Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T17:52:09.568Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 11 - Role of Ultrasound in Assisted Reproductive Treatment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2020

Kanna Jayaprakasan ,
Lukasz Polanski  and
Kamal Ojha
By
Lukasz Polanski ,
Mamata Deenadayal  and
Aarti Deenadayal Tolani
Kanna Jayaprakasan
Affiliation:
Department of Maternity and Gynaecology, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby
Lukasz Polanski
Affiliation:
Assisted Conception Unit, Guy’s Hospital, London
Kamal Ojha
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St George's University Hospital, London
Get access

Summary

Assisted reproductive treatment (ART) has become the only hope for biologically own children for numerous infertile couples. It is estimated that 1.7–4.0 per cent of children born in developed countries are the result of assisted conception . As a minimally invasive diagnostic tool, ultrasound is used readily throughout ART – starting with the pre-treatment assessment of pelvic organs, through cycle monitoring, oocyte collection and embryo replacement, to diagnosis of complications and outcome monitoring.

Type
Chapter
Information
Gynaecological Ultrasound Scanning
Tips and Tricks
 , pp. 145 - 167
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Klemetti, R, Gissler, M, Hemminki, E. Comparison of perinatal health of children born from IVF in Finland in the early and late 1990s. Hum Reprod 2002;17(8):2192–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, C, Sutcliffe, A. Infant outcomes of assisted reproduction. Early Hum Dev 2009;85(11):673–7.Google Scholar
Fleming, R, Seifer, DB, Frattarelli, JL, Ruman, J. Assessing ovarian response: antral follicle count versus anti-Mullerian hormone. Reprod Biomed Online 2015;31(4):486–96.Google Scholar
Broekmans, FJ, de Ziegler, D, Howles, CM, et al. The antral follicle count: practical recommendations for better standardization. Fertil Steril 2010;94(3):1044–51.Google Scholar
Chang, MY, Chiang, CH, Chiu, TH, Hsieh, TT, Soong, YK. The antral follicle count predicts the outcome of pregnancy in a controlled ovarian hyperstimulation/intrauterine insemination program. J Assist Reprod Genet 1998;15(1):12–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, MY, Chiang, CH, Hsieh, TT, Soong, YK, Hsu, KH. Use of the antral follicle count to predict the outcome of assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril 1998;69:505–10.Google Scholar
Deb, S, Campbell, BK, Clewes, JS, Pincott-Allen, C, Raine-Fenning, NJ. Intracycle variation in number of antral follicles stratified by size and in endocrine markers of ovarian reserve in women with normal ovulatory menstrual cycles. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;41(2):216–22.Google Scholar
Bauman, D. Diagnostic methods in pediatric and adolescent gynecology. Endocr Dev 2012;22:40–55.Google Scholar
Broekmans, FJ, Kwee, J, Hendriks, DJ, Mol, BW, Lambalk, CB. A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome. Hum Reprod Update 2006;12(6):685–718.Google Scholar
Broer, SL, Mol, BW, Hendriks, D, Broekmans, FJ. The role of antimullerian hormone in prediction of outcome after IVF: comparison with the antral follicle count. Fertil Steril 2009;91(3):705–14.Google Scholar
La Marca, A, Sighinolfi, G, Radi, D, et al. Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) as a predictive marker in assisted reproductive technology (ART). Hum Reprod Update 2010;16(2):113–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iliodromiti, S, Anderson, RA, Nelson, SM. Technical and performance characteristics of anti-Mullerian hormone and antral follicle count as biomarkers of ovarian response. Hum Reprod Update 2015;21(6):698–710.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strandell, A, Lindhard, A, Waldenstrom, U, et al. Hydrosalpinx and IVF outcome: a prospective, randomized multicentre trial in Scandinavia on salpingectomy prior to IVF. Hum Reprod 1999;14(11):2762–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penzias, AS, Emmi, AM, Dubey, AK, et al. Ultrasound prediction of follicle volume: is the mean diameter reflective? Fertil Steril 1994;62(6):1274–6.Google Scholar
Jayaprakasan, K, Deb, S, Sur, S, et al. Ultrasound and its role in assisted reproduction treatment. Imaging Med 2010;2(2):135–50.Google Scholar
Wittmaack, FM, Kreger, DO, Blasco, L, et al. Effect of follicular size on oocyte retrieval, fertilization, cleavage, and embryo quality in in vitro fertilization cycles: a 6-year data collection. Fertil Steril 1994;62(6):1205–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raine-Fenning, N. Doppler assessment of uterine artery blood flow for the prediction of pregnancy after assisted reproduction treatment. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;31(4):371–5.Google Scholar
