Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. Gesamtausgabe der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, eds. Lauth, Reinhard, Jacob, Hans, and Gliwitzky, Hans. Stuttgart-Bad Canstatt: Fromann-Holzboog, 1962–2012.Google Scholar

Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. Sämmtliche Werke, ed. Fichte, I. H.. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1965.Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Gesammelte Werke, eds. Buchner, Hartmut and Pöggler, Otto. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1968.Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Werke in zwanzig Bänden, eds. Moldenhauer, E. and Michel, K. M.. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1970.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried. Sämtliche Werke, eds. Suphan, B. et al. Berlin: Weidemann, 1877–1913.Google Scholar

Hölderlin, , Sämtliche Werke. Groβe Stuttgarter Ausgabe, 15 vols., ed. Beiβner, Frederick. Stuttgart: Cotta, 1943–1985.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Gesammelte Schriften, ed. Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie Der Wissenschaften, 29 vols. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter, 1900–.Google Scholar

Schelling, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph von. Historisch-kritische Ausgabe, eds. Baumgartner, Michael et al. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog, 1976–.Google Scholar

Schlegel, Friedrich. Kritische Ausgabe, 35 vols., eds. Behler, Ernst et al. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh, 1958–.Google Scholar

Schleiermacher, Friedrich Daniel Ernst. Kritische Gesamtausgabe. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1980–.Google Scholar

Adler, Hans. Die Prägnanz Des Dunklen: Gnoseologie, Ästhetik, Geschichtsphilosophie Bei Johann Gottfried Herder. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1990.Google Scholar

Allais, Lucy. “Kant, Non-Conceptual Content and the Representation of Space.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 47, no. 3 (2009): 383–413.Google Scholar

Allais, Lucy. Manifest Reality: Kant’s Idealism and His Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Allais, Lucy. “Synthesis and Binding.” In Kant and the Philosophy of Mind: Perception, Reason, and the Self, eds. Gomes, Anil and Stephenson, Andrew, 25–45. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Allison, Henry. “Kant’s Theory of Judgment, and Judgments of Taste: On Henry Allison’s Kant’s Theory of Taste.” Inquiry 46, no. 2 (2003): 143–63.Google Scholar

Allison, Henry. Kant’s Theory of Taste: A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Allison, Henry E. Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ameriks, Karl. “Kant and Guyer on Apperception.” Archiv Für Geschichte Der Philosophie 65, no. 2 (1983): 174–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ameriks, Karl. Kant’s Elliptical Path. Corby: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Ameriks, Karl. “History, Succession, and German Romanticism.” In The Relevance of Romanticism, ed. Nassar, Dalia, 47–67. New York City: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Arendt, Hannah. Men in Dark Times. Orlando: Harcourt Brace and Company, 1967.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, ed. Barnes, Jonathan. Vol. 1 and 2. Bollingen Series LXXI 2. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Arndt, Andreas. “Schleiermacher (1768–1834).” In The Oxford Handbook of German Philosophy in the Nineteenth Century, eds. Forster, Michael N. and Gjesdal, Kristin, 26–45. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Arndt, Andreas. “Hermeneutik Und Einbildungskraft.” In Friedrich Schleiermachers Hermeneutik Interpretationen Und Perspektiven, ed. Dierken, Jörg, 119–28. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2016.Google Scholar

Bader, Ralf. “Inner Sense and Time.” In Kant and the Philosophy of Mind: Perception, Reason, and the Self, eds. Gomes, Anil and Stephenson, Andrew, 124–37. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Bates, Jennifer Ann. Hegel’s Theory of Imagination. Albany: SUNY Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. Metaphysics: A Critical Translation with Kant’s Elucidations, Selected Notes, and Related Materials, eds. Fugate, Courtney D. and Hymers, John. London: Bloomsbury, 2013.Google Scholar

Behler, Ernst. Introduction to Friedrich Schlegel: Dialogue on Poetry and Literary Aphorisms. University Park: Penn State Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Behler, Ernst. German Romantic Literary Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Beiser, Frederick. “Schleiermacher’s Ethics.” In The Cambridge Companion to Friedrich Schleiermacher, ed. Mariña, Jacqueline, 53–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beiser, Frederick. German Idealism: The Struggle against Subjectivism, 1781–1801. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Beiser, Frederick. “Romanticism and Idealism.” In The Relevance of Romanticism: Essays on German Romantic Philosophy, ed. Nassar, Dalia, 30–43. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Bowman, Brady. “On the Defense of Literary Value: From Early German Romanticism to Analytic Philosophy of Literature.” In The Relevance of Romanticism: Essays on German Romantic Philosophy, ed. Nassar, Dalia, 147–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Bowman, Brady, and Speight, Allen, eds. “Review of Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi’s Works, III.” Heidelberg Writings: Journal Publications, by Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, 3–31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Breazeale, Daniel. “Against Art? Fichte on Aesthetic Experience and Fine Art.” Journal of the Faculty of Letters, The University of Tokyo 38 (2013): 25–42.Google Scholar

Breazeale, Daniel. “The Wissenschaftslehre of 1796–99 (Nova Methodo).” In The Cambridge Companion to Fichte, eds. James, David and Zöller, Günter, 93–138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Bubbio, Paolo Diego. “Solger and Hegel: Negation and Privation.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17, no. 2 (2009): 173–87.Google Scholar

Bubbio, Paolo Diego. “Solger’s Notion of Sacrifice as Double Negation.” The Heythrop Journal 50, no. 2 (2009): 206–14.Google Scholar

Claesges, Ulrich. Geschichte Des Selbstbewusstseins Der Ursprung Des Spekulativen Problems in Fichtes Wissenschaftslehre Von 1794–95. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff, 1974.Google Scholar

Collins, Arthur W. Possible Experience: Understanding Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Coves, Faustino Oncina. “Rechte Oder Äesthetik Als Vermittlung Zwischen Natur Und Freiheit: Ein Dilemma Bei Fichte.” In Der Transzsendentalphilosophische Zugang Zu Wirklichkeit: Beiträge Aus Der Aktuellen Fichte-Forschung, eds. Fuchs, Erich, Ivaldo, Marco, and Moretto, Giovanni, 361–79. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 2001.Google Scholar

Creuzer, F. “Idee Und Probe Alter Symbolik.” Eds. Daub, C. and Creuzer, F.. Studien II (1806): 224–324.Google Scholar

Creuzer, F. Symbolik und Mythologie der alten Völker, besonders der Griechen. Leipzig u. Darmstad: Heyer und Lesket, first edition, 1810–12; second edition, 1819; third edition, 1836–42.Google Scholar

Crouter, Richard. Friedrich Schleiermacher: Between Enlightenment and Romanticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Danto, Arthur C. The Transfiguration of the Common Place: A Philosophy of Art. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Decker, Friedhelm. “Einheit Von Offenbarung Und Spekulation: Anmerkungen Zum Mystischen Grundzug Der Solgerschen Philosophie.” Prima Philosophia 3, no. 3 (2000).Google Scholar

Desouza, Nigel. “Leibniz in the Eighteenth Century: Herder’s Critical Reflections on the Principles of Nature and Grace.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20, no. 4 (2012): 773–95.Google Scholar

Dieckmann, Liselotte. “Friedrich Schlegel and Romantic Concepts of the Symbol.” The Germanic Review: Literature, Culture, Theory 34, no. 4 (1959): 276–83.Google Scholar

Dilthey, Wilhelm. “Schleiermacher’s Hermeneutical System in Relation to Earlier Protestant Hermeneutics (1860).” Trans. Nordenhaug, Theodore. In Hermeneutics and the Study of History, eds. Dilthey, Wilhelm, Makkreel, Rudolf A., and Rodi, Frithjof, 33–229. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Donougho, Martin. “Hegel and Creuzer: Or, Did Hegel Believe in Myth?” In New Perspectives on Hegel’s Philosophy of Religion, ed. Kolb, David, 59–80. Albany: SUNY Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Dyck, Corey W. “Spontaneity before the Critical Turn: The Spontaneity of the Mind in Crusius, the Pre-Critical Kant, and Tetens.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 54, no. 4 (2016): 625–48.Google Scholar

Eaton, A. W. Titian’s “Rape of Europa”: The Intersection of Ethics and Aesthetics. PhD diss., University of Chicago, 2003.Google Scholar

Eldridge, Richard. “‘Doch Sehnend Stehst/Am Ufer Du’ (‘But Longing You Stand On the Shore’): Hölderlin, Philosophy, Subjectivity, and Finitude.” In The Relevance of Romanticism: Essays on German Romantic Philosophy, ed. Nassar, Dalia, 129–46. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Engstrom, Stephen. The Form of Practical Knowledge: A Study of the Categorical Imperative. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Engstrom, Stephen. “Understanding and Sensibility.” Inquiry 49, no. 1 (2006): 2–25.Google Scholar

Engstrom, Stephen. The Identity of Reason. 2018. MS.Google Scholar

Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. Foundations of Natural Right: According to the Principles of the Wissenschaftslehre. Trans. Baur, Michael. Ed. Neuhouser, Frederick. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. Foundations of Transcendental Philosophy, (Wissenschaftslehre) Nova Methodo (1796/99). Trans. Breazeale, Daniel. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. Fichte, Early Philosophical Writings. Trans. Breazeale, Daniel. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. Grundlage Der Gesamten Wissenschaftslehre: Als Handschrift Für Seine Zuhörer (1794). Hamburg: Meiner, 1997.Google Scholar

Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. Introductions to the Wissenschaftslehre and Other Writings (1797–1800). Trans. Breazeale, Daniel. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1994.Google Scholar

Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. Science of Knowledge: With the First and Second Introductions. Trans. Heath, Peter and Lachs, John. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. The Vocation of Man. Trans. Preuss, Peter. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1987.Google Scholar

Fichte, J. G. “Vergleichung Des Vom Hrn. Prof. Schmid Aufgestellten Systems Mit Der Wissenschaftslehre.” Philosophisches Journal 3, no. 4 (1796): 267–320.Google Scholar

Foley, Peter. Friedrich Schleiermacher’s “Essay on a Theory of Social Behavior” (1799): A Contextual Interpretation. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Forster, Michael N. Wittgenstein on the Arbitrariness of Grammar. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Forster, Michael N. “Schleiermacherâs Hermeneutics.” The Harvard Review of Philosophy 13, no. 1 (2005): 100–22.Google Scholar

Forster, Michael N. After Herder: Philosophy of Language in the German Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Forster, Michael N. German Philosophy of Language: From Schlegel to Hegel and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forster, Michael N. “Herder’s Doctrine of Meaning as Use.” In Linguistic Content: New Essays on the History of Philosophy of Language, eds. Stainton, Robert and Cameron, Margaret, 201–22. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Frank, Manfred. Das Individuelle Allgemeine: Textstrukturierung Und –interpretation Nach Schleiermacher (suhrkamp Taschenbuch Wissenschaft, Band 544). Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1985.Google Scholar

Frank, Manfred. Einführung in Die Frühromantische Aesthetik. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1989.Google Scholar

Frank, Manfred. The Philosophical Foundations of Early German Romanticism. Trans. Millán-Zaibert, Elizabeth. Albany: SUNY Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Franks, Paul W. All or Nothing: Systematicity, Transcendental Arguments, and Skepticism in German Idealism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Friedman, Michael. “Kant’s Theory of Geometry.” The Philosophical Review 94, no. 4 (1985): 455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, Michael. “Exorcising the Philosophical Tradition: Comments on John McDowell’s Mind and World.” The Philosophical Review 105, no. 4 (1996): 427–67.Google Scholar

Friedman, Michael. “Kant on Geometry and Spatial Intuition.” Synthese 186, no. 1 (2012): 231–55.Google Scholar

Förster, Eckart. “Kant’s Refutation of Idealism.” In Philosophy, Its History and Historiography, ed. Holland, A. J., 287–303. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1985.Google Scholar

Förster, Eckart. “‘To Lend Wings to Physics Once Again’: Hölderlin and the ‘Oldest System-Programme of German Idealism.’” European Journal of Philosophy 3, no. 2 (1995): 174–98.Google Scholar

