Aalto, R., Dunne, T., Guyot, J. L., 2006. Geomorphic controls on Andean denudation rates. Journal of Geology, 114(1), 85–99.Google Scholar

Abad, J. D., Garcia, M. H., 2009. Experiments in a high-amplitude Kinoshita meandering channel: 2. Implications of bend orientation on bed morphodynamics. Water Resources Research, 45. 10.1029/2008wr007017.Google Scholar

Abbado, D., Slingerland, R., Smith, N. D., 2005. Origin of anastomosis in the upper Columbia River, British Columbia, Canada. In: Blum, M. D., Marriott, S. B., LeClair, S. F. (eds.), Fluvial Sedimentology VII, International Association of Sedimentologists Special Publication No. 35, pp. 3–15.Google Scholar

Abban, B., Papanicolaou, A. N., Cowles, M. K., et al., 2016. An enhanced Bayesian fingerprinting framework for studying sediment source dynamics in intensively managed landscapes. Water Resources Research, 52(6), 4646–4673. 10.1002/2015wr018030.Google Scholar

Abbe, T., Brooks, A., 2011. Geomorphic, engineering, and ecological considerations when using wood in river restoration. In: Simon, A., Bennett, S. J., Castro, J. M. (eds.), Stream Restoration in Dynamic Fluvial Systems: Scientific Approaches, Analyses, and Tools. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, pp. 419–451.Google Scholar

Abernethy, B., Rutherfurd, I. D., 2000. Stabilising stream banks with riparian vegetation. Natural Resource Management, 3(2), 2–9.Google Scholar

Abrahams, A. D., 1977. Factor of relief in evolution of channel networks in mature drainage basins. American Journal of Science, 277(5), 626–646.Google Scholar

Abrahams, A. D., 1984. Channel networks: a geomorphological perspective. Water Resources Research, 20(2), 161–188.Google Scholar

Abrahams, A. D., Li, G., Atkinson, J. F., 1995. Step-pool streams – adjustment to maximum flow resistance. Water Resources Research, 31(10), 2593–2602.Google Scholar

Abrams, D. M., Lobkovsky, A. E., Petroff, A. P., et al., 2009. Growth laws for channel networks incised by groundwater flow. Nature Geoscience, 2(3), 193–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adami, L., Bertoldi, W., Zolezzi, G., 2016. Multidecadal dynamics of alternate bars in the Alpine Rhine River. Water Resources Research, 52(11), 8921–8938. 10.1002/2015wr018228.Google Scholar

Adamowski, K., 1981. Plotting formula for flood frequency. Water Resources Bulletin, 17(2), 197–202.Google Scholar

Adams, P. N., Slingerland, R. L., Smith, N. D., 2004. Variations in natural levee morphology in anastomosed channel flood plain complexes. Geomorphology, 61(1–2), 127–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Agouridis, C. T., Edwards, D. R., Workman, S. R., et al., 2005. Streambank erosion associated with grazing practices in the humid region. Transactions of the Association of Agricultural Engineers, 48(1), 181–190.Google Scholar

Ahadiyan, J., Adeli, A., Bahmanpouri, F., Gualtieri, C., 2018. Numerical simulation of flow and scour in a laboratory junction. Geosciences, 8(5), 162.10.3390/geosciences8050162.Google Scholar

Aharonson, O., Zuber, M. T., Rothman, D. H., Schorghofer, N., Whipple, K. X., 2002. Drainage basins and channel incision on Mars. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(4), 1780–1783.Google Scholar

Ahilan, S., O’Sullivan, J. J., Bruen, M., Brauders, N., Healy, D., 2013. Bankfull discharge and recurrence intervals in Irish rivers. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Water Management, 166(7), 381–393.Google Scholar

Ahmed, J., Constantine, J. A., Dunne, T., 2019. The role of sediment supply in the adjustment of channel sinuosity across the Amazon Basin. Geology, 47(9), 807–810. 10.1130/G46319.1.Google Scholar

Ahnert, F., 1970. Functional relationships between denudation, relief, and uplift in large mid-latitude drainage basins. American Journal of Science, 268(3), 243–263.Google Scholar

Aich, V., Zimmermann, A., Elsenbeer, H., 2014. Quantification and interpretation of suspended-sediment discharge hysteresis patterns: how much data do we need? Catena, 122, 120–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aksoy, H., Kavvas, M. L., 2005. A review of hillslope and watershed scale erosion and sediment transport models. Catena, 64(2–3), 247–271. 10.1016/j.catena.2005.08.008.Google Scholar

Allen, G. H., Pavelsky, T. M., 2018. Global extent of rivers and streams. Science, 361(6402), 585–587.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Allmendinger, N. E., Pizzuto, J. E., Moglen, G. E., Lewicki, M., 2007. A sediment budget for an urbanizing watershed, 1951–1996, Montgomery County, Maryland, U.S.A. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 43(6), 1483–1498.Google Scholar

Allred, T. M., Schmidt, J. C., 1999. Channel narrowing by vertical accretion along the Green River near Green River, Utah. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 111(12), 1757–1772.Google Scholar

Alonso, C. V., 1980. Selecting a formula to estimate sediment transport in non-vegetated channels. Chapter 5. In: Knisel, W. G. (ed.), CREAMS – A Field Scale Model for Chemicals, Runoff, and Erosion from Agriculture Management Systems, Conservation Research Report No. 26. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Alonso, C. V., Bennett, S. J., Stein, O. R., 2002. Predicting head cut erosion and migration in concentrated flows typical of upland areas. Water Resources Research, 38(12), 39-1–39-15. 10.1029/2001wr001173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

American Rivers, 2019. Dam Removal Database, https://figshare.com/articles/_/5234068 (accessed May 14, 2019).Google Scholar

An, H.-P., Chen, S.-C., Chan, H.-C., Hsu, Y., 2013. Dimension and frequency of bar formation in a braided river. International Journal of Sediment Research, 28(3), 358–367.Google Scholar

Anderson, D. G., 1970. Effects of urban development on floods in Northern Virginia. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2001-C, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Anderson, R. S., Anderson, S. P., 2010. Geomorphology: The Mechanics and Chemistry of Landscape. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar

Andrews, E. D., 1980. Effective and bankfull discharges of streams in the Yampa River basin, Colorado and Wyoming. Journal of Hydrology, 46(3–4), 311–330.Google Scholar

Andrews, E. D., 1983. Entrainment of gravel from naturally sorted riverbed material. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 94(10), 1225–1231.Google Scholar

Andrews, E. D., 1984. Bed-material entrainment and hydraulic geometry of gravel-bed rivers in Colorado. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 95(3), 371–378.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrews, E. D., Erman, D. C., 1986. Persistence in the size distribution of surficial bed material during an extreme snowmelt flood. Water Resources Research, 22(2), 191–197.Google Scholar

Anisimov, O., Vandenberghe, J., Lobanov, V., Kondratiev, A., 2008. Predicting changes in alluvial channel patterns in North-European Russia under conditions of global warming. Geomorphology, 98(3–4), 262–274.Google Scholar

Annable, W. K., Watson, C. C., Thompson, P. J., 2012. Quasi-equilibrium conditions of urban gravel-bed stream channels in southern Ontario, Canada. River Research and Applications, 28(3), 302–325.Google Scholar

Ansari, K., Morvan, H. P., Hargreaves, D. M., 2011. Numerical investigation into secondary currents and wall shear in trapezoidal channels. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 137(4), 432–440.Google Scholar

Anthony, D. J., Harvey, M. D., 1991. Stage-dependent cross section adjustments in a meandering reach of Fall River, Colorado. Geomorphology, 4(3–4), 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arcement, G. J., Schneider, V. R., 1989. Guide for selecting Manning’s roughness coefficients for natural channels and flood plains. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2339, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Arnell, N. W., Gosling, S. N., 2016. The impacts of climate change on river flood risk at the global scale. Climatic Change, 134(3), 387–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnold, C. L., Boison, P. J., Patton, P. C., 1982. Sawmill Brook: an example of rapid geomorphic change related to urbanization. Journal of Geology, 90(2), 155–166. 10.1086/628660.Google Scholar

Arrospide, F., Mao, L., Escauriaza, C., 2018. Morphological evolution of the Maipo River in central Chile: influence of instream gravel mining. Geomorphology, 306, 182–197.Google Scholar

Asahi, K., Shimizu, Y., Nelson, J., Parker, G., 2013. Numerical simulation of river meandering with self-evolving banks. Journal of Geophysical Research – Earth Surface, 118(4), 2208–2229. 10.1002/jgrf.20150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashmore, P. E., 1982. Laboratory modeling of gravel braided stream morphology. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 7(3), 201–225.Google Scholar

Ashmore, P. E., 1991a. How do gravel-bed rivers braid? Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 28(3), 326–341.Google Scholar

Ashmore, P. E., 1991b. Channel morphology and bedload pulses in braided, gravel-bed streams. Geografiska Annaler Series A Physical Geography, 73, 37–52.Google Scholar

