Adams, K., ‘The Library Exceptions’ in Knopf, H. (ed), The New Copyright Act: Managing the Impact (Toronto: Insight Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Africa, M., ‘The Misuse of Licensing Evidence in Fair Use Analysis: New Technologies, New Markets, and the Courts’ (2000) 88 California Law Review 1145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alberts Carson, C., ‘Laser Bones: Copyright Issues Raised by the Use of Information Technology in Archaelogy’ (1997) 10 Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 281.Google Scholar

Allan, R., ‘After Bridgeman: Copyright, Museums, and Public Domain Works of Art’ (2007) 155 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 961.Google Scholar

Amineddoleh, L. ‘The Role of Museums in the Trade of Black Market Cultural Heritage Property’ (2013) 18 Art Antiquity and Law 227.Google Scholar

Aplin, T., ‘Contemplating Australia’s Digital Future: The Copyright Amendment (Digital Agenda) Act’ (2001) 23 European Intellectual Property Review 565.Google Scholar

Aplin, T., ‘Confidential Information as Property?’ (2013) 24 King’s Law Journal 172.Google Scholar

Aplin, T. and Bently, L., ‘Displacing the Dominance of the Three-Step Test: The Role of Global, Mandatory Fair Use’ in Sun, H., Balganesh, S. and Ng-Loy, W. (eds), Comparative Aspects of Limitations and Exceptions in Copyright Law (New York: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming).Google Scholar

Appel, S., ‘Copyright, Digitization of Images, and Art Museums: Cyberspace and Other New Frontiers’ (1999) 6 UCLA Entertainment Law Review 149.Google Scholar

Ariely, D., The (Honest) Truth About Dishonesty (London: Harper, 2012).Google Scholar

Arnold, R. and Rosati, E., ‘Are National Courts the Addressee of the InfoSoc Three-Step Test?’ (2015) 10 Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austin, G., ‘Four Questions about the Australian Approach to Fair Dealing Defenses to Copyright Infringement’ (2010) 57 Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA 611.Google Scholar

Austin, G., ‘The Two Faces of Fair Use’ (2012) 25 New Zealand Universities Law Review 285.Google Scholar

Austin, G., ‘This Is a Complex Issue: A Few More Questions about Fair Use’ (2018) 28 Australian Intellectual Property Journal 97.Google Scholar

Axelrod, R., The Evolution of Cooperation (New York: Basic Books, 1984).Google Scholar

Band, J. and Butler, B., ‘Some Cautionary Tales about Collective Licensing’ (2013) 21 Michigan State International Law Review 687.Google Scholar

Bartow, A., ‘Electrifying Copyright Norms and Making Cyberspace More Like a Book’ (2003) 48 Villanova Law Review 13.Google Scholar

Becker, G., ‘Crime and Punishment: An Economic Analysis’ (1968) 78 Journal of Political Economy 169.Google Scholar

Beebe, B., ‘An Empirical Study of U.S. Copyright Fair Use Opinions’ (2008) 156 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 549.Google Scholar

Bell, A., and Parchomovsky, G., ‘The Dual-Grant Theory of Fair Use’ (2016) 83 University of Chicago Law Review 1051.Google Scholar

Bell, T., ‘Fair Use vs Fared Use: The Impact of Automated Rights Management on Copyright’s Fair Use Doctrine’ (1998) 76 North Carolina Law Review 557.Google Scholar

Bently, L., ‘Trade Secrets: “Intellectual Property” but Not “Property”’?’ in Howe, H. and Griffiths, J. (eds), Concepts of Property in Intellectual Property Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Bently, L. and Aplin, T., ‘Whatever Became of Global, Mandatory, Fair Use? A Case Study in Dysfunctional Pluralism’ in Frankel, S. (ed), Is Intellectual Property Pluralism Functional? (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2019).Google Scholar

Bently, L. and Sherman, B., Intellectual Property Law, 3rd edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Bently, L., Sherman, B., Gangjee, D. and Johnson, P., Intellectual Property Law, 5th edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).Google Scholar

Besek, J. and Loengard, P., ‘Maintaining the Integrity of Digital Archives’ (2008) 31 Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts 267.Google Scholar

Besser-Jones, L., ‘The Role of Justice in Hume’s Theory of Psychological Development’ (2006) 32 Hume Studies 253.Google Scholar

Bouchard, M., ‘Collective Management in Commonwealth Jurisdictions: Comparing Canada with Australia’ in Gervais, D. (ed), Collective Management of Copyright and Related Rights (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2006).Google Scholar

Bowrey, K. and Anderson, J., ‘The Politics of Global Information Sharing: Whose Cultural Agendas Are Being Advanced?’ (2009) 18 Social & Legal Studies 479.Google Scholar

Bowrey, K., Handler, M., Nicol, D. and Weatherall, K., Australian Intellectual Property Law: Commentary, Law and Practice, 2nd edition (South Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Brannon, P., ‘Reforming Copyright to Foster Innovation: Providing Access to Orphaned Works’ (2006) 14 Journal of Intellectual Property Law 145.Google Scholar

Breakey, H., ‘Natural Intellectual Property Rights and the Public Domain’ (2010) 73 Modern Law Review 208.Google Scholar

Brennan, D., ‘Copyright and Parody in Australia: Some Thoughts on Suntrust Bank v Houghton Mifflin Company’ (2002) 13 Australian Intellectual Property Journal 161.Google Scholar

Brennan, D., ‘The Copyright Tribunal as Exception-Maker: Are Both Flexibility and Certainty Achievable’ (2018) 28 Australian Intellectual Property Journal 83.Google Scholar

Brooks, D. ‘Rectifying Fair Use After Cariou v. Prince: Reviving the Forgotten Statutory Text and Requiring that Unauthorized Copying Be Justified, rather than Merely “Transformative”’ (2016) 15 Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property Law 93.Google Scholar

Burrell, R., ‘Reining in Copyright Law: Is Fair Use the Answer?’ [2001] Intellectual Property Quarterly 361.Google Scholar

Burrell, R. and Coleman, A., Copyright Exceptions: The Digital Impact (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Burrell, R. and Weatherall, K., ‘Exporting Controversy? Reactions to the Copyright Provisions of the U.S.-Australia Free Trade Agreement: Lessons for U.S. Trade Policy’ [2008] 2 University of Illinois Journal of Law, Technology and Policy 259.Google Scholar

Burroughs & Co, Canadian Encyclopedic Digest Western, 2nd edition, volume 5 (Calgary: Burroughs & Co, 1958).Google Scholar

Butler, B., ‘Transformative Teaching and Educational Fair Use After Georgia State’ (2015) 48 Connecticut Law Review 475.Google Scholar

Calabresi, G. and Melamed, A., ‘Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral’ (1972) 85 Harvard Law Review 1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Capell, L., ‘Digitization as a Preservation Method for Damaged Acetate Negatives: A Case Study’ (2010) 73 The American Archivist 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carrier, M., ‘Cabining Intellectual Property through a Property Paradigm’ (2004) 54 Duke Law Journal 1.Google Scholar

Carroll, M., ‘Fixing Fair Use’ (2007) 85 North Carolina Law Review 1087.Google Scholar

Chapdelaine, P., ‘The Property Attributes of Copyright’ (2014) 10 Buffalo Intellectual Property Law Journal 34.Google Scholar

Chapdelaine, P., Copyright User Rights: Contracts and the Erosion of Property (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Christie, A., ‘Making It Simple: How Copyright Legislation Can Be Simplified’ (2011) 6 New Zealand Intellectual Property Journal 783.Google Scholar

Christie, A., ‘Maximising Permissible Exceptions to Intellectual Property Rights’ in Kur, A. and Mizaras, V. (eds), The Structure of Intellectual Property Law: Can One Size Fit All? (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2011).Google Scholar

Cloonan, M., ‘W(h)ither Preservation?’ (2001) 71 The Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy 231.Google Scholar

Coase, R., ‘The Problem of Social Cost’ (1960) 3 Journal of Law & Economics 1.Google Scholar

Cohen, J., ‘What Kind of Property Is Intellectual Property?’ (2014) 52 Houston Law Review 691.Google Scholar

Conrad, S., ‘Analog, the Sequel: An Analysis of Current Film Archiving Practice and Hesitance to Embrace Digital Preservation’ (2012) 34 Archival Issues 27.Google Scholar

