Abi-Saab, Georges, “The Newly Independent States and International Law: An Outline” (1962) 8 (2) Howard Law Journal 97–121.Google Scholar

Ackermann, Thomas E A, “Editorial Comments: Clear and Present Danger: Poland, the Rule of Law & Primacy” (2021) 58 (6) Common Market Law Review 1635–1648.Google Scholar

Akehurst, Michael, “Custom as a Source of International Law” (1974–1975) 47 British Yearbook of International Law 1–53.Google Scholar

Albert, Hans, Konstruktion und Kritik. Aufsätze zur Philosophie des kritischen Rationalismus (Hoffmann und Campe 2nd ed 1975).Google Scholar

Albert, Hans, Traktat über rationale Praxis (Mohr Siebeck 1978).Google Scholar

Albert, Hans, Kritik der reinen Erkenntnislehre (Mohr Siebeck 1987).Google Scholar

Alexy, Robert, “Diskurstheorie und Menschenrechte” in Alexy, Robert (ed) Recht, Vernunft, Diskurs: Studien zur Rechtsphilosophie (Suhrkamp 1995) 127–164.Google Scholar

Alexy, Robert, “Hans Kelsens Begriff des relativen Apriori” in Alexy, Robert et al (eds) Neukantianismus und Rechtsphilosophie (Nomos 2002) 179–202.Google Scholar

Alfano, Mark and Loeb, Don, “Experimental Moral Philosophy” in Zalta, Edward N (ed) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (August 9, 2018), available at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/experimental-moral/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar

Allen, Meredith, Perry, Conrad and Kaufman, Jordy, “Toddlers Prefer to Help Familiar People” (2018) 174 Psychology 90–102.Google ScholarPubMed

Als, Heidelise, “Social Interaction: Dynamic Matrix for Developing Behavioral Organization” in Užgiris, Ina Č (ed) Social Interaction during Infancy: New Directions for Child Development Vol 4 (Jossey-Bass 1979) 21–39.Google Scholar

Alvarez-Jiménez, Alberto, “Methods for the Identification of Customary International Law in the International Court of Justice’s New Millennium Jurisprudence: 2000–2009” (2011) 60 (3) International & Comparative Law Quarterly 681–712.Google Scholar

Ameriks, Karl and Höffe, Otfried (eds), Kant’s Moral and Legal Philosophy (Cambridge University Press 2009).Google Scholar

Amrhein-Hofmann, Christine, Monismus und Dualismus in den Völkerrechtslehren (Duncker & Humblot 2003).Google Scholar

Andersen, Hans Christian, “Des Kaisers neue Kleider” in Andersen, Hans Christian (ed) Gesammelte Märchen I (Carl B Lorck 1847) 37–44.Google Scholar

Anderson, Benedict, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism (Verso 6th ed 2006).Google Scholar

Anzilotti, Dionisio, Corso di diritto internazionale (Athenaeum 2nd ed 1912).Google Scholar

Anzilotti, Dionisio, Lehrbuch des Völkerrechts (German translation by Cornelia Bruns and Karl Schmid W de Gruyter 1929).Google Scholar

Apel, Karl-Otto, “Das Apriori der Kommunikationsgemeinschaft und die Grundlagen der Ethik: Zum Problem einer rationalen Begründung der Ethik im Zeitalter der Wissenschaft” in Apel, Karl-Otto (ed) Transformation der Philosophie Vol 2 (Suhrkamp 1973) 358–435.Google Scholar

Apel, Karl-Otto, Understanding and Explanation: A Transcendental-Pragmatic Perspective (translated by Georgia Warnke MIT Press 1984 [Die Erklären-Verstehen-Kontroverse in Transzendental-Pragmatischer Sicht Suhrkamp 1979]).Google Scholar

Apperly, Ian and Butterfill, Stephen, “Do Humans Have Two Systems to Track Beliefs and Belief-Like States?” (2009) 116 Psychological Review 953–970.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas, Truth (translated and edited by R W Schmidt, Robert W Mulligan and James V McGlynn Hackett 1994 [Quaestiones disputatae de Veritate 1256–1259]).Google Scholar

Arangio-Ruiz, Gaetano, “International Law and Interindividual Law” in Nijman, Janne and Nollkaemper, André (eds) New Perspectives on the Divide between National and International Law (Oxford University Press 2007) 15–51.Google Scholar

Ashford, Elizabeth and Mulgan, Tim, “Contractualism” in Zalta, Edward N (ed) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (April 20, 2018), available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/contractualism/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar

Atwood, George E and Stolorow, Robert D, Structures of Subjectivity: Explorations in Psychoanalytic Phenomenology and Contextualism (Routledge 2nd ed 2014).Google Scholar

Auby, Jean-Bernard, “Globalisation et droit public” in Gouverner, administrer, juger. Mélanges en l’honneur de Jean Waline (Dalloz 2002) 135–157.Google Scholar

Audit, Robert, Epistemology. A Contemporary Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge (Routledge 3rd ed 2011).Google Scholar

Aust, Anthony, Modern Treaty Law and Practice (Cambridge University Press 3rd ed 2013).Google Scholar

Avbelj, Matej, “Supremacy or Primacy of EU Law: (Why) Does It Matter?” (2011) 17 (6) European Law Journal 744–763.Google Scholar

Avbelj, Matej, Fontanelli, Filippo and Martinico, Giuseppe (eds), Kadi on Trial: A Multifaceted Analysis of the Kadi Trial (Routledge 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Awad, Edmond et al, “The Moral Machine Experiment” (2018) 563 (7729) Nature 59–64.Google Scholar

Awad, Edmond et al, “Universals and Variations in Moral Decisions Made in 42 Countries by 70,000 Participants” (2020) 117 (5) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2332–2337.Google Scholar

Baquero Cruz, Julio, “The Legacy of the Maastricht-Urteil and the Pluralist Movement” (2008) 14 (4) European Law Journal 389–422.Google Scholar

Barents, René, The Autonomy of Community Law (Kluwer 2004).Google Scholar

Basdevant, Jules, “Règles générales du droit de la paix” (1936) 58 Recueil des Cours IV 471–715.Google Scholar

Bast, Jürgen, “Autonomy in Decline? A Commentary on Rimšēvičs and ECB v Latvia” (May 13, 2019) Verfassungsblog, available at https://verfassungsblog.de/autonomy-in-decline-a-commentary-on-rimsevics-and-ecb-v-latvia/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar

Bateson, Mary C, “The Epigenesis of Conversational Interaction: A Personal Account of Research Development” in Bullowa, Margaret (ed) Before Speech: The Beginning of Human Communication (Cambridge University Press 1979) 63–77.Google Scholar

Batson, C Daniel et al, “Immorality from Empathy-Induced Altruism: When Compassion and Justice Conflict” (1995) 68 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1042–1054.Google Scholar

Bauerschmidt, Jonathan, Die Rechtsperson der Europäischen Union im Wandel. Auswirkungen differenzierter Integration durch Völkerrecht auf die Europäische Union (Mohr Siebeck 2019).Google Scholar

Baumann, Peter, Erkenntnistheorie (J B Metzler 3rd ed 2015).Google Scholar

Baumgartner, Gerhard, “Der Rang des Gemeinschaftsrechts im Stufenbau der Rechtsordnung” (2000) 8 Journal für Rechtspolitik 84–99.Google Scholar

Bäumler, Jelena, “Vom Vertragstext zum Inkrafttreten: Das Vertragsschlussverfahren im Mehrebenensystem am Beispiel CETA” (2016) 51 (6) Europarecht 607–631.Google Scholar

Bazalgette, Peter, The Empathy Instinct: How to Create a More Civil Society (John Murray 2017).Google Scholar

Beckermann, Ansgar, “Die realistischen Voraussetzungen der Konsenstheorie von J. Habermas” (1972) 3 (1) Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 63–80.Google Scholar

Bederman, David J, Globalization and International Law (Palgrave 2008).Google Scholar

Benhabib, Seyla, “In the Shadow of Aristotle and Hegel: Communicative Ethics and Current Controversies in Practical Philosophy” (1989) 21 (1) Philosophical Forum 1–31.Google Scholar

Benhabib, Seyla, “Another Universalism: On the Unity and Diversity of Human Rights” (2007) 81 Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 7–32.Google Scholar

Benson, Peter, “François Gény’s Doctrine of Customary Law” (1982) 20 Canadian Yearbook of International Law 267–281.Google Scholar

Bergmann, Andreas, Zur Souveränitätskonzeption des Europäischen Gerichtshofs (Mohr Siebeck 2018).Google Scholar

Bergmann, Gustav, “Strawson’s Ontology” (1960) 57 (19) Journal of Philosophy 601–622.Google Scholar

Bergmann, Gustav, Logic and Reality (University of Wisconsin Press 1964).Google Scholar

Berka, Walter, Verfassungsrecht (Verlag Österreich 6th ed 2016).Google Scholar

Berman, Paul S, “Global Legal Pluralism” (2007) 80 Southern California Law Review 1155–1238.Google Scholar

Berman, Paul S, Global Legal Pluralism: A Jurisprudence of Law beyond Borders (Oxford University Press 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berman, Paul S, “How Legal Pluralism Is and Is Not Distinct from Liberalism: A Response to Alexis Galán and Dennis Patterson” (2013) 11 (3) International Journal of Constitutional Law 801–808.Google Scholar

Berman, Paul S, “Jurisgenerative Constitutionalism: Procedural Principles for Managing Global Legal Pluralism” (2013) 20 (2) Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 665–695.Google Scholar

Berman, Paul S, “From Legal Pluralism to Global Legal Pluralism” in Nobles, Richard and Schiff, David (eds) Law, Society and Community Socio-Legal Essays in Honour of Roger Cotterrell (Ashgate 2014) 255–271.Google Scholar

Berman, Paul S, “The Evolution of Global Legal Pluralism” in Cotterrell, Roger and Del Mar, Maksymilian (eds) Authority in Transnational Legal Theory: Theorising across Disciplines (Edward Elgar 2016) 151–188.Google Scholar

Besson, Samantha, “Whose Constitution(s)? International Law, Constitutionalism, and Democracy” in Dunhoff, Jeffrey L and Trachtman, Joel P (eds) Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance (Cambridge University Press 2009) 381–408.Google Scholar

Betlem, Gerrit and Nollkaemper, André, “Giving Effect to Public International Law and European Community Law before Domestic Courts. A Comparative Analysis of the Practice of Consistent Interpretation” (2003) 14 (3) European Journal of International Law 569–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bianchi, Andrea, “Assessing the Effectiveness of the UN Security Council’s Anti-Terrorism Measures: The Quest for Legitimacy and Cohesion” (2017) 17 (5) European Journal of International Law 881–919.Google Scholar

Biernat, Stanisław et al, “Statement of Retired Judges of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal” (October 11, 2021) Verfassungsblog, available at https://verfassungsblog.de/statement-of-retired-judges-of-the-polish-constitutional-tribunal [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar

Bigman, Yochanan E and Gray, Kurt, “Life and Death Decisions of Autonomous Vehicles” (2020) 549 (7797) Nature E1–E2.Google Scholar

Binder, Christina, Die Grenzen der Vertragstreue im Völkerrecht (Springer 2012).Google Scholar

Bird-Pollan, Stefan, “Rawls: Construction and Justification” (2009) 1 (2) Public Reason 12–30.Google Scholar

Bix, Brian, Jurisprudence: Theory and Context (Sweet & Maxwell 5th ed 2009).Google Scholar

Blaffer Hrdy, Sarah, Mothers and Others (Harvard University Press 2009).Google Scholar

