Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of European Monetary, Economic and Financial Integration
- The Cambridge Handbook of European Monetary, Economic and Financial Integration
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I The Economic and Monetary Union
- Part II The Monetary Dimension
- Part III The Economic and Fiscal Dimensions
- Part IV Financial Integration
- 23 Banking Regulation in Europe
- 24 The Politics behind the Creation of the Banking Union
- 25 Failing Banks within the Banking Union at the Crossroads
- 26 The Banking Union
- 27 The Re-emergence of Market-Based Finance?
- 28 The European Strategy on Digital Finance and Its Interplay with Capital Markets Integration in the EU
- 29 Regulating Crypto and Cyberware in the EU
- Index
- References
28 - The European Strategy on Digital Finance and Its Interplay with Capital Markets Integration in the EU
from Part IV - Financial Integration
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 September 2023
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of European Monetary, Economic and Financial Integration
- The Cambridge Handbook of European Monetary, Economic and Financial Integration
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I The Economic and Monetary Union
- Part II The Monetary Dimension
- Part III The Economic and Fiscal Dimensions
- Part IV Financial Integration
- 23 Banking Regulation in Europe
- 24 The Politics behind the Creation of the Banking Union
- 25 Failing Banks within the Banking Union at the Crossroads
- 26 The Banking Union
- 27 The Re-emergence of Market-Based Finance?
- 28 The European Strategy on Digital Finance and Its Interplay with Capital Markets Integration in the EU
- 29 Regulating Crypto and Cyberware in the EU
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter focuses on the historical path and the impact of digital finance policies on capital markets integration in the European Union. The first section gives an overview of the origins of key recent technological developments for the financial system, such as distributed ledger technologies, and the principle of regulatory intervention in the EU. The second section delves into the content of the most recent European strategy on digital finance, with a focus on recent regulatory interventions, such as the Markets in Crypto Assets Regulation (MiCAR) and the Distributed Ledger Technology Regulation (DLTR). The last section draws conclusions on the promises and perils of a digital security for capital markets integration and corporate governance.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Abriani, N., and Schneider, G. (2021). Diritto delle imprese e intelligenza artificiale. Bologna: Il Mulino, pp. 191–225.Google Scholar
Armour, J., Enriques, L., Ezrachi, A., and Vella, J. (2019). Putting technology to good use for society: The role of corporate, competition and tax law. ECGI Law Working Paper, No. 427/2018.Google Scholar
Auer, R. (2019). Embedded supervision: How to build regulation into blockchain finance. BIS Working Paper, No. 811, 16 September. www.bis.org/publ/work811.htmCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auer, R., Cornelli, G., and Frost, J. (2020). Rise of the central bank digital currencies: Drivers, approaches and technologies. BIS Working Paper, No. 880, 24 August.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, T. (2020). FinTech and financial inclusion: Opportunities and pitfalls. ADBI Working Paper Series, No. 1165, July. www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/623276/adbi-wp1165.pdfGoogle Scholar
Beck, T. (2021). Digital technology and financial innovation: A literature survey. In Beck, T. and Park, Y. C. (eds.), Fostering FinTech for Financial Transformation: The Case of South Korea.London: CEPR Press, 143–188. https://voxeu.org/content/fostering-fintech-financial-transformation-case-south-korea.Google Scholar
Blemus, S., and Guegan, D. (2019). Initial crypto-assets offerings (ICOs), tokenisation and corporate governance. CES Working Papers, No. 2019.04, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
Bullmann, D., Klemm, J., and Pinna, A. (2019). In search for stability in crypto-assets: Are stablecoins the solutions? ECB Occasional Paper Series, No. 230, August.Google Scholar
European Banking Authority (2019a). Report on potential impediments to the cross-border provision of banking and payment services. EBA Report, 29 October. www.eba.europa.eu/eba-calls-european-commission-take-action-facilitate-scaling-cross-border-activityGoogle Scholar
European Banking Authority (2019b). Regulatory perimeter, regulatory status and authorisation approaches in relation to FinTech activities. Final Report. www.eba.europa.eu/eba-publishes-report-on-regulatory-perimeter-regulatory-status-and-authorisation-approaches-in-relation-to-fintech-activitiesGoogle Scholar
European Banking Authority (2019c). Report with advice for the European Commission on Crypto Assets. 9 January. www.eba.europa.eu/eba-reports-on-crypto-assetsGoogle Scholar
European Banking Authority (2021). Report on the use of digital platforms in the EU banking and payment sector. EBA/REP/2021/26, September. www.eba.europa.eu/eba-sees-rapid-growth-use-digital-platforms-eu%E2%80%99s-banking-and-payments-sector-and-identifies-stepsGoogle Scholar
European Central Bank (2021). Opinion on a proposal for regulation on Markets in Crypto-assets, and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937, CON/2021/4, OJ C 152. 29 April. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52021AB0004Google Scholar
European Commission (2015). A digital single market strategy for Europe. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2015) 192 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52015DC0192&from=ENGoogle Scholar
European Commission (2017). FinTech: A more competitive and innovative European financial sector. Consultation Document. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/2017-fintech-consultation-document_en_0.pdfGoogle Scholar
European Commission (2018). FinTech action plan: For a more competitive and innovative European financial sector. Communication from the Commission, COM(2018) 109 final, 8 March. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52018DC0109&from=ENGoogle Scholar