Ashmore, P. E., 1993. Anabranch confluence kinetics and sedimentation processes in gravel-braided streams. In: Best, J. L., Bristow, C. S. (eds.), Braided Rivers. Special Publication No. 75, Geological Society of London, London, pp. 129–146.Google Scholar

Ashmore, P. E., 2009. Intensity and characteristic length of braided channel patterns. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 36(10), 1656–1666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashmore, P. E., 2013. Morphology and dynamics of braided rivers. In: Shroder, J. (ed.), Treatise on Geomorphology, vol. 9, Fluvial Geomorphology, Wohl, E. (vol. ed.). Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 289–312.Google Scholar

Ashmore, P. E., 2015. Towards a sociogeomorphology of rivers. Geomorphology, 251, 149–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashmore, P. E., Church, M., 1998. Sediment transport and river morphology: a paradigm for study. In: Klingeman, P. C., Beschta, R. L., Komar, P. D., Bradley, J. B. (eds.), Gravel-Bed Rivers in the Environment. Water Resources Publications, Highland Ranch, CO, pp. 115–148.Google Scholar

Ashmore, P. E., Day, T. J., 1988. Effective discharge for suspended sediment transport in streams of the Saskatchewan River basin. Water Resources Research, 24(6), 864–870.Google Scholar

Ashmore, P. E., Gardner, J. T., 2008. Unconfined confluences in braided rivers. In: Rice, S. P., Roy, A. G., Rhoads, B. L. (eds.), River Confluences, Tributaries and the Fluvial Network. Wiley, Chichester, UK, pp. 119–147.Google Scholar

Ashmore, P. E., Parker, G., 1983. Confluence scour in coarse braided streams. Water Resources Research, 19(2), 392–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashmore, P. E., Sauks, E., 2006. Prediction of discharge from water surface width in a braided river with implications for at-a-station hydraulic geometry. Water Resources Research, 42(3). 10.1029/2005wr003993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashmore, P. E., Ferguson, R. I., Prestegaard, K. L., Ashworth, P. J., Paola, C., 1992. Secondary flow in anabranch confluences of a braided, gravel-bed stream. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 17(3), 299–311. 10.1002/esp.3290170308.Google Scholar

Ashmore, P. E., Bertoldi, W., Gardner, J. T., 2011. Active width of gravel-bed braided rivers. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 36(11), 1510–1521. 10.1002/esp.2182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashworth, P. J., 1996. Mid-channel bar growth and its relationship to local flow strength and direction. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 21(2), 103–123. 10.1002/(sici)1096–9837(199602)21:2<103::aid-esp569>3.0.co;2-o.3.0.CO;2-O>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashworth, P. J., Ferguson, R. I., 1989. Size-selective entrainment of bed load in gravel bed streams. Water Resources Research, 25(4), 627–634. 10.1029/WR025i004p00627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashworth, P. J., Lewin, J., 2012. How do big rivers come to be different? Earth-Science Reviews, 114(1–2), 84–107. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.05.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashworth, P. J., Ferguson, R. I., Ashmore, P. E., et al., 1992. Measurements in a braided river chute and lobe: 2. Sorting of bed load during entrainment, transport, and deposition. Water Resources Research, 28(7), 1887–1896. 10.1029/92wr00702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashworth, P. J., Best, J. L., Roden, J. E., Bristow, C. S., Klaassen, G. J., 2000. Morphological evolution and dynamics of a large, sand braid-bar, Jamuna River, Bangladesh. Sedimentology, 47(3), 533–555. 10.1046/j.1365–3091.2000.00305.x.Google Scholar

Ashworth, P. J., Smith, G. H. S., Best, J. L., et al., 2011. Evolution and sedimentology of a channel fill in the sandy braided South Saskatchewan River and its comparison to the deposits of an adjacent compound bar. Sedimentology, 58(7), 1860–1883.Google Scholar

Aslan, A., Autin, W. J., 1999. Evolution of the Holocene Mississippi River floodplain, Ferriday, Louisiana: insights on the origin of fine-grained floodplains. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 69(4), 800–815. 10.2110/jsr.69.800.Google Scholar

Asselman, N. E. M., 2000. Fitting and interpretation of sediment rating curves. Journal of Hydrology, 234(3–4), 228–248. 10.1016/s0022-1694(00)00253–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Asselman, N. E. M., Middelkoop, H., 1995. Floodplain sedimentation – quantities, patterns, and processes. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 20(6), 481–499. 10.1002/esp.3290200602.Google Scholar

Attal, M., Lave, J., 2009. Pebble abrasion during fluvial transport: experimental results and implications for the evolution of the sediment load along rivers. Journal of Geophysical Research – Earth Surface, 114. 10.1029/2009jf001328.Google Scholar

Ayles, C. P., Church, M., 2015. Downstream channel gradation in the regulated Peace River. In: Church, M. (ed.), Regulation of Peace River: A Case Study for River Management. Wiley, Chichester, UK, pp. 39–66.Google Scholar

Baartman, J. E. M., Jetten, V. G., Ritsema, C. J., de Vente, J., 2012. Exploring effects of rainfall intensity and duration on soil erosion at the catchment scale using openLISEM: Prado catchment, SE Spain. Hydrological Processes, 26(7), 1034–1049. 10.1002/hyp.8196.Google Scholar

Bagherimiyab, F., Lemmin, U., 2013. Shear velocity estimates in rough-bed open-channel flow. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 38(14), 1714–1724. 10.1002/esp.3421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bagnold, R. A., 1966. An approach to the sediment transport problem from general physics. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 422-I, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Bagnold, R. A., 1973. Nature of saltation and of “bed-load” transport in water. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A – Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, 332(1591), 473–504. 10.1098/rspa.1973.0038.Google Scholar

Bagnold, R. A., 1980. An empirical correlation of bedload transport rates in flumes and natural rivers. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A – Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, 372(1751), 453–473. 10.1098/rspa.1980.0122.Google Scholar

Bai, S., Li, J., 2013. Sediment wash-off from an impervious urban land surface. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 18(5), 488–498. 10.1061/(asce)he.1943–5584.0000654.Google Scholar

Bailey, B. B., 1967. James Hutton – The Founder of Modern Geology. Elsevier, New York.Google Scholar

Bak, P., 1996. How Nature Works: The Science of Self-Organized Criticality. Copernicus, New York.Google Scholar

Baker, V. R., 1977. Stream channel response to floods, with examples from central Texas. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 88(8), 1057–1071. 10.1130/0016–7606(1977)88<1057:srtfwe>2.0.co;2.Google Scholar

Baker, V. R., Costa, J., 1987. Flood power. In: Mayer, L., Nash, D. B. (eds.), Catastrophic Flooding. Allen and Unwin, London, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar

Baker, V. R., Kochel, R. C., 1988. Flood sedimentation in bedrock fluvial systems. In: Baker, V. R., Kochel, R. C., Patton, P. C. (eds.), Flood Geomorphology. Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 123–137.Google Scholar

Bakke, P. D., Basdekas, P. O., Dawdy, D. R., Klingeman, P. C., 1999. Calibrated Parker-Klingeman model for gravel transport. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 125(6), 657–660. 10.1061/(asce)0733–9429(1999)125:6(657).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakke, P. D., Sklar, L. S., Dawdy, D. R., Wang, W. C., 2017. The design of a site-calibrated Parker-Klingeman gravel transport model. Water, 9(6), 441; 10.3390/w9060441.Google Scholar

Baranya, S., Olsen, N. R. B., Jozsa, J., 2015. Flow analysis of a river confluence with field measurements and RANS model with next grid approach. River Research and Applications, 31(1), 28–41. 10.1002/rra.2718.Google Scholar

Barman, B., Kumar, B., Sarma, A. K., 2018. Turbulent flow structures and geomorphic characteristics of a mining affected alluvial channel. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 43(9), 1811–1824. 10.1002/esp.4355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnard, R. S., Melhorn, W. N., 1982. Morphologic and morphometric response to channelization: the case of history of the Big Pine Creek Ditch, Benton County, Iowa. In: Craig, R. G., Craft, J. L. (eds.), Applied Geomorphology. George Allen and Unwin, London, pp. 224–239.Google Scholar

Barnes, H. H., 1967. Roughness characteristics of natural channels. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1849, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Barry, J. J., Buffington, J. M., Goodwin, P., King, J. G., Emmett, W. W., 2008. Performance of bed-load transport equations relative to geomorphic significance: predicting effective discharge and its transport rate. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 134(5), 601–615. 10.1061/(asce)0733–9429(2008)134:5(601).Google Scholar

Barth, N. A., Villarini, G., Nayak, M. A., White, K., 2017. Mixed populations and annual flood frequency estimates in the western United States: The role of atmospheric rivers. Water Resources Research, 53(1), 257–269. 10.1002/2016wr019064.Google Scholar

Basso, S., Frascati, A., Marani, M., Schirmer, M., Botter, G., 2015. Climatic and landscape controls on effective discharge. Geophysical Research Letters, 42(20), 8441–8447. 10.1002/2015gl066014.Google Scholar

Bates, B. C., 1990. A statistical log piecewise linear model of at-station hydraulic geometry. Water Resources Research, 26(1), 109–118. 10.1029/WR026i001p00109.Google Scholar

