Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-26T00:00:52.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

25 - Should I Stay or Should I Go Now?

Integrating the Learning and Selection Views on Firms’ Successive Make-or-Ally Decisions for Product Innovation

from Part X - The Evolution, Survival or Termination of Alliances

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2019

By
Louis Mulotte ,
Charlotte Ren ,
Pierre Dussauge  and
Jaideep Anand
Edited by
Farok J. Contractor  and
Jeffrey J. Reuer
Farok J. Contractor
Affiliation:
Rutgers University, New Jersey
Jeffrey J. Reuer
Affiliation:
University of Colorado Boulder
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Frontiers of Strategic Alliance Research
Negotiating, Structuring and Governing Partnerships
 , pp. 423 - 436
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amburgey, T., Miner, A. 1992. Strategic momentum: The effects of repetitive, positional, and contextual momentum on merger activity. Strategic Management Journal, 13: 335–348.Google Scholar
Anand, B., Khanna, T. 2000. Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3): 295–315.Google Scholar
Anand, J., Mulotte, L., Ren, C. 2016. Does experience imply learning? Strategic Management Journal, 37(7): 1395–1412.Google Scholar
Anand, J., Oriani, R., Vassolo, R. 2010. Alliance activity as a dynamic capability: Accessing external technology. Organization Science, 21: 1213–1232.Google Scholar
Castañer, X., Mulotte, L., Garrette, B., Dussauge, P. 2014. Governance mode vs. governance fit: Performance implications of make-or-ally choices for product innovation in the worldwide aircraft industry, 1942–2000. Strategic Management Journal, 35(9): 1386–1397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, S.-J., Rosenzweig, P. 2001. The choice of entry mode in sequential foreign direct investment. Strategic Management Journal, 22(8): 747–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cyert, R., March, J. 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Delios, A., Beamish, P. 1999. Ownership strategy of Japanese firms: Transactional, institutional, and experience influences. Strategic Management Journal, 20(10): 915–933.Google Scholar
Doz, Y.L. 1996. The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: Initial conditions or learning processes? Strategic Management Journal, 17(Special Issue): 55–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dussauge, P., Garrette, B. 1995. Determinants of success in international strategic alliances: Evidence from the global aerospace industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(3): 505–530.Google Scholar
Dussauge, P., Garrette, B., Mitchell, W. 2000. Learning from competing partners: Outcomes and durations of scale and link alliances in Europe, North America, and Asia. Strategic Management Journal, 21(2): 99–126.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FI/DMS. 2000. Aerospace Systems Group Library. Newtown, CT: FI/DMS.Google Scholar
Garrette, B., Castañer, X., Dussauge, P. 2009. Horizontal alliances vs. autonomous production: The choice of product expansion modes in the worldwide aircraft industry 1945–2000. Strategic Management Journal, 30(8): 885–894.Google Scholar
Greve, H. 2003. A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: Evidence from shipbuilding. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6): 685–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillén, M. 2003. Experience, imitation, and the sequence of foreign entry: Wholly owned and joint venture manufacturing by South Korean firms and business groups in China, 1987–1995. Journal of International Business Studies, 34(2): 185–198.Google Scholar
Gulati, R. 1995. Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1): 85–112.Google Scholar
Gulati, R. 1999. Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5): 397–420.Google Scholar
Haleblian, J. J., Kim, J. Y., Rajagopalan, N. 2006. The influence of acquisition experience and performance on acquisition behavior: Evidence from the US commercial banking industry. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2): 357–370.Google Scholar
Hamel, G. 1991. Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 12(Special Issue): 83–103.Google Scholar
Hennart, J.-F. 1988. A transaction cost theory of equity joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 9(4): 361–374.Google Scholar
Hennart, J.-F., Roehl, T., Zietlow, D. 1999. Trojan horse or workhorse? The evolution of US-Japanese joint ventures in the United States. Strategic Management Journal, 20(1): 15–29.Google Scholar
Hoang, H., Rothaermel, F. 2005. The effect of general and partner-specific alliance experience on joint R&D project performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48(2): 332–345.Google Scholar