Förster, Eckart. Twenty-Five Years of Philosophy: A Systematic Reconstruction. Trans. Bowman, Brady. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Hegels Dialektik: Fünf Hermeneutische Studien. Tübingen: Mohr U. Siebeck, 1971.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Hegel’s Dialectic: Five Hermeneutical Studies. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. “The Universality of the Hermeneutic Problem.” Trans. Linge, David E.. In Philosophical Hermeneutics, ed. Gadamer, Hans-Georg, 3–17. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. Trans. Weinsheimer, Joel and Marshall, Donald G.. New York: Continuum, 1994 and 2002.Google Scholar

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2004.Google Scholar

Gardner, Sebastian. “Fichte and Schelling: The Limitations of the Wissenschaftslehre?” ed. Zöller, Günter. In The Cambridge Companion to Fichte, ed. James, David, 326–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Gentry, Gerad. “Formal Purposiveness in Kant’s Aesthetic Judgment.” In Rethinking Kant, eds. Muchnik, Pablo and Thorndike, Oliver, 253–80. Vol. 5. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2018.Google Scholar

Gentry, Gerad, ed. Kantian Legacies in German Idealism. Routledge Studies in Nineteenth-Century Philosophy. New York: Routledge, Forthcoming.Google Scholar

Geuss, Raymond. “A Response to Paul De Man.” Critical Inquiry 10, 2 (1983): 375–82.Google Scholar

Gjesdal, Kristin. “Reading Kant Hermeneutically: Gadamer and the Critique of Judgment.” Kant Studien 98, no. 3 (2007): 351–71.Google Scholar

Gjesdal, Kristin. Gadamer and the Legacy of German Idealism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Gjesdal, Kristin. “Hermeneutics, Individuality, and Tradition: Schleiermacher’s Idea of Bildung in the Landscape of Hegelian Thought.” In The Relevance of Romanticism: Essays on German Romantic Philosophy, ed. Nassar, Dalia, 92–109. Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Gjesdal, Kristin. “Bildung.” In The Oxford Handbook of German Philosophy in the Nineteenth Century, ed. Gjesdal, Kristin, 695–719. Oxford Handbooks. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Ginsborg, Hannah. “Was Kant a Nonconceptualist?” Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 137, no. 1 (January 2008): 65–77.Google Scholar

Ginsborg, Hannah. The Normativity of Nature: Essays on Kant’s Critique of Judgement. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von. Goethe: The Collected Works. Trans. Von Nardroff, Ellen and Von Nardroff, Ernest H.. Ed. Gearey, John. Vol. 3. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von. Selected Poems. Trans. Whaley, John. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Goethe, Johann Wolfgang, and Eckermann, Johann Peter. In Conversations of Goethe with Johann Peter Eckermann, ed. Moorhead, J. K.. New York: Da Capo Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Gombrich, E. H. “The Use of Art for the Study of Symbols.” American Psychologist 20, no. 1 (1965): 34–50.Google Scholar

Gomes, Anil. “Kant on Perception: Naïve Realism, Non-Conceptualism, and the B-Deduction.” The Philosophical Quarterly 64, no. 254 (January 2014): 1–19.Google Scholar

Gorodeisky, Keren. “A Tale of Two Faculties.” The British Journal of Aesthetics 51, no. 4 (2011): 415–36.Google Scholar

Gorodeisky, Keren. ““No Poetry, No Reality”: Schlegel, Wittgenstein, Fiction, and Reality.” In The Relevance of Romanticism: Essays on German Romantic Philosophy, ed. Nassar, Dalia, 163–85. Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Gorodeisky, Keren. “Rationally Agential Pleasure? A Kantian Proposal.” In Pleasure: A History, ed. Shapiro, Lisa, 167–94. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Gorodeisky, Keren. “Schematizing without a Concept – Imagine That!” In Kant and Philosophy in a Cosmopolitan Sense (Akten Des XI. Kant-Kongresses), eds. Bacin, Stefano, Ferrarin, Alfredo, La Rocca, Claudio, and Ruffing, Margi, 59–70. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2010.Google Scholar

Grüne, Stefanie. Blinde Anschauung: Die Rolle Von Begriffen in Kants Theorie Sinnlicher Synthesis. Frankfurt Am Main: Klostermann, 2009.Google Scholar

Grüne, Stefanie. “Kant and the Spontaneity of the Understanding.” In Self, World, and Art: Metaphysical Topics in Kant and Hegel, ed. Emundts, Dina, 145–76. Göttingen: De Gruyter, 2013.Google Scholar

Grüne, Stefanie. “Reply to Colin McLear.” Critique, August 20, 2014. https://virtualcritique.wordpress.com/2014/08/20/reply-to-colin-mclear/.Google Scholar

Grüne, Stefanie. “Sensible Synthesis and the Intuition of Space.” Kantian Nonconceptualism, 2016: 81–98.Google Scholar

Güthenke, Constanze. Feeling and Philology: Understanding Antiquity in German Classical Scholarship, 1790–1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Forthcoming.Google Scholar

Guyer, Paul. Kant and the Claims of Taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Haag, Johanness. “Das Empirische Wirken Der Produktiven Einbildungskraft.” In Kreativität, ed. Abel, G., 551–63. Berlin: Universitätsverlag TU Berlin, 2005.Google Scholar

Haag, Johannes. Erfahrung Und Gegenstand: Das Verhältnis Von Sinnlichkeit Und Verstand. Frankfurt Am Main: V. Klostermann, 2007.Google Scholar

Haag, Johannes. “Faculties in Kant and German Idealism.” In The Faculties: A History, ed. Perler, Dominik, 198–246. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Hanna, Robert. “Direct Perceptual Realism II: Non-Conceptual Content.” European Journal of Philosophy 13, no. 2 (2005): 247–90.Google Scholar

Harris, H. S. Hegel’s Ladder. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1997.Google Scholar