Bathurst, J. C., 1985. Flow resistance estimation in mountain rivers. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 111(4), 625–643.Google Scholar

Bathurst, J. C., 1987. Critical conditions for bed material movement in steep, boulder-bed streams. In: Beschta, R. L., Blinn, T., Grant, G. E., Ice, G. G., Swanson, F. J. (eds.), Erosion and Sedimentation in the Pacific Rim. IAHS Publication No. 165, IAHS Press, Wallingford, UK, pp. 309–318.Google Scholar

Bathurst, J. C., 2013. Critical conditions for particle motion in coarse bed materials of nonuniform size distribution. Geomorphology, 197, 170–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bathurst, J. C., Thorne, C. R., Hey, R. D., 1977. Direct measurements of secondary currents in river bends. Nature, 269(5628), 504–506.Google Scholar

Bathurst, J. C., Thorne, C. R., Hey, R. D., 1979. Secondary flow and shear stress at river bends. Journal of the Hydraulics Division – ASCE, 105(10), 1277–1295.Google Scholar

Bathurst, J. C., Benson, I. A., Valentine, E. M., Nalluri, C., 2002. Overbank sediment deposition patterns for straight and meandering flume channels. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 27(6), 659–665.Google Scholar

Bauer, B. O., Sherman, D. J., Wolcott, J. F., 1992. Sources of uncertainty in shear stress and roughness length estimates derived from velocity profiles. Professional Geographer, 44(4), 453–464.Google Scholar

Bayat, E., Rodriguez, J. F., Saco, P. M., et al., 2017. A tale of two riffles: using multidimensional, multifractional, time-varying sediment transport to assess self-maintenance in pool-riffle sequences. Water Resources Research, 53(3), 2095–2113. 10.1002/2016wr019464.Google Scholar

Baynes, E. R. C., Lague, D., Attal, M., et al., 2018a. River self-organisation inhibits discharge control on waterfall migration. Scientific Reports, 8. 10.1038/s41598-018–20767-6.Google Scholar

Baynes, E. R. C., van de Lageweg, W. I., McLelland, S. J., et al., 2018b. Beyond equilibrium: Re-evaluating physical modelling of fluvial systems to represent climate changes. Earth-Science Reviews, 181, 82–97.Google Scholar

Beach, T., 1994. The fate of eroded soil – sediment sink and sediment budgets of agrarian landscapes in southern Minnesota, 1851–1988. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 84(1), 5–28.Google Scholar

Beaumont, C., Kooi, H., Willet, S., 2000. Coupled tectonic-surface process models with applications to rifted margins and collision orogens. In: Summerfield, M. A. (ed.), Geomorphology and Global Tectonics. Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK, pp. 29–55.Google Scholar

Beauvais, A. A., Montgomery, D. R., 1997. Are channel networks statistically self-similar? Geology, 25(12), 1063–1066.Google Scholar

Beechie, T., Imaki, H., 2014. Predicting natural channel patterns based on landscape and geomorphic controls in the Columbia River basin, USA. Water Resources Research, 50(1), 39–57. 10.1002/2013wr013629.Google Scholar

Beechie, T. J., Liermann, M., Pollock, M. M., Baker, S., Davies, J., 2006. Channel pattern and river-floodplain dynamics in forested mountain river systems. Geomorphology, 78(1–2), 124–141.Google Scholar

Beechie, T. J., Sear, D. A., Olden, J. D., et al., 2010. Process-based principles for restoring river ecosystems. Bioscience, 60(3), 209–222.Google Scholar

Beechie, T., Richardson, J. S., Gurnell, A. M., Negishi, J., 2013a. Watershed processes, human impacts, and process-based restoration. In: Roni, P., Beechie, T. (eds.), Stream and Watershed Restoration: A Guide to Restoring Riverine Processes and Habitats. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK, pp. 11–49.Google Scholar

Beechie, T., Pess, G.R., Morley, S., et al., 2013b. Watershed assessments and identification of restoration needs. In: Beechie, T., Roni, P. (eds.), Stream and Watershed Restoration: A Guide to Restoring Riverine Processes and Habitats. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK, pp. 50–113.Google Scholar

Beer, T., Borgas, M., 1993. Horton Laws and the fractal nature of streams. Water Resources Research, 29(5), 1475–1487.Google Scholar

Beeson, C. E., Doyle, P. F., 1995. Comparison of bank erosion at vegetated and non-vegetated channel bends. Water Resources Bulletin, 31(6), 983–990.Google Scholar

Begin, Z. B., Meyer, D. F., Schumm, S. A., 1981. Development of longitudinal profiles of alluvial channels in response to base-level lowering. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 6(1), 49–68.Google Scholar

Belmont, P., Willenbring, J. K., Schottler, S. P., et al., 2014. Toward generalizable sediment fingerprinting with tracers that are conservative and nonconservative over sediment routing timescales. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 14(8), 1479–1492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benaichouche, A., Stab, O., Tessier, B., Cojan, I., 2016. Evaluation of a landscape evolution model to simulate stream piracies: Insights from multivariable numerical tests using the example of the Meuse basin, France. Geomorphology, 253, 168–180.Google Scholar

Benda, L., Poff, N. L., Miller, D., et al., 2004a. The network dynamics hypothesis: How channel networks structure riverine habitats. Bioscience, 54(5), 413–427.Google Scholar

Benda, L., Andras, K., Miller, D., Bigelow, P., 2004b. Confluence effects in rivers: Interactions of basin scale, network geometry, and disturbance regimes. Water Resources Research, 40(5). 10.1029/2003wr002583.Google Scholar

Bendixen, M., Best, J. L., Hackney, C., Lonsmann Iverson, L., 2019. Time is running out for sand. Nature, 571, 29–31.Google Scholar

Benedetti, M. M., 2003. Controls on overbank deposition in the upper Mississippi River. Geomorphology, 56(3–4), 271–290.Google Scholar

Bennett, S. J., 1999. Effect of slope on the growth and migration of headcuts in rills. Geomorphology, 30(3), 273–290.Google Scholar

Bennett, S. J., Alonso, C. V., 2005. Kinematics of flow within headcut scour holes on hillslopes. Water Resources Research, 41(9). 10.1029/2004wr003752.Google Scholar

Bennett, S. J., Liu, R. J., 2016. Basin self-similarity, Hack’s law, and the evolution of experimental rill networks. Geology, 44(1), 35–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bennett, S. J., Hou, Y. T., Atkinson, J. F., 2014. Turbulence suppression by suspended sediment within a geophysical flow. Environmental Fluid Mechanics, 14(4), 771–794.Google Scholar

Bennett, S. J., Gordon, L. M., Neroni, V., Wells, R. R., 2015. Emergence, persistence, and organization of rill networks on a soil-mantled experimental landscape. Natural Hazards, 79, S7–S24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benson, M. A., Thomas, D. M., 1966. A definition of dominant discharge. International Association of Hydrological Sciences Bulletin, 11, 76–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bent, G. C., Waite, A. M., 2013. Equations for estimating bankfull channel geometry and discharge for streams in Massachusetts. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2013–5155.Google Scholar

Bentley, P. J., Gulbrandsen, M., Kyvik, S., 2015. The relationship between basic and applied research in universities. Higher Education, 70(4), 689–709.Google Scholar

Bergeron, N. E., Abrahams, A. D., 1992. Estimating shear velocity and roughness length from velocity profiles. Water Resources Research, 28(8), 2155–2158.Google Scholar

Berhanu, M., Petroff, A., Devauchelle, O., Kudrolli, A., Rothman, D. H., 2012. Shape and dynamics of seepage erosion in a horizontal granular bed. Physical Review E, 86(4), 9. 10.1103/PhysRevE.86.041304.Google Scholar

Berlin, M. M., Anderson, R. S., 2007. Modeling of knickpoint retreat on the Roan Plateau, western Colorado. Journal of Geophysical Research – Earth Surface, 112(F3). 10.1029/2006jf000553.Google Scholar

Bernhardt, E. S., Palmer, M. A., Allan, J. D., et al., 2005. Synthesizing US river restoration efforts. Science, 308(5722), 636–637.Google Scholar

Bernhardt, E. S., Sudduth, E. B., Palmer, M. A., et al., 2007. Restoring rivers one reach at a time: results from a survey of US river restoration practitioners. Restoration Ecology, 15(3), 482–493.Google Scholar

Bertoldi, W., 2012. Life of a bifurcation in a gravel-bed braided river. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 37(12), 1327–1336.Google Scholar

Bertoldi, W., Tubino, M., 2005. Bed and bank evolution of bifurcating channels. Water Resources Research, 41(7). 10.1029/2004wr003333.Google Scholar

Bertoldi, W., Tubino, M., 2007. River bifurcations: experimental observations on equilibrium configurations. Water Resources Research, 43(10). 10.1029/2007wr005907.Google Scholar

Bertoldi, W., Amplatz, T., Miori, T., Zanoni, L., Tubino, M., 2006. Bed load fluctuations and channel processes in a braided network laboratory model. In: Ferreira, R., Alves, C., Leal, G., Cardoso, A. (eds.), River Flow 2006, Vols. 1 & 2. Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 937–945.Google Scholar

