (2013) ‘Herodotus and Historia’, in Munson, R. V. (ed.), Herodotus: Oxford Readings in Classical Studies, vol. 2 (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 78–105.Google Scholar

Daugherty, G. N. (1992) ‘The Cohortes Vigilum and the Great Fire of AD64’, CJ 87, 229–40.Google Scholar

Davidson, J. (1997) Courtesans and Fishcakes: The Consuming Passions of Classical Athens (London: HarperCollins).Google Scholar

Dawson, W. R. (1986) ‘Herodotus as a Medical Writer’, BICS 33, 87–96.Google Scholar

Day, J. W. (2010). Archaic Greek Epigram and Dedication: Representation and Reperformance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

de Blois, L. (2017) ‘Caesar the General and Leader’, in Raaflaub, K. (ed.), The Landmark Julius Caesar (New York: Pantheon), app. X: web essay at www.landmarkcaesar.com.Google Scholar

de Jong, I. J. F. (2002) ‘Narrative Unity and Units’, in Bakker, E. J., de Jong, I. J. F., and van Wees, H. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus (Leiden: Brill), 245–66.Google Scholar

de Jong, I. J. F. (2004) ‘Herodotus’, in de Jong, I. J. F., Nünlist, R., and Bowie, A. (eds.), Narrators, Narratees, and Narratives in Ancient Greek Literature: Studies in Ancient Greek Narrative (Leiden: Brill), 102–14.Google Scholar

de Jong, I. J. F. (2009) ‘Metalepsis in Ancient Greek Literature’, in Grethlein, J. and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Narratology and Interpretation: The Content of Narrative Form in Ancient Literature (Berlin: De Gruyter), 87–116.Google Scholar

de Jong, I. J. F. (2013 [1999]) ‘Narratological Aspects of the Histories of Herodotus’, in Munson, R. V. (ed.), Herodotus: Oxford Readings in Classical Studies, vol. 1 (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 253–91.Google Scholar

de Jong, I. J. F. (2014a) Narratology and Classics: A Practical Guide (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

de Jong, I. J. F. (2014b) ‘The Anonymous Traveler in European Literature: A Greek Meme’, in Cairns, D. and Scodel, R. (eds.), Defining Greek Narrative, Edinburgh Leventis Studies 7 (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press), 314–33.Google Scholar

de Jong, I. J. F. and Nünlist, R. (2004) ‘From Bird’s Eye View to Close-Up: The Standpoint of the Narrator in the Homeric Epics’, in Bierl, A., Schmitt, A., and Willi, A. (eds.), Antike Literatur in neuer Deutung (Munich: Saur), 63–83.Google Scholar

de Jonge, C. C. (2015) ‘Grammatical Theory and Rhetorical Teaching’, in Montanari, F., Matthaios, S., and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Ancient Greek Scholarship, 2 vols. (Leiden: Brill), 979–1011.Google Scholar

de Jonge, C. C. (2020) ‘Ps.-Longinus on Ecstasy: Author, Audience, and Text’, in Grethlein, J., Huitink, L., and Tagliabue, A. (eds.), Experience, Narrative, and Criticism in Ancient Greece (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 148–71.Google Scholar

de la Bédoyère, G. (1995) The Diary of John Evelyn (Woodbridge: Boydell).Google Scholar

de Lacy, P. and Einarson, B. (eds.) (1959) Moralia, VII: 523C–612B (London: Heinemann).Google Scholar

de Lacy, P. and Einarson, B. (eds.) (1984) Plutarch’s Moralia VII (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

de Lannoy, L. (1997) ‘Le problème des Philostrate. État de la question’, in Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II 34.3 (Berlin: De Gruyter), 2362–449.Google Scholar

de Romilly, J. (1967) Histoire et raison chez Thucydide (Paris: Les Belles Lettres), translated by Rawlings, E. T. as The Mind of Thucydides (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

de Romilly, J. (1971) ‘La vengeance comme explication historique dans l’oeuvre d’Hérodote’, REG 84, 314–57.Google Scholar

de Romilly, J. (2012) The Mind of Thucydides, trans. Rawlings, E. T. (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar

de Sélincourt, A. (1960) Livy: The Early History of Rome (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books).Google Scholar

Debnar, P. A. (2000) ‘Diodotus’ Paradox and the Mytilene Debate (Thuc. 3.37–49)’, RhM 143, 161–78.Google Scholar

Debnar, P. A. (2001) Speaking the Same Language: Speech and Audience in Thucydides’ Spartan Debates (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).Google Scholar

Debnar, P. A. (2013) ‘Blurring the Boundaries of Speech: Thucydides and Indirect Discourse’, in Tsakmakis, A. and Tamiolaki, M. (eds.), Thucydides between History and Literature (Berlin: De Gruyter), 271–85.Google Scholar

DelConte, M. (2003) ‘Why You Can’t Speak: Second-Person Narration, Voice, and a New Model for Understanding Narrative’, Style 37, 204–19.Google Scholar

Delarue, F. (1998) ‘Sur la préface de Tite-Live’, Vita Latina 151, 44–58.Google Scholar

Dench, E. (2007) ‘Ethnography and History’, in Marincola, J. (ed.), A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography (Oxford: Blackwell), 493–503.Google Scholar

Detienne, M. (1986) The Creation of Mythology, trans. Cook, M. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press; originally published in French in 1981).Google Scholar

Dewald, C. (1985) ‘Practical Knowledge and the Historian’s Role’, in Jameson, M. (ed.), The Greek Historians: Papers Presented to A. E. Raubitschek (Saratoga, NY: ANMA Libri), 47–63.Google Scholar

Dewald, C. (1987) ‘Narrative Surface and Authorial Voice in Herodotus’ Histories’, in Boedeker, D. (ed.), Herodotus and the Invention of History, Arethusa 20 (Buffalo: State University of New York), 147–70.Google Scholar

Dewald, C. (1993) ‘Reading the World: The Interpretation of Objects in Herodotus’ Histories’, in Rosen, R. and Farrell, J. (eds.), Nomodeiktes: Festschrift for Martin Ostwald (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press), 55–70.Google Scholar