Raine-Fenning, N, Deb, S, Jayaprakasan, K, et al. Timing of oocyte maturation and egg collection during controlled ovarian stimulation: a randomized controlled trial evaluating manual and automated measurements of follicle diameter. Fertil Steril 2010;94(1):184–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raine-Fenning, N, Jayaprakasan, K, Clewes, J, et al. SonoAVC: a novel method of automatic volume calculation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;31(6):691–6.Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Fuentes, A, Hernandez, J, Garcia-Guzman, R, et al. Prospective evaluation of automated follicle monitoring in 58 in vitro fertilization cycles: follicular volume as a new indicator of oocyte maturity. Fertil Steril 2010;93(2):616–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shmorgun, D, Hughes, E, Mohide, P, Roberts, R. Prospective cohort study of three- versus two-dimensional ultrasound for prediction of oocyte maturity. Fertil Steril 2010;93(4):1333–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oliveira, JB, Baruffi, RL, Mauri, AL, et al. Endometrial ultrasonography as a predictor of pregnancy in an in-vitro fertilization programme after ovarian stimulation and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone and gonadotrophins. Hum Reprod 1997;12(11):2515–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundstrom, P. Establishment of a successful pregnancy following in-vitro fertilization with an endometrial thickness of no more than 4 mm. Hum Reprod 1998;13(6):1550–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, SL, Wu, FR, Luo, C, et al. Combined analysis of endometrial thickness and pattern in predicting outcome of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2010;8:30.Google Scholar
Killick, SR Ultrasound and the receptivity of the endometrium. Reprod Biomed Online 2007;15(1):63–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fanchin, R, Righini, C, Ayoubi, JM, et al. New look at endometrial echogenicity: objective computer-assisted measurements predict endometrial receptivity in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 2000;74(2):274–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosch, E, Valencia, I, Escudero, E, et al. Premature luteinization during gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles and its relationship with in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril 2003;80(6):1444–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedler, S, Schenker, JG, Herman, A, Lewin, A. The role of ultrasonography in the evaluation of endometrial receptivity following assisted reproductive treatments: a critical review. Hum Reprod Update 1996;2(4):323–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kupesic, S, Bekavac, I, Bjelos, D, Kurjak, A. Assessment of endometrial receptivity by transvaginal color Doppler and three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasonography in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization procedures. J Ultrasound Med 2001;20(2):125–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jinno, M, Ozaki, T, Iwashita, M, et al. Measurement of endometrial tissue blood flow: a novel way to assess uterine receptivity for implantation. Fertil Steril 2001;76(6):1168–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zaidi, J, Campbell, S, Pittrof, R, Tan, SL. Endometrial thickness, morphology, vascular penetration and velocimetry in predicting implantation in an in vitro fertilization program. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995;6(3):191–8.Google Scholar
Raine-Fenning, NJ, Campbell, BK, Kendall, NR, Clewes, JS, Johnson, IR. Endometrial and subendometrial perfusion are impaired in women with unexplained subfertility. Hum Reprod 2004;19(11):2605–14.Google Scholar
Alcazar, JL. Three-dimensional ultrasound assessment of endometrial receptivity: a review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2006;4:56.Google Scholar
Fanchin, R, Righini, C, Olivennes, F, et al. Uterine contractions at the time of embryo transfer alter pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1998;13(7):1968–74.Google Scholar
Lesny, P, Killick, SR. The junctional zone of the uterus and its contractions. BJOG 2004;111(11):1182–9.Google Scholar
Borm, G, Mannaerts, B. Treatment with the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist ganirelix in women undergoing ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone is effective, safe and convenient: results of a controlled, randomized, multicentre trial. The European Orgalutran Study Group. Hum Reprod 2000;15(7):1490–8.Google Scholar
Kolibianakis, EM, Albano, C, Kahn, J, et al. Exposure to high levels of luteinizing hormone and estradiol in the early follicular phase of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles is associated with a reduced chance of pregnancy. Fertil Steril 2003;79(4):873–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garcia-Velasco, JA, Isaza, V, Vidal, C, et al. Human ovarian steroid secretion in vivo: effects of GnRH agonist versus antagonist (cetrorelix). Hum Reprod 2001;16(12):2533–9.Google Scholar
Kolibianakis, EM, Albano, C, Camus, M, et al. Prolongation of the follicular phase in in vitro fertilization results in a lower ongoing pregnancy rate in cycles stimulated with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists. Fertil Steril 2004;82(1):102–7.Google Scholar
de Jong, D, Macklon, NS, Fauser, BC. A pilot study involving minimal ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: extending the “follicle-stimulating hormone window” combined with the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cetrorelix. Fertil Steril 2000;73(5):1051–4.Google Scholar
