Agosta, G. (2009) Ricerche sui Cynegetica di Oppiano, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Albrecht, M. von (2008a) ‘Seneca's language and style, I’, Hyperboreus 14: 68–90.Google Scholar

Albrecht, M. von (2008b) ‘Seneca's language and style, II: linguistic differences and connections between Seneca's philosophical works and his tragedies’, Hyperboreus 14: 124–50.Google Scholar

Alexander, L. (1993) The Preface to Luke's Gospel: Literary Convention and Social Context in Luke 1.1–4 and Acts 1.1, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Algra, K. (2009) ‘Stoic philosophical theology and Graeco-Roman religion’, in Salles, R. (ed.), God and Cosmos in Stoicism, Oxford: 224–51.Google Scholar

Allmand, C. (2009) ‘A Roman text on war: The Strategemata of Frontinus in the Middle Ages’, in Coss, P. and Tyerman, C. (eds), Soldiers, Nobles and Gentlemen: Essays in Honour of Maurice Keen, Woodbridge: 153–68.Google Scholar

Allmand, C. (2011) The De Re Militari of Vegetius: The Reception, Transmission and Legacy of a Roman Text in the Middle Ages, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amato, E. (2003) ‘Per la cronologia di Dionisio il Periegeta’, Revue de philologie 77: 7–16.Google Scholar

Amato, E. (2005) Dionisio di Alessandria: Descrizione della terra abitata. Prefazione, introduzione, traduzione, note e apparati, Milan.Google Scholar

Ambaglio, D. (1981) ‘Il trattato Sul Comandante di Onasandro’, Athenaeum 59: 353–77.Google Scholar

Ampolo, C. (1990–91) ‘Lotte sociali in Italia centrale. Un documento controverso: il calendario brontoscopico attribuito a Nigidio Figulo’, Opus 9–10: 185–97.Google Scholar

Anderson, G. (1986) Philostratus: Biography and Belles Lettres in the Third Century AD, London.Google Scholar

Ando, C. (ed.) (2003) Roman Religion, Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Ando, C. (2008) The Matter of the Gods: Religion and the Roman Empire, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Andrén, A. (1960) ‘Dionysius of Halicarnassus on Roman monuments’, in Hommages à Léon Herrmann (Collection Latomus 44), Brussels: 88–104.Google Scholar

Anglo, S. (2002) ‘Vegetius’ De re militari: The triumph of mediocrity’, Antiquaries Journal 82: 247–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anglo, S. (2005) Machiavelli: The First Century, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnar, A. S. (1990) Encyclopedism from Pliny to Borges, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Asheri, A., Lloyd, A. and Corcella, A. (2007), A Commentary on Herodotus, Books I-IV, Oxford.Google Scholar

Asper, M. (1997) Onomata allotria: Zur Genese, Struktur und Funktion poetologischer Metaphern bei Kallimachos, Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Asper, M. (2007) Griechische Wissenschaftstexte: Formen, Funktionen, Differenzierungsgeschichten, Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Asper, M. (2011) ‘“Frame tales” in Ancient Greek science writing’, in Pohl, K.-H. and Wöhrle, G. (eds), Form und Gehalt in Texten der Griechischen und Chinesischen Philosophie, Stuttgart: 91–112.Google Scholar

Asper, M. (ed.) (2013a) Writing Science: Mathematical and Medical Authorship in Ancient Greece, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Asper, M. (2013b) ‘Introduction’, in Asper 2013a: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Asper, M. (2013c) ‘Making up progress – in Ancient Greek science writing’, in Asper 2013a: 411–30.Google Scholar

Astbury, R. (ed.) (2002) M. Terentius Varro: Saturarum Menippearum Fragmenta (2nd edn), Munich.Google Scholar

Astin, A. E. (1978) Cato the Censor, Oxford.Google Scholar

Atherton, C. (ed.) (1998) Form and Content in Didactic Poetry, Bari.Google Scholar

Aubert, J.-J. (1994) Business Managers in Ancient Rome: A Social and Economic Study of Institores, 200 BC–AD 250, Leiden.Google Scholar

Aubert, J.-J. and Sirks, B. (eds) (2002) Speculum Iuris: Roman Law as a Reflection of Social and Economic Life in Antiquity, Ann Arbor, MI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baier, T. (1997) Werk und Wirkung Varros im Spiegel seiner Zeitgenossen, Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Baldwin, B. (1963) ‘Columella's sources and how he used them’, Latomus 22: 785–91.Google Scholar

Baltussen, H. (ed.) (2013) Greek and Roman Consolations: Eight Studies of a Tradition and Its Afterlife, Swansea.Google Scholar

Baragwanath, E. (2008) Motivation and Narrative in Herodotus, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baragwanath, E. and de Bakker, M. (2012a) ‘Introduction: Myth, truth, and narrative in Herodotus’ Histories’, in Baragwanath and de Bakker 2012b: 1–56.Google Scholar

Baragwanath, E. and de Bakker, M. (eds) (2012b) Myth, Truth, and Narrative in Herodotus, Oxford.Google Scholar

Baraz, Y. (2012) A Written Republic: Cicero's Philosophical Politics, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Barker, A. (2007) The Science of Harmonics of Classical Greece, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. (1993) ‘Galen and the utility of logic’, in Kollesch, J. and Nickel, D. (eds), Galen und das hellenistische Erbe, Stuttgart: 33–92.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. (2003) ‘Proofs and syllogisms in Galen’, in Barnes and Jouanna 2003: 1–24.Google Scholar

Barnes, J. and Jouanna, J. (eds) (2003) Galien et la philosophie, Vandoeuvres-Geneva.Google Scholar

Baron, C. A. (2013) Timaeus of Tauromenium and Hellenistic Historiography, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Barthes, R. (1987) Writer Sollers (tr. Tody, P.), Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar

Bartley, A. N. (2003) Stories from the Mountains, Stories from the Sea: The Digressions and Similes of Oppian's Halieutica and the Cynegetica, Göttingen.Google Scholar

Barton, T. (1994a) Ancient Astrology, London.Google Scholar

Barton, T. (1994b) Power and Knowledge: Astrology, Physiognomics, and Medicine under the Roman Empire, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar

Bartsch, S. (2006) The Mirror of the Self: Sexuality, Self-Knowledge and the Gaze in the Early Roman Empire, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Bauman, R. A. (2000) Human Rights in Ancient Rome, London.Google Scholar

Beagon, M. (1992) Roman Nature: The Thought of Pliny the Elder, Oxford.Google Scholar

Beagon, M. (2013) ‘Labores pro bono publico: The burdensome mission of Pliny's Natural History’, in König and Woolf 2013: 84–107.Google Scholar

Beard, M. (1986) ‘Cicero and divination: The formation of a Latin discourse’, Journal of Roman Studies 76: 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beard, M. (2012) ‘Cicero's “Response of the haruspices” and the voice of the gods’, Journal of Roman Studies 102: 20–39.Google Scholar

Beard, M. and North, J. (eds) (1990) Pagan Priests: Religion and Power in the Ancient World, London.Google Scholar

Beard, M., North, J. and Price, S. (1998) Religions of Rome (2 volumes), Cambridge.Google Scholar

Bekker-Nielsen, T. (2002) ‘Fish in the ancient economy’, in Ascani, K., Gabrielsen, V., Kvist, K. and Rasmussen, A. H. (eds), Ancient History Matters: Studies Presented to Jens Erik Skydsgaard on His Seventieth Birthday, Rome: 29–37.Google Scholar

Bekker-Nielsen, T. (2006) ‘The technology and productivity of ancient sea-fishing’, in Bekker-Nielsen, T. (ed.), Ancient Fishing and Fish Processing in the Black Sea Region, Aarhus: 83–95.Google Scholar

Bellemore, J. (1992) ‘The dating of Seneca's Ad Marciam De Consolatione’, Classical Quarterly 42: 219–34.Google Scholar

Bendlin, A. (2000) ‘Looking beyond the civic compromise: Religious pluralism in late Republican Rome’, in Bispham, E. and Smith, C. (eds), Religion in Archaic and Republican Rome: Evidence and Experience, Edinburgh: 115–35, 167–71.Google Scholar

Bendz, G. (1938) Die Echtheitsfrage des vierten Buches der Frontinischen Strategemata, Lund.Google Scholar

Bergemann, C. (1992) Politik und Religion im spätrepublikanischen Rom, Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Berggren, J. L. and Jones, A. (2000) Ptolemy's Geography: An Annotated Translation of the Theoretical Chapters, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Bernard, A. (2010) ‘The significance of Ptolemy's Almagest for its early readers’, Revue de Synthèse 131: 495–521.Google Scholar

Berryman, S. (2009) The Mechanical Hypothesis in Ancient Greek Natural Philosophy, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Bettalli, M. (2010) ‘Il militare’, in Zecchini, G. (ed.), Lo storico antico: mestieri e figure sociali, Bari: 215–29.Google Scholar

Bing, P. (1988) The Well-Read Muse: Present and Past in Callimachus and the Hellenistic Poets, Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blank, D. L. (1998) Sextus Empiricus: Against the Grammarians, Oxford.Google Scholar

Blank, D. L. (2012) ‘Varro and Antiochus’, in Sedley, D. (ed.), The Philosophy of Antiochus, Cambridge: 250–89.Google Scholar

Blänsdorf, J. (1991) ‘“Augurenlächeln”: Ciceros Kritik an der römischen Mantik’, in Wißmann, H. (ed.), Zur Erschließung von Zukunft in den Religionen: Zukunftserwartung und Gegenwartsbewältigung in der Religionsgeschichte, Würzburg: 45–65.Google Scholar

Bobzien, S. (1996) ‘Stoic syllogistic’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 14: 133–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boll, F. (1903) Sphaera: Neue griechische Texte und Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der Sternbilder, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Bömer, F. (1969–86) P. Ovidius Naso: Metamorphosen, I–VI, Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Boshnakov, K. (2004) Pseudo-Skymnos (Semos von Delos?), Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Bosman, P. R. (2012) ‘Lucian among the Cynics: The Zeus Refuted and Cynic tradition’, Classical Quarterly 62: 785–95.Google Scholar

Bosworth, A. B. (1993) ‘Arrian and Rome: The minor works’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II, 34(1): 253–64.Google Scholar

Boudon-Millot, V. (2009) ‘Galen's bios and methodos: From ways of life to paths of knowledge’, in Gill, Wilkins and Whitmarsh 2009: 175–89.Google Scholar

Boudon-Millot, V. and Jouanna, J. (2010) Galien: Ne pas se chagriner, Paris.Google Scholar

Boudon-Millot, V. and Pietrobelli, A. (2005) ‘Galien ressuscité: edition “princeps” du texte grec du De propriis placitis’, Revue des études grecques 118: 168–213.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1993) The Field of Cultural Production, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Bowen, A. C. and Goldstein, B. R. (1988) ‘Meton of Athens and astronomy in the late fifth century B.C.’, in Leichty, E., Ellis, M. de J. and Gerardi, P. (eds), A Scientific Humanist: Studies in Memory of Abraham Sachs, Philadelphia, PA: 39–81.Google Scholar

Bowersock, G. W. (1965) Augustus and the Greek World, Oxford.Google Scholar

Bowie, E. (1990) ‘Greek poetry in the Antonine age’, in Russell, D. A. (ed.), Antonine Literature, Oxford: 53–90.Google Scholar

Bowie, E. (2004) ‘Denys d'Alexandrie: un poète grec dans l'empire romain’, Revue des études antiques 106: 177–85.Google Scholar

Bowie, E. (2006) ‘Portrait of the sophist as a young man’, in McGing, B. and Mossman, J. (eds), The Limits of Ancient Biography, Swansea: 141–53.Google Scholar

Bowie, E. (2013) ‘Libraries for the Caesars’, in König, Oikonomopoulou and Woolf 2013: 237–60.Google Scholar

Boylan, M. (1984) ‘The Galenic and Hippocratic challenges to Aristotle's conception theory’, Journal of the History of Biology 17: 83–112.Google Scholar

Boys-Stones, G. (2013) ‘The Consolatio ad Apollonium: Therapy for the dead’, in Baltussen 2013: 123–37.Google Scholar

Brancacci, A. (2000) ‘Dio, Socrates and Cynicism’, in Swain 2000: 240–60.Google Scholar

Branham, R. B. (1989) Unruly Eloquence: Lucian and the Comedy of Traditions, Harvard, MA.Google Scholar

Braund, S. (2009) Seneca De Clementia: Edited with Translation and Commentary, Oxford.Google Scholar

Bremer, J. M. (1981) ‘Greek hymns’, in Versnel, H. S. (ed.), Faith, Hope and Worship: Aspects of Religious Mentality in the Ancient World, Leiden: 193–215.Google Scholar

Briscoe, J. (2008) A Commentary on Livy: Books 38–40, Oxford.Google Scholar

Brisson, L., Congourdeau, M.-H. and Solère, J.-L. (eds) (2008) L'Embryon: formation et animation. Antiquité grecque et latine, traditions hébraïque, chrétienne et islamique, Paris.Google Scholar

Brodersen, K. (1994) Dionysios von Alexandria: Das Lied von der Welt, Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Bronkhorst, J. (2002) ‘Discipliné par le débat’, in Bansat-Boudon, L. and Scheid, J. (eds), Le Disciple et ses maîtres, Paris: 207–25.Google Scholar

Brooks, E. B. and Brooks, A. T. (1998) The Original Analects, New York.Google Scholar

Broughton, T. R. S. (1951–86) The Magistrates of the Roman Republic (3 volumes), New York.Google Scholar

Brown, D. (2000) Mesopotamian Planetary Astronomy-Astrology, Groningen.Google Scholar

Brown, P. (1978) The Making of Late Antiquity, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. (1972) ‘Cn. Tremelius Scrofa the agronomist’, Classical Review 86: 304–8.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. (1989) ‘Philosophy and religion in the late Republic’, in Griffin and Barnes 1989: 174–98.Google Scholar

Bryan, J. (2013) ‘Neronian philosophy’, in Buckley and Dinter 2013: 134–48.Google Scholar

Buckley, E. and Dinter, M. T. (eds) (2013) A Companion to the Neronian Age, Chichester.Google Scholar

Burckhardt, L. A. (1988) Politische Strategien der Optimaten in der späten römischen Republik, Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. F. (2005) ‘Archytas and optics’, Science in Context 18: 35–53.Google Scholar

Cam, M.-T., Liou, B. and Zuinghedau, M. (eds) (1995) Vitruvius: De l'architecture: Livre VII, Paris.Google Scholar

Cameron, A. (2004) Greek Mythography in the Roman World, New York.Google Scholar

Cameron, A. (2011) The Last Pagans of Rome, New York.Google Scholar

Campanile, D. (2005) ‘Il sofista allo specchio: Filostrato nelle Vitae Sophistarum’, Studi Ellenistici 16: 275–88.Google Scholar

Campbell, B. (1987) ‘Teach yourself how to be a general’, Journal of Roman Studies 77: 13–29.Google Scholar

Campbell, B. and Purcell, N. (1996) ‘Iulius Frontinus, Sextus’, in Hornblower, S. and Spawforth, A. (eds), The Oxford Classical Dictionary (3rd edition), Oxford: 785.Google Scholar

Cardauns, B. (ed.) (1960) Logistoricus über die Götterverehrung (Curio de cultu deorum) (with translation and commentary), Würzburg.Google Scholar

Cardauns, B. (ed.) (1976) M. Terentius Varro, Antiquitates Rerum Divinarum: I Die Fragmente; II Kommentar, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Cardauns, B. (2001) Marcus Terentius Varro: Einführung in sein Werk, Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Carey, S. (2003) Pliny's Catalogue of Culture: Art and Empire in the Natural History, Oxford.Google Scholar

Carlsen, J. (1995) Vilici and Roman Estate Managers until AD 284, Rome.Google Scholar

Carvounis, K. and Hunter, R. (eds) (2008) ‘Signs of Life? Studies in Later Greek Poetry’ Ramus 37(1–2).Google Scholar

Cavavero, A. (2002) ‘The envied Muse: Plato versus Homer’, in E. Spentzou and D. Fowler 2002: 47–67.Google Scholar

Cèbe, J.-P. (ed.) (1985) Varron, Satires ménippées, Vol. 7 (with translation and commentary), Rome.Google Scholar

Cèbe, J.-P. (ed.) (1999) Varron, Satires ménippées, Vol. 13 (with translation and commentary), Rome.Google Scholar

Chandler, C. (2006) Philodemus: On Rhetoric, Books 1 and 2, New York.Google Scholar

Charles, M. (2007) Vegetius in Context: Establishing the Date of the Epitoma Rei Militaris, Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Chilton, H. W. (1971) Diogenes of Oenoanda: The Fragments, London.Google Scholar

Civiletti, M. (2002) Filostrato: Vite dei Sofisti, Milan.Google Scholar

Clark, H. (1990) The Fictional Encyclopedia: Joyce, Pound, Sollers, New York.Google Scholar

Clark, H. (1992) ‘Encyclopedic discourse’, SubStance 67: 95–110.Google Scholar

Clarke, K. (1997) ‘In search of the author of Strabo's Geography’, Journal of Roman Studies 87: 92–110.Google Scholar

Clarke, K. (1999) Between Geography and History: Hellenistic Constructions of the Roman World, Oxford.Google Scholar

Clauss, J. J. (2006) ‘Theriaca: Nicander's poem of the earth’, Studi italiani di filologia classica 4: 160–82.Google Scholar

Clay, D. (1992) ‘Lucian of Samosata: Four philosophical lives (Nigrinus, Demonax, Peregrinus, Alexander Pseudomantis)’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II, 36(5): 3406–50.Google Scholar

Cole, T. (1990) Democritus and the Sources of Greek Anthropology, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (1994) Genres and Readers: Lucretius, Love Elegy, Pliny's Encyclopedia (tr. Most, G.), Baltimore.Google Scholar

Corbeill, A. (2012) ‘Cicero and the Etruscan haruspices’, Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar 15: 243–66.Google Scholar

Corbeill, A. (2013) ‘Cicero and the intellectual milieu of the late Republic’, in Steel, C. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Cicero, Cambridge: 9–24.Google Scholar

Cornell, T. (ed.) (2013) The Fragments of the Roman Historians (3 volumes), Oxford.Google Scholar

Costanza, S. (1991) ‘Motivi callimachei nel proemio dei Cynegetica di Oppiano d'Apamea’, in Studi di filologia classica in onore di Giusto Monaco, I: Letteratura greca, Palermo: 479–89.Google Scholar

Courrént, M. (2011) De architecti scientia: Idée de nature et théorie de l'art dans le De architectura de Vitruve, Caen.Google Scholar

Cramer, F. H. (1954) Astrology in Roman Law and Politics, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar

Cribiore, R. (2001) Gymnastics of the Mind: Greek Education in Hellenistic and Roman Egypt, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Crook, J. (1995) Legal Advocacy in the Roman World, London.Google Scholar

Crowther, N. B. (1992) ‘Second-place finishes and lower in Greek athletics (including the pentathlon)’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 90: 97–102 (reprinted in Crowther 2004).Google Scholar

Crowther, N. B. (2000) ‘Resolving an impasse: Draws, dead heats, and similar decisions in Greek athletics’, Nikephoros 13: 125–40 (reprinted in Crowther 2004).Google Scholar

Crowther, N. B. (2004) Athletika: Studies on the Olympic Games and Greek Athletics, Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Cuomo, S. (2000) Pappus of Alexandria and the Mathematics of Late Antiquity, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Cuomo, S. (2001) Ancient Mathematics, London.Google Scholar

Cuomo, S. (2007a) ‘Measures for an emperor: Volusius Maecianus’ monetary pamphlet for Marcus Aurelius’, in König and Whitmarsh 2007b: 206–28.Google Scholar

Cuomo, S. (2007b) Technology and Culture in Greek and Roman Antiquity, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Cuomo, S. (2011) ‘Skills and virtues in Vitruvius’ Book 10’, in Formisano and Böhme 2011: 309–32.Google Scholar

Cuypers, M. (2004) ‘Prince and principle: The philosophy of Callimachus’ Hymn to Zeus’, in Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F. and Wakker, G. C. (eds), Callimachus II (Hellenistica Groningana 7), Leuven: 95–115.Google Scholar

Dalle Vedove, E. (2009) ‘Aspetti della presenza del dedicatario nel De beneficiis di Seneca e raffronto con le prefazioni di Seneca Padre’, in Picone, G., Beltrami, L. and Ricottilli, L. (eds), Benefattori e beneficati: La relazione asimmetrica nel De beneficiis di Seneca, Palermo: 97–120.Google Scholar

Dalzell, A. (1996) The Criticism of Didactic Poetry, Toronto.Google Scholar

d'Assigny, M. (1686) The Stratagems of War, or, A Collection of the Most Celebrated Practices and Wise Sayings of the Great Generals in Former Ages Written by Sextus Julius Frontinus, One of the Roman Consuls; Now English'd, London.Google Scholar

De George, R. T. (1985) The Nature and Limits of Authority, Lawrence, KS.Google Scholar

De Jong, I. (2001) A Narratological Commentary on the Odyssey, Cambridge.Google Scholar

De Jong, I., Nünlist, R. and Bowie, A. (eds) (2004) Narrators, Narratees, and Narratives in Ancient Greek Literature, Leiden.Google Scholar

De Jonge, C. (2005a) ‘Dionysius of Halicarnassus and the method of metathesis’, Classical Quarterly 55: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Jonge, C. (2005b) ‘Dionysius of Halicarnassus as a historian of linguistics: The history of the “parts of speech” in De compositione verborum 2’, Henry Sweet Bulletin 44: 5–18.Google Scholar

De Jonge, C. (2008) Between Grammar and Rhetoric: Dionysius of Halicarnassus on Language, Linguistics and Literature, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Lacy, P. (1972) ‘Galen's Platonism’, American Journal of Philology 93: 27–39.Google Scholar

De Lacy, P. (ed.) (1992) Galen: On Semen (CMG 5.3.1), Berlin.Google Scholar

De Lacy, P. (ed.) (2005) Galen: On the Doctrines of Hippocrates and Plato (3 volumes) (3rd edn) (CMG 5.4.1.2), Berlin.Google Scholar

De Libero, L. (1992) Obstruktion: Politische Praktiken im Senat und in der Volksversammlung der ausgehenden römischen Republik (70–49 v.Chr.), Stuttgart.Google Scholar

De Pizan, C. (1999) The Book of Deeds of Arms and of Chivalry (tr. Willard, S., ed. Willard, C. C.), Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar

De Ste. Croix, G. E. M. (1981) The Class Struggle in the Ancient Greek World, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Dean-Jones, L. (2003) ‘Written texts and the rise of the charlatan in ancient Greek medicine’, in Yunis, H. (ed.), Writing into Culture: Written Text and Cultural Practice in Ancient Greece, Cambridge: 97–121.Google Scholar

Dear, P. (1995) Discipline and Experience: The Mathematical Way in the Scientific Revolution, Chicago, IL.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Debru, A. (1991) ‘Expérience, plausibilité et certitude chez Galien’, in López Férez 1991: 31–40.Google Scholar

Delbrück, H. (1975–85) History of the Art of War within the Framework of Political History (4 volumes) (translated from the German by Renfroe, Walter J. Jr.), Westport, CT.Google Scholar

Delcourt, A. (2005) Lecture des Antiquités romaines de Denys d'Halicarnasse: Un historien entre deux mondes, Brussels.Google Scholar

Della Casa, A. (1962) Nigidio Figulo, Rome.Google Scholar

Denyer, N. (1985) ‘The case against divination: An examination of Cicero's De divinatione’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 31: 1–10.Google Scholar

Detienne, M. (1996) The Masters of Truth in Archaic Greece, New York.Google Scholar

Devillers, O. and Krings, V. (1996) ‘Autour de l'agronome Magon’, in Khanoussi, M., Ruggeri, P. and Vismara, C. (eds), L'Africa romana: Atti dell’ XI Convegno di Studio, Cartagine, 15–18 dicembre 1994, Ozieri: 489–516.Google Scholar

Devine, A. M. (1989) ‘Aelian's manual of Hellenistic military tactics: A new translation from the Greek with an introduction’, The Ancient World 19: 31–9.Google Scholar

Dicks, D. R. (1971) ‘Euctemon’, in Gillespie 1970–90: 4.459–60.Google Scholar

Diederich, S. (2007) Römische Agrarhandbücher zwischen Fachwissenschaft, Literatur und Ideologie, Berlin.Google Scholar

Dihle, A. (1996) ‘Die Theologia tripertita bei Augustin’, in Cancik, H., Lichtenberger, H. and Schäfer, P. (eds), Geschichte-Tradition-Reflexion: Festschrift für Martin Hengel zum 70. Geburtstag, Tübingen: 183–202.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. (1993) Alcinous: The Handbook of Platonism, Oxford.Google Scholar

Dillon, J. N. (2012) The Justice of Constantine: Law, Communication and Control, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar

Dobbin, R. (1998) Epictetus: Discourses Book 1, Oxford.Google Scholar

Dodds, E. R. (1963) Proclus: The Elements of Theology, Oxford.Google Scholar

Domenici, I. and Maderna, E. (2007) Giovanni Lido: Sui segni celesti, Milan.Google Scholar

Domenicucci, P. (2003) ‘La previsione astrologica attribuita a Nigidio Figulo in Luc. I, 639–70’, Schol(ia) 5(3): 85–106.Google Scholar

Donini, P. (2008), ‘Galen's Psychology’, in Hankinson 2008b: 184–209.Google Scholar

Doody, A. (2007) ‘Virgil the farmer? Critiques of the Georgics in Columella and Pliny’, Classical Philology 102: 180–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doody, A., Föllinger, S. and Taub, L. (2012) ‘Structures and strategies in ancient Greek and Roman technical writing’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Special Issue 43(2): 233–6.Google Scholar

D'Ooge, M. L. (1926) Nicomachus of Gerasa: Introduction to Arithmetic (tr. with studies in Greek arithmetic by Robbins, F. E. and Karpinski, L. C.), New York.Google Scholar

Dougherty, C. (2001) The Raft of Odysseus: The Ethnographic Imagination of Homer's Odyssey, Oxford.Google Scholar

Drake, S. (1957) Discoveries and Opinions of Galileo, New York.Google Scholar

Du Plessis, P. J. (ed.) (2013) New Frontiers: Law and Society in the Roman World, Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Ducatillon, J. (1977) Polemique dans la collection hippocratique, Paris.Google Scholar

Dueck, D. (2000) Strabo of Amaseia: A Greek Man of Letters in Augustan Rome, London.Google Scholar

Dumont, J. C. (1986) ‘Quelques aspects de l'esclavage et de l’économie agraire chez Pline’, Helmantica 37: 293–306.Google Scholar

Duncan-Jones, R. P. (1963) ‘Wealth and munificence in Roman Africa’, Papers of the British School at Rome 31: 159–77.Google Scholar

Dyck, A. R. (2004) A Commentary on Cicero, De Legibus, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar

Eck, W. (1982) ‘Die Gestalt Frontinus in ihrer politischen and sozialen Umwelt’, in Frontinus-Gesellschaft, (ed.), Wasserversorgung im Antiken Rom, Vol. I: Sextus Julius Frontinus, Curator Aquarum, Munich.Google Scholar

Edwards, C. (1996) Writing Rome: Textual Approaches to the City, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Edwards, C. (1997) ‘Self-scrutiny and self-transformation in Seneca's Letters’, Greece and Rome 44: 23–38 (reprinted in Fitch 2008: 84–101).Google Scholar

Effe, B. (1977) Dichtung und Lehre: Untersuchungen zur Typologie des antiken Lehrgedichts, Munich.Google Scholar

Einarson, B. (1936) ‘On certain mathematical terms in Aristotle's logic’, American Journal of Philology 57: 33–54, 151–72.Google Scholar

Elderkin, G. (1935) ‘Two mosaics representing the Seven Wise Men’, American Journal of Archaeology 39: 92–111.Google Scholar

Elm, D. (2003) ‘Die Kontroverse über die “Sondergötter”: ein Beitrag zur Rezeptions- und Wirkungsgeschichte des Handbuches Religion und Kultus der Römer von Georg Wissowa’, Archiv für Religionsgeschichte 5: 67–79.Google Scholar

Engels, D. (2007) Das römische Vorzeichenwesen (753–27 v.Chr.): Quellen, Terminologie, Kommentar, historische Entwicklung, Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Engels, J. (2013) ‘Agias and Derkylos (305)’, in Brill's New Jacoby (Brill Online).Google Scholar

Eramo, I. (2010) Discorsi di guerra, Bari.Google Scholar

Erdkamp, P. (1999) ‘Agriculture, underemployment and the cost of rural labour in the Roman world’, Classical Quarterly 49: 556–72.Google Scholar

Erren, M. (1958) ‘ΑΣΤΕΡΕΣ ΑΝΩΝΥΜΟΙ (Zu Arat 367–385)’, Hermes 86: 240–3.Google Scholar

Eshleman, K. (2012) The Social World of Intellectuals in the Roman Empire: Sophists, Philosophers and Christians, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Evans, J. and Berggren, J. L. (2006) Geminos's Introduction to the Phenomena: A Translation and Study of a Hellenistic Survey of Astronomy, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Fajen, F. (1999) Oppianus Halieutica: Der Fischfang, Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Fales, F. M. and Postgate, J. N. (1992) Imperial Administrative Records, Part I: Palace and Temple Administration (State Archives of Assyria 7), Helsinki.Google Scholar

Fantar, M. H. (1998) ‘De l'agriculture à Carthage’, in Khanoussi, M., Ruggeri, P. and Vismara, C. (eds), L'Africa romana: Atti del XII Convegno di Studio, Olbia, 12–15 dicembre 1996, Sassari: 113–21.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (2002) ‘Ovid's Fasti: Politics, history, and religion’, in Boyd, B. W. (ed.), Brill's Companion to Ovid, Leiden: 197–233.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (2004) The Roman World of Cicero's De oratore, Oxford.Google Scholar

Fantuzzi, M. and Hunter, R. (2004) Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. (1998) Literature and Religion at Rome: Cultures, Contexts, and Beliefs, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Feke, J. (2009) ‘Ptolemy in Philosophical Context: A Study of the Relationships between Physics, Mathematics, and Theology’ (PhD diss., University of Toronto).Google Scholar

Feke, J. (2012) ‘Ptolemy's defense of theoretical philosophy’, Apeiron 45: 61–90.Google Scholar

Fitch, J. G. (ed.) (2008) Seneca, Oxford.Google Scholar

Flach, D. (ed.) (2002) Marcus Terentius Varro, Gespräche über die Landwirtschaft, Buch 3, Darmstadt.Google Scholar

Fögen, T. (ed.) (2005) Antike Fachtexte: Ancient Technical Texts, Berlin.Google Scholar

Fögen, T. (2009) Wissen, Kommunikation und Selbstdarstellung: Zur Struktur und Charakteristik römischer Fachtexte der frühen Kaiserzeit, Munich.Google Scholar

Ford, A. (1992) Homer: The Poetry of the Past, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar

Ford, A. (2002) The Origins of Criticism: Literary Culture and Poetic Theory in Classical Greece, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Forhan, K. (2002) The Political Theory of Christine de Pizan, Burlington, VT.Google Scholar

Formisano, M. (2001) Tecnica e scrittura: Le letterature tecnico-scientifiche nello spazio letterario tardolatino, Rome.Google Scholar

Formisano, M. (2002) ‘Strategie da manual. L'arte della guerra, Vegezio e Machiavelli’, Quaderni di Storia 55: 99–127.Google Scholar

Formisano, M. (2009) ‘The Renaissance tradition of the ancient art of war’, in Beltramini, G. (ed.), Andrea Palladio and the Architecture of Battle, Venice: 226–39.Google Scholar

Formisano, M. (2011) ‘The Strategikós of Onasander: Taking military texts seriously’, Technai 2: 39–52.Google Scholar

Formisano, M. (2012) ‘Review of Allmand 2011’, Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2012.11.59.Google Scholar

Formisano, M. (2014) ‘Kriegskunst’, in Landfester, M. (ed.), Renaissance-Humanismus: Lexikon zur Antikerezeption (Der Neue Pauly, Supplemente 9), Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Formisano, M. and Böhme, H. (eds) (2011) War in Words: Transformations of War from Antiquity to Clausewitz, Berlin.Google Scholar

Formisano, M. and van der Eijk, P. (eds) (2017) Knowledge, Text and Practice in Ancient Technical Writing, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. P. (2000) ‘The didactic plot’, in Depew, M. and Obbink, D. (eds), Matrices of Genre: Authors, Canons, and Society, Cambridge, MA: 205–19.Google Scholar

Fox, M. (1993) ‘History and rhetoric in Dionysius of Halicarnassus’, Journal of Roman Studies 83: 31–47.Google Scholar

Fox, M. (1996) Roman Historical Myths: The Regal Period in Augustan Literature, Oxford.Google Scholar

Fox, M. (2001) ‘Dionysius, Lucian, and the prejudice against rhetoric in history’, Journal of Roman Studies 91: 76–93.Google Scholar

Foxhall, L. (1990) ‘The dependent tenant: Land leasing and labour in Italy and Greece’, Journal of Roman Studies 80: 97–114.Google Scholar

Frakes, R. M. (2011) Compiling the Collatio Legum Mosaicarum et Romanarum in Late Antiquity (Oxford Studies in Roman Law and Society 2), Oxford.Google Scholar

Frede, M. (2003) ‘Galen's theology’, in Barnes and Jouanna 2003: 73–106.Google Scholar

Frischer, B. (1982) The Sculpted Word: Epicureanism and Philosophical Recruitment in Ancient Greece, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Frischer, B. (1991) Shifting Paradigms: New Approaches to Horace's Ars poetica, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar

Fromentin, V. (1988) ‘L'attitude critique de Denys d'Halicarnasse face aux mythes’, Bulletin de l'Association Guillaume Budé 1988: 318–26.Google Scholar

Fromentin, V. (1993) ‘La définition de l'histoire comme mélange dans le prologue des Antiquités Romaines de Denys d'Halicarnasse (I, 8 3)’, in Les Actes du IIe colloque sur Denys d'Halicarnasse historien (Pallas 39): 177–92.Google Scholar

Fromentin, V. (1998) Denys d'Halicarnasse: Antiquités Romaines, Livre I (with introduction and commentary), Paris.Google Scholar

Fromentin, V. (2006) ‘Denys d'Halicarnasse et Hérodote III, 80–82 ou comment choisir la meilleure constitution pour Rome?’, in Le Monde et les mots: Mélanges Germaine Aujac (Pallas 72): 229–42.Google Scholar

Fromentin, V. (2010) ‘Les Moi de l'historien: récit et discours chez Denys d'Halicarnasse’, in Guelfucci, M.-R. (ed.), Jeux et enjeux de la mise en forme de l'histoire: recherches sur le genre historique en Grèce et à Rome (Dialogues d'histoire ancienne Suppl. 4), Besançon: 261–77.Google Scholar

Fuhrmann, M. (1960) Das systematische Lehrbuch: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Wissenschaften in der Antike, Göttingen.Google Scholar

Gabba, E. (1984) ‘Dionigi, Varrone e la religione senza miti’, Rivista storica italiana 96: 855–70.Google Scholar

Gabba, E. (1991) Dionysius and the History of Archaic Rome, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Galimberti, A. (2002) ‘Lo Strategikós di Onasandro’, in Sordi, M. (ed.), Guerra e diritto nel mondo greco e romano, Milan: 141–54.Google Scholar

Gallia, A. B. (2012) Remembering the Roman Republic: Culture, Politics, and History under the Principate, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Garnett, R. (1895) ‘On the date of the Ἀποτελεσματικά of Manetho’, Journal of Philology 23: 238–40.Google Scholar

Garrett, A. V. (2003) Meaning in Spinoza's Method, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gauthier, P. (1985) Les cités grecques et leur bienfaiteurs, Paris.Google Scholar

Geertman, H. and De Jong, J. J. (eds) (1989) Munus non ingratum: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Vitruvius’ De architectura and the Hellenistic and Republican Architecture, Leiden 20–23 January 1987, Leiden.Google Scholar

Gehrke, H.-J. (1998) ‘Die Geburt der Erdkunde aus dem Geiste der Geometrie: Überlegungen zur Entstehung und zur Frühgeschichte der wissenschaftlichen Geographie bei den Griechen’, in Kullmann, Althoff and Asper 1998: 163–92.Google Scholar

Geller, M. (2010) Ancient Babylonian Medicine, Chichester.Google Scholar

Gerson, J. (1960) Oeuvres complètes, Vol. 2 (ed. Glorieux, P.), Paris.Google Scholar

Getty, R. J. (1941) ‘The astrology of P. Nigidius Figulus (Lucan I, 649–65)’, Classical Quarterly 35: 17–22.Google Scholar

Getty, R. J. (1960) ‘Neopythagoreanism and mathematical symmetry in Lucan, De bello civili 1’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 91: 310–23.Google Scholar

Gibson, R. (1997) ‘Didactic poetry as “popular” form’, in Atherton, C. (ed.), Form and Content in Didactic Poetry, Bari: 67–98.Google Scholar

Gildenhard, I. (2011) Creative Eloquence: The Construction of Reality in Cicero's Speeches, Oxford.Google Scholar

Gill, C. (2010) Naturalistic Psychology in Galen and Stoicism, Oxford.Google Scholar

Gill, C., Whitmarsh, T. and Wilkins, J. (eds) (2009) Galen and the World of Knowledge, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gillespie, C. C. (ed.) (1970–90) Dictionary of Scientific Biography (18 volumes), New York.Google Scholar

Gilliver, C. (2007) ‘Battle’, in Sabin, Van Wees and Whitby 2007: 122–57.Google Scholar

Gilmartin, K. (1975) ‘A rhetorical figure in Latin historical style: The imaginary second person singular’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 104: 99–121.Google Scholar

Giuffré, V. (1974) La letteratura ‘de re militari’: appunti per una storia degli ordinamenti militari, Naples.Google Scholar

Gleason, M. (1995) Making Men: Sophists and Self-Presentation in Ancient Rome, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Glinister, F. (2007) ‘Constructing the past’, in Glinister and Woods 2007: 1–9.Google Scholar

Glinister, F. and Woods, C. (eds) (2007) Verrius, Festus and Paul: Lexicography, Scholarship, and Society, London.Google Scholar

Goar, R. J. (1968) ‘The purpose of De divinatione’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 99: 241–8.Google Scholar

Goar, R. J. (1972) Cicero and the State Religion, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. (2002) The Invention of Prose, Oxford.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. (2006) ‘Artemis and cultural identity in empire culture: How to think about polytheism, now?’, in Konstan, D. and Saïd, S. (eds), Greeks on Greekness: Viewing the Greek Past under the Roman Empire, Cambridge: 112–61.Google Scholar

Goldstein, B. R. (2007) ‘What's new in Ptolemy's Almagest?’, Nuncius 22: 261–85.Google Scholar

Goldstein, B. R. and Bowen, A. C. (1991) ‘The introduction of dated observations and precise measurement in Greek astronomy’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences 43: 93–132.Google Scholar