Bertoldi, W., Zanoni, L., Tubino, M., 2009a. Planform dynamics of braided streams. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 34(4), 547–557.Google Scholar

Bertoldi, W., Ashmore, P., Tubino, M., 2009b. A method for estimating the mean bed load flux in braided rivers. Geomorphology, 103(3), 330–340. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.06.014.Google Scholar

Bertoldi, W., Zanoni, L., Miori, S., Repetto, R., Tubino, M., 2009c. Interaction between migrating bars and bifurcations in gravel bed rivers. Water Resources Research, 45. 10.1029/2008wr007086.Google Scholar

Bertoldi, W., Zanoni, L., Tubino, M., 2010. Assessment of morphological changes induced by flow and flood pulses in a gravel bed braided river: the Tagliamento River (Italy). Geomorphology, 114(3), 348–360.Google Scholar

Bertoldi, W., Gurnell, A. M., Drake, N. A., 2011a. The topographic signature of vegetation development along a braided river: results of a combined analysis of airborne lidar, color air photographs, and ground measurements. Water Resources Research, 47. 10.1029/2010wr010319.Google Scholar

Bertoldi, W., Drake, N. A., Gurnell, A. M., 2011b. Interactions between river flows and colonizing vegetation on a braided river: exploring spatial and temporal dynamics in riparian vegetation cover using satellite data. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 36(11), 1474–1486.Google Scholar

Bertoldi, W., Welber, M., Gurnell, A. M., et al., 2015. Physical modelling of the combined effect of vegetation and wood on river morphology. Geomorphology, 246, 178–187.Google Scholar

Beschta, R. L., 1978. Long-term patterns of sediment production following road construction and logging in the Oregon Coast Range. Water Resources Research, 14(6), 1011–1016.Google Scholar

Beschta, R. L., Pyles, M. R., Skaugset, A. E., Surfleet, C. G., 2000. Peakflow responses to forest practices in the western cascades of Oregon, USA. Journal of Hydrology, 233(1–4), 102–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Best, J. L., 1987. Flow dynamics at river channel confluences: Implications for sediment transport and bed morphology. In: Ethridge, F. G., Flores, R. M., Harvey, M. D. (eds.), Recent Developments in Fluvial Sedimentology, Special Publication 39. Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Tulsa, OK, pp. 27–35.Google Scholar

Best, J. L., 1988. Sediment transport and bed morphology at river channel confluences. Sedimentology, 35, 481–498.Google Scholar

Best, J. L., 1992. On the entrainment of sediment and initiation of bed defects – insights from recent developments within turbulent boundary-layer research. Sedimentology, 39(5), 797–811.Google Scholar

Best, J. L., 2005. The fluid dynamics of river dunes: a review and some future research directions. Journal of Geophysical Research – Earth Surface, 110(F4). 10.1029/2004jf000218.Google Scholar

Best, J. L., 2019. Anthropogenic stresses on the world’s big rivers. Nature Geoscience, 12(1), 7–21.Google Scholar

Best, J. L., Ashworth, P. J., 1997. Scour in large braided rivers, and the recognition of sequence stratigraphic boundaries. Nature, 387(6630), 275–277.Google Scholar

Best, J. L., Reid, I., 1984. Separation zone at open-channel junctions. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 110(11), 1588–1594.Google Scholar

Best, J. L., Rhoads, B. L., 2008. Sediment transport, bed morphology, and the sedimentology of river channel confluences. In: Rice, S. P., Roy, A. G., Rhoads, B. L. (eds.), River Confluences, Tributaries and the Fluvial Network. Wiley, Chichester, UK, pp. 45–72.Google Scholar

Best, J. L., Roy, A. G., 1991. Mixing layer distortion at the confluence of channels of different depth. Nature, 350(6317), 411–413.Google Scholar

Bettis, E. A., Benn, D. W., Hajic, E. R., 2008. Landscape evolution, alluvial architecture, environmental history, and the archaeological record of the Upper Mississippi River Valley. Geomorphology, 101(1–2), 362–377.Google Scholar

Bettis, R., White, W. R., 1987. Extremal hypotheses applied to river regime. In: Thorne, C. R., Bathurst, J. C., Hey, R. D. (eds.), Sediment Transport in Gravel-Bed Rivers. Wiley, Chichester, UK, pp. 767–789.Google Scholar

Bevan, V., MacVicar, B., Chapuis, M., et al., 2018. Enlargement and evolution of a semi-alluvial creek in response to urbanization. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 43(11), 2295–2312.Google Scholar

Beven, K., 1981. The effect of ordering on the geomorphic effectiveness of hydrologic events. In: Davies, T. R. H., Pearce, A. J. (eds.), Erosion and Sediment Transport in the Pacific Rim Steeplands. IAHS Publication No. 132, IAHS Press, Wallingford, UK, pp. 510–526.Google Scholar

Bezak, N., Brilly, M., Sraj, M., 2014. Comparison between the peaks-over-threshold method and the annual maximum method for flood frequency analysis. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 59(5), 959–977.Google Scholar

Bhowmik, N. G., Demissie, M., 1982. Bed material sorting in pools and riffles. Journal of the Hydraulics Division – ASCE, 108(10), 1227–1231.Google Scholar

Biedenharn, D. S., Copeland, R. R., Thorne, C. R., et al., 2000. Effective discharge calculation: A practical guide. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Research and Development Center, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Bieger, K., Rathjens, H., Allen, P. M., Arnold, J. G., 2015. Development and evaluation of bankfull hydraulic geometry relationships for the physiographic regions of the United States. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 51(3), 842–858.Google Scholar

Billi, P., Preciso, E., Salemi, E., 2014. Field investigation on step-pool morphology and processes in steep mountain streams. Agriculture and Forestry, 60(3), 7–28.Google Scholar

Bingner, R. L., Theurer, F. D., Yuan, Y., 2015. AnnAGNPS Technical Processes. National Sedimentation Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Oxford, Mississippi.Google Scholar

Bird, G., Brewer, P. A., Macklin, M. G., et al., 2008. River system recovery following the Novat-Rosu tailings dam failure, Maramures County, Romania. Applied Geochemistry, 23(12), 3498–3518.Google Scholar

Biron, P., Roy, A. G., Best, J. L., Boyer, C. J., 1993. Bed morphology and sedimentology at the confluence of unequal depth channels. Geomorphology, 8, 115–129.Google Scholar

Biron, P., Best, J. L., Roy, A. G., 1996a. Effects of bed discordance on flow dynamics at open channel confluences. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 122(12), 676–682.Google Scholar

Biron, P., Boy, A. G., Best, J. L., 1996b. Turbulent flow structure at concordant and discordant open-channel confluences. Experiments in Fluids, 21(6), 437–446.Google Scholar

Biron, P. M., Richer, A., Kirkbride, A. D., Roy, A. G., Han, S., 2002. Spatial patterns of water surface topography at a river confluence. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 27(9), 913–928.Google Scholar

Biron, P. M., Robson, C., Lapointe, M. F., Gaskin, S. J., 2004a. Comparing different methods of bed shear stress estimates in simple and complex flow fields. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 29(11), 1403–1415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biron, P. M., Ramamurthy, A. S., Han, S., 2004b. Three-dimensional numerical modeling of mixing at river confluences. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 130(3), 243–253.Google Scholar

Biron, P. M., Buffin-Belanger, T., Larocque, M., et al., 2014. Freedom space for rivers: A sustainable management approach to enhance river resilience. Environmental Management, 54(5), 1056–1073.Google Scholar

Biron, P. M., Buffin-Belanger, T., Masse, S., 2018. The need for river management and stream restoration practices to integrate hydrogeomorphology. Canadian Geographer, 62(2), 288–295.Google Scholar

Bishop, P., 2007. Long-term landscape evolution: Linking tectonics and surface processes. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 32(3), 329–365.Google Scholar

Bishop, P., Hoey, T. B., Jansen, J. D., Artza, I. L., 2005. Knickpoint recession rate and catchment area: The case of uplifted rivers in Eastern Scotland. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 30(6), 767–778.Google Scholar

Blainey, J. B., Webb, R. H., Moss, M. E., Baker, V. R., 2002. Bias and information content of paleoflood data in flood-frequency analysis. In: House, P. K., Webb, R. H., Baker, V. R., Levish, D. R. (eds.), Ancient Floods, Modern Hazards: Principles and Applications of Paleoflood Hydrology. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, pp. 161–174.Google Scholar

Blanckaert, K., 2009. Saturation of curvature-induced secondary flow, energy losses, and turbulence in sharp open-channel bends: Laboratory experiments, analysis, and modeling. Journal of Geophysical Research – Earth Surface, 114. 10.1029/2008jf001137.Google Scholar

Blanckaert, K., 2010. Topographic steering, flow recirculation, velocity redistribution, and bed topography in sharp meander bends. Water Resources Research, 46. 10.1029/2009wr008303.Google Scholar

Blanckaert, K., 2011. Hydrodynamic processes in sharp meander bends and their morphological implications. Journal of Geophysical Research – Earth Surface, 116. 10.1029/2010jf001806.Google Scholar

Blanckaert, K., 2015. Flow separation at convex banks in open channels. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 779, 432–467.Google Scholar

Blanckaert, K., de Vriend, H. J., 2004. Secondary flow in sharp open-channel bends. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 498, 353–380.Google Scholar

Blanckaert, K., de Vriend, H. J., 2010. Meander dynamics: a nonlinear model without curvature restrictions for flow in open-channel bends. Journal of Geophysical Research – Earth Surface, 115. 10.1029/2009jf001301.Google Scholar

Blanckaert, K., Graf, W. H., 2004. Momentum transport in sharp open-channel bends. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 130(3), 186–198.Google Scholar

Blanckaert, K., Duarte, A., Chen, Q., Schleiss, A. J., 2012. Flow processes near smooth and rough (concave) outer banks in curved open channels. Journal of Geophysical Research – Earth Surface, 117. 10.1029/2012jf002414.Google Scholar

Blanckaert, K., Duarte, A., Schleiss, A. J., 2010. Influence of shallowness, bank inclination and bank roughness on the variability of flow patterns and boundary shear stress due to secondary currents in straight open-channels. Advances in Water Resources, 33(9), 1062–1074. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.06.012.Google Scholar

Blanckaert, K., Kleinhans, M. G., McLelland, S. J., et al., 2013. Flow separation at the inner (convex) and outer (concave) banks of constant-width and widening open-channel bends. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 38(7), 696–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bledsoe, B. P., Watson, C. C., 2001a. Logistic analysis of channel pattern thresholds: Meandering, braiding, and incising. Geomorphology, 38(3–4), 281–300.Google Scholar

Bledsoe, B. P., Watson, C. C., 2001b. Effects of urbanization on channel instability. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 37(2), 255–270.Google Scholar

Bledsoe, B. P., Watson, C. C., Biedenharn, D. S., 2002. Quantification of incised channel evolution and equilibrium. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 38(3), 861–870.Google Scholar

Blettler, M. C. M., Amsler, M. L., Ezcurra de Drago, I., et al., 2015. The impact of significant input of fine sediment on benthic fauna at tributary junctions: A case study of the Bermejo-Paraguay River confluence, Argentina. Ecohydrology, 8(2), 340–352.Google Scholar

Blom, A., Viparelli, E., Chavarrias, V. C., 2016. The graded alluvial river: Profile concavity and downstream fining. Geophysical Research Letters, 43(12), 6285–6293. 10.1002/2016gl068898.Google Scholar

Blom, A., Arkesteijn, L., Chavarrias, V., Viparelli, E., 2017a. The equilibrium alluvial river under variable flow and its channel-forming discharge. Journal of Geophysical Research – Earth Surface, 122(10), 1924–1948.Google Scholar

Blom, A., Chavarrias, V., Ferguson, R. I., Viparelli, E., 2017b. Advance, retreat, and halt of abrupt gravel-sand transitions in alluvial rivers. Geophysical Research Letters, 44(19), 9751–9760. 10.1002/2017gl074231.Google Scholar

Blondeaux, P., Seminara, G., 1985. A unified bar bend theory of river meanders. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 157(AUG), 449–470.Google Scholar

Bloschl, G., Gaal, L., Hall, J., et al., 2015. Increasing river floods: fiction or reality? Water, 2(4), 329–344.Google Scholar

Blott, S. J., Pye, K., 2001. GRADISTAT: A grain size distribution and statistics package for the analysis of unconsolidated sediments. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 26(11), 1237–1248.Google Scholar

Blott, S. J., Pye, K., 2012. Particle size scales and classification of sediment types based on particle size distributions: Review and recommended procedures. Sedimentology, 59(7), 2071–2096.Google Scholar

Bluck, B. J., 1987. Bed forms and clast size changes in gravel-bed rivers. In: Richards, K. S. (ed.), River Channels: Environment and Process. Blackwell, Oxford, UK, pp. 159–178.Google Scholar

Blue, B., 2018. What’s wrong with healthy rivers? Promise and practice in the search for a guiding ideal for freshwater management. Progress in Physical Geography, 42(4), 462–477.Google Scholar

Blue, B., Brierley, G., 2016. “But what do you measure?” Prospects for a constructive critical physical geography. Area, 48(2), 190–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blum, M. D., Guccione, M. J., Wysocki, D. A., Robnett, P. C., Rutledge, E. M., 2000. Late Pleistocene evolution of the lower Mississippi River valley, southern Missouri to Arkansas. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 112(2), 221–235.Google Scholar

Bolla Pittaluga, M., Repetto, R., Tubino, M., 2003. Channel bifurcation in braided rivers: Equilibrium configurations and stability. Water Resources Research, 39(3). 10.1029/2001wr001112.Google Scholar

Bolla Pittaluga, M., Coco, G., Kleinhans, M. G., 2015. A unified framework for stability of channel bifurcations in gravel and sand fluvial systems. Geophysical Research Letters, 42(18), 7521–7536.Google Scholar

Bomhof, J., Rennie, C. D., Jenkinson, R. W., 2015. Use of local soil and vegetation classifications to improve regional downstream hydraulic geometry relations. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 141(5). 10.1061/(asce)hy.1943–7900.0000978.Google Scholar

Booker, D. J., Sear, D. A., Payne, A. J., 2001. Modelling three-dimensional flow structures and patterns of boundary shear stress in a natural pool-riffle sequence. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 26(5), 553–576.Google Scholar

Booth, D. B., Fischenich, C. J., 2015. A channel evolution model to guide sustainable urban stream restoration. Area, 47(4), 408–421.Google Scholar

Booth, D. B., Roy, A. H., Smith, B., Capps, K. A., 2016. Global perspectives on the urban stream syndrome. Freshwater Science, 35(1), 412–420.Google Scholar

Borrelli, P., Robinson, D. A., Fleischer, L. R., et al., 2017. An assessment of the global impact of 21st century land use change on soil erosion. Nature Communications, 8. 10.1038/s41467-017–02142-7.Google Scholar

Bouchez, J., Lajeunesse, E., Gaillardet, J., et al., 2010. Turbulent mixing in the Amazon River: The isotopic memory of confluences. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 290(1–2), 37–43.Google Scholar

Boyer, C., Roy, A. G., Best, J. L., 2006. Dynamics of a river channel confluence with discordant beds: Flow turbulence, bed load sediment transport, and bed morphology. Journal of Geophysical Research – Earth Surface, 111(F4). 10.1029/2005JF000458.Google Scholar

Bracken, L. J., Wainwright, J., 2006. Geomorphological equilibrium: myth and metaphor? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 31(2), 167–178.Google Scholar

Bradbrook, K. F., Lane, S. N., Richards, K. S., 2000. Numerical simulation of three-dimensional, time-averaged flow structure at river confluences. Water Resources Research, 36 (9), 2731–2746.Google Scholar

Bradbrook, K. F., Lane, S. N., Richards, K. S., Biron, P. M., Roy, A. G., 2001. Role of bed discordance at asymmetrical river confluences. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 127(5), 351–368.Google Scholar

Brandt, S. A., 2000. Classification of geomorphological effects downstream of dams. Catena, 40(4), 375–401.Google Scholar

Brasington, J., Rumsby, B. T., McVey, R. A., 2000. Monitoring and modelling morphological change in a braided gravel-bed river using high resolution GPS-based survey. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 25(9), 973–990.Google Scholar

Brasington, J., Langham, J., Rumsby, B., 2003. Methodological sensitivity of morphometric estimates of coarse fluvial sediment transport. Geomorphology, 53(3–4), 299–316.Google Scholar

Braudrick, C. A., Dietrich, W. E., Leverich, G. T., Sklar, L. S., 2009. Experimental evidence for the conditions necessary to sustain meandering in coarse-bedded rivers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, of the United States of America 106(40), 16936–16941.Google Scholar

Braun, J., Sambridge, M., 1997. Modelling landscape evolution on geological time scales: A new method based on irregular spatial discretization. Basin Research, 9(1), 27–52.Google Scholar

Bray, D. I., 1982. Regime equations for gravel-bed rivers. In: Hey, R. D., Bathurst, J. C., Thorne, C. R. (eds.), Gravel-Bed Rivers. Wiley, Chichester, UK, pp. 517–542.Google Scholar

Brayshaw, A. C., 1984. Characteristics and origin of cluster bedforms in coarse-grained alluvial channels. In: Koster, E. H., Steele, R. J. (eds.), Sedimentology of Gravels and Conglomerates. Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 10, pp. 77–85.Google Scholar

Brebner, A., Wilson, K. C., 1967. Derivation of regime equations from relationships for pressurized flow by use of minimum energy degradation rate. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 36(JAN), 47–62.Google Scholar

Brenna, A., Surian, N., Mao, L., 2019. Virtual velocity approach for estimating bed material transport in gravel-bed rivers: Key factors and significance. Water Resources Research, 55(2), 1651–1674. 10.1029/2018wr023556.Google Scholar

Brennan, S. R., Schindler, D. E., Cline, T. J., et al., 2019. Shifting habitat mosaics and fish production across river basins. Science, 364(6442), 783–786.Google Scholar

Bressan, F., Papanicolaou, A. N., Abban, B., 2014. A model for knickpoint migration in first- and second-order streams. Geophysical Research Letters, 41(14), 4987–4996. 10.1002/2014gl060823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brewer, P. A., Lewin, J., 1998. Planform cyclicity in an unstable reach: Complex fluvial response to environmental change. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 23(11), 989–1008.Google Scholar

Brewer, P. A., Leeks, G. J. L., Lewin, J., 1992. Direct measurement of in-channel abrasion processes. In: Bogen, J., Walling, D. E., Day, T. J. (eds.), Erosion and Sediment Transport Monitoring Programmes in River Basins. IAHS Publication No. 210, IAHS Press, Wallingford, UK, pp. 21–29.Google Scholar

Bridge, J. S., 1985. Paleochannel patterns inferred from alluvial deposits – a critical evaluation. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 55(4), 579–589.Google Scholar

Bridge, J. S., 1993. The interaction between channel geometry, water flow, sediment transport and deposition in braided rivers. In: Best, J. L., Bristow, C. S. (eds.), Braided Rivers. Special Publication No. 75. Geological Society of London, London, pp. 13–71.Google Scholar

Bridge, J. S., 2003. Rivers and Floodplains: Form, Process and Sedimentary Record. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar

Bridge, J. S., Bennett, S. J., 1992. A model for the entrainment and transport of sediment grains of mixed sizes, shapes, and densities. Water Resources Research, 28(2), 337–363.Google Scholar

Bridge, J. S., Gabel, S. L., 1992. Flow and sediment dynamics in a low sinuosity braided river – Calamus River, Nebraska Sandhills. Sedimentology, 39(1), 125–142.Google Scholar

Bridge, J. S., Lunt, I. A., 2006. Depositional models of braided rivers. In: Smith, G. H. S., Best, J. L., Bristow, C. S., Petts, G. E. (eds.), Braided Rivers: Process, Deposits, Ecology and Management. Special Publications of the International Association of Sedimentologists, 36, Blackwell, Malden, MA, pp. 11–50.Google Scholar

Bridge, J. S., Smith, N. D., Trent, F., Gabel, S. L., Bernstein, P., 1986. Sedimentology and morphology of a low-sinuosity river – Calamus River, Nebraska Sand Hills. Sedimentology, 33(6), 851–870.Google Scholar

Bridge, J. S., Alexander, J., Collier, R. E. L., Gawthorpe, R. L., Jarvis, J., 1995. Ground-penetrating radar and coring used to study the large-scale structure of point-bar deposits in 3 dimensions. Sedimentology, 42(6), 839–852.Google Scholar

Brierley, G. J., 1989. River planform facies models – the sedimentology of braided, wandering and meandering reaches of the Squamish River, British Columbia. Sedimentary Geology, 61(1–2), 17–35.Google Scholar

Brierley, G. J., 1991a. Bar sedimentology of the Squamish River, British Columbia – definition and application of morphostratigraphic units. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 61(2), 211–225.Google Scholar

Brierley, G. J., 1991b. Floodplain sedimentology of the Squamish River, British Columbia – relevance of element analysis. Sedimentology, 38(4), 735–750.Google Scholar

Brierley, G. J., 2010. Landscape memory: The imprint of the past on contemporary landscape forms and processes. Area, 42(1), 76–85.Google Scholar

Brierley, G. J., Hickin, E. J., 1985. The downstream gradation of particle size in the Squamish River, British Columbia. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 10(6), 597–606.Google Scholar

Brierley, G. J., Hickin, E. J., 1991. Channel planform as a non-controlling factor in fluvial sedimentology – the case of the Squamish River floodplain, British Columbia. Sedimentary Geology, 75(1–2), 67–83.Google Scholar

Brierley, G. J., Hickin, E. J., 1992. Floodplain development based on selective preservation of sediments, Squamish River, British Columbia. Geomorphology, 4(6), 381–391.Google Scholar

Brierley, G., Fryirs, K., 1998. A fluvial sediment budget for upper Wolumla Creek, south coast, New South Wales, Australia. Australian Geographer, 29(2), U1-111.Google Scholar

Brierley, G., Fryirs, K., 2005. Geomorphology and River Management. Blackwell, Malden, MA.Google Scholar

Brierley, G., Fryirs, K., 2009. Don’t fight the site: Three geomorphic considerations in catchment-scale river rehabilitation planning. Environmental Management, 43(6), 1201–1218.Google Scholar

Brierley, G., Fryirs, K., 2012. Geomorphic Analysis of Rivers: An Approach to Reading the Landscape. Wiley, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar

Brierley, G. J., Fryirs, K. A., 2016. The use of evolutionary trajectories to guide “moving targets” in the management of river futures. River Research and Applications, 32(5), 823–835.Google Scholar

Brierley, G. J., Ferguson, R. J., Woolfe, K. J., 1997. What is a fluvial levee? Sedimentary Geology, 114(1–4), 1–9.Google Scholar

Bristow, C. S., Skelly, R. L., Ethridge, F. G., 1999. Crevasse splays from the rapidly aggrading, sand-bed, braided Niobrara River, Nebraska: Effect of base-level rise. Sedimentology, 46(6), 1029–1047.Google Scholar

Brizga, S. O., Finlayson, B. L., 1990. Channel avulsion and river metamorphosis – the case of the Thomson River, Victoria, Australia. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 15(5), 391–404.Google Scholar

Brookes, A., 1985. River channelization: Traditional engineering methods, physical consequences and alternative practices. Progress in Physical Geography, 9(1), 44–73.Google Scholar

Brookes, A., 1987a. The distribution and management of channelized streams in Denmark. Regulated Rivers, 1, 3–16.Google Scholar

Brookes, A., 1987b. River channel adjustments downstream from channelization works in England and Wales. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 12(4), 337–351.Google Scholar

Brookes, A., 1987c. Restoring the sinuosity of artificially straightened stream channels. Environmental Geology and Water Sciences, 10(1), 33–41.Google Scholar

Brookes, A., 1988. Channelized Rivers: Perspectives for Environmental Management. Wiley, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar

Brookes, A., 1995. Challenges and objectives for geomorphology in UK river management. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 20(7), 593–610.Google Scholar

Brooks, A. P., Brierley, G. J., 1997. Geomorphic responses of lower Bega River to catchment disturbance, 1851–1926. Geomorphology, 18(3–4), 291–304.Google Scholar

Brooks, A. P., Brierley, G. J., Millar, R. G., 2003. The long-term control of vegetation and woody debris on channel and flood-plain evolution: Insights from a paired catchment study in southeastern Australia. Geomorphology, 51(1–3), 7–29.Google Scholar

Browand, F. K., 1986. The structure of the turbulent mixing layer. Physica D, 18(1–3), 135–148.Google Scholar

Brown, A. G., Carey, C., Erkens, G., et al., 2009. From sedimentary records to sediment budgets: Multiple approaches to catchment sediment flux. Geomorphology, 108(1–2), 35–47.Google Scholar

Brown, A. G., Tooth, S., Chiverrell, R. C., et al., 2013. The Anthropocene: Is there a geomorphological case? Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 38(4), 431–434.Google Scholar

Brown, A. G., Petit, F., James, L. A., 2016. Archeology and human artefacts. In: Kondolf, G. M., Piegay, H. (eds.), Tools in Fluvial Geomorphology, 2nd Edition. Wiley, Chichester, UK, pp. 40–55.Google Scholar

Brown, A. G., Tooth, S., Bullard, J. E., et al., 2017. The geomorphology of the Anthropocene: Emergence, status and implications. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 42(1), 71–90.Google Scholar

Brune, G. M., 1953. Trap efficiency of reservoirs. Transactions, American Geophysical Union, 34(3), 407–418.Google Scholar

Brunsden, D., 2001. A critical assessment of the sensitivity concept in geomorphology. Catena, 42(2–4), 99–123.Google Scholar

Brunsden, D., Thornes, J. B., 1979. Landscape sensitivity and change. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 4(4), 463–484.Google Scholar

Brush, L. M. Jr., 1961. Drainage basins, channels, and flow characteristics of selected streams in central Pennsylvania U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 282-F. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Bryan, R. B., Jones, J. A. A., 1997. The significance of soil piping processes: inventory and prospect. Geomorphology, 20(3–4), 209–218.Google Scholar

Buffin-Belanger, T., Roy, A. G., 1998. Effects of a pebble cluster on the turbulent structure of a depth-limited flow in a gravel-bed river. Geomorphology, 25(3–4), 249–267.Google Scholar

Buffin-Belanger, T., Roy, A. G., Kirkbride, A. D., 2000. On large-scale flow structures in a gravel-bed river. Geomorphology, 32(3–4), 417–435.Google Scholar

Buffin-Belanger, T., Biron, P. M., Larocque, M., et al., 2015. Freedom space for rivers: An economically viable river management concept in a changing climate. Geomorphology, 251, 137–148.Google Scholar

