Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T07:58:25.270Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - A Metapragmatic Aspect of Politeness: With a Special Emphasis on Attentiveness in Japanese

from Part II - Concepts and Cultural Norms Underlying Politeness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 June 2019

By
Saeko Fukushima
Edited by
Eva Ogiermann  and
Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
Eva Ogiermann
Affiliation:
King's College London
Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Charlotte
Get access

Summary

Focusing on emic understandings in Japanese relational networks, Fukushima’s chapter scrutinizes from a metapragmatic perspective the relationships between attentiveness and four other concepts: consideration, empathy, altruism and helping behavior. Fukushima’s exploration is based on data elicited through a questionnaire based on a visual analog scale distributed to 132 Japanese participants and their written logs on what concepts or expressions best describe attentiveness. The extent to which these concepts differ is further investigated through focus group data. Findings obtained from the questionnaire show that all four concepts are related to attentiveness, with empathy being the most closely related. The written part of the questionnaire refers to stages of attentiveness and concepts such as self-sacrifice and help. The focus group data reveal nuanced differences among the concepts investigated, identifying differences between attentiveness and altruism or helping behavior that have not been discussed in previous research. Fukushima concludes that the concepts taken up in this chapter provide a ‘heart perspective’ on politeness and interpersonal relationships.

Keywords

Second-order politeness
Type
Chapter
Information
From Speech Acts to Lay Understandings of Politeness
Multilingual and Multicultural Perspectives
 , pp. 226 - 247
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., and Akert, R. A. (2013). Social Psychology, 8th Edn, Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.Google Scholar
Batson, C. D. (2011). Altruism in Humans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. (1987[1978]). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Caffi, C. (2009). Metapragmatics. In Mey, J. L., ed., Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 625–30.Google Scholar
Chang, W.-L. M. and Fukushima, S. (2017). ‘Your care and concern are my burden’: accounting for the emic concepts of ‘attentiveness’ and ‘empathy’ in interpersonal relationships among Taiwanese females. East Asian Pragmatics 2(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christie, C. (2015). Epilogue. Politeness research: sociolinguistics as applied pragmatics. Journal of Politeness Research 11(2), 355–64.Google Scholar
Cohen, R. (1978). Altruism: human, cultural, or what? In Wispé, L., ed., Altruism, Sympathy, and Helping: Psychological and Sociological Principles. New York, NY: Academic Press, pp. 79–98.Google Scholar
Daibou, I. (2012). Taijin kankei ni okeru hairyo koudou no shinrigaku: Taijin komyunikeeshon no shiten [Psychology of considerate behavior in interpersonal relationships: A perspective of interpersonal communication]. In Miyake, K., Noda, H., and Ogoshi, N., eds, Hairyo wa donoyou ni shime sareru ka [How Consideration Is Expressed]. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo, pp. 51–67.Google Scholar
Eelen, G. (2001). A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St Jerome.Google Scholar
Fukushima, S. (2000). Requests and Culture: Politeness in British English and Japanese. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Fukushima, S. (2004). Evaluation of politeness: the case of attentiveness. Multilingua 23(4), 365–87.Google Scholar
Fukushima, S. (2009). Evaluation of politeness: do the Japanese evaluate attentiveness more positively than the British? Pragmatics 19(4), 501–18.Google Scholar
Fukushima, S. (2011). A cross-generational and cross-cultural study on demonstration of attentiveness. Pragmatics 21(4), 549–71.Google Scholar
Fukushima, S. (2013). Evaluation of (im)politeness: a comparative study among Japanese students, Japanese parents and American students on evaluation of attentiveness. Pragmatics 23(2), 275–99.Google Scholar