Dewald, C. (1999) ‘The Figured Stage: Focalizing the Initial Narratives of Herodotus and Thucydides’, in Falkner, T. M. and Peradotto, J. J. (eds.), Contextualizing Classics: Ideology, Perfomance, Dialogue: Essays in Honor of John J. Peradotto (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield), 221–52.Google Scholar

Dewald, C. (2002) ‘“I didn’t give my own genealogy”: Herodotus and the Authorial Persona’, in Bakker, E. J., de Jong, I. J. F., and van Wees, H. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus (Leiden: Brill), 267‒89.Google Scholar

Dewald, C. (2003) ‘Form and Content: The Question of Tyranny in Herodotus’, in Morgan, K. (ed.), Popular Tyranny: Sovereignty and Its Discontents in Ancient Greece (Austin: University of Texas Press), 25–58.Google Scholar

Dewald, C. (2005) Thucydides’ War Narrative: A Structural Study (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar

Dewald, C. (2006a) ‘Humour and Danger in Herodotus’, in Dewald, C. and Marincola, J. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 145–64.Google Scholar

Dewald, C. (2006b) ‘Paying Attention: History as the Development of a Secular Narrative’, in Goldhill, S. and Osborne, R. (eds.), Rethinking Revolutions through Ancient Greece (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 164–82.Google Scholar

Dewald, C. (2007) ‘The Construction of Meaning in the First Three Historians’, in Marincola, J. (ed.), A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography, vol. 1 (Malden, MA: Blackwell), 89–101.Google Scholar

Dewald, C. (2011) ‘Happiness in Herodotus’, Symbolae Osloensis 85, 18–39.Google Scholar

Dewald, C. (2013 [1997]) ‘Wanton Kings, Pickled Heroes, and Gnomic Founding Fathers: Strategies of Meaning at the End of Herodotus’s Histories’, in Munson, R. V. (ed.), Herodotus: Oxford Readings in Classical Studies, vol. 1 (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 379–402.Google Scholar

Dewald, C. (2013 [1981]) ‘Women and Culture in Herodotus’ Histories’, in Munson, R. V. (ed.), Herodotus: Oxford Readings in Classical Studies, vol. 2 (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 151–82.Google Scholar

Dewald, C. (2015) ‘“The medium is the message”: Herodotus and His Logoi’, in Ash, R., Mossman, J., and Titchener, F. B. (eds.), Fame and Infamy: Essays for Christopher Pelling on Characterization in Greek and Roman Biography and Historiography (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dewald, C. and Kitzinger, R. (2015) ‘Speaking Silences in Herodotus and Sophocles’, in Clark, C. A., Foster, E., and Hallett, J. P. (eds.), Kinesis: The Ancient Depiction of Gesture, Motion, and Emotion. Essays for Donald Lateiner (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press), 86–102.Google Scholar

Dewald, C. and Marincola, J. (eds.) (2006) The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Diano, C. and Serra, G. (1980) Eraclito. I Frammenti e le Testimonianze (Milan: Fondazione Lorenzo Valla, Mondadori).Google Scholar

Díaz-Tejera, A. (1978) ‘Concordancias terminológicas con La Poética en la historia universal: Aristóteles y Polibio’, Habis 9, 33–48.Google Scholar

Diels, H. (1922) Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, 4th ed. (Berlin: Weidmann).Google Scholar

Diggle, J. (2004) Theophrastus: Characters (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Dillery, J. (1995) Xenophon and the History of His Times (London: Routledge).Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (2014) ‘Plutarch and Platonism’, in Beck, M. (ed.), A Companion to Plutarch (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell), 61–72.Google Scholar

Ditman, T., Brunyé, T. T., Mahoney, C. R., and Taylor, H. A. (2010) ‘Simulating an Enactment Effect: Pronouns Guide Action Simulation during Narrative Comprehension’, Cognition 115, 172–8.Google Scholar

Dixon, S. (2007) Cornelia, Mother of the Gracchi (London: Routledge).Google Scholar

Dougherty, C. (1993) The Poetics of Colonization: From City to Text in Archaic Greece (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Dover, K. J. (1973) Thucydides, Greece & Rome New Surveys in the Classics 7 (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Dover, K. J. (1983 [2009]) ‘Thucydides “as History” and “as Literature”’, History & Theory 22, 54–63, reprinted in J. S. Rusten (ed.), Thucydides (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 44–59.Google Scholar

Drumann, W. and Groebe, P. (1899) Geschichte Roms, vol. 1² (Berlin: Borntraeger).Google Scholar

Duchemin, J. (1955) Pindare: Poète et prophète (Paris: Les Belles Lettres).Google Scholar

Eberhardt, W. (1959) ‘Der Melierdialog und die Inschriften ATL A 9 (IG I2 63 +) und IG I2 97 +’, Historia 8, 284–314.Google Scholar

Eck, W., Caballos, A., and Fernández, F. (1996) Das senatus consultum de Cn. Pisone patre (Munich: Beck).Google Scholar

Eckstein, A. M. (1995) Moral Vision in the Histories of Polybius (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar

Edwards, C. (2011) ‘Imagining Ruins in Ancient Rome’, European Review of History – Revue européenne d’histoire 18, 645–61.Google Scholar

Eidinow, E. (2011) Luck, Fate and Fortune: Antiquity and Its Legacy (London: I. B. Tauris).Google Scholar

Eidinow, E. (2016) ‘Popular Theologies: The Gift of Divine Envy’, in Eidinow, E., Kindt, J., and Osborne, R. (eds.), Theologies of Ancient Greek Religion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 205–32.Google Scholar

Elliott, J. (2015) ‘The Epic Vantage-Point: Roman Historiographical Allusion Reconsidered’, Histos 9, 277–311.Google Scholar

Erbse, H. (1953) ‘Über eine Eigenheit thukydideischer Geschichtsbetrachtung’, RhM 96, 38–62.Google Scholar