Buffington, J. M., 1999. The legend of A. F. Shields. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 125(4), 376–387.Google Scholar

Buffington, J. M., Montgomery, D. R., 1997. A systematic analysis of eight decades of incipient motion studies, with special reference to gravel-bedded rivers. Water Resources Research, 33(8), 1993–2029.Google Scholar

Buffington, J. M., Montgomery, D. R., 2013. Geomorphic classification of rivers. In: Shroder, J. W. (ed.), Treatise on Geomorphology, Vol. 9, Fluvial geomorphology, Wohl, E. (vol. ed.). Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 730–767.Google Scholar

Buffington, J. M., Dietrich, W. E., Kirchner, J. W., 1992. Friction angle measurements on a naturally formed gravel streambed – implications for critical boundary shear stress. Water Resources Research, 28(2), 411–425.Google Scholar

Buffington, J. M., Lisle, T. E., Woodsmith, R. D., Hilton, S., 2002. Controls on the size and occurrence of pools in coarse-grained forest rivers. River Research and Applications, 18(6), 507–531.Google Scholar

Bull, L. J., 1997. Relative velocities of discharge and sediment waves for the River Severn, UK. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 42(5), 649–660.Google Scholar

Bull, L. J., Kirkby, M. J., 1997. Gully processes and modelling. Progress in Physical Geography, 21(3), 354–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bull, L. J., Lawler, D. M., Leeks, G. J. L., Marks, S., 1995. Downstream changes in suspended sediment fluxes in the River Severn, UK. In: Osterkamp, W. R. (ed.), Effects of Scale on Interpretation and Management of Sediment and Water Quality. IAHS Publication 226, IAHS Press, Wallingford, UK, pp. 27–37.Google Scholar

Bull, W. B., Scott, K. M., 1974. Impact of mining gravel from urban streambeds in the southwestern United States. Geology, 2, 171–174.Google Scholar

Bunte, K., Abt, S. R., 2001. Sampling Surface and Subsurface Particle-Size Distributions in Wadable Gravel- and Cobble-Bed Streams for Analyses in Sediment Transport, Hydraulics, and Streambed Monitoring. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-74, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Fort Collins, CO.Google Scholar

Bunte, K., Abt, S. R., Swingle, K. W., Cenderelli, D. A., 2014. Effective discharge in Rocky Mountain headwater streams. Journal of Hydrology, 519, 2136–2147.Google Scholar

Buraas, E. M., Renshaw, C. E., Magilligan, F. J., Dade, W. B., 2014. Impact of reach geometry on stream channel sensitivity to extreme floods. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 39(13), 1778–1789.Google Scholar

Burckhardt, J. C., Todd, B. L., 1998. Riparian forest effect on lateral stream channel migration in the glacial till plains. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 34(1), 179–184.Google Scholar

Burge, L. M., 2005. Wandering Miramichi rivers, New Brunswick, Canada. Geomorphology, 69(1–4), 253–274. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.01.010.Google Scholar

Burge, L. M., 2006. Stability, morphology and surface grain size patterns of channel bifurcation in gravel-cobble bedded anabranching rivers. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 31(10), 1211–1226.Google Scholar

Burge, L. M., Lapointe, M. F., 2005. Understanding the temporal dynamics of the wandering Renous River, New Brunswick, Canada. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 30(10), 1227–1250.Google Scholar

Burkham, D. E., 1972. Channel changes of the Gila River in the Safford Valley, Arizona 1846–1970. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 655-G, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Buscombe, D., Conley, D. C., 2012. Effective shear stress of graded sediments. Water Resources Research, 48. 10.1029/2010wr010341.Google Scholar

Bussi, G., Dadson, S. J., Bowes, M. J., Whitehead, P. G., 2017. Seasonal and interannual changes in sediment transport identified through sediment rating curves. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 22(2). 10.1061/(asce)he.1943–5584.0001466.Google Scholar

Caamano, D., Goodwin, P., Buffington, J. M., Liou, J. C. P., Daley-Laursen, S., 2009. Unifying criterion for the velocity reversal hypothesis in gravel-bed rivers. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 135(1), 66–70.Google Scholar

Caamano, D., Goodwin, P., Buffington, J. M., 2012. Flow structure through pool-riffle sequences and a conceptual model for their sustainability in gravel-bed rivers. River Research and Applications, 28(3), 377–389.Google Scholar

Cabezas, A., Angulo-Martinez, M., Gonzalez-Sanchis, M., Jimenez, J. J., Comin, F. A., 2010. Spatial variability in floodplain sedimentation: The use of generalized linear mixed-effects models. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 14(8), 1655–1668.Google Scholar

Cahoon, D. R., White, D. A., Lynch, J. C., 2011. Sediment infilling and wetland formation dynamics in an active crevasse splay of the Mississippi River delta. Geomorphology, 131(3–4), 57–68.Google Scholar

Call, B. C., Belmont, P., Schmidt, J. C., Wilcock, P. R., 2017. Changes in floodplain inundation under nonstationary hydrology for an adjustable, alluvial river channel. Water Resources Research, 53(5), 3811–3834.Google Scholar

Calle, M., Alho, P., Benito, G., 2017. Channel dynamics and geomorphic resilience in an ephemeral Mediterranean river affected by gravel mining. Geomorphology, 285, 333–346.Google Scholar

Calver, A., Anderson, M. G., 2004. Conceptual framework for the persistence of flood-initiated geomorphological features. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29(1), 129–137.Google Scholar

Camacho, R., Yen, B. C., 1991. Nonlinear resistance relationships for alluvial channels. In: Yen, B. C. (ed.), Channel Flow Resistance: Centennial of Manning’s Formula. Water Resources Publications, Highlands, Colorado, pp. 186–194.Google Scholar

Campbell, A. J., Sidle, R. C., 1985. Bedload transport in a pool-riffle sequence of a coastal Alaska stream. Water Resources Bulletin, 21(4), 579–590.Google Scholar

Campodonico, V. A., Garcia, M. G., Pasquini, A. I., 2015. The dissolved chemical and isotopic signature downflow the confluence of two large rivers: The case of the Parana and Paraguay rivers. Journal of Hydrology, 528, 161–176.Google Scholar

Camporeale, C., Perona, P., Porporato, A., Ridolfi, L., 2007. Hierarchy of models for meandering rivers and related morphodynamic processes. Reviews of Geophysics, 45(1). 10.1029/2005rg000185.Google Scholar

Camporeale, C., Perucca, E., Ridolfi, L., 2008. Significance of cutoff in meandering river dynamics. Journal of Geophysical Research – Earth Surface, 113(F1). 10.1029/2006jf000694.Google Scholar

Canovaro, F., Solari, L., 2007. Dissipative analogies between a schematic macro-roughness arrangement and step-pool morphology. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 32(11), 1628–1640.Google Scholar

Cant, D. J., Walker, R. G., 1978. Fluvial processes and facies sequences in sandy braided south Saskatchewan River, Canada. Sedimentology, 25(5), 625–648.Google Scholar

Cantelli, A., Muto, T., 2014. Multiple knickpoints in an alluvial river generated by a single instantaneous drop in base level: experimental investigation. Earth Surface Dynamics, 2(1), 271–278.Google Scholar

Cantelli, A., Wong, M., Parker, G., Paola, C., 2007. Numerical model linking bed and bank evolution of incisional channel created by dam removal. Water Resources Research, 43(7). 10.1029/2006wr005621.Google Scholar

Cao, S. Y., Knight, D. W., 1997. Entropy-based design approach of threshold alluvial channels. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 35(4), 505–524.Google Scholar

Cao, S. Y., Knight, D. W., 1998. Design for hydraulic geometry of alluvial channels. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 124(5), 484–492.Google Scholar

Cao, Z. X., Egashira, S. J., Carling, P. A., 2003. Role of suspended-sediment particle size in modifying velocity profiles in open channel flows. Water Resources Research, 39(2). 10.1029/2001wr000934.Google Scholar

Capra, A., Di Stefano, C., Ferro, V., Scicolone, B., 2009. Similarity between morphological characteristics of rills and ephemeral gullies in Sicily, Italy. Hydrological Processes, 23(23), 3334–3341.Google Scholar

Carling, P. A., 1983. Threshold of coarse sediment transport in broad and narrow natural streams. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 8(1), 1–18.Google Scholar

Carling, P. A., 1984. Deposition of fine and coarse sand in an open-work gravel bed. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 41(2), 263–280.Google Scholar

Carling, P., 1988. The concept of dominant discharge applied to two gravel-bed streams in relation to channel stability thresholds. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 13(4), 355–367.Google Scholar

Carling, P. A., 1991. An appraisal of the velocity-reversal hypothesis for stable pool riffle sequences in the River Severn, England. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 16(1), 19–31.Google Scholar

Carling, P. A., 1999. Subaqueous gravel dunes. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 69(3), 534–545.Google Scholar

Carling, P. A., Orr, H. G., 2000. Morphology of riffle-pool sequences in the River Severn, England. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 25(4), 369–384.Google Scholar

Carling, P. A., Reader, N. A., 1982. Structure, composition and bulk properties of upland stream gravels. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 7(4), 349–365.Google Scholar

Carling, P. A., Wood, N., 1994. Simulation of flow over pool-riffle topography – a consideration of the velocity reversal hypothesis. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 19(4), 319–332.Google Scholar

Carling, P. A., Kelsey, A., Glaister, M. S. 1992. Effect of bed roughness, particle shape and orientation on initial motion criteria. In: Billi, P., Hey, R. D., Thorne, C. R., Tacconi, P. (eds.), Dynamics of Gravel-Bed Rivers. Wiley, Chichester, UK, pp. 23–38.Google Scholar

Carling, P. A., Cao, Z. X., Holland, M. J., Ervine, D. A., Babaeyan-Koopaei, K., 2002. Turbulent flow across a natural compound channel. Water Resources Research, 38(12). 10.1029/2001wr000902.Google Scholar

Carling, P., Jansen, J., Meshkova, L., 2014. Multichannel rivers: Their definition and classification. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 39(1), 26–37.Google Scholar

Carling, P. A., Gupta, N., Atkinson, P. M., He, H. Q., 2016. Criticality in the planform behavior of the Ganges River meanders. Geology, 44(10), 859–862.Google Scholar

Carling, P. A., Perillo, M., Best, J., Garcia, M. H., 2017. The bubble bursts for cavitation in natural rivers: Laboratory experiments reveal minor role in bedrock erosion. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 42(9), 1308–1316.Google Scholar

Carlston, C. W., 1969. Downstream variations in hydraulic geometry of streams – special emphasis on mean velocity. American Journal of Science, 267(4), 499–509.Google Scholar

Carretier, S., Poisson, B., Vassallo, R., Pepin, E., Farias, M., 2009. Tectonic interpretation of transient stage erosion rates at different spatial scales in an uplifting block. Journal of Geophysical Research – Earth Surface, 114, 19. 10.1029/2008jf001080.Google Scholar

Carson, M. A., 1984a. The meandering-braided river threshold – a reappraisal. Journal of Hydrology, 73(3–4), 315–334. 10.1016/0022–1694(84)90006–4.Google Scholar

Carson, M. A., 1984b. Observations on the meandering-braided transition, the Canterbury Plains, New Zealand. Part One. New Zealand Geographer, 40, 12–17.Google Scholar

Carson, M. A., 1986. Characteristics of high-energy “meandering” rivers – the Canterbury Plains, New Zealand. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 97(7), 886–895.Google Scholar

Carson, M. A., Griffiths, G. A., 1989. Gravel transport in the braided Waimakariri River – mechanisms, measurements, and predictions. Journal of Hydrology, 109(3–4), 201–220.Google Scholar

Carson, M. A., Lapointe, M. F., 1983. The inherent asymmetry of river meander planform. Journal of Geology, 91(1), 41–55.Google Scholar

Cartigny, M. J. B., Ventra, D., Postma, G., van den Berg, J. H., 2014. Morphodynamics and sedimentary structures of bedforms under supercritical-flow conditions: new insights from flume experiments. Sedimentology, 61(3), 712–748. 10.1111/sed.12076.Google Scholar

Castelltort, S., Simpson, G., 2006. River spacing and drainage network growth in widening mountain ranges. Basin Research, 18(3), 267–276.Google Scholar

Castillo, C., Gomez, J. A., 2016. A century of gully erosion research: Urgency, complexity and study approaches. Earth-Science Reviews, 160, 300–319.Google Scholar

Castillo, M., Bishop, P., Jansen, J. D., 2013. Knickpoint retreat and transient bedrock channel morphology triggered by base-level fall in small bedrock river catchments: The case of the Isle of Jura, Scotland. Geomorphology, 180, 1–9.Google Scholar

Castro, J. M., Jackson, P. L., 2001. Bankfull discharge recurrence intervals and regional hydraulic geometry relationships: Patterns in the Pacific Northwest, USA. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 37(5), 1249–1262.Google Scholar

Cazanacli, D., Smith, N. D., 1998. A study of morphology and texture of natural levees – Cumberland Marshes, Saskatchewan, Canada. Geomorphology, 25(1–2), 43–55.Google Scholar

Celik, A. O., Diplas, P., Dancey, C. L., 2013. Instantaneous turbulent forces and impulse on a rough bed: Implications for initiation of bed material movement. Water Resources Research, 49(4), 2213–2227. 10.1002/wrcr.20210.Google Scholar

Chang, H. H., 1979. Minimum stream power and river channel patterns. Journal of Hydrology, 41, 303–327.Google Scholar

Chang, H. H., 1980. Geometry of gravel streams. Journal of the Hydraulics Division – ASCE, 106(9), 1443–1456.Google Scholar

Chang, H. H., 1988a. Fluvial Processes in River Engineering. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar

Chang, H. H., 1988b. On the cause of river meandering. In: White, W. R. (ed.), International Conference on River Regime. Wiley, New York, pp. 83–93.Google Scholar

Chang, H. Y., Simons, D. B., Woolhiser, D. A., 1971. Flume experiments on alternate bar formation. Journal of the Waterways, Harbors and Coastal Engineering Division, ASCE, 97, 155–165.Google Scholar

Chartrand, S. M., Whiting, P. J., 2000. Alluvial architecture in headwater streams with special emphasis on step-pool topography. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 25(6), 583–600.Google Scholar

Chartrand, S. M., Jellinek, M., Whiting, P. J., Stamm, J., 2011. Geometric scaling of step-pools in mountain streams: observations and implications. Geomorphology, 129(1–2), 141–151. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.01.020.Google Scholar

Chartrand, S. M., Jellinek, A. M., Hassan, M. A., Ferrer-Boix, C., 2018. Morphodynamics of a width-variable gravel bed stream: new insights on pool-riffle formation from physical experiments. Journal of Geophysical Research – Earth Surface, 123(11), 2735–2766. 10.1029/2017jf004533.Google Scholar

Chen, A., Darbon, J., Morel, J.-M., 2014. Landscape evolution models: A review of their fundamental equations. Geomorphology, 219, 68–86. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.04.037.Google Scholar

Chen, D., Jirka, G. H., 1995. Experimental study of plane turbulent wakes in a shallow water layer. Fluid Dynamics Research, 16, 11–41.Google Scholar

Chen, X., Zhu, D. Z., Steffler, P. M., 2017. Secondary currents induced mixing at channel confluences. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 44(12), 1071–1083. 10.1139/cjce-2016–0228.Google Scholar

Cheng, C., Song, Z. Y., Wang, Y. G., Zhang, J. S., 2013. Parameterized expressions for an improved Rouse equation. International Journal of Sediment Research, 28(4), 523–534.Google Scholar

Cheng, L., Yaeger, M., Viglione, A., et al., 2012. Exploring the physical controls of regional patterns of flow duration curves – Part 1: insights from statistical analyses. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 16(11), 4435–4446.Google Scholar

Cheng, N. S., 1997. Simplified settling velocity formula for sediment particle. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 123(2), 149–152.Google Scholar

Chew, L. C., Ashmore, P. E., 2001. Channel adjustment and a test of rational regime theory in a proglacial braided stream. Geomorphology, 37(1–2), 43–63.Google Scholar

Chin, A., 1989. Step pools in stream channels. Progress in Physical Geography, 13(3), 390–407.Google Scholar

Chin, A., 1998. On the stability of step-pool mountain streams. Journal of Geology, 106(1), 59–69.Google Scholar

Chin, A., 1999a. On the origin of step-pool sequences in mountain streams. Geophysical Research Letters, 26(2), 231–234.Google Scholar

Chin, A., 1999b. The morphologic structure of step-pools in mountain streams. Geomorphology, 27(3–4), 191–204.Google Scholar

Chin, A., 2002. The periodic nature of step-pool mountain streams. American Journal of Science, 302(2), 144–167.Google Scholar

Chin, A., 2003. The geomorphic significance of step-pools in mountain streams. Geomorphology, 55(1–4), 125–137.Google Scholar

Chin, A., 2006. Urban transformation of river landscapes in a global context. Geomorphology, 79(3–4), 460–487.Google Scholar

Chin, A., Phillips, J. D., 2007. The self-organization of step-pools in mountain streams. Geomorphology, 83(3–4), 346–358.Google Scholar

Chin, A., Wohl, E., 2005. Toward a theory for step pools in stream channels. Progress in Physical Geography, 29(3), 275–296.Google Scholar

Chin, A., Daniels, M. D., Urban, M. A., et al., 2008. Perceptions of wood in rivers and challenges for stream restoration in the United States. Environmental Management, 41(6), 893–903.Google Scholar

Chin, A., Gidley, R., Tyner, L., Gregory, K., 2017. Adjustment of dryland stream channels over four decades of urbanization. Anthropocene, 20, 24–36.Google Scholar

Chiu, C. L., Lin, G. F., 1983. Computation of 3-D flow and shear in open channels. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 109(11), 1424–1440.Google Scholar

Chone, G., Biron, P. M., 2016. Assessing the relationship between river mobility and aquatic habitat. River Research and Applications, 32(4), 528–539.Google Scholar