Hartmann, Klaus, and Müller, Olaf. Hegels Logik. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1999.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art. Trans. Knox, Thomas Malcolm. New York: Oxford University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. “Die Philosophie Des Geistes, 1817.” In Hegel: Studienausgabe, eds. Löwith, K. and Riedel, M.. Vol. 3. 1968.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. Faith and Knowledge. Trans. Cerf, W.. Ed. Harris, H. S.. Albany: SUNY Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. Glauben Und Wissen: Oder Die Reflexionsphilosophie Der Subjektivität, in Der Vollständigkeit Ihrer Formen, Als Kantische, Jacobische Und Fichtesche Philosophie. Eds. Brockard, Hans and Buchner, Hartmut. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1986.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. Hegel: Lectures on the Philosophy of Spirit, 1827–8. Ed. Williams, Robert R.. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. Hegel’s Philosophy of Right. Trans. Knox, T. M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. Hegel’s Philosophy of Subjective Spirit. Trans. Petry, M. J.. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1978.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. Lectures on the Philosophy of Art: The Hotho Transcript of the 1823 Berlin Lectures. Trans. Brown, Robert F.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. Lectures on the Philosophy of Religion: The Lectures of 1827. Trans. Brown, R. F. and Stewart, J. M.. Ed. Hodgson, Peter C.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. Phenomenology of Spirit. Trans. Miller, Arnold V.. Ed. Findlay, J. N.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. “Review of Friedrich Heinrich Jacobi’s Works, III.” In Heidelberg Writings: Journal Publications, eds. Bowman, Brady and Speight, Allen, 3–31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. The Difference between Fichte’s and Schelling’s System of Philosophy. Albany: SUNY Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. The Phenomenology of Spirit. Ed. Pinkard, Terry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. The Science of Logic. Ed. Di Giovanni, George. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Henrich, Dieter. “On the Unity of Subjectivity.” Trans. Zöller, Günter. In Unity of Reason, ed. Velkley, R., 17–54. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried. Philosophical Writings. Trans. Forster, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried. Selected Writings on Aesthetics. Trans. Moore, Gregory. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Herder, Johann Gottfried. Werke in Zehn Bänden. Eds. Arnold, Günter and Smend, Rudolf. Frankfurt Am Main: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag, 1993.Google Scholar

Hinnebusch, Georginna. A Philosophy to Live By: Goethe’s Art of Living in the Spirit of the Ancients. PhD diss., University of Chicago, 2018.Google Scholar

Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. Ed. Macpherson, Crawford Brough. Hammondsworth: Penguin Books, 1982.Google Scholar

Hoffmeister, J. “Hegel Und Creuzer.” Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift Für Literaturwissenschaft Und Geistesgeschichte 8 (1930): 260–82.Google Scholar

Horstmann, Rolf-Peter. “The Problem of Purposiveness and the Objective Validity of Judgments in Kant’s Theoretical Philosophy.” Washington University Jurisprudence Review 6, no. 1 (2013): 81–97.Google Scholar

Houlgate, Stephen. The Opening of Hegel’s Logic: From Being to Infinity. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Hughes, Fiona. Kant’s Aesthetic Epistemology: Form and World. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Hulin, Michel. Hegel Et L’Orien. Paris: J. Vrin, 1979.Google Scholar

Indregard, Jonas Jervell. “Self-Affection and Pure Intuition in Kant.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 95, no. 4 (2017): 627–43.Google Scholar

Jaeschke, W. Die Religionsphilosophie Hegels. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1983.Google Scholar

Jaeschke, W. “Zur Logik Der Bestimmten Religion.” Ed. Henrich, Dieter. In Hegels Logik Der Philosophie: Religion Und Philosophie in Der Theorie Des Absoluten Geistes, ed. Horstmann, Rolf-Peter, 172–88. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1984.Google Scholar

Jaeschke, Walter. Reason in Religion: The Foundations of Hegel’s Philosophy of Religion. Trans. Stewart, J. Michael and Hodgson, Peter C.. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Jamme, Christoph. “Göttersymbole.” In Mythos Als Aufklärung: Dichten Und Denken Um 1800, 199–210. München: Wilhelm Fink, 2013.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. “A New Fragment of Immanuel Kant.” Trans. Robinson, Hoke. International Philosophical Quarterly 29, no. 3 (1989): 249–60.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Judgment. Trans. Pluhar, Werner S.. Ed. Gregor, Mary J.. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1987.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Practical Reason. Ed. Gregor, Mary J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel, and Wood, Allen. Critique of Pure Reason. Ed. Guyer, Paul. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Ed. Guyer, Paul. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals; With on a Supposed Right to Lie Because of Philanthropic Concerns. Ed. Ellington, James W.. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1993.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Kant’s Gesammelte Schriften. Ed. Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie Der Wissenschaften, 29 vols. Berlin: Walter De Gruyter, 1920.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Philosophical Correspondence, 1759–99. Ed. Zweig, Arnulf. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. The Metaphysics of Morals. Ed. Gregor, Mary J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Kern, Andrea. “Spontaneity and Receptivity in Kant’s Theory of Knowledge.” Philosophical Topics 34, no. 1 (2006): 145–62.Google Scholar

Kitcher, Patricia. Kant’s Transcendental Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Kleingeld, Pauline. “Kant on the Unity of Theoretical and Practical Reason.” Review of Metaphysics 52, no. 2 (1998): 500–28.Google Scholar

Klotz, Christian. “Fichte’s Explanation of the Dynamic Structure of Consciousness in the 1794–95 Wissenschaftslehre.” In The Cambridge Companion to Fichte, eds. James, David and Zöller, Günter, 65–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Kneller, Jane. Kant and the Power of Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Kreines, James. “The Logic of Life: Hegel’s Philosophical Defense of Teleological Explanation of Living Beings.” In Cambridge Companion to Hegel and Nineteenth-Century Philosophy, ed. Beiser, Frederick C., 344–77. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Kroner, Richard. Von Kant Bis Hegel. Tübingen: Mohr, 1921.Google Scholar

Kroner, Richard. The Religious Function of Imagination. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1941.Google Scholar

Kuehn, Manfred. Scottish Common Sense in Germany, 1768–1800: A Contribution to the History of Critical Philosophy. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Kukla, Rebecca. Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant’s Critical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Labuschagne, Barend, and Slootweg, Timo. Hegel’s Philosophy of the Historical Religions. Leiden: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar

Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe, and Nancy, Jean-Luc. The Literary Absolute: The Theory of Literature in German Romanticism. Trans. Barnard, Philip and Lester, Cheryl. Albany: SUNY Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Lamm, Julia A. The Living God: Schleiermacher’s Theological Appropriation of Spinoza. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Lamm, Julia A. “The Art of Interpreting Plato.” In The Cambridge Companion to Friedrich Schleiermacher, ed. Mariña, Jacqueline, 91–108. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Land, Thomas. “Kantian Conceptualism.” In Rethinking Epistemology, ed. Abel, G., 197–240. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2011.Google Scholar