Erbse, H. (1992) Studien zum Verständnis Herodots (Berlin: De Gruyter).Google Scholar

Eshleman, K. J. (2008) ‘Defining the Circle of Sophists: Philostratus and the Construction of the Second Sophistic’, CP 103, 395–413.Google Scholar

Evans, J. A. S. (1987) ‘The Faiyum and the Lake of Moeris’, AHB 92, 66‒74.Google Scholar

Evans, J. A. S. (2013 [1980]) ‘Oral Tradition in Herodotus’, in Munson, R. V. (ed.), Herodotus: Oxford Readings in Classical Studies, vol. 1 (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 113–23.Google Scholar

Everson, J. (2011) ‘Il Mambriano di Francesco Cieco da Ferrara – fra tradizione cavalleresca e mondo estense’, in Venturi, G. (ed.), L’uno e l’altro Ariosto: In corte e nelle delizie (Florence: Olschki), 153–73.Google Scholar

Fairbank, K. (2017) ‘Caesar’s Portrait of “Caesar”’, in Raaflaub, K. (ed.), The Landmark Julius Caesar (New York: Pantheon), app. EE: web essay at www.landmarkcaesar.com.Google Scholar

Fairweather, J. (1974) ‘Fiction in the Biographies of Ancient Writers’, AncSoc 5, 231–75.Google Scholar

Farrington, S. T. (2008) ‘As the Tragic Poets Do: Polybius’ Conception of Tragedy and Its Relationship to “Tragic History”’ (PhD dissertation, University of Colorado).Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (1991) The Gods in Epic: Poets and Critics of the Classical Tradition (Oxford: Clarendon Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (2007) Caesar’s Calendar: Ancient Time and the Beginnings of History (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar

Fehling, D. C. (1989) Herodotus and His ‘Sources’: Citation, Invention and Narrative Art (Leeds: Francis Cairns), English trans. by J. G. Howie of a revised version of Die Quellenangaben bei Herodot (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1971).Google Scholar

Fisher, N. R. E. (2002) ‘Popular Morality in Herodotus’, in Bakker, E. J., de Jong, I. J. F., and van Wees, H. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus (Leiden: Brill), 199–224.Google Scholar

Fisher, N. R. E. (2003) ‘Let Envy Be Absent: Envy, Liturgies, and Reciprocity in Athens’, in Konstan, D. and Rutter, N. K. (eds.), Envy, Spite and Jealousy: The Rivalrous Emotions in Ancient Greece, Edinburgh Leventis Studies 2 (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press), 181–215.Google Scholar

Fisher, N. R. E. (2010) ‘Kharis, Kharites, Festivals, and Social Peace in the Classical Greek City’, in Rosen, R. M. and Sluiter, I. (eds.), Valuing Others in Classical Antiquity, Mnemosyne Supplement 323 (Leiden: Brill), 71–112.Google Scholar

Flach, D. (1985) Einführung in die römische Geschichtsschreibung (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft).Google Scholar

Flinterman, J.-J. (1995) Power, Paideia and Pythagoreanism: Greek Identity, Conceptions of the Relationship between Philosophers and Monarchs and Political Ideas in Philostratus’ Life of Apollonius (Amsterdam: Gieben).Google Scholar

Flower, H. I. (1992) ‘Thucydides and the Pylos Debate (4.27–29)’, Historia 41, 40–57.Google Scholar

Flower, H. I. (1996) Ancestor Masks and Aristocratic Power in Roman Culture (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Flower, H. I. (2014) ‘Memory and Memoirs in Republican Rome’, in Galinsky, K. (ed.), Memoria Romana: Memory in Rome and Rome in Memory, Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome, supplement 10 (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press), 27–40.Google Scholar

Flower, H. I. (2015a) ‘Sulla’s Memoirs as an Account of Personal Religious Experiences’, Religion in the Roman Empire 1, 297–320.Google Scholar

Flower, H. I. (2015b) ‘The Rapture and the Sorrow: Characterization in Sulla’s Memoirs’, in Ash, R., Mossman, J., and Titchener, F. B. (eds.), Fame and Infamy: Essays for Christopher Pelling on Characterization in Greek and Roman Biography and Historiography (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 209–23.Google Scholar

Flower, H. I. (2020) ‘The Freedom of the Rhodians: Cato the Elder and Demosthenes’, in Balmaceda, C. (ed.), Libertas and Res Publica in the Roman Republic (Leiden: Brill), 84–103.Google Scholar

Flower, H. I. (forthcoming) ‘Self-Representation in a Time of Civil Strife: Publius Rutilius Rufus’ de vita sua’, in Havener, W. and Gotter, U. (eds.), A Culture of Civil War? Bellum Civile in the Late Republic and Early Empire, HABES (Steiner: Stuttgart).Google Scholar

Flower, M. A. (1994) Theopompus of Chios: History and Rhetoric in the Fourth Century BC. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Flower, M. A. (2000) ‘From Simonides to Isocrates: The Fifth-Century Origins of Fourth-Century Panhellenism’, ClAnt 19, 65–101.Google Scholar

Flower, M. A. (2006) ‘Herodotus and Persia’, in Dewald, C. and Marincola, J. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 274–89.Google Scholar

Flower, M. A. (2007) ‘The Size of Xerxes’ Expeditionary Forces’, in Strassler, R. (ed.), The Landmark Herodotus: The Histories, app. R (New York: Pantheon), 802–6.Google Scholar

Flower, M. A. (2012) Xenophon’s Anabasis, or The Expedition of Cyrus (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Flower, M. A. (2017) ‘Xenophon as a Historian’, in Flower, M. A. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Xenophon (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 301–22.Google Scholar

Flower, M. A. and Marincola, J. (eds.) (2002) Herodotus Histories Book IX, Cambridge Greek and Latin Classics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Fludernik, M. (1993) ‘Second-Person Fiction: Narrative You as Addressee and/or Protagonist’, Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 18, 217–47.Google Scholar

