Book contents
- Half title page
- Title page
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Glossary
- Introduction: Livy and Domestic Politics
- 1 The Historiographical Archaeology
- 2 Livy’s Preface: A Reader’s Guide to the First Pentad
- 3 Monarchy and the Education of the Roman People
- 4 Tyranny and the Tyrannical Temperament
- 5 The Best Citizen and the Best Orator
- 6 The Roman People and the Necessity of Discord
- Conclusion: Livy’s “Republic”
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 March 2015
Book contents
- Half title page
- Title page
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Glossary
- Introduction: Livy and Domestic Politics
- 1 The Historiographical Archaeology
- 2 Livy’s Preface: A Reader’s Guide to the First Pentad
- 3 Monarchy and the Education of the Roman People
- 4 Tyranny and the Tyrannical Temperament
- 5 The Best Citizen and the Best Orator
- 6 The Roman People and the Necessity of Discord
- Conclusion: Livy’s “Republic”
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Livy's Political PhilosophyPower and Personality in Early Rome, pp. 181 - 194Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
Asmis, A. (2005) “A New Kind of Model: Cicero’s Roman Constitution in De republica,” AJPh 126: 377–416.Google Scholar
Atkins, J.W. (2013) Cicero on Politics and the Limits of Reason: The Republic and Laws. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badian, E. (1966) “The Early Historians,” in The Latin Historians, ed. T.A. Dorey. New York: 1–38.Google Scholar
Bakker, E. (2006) “Contract and Design: Thucydides’ Writing,” in Rengakos and Tsakmakis (eds.) 2006: 109–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balot, R.K. (ed.) (2009) Blackwell Companion to Greek and Roman Political Thought. Malden, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batstone, W. (1988) “The Antithesis of Virtue: Sallust’s ‘Synkrisis’ and the Crisis of the Late Republic,” ClAnt 7.1: 1–29.Google Scholar
Batstone, W. (2009) “Postmodern Historiographical Theory and the Roman Historians,” in Feldherr (ed.) 2009: 24–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beard, M. (1999) “The Erotics of Rape: Livy, Ovid, and the Sabine Women,” in Female Networks and the Public Sphere in Roman Society, eds. Setälä, P. and Savunen, L.. Rome: 1–10.Google Scholar
Bellandi, F. (1976) “Scelus Tulliae. Storiografia e tipologia tragica in Dionigi, Livio, Ovidio,” PP 31: 148–68.Google Scholar
Blössner, N. (2001) “Cicero gegen die Philosophie: Eine Analyse von De re publica 1.1–3,” NAWG 2001.3, nr. 3: 201–71.Google Scholar
Bolchazy, L.J. (1977) Hospitality in Antiquity: Livy’s Concept of Its Humanizing Force. Chicago.Google Scholar
Bonner, S.F. (1949) Roman Declamation in the Late Republic and the Early Empire. Liverpool.Google Scholar
Borghini, A. (1984) “La ‘scena’ del carro e la donna divina: Gordio, Pisistrato e Tarquinio Prisco,” MD 12: 61–115.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J.N. (1987) “Romulus, Remus and the Foundation of Rome,” in Bremmer and Horsfall (eds.) 1987: 25–48.Google Scholar
Brink, C.O. and Walbank, F.W. (1954) “The Construction of the Sixth Book of Polybius,” CQ: 97–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briquel, D. (1998) “Les figures féminines dans la tradition sur les trois derniers rois de Rome,” Gerión 16: 113–41.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1995) “Livy’s Sabine Women and the Ideal of Concordia,” TAPhA 125: 291–319.Google Scholar
Bruun, C. (2000) “What Every Man in the Street Used to Know: M. Furius Camillus, Italic Legends and Roman Historiography, c. 400-133 B.C.,” in The Roman Middle Republic: Politics, Religion, and Historiography, c. 400–133 BC, ed. Bruun, C.. Rome: 41–68.Google Scholar
Burck, E. (1964) Die Erzählungskunst des T. Livius. Berlin. 2nd edn. reproduces original 1934 edn. with new review of scholarship, ix–xxviii.Google Scholar
Burton, P.J. (2000) “The Last Republican Historian: A New Date for the Composition of Livy’s First Pentad,” Historia 49: 429–46.Google Scholar
Calhoun, C.G. (1997) “Lucretia, Savior and Scapegoat: The Dynamics of Sacrifice in Livy 1.57–59,” Helios 24.2: 151–69.Google Scholar
Ceauşescu, P. (1976) “Altera Roma – Histoire d’une folie politique,” Historia 25: 79–108.Google Scholar
Champeaux, J. (1982) Fortuna: Recherches sur le culte de la Fortune à Rome et dans le monde romain des origines à la mort de César. 2 vols. Rome.Google Scholar
Chaplin, J.D. (2003) “Livy’s Narrative Habit,” in Gestures: Essays in Ancient History, Literature and Philosophy Presented to Alan L. Boegehold, eds. Bakewell, G.W. and Singer, J.P.. Oxford: 195–213.Google Scholar
Chaplin, J.D. and Kraus, C.S. (eds.) (2009) Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Livy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Chassignet, M. (2001) “La ‘construction’ des aspirants à la tyrannie: Spurius Cassius, Spurius Maelius et Manlius Capitolinus,” in L’invention des grands hommes de la Rome antique, eds. Coudry, M. and Späth, T.. Paris: 83–96.Google Scholar
Chilver, G.E.F. (1975) Cisalpine Gaul: Social and Economic History from 49 B.C. to the Death of Trajan. New York.Google Scholar
Claassen, J.-M. (1998) “The Familiar Other: The Pivotal Role of Women in Livy’s Narrative of Political Development in Early Rome,” AClass 41: 71–103.Google Scholar
Classen, C.J. (1962) “Romulus in der römischen Republik,” Philologus 106: 174–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Classen, C. J. (1993) “Ciceros orator perfectus: ein vir bonus dicendi peritus?” in Die Welt der Römer, ed. Classen, C.J.. Berlin: 155–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, J. (2007) The State of Speech: Rhetoric and Political Thought in Ancient Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. (2009) “Virtue and Violence: The Historians on Politics,” in Feldherr (ed.) 2009: 181–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, J. (2010) “Cicero’s concordia ordinum: A Machiavellian Reappraisal,” NYU online working paper: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1671070Google Scholar
Cornell, T.J. (1975) “Aeneas and the Twins: The Development of the Roman Foundation Legend,” PCPhS 21: 1–32.Google Scholar
Cornell, T.J. (1983) “The Failure of the Plebs,” in Tria Corda: Scritti in onore di A. Momigliano, ed. Gabba, E.. Como: 101–20.Google Scholar
Cornell, T.J. (1989) “Rome and Latium to 390 BC,” in Cambridge Ancient History: The Rise of Rome to 220 B.C., Volume 7 Part 2, eds. F.W. Walbank, A.E. Astin, et al., 2nd edn. Cambridge: 243–308.Google Scholar
Cornell, T.J. (1995) The Beginnings of Rome: Italy and Rome from the Bronze Age to the Punic Wars (c. 1000–264 B.C.). London.Google Scholar
Cornell, T.J. (2001) “Cicero on the Origins of Rome,” in Powell and North (eds.) 2001: 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornell, T.J. (2003) “Coriolanus: Myth, History and Performance,” in Myth, History and Culture in Republican Rome, eds. D. Braund and C. Gill. Exeter 2003: 73–97.Google Scholar
Davies, J.P. (1971) “The Rhetorical Tyrant in Roman Historiography: Sallust, Livy and Tacitus,” CW 65: 12–20.Google Scholar
Davies, J.P. (2004) Rome’s Religious History: Livy, Tacitus and Ammianus on Their Gods. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dessau, H. (1903) “Die Vorrede des Livius,” in Festschrift zu O. Hirschfelds sechzigsten Geburtstage. Berlin: 461–6.Google Scholar
Ducos, M. (1987) “Dynasties familiales et exercice du pouvoir dans l’oeuvre de Tite-Live,” Ktema 12: 159–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunkle, J.R. (1967) “The Greek Tyrant and Roman Political Invective of the Late Republic,” TAPhA 98: 151–71.Google Scholar
Dunkle, J.R. (1971) “The Rhetorical Tyrant in Roman Historiography: Sallust, Livy and Tacitus,” CW 65: 12–20.Google Scholar
