Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T06:59:08.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Panhellenic Sanctuaries: Local and Regional Perspectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2023

Hans Beck
Affiliation:
Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Germany
Julia Kindt
Affiliation:
University of Sydney
Get access

Summary

This chapter targets the local horizon of sanctuaries whose scope and spheres of influence transcended the local. Variously labelled as ‘regional’ or ‘Panhellenic’ sanctuaries, Funke’s contribution challenges the implicit dichotomy between these descriptors and the local. He begins with the observation that religious conduct in the polis was always subject to diverse spatial dynamics, articulated, for instance, in the different reach of urban and liminal cult sites. A similar spatial and functional diversification is pitched for Panhellenic sites. Rather than being elusive or purely notional, Panhellenic perspectives manifested themselves in the evocation of Greek gods and in cult practices that were considered genuinely Hellenic in nature. As shared points of reference, Panhellenic commodities were not only commonly accepted by the Greeks but, in fact, were substantiated through hardwired regulations that assured availability to all.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcock, S. E. and Osborne, R. (eds.) (1994) Placing the Gods. Sanctuaries and Sacred Space in Ancient Greece. Oxford.Google Scholar
Beck, H. (2020) Localism and the Ancient Greek City-State. Chicago, Ill.Google Scholar
Becker, A. and Scholz, P. (2004) Dissoi Logoi. Zweierlei Ansichten. Ein sophistischer Traktat. Text – Übersetzung – Kommentar. Berlin.Google Scholar
Bentz, M. (1998) Panathenäische Preisamphoren. Eine athenische Vasengattung und ihre Funktion vom 6.–4. Jahrhundert v. Chr. Basel.Google Scholar
Bichler, R. (2001) Herodots Welt. Der Aufbau der Historie am Bild der fremden Länder und Völker, ihrer Zivilisation und ihrer Geschichte. Berlin.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1985) ‘Herodot über die Namen der Götter: Polytheismus als historisches Problem’, Museum Helveticum 42, 121–32.Google Scholar
Cole, S. G. (1995) ‘Civic Cult and Civic Identity’, in Hansen, M. H. (ed.) Sources for the Ancient Greek City-State. Symposium August, 24–27 1994, Acts of the Copenhagen Polis Centre vol. 2. Copenhagen, 292325.Google Scholar
Dakaris, S., Vokotopoulou, J. and Christidis, A. P. (eds.) (2013) Τα Χρηστήρια Ἐλάσματα της Δωδώνης των ἀνασκαϕών Δ. Ευαγγελίδη, 2 volumes. Athens.Google Scholar
Deubner, L. (1932) Attische Feste. Berlin.Google Scholar
Funke, P. (2004) ‘Herodotus and the Major Sanctuaries of the Greek World’, in Karagheorgis, V. and Taifacos, J. (eds.) The World of Herodotus. Proceedings of an International Conference Held at the Foundation Anastasios G. Leventis, Nicosia, September 18–21, 2003 and Organized by the Foundation Anastasios G. Leventis and the Faculty of Letters, University of Cyprus. Nicosia, 159–67.Google Scholar
Funke, P. (2005) ‘Die Nabel der Welt. Überlegungen zur Kanonisierung der “panhellenischen” Heiligtümer’, in Schmitt, T., Schmitz, W. and Winterling, A. (eds.) Gegenwärtige Antike – antike Gegenwarten. Kolloquium zum 60. Geburtstag von Rolf Rilinger. Munich, 116.Google Scholar