Conway, P., ‘Overview: Rationale for Digitization and Preservation’ in Sitts, M. (ed), Handbook for Digital Projects: A Management Tool for Preservation and Access (Andover, MA: Northeast Document Conservation Center, 2000).Google Scholar

Cooter, R., ‘Expressive Law and Economics’ (1998) 27 Journal of Legal Studies 585.Google Scholar

Corbett, S., ‘Copyright Norms and Flexibilities and the Digitisation Practices of New Zealand Museums’ (2013) 29 Law in Context: A Socio-Legal Journal 55.Google Scholar

Cornish, G., ‘The New United Kingdom Copyright Act and Its Implications for Libraries and Archives’ (1991) 83 Law Library Journal 51.Google Scholar

Cornish, W., Llewellyn, D. and Aplin, T., Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights, 8th edition (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2013).Google Scholar

Cowan, T., ‘Rule or Standard in Tort Law’ (1955) 13 Rutgers Law Review 141.Google Scholar

Craig, C., ‘The Changing Face of Fair Dealing in Canadian Copyright Law: A Proposal for Legislative Reform’ in Geist, M. (ed), In the Public Interest: The Future of Canadian Copyright Law (Toronto: Irwin Law, 2005).Google Scholar

Craig, C., ‘Globalizing User Rights-Talk: On Copyright Limits and Rhetorical Risks’ (2017) 33 American University International Law Review 1.Google Scholar

Crews, K., Copyright, Fair Use, and the Challenge for Universities: Promoting the Progress of Higher Education (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Crews, K., ‘Electronic Reserves and Fair Use: The Outer Limits of CONFU’ (1999) 50(14) Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1342.Google Scholar

Crews, K., Copyright Law for Librarians and Educators: Creative Strategies and Practical Solutions, 2nd edition (Chicago: American Library Association, 2006).Google Scholar

Crews, K., ‘Museum Policies and Art Images: Conflicting Objectives and Copyright Overreaching’ (2012) 22 Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal 795.Google Scholar

Dagan, H., ‘Property and the Public Domain’ (2006) 18 Supplement Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 84.Google Scholar

D’Agostino, G., ‘Healing Fair Dealing? A Comparative Analysis of Canada’s Fair Dealing to U.K. Fair Dealing and U.S. Fair Use’ (2008) 53 McGill Law Journal 309.Google Scholar

Dalton, J., ‘Electronic Reserves and the Copyright Challenge in Canada’ (2007) 17 Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Electronic Reserve 97.Google Scholar

Davison, M., Monotti, A. and Wiseman, L., Australian Intellectual Property Law, 3rd edition (Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Deazley, R., ‘Copyright and Parody: Taking Backward the Gowers Review?’ (2010) 73 Modern Law Review 785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Beer, J. and Bouchard, M., Canada’s “Orphan Works” Regime: Unlocatable Copyright Owners and the Copyright Board (1 December 2009).Google Scholar

Depoorter, B., ‘Technology and Uncertainty: The Shaping Effect on Copyright Law’ (2009) 157 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1831.Google Scholar

Dewey, J., Theory of the Moral Life (1932) (New York: Irvington Publishers, 1996).Google Scholar

de Zwart, M., ‘A Historical Analysis of the Birth of Fair Dealing and Fair Use: Lessons for the Digital Age’ [2007] 1 Intellectual Property Quarterly 60.Google Scholar

de Zwart, M., ‘The Copyright Amendment Act 2006: The New Copyright Exceptions’ (2007) 25 Copyright Reporter 4.Google Scholar

Di Valentino, L., ‘Laying the Foundation for Copyright Policy and Practice in Canadian Universities’ (PhD Thesis, The University of Western Ontario, 2016) https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/4312.Google Scholar

Dias Pereira, A., ‘Levies in EU Copyright Law: An Overview of the CJEU’s Judgments on the Fair Compensation of Private Copying and Reprography’ (2017) 12 Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 591.Google Scholar

Dinwoodie, G. and Dreyfuss, R., A Neofederalist Vision of TRIPS (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Drassinower, A., ‘Taking User Rights Seriously’ in Geist, M. (ed), In the Public Interest: The Future of Canadian Copyright Law (Toronto: Irwin Law, 2005).Google Scholar

Drassinower, A., ‘Exceptions Properly So-Called’ in Drassinower, A. and Gendreau, Y. (eds), Language and Copyright (Montréal: Carswell, 2010).Google Scholar

Duxbury, N., Patterns of American Jurisprudence (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Dworkin, G., ‘Reports of Committees: The Whitford Committee Report on Copyright and Designs Law’ (1977) 40 Modern Law Review 685.Google Scholar

Ehrlich, I. and Posner, R., ‘An Economic Analysis of Legal Rulemaking’ (1974) 3 The Journal of Legal Studies 257.Google Scholar

Elkin-Koren, N. and Fischman-Afori, O., ‘Rulifying Fair Use’ (2017) 59 Arizona Law Review 161.Google Scholar

Ellickson, R., Order without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Ellickson, R., ‘Law and Economics Discovers Social Norms’ (1998) 27 Journal of Legal Studies 537.Google Scholar

Fagundes, D., ‘Crystals in the Public Domain’ (2009) 50 Boston College Law Review 139.Google Scholar

Favale, M., Kretschmer, M. and Torremans, P., ‘Is There an EU Copyright Jurisprudence? An Empirical Analysis of the Workings of the European Court of Justice’ (2016) 79 Modern Law Review 31.Google Scholar

Ficsor, M., Collective Management of Copyright and Related Rights (Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization, 2002).Google Scholar

Ficsor, M., The Law of Copyright and the Internet (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Fisher, W. III, ‘Reconstructing the Fair Use Doctrine’ (1988) 101 Harvard Law Review 1659.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, B., ‘Underlying Rationales of Fair Use: Simplifying the Copyright Act’ (1998) 2 Southern Cross University Law Review 153.Google Scholar

Fox, H., The Canadian Law of Copyright (The University of Toronto Press, 1944).Google Scholar

Fox, H., The Canadian Law of Copyright and Industrial Designs, 2nd edition (Carswell Company Limited, 1967).Google Scholar

Fraser, M., ‘Fair Is Foul and Foul Is Fair: From Analogue to Digital Fair Dealing’ (1998) 9 Journal of Law and Information Science 93.Google Scholar

Füller, J., ‘Article 13 Limitations and Exceptions’ in Stoll, P., Busche, J. and Arend, K. (eds), WTO—Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (Leiden: Brill, 2009).Google Scholar

Gangjee, D. and Burrell, R., ‘Because You’re Worth It: L’Oréal and the Prohibition on Free Riding’ (2010) 73 Modern Law Review 282.Google Scholar

Garnett, K., ‘Copyright in Photographs’ (2000) 22 European Intellectual Property Review 229.Google Scholar

Gasaway, L., ‘Library Reserve Collections: From Paper to Electronic Collections’ in Gasaway, L. (ed), Growing Pains: Adapting Copyright for Libraries, Education, and Society (Littleton: Fred B. Rothman & Co, 1997).Google Scholar

Gasaway, L., ‘Values Conflict in the Digital Environment: Libraries versus Copyright Holders’ (2000) 24 Columbia-VLA Journal of Law and the Arts 115.Google Scholar

Gasaway, L., ‘Libraries, Digital Content, and Copyright’ (2010) 12 Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law 755.Google Scholar

Gasaway, L., ‘Libraries and Copyright at the Dawn of the Twentieth Century: The 1909 Copyright Act’ (2010) 11 North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology 419.Google Scholar

Geiger, C., ‘From Berne to National Law, Via the Copyright Directive: The Dangerous Mutations of the Three-Step Test’ (2007) 29 European Intellectual Property Review 486.Google Scholar

Geiger, C., ‘Promoting Creativity through Copyright Limitations: Reflections on the Concept of Exclusivity in Copyright Law’ (2010) 12 Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law 515.Google Scholar

Geiger, C., Gervais, D. and Senftleben, M., ‘The Three-Step Test Revisited: How to Use the Test’s Flexibility in National Copyright Law’ (2014) 29 American University International Law Review 581.Google Scholar

Geiger, C., Griffiths, J. and Hilty, R., ‘Towards a Balanced Interpretation of the “Three-Step Test” in Copyright Law’ (2008) 30 European Intellectual Property Review 489.Google Scholar