Lauth, Reinhard. Die Transzendentale Naturlehre Fichtes Nach Den Prinzipien Der Wissenschaftslehre. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1984.Google Scholar

Laywine, Alison. “Kant’s Metaphysical Reflections in the Duisburg Nachlass.” Kant Studien 97, no. 1 (2005): 79–113.Google Scholar

Laywine, Alison. “Kant’s Laboratory of Ideas in the 1770s.” In A Companion to Kant, ed. Bird, Graham, 63–78. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2006.Google Scholar

Leuze, R. Die Ausserchristlichen Religionen Bei Hegel. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 1975.Google Scholar

Longuenesse, Béatrice. Hegel’s Critique of Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Longuenesse, Béatrice. Kant and the Capacity to Judge: Sensibility and Discursivity in the Transcendental Analytic of the Critique of Pure Reason. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Longuenesse, Béatrice. Kant on the Human Standpoint. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Longuenesse, Béatrice. “Kant’s Theory of Judgment, and Judgments of Taste: On Henry Allison’s Kant’s Theory of Taste.” Inquiry 46, no. 2 (2003): 143–63.Google Scholar

Longuenesse, Béatrice. “Point of View of Man or Knowledge of God: Kant and Hegel on Concept, Judgment and Reason.” In The Reception of Kant’s Critical Philosophy, ed. Sedgwick, Sally, 253–82. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Lukács, Georg. The Young Hegel: Studies in the Relations between Dialects and Economics. Trans. Livingstone, Rodney. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1966.Google Scholar

MacFarlane, John. What Does It Mean to Say That Logic Is Formal? Ann Arbor: UMI Dissertation Services, 2000.Google Scholar

Makkreel, Rudolf. Imagination and Interpretation in Kant: The Hermeneutical Import of the Critique of Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Man, Paul De. “Sign and Symbol in Hegel’s ‘Aesthetics’.” Critical Inquiry 8, no. 4 (1982): 761–75.Google Scholar

Man, Paul De. “Reply to Raymond Geuss.” Critical Inquiry 10, no. 2 (1983): 383–90.Google Scholar

Mariña, Jacqueline. The Transformation of the Self in the Thought of Friedrich Schleiermacher. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Matherne, Samantha. “Images and Kant’s Theory of Perception.” Ergo 2, no. 29 (2015): 737–7.Google Scholar

Matherne, Samantha. “Kant and the Art of Schematism.” Kantian Review 19, no. 02 (2014): 181–205.Google Scholar

Matherne, Samantha. “Kant’s Theory of the Imagination.” In Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Imagination, ed. Kind, Amy, 55–68. Routledge Handbooks in Philosophy. New York: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar

Matherne, Samantha. “The Inclusive Interpretation of Kant’s Aesthetic Ideas.” The British Journal of Aesthetics 53, no. 1 (January 2013): 21–39.Google Scholar

McLear, Colin. “Kant on Animal Consciousness.” Philosophers Imprint 11, no. 15 (November 2011): 1–16.Google Scholar

McLear, Colin. “Kant on Perceptual Content.” Mind 125, no. 497 (2016): 95–144.Google Scholar

McLear, Colin. “Two Kinds of Unity in the Critique of Pure Reason.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 53, no. 1 (2015): 79–110.Google Scholar

Meier, Georg Friedrich. Versuch Einer Allgemeinen Auslegungskunst. Eds. Bühler, Axel and Madonna, Luigi Cataldi. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 1996.Google Scholar

Meinecke, Friedrich. Die Entstehung Des Historismus. München: Leibniz Verlag, 1946.Google Scholar

Merritt, Melissa, and Valaris, Markos. “Attention and Synthesis in Kant’s Conception of Experience.” The Philosophical Quarterly 67, no. 268 (2017): 571–92.Google Scholar

Messina, James. “Kant on the Unity of Space and the Synthetic Unity of Apperception.” Kant-Studien 105, no. 1 (2014): 5–40.Google Scholar

Metz, Wilhelm. Kategoriendeduktion Und Produktive Einbildungskraft In Der Theoretischen Philosophie Kants Und Fichtes. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1991.Google Scholar

Millán, Elizabeth. “Aesthetic Humanism: Poetry’s Role in the Work of Friedrich Schlegel and Schopenhauer.” In The Palgrave Schopenhauer Handbook, ed. Shapshay, Sandra, 179–96. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.Google Scholar

Millán, Elizabeth. “Bestimmung as Bildung: On Reading Fichte’s Vocation of Man as a Bildungsroman.” In Fichte’s Vocation of Man: New Interpretive and Critical Essays, eds. Breazeale, Daniel and Rockmore, Tom, 45–56. Albany: SUNY Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Millán, Elizabeth. “Fichte and Early German Romantic Philosophy.” In The Cambridge Companion to Fichte, eds. James, David and Zöller, Günter, 306–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Millán-Zaibert, Elizabeth. Friedrich Schlegel and the Emergence of Romantic Philosophy. Albany: SUNY Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Moyar, Dean. Hegel’s Conscience. New York City: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Mueller, Gustav E. “Solger’s Aesthetics – A Key to Hegel (Irony and Dialectic).” In Corona: Studies in Celebration of the Eightieth Birthday of Samuel Singer, Professor Emeritus, University of Berne, Switzerland, eds. Schirokauer, Arno and Paulsen, Wolfgang. Durham: Duke University Press, 1941.Google Scholar

Naragon, Steve. “Kant on Descartes and the Brutes.” Kant-Studien 81, no. 1 (1990): 1–23.Google Scholar

Nassar, Dalia. “Friedrich Schlegel (1772–1829).” In The Oxford Handbook of German Philosophy in the Nineteenth Century, eds. Forster, Michael N. and Gjesdal, Kristin, 68–87. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Nassar, Dalia. “Interpreting Novalis’ Fichte-Studien.” Deutsche Vierteljahrsschrift Für Literaturwissenschaft Und Geistesgeschichte 84, no. 3 (2010): 315–41.Google Scholar