Fukushima, S. (2015). In search of another understanding of politeness: from the perspective of attentiveness. Journal of Politeness Research 11(2), 261–87.Google Scholar
Fukushima, S. (2016). Emic understandings of attentiveness and its related concepts among Japanese. East Asian Pragmatics 1(2), 181–208.Google Scholar
Fukushima, S. and Haugh, M. (2014). The role of emic understandings in theorizing im/politeness: the metapragmatics of attentiveness, empathy and anticipatory inference in Japanese and Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics 74, 165–79.Google Scholar
Fukushima, S. and Sifianou, M. (2017). Conceptualizing politeness in Japanese and Greek. Intercultural Pragmatics 14(4), 525–55.Google Scholar
Furuhata, K., ed. (1994). Shakai Shinrigaku Shojiten [A Small Dictionary of Social Psychology]. Tokyo: Yuhikaku.Google Scholar
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, P. (2009). Impoliteness and identity in the American news media: the ‘Culture Wars’. Journal of Politeness Research 5(2), 273–303.Google Scholar
Grainger, K. and Mills, S. (2016). Directness and Indirectness across Cultures. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Haidt, J. and Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research 20(1), 98–116.Google Scholar
Haidt, J. and Kesebir, S. (2010). Morality. In Fiske, S., Gilbert, D., and Lindzey, G., eds, Handbook of Social Psychology, 5th Edn, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, pp. 797–832.Google Scholar
Hara, K. (2006). The concept of omoiyari (altruistic sensitivity) in Japanese relational communication. Intercultural Communication Studies XV(1), 24–32.Google Scholar
Haugh, M. (2004). Revisiting the conceptualization of politeness in English and Japanese. Multilingua 23(1/2), 85–109.Google Scholar
Haugh, M. (2012). Epilogue: the first-second order distinction in face and politeness research. Journal of Politeness Research 8(1), 111–34.Google Scholar
Haugh, M. (2015). Im/politeness Implicatures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Haugh, M. (2016). The role of English as a scientific metalanguage for research in pragmatics: reflections on the metapragmatics of ‘politeness’ in Japanese. East Asian Pragmatics 1(1), 39–71.Google Scholar
Intachakra, S. (2012). Politeness motivated by the ‘heart’ and ‘binary rationality’ in Thai culture. Journal of Pragmatics 44(5), 619–35.Google Scholar
Işık-Güler, H. (2008). Metapragmatics of (Im)politeness in Turkish: An Exploratory Emic Investigation. Unpublished PhD thesis, Ankara Middle East Technical University.Google Scholar
Kádár, D. Z. and Haugh, M. (2013). Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kádár, D. Z. and Márquez Reiter, R. (2015). (Im)politeness and (im)morality: Insights from intervention. Journal of Politeness Research 11(2), 239–60.Google Scholar
Kádár, D. Z. and Mills, S. (2011). Introduction. In Kádár, D. Z. and Mills, S., eds, Politeness in East Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
Krueger, R. A. 1988. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Lebra, T. S. (1976). Japanese Patterns of Behavior. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Lebra, T. S. (1993). Culture, self, and communication in Japan and the United States. In Gudykunst, W. B., ed., Communication in Japan and the United States. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, pp. 51–87.Google Scholar
Leech, G. N. (2014). The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Linguistic Politeness Research Group, eds (2011). Discursive Approaches to Politeness. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Locher, M. A. (2015). Interpersonal pragmatics and its link to (im)politeness research. Journal of Pragmatics 86, 5–10.Google Scholar
Matsui, Y. (1991). Omoiyari no kouzou [The anatomy of empathy]. Gendai no esupuri 291, 27–37.Google Scholar
Mills, S. (2003). Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mills, S. (2011). Discursive approaches to politeness and impoliteness. In Linguistic Politeness Research Group, eds, Discursive Approaches to Politeness. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 19–56.Google Scholar
Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Nakamura, H. and Takagi, O. (eds) (1987). Hito o Tasukeru Koudou no Shinrigaku [Psychology of Behavior of Helping Others]. Tokyo: Kouseikan.Google Scholar