Funke, P. (2006) ‘Fremde und Nicht-Bürger in den griechischen Heiligtümern der antiken Mittelmeerwelt. Eine historische Einführung’, in Naso, A. (ed.) Stranieri e non cittadini nei santuari greci. Atti del convegno internazionale. Grassina, 112.Google Scholar
Funke, P. (2009) ‘Integration und Abgrenzung. Vorüberlegungen zu den politischen Funktionen überregionaler Heiligtümer in der griechischen Staatenwelt’, Archiv für Religionsgeschichte 11, 285–97.Google Scholar
Funke, P. (2013) ‘Greek Amphiktyonies: An Experiment in Transregional Governance’, in Beck, H. (ed.) A Companion to Ancient Greek Government. Oxford, 451–65.Google Scholar
Funke, P. (2014) ‘Überregionale Heiligtümer – Orte der Begegnung mit dem Fremden’, in Rollinger, R. and Schnegg, K. (eds.) Kulturkontakte in antiken Welten. Vom Denkmodell zur Fallstudie. Proceedings des internationalen Kolloquiums aus Anlass des 60. Geburtstages von Christoph Ulf, Innsbruck, 26. bis 30. Januar 2009. Leuven, Paris, and Walpole, Mass., 5365.Google Scholar
Hall, J. M. (2002) Hellenicity: Between Ethnicity and Culture. Chicago, Ill.Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. (1996) A Commentary on Thucydides, volume 2. Oxford.Google Scholar
Humphreys, S. C. (2018) Kinship in Ancient Athens: An Anthropological Analysis, 2 volumes. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kilian-Dirlmeier, I. (1985) ‘Fremde Weihungen in griechischen Heiligtümern vom 8. bis zum Beginn des 7. Jahrhunderts v. Chr.’, Jahrbuch des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums Mainz 32, 215–54.Google Scholar
Kindt, J. (2009) ‘Polis Religion – A Critical Appreciation’, Kernos 22, 934.Google Scholar
Kindt, J. (2012) Rethinking Greek Religion. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Knäpper, K. (2018) Hieros kai Asylos. Territoriale Asylie im Hellenismus in ihrem historischen Kontext. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (2001) ‘To Hellenikon ethnos: Ethnicity and the Construction of Ancient Greek Identity’, in Malkin, I. (ed.) Ancient Perceptions of Greek Ethnicity. Cambridge, Mass., 2950.Google Scholar
Krauter, S. (2004) Bürgerrecht und Kultteilnahme: Politische und kultische Rechte und Pflichten in griechischen Poleis, Rom und antikem Judentum. Berlin.Google Scholar
Lepke, A. (2017) ‘Festgehalten in Stein. Die Kommunikationspotentiale griechischer Freilassungsinschriften’. PhD dissertation, Münster.Google Scholar
Lhôte, E. (2006) Les Lamelles oraculaires de Dodone. Geneva.Google Scholar
Linke, B. (2014) Antike Religion. Munich.Google Scholar
Malacrino, C., Soueref, K. I. and Vecchio, L. (eds.) (2019) Dodonaios. L’oracolo di Zeus e La Magna Grecia. Reggio.Google Scholar
Marinatos, N. and Hägg, R. (eds.) (1993) Greek Sanctuaries: New Approaches. London.Google Scholar
Meyer, E. A. (2013) The Inscriptions of Dodona and a New History of Molossia. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Meyer, E. A. (2015) ‘Molossia and Epeiros’, in Beck, H. and Funke, P. (eds.) Federalism in Greek Antiquity. Cambridge, 297318.Google Scholar
Mitchell, L. G. (2007) Panhellenism and the Barbarian in Archaic and Classical Greece. Swansea.Google Scholar
Mitchell, L. G. (2015) ‘The Community of the Hellenes’, in Beck, H. and Funke, P. (eds.) Federalism in Greek Antiquity. Cambridge, 4965.Google Scholar
Moustakis, N. (2006) Heiligtümer als politische Zentren. Untersuchungen zu den multidimensionalen Wirkungsgebieten von polisübergreifenden Heiligtümern im antiken Epirus. Munich.Google Scholar
Naerebout, F. G. (2009) ‘Territorialität und griechische Religion – die aufgeteilte Landschaft’, in Olshausen, E. and Sauer, V. (eds.) Die Landschaft und die Religion. Stuttgarter Kolloquium zur Historischen Geographie des Altertums 9, 2005. Stuttgart, 191214.Google Scholar
Nesselrath, H.-G. (1999) ‘Dodona, Siwa und Herodot. Ein Testfall für den Vater der Geschichte’, Museum Helveticum 56, 114.Google Scholar
Nilsson, M. P. (1957) Geschichte der griechischen Religion, volume 1, 3rd edn. Munich.Google Scholar
Parker, R. (1996) Athenian Religion: A History. Oxford.Google Scholar
Parker, R. (1998) Cleomenes on the Acropolis: An Inaugural Lecture Delivered before the University of Oxford on 12 May 1997. Oxford.Google Scholar
Parker, R. (2005) Polytheism and Society at Athens. Oxford.Google Scholar
Piccinini, J. (2017) The Shrine of Dodona in the Archaic and Classical Ages: A History. Macerata.Google Scholar
Polignac, F. de (1995) Cults, Territory, and the Origins of the Greek City-State. Chicago, Ill.Google Scholar
Polignac, F. de (2009) ‘Sanctuaries and Festivals’, in Raaflaub, K. A. and van Wees, H. (eds.) A Companion to Archaic Greece. Oxford, 427–43.Google Scholar
Robinson, T. M. (1979) Contrasting Arguments: An Edition of the Dissoi Logoi. New York, N.Y.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. (1999) ‘Antike Großstadtreligion’, in Batsch, C., Egelhaaf-Gaiser, U. and Stepper, R. (eds.) Zwischen Krise und Alltag / Conflit et normalité: Antike Religionen im Mittelmeerraum / Religions anciennes dans l’espace méditerranéen. Stuttgart, 1330.Google Scholar
Schmitt-Pantel, P. (1990) ‘Collective Activities and the Political in the Greek City’, in Murray, O. and Price, S. (eds.) The Greek City: From Homer to Alexander. Oxford, 199213.Google Scholar
Scott, M. (2009) Delphi and Olympia: The Spatial Politics of Panhellenism in the Archaic and Classical Periods. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Shear, J. L. (2001) Polis and Panathenaia: The History and Development of Athena’s Festival. Ann Arbor, Mich.Google Scholar
Smarczyk, B. (1990) Untersuchungen zur Religionspolitik und politischen Propaganda Athens im Delisch-Attischen Seebund. Munich.Google Scholar
Smarczyk, B. (2007) ‘Religion und Herrschaft: Der Delisch-Attische Seebund’, Saeculum 58, 205–28.Google Scholar
Sourvinou-Inwood, C. (2000a) ‘What Is Polis Religion?’, in Buxton, R. (ed.) Oxford Readings in Greek Religion. Oxford, 1337.Google Scholar
Sourvinou-Inwood, C. (2000b) ‘Further Aspects of Polis Religion’, in Buxton, R. (ed.) Oxford Readings in Greek Religion. Oxford, 3855.Google Scholar
Theotikou, M. (2013) Die ekecheiria zwischen Religion und Politik. Der sog. “Gottesfriede” als Instrument in den zwischenstaatlichen Beziehungen der griechischen Welt. Berlin.Google Scholar
Tracy, S. V. (1991) ‘The Panathenaic Festival and Games: An Epigraphic Inquiry’, Nikephoros 4, 133–53.Google Scholar
Woolf, G. (1997) ‘Polis-Religion and Its Alternatives in the Roman Provinces’, in Cancik, H. and Rüpke, J. (eds.) Römische Reichsreligion und Provinzialreligion. Tübingen, 7184.Google Scholar
Zacharia, K. (2008) ‘Herodotus’ Four Markers of Greek Identity’, in Zacharia, K. (ed.) Hellenism: Culture, Identity, and Ethnicity from Antiquity to Modernity. London and New York, N.Y., 2136.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×