Nassar, Dalia. “Romantic Empiricism after the ‘End of Nature’: Contributions to Environmental Philosophy.” In The Relevance of Romanticism: Essays on German Romantic Philosophy, ed. Nassar, Dalia, 296–313. Oxford University Press, 2014c.Google Scholar

Nassar, Dalia. The Relevance of Romanticism: Essays on German Romantic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014a.Google Scholar

Nassar, Dalia. The Romantic Absolute: Being and Knowing in Early German Romantic Philosophy, 1795–1804. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014b.Google Scholar

Neuhouser, Frederick. Fichte’s Theory of Subjectivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Ng, Karen. “Life and Mind in Hegel’s Logic and Subjective Spirit.” Hegel Bulletin 39, no. 01 (2016): 23–44.Google Scholar

Norman, J. “Squaring the Romantic Circle: Hegel’s Critique of Schlegel’s Theory of Art.” In Hegel and Aesthetics, ed. Maker, William, 131–44. Albany: SUNY Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha C. Love’s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. New York City: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Nuzzo, Angelica. Ideal Embodiment: Kant’s Theory of Sensibility (Studies in Continental Thought). Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Onof, Christian, and Schulting, Dennis. “Space as Form of Intuition and as Formal Intuition: On the Note to B160 in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason.” Philosophical Review 124, no. 1 (2015): 1–58.Google Scholar

Patsch, Hermann. “Zwischen Hermeneutik Und Dialektik.” In Schleiermacher, Romanticism, and the Critical Arts: A Festschrift in Honor of Hermann Patsch, eds. Dierkes, Hans, Tice, Terrence N., and Virmond, Wolfgang. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Pendlebury, Michael. “The Role of Imagination in Perception.” South African Journal of Philosophy 15, no. 4 (1996): 133–8.Google Scholar

Philonenko, Alexis. La Liberté Humaine Dans La Philosophie De Fichte. Paris: J. Vrin, 1966.Google Scholar

Piché, Claude. “The Place of Aesthetics in Fichte’s Early System.” In New Essays on Fichte’s Later Jena Wissenschaftslehre, eds. Breazeale, Daniel and Rockmore, Tom, 299–316. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Pinkard, Terry. German Philosophy: 1760–1860; the Legacy of Idealism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Pinkard, Terry P. Hegel’s Naturalism: Mind, Nature, and the Final Ends of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Pinkard, Terry. “Introduction: Hegel’s Path to the Phenomenology.” In Hegel, G. W. F. The Phenomenology of Spirit, ed. Pinkard, Terry, trans. Baur, Michael, p. xv. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Pippin, Robert B. “Fichte’s Alleged Subjective, Psychological, One-Sided Idealism.” In The Reception of Kant’s Critical Philosophy: Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel, ed. Sedgwick, Sally, 147–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Pippin, Robert B. Hegel’s Idealism: The Satisfactions of Self-Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Pippin, Robert B. Idealism as Modernism: Hegelian Variations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Pippin, Robert B. “Kant on the Spontaneity of Mind.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 17, no. 2 (1987): 449–75.Google Scholar

Pöggeler, Otto. Hegels Kritik Der Romantik. Bonn: Friedrich Wilhelms Universität, 1965.Google Scholar

Pöggeler, O. “Hegel Und Heidelberg.” Hegel-Studien 6 (1971): 65–133.Google Scholar

Pollack-Milgate, Howard. “Fichte and Novalis on the Relationship between Ethics and Aesthetics.” In Fichte’s System of Ethics: Papers from the Ninth Biennial Meeting of the North American Fichte Society. Philosophy Today, 52: no. 3–4 (2008).Google Scholar

Pollok, Anne. “Significant Formation: An Intersubjective Approach to Aesthetic Experience in Cassirer and Langer.” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 37 (2016): 71–95.Google Scholar

Pollok, Konstantin. “The ‘Transcendental Method’: On the Reception of the Critique of Pure Reason in Neo-Kantianism.” In The Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, ed. Guyer, Paul, 346–79. Cambridge Companions to Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Pollok, Konstantin. Kant’s Theory of Normativity: Exploring the Space of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Prauss, Gerold. Die Einheit Von Subjekt Und Objekt: Kants Probleme Mit Den Sachen Selbst. Freiburg: Verlag Karl Alber, 2015.Google Scholar

Radrizzani, Ives. “Von Der Kritik Der Urteilskraft Zur Ästhetik Der Einbildungskraft, Oder Von Der Kopernikanische Revoution Der Ästhetik Bei Fichte.” In Der Transzsendentalphilosophische Zugang Zur Wirklichkeit: Beiträge Aus Der Aktuellen Fichte-Forschung, eds. Moretto, Giovanni, Ivaldo, Marco, and Fuchs, Erich, 341–59. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 2001.Google Scholar

Redding, Paul. “Mathematics, Computation, Language, and Poetry: The Novalis Paradox.” In The Relevance of Romanticism: Essays on German Romantic Philosophy, ed. Nassar, Dalia, 221–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Reid, Jeffrey. “Hegel, Critique De Solger. Le Problème De La Communication Scientifique.” Par Archives De Philosophie 60 (1997): 255–64.Google Scholar

Reid, Jeffrey. “How the Dreaming Soul Became the Feeling Soul, between the 1827 and 1830 Editions of Hegel’s Philosophy of Subjective Spirit: Empirical Psychology and the Late Enlightenment.” 37–54. Proceedings of Proceedings of the Hegel Society of America. Vol. 20. 2013.Google Scholar

Renaut, Alain. Le Système Du Droit. Philosophie Et Droit Dans Le Pensée De Fichte. Paris: Presses Universitaires De France, 1986.Google Scholar

Rosefeldt, Tobias. Das Logische Ich: Kant über Den Gehalt Des Begriffes Von Sich Selbst. Berlin: Philo, 2000.Google Scholar

Rosefeldt, Tobias. Kant on Synthesis and the Intuition of Infinite Space. 2018. MS, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin.Google Scholar

Rush, Fred. Irony and Idealism: Rereading Schlegel, Hegel, and Kierkegaard. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Schäfer, Rainer. Johann Gottlieb Fichtes “Grundlage Der Gesamten Wissenschaftslehre” Von 1794. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 2006.Google Scholar