Geist, M., ‘Fairness Found: How Canada Quietly Shifted from Fair Dealing to Fair Use’ in Geist, M. (ed), The Copyright Pentalogy: How the Supreme Court of Canada Shook the Foundations of Canadian Copyright Law (Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Gervais, D., ‘Collective Management of Copyright and Neighbouring Rights in Canada: An International Perspective’ (2002) 1 Canadian Journal of Law and Technology 21.Google Scholar

Gervais, D., ‘Canadian Copyright Law Post-CCH’ (2004) 18 Intellectual Property Journal 131.Google Scholar

Gervais, D., ‘A Uniquely Canadian Institution: The Copyright Board of Canada’ in Gendreau, Y., An Emerging Intellectual Property Paradigm: Perspectives from Canada (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2008).Google Scholar

Gervais, D., ‘Fair Use, Fair Dealing, Fair Principles: Efforts to Conceptualize Exceptions and Limitations to Copyright’ (2010) 57 Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA 499.Google Scholar

Gervais, D., ‘Collective Management of Copyright: Theory and Practice in the Digital Age’ in Gervais, D. (ed), Collective Management of Copyright and Related Rights, 3rd edition (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2015).Google Scholar

Giblin, R., ‘Stranded in the Technological Dark Ages: Implications of the Full Federal Court’s Decision in NRL v Optus’ (2012) 34 European Intellectual Property Review 632.Google Scholar

Gibson, J., ‘Risk Aversion and Rights Accretion in Intellectual Property Law’ (2007) 116 Yale Law Journal 882.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, J., ‘Toward Supranational Copyright Law? The WTO Panel Decision and the “Three-Step Test” for Copyright Exceptions’ (2001) 187 Revue Internationale du Droit D’Auteur 3.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, J., ‘Legal Protection of Technological Measures Protecting Works of Authorship: International Obligations and the US Experience’ (2005) 29 Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts 11.Google Scholar

Goebel, J., ‘Rules and Standards: A Critique of Two Critical Theorists’ (1992) 31 Duquesne Law Review 51.Google Scholar

Goldstein, P., ‘Copyright’s Commons’ (2005) 29 Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts 1.Google Scholar

Goldstein, P., ‘Fair Use in Context’ (2008) 31 Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts 433Google Scholar

Goldstein, P., Goldstein on Copyright Volume II (New York: Aspen Publishers, 2008).Google Scholar

Gordon, W., ‘Fair Use as Market Failure: A Structural and Economic Analysis of the Betamax Case and Its Predecessors’ (1982) 82 Columbia Law Review 1600.Google Scholar

Gordon, W., ‘A Property Right in Self-Expression: Equality and Individualism in the Natural Law of Intellectual Property’ (1993) 102 Yale Law Journal 1533.Google Scholar

Gordon, W., ‘On the Economics of Copyright, Restitution, and “Fair Use”: Systematic Versus Case-by-Case Responses to Market Failure’ (1997) 8 Journal of Law and Information Science 7.Google Scholar

Gordon, W., ‘Excuse and Justification in the Law of Fair Use: Commodification and Market Perspectives’ in Elkin-Koren, N. and Netanel, N. (eds), The Commodification of Information (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2002).Google Scholar

Gordon, W., ‘The “Why” of Markets: Fair Use and Circularity’ (2007) 116 Yale Law Journal Pocket Part 358.Google Scholar

Gould, T., Lipinski, T. and Buchanan, E., ‘Copyright Policies and the Deciphering of Fair Use in the Creation of Reserves at University Libraries’ (2005) 31 Journal of Academic Librarianship 182.Google Scholar

Gracy, K., ‘Ambition and Ambivalence: A Study of Professional Attitudes towards Digital Distribution of Archival Moving Images’ (2013) 76 The American Archivist 346.Google Scholar

Gracy, K., ‘The Evolution and Integration of Moving Image Preservation Work into Cultural Heritage Institutions’ (2013) 48 Information & Culture 368.Google Scholar

Griffiths, J., ‘Preserving Judicial Freedom of Movement – Interpreting Fair Dealing in Copyright Law’ [2000] Intellectual Property Quarterly 164.Google Scholar

Griffiths, J., ‘The “Three-Step Test” in European Copyright Law: Problems and Solutions’ [2009] Intellectual Property Quarterly 428.Google Scholar

Griffiths, J., ‘Fair Dealing after Deckmyn – The United Kingdom’s Defence for Caricature, Parody or Pastiche’ in Richardson, M. and Ricketson, S. (eds), Research Handbook on Intellectual Property in Media and Entertainment (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 2017).Google Scholar

Guibault, L. and Schroff, S., ‘Extended Collective Licensing for the Use of Out-of-Commerce Works in Europe: A Matter of Legitimacy vis-a-vis Rights Holders’ (2018) 49 International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 916.Google Scholar

Haight Farley, C., ‘No Comment: Will Cariou v. Prince Alter Copyright Judges’ Taste in Art?’ (2015) 5 IP Theory 19.Google Scholar

Handler, M., ‘Continuing Problems with Film Copyright’ in Macmillan, F. (ed), New Directions in Copyright Law, Volume 6 (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2007).Google Scholar

Handler, M. and Hudson, E., ‘Fair Use as an Advance on Fair Dealing? Depolarising the Debate’ in Sun, H., Balganesh, S. and Ng-Loy, W. (eds), Comparative Aspects of Limitations and Exceptions in Copyright Law (New York: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming).Google Scholar

Handler, M. and Rolph, D., ‘“A Real Pea Souper”: The Panel Case and the Development of the Fair Dealing Defences to Copyright Infringement in Australia’ (2003) 27 Melbourne University Law Review 381.Google Scholar

Harris, L., Canadian Copyright Law, 3rd edition (Toronto: McGraw-Hill, 2001).Google Scholar

Hazucha, B., ‘Private Copying and Harm to Authors – Compensation versus Remuneration’ (2017) 133 Law Quarterly Review 269.Google Scholar

Hedstrom, M., ‘Digital Preservation: A Time Bomb for Digital Libraries’ (1998) 31 Computers and the Humanities 189.Google Scholar

Helberger, N. and Hugenholtz, P., ‘No Place Like Home for Making a Copy: Private Copying in European Copyright Law and Consumer Law’ (2007) 22 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 1061.Google Scholar

Helfer, L., ‘World Music on a U.S. Stage: A Berne/TRIPS and Economic Analysis of the Fairness in Music Licensing Act’ (2000) 80 Boston University Law Review 93.Google Scholar

Heymann, L., ‘Everything Is Transformative: Fair Use and Reader Response’ (2008) 31 Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts 445.Google Scholar

Hirtle, P., ‘Research, Libraries, and Fair Use: The Gentlemen’s Agreement of 1935’ (2006) 53 Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA 545.Google Scholar

Hirtle, P., ‘The History and Current State of Digital Preservation in the United States’ in Metadata and Digital Collections: A Festschrift in Honor of Thomas P. Turner (Cornell University Library, online resource).Google Scholar

Hohfeld, W., ‘Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Legal Reasoning’ (1913) 23 Yale Law Journal 16.Google Scholar

Holmes, O., ‘The Path of the Law’ (1897) 10 Harvard Law Review 457.Google Scholar

Hudson, E., ‘Copyright and Publicly Located Artistic Works: The End of an Exception?’ (2006) 19 Intellectual Property Law Bulletin 106.Google Scholar

Hudson, E., ‘The Copyright Amendment Act 2006: The Scope and Likely Impact of New Library Exceptions’ (2006) 14 Australian Law Librarian 25.Google Scholar

Hudson, E., ‘Copyright Exceptions: The Experiences of Cultural Institutions in the United States, Canada and Australia’ (PhD Thesis, University of Melbourne, November 2011).Google Scholar

Hudson, E., ‘Implementing Fair Use in Copyright Law: Lessons from Australia’ (2013) 25 Intellectual Property Journal 201.Google Scholar

Hudson, E., ‘Phillips v Mulcaire: A Property Paradox’ in Douglas, S., Hickey, R. and Waring, E. (eds), Landmark Cases in Property Law (Oxford: Hart, 2015).Google Scholar

