Book contents
- The Cambridge Companion to The Problem of Evil
- Cambridge Companions to Religion
- The Cambridge Companion to The Problem of Evil
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Conceptual Issues and Controversies
- Part II Interdisciplinary Issues
- Index
- Miscellaneous Endmatter
- References
Part II - Interdisciplinary Issues
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2017
Book contents
- The Cambridge Companion to The Problem of Evil
- Cambridge Companions to Religion
- The Cambridge Companion to The Problem of Evil
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Conceptual Issues and Controversies
- Part II Interdisciplinary Issues
- Index
- Miscellaneous Endmatter
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Companion to the Problem of Evil , pp. 145 - 266Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Further Reading
Clayton, Philip and Knapp, Steven. The Predicament of Belief; Science, Philosophy, Faith. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drees, William B. (ed.). Is Nature Ever Evil? London: Routledge, 2003 (especially article by Rolston).Google Scholar
Murphy, Nancey, Russell, Robert John, and Stoeger, William R., SJ (eds.). Physics and Cosmology: Scientific Perspectives on the Problem of Evil. Vatican City and Berkeley, CA: Vatican Observatory and Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences, 2007.Google Scholar
Murray, Michael J. Nature Red in Tooth and Claw: Theism and the Problem of Animal Suffering. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Robert John. “Natural Theodicy in an Evolutionary Context: The Need for an Eschatology of New Creation.” In Cosmology: from Alpha to Omega by Robert John Russell. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 2008, 249–72.Google Scholar
Southgate, Christopher. The Groaning of Creation: God, Evolution and the Problem of Evil. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Further Reading
Bahrani, Zainab. The Graven Image. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Frankfurter, David. Evil Incarnate: Rumors of Demonic Conspiracy and Satanic Abuse in History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Juergensmeyer, Mark. Terror in the Mind of God. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2000, 2003.Google Scholar
Juergensmeyer, Mark, Kitts, Margo, and Jerryson, Michael, Eds. The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Violence. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Juergensmeyer, Mark, and Kitts, Margo, Eds. Princeton Readings in Religion and Violence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Siebers, Tobin. “The Return to Ritual: Violence and Art in the Media Age.” Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory 5.1 (2003): 9–33.Google Scholar
Sontag, Susan. Regarding the Pain of Others. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 2003.Google Scholar
Stewart, Pamela, and Strathern, Andrew. Violence: Theory and Ethnography. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2002.Google Scholar
Further Reading
Fackenheim, Emil. The Human Condition after Auschwitz. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Kraemer, David. Responses to Suffering in Classical Rabbinic Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Lamentations Rabbah, trans. A. Cohen, in The Midrash, volume 7. UK: Soncino, 1939.Google Scholar
Leaman, Oliver. Evil and Suffering in Jewish Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Rubenstein, Richard L. After Auschwitz: History, Theology, and Contemporary Judaism, second edition. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Usque, Samuel. Consolation for the Tribulations of Israel, trans. Martin A. Cohen. Philadelphia, PA: Jewish Publication Society, 1977.Google Scholar
Further Reading
Aulen, Gustav. Christus Victor. An Historical Study of the Three Main Types of the Idea of Atonement. Trans. A. G. Herbert. London: SPCK, 1970.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl. Church Dogmatics. Trans. and ed. Bromiley, G. W and Torrance, T. F. Volume IV, Part One, The Doctrine of Reconciliation. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1974.Google Scholar
Davis, Stephen T., Kendall, Daniel and O’Collins, Gerald (eds.). The Redemption. An Interdisciplinary Symposium on Christ as Redeemer. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Fiddes, Paul S. Past Event and Present Salvation. The Christian Idea of Atonement. London: Darton, Longman and Todd, 1989.Google Scholar
Ford, Lewis S. The Lure of God: A Biblical Background for Process Theism. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Gunton, Colin E. The Actuality of Atonement. A Study of Metaphor, Rationality and the Christian Tradition. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1988.Google Scholar
Hick, John. Evil and the God of Love. New Edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.Google Scholar
Moltmann, Jürgen. The Crucified God. The Cross of Christ as the Foundation and Criticism of Christian Theology. Trans. R. A. Wilson and J. Bowden. London: SCM Press, 1974.Google Scholar
O’Collins, Gerald. Jesus Our Redeemer. A Christian Approach to Salvation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Tillich, Paul. Systematic Theology. Volume 2. Existence and the Christ (London: SCM Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Wink, Walter. Naming the Powers. The Language of Power in the New Testament. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Further Reading
Jackson, Sherman A. Islam and the Problem of Black Suffering. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Kermani, Navid. The Terror of God: Attar, Job and the Metaphysical Revolt. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Michel, Thomas. “God’s Justice in Relation to Natural Disasters.” In Theodicy and Justice in Modern Islamic Thought. Ed. Abu Rabi’, Ibrahim M. Farnham: Ashgate, 2010, 219–26.Google Scholar
Ormsby, Eric. Theodicy in Islamic thought: The Dispute over al-Ghazālī‘s “Best of All Possible Worlds.” Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Schuon, Frithjof. “The Question of Theodicies.” Studies in Comparative Religion 8/i (Winter 1974).Google Scholar
Further Reading
Haught, John. F. God and the New Atheism: A Critical Response to Dawkins, Harris, and Hitchens. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2008.Google Scholar
McGrath, Alister and McGrath, J. C.. The Dawkins Delusion? Atheist Fundamentalism and the Denial of the Divine. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin. Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Ruse, Michael. Can a Darwinian Be a Christian? The Relationship between Science and Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar