Book contents
- Romans 7 and Christian Identity
- Society for New Testament Studies
- Romans 7 and Christian Identity
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Speech-in-Character
- 3 Romans 3:7
- 4 Romans 6:12–19
- 5 Romans 7:7–13
- 6 Romans 7:14–25
- 7 Conclusion
- Appendix 1 The First-Person Singular in Romans
- Bibliography
- Index of Ancient Sources
- Subject And Author Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 December 2017
Book contents
- Romans 7 and Christian Identity
- Society for New Testament Studies
- Romans 7 and Christian Identity
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Speech-in-Character
- 3 Romans 3:7
- 4 Romans 6:12–19
- 5 Romans 7:7–13
- 6 Romans 7:14–25
- 7 Conclusion
- Appendix 1 The First-Person Singular in Romans
- Bibliography
- Index of Ancient Sources
- Subject And Author Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Romans 7 and Christian IdentityA Study of the ‘I' in its Literary Context, pp. 212 - 227Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Aasgaard, Reidar. 2004. ‘My Beloved Brothers and Sisters!’ Christian Siblingship in Paul. London: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Achtemeier, Paul J. 1984. Some Things in Them Hard to Understand: Reflections on an Approach to Paul. Interpretation 38, 254–267.Google Scholar
Adams, Jim W. 2006. The Performative Nature and Function of Isaiah 40–55. Library of Hebrew Bible/Old Testament Studies. New York: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Agersnap, Søren. 1999. Baptism and the New Life: A Study of Romans 6.1–14. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
Aland, Kurt, and Aland, Barbara. 1989. The Text of the New Testament: An Introduction to the Critical Editions and to the Theory and Practice of Modern Textual Criticism. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Aletti, Jean-Noël. 1996. Romans 7,7–25: Rhetorical Criticism and Its Usefulness. Svensk Exegetisk Årsbok 61, 77–95.Google Scholar
Allen, Leslie. 1993. Structure, Tradition and Redaction in Ezekiel’s Death Valley Vision. In Among the Prophets: Language, Image and Structure in the Prophetic Writings. JSOTSup, 144. Eds. Davies, Philip R. and Clines, David J. A., 127–142. Sheffield: JSOT Press.Google Scholar
Augustine, . 1994. Against Two Letters of the Pelagians. In Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers Volume 5, ed. Schaff, Philip, 383–384. Peabody: Hendrickson.Google Scholar
Baltzer, Klaus. 2001. Deutero-Isaiah: A Commentary on Isaiah 40–55. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress.Google Scholar
Banks, R. 1978. Romans 7.25a: An Eschatological Thanksgiving? Australian Biblical Review XXVI, 34–42.Google Scholar
Barclay, John M. G. 1988. Obeying the Truth: A Study of Paul’s Ethics in Galatians. Edinburgh: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Barclay, John M. G. 1998. Paul and Philo on Circumcision: Romans 2.25–9 in Social and Cultural Context. NTS 44, 536–556.Google Scholar
Barclay, John M. G. 2001. ‘Do We Undermine the Law?’ A Study of Romans 14.1–15.6. In Paul and the Mosaic Law, ed. Dunn, James D. G., 287–308. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Barclay, John M. G. 2008. Grace and the Transformation of Agency in Christ. In Redefining First-Century Jewish and Christian Identities: Essays in Honor of Ed Parish Sanders, ed. Udoh, Fabian E., 372–389. South Bend: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Barclay, John M. G. 2013. Under Grace: The Christ-Gift and the Construction of a Christian Habitus. In Apocalyptic Paul: Cosmos and Anthropos in Romans 5–8, ed. Gaventa, Beverley Roberts, 59–76. Waco: Baylor University Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, Paul. 1997. The Second Epistle to the Corinthians. NICNT. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Barrosse, Thomas. 1953. Death and Sin in St. Paul’s Epistle to the Romans. CBQ 15, 438–459.Google Scholar
Bassler, Jouette M. 1982. Divine Impartiality: Paul and a Theological Axiom. Chico: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Bassler, Jouette M. 2007. Navigating Paul: An Introduction to Key Theological Concepts. Louisville: Westminster John Knox.Google Scholar
Beale, G. K. 2011. A New Testament Biblical Theology: The Unfolding of the Old Testament in the New. Grand Rapids: Baker.Google Scholar
Beker, J. Christiaan. 1980. Paul the Apostle: The Triumph of God in Life and Thought. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Beker, J. Christiaan. 1990. The Triumph of God: The Essence of Paul’s Thought. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Bennema, Cornelis. 2014. A Theory of Character in New Testament Narrative. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Berg, Shane. 2013. Sin’s Corruption of the Knowledge of God and the Law in Romans 1–8. In The Unrelenting God, eds. Downs, David J. and Skinner, Matthew L., 119–138. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Berkley, Timothy W. 2000. From a Broken Covenant to Circumcision of the Heart: Pauline Intertextual Exegesis in Romans 2: 17–29. Atlanta: SBL.Google Scholar
Bertone, John A. 2005. “The Law of the Spirit”: Experience of the Spirit and Displacement of the Law in Romans 8: 1–16. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Best, Ernest. 1967. The Letter of Paul to the Romans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Billerbeck, P., and Strack, H. L.. 1922–1928. 4 vols. Kommentar zum Neuen Testament aus Talmud und Midrasch. Munich.Google Scholar
Black, David Alan. 1984b. Paul, Apostle of Weakness: Astheneia and Its Cognates in the Pauline Literature. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Bornkamm, Günther. 1971. Theologie als Teufelskunst: Römer 3, 1–9. In Geschichte und Glaube 2, 140–148. Munich: Chr. Kaiser Verlag.Google Scholar
Bowsher, Herbert. 2006. To Whom Does the Law Speak? Romans 3:19 and the Works of the Law Debate. WTJ 68, 295–303.Google Scholar
Boyer, James L. 1982. Second Class Conditions in New Testament Greek. Grace Theological Journal 3, no. 1, 81–88.Google Scholar
Bright, Pamela. 2005. Augustine. In Reading Romans through the Centuries: From the Early Church to Karl Barth, eds. Greenman, Jeffrey P. and Larsen, Timothy, 59–80. Grand Rapids: Brazos Press.Google Scholar
Brown, R. E. 1983. The Beginnings of Christianity at Rome. In Antioch and Rome: New Testament Cradles of Catholic Christianity, eds. Brown, R. E. and Meier, J. P., 92–104. New York: Paulist.Google Scholar
Bultmann, R. 1932. Römer 7 und die Anthropologie des Paulus. In Imago Dei, Festschrift for Gustav Krüger, 53–62. Giessen: Alfred Töpelmann.Google Scholar
Bultmann, R. 1961. Romans 7 and the Anthropology of Paul. In Existence and Faith, 147–157. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
Bultmann, R. 1967. Exegetica. Aufsätze zur Erforschung des Neuen Testaments. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Burdick, Donald W. 1974. Οἰδα and Γινώσκω in the Pauline Epistles. In New Dimensions in New Testament Study, eds. Longenecker, Richard N. and Tenney, Merrill C., 344–356. Grand Rapids: Zondervan.Google Scholar
Busch, Austin. 2004. The Figure of Eve in Romans 7:5–25. Biblical Interpretation 12, 1–36.Google Scholar
Byrne, Brendan. 2011. Adam, Christ, and the Law in Romans 5–8. In Celebrating Paul: Festschrift in Honor of Jerome Murphy-O’Connor, O. P., and Joseph A. Fitzmyer, S. J., ed. Spitaler, Peter, 210–232. Washington, DC: The Catholic Biblical Association of America.Google Scholar
Byrskog, Samuel. 1996. Co-Senders, Co-Authors and Paul’s Use of the First Person Plural. ZNW 87, 230–250.Google Scholar
Byrskog, Samuel. 1997. Epistolography, Rhetoric and Letter Prescript: Romans 1.1–7 as a Test Case. JSNT 19, 27–46.Google Scholar
Calvin, . 1960. The Epistles of Paul the Apostle to the Romans and to the Thessalonians. Edited by Torrance, David W. and Torrance, Thomas F.. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Campbell, Constantine R. 2007. Verbal Aspect, the Indicative Mood, and Narrative: Soundings in the Greek of the New Testament. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Campbell, David H. 1980. The Identity of ἐγώ in Romans 7: 7–25. In Studia Biblical 1978: III. Papers on Paul and Other New Testament Authors, ed. Livingstone, E. A., 57–64. Sheffield: JSOT Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Douglas A. 2009. The Deliverance of God: An Apocalyptic Rereading of Justification in Paul. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Catchpole, David. 2004. The Contrite Wrongdoer—Condemned or Set Free by the Spirit? Romans 7:7–8: 4. In The Holy Spirit and Christian Origins: Essays in honor of James D. G. Dunn, eds. Stanton, Graham N., Longenecker, Bruce W., and Barton, Stephen C., 181–192. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Cherry, Roger. 1988. Ethos Versus Persona: Self-Representation in Written Discourse. Written Communication 5, 251–276.Google Scholar
Chester, Stephen J. 2003. Conversion at Corinth: Perspectives on Conversion in Paul’s Theology and the Corinthian Church. London: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Chester, Stephen J. 2010. Romans 7 and Conversion in the Protestant Tradition. Ex Auditu 25, no. 2009: 135–171.Google Scholar
Chester, Stephen J. 2011 . The Retrospective View of Romans 7: Paul’s Past in Present Perspective. In Perspectives on Our Struggle with Sin: Three Views on Romans 7, ed. Wilder, Terry L., 57–110. Nashville: B&H Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Ciampa, Roy E., and Rosner, Brian S.. 2010. The First Letter to the Corinthians. Nottingham: Apollos.Google Scholar
Colwell, Ernest C. 1969. Method in Evaluating Scribal Habits: A Study of P45, P66, P75. In Studies in Methodology in Textual Criticism of the New Testament, 106–124. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Cosgrove, Charles H. 1987. What If Some Have Not Believed? The Occasion and Thrust of Romans 3:1–8. ZNW 78, 90–105.Google Scholar
Cosmin-Constantin, Murariu. 2009. The Characters in Romans 7, 7–25: A Critique of Stanley Stowers’ Thesis. In The Letter To The Romans, ed. Schnelle, Udo, 739–753. Leuven: Uitgeverij Peeters.Google Scholar
Cranfield, C. E. B. 1975. The Epistle to The Romans: Volume I. Edinburgh: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Dahl, Nils Alstrup. 1977. Studies in Paul: Theology for the Early Christian Mission. Minneapolis: Augsburg Publishing House.Google Scholar
Davies, W. D. 1948. Paul and Rabbinic Judaism: Some Rabbinic Elements in Pauline Theology. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
de Boer, Martinus C. 1988. The Defeat of Death: Apocalyptic Eschatology in 1 Corinthians 15 and Romans 5. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dodson, Joseph R. 2008. The ‘Powers’ of Personification: Rhetorical Purpose in the Book of Wisdom and the Letter to the Romans. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Donfried, Karl P., ed. 1991. The Romans Debate: Revised and Expanded Edition. Peabody: Hendrickson.Google Scholar
Dooley, Robert A., and Levinsohn, Stephen H.. 2001. Analyzing Discourse: A Manual of Basic Concepts. Dallas: SIL International.Google Scholar
Dryden, J. de Waal. 2015. Revisiting Romans 7: Law, Self, and Spirit. JSPL 5, no. 1: 129–151.Google Scholar
Dunn, James D. G. 1975. Rom 7.14–25 in the Theology of Paul. Theologische Zeitschrift 31, 257–273.Google Scholar
Dunn, James D. G. 2002. The Narrative Approach to Paul: Whose Story? In Narrative Dynamics in Paul: A Critical Assessment, 217–230. Louisville: Westminster John Knox.Google Scholar
Dunson, Ben C. 2012. Individual and Community in Paul’s Letter to the Romans. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Eastman, Susan. 2013. Double Participation and the Responsible Self in Romans 5–8. In Apocalyptic Paul: Cosmos and Anthropos in Romans 5–8, ed. Gaventa, Beverley Roberts, 93–110. Waco: Baylor.Google Scholar
Édart, Jean-Baptiste. 1998. De La Nécessité d’un Sauveur Rhétorique et Théologie de Rm 7, 7–25. Revue Biblique 105–3, 359–396.Google Scholar
Edsall, Benjamin A. 2014. Paul’s Witness to Formative Early Christian Instruction. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Elliot, Neil. 1990. The Rhetoric of Romans: Argumentative Constraint and Strategy and Paul’s Dialogue with Judaism. Sheffield: JSOT Press.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Troels. 1995. Galatians in Romans 5–8 and Paul’s Construction of the Identity of Christ Believers. In Texts and Contexts: Biblical Texts in Their Textual and Situational Contexts: Essays in Honor of Lars Hartman, eds. Fornberg, Tord and Hellholm, David, 477–505. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Troels. 2002. The Reception of Graeco-Roman Culture in the New Testament: The Case of Romans 7.7–25. In The New Testament as Reception, eds. Müller, Mogens, and Tronier, Henrik, 32–57. London: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Troels. 2011. A Stoic Concept of the Person in Paul? From Galatians 5:17 to Romans 7: 14–25. In Christian Body, Christian Self: Concepts of Early Christian Personhood, eds. Rothschild, Clare K. and Thompson, Trevor W., 86–112. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Esler, Philip F. 2003. Conflct and Identity in Romans: The Social Setting of Paul’s Letter. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Fanning, Buist M. 1990. Verbal Aspect in New Testament Greek. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fasulo, Alessandra, and Zucchermaglio, C.. 2002. My Selves and I: Identity Markers in Work Meeting Talk. Journal of Pragmatics 34, no. 9: 1119–1144.Google Scholar
Fee, Gordon D. 1994. God’s Empowering Presence: The Holy Spirit in the Letters of Paul. Peabody: Hendrikson.Google Scholar
Fee, Gordon D. 1995. The Use of the Greek Fathers for New Testament Textual Criticism. In The Text of the New Testament in Contemporary Research: Essays on the Status Quaestionis, eds. Ehrman, Bart D. and Holmes, Michael W., 191–207. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Feuillet, A. 1980. Loi de Dieu, loi du Christ et loi de l’Esprit d’après les epîtres pauliniennes: Les rapports de ces trois lois avec la Loi Mosaique. Novum Testamentum 22, no. 1: 29–65.Google Scholar
Fiddes, Paul, and Bader, Günter. 2013. Whatever Happened to a Pauline Text? 2 Cor 3.6 and Its Afterlife. In The Spirit and the Letter: A Tradition and a Reversal, eds. Fiddes, Paul S. and Bader, Günter, 3–27. London: Bloomsbury T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Forde, Gerhard O. 1990. Justification by Faith: A Matter of Death and Life. Eugene: Wipf and Stock.Google Scholar
Gaca, Kathy L. 2003. The Making of Fornication: Eros, Ethics and Political Reform in Greek Philosophy and Early Christianity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Galling, Kurt, ed. 1957–1965. Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart. 3rd ed., 7 vols. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Garlington, Don B. 1994. Faith, Obedience and Perseverance: Aspects of Paul’s Letter to the Romans. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Gaston, Lloyd. 1987. Paul and the Torah. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Gathercole, Simon J. 2002. Where Is Boasting? Early Jewish Soteriology and Paul’s Response in Romans 1–5. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Gathercole, Simon J. 2003. Romans 1–5 and the “Weak” and the “Strong”: Pauline Theology, Pastoral Rhetoric, and the Purpose of Romans. Review and Expositor 100 , 35–51.Google Scholar
Gathercole, Simon J. 2006. Sin in God’s Economy: Agencies in Romans 1 and 7. In Divine and Human Agency in Paul and His Cultural Environment, eds. Barclay, John M. G. and Gathercole, Simon J., 158–172. London: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Gaventa, Beverley R. 2004. The Cosmic Power of Sin in Paul’s Letter to the Romans: Toward a Widescreen Edition. Interpretation 58, no. 3: 229–240.Google Scholar
Gaventa, Beverley R. 2013. The Shape of the “I”: The Psalter, the Gospel, and the Speaker in Romans 7. In Apocalyptic Paul: Cosmos and Anthropos in Romans 5–8, 77–91. Waco: Baylor University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, Craig A. 2008. Libanius’s Progymnasmata: Model Exercises in Greek Prose Composition and Rhetoric. Atlanta: SBL.Google Scholar
Godet, F. 1892a. Commentary on St. Paul’s Epistle to the Romans Vol I. Edinburgh: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Godet, F. 1892b. Commentary on St. Paul’s Epistle to the Romans Vol II. Edinburgh: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Goldingay, John. 2005. The Message of Isaiah 40–55: A Literary-Theological Commentary. London: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Goodrich, John K. 2013. Sold Under Sin: Echoes of Exile in Romans. NTS 59, no. 4: 476–495.Google Scholar
Gundry, Robert H. 1976. Sōma in Biblical Theology with Emphasis on Pauline Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gundry, Robert H. 1980. The Moral Frustration of Paul Before His Conversion: Sexual Lust in Romans 7: 7–25. In Pauline Studies: Essays Presented to Professor F. F. Bruce on his 70th Birthday, eds. Hagner, D. A. and Harris, M. J., 228–245. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Gundry, Robert H. 2005. The Moral Frustration of Paul Before His Conversion: Sexual Lusts in Romans 7: 7–25. In The Old Is Better: New Testament Essays in Support of Traditional Interpretations, 252–271. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Guthrie, George H. 2015. 2 Corinthians. Edited by Yarbrough, Robert W. and Stein, Robert H.. Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.Google Scholar
Hafemann, Scott. 2000a. 2 Corinthians. The NIV Application Commentary. Grand Rapids: Zondervan.Google Scholar
Hafemann, Scott. 2000b. The Role of Suffering in the Mission of Paul. In The Mission of the Early Church to Jews and Gentiles, eds. Ådna, Jostein and Kvalbein, Hans, 165–184. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Hammond Bammel, Caroline P. 1981. Philocalia IX, Jerome, Epistle 121, and Origen’s Exposition of Romans VII. JTS 32, 50–81.Google Scholar
Harrill, J. Albert. 2006. Slaves in the New Testament: Literary, Social and Moral Dimensions. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Murray J. 2005. The Second Epistle to the Corinthians: A Commentary on the Greek Text. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Harris, Murray J. 2012. Prepositions and Theology in the Greek New Testament. Grand Rapids: Zondervan.Google Scholar
Hays, Richard B. 1989. Echoes of Scripture in the Letters of Paul. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hays, Richard B. 1993. Christ Prays the Psalms: Paul’s Use of an Early Christian Exegetical Convention. In The Future of Christology: Essays in Honor of Leander E. Keck, eds. Malherbe, Abraham J. and Meeks, Wayne A., 122–136. Minneapolis: Fortress.Google Scholar
Hays, Richard B. 2005. The Conversion of the Imagination: Paul as Interpreter of Israel’s Scripture. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Head, Peter M. 1990. Observations on Early Papyri of the Synoptic Gospels, especially on the “Scribal Habits”. Biblica 71, 240–247.Google Scholar
Head, Peter M. 2004. The Habits of New Testament Copyists: Singular Readings in the Early Fragmentary Papyri of John. Biblica 85, 399–408.Google Scholar
Hellholm, David. 1994. Enthymemic Argumentation in Paul: The Case of Romans 6. In Paul in His Hellenistic Context, ed. Engberg-Pedersen, Troels, 119–179. Edinburgh: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Hester, James D. 2004. The Rhetoric of Persona in Romans: Re-reading Romans 1: 11–12. In Celebrating Romans: Template for Pauline Theology, ed. McGinn, Sheila E., 83–105. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Hofius, Otfried. 2001. The Adam-Christ Antithesis and the Law: Reflections on Romans 5: 12–21. In Paul and the Mosaic Law, ed. Dunn, James D. G., 165–205. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Hofius, Otfried. 2002. Der Mensch im Schatten Adams. Römer 7,7–25a. In Paulusstudien II, 104–154. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Holland, Glenn S. 1999. The Self Against the Self in Romans 7.7–25. In The Rhetorical Interpretation of Scripture, eds. Porter, Stanley E., and Stamps, Dennis L., 260–271. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hooker, Morna D. 1990. Adam In Romans 1. In From Adam to Christ: Essays on Paul, 73–84. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Jervis, L. 2004. ‘The Commandment Which Is for Life’ (Romans 7.10): Sin’s Use of the Obedience of Faith. Journal for the Study of the New Testament 27, no. 2: 193–216.Google Scholar
Jervis, L. Ann. 2013. Time in Romans 5–8: From Life to Life. In The Unrelenting God, eds. Downs, David J. and Skinner, Matthew L., 139–149. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Jewett, Robert. 1971. Paul’s Anthropological Terms: A Study of Their Use in Conflict Settings. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Johnson, Dennis E. 2008. The Function of Romans 7:13–25 in Paul’s Argument for the Law’s Impotence and the Spirit’s Power, and Its Bearing on the Identity of the Schizophrenic “I”. In Resurrection and Eschatology: Theology in Service of the Church, eds. Tipton, Lane G. and Waddington, Jeffrey C., 3–59. Phillipsburg: P&R.Google Scholar
Johnson, S. Lewis Jr. 1974. Romans 5:12—An Exercise in Exegesis and Theology. In New Dimensions in New Testament Study, eds. Longenecker, Richard N. and Tenney, Merrill C., 298–316. Grand Rapids: Zondervan.Google Scholar
Josephus, H. St. J. Thackeray, et al. 10 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1926–1965.Google Scholar
Joyce, Paul M. 1989 . Divine Initiative and Human Response in Ezekiel. Library of Hebrew Bible/Old Testament Studies. Sheffield: Bloomsbury T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Kaminsky, Joel S. 2000. Paradise Regained: Rabbinic Reflections on Israel at Sinai. In Jews, Christians, and the Theology of the Hebrew Scriptures, eds. Bellis, Alice Ogden and Kaminsky, Joel S., 15–43. Atlanta: SBL.Google Scholar
Karlberg, M. W. 1986. Israel’s History Personified: Romans 7: 7–13 in Relation to Paul’s Teaching on the Old Man. Trinity Journal 7, 65–74.Google Scholar
Käsemann, Ernst. 1971a. On Paul’s Anthropology. In Perspectives on Paul, 1–31. London: SCM.Google Scholar
Käsemann, Ernst. 1971c. The Spirit and the Letter. In Perspectives on Paul, 138–166. Philadelphia: Fortress.Google Scholar