Hu, X, Luo, Y, Huang, K, et al. New perspectives on criteria for the determination of HCG trigger timing in GnRH antagonist cycles. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95(20):e3691.Google Scholar
Chen, Y, Zhang, Y, Hu, M, Liu, X, Qi, H. Timing of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) hormone administration in IVF/ICSI protocols using GnRH agonist or antagonists: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Endocrinol 2014;30(6):431–7.Google Scholar
Falagario, M, Trerotoli, P, Chincoli, A, et al. Dynamics of the development of multiple follicles by early versus late hCG administration in ART program. Gynecol Endocrinol 2017;33(2):105–8.Google Scholar
Wang, W, Zhang, XH, Wang, WH, et al. The time interval between hCG priming and oocyte retrieval in ART program: a meta-analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet 2011;28(10):901–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bokal, EV, Vrtovec, HM, Virant Klun, I, Verdenik, I. Prolonged HCG action affects angiogenic substances and improves follicular maturation, oocyte quality and fertilization competence in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome. Hum Reprod 2005;20(6):1562–8.Google Scholar
Andersen, AG, Als-Nielsen, B, Hornnes, PJ, Franch, Andersen L. Time interval from human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) injection to follicular rupture. Hum Reprod 1995;10(12):3202–5.Google Scholar
Fleming, R, Coutts, JR Induction of multiple follicular development for IVF. Br Med Bull 1990;46(3):596–615.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wisanto, A, Braeckmans, P, Camus, M, et al. Perurethral ultrasound-guided ovum pickup. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf 1988;5(2):107–11.Google Scholar
Davis, LB, Ginsburg, ES. Transmyometrial oocyte retrieval and pregnancy rates. Fertil Steril 2004;81(2):320–2.Google Scholar
Dicker, D, Ashkenazi, J, Feldberg, D, et al. Severe abdominal complications after transvaginal ultrasonographically guided retrieval of oocytes for in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 1993;59(6):1313–15.Google Scholar
Abou-Setta, AM, Mansour, RT, Al-Inany, HG, et al. Among women undergoing embryo transfer, is the probability of pregnancy and live birth improved with ultrasound guidance over clinical touch alone? A systemic review and meta-analysis of prospective randomized trials. Fertil Steril 2007;88(2):333–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matorras, R, Urquijo, E, Mendoza, R, et al. Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer improves pregnancy rates and increases the frequency of easy transfers. Hum Reprod 2002;17(7):1762–6.Google Scholar
Coroleu, B, Barri, PN, Carreras, O, et al. The influence of the depth of embryo replacement into the uterine cavity on implantation rates after IVF: a controlled, ultrasound-guided study. Hum Reprod 2002;17(2):341–6.Google Scholar
Franco, JG, Jr., Martins, AM, Baruffi, RL, et al. Best site for embryo transfer: the upper or lower half of endometrial cavity? Hum Reprod 2004;19(8):1785–90.Google Scholar
Sallam, HN, Agameya, AF, Rahman, AF, Ezzeldin, F, Sallam, AN. Ultrasound measurement of the uterocervical angle before embryo transfer: a prospective controlled study. Hum Reprod 2002;17(7):1767–72.Google Scholar
Vloeberghs, V, Peeraer, K, Pexsters, A, D’Hooghe, T. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and complications of ART. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2009;23(5):691–709.Google Scholar
Golan, A, Ron-el, R, Herman, A, et al. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: an update review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1989;44(6):430–40.Google Scholar
Aboulghar, MA and Mansour, RT. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: classifications and critical analysis of preventive measures. Hum Reprod Update 2003;9(3):275–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Management of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome. Green-top Guideline 5. RCOG, 2006; 1–11.Google Scholar
Bodri, D, Guillen, JJ, Polo, A, et al. Complications related to ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval in 4052 oocyte donor cycles. Reprod Biomed Online 2008;17(2):237–43.Google Scholar
Dogra, V, Gottlieb, R, Oka, M, Rubens, D. Sonography of the scrotum. Radiology 2003;227(1):18–36.Google Scholar
Schurich, M, Aigner, F, Frauscher, F, Pallwein, L. The role of ultrasound in assessment of male fertility. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2009; 144(1):S192–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foresta, C, Garolla, A, Bettella, A, et al. Doppler ultrasound of the testis in azoospermic subjects as a parameter of testicular function. Hum Reprod 1998;13(11):3090–3.Google Scholar
Tarhan, S, Gumus, B, Gunduz, I, Ayyildiz, V, Goktan, C. Effect of varicocele on testicular artery blood flow in men: color Doppler investigation. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2003;37(1):38–42.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×