Blecha, Jörg, “Mit Anstand auf die Welt” (December 16, 2006) Spiegel, available at www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-49929836.html [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar

Blecha, Jörg and von Bredow, Rafaela, “Die Grammatik des Guten” (July 30, 2007) Spiegel, available at www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-52417856.html [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar

Bleckmann, Albert, “Die Position des Völkerrechts im inneren Rechtsraum der EG. Monismus oder Dualismus der Rechtsordnungen?” (1975) 18 German Yearbook of International Law 300–319.Google Scholar

Blokker, Paul, “Populist Counter-Constitutionalism, Conservatism, and Legal Fundamentalism” (2019) 15 (3) European Constitutional Law Review 519–543.Google Scholar

Bloom, Paul and Jarudi, Izzat, “The Chomsky of Morality? A View of Morality as the Product of an Innate Mental Faculty – Rather Like Language” (2006) 443 Nature 909–910.Google Scholar

Bloom, Paul, Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion (Ecco 2016).Google Scholar

Bobić, Ana, The Jurisprudence of Constitutional Conflict in the European Union (Oxford University Press 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boelaert, Sonja, “Minding the Gap: Reflections on the Relationship between EU Law and Public International Law in the Light of the Judgment in Case C-364/10 Hungary v Slovakia” in Czuczai, Jenő and Naert, Frederik (eds) The EU as a Global Actor – Bridging Legal Theory and Practice: Liber Amicorum in Honour of Ricardo Gosalbo Bono (Brill Nijhoff 2017) 217–240.Google Scholar

Bogdanowicz, Piotr and Taborowski, Maciej, “How to Save a Supreme Court in a Rule of Law Crisis: The Polish Experience” (2020) 16 (2) European Constitutional Law Review 306–327.Google Scholar

Bohman, James and Rehg, William, “Jürgen Habermas” in Edward N Zalta (ed) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (August 4, 2014), available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/habermas/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar

Bonelli, Matteo, “The Taricco Saga and the Consolidation of Judicial Dialogue in the European Union: CJEU, C-105/14 Ivo Taricco and Others, ECLI:EU:C:2015:555; and C-42/17 M.A.S., M.B., ECLI:EU:C:2017:936 Italian Constitutional Court, Order no. 24/2017” (2018) 25 (3) Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 357–373.Google Scholar

Bonnefon, Jean-François, Rahwan, Iyad and Shariff, Azim, “The Social Dilemma of Autonomous Vehicles” (2016) 352 (6293) Science 1573–1576.Google Scholar

Bostrom, Nick, “Are You Living in a Computer Simulation?” (2003) 53 (211) Philosophical Quarterly 243–255.Google Scholar

Bradley, Kieran, “Investor–State Dispute Tribunals Established under EU International Agreements: Opinion 1/17 (EU-Canada CETA)” in Butler, Graham and Wessel, Ramses A (eds) EU External Relations Law. The Cases in Context (Hart 2022) 959–969.Google Scholar

Bråten, Stein and Trevarthen, Colwyn, “Prologue. From Infant Intersubjectivity and Participant Movements to Simulation and Conversation in Cultural Common Sense” in Bråten, Stein (ed) On Being Moved: From Mirror Neurons to Empathy (John Benjamins North America 2007) 21–34.Google Scholar

Brazelton, T Berry, “Evidence of Communication During Neonatal Behavioural Assessment” in Bullowa, Margaret (ed) Before Speech: The Beginning of Human Communication (Cambridge University Press 1979) 79–88.Google Scholar

Brazelton, T Berry and Nuget, J Kevin, The Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale (Mac Keith Press 1995).Google Scholar

Breuer, Hubertus, “Das Moral-Gen: Ist das Gute im Menschen angeboren? Wissenschafter meinen: ja” (March 31, 2007) Profil, available at www.profil.at/home/das-moral-gen-ist-gute-menschen-wissenschafter-169043 [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar

Breuer, Marten, “Wider das Recht auf Vergessen … des Bundesverfassungsgerichts!” (December 2, 2019) Verfassungsblog, available at https://verfassungsblog.de/wider-das-recht-auf-vergessen-des-bundesverfassungsgerichts/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar

Brierly, John L, The Law of Nations (Oxford University Press 1963).Google Scholar

Broad, Kevin D, Curley, James P and Keverne, Eric B, “Mother–Infant Bonding and the Evolution of Mammalian Social Relationships” (2006) 361 (1476) Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 2199–2214.Google Scholar

Brockmöller, Annette, Kirste, Stephan and Neumann, Ulfrid (eds), Wert und Wahrheit in der Rechtswissenschaft ARSP Beiheft 145 (Franz Steiner 2015).Google Scholar

Brodherr, Anke, Alfred Verdross’ Theorie des gemäßigten Monismus (Herbert Utz 2004).Google Scholar

Brölmann, Catherine, “Deterritorialization in International Law: Moving Away from the Divide between National and International Law” in Nijman, Janne E. and Nollkaemper, André (eds) New Perspectives on the Divide between National and International Law (Oxford University Press 2007) 84–108.Google Scholar

Buckle, Stephen, Natural Law and the Theory of Property (Oxford Clarendon Press 1991).Google Scholar

Budras, Corinna, “EZB hätte kooperativer sein müssen” Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung June 29, 2020.Google Scholar

Buergenthal, Thomas, “Self-Executing and Non-Self-Executing Treaties in National and International Law” (1992) 235 Recueil des Cours Vol IV 303–400.Google Scholar

Bulygin, Eugenio, “Das Problem der Geltung bei Kelsen” in Paulson, Stanley L and Stolleis, Michael (eds) Hans Kelsen – Staatsrechtslehrer und Rechtstheoretiker des 20. Jahrhunderts (Mohr Siebeck 2004) 80–95.Google Scholar

Burchardt, Dana, Die Rangfrage im europäischen Normenverbund. Theoretische Grundlagen und dogmatische Grundzüge des Verhältnisses von Unionsrecht und nationalem Recht (Mohr Siebeck 2015).Google Scholar

Burchardt, Dana, “Die Ausübung der Identitätskontrolle durch das Bundesverfassungsgericht – Zugleich Besprechung des Beschlusses 2 BvR 2735/14 des BVerfG vom 15.12.2015 (‚Solange III‘/‘Europäischer Haftbefehl II‘)” (2016) 76 Heidelberg Journal of International Law 527–551.Google Scholar

Burchardt, Dana, “Belittling the Primacy of EU Law in Taricco II” (December 7, 2017) Verfassungsblog, available at https://verfassungsblog.de/belittling-the-primacy-of-eu-law-in-taricco-ii/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar

Burchardt, Dana, “The Relationship between the Law of the European Union and the Law of Its Member States – A Norm-Based Conceptual Framework” (2019) 15 (1) European Constitutional Law Review 73–103.Google Scholar

Burgorgue-Larsen, Laurence, “La mobilisation de la Charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne par les juridictions constitutionnelles” (2019) Titre VII (2) De l’intégration des ordres juridiques: droit constitutionnel et droit de l’Union européenne 31–40.Google Scholar

Burke-White, William W, “International Legal Pluralism” (2005) 25 (4) Michigan Journal of International Law 963–979.Google Scholar

Bußjäger, Peter, Homogenität und Differenz: Zur Theorie der Aufgabenverteilung zwischen Bund und Ländern in Österreich (Braumüller 2006).Google Scholar

Bußjäger, Peter and Heißl, Gregor, “Nationaler Souveränitätsanspruch versus autonome Rechtsordnung? Integrationsschranken im Spannungsverhältnis zur Vorrangjudikatur” (2008) 34 (8) Österreichische Juristenzeitung 307–315.Google Scholar

Bußjäger, Peter, “Folgerungen aus dem Lissabonurteil des Bundesverfassungsgerichts” (2010) 132 (5) Juristische Blätter 273–283.Google Scholar

Butler, Graham, Constitutional Law of the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy: Competence and Institutions in External Relations (Hart 2019).Google Scholar

Buttelmann, David, Carpenter, Malinda and Tomasello, Michael, “Eighteen-Month-Old Infants Show False Belief Understanding in an Active Helping Paradigm” (2009) 112 (2) Cognition 337–342.Google Scholar

Buttelmann, David et al, “Eighteen-Month-Olds Understand False Beliefs in an Unexpected-Contents Task” (2014) 119 Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 120–126.Google Scholar

Buttelmann, David et al, “Great Apes Distinguish True from False Beliefs in an Interactive Helping Task” (2017) 12 (4) PLoS ONE.Google Scholar

Byers, Michael, Custom, Power and the Power of Rules: International Relations and Customary International Law (Cambridge University Press 1999).Google Scholar

Çalı, Başak, The Authority of International Law: Obedience, Respect, and Rebuttal (Oxford University Press 2015).Google Scholar

Calliess, Christian and van der Schyff, Gerhard, Constitutional Identity in a Europe of Multilevel Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press 2019).Google Scholar

Cannizzaro, Enzo, “The Neo-Monism of the European Legal Order” in Cannizzaro, Enzo, Palchetti, Paolo and Wessel, Ramses A (eds) International Law as Law of the European Union (Martinus Nijhoff 2012) 35–58.Google Scholar

Capps, John, “The Pragmatic Theory of Truth” in Edward N Zalta (ed) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (March 21, 2019), available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/truth-pragmatic/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar

Carpenter, Malinda and Liebal, Kristin, “Joint Attention, Communication, and Knowing Together in Infancy” in Seemann, Axel (ed) Joint Attention: New Developments in Psychology, Philosophy of Mind, and Social Neuroscience (MIT Press 2011) 159–181.Google Scholar

Cartabia, Marta, “The Italian Constitutional Court and the Relationship between the Italian Legal System and the European Community” (1990) 12 Michigan International Law Journal 173–203.Google Scholar

Cassese, Antonio, International Law (Oxford University Press 2nd ed 2005).Google Scholar

Castoriadis, Cornelius, “The Logic of Magmas and the Question of Autonomy” in Cornelius Castoriadis, The Castoriadis Reader (translated and edited by David A Curtis Oxford University Press 1997) 290–318.Google Scholar

Charney, Jonathan Ian, “The Persistent Objector Rule and the Development of Customary International Law” (1985) 56 British Yearbook of International Law 1–24.Google Scholar

Charney, Jonathan Ian, “Universal International Law” (1993) 87 (4) American Journal of International Law 529–551.Google Scholar

Cheng, Bin, “United Nations Resolutions on Outer Space: ‘Instant’ Customary International Law?” (1965) 5 Indian Journal of International Law 23–48.Google Scholar

Cheng, Yawei et al, “Love Hurts: An fMRI Study” (2010) 51 (2) Neuro Image 923–929.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam, Syntactic Structures (Mouton 1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax (MIT Press 1965).Google Scholar

Christoph, Krenn, “Warum Unionsrecht Vorrang hat: Zur aktualisierten Begr?ndung des Vorrangprinzips in den Urteilen Euro Box Promotion und R.S.”Google Scholar

Churchland, Patricia S, Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us about Morality (Princeton University Press 2011) 18–19.Google Scholar

Churchland, Patricia S, “The Neurobiological Platform for Moral Values” (2014) 151 Behaviour 283–296.Google Scholar

Claes, Monica, The National Courts’ Mandate in the European Constitution (Hart 2006).Google Scholar

Claes, Monica, “National Identity: Trump Card or Up for Negotiation?” in Arnaiz, Alejandro Saiz and Llivina, Carina Alcoberro (eds) National Constitutional Identity and European Integration (Intersentia 2013) 109–139.Google Scholar