Goodchild, H. and Witcher, R. E. (2010) ‘Modelling the agricultural landscapes of Republican Italy’, in Carlsen, J. and Lo Cascio, E. (eds), Agricoltura e scambi nell'Italia tardo-repubblicana, Rome: 187–220.Google Scholar

Goodyear, F. R. D. (1982) ‘Technical writing’, in Kenney, E. J. (ed.), The Cambridge History of Classical Literature, Vol. 2: Latin Literature, Cambridge: 667–73.Google Scholar

Gordley, M. E. (2011) Teaching through Song in Antiquity, Tübingen.Google Scholar

Gordon, R. (1990) ‘The veil of power: Emperors, sacrificers and benefactors’, in Beard and North 1990: 199–231.Google Scholar

Görler, W. (1995) ‘Silencing the troublemaker: De Legibus I. 39 and the continuity of Cicero's scepticism’, in Powell, J. G. F. (ed.), Cicero the Philosopher: Twelve Papers, Oxford: 85–113.Google Scholar

Grafton, A. and Williams, M. (2006) Christianity and the Transformation of the Book: Origen, Eusebius and the Library of Caesarea, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Graham, A. C. (1989) Disputers of the Tao, La Salle, IL.Google Scholar

Gray, V. (2012) ‘Herodotus on Melampus’, in Baragwanath and de Bakker 2012b: 167–91.Google Scholar

Graziosi, B. (2001) ‘Competition in wisdom’, in Budelmann, F. and Michelakis, P. (eds), Homer, Tragedy and Beyond: Essays in Honour of P. E. Easterling, London: 57–74.Google Scholar

Green, C. M. C. (1997) ‘Free as a bird: Varro De re rustica 3’, American Journal of Philology 118: 427–48.Google Scholar

Green, C. M. C. (2002) ‘Varro's three theologies and their influence on the Fasti’, in Herbert-Brown, G. (ed.), Ovid's Fasti: Historical Readings at its Bimillennium, Oxford: 71–99.Google Scholar

Green, P. (2006) Diodorus Siculus: Books 11–12.37.1, Austin, TX.Google Scholar

Green, S. J. (2014) Disclosure and Discretion in Roman Astrology: Manilius and his Augustan Contemporaries, Oxford.Google Scholar

Greene, J. and Kehoe, D. P. (1995) ‘Mago the Carthaginian’, in Fantar, M. and Ghakhi, M. (eds), Actes du IIIe Congrès International des Études Phéniciennes et Puniques, Tunis: 110–17.Google Scholar

Greene, K. (2000) ‘Technological innovation and economic progress in the ancient world: M. I. Finley re-considered’, Economic History Review 53: 29–59.Google Scholar

Gregory, A. F. and Tuckett, C. M. (eds) (2005) Trajectories through the New Testament and the Apostolic Fathers, Oxford.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. T. (1976) Seneca: A Philosopher in Politics, Oxford.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. T. (1989) ‘Philosophy, politics and politicians at Rome’, in Griffin and Barnes 1989: 1–37.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. T. (1995) ‘Philosophical badinage in Cicero's letters to his friends’, in Powell, J. G. F. (ed.), Cicero the Philosopher, Oxford: 325–46.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. T. (2007) ‘Seneca's pedagogic strategy: Letters and De beneficiis’, in Sorabji, R. and Sharples, R. (eds), Greek and Roman Philosophy 100 BC–200 AD, Vol. 1, London: 89–113.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. T. (2013) Seneca on Society: A Guide to De Beneficiis, Oxford.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. T. and Barnes, J. (eds) (1989) Philosophia Togata: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society, Oxford.Google Scholar

Grimal, P. (1965–66) ‘Encyclopédies antiques’, Cahiers d'histoire mondiale 9: 459–82.Google Scholar

Gros, P. (1989) ‘L'auctoritas chez Vitruve: Contribution a l’étude de la sémantique des ordres dans le De Architectura’, in Geertman and De Jong 1989: 126–33.Google Scholar

Gros, P. (1994) ‘Munus non ingratum: le traité vitruvien et la notion de service’, in Gros, P., Le projet de Vitruve: objet, déstinataires et reception du De architectura, Rome: 75–90.Google Scholar

Gross, A. (1996) The Rhetoric of Science, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Gross, A. (2006) Starring the Text: The Place of Rhetoric in Science Studies, Carbondale, IL.Google Scholar

Guillaumont, F. (1984) Philosophe et augure: Recherches sur la théorie cicéronienne de la divination, Brussels.Google Scholar

Guittard, C. (2003) ‘Les calendriers brontoscopiques dans le monde étrusco-romain’, in Cusset, C. (ed.), La Météorologie dans l'antiquité: Entre science et croyance, Saint-Étienne: 455–66.Google Scholar

Gunderson, E. (ed.) (2009) The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Rhetoric, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Habinek, T. and Schiesaro, A. (eds) (1997) The Roman Cultural Revolution, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hagendahl, H. (1967) Augustine and the Latin Classics, Göteborg.Google Scholar

Hahn, J. (1991) ‘Plinius und die griechischen Ärzte in Rom: Naturkonzeption und Medizinkritik in der Naturalis Historia’, Sudhoffs Archiv 75: 209–39.Google Scholar

Hale, J. R. (1988) ‘A humanistic visual aid: The military diagram in the Renaissance’, Renaissance Studies 2: 280–98.Google Scholar

Hamilton, N. T., Swerdlow, N. M. and Toomer, G. J. (1987) ‘The “Canobic Inscription”: Ptolemy's earliest work’, in Berggren, J. L. and Goldstein, B. R. (eds), From Ancient Omens to Statistical Mechanics, Copenhagen: 55–73.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. (1991a) On the Therapeutic Method: Books One and Two, Oxford.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. (1991b) ‘Galen on the foundations of science’, in López Férez 1991: 15–29.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. (1994) ‘Galen's concept of scientific progress’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II, 37(2): 1775–89.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. (1998) Galen: On Antecedent Causes, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. (2003) ‘Causation in Galen’, in Barnes, and Jouanna, 2003: 31–72.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. (2005a) ‘Prédiction, prophétie, prognostic: la gnoséologie de l'avenir dans la divination et la medicine antique’, in Kany-Turpin, R. (ed.), Signes et prédiction dans l'antiquité, Saint-Etienne: 147–62.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. (2005b) ‘Aristotle on kind-crossing’, in Sharples 2005: 23–54.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. (2008a) ‘Galen's epistemology’, in Hankinson 2008b: 157–83.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. (ed.) (2008b) The Cambridge Companion to Galen. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. (2009) ‘Galen on the limitations of knowledge’, in Gill, Whitmarsh and Wilkins 2009: 206–42.Google Scholar

Hannah, R. (1996) ‘Lucan Bellum civile 1.649–65: The astrology of P. Nigidius Figulus revisited’, Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar 9: 175–90.Google Scholar

Hannah, R. (2001) ‘From orality to literacy? The case of the parapegmata’, in Watson, J. (ed.), Speaking Volumes: Orality and Literacy in the Greek and Roman World, Leiden: 139–59.Google Scholar

Hannah, R. (2002) ‘Euctemon's parapêgma’, in Tuplin and Rihll 2002: 112–32.Google Scholar

Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F. and Wakker, G. C. (eds) (2006) Beyond the Canon (Hellenistica Groningana 11), Leuven.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. R. (1992) ‘Plutarch and the interpretation of myth’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II, 33(6): 4743–87.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. (2015) Ovidio: Metamorfosi, Vol. 6, Milan.Google Scholar

Harkness, D. (2007) The Jewel House: Victorian London and the Scientific Revolution, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar

Harper, D. (1998) Early Chinese Medical Literature: The Mawangdui Manuscripts, London.Google Scholar

Harries, J. (2006) Cicero and the Jurists: From Citizens’ Law to the Lawful State, London.Google Scholar

Harries, J. (2013) ‘Encyclopaedias and autocracy: Justinian's encyclopaedia of Roman law’, in König and Woolf 2013: 178–96.Google Scholar

Harris, W. V. (1971) Rome in Etruria and Umbria, Oxford.Google Scholar

Harris, W. V. (1989) Ancient Literacy, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Harris-McCoy, D. (2008a) ‘Varieties of Encyclopedism in the Early Roman Empire: Vitruvius, Pliny the Elder, Artemidorus’ (PhD Diss., University of Pennsylvania).Google Scholar

Harris-McCoy, D. (2008b) ‘Jason König and Tim Whitmarsh, Ordering Knowledge in the Roman Empire’, Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2008.10.39.Google Scholar

Harris-McCoy, D. (2012) Artemidorus’ Oneirocritica: Text, Translation, and Commentary, Oxford.Google Scholar

Harris-McCoy, D. (2013) ‘Artemidorus’ Oneirocritica as fragmentary encyclopedia’, in König and Woolf 2013: 154–77.Google Scholar

Harrison, S. J. (2000) Apuleius: A Latin Sophist, Oxford.Google Scholar

Harrison, S. J., Hilton, J. and Hunink, V. (2001) Apuleius: Rhetorical Works, Oxford.Google Scholar

Hawking, S. (1988) A Brief History of Time, New York.Google Scholar

Healy, L. and Hoyles, C. (2000) ‘A study of proof conceptions in algebra’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 31: 396–428.Google Scholar

Heath, M. (2004) Menander: A Rhetor in Context, Oxford.Google Scholar

Heiberg, J. L. (1891–93) Apollonii Pergaei quae Graece exstant opera, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Heiberg, J. L. (1898–1907) Claudii Ptolemaei opera quae exstant omnia, Vol. 1: Syntaxis mathematica; Vol. 2: Opera astronomica minora, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Heiberg, J. L. and Stamatis, E. (1915) Commentarii in libros de sphaera et cylindro, Vol. 3: Archimedis opera omnia cum commentariis Eutocii, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Heinimann, F. (1961) ‘Eine vorplatonischen Theorie der Techne’, Museum Helveticum 18: 105–30.Google Scholar

