Book contents
- Connecting Creativity and Motivation Research with End Users
- Connecting Creativity and Motivation Research with End Users
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Modules
- Boxes
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Chapter 1 Translational Education Research
- Chapter 2 Creativity
- Chapter 3 Motivation
- Chapter 4 Assessment Attributes and Related Guidelines
- Chapter 5 Assessment of Creativity
- Chapter 6 Assessment of Motivation
- Chapter 7 Additional Theorists on Creativity and Motivation
- Chapter 8 Neuroscience of Creativity, Mindfulness, and Mind/Brain/Education Science
- Chapter 9 Creativity Modules
- Chapter 10 Motivation Modules
- Chapter 11 Dissemination and Communication Techniques for Translational Research
- Chapter 12 From Individual Compliance to Creative Collaboration: A Business Perspective
- Index
- References
Chapter 5 - Assessment of Creativity
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 February 2024
Book contents
- Connecting Creativity and Motivation Research with End Users
- Connecting Creativity and Motivation Research with End Users
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Modules
- Boxes
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Chapter 1 Translational Education Research
- Chapter 2 Creativity
- Chapter 3 Motivation
- Chapter 4 Assessment Attributes and Related Guidelines
- Chapter 5 Assessment of Creativity
- Chapter 6 Assessment of Motivation
- Chapter 7 Additional Theorists on Creativity and Motivation
- Chapter 8 Neuroscience of Creativity, Mindfulness, and Mind/Brain/Education Science
- Chapter 9 Creativity Modules
- Chapter 10 Motivation Modules
- Chapter 11 Dissemination and Communication Techniques for Translational Research
- Chapter 12 From Individual Compliance to Creative Collaboration: A Business Perspective
- Index
- References
Summary
Chapter 5 includes assessments of creative processes with the Torrance tests of creative thinking, the Reisman Diagnostic Creativity Assessment (RDCA), Amabile’s componential model, and many others that reflect assessments representing standardized, self-reports, rating scales and products. Also included are the advantages and disadvantages of self-reports, generic influences on learning, and six appendices: Appendix 5A defines the generic influences on learning, Appendix 5B includes additional generic influences on learning, Appendix 5C sets out observations of generic influences on learning and gives tips for teachers, Appendix 5D presents RDCA creativity characteristics integrated with generic influences on learning, Appendix 5E provides the RDCA scoring interpretation, and Appendix 5F is a glossary.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Connecting Creativity and Motivation Research with End UsersLab to Learner, pp. 109 - 159Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amabile, T. M., Hill, K. G., Hennessey, B. A. & Tighe, E. M. (1994). The Work Preference Inventory: Assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(5), 950–967. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.950.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amabile, T. M. (2012). Componential theory of creativity. Harvard Business School Working Paper, No. 12–096.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A Social Learning Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Birch, H. G. & Belmont, L. (1964). Auditory-visual integration in normal and retarded readers. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 34(5), 852–861. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.1964.tb02240.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cramond, B. (2020). Assessing Creativity: A Palette of Possibilities. Billund, Denmark: Lego Foundation. https://cms.learningthroughplay.com/media/ynrbfpi4/appendix_assessingcreativity_pdf.pdf.Google Scholar
Cropley, A. J. (2000). Defining and measuring creativity: Are creativity tests worth using? Roeper Review, 23, 2, 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190009554069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dabrowski, K., & Piechowski, M. M. (1977). Theory of Levels of Emotional Development: Vol. 1B. Multilevelness and Positive Disintegration. Oceanside, NY: Dabor Science.Google Scholar
Gough, H. G. & Heilbrun, A. B., Jr. (1965). The Adjective Check List Manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Gough, H. G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the Adjective Check List. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(8), 1398–1405. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.8.1398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0063487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hallahan, D. P. & Kauffman, J. M. (1977). Labels, categories, behaviors: ED, LD, and EMR reconsidered. The Journal of Special Education, 11(2), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246697701100202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hebert, P. D., Cywinska, A., Ball, S. L. & deWaard, J. R. (2003). Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 270(1512), 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