Hudson, E., ‘The Pastiche Exception in Copyright Law: A Case of Mashed-Up Drafting?’ [2017] Intellectual Property Quarterly 346.Google Scholar

Hudson, E., ‘The Georgia State Litigation: Literal Copying in Education’ (2019) 82 Modern Law Review 508.Google Scholar

Hudson, E., ‘Copyright and Invisible Authors: A Property Perspective’ in Johnston, A. and Talbot, L. (eds), Great Debates in Critical Commercial and Corporate Law (Basingstoke: Palgrave, forthcoming).Google Scholar

Hudson, E., and Burrell, R., ‘Abandonment, Copyright and Orphaned Works: What Does It Mean to Take the Proprietary Nature of Intellectual Property Rights Seriously?’ (2011) 35 Melbourne University Law Review 971.Google Scholar

Hudson, E. and Kenyon, A., ‘Communication in the Digital Environment: An Empirical Study into Copyright Law and Digitisation Practices in Public Museums, Galleries and Libraries’ (Working Paper No 15/05, Intellectual Property Research Institute of Australia, July 2005).Google Scholar

Hudson, E. and Kenyon, A., Copyright and Cultural Institutions: Guidelines for Digitisation (Melbourne: University of Melbourne, 2005).Google Scholar

Hudson, E. and Kenyon, A., ‘Digital Access: The Impact of Copyright on Digitisation Practices in Australian Museums, Galleries, Libraries and Archives’ (2007) 30 University of New South Wales Law Journal 12.Google Scholar

Hudson, E. and Kenyon, A., ‘Without Walls: Copyright Law and Digital Collections in Australian Cultural Institutions’ (2007) 4 SCRIPTed 197.Google Scholar

Hugenholtz, P., ‘Flexible Copyright: Can the EU Author’s Rights Accommodate Fair Use’ in Okediji, R. (ed), Copyright Law in an Age of Limitations and Exceptions (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Hughes, J., ‘Fair Use Across Time’ (2003) 50 UCLA Law Review 775.Google Scholar

Hughes, J., ‘The Photographer’s Copyright – Photograph as Art, Photograph as Database’ (2012) 25 Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 339.Google Scholar

Hughes, J., ‘Fair Use and Its Politics – at Home and Abroad’ in Okediji, R. (ed), Copyright Law in an Age of Limitations and Exceptions (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Hughes, R., ‘Evolution of the Concept of Fair Dealing in Canadian Copyright Law’ (2008) 26 Copyright Reporter 44.Google Scholar

Hunter, D., ‘American Lessons: Implementing Fair Use in Australia’ (2014) 24 Australian Intellectual Property Journal 192.Google Scholar

Iljadica, M., Copyright Beyond Law: Regulating Creativity in the Graffiti Subculture (Oxford: Hart, 2016).Google Scholar

Iljadica, M., ‘Copyright and the Right to the City’ (2017) 68 Northern Island Legal Quarterly 59.Google Scholar

Jacques, S., ‘Are National Courts Required to Have an (Exceptional) European Sense of Humour?’ (2015) 37 European Intellectual Property Review 134.Google Scholar

Jaszi, P., ‘Copyright, Fair Use and Motion Pictures’ (2007) Utah Law Review 715.Google Scholar

Johns, A., Piracy: The Intellectual Property Wars from Gutenberg to Gates (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Kalimo, H., Meyer, T. and Mylly, T., ‘Of Values and Legitimacy – Discourse Analytical Insights on the Copyright Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union’ (2018) 81 Modern Law Review 282.Google Scholar

Kaplow, L., ‘Rules versus Standards: An Economic Analysis’ (1992) 42 Duke Law Journal 557.Google Scholar

Kaplow, L., ‘A Model of the Optimal Complexity of Legal Rules’ (1995) 11 Journal of Law, Economics & Organization 150.Google Scholar

Kaplow, L. and Shavell, S., ‘Property Rules versus Liability Rules: An Economic Analysis’ (1996) 109 Harvard Law Review 713.Google Scholar

Katz, A., ‘Spectre: Canadian Copyright and the Mandatory Tariff – Part I’ (2015) 27 Intellectual Property Journal 151.Google Scholar

Katz, A., ‘Spectre: Canadian Copyright and the Mandatory Tariff – Part II’ (2015) 28 Intellectual Property Journal 39.Google Scholar

Kennedy, D., ‘Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication’ (1976) 89 Harvard Law Review 1685.Google Scholar

Kenyon, A. and Hudson, E., ‘Copyright, Digitisation and Cultural Institutions’ (2004) 31 Australian Journal of Communication 89.Google Scholar

Kenyon, A. and Wright, R., ‘Whose Conflict? Copyright, Creators and Cultural Institutions’ (2010) 33 UNSW Law Journal 286.Google Scholar

Knopf, H., ‘Limits on the Nature and Scope of Copyright’ in Henderson, G. (ed), Copyright and Confidential Information Law of Canada (Toronto: Carswell, 1994).Google Scholar

Koelman, K., ‘Fixing the Three Step Test’ (2006) 28 European Intellectual Property Review 407.Google Scholar

Kogan, T., ‘Photographic Reproductions, Copyright and the Slavish Copy’ (2012) 35 Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts 445.Google Scholar

Korobkin, R., ‘Behavioral Analysis and Legal Form: Rules vs. Standards Revisited’ (2000) 79 Oregon Law Review 23.Google Scholar

Korobkin, R. and Ulen, T., ‘Law and Behavioral Science: Removing the Rationality Assumption from Law and Economics’ (2000) 88 California Law Review 1051.Google Scholar

Laddie, H., ‘Copyright: Over-Strength, Over-Regulated, Over-Rated?’ (1996) 18 European Intellectual Property Review 253.Google Scholar

Lahore, J., ‘Photocopying in Australian Libraries: Developments in Copyright Law’ (1976) 4 International Journal of Law Libraries 32.Google Scholar

Landes, W. and Posner, R., ‘An Economic Analysis of Copyright Law’ (1989) 18 Journal of Legal Studies 325.Google Scholar

Laughlin, G., ‘Digitization and Democracy: The Conflict between the Amazon Kindle License Agreement and the Role of Libraries in a Free Society’ (2010) 40 University of Baltimore Law Review 3.Google Scholar

Leenheer Zimmerman, D., ‘Can Our Culture Be Saved? The Future of Digital Archiving’ (2007) 91 Minnesota Law Review 989.Google Scholar

Lemley, M., ‘Property, Intellectual Property, and Free Riding’ (2005) 83 Texas Law Review 1031.Google Scholar

Lemley, M., ‘Should a Licensing Market Require Licensing?’ (2007) 70 Law and Contemporary Problems 185.Google Scholar

Leval, P., ‘Toward a Fair Use Standard’ (1990) 103 Harvard Law Review 1105.Google Scholar

Lindsay, D., ‘Fair Use and Other Copyright Exceptions: Overview of Issues’ (2005) 23 Copyright Reporter 4.Google Scholar

Litman, J., ‘Copyright, Compromise, and Legislative History’ (1987) 72 Cornell Law Review 857.Google Scholar

Litman, J., ‘Copyright Legislation and Technological Change’ (1989) 68 Oregon Law Review 275.Google Scholar

Litman, J., ‘Copyright as Myth’ (1991) 53 University of Pittsburgh Law Review 235.Google Scholar

Litman, J., ‘Revising Copyright Law for the Information Age’ (1996) 75 Oregon Law Review 19.Google Scholar

Loring, C., ‘Library Reserves and Copyright: Thirty Years on and Still Changing’ (1997) 21 Library Acquisitions: Practice & Theory 29.Google Scholar

Lunney, G., ‘Copyright Collectives and Collecting Societies: The United States Experience’ in Gervais, D. (ed), Collective Management of Copyright and Related Rights, 3rd edition (Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2015).Google Scholar

Madison, M., ‘Rewriting Fair Use and the Future of Copyright Reform’ (2005) 23 Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal 391.Google Scholar

Malaro, M., and DeAngelis, I., A Legal Primer on Managing Museum Collections, 3rd edition (Washington, DC: Smithsonian Books, 2012).Google Scholar

Matz, R., ‘Bridgeman Art Library, Ltd v Corel Corp’ (2000) 15 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 3.Google Scholar