Claes, Monica, “The Primacy of EU Law in European and National Law” in Chalmers, Damian and Arnull, Anthony (eds) The Oxford Handbook of European Union Law (Oxford University Press 2015) 178–211.Google Scholar

Cloots, Elke, National Identity in EU Law (Oxford University Press 2015).Google Scholar

Cohen, Hermann, Das Prinzip der Infinitesimal-Methode und seine Geschichte (Dümmler 1883 [partially translated by Hermann Cohen, “‘Introduction’ to The Principle of the Infinitesimal Method and its History (1883)” in Sebastian Luft (ed) The Neo-Kantian Reader (partially translated by David Hyder and Lydia Patton Routledge 2015)]).Google Scholar

Cohen, Hermann, Kants Theorie der Erfahrung (Dümmler 2nd ed 1885 [partially translated by David Hyder as “‘The Synthetic Principles’ from Kant’s Theory of Experience (1885)” in Sebastian Luft (ed) The Neo-Kantian Reader (Routledge 2015) 107–116]).Google Scholar

Cohen, Hermann, “Biographisches Vorwort und Einleitung mit kritischem Nachtrag” in Lange, Friedrich (ed) Geschichte des Materialismus und Kritik seiner Bedeutung in der Gegenwart (Baedeker 6th ed 1898) xv–lxxvi.Google Scholar

Cohen, Hermann, Logik der reinen Erkenntnis (Cassirer 3rd ed 1922).Google Scholar

Cohen, Hermann, Logik der reinen Erkenntnis (Georg Olms Hermann Cohen Werke Vol 6 I 4th ed 1977 [Bruno Cassirer 2nd ed 1914]).Google Scholar

Cohen, Hermann, System der Philosophie, Zweiter Teil: Ethik des reinen Willens (Georg Olms Hermann Cohen Werke Vol 7 II 5th ed 1981 [Bruno Cassirer 2nd ed 1907]).Google Scholar

Cohen, Hermann, Kants Theorie der Erfahrung (Georg Olms 1987 Hermann Cohen Werke Vol 1 I.3 [Dümmler 1st ed 1871]).Google Scholar

Cohen, Jean L, Globalization and Sovereignty. Rethinking Legality, Legitimacy, and Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press 2012).Google Scholar

Cohon, Rachel, “Hume’s Moral Philosophy” in Edward N Zalta (ed) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (August 20, 2018), available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hume-moral/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar

Constantinesco, Vlad and Simon, Denys, “Quelques problèmes des relations extérieures des Communautés Européennes” (1975) 11 Revue trimestrielle de droit européen 432–469.Google Scholar

Conway, Gerard, “Conflicts of Competence Norms in EU Law and the Legal Reasoning of the ECJ” (2010) 11 (9) German Law Journal 966–1005.Google Scholar

Correa-Chávez, Maricela and Roberts, Amy L D, “A Cultural Analysis Is Necessary in Understanding Intersubjectivity” (2012) 18 (1) Culture & Psychology 99–108.Google Scholar

Corten, Olivier and Klein, Pierre, “Are Agreements between States and Non-State Entities Rooted in the International Legal Order?” in Cannizzaro, Enzo (ed) The Law of Treaties beyond the Vienna Convention (Oxford University Press 2011) 3–24.Google Scholar

Costa, Albert et al, “Your Morals Depend on Language” (2014) 9 (4) Public Library of Science ONE 1–7.Google Scholar

Cotterrell, Roger, Law, Culture and Society: Legal Ideas in the Mirror of Social Theory (Ashgate 2006).Google Scholar

Cotterrell, Roger, “Does Global Legal Pluralism Need a Concept of Law?” in Baxi, Upendra, McCrudden, Christopher and Paliwala, Abdul (eds) Law’s Ethical, Global and Theoretical Contexts – Essays in Honour of William Twining (Cambridge University Press 2015) 303–319.Google Scholar

Cover, Robert M, “The Supreme Court, 1982 Term-Foreword: Nomos and Narrative” (1983) 97 (4) Harvard Law Review 4–68.Google Scholar

Cover, Robert M, “Violence and the Word” (1986) 95 (8) Yale Law Journal 1601–1629.Google Scholar

Cowie, Fiona, “Innateness and Language” in Edward N Zalta (ed) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (January 16, 2008), available at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/innateness-language/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar

Craig, Paul, The Lisbon Treaty. Law, Politics and Treaty Reform (Oxford University Press 2010).Google Scholar

Craig, Paul, “The ECJ and Ultra Vires Action: A Conceptual Analysis” (2011) 48 (2) Common Market Law Review 395–437.Google Scholar

Craig, Paul, “Constitutional Identity in the United Kingdom. An Evolving Concept” in Calliess, Christian and van der Schyff, Gerhard (eds) Constitutional Identity in a Europe of Multilevel Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press 2019) 284–302.Google Scholar

Craig, Paul and de Búrca, Gráinne, EU Law. Text, Cases, and Materials (Oxford University Press 7th ed 2020).Google Scholar

Crawford, James, Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law (Oxford University Press 8th ed 2012).Google Scholar

Cremer, Wolfram, “Artikel 21 EUV” in Calliess, Christian and Ruffert, Matthias (eds) EUV/AEUV (CH Beck 6th ed 2022) 351–356.Google Scholar

Cremona, Marise, “External Relations and External Competence of the European Union” in Craig, Paul and de Búrca, Graínne (eds) The Evolution of EU Law (Oxford University Press 2nd ed 2011) 217–268.Google Scholar

Cremona, Marise (ed), Structural Principles in EU External Relations Law (Hart 2018).Google Scholar

Croquet, Nicolas AJ, “The Import of International Customary Law into the EU Legal Order: The Adequacy of a Direct Effect Analysis” (2013) 15 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 47–81.Google Scholar

Csibra, Gergely, “Recognizing Communicative Intentions” (2010) 25 (2) Infancy, Mind and Language 141–168.Google Scholar

Csibra, Gergely and Gergely, György, “Natural Pedagogy” (2009) 13 (4) Trends in Cognitive Sciences 148–153.Google Scholar

Cudd, Ann and Eftekhari, Seena, “Contractarianism” in Edward N Zalta (ed) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (March 15, 2017), available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/contractarianism/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar

Curtin, Deirdre, “Official Secrets and the Negotiation of International Agreements: Is the EU Executive Unbound?” (2013) 50 (2) Common Market Law Review 423–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

D’Amato, Anthony, The Concept of Custom in International Law (Cornell University Press 1971).Google Scholar

D’Aspremont, Jean, Formalism and the Sources of International Law: A Theory of the Ascertainment of Legal Rules (Oxford University Press 2011).Google Scholar

Dahm, Georg, Völkerrecht Vol I (De Gruyter 1958).Google Scholar

Damestoy, Manon and Levrat, Nicolas, “The Mixed Nature of the EU-Canada FTA. Between Competences Distribution and Democratic Legitimacy” in Levrat, Nicolas et al (eds) The EU and Its Member States’ Joint Participation in International Agreements (Hart 2022) 77–95.Google Scholar

Damm, Carolin, Die Europäische Union im universellen Völkergewohnheitsrecht (Mohr Siebeck 2016).Google Scholar

Damon, William, “Fair Distribution and Sharing: The Development of Positive Justice” in Puka, Bill (ed) Fundamental Research in Moral Development (Garland Publishing 1994) 189–254.Google Scholar

Danilenko, Gennady M, “Application of Customary International Law to Municipal Law” in Tunkin, Grigory I and Wolfrum, Rüdiger (eds) International and Municipal Law (Duncker & Humblot 1988) 13–23.Google Scholar

Danilenko, Gennady M, “The Theory of Customary International Law” (1988) 31 German Yearbook of International Law 9–47.Google Scholar

Danilenko, Gennady M, Law-Making in the International Community (Brill 1993).Google Scholar

Dashwood, Alan, “EU Acts and Member State Acts in the Negotiation, Conclusion, and Implementation of International Agreements” in Cremona, Marise and Kilpatrick, Claire (eds) EU Legal Acts. Challenges and Transformations (Oxford University Press 2018) 189–249.Google Scholar

David, Marian, “The Correspondence Theory of Truth” in Edward N Zalta (ed) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (May 28, 2015), available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/truth-correspondence/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar

Davidson, Donald, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation (Oxford University Press 1984).Google Scholar

Davidson, Donald, “The Centrality of Truth” in Peregrin, Jaroslav (ed) Truth and Its Nature (If Any) (Springer 1999) 105–115.Google Scholar

Davidson, Donald, “The Folly of Trying to Define Truth” in Lynch, Michael P (ed) The Nature of Truth. Classic and Contemporary Perspectives (MIT Press 2001) 623–640.Google Scholar

De Baere, Geert, Constitutional Principles of EU External Relations (Oxford University Press 2008).Google Scholar

De Baere, Geert and Koutrakos, Panos, “The Interactions between the Legislature and the Judiciary in EU External Relations” in Syrpis, Phil (ed) The Judiciary, the Legislature and the EU Internal Market (Cambridge University Press 2012) 243–273.Google Scholar

De Baere, Geert and Ryngaert, Cedric, “The ECJ’s Judgment in Air Transport Association of America and the International Legal Context” (2013) 18 (3) European Foreign Affairs Review 389–409.Google Scholar

De Baere, Geert and Van den Sanden, Tina, “Interinstitutional Gravity and Pirates of the Parliament on Stranger Tides: The Continued Constitutional Significance of the Choice of Legal Basis in Post-Lisbon External Action” (2016) 12 (1) European Constitutional Law Review 85–113.Google Scholar

De Búrca, Gráinne, “The European Court of Justice and the International Legal Order after Kadi” (2010) 51 (1) Harvard International Law Journal 1–48.Google Scholar

De Búrca, Graínne, “The Road Not Taken. The European Union as a Global Human Rights Actor” (2011) 105 (4) American Journal of International Law 649–693.Google Scholar

De Búrca, Graínne, “The ECJ and the International Legal Order: A Re-Evaluation” in de Búrca, Graínne and Weiler, Joseph H H (eds) The Worlds of European Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press 2012) 105–149.Google Scholar

De Búrca, Gráinne, “International Law before the Courts. The EU and the US Compared” (2015) 55 (3) Virginia Journal of International Law 685–728.Google Scholar

De Sousa Santos, Boaventura, Toward a New Common Sense: Law, Science and Politics in the Paradigmatic Transition (Routledge 1995).Google Scholar

De Waal, Frans, The Age of Empathy: Nature’s Lessons for a Kinder Society (Crown/Archetype 2010).Google Scholar

De Witte, Bruno, “European Union Law: How Autonomous Is Its Legal Order?” (2010) 65 Zeitschrift für Öffentliches Recht 141–155.Google Scholar

De Witte, Bruno, “Direct Effect, Primacy and the Nature of the Legal Order” in de Búrca, Gráinne and Craig, Paul (eds) The Evolution of EU Law (Oxford University Press 2011) 323–362.Google Scholar

De Witte, Bruno and Martinelli, Thibault, “Treaties between EU Member States as Quasi-Instruments of EU Law” in Cremona, Marise and Kilpatrick, Claire (eds) EU Legal Acts. Challenges and Transformations (Oxford University Press 2018) 157–188.Google Scholar

Debiec, Jacek and Sullivan, Regina Marie, “Intergenerational Transmission of Emotional Trauma through Amygdala-Dependent Mother-to-Infant Transfer of Specific Fear” (2014) 111 (33) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 12222–12227.Google Scholar

Décencière-Ferrandière, André, “Considérations sur le Droit International dans ses Rapports avec le Droit de l’État” (1933) 40 (1) Revue Générale de Droit International Public 45–70.Google Scholar

Decety, Jean and Cowell, Jason M, “Friends or Foes: Is Empathy Necessary for Moral Behavior?” (2014) 9 (4) Perspectives on Psychological Science 525–537.Google Scholar

Deckert, Martina, “Recht und Wahrheit. Zum gegenwärtigen Stand der Diskussion” (1996) 82 (1) Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 43–54.Google Scholar

Dederer, Hans-Georg, “Die Grenzen des Vorrangs des Unionsrechts – zur Vereinheitlichung von Grundrechts-, Ultra-vires- und Identitätskontrolle” (2014) 69 (7) JuristenZeitung 313–322.Google Scholar

Delafield-Butt, Jonathan and Trevarthen, Colwyn, “Theories of the Development of Human Communication” in Cobley, Paul and Schultz, Peter J (eds) Theories and Models of Communication (Mouton De Gruyter 2013) 199–222.Google Scholar

Delbrück, Jost, “Begriff, Geltung u. Erscheinungsformen des Völkerrechts” in Dahm, Georg et al (eds) Völkerrecht Vol I/1 (De Gruyter 2nd ed 1989) 27.Google Scholar

Delbrück, Jost, “Das Individuum im Völkerrecht” in Dahm, Georg et al (eds) Völkerrecht Vol. I/2 (De Gruyter 2nd ed 2002) 259.Google Scholar

Delbrück, Jost, “Verbindlichkeit und Geltungsbereich der Verträge” in Dahm, Georg et al (eds) Völkerrecht Vol I/3 (De Gruyter 2nd ed 2002) 600.Google Scholar

Delgado Casteleiro, Andrés, The International Responsibility of the European Union. From Competence to Normative Control (Cambridge University Press 2018) 32–33.Google Scholar

Delhomme, Vincent and Larripa, Lucie, “C-416/17 Commission v France: Failure of a Member State to Fulfil its Obligations Article 267(3) TFEU” (November 22, 2018) European Law Blog, available at https://europeanlawblog.eu/2018/11/22/c-416-17-commission-v-france-failure-of-a-member-state-to-fulfil-its-obligations-under-article-2673-tfeu/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar

Delmas-Marty, Mireille, Les forces imaginantes du droit (II) : Le pluralisme ordonné (Seuil 2006).Google Scholar

Delmas-Marty, Mireille, Ordering Pluralism: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding the Transnational Legal World (translated by Naomi Norberg Hart 2009).Google Scholar

Denza, Eileen, “International Aviation and the EU Carbon Trading Scheme: Comment on the Air Transport Association of America Case” (2012) 37 (3) European Law Review 314–326.Google Scholar

Denza, Eileen, “Placing the European Union in International Context: Legitimacy of the Case Law” in Adams, Maurice et al (eds) Judging Europe’s Judges: The Legitimacy of the Case Law of the European Court of Justice (Hart 2013) 175–196.Google Scholar

Descartes, René, The Philosophical Writings of Descartes (edited by Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert and Murdoch, Dugald Cambridge University Press 1984).Google Scholar

Dewey, John and Bentley, Arthur, Knowing and the Known (Beacon Press 1949).Google Scholar

Di Giovanni, George and Livieri, Paolo, “Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi” in Edward N Zalta (ed) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (December 6, 2018), available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/friedrich-jacobi/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar

Dias, Brian G and Ressler, Kerry J, “Parental Olfactory Experience Influences Behavior and Neural Structure in Subsequent Generations” (2014) 17 (1) Nature Neuroscience 89–98.Google Scholar

Dickson, Julie, “Towards a Theory of European Union Legal Systems” in Dickson, Julie and Eleftheriadis, Pavlos (eds) Philosophical Foundations of European Union Law (Oxford University Press 2012) 25–53.Google Scholar

Dietze, Jan et al, “Europa – Quo Vadis? Ein kritischer Kommentar zum EZB-Urteil des BverfG” (2020) 31 (12) Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 525–530.Google Scholar

Diggelmann, Oliver and Altwicker, Tilmann, “Is There Something Like a Constitution of International Law? A Critical Analysis of the Debate on World Constitutionalism” (2008) 68 Heidelberg Journal of International Law 623–650.Google Scholar

Doore, Isaak I, The Epistemological Foundations of Law (Carolina Academic Press 2007).Google Scholar

Dörr, Oliver, “Art 31 and 32” in Dörr, Oliver and Schmalenbach, Kirsten (eds) Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties – A Commentary (Springer 2nd ed 2018).Google Scholar

Dougan, Michael, “The Primacy of Union Law over Incompatible National Measures: Beyond Disapplication and towards a Remedy of Nullity” (2022) 59 (5) Common Market Law Review 1301–1332.Google Scholar

Dreier, Horst, Rechtslehre, Staatssoziologie und Demokratietheorie bei Hans Kelsen (Nomos 2nd ed 1990).Google Scholar

Dreier, Ralf, “Bemerkungen zur Theorie der Grundnorm” in Hans Kelsen-Institut (ed) Die Reine Rechtslehre in wissenschaftlicher Diskussion (Manz 1982) 38–46.Google Scholar

Drinóczi, Tímea, “Hungarian Constitutional Court: The Limits of EU Law in the Hungarian Legal System: Judgment of 5 December 2016, No 22/2016” (2017) 11 (1) Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law 139–151.Google Scholar

Duguit, Léon, Souveraineté et liberté (Éditions La Mémoire du Droit 1922).Google Scholar

Duhigg, Charles, The Power of Habit: Why We Do What We Do in Life and Business (Random House 2012).Google Scholar

Dummett, Michael, Frege: Philosophy of Language (Harper & Row 1973).Google Scholar

Dummett, Michael, Origins of Analytical Philosophy (Harvard University Press 1993).Google Scholar

Dunoff, Jeffrey L and Trachtman, Joel P, “A Functional Approach to International Constitutionalization” in Dunoff, Jeffrey L and Trachtman, Joel P (eds) Ruling the World: Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance (Cambridge University Press 2009) 3–35.Google Scholar

Dupoux, Emmanuel and Jacob, Pierre, “Universal Moral Grammar: A Critical Appraisal” (2007) 11 (9) Trends in Cognitive Sciences 373–378.Google Scholar

Dupré, John, “Making Hay with Straw Men. Book Review of Pinker, Steven. The Blank Slate” (2003) American Scientist, available at www.researchgate.net/profile/John-Dupre-2/publication/272353765_Making_Hay_with_Straw_Men_Review_of_Steven_Pinker_The_Blank_Slate_The_Modern_Denial_of_Human_Nature/links/54e2883b0cf296663796aabc/Making-Hay-with-Straw-Men-Review-of-Steven-Pinker-The-Blank-Slate-The-Modern-Denial-of-Human-Nature?_tp=eyJjb250ZXh0Ijp7ImZpcnN0UGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uIiwicGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uIn19 [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar

Eagleman, David, Incognito: The Secret Lives of the Brain (Pantheon 2011).Google Scholar

Eckes, Christina, EU Powers Under External Pressure. How the EU’s External Actions Alter its Internal Structures (Oxford University Press 2019).Google Scholar

Eckes, Christina, “The Autonomy of the EU Legal Order” (2020) 4 (1) Europe and the World: A Law Review 1–19.Google Scholar

Eeckhout, Piet, “Case C-308/06 The Queen, on the Application of International Association of Independent Tanker Owners (Intertanko) and Others v Secretary of State for Transport, judgment of the Court of Justice, (Grand Chamber) of 3 June 2008” (2009) 46 (6) Common Market Law Review 2041–2057.Google Scholar

Eeckhout, Piet, EU External Relations Law (Oxford University Press 2nd ed 2012).Google Scholar

Eeckhout, Piet, “Human Rights and the Autonomy of EU Law: Pluralism or Integration?” (2013) 66 (1) Current Legal Problems 169–202.Google Scholar

Eeckhout, Piet, “The Integration of Public International Law in EU Law: Analytical and Normative Questions” in Eeckhout, Piet and López-Escudero, Manuel (eds) The European Union’s External Action in Times of Crisis (Hart 2016) 189–204.Google Scholar

Ehrlich, Eugen, Fundamental Principles of Sociology of Law (translated by Walter Lewis Moll Harvard University Press 1936 [Grundlegung der Soziologie des Rechts Duncker & Humblot 1913]).Google Scholar

Eleftheriadis, Pavlos, “Cosmopolitan Legitimacy” paper presented at the “Philosophical Foundations of Global Law” conference at the University of Cartagena, Colombia on August 25, 2016 (on file with the author).Google Scholar

Elias, Olufemi, “The Nature of the Subjective Element in Customary International Law” (1995) 44 (3) International and Comparative Law Quarterly 501–520.Google Scholar

Emde, Robert N et al, “The Moral Self of Infancy: Affective Core and Procedural Knowledge” (1991) 11 (3) Developmental Review 251–270.Google Scholar

Engisch, Karl, Die Einheit der Rechtsordnung (Winter 1935).Google Scholar

Engisch, Karl, Einführung in das juristische Denken (Kohlhammer 7th ed 1977).Google Scholar

Epiney, Astrid, “Zur Stellung des Völkerrechts in der EU. Zugleich Besprechung von EuGH, EuZW 1998, 572 – Hermès und EuGH, EuZW 1998, 964 – Racke” (1999) 9 Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 5–11.Google Scholar

Epiney, Astrid, “Die Bindung der EU an das allgemeine Völkerrecht” in Obwexer, Walter (ed) Die Europäische Union im Völkerrecht (Nomos 2012) 25–48.Google Scholar

Fabbrini, Federico, “After the OMT Case: The Supremacy of EU Law as the Guarantee of the Equality of the Member States” (2015) 16 (4) German Law Journal 1003–1023.Google Scholar

Falk, Richard A, “The New States and International Legal Order” (1966) 118 Recueil des Cours 1–103.Google Scholar

Falk Moore, Sally, “Certainties Undone. Fifty Turbulent Years of Legal Anthropology, 1949–1999” (2001) 7 (1) Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 95–116.Google Scholar

Faraguna, Pietro, “The Italian Constitutional Court in re Taricco: ‘Gauweiler in the Roman Campagna’” (January 31, 2017) Verfassungsblog, available at https://verfassungsblog.de/the-italian-constitutional-court-in-re-taricco-gauweiler-in-the-roman-campagna/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar

Fassbender, Bardo, “Triepel in Luxemburg: Die dualistische Sicht des Verhältnisses zwischen Europa- und Völkerrecht in der ‘Kadi-Rechtssprechung’ des EuGH als Problem des Selbstverständnisses der Europäischen Union” (2010) 63 (8) Die öffentliche Verwaltung 333–341.Google Scholar

Fastenrath, Ulrich, Kompetenzverteilung im Bereich der auswärtigen Gewalt (CH Beck 1986).Google Scholar

Fastenrath, Ulrich, Lücken im Völkerrecht – Zu Rechtscharakter, Quellen, Systemzusammenhang, Methodenlehre und Funktionen des Völkerrechts (Duncker & Humblot 1991).Google Scholar

Fastenrath, Ulrich, “Anmerkung” (2016) 71 (12) JuristenZeitung 636–640.Google Scholar

Fastenrath, Ulrich and Groh, Thomas, “Art 59 GG” in Friauf, Karl Heinrich and Höfling, Wolfram (eds) Berliner Kommentar zum Grundgesetz (Erich Schmidt 22 sup 2007).Google Scholar

Feinäugle, Clemens, “Kadi Case” in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed) Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press 2014).Google Scholar

Fénelon, François, Lives of the Ancient Philosophers (Knight and Lacey 1825 [translated from Abrégé des vies des anciens philosophes, Paris 1726, 314]).Google Scholar

Fichte, Johann Gottlieb, “Über den Begriff der Wissenschaftslehre” in Fichte, Immanuel Hermann (ed) FichtesWerke Vol 1 (Walter de Gruyter 1971 [1834–1846]) 27–81.Google Scholar

Finnis, John, Natural Law and Natural Rights (Oxford Clarendon Press 2nd ed 2011).Google Scholar

Fischer-Lescano, Andreas and Teubner, Gunther, “Regime-Collision: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law” (2004) 25 (4) Michigan Journal of International Law 999–1046.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, Gerald G, “The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice 1951–54: General Principles and Sources of Law” (1953) 30 British Yearbook of International Law 1–70.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, Gerald G, “The General Principles of International Law Considered from the Standpoint of the Rule of Law” (1957) 92 Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International 1–227.Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, Gerald, “Some Problems Regarding the Formal Sources of International Law” in van Asbeck, Frederik Mari et al (eds) Symbolae Verzijl (Martinus Nijhoff 1958) 153–176.Google Scholar

Flynn, Tom, The Triangular Constitution. Constitutional Pluralism in Ireland, the EU and the ECHR (Hart 2020).Google Scholar

Foot, Philippa, The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect in Virtues and Vices (Basil Blackwell 1978), originally appearing as Foot, Philippa, “The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of Double Effect” (1967) 5 Oxford Review 5–15.Google Scholar

Freeman, Colin L et al, “Structural Control of Crystal Nuclei by an Eggshell Protein” (2010) 49 (30) Angewandte Chemie International Edition 5135–5137.Google Scholar

Freeman, Walter J, “Nonlinear Brain Dynamics and Intention According to Aquinas” (2008) 6 (2) Mind and Matter 207–234.Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob, Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik. Eine logische mathematische Untersuchung (Wilhelm Koebner 2nd ed 1884).Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob, The Foundations of Arithmetic. A Logico-Mathematical Enquiry into the Concept of Number (translated by J L Austin Harper 2nd ed 1953 [Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik. Eine logisch mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl Wilhelm Koebner 1884]).Google Scholar

Fuller, Chris, “Legal Anthropology: Legal Pluralism and Legal Thought” (1994) 10 (3) Anthropology Today 9–12.Google Scholar

Gabriel, Gottfried, Grundprobleme der Erkenntnistheorie. Von Descartes zu Wittgenstein (utb 3rd ed 2008).Google Scholar

Gabriel, Markus, An den Grenzen der Erkenntnistheorie. Die notwendige Endlichkeit des objektiven Wissens als Lektion des Skeptizismus (Karl Alber 2nd ed 2014).Google Scholar

Gabriel, Markus, Die Erkenntnis der Welt – Eine Einführung in die Erkenntnistheorie (Karl Alber 5th ed 2016).Google Scholar

Galán, Alexis and Patterson, Dennis, “The Limits of Normative Legal Pluralism: Review of Paul Schiff Berman, Global Legal Pluralism: A Jurisprudence of Law beyond Borders” (2013) 11 (3) International Journal of Constitutional Law 783–800.Google Scholar

Garben, Sacha and Govaere, Inge (eds), The Division of Competences between the EU and the Member States. Reflections on the Past, the Present and the Future (Hart 2017).Google Scholar

Gärdenfors, Peter, “Slicing the Theory of Mind” (2001) 36 Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 7–34.Google Scholar

Gärdenfors, Peter, How Homo Became Sapiens: On the Evolution of Thinking (Oxford University Press 2003).Google Scholar

Gärdenfors, Peter, “Evolutionary and Developmental Aspects of Intersubjectivity” in Liljenström, Hans and Århem, Peter (eds) Consciousness Transitions: Phylogenetic, Ontogenetic and Physiological Aspects (Elsevier 2007) 281–305.Google Scholar

Gärdenfors, Peter, “The Role of Intersubjectivity in Animal and Human Cooperation” (2008) 3 (1) Biological Theory 1–12.Google Scholar

Gatti, Mauro and Manzini, Pietro, “External Representation of the European Union in the Conclusion of International Agreements” (2012) 49 (5) Common Market Law Review 1703–1734.Google Scholar

Geiger, Rudolf, “Article 216 TFEU” in Geiger, Rudolf, Khan, Daniel-Erasmus and Kotzur, Markus (eds) European Union Treaties. A Commentary. Treaty on European Union. Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (CH Beck and Hart 2015).Google Scholar

Gény, François, Methode d’interpretation et sources en droit prive positif (Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence 2nd ed 1919).Google Scholar

Gianelli, Alessandra, “Customary International Law in the European Union” in Cannizzaro, Enzo, Palchetti, Paolo and Wessel, Ramses A (eds) International Law as Law of the European Union (Martinus Nijhoff 2012) 93–110.Google Scholar

Gihl, Torsten, “The Legal Character of Sources of International Law” (1957) 1 Scandinavian Studies in Law 51–92.Google Scholar

Giner Torréns, Marta, Dreizler, Kristin and Kärtner, Joscha, “Insight into Toddlers’ Motivation to Help: From Social Participants to Prosocial Contributors” (2021) 64 Infant Behavior and Development 101603.Google Scholar

Giudice, Michael, “Global Legal Pluralism: What’s Law Got to Do with It?” (2014) 34 (3) Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 589–608.Google Scholar

Grabenwarter, Christoph, “Änderungen der österreichischen Bundesverfassung aus Anlaß des Beitritts zur Europäischen Union” (1995) 55 Heidelberg Journal of International Law 166–190.Google Scholar

Grabenwarter, Christoph, “Offene Staatlichkeit: Österreich” in von Bogdandy, Armin, Villalón, Cruz and Huber, Peter M (eds) Handbuch Ius Publicum Europaeum. Vol 2 Offene Staatlichkeit – Wissenschaft vom Verfassungsrecht (C F Müller 2008) 211–241.Google Scholar

Grabenwarter, Christoph, “National Constitutional Law Relating to the European Union” in von Bogdandy, Armin and Bast, Jürgen (eds) Principles of European Constitutional Law (Hart et al 2nd ed 2011) 95–144.Google Scholar

Gragl, Paul, The Accession of the European Union to the European Convention on Human Rights (Hart 2013).Google Scholar

Gragl, Paul, “The Silence of the Treaties: General International Law and the European Union” (2014) 47 German Yearbook of International Law 375–410.Google Scholar

Gragl, Paul, “The Pure Theory of Law and Legal Monism – Epistemological Truth and Empirical Plausibility” (2015) 70 (4) Zeitschrift für Öffentliches Recht 665–736.Google Scholar

Gragl, Paul, “In Defence of Kelsenian Monism: Countering Hart and Raz” (2017) 8 (2) Jurisprudence 287–318.Google Scholar

Gragl, Paul, Legal Monism: Law, Philosophy, and Politics (Oxford University Press 2018).Google Scholar

Granat, Katarzyna, “Kontrolle des EU-Sekundärrechts durch den polnischen Verfassungsgerichtshof. Anmerkung zum Beschluss des polnischen Verfassungsgerichtshofs vom 16. November 2011, SK 45/09” (2013) 48 (2) Europarecht 205–214.Google Scholar

Green, James A, The Persistent Objector Rule in International Law (Oxford University Press 2016).Google Scholar

Green, Leslie, “Law and Obligations” in Coleman, Jules and Shapiro, Scott (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence & Philosophy of Law (Oxford University Press 2002 reprinted in 2011) 514–547.Google Scholar

Green, Michael S, “Hans Kelsen and the Logic of Legal Systems” (2003) 54 (2) Alabama Law Review 365–413.Google Scholar

Green, Michael S, “Marmor’s Kelsen” in Telman, D A Jeremy (ed) Hans Kelsen in America (Springer 2016) 31–55.Google Scholar

Greene, Joshua D, “Beyond Point-and-Shoot Morality: Why Cognitive (Neuro)Science Matters for Ethics” (2014) 124 (4) Ethics 695–726.Google Scholar

Greene, Joshua D, “The Rise of Moral Cognition” (2015) 135 Cognition 39–42.Google Scholar

Greene, Joshua D and Haidt, Jonathan, “How (and Where) Does Moral Judgment Work?” (2002) 6 (12) Trends in Cognitive Sciences 517–523.Google Scholar

Greenspan, Stanley and Shanker, Stuart, The First Idea (Da Capo Press 2004).Google Scholar

Grewe, Constance, “Methods of Identification of National Constitutional Identity” in Arnaiz, Alejandro Saiz and Llivina, Carina Alcoberro (eds) National Constitutional Identity and European Integration (Intersentia 2013) 37–48.Google Scholar

Griffiths, John, “What Is Legal Pluralism?” (1986) 18 (24) Journal of Legal Pluralism 1–47.Google Scholar

Griffiths, John, “The Idea of Sociology of Law and Its Relation to Law and to Sociology” in Freeman, Michael (ed) Law and Sociology: Current Legal Issues Vol 8 (Oxford University Press 2006) 49–68.Google Scholar

Griller, Stefan, Die Übertragung von Hoheitsrechten auf zwischenstaatliche Einrichtungen (Springer 1989).Google Scholar

Griller, Stefan, “Verfassungsfragen der österreichischen EU-Mitgliedschaft” (1995) 9 Zeitschrift für Europarecht, internationales Privatrecht & Rechtsvergleichung 98–115.Google Scholar

Griller, Stefan, “Blockademöglichkeiten gegen die Einführung des Euro” (1997) 4 Journal für Rechtspolitik 221–233.Google Scholar

Griller, Stefan, “Der Stufenbau der österreichischen Rechtsordnung nach dem EU-Beitritt” (2000) 8 (4) Journal für Rechtspolitik 273–288.Google Scholar

Griller, Stefan, “Völkerrecht und Landesrecht – unter Berücksichtigung des Europarechts” in Walter, Robert, Jabloner, Clemens and Zeleny, Karl (eds) Hans Kelsen und das Völkerrecht: Ergebnisse eines internationalen Symposiums in Wien (Manz 2004) 83–120.Google Scholar

Griller, Stefan, “Executive Summary” in European Parliament and Directorate-General for International Policies (ed) National Constitutional Law and European Integration (European Parliament 2011) 11–31.Google Scholar

Griller, Stefan, “Fragmentierungen im Öffentlichen Recht: Diskursvergleich im internationalen und nationalen Recht” (2018) 77 Veröffentlichungen der Vereinigung der Deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer 237–283.Google Scholar

Grimm, Dieter, “The Constitution in the Process of Denationalization” (2005) 12 (4) Constellations 447–463.Google Scholar

Grimm, Dieter, “The Democratic Costs of Constitutionalization: The European Case” in Grimm, Dieter, Constitutionalism. Past, Present, and Future (Oxford University Press 2015) 295–313.Google Scholar

Grimm, Dieter, “The Role of National Constitutions in a United Europe” in Grimm, Dieter, Constitutionalism. Past, Present, and Future (Oxford University Press 2015) 271–294.Google Scholar

Groce, Mariano and Goldoni, Marco, “A Sense of Self-Suspicion: Global Legal Pluralism and the Claim to Legal Authority” (2015) 8 (1) Ethics & Global Politics 1–20.Google Scholar

Groh, Kathrin, Demokratische Staatsrechtslehrer in der Weimarer Republik. Von der konstitutionellen Staatslehre zur Theorie des modernen demokratischen Verfassungsstaats (Mohr Siebeck 2010).Google Scholar

Grussmann, Wolf-Dietrich, “Grundnorm und Supranationalität – Rechtsstrukturelle Sichtweisen der europäischen Integration” in von Danwitz, Thomas et al (ed) Auf dem Wege zu einer europäischen Staatlichkeit (Boorberg 1993) 47–64.Google Scholar

