Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T23:33:29.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Digital Platforms and Ecosystems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 May 2024

Chander Velu
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Why are digital platforms becoming ubiquitous and what are the business model implications? This chapter examines the benefits and challenges inherent in managing platform-based business models. It introduces the concept of layered modular architecture (LMA) and how platform business models evolve over time. In addition, the chapter discusses the strategic issues of managing platforms within a business-to-consumer (B2C), compared to a business-to-business (B2B), setting.

Type
Chapter
Information
Business Model Innovation
A Blueprint for Strategic Change
, pp. 111 - 137
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable Construct for Strategy. Journal of Management 43(1): 3958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, C. (2007). Where Do Transactions Come From? Modularity, Transactions, and the Boundaries of the Firms. Industrial and Corporate Change 17(1): 155195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, C. Y. and Clark, K. B. (2000). Design Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, C. Y. and Woodard, C. J. (2009). The Architecture of Platforms: A Unified View. Research Collection School of Information Systems: 19–44.Google Scholar
Baskerville, R., Myers, M., and Yoo, Y. (2020). Digital First: The Ontological Reversal and New Challenges for IS Research, MIS Quarterly 44(2), 509523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belk, R. (2014). You Are What You Can Access: Sharing and Collaborative Consumption Online. Journal of Business Research 67: 15951600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandenburger, A. M. and Nalebuff, B. J. (1996) Coopetition. Doubleday, New York.Google Scholar
Bresnahan, T. F. and Greenstein, S. (1999). Technological Competition and the Structure of the Computer Industry. The Journal of Industrial Economics 47(1): 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chasin, F., von Hoffen, M., Hoffmeister, B., and Becker, J. (2018). Reasons for Failures of Sharing Economy Businesses. MIS Quarterly Executive 17(3): 185198.Google Scholar
Chen, Y., Pereira, I., and Patel, P. C. (2021). Decentralized Governance of Digital Platforms. Journal of Management 47(5): 13051337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramer, J. and Krueger, A. B. (2016). Disruptive Change in the Taxi Business: The Case of Uber. American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings 106(5): 177182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cusumano, M. A. and Gawer, A. (2002). The Elements of Platform Leadership. MIT Sloan Management Review 43(3): 5058.Google Scholar
Cusumano, M. A., Gawer, A., and Yoffie, D. B. (2019). The Business of Platforms. Strategy in the Age of Digital Competition, Innovation, and Power. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
El Sawy, O. A, Kraemmergaard, P., Amsinck, H., and Vinther, A. L. (2016). How LEGO Built the Foundations and Enterprise Capabilities for Digital Leadership. MIS Quarterly Executive 15(2): 141166.Google Scholar
Filippas, A., Horton, J. J., and Zeckhauser, R. J. (2020). Owning, Using, and Renting: Some Simple Economics of the “Sharing Economy.” Management Science 66(9): 41524172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Financial Times. (2021), How Apple’s iOS 14.5 Update Is Shaking Up the App Economy, 27 April.Google Scholar
Gawer, A. (2014). Bridging Differing Perspectives on Technological Platforms: Toward an Integrative Framework. Research Policy 43: 12391249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gawer, A. (2021). Digital Plaforms’ Boundaries: The Interplay of Firm Scope, Platforms Sides, and Digital Interfaces. Long Range Planning 54(5): 102045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gebert, D., Boerner, S., and Kearney, E. (2010). Fostering Team Innovation: Why Is It Important to Combine Opposing Action Strategies? Organization Science 21(3): 593608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagiu, A. and Wright, J. (2018). Controlling vs. Enabling. Management Science 65(2): 577595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helfat, C. E. and Raubitschek, R. S. (2018). Dynamic and Integrative Capabilities for Profiting from Innovation in Digital Platform-Based Ecosystems. Research Policy 47: 13911399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilbolling, S., Berends, H., Deken, F., and Tuertscher, P. (2021). Sustaining Complement Quality for Digital Product Platforms: A Case Study of the Philips Hue Ecosystem. Journal of Product Innovation Management 38(1): 2148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hou, H. and Shi, Y. (2020). Ecosystem-as-Structure and Ecosystem-as-Coevolution: A Constructive Examination. Technovation: 100.Google Scholar
Iansiti, M. and Lakhani, K. R. (2020). Competing in the Age of AI. How Machine Intelligence Changes the Rules of Business. Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar
IMD – International Institute for Management Development. (2019). Digital Transformation at GE: Shifting Minds for Agility.Google Scholar
Immelt, J. R. (2017). How I Remade GE and What I Learned along the Way. Harvard Business Review 95(5): 42–51.Google Scholar
Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., and Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a Theory of Ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal 39: 22552276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, F., Zheng, X., Fan, D., Zhang, P., and Li, S. (2021). The Sharing Economy and Business Model Design: A Configurational Approach. Journal of Management Studies: 128.Google Scholar
Kathan, W., Matzler, K., and Veider, V. (2016). The Sharing Economy: Your Business Model’s Friend or Foe? Business Horizons 59: 663672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khanagha, S., Ansari, S., Paroutis, S., and Oviedo, L. (2022). Mutualism and the Dynamics of New Platform Creation: A Study of Cisco and Fog Computing. Strategic Management Journal 43(3): 476506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laamanen, T., Pfeffer, J., Rong, K., and Van de Ven, A. (2018). Editor’s Introduction: Business Models, Ecosystems, and Society in the Sharing Economy. Academy of Management Discoveries 4(3): 213219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lal, R. and Johnson, S. (2019). Philips: The Shift to Value. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing, Case Number: 9-517-045.Google Scholar
Misangyi, V. F., Greckhamer, T., Furnari, S., Fiss, P. C., Crilly, D., and Aguilera, R. (2016). Embracing Casual Complexity: The Emergence of a Neo-Configurational Perspective. Journal of Management 43(1): 255282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, J. F. (2006). Business Ecosystems and the View from the Firm. The Antitrust Bulletin 51(1): 3175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munoz, P. and Cohen, B. (2018). A Compass for Navigating Sharing Economy Business Models. California Management Review 61(1): 114147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, G. G. and Van Alstyne, M. W. (2006). Two-Sided Network Effects: A Theory of Information Product Design. Management Science 51(10): 14941504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, G. G., Van Alstyne, M. W., and Choudary, S. P. (2016). Platform Revolution. How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economy and How to Make Them Work for You. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Quelch, J. A. and Rodriguez, M. L. (2015). Philips Healthcare: Marketing the HealthSuite Digital Platform. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing, Case Number: 9-515-052.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. and Ulrich, K. (1998). Planning for Product Platforms. Sloan Management Review 39(4): 1931.DGoogle Scholar
Rochet, J-C. and Tirole, J. (2003). Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets. Journal of the European Economic Association 1(4): 9901029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, D. (2011). The Sharing Economy: Fast Company (April 18, online edition). Available at: www.fastcompany.com/1747551/sharing-economy (accessed 8 May 2022).Google Scholar
Statista Research. (2021). Number of Apps Available in Leading App Stores as of 1st Quarter 2021.Google Scholar
Svahn, F., Mathiassen, L., and Lindgren, R. (2017). Embracing Digital Innovation in Incumbent Firms: How Volvo Cars Managed Competing Concerns. MIS Quarterly 41(1): 239253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The United States Department of Justice. (2020). Justice Department Sues Monopolist Google for Violating Antitrust Laws.Google Scholar
Thomas, L. D. W., Autio, E., and Gann, D. M. (2014). Architectural Leverage: Putting Platforms in Context. The Academy of Management Perspectives 28(2): 198219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velu, C. (2015). Knowledge Management Capabilities of Lead Firms in Innovation Ecosystems. AMS Review.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velu, C. (2016). Evolutionary or Revolutionary Business Model Innovation through Coopetition? The Role of Dominance in Network Markets. Industrial Marketing Management 53: 124135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velu, C. (2018). Coopetition and Business Models. In: Chiambaretto, P., Czakon, W., Anne-Sophie Fernandez, A., and Le Roy, F. (eds), Handbook of Coopetition Strategies in the Routledge Companion on Coopetition Strategy. Routledge.Google Scholar
Wareham, J., Fox, P. B., and Giner, J. L. C. (2014). Technology Ecosystem Governance. Organization Science 25(4): 11951215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheelwright, S. C. and Clark, K. B. (1992). Revolutionizing Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency, and Quality. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Yoffie, D. B. and Cusumano, M. A. (2015). Strategy Rules: Five Timeless Lessons from Bill Gates, Andy Grove and Steve Jobs. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Yoo, Y. (2010). Computing in Everyday Life: A Call for Research on Experimental Computing. MIS Quarterly 34(2): 213231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., and Lyytinen, K. (2010). The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research. Information Systems Research 21(4): 724735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoo, Y., Boland, R. J., Lyytinen, K., and Majchrzak, A. (2012). Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World. Organization Science 23(5): 13981408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeng, M. (2015). Economic and Business Dimensions: Three Paradoxes of Building Platforms. Communications of ACM, 58(2): 2729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zittrain, J. L. (2006). The Generative Internet. Harvard Law Review 119(7): 19742040.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×