Matusiak, K. and Johnston, T., ‘Digitization for Preservation and Access: Restoring the Usefulness of the Nitrate Negative Collections at the American Geographical Society Library’ (2014) 77 The American Archivist 241.Google Scholar

Marshall, D., ‘Access to the Law: Should Copyright Play a Role?’ in Knopf, H. (ed), The New Copyright Act: Managing the Impact (Toronto: Insight Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Maurice Hyam, G., ‘The Working Paper on Copyright: A Preliminary Response’ (Summer 1977) 4 Archivaria 188.Google Scholar

McAdams, R., ‘The Origin, Development, and Regulation of Norms’ (1997) 96 Michigan Law Review 338.Google Scholar

McAdams, R‘Beyond the Prisoners’ Dilemma: Coordination, Game Theory, and Law’ (2009) 82 Southern California Law Review 209.Google Scholar

McCutcheon, J., and Holloway, S., ‘Whose Fair Dealing? Third-Party Reliance on the Fair Dealing Exception for Parody or Satire’ (2016) 27 Australian Intellectual Property Journal 54.Google Scholar

McKeown, J., Fox Canadian Law of Copyright and Industrial Designs, 3rd edition (Toronto: Carswell, 2000).Google Scholar

Melamut, S., ‘Pursuing Fair Use, Law Libraries, and Electronic Reserves’ (2000) 92 Law Library Journal 157.Google Scholar

Menell, P., ‘Knowledge Accessibility and Preservation Policy for the Digital Age’ (2007) 44 Houston Law Review 1013.Google Scholar

Merges, R., ‘Are You Making Fun of Me: Notes on Market Failure and the Parody Defense in Copyright’ (1993) 21 AIPLA Quarterly Journal 305.Google Scholar

Minow, M. and Lipinski, T., The Library’s Legal Answer Book (Chicago: American Library Association, 2003).Google Scholar

Morrison, C., ‘Illustration for Instruction and the UK Higher Education Sector’ (MA dissertation, King’s College London, 2018).Google Scholar

Mossoff, A., ‘Is Copyright Property?’ (2005) 42 San Diego Law Review 29.Google Scholar

Mumford, M., ‘Copyright in Canadian Archives: An Evolving Challenge’ (2006) 31 Canadian Law Library Review 238.Google Scholar

Murray, L. and Trosow, S., Canadian Copyright: A Citizen’s Guide (Toronto: Between the Lines, 2007).Google Scholar

Murray, L., Piper, S. and Robertson, K., Putting Intellectual Property in Its Place: Rights Discourses, Creative Labor, and the Everyday (New York: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Netanel, N., ‘Copyright and a Democratic Civil Society’ (1996) 106 Yale Law Journal 283.Google Scholar

Netanel, N., ‘The Next Round: The Impact of the WIPO Copyright Treaty on TRIPS Dispute Settlement’ (1997) 37 Virginia Journal of International Law 441.Google Scholar

Netanel, N., ‘Making Sense of Fair Use’ (2011) 15 Lewis & Clark Law Review 715.Google Scholar

Nimmer, D., ‘“Fairest of Them All” and Other Fairy Tales of Fair Use’ (2003) 66 Law and Contemporary Problems 263.Google Scholar

Nimmer, M., and Nimmer, D., Nimmer on Copyright (LexisNexis, online resource).Google Scholar

Nordemann, W., Vinck, K., Hertin, P. and Meyer, G., International Copyright and Neighbouring Rights Law (Weinheim: VCH, 1990).Google Scholar

Oakley, R., ‘Preservation and Copyright’ in Gasaway, L. (ed), Growing Pains: Adapting Copyright for Libraries, Education, and Society (Littleton, Colorado: Fred B. Rothman & Co, 1997).Google Scholar

Okediji, R., ‘Towards an International Fair Use Doctrine’ (2000) 39 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 75.Google Scholar

Oliver, J., ‘Copyright in the WTO: The Panel Decision and the Three-Step Test’ (2002) 25 Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts 119.Google Scholar

Ong, B., ‘Fissures in the Façade of Fair Dealing: Users’ Rights in Works Protected by Copyright’ [2004] Singapore Journal of Legal Studies 150.Google Scholar

Owen, V., ‘The Librarian’s Perspective on Collecting Societies’ (Paper presented at the World Library and Information Congress: 73rd IFLA General Conference and Council, Durban, South Africa, 19–23 August 2007).Google Scholar

Padfield, T., Copyright for Archivists and Users of Archives, 2nd edition (London: Facet Publishing, 2004).Google Scholar

Pallante, M., ‘Orphan Works & Mass Digitization: Obstacles & Opportunities’ (2012) 27 Berkeley Technology Law Journal 1251.Google Scholar

Pallas Loren, L., ‘Redefining the Market Failure Approach to Fair Use in an Era of Copyright Permission Systems’ (1997) 5 Journal of Intellectual Property Law 1.Google Scholar

Pantalony, R., Illustrating Options: Collective Administration of Intellectual Property for Canadian Cultural Heritage Institutions (Canadian Heritage Information Network, 1999).Google Scholar

Patry, W., The Fair Use Privilege in Copyright Law, 2nd edition (Washington, DC: BNA Books, 1995).Google Scholar

Patry, W., Patry on Copyright, Volume 4 (Thomson Reuters, online resource, updated to March 2018).Google Scholar

Patterson, L., ‘Free Speech, Copyright, and Fair Use’ (1987) 40 Vanderbilt Law Review 1.Google Scholar

Patterson, L., ‘Folsom v Marsh and Its Legacy’ (1998) 5 Journal of Intellectual Property Law 431.Google Scholar

Patterson, L. and Lindberg, S., The Nature of Copyright: A Law of Users’ Rights (Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1991).Google Scholar

Pessach, G., ‘Museums, Digitization and Copyright Law: Taking Stock and Looking Ahead’ (2007) 1 Journal of International Media & Entertainment Law 253.Google Scholar

Petri, G., ‘Copyright and Reproductions of Two-Dimensional Works of Art’ (2014) 12 Journal of Conservation and Museum Studies.Google Scholar

Pila, J., ‘Pluralism, Principles and Proportionality in Intellectual Property’ (2014) 34 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 182.Google Scholar

Pila, J. and Torremans, P., European Intellectual Property Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2016).Google Scholar

Posner, R., ‘When Is Parody Fair Use?’ (1992) 21 Journal of Legal Studies 67.Google Scholar

Posner, E., ‘Standards, Rules, and Social Norms’ (1997) 21 Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 101.Google Scholar

Posner, E., Law and Social Norms (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Pound, R., ‘Hierarchy of Sources and Forms in Different Systems of Law’ (1933) 7 Tulane Law Review 475.Google Scholar

Purday, J., ‘Intellectual Property Issues and Europeana, Europe’s Digital Library, Museum and Archive’ (2010) 10 Legal Information Management 174.Google Scholar

Reese, A., ‘Photographs of Public Domain Paintings: How, If at All, Should We Protect Them’ (2009) 34 Journal of Corporation Law 1033.Google Scholar

Reese, R., ‘The Story of Folsom v. Marsh: Distinguishing between Infringing and Legitimate Uses’ in Dreyfuss, R. and Ginsburg, J. (eds), Intellectual Property Stories (New York: Foundation Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Reese, R., ‘Transformativeness and the Derivative Work Right’ (2008) 31 Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts 467.Google Scholar

Ricketson, S., ‘Simplifying Copyright Law: Proposals from Down Under’ (1999) 21 European Intellectual Property Review 537.Google Scholar

Rendas, T., ‘Advocate General Szpunar in Spiegel Online (or Why We Need Fair Use in the EU)’ (2019) 14 Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 265.Google Scholar

Ricketson, S. and Creswell, C., Law of Intellectual Property: Copyright, Design and Confidential Information (Legal Online, electronic resource).Google Scholar

Ricketson, S. and Ginsburg, J., International Copyright and Neighbouring Rights: The Berne Convention and Beyond Volume I, 2nd edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Rieger, O., Preservation in the Age of Large-Scale Digitization: A White Paper (February 2008).Google Scholar

Rimmer, M., ‘Canadian Rhapsody: Copyright Law and Research Libraries’ (2004) 35 Australian Academic & Research Libraries 193.Google Scholar

Rosati, E., ‘CJEU says that Member States May Grant Public Libraries the Right to Digitize Works in Their Collections’ (2015) 10 Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 6.Google Scholar