Fludernik, M. (1994) ‘ Introduction: Second-Person Narrative and Related Issues’, in Mosher, H. F. (ed.), ‘Second-Person Narrative’, special issue of Style 28.3, 281–311.Google Scholar

Fludernik, M. (1996) Towards a ‘Natural’ Narratology (London: Routledge).Google Scholar

Fontenrose, J. (1978) The Delphic Oracle (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar

Fornara, C. W. (1971) Herodotus: An Interpretative Essay (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Fornara, C. W. (1983) The Nature of History in Ancient Greece and Rome (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar

Fornara, C. W. (2013 [1971]) ‘Herodotus’ Perspective’, in Munson, R. V. (ed.), Herodotus: Oxford Readings in Classical Studies, vol. 1 (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 321–33.Google Scholar

Foster, B. O. (1919) Livy (Loeb edition), vol. 1 (London: William Heinemann; New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons).Google Scholar

Fowler, A. (1982) Kinds of Literature: An Introduction to the Theory of Genres and Modes (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Fowler, H. N. (1936) Plutarch’s Moralia X (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Fowler, R. (2000) ‘P. Oxy. 4458: Poseidonios’, ZPE 132, 133–42.Google Scholar

Fowler, R. (2000–13) Early Greek Mythography, 2 vols. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Fowler, R. (2006a) ‘Herodotus and His Prose Predecessors’, in Dewald, C. and Marincola, J. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 29–45.Google Scholar

Fowler, R. (2006b) ‘How to Tell a Myth: Genealogy, Mythology, Mythography’, Kernos 19, 35–46.Google Scholar

Fowler, R. (2010) ‘Gods in Early Greek Historiography’, in Bremmer, J. N. and Erskine, A. (eds.), The Gods of Ancient Greece: Identities and Transformations (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press), 318‒34.Google Scholar

Fowler, R. (2011) ‘Mythos and Logos’, JHS 131, 45‒66.Google Scholar

Fowler, R. (2013) Early Greek Mythography, vol. 2: Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Fowler, R. (2013 [1996]) ‘Herodotos and His Contemporaries’, in Munson, R. V. (ed.) Herodotus: Oxford Readings in Classical Studies, vol. 1 (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 46–83.Google Scholar

Fraenkel, E. (1964) ‘Eine Form römischer Kriegsbulletins’, in Fraenkel, E. (ed.), Kleine Beiträge zur klassischen Philologie, vol. 2 (Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura), 69–73.Google Scholar

Fränkel, H. (1975) Early Greek Poetry and Philosophy (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar

Freudenburg, K. (2001) Satires of Rome: Threatening Poses from Lucilius to Juvenal (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Fulkerson, L. (2008) ‘Emotional Appeals in the Mytilenean Debate’, SyllClass 19, 115–54.Google Scholar

Gaertner, J. F. (2008) ‘Livy’s Camillus and the Political Discourse of the Late Republic’, JRS 98, 27–52.Google Scholar

Gaertner, J. F. (2018) ‘The Corpus Caesarianum’, in Grillo, L. and Krebs, C. B. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Writings of Julius Caesar (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 263–76.Google Scholar

Gaertner, J. F. and Hausburg, B. (2013) Caesar and the Bellum Alexandrinum: An Analysis of Style, Narrative Technique, and the Reception of Greek Historiography (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).Google Scholar

Garcea, A. (2012) Caesar’s De Analogia: Edition, Translation, and Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Gardthausen, V. (1891) Augustus und seine Zeit (Aalen: Scientia Verlag).Google Scholar

Gelzer, M. (1959) Pompeius, 2nd ed. (Munich: Bruckmann).Google Scholar

Gelzer, M. (1963) ‘Caesar als Historiker’, in Gelzer, M. (ed.), Kleine Schriften, vol. 2 (Wiesbaden: Steiner), 307–35.Google Scholar

Gelzer, M. (1968) Caesar: Politician and Statesman (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Gera, D. L. (2000) ‘Two Thought Experiments in the Dissoi Logoi’, AJPh 121, 21–45.Google Scholar

Gerrish, J. (2013) ‘Civitatem recipit: Responding to Revolt in Thucydides 3 and Caesar’s Bellum Gallicum 7’, New England Classical Journal 40, 69–85.Google Scholar

Gerrish, J. (2018) ‘Heroic Resonances in Caesar’s Bellum Gallicum 5’, CW 111.3, 351–70.Google Scholar

Gesche, H. (1976) Caesar (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft).Google Scholar

Gibson, B. J. (1998) ‘Rumours as Causes of Events in Tacitus’, Materiali e iscussion per l’analisi dei testi classici 40, 111–29.Google Scholar

Gibson, B. J. (2010) ‘Causation in Post-Augustan Epic’, in Miller, J. F. and Woodman, A. J. (eds.), Latin Historiography and Poetry in the Early Empire: Generic Interactions (Leiden: Brill), 29–47.Google Scholar

Gibson, B. J. (2018) ‘Praise in Polybius’, in Miltsios, N. and Tamiolaki, M. (eds.), Polybius and His Legacy (Berlin: De Gruyter), 75–101.Google Scholar

Gibson, R. (2003) ‘Pliny and the Art of (In)offensive Self-Praise’, Arethusa 36, 235–54.Google Scholar

Gibson, R. (2020) Man of High Empire: The Life of Pliny the Younger (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Gilbert, C. D. (1970) ‘Blind Cupid’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 33, 304–5.Google Scholar

Gilmartin, K. (1975) ‘A Rhetorical Figure in Latin Historical Style: The Imaginary Second Person Singular’, TAPA 105, 99–121.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, J. (1981) Tradition and Theme in the Annals of Tacitus (New York: Arno Press).Google Scholar

Ginzburg, C. (2012) ‘The Bitter Truth: Stendhal’s Challenge to Historians’, in Ginzburg, C., Tedeschi, A., and Tedeschi, J. (eds.), Threads and Traces: True False Fictive (Berkeley: University of California Press), 137–50.Google Scholar