India Today (2021). 7 different types of aptitude test candidates must know about. www.indiatoday.in/education-today/featurephilia/story/7-different-types-of-aptitude-test-candidates-must-know-about-1876904-2021-11-15.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. (2012). Counting the muses: Development of the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(4), 298–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). The Psychology of Mathematical Abilities in Schoolchildren. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kudrowitz, B. & Dippo, C. (2013). When does a paper clip become a sundial? Exploring the progression of originality in the alternative uses test. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science, 17(4), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.3233/jid-2013-0018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 140, 5–55.Google Scholar
Lubart, T. & Guignard, J.-H. (2004). The generality-specificity of creativity: A multivariate approach. In Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L. & Singer, J. L. (eds.), Creativity: From Potential to Realization (pp. 43–56). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10692-004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon, D. (1978). In Search of Human Effectiveness: Identifying and Developing Creativity. Scituate, MA: Creative Education Foundation.Google Scholar
Mednick, S. A. & Mednick, M. T. (1962). A theory and test of creative thought. In Nielson, G (ed.), Proceedings of the XIV International Congress of Applied Psychology. Vol. 5. Industrial and Business Psychology (pp. 40–47). Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
O’Quin, K. & Besemer, S. P. (1989). The development, reliability, and validity of the revised Creative Product Semantic Scale. Creativity Research Journal, 2(4), 267–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Quin, K. & Besemer, S. P. (2006). Using the Creative Product Semantic Scale as a metric for results-oriented business. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15(1), pp. 34–44. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2006.00367.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulhus, D. L. & Vazire, S. (2007). The self-report method. In Robins, R. W., Fraley, R. C. & Krueger, R. F. (eds.), Handbook of Research Methods in Personality Psychology (pp. 224–239). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Psychology Encyclopedia (n.d.). Creativity tests. https://psychology.jrank.org/pages/155/Creativity-Tests.html.Google Scholar
Reisman, F., Keiser, L. & Otti, O. (2011). Development, use and implications of diagnostic creativity assessment phone app, RDCA – Reisman Diagnostic Creativity Assessment. (co-presented with L. Keiser, C. Schmitt & O. Otti, Drexel University), American Creativity Association (ACA) International Conference, Art Institute of Fort Lauderdale, FL.Google Scholar
Reisman, F., Keiser, L. & Otti, O. (2016). Development, use and implications of diagnostic creativity assessment app, RDCA – Reisman Diagnostic Creativity Assessment. Creativity Research Journal, 28(2), 177–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisman, F. & Severino, L. (2021). Using Creativity to Address Dyslexia, Dysgraphia, and Dyscalculia: Assessment and Techniques. Abingdon-on-Thames, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Renzulli, J. S. (1976). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 20, 303–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runco, M. A. (1989). Parents’ and teachers’ ratings of the creativity of children. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 4(1), 73–83.Google Scholar
Runco, M. A., Plucker, J. A. & Lim, W. (2001). Development and psychometric integrity of a measure of ideational behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 393–400. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runco, M. & Pritzker, S. (eds.) (2011). Encyclopedia of Creativity (2nd ed.). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Runco, M. A. (2013). Divergent thinking. In Carayannis, E. G. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_430.Google Scholar
Swartz, J. D. (1988). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. In Keyser, D. J. & Sweetland, R. C. (eds.), Test Critique (vol. 7, pp. 619–622). Kansas, MS: Test Corporation of America.Google Scholar
Tanner, D. & Reisman, F. (2014). Creativity as a Bridge between Education and Industry: Fostering New Innovations. North Charleston, NC: CreateSpace.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (1974). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms-Technical Manual. Research Edition. Verbal Tests, Forms A and B. Figural Tests, Forms A and B. Princeton, NJ: Personnel Press.Google Scholar
Vagias, W. M. (2006). Likert-Type Scale Response Anchors. Clemson International Institute for Tourism & Research Development, Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management. Clemson, SC: Clemson University. www.clemson.edu/centers-institutes/tourism/documents/sample-scales.pdf.Google Scholar
Woolfolk, A. & Shaughnessy, M. F. (2004). An interview with Anita Woolfolk: The educational psychology of teacher efficacy. Educational Psychology Review, 16(2), 153–175.Google Scholar