Norrick, N. and Haugh, M. (2015). Interdisciplinary perspectives on pragmatics: a festschrift for Jonathan Culpeper (Editorial). Journal of Pragmatics 86, 1–4.Google Scholar
Obana, Y. and Tomoda, T. (1994). The sociological significance of ‘politeness’ in English and Japanese languages: report from a pilot study. Japanese Studies Bulletin 14(2), 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogiermann, E. (2015). Direct off-record requests? ‘Hinting’ in family interactions. Journal of Pragmatics 86, 31–5.Google Scholar
Overstreet, M. (2010). Metapragmatics. In Cummings, L., ed., Pragmatics Encyclopedia. London: Routledge, pp. 266–8.Google Scholar
Pizziconi, B. (2007). The lexical mapping of politeness in British English and Japanese. Journal of Politeness Research 3(2), 207–41.Google Scholar
Pon, F. (1996). ‘Ki’ ‘Kikubari hyougen’ o megutte [On ki and expressions of kikubari]. Nihongogaku 15, 76–83.Google Scholar
Pon, F. (2005). Nihongo no ‘hairyo hyogen’ ni kansuru kenkyu: Chugokugo to no hikaku kenkyu ni okeru shomondai [A Study on ‘Expressions of Consideration’ in Japanese: Some Problems Concerning a Comparison with Chinese]. Osaka: Izumi Shoin.Google Scholar
Ruhi, Ş. and Işık-Güler, H. (2007). Conceptualizing face and relational work in (im)-politeness: revelations from politeness lexemes and idioms in Turkish. Journal of Pragmatics 39(4), 681–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In Berkowitz, L., ed., Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York, NY: Academic Press, pp. 221–79.Google Scholar
Shinmura, I., ed. (2008). Kojien, 6th Edn, Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Sifianou, M. (1992). Politeness Phenomena in England and Greece: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Sifianou, M. (1993). Off-record indirectness and the notion of imposition. Multilingua 12(1), 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sifianou, M. (1995). Indirectness and politeness: the case of English and Greek. Reading Working Papers in Linguistics 2, 241–53.Google Scholar
Sifianou, M. (1997). Politeness and off-record indirectness. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 126, 163–79.Google Scholar
Sifianou, M. (2011). On the concept of face and politeness. In Bargiela-Chiappini, F. and Kádár, D. Z., eds, Politeness across Cultures. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 42–58.Google Scholar
Sifianou, M. (2015). Conceptualizing politeness in Greek: evidence from Twitter corpora. Journal of Pragmatics 86, 25–30.Google Scholar
Sifianou, M. and Tzanne, A. (2010). Conceptualizations of politeness and impoliteness in Greek. Intercultural Pragmatics 7(4), 661–87.Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H. and Kádár, D. Z. (2016). The bases of (im)politeness evaluations: culture, the moral order and the East–West debate. East Asian Pragmatics 1(1), 73–106.Google Scholar
Stewart, D. W. and Shamdasani, P. N. (1990). Focus Groups: Theory and Practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Sugito, S. (2005). Nihonjin no gengo koudou: kikubari no kouzou [Japanese verbal behavior: structure of attentiveness]. In Nakamura, A., Nomura, M., Sakuma, M., and Komiya, C., eds, Hyogen to Buntai [Expressions and Styles]. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin, pp. 362–71.Google Scholar
Takagi, O. (1998). Hito o Tasukeru Kokoro: Enjo Koudou no Shakai Shinrigaku [Heart to Help People: Social Psychology of Helping Behavior]. Tokyo: Saiensusha.Google Scholar
Takemura, K. (1991). Kenketsu/zouki teikyo koudou to aitashin [Blood/organ donation behavior and altruism]. Gendai no esupuri 291, 86–97.Google Scholar
van der Bom, I. and Mills, S. (2015). A discursive approach to the analysis of politeness data. Journal of Politeness Research 11(2), 179–206.Google Scholar
Verschueren, J. (2000). Notes on the role of metapragmatic awareness in language use. Pragmatics 10(4), 439–56.Google Scholar
Waltz, C. F., Strickland, O. L., and Lenz, E. R. (2005). Measurement in Nursing and Health Research, 3rd Edn. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Watts, R. J. (2005 [1992]). Linguistic politeness and politic verbal behavior: reconsidering claims for universality. In Watts, R. J., Ide, S., and Ehlich, K., eds, Politeness in Language: Studies in History, Theory and Practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 43–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×