Gleason, M. (2011) ‘Identity Theft: Doubles and Masquerades in Cassius Dio’s Contemporary History’, ClAnt 30, 33–86.Google Scholar

Glenberg, A. M. and Kaschak, M. P. (2002) ‘Grounding Language in Action’, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9, 558–65.Google Scholar

Goldberg, S. (2010) Constructing Literature in the Roman Republic (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Goldknopf, D. (1972) The Life of the Novel (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar

Goldman, M. L. (2015) ‘Associating the aulêtris: Flute Girls and Prostitutes in the Classical Greek Symposium’, Helios 42, 29–60.Google Scholar

Goldsworthy, A. (1998) ‘“Instinctive Genius”: The Depiction of Caesar the General’, in Welch, K. and Powell, A. (eds.), Julius Caesar as Artful Reporter: The War Commentaries as Political Instruments (London: Duckworth; Swansea: Classical Press of Wales), 193–219.Google Scholar

Goldsworthy, A. (2006) Caesar: Life of a Colossus (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar

Gomme, A. W., Andrewes, A., and Dover, K. J. (1945–81) A Historical Commentary on Thucydides, 5 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Goodyear, F. R. D. (1972) The Annals of Tacitus, vol. 1 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Gorman, R. G. and Gorman, V. B. (2007) ‘The Tryphê of the Sybarites: A Historiographical Problem in Athenaeus’, JHS 127, 38–60.Google Scholar

Gorman, V. B. (2001) Miletos, the Ornament of Ionia: A History of the City to 400 B.C.E. (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).Google Scholar

Gould, H. E. and Whiteley, J. L. (1952) Livy Book 1 (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar

Gould, J. (1985) ‘On Making Sense of Greek Religion’, in Easterling, P. E. and Muir, J. V. (eds.), Greek Religion and Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 1–33, reprinted in J. Gould, Myth, Ritual, Memory and Exchange: Essays in Greek Literature and Culture (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), 203–34.Google Scholar

Gould, J. (1989) Herodotus (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson).Google Scholar

Gould, J. (1994) ‘Herodotus and Religion’, in Hornblower, S. (ed.), Greek Historiography (Oxford: Oxford University Press) 91–106, reprinted in J. Gould, Myth, Ritual, Memory and Exchange: Essays in Greek Literature and Culture (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), 283–303.Google Scholar

Gould, J. (2001) Myth, Ritual, Mmemory and Exchange: Essays in Greek Literature and Culture (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Gould, J. (2003) ‘Herodotus and the “Resurrection”’, in Derow, P. and Parker, R. C. T. (eds.), Herodotus and His World: Essays from a Conference in Memory of George Forrest (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 297–302.Google Scholar

Gow, A. S. F. (1950–1952) Theocritus, vol. 1: Introduction, Text and Translation; vol. 2: Commentary, Appendix, Indexes and Plates (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Gowers, E. (1995) ‘The Anatomy of Rome from Capitol to Cloaca’, JRS 85, 23–32.Google Scholar

Grafton, A. T. (1983‒93) Joseph Scaliger: A Study in the History of Classical Scholarship (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Graham, D. W. (2008) ‘Heraclitus: Flux, Order, and Knowledge’, in Curd, P. and Graham, D. W. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 169–84.Google Scholar

Green, P. (2010) Diodorus Siculus: The Persian Wars to the Fall of Athens: Books 11–14.34 (480–401 BCE) (Austin: University of Texas Press).Google Scholar

Greenblatt, S. (1991) Marvelous Possessions: The Wonder of the New World (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar

Greenhalgh, P. (1980) Pompey: The Roman Alexander (Columbia: University of Missouri Press).Google Scholar

Greenwood, E. (2006) Thucydides and the Shaping of History (London: Duckworth).Google Scholar

Grene, D. (1946 [1965]) Greek Political Theory: The Image of Man in Plato and Thucydides (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar

Grethlein, J. (2009) ‘How Not to Do History: Xerxes in Herodotus’ Histories,’ AJPh 130, 195–218.Google Scholar

Grethlein, J. (2010) The Greeks and Their Past: Poetry, Oratory and History in the Fifth Century BCE (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Grethlein, J. (2012) ‘Xenophon’s Anabasis from Character to Narrator’, JHS 132, 23–40.Google Scholar

Grethlein, J. (2013) Experience and Teleology in Ancient Historiography: ‘Futures Past’ from Herodotus to Augustine (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Grethlein, J. (2017) Aesthetic Experiences and Classical Antiquity: The Significance of Form in Narratives and Pictures (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Grethlein, J. (2018) ‘The Dynamics of Time: Herodotus’ Histories and Contemporary Athens before and after Fornara’, in Harrison, T. and Irwin, E. (eds.), Interpreting Herodotus (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 223–42.Google Scholar

Grethlein, J. (2020) ‘World and Words: The Limits to mimesis and Immersion in Heliodorus’ Ethiopica’, in Grethlein, J., Huitink, L., and Tagliabue, A. (eds.), Experience, Narrative, and Criticism in Ancient Greece: Under the Spell of Stories (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 127–47.Google Scholar

Grethlein, J. and Huitink, L. (2017) ‘Homer’s Vividness: An Enactive Approach’, JHS 137, 67–91.Google Scholar

Grethlein, J., Huitink, L., and Tagliabue, A. (eds.) (2020) Experience, Narrative, and Criticism in Ancient Greece: Under the Spell of Stories (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Griffin, J. (1990) ‘Die Ursprünge der Historien Herodots’, in von Ax, W. (ed.), Memoria rerum veterum: Neue Beiträge zur antiken Historiographie und alten Geschichte. Festschrift für Carl Joachim Classen zum 60. Geburtstag (Stuttgart: Steiner), 51–82, translated as ‘The Emergence of Herodotus’, Histos 8 (2014), 1–24.Google Scholar

Griffin, J. (2006) ‘Herodotus and Tragedy’, in Dewald, C. and Marincola, J. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 46–59.Google Scholar

Griffiths, A. (1989) ‘Was Cleomenes mad?’, in Powell, A. (ed.), Classical Sparta (London: Routledge), 51–78.Google Scholar

Grillo, L. (2012) The Art of Caesar’s Bellum Civile: Literature, Ideology, and Community (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Grillo, L. (2018a) ‘Literary Approaches to Caesar: Three Case Studies’, in Grillo, L. and Krebs, C. B. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Writings of Julius Caesar (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 157–69.Google Scholar

Grillo, L. (2018b) ‘Speeches in the Commentarii’, in Grillo, L. and Krebs, C. B. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Writings of Julius Caesar (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 131–43.Google Scholar

Grillo, L. and Krebs, C. B. (eds.) (2018) The Cambridge Companion to the Writings of Julius Caesar (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Grimm, J. and Grimm, W. (1812–15) Kinder- und Hausmärchen, 1st ed. in 2 vols. (Berlin: Realschulbuchhandlung).Google Scholar

Grote, G. (1904‒7) History of Greece (London: John Murray); orig. pub. 1846‒56.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. S. (1992) ‘Lucilius and the Contemporary Scene’, in Gruen, E. S. (ed.), Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome (London: Duckworth; Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press), 272–318.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. S. (2009) ‘Caesar as a Politician’, in Griffin, M. (ed.), A Companion to Julius Caesar (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell), 23–36.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. S. (2011) Rethinking the Other in Antiquity (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Grüner, A. (2004) Venus Ordinis: Der Wandel von Malerei und Literatur im Zeitalter der römischen Bürgerkriege (Paderborn: Schöningh).Google Scholar

Gulick, C. B. (1927) Athenaeus: The Deipnosophists, Volume I, Books 1–3.106e (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Guthrie, W. K. C. (1965–81) A History of Greek Philosophy, 6 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Guzzo, P. G. (2010) ‘Intorno a Lampsake: Ipotesi di un modello foceo’, Incidenza dell’antico 8, 197–212.Google Scholar

Hägg, T. (2012) The Art of Biography in Antiquity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Hallett, J. P. (2002) ‘Women Writing in Rome and Cornelia, Mother of the Gracchi’, in Churchill, L. J., Brown, P. R., and Jeffrey, J. E. (eds.), Women Writing Latin from Roman Antiquity to Early Modern Europe, vol. 1 Women Writing Latin in Roman Antiquity, Late Antiquity, and the Early Christian Era (London: Routledge), 13–24.Google Scholar

Hallett, J. P. (2006) ‘Introduction: Cornelia and Her Maternal Legacy’, Helios 33.2, 119–47.Google Scholar

Hallett, J. P. (2018) ‘Oratorum Romanorum Fragmenta Liberae Rei Publicae: The Letter of Cornelia, Mater Gracchorum and the Speeches of her Father and Son’, in Gray, C., Balbo, A., Marshall, R. M. A., and Steel, C. E. W. (eds.), Reading Republican Oratory. Reconstructions, Contexts, Receptions (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 309–18.Google Scholar

Halliwell, S. (1991) ‘The Uses of Laughter in Greek Culture’, CQ 41, 279–96.Google Scholar

Halliwell, S. (2012) Between Ecstasy and Truth: Interpretations of Greek Poetics from Homer to Longinus (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Hammond, N. G. L. (1972) A History of Macedonia, vol. 1 (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Hansen, M. H. (1983–9) The Athenian Ecclesia, 2 vols. (Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press).Google Scholar

Hansen, W. (2002) Ariadne’s Thread: A Guide to International Tales Found in Classical Literature (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar

Hardie, P. (2012) Rumour and Renown: Representations of Fama in Western Literature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Harrison, T. (2000) Divinity and Herodotus: The Religion of Herodotus (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Harrison, T. (2002) ‘The Persian Invasions’, in Bakker, E. J., de Jong, I. J. F., and Van Wees, H. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus (Leiden: Brill), 551–78.Google Scholar

Harrison, T. (2003) ‘The Cause of Things: Envy and the Emotions in Herodotus’ Histories’, in Konstan, D. and Rutter, K. (eds.), Envy, Spite and Jealousy: The Rivalrous Emotions in Ancient Greece (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press), 143–63.Google Scholar

Hartog, F. (1988) The Mirror of Herodotus: The Representation of the Other in the Writing of History (French original: Le miroir d’Herodote [Paris: ´Editions Gallimard, 1980]), trans. J. Lloyd (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar

Hass, K. (2007) Lucilius und der Beginn der Persönlichkeitsdichtung in Rom (Stuttgart: Steiner).Google Scholar

Hau, L. I. (2016) Moral History from Herodotus to Diodorus Siculus (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press).Google Scholar

Haubold, J. (2013) Greece and Mesopotamia. Dialogues in Literature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Havener, W. (2016) Imperator Augustus: die diskursive Konstituierung der militärischen persona des ersten römischen princeps (Stuttgart: Steiner).Google Scholar

Hawthorn, G. (2014) Thucydides on Politics: Back to the Present (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Helmbold, W. C. (1939) Plutarch’s Moralia VI (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Hemelrijk, E. A. (1999) Matrona Docta: Educated Women in the Roman Élite from Cornelia to Julia Domna (London: Routledge).Google Scholar

Henderson, W. J. (1992) ‘Pindar Fr. 140B Snell-Maehler: The Chariot and the Dolphin’, Hermes 120.2, 148–58.Google Scholar

Henrichs, A. (1994/5) ‘“Why Should I Dance?”: Choral Self-Referentiality in Greek Tragedy’, in Golder, H. (ed.), ‘The Chorus in Greek Tragedy and Culture’, special issue of Arion: A Journal of Humanities and the Classics, Third Series 3.1, 56–111.Google Scholar

Hepperle, A. (1956) ‘Charon von Lampsakos’, in Festschrift für Otto Regenbogen zum 65. Geburtstage (Heidelberg: n.p.), 67–76.Google Scholar

Herkommer, E. (1968) ‘Die Topoi in den Proömien der römischen Geschichtswerke’ (dissertation, University of Tübingen).Google Scholar

Herman, D. (1994) ‘Textual You and Double Deixis in Edna O’Brien’s A Pagan Place’, Style 28, 378–410.Google Scholar

Hershbell, J. P. (2004) ‘Plutarch’s Political Philosophy: Peripatetic and Platonic’, in de Blois, L., Bons, J., Kessels, T., and Schenkeveld, D. M. (eds.), The Statesman in Plutarch’s Works: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of the International Plutarch Society, Nijmegen/Castle Hernen, May 1–5, 2002, vol. 1: Plutarch’s Statesman and His Aftermath: Political, Philosophical, and Literary Aspects, Mnemosyne Supplement 250 (Leiden: Brill), 151–62.Google Scholar

Heubeck, A. (1980) ‘Πρόφασις und keine Ende (zu Thuk. 1.23)’, Glotta 58, 222–36.Google Scholar

Heurgon, J. (1970) Tite-Live: Ab Vrbe Condita Liber Primus, 2nd ed. (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France).Google Scholar

Hillard, T. W. (2001) ‘Popilia and the Laudationes Funebres for Women’, Antichthon 35, 45–63.Google Scholar

Holmes, T. R. (1928) The Architect of the Roman Empire (Oxford: Humphrey Milford).Google Scholar

Horden, P. and Purcell, N. (2000) The Corrupting Sea (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar

Hornblower, S. (1991–2008) A Commentary on Thucydides, 3 vols. (revised editions, vols. 1 and 2, 1997 and 2004) (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Hornblower, S. (1994) Greek Historiography (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Hornblower, S. (2003) ‘Panionios of Chios and Hermotimos of Pedasa (Hdt. 8.104–6)’, in Derow, P. and Parker, R. C. T. (eds.), Herodotus and His World: Essays from a Conference in Memory of George Forrest (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 37–57.Google Scholar

Hornblower, S. (2004) Thucydides and Pindar: Historical Narrative and the World of Epinikian Poetry (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Hornblower, S. and Pelling, C. (2017) Herodotus: Histories, Book VI (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. (1974) ‘Virgil’s Roman Chronography: A Reconsideration’, CQ 24, 111–15, reprinted in N. Horsfall, Fifty Years at the Sibyl’s Heels: Selected Papers on Virgil and Rome (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020), 34–9.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. (1981) ‘Some Problems of Titulature in Roman Literary History’, BICS 28, 103–14.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. (1989) Cornelius Nepos, a Selection Including the Lives of Cato and Atticus (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

How, W. W. and Wells, J. (1912, rev. 1928) A Commentary on Herodotus, 2 vols. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Howe, A. (2013) Byron and the Forms of Thought (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press).Google Scholar

Howell, P. (1995) Martial Epigrams V (Warminster: Aris and Phillips).Google Scholar

Huitink, L. (2019) ‘“There was a river on their left-hand side”: Xenophon’s Anabasis, Arrival Scenes, Reflector Narrative and the Evolving Language of Greek Historiography’, in Willi, A. and Derron, P. (eds.), Formes et fonctions des langues littéraires en Grèce ancienne, Entr. Hardt 65 (Vandoeuvres-Genève: Fondation Hardt), 185–226.Google Scholar

Hunter, V. J. (1973) Thucydides: The Artful Reporter (Toronto: Hakkert).Google Scholar

Hunter, V. (1980) ‘Thucydides and the Uses of the Past’, Klio 62, 190–219.Google Scholar

Hunter, V. J. (1982) Past and Process in Herodotus and Thucydides. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Hurst, A. (1975) ‘Prose historique et poésie. Le cas de Charon de Lampsaque’, in Fischer, I. (ed.), Actes de la XIIe conférence international d’études classiques Eirene, Cluj-Napoca, 2–7 octobre 1972 (Amsterdam: Hakkert), 231–7.Google Scholar

Hussey, E. L. (1985) ‘Thucydidean History and Democritean Theory’, History of Political Thought 6, 118–38.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, G. O. (2020) Motion in Classical Literature: Homer, Parmenides, Sophocles, Ovid, Seneca, Tacitus, Art (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Immerwahr, H. (2013 [1956]) ‘Aspects of Historical Causation in Herodotus’, in Munson, R. V. (ed.), Herodotus: Oxford Readings in Classical Studies, vol. 1 (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 157–93.Google Scholar

Instinsky, H. U. (1971) ‘Zur Echtheitsfrage der Brieffragmente der Cornelia, Mutter der Gracchen’, Chiron 1, 177–89.Google Scholar

Irwin, E. (2007) ‘The Politics of Precedence: First “Historians” on First “Thalassocrats”’, in Osborne, R. (ed.), Debating the Athenian Cultural Revolution: art, Literature, Philosophy, and Politics 430–380 BC (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 188–223.Google Scholar

Isaac, B. (1986) The Greek Settlements in Thrace until the Macedonian Conquest (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar

Iser, W. (1978) The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar

Isnardi, M. (1953) ‘Τέχνη e ἦθος nella metodologia storiografica di Polibio’, SCO 3, 102–10.Google Scholar

Jacoby, F. (1902) Apollodors Chronik: Eine Sammlung der Fragmente (Berlin: Weidmann).Google Scholar

Jacoby, F. (1909) ‘Über die Entwicklung der griechischen Geschichtsschreibung und den Plan einer neuen Sammlung der griechischen Historikerfragmente’, Klio 9, 80‒123.Google Scholar

Jacoby, F. (1913) ‘Herodotos’, RE Suppl. 2, 205‒520.Google Scholar

Jacoby, F. (1922) ‘Ktesias’, RE 11, 2032–37.Google Scholar

Jacoby, F. (1926) Die Fragmente der griechischen Historiker. Zweiter Teil C: Kommentar zu Nr. 56–105 (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar

Jacoby, F. (1943) Die Fragmente der griechischen Historiker, vol. IIIa, Kommentar (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar

Jacoby, F. (1949) Atthis: The Local Chronicles of Ancient Athens (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Jacoby, F. (1956) ‘Charon of Lampsakos’, originally SIFC 15 (1938), 207–42, quoted from H. Bloch (ed.), Abhandlungen zur griechischen Geschichtsschreibung (Leiden: Brill), 178–206.Google Scholar

Jacoby, F. (2015) On the Development of Greek Historiography and the Plan for a New Collection of the Fragments of the Greek Historians, trans. M. Chambers and S. Schorn (Histos Supplement 3, Newcastle upon Tyne).Google Scholar

Jaeger, M. (1999) ‘Guiding Metaphor and Narrative Point of View in Livy’s Ab Vrbe Condita’, in Kraus, C. S. (ed.), The Limits of Historiography: Genre and Narrative in Ancient Historical Texts (Leiden: Brill), 169–95.Google Scholar

Jervis, A. (2017) ‘The Gallic War as a Work of Propaganda’, in Raaflaub, K. (ed.), The Landmark Julius Caesar (New York: Pantheon), app. HH: web essay at www.landmarkcaesar.com.Google Scholar

Jones, C. P. (1974) ‘The Reliability of Philostratus’, in Bowersock, G. W. (ed.), Approaches to the Second Sophistic: Papers Presented at the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Philological Association (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press), 11–16.Google Scholar

Jones, C. P. (2002) ‘Philostratus and the Gordiani’, MedAnt 5, 759–67.Google Scholar

Judson, L. (1991) ‘Chance and “Always for the Most Part” in Aristotle’, in Judson, L. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics: A Collection of Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 73–99.Google Scholar

Judson, L. (1998) ‘What Can Happen When You Eat Pungent Food’, in Avgelis, N. and Peonidis, F. (eds.), Aristotle on Logic, Language and Science (Thessaloniki: Sakkoulas Publications), 185–204.Google Scholar

Kacandes, I. (1990) ‘Orality, Reader Address and “Anonymous You”: On Translating Second Person References from Modern Greek Prose’, Journal of Modern Greek Studies 8, 223–43.Google Scholar

Kacandes, I. (1993) ‘Are You in the Text?: The “Literary Performative” in Postmodernist Fiction’, Text and Performance Quarterly 13, 139–53.Google Scholar

Kagan, D. (1969) The Outbreak of the Peloponnesian War (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar

Kagan, D. (2009) Thucydides: The Reinvention of History (New York: Viking).Google Scholar

Kahane, A. (2005) Diachronic Dialogues: Authority and Continuity in Homer and the Homeric Tradition (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books).Google Scholar

Kajanto, I. (1957) God and Fate in Livy (Turku: Turun Yliopiston Kustantama).Google Scholar

Kallet, L. (2001) Money and the Corrosion of Power in Thucydides: The Sicilian Expedition and Its Aftermath (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar

Karttunen, K. (2002) ‘The Ethnography of the Fringes,’ in Bakker, E. J., de Jong, I. J. F., and van Wees, H. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus (Leiden: Brill), 457–74.Google Scholar

Kayser, C. L. (1870–1) Flavii Philostrati opera auctiora, 2 vols. (Leipzig: Teubner, reprinted in 1985).Google Scholar

Keitel, E. (2009) ‘“Is Dying So Very Terrible?”: The Neronian Annals’, in Woodman, A. J. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Tacitus (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 127–43.Google Scholar

Keitel, E. (2010) ‘The Art of Losing: Tacitus and the Disaster Narrative’, in Kraus, C. S., Marincola, J., and Pelling, C. (eds.), Ancient Historiography and Its Contexts: Studies in Honour of A. J. Woodman (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 331–52.Google Scholar

Kemezis, A. M. (2011) ‘Narrative of Cultural Geography in Philostratus’ Lives of the Sophists’, in Fleury, P. and Schmidt, T. (eds.), Regards sur la Seconde Sophistique et son époque (Toronto: University of Toronto Press), 3–22.Google Scholar

Kemezis, A. M. (2014) Greek Narratives of the Roman Empire under the Severans: Cassius Dio, Philostratus and Herodian (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Kemezis, A. M. (2016–17) ‘“Inglorius Labor”?: The Rhetoric of Glory and Utility in Plutarch’s Precepts and Tacitus’ Agricola’, CW 110, 87–117.Google Scholar

Keulen, W. (2006) Gellius the Satirist: Roman Cultural Authority in Attic Nights (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar

Kienast, D. (2009) Augustus: Prinzeps und Monarch, 4th ed. (Darmstadt: Primus Verlag).Google Scholar

Kierdorf, W. (1962) ‘Zum Melier-Dialog des Thukydides’, RhM 105, 253–6.Google Scholar

Kierdorf, W. (1980) Laudatio funebris: Interpretationen und Untersuchungen zur Entwicklung der römischen Leichenrede (Meisenheim: Hain).Google Scholar

Kirwan, C. (1993) Aristotle, Metaphysics Books Γ, Δ and Ε, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar

Klotz, F. (2007) ‘Portraits of the Philosopher: Plutarch’s Self-Presentation in the Quaestiones Convivales’, CQ 57, 550–7.Google Scholar

Klotz, F. and Oikonomopoulou, K. (eds.) (2011) The Philosophers’ Banquet: Plutarch’s Table Talk in the Intellectual Culture of the Roman Empire (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Knausgaard, K. O. (2019) So Much Longing in So Little Space: The Art of Edvard Munch, trans. I. Burkey, Norwegian original 2017 (New York: Penguin, London: Harvill Secker).Google Scholar

König, J. (2009) ‘Conventions of Prefatory Self-Representation in Galen’s On the Order of My Own Books’, in Gill, C., Whitmarsh, T. J. G., and Wilkins, J. (eds.), Galen and the World of Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 35–58.Google Scholar

König, J. (2011) ‘Self-Promotion and Self-Effacement in Plutarch’s Table Talk’, in Klotz, F. and Oikonomopoulou, K. (eds.), The Philosopher’s Banquet: Plutarch’s Table Talk in the Intellectual Culture of the Roman Empire (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 179–203.Google Scholar