Keck, Leander E. 1999. The Absent Good: The Significance of Rom 7: 18a. In Text und Geschichte: Facetten theoloischen Arbeitens aus dem Freundes und Schülerkreis: Dieter Lührmann zum 60 Geburtstag, eds. Maser, Stefan and Schlarb, Egbert, 66–75. Marburg: Elwert.Google Scholar
Keesmat, Sylvia C. 2004. The Psalms in Romans and Galatians. In The Psalms in the New Testament, eds. Moyise, Steve and Menken, Maarten J. J., 139–161. London: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George A. 1984. New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George A. 2003. Progymnasmata: Greek Textbooks of Prose Composition and Rhetoric. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Kidwell, Brian. 2013. The Adamic Backdrop of Romans. Criswell Theological Review 11, 103–120.Google Scholar
Klein, Anja. 2010. Prophecy Continued: Reflections on Innerbiblical Exegesis in the Book of Ezekiel. Vetus Testamentum 60, 571–582.Google Scholar
Könnecke, Emendationen. 1908. Emendationen zu Stellen des Neuen Testaments. BFCT. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann.Google Scholar
Koole, Jan L. 1998. Isaiah Part 3: Volume 2: Isaiah 49–55. Historical Commentary on the Old Testament. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Krauter, Stefan. 2011. Is Romans 7: 7–13 About Akrasia? In Christian Body, Christian Self: Concepts of Early Christian Personhood, eds. Rothschild, Clare K. and Thompson, Trevor W., Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Kümmel, Werner. 1929. Römer 7 und die Bekehrung des Paulus. Leipzig: J. G. Hinrichs’sche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Kümmel, Werner Georg. 1974. Römer 7 und die Bekehrung des Paulus. In Römer 7 und das Bild des Menschen im Neuen Testament: Zwei Studien, 1–160. Munich: Chr. Kaiser Verlag.Google Scholar
Kuula, Kari. 2003. The Law, the Covenant and God’s Plan Volume 2. Helsinki: Finnish Exegetical Society; Vanderhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Laato, Timo. 1995. Paul and Judaism: An Anthropological Approach. Atlanta: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Lake, Kirsopp, and New, Silva. 1932. Six Collations of New Testament Manuscripts. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Jan. 1992. The Wretched “I” and Its Liberation: Paul in Romans 7 and 8. Louvain: Peeters Press.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Jan. 1999. Second Corinthians. Sacra Pagina Series. Collegeville: Liturgical Press.Google Scholar
Landes, Paula Fredriksen. 1982. Augustine on Romans: Propositions from the Epistle to the Romans; Unfinished Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans. Chico: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Lausberg, Heinrich. 1998. Handbook of Literary Rhetoric: A Foundation for Literary Style. Edited by Orton, David E. and Anderson, R. Dean. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Lee, Jae Hyun. 2010. Paul’s Gospel in Romans: A Discourse Analysis of Rom 1: 16–8:39. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Levinsohn, Stephen H. 2000. Discourse Features of New Testament Greek: A Coursebook on the Information Structure of New Testament Greek. Dallas: SIL International.Google Scholar
Lichtenberger, Hermann. 2004. Das Ich Adams und das Ich der Menschheit: Studien zum Menschenbild in Römer 7. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Lincicum, David. 2013. Paul and the Early Jewish Encounter with Deuteronomy. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.Google Scholar
Lindars, Barnabas. 1988. Paul and the Law in Romans 5–8: An Actantial Analysis. In Law and Religion: Essays on the Place of the Law in Israel and Early Christianity, ed. Lindars, Barnabas, 126–140. Cambridge: James Clarke & Co.Google Scholar
Linebaugh, Jonathan A. 2011. Announcing the Human: Rethinking the Relationship Between Wisom of Solomon 13–15 and Romans 1.18–2.11. NTS 57, 214–237.Google Scholar
Linebaugh, Jonathan A. 2013. God, Grace and Righteousness in Wisdom of Solomon and Paul’s Letter to the Romans: Texts in Conversation. Novum Testamentum Supplements. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Lommatzsch, Carol. H. E. 1837. Origenis in Epistolam Ad Romanos Commentariorum Pars II. Berlin: Haude et Spener.Google Scholar
Longenecker, Bruce M. 2005. Rhetoric at the Boundaries: The Art and Theology of the New Testament Chain-Link Transitions. Waco: Baylor University Press.Google Scholar
Longenecker, Richard N. 2011. Introducing Romans: Critical Issues in Paul’s Most Famous Letter. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Longinus, . On the Sublime. 1982. Translated by Fyfe, W. Hamilton. LCL. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Macaskill, Grant. 2013. Union with Christ in the New Testament. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, Joel. 1989. The Circumcision and Uncircumcision in Rome. NTS 35, no. 1: 67–81.Google Scholar
Martin, Troy W. 1999. Whose Flesh? What Temptation? (Galatians 4.13–14). JSNT 74, 65–91.Google Scholar
Mason, Steve. 1994. ‘For I Am Not Ashamed of the Gospel’ (Rom 1.16): The Gospel and the First Readers of Romans. In Gospel In Paul: Studies on Corinthians, Galatians and Romans for Richard N. Longenecker, eds. Jervis, L. Ann and Richardson, Peter, 254–287. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
Maston, Jason. 2010. Divine and Human Agency in Second Temple Judaism and Paul. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
McFadden, Kevin W. 2015. Does Πίστις Mean ‘Faith(Fulness)’ in Paul? TynBul 66, no. 2: 251–270.Google Scholar