Rosati, E., Copyright in the EU: In Search of (in)flexibilities’ (2014) 9 Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 585.Google Scholar

Rose, C., ‘Crystals and Mud in Property Law’ (1988) 40 Stanford Law Review 577.Google Scholar

Rothman, J., ‘The Questionable Use of Custom in Intellectual Property Law’ (2007) 93 Virginia Law Review 1899.Google Scholar

Russell, C., Complete Copyright: An Everyday Guide for Librarians (Chicago: American Library Association, 2004).Google Scholar

Sag, M., ‘God in the Machine: A New Structural Analysis of Copyright’s Fair Use Doctrine’ (2005) 11 Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review 381.Google Scholar

Sag, M., ‘The Google Book Settlement and the Fair Use Counterfactual’ (2010/11) 55 New York Law School Law Review 19.Google Scholar

Sag, M., ‘Predicting Fair Use’ (2012) 73 Ohio State Law Journal 47.Google Scholar

Samuelson, P., ‘Unbundling Fair Uses’ (2009) 77 Fordham Law Review 2537.Google Scholar

Samuelson, P., ‘Possible Future of Fair Use’ (2015) 90 Washington Law Review 815.Google Scholar

Samuelson, P., ‘Justifications for Copyright Limitations and Exceptions’ in Okediji, R., Copyright Law in an Age of Limitations and Exceptions (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Samuelson, P., ‘The Relative Virtues of Bottom-Up and Top-Down Theories of Fair Use’ (2017) 83 University of Chicago Law Review Online 206.Google Scholar

Scassa, T., ‘Recalibrating Copyright Law? A Comment on the Supreme Court of Canada’s Decision in CCH Canadian Limited et al v Law Society of Upper Canada’ (2004) 3 Canadian Journal of Law & Technology 89.Google Scholar

Schlag, P., ‘Rules and Standards’ (1985) 33 UCLA Law Review 379.Google Scholar

Seale, C., ‘Validity, Reliability and the Quality of Research’ in Seale, Clive (ed) Researching Society and Culture (London: Sage Publications, 2nd edition, 2004).Google Scholar

Senftleben, M. Copyright, Limitations and the Three-Step Test: An Analysis of the Three-Step Test in International and EC Copyright Law (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2004).Google Scholar

Senftleben, M. ‘The Perfect Match: Civil Law Judges and Open-Ended Fair Use Provisions’ (2017) 33 American University International Law Review 231.Google Scholar

Sherman, B. and Bently, L., The Making of Modern Intellectual Property Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Sherman, B. and Wiseman, L., ‘Fair Copy: Protecting Access to Scientific Information in Post-War Britain’ (2010) 73 Modern Law Review 240.Google Scholar

Sims, A., ‘Abundant Pest or Endangered Species? The Future of Fair Dealing in Copyright Law’ (2008) 14 New Zealand Business Law Quarterly 231.Google Scholar

Sims, A., ‘Strangling Their Creation: The Courts’ Treatment of Fair Dealing in Copyright Law Since 1911’ [2010] Intellectual Property Quarterly 192.Google Scholar

Singh, S., Blake, M. and O’Donnell, J., ‘Digitizing Pacific Cultural Collections: The Australian Experience’ (2013) 20 International Journal of Cultural Property 77.Google Scholar

Sites, B., ‘Fair Use and the New Transformative’ (2016) 39 Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts 513.Google Scholar

Skone James, F., and Skone James, E., (eds), Copinger and Skone James on the Law of Copyright, 9th edition (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1958).Google Scholar

Spence, M., ‘Intellectual Property and the Problem of Parody’ (1998) 114 Law Quarterly Review 594.Google Scholar

Spence, M., Intellectual Property (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Spence, M. and Endicott, T., ‘Vagueness in the Scope of Copyright’ (2005) 121 Law Quarterly Review 657.Google Scholar

Sterk, S., ‘Intellectualizing Property: The Tenuous Connections between Land and Copyright’ (2005) 83 Washington University Law Quarterly 417.Google Scholar

Sterk, S., ‘Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Uncertainty About Property Rights’ (2008) 106 Michigan Law Review 1285.Google Scholar

Sterling, J., World Copyright Law, 3rd edition (London: Street & Maxwell, 1998).Google Scholar

Stewart, A., Griffith, P., Bannister, J. and Liberman, A., Intellectual Property in Australia, 5th edition (Chatswood NSW: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2014).Google Scholar

Stewart, S., International Copyright and Neighbouring Rights, 2nd edition (London: Butterworths, 1989).Google Scholar

Stokes, S., ‘Graves’ Case and Copyright in Photographs: Bridgeman v. Corel (USA)’ in McClean, D. and Schubert, K. (eds), Dear Images: Art, Copyright and Culture (London: Ridinghouse and Institute of Contemporary Arts, 2002).Google Scholar

Sullivan, K., ‘The Justices of Rules and Standards’ (1992) 106 Harvard Law Review 22.Google Scholar

Sun, H., ‘Copyright and Responsibility’ (2013) 4 Harvard Journal of Sports & Entertainment Law 263.Google Scholar

Sunstein, C., ‘Problems with Rules’ (1995) 83 California Law Review 953.Google Scholar

Tamaro, N., The Annotated Copyright Act 1992 (Toronto: Carswell, 1992).Google Scholar

Tamaro, N., The 1997 Annotated Copyright Act (Toronto: Carswell, 1996).Google Scholar

Tamaro, N., The 1999 Annotated Copyright Act (Toronto: Carswell, 1999).Google Scholar

Tamaro, N., The 2002 Annotated Copyright Act (Toronto: Carswell, 2002).Google Scholar

Tamaro, N., The 2009 Annotated Copyright Act (Toronto: Carswell, 2008).Google Scholar

Tamura, Y., ‘Rethinking Copyright Institution for the Digital Age’ (2009) 1 WIPO Journal 63.Google Scholar

Tamura, Y., The Canadian Encyclopedic Digest (Western), Fourth Edition, Volume 8, Title 35, ‘Copyright’ (title current to November 2008).Google Scholar

Trosow, S., ‘Bill C-32 and the Educational Sector: Overcoming Impediments to Fair Dealing’ in Geist, M. (ed), From “Radical Extremism” to “Balanced Copyright”: Canadian Copyright and the Digital Agenda (Toronto: Irwin Law, 2010).Google Scholar

Trosow, S., Armstrong, S. and Harasym, B., ‘Objections to the Proposed Access Copyright Post-Secondary Tariff and Its Progeny Licenses: A Working Paper’ (14 August 2012).Google Scholar

Tushnet, R., ‘Copy This Essay: How Fair Use Doctrine Harms Free Speech and How Copying Serves It’ (2004) 114 Yale Law Journal 535.Google Scholar

Vanderschraaf, P., ‘The Informal Game Theory in Hume’s Account of Convention’ (1998) 14 Economics & Philosophy 215.Google Scholar

Vaver, D., Copyright Law (Toronto: Irwin Law, 2000).Google Scholar

Vaver, D., ‘Canada’s Intellectual Property Framework: A Comparative Overview’ (2004) 17 Intellectual Property Journal 125.Google Scholar

van Gompel, S., ‘Formalities in the Digital Era: An Obstacle or Opportunity?’ in Bently, L., Suthersanen, U. and Torremans, P. (eds), Global Copyright: Three Hundred Years since the Statute of Anne, from 1709 to Cyberspace (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2010).Google Scholar

Warner, P., ‘Reserves, Electronic Reserves and Copyright in Canada’ (2006) 1 Canadian Online Library and Archives Journal.Google Scholar

Weinrib, L., ‘Fair’s Fair: A Comment on the Fair Use Doctrine’ (1990) 103 Harvard Law Review 1137.Google Scholar

Williams, M., ‘Recent Second Circuit Opinions Indicate that Google’s Library Project Is Not Transformative’ (2007) 25 Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal 303.Google Scholar

Wiseman, L., ‘Beyond the Photocopier: Copyright and Publishing in Australia’ (2002) 7 Media and Arts Law Review 299.Google Scholar

American Library Association, Model Policy Concerning College and University Photocopying for Classroom, Research and Library Reserve Use (1982).Google Scholar