European Commission (2020a). Digital finance package. Commission Communication, COM/2020/591 final, 24 September. https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/200924-digital-finance-proposals_enGoogle Scholar
European Commission (2020b). Retail payments strategy for the EU. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM(2020) 591 final, 24 September. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0591&from=ENGoogle Scholar
European Parliament (2020). Digital finance: Emerging risks in crypto-assets – regulatory and supervisory challenges in the area of financial services, institutions and markets. European Parliament Regulation of 8 October 2020, P9_TA(2020)0265. www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2020-0265_EN.htmlGoogle Scholar
European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) (2019a). Initial coin offerings and crypto-assets. Advice to the European Commission, ESMA50-157-1391, 9 January. www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/esma50-157-1391_crypto_advice.pdfGoogle Scholar
European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) (2019b). Legal qualification of crypto-assets – Survey to NCAs. Annex to ESMA50-157-1391, 9 January). www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/esma50-157-1384_annex.pdfGoogle Scholar
European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) (2021). Use of FinTech by CSDs, Report to the European Commission. ESMA70-156-4576, 2 August.Google Scholar
European Securities and Markets Authority, European Banking Authority and European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (ESMA, EBA, and EIOPA) (2018). FinTech: Regulatory sandboxes and innovation hubs. Report, JC 2018/74. www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/jc_2018_74_joint_report_on_regulatory_sandboxes_and_innovation_hubs.pdfGoogle Scholar
Fenwick, M., Kaal, W. A., and Vermeulen, E. P. M. (2018a). Why blockchain will disrupt corporate organizations. TILEC Discussion Paper and ECGI Law Working Paper No. 419/2018, October.Google Scholar
Fenwick, M., McCahery, J. A., and Vermeulen, E. P. M. (2018b). The end of ‘corporate’ governance (hello ‘platform’ governance). ECGI Law Working Paper, No. 430/2018, December.Google Scholar
Feyen, E., Frost, J., Gambacorta, L., Natarajan, H., and Saal, M. (2021). Fintech and the digital transformation of financial services: Implications for market structure and public policy. BIS Papers, No. 117.Google Scholar
Financial Stability Board (2017). Financial stability implications from FinTech: Supervisory and regulatory issues that merit authorities’ attention. www.fsb.org/wp-content/uploads/R270617.pdfGoogle Scholar
Financial Stability Board (2020a). Regulation, supervision and oversight of ‘global stablecoin’ arrangements. Final report and high-level recommendations, October. www.fsb.org/wp-content/uploads/P131020-3.pdfGoogle Scholar
Financial Stability Board (2020b). Effective practices for cyber incident response and recovery: Final Report. Final Report of Public Consultation. www.fsb.org/2020/10/effective-practices-for-cyber-incident-response-and-recovery-final-report/Google Scholar
Gortsos, C. V. (2020). The Commission’s 2020 proposal for a markets in crypto-assets regulation (‘MiCAR’): A brief introductory overview. Notes for students. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3842824Google Scholar
Group of Thirty (2009). Financial reform: A framework for financial stability. Report of Working Group on Financial Reform. https://group30.org/publications/detail/146Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (2021). COVID-19, crypto, and climate: Navigating challenging transitions. Global Financial Stability Report, October.Google Scholar
International Organization of Securities Commissions (2019a). Board priorities – IOSCO work program for 2019. www.iosco.org/library/pubdocs/pdf/IOSCOPD625.pdfGoogle Scholar
International Organization of Securities Commissions (2019b). Cyber Task Force: Final Report. FR09/2019, June. www.iosco.org/library/pubdocs/pdf/IOSCOPD633.pdfGoogle Scholar
International Organization of Securities Commissions (2020a). Global Stablecoin Initiative. Public Report, OR01/2020, March.Google Scholar
International Organization of Securities Commissions (2020b). Issues, risks and regulatory considerations relating to crypto-asset trading platforms. Final Report, FR02/2020, February. www.iosco.org/library/pubdocs/pdf/IOSCOPD649.pdfGoogle Scholar
Lafarre, A., and Van der Elst, C. (2018). Blockchain technology for corporate governance and shareholder activism. Tilburg Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series, No. 7/2018.Google Scholar
Laster, T. J. (2017). The block chain plunger: Using technology to clean up proxy plumbing and take back the vote available. Keynote Speech at the Council of Institutional Investors, Chicago, 29 September.Google Scholar
Linnemann Bech, M., Hancock, J., Rice, T., and Wadsworth, A. (2020). On the future of securities settlement. BIS Quarterly Review March. www.bis.org/publ/qtrpdf/r_qt2003i.htmGoogle Scholar
Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdfGoogle Scholar
ROFIEG (Expert Group on Regulatory Obstacles to Financial Innovation) (2019). Thirty recommendations on regulation, innovation and finance. Final Report to the European Commission, December. https://ec.europa.eu/info/files/191113-report-expert-group-regulatory-obstacles-financial-innovation_enGoogle Scholar
Valiante, D. (2022). Regulating digital platforms: The European experience with financial return crowdfunding. European Company and Financial Law Review 19(5), n.p.Google Scholar
Xiao, R. (2021). Decentralized central bank’s currency experiment. Medium blog post, 30 August. https://medium.com/iosg-ventures/decentralized-central-banks-currency-experiment-6e3120438a94Google Scholar
Zetzsche, D. A., and Woxholth, J. (2021). The DLT sandbox under the pilot regulation. Law Working Paper Series, No. 2021-001, University of Luxembourg. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3833766Google Scholar
Zetzsche, D. A., Annunziata, F., Arner, D., and Buckley, R. P. (2021). The markets in crypto-assets regulation (MiCA) and the EU digital finance strategy. Capital Markets Law Journal 16(2), 203–225.Google Scholar