Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T04:21:49.551Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The Electoral College and Political Equality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2023

George C. Edwards III
Affiliation:
Texas A & M University
Get access

Summary

The electoral college violates political equality. It is not a neutral counting device. The use of the unit-vote system, the allocation of electoral votes among the states, differences in voter turnout among the states, and the vagaries of the size of the U.S. House of Representatives allow the electoral college to favor some citizens over others, depending solely upon the state in which voters cast their votes for president. As a result, popular votes do not directly translate into electoral votes, and the candidate receiving the most popular votes may lose the election, as has happened twice in the twenty-first century. Thus, the electoral college is not just an archaic mechanism for counting the votes. It is an institution that aggregates popular votes in an inherently unjust manner. In addition, electors may violate their oaths to support their party’s candidates, and many U.S. citizens are disenfranchised.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Suggested Readings

Calhoun, Charles W., Minority Victory: Gilded Age Politics and the Front Porch Campaign of 1888 (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2008).Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A., A Preface to Democratic Theory (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1963).Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A., On Democracy (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Dershowitz, Alan M., Supreme Injustice: How the High Court Hijacked Election 2000 (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Holt, Michael F., By One Vote: The Disputed Presidential Election of 1876 (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2008).Google Scholar
Rawls, John, Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zelden, Charles L., Bush v. Gore: Exposing the Growing Crisis in American Democracy, 3rd expanded ed. (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2020).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×