Attorney-General’s Department, Fair Use and Other Copyright Exceptions: An Examination of Fair Use, Fair Dealing and Other Exceptions in the Digital Age (May 2005).Google Scholar

Attorney-General’s Department, ‘Major Copyright Reforms Strike Balance’, Media Release 088/2006 (14 May 2006).Google Scholar

Australian Copyright Council (ACC), Special Case Exception: Educations, Libraries, Collections: A Practical Guide, B130v01 (December 2007) (text attributed to Ian McDonald).Google Scholar

Australian Copyright Council (ACC), 2006 Copyright Amendments: A Practical Guide (December 2007)Google Scholar

Australian Law Reform Commission, Copyright in the Digital Economy: Discussion Paper, DP 79 (May 2013).Google Scholar

Australian Law Reform Commission, Copyright and the Digital Economy: Final Report, Report No. 122 (November 2013).Google Scholar

Australian Libraries Copyright Committee (ALCC) and the Australian Digital Alliance (ADA), A User’s Guide to the Flexible Dealing Provision for Libraries, Educational Institutions and Cultural Institutions: Section 200AB of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) (2008) (text attributed to Laura Simes).Google Scholar

Bergström, S., ‘Report on the Work of Main Committee I (Substantive Provisions of the Berne Convention: Articles 1 to 20) in WIPO, Records of the Intellectual Property Conference of Stockholm, Volume II (WIPO, 1971).Google Scholar

Bently, L., ‘Exploring the Flexibilities Available to UK Law’, submission to the Hargreaves Review of Intellectual Property and Growth (3 March 2011).Google Scholar

Besek, J., Copyright and Related Issues Relevant to Digital Preservation and Dissemination of Unpublished Pre-1972 Sound Recordings by Libraries and Archives (Council on Library and Information Resources and Library of Congress, March 2009).Google Scholar

Besek, J., Ginsburg, J., Loengard, P. and Lev-Aretz, Y., ‘Copyright Exceptions in the United States for Educational Uses of Copyrighted Works’, submission in response to the ALRC Issues Paper (2012).Google Scholar

Burrell, R., Handler, M., Hudson, E. and Weatherall, K., ‘ALRC Inquiry into Copyright and the Digital Economy: Submission in response to Issues Paper No. 42’ (14 December 2012).Google Scholar

Burrell, R., Handler, M., Hudson, E. and Weatherall, K., ‘ALRC Inquiry into Copyright and the Digital Economy: Submission in response to Discussion Paper No. 79 (DP 79)’ (31 July 2013).Google Scholar

Canadian Library Association, CLA Objection to the Access Copyright Post Secondary Tariff (27 July 2010), http://cla.ca/wp-content/uploads/CLA_Tariff_objections_jul2010_final.pdf.Google Scholar

Classroom Guidelines, HR Rep No 94-1467, 94th Congress, 2nd Session (1976).Google Scholar

Commission of the European Communities, Proposal for a European Parliament and Council Directive on the Harmonization of Certain Aspects of Copyright and Related Rights in the Information Society, 97/0359 (COD).Google Scholar

Committee to Consider the Law on Copyright and Designs (Whitford Committee), Report on Copyright and Designs Law, Cmnd 6732 (1977).Google Scholar

Copyright Committee (Gregory Committee), Report of the Copyright Committee, Cmd 8662 (1952).Google Scholar

Copyright in Cultural Institutions (CICI), Flexible Dealing and Cultural Institutions: Statement of Principles Regarding the Use of Section 200AB of the Copyright Act (1968): An Industry Standard and User Guide for the Cultural Sector (September 2010) (text attributed to Sarah Waladan).Google Scholar

Copyright Law Committee on Reprographic Reproduction (Franki Committee), Report of the Copyright Law Committee on Reprographic Reproduction (AGPS, 1976).Google Scholar

Copyright Law Review Committee (Spicer Committee), Report of the Committee Appointed by the Attorney-General of the Commonwealth to Consider What Alterations Are Desirable in the Copyright Law of the Commonwealth (CGP, 1959).Google Scholar

Copyright Law Review Committee, Simplification of the Copyright Act 1968 Part 1: Exceptions to the Exclusive Rights of Copyright Owners (September 1998).Google Scholar

Economic Council of Canada, Report on Intellectual and Industrial Property (Information Canada, January 1971).Google Scholar

Erola, J. and Fox, F., From Gutenberg to Telidon: A White Paper on Copyright: Proposals for the Revision of the Canadian Copyright Act (Department of Consumer and Corporate Affairs and Department of Communications, 1984).Google Scholar

Favale, M., Homberg, F., Kretschmer, M., Mendis, D. and Secchi, D., Copyright, and the Regulation of Orphan Works: A Comparative Review of Seven Jurisdictions and a Rights Clearance Simulation (IPO, 2013).Google Scholar

Federal Cultural Policy Review Committee, Report of the Federal Cultural Policy Review Committee (Information Services, Department of Communications, Government of Canada, 1982).Google Scholar

Gowers, A., Gowers Review of Intellectual Property (HM Treasury 2006).Google Scholar

Hargreaves, I., Digital Opportunity: A Review of Intellectual Property and Growth (May 2011).Google Scholar

Hébert, M., Copyright Act Reform (Library of Parliament, 25 October 1982 revised 9 January 1990).Google Scholar

Hébert, M., Background Paper: Copyright Reform (Library of Parliament, March 1996).Google Scholar

Hébert, M., Bill C-32: An Act to Amend the Copyright Act (Library of Parliament, 17 May 1996 revised 21 March 1997).Google Scholar

Hinze, G., Jaszi, P. and Sag, M., ‘The Fair Use Doctrine in the United States – A Response to the Kernochan Report’, submission in response to ALRC Discussion Paper 79 (26 July 2013).Google Scholar

House of Commons Standing Committee on Communications and Culture, Sub-Committee on the Revision of Copyright, A Charter of Rights for Creators (Minister of Supply and Services Canada, October 1985).Google Scholar

HR Report No 89-2237 (1966).Google Scholar

HR Report No 94-1476, 94th Congress, 2nd Session (1976).Google Scholar

Hudson, E., Aplin, T. and Burrell, R., ‘Submission to the Copyright Consultation: Department of Communications and the Arts’ (4 July 2018).Google Scholar

Ilsley Report: Royal Commission on Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Industrial Designs, Report on Copyright (Queen’s Printer, 1957).Google Scholar

Intellectual Property Office, Exceptions to Copyright: Guidance for Creators and Copyright Owners (IPO, 2014).Google Scholar

Intellectual Property Office, Exceptions to Copyright: Libraries, Archives and Museums (May 2014).Google Scholar

Joint Standing Committee on Treaties (JSCOT), Parliament of Australia, Report 61: Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement (23 June 2004).Google Scholar

Keyes, A. and Brunet, C., Copyright in Canada: Proposals for a Revision of the Law (Consumer and Corporate Affairs Canada, April 1977).Google Scholar

Latman, A., Study No 14: Fair Use of Copyrighted Works (March 1958), reproduced in Committee Print, 86th Congress, 2nd Session, Studies 14-16 (United States Government Printing Service, 1960).Google Scholar

Liberal Party of Australia, Strengthening Australian Arts (2004).Google Scholar

Library of Congress, US Copyright Office, Library Reproduction of Copyrighted Works (17 U.S.C. 108): Report of the Register of Copyrights (Library of Congress, 1983).Google Scholar

National Commission on New Technological Uses of Copyrighted Works, Final Report of the National Commission on New Technological Uses of Copyrighted Works, July 31, 1978 (Library of Congress, 1979).Google Scholar

Fox, Phillips, Digital Agenda Review: Report and Recommendations (January 2004).Google Scholar

Rasenberger, M. and Weston, C., ‘Overview of the Libraries and Archives Exception in the Copyright Act: Background, History, and Meaning’, attached as Appendix K to the Section 108 Study Group.Google Scholar

Register of Copyrights, Report of the Register of Copyrights on the General Revision of the US Copyright Law, 87th Congress, 1st Session (Comm Print, 1961).Google Scholar

Royal Commission on Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Industrial Designs (‘Ilsley Report’), Report on Copyright (Queen’s Printer, 1957).Google Scholar

Secker, J., Gadd, E. and Morrison, C., Understanding the Value of the CLA Licence to UK Higher Education (Universities UK/Guild HE Copyright Negotiation and Advisory Committee, July 2019).Google Scholar