McKay, K. L. 1981. On the Perfect and Other Aspects in New Testament Greek. Novum Testamentum 23, no. 4: 289–329.Google Scholar
Metzger, Bruce M. 2001. A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Metzger, Bruce M., and Ehrman, Bart D.. 2005. The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, Jason C. 2009. The End of the Law: Mosaic Covenant in Pauline Theology. Nashville: B&H Publishing.Google Scholar
Meyer, Paul W. 1990. The Worm at the Core of the Apple: Exegetical Reflections on Romans 7. In The Conversation Continues, eds. Fortna, Robert T. and Gaventa, Beverley Roberts, 62–84. Nashville: Abingdon Press.Google Scholar
Middendorf, Michael Paul. 1997. The “I” in the Storm: A Study of Romans 7. St. Louis: Concordia Academic Press.Google Scholar
Moffatt, James. 1918. An Introduction to the Literature of the New Testament. Edinburgh: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Moule, C. F. D. 1959. An Idiom Book of New Testament Greek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moulton, J. H., and Milligan, G.. 1930. The Vocabulary of the Greek New Testament: Illustrated from the Papyri and Other Non-Literary Sources. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
Moxnes, Halvor. 1980. Theology in Conflict: Studies in Paul’s Understanding of God in Romans. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Neyrey, Jerome H. 2003. The Social Location of Paul: Education as the Key. In Fabrics of Discourse: Essays in Honor of Vernon K. Robbins, eds. Robbins, Vernon Kay, Gowler, David B., Bloomquist, L. Gregory, and Watson, Duane F., 126–164. Harrisburg: Trinity Press International.Google Scholar
Nguyen, V. Henry T. 2008. Christian Identity in Corinth: A Comparative Study of 2 Corinthians, Epictetus and Valerius Maximus. Edited by Frey, Jörg. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2. Reihe. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Peter T. 1991. The Epistle to the Philippians: A Commentary on the Greek Text. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Origen, . 1953. Contra Celsum. Edited by Chadwick, H.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Origen, . 2002. Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans, Books 6–10. Translated by Scheck, Thomas P.. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Orriens, Sander. 2009. Involving the Past in the Present: the Classical Greek Perfect as a Situating Cohesion Device. In Discourse Cohesion in Ancient Greek, eds. Bakker, Stéphanie and Wakker, Gerry, 221–239. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Packer, J. I. 1999. The “Wretched Man” Revisited: Another Look at Romans 7: 14–25. In Romans and the People of God: Essays in Honor of Gordon D. Fee on the Occasion of His 65th Birthday, eds. Soderlund, Sven K. and Wright, N. T., 70–81. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Pao, David W. 2002. Thanksgiving: An Investigation of a Pauline Theme. Leicester: Apollos.Google Scholar
Penna, Romano. 1996. Paul the Apostle: Jew and Greek Alike. Collegeville: The Liturgical Press.Google Scholar
Penner, Todd. 2004. In Praise of Christian Origins: Stephen and the Hellenists in Lukan Apologetic Historiography. London: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Philo, F. H. Colson, G. H. Whitaker, , et al. 10 vols. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1929–1981.Google Scholar
Philonenko, Marc. 1986. Sur l’expression “vendu au péché dans l’Epître aux Romains. Revue de l’histoire des religions 103, 41–52.Google Scholar
Quintilian, . The Orator’s Education, Books 1–2. 2001. Translated by Russell, D. A.. LCL. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Quintilian, . The Orator’s Education, Books 9–10. 2001. Translated by Russell, D. A.. LCL. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Piper, John. 1993. The Justification of God: An Exegetical and Theological Study of Romans 9: 1–23. Grand Rapids: Baker.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. 1989. Verbal Aspect in the Greek of the New Testament, with Reference to Tense and Mood. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley E. 1994. Idioms of the Greek New Testament. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
Postell, Seth D. 2011. Adam as Israel: Genesis 1–3 as the Introduction to the Torah and Tanakh. Cambridge: James Clarke and Co.Google Scholar
Räisänen, Heikki. 1986. Zum Verständnis Von Röm 3: 1–8. In The Torah and Christ, Helsinki: Finnish Exegetical Society.Google Scholar
Räisänen, Heikki. 1992. The Use of ἐπιθυμία and ἐπιθυμεῖν in Paul. In Jesus, Paul and Torah: Collected Essays, 95–111. Sheffield: JSOT Press.Google Scholar
Ramsbotham, A. 1912a. The Commentary of Origen on the Epistle to the Romans. JTS 13, 209–224.Google Scholar
Ramsbotham, A. 1912b. The Commentary of Origen on the Epistle to the Romans II. JTS 13, 357–368.Google Scholar
Ramsbotham, A. 1913. The Commentary of Origen on the Epistle to the Romans III. JTS 14, 10–22.Google Scholar
Reasoner, Mark. 2005. Romans in Full Circle: A History of Interpretation. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.Google Scholar
Reid, Marty L. 1995. A Consideration of the Function of Rom 1: 8–15 in Light of Greco-Roman Rhetoric. JETS 38, no. 2: 181–191.Google Scholar
Rimmon-Kenan, Shlomith. 2002. Narrative Fiction: Contemporary Poetics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Robertson, A. T. 1934. A Grammar of the Greek New Testament in the Light of Historical Research. Nashville: Broadman Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. Armitage. 1893. The Philocalia of Origen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, Rafael. 2014. If You Call Yourself a Jew: Reappraising Paul’s Letter to the Romans. Eugene: Wipf and Stock.Google Scholar
Romanello, S. 2003. Rom 7,7–25 and the Impotence of the Law. A Fresh Look at a Much-Debated Topic Using Literary-Rhetorical Analysis. Biblica 84, 510–530.Google Scholar
Royse, James R. 2008. Scribal Habits in Early Greek New Testament Papyri. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Runge, Steven E. 2010. Discourse Grammar of the Greek New Testament. Peabody: Hendrickson.Google Scholar
Runge, Steven E. 2014. Discourse Function of the Greek Perfect. SBL Annual Meeting, Nov 22–25.Google Scholar
Sampley, J. 2003. Paul in the Greco-Roman World: a Handbook. Harrisburg: Trinity Press International.Google Scholar
Sanday, W., and Headlam, A. C. 1902. The Epistle to the Romans. Edinburgh: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Sanders, E. P. 1977. Paul and Palestinian Judaism: A Comparison of Patterns of Religion. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
Sanders, E. P. 1983. Paul, the Law, and the Jewish People. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
Sanders, Jack T. 1962. The Transition from Opening Epistolary Thanksgiving to Body in the Letters of the Pauline Corpus. JBL 71, 348–362.Google Scholar
Schelkle, Karl Hermann. 1959. Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans Books 6–10. Washington, D.C.: Patmos-Verlag.Google Scholar
Schliesser, Benjamin. 2007. Abraham’s Faith in Romans 4: Paul’s Concept of Faith in the Light of the History of Reception of Genesis 15:6. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Schnelle, Udo. 2009. Theology of the New Testament. Translated by Eugene Boring, M.. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.Google Scholar
Seifrid, Mark A. 1992a. Justification by Faith: The Origin and Development of a Central Pauline Theme. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Seifrid, Mark A. 1992b. The Subject of Rom 7: 14–25. Novum Testamentum 34, no. 4: 313–333.Google Scholar
Seifrid, Mark A. 2000. Christ our Righteousness: Paul’s Theology of Justification. Leicester: Apollos.Google Scholar
Seifrid, Mark A. 2006. Paul’s Use of Habbakuk 2:4 in Romans 1:17: Reflections on Israel’s Exile in Romans. In History and Exegesis: New Testament Essays in Honor of Dr. E. Earle Ellis for His 80th Birthday, ed. (Aaron) Son, Sang-Won, 133–149. New York: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Seifrid, Mark A. 2007. Romans. In Commentary on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament, eds. Beale, G. K. and Carson, D. A., 607–694. Grand Rapids: Baker.Google Scholar
Seifrid, Mark A. 2011. Romans 7: The Voice of the Law, the Cry of Lament, and the Shout of Thanksgiving. In Perspectives on Our Struggle with Sin: Three Views of Romans 7, ed. Wilder, Terry L., 111–176. Nashville: B & H Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Shum, Shiu-Lun. 2002. Paul’s Use of Isaiah in Romans: A Comparative Study of Paul’s Letter to the Romans and the Sibylline and Qumran Sectarian Texts. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2. Reihe. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Siikavirta, Samuli. 2015. Baptism and Cognition in Romans 6–8. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Silva, M. 1994. Biblical Words and Their Meaning: An Introduction to Lexical Semantics. Grand Rapids: Zondervan.Google Scholar
Sorensen, Eric. 2002. Possession and Exorcism in the New Testament and Early Christianity. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Smyth, Herbert. 1968. Greek Grammar. Edited by Messing, G.. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Spicq, Ceslas. 1994. Theological Lexicon of the New Testament. Translated and edited by Ernest, James D.. 3 vols. Peabody, Mass.: HendricksonGoogle Scholar
Sprinkle, Preston M. 2008. Law and Life: The Interpretation of Leviticus 18:5 in Early Judaism and in Paul. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Staab, Karl. 1933. Pauluskommentare aus der griechischen Kirche. Aus Katenenhandschriften gesammelt und herausgegeben. Münster: Aschendorff.Google Scholar
Stanley, Christopher. 2004. Arguing with Scripture: The Rhetoric of Quotations in the Letters of Paul. London: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Stendahl, Krister. 1963. The Apostle Paul and the Introspective Conscience of the West. Harvard Theological Review 56, no. 3: 199–215.Google Scholar
Stendahl, Krister. 1977. The Apostle Paul and the Introspective Conscience of the West. In Paul Among Jews and Gentiles, 78–96. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
Stockhausen, Carol K. 1989. Moses’ Veil and the Glory of the New Covenant: The Exegetical Substructure of II Cor. 3,1–4,6. Rome: Editrice Pontificio Istituto Biblico.Google Scholar
Stowers, Stanley K. 1981. The Diatribe and Paul’s Letter to The Romans. Chico: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Stowers, Stanley K. 1984. Paul’s Dialogue with a Fellow Jew in Romans 3:1–9. CBQ 46, 707–722.Google Scholar
Stowers, Stanley K. 1994a. A Rereading of Romans: Justice, Jews, and Gentiles. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Stowers, Stanley K. 1994b. Romans 7.7–25 as a Speech-in-Character (προσωποποιία). In Paul in His Hellenistic Context, ed. Engberg-Pedersen, Troels, 180–202. Edinburgh: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Stowers, Stanley K. 2003. Apostrophe, Προσωποποιία and Paul’s Rhetorical Education. In Early Christianity and Classical Culture: Comparative Studies in Honor of Abraham J. Malherbe, eds. Fitzgerald, John T., Olbricht, Thomas H., and Michael White, L., 351–369. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Stuhlmacher, Peter. 1994. Paul’s Letter to the Romans: A Commentary. Edinburgh: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Stuhlmacher, Peter. 2001. The Purpose of Romans. In The Romans Debate, 231–242. Peabody: Hendrickson.Google Scholar
Suggs, M. J., ed. 2001. New Testament Greek Manuscripts, Variant Readings Arranged in Horizontal Lines Against Codex Vaticanus: Romans. Wheaton: Tyndale House Publishers.Google Scholar
Swanson, Reuben J., ed. 2001. New Testament Greek Manuscripts, Variant Readings Arranged in Horizontal Lines Against Codex Vaticanus: Romans. Wheaton: Tyndale House Publishers.Google Scholar
Tannehill, Robert C. 1967. Dying and Rising with Christ: A Study in Pauline Eschatology. Berlin: Töpelmann.Google Scholar
Theissen, Gerd. 1987. Psychological Aspects of Pauline Theology. Edinburgh: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Thiessen, Matthew. 2014. Paul’s Argument Against Gentile Circumcision in Romans 2:17–29. Novum Testamentum 56, 373–391.Google Scholar
Thiselton, Anthony C. 2000. The First Epistle to the Corinthians: A Commentary on the Greek Text. Carlisle: Paternoster.Google Scholar
Thorsteinsson, Runar M. 2003. Paul’s Interlocutor in Romans 2: Function and Identity in the Context of Ancient Epistolography. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Thrall, Margaret E. 1994. The Second Epistle to the Corinthians. ICC. Edinburgh: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Thrall, Margaret E. 2003. Paul of Tarsus: A Hellenistic Jew. In Honouring the Past and Shaping the Future: Religious and Biblical Studies in Wales: Essays in Honour of Gareth Lloyd Jones, ed. Pope, Robert, 97–111. Leominster: Gracewing.Google Scholar
Thurén, Lauri. 2002. Romans 7 Derhetorized. In Rhetorical Criticism and the Bible, ed. Porter, Stanley E., 420–440. London: Sheffield Academic Press.Google Scholar
Timmins, Will. 2016. Romans 7 and Speech-In-Character: A Critical Evaluation of Stowers’ Hypothesis. ZNW 107, 94–115.Google Scholar
Tobin, Thomas H. 2004. Paul’s Rhetoric in its Contexts: The Argument of Romans. Peabody: Hendrickson.Google Scholar
Trebilco, Paul. 2012. Self-Designations and Group Identity in the New Testament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Venter, Dirk J. 2014. Romans 8: 3–4 and God’s Resolution of the Threefold Problems of Sin, the Incapability of the Law and the Weakness of the Flesh. In die Skriflig 48, no. 1: 1–7.Google Scholar
Virgil, . Aeneid I–VI. 1999. Translated by Fairclough, H. Rushton, rev. Goold, G. P.. LCL. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vlachos, Chris A. 2006. Law and Sin—An Edenic Nexus? A Study with Reference to 1 Corinthians 15:56 and the Catalytic Operation of the Law. Wheaton College.Google Scholar
Vlachos, Chris A. 2009. The Law and the Knowledge of Good and Evil. Eugene: Pickwick Publications.Google Scholar
Wagner, J. Ross. 2002. Heralds of the Good News: Isaiah and Paul “In Concert” in the Letter to the Romans. Supplements to Novum Testamentum. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Wallace, Daniel B. 1996. Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics: An Exegetical Syntax of the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Zondervan.Google Scholar
Watson, Francis. 2007. Paul, Judaism, and the Gentiles: Beyond the New Perspective. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Watts, John D. W. 2005. Isaiah 34–66 (Revised Edition). Word Biblical Commentary. Nelson Reference & Electronic.Google Scholar
Wedderburn, A. J. M. 1987. Baptism and Resurrection: Studies in Pauline Theology Against Its Graeco-Roman Background. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Wenham, David. 1980. The Christian Life: A Life of Tension? In Pauline Studies, eds. Hagner, D. A. and Harris, M. J., 80–94. Exeter: Paternoster.Google Scholar
Westerholm, Stephen. 1984. ‘Letter’ and ‘Spirit’: The Foundation of Pauline Ethics. NTS 30, 229–248.Google Scholar
Westerholm, Stephen. 1988. Israel’s Law and the Church’s Faith: Paul and His Recent Interpreters. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Westerholm, Stephen. 2004. Perspectives Old and New on Paul: The “Lutheran” Paul and His Critics. Cambridge: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Westfall, Cynthia Long. 2009. A Method for the Analysis of Prominence in Hellenistic Greek. In The Linguist as Pedagogue, eds. Porter, Stanley E. and O’Donnell, Matthew Brook, 75–94. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press.Google Scholar
Winger, Joseph Michael. 1992. By What Law? The Meaning of Νόμος in the Letters of Paul. SBLDS. Atlanta: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Witherington, Ben III. 2009. Romans 7:7–25: Retelling Adam’s Tale. In What’s in the Word: Rethinking the Socio-Rhetorical Character of the New Testament, 61–76. Waco: Baylor University Press.Google Scholar
Wolter, Michael. 2013. ‘Spirit’ and ‘Letter’ in the New Testament. In The Spirit and the Letter: A Tradition and a Reversal, eds. Fiddes, Paul S. and Bader, Günter, 31–46. London: Bloomsbury T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Wright, N. T. 1991. The Climax of the Covenant: Christ and the Law in Pauline Theology. Edinburgh: T & T Clark.Google Scholar
Wright, N. T. 2002. The Letter to the Romans: Introduction, Commentary, and Reflections. In The New Interpreter’s Bible: Volume X, ed. Keck, Leander E., 393–770. Nashville: Abingdon Press.Google Scholar
Wright, N. T. 2013. Paul and the Faithfulness of God. Christian Origins and the Question of God. London: SPCK.Google Scholar