Guggenheim, Paul, “Les deux éléments de la coutume en droit international” in Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence (ed) La technique et les principes du droit public: Études en l’honneur de Georges Scelle I (Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence 1950) 275–284.Google Scholar

Guggenheim, Paul, Traité de droit international public (Librairie de l’Université 1953).Google Scholar

Guggenheim, Paul, Traité de droit international public I (Librairie de l’Université 2nd ed 1967).Google Scholar

Günther, Klaus, “Legal Pluralism or Uniform Concept of Law? Globalisation as a Problem of Legal Theory” (2008) 5 No Foundations – Journal of Extreme Legal Positivism 5–21.Google Scholar

Günther, Klaus, “Normativer Rechtspluralismus: Eine Kritik” in Moos, Thorsten, Schlette, Magnus and Diefenbacher, Hans (eds) Das Recht im Blick der Anderen: Zu Ehren von Eberhard Schmidt-Aßmann (Mohr Siebeck 2016) 43–62.Google Scholar

Günther, Klaus, “Normative Legal Pluralism – A Critique” in Zamora, Jorge Luis Fabra (ed) Jurisprudence in a Globalised World (Edward Elgar 2020) 85–99.Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen W, “Introduction” in Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Pure Reason (Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant translated and edited by Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen W Cambridge University Press 1998 [Kritik der reinen Vernunft Johann Friedrich Hartknoch 1781/1787]) 1–80.Google Scholar

Guzman, Andrew T, “Against Consent” (2012) 52 (4) Virginia Journal of International Law 747–790.Google Scholar

Guzman, Andrew T and Hsiang, Jerome, “Reinvigorating Customary International Law” in Bradley, Curtis A (ed) Custom’s Future: International Law in a Changing World (Cambridge University Press 2016) 275–304.Google Scholar

Haack, Susan, “The Legitimacy of Metaphysics: Kant’s Legacy to Peirce, and Peirce’s to Philosophy Today” (2008) 36 (1) Philosophical Topics 97–100.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, “Wahrheitstheorien” in Fahrenbach, Helmut (ed) Wirklichkeit und Reflexion. Walter Schulz zum 60. Geburtstag (Neske 1973) 211–265.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, “What Is Universal Pragmatics?” in Jürgen Habermas, On the Pragmatics of Communication (edited by Cooke, Maeve MIT Press 1976 [“Was heißt Universalpragmatik?” in Karl-Otto Apel (ed) Sprachpragmatik und Philosophie Suhrkamp (1976) 174–272]) 21–103.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, Communication and the Evolution of Society (Beacon Press 1979).Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, The Theory of Communicative Action. Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason Vol 2 (translated by Thomas McCarthy Polity Press 1987 [Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns Band 2: Zur Kritik der funktionalistischen Vernunft Suhrkamp 3rd ed 1985]).Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, “Discourse Ethics: Notes on Philosophical Justification” in Jürgen Habermas, Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action (MIT Press 1990) 43–115.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, Die postnationale Konstellation (Suhrkamp 1998).Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, Truth and Justification (translated by Barbara Fultner MIT Press 2003 [Wahrheit und Rechtfertigung. Philosophische Aufsätze Suhrkamp 1999]).Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, Legitimationsprobleme im Spätkapitalismus (Suhrkamp 2004).Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, “Die Krise der Europäischen Union im Lichte einer Konstitutionalisierung des Völkerrechts – Ein Essay zur Verfassung Europas” (2012) 72 Heidelberg Journal of International Law 1–44.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen, “Interview with Jürgen Habermas” in Bächtiger, Andre et al (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy (Oxford University Press 2018) 871–882.Google Scholar

Hacker, Peter M S, “The Linguistic Turn in Analytical Philosophy” in Beaney, Michael (ed) The Oxford Handbook of the History of Analytic Philosophy (Oxford University Press 2013) 926–947.Google Scholar

Halberstam, Daniel, “Local, Global and Plural Constitutionalism: Europe Meets the World” in de Búrca, Graínne and Weiler, Joseph H H (eds) The Worlds of European Constitutionalism (Cambridge University Press 2012) 150–202.Google Scholar

Halmai, Gábor, “The Hungarian Constitutional Court and Constitutional Identity” (January 10, 2017) Verfassungsblog, available at https://verfassungsblog.de/the-hungarian-constitutional-court-and-constitutional-identity/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar

Halmai, Gábor, “A Coup against Constitutional Democracy. The Case of Hungary” in Graber, Mark A, Levinson, Sanford and Tushnet, Mark (eds) Constitutional Democracy in Crisis? (Oxford University Press 2018) 243–256.Google Scholar

Halper, Edward, Aristotle’s Metaphysics: A Reader’s Guide (Continuum 2012).Google Scholar

Hamlin, J Kiley, “The Case for Social Evaluation in Preverbal Infants: Gazing Toward One’s Goal Drives Infants’ Preferences for Helpers over Hinderers in the Hill Paradigm” (2015) 5 (1563) Frontiers in Psychology 1–9.Google Scholar

Hamlin, J Kiley, Wynn, Karen and Bloom, Paul, “3-Month-Olds Show a Negativity Bias in Their Social Evaluations” (2010) 13 (6) Developmental Science 923–929.Google Scholar

Hanley, Seán and Vachudová, Milada Anna, “Understanding the Illiberal Turn: Democratic Backsliding in the Czech Republic” (2018) 34 (3) East European Politics 276–296.Google Scholar

Hanna, Robert, “Kant’s Theory of Judgment” in Edward N Zalta (ed) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (October 23, 2017), available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-judgment/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar

Harman, Gilbert, “Does Marc Hauser’s Moral Minds Plagiarize John Mikhail’s Earlier Work?,” formerly available at www.princeton.edu/~harman/Mikhail%20and%20Hauser.pdf [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar

Harris, J W, Legal Philosophies (Butterworths 1997).Google Scholar

Hart, Herbert L A, “Are There Any Natural Rights?” (1955) 64 (2) Philosophical Review 175–191.Google Scholar

Hartley, Trevor C, “National Law, International Law and EU Law – How Do They Relate?” in Capps, Patrick, Evans, Malcolm and Konstadinidis, Stratos (eds) Asserting Jurisdiction. International and European Legal Approaches (Hart 2003) 65–81.Google Scholar

Hartmann, Moritz, “Review Essay: ‘Lost in Disordered Clouds: Transnational Legal Pluralism and the Regulation of Global Asymmetries’ – Mireille Delmas‐Marty’s Ordering Pluralism” (2009) 11 (9) German Law Journal 1025–1037.Google Scholar

Hatje, Armin and Mankowski, Peter, “Nationale Unionsrechte. Sprachgrenzen, Traditionsgrenzen, Systemgrenzen, Denkgrenzen” (2014) 49 (2) Europarecht 155–169.Google Scholar

Hauser, Marc D, Moral Minds: How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong (Ecco 2006).Google Scholar

Hauser, Marc D, “Response to Gil Harman’s ‘Did Marc Hauser’s Moral Minds Plagiarize John Mikhail’s Earlier Work?’,” formerly available at www.princeton.edu/~harman/HauserResponse_Harman%20essay.pdf [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar

Hauser, Oliver P et al, “Cooperating with the Future” (2014) 511 (7508) Nature 220–223.Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, Die Differenz des Fichteschen und Schellingschen Systems der Philosophie (Jena (Akademische Buchhandlung) 1801).Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, Glauben und Wissen oder Reflexionsphilosophie der Subjektivität in der Vollständigkeit ihrer Formen als Kantische, Jacobische und Fichtesche Philosophie (Cotta 1802).Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts (Nicolai 1821).Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences in Basic Outline Part I Science of Logic (translated and edited by Brinkmann, Klaus and Dahlstrom, Daniel O Cambridge University Press 2010 [Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften I 1830]).Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, The Science of Logic (translated by George di Giovanni Cambridge University Press 2010 [Wissenschaft der Logik 1832]).Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, The Phenomenology of Spirit (translated by Terry Pinkard Cambridge University Press 2018 from Phenomenologie des Geistes 1807].Google Scholar

Heidemann, Carsten, Die Norm als Tatsache: Zur Normentheorie Hans Kelsens (Nomos 1997).Google Scholar

Heis, Jeremy, “Neo-Kantianism” in Edward N Zalta (ed) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (May 18, 2018), available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/neo-kantianism/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar

Henkin, Louis, International Law, Politics and Values (Brill 1995).Google Scholar

Henkin, Louis, “Elements of Constitutionalism” (1998) 60 (11) Special Issue of International Commission of Jurists. The Review 11–22.Google Scholar

Hilpold, Peter, “EU Law and UN Law in Conflict: The Kadi Case” (2009) 13 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 141–182.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan (Three-Text Edition of Thomas Hobbes’s Political Theory. The Elements of Law, De Cive and Leviathan edited by Baumgold, Deborah Cambridge University Press 2017 [1651]).Google Scholar

Hobson, Jessica A and Hobson, R Peter, “Identification: The Missing Link between Joint Attention and Imitation?” (2007) 19 (2) Development and Psychopathology 411–431.Google Scholar

Hobson, R Peter and Hobson, Jessica, “Joint Attention or Joint Engagement? Insights from Autism” in Seemann, Alex (ed) Joint Attention: New Developments in Psychology, Philosophy of Mind, and Social Neuroscience (MIT Press 2011) 115–136.Google Scholar

Hoerster, Norbert, Was ist Recht? Grundfragen der Rechtsphilosophie (CH Beck 2006).Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Tamás, “The Gentle Humanizer of Humanitarian Law: Antonio Cassese and the Creation of the Customary Law of Non-International Armed Conflicts” in Stahn, Carsten and van den Herik, Larissa (eds) Future Perspectives on International Criminal Justice (Asser Press 2010) 58–80.Google Scholar

Hoffmeister, Frank, “The Contribution of EU Practice to International Law” in Cremona, Marise (ed) Developments in EU External Relations Law (Oxford University Press 2008) 37–127.Google Scholar

Hoffmeister, Frank, “Article 14” in Dörr, Oliver and Schmalenbach, Kirsten (eds) Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties – A Commentary (Springer 2nd ed 2018).Google Scholar

Horsley, Thomas, The Court of Justice of the European Union as an Institutional Actor. Judicial Lawmaking and Its Limits (Cambridge University Press 2018).Google Scholar

Horton, John, Political Obligation (Macmillan 1992).Google Scholar

Horwich, Paul, “A Defense of Minimalism” in Lynch, Michael P (ed) The Nature of Truth. Classic and Contemporary Perspectives (MIT Press 2001) 559–578.Google Scholar

Hösle, Vittorio, Hegels System. Der Idealismus der Subjektivität und das Problem der Intersubjektivität Vol 1: Systementwicklung und Logik (Felix Meiner 1st ed 1987).Google Scholar

Hösle, Vittorio, Die Krise der Gegenwart und die Verantwortung der Philosophie. Transzendentalpragmatik, Letztbegründung, Ethik (CH Beck 3rd ed 1997).Google Scholar

Hrdy, Sarah Blaffer, Mothers and Others (Harvard University Press 2009).Google Scholar

Huber, Peter M, “Interview Das EZB-Urteil war zwingend” Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung May 12, 2020.Google Scholar

Huber, Peter M and Paulus, Andreas L, “Cooperation of Constitutional Courts in Europe: The Openness of the German Constitution to International, European, and Comparative Constitutional Law” in Andenas, Mads and Fairgrieve, Duncan (eds) Courts and Comparative Law (Oxford University Press 2015) 281–299.Google Scholar

Hübl, Philipp, Die aufgeregte Gesellschaft. Wie Emotionen unsere Moral prägen und die Polarisierung verstärken (C Bertelsmann 2019).Google Scholar

Hubley, Penelope and Trevarthen, Colwyn, “Sharing a Task in Infancy” (1979) 4 Social Interaction during Infancy: New Directions for Child Development 57–80.Google Scholar

Hudson, William D (ed), The Is–Ought Problem. A Collection of Papers on the Central Problem in Moral Philosophy (Penguin 1969).Google Scholar

Hume, David, A Treatise of Human Nature. A Critical Edition Vol 1 (edited by Norton, David Fate and Norton, Mary J Oxford University Press 2007 [1739–1740]).Google Scholar

Hume, David, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (edited with an introduction and notes by Millican, Peter Oxford University Press 2007 [1748]).Google Scholar

Hummer, Waldemar, “Art 218” in Vedder, Christoph and von Heinegg, Wolff Heintschel (eds) Europäisches Unionsrecht. Handkommentar (Nomos et al 2nd ed 2018).Google Scholar

Husa, Jaako, “Global Constitutionalism – Some Critical Remarks” (2017) 47 (1) Hong Kong Law Journal 73–88.Google Scholar

Husserl, Edmund, Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology (Martinus Nijhoff 1960 [originally published as Méditations cartésiennes: Introduction à la phénoménologie 1931]).Google Scholar

Isak, Hubert, “Kompetenzüberschreitende Akte von Organen der Europäischen Union – Die Sicht des österreichischen Verfassungsrechts” in Simma, Bruno and Schulte, Constanze (eds) Völker- und Europarecht in der aktuellen Diskussion (Linde 1999) 33–58.Google Scholar

Isensee, Josef, “Ethische Grundwerte im freiheitlichen Staat” in Paus, Ansgar (ed) Werte – Rechte – Normen (Kevelaer et al 1979) 132.Google Scholar

Isiksel, Turkuler, “Global Legal Pluralism as Fact and Norm” (2013) 2 (2) Global Constitutionalism 160–195.Google Scholar

Itzcovich, Giulio, “The Interpretation of Community Law by the European Court of Justice” (2009) 10 (5) German Law Journal 537–560.Google Scholar

Iwasawa, Yuji, “The Doctrine of Self-Executing Treaties in the United States: A Critical Analysis” (1986) 26 Virginia Journal of International Law 627–692.Google Scholar

Jacobi, Friedrich Heinrich, “Ueber den transscendentalen Idealismus” in Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi, Werke Vol 2 (edited by Roth, F and Köppen, F 1976 [1787]) 291–310.Google Scholar

Jacobi, Friedrich Heinrich, “David Hume on Faith or Idealism and Realism: A Dialogue” in di Giovanni, George (ed) The Main Philosophical Writings and the Novel Allwill. Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi (translated with an introductory study, notes and bibliography by George di Giovanni McGill-Queen’s University Press 1994 [1787]) 253–338.Google Scholar

Jacot-Guillarmod, Olivier, Droit communautaire et droit international public. Etude des sources internationales de l’ordre juridique des Communautés européennes (Librairie de l’Université Genève 1979).Google Scholar

Jakab, András, “Kelsens Völkerrechtslehre zwischen Erkenntnistheorie und Politik” (2004) 64 Heidelberg Journal of International Law 1045–1057.Google Scholar

Jakab, András, “Problems of the Stufenbaulehre: Kelsen’s Failure to Derive the Validity of a Norm from Another Norm” (2007) 20 (1) Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 35–67.Google Scholar

Jakab, András, European Constitutional Language (Cambridge University Press 2016).Google Scholar

Jakab, András, “Informal Institutional Elements as Both Preconditions and Consequences of Effective Formal Legal Rules: The Failure of Constitutional Institution Building in Hungary” (2020) 68 (4) American Journal of Comparative Law 760–800.Google Scholar

Jakab, András and Sonnevend, Pal, “The Bundesbank Is under a Legal Obligation to Ignore the PSPP Judgment of the Bundesverfassungsgericht” (May 25, 2020) Verfassungsblog, available at https://verfassungsblog.de/the-bundesbank-is-under-a-legal-obligation-to-ignore-the-pspp-judgment-of-the-bundesverfassungsgericht/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar

Jaklic, Klemen, Constitutional Pluralism in the EU (Oxford University Press 2013).Google Scholar

James, William, “Pragmatism’s Conception of Truth” in Lynch, Michael P (ed) The Nature of Truth. Classic and Contemporary Perspectives (MIT Press 2001 [1907]) 211–228.Google Scholar

James, William, The Meaning of Truth: A Sequel to “Pragmatism” in William James, Pragmatism and the Meaning of Truth (edited with an introduction by Ayer, Alfred J Harvard University Press 1978 [1909]).Google Scholar

Janko, Andreas, Gesamtänderung der Bundesverfassung (Verlag Österreich 2004).Google Scholar

Jellinek, Georg, Die rechtliche Natur der Staatenverträge (A Hölder 1880).Google Scholar

Jenks, Wilfried C, “The Conflict of Law-Making Treaties” (1953) 30 British Yearbook of International Law 401–453.Google Scholar

Jennings, Robert Y, “What Is International Law and How Do We Tell It When We See It?” (1981) 37 Annuaire Suisse de Droit International 59–88.Google Scholar

Jennings, Robert Y and Watts, Arthur, Oppenheim’s International Law (Oxford University Press 9th ed 1992).Google Scholar

Jestaedt, Matthias, “Der Europäische Verfassungsverbund – Verfassungstheoretischer Charme und rechtstheoretische Insuffizienz einer Unschärferelation” in Krause, Rüdiger, Veelken, Winfried and Vieweg, Klaus (eds) Recht der Wirtschaft und der Arbeit in Europa: Gedächtnisschrift für Wolfgang Blomeyer (Duncker & Humblot 2004) 637–674, reprinted in Christian Calliess (ed) Verfassungswandel im europäischen Staaten- und Verfassungsverbund. Beiträge der Ersten Göttinger Gespräche zum deutschen und europäischen Verfassungsrecht vom 15. bis 17. Juni 2006 (Mohr Siebeck 2007) 93–128.Google Scholar

Jeutner, Valentin, Irresolvable Norm Conflicts in International Law – The Concept of a Legal Dilemma (Oxford University Press 2017).Google Scholar

Jovanović, Miodrag A, The Nature of International Law (Cambridge University Press 2019).Google Scholar

Jung, Florian, “Reben, Wein und der EuGH: Zur Auslegung von Art. 218 Abs. 9 AEUV – Anmerkungen zum Urteil des EuGH vom 07.10.2014, Rs. C-399/12 – Deutschland/Rat” (2015) 50 (6) Europarecht 735–745.Google Scholar

Kaddous, Christine, “L’arrêt France c. Commission de 1994 (accord concurrence) et le contrôle de la ‘légalité’ des accords externes en vertu de l’art. 173 CE: la difficile réconciliation de l’orthodoxie communautaire avec l’orthodoxie internationale” (1996) 32 Cahiers de droit européen 613–633.Google Scholar

Kadelbach, Stefan, “Konstitutionalisierung und Rechtspluralismus – Über die Konkurrenz zweier Ordnungsentwürfe” in Bung, Jochen and Engländer, Armin (eds) Souveränität, Transstaatlichkeit und Weltverfassung ARSP-Beiheft 153 (Franz Steiner 2017) 97–108.Google Scholar

Kadens, Emily and Young, Ernest A, “How Customary Is Customary International Law?” (2013) 54 (3) William & Mary Law Review 885–920.Google Scholar

Kahneman, Daniel, Thinking, Fast and Slow (Penguin 2012).Google Scholar

Kaiser, Karen, “Treaties, Direct Applicability” in Wolfrum, Rüdiger (ed) Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford University Press 2011).Google Scholar

Kammerhofer, Jörg, “Uncertainty in the Formal Sources of International Law: Customary International Law and Some of Its Problems” (2004) 15 (3) European Journal of International Law 523–553.Google Scholar

Kammerhofer, Jörg, “Kelsen – Which Kelsen? A Reapplication of the Pure Theory to International Law” (2009) 22 (2) Leiden Journal of International Law 225–249.Google Scholar

Kammerhofer, Jörg, Uncertainty in International Law: A Kelsenian Perspective (Routledge 2011).Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel, Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics. That Will Be Able to Come Forward as Science (edited and translated by Hatfield, Gary Cambridge University Press 2nd ed 2004 [Prolegomena zu einer jeden künftigen Metaphysik, die als Wissenschaft wird auftreten können 1783]).Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Pure Reason (Cambridge edition of the works of Immanuel Kant translated and edited by Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen W Cambridge University Press 1998 [Kritik der reinen Vernunft (Johann Friedrich Hartknoch 1781/1787)]).Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel, Über den Gemeinspruch: “Das mag in der Theorie richtig sein, taugt aber nicht für die Praxis” (Berlinische Monatsschrift 1793).Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel, Metaphysics of Morals: Doctrine of Virtue Vol I and Doctrine of Right Vol II (edited and translated by Gregor, Mary J Cambridge University Press 1997 [Die Metaphysik der Sitten: Tugendlehre und Rechtslehre 1797]).Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel, Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre (1797).Google Scholar

Kantorowicz, Hermann, The Definition of Law (Cambridge University Press 1958).Google Scholar

Karl, Wolfram, “Conflicts between Treaties” in Bernhardt, Rudolf (ed) Encyclopedia of Public International Law Vol VII (North-Holland 1984) 467–473.Google Scholar

Keleman, R Daniel, “On the Unsustainability of Constitutional Pluralism: European Supremacy and the Survival of the Eurozone” (2016) 23 (1) Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 136–150.Google Scholar

Kelemen, R Daniel and Pech, Laurent, “Why Autocrats Love Constitutional Identity and Constitutional Pluralism. Lessons from Hungary and Poland” (2018) 2 RECONNECT working paper.Google Scholar

Kelemen, R Daniel and Pech, Laurent, “The Uses and Abuses of Constitutional Pluralism: Undermining the Rule of Law in the Name of Constitutional Identity in Hungary and Poland” (2019) 21 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 59–74.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, Das Problem der Souveränität und die Theorie des Völkerrechts (Mohr Siebeck 1920).Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, Hauptprobleme der Staatsrechtslehre (Scientia 2nd ed 1923).Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, Allgemeine Staatslehre (Springer 1925).Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, “Les rapports de système entre le droit interne et le droit international public” (1926) 14 Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International, 227–331.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, “Die Bundesexekution – Ein Beitrag zur Theorie und Praxis des Bundesstaates, unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der deutschen Reichs- und der österreichischen Bundes-Verfassung” in Giacometti, Zaccaria and Schindler, Dietrich (eds) Festgabe für Fritz Fleiner zum 60. Geburtstag (J C B Mohr 1927) 127–187.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, Das Problem der Souveränität und die Theorie des Völkerrechts: Beitrag zu einer Reinen Rechtslehre (J C B Mohr 2nd ed 1928).Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, Reine Rechtslehre (Franz Deuticke 1934).Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, “Théorie du Droit International Coutumier” (1939) 1 (NS) Revue International de la Théorie du Droit 253–274.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, Law and Peace in International Relations. The Oliver Wendell Holmes Lectures 1940–41 (Harvard University Press 1942).Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, General Theory of Law and State (translated by Anders Wedberg Harvard University Press 1945 [1928]).Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, Natural Law Doctrine and Legal Positivism (translated by Wolfgang Herbert Kraus as an appendix to Kelsen, General Theory of Law and State Harvard University Press 1945) 389–446.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, Philosophical Foundations of Natural Law Theory and Legal Positivism (translated by Wolfgang H Kraus as an appendix to Kelsen, General Theory of Law and State Harvard University Press 1945 [1928]) 389–445.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, Principles of International Law (Rinehart 1952).Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, “Der Begriff der Rechtsordnung” (1958) 1 (3) Logique et Analyse 150–167.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, “Die Einheit von Völkerrecht und staatlichem Recht” (1958) 19 Heidelberg Journal of International Law 234–248.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, Reine Rechtslehre (Franz Deuticke 2nd ed 1960).Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, Principles of International Law (Rinehart 2nd ed 1966).Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, Pure Theory of Law (University of California Press 2nd ed 1967).Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, Allgemeine Theorie der Normen (Manz 1979).Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory (translated by Bonnie Litschewski Paulson and Stanley L Paulson Oxford Clarendon Press 1992 [Reine Rechtslehre 1934]).Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans, “The Pure Theory of Law, ‘Labandism’, and Neo-Kantianism: A Letter to Renato Treves” in Paulson, Stanley L and Litschewski Paulson, Bonnie (eds) Normativity and Norms: Critical Perspectives on Kelsenian Themes (Clarendon Press 1998) 169–175.Google Scholar

Keverne, Eric B, “Genomic Imprinting and the Evolution of Sex Differences in Mammalian Reproductive Strategies” (2007) 59 Advances in Genetics 217–243.Google Scholar

Keverne, Eric B and Curley, James P, “Vasopressin, Oxytocin and Social Behaviour” (2004) 14 (6) Current Opinion in Neurobiology 777–783.Google Scholar

Keynes, John Maynard, The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (Palgrave Macmillan 1936).Google Scholar

Khan, Daniel-Erasmus, Die deutschen Staatsgrenzen. Rechtshistorische Grundlagen und offene Rechtsfragen (Mohr Siebeck 2004).Google Scholar

Khan, Daniel-Erasmus, Das Rote Kreuz: Geschichte einer humanitären Weltbewegung (CH Beck 2013).Google Scholar

Khan, Daniel-Erasmus, “Territory Taking Centre Stage in International Law. Some Preliminary Thoughts on the Rise of Territoriality to the Bedrock of Modern Statehood” in Société Française pour le droit international (ed) Droit des Frontières internationals / The Law of International Borders (Pedone 2016) 53–64.Google Scholar

Khan, Daniel-Erasmus, “Art 216” in Geiger, Rudolf, Khan, Daniel-Erasmus and Kotzur, Markus (eds) EUV/AEUV (CH Beck 6th ed 2017) 795–801.Google Scholar

Khan, Daniel-Erasmus, “Das Staatsgebiet und die Grenzen der Bundesrepublik Deutschland” in Kahl, Wolfgang, Waldhoff, Christian and Walter, Christian (eds) Bonner Kommentar zum Grundgesetz (C F Müller 2022) 1–228.Google Scholar

Khan, Daniel-Erasmus and Kirchmair, Lando, “Art 216” in Geiger, Rudolf et al (eds) EUV/AEUV (CH Beck 7th ed 2023) 868–875.Google Scholar

Kieber, Stefan and Klaushofer, Reinhard, “The Austrian Constitutional Court Post Case-Law after the Landmark Decision on Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union” (2017) 23 (2) European Public Law 221–236.Google Scholar

Kingsbury, Benedict, “Confronting Difference: The Puzzling Durability of Gentili’s Combination of Pragmatic Pluralism and Normative Judgment” (1998) 92 American Journal of International Law 713–723.Google Scholar

Kirchmair, Lando, “The ‘Janus Face’ of the Court of Justice of the European Union: A Theoretical Appraisal of the EU Legal Order’s Relationship with International and Member State Law” (2012) 4 (3) Goettingen Journal of International Law 677–691.Google Scholar

Kirchmair, Lando, “Die autonome Rechtsordnung der EU und die Grenzen von Monismus und Dualismus” in Kettemann, Matthias C (ed) Grenzen im Völkerrecht – Grenzen des Völkerrechts (Jan Sramek 2013) 275–291.Google Scholar

Kirchmair, Lando, Die Theorie des Rechtserzeugerkreises. Eine rechtstheoretische Untersuchung des Verhältnisses von Völkerrecht zu Staatsrecht am Beispiel der österreichischen Rechtsordnung (Duncker & Humblot 2013).Google Scholar

Kirchmair, Lando, “Is the EU Legal Order the Tombstone of the Dualistic and the Monistic Doctrine?” in Thaler, Michael and Verpeaux, Michel (eds) La recherche en droit constitutionnel comparé (L’Harmattan 2014) 71–86.Google Scholar

Kirchmair, Lando, “The Theory of the Law Creators’ Circle: Re-Conceptualizing the Monism–Dualism–Pluralism Debate” (2016) 17 (2) German Law Journal 179–214.Google Scholar

Kirchmair, Lando, “Ist Art. 59 Abs. 2 GG tatsächlich dualistisch? Ein Beitrag zur Stärkung der innerstaatlichen Wirkung völkerrechtlicher Verträge und gleichzeitig einer stärkeren Einbindung der Legislative auf völkerrechtlicher Ebene” (2017) 72 (3) Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht 515–547.Google Scholar

Kirchmair, Lando, “Morality between Nativism and Behaviorism. (Innate) Intersubjectivity as a Response to John Mikhail’s ‘Universal Moral Grammar’” (2017) 37 (4) Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 230–260.Google Scholar

Kirchmair, Lando, “What Came First: The Obligation or the Belief? A Renaissance of Consensus Theory to Make the Normative Foundations of Customary International Law More Tangible” (2017) 59 German Yearbook of International Law 289–319.Google Scholar

Kirchmair, Lando, “Who Has the Final Say? The Relationship between International, EU and National Law” (2018) 10 European Journal of Legal Studies 47–100.Google Scholar

Kirchmair, Lando, “Descriptive vs Prescriptive (Global) Legal Pluralism: A Gentle Reminder of David Hume’s Is–Ought Divide” (2019) 51 (1) Journal of Global Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 48–71.Google Scholar

Kirchmair, Lando, “How (Not) to Argue for the Relation between Natural Sciences and Law: Why the Thesis of an Innate ‘Universal Moral Grammar’ and Its Relevance for Law as Argued by John Mikhail Fails” (2019) 105 (4) Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie 523–535.Google Scholar

Kirchmair, Lando, “Europäische Souveränität? Zur Autonomie des Unionsrechts im Verhältnis zum Völkerrecht sowie den Mitgliedstaaten am Beispiel der Corona Krise” (2021) 56 (1) Europarecht 28–39.Google Scholar

Kirchmair, Lando, “Nationale Souveränität als Verfassungsidentität. Warum der EuGH Letztentscheider über den Gehalt nationaler Identität sein sollte” (2021) 73 (8) Die Öffentliche Verwaltung 321–326.Google Scholar

Kirgis, Frederick L, “Custom on a Sliding Scale” (1987) 81 (1) American Journal of International Law 146–151.Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, The Constitutionalization of International Law (Oxford University Press 2009).Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, The European Union in International Law (Editions A Pedone 2012).Google Scholar

Klabbers, Jan, “Straddling the Fence: The EU and International Law” in Arnull, Anthony and Chalmers, Damian (eds) The Oxford Handbook of European Union Law (Oxford University Press 2017) 52–71.Google Scholar

Klamert, Marcus, The Principle of Loyalty in EU Law (Oxford University Press 2014).Google Scholar

Klaushofer, Reinhard and Palmstorfer, Rainer, “Austrian Constitutional Court Uses Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union as Standard of Review: Effects on Union Law” (2013) 19 (1) European Public Law 1–11.Google Scholar

Kleinlein, Thomas, Konstitutionalisierung im Völkerrecht (Springer 2012).Google Scholar

Kleinlein, Thomas, “Neue starke Stimme in der europäischen Grundrechts-Polyphonie” (December 1, 2019) Verfassungsblog, available at https://verfassungsblog.de/neue-starke-stimme-in-der-europaeischen-grundrechts-polyphonie/ [last accessed February 1, 2023].Google Scholar

Knauff, Matthias, Der Regelungsverbund: Recht und Soft Law im Mehrebenensystem (Mohr Siebeck 2010).Google Scholar

Köck, Heribert-Franz, “Der erste Staatszweck in einer pluralistischen Gesellschaft” in Miehsler, Herbert et al (eds) Ius Humanitas. Festschrift zum 90. Geburtstag von Alfred Verdross (Duncker & Humblot 1980) 87.Google Scholar

Koffka, Kurt, Principles of Gestalt Psychology (Harcourt-Brace 1935).Google Scholar

Köhnke, Klaus Christian, Entstehung und Aufstieg des Neukantianismus. Die deutsche Universitätsphilosophie zwischen Idealismus und Positivismus (Suhrkamp 1993).Google Scholar

Kokott, Juliane and Sobotta, Christoph, “The Kadi Case – Constitutional Core Values and International Law – Finding the Balance?” (2012) 23 (4) European Journal of International Law 1015–1024.Google Scholar

Kolb, Robert, “Selected Problems in the Theory of Customary International Law” (2003) 50 (2) Netherlands International Law Review 119–150.Google Scholar

Koller, Peter, Neue Theorien des Sozialkontrakts (Duncker & Humblot 1987).Google Scholar

Koller, Peter, “Meilensteine des Rechtspositivismus im 20. Jahrhundert: Hans Kelsens Reine Rechtslehre und H. L. A. Harts ‘Concept of Law’” in Weinberger, Ota and Krawietz, Werner (eds) Reine Rechtslehre im Spiegel ihrer Fortsetzer und Kritiker (Springer 1988) 129–178.Google Scholar

Komárek, Jan, “Playing with Matches: The Czech Constitutional Court Declares a Judgment of the Court of Justice of the EU Ultra Vires; Judgment of 31 January 2012, Pl. ÚS 5/12, Slovak Pensions XVII” (2012) 8 (1) European Constitutional Law Review 323–337.Google Scholar

Konstadinides, Theodore, “When in Europe: Customary International Law and EU Competences in the Sphere of External Action” (2012) 13 (11) German Law Journal 1177–1201.Google Scholar

Kopelmans, Lazare, “Custom as a Means of the Creation of International Law” (1937) 18 British Yearbook of International Law 127–151.Google Scholar

Kosař, David, Baroš, Jiří and Dufek, Pavel, “The Twin Challenges to Separation of Powers in Central Europe: Technocratic Governance and Populism” (2019) 15 (3) European Constitutional Law Review 427–461.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, “The Pull of the Mainstream” (1990) 88 (6) Michigan Law Review 1946–1962.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, The Gentle Civilizer of Nations (Cambridge University Press 2001).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument (Cambridge University Press 2005).Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, “Chairman of the Study Group of the ILC on Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law” (2006) Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission, UN Doc A/CN.4/L.682.Google Scholar

Köster, Moritz et al, “Cultural Influences on Toddlers’ Prosocial Behavior: How Maternal Task Assignment Relates to Helping Others” (2016) 87 (6) Child Development 1727–1738.Google Scholar

Koutrakos, Panos, EU International Relations Law (Hart 2nd ed 2015).Google Scholar

Koutrakos, Panos, “Institutional Balance and the Duty of Cooperation in Treaty-Making under EU Law” (2018) 68 (1) International and Comparative Law Quarterly 1–33.Google Scholar

Koutrakos, Panos, “The European Union” in Bowman, Michael J and Kritsiotis, Dino (eds) Conceptual and Contextual Perspectives on the Modern Law of Treaties (Cambridge University Press 2018) 933–965.Google Scholar