Second reading speech of the Attorney-General: Commonwealth, Parliamentary Debates, House of Representatives, 19 October 2006 (Philip Ruddock).Google Scholar

Section 108 Study Group, The Section 108 Study Group Report: An Independent Report sponsored by the United States Copyright Office and the National Digital Information Infrastructure and Preservation Program of the Library of Congress (March 2008).Google Scholar

Senate Select Committee on the Free Trade Agreement between Australia and the United States of America, Parliament of Australia, Final Report on the Free Trade Agreement between Australia and the United States of America (5 August 2004).Google Scholar

Torno, B., Fair Dealing: The Need for Conceptual Clarity on the Road to Copyright Revision (Consumer and Corporate Affairs, 1981).Google Scholar

Varmer, B., Study No 15: Photoduplication of Copyrighted Material by Libraries (May 1959), reproduced in Committee Print, 86th Congress, 2nd Session, Studies 14–16 (United States Government Printing Service, 1960).Google Scholar

United States Copyright Office, Report on Orphan Works: A Report of the Register of Copyrights (Washington DC: Library of Congress, 2006).Google Scholar

United States Copyright Office, Orphan Works and Mass Digitization: A Report of the Register of Copyrights (United States Copyright Office, June 2015).Google Scholar

Section 1201 of Title 17: A Report of the Register of Copyrights (United States Copyright Office, June 2017).Google Scholar

Section 108 of Title 17: A Discussion Document of the Register of Copyrights (United States Copyright Office, September 2017).Google Scholar

WIPO, Records of the Intellectual Property Conference of Stockholm, Volume 1 (Geneva: WIPO, 1971).Google Scholar

Albanese, A., ‘GSU Prevails (Again) in Key Copyright Case’, Publishers Weekly (1 April 2016), www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/digital/copyright/article/69830-gsu-prevails-again-in-key-copyright-case.html.Google Scholar

Austin, G. and Hudson, E., ‘Why the Not-for-Profit Cultural Sector Needs Tailor-Made Copyright Safe Harbours’, The Conversation (13 February 2018), http://theconversation.com/why-the-not-for-profit-cultural-sector-needs-tailor-made-copyright-safe-harbours-89564.Google Scholar

Beck, B., and von Werder, K. ‘German Federal Court of Justice Confirms Copyright in Photographs of Public Domain Paintings’, All About IP (21 March 2019), www.allaboutipblog.com/2019/03/german-federal-court-of-justice-confirms-copyright-in-photographs-of-public-domain-paintings/.Google Scholar

Berkowitz, P., ‘Majority of Canadian Universities Sign Licence with Access Copyright’, University Affairs (9 July 2012), www.universityaffairs.ca/news/news-article/majority-of-canadian-universities-sign-licence-with-access-copyright/.Google Scholar

Brown, J., ‘Copyright Board Warns Universities They Can’t Dodge Copying Tariff’, Canadian Lawyer (29 August 2011), www.canadianlawyermag.com/author/jennifer-brown/copyright-board-warns-universities-they-cant-dodge-copying-tariff-1311/.Google Scholar

Butler, B., ‘My GSU Hot Take’ (1 April 2016), http://brandonbutler.info/post/142052963020/my-gsu-hot-take.Google Scholar

Courtney, K., ‘GSU e-Reserves Decision | Peer to Peer Review’, Library Journal (12 May 2016), https://lj.libraryjournal.com/2016/05/opinion/peer-to-peer-review/gsu-e-reserves-decision-peer-to-peer-review/.Google Scholar

Cox, K., ‘Authors Guild v. HathiTrust Litigation Ends in Victory for Fair Use’, ARL Policy Notes Blog (8 January 2015), http://policynotes.arl.org/?p=837.Google Scholar

Di Valentino, L., ‘Access Copyright’s New Offerings and the Collective’s Future with Universities’, Fair Dealing in Education (5 January 2016), https://fairdealingineducation.com/2016/01/05/access-copyrights-new-offerings-and-the-collectives-future-with-universities/.Google Scholar

Di Valentino, L., ‘Access Copyright Renewals Update’, Fair Dealing in Education (updated 8 February 2016), https://fairdealingineducation.com/2015/10/15/access-copyright-renewals-update/.Google Scholar

Di Valentino, L., ‘Access Copyright Renewals Update 2019’, Fair Dealing in Education (updated 21 February 2019), https://fairdealingineducation.com/2019/05/21/access-copyright-renewals-update-2019/#more-790.Google Scholar

Esmail, P., ‘CCH Canadian Ltd v Law Society of Upper Canada: Case Comment on a Landmark Copyright Case’ (2005) 10 Appeal 13.Google Scholar

Geist, M., ‘Low-tech Case Has High-tech Impact’, Toronto Star (22 March 2004), www.michaelgeist.ca/resc/html_bkup/mar222004.html.Google Scholar

Geist, M., ‘Access Copyright and AUCC Strike a Deal: What It Means for Innovation in Education’, Michael Geist (17 April 2011), www.michaelgeist.ca/2012/04/access-copyright-and-aucc-deal/.Google Scholar

Geist, M., ‘The Access Copyright Interim Tariff Opt-Out List’, Michael Geist (29 July 2011), www.michaelgeist.ca/2011/07/access-copyright-opt-out-list/.Google Scholar

Geist, M., ‘Ignoring the Supreme Court: Federal Court Judge Hands Access Copyright Fair Dealing Victory’, Michael Geist (13 July 2017), www.michaelgeist.ca/2017/07/ignoring-supreme-court-trial-judge-hands-access-copyright-fair-dealing-victory/.Google Scholar

Katz, A., ‘The Voice of Canadian Universities?’, Arial Katz (24 April 2012), https://arielkatz.org/the-voice-of-canadian-universities/.Google Scholar

Knopf, H., ‘Access Copyright’s Excessive $45 per University Student Proposed Tariff – August 11, 2010 Deadline’, Excess Copyright (8 August 2010), http://excesscopyright.blogspot.com/2010/08/access-copyrights-excessive-45-per.html.Google Scholar

Knopf, H., ‘AUCC Follows UofT & Western and Capitulates to Access Copyright’s Copyright Bullying – And It Still “Ain’t Over”’, Excess Copyright (19 April 2012), http://excesscopyright.blogspot.com/2012/04/aucc-follows-uoft-western-and.html.Google Scholar

Knopf, H., ‘Access Copyright v. York U – The Federal Court of Appeal Hearing Is March 5 and 6, 2019’, Excess Copyright (4 March 2019), http://excesscopyright.blogspot.com/2019/03/access-copyright-v-york-u-federal-court.html.Google Scholar

Knopf, H., ‘U. of T. and Western Capitulate to Access Copyright’, Excess Copyright (31 January 2012), http://excesscopyright.blogspot.com/2012/01/u-of-t-and-western-capitulate-to-access.html.Google Scholar

Lorinc, J., ‘Universities in Dispute with Copyright Collective Over Fees’, University Affairs (16 August 2010), www.universityaffairs.ca/news/news-article/universities-in-dispute-with-copyright-collective/.Google Scholar

Smirke, R., ‘European Court Rules in Favor of Kraftwerk in 20 Year-Long Copyright Dispute’, Billboard (29 July 2019), https://www.billboard.com/articles/business/8524267/kraftwerk-european-court-justice-ruling-metall-auf-metall.Google Scholar

Smith, K., ‘Here We Go Again: Latest GSU Ruling an Odd Victory for Libraries’ (1 April 2016), https://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/2016/04/01/fgo-latest-gsuruling-odd-victory-libraries/.Google Scholar

Somers, J., ‘Torching the Modern-Day Library of Alexandria’, The Atlantic (20 April 2017), www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2017/04/the-tragedy-of-google-books/523320/.Google Scholar

Trosow, S., ‘Compilation of Announcements for Institutions Opting-Out of Model Licence’, Sam Trosow (29 June 2012), https://samtrosow.wordpress.com/2012/06/29/compilation-of-annoucements-for-institutions-opting-out-of-model-license/.Google Scholar

Zhang, S., ‘The Real Cost of Knowledge’, The Atlantic (4 March 2019), at www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2019/03/uc-elsevier-publisher/583909/.Google Scholar