Eckstein, A. (1997) “Physis and Nomos: Polybius, the Romans, and Cato the Elder,” in Hellenistic Constructs: Essays in Culture, History, and Historiography, eds. P. Cartledge, P. Garnsey, and E.S. Gruen. Berkeley: 175–99.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (1973) “Aequabilitas in Cicero’s Political Theory, and the Greek Tradition of Proportional Justice,” CQ 23: 285–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, J. (2013) “Camillus in Ovid’s Fasti,” in Augustan Poetry and the Roman Republic, eds. Farrell, J. and Nelis, D.. Oxford: 58–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. (1999) “History and Revelation in Vergil’s Underworld,” in Virgil: Critical Assessments of Classical Authors, ed. Hardie, P.. London: 221–43 = PCPhS n.s. 32 (1986) 1–24.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. (2007a) “The history of Roman religion in Roman Historiography and Epic,” in Blackwell Companion to Roman Religion, ed. Rüpke, J.. Oxford: 129–42.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. (2007b) “On Not Forgetting the ‘Literatur’ in ‘Literatur und Religion,’” in Literatur und Religion, eds. Bierl, A., Lämmle, R., and Wesselmann, K.. 2 vols. Berlin: 2.173–202.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. (2007c) Caesar’s Calendar: Ancient Time and the Beginnings of History. Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. (2010) “Fathers and Sons: The Manlii Torquati and Family Continuity in Catullus and Horace,” in Ancient Historiography and Its Contexts: Studies in Honor of A.J. Woodman, eds. Kraus, C.S., Marincola, J., and Pelling, C.. Oxford: 205–23.Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. (1997) “Caeci Avaritia: Avarice, History, and Vision in Livy V,” in Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History VIII, ed. Deroux, C. (=Collection Latomus 239). Brussels: 268–77.Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. (ed.) (2009) The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Historians. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrary, J.-L. (1984) “L’archéologie du de re publica (2, 2, 4–37, 63): Cicéron entre Polybe et Platon,” JRS 74: 87–98.Google Scholar
Ferrary, J.-L. (1995) “The Statesman and the Law in the Political Philosophy of Cicero,” in Laks and Schofield (eds.) 1995: 48–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, M. (2006) “Prologue: Machiavelli’s Rapacious Republicanism,” in Machiavelli’s Liberal Republican Legacy, ed. Rahe, P.. Cambridge: xxxi–lxii.Google Scholar
Forsythe, G. (1994) The Historian L. Calpurnius Piso Frugi and the Roman Annalistic Tradition. Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
Forsythe, G. (1999) Livy and Early Rome: A Study in Historical Method and Judgment. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Forsythe, G. (2005) A Critical History of Early Rome from Prehistory to the First Punic War. Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frier, B.W. (1979) Libri Annales Pontificum Maximorum: The Origins of the Annalistic Tradition. Rome.Google Scholar
Gabba, E. (1981) “True History and False History in Classical Antiquity,” JRS 71: 50–62.Google Scholar
Gaertner, J.F. (2008) “Livy’s Camillus and the Political Discourse of the Late Republic,” JRS 98: 27–52.Google Scholar
Gage, J. (1974) “Les Quinctii, l’ ‘imperium’ capitolin et la règle du Champ de Mars,” REL 52: 110–48.Google Scholar
Garnsey, P. (1988) Famine and Food Supply in the Greco-Roman World: Responses to Risk and Crisis. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelzer, M. (1964) “Besprechung: Kurt von Fritz, The Theory of the Mixed Constitution in Antiquity,” in Matthias Gelzer: Kleine Schriften, eds. Strasburger, H. and Meier, C.. 3 vols. Wiesbaden: 2.191–200.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. (2006) “Reckoning with Tyranny: Greek Thoughts on Caesar in Cicero’s Letters to Atticus in Early 49,” in S. Lewis (ed.) 2006: 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girardet, K. (1977) “Ciceros Urteil über die Entstehung des Tribunates als Institution der römischen Verfassung (Rep. 2,57-59),” in Bonner Festgabe J. Straub, eds. Lippold, A. and Himmelmann, N.. Bonn: 179–200.Google Scholar
Glinister, F. (1997) “Women and Power in Archaic Rome,” in Gender and Ethnicity in Ancient Italy, eds. Cornell, T.J. and Lomas, K.. London: 115–27.Google Scholar
Glinister, F. (2006) “Kingship and Tyranny in Archaic Rome,” in Lewis, S. (ed.) 2006: 17–32.Google Scholar
Görler, W. (1995) “Silencing the Troublemaker: De Legibus I.39 and the Continuity of Cicero’s Scepticism,” in Powell, J.G.F. (ed.) 1995: 85–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haberman, L. (1980) “Nefas ab libidine ortum: Sexual Morality and Politics in the Early Books of Livy,” CB 57: 8–11.Google Scholar
Hahm, D.E. (2009) “The Mixed Constitution in Greek Thought,” in Balot (ed.) 2009: 178–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, J. (2008) “The Rhetorical Design and Success of Cicero’s Twelfth Philippic,” in Cicero’s Philippics: History, Rhetoric and Ideology, eds. Stevenson, T. and Wilson, M.. Auckland: 282–304.Google Scholar
Hammer, D. (2008) Roman Political Thought and the Modern Theoretical Imagination. Norman, OK.Google Scholar
Harrison, I. (2008) “Catiline, Clodius, and Popular Politics at Rome during the 60s and 50s BCE,” BICS 51: 95–118.Google Scholar
Harvey, A.D. (2007) Body Politic: Political Metaphor and Political Violence. Newcastle.Google Scholar
Hine, H.M. (1978) “Livy’s Judgement on Marius (Seneca Natural Questions 5.18.4; Livy Periocha 80),” LCM 3: 83–7.Google Scholar
Holford-Strevens, L.A. (2005) Aulus Gellius: An Antonine Scholar and His Achievement. 2nd edn. Oxford.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N.M. (1987) “Caeculus and the Foundation of Praeneste,” in Bremmer and Horsfall 1987: 49–61.Google Scholar
Humm, M. (2001) “Le figure d’Appius Claudius Caecus chez Tite-Live,” in Le censeur et les Samnites. sur Tite-Live IX, eds. Briquel, D. and Thuillier, J.-P.. Paris: 65–96.Google Scholar
Jehne, M. (2006) “Methods, Models, and Historiography,” in Rosenstein and Morstein-Marx (eds.) 2006: 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joplin, P. K. (1990) “Ritual Work on Human Flesh: Livy’s Lucretia and the Rape of the Body Politic,” Helios 17.1: 51–70.Google Scholar
Joshel, S.R. (1992) “The Body Female and the Body Politic: Livy’s Lucretia and Verginia,” in Pornography and Representation in Greece and Rome, ed. A. Richlin. Oxford: 112–30 = Chaplin and Kraus (eds.) 2009: 380–408.Google Scholar
Kallet, L. (2006) “Thucydides’ Workshop of History and Utility Outside the Text,” in Rengakos and Tsakmakis (eds.) 2006: 335–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplow, L. (2012) “Creating popularis History: Sp. Cassius, Sp. Maelius, and M. Manlius in the Political Discourse of the Late Republic,” BICS 55: 101–9.Google Scholar
Kapust, D.J. (2004) “Skinner, Pettit and Livy: The Conflict of the Orders and the Ambiguity of Republican Liberty,” HPTh 25.3: 377–401.Google Scholar
Kapust, D.J. (2011) Republicanism, Rhetoric, and Roman Political Thought: Sallust, Livy, and Tacitus. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klindienst, P. (1990) “Ritual Work on Human Flesh: Livy’s Lucretia and the Rape of the Body Politic,” Helios 17.1: 51–70.Google Scholar
Kowalewski, B. (2002) Frauengestalten im Geschichtswerk des T. Livius. Munich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraus, C.S. (1991) “Initium turbandi omnia a femina ortum est: Fabia Minor and the Election of 367 B.C.,” Phoenix 45.4: 314–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraus, C.S. (1994b) “No Second Troy: Topoi and Refoundation in Livy, Book V,” TAPhA 124: 267–89.Google Scholar
Kraus, C.S. (2005) “From Exempla to Exemplar? Writing History Around the Emperor in Imperial Rome,” in Flavius Josephus and Flavian Rome, eds. Edmondson, J., Mason, S. and Rives, J.B.. New York: 181–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krebs, C.B. (2012) “M. Manlius Capitolinus. The Metaphorical Plupast and Metahistorical Reflections,” in Time and Narrative in Ancient Historiography. The ‘Plupast’ from Herodotus to Appian, eds. Grethlein, J. and Krebs, C.B.. Cambridge: 139–55.Google Scholar
Laks, A. and Schofield, M. (eds.) (1995) Justice and Generosity: Studies in Hellenistic Social and Political Philosophy. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, A. (1946) Die indirekte Rede als künstlerisches Stilmittel des Livius. Rüschlikon, Switzerland.Google Scholar
La Penna, A. (1979) “Funzioni e interpretazioni del mito nella tragedia arcaica latina,” in Fra teatro, poesia e politica romana, ed. A. La Penna. Turin: 49–104.Google Scholar
Lendon, T. (2009) “Historians without History: Against Roman Historiography,” in Feldherr (ed.) 2009: 41–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levene, D.S. (2005) “The Late Republic/Triumviral Period: 90–40 B.C.,” in Blackwell Companion to Latin Literature, ed. Harrison, S.. Oxford: 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levene, D.S. (2006) “History, Metahistory, and Audience Response in Livy 45,” ClAnt 25: 73–108.Google Scholar
Levene, D.S. (2007) “Roman Historiography in the Late Republic,” in Marincola (ed.) 2007: 274–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levick, B. (1978) “Concordia at Rome,” in Scripta Nummaria Romana. Essays presented to H. Sutherland, eds. Carson, R.A.G. and Kraay, C.M.. London: 217–33.Google Scholar
Lewis, R.G. (ed. and trans.) (2006) Asconius: Commentaries on Speeches by Cicero, revised by Harries, J., Richardson, J., Smith, C., and Steel, C.. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lieberg, G. (1994) “Das Methodenkapitel in Ciceros Staat (Rep. 2, 11, 21–22),” Mnemosyne 47:12–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebeschuetz, J.H.W.G. (1967) “The Religious Position of Livy’s History,” JRS 57: 45–55.Google Scholar
Lintott, A.W. (1972) “Provocatio from the Struggle of the Orders to the Principate,” ANRW 1.2: 226–67.Google Scholar
Lintott, A.W. (1997) “The Theory of the Mixed Constitution at Rome,” in Philosophia Togata II: Plato and Aristotle at Rome, eds. Barnes, J. and Griffin, M.. Oxford: 70–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liou-Gille, B. (2007) “Lucius Quinctius Cincinnatus et ses quatres arpents,” Latomus 66.2: 301–26.Google Scholar
Long, A.A. (1995) “Cicero’s Politics in De officiis,” in Laks and Schofield (eds.) 1995: 213–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowrie, M. (2010) “Spurius Maelius: Dictatorship and the homo sacer,” in Citizens of Discord, eds. Breed, B.W., Damon, C., and Rossi, A.. Oxford: 171–85.Google Scholar
Luce, T.J. (1990) “Livy, Augustus, and the Forum Augustum,” in Between Republic and Empire: Interpretations of Augustus and His Principate, eds. Raaflaub, K.A. and Toher, M.. Berkeley: 123–38.Google Scholar
Mansfield, H.C. (1979) Machiavelli’s New Modes and Orders: A Study of the Discourses on Livy. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Mansfield, H. C. and Tarcov, N. (trans.) (1996) Niccolò Machiavelli. Discourses on Livy. Chicago.Google Scholar
Marincola, J. (1997) Authority and Tradition in Ancient Historiography. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marincola, J.(1999) “Greco-Roman Historiography,” in The Limits of Historiography: Genre and Narrative in Ancient Historical Texts, ed. Kraus, C.S.. Leiden: 281–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marincola, J.(ed.) (2007) A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography. Malden, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marino, R. (1980) “Livio storico del ‘dissenso’?” in Philias Charin: Miscellanea di studi classici in onore di Eugenio Manni. Vol. 4. Rome: 1406–23.Google Scholar
Matthes, M.M. (2000) The Rape of Lucretia and the Founding of Republics: Readings in Livy, Machiavelli, and Rousseau. University Park, PA.Google Scholar
May, J.M. (1980) “The Image of the Ship of State in Cicero’s Pro Sestio,” Maia n.s. 52: 259–64.Google Scholar
McGushin, P. (1977) C. Sallustius Crispus: Bellum Catilinae. A Commentary. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milnor, K. (2007) “Augustus, History and the Landscape of the Law,” Arethusa 40: 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moles, J.L. (1993) “Truth and Untruth in Herodotus and Thucydides,” in Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World, eds. Gill, C. and Wiseman, T.P.. Austin: 88–121.Google Scholar
Moles, J.L. (2009) “Livy’s Preface,” in Chaplin and Kraus (eds.) 2009: 49–87. Revised, with updated bibliography, from PCPhS 39 (1993) 141–68.Google Scholar
Mommsen, T. (1888) The History of Rome. Vol. 1 (trans. W.P. Dickson). 2nd edn. London.Google Scholar
Nicolet, C. (1960) “Consul togatus: Remarques sur le vocabulaire politique de Cicéron et de Tite-Live,” REL 38: 236–63.Google Scholar
Oakley, S.P. (2010) “Dionysius of Halicarnassus and Livy on the Horatii and the Curiatii,” in Ancient Historiography and Its Contexts: Studies in Honor of A.J. Woodman, eds. Kraus, C.S., Marincola, J., and Pelling, C.. Oxford: 118–38.Google Scholar
Önnerfors, A. (1974) Vaterporträts in der römischen Poesie: unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Horaz, Statius und Ausonius. Rome.Google Scholar
Osgood, J. (2006) Caesar’s Legacy: Civil War and the Emergence of the Roman Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Panciera, M. (2004) “Livy, conubium, and Plebeians’ Access to the Consulship,” in Augusto augurio: rerum humanarum et divinarum commentationes in honorem Jerzy Linderski, ed. Konrad, C.F.. Stuttgart: 89–100.Google Scholar
Paschalis, M. (1980) “Livy’s Praefatio and Sallust,” Diss. Ohio State University. Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
Paton, W.R. (trans., revised by Walbank, F.W. and Habicht, C.) (2011). Polybius. The Histories. Books 5–8. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Paul, G.M. (1982) “Urbs Capta: Sketch of an Ancient Literary Motif,” Phoenix 36: 144–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penella, R.J. (1990) “Vires/Robur/Opes and Ferocia in Livy’s Account of Romulus and Tullus Hostilius,” CQ 40: 207–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perelli, L. (1979) “Note sul tribunato della plebe nella riflessione ciceroniana,” QS 10: 285–303.Google Scholar
Perl, G. (1982) “Der Redner Helvius Mancia und der pictus Gallus (Cicero, de oratore 2.266),” Philologus 126: 56–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philippides, N. (1975) “Narrative Strategies and Ideology in Livy’s ‘Rape of Lucretia,’” Helios 10: 113–19.Google Scholar
Philips, J.E. (1982) “Current Research on Livy’s First Decade: 1959–1979,” ANRW 2.30.2: 998–1057.Google Scholar
Piganiol, A. (1973) “Romains et Latins: La legende des Quinctii,” in Scripta varia, eds. Bloch, R. and Chastagnol, A., 1973 (Latomus 132). Brussels: 203–28 = MEFR 38 (1920) 285–316.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F. (2006) “The Tyrant Must Die: Preventive Tyrannicide in Roman Political Thought,” in Repúblicas y Ciudadanos: Modelos de Participación Cívica en el Mundo Antiguo, ed. F.M. Simón, F. Pina Polo, and J.R. Rodríguez. Barcelona: 71–101.Google Scholar
Poucet, J. (2000) Les Rois de Rome: Tradition et histoire. (Académie Royale de Belgique, Classe del Lettres et des Sciences Morales et Politiques. 3e série, Tome 22) Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.Google Scholar
Powell, J.G.F. (2001) “Were Cicero’s Laws the Laws of Cicero’s Republic?” in Powell and North (eds.) 2001: 17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, J.G.F. and Rudd, N. (eds., trans. Rudd, N.) (1998) Cicero. The Republic and the Laws. Oxford.Google Scholar
Pownall, F. (2003) Lessons from the Past: The Moral Use of History in Fourth-Century Prose. Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raaflaub, K.A. (2005a) “The Conflict of the Orders in Archaic Rome: A Comprehensive and Comparative Approach,” in Raaflaub (ed.) 2005c: 1–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raaflaub, K.A. (2005b) “From Protection and Defense to Offense and Participation,” in Raaflaub (ed.) 2005c: 185–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raaflaub, K.A. (ed.) (2005c) Social Struggles in Archaic Rome: New Perspectives on the Conflict of the Orders. Revised and expanded version of 1986 edn. Malden, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahe, P.A. (2008) Against Throne and Altar: Machiavelli and Political Theory Under the English Republic. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rich, J. (2011) “Structuring Roman History: The Consular Year and the Roman Historical Tradition,” Histos 5: 1–43; slightly revised from Chaplin and Kraus (eds.) 2009: 118–47. Orig. version in Histos 1 (1997).Google Scholar
Richardson, J.H. (2012) The Fabii and the Gauls: Studies in Historical Thought and Historiography in Republican Rome. Stuttgart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridley, R.T. (1990) “Pativinitas Among the Patricians? Livy and the Conflict of the Orders,” in Staat und Staatlichkeit in der früen römischen Republik: Akten eines Symposiums, 12–15 Juli 1988, Freie Universität Berlin, ed. Eder, W.. Stuttgart: 103–38.Google Scholar
Roller, M.B. (2001) Constructing Autocracy: Aristocrats and Emperors in Julio-Claudian Rome. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roller, M.B. (2004) “Exemplarity in Roman Culture: The Cases of Horatius Cocles and Cloelia,” ClPh 99: 1–56.Google Scholar
Rosenstein, N. and Morstein-Marx, R. (eds.) (2006) A Companion to the Roman Republic. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, C. and Schofield, M. (eds.) (2000) The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutland, L. (1979) “Irrationality in the Early Republic: Livy Editorializes,” CW 72.7: 416–17.Google Scholar
Sailor, D. (2006) “Dirty Linen, Fabrication, and the Authorities of Livy and Augustus,” TAPhA 136: 329–88.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. (2009) “When Did Livy Write Books 1, 3, 28, and 59?” CQ 59: 653–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, P.L. (2001) “The Original Version of the De Re Publica and the De Legibus,” in Powell and North (eds.) 2001: 7–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, M. (1995) “Cicero’s Definition of Res Publica,” in Powell (ed.) 1995: 63–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultze, C. (2000) “Authority, Originality and Competence in the Roman Archaeology of Dionysius of Halicarnassus,” Histos 4: 6–49.Google Scholar
Seager, R. (1977) “‘Populares’ in Livy and the Livian Tradition,” CQ 27: 379–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seita, M. (2000) “Una tragedia senza palcoscenico: Tarquinio il Superbo e i suoi familiari secondo Tito Livio,” BStudLat 30.2: 485–513.Google Scholar
Smith, C.J. (2006a) “Adfectatio regni in the Roman Republic,” in S. Lewis (ed.) 2006: 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C.J. (2006b) The Roman Clan: The Gens from Ancient Ideology to Modern Anthropology. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C.J. (2010a) “Family and Kinship, Roman: Roman Kinship,” in Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Greece and Rome, ed. M. Gagarin. Vol. I. Oxford: 160–3.Google Scholar
Smith, C.J. (2010b) “Rhetorical History: The Struggle of the Orders in Livy,” in Form and Function in Roman Oratory, eds. Berry, D.H. and Erskine, A.. Cambridge: 264–80.Google Scholar
Solodow, J. (1979) “Livy and the Story of Horatius 1.24–26,” TAPhA 109: 251–68 = Chaplin and Kraus (eds.) 2009: 297–320.Google Scholar
Stadter, P.A. (1972) “The Structure of Livy’s History.” Historia 21: 287–307. Reprinted with updated, annotated bibliography in Chaplin and Kraus (eds.) 2009: 91–117.Google Scholar
Staveley, E.S. (1954–55) “Provocatio During the Fifth and Fourth Centuries BC,” Historia 3: 412–28.Google Scholar
Stehle, E. (1989) “Venus, Cybele and the Sabine Women: The Roman Construction of Female Sexuality,” Helios 16: 143–64.Google Scholar
Stevenson, T. (2011) “Women of Early Rome as exempla in Livy, Ab Urbe Condita, Book I,” CW 104: 175–89.Google Scholar
Tatum, W.J. (2006) “The Final Crisis (69-44),” in Rosenstein and Morstein-Marx (eds.) 2006: 190–212.Google Scholar
Taubler, E. (1921) Untersuchungen zur Geschichte des Decemvirats und der Zwolftafeln. Berlin.Google Scholar
Temelini, M.A. (2002) Cicero’s “Concordia”: The Promotion of a Political Concept in the Late Roman Republic. Diss. McGill University. Montreal.Google Scholar
Thommen, L. (1988) “Das Bild vom Volkstribunat in Ciceros Schrift über die Gesetze,” Chiron 18: 358–75.Google Scholar
Thomsen, R. (1980) King Servius Tullius: A Historical Synthesis (Humanitas 5). Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Tränkle, H. (1998) “Gebet und Schimmeltriumph des Camillus. Einige Überlegungen zum fünften Buch des Livius,” WS 111: 145–65.Google Scholar
Trompf, G.W. (1979) The Idea of Historical Recurrence in Western Thought from Antiquity to the Reformation. Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullmann, R. (1927) La technique des discours dans Salluste, Tite-Live et Tacite. Oslo.Google Scholar
Utard, R. (2006) “L’éloquence stratégique en discours indirect chez César, Tite-Live et Tacite: essai comparé,” REL 84: 62–81.Google Scholar
Vandiver, E. (1999) “The Founding Mothers of Livy’s Rome: The Sabine Women and Lucretia,” in The Eye Expanded: Life and the Arts in Greco-Roman Antiquity, eds. Titcherner, F.B. and Moorton, R.F., Jr. Berkeley: 206–32.Google Scholar
Vasaly, A. (1987) “Personality and Power: Livy’s Depiction of the Appii Claudii in the First Pentad,” TAPhA 117: 203–26.Google Scholar
Vasaly, A. (1999) “The Rhetoric of Anti-Rhetoric: The Quinctii in Livy’s First Pentad,” CW 92: 513–30.Google Scholar
Vasaly, A. (2002) “The Structure of Livy’s First Pentad and the Augustan Poetry Book,” in Clio and the Poets: Augustan Poetry and the Tradition of Ancient Historiography, eds. Levene, D.S. and Nelis, D.P.. Leiden: 275–90.Google Scholar
Vasaly, A. (2009) “Character and Complexity: Caesar, Sallust and Livy,” in Feldherr (ed.) 2009: 245–60.Google Scholar
Vasaly, A. (2014) “The Composition of the Ab Urbe Condita: The Case of the First Pentad,” in Blackwell Companion to Livy, ed. Mineo, B.. Oxford: 217–29.Google Scholar
von Fritz, K. (1954) The Theory of the Mixed Constitution in Antiquity: A Critical Analysis of Polybius’ Political Ideas. New York.Google Scholar
von Haehling, (1989) Zeitbezüge des T. Livius in der ersten Dekade seines Geschichtswerkes. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
von Ungern-Sternberg, J. (2004) “The Crisis of the Republic,” in Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic, ed. H. Flower. Cambridge: 89–112.Google Scholar
Walsh, P.G. (1982) “Livy and the Aims of ‘historia’: An Analysis of the Third Decade,” ANRW II.30.2: 1058–74.Google Scholar
Walter, U. (2004) “Ein Ebenbild des Vaters: Familiale Wiederholungen in der historiographischen Traditionsbildung der römischen Republik,” Hermes 132: 406–25.Google Scholar
Warmington, E.H. (ed.) (1936) Remains of Old Latin: Livius, Andronicus, Naevius, Pacuvius, Accius. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Wiedemann, T. (2000) “Reflections of Roman Political Thought in Latin Historical Writing,” in Rowe and Schofield (eds.) 2000: 517–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wirszubski, C. (1950) Libertas as a Political Idea at Rome During the Late Republic and Early Principate. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, T.P. (2006) “Roman History and the Ideological Vacuum,” in Classics in Progress: Essays on Greece and Rome, ed. Wiseman, T.P.. Oxford: 285–310 = Wiseman 2009: 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, T.P. (2007) “When Demigods Walked the Earth,” review of Feeney 2007c, London Review of Books 20.20 (18 Oct.): 25–7.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T.P. (2009) Remembering the Roman People: Essays on Late Republican Politics and Literature. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wisse, J. (2002) “De Oratore: Rhetoric, Philosophy, and the Making of the Ideal Orator,” in Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric, ed. May, J.M.. Leiden: 375–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, N. (1995) “Sallust’s Theorem: A Comment on ‘Fear’ in Western Political Thought,” HPTh 16: 174–89.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J.G. (2001) “Citizen and Commonwealth in De re publica Book 4,” in Powell and North (eds.) 2001: 83–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zetzel, J.G. (2003) “Plato with Pillows: Cicero on the Uses of Greek Culture,” in Myth, History and Culture in Republican Rome, eds. Braund, D. and Gill, C.. Exeter: 118–38.Google Scholar