Hochmuth, M. S. 1974. Aerospace. In Vernon, R. (Ed.), Big Business and the State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 145–169.Google Scholar
Inkpen, A., Beamish, P. W. 1997. Knowledge, bargaining power, and the instability of international joint ventures. Academy of Management Review, 22(1): 177–202.Google Scholar
Inkpen, A., Tsang, E. 2007. Learning and strategic alliances. Academy of Management Annals, 1(1): 479–511.Google Scholar
Jane’s. 1944–2000. All the World’s Aircraft. London: Jane’s Publishing Company Ltd.Google Scholar
Johanson, J., Vahlne, J.-E. 1977. The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1): 23–32.Google Scholar
Kale, P., Anand, J. 2006. Regulatory liberalization and the decline of emerging economy joint ventures: The case of India. California Management Review, 48(3): 61–76.Google Scholar
Kale, P., Singh, H., Perlmutter, H. 2000. Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital. Strategic Management Journal, 21(43): 217–237.Google Scholar
Khanna, T., Gulati, R., Nohria, N. 1998. The dynamics of learning alliances: Competition, cooperation, and relative scope. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 193–210.Google Scholar
Kim, L. 1998. Crisis construction and organizational learning: Capability building in catching-up at Hyundai Motor. Organization Science, 9(4): 506–521.Google Scholar
Lavie, D. 2007. Alliance portfolios and firm performance: A study of value creation and appropriation in the US software industry. Strategic Management Journal, 28(12): 1187–1212.Google Scholar
Leiblein, M., Miller, D. 2003. An empirical examination of transaction- and firm-level influences on the vertical boundaries of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 24(9): 839–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, B., March, J. 1988. Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14: 319–340.Google Scholar
Mowery, D. 1990. The Japanese commercial aircraft industry: Déjà vu all over again. Technovation, 10(6): 419–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mowery, D., Oxley, J. E., Silverman, B. 1996. Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue): 77–92.Google Scholar
Moxon, R. 1987. International competition in high technology: The Brazilian aircraft industry. International Marketing Review, 4(2): 7–20.Google Scholar
Mulotte, L. 2014. Do experience effects vary across governance modes? Organization Science, 25(3): 757–775.Google Scholar
Mulotte, L., Dussauge, P., Mitchell, W. 2013. Does pre-entry licensing undermine the performance of subsequent independent activities? Strategic Management Journal, 34(3): 358–372.Google Scholar
Nelson, R., Winter, S. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pedersen, T., Petersen, B., Benito, G. 2002. Change of foreign operation method: Impetus and switching costs. International Business Review, 11(3): 325–345.Google Scholar
Penner-Hahn, J. 1998. Firm and environmental influences on the mode and sequence of foreign research and development activities. Strategic Management Journal, 19(2): 149–168.Google Scholar
Robertson, T., Gatignon, H. 1998. Technology development mode: A transaction cost conceptualization. Strategic Management Journal, 19(6): 515–532.Google Scholar
Roehl, T., Truitt, F. 1987. Japanese industrial policy in aircraft manufacturing. International Marketing Review, 4(2): 21–32.Google Scholar
Sampson, R. 2005. Experience effects and collaborative returns in R&D alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 26(11): 1009–1031.Google Scholar
Schilke, O., Goerzen, A. 2010. Alliance management capability: An investigation of the construct and its measurement. Journal of Management, 36(5): 1192–1219.Google Scholar
Schreiner, M., Kale, P., Corsten, D. 2009. What really is alliance management capability and how does it impact alliance outcomes and success? Strategic Management Journal, 30(13): 1395–1419.Google Scholar
Simonin, B. L. 1997. The importance of collaborative know-how: An empirical test of the learning organization. Academy of Management Journal, 40(5): 1150–1174.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Rajagopalan, N. 2015. Alliance capabilities: Review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 41(1): 236–260.Google Scholar
White, S. 2000. Competition, capabilities and the make, buy, or ally decisions of Chinese state-owned firms. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3): 324–341.Google Scholar
Zollo, M., Reuer, J., Singh, H. 2002. Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances. Organization Science, 13(6): 701–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×