Schelling, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Von. System of Transcendental Idealism (1800). Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 2001.Google Scholar

Schelling, Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Von. The Philosophy of Art. Trans. Stott, Douglas W.. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Schlegel, Friedrich. Dialogue on Poetry “Gespräch Über Die Poesie” Aus: Athenaeum 1799–1800 and Literary Aphorisms Ausz. Aus D. Aphorismen “Lyceum” 1797, “Athenaeum” 1798–1800. Trans. Behler, Ernst and Struc, Roman. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1968b.Google Scholar

Schlegel, Friedrich Von. Friedrich Schlegel’s Lucinde and the Fragments. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Schlegel, Friedrich. Gespräch über Die Poesie. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler, 1968a.Google Scholar

Schlegel, Friedrich. “On Goethe’s Meister.” In Classic and Romantic: German Aesthetics, ed. Bernstein, J. M., 269–86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Schlegel, Friedrich Von. Philosophical Fragments. Trans. Firchow, Peter. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Schlegel, Friedrich. “Schlegel Fragments.” In Classic and Romantic German Aesthetics, ed. Bernstein, J. M., 239–60. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Schleiermacher, Friedrich. Hermeneutik. Nach Den Handschriften. Edited by Kimmerle, Heinz. Heidelberg: Carl Winter, 1974.Google Scholar

Schleiermacher, Friedrich. Hermeneutics and Criticism and Other Writings. Trans. Bowie, Andrew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Schleiermacher, Friedrich. Hermeneutik Und Kritik. Ed. Frank, Manfred. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 1993.Google Scholar

Schleiermacher, Friedrich. Notes on Ethics (1805/1806). Trans. Tice, Terrence N.. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Schleiermacher, Friedrich. On Religion: Speeches to Its Cultured Despisers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Schmidt, Sarah. Die Konstruktion Des Endlichen: Schleiermachers Philosophie Der Wechselwirkung. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2004.Google Scholar

Schmitz, Friederike. “On Kant’s Conception of Inner Sense: Self-Affection by the Understanding.” European Journal of Philosophy 23, no. 4 (2015): 1044–63.Google Scholar

Scholtz, Gunter. Ethik Und Hermeneutik: Schleiermachers Grundlegung Der Geisteswissenschaften. Frankfurt Am Main: Suhrkamp, 1995.Google Scholar

Scholtz, Gunter. “Schleiermacher Im Kontext Der Neuzeitlichen Hermeneutik-Entwicklung.” In Friedrich Schleiermachers Hermeneutik Interpretationen Und Perspektiven, eds. Arndt, Andreas and Dierken, Jörg, 1–26. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2016.Google Scholar

Schopenhauer, Arthur. The World as Will and Representaion. Trans. Payne, E. F. J.. New York City: Dover, 1966.Google Scholar

Schulin, Ernst, Hegel, G. W. F., and Von Ranke, Leopold. Die Weltgeschichtliche Erfassung Des Orients Bei Hegel Und Ranke. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck Und Ruprecht, 1958.Google Scholar

Sedgwick, Sally, ed. The Reception of Kant’s Critical Philosophy: Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Sellars, Wilfrid. “Kant’s Transcendental Idealism.” Collections of Philosophy 6, 1976, 165–81.Google Scholar

Sellars, Wilfrid. Science and Metaphysics. New York City: Routledge, 1968.Google Scholar

Sellars, Wilfrid. “Sensa or Sensings: Reflections on the Ontology of Perception.” Philosophical Studies 41, no. 1 (1982): 83–111.Google Scholar

Sellars, Wilfrid. “Some Remarks on Kant’s Theory of Experience.” The Journal of Philosophy 64, no. 20 (1967): 633–47.Google Scholar

Shabel, Lisa. “The Transcendental Aesthetic.” In Cambridge Companion to the Critique of Pure Reason, ed. Guyer, Paul, 93–117. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Smith, John H. “Friedrich Schlegel’s Romantic Calculus: Reflections on the Mathematical Infinite Around 1800.” In The Relevance of Romanticism: Essays on German Romantic Philosophy, ed. Nassar, Dalia, 239–257. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Smyth, Daniel. “Infinity and Givenness: Kant on the Intuitive Origin of Spatial Representation.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 44, no. 5–6 (2014): 551–79.Google Scholar

Solger, K. W. F. Erwin: Vier Gespräche über Das Schöne Und Die Kunst. Ed. Kurtz, Rudolf. Berlin: Verlag Von Wiegandt Und Trieben, 1907.Google Scholar

Solger, K. W. F. “Kritik über Die Vorlesungen Des Herrn August Wilhelm Von Schlegel über Dramatische Kunst Und Literatur.” Wiener Jahrbuch 7.Google Scholar

Solger, K. W. F. “Posthumous Writings and Correspondence.” Trans. Behler, Diana I.. In Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences in Outline, and Other Critical Writings, by Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, ed. Behler, Ernst. Vol. 24. The German Library. New York: Continuum, 1990.Google Scholar

Solger, K. W. F. Vorlesungen über Ästhetik. Ed. Pinna, Giovanna. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 2017.Google Scholar

Speight, Allen. “Artisans, Artists and Hegel’s History of Art.” Hegel Bulletin 34, no. 02 (October 2013): 203–22.Google Scholar

Speight, Allen. Hegel, Literature, and the Problem of Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Speight, Allen. “Hegel on Poetry, Prose and the Origin of the Arts.” In Palgrave Hegel Handbook, ed. Marina Bykova. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, Forthcoming.Google Scholar

Speight, Allen. “Religion, Art and the Emergence of Absolute Spirit in the Phenomenology of Spirit.” In The Oxford Handbook of Hegel, ed. Moyar, Dean, 148–65. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Speight, Allen, and Baur, Michael. “Hegel and the ‘Historical Deduction’ of the Concept of Art.” In Blackwell Companion to Hegel, ed. Houlgate, Stephen, 353–68. Oxford: Blackwell, 2011.Google Scholar

Speight, Allen, and Hebing, Niklas. “Hegel on the Symbolic Form of Art.” In G. W. F. Hegel: Vorlesungen über Die Philosophie Der Kunst: Klassiker Auslegen, ed. Birgit Sandkaulen. Berlin: De Gruyter, Forthcoming.Google Scholar