Helm, R. (1956) Die Chronik des Hieronymus = Hieronymi Chronicon (GCS 47), Berlin.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (2002) ‘Columella's living hedge: The Roman gardening book’, Journal of Roman Studies 92: 110–33.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (2004) Morals and Villas in Seneca's Letters: Places to Dwell, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hense, O. (1905) C. Musonii Rufi reliquiae, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Hesk, J. (2007) ‘Combative capping in Aristophanic comedy’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 53: 124–60.Google Scholar

Heurgon, J. (1976) ‘L'agronome carthaginois Magon et ses traducteurs en latin et en grec’, Comptes rendus de l'Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres 120: 441–56.Google Scholar

Heurgon, J. (1978) Varron: Économie rurale, Livre 1, Paris.Google Scholar

Heuser, B. (2007) ‘Introduction’, in Clausewitz, C. von, On War, Oxford: vii–xxxviii.Google Scholar

Heuser, B. (2010) The Evolution of Strategy: Thinking War from Antiquity to the Present, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hidber, T. (ed.) (1996) Das klassizistische Manifest des Dionys von Halikarnass: Die praefatio zu De oratoribus veteribus (with translation and commentary), Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Hidber, T. (2011) ‘Impacts of writing in Rome: Greek perceptions of Roman literature in the first century BCE’, in Schmitz and Wiater 2011: 115–23.Google Scholar

Highet, G. (1962) The Anatomy of Satire, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. (1998) Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hine, H. M. (2006) ‘Rome, the cosmos, and the emperor in Seneca's Natural Questions’, Journal of Roman Studies 96: 42–72.Google Scholar

Hine, H. M. (2009) ‘Subjectivity and objectivity in Latin scientific and technical literature’, in Taub and Doody 2009: 13–30.Google Scholar

Hine, H. M. (2010) ‘Form and function of speech in the prose works of the younger Seneca’, in Berry, D. H. and Erskine, A. (eds), Form and Function in Roman Oratory, Cambridge: 208–24.Google Scholar

Hine, H. M. (2016) ‘Philosophy and philosophi from Cicero to Apuleius’, in Williams and Volk 2016: 13–29.Google Scholar

Hirzel, R. (1895) Der Dialog: Ein literarhistorischer Versuch (2 volumes), Leipzig.Google Scholar

Hobden, F. and Tuplin, C. (eds) (2012) Xenophon: Ethical Principles and Historical Enquiry, Leiden.Google Scholar

Hon, G. (1989) ‘Is there a concept of experimental error in Greek astronomy?’, British Journal for the History of Science 22: 129–50.Google Scholar

Honigman, S. (2003) The Septuagint and Homeric Scholarship in Alexandria: A Study in the Narrative of the Letter of Aristeas, London.Google Scholar

Honoré, T. (1978) Tribonian, London.Google Scholar

Honoré, T. (1994) Emperors and Lawyers (2nd edn), Oxford.Google Scholar

Honoré, T. (2002) Ulpian: Pioneer of Human Rights (2nd edn), Oxford.Google Scholar

Honoré, T. (2010) Justinian's Digest: Character and Compilation, Oxford.Google Scholar

Hopkinson, N. (1994) Greek Poetry of the Imperial Period: An Anthology, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Horster, M. (2008) ‘Some notes on grammarians in Plutarch’, in Nikolaidis, A. G. (ed.), The Unity of Plutarch's Work: ‘Moralia’ Themes in the ‘Lives’, Features of the ‘Lives’ in the ‘Moralia’, Berlin: 611–24.Google Scholar

Horster, M. and Reitz, C. (eds) (2003) Antike Fachschriftsteller: Literarischer Diskurs und sozialer Kontext, Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Housman, A. E. (1926) M. Annaei Lucani Belli Civilis libri decem, Oxford.Google Scholar

Howe, N. (1985) ‘In defense of the encyclopedic mode: On Pliny's preface to the Natural History’, Latomus 44: 561–76.Google Scholar

Howley, J. (2013) ‘Why read the jurists? Aulus Gellius on reading across disciplines’, in Du Plessis 2013: 9–30.Google Scholar

Hsu, E. (2010) Pulse Diagnosis in Early Chinese Medicine: The Telling Touch, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Humfress, C. (2005) ‘Law and legal practice in the age of Justinian’, in Maas, M. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Justinian, Cambridge: 161–84.Google Scholar

Humphreys, S. C. (1975) ‘Transcendence and intellectual roles: The ancient Greek case’, Daedalus 104: 91–118.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. (1995) ‘Written in the stars: Poetry and philosophy in the Phainomena of Aratus’, Arachnion 2: 1–34.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. (2004a) ‘Epic in a minor key’, in Fantuzzi and Hunter 2004: 191–245.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. (2004b) ‘The Periegesis of Dionysius and the traditions of Hellenistic poetry’, Revue des études antiques 106: 217–31.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. (2006) ‘The Prologue of the Periodos to Nicomedes (“Pseudo-Scymnus”)’, in Harder, Regtuit and Wakker 2006: 123–40.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. (2012) Plato and the Traditions of Ancient Literature: The Silent Stream, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. (2014) Hesiodic Voices: Studies in the Ancient Reception of Hesiod's Works and Days, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, G. O. (2009) ‘Read the instructions: Didactic poetry and didactic prose’, Classical Quarterly 59: 196–211.Google Scholar

Ierodiakonou, K. (2002) ‘Aristotle's use of examples in the Prior Analytics’, Phronesis 47: 127–52.Google Scholar

Inwood, B. (1995) ‘Seneca in his philosophical milieu’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 97: 63–76 (reprinted in B. Inwood (2005) Reading Seneca: Stoic Philosophy at Rome, Oxford: 7–22).Google Scholar

Jacob, C. (1981) ‘L’œil et la mémoire: sur la Périégèse de la Terre habitée de Denys’, in Jacob, C. and Lestringant, F. (eds), Arts et légendes d'espaces: figures du voyage et rhétoriques du monde, Paris: 21–97.Google Scholar

Jacob, C. (1990) La Description de la terre habitée de Denys d'Alexandrie ou la leçon de géographie, Paris.Google Scholar

Jacob, C. (1991) ‘Θεὸς Ἑρμῆς ἐπὶ Ἁδριανοῦ: la mise en scène du pouvoir impérial dans la Description de la terre habitée de Denys d'Alexandrie’, Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz 2: 43–53.Google Scholar

Jacques, J.-M. (2007) Nicandre, Œuvres, Vol. 3: Les Alexipharmaques, Paris.Google Scholar

Jaeger, M. (2008) Archimedes and the Roman Imagination, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar

Jal, P. (1961) ‘La propagande religieuse à Rome au cours des guerres civiles de la fin de la république’, Antiquité classique 30: 395–414.Google Scholar

Janniard, S. (2008) ‘Végèce et les transformations de l'art de la guerre aux IVe et Ve siècles après J.-C.’, Antiquité tardive 16: 19–36.Google Scholar

Janson, T. (1964) Latin Prose Prefaces: Studies in Literary Conventions, Stockholm.Google Scholar

Jocelyn, H. D. (1982) ‘Varro's Antiquitates rerum divinarum and religious affairs in the late Roman Republic’, Bulletin of the John Rylands University Library of Manchester 65: 148–205.Google Scholar

Johnson, M. R. (2009) ‘The Aristotelian explanation of the halo’, Apeiron 42: 325–58.Google Scholar

Johnson, W. A. (2013) ‘Libraries and reading culture in the high empire’, in König, Oikonomopoulou and Woolf 2013: 347–63.Google Scholar

Johnson, W. A. and Parker, H. N. (eds) (2009) Ancient Literacies: The Culture of Reading in Greece and Rome, Oxford.Google Scholar

Johnston, I. and Horsley, G. H. R. (2011) Galen, Method of Medicine, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Johnston, S. I. (2001) ‘Charming children: The use of the child in ancient divination’, Arethusa 34: 97–117.Google Scholar

Johnston, S. I. (2008) Ancient Greek Divination, Malden, MA.Google Scholar

Jones, A. (1990) Ptolemy's First Commentator (Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 80.7), Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar

Jones, A. (1994) ‘The place of astronomy in Roman Egypt’, Apeiron 27: 25–51.Google Scholar

Jones, A. (1999) Astronomical Papyri from Oxyrhynchus (P. Oxy. 4133–4300a), Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar

Jones, A. (2005a) ‘Ptolemy's “Canobic Inscription” and Heliodorus's observation reports’, SCIAMVS 6: 53–97.Google Scholar

Jones, A. (2005b) ‘In order that we should not ourselves appear to be adjusting our estimates…to make them fit some predetermined amount’, in Buchwald, J. Z. and Franklin, A. (eds), Wrong for the Right Reasons, Dordrecht: 17–39.Google Scholar

Jones, A. (2010a) ‘Introduction’, in Jones 2010b: xi–xv.Google Scholar

Jones, A. (ed.) (2010b) Ptolemy in Perspective: Use and Criticism of his Work from Antiquity to the Nineteenth Century, Dordrecht.Google Scholar

Jones, A. (2011) ‘Ptolemy's Geography: a reform that failed’, in Shalev, Z. and Burnett, C. (eds), Ptolemy's Geography in the Renaissance, London: 15–29.Google Scholar

Jones, C. (1978) The Roman World of Dio Chrysostom, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Jouanna, J. (1999) Hippocrates (tr. DeBevoise, M. B.; first published in French 1992), Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar

Keegan, J. (1983) The Face of Battle: A Study of Agincourt, Waterloo, and the Somme, London.Google Scholar

Keen, R. (1985) ‘Lucretius and his reader’, Apeiron 19: 1–10.Google Scholar

Kennedy, D. F. (2011) ‘Sums in verse or a mathematical aesthetic?’, in Green, S. J. and Volk, K. (eds), Forgotten Stars: Rediscovering Manilius’ Astronomica, Oxford: 165–87.Google Scholar

Ker, J. (2006) ‘Seneca, man of many genres’, in Volk, K. and Williams, G. D. (eds), Seeing Seneca Whole: Perspectives on Philosophy, Poetry and Politics, Leiden: 19–41.Google Scholar

Ker, J. (2009) ‘Outside and inside: Senecan strategies’, in Dominik, W. J., Garthwaite, J. and Roche, P. A. (eds), Writing Politics in Imperial Rome, Leiden: 249–71.Google Scholar

Keulen, W. (2009) Gellius the Satirist: Roman Cultural Authority in Attic Nights, Leiden.Google Scholar

Khan, Y. (2004) ‘Denys lecteur des Phénomènes d'Aratos’, Revue des études antiques 106: 233–46.Google Scholar

Kidd, D. (1997) Aratus, Phaenomena: Edited with Introduction, Translation and Commentary, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kidd, I. G. (1988) Posidonius, Vol. 2: The Commentary, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kim, L. (2010) Homer between History and Fiction in Imperial Greek Literature, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kindt, J. (2006) ‘Delphic oracle stories and the beginning of historiography: Herodotus’ Croesus Logos’, Classical Philology 101: 34–51.Google Scholar

King, C. (2003) ‘The organization of Roman religous beliefs’, Classical Antiquity 22: 275–312.Google Scholar

Klotz, F. (2007) ‘Portraits of the philosopher: Plutarch's self-presentation in the Quaestiones Convivales’, Classical Quarterly 57: 650–67.Google Scholar

Klotz, F. (2011) ‘Imagining the past: Plutarch's play with time’, in Klotz and Oikonomopoulou 2011: 161–78.Google Scholar

Klotz, F. and Oikonomopoulou, K. (eds) (2011) The Philosopher's Banquet: Plutarch's Table Talk in the Intellectual Culture of the Roman Empire, Oxford.Google Scholar

Kneebone, E. (2008) ‘ΤΟΣΣ’ ΕΔΑΗΝ: The poetics of knowledge in Oppian's Halieutica’, in Carvounis and Hunter 2008: 32–59.Google Scholar

Knorr, W. R. (1986) The Ancient Tradition of Geometric Problems, Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Knorr, W. R. (1989) Textual Studies in Ancient and Medieval Geometry, Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Koch, C. (2003) ‘Roman state religion in the mirror of Augustan and late Republican apologetics’ (tr. C. Barnes), in Ando 2003: 296–329.Google Scholar

König, A. (2007) ‘Knowledge and power in Frontinus’ On Aqueducts’, in König and Whitmarsh 2007b: 177–205.Google Scholar

König, A. (2009) ‘From architect to imperator: Vitruvius and his addressee in the De architectura’, in Taub and Doody 2009: 31–52.Google Scholar

König, J. (2005) Athletics and Literature in the Roman Empire, Cambridge.Google Scholar

König, J. (2007) ‘Fragmentation and coherence in Plutarch's Sympotic Questions’, in König and Whitmarsh 2007b: 43–68.Google Scholar

König, J. (2009) ‘Conventions of prefatory self-presentation in Galen's On the Order of My Own Books’, in Gill, Whitmarsh and Wilkins 2009: 35–58.Google Scholar

König, J. (2010) ‘Competitiveness and anti-competitiveness in Philostratus’ Lives of the Sophists’, in Fisher, N. and Wees, H. van (eds), Competition in the Ancient World, Swansea: 279–300.Google Scholar

König, J. (2011) ‘Self-promotion and self-effacement in Plutarch's Sympotic Questions’, in Klotz and Oikonomopoulou 2011: 179–203.Google Scholar

König, J. (2012) Saints and Symposiasts: The Literature of Food and the Symposium in Greco-Roman and Early Christian Culture, Cambridge.Google Scholar

König, J. (2014) ‘Images of elite community in Philostratus’ Lives of the Sophists’, in Madsen, J. and Rees, R. (eds), Roman Rule in Greek and Latin Writing: Double Vision, Leiden: 246–70.Google Scholar

König, J. (2016) ‘Re-reading Pollux: Encyclopaedic structure and athletic culture in Onomasticon Book 3’, Classical Quarterly 66: 298–315.Google Scholar

König, J. and Whitmarsh, T. (2007a) ‘Ordering knowledge’, in König and Whitmarsh 2007b: 3–39.Google Scholar

König, J. (eds) (2007b) Ordering Knowledge in the Roman Empire, Cambridge.Google Scholar

König, J., Oikonomopoulou, K. and Woolf, G. (eds) (2013) Ancient Libraries, Cambridge.Google Scholar

König, J. and Woolf, G. (eds) (2013) Encyclopaedism from Antiquity to the Renaissance, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Korenjak, M. (2003) Die Welt-Rundreise eines anonymen griechischen Autors (‘pseudo-Skymnos’): Einleitung, Text, Übersetzung und Kommentar, Hildesheim.Google Scholar

Koster, S. (1970) Antike Epostheorien, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Kowalski, H. (1995) ‘Cicero, Augur und Politiker: Die Theorie und Praxis der Auspizien in Ciceros Tätigkeit’, Acta classica Universitatis Scientiarum Debreceniensis 31: 125–39.Google Scholar

Krause, M. (1936) Die Sphärik von Menelaos aus Alexandrien in der Verbasserung von Abū Nasr Mansūr b. ‘Alī b. ‘Irāq, Berlin.Google Scholar

Krenkel, W. A. (ed.) (2002) Marcus Terentius Varro, Saturae menippeae (with translation and commentary) (4 volumes), St Katharinen.Google Scholar

Kroll, W. (1937) ‘P. Nigidius Figulus’, Pauly-Wissowa RE 17: 200–12.Google Scholar

Kron, J. G. (2008) ‘The much maligned peasant: Comparative perspectives on the productivity of the small farmer in classical antiquity’, in Ligt, L. de and Northwood, S. J. (eds), People, Land and Politics: Demographic Developments and the Transformation of Roman Italy, 300 BC–AD 14, Leiden: 71–119.Google Scholar

Kronenberg, L. (2009) Allegories of Farming from Greece and Rome: Philosophical Satire in Xenophon, Varro, and Virgil, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Krostenko, B. A. (2000) ‘Beyond (dis)belief: Rhetorical form and religious symbol in Cicero's de Divinatione’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 130: 353–91.Google Scholar

Krueger, D. (2004) Writing and Holiness: The Practice of Authorship in the Early Christian East, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. S. (1962) ‘The structure of scientific revolutions’, International Encyclopedia of Unified Science: Foundations of the Unity of Science, Vol. 2.2, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Kühner, R. and Gerth, B. (1904) Ausführliche Grammatik der griechischen Sprache (3rd edn), Hanover.Google Scholar

Kullmann, W., Althoff, J. and Asper, M. (eds) (1998) Gattungen wissenschaftlicher Literatur in der Antike, Tübingen.Google Scholar

Kurth, T. (1994) Senecas Trostschrift an Polybius, Dialog 11: Ein Kommentar (Beiträge zur Altertumskunde 59), Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Lammert, F. (1931) Die römische Taktik zu Beginn der Kaiserzeit und die Geschichtsschreibung, Leipzig.Google Scholar

Langlands, R. (2008) ‘“Reading for the moral” in Valerius Maximus: The case of severitas’, Cambridge Classical Journal 54: 160–87.Google Scholar

Langlands, R. (2011) ‘Roman exempla and situation ethics: Valerius Maximus and Cicero, De officiis’, Journal of Roman Studies 101: 1–23.Google Scholar

Lateiner, D. (1989) The Historical Method of Herodotus, Toronto.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Le Bohec, Y. (1998) ‘Que voulait Onasandros?’, in Burnand, Y., Le Bohec, Y. and Martin, J.-P. (eds), Claude de Lyon empereur romain, Paris: 169–79.Google Scholar

le Saux, F. (2004) ‘War and knighthood in Christine de Pizan's Livre des fait d'armes et de chevallerie’, in Saunders, C., Saux, F. le and Thomas, N. (eds), Writing War: Medieval Literary Responses to Warfare, Cambridge: 93–105.Google Scholar

Lebek, W. D. (1976) Lucans Pharsalia: Dichtungsstruktur und Zeitbezug, Göttingen.Google Scholar

Leeman, A., Pinkster, J. and Wisse, J. (1981–96) M. Tullius Cicero, De oratore, Libri III (4 volumes), Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Lehmann, Y. (1997) Varron théologien et philosophe romain, Brussels.Google Scholar

Lehoux, D. (2007) Astronomy, Weather, and Calendars in the Ancient World: Parapegmata and Related Texts in Classical and Near-Eastern Societies, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lehoux, D. (2012) What Did the Romans Know? An Inquiry into Science and Worldmaking, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Lehoux, D. (2013) ‘Seeing and unseeing, seen and unseen’, in Lehoux, D., Morrison, A. D. and Sharrock, A. (eds), Lucretius: Poetry, Philosophy, Science, Oxford: 131–52.Google Scholar

Lenaghan, J. O. (1969) A Commentary on Cicero's Oration De haruspicum responso, The Hague.Google Scholar

Lenoir, M. (1996) ‘La littérature De re militari’, in Nicolet, C. (ed.), Les Littératures téchniques dans l'antiquité romaine: Statut, public et destination, tradition (Fondation Hardt. Entretiens sur l'antiquité classique 42), Geneva: 77–115.Google Scholar

Levick, B. (2003) ‘Seneca and money’, in De Vivo, A. and Lo Cascio, E. (eds), Seneca uomo politico e l'età di Claudio e di Nerone: Atti del Convegno Internazionale (Capri 25–27 marzo 1999), Bari: 211–28.Google Scholar

Lewis, A.-M. (1998) ‘What dreadful purpose do you have? A new explanation of the astrological prophecy of Nigidius Figulus in Lucan's Pharsalia I, 658–63’, Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 9: 379–400.Google Scholar

Lewis, M. J. T. (2001) Surveying Instruments of Greece and Rome, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lhommé, M.-K. (2007) ‘Varron et Verrius au 2ème siècle après Jésus-Christ’, in Glinister and Woods 2007: 11–47.Google Scholar

Lieberg, G. (1973) ‘Die “theologia tripartita” in Forschung und Bezeugung’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt I, 4: 63–115.Google Scholar

Liebs, D. (1976) ‘Rechtsschulen und Rechtsunterricht im Prinzipat’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II, 15: 197–216.Google Scholar

Lightfoot, J. L. (2008) ‘Catalogue technique in Dionysius Periegetes’, in Carvounis and Hunter 2008: 11–31.Google Scholar

Lightfoot, J. L. (2014) Dionysius Periegetes, Description of the Known World, with Introduction, Text, Translation, and Commentary, Oxford.Google Scholar

Lim, R. (1995) Public Disputation, Power, and Social Order in Late Antiquity, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Lindemann, A. (2005) ‘Paul's influence on “Clement” and Ignatius’, in Gregory and Tuckett 2005: 9–24.Google Scholar

Linderski, J. (1971) ‘Römischer Staat und Götterzeichen: Zum Problem der obnuntiatio’, Jahrbuch der Universität Düsseldorf 1969–1970: 309–22 (= Linderski 1995: 444–57).Google Scholar

Linderski, J. (1982) ‘Cicero and Roman divination’, La parola del passato 37: 12–38 (= Linderski 1995: 458–84).Google Scholar

Linderski, J. (1985) ‘The libri reconditi’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 89: 207–34.Google Scholar

Linderski, J. (1986) ‘The augural law’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II, 16: 2146–312.Google Scholar

Linderski, J. (1995) Roman Questions: Selected Papers, Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Ling, R. (1991) ‘Brading, Brantingham and York: A new look at some fourth-century mosaics’, Britannia 22: 148–53.Google Scholar

Littlewood, R. J. (2006) A Commentary on Ovid, Fasti Book VI, Oxford.Google Scholar

Littré, E. (1839–61) Oeuvres complètes d'Hippocrate (10 volumes), Paris.Google Scholar

Liuzzi, D. (1983) Nigidio Figulo ‘astrologo e mago’: Testimonianze e frammenti, Lecce.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. (1975) ‘The Hippocratic question’, Classical Quarterly 25: 171–92.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. (1979) Magic, Reason, and Experience: Studies in the Origins and Development of Greek Science, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. (1982) ‘Observational error in later Greek science’, in Barnes, J. and Brunschwig, J. (eds), Science and Speculation: Studies in Hellenistic Theory and Practice, Cambridge: 128–64.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. (1983) Science, Folklore and Ideology: Studies in the Life Sciences in Ancient Greece, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. (1987a) The Revolutions of Wisdom: Studies in the Claims and Practice of Ancient Greek Science, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. (1987b) ‘Dogmatism and uncertainty in early Greek speculative thought’, in Detienne, M. (ed.), Poikilia: Études offertes à J.-P. Vernant, Paris: 297–312.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. (1988) ‘Scholarship, authority and argument in Galen's Quod animi mores’, in Manuli, P. and Vegetti, M. (eds), Le Opere psicologiche di Galeno, Naples: 11–42.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. (1990) Demystifying Mentalities, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. (1991a) ‘Galen on Hellenistics and Hippocrateans: Contemporary battles and past authorities’, in Lloyd 1991b: 398–416.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. (1991b) Methods and Problems in Greek Science: Selected Papers, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. (1996a) ‘Theories and practices of demonstration in Galen’, in Frede, M. and Striker, S. (eds), Rationality in Greek Thought, Oxford: 255–77.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. (1996b) Adversaries and Authorities: Investigations into Ancient Greek and Chinese Science, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. (2002) The Ambitions of Curiosity, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. (2005) ‘Mathematics as a model of method in Galen’, in Sharples 2005: 110–30.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. (2009) Disciplines in the Making, Oxford.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. (2012) ‘The pluralism of Greek “mathematics”’, in Chemla, K. (ed.), The History of Mathematical Proof in Ancient Traditions, Cambridge: 294–310.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. (2014) The Ideals of Inquiry, Oxford.Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. and Sivin, N. (2002) The Way and the Word: Science and Medicine in Early China and Greece, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar

Long, A. (2002) Epictetus: A Stoic and Socratic Guide to Life, Oxford.Google Scholar

Long, P. O. (2001) Openness, Secrecy, Authorship: Technical Arts and the Culture of Knowledge from Antiquity to the Renaissance, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar

Lonie, I. M. (1964) ‘Erasistratus, the Erasistrateans and Aristotle’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine 38: 426–43.Google Scholar

López Férez, J. A. (ed.) (1991) Galeno: Obra, pensamiento y influencia, Madrid.Google Scholar

Loraux, N. (1986) ‘Thucydide a écrit La Guerre du Péloponnèse’, Métis 1: 139–61.Google Scholar

Lorenz, T. (1965) Galerien von griechischen Philosophen- und Dichterbildnissen bei den Römern, Mainz.Google Scholar

Luraghi, N. (2003) ‘Dionysios von Halikarnassos zwischen Griechen und Römern’, in Eigler, U., Gotter, U., Luraghi, N. and Walter, U. (eds), Formen römischer Geschichtsschreibung von den Anfängen bis Livius: Gattungen – Autoren – Kontexte, Darmstadt: 268–86.Google Scholar

Lynch, C. (ed.) (2003) Niccolò Macchiavelli, Art of War (translated, edited, and with a commentary), Chicago.Google Scholar

Lyons, J. D. (1989) Exemplum: The Rhetoric of Example in Early Modern France and Italy, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar

Ma, J. (1999) Antiochus III and the Cities of Western Asia Minor, Oxford.Google Scholar

Machiavelli, N. (2003) Art of War: Translated, Edited and with a Commentary by Christopher Lynch, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar

Mackey, J. L. (2009) ‘Rethinking Roman Religion: Action, Practice, and Belief’ (PhD Diss., Princeton).Google Scholar

MacMullen, R. (1966) Enemies of the Roman Order, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

MacRae, D. (2013a) ‘The Books of Numa: Writing, Intellectuals and the Making of Roman Religion’ (PhD Diss., Harvard).Google Scholar

MacRae, D. (2013b) ‘Review of Rüpke 2012’, American Journal of Philology 134: 510–14.Google Scholar

Magnelli, E. (2005) ‘Esiodo “epico” ed Esiodo didattico: il doppio epilogo di Dionisio Periegeta’, Appunti romani di filologia 7: 105–8.Google Scholar

Magnelli, E. (2006) ‘Altre fonti e imitazioni del poema di Dionisio Periegeta’, Studi italiani di filologia classica 4: 241–51.Google Scholar

Mahaffy, J. P. (1889) ‘The work of Mago on agriculture’, Hermathena 7: 29–35.Google Scholar

Malloch, S. J. V. (2015) ‘Frontinus and Domitian: The politics of the Strategemata’, Chiron 45: 77–100.Google Scholar

Manitius, K. (ed.) (1894) Gemini elementa astronomiae (with translation and commentary), Leipzig (reprinted Stuttgart, 1974).Google Scholar

Mann, J. E. (2008) ‘Prediction, precision, and practical experience: The Hippocratics on technē’, Apeiron 4: 89–122.Google Scholar

Manning, C. E. (1981) On Seneca's ‘Ad Marciam’ (Mnemosyne Suppl. 69), Leiden.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. (1998) Prolegomena mathematica: From Apollonius of Perga to Late Neoplatonism, with an Appendix on Pappus and the History of Platonism, Leiden.Google Scholar

Marcotte, D. (2000) Géographes grecs, Vol. 1: Introduction générale, Paris.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. (1997) Authority and Tradition in Ancient Historiography, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Maróti, E. (1976) The Vilicus and the Villa-System in Ancient Italy, Budapest.Google Scholar

Marrou, H. I. (1938) Saint Augustin et la fin de la culture antique, Paris.Google Scholar

Marsden, E. W. (1971) Greek and Roman Artillery: Technical Treatises, Oxford.Google Scholar

Martin, J. (1956) Histoire du texte des Phénomènes d'Aratos, Paris.Google Scholar

Martin, J. (1997) ‘John of Salisbury's manuscripts of Frontinus and Gellius’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 40: 1–26.Google Scholar

Martin, J. (1998) Aratos, Phénomènes (2 volumes), Paris.Google Scholar

Martin, R. (1971) Recherches sur les agronomes latins et leurs conceptions économiques et sociales, Paris.Google Scholar

Martin, R. (1972) ‘“Familia rustica”: les ésclaves chez les agronomes latins’, in Actes du colloque 1972 sur l'ésclavage, Paris: 267–97.Google Scholar

Martin, R. (1985) ‘État présent des études sur Columelle’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II, 32(3): 1959–79.Google Scholar

Martínez, V. M. and Senseney, M. F. (2013) ‘The professional and his books: Special libraries in the ancient world’, in König, Oikonomopoulou and Woolf (2013): 401–17.Google Scholar

Matilal, B. K. (1998) The Character of Logic in India (ed. Ganeri, J. and Tiwari, H.), Albany, NY.Google Scholar

Mattern, S. P. (2008) Galen and the Rhetoric of Healing, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar

Mattern, S. P. (2013) The Prince of Medicine, Oxford.Google Scholar

May, J. and Wisse, J. (2001) Cicero: On the Ideal Orator, New York.Google Scholar

Mazour-Matusevich, Y. and Bejczy, I. P. (2007) ‘Jean Gerson on virtues and princely education’, in Bejczy, I. P. and Nederman, C. J. (eds), Princely Virtues in the Middle Ages 1200–1500, Turnhout.Google Scholar

McEwen, I. K. (2003) Vitruvius: Writing the Body of Architecture, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

McGill, S. (2012) Plagiarism in Latin Literature, Cambridge.Google Scholar