Spinoza, Benedictus De. Ethics. Ed. Kisner, Matthew J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Steinberg, M. P. “Aby Warburg and the Secularization of the Image.” In Weimar Thought: A Contested Legacy, eds. McCormick, John P. and Gordon, Peter Eli, 316–38. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Stephenson, Andrew. “Kant on the Object-Dependence of Intuition and Hallucination.” The Philosophical Quarterly 65, no. 260 (2015): 486–508.Google Scholar

Stern, Robert. Hegelian Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Strawson, P. F. “Sensibility, Understanding, and the Doctrine of Synthesis.” Philosophical Writings, 2011, 157–65.Google Scholar

Szondi, Peter. Poetik Und Geschichtsphilosphie I. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1974.Google Scholar

Szondi, Peter. Introduction to Literary Hermeneutics. Trans. Woodmansee, Martha. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Thiel, Udo. “Between Wolff and Kant: Merian’s Theory of Apperception.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 34, no. 2 (1996): 213–32.Google Scholar

Thiel, Udo. “Kant’s Notion of Self-Consciousness in Context.” In Kant Und Die Berliner Aufklärung: Akten Des IX. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses, eds. Gerhardt, Volker, Horstmann, Rolf-Peter, and Schumacher, Ralph, 468–76. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2001.Google Scholar

Tolley, Clinton. “Between ‘Perception’ and Understanding, from Leibniz to Kant.” Estudos Kantianos 4, no. 2 (2016): 71–98.Google Scholar

Tolley, Clinton. “Kant on the Place of Cognition in the Progression of Our Representations.” Synthese, 2017: 1–30.Google Scholar

Tolley, Clinton. “The Difference Between Original, Metaphysical, and Geometrical Representations of Space.” In Kantian Nonconceptualism, ed. Schulting, Dennis, 257–85. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.Google Scholar

Tolley, Clinton. “The Meaning of ‘Perception’ in Kant and His Historical Context.” Proceedings of 12th International Kant Congress, Vienna. 2016.Google Scholar

Tolley, Clinton. “The Non-Conceptuality of the Content of Intuitions: A New Approach.” Kantian Review 18, no. 01 (2013): 107–36.Google Scholar

Tracz, Brian. Images in Kant. PhD diss., University of California San Diego.Google Scholar

Valaris, Markos. “Inner Sense, Self-Affection and Temporal Consciousness in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason.” Philosophers’ Imprint 8 (2008): 1–18.Google Scholar

Vischer, F. T., and Zeller, Eduard. Philosophische Aufsätze: Eduard Zeller Zu Seinem Fünfzigjährigen Doctor-Jubiläum Gewidmet. Leipzig: Fue’s Verlag, 1887, 153–93.Google Scholar

Waibel, Violetta. “From the Metaphysics of the Beautiful to the Metaphysics of the True: Hölderlin’s Philosophy in the Horizon of Poetry.” In The Palgrave Handbook of German Idealism, ed. Altman, Matthew C., 409–34. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.Google Scholar

Waibel, Violetta L. Hölderlin Und Fichte: 1794–1800. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh, 2000.Google Scholar

Waldow, Anik. David Hume and the Problem of Other Minds. London: Continuum, 2009.Google Scholar

Waldow, Anik. Experience Embodied: Early Modern Accounts of the Human Place in Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Forthcoming.Google Scholar

Watkins, Eric. “Kant and the Myth of the Given.” Inquiry 51, no. 5 (2008): 512–31.Google Scholar

Watkins, Eric. Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason: Background Source Materials. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Waxman, Wayne. Kant’s Model of the Mind: A New Interpretation of Transcendental Idealism. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Wellbery, David E. Goethes Pandora: Dramatisierung einer Urgeschichte der Moderne. München: Bayerische Akademie Der Wissenschaften, 2017.Google Scholar

Wellbery, David E. The Specular Moment: Goethe’s Early Lyric and the Beginnings of Romanticism. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Westphal, Kenneth R. “Kant, Hegel, and the Fate of ‘the’ Intuitive Intellect.” In The Reception of Kant’s Critical Philosophy, ed. Sedgwick, Sally, 283–305. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Wheeler, Kathleen M. German Aesthetic and Literary Criticism: The Romantic Ironists and Goethe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Williams, Jessica. “How Conceptually Guided Are Kantian Intuitions?” History of Philosophy Quarterly 29, no. 1, 57–78. Accessed 2012.Google Scholar

Williams, Jessica J. “Kant on the Original Synthesis of Understanding and Sensibility.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26, no. 1 (2018): 66–86.Google Scholar

Wind, Edgar. “Warburg’s Concept of Kulturwissenschaft and Its Meaning for Aesthetics.” In The Eloquence of Symbols: Studies in Humanist Art. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Wolff, Michael. “Science of Logic.” In The Bloomsbury Companion to Hegel, eds. De Laurentiis, Allegra and Edwards, Jeffrey, 71–101. London: Bloomsbury, 2013.Google Scholar

Wolfgang, Virmond. “Neue Textgrundlagen Zu Schleiermachers Früher Hermeneutik. Prolegomena Zur Kritischen Edition.” In Schleiermacher-Archiv. Vol. 1. 575–90. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1985.Google Scholar

Wuerth, Julian. Kant on Mind, Action, and Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Wunderlich, Falk. Kant Und Die Bewusstseinstheorien Des 18. Jahrhunderts. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2005.Google Scholar

Young, J. Michael. “Kant’s View of Imagination.” Kant-Studien 79, 1–4 (1988): 140–64.Google Scholar

Zambrana, Rocío. Hegel’s Theory of Intelligibility. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Zammito, John H. Kant, Herder, and the Birth of Anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Zammito, John H. The Genesis of Kant’s Critique of Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Zöller, Günter. “A Philosophy of Freedom: Fichte’s Philosophical Achievement,” in The Palgrave Handbook of German Idealism, ed. Altman, Matthew C., 286–99. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.Google Scholar

Zovko, Jure. “Philosophie Nach Hegels Beisetzung Der Romantik.” Hegel-Jahrbuch 2002 (2002): 335–47.Google Scholar

Zuckert, Rachel. Kant on Beauty and Biology: An Interpretation of the Critique of Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar