Book contents
- Juvenal and the Poetics of Anonymity
- Cambridge Classical Studies
- Juvenal and the Poetics of Anonymity
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations, Editions and Commentaries
- 1 Introduction: Meet Anon
- 2 Anonymity Programmed
- 3 The Anatomy of Anonymity: Bodies and Names
- 4 Shrinking, Slinking, and Sinking
- 5 Consolation, Isolation, Indigestion
- 6 Conclusion
- Bibliography
- General Index
- Index Locorum
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 November 2017
Book contents
- Juvenal and the Poetics of Anonymity
- Cambridge Classical Studies
- Juvenal and the Poetics of Anonymity
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations, Editions and Commentaries
- 1 Introduction: Meet Anon
- 2 Anonymity Programmed
- 3 The Anatomy of Anonymity: Bodies and Names
- 4 Shrinking, Slinking, and Sinking
- 5 Consolation, Isolation, Indigestion
- 6 Conclusion
- Bibliography
- General Index
- Index Locorum
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Juvenal and the Poetics of Anonymity , pp. 309 - 344Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Adamietz, J. 1983. ‘Juvenals 12. Satire’. In Hommages à Jean Cousin: rencontres avec l’antiquité classique, 237–48. Paris: Presses universitaires de Franche-Comté.Google Scholar
Adkin, N. 2008. ‘Three Notes on Juvenal’s Twelfth Satire’. Philologus 152 (1): 128–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adorno, T. 2010. Minima moralia: Reflections from Damaged Life. Translated by Jephcott, E. F. N.. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Ahl, F. M. 1984. ‘The Art of Safe Criticism in Greece and Rome’. The American Journal of Philology 105 (2): 174–208.Google Scholar
Ahl, F. M. 1985. Metaformations: Soundplay and Wordplay in Ovid and Other Classical Poets. Ithaca (NY): Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, W. Jr. 1956. ‘O Fortunatam Natam …’ Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 87: 130–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, R. 1996. ‘Conquest by Text: Juvenal and Plutarch on Egypt’. In Roman Imperialism: Post-Colonial Perspectives, edited by Webster, J. and Cooper, N., 99–110. Leicester: University of Leicester.Google Scholar
Ambuhl, A. 2014. ‘(Re)constructing Myth: Elliptical Narrative in Hellenistic and Latin Poetry’. In Hellenistic Studies at a Crossroads: Exploring Texts, Contexts and Metatexts, edited by Hunter, R. L., Rengakos, A., and Sistakou, E., 113–32. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Anderson, W. 1987. ‘Juvenal Satire 15: Cannibals and Culture’. Ramus Special Number 16: The Imperial Muse: To Juvenal through Ovid: 203–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ando, V. 2010. ‘Cannibalismo e antropoiesi nella poesia iliadica’. In Come bestie? Forme e paradossi della violenza tra mondo antico e disagio contemporaneo, edited by Ando, V. and Cusumano, N., 1–18. Caltanissetta: Salvatore Sciascia editore.Google Scholar
Arens, W. 1979. The Man-Eating Myth: Anthropology and Anthropophagy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aricò, G. and Rivoltella, M.. 2008. La riflessione sul teatro nella cultura romana. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. 2012. ‘“Juvenalis eques”: A Dissident Voice from the Lower Tier of the Roman Elite’. In A Companion to Persius and Juvenal, edited by Braund, S. and Osgood, J., 59–78. Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arweiler, A. H. and Möller, M.. 2008. Vom Selbst-Verständnis in Antike und Neuzeit = Notions of the Self in Antiquity and Beyond. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ash, R. Forthcoming 2017. ‘“Do Not Adjust Your Set!”: Paradoxography and Marvels in Post-Domitianic Literature’. In Roman Literature under Nerva, Trajan and Hadrian: Literary Interactions, AD 96–138, edited by König, A. and Whitton, C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Astbury, R. 1977. ‘The Date of Juvenal’s Thirteenth Satire’. American Journal of Philology 98 (4): 392–95.Google Scholar
Atkinson, R. 1993. ‘Humour in Philosophy’. In Humour and History, edited by Cameron, K., 10–20. Oxford: Intellect Books.Google Scholar
Austin, F. M. 1903. ‘Cacophony in Juvenal, Horace and Persius’. American Journal of Philology 24 (4): 452–55.Google Scholar
Avramescu, C. 2009. An Intellectual History of Cannibalism. Translated by Blyth, A. I.. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Baines, V. 2003. ‘“Umbricius” “Bellum Ciuile”: Juvenal, Satire 3’. Greece and Rome 50 (2): 220–37.Google Scholar
Baird, J. A. and Taylor, C., eds. 2011. Ancient Graffiti in Context. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Baker, S. 1993. Picturing the Beast: Animals, Identity, and Representation. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Baldin, M. 2010. ‘Valenze della terminologia medica in autori non medici: Plauto, Sallustio, Giovenale’. In Body, Disease and Treatment in a Changing World, edited by Langslow, D. and Langslow, B. M., 73–87. Lausanne: Éditions BHMS.Google Scholar
Baldwin, B. 1961. ‘Lucian As Social Satirist’. Classical Quarterly 11: 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, B. 1982. ‘Literature and Society in the Later Roman Empire’. In Literary and Artistic Patronage in Ancient Rome, edited by Gold, B. K., 67–83. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, B. 1990. ‘Juvenal and the Historia Augusta: Two Possible Concordances’. Acta Classica 33: 108–11.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 1997. The Poet and the Prince: Ovid and Augustan Discourse. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 1999. ‘Representations of Suffering and Interpretation in the Aeneid’. In Virgil: Critical Assessments of Classical Authors, edited by Hardie, P. R., 3: 324–44. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 2009. ‘Exemplarity: Between Practice and Text’. In Latinitas Perennis Volume II: Appropriation and Latin Literature, edited by Maes, Y., Papy, J., and Verbaal, W., 41–62. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Barta, P. I., ed. 2001. Carnivalizing Difference: Bakhtin and the Other. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. 1975. The Pleasure of the Text. Translated by Miller, R.. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. 1995. ‘The Death of the Author’. In Authorship: From Plato to the Postmodern, edited by Burke, S., 125–30. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. 1994. Actors in the Audience: Theatricality and Doublespeak from Nero to Hadrian. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. 2012. ‘Persius, Juvenal, and Stoicism’. In A Companion to Persius and Juvenal, edited by Braund, S. and Osgood, J., 217–38. Malden (MA), Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. 2015. Persius: A Study in Food, Philosophy, and the Figural. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Baruffaldi, L. 2005. ‘La IV satira di Giovenale: il rombo di Domiziano e il silenzio del potere’. In Modelli letterari e ideologia nell’età flavia, edited by Gasti, F. and Mazzoli, G., 185–203. Como: Ibis.Google Scholar
Basson, A. F. and Dominik, W. J., eds. 2003. Literature, Art, History: Studies on Classical Antiquity and Tradition in Honour of W. J. Henderson. Bern, Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
Baumert, J. 1989. ‘Identifikation und Distanz: eine Erprobung satirischer Kategorien bei Juvenal’. Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt 33 (1): 734–69.Google Scholar
Beard, M. 1993. ‘Looking (Harder) for Roman Myth: Dumézil, Declamation and the Problems of Definition’. In Mythos in mythenloser Gesellschaft, edited by Graf, F., 44–64. Stuttgart: Teubner.Google Scholar
Beard, M. 2002. ‘Ciceronian Correspondences: Making a Book out of Letters’. In Classics in Progress, edited by Wiseman, T. P., 103–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beard, M. and Henderson, J.. 1998. ‘The Emperor’s New Body: Ascension from Rome’. In Parchments of Gender: Deciphering the Body in Antiquity, edited by Wyke, M., 191–219. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beard, M., North, J., and Price, S. R. F., eds. 1998. Religions of Rome 1: A History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beaton, R. J. 1984. ‘The Indebtedness of Juvenal to the Satires of Lucilius’. Ph.D. thesis, Albany: State University of New York at Albany.Google Scholar
Becker, A. S. 1995. The Shield of Achilles and the Poetics of Ekphrasis. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Bellandi, F. 1980. Etica diatribica e protesta sociale nelle Satire di Giovenale. Bologna: Pàtron.Google Scholar
Bellandi, F. 1984. ‘Sulla struttura della satira 14 di Giovenale’. Prometheus 10: 154–60.Google Scholar
Bellandi, F. 2009. ‘Naevolus cliens’. In Persius and Juvenal, edited by Plaza, M., 469–505. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benario, H. W. 1980. A Commentary on the Vita Hadriani in the Historia Augusta. Chico (CA): Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Bergson, H. 1911. Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic. Translated by Brereton, C.. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Birley, A. 2000. ‘Hadrian to the Antonines’. In The Cambridge Ancient History Volume XI: The High Empire, A.D. 70–192, edited by Bowman, A. K., Garnsey, P., and Rathbone, D., 132–94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boas, A. and Lovejoy, G.. 1965. Primitivism and Related Ideas in Antiquity. New York: Octagon.Google Scholar
Bocchi, G. 2008. ‘‘An exspectas ut Quintilianus ametur?’ (Iuu. 6, 75): antiesemplarità del teatro in ottica satirica’. In Riflessione sul teatro nella cultura romana, edited by Aricò, G. and Rivoltella, M., 303–13. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.Google Scholar
Boer, W. den. 1955. ‘Religion and Literature in Hadrian’s Policy’. Mnemosyne 8: 123–44.Google Scholar
Bogel, F. V. 2001. The Difference Satire Makes: Rhetoric and Reading from Jonson to Byron. Ithaca (NY): Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bond, R. P. 2001. ‘“Urbs satirica”: the City in Roman Satire with Special Reference to Horace and Juvenal’. Scholia 10: 77–91.Google Scholar
Bowditch, P. L. 2001. Horace and the Gift Economy of Patronage. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, A. K. 2002. ‘Recolonising Egypt’. In Classics in Progress, edited by Wiseman, T. P., 193–223. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. and Dominik, W. J., eds. 2003. Flavian Rome: Culture, Image, Text. Leiden, Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Bracci, F. 2014. La satira 11 di Giovenale: introduzione, traduzione e commento. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bramble, J. C. 1974. Persius and the Programmatic Satire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bramble, J. C. 1982. ‘Martial and Juvenal’. In The Cambridge History of Classical Literature Volume II: Latin Literature, edited by Kenney, E. J. and Clausen, W. V., 597–623. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Branham, R. B. 1989. Unruly Eloquence: Lucian and the Comedy of Traditions. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braund, S. 1984. ‘Juvenal, Satires 8 and 9: Introduction and Commentary’. Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge: University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Braund, S. 1988. Beyond Anger: A Study of Juvenal’s Third Book of Satires. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Braund, S. 1992. ‘Juvenal: Misogynist or Misogamist?’ Journal of Roman Studies 82: 71–86.Google Scholar
Braund, S. 1993. ‘Paradigms of Power: Roman Emperors in Roman Satire’. In Humour and History, edited by Cameron, K., 56–69. Oxford: Intellect Books.Google Scholar
Braund, S. 1995. ‘A Woman’s Voice?: Laronia’s Role in Juvenal Satire 2’. In Women in Antiquity, 207–19. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Braund, S. 1997a. ‘A Passion Unconsoled?: Grief and Anger in Juvenal Satire 13’. In The Passions in Roman Thought and Literature, edited by Braund, S. and Gill, C., 68–88. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Braund, S. 1997b. ‘Personal Plurals’. In Compromising Traditions: The Personal Voice in Classical Scholarship, edited by Hallett, J. P. and Van Nortwick, T., 38–53. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Braund, S. 2004b. ‘‘Libertas’ or ‘licentia’?: Freedom and Criticism in Roman Satire’. In Free Speech in Classical Antiquity, edited by Sluiter, I. and Rosen, R. M., 409–28. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Braund, S. 2009. ‘Declamation and Contestation in Satire’. In Persius and Juvenal, edited by Plaza, M., 450–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Braund, S. and Cloud, J. D.. 1982. ‘Juvenal’s libellus: A farrago’. Greece and Rome 29: 77–85.Google Scholar
Braund, S. and Gilbert, G.. 2003. ‘An ABC of Epic ira: Anger, Beasts, and Cannibalism’. In Ancient Anger: Perspectives from Homer to Galen, edited by Braund, S. and Most, G., 250–85. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Braund, S. and Gill, C., eds. 1997. The Passions in Roman Thought and Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Braund, S. and Gold, B. K.. 1998. ‘Introduction’. Arethusa Special Number: Vile Bodies: Roman Satire and Corporeal Discourse 31 (3): 247–56.Google Scholar
Braund, S. and James, P.. 1998. ‘Quasi Homo: Distortion and Contortion in Seneca’s’. Apocolocyntosis Arethusa Special Number: Vile Bodies: Roman Satire and Corporeal Discourse 31 (3): 285–312.Google Scholar
Braund, S. and Most, G. W., eds. 2003. Ancient Anger: Perspectives from Homer to Galen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Braund, S. and Osgood, J., eds. 2012. A Companion to Persius and Juvenal. Malden (MA), Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Braund, S. and Raschke, W.. 2009. ‘Satiric Grotesques in Public and Private: Juvenal, Dr Frankenstein, Raymond Chandler, and Absolutely Fabulous’. In Persius and Juvenal, edited by Plaza, M., 506–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. N., Roodenburg, H., and Brodersen, K., eds. 1999. Kulturgeschichte des Humors: von der Antike bis heute. Darmstadt: Primus-Verlag.Google Scholar
Brown, B. 2003. A Sense of Things: The Object Matter of American Literature. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brown, E. L. 1963. Numeri Vergiliani: Studies in Eclogues and Georgics. Berchem-Bruxelles: Latomus.Google Scholar
Brugnoli, G. 1963. ‘Vita Iuvenalis’. Studi urbinati: serie B, scienze umane e sociali 37: 5–14.Google Scholar
Bureau, B. 2011. ‘Quand il n’y a plus de honte à parler de soi: ‘ego’ et ses avatars dans le poème de Lucain’. In ‘Vox poetae’: Manifestations auctoriales dans l’épopée gréco-latine: Textes réunis par Emmanuelle Raymond, 73–96. Paris: de Boccard.Google Scholar
Bureau, B. and Nicolas, C.. 2008. Commencer et finir: débuts et fins dans les littératures grecque, latine et néolatine. Paris: de Boccard.Google Scholar
Burke, S. 1995. ‘The Ethics of Signature’. In Authorship: From Plato to the Postmodern, edited by Burke, S., 285–91. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Burton, S. 2001. ‘Difference and Convention: Bakhtin and the Practice of Travel Literature’. In Carnivalizing Difference: Bakhtin and the Other, edited by Barta, P. I., 225–46. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. 1972. Generic Composition in Greek and Roman Poetry. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Cairns, F., ed. 1981. Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar, III. Liverpool: F. Cairns.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. and Heath, M., eds. 1990. Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar, Sixth Volume: Roman Poetry and Drama, Greek Epic, Comedy, Rhetoric. Leeds: F. Cairns.Google Scholar
Cameron, A. D. E. 1964. ‘Literary Allusions in the Historia Augusta’. Hermes 92: 363–77.Google Scholar
Carter, M. A. S. 2002. ‘“Vergilium uestigare”: Aeneid 12.587–8’. Classical Quarterly 52 (2): 615–17.Google Scholar
Cary, E. 1925. Dio Cassius: Roman History VIII (Books 61–70). Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Champlin, E. 1991. Final Judgments: Duty and Emotion in Roman Wills, 200 B.C. – A.D. 250. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Citroni, M. 1991. ‘L’autobiografia nella satira e nell’epigramma latino’. In La componente autobiografica nella poesia greca e latina fra realtà e artificio letterario, edited by Arrighetti, G. and Montanari, F., 275–92. Pisa: Giardini.Google Scholar
Citroni Marchetti, S. 1994. ‘Motivi moralistici e tecniche del discorso satirico: contributi all’interpretazione di Giovenale 1, 143; 2, 15 ss.; 3, 21 ss.; 3, 254–267; 1, 81–90’. Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 32: 113–44.Google Scholar
Clark, C. A. 2009. ‘Tears in Lucretius’. In Tears in the Graeco-Roman World, edited by Fögen, T., 161–77. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Clark, J. 1991. The Modern Satiric Grotesque and Its Traditions. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
Clark, M. E. 1988. ‘Juvenal, Satire 16: Fragmentary Justice’. Illinois Classical Studies 13: 113–25.Google Scholar
Clausen, W. 1992. A. Persi Flacci et D. Iuni Iuuenalis Saturae. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Clay, D. 1998. ‘The Theory of the Literary Persona in Antiquity’. Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 40: 9–40.Google Scholar
Cloud, D. 1989. ‘The Client-Patron Relationship: Emblem and Reality in Juvenal’s First Book’. In Patronage in Ancient Society, edited by Wallace-Hadrill, A., 205–18. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Coffee, N. A. 2009. The Commerce of War: Exchange and Social Order in Latin Epic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffey, M. 1996. ‘Generic Impropriety in the High Style: Satirical Themes in Seneca and Lucan’. In Satura lanx: Festschrift für Werner A. Krenkel zum 70. Geburtstag, edited by Klodt, C., 81–93. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Coleman, K. M. 1990. ‘Latin Literature after A.D. 96: Change or Continuity’. American Journal of Ancient History 15 (1): 19–39.Google Scholar
Cole, S. 2006. ‘Elite Scepticism in the Apocolocyntosis: Further Qualifications’. In Seeing Seneca Whole: Perspectives on Philosophy, Poetry and Politics, edited by Volk, K. and Williams, G., 175–82. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Cole, T. 1967. Democritus and the Sources of Greek Anthropology. Cleveland: Press of Western Reserve University.Google Scholar
Colton, R. E. 1965. ‘Dinner Invitation: Juvenal XI, 56–208’. The Classical Bulletin 41: 39–45.Google Scholar
Colton, R. E. 1991. Juvenal’s Use of Martial’s Epigrams: A Study of Literary Influence. Amsterdam: Hakkert.Google Scholar
Connors, C. 1994. ‘Famous Last Words: Authorship and Death in the Satyricon and in Neronian Rome’. In Reflections of Nero, edited by Elsner, J. and Masters, J., 225–35. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Connors, C. 2001. ‘Imperial Space and Time: The Literature of Leisure’. In Literature in the Roman World: A New Perspective, edited by Taplin, O., 492–518. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Connors, C. 2004. ‘Monkey Business: Imitation, Authenticity, and Identity from Pithekoussai to Plautus’. Classical Antiquity 23 (2): 179–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connors, C. 2005. ‘Epic Allusion in Roman Satire’. In The Cambridge Companion to Roman Satire, edited by Freudenburg, K., 123–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. 1996. The Hidden Author: An Interpretation of Petronius’ Satyricon. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Corn, A. M. 1975. The Persona in the Fifth Book of Juvenal’s Satires. Ph.D. thesis, Columbus: Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Corn, A. M. 1992. ‘“Thus Nature Ordains”: Juvenal’s Fourteenth Satire’. Illinois Classical Studies 17: 309–22.Google Scholar
Courtney, E. 1967. ‘The Transmission of Juvenal’s Text’. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies of the University of London 14: 38–50.Google Scholar
Courtney, E. 1975. ‘The Interpolations in Juvenal’. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies of the University of London 22: 147–62.Google Scholar
Cowan, R. W. 2009. ‘Starring Nero as Nero: Poetry, Role-Playing and Identity in Juvenal 8.215–21’. Mnemosyne 62 (1): 76–89.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M., and Rochberg-Halton, E.. 1981. The Meaning of Things: Domestic Symbols and the Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cucchiarelli, A. 2001. La satira e il poeta: Orazio tra ‘Epodi’ e ‘Sermones’. Pisa: Giardini.Google Scholar
Cucchiarelli, A. 2005. ‘Speaking from Silence: The Stoic Paradoxes of Persius’. In The Cambridge Companion to Roman Satire, edited by Freudenburg, K., 62–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Currie, S. 1998. ‘Poisonous Women and Unnatural History in Roman Culture’. In Parchments of Gender: Deciphering the Body in Antiquity, edited by Wyke, M., 147–67. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Damon, C. 2010. ‘Too Close? Historian and Poet in the Apocolocyntosis’. In Latin Historiography and Poetry in the Early Empire, edited by Miller, J. F. and Woodman, A. J., 49–70. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
De Blois, L., Bons, J., Kessels, T., and Schenkeveld, D. M., eds. 2005. The Statesman in Plutarch’s Works: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of the International Plutarch Society, Nijmegen/Castle Hernen, May 1–5, 2002. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
de Decker, J. 1913. Juvenalis declamans: étude sur la rhétorique declamatoire dans les Satires de Juvénal. Gand: Van Goethem & Cie.Google Scholar
de Jong, I. J. 1987. ‘The Voice of Anonymity: τις-Speeches in the Iliad’. Eranos: acta philologica Suecana 85: 69–84.Google Scholar
Delignon, B. 2008. ‘Pourquoi commencer et comment finir?: contraintes et libertés poétiques et politiques dans la satire de Juvénal et dans l’épigramme de Martial’. In Commencer et finir, edited by Bureau, B. and Nicolas, C., 445–64. Paris: de Boccard.Google Scholar
Dench, E. 2004. Romulus’ Asylum: Roman Identities from the Age of Alexander to the Age of Hadrian. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deroux, C. 1989. Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History, V. Bruxelles: Latomus.Google Scholar
Deroux, C. 2008. Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History, 14. Bruxelles: Latomus.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. 2008. The Animal That Therefore I Am. Translated by Wills, D.. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. and Dufourmantelle, A.. 2000. Of Hospitality: Anne Dufourmantelle Invites Jacques Derrida to Respond. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. 1981. ‘Between Beasts and Gods’. In Myth, Religion and Society: Structuralist Essays by M. Detienne, L. Gernet, J.-P. Vernant and P. Vidal-Naquet, edited by Gordon, R. L., 215–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Detienne, M., Vernant, J.-P., and Wissing, P., eds. 1989. The Cuisine of Sacrifice among the Greeks. Translated by P. Wissing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dick, B. F. 1969. ‘Seneca and Juvenal 10’. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 73: 237–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickie, M. W. 1981. ‘The Disavowal of Invidia in Roman Iamb and Satire, III’. In Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar, III, 183–208. Liverpool: F. Cairns.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. M. 2000. ‘Philosophy’. In The Cambridge Ancient History Volume XI: The High Empire, A.D. 70–192, edited by Bowman, A. K., Garnsey, P., and Rathbone, D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dinter, M. 2006. ‘Lucan’s Epic Body: Corporeality in the “Bellum Civile”’. Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge: University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dinter, M. 2009. ‘Laying Down the Law: Horace’s Reflection in His Sententiae’. In Perceptions of Horace, edited by Houghton, L. B. T and Wyke, M., 96–108. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dominik, W. J., Garthwaite, J., and Roche, P. A., eds. 2009. Writing Politics in Imperial Rome. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Donne, J. 1967. The Satires, Epigrams and Verse Letters. Edited by Milgate, W.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
d’Orgeval, B. 1950. L’empereur Hadrien: oeuvre législative et administrative. Paris: Domat-Montchrestien.Google Scholar
Duff, J. W., and Duff, A. M.. 1964. A Literary History of Rome in the Silver Age: from Tiberius to Hadrian. 3rd ed. London: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
Dupont, F. 1997. ‘Recitatio and the Reorganization of the Space of Public Discourse’. In The Roman Cultural Revolution, edited by Habinek, T. and Lardinois, A. P. M. H., translated by T. Habinek, 44–59. Cambridge: Cambridge Philological Society.Google Scholar
Eagleton, T. 2008. ‘Review of John Mullan “Anonymity: A Secret History of English Literature”’. London Review of Books, 22 May, 30.10 edition.Google Scholar
Eco, U. 1992. Interpretation and Overinterpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgeworth, R. J. 1999. ‘Passages in Juvenal Four and Ten’. Classica et Mediaevalia 50: 179–87.Google Scholar
Edmondson, J. C., Mason, S., and Rives, J. B., eds. 2005. Flavius Josephus and Flavian Rome. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Edmunds, L. 1982. ‘The Latin Invitation-poem: What Is It? Where Did It Come From?’. American Journal of Philology 103: 184–88.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. and Woolf, G., eds. 2003. Rome the Cosmopolis. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. J. and Swain, S. C. R., eds. 1997. Portraits: Biographical Representation in the Greek and Latin Literature of the Roman Empire. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, S. 1987. ‘Parody and Poetics in the Satires of Juvenal’. Ph.D. thesis, Bryn Mawr: Bryn Mawr College.Google Scholar
Ehlers, W.-W. 1990. ‘Zur Rezitation der Satiren des Persius’. In Strukturen der Mündlichkeit in der römischen Literatur, edited by Vogt-Spira, G., 171–81. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Ehlers, W.-W. 1996. ‘Von Bibern und Menschen: Anmerkungen zur 12. Satire Juvenals’. In Satura lanx: Festschrift für Werner A. Krenkel zum 70. Geburtstag, edited by Klodt, C., 57–73. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Eichholz, D. E. 1956. ‘The Art of Juvenal and His Tenth Satire’. Greece & Rome 3: 61–69.Google Scholar
Elliott, R. C. 1960. The Power of Satire: Magic, Ritual, Art. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 2001. ‘Describing Self in the Language of Other: Pseudo (?) Lucian at the Temple of Hierapolis’. In Being Greek under Rome, edited by Goldhill, S., 123–53. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. and Masters, J., eds. 1994. Reflections of Nero: Culture, History, and Representation. Chapel Hill (NC): University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Facchini Tosi, C. 1979. ‘Struttura e motivi della satira xi di Giovenale’. Studi italiani di filologia classica 51: 180–99.Google Scholar
Facchini Tosi, C. 2006a. ‘Annibale visto da un satirico’. Giornale italiano di filologia 58 (1): 103–15.Google Scholar
Facchini Tosi, C. 2006b. ‘Note sull’arte figurativa di Giovenale: 10, 55–107’. Bollettino di studi latini 36 (2): 438–49.Google Scholar
Facchini Tosi, C. 2006c. ‘Strategie retoriche al servizio della satira nella prima età imperiale: la ripetizione lessicale in Giovenale’. Bollettino di studi latini 36 (1): 142–204.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. 1996. Roman Literary Culture: From Cicero to Apuleius. Baltimore, London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. 1991. Vergil’s Georgics and the Traditions of Ancient Epic: The Art of Allusion in Literary History. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. 2007. ‘Horace’s Body, Horace’s Books’. In Classical Constructions: Papers in Memory of Don Fowler, Classicist and Epicurean, edited by Heyworth, S. J., 174–93. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. 1992. ‘Si licet et fas est: Ovid’s Fasti and the Problem of Free Speech under the Principate’. In Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus, edited by Powell, A., 1–25. Bristol: Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. 1998. Literature and Religion at Rome: Cultures, Contexts, and Beliefs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. 2011. ‘Hic finis fandi: On the Absence of Punctuation for the Endings (and Beginnings) of Speeches in Latin Poetic Texts’. Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 66: 45–91.Google Scholar
Fein, S. 1994. Die Beziehungen der Kaiser Trajan und Hadrian zu den litterati. Stuttgart: Teubner.Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. 2008. ‘‘‘Intus habes quem poscis”: Theatricality and the Borders of the Self in Ovid’s Tereus Narrative’. In Vom Selbst-Verständnis in Antike und Neuzeit = Notions of the Self in Antiquity and Beyond, edited by Arweiler, A. and Möller, M., 33–47. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Felton, K., and Lee, K. H.. 1972. ‘The Theme of Juvenal’s Eleventh Satire’. Latomus 31: 1041–46.Google Scholar
Fietz, L. 1984. ‘‘‘In anguish dividing and dividing” – Reflections on the Theme of Human Fragmentariness in English Literature from the Sixteenth to the Eighteenth Century’. In Literary Theory and Criticism: Festschrift Presented to René Wellek in Honor of His Eightieth Birthday, edited by Strelka, J., 807–20. Bern: Lang.Google Scholar
Fishelov, D. 1990. ‘The Vanity of the Reader’s Wishes: Rereading Juvenal’s Satire 10’. American Journal of Philology 111: 370–82.Google Scholar
Fishelov, D. 1993. Metaphors of Genre: The Role of Analogies in Genre Theory. University Park (PA): Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. 2000. Slavery and the Roman Literary Imagination. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. 2007. Martial: the World of the Epigram. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W., and Gowers, E.. 2007. Ennius perennis: The ‘Annals’ and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge Philological Society.Google Scholar
Flintoff, T. E. S. 1990. ‘Juvenal’s Fourth Satire’. In Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar, Sixth Volume: Roman Poetry and Drama, Greek Epic, Comedy, Rhetoric, edited by Cairns, F. and Heath, M., 121–37. Leeds: Cairns.Google Scholar
Flower, H. I. 2006. The Art of Forgetting: Disgrace and Oblivion in Roman Political Culture. Chapel Hill (NC): University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1995. ‘Extract from “What Is an Author?’’’ In Authorship: From Plato to the Postmodern, edited by Burke, S., 233–45. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. 1997. ‘Epicurean Anger’. In The Passions in Roman Thought and Literature, edited by Braund, S. and Gill, C., 16–35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frazer, J. G. 1940. The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fredericks, S. C. 1971. ‘Calvinus in Juvenal’s Thirteenth Satire’. Arethusa 4: 219–31.Google Scholar
Fredericks, S. C. 1973. ‘The Function of the Prologue (1–20) in the Organization of Juvenal’s Third Satire’. Phoenix 27: 62–67.Google Scholar
Fredericks, S. C. 1976. ‘Juvenal’s Fifteenth Satire’. Illinois Classical Studies 1: 174–89.Google Scholar
Fredericks, S. C. 1979. ‘Irony of Overstatement in the Satires of Juvenal’. Illinois Classical Studies 4: 178–91.Google Scholar
Fredricksmeyer, H. C. 1990. ‘An Observation on the Programmatic Satires of Juvenal, Horace and Persius’. Latomus 49: 792–800.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. 2001. Satires of Rome: Threatening Poses from Lucilius to Juvenal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. 2005a. ‘Making Epic Silver: The Alchemy of Imperial Satire’. In Roman and Greek Imperial Epic, edited by Paschalis, M., 77–89. Herakleion: University of Crete.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K., ed. 2005b. The Cambridge Companion to Roman Satire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. 2009. ‘Faking it in Nero’s Orgasmatron: Persius 1 and the Death of Criticism’. In Persius and Juvenal, edited by Plaza, M., 199–221. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. 2010. ‘Horatius anceps: Persona and Self-revelation in Satire and Song’. In A Companion to Horace, edited by Davis, G., 271–90. Malden (MA), Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, Kirk. 1993. The Walking Muse: Horace on the Theory of Satire. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Freud, S. 1960. Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious. Translated by Strachey, J.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Friedländer, L. 1969. L. Friedländer’s Essays on Juvenal. Translated by Martyn, J. R. C.. Amsterdam: Hakkert.Google Scholar
Fruelund Jensen, B. 1981. ‘Crime, Vice and Retribution in Juvenal’s Satires’. Classica et mediaevalia 33: 155–68.Google Scholar
Fruelund Jensen, B. 1986. ‘Martyred and Beleaguered Virtue: Juvenal’s Portrait of Umbricius’. Classica et mediaevalia 37: 185–97.Google Scholar
Frye, N. 1971. ‘The Mythos of Winter: Irony and Satire’. In Satire: Modern Essays in Criticism, edited by Paulson, R., 233–48. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Galán Vioque, G. 2002. Martial, Book VII: A Commentary. Translated by Zoltowski, J. J.. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, M. R. 1991. ‘Man and Beast in Lucretius and the Georgics’. Classical Quarterly 61: 414–26.Google Scholar
Gallop, J. 2011. Deaths of the Author: Reading and Writing in Time. Durham (NC): Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Garber, F. 1984. ‘Satire and the Making of Selves’. In Literary Theory and Criticism: Festschrift Presented to René Wellek in Honor of His Eightieth Birthday, edited by Strelka, J., 849–70. Bern: Lang.Google Scholar
Garland, R. 1994. ‘The Mockery of the Deformed and Disabled in Graeco-Roman Culture’. In Laughter down the Centuries 1, edited by Jäkel, S. and Timonen, A., 71–84. Turku: Turun Yliopisto.Google Scholar
Gasti, F. and Mazzoli, G., eds. 2005. Modelli letterari e ideologia nell’età flavia: atti della 3a giornata ghisleriana di filologia classica (Pavia, 30–31 ottobre 2003). Como: Ibis.Google Scholar
Genette, G. 1997. Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation. Translated by Lewin, J. E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gera, D. L. 2003. Ancient Greek Ideas on Speech, Language, and Civilization. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. 2007. Excess and Restraint: Propertius, Horace and Ovid’s Ars Amatoria. London: Institute of Classical Studies.Google Scholar
Gibson, R., and Morello, R.. 2012. Reading the Letters of Pliny the Younger: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giegengack, J. M. 1969. ‘Significant Names in Martial’. Ph.D. thesis, New Haven: Yale University.Google Scholar
Gildenhard, I. 2011. Creative Eloquence: The Construction of Reality in Cicero’s Speeches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gilhus, I.S. 2006. Animals, Gods, and Humans: Changing Attitudes to Animals in Greek, Roman, and Early Christian Ideas. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, S. 2010. ‘Metempsychosis from Ennius to Jorge Luis Borges’. In Classical Literary Careers and Their Reception, edited by Hardie, P. R. and Moore, H., 209–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giovini, M. 1996. ‘Il concetto di humanitas nei Gesta Berengarii imperatoris (X sec.) e la XV satira di Giovenale’. Maia 48: 301–9.Google Scholar
Gleason, M. W. 1995. Making Men: Sophists and Self-Presentation in Ancient Rome. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gleason, M. W. 2001. ‘Mutilated Messengers: Body Language in Josephus’. In Being Greek under Rome, 50–85. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gold, B. K., ed. 1982. Literary and Artistic Patronage in Ancient Rome. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Gold, B. K. 1994. ‘Humor in Juvenal’s Sixth Satire: Is It Funny?’ In Laughter Down the Centuries 1, edited by Jäkel, S. and Timonen, A., 95–111. Turku: Turun Yliopisto.Google Scholar
Gold, B. K. 1998. ‘‘The House I Live in Is Not My Own’: Women’s Bodies in Juvenal’s ‘Satires’. Arethusa Special Number: Vile Bodies: Roman Satire and Corporeal Discourse 31 (3): 369–86.Google Scholar
Gold, B. K. 2003. ‘“Accipe divitias et vatum maximus esto”: Money, Poetry, Mendicancy and Patronage in Martial’. In Flavian Rome, edited by Boyle, A. J. and Dominik, W. J., 591–612. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Gold, B. K. 2012. ‘Juvenal: The Idea of the Book’. In A Companion to Persius and Juvenal, edited by Braund, S. and Osgood, J., 97–112. Malden (MA), Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 1988. ‘Reading Differences: The Odyssey and Juxtaposition’. Ramus 17: 1–31.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 1991. The Poet’s Voice: Essays in Poetics and Greek Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 1994. ‘The Failure of Exemplarity’. In Modern Critical Theory and Classical Literature, edited by de Jong, I. J. and Sullivan, J. P., 51–73. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S., ed. 2001. Being Greek under Rome: Cultural Identity, the Second Sophistic and the Development of Empire. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. 2010. ‘Rhetoric and the Second Sophistic’. In The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S., and Osborne, R., eds. 2006. Rethinking Revolutions through Ancient Greece. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, J. B. 1988. ‘A-filiative Families and Subversive Reproduction: Gossip in Jane Austen’. Genre 21 (1): 5–46.Google Scholar
Goulet-Cazé, M-O. 1996. The Cynics: The Cynic Movement in Antiquity and Its Legacy. Edited by Branham, R. B.. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gowers, E. 1993a. ‘Horace, Satires 1.5: An Inconsequential Journey’. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 39: 48–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowers, E. 1993b. The Loaded Table: Representations of Food in Roman Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowers, E. 1994. ‘Persius and the Decoction of Nero’. In Reflections of Nero, edited by Elsner, J. and Masters, J., 131–50. Chapel Hill (NC): University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Gowers, E. 2002. ‘Blind Eyes and Cut Throats: Amnesia and Silence in Horace Satires 1.7’. Classical Philology 97 (2): 145–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowers, E. 2003. ‘Fragments of Autobiography in Horace Satires 1’. Classical Antiquity 22 (1): 55–91.Google Scholar
Gowers, E. 2007. ‘The “Cor” of Ennius’. In Ennius perennis: The ‘Annals’ and Beyond, edited by Fitzgerald, W. and Gowers, E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Graf, F., ed. 1993. Mythos in mythenloser Gesellschaft: das Paradigma Roms. Stuttgart: Teubner.Google Scholar
Graf, F. 1999. ‘Cicero, Plautus und das römische Lachen’. In Kulturgeschichte des Humors, edited by Bremmer, J. and Roodenburg, H., 32–42. Darmstadt: Primus-Verlag.Google Scholar
Graf, F. 2005. ‘Satire in a Ritual Context’. In The Cambridge Companion to Roman Satire, edited by Freudenburg, K., 192–206. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. 1996. ‘Cynicism and the Romans: Attraction and Repulsion’. In The Cynics: The Cynic Movement in Antiquity and Its Legacy, edited by Branham, R. B., 190–204. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. 2000. ‘Nerva to Hadrian’. In The Cambridge Ancient History Volume XI: The High Empire, A.D. 70–192, edited by Bowman, A. K., Garnse, P.y, and Rathbone, D., 84–131. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Griffith, J. G. 1969. ‘Juvenal, Statius and the Flavian Establishment’. Greece and Rome 16: 134–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, J. G. 1970. ‘The Ending of Juvenal’s First Satire and Lucilius, Book XXX’. Hermes 98: 56–72.Google Scholar
Gruen, E. 2011. Rethinking the Other in Antiquity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gunderson, E. T. 2003. ‘The Flavian Amphitheatre: All the World as Stage’. In Flavian Rome, edited by Boyle, A. J. and Dominik, W. J., 637–58. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Gunderson, E. T. 2005. ‘The Libidinal Rhetoric of Satire’. In The Cambridge Companion to Roman Satire, edited by Freudenburg, K., 224–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gurd, S. A. 2012. Work in Progress: Literary Revision as Social Performance in Ancient Rome. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. 1962. A History of Greek Philosophy, I: The Earlier Presocratics and the Pythagoreans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. 1998. The Politics of Latin Literature: Writing, Identity, and Empire in Ancient Rome. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. 2005. The World of Roman Song: From Ritualized Speech to Social Order. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Habinek, T., and Schiesaro, A., eds. 1997. The Roman Cultural Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge Philological Society.Google Scholar
Haendel, P., and Meid, W., eds. 1983. Festschrift für Robert Muth zum 65. Geburtstag am 1. Januar 1981 dargebracht von Freunden und Kollegen. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Hahn, F. H. 2011. ‘Performing the Sacred: Prayers and Hymns’. In A Companion to Roman Religion, edited by Rüpke, J., 235–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Halliwell, F. S. 2004. ‘Aischrology, Shame, and Comedy’. In Free Speech in Classical Antiquity, edited by Sluiter, I. and Rosen, R. M., 115–44. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Halliwell, F. S. 2008. Greek Laughter: A Study in Cultural Psychology from Homer to Early Christianity. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hardie, A. 1990. ‘Juvenal and the Condition of Letters: The Seventh Satire’. In Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar, Sixth Volume, edited by Cairns, F., 145–209.Google Scholar
Hardie, A. 1997. ‘Juvenal, Domitian and the Accession of Hadrian (Satire 4)’. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies of the University of London 42: 117–44.Google Scholar
Hardie, A. 1998. ‘Juvenal, the Phaedrus, and the Truth about Rome’. Classical Quarterly 48 (1): 234–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 1995. ‘The Speech of Pythagoras in Ovid Metamorphoses 15 : Empedoclean Epos’. Classical Quarterly 45 (1): 204–14.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 1997. ‘Closure in Latin Epic’. In Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature, edited by Roberts, D. H., Dunn, F. M., and Fowler, D. P., 139–62. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 1999. Virgil: Critical Assessments of Classical Authors. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 2009. Lucretian Receptions: History, The Sublime, Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 2010. ‘Crowds and Leaders in Imperial Historiography’. In Latin Historiography and Poetry in the Early Empire: Generic Interactions, edited by Miller, J. F. and Woodman, A. J., 9–28. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 2012. Rumour and Renown: Representations of Fama in Western Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, E. L. 1960. ‘Neglected Hyperbole in Juvenal’. Classical Review 10 (2): 99–101.Google Scholar
Harrison, G. 1987. ‘The Confessions of Lucilius (Horace Sat. 2.1.30–34): A Defense of Autobiographical Satire?’ Classical Antiquity 6 (1): 38–52.Google Scholar
Hassell, M. 2000. ‘The Army’. In The Cambridge Ancient History Volume XI: The High Empire, A.D. 70–192, edited by Bowman, A. K., Garnsey, P., and Rathbone, D., 320–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hass, K. 2007. Lucilius und der Beginn der Persönlichkeitsdichtung in Rom. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Hawley, R. and Levick, B. M., eds. 1995. Women in Antiquity: New Assessments. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heath, J. 2005. The Talking Greeks: Speech, Animals, and the Other in Homer, Aeschylus, and Plato. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Helmbold, W. C. 1956. ‘Juvenal’s Twelfth Satire’. Classical Philology 51: 14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmbold, W. C. and O’Neil, E. N.. 1959. ‘The Form and Purpose of Juvenal’s Seventh Satire’. Classical Philology 54 (2): 100–08.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. 1982. ‘A Room (-) with a View’. Liverpool Classical Monthly 7 (10): 143–45.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. 1991. ‘“Persius” Didactic Satire: The Pupil as Teacher’. Ramus 20: 123–48.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. 1995. ‘Pump Up the Volume: Juvenal, Satires 1.1–21’. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 41: 101–37.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. 1997. Figuring Out Roman Nobility: Juvenal’s Eighth Satire. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. 1999. Writing Down Rome: Satire, Comedy and Other Offences in Latin Poetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. 2001. Telling Tales on Caesar: Roman Stories from Phaedrus. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. 2002. Pliny’s Statue: The ‘Letters’, Self-portraiture and Classical Art. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. 2004a. Aesop’s Human Zoo: Roman Stories about Our Bodies. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. 2004b. ‘“Terence’s ‘Selbstaussöhnung”: Payback Time for the Self (Hautontimorumenus)’. Ramus 33 (1): 53–81.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. 2009. ‘The Runaround: A Volume Retrospect on Ancient Rhetorics’. In The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Rhetoric, edited by Gunderson, E., 278–90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hendrickson, G. L. 1971. ‘Satura tota nostra est’. In Satire: Modern Essays in Criticism, edited by Paulson, R., 37–51. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Henke, R. 2000. ‘Elefanten, Tochtermörder und Erbschleicher: Juvenal, Sat. 12, 93–130’. Hermes 128 (2): 202–17.Google Scholar
Heslin, P. 2005. The Transvestite Achilles: Gender and Genre in Statius’ ‘Achilleid’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hessen, B. 2000. ‘‘‘Narrate, puellae Pierides!”: zur Poetologie Juvenals’. In Studies in Ancient Literary Theory and Criticism, 323–34. Krakow: Ksiegarnia Akademicka.Google Scholar
Highet, G. 1937. ‘The Life of Juvenal’. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 68: 480–506.Google Scholar
Highet, G. 1949. ‘The Philosophy of Juvenal’. Transactions of the American Philological Association 80: 254–70.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. 1998. Allusion and Intertextuality: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hirsch, E. D. Jr. 1995. ‘Banishment of the Author’. In Authorship: From Plato to the Postmodern, edited by Burke, S., 108–16. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Hook, B. S. 2008. ‘Umbricius “caligatus”: Wordplay in Juvenal 3, 322’. In Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 14, 365–74. Bruxelles: Latomus.Google Scholar
Hooley, D. M. 1997. The Knotted Thong: Structures of Mimesis in Persius. Ann Arbor (MI): University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Hooley, D. M. 2007a. ‘Rhetoric and Satire: Horace, Persius, and Juvenal’. In A Companion to Roman Rhetoric, edited by Dominik, W. and Hall, J., 396–412. Malden (MA), Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hopman, M. 2003. ‘Satire in Green: Marked Clothing and the Technique of “Indignatio” at Juvenal 5.141–45’. American Journal of Philology 124 (4): 557–74.Google Scholar
Houghton, L. B. T. and Wyke, M., eds. 2009. Perceptions of Horace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Housman, A. E. 1931. Juvenal: ‘Saturae’. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Humble, N. M. and Sidwell, K.. 2006. ‘Dreams of Glory: Lucian as Autobiographer’. In The Limits of Ancient Biography, edited by McGing, B. and Mossman, J., 213–25. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. 1993. Latin Literature from Seneca to Juvenal: A Critical Study. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Iddeng, J. W. 2000. ‘Juvenal, Satire and the Persona Theory: Some Critical Remarks’. Symbolae Osloenses 75: 107–29.Google Scholar
Iddeng, J. W. 2005. ‘How Shall We Comprehend the Roman “I”-poet?: A Reassessment of the “Persona’-theory”’. Classica et Mediaevalia 56: 185–205.Google Scholar
Itic, S. 2006. ‘Les implications poétiques du terme “farrago” dans la première “Satire” de Juvénal’. Revue des études latines 84: 223–38.Google Scholar
Jäkel, S. and Timonen, A., eds. 1994. Laughter down the Centuries 1. Turku: Turun Yliopisto.Google Scholar
Jäkel, S. and Timonen, A.. and Timonen, A.. 1995. Laughter down the Centuries 2. Turku: Turun Yliopisto.Google Scholar
Jenkyns, R. 1982. Three Classical Poets: Sappho, Catullus, and Juvenal. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Johnson, T. and Dandeker, C.. 1989. ‘Patronage: Relation and System’. In Patronage in Ancient Society, edited by Wallace-Hadrill, A., 219–42. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. A. 2010. Readers and Reading Culture in the High Roman Empire: A Study of Elite Communities. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. R. 1993. Horace and the Dialectic of Freedom: Readings in Epistles I. Ithaca (NY): Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, F. 1982. ‘A Visual Pun at Juvenal 12.81’. Liverpool Classical Monthly 7 (9): 140.Google Scholar
Jones, F. 1983. ‘Towards an Interpretation of Juvenal, Satire 11’. Acta classica 26: 104–7.Google Scholar
Jones, F. 1989. ‘Juvenal, Satire VII’. In Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History V, edited by Deroux, C., 444–64. Bruxelles: Latomus.Google Scholar
Jones, F. 1990. ‘The Persona and the Addressee in Juvenal, Satire 11’. Ramus 19: 160–68.Google Scholar
Kachuck, A. 2009. ‘Haec-Acrostics at Juvenal 1.52–55 and Lucan 6.719–722’. M.Phil. thesis, Cambridge: University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kahane, A. 2001. ‘Antiquity’s Future: Writing, Speech and Representation in the Prologue to Apuleius’ Metamorphoses’. In A Companion to the Prologue of Apuleius’ Metamorphoses, edited by Kahane, A. and Laird, A., 231–42. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. 2001. ‘Declamation in Rhetorical Education at Rome’. In Education in Greek and Roman Antiquity, edited by Too, Y. L., 317–37. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Keane, C. 2001. ‘Satiric Memories: Autobiography and the Construction of Genre’. The Classical Journal 97 (3): 215–31.Google Scholar
Keane, C. 2002a. ‘Juvenal’s Cave-woman and the Programmatics of Satire’. The Classical Bulletin 78 (1): 5–20.Google Scholar
Keane, C. 2002b. ‘The Critical Contexts of Satiric Discourse’. Classical and Modern Literature 22 (2): 7–31.Google Scholar
Keane, C. 2003. ‘Theatre, Spectacle, and the Satirist in Juvenal’. Phoenix 57 (3): 257–75.Google Scholar
Keane, C. 2007a. ‘Defining the Art of Blame: Classical Satire’. In A Companion to Satire, edited by Quintero, R., 31–51. Malden (MA), Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Keane, C. 2007b. ‘Philosophy into Satire: The Program of Juvenal’s Fifth Book’. American Journal of Philology 128 (1): 27–57.Google Scholar
Keane, C. 2010. ‘Persona and Satiric Career in Juvenal’. In Classical Literary Careers and Their Reception, edited by Hardie, P. and Moore, H., 105–17. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keane, C. 2012. ‘Historian and Satirist: Tacitus and Juvenal’. In A Companion to Tacitus, edited by Pagan, V. E., 403–27. Malden (MA), Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Keane, C. 2015. Juvenal and the Satiric Emotions. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Keitel, E. 1984. ‘Principate and Civil War in the Annals of Tacitus’. American Journal of Philology 105: 306–25.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. 2006. ‘Atoms, Individuals, and Myths’. In Laughing with Medusa: Classical Myth and Feminist Thought, edited by Zajko, V. and Leonard, M., 233–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J. 1962. ‘The First Satire of Juvenal’. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 8: 29–40.Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J., Braund, S., and Osgood, J.. 2012. ‘Satiric Textures: Style, Meter, and Rhetoric’. In A Companion to Persius and Juvenal, 113–36. Malden (MA), Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ker, J. 2009. ‘Seneca and Self-examination: Re-reading “On Anger” 3.36’. In Seneca and the Self, edited by Bartsch, S. and Wray, D., 160–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kilgour, M. 1990. From Communion to Cannibalism: An Anatomy of Metaphors of Incorporation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kilpatrick, R. S. 1973. ‘Juvenal’s Patchwork Satires, 4 and 7’. Yale Classical Studies 23: 229–41.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E., and Schofield, M.. 1983. The Presocratic Philosophers: A Critical History with a Selection of Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Klingenberg, G. 2002. ‘Die “dissimulation” der “iniuria”’. In Iurisprudentia universalis, 317–36. Köln: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Klodt, C., ed. 1996. Satura lanx: Festschrift für Werner A. Krenkel zum 70. Geburtstag. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Knuuttila, S. 2004. Emotions in Ancient and Medieval Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kraus, C. S. 2005. ‘From Exempla to Exemplar?: Writing History around the Emperor in Imperial Rome’. In Flavius Josephus and Flavian Rome, edited by Edmondson, J. C., Mason, S., and Rives, J. B., 181–200. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krueger, D. 1996. ‘The Bawdy and Society: The Shamelessness of Diogenes in Roman Imperial Culture’. In The Cynics: the Cynic Movement in Antiquity and Its Legacy, edited by Branham, R. B., 222–39. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kullmann, W. and Reichel, M.. 1990. Der Übergang von der Mündlichkeit zur Literatur bei den Griechen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Kurke, L. 1991. The Traffic in Praise: Pindar and the Poetics of Social Economy. Ithaca (NY): Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Labate, M. 1992. ‘Le necessità del poeta satirico: fisiopatologia di una scelta letteraria’. In Civiltà materiale e letteratura nel mondo antico, edited by Mazzini, I., 55–66. Macerata: Università degli studi di Macerata.Google Scholar
Labate, M. 2009. ‘Horatian Sermo and Genres of Literature’. In Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Horace: Satires and Epistles, edited by Freudenburg, K., 102–21. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
LaFleur, R. A. 1974. ‘Catullus and Catulla in Juvenal’. Revue de philologie, de littérature et d’histoire anciennes 48: 71–74.Google Scholar
LaFleur, R. A. 1976a. ‘Juvenal 1.80: Cluvianus?’ Revue de philologie, de littérature et d’histoire anciennes 50: 79–84.Google Scholar
LaFleur, R. A. 1976b. ‘Umbricius and Juvenal Three’. Živa antika = Antiquité vivante 26: 383–431.Google Scholar
LaFleur, R. A. 1981. ‘Horace and Onomasti Komodein: The Law of Satire’. Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2 (31): 1790–1826.Google Scholar
Laird, A. 2007. ‘The True Nature of the Satyricon’. In The Greek and Roman Novel: Parallel Readings, edited by Paschalis, M., Frangoulidis, S. A., and Harrison, S. J., 151–67. Groningen: Barkhuis.Google Scholar
Langslow, D. R. and Maire, B., eds. 2010. Body, Disease and Treatment in a Changing World: Latin Texts and Contexts in Ancient and Medieval Medicine: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference ‘Ancient Latin Medical Texts’ Hulme Hall, University of Manchester, 5th-8th September 2007. Lausanne: Éd. BHMS.Google Scholar
La Penna, A. 1990. ‘Il programma poetico di Giovenale (con un riferimento a Properzio I.9)’. Paideia 45: 239–75.Google Scholar
Larmour, D. 2004. ‘The Incurable Wound of Telephus: Noise, Speech and Silence in Juvenal’s Satire 1’. Intertexts 8 (1): 55–76.Google Scholar
Larmour, D. 2005. ‘Lightening the Load: Castration, Money, and Masculinity in Juvenal’s Satire 12’. Syllecta Classica 16: 139–72.Google Scholar
Larmour, D. 2007. ‘Holes in the Body: Sites of Abjection in Juvenal’s Rome’. In The Sites of Rome: Time, Space, Memory, edited by Larmour, D. and Spencer, D., 168–210. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Larmour, D. 2016. The Arena of Satire: Juvenal’s Search for Rome. Norman: Oklahoma University Press.Google Scholar
Lawall, G. 1958. ‘Exempla and Theme in Juvenal’s Tenth Satire’. Transactions of the American Philological Association 89: 25–31.Google Scholar
Leach, E. W. 1989. ‘The Implied Reader and the Political Argument in Seneca’s Apocolocyntosis and De Clementia’. Arethusa 22: 197–230.Google Scholar
Leeman, A. D. 1983. ‘Die Konsultierung des Trebatius: Statuslehre in Horaz, Serm. 21’. In Festschrift für Robert Muth zum 65. Geburtstag am 1. Januar 1981 dargebracht von Freunden und Kollegen, edited by Haendel, P. and Meid, W., 209–15. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Lelièvre, F. J. 1958. ‘Juvenal: Two Possible Examples of Wordplay’. Classical Philology 53: 241–42.Google Scholar
Levene, D. S. 1997. ‘Pity, Fear and the Historical Audience: Tacitus on the Fall of Vitellius’. In The Passions in Roman Thought and Literature, edited by Braund, S. and Gill, C., 128–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lieberg, G. 1982. Poeta creator: Studien zu einer Figur der antiken Dichtung. Amsterdam: Gieben.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, J. L., ed. 1999. Parthenius of Nicaea: The Poetical Fragments and the ‘Erotika pathemata’. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lindo, L. I. 1974. ‘The Evolution of Juvenal’s Later Satires’. Classical Philology 69: 17–27.Google Scholar
Littlewood, C. 2002. ‘Integer Ipse? Self-Knowledge and Self-Representation in Persius Satires 4’. Phoenix 56 (1/2): 56–83.Google Scholar
Littlewood, C. 2007. ‘Poetry and Friendship in Juvenal’s Twelfth Satire’. American Journal of Philology 128 (3): 389–418.Google Scholar
Lovatt, H. 2010. ‘Cannibalising History: Livian Moments in Statius’ Thebaid’. In Latin Historiography and Poetry in the Early Empire, edited by Miller, J. F. and Woodman, A. J., 71–86. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Love, H. 2004. English Clandestine Satire, 1660–1702. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lowrie, M. 2007. ‘Making an Exemplum of Yourself: Cicero and Augustus’. In Classical Constructions: Papers in Memory of Don Fowler, Classicist and Epicurean, edited by Heyworth, S. J., 91–112. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowrie, M. 2009. Writing, Performance, and Authority in Augustan Rome. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Luisi, A. 1999. ‘Elementi retorici nelle satire di Giovenale’. Invigilata lucernis 21: 199–213.Google Scholar
Mader, G. 2007. ‘This Fake Is Real: Script and Performance at Juvenal 3.86–108’. New England Classical Journal 34 (1): 36–41.Google Scholar
Malamud, M. A. 1996. ‘Out of Circulation?: An Essay on Exchange in Persius’ Satires’. Ramus 25 (1): 39–64.Google Scholar
Malamud, M. A. 2001. ‘That’s Entertainment!: Dining with Domitian in Statius’ “Siluae”’. Ramus 30 (1): 23–45.Google Scholar
Marchesi, I. 2008. The Art of Pliny’s Letters: A Poetics of Allusion in the Private Correspondence. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Margaret, G. 2009. ‘The Weeping Wise: Stoic and Epicurean Consolations in Seneca’s 99th Epistle’. In Tears in the Graeco-Roman World, edited by Fögen, T., 235–52. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Marmodoro, A. and Hill, J., eds. 2014. The Author’s Voice in Classical and Late Antiquity. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. 2005. Latin Poetry and the Judgement of Taste: An Essay in Aesthetics. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martyn, J. R. C. 1970. ‘A New Approach to Juvenal’s First Satire’. Antichthon 4: 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martyn, J. R. C. 1996b. ‘Problems in Editing the Satires of Juvenal’. In Satura lanx: Festschrift für Werner A. Krenkel zum 70. Geburtstag, edited by Klodt, C., 75–79. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Masters, J. 1992. Poetry and Civil War in Lucan’s ‘Bellum Civile’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. G. 2003. ‘Persona Problems: The Literary Persona in Antiquity Revisited’. Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 50: 55–80.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. G. 2005. ‘Sleeping with the Enemy: Satire and Philosophy’. In The Cambridge Companion to Roman Satire, edited by Freudenburg, K., 146–59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McGill, S. 2012. Plagiarism in Latin Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McGing, B. C., Mossman, J. M., eds. 2006. The Limits of Ancient Biography. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
McKim, R. 1986. ‘Philosophers and Cannibals: Juvenal’s Fifteenth Satire’. Phoenix 40: 58–71.Google Scholar
Merli, E. 2008. ‘“Cenabis belle”: rappresentazione e struttura negli epigrammi di invito a cena di Marziale’. In Epigramma longum, 299–326. Cassino: Edizioni dell’Università degli studi di Cassino.Google Scholar
Miller, J. F. and Woodman, A. J., eds. 2010. Latin Historiography and Poetry in the Early Empire: Generic Interactions. Leiden, Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Miller, P. A. 1998. ‘The Bodily Grotesque in Roman Satire: Images of Sterility’. Arethusa 31: 257–83.Google Scholar
Miller, P. A. 2001. ‘The Otherness of History in Rabelais’ Carnival and Juvenal’s Satire, or Why Bakhtin Got It Right the First Time’. In Carnivalizing Difference, edited by Barta, P. I., 141–63. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Miller, P. A. 2007. ‘‘‘I Get Around”: Sadism, Desire, and Metonymy on the Streets of Rome with Horace, Ovid, and Juvenal’. In The Sites of Rome: Time, Space, Memory, edited by Larmour, D. and Spencer, D., 138–67. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, P. A. 2009. ‘The Bodily Grotesque in Roman Satire: Images of Sterility’. In Persius and Juvenal, edited by Plaza, M., 327–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moles, J. 2005. ‘The Thirteenth Oration of Dio Chrysostom: Complexity and Simplicity, Rhetoric and Moralism, Literature and Life’. Journal of Hellenic Studies 125: 112–38.Google Scholar
Montserrat, D., ed. 1998. Changing Bodies, Changing Meanings: Studies on the Human Body in Antiquity. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moodie, E. K. 2012. ‘The Bully as Satirist in Juvenal’s Third Satire’. American Journal of Philology 133 (1): 93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morelli, A. M. 2008. Epigramma longum: da Marziale alla tarda antichità = From Martial to Late Antiquity: Atti del convegno internazionale: Cassino, 29–31 maggio 2006. Cassino: Edizioni dell’Università degli studi di Cassino.Google Scholar
Morford, M. 1973. ‘Juvenal’s Thirteenth Satire’. American Journal of Philology 94 (1): 26–36.Google Scholar
Morgan, L. 2000. ‘Metre Matters: Some Higher-level Metrical Play in Latin Poetry’. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 46: 99–120.Google Scholar
Morgan, L. 2010. ‘Musa pedestris’: Metre and Meaning in Roman Verse. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, T. 2007. Popular Morality in the Early Roman Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Most, G. 1992. ‘Disiecti membra poetae: The Rhetoric of Dismemberment in Neronian Poetry’. In Innovations of Antiquity, edited by Hexter, R. and Selden, D., 391–419. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moul, V. 2010. Jonson, Horace and the Classical Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moxon, I. S., Smart, J. D., and Woodman, A. J., eds. 1986. Past Perspectives: Studies in Greek and Roman Historical Writing. Papers Presented at a Conference in Leeds, 6–8 April 1983. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Müller-Goldingen, C. 2006. Dichter und Gesellschaft: vier Studien zur römischen Literatur. Münster: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
Mullan, J. 2007. Anonymity: A Secret History of English Literature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Münscher, K. 1922. Senecas Werke, Untersuchungen zur Abfassungszeit und Echtheit. Leipzig: Philologus.Google Scholar
Murray, P. 1998. ‘Bodies in Flux: Ovid’s “Metamorphoses”’. In Changing Bodies, Changing Meanings: Studies on the Human Body in Antiquity, edited by Montserrat, D., 80–96. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Musurillo, H. A. 1961. Symbol and Myth in Ancient Poetry. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Nappa, C. J. 1998. ‘Praetextati Mores: Juvenal’s Second Satire’. Hermes 126 (1): 90–108.Google Scholar
Nappa, C. J. 2010. ‘The Unfortunate Marriage of Gaius Silius: Tacitus and Juvenal on the Fall of Messalina’. In Latin Historiography and Poetry in the Early Empire: Generic Interactions, edited by Miller, J. F. and Woodman, A. J., 189–204. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Nash, R. 1995. ‘Satyrs and Satire in Augustan England’. In Theorizing Satire: Essays in Literary Criticism, edited by Combe, K. and Connery, B., 95–105. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Nauta, R. R. 1987. ‘Seneca’s Apocolocyntosis as Saturnalian Literature’. Mnemosyne 40 (1/2): 69–96.Google Scholar
Nauta, R. R. 2002. Poetry for Patrons: Literary Communication in the Age of Domitian. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Navia, L. E. 1998. Diogenes of Sinope: The Man in the Tub. Westport (CN): Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Newlands, C. E. 2003. ‘The Emperor’s “Saturnalia”: Statius, Silvae 1.6’. In Flavian Rome, edited by Boyle, A. J. and Dominik, W. J., 499–522. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Newmyer, S. T. 2006. Animals, Rights, and Reason in Plutarch and Modern Ethics. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nicholls, M. 2013. ‘Roman Libraries as Public Buildings in the Cities of the Empire’. In Ancient Libraries, edited by Koenig, J., Oikonomopoulou, K., and Woolf, G., 261–76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nimis, S. 2004. ‘Egypt in Greco-Roman History and Fiction’. Alif: Journal of Comparative Poetics 24: 34–67.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. 2009. ‘Housman’s Juvenal’. In A. E. Housman: Classical Scholar, edited by Butterfield, D. J. and Stray, C. A., 45–63. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Nougaret, F. 1910. ‘Juvénal: omission du fragment Winstedt’. In Mélanges offerts a M. Émile Chatelain par ses élèves et ses amis, 255–67. Paris: Libraire Ancienne Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 1994. The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 2009. ‘Stoic Laughter: A Reading of Seneca’s Apocolocyntosis’. In Seneca and the Self, edited by Wray, D. and Bartsch, S., 84–112. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Gorman, E. 1993. ‘No Place Like Rome: Identity and Difference in the Germania of Tacitus’. Ramus 22: 135–54.Google Scholar
O’Gorman, E. 2005. ‘Citation and Authority in Seneca’s Apocolocyntosis’. In The Cambridge Companion to Roman Satire, 95–108. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliensis, E. 1997. ‘Ut arte emendaturus fortunam: Horace, Nasidienus, and the Art of Satire’. In The Roman Cultural Revolution, edited by Habinek, T., 90–104. Cambridge: Cambridge Philological Society.Google Scholar
Oliensis, E. 2009. Freud’s Rome: Psychoanalysis and Latin Poetry. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oliver, R. P. 1951. ‘The First Medicean MS of Tacitus and the Titulature of Ancient Books’. Transactions of the American Philological Association 82: 232–61.Google Scholar
O’Neil, E. N. 1960. ‘The Structure of Juvenal’s Fourteenth Satire’. Classical Philology 55: 251–3.Google Scholar
Osborne, C. 2007. Dumb Beasts and Dead Philosophers: Humanity and the Humane in Ancient Philosophy and Literature. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Osgood, J. 2007. ‘The Vox and Verba of an Emperor: Claudius, Seneca and Le Prince Ideal’. The Classical Journal 102 (4): 329–53.Google Scholar
Osgood, J. 2012. ‘Introduction: Persius and Juvenal as Satiric Successors’. In A Companion to Persius and Juvenal, edited by Braund, S. and Osgood, J., 1–16. Malden (MA), Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Panagakos, K. 2010. ‘Eat Like an Egyptian: Cannibalism in Juvenal 15 and Achilles Tatius’. Classical Association of the Middle, West, and South Conference, Oklahoma City (OK), 27 March 2010.Google Scholar
Parker, H. 1998. ‘Loyal Slaves and Loyal Wives: The Crisis of the Outsider-within and Roman Exemplum Literature’. In Women and Slaves in Greco-Roman Culture: Differential Equations, edited by Sandra, R. J., 152–73. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Parker, H. 2012. ‘Manuscripts of Juvenal and Persius’. In A Companion to Persius and Juvenal, edited by Braund, S. and Osgood, J., 137–61. Malden (MA), Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Paschalis, M., Frangoulidis, S. A., and Harrison, S. J., eds. 2007. The Greek and Roman Novel: Parallel Readings. Groningen: Barkhuis.Google Scholar
Pasoli, E. 1982. Tre poeti latini espressionisti: Properzio, Persio, Giovenale. Edited by Giardina, G. and Cuccioli Melloni, R.. Roma: Edizioni dell’Ateneo.Google Scholar
Pavlovskis, Z. 1973. Man in an Artificial Landscape: The Marvels of Civilization in Imperial Roman Literature. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Pavlovskis-Petit, Z. 2007. ‘Irony and Satire’. In A Companion to Satire, edited by Quintero, R., 510–24. Malden (MA), Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Payne, M. 2010. The Animal Part: Human and Other Animals in the Poetic Imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peirano, I. 2012. The Rhetoric of the Roman Fake: Latin Pseudepigrapha in Context. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Peirano, I. 2014. ‘Ille ego qui quondam: On Authorial (An)Onymity’. In The Author’s Voice in Classical and Late Antiquity, edited by Marmodoro, A. and Hill, J., 251–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pelling, C. 2002. Plutarch and History: Eighteen Studies. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
Penwill, J. L. 2003. ‘Expelling the Mind: Politics and Philosophy in Flavian Rome’. In Flavian Rome, edited by Boyle, A. J. and Dominik, W. J., 345–68. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Penwill, J. L. 2015. ‘Compulsory Freedom: Literature in Trajan’s Rome’. In The Art of Veiled Speech: Self-Censorship from Aristophanes to Hobbes, edited by Baltussen, H. and Davis, P. J., 176–208. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Plaza, M. 2006. The Function of Humour in Roman Verse Satire: Laughing and Lying. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, A., ed. 1992. Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus. London: Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar
Powell, B. 1979. ‘What Juvenal Saw: Egyptian Religion and Anthrophagy in Satire 15’. Rheinisches Museum 122: 185–92.Google Scholar
Powell, J. 1987. ‘The farrago of Juvenal 1.86 Reconsidered’. In Homo viator: Classical Essays for John Bramble, edited by Whitby, M., Hardie, P. R., and Whitby, M., 253–58. Bristol: Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar
Powell, J. 2010. ‘Juvenal and the Delatores’. In Ancient Historiography and Its Contexts: Studies in Honour of A. J. Woodman, edited by Kraus, C. S., Marincola, J., and Pelling, C., 224–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pucci, J. 1992. ‘Horace and Virgilian Mimesis: A Re-reading of “Odes” 1.3’. Classical World 85 (6): 659–73.Google Scholar
Purdie, S. 1993. Comedy: The Mastery of Discourse. New York, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Rabb, M. A. 2007. Satire and Secrecy in English Literature from 1650 to 1750. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ramage, E. S. 1978. ‘Juvenal, Satire 12: On Friendship True and False’. Illinois Classical Studies 3: 221–37.Google Scholar
Ramage, E. S. 1989. ‘Juvenal and the Establishment: Denigration of Predecessor in the Satires’. Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2 (33): 640–707.Google Scholar
Ramelli, I. 2000. ‘L’opposizione all’impero in Giovenale’. In L’opposizione nel mondo antico, 195–214. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.Google Scholar
Rankin, H. D. 1969. ‘‘‘Eating People Is Right”: Petronius 141 and a ΤΟΠΟΣ’. Hermes 97 (3): 381–84.Google Scholar
Rawson, C. 1984. ‘Narrative and the Proscribed Act: Homer, Euripides and the Literature of Cannibalism’. In Literary Theory and Criticism: Festschrift Presented to René Wellek in Honor of His Eightieth Birthday, edited by Strelka, J., 1159–87. Bern: Lang.Google Scholar
Reinhartz, A. 1998. ‘Why Ask My Name?’: Anonymity and Identity in Biblical Narrative. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Relihan, J. C. 1993. Ancient Menippean Satire. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Reynolds, L. D. 1983. Texts and Transmission: A Survey of the Latin Classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. 1992. The Garden of Priapus: Sexuality and Aggression in Roman Humor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Richlin, A. 2009. ‘Juvenal and Priapus’. In Persius and Juvenal, edited by Plaza, M., 305–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rimell, V. 2002. Petronius and the Anatomy of Fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rimell, V. 2005. ‘The Poor Man’s Feast: Juvenal’. In The Cambridge Companion to Roman Satire, edited by Freudenburg, K., 81–94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rimell, V. 2008. Martial’s Rome: Empire and the Ideology of Epigram. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rimell, V. 2017. ‘I Will Survive (You): Martial (Epigrams 10) and Tacitus (Agricola) on Regime Change’. In Roman Literature under Nerva, Trajan and Hadrian: Literary Interactions, AD 96–138, edited by A. König and C. Whitton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, D. H., Dunn, F. M., and Fowler, D. P., eds. 1997. Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, M. 1984. ‘Horace Satires 2.5: Restrained Indignation’. American Journal of Philology 105: 426–33.Google Scholar
Robinson, T. J. 2005. ‘In the Court of Time: The Reckoning of a Monster in the Apocolocyntosis’. Arethusa 38 (2): 223–57.Google Scholar
Roche, P. 2012. ‘Self-representation and Performativity’. In A Companion to Persius and Juvenal, edited by Braund, S. and Osgood, J., 190–216. Malden (MA), Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roller, M. B. 2012. ‘Politics and Invective in Persius and Juvenal’. In A Companion to Persius and Juvenal, edited by Braund, S. and Osgood, J., 283–311. Malden (MA), Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Romano, A. 1998. ‘Metaficción y sátira’. Cuadernos de filología clásica. Estudios latinos 15: 89–96.Google Scholar
Ronnick, M. V. 1993b. ‘Juvenal, Sat. 12. 32: Catullus’ Shipwreck’. Museum Helveticum 50: 223–24.Google Scholar
Rooy, C. A. van. 1965. Studies in Classical Satire and Related Literary Theory. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Rose, M. A. 1993. Parody: Ancient, Modern, and Post-modern. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosen, R. M. 2007. Making Mockery: The Poetics of Ancient Satire. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rosen, R. M. 2012. ‘Satire in the Republic: From Lucilius to Horace’. In A Companion to Persius and Juvenal, edited by Braund, S. and Osgood, J., 19-40. Malden (MA), Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rosen, R. M., and Baines, V.. 2002. ‘“I Am Whatever You Say I Am … ”: Satiric Program in Juvenal and Eminem’. Classical and Modern Literature 22 (2): 103–27.Google Scholar
Ross, D. 1975. Backgrounds to Augustan Poetry: Gallus, Elegy and Rome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rubino, C. A. 1994. ‘Joyous Entropy: The Phenomenon of Laughter and the Science of Thermodynamics’. In Laughter Down the Centuries 1, edited by Jäkel, S. and Timonen, A., 133–44. Turku: Turun Yliopisto.Google Scholar
Rubino, C. A. 1997. ‘To Make Truth Laugh: Umberto Eco and the Power of Laughter’. In Laughter Down the Centuries 3, edited by Jäkel, Siegfried and Timonen, Asko, 257–63. Turku: Turun Yliopisto.Google Scholar
Rudd, N. 1976. ‘Poets and Patrons in Juvenal’s Seventh Satire’. In Lines of Enquiry: Studies in Latin Poetry, edited by Rudd, N., 84–118. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. 2007. Religion of the Romans. Translated by Richard Lindsay Gordon. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Rutledge, S. H. 2001. Imperial Inquisitions: Prosecutors and Informants from Tiberius to Domitian. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rutledge, S. H. 2009. ‘Writing Imperial Politics: The Social and Political Background’. In Writing Politics in Imperial Rome, edited by Dominik, W. J., Garthwaite, J., and Roche, P. A., 23–61. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Rütten, T. 1992. Demokrit, lachender Philosoph und sanguinischer Melancholiker: eine pseudohippokratische Geschichte. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Sailor, D. 2008. Writing and Empire in Tacitus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Santayana, G. 1935. Three Philosophical Poets: Lucretius, Dante and Goethe. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Santorelli, B. 2008a. ‘Antropofagia e religione nella Satira 15 di Giovenale, tra fraintendimento e deformazione satirica’. In Studi offerti ad Alessandro Perutelli, 473–82. Roma: Aracne.Google Scholar
Santorelli, B. 2008b. ‘Trent’anni di studi giovenaliani (1977–2007) 1’. Bollettino di studi latini 38 (1): 119–94.Google Scholar
Santorelli, B. 2012. Giovenale, ‘Satira’ IV: introduzione, traduzione e commento. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Saunders, T. 2008. Bucolic Ecology: Virgil’s ‘Eclogues’ and the Environmental Literary Tradition. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Scarry, E., ed. 1990. Literature and the Body: Essays on Populations and Persons. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Schermaier, M. J., Rainer, J. M., and Winkel, L., eds. 2002. Iurisprudentia universalis: Festschrift für Theo Mayer-Maly zum 70. Geburtstag. Köln, Wien: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Schierl, P. 2006. Die Tragoedien des Pacuvius: ein Kommentar zu den Fragmenten mit Einleitung, Text und Übersetzung. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schlegel, C. M. 2005. Satire and the Threat of Speech: Horace’s ‘Satires’, Book 1. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, E. A. 1995. ‘Vom Lachen in der römischen Satire’. In Laughter Down the Centuries 2, edited by Jäkel, S. and Timonen, A., 121–43. Turku: Turun yliopisto.Google Scholar
Scobie, A. 1973. More Essays on the Ancient Romance and Its Heritage. Beiträge zur Klassischen Philologie. Meisenheim am Glan: A. Hain.Google Scholar
Scott, J. 1990. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Seaford, R. 2004. Money and the Early Greek Mind: Homer, Philosophy, Tragedy. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. 2007. Creationism and Its Critics in Antiquity. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Seidel, M. 1979. Satiric Inheritance: Rabelais to Sterne. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Seo, J. M. 2009. ‘Plagiarism and Poetic Identity in Martial’. American Journal of Philology 130 (4): 567–93.Google Scholar
Shea, L. 2010. The Cynic Enlightenment: Diogenes in the Salon. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Shell, M. 1982. Money, Language and Thought: Literary and Philosophical Economies from the Medieval to the Modern Era. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Shumate, N. 2006. Nation, Empire, Decline: Studies in Rhetorical Continuity from the Romans to the Modern Era. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Singleton, D. 1983. ‘Juvenal’s Fifteenth Satire: A Reading’. Greece and Rome 30: 198–207.Google Scholar
Slater, N. W. 2001. ‘The Horizons of Reading’. In A Companion to the Prologue of Apuleius’ ‘Metamorphoses’, edited by Kahane, A. and Laird, A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Slater, N. W. 2012. ‘Eumolpus Poeta at Work: Rehearsed Spontaneity in the Satyricon’. In Orality, Literacy and Performance in the Ancient World, edited by Minchin, E., 245–64. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Sluiter, I. and Rosen, R. M., eds. 2004. Free Speech in Classical Antiquity. Leiden, Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Smith, B. H. 1968. Poetic Closure: A Study of How Poems End. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Smith, W. S. 1989a. ‘Greed and Sacrifice in Juvenal’s Twelfth Satire’. Transactions of the American Philological Association 119: 287–98.Google Scholar
Smith, W. S. 1989b. ‘Heroic Models for the Sordid Present: Juvenal’s View of Tragedy’. Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2 (33): 811–23.Google Scholar
Smith, W. S. 1997. ‘Juvenal and the Sophist Isaeus’. Classical World 91 (1): 39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sogno, C. 2012. ‘Persius, Juvenal, and the Transformation of Satire in Late Antiquity’. In A Companion to Persius and Juvenal, edited by Braund, S. and Osgood, J., 363–85. Malden (MA), Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. 1993. Animal Minds and Human Morals: The Origins of the Western Debate. Ithaca (NY): Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Spence, S. 2007. Figuratively Speaking: Rhetoric and Culture from Quintilian to the Twin Towers. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Spencer, D. 2010. Roman Landscape: Culture and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stein, J. P. 1970. ‘The Unity and Scope of Juvenal’s Fourteenth Satire’. Classical Philology 65: 34–36.Google Scholar
Stevenson, T. and Wilson, M., eds. 2008. Cicero’s Philippics: History, Rhetoric and Ideology. Auckland: Polygraphia.Google Scholar
Stewart, Z. 1994. ‘Laughter and the Greek Philosophers: A Sketch’. In Laughter down the Centuries 1, edited by Jäkel, S. and Timonen, A., 29–37. Turku: Turun Yliopisto.Google Scholar
Stramaglia, A. 2008. Giovenale, Satire 1, 7, 12, 16: storia di un poeta. Bologna: Pàtron.Google Scholar
Styka, J., ed. 2000. Studies in Ancient Literary Theory and Criticism. Kraków: Ksiegarnia Akademicka.Google Scholar
Sullivan, J. P. 1991. Martial: The Unexpected Classic: A Literary and Historical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Swain, S. C. R. 2001. ‘The Hiding Author: Context and Implication’. In A Companion to the Prologue of Apuleius’ Metamorphoses, edited by Kahane, A. and Laird, A., 55–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Syme, R. 1979a. ‘Juvenal, Pliny, Tacitus’. The American Journal of Philology 100 (2): 250–78.Google Scholar
Taplin, O., ed. 2001. Literature in the Roman World: A New Perspective. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Temple, M. 1995. Onomastics and Anonymity in the Works of Stephane Mallarmé. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.Google Scholar
Tengström, E. 1980. A Study in Juvenal’s Tenth Satire: Some Structural and Interpretative Problems. Göteborg: Göteborg Universitet.Google Scholar
Tennant, P. 1995. ‘Biting Off More Than One Can Chew: A Recent Trend in the Interpretation of Juvenal’s 15th Satire’. Akroterion 40: 120–34.Google Scholar
Tennant, P. 2002. ‘Beyond the Rhetoric 2: Juvenal and the Roman Élite in Satires 4–6’. Syllecta classica 13: 154–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tennant, P. 2003. ‘Queering the Patron’s Pitch: the Real Satirical Target of Juvenal’s Ninth Satire’. In Literature, Art, History: Studies on Classical Antiquity and Its Tradition in Honour of W.J. Henderson, edited by Basson, A. F. and Dominik, W. J., 123–32. Frankfurt am Main, New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. 1983. ‘Virgil’s Ecphrastic Centerpieces’. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 87: 175–84.Google Scholar
Tomasevskij, B. 1995. ‘Literature and Biography’. In Authorship: From Plato to the Postmodern, edited by Burke, S., 81–89. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Toohey, P. 1993. ‘Jason, Pallas and Domitian in Valerius Flaccus’ Argonautica’. Illinois Classical Studies 18: 191–201.Google Scholar
Townend, G. B. 1972. ‘The Earliest Scholiast on Juvenal’. Classical Quarterly 22 (2): 376–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townend, G. B. 1973. ‘The Literary Substrata to Juvenal’s Satires’. Journal of Roman Studies 63: 148–60.Google Scholar
Tutrone, F. 2010. ‘Confine in discesa: rappresentazioni della violenza e della bestialità nella cultura Romana’. In Come bestie? Forme e paradossi della violenza tra mondo antico e disagio contemporaneo, edited by Ando, V. and Cusumano, N., 209–33. Caltanissetta: Salvatore Sciascia editore.Google Scholar
Tzounakas, S. 2005. ‘Persius on His Predecessors: A Re-examination’. Classical Quarterly 55 (2): 559–71.Google Scholar
Uden, J. 2011. ‘The Invisibility of Juvenal’. Ph.D. thesis, New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
Uden, J. 2015. The Invisible Satirist: Juvenal and Second Century Rome. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Uden, J. Forthcoming 2017. ‘Childhood Education and the Boundaries of Literary Interaction: [Plutarch], Quintilian, Juvenal’. In Roman Literature under Nerva, Trajan and Hadrian: Literary Interactions, AD 96–138, edited by König, A. and Whitton, C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Uden, J. Forthcoming. ‘A Crowd of Gods: Atheism and Superstition in Juvenal, Satire 13’. Classical PhilologyGoogle Scholar
Uden, J. and Fielding, I.. 2010. ‘Latin Elegy in the Old Age of the World: The Elegiac Corpus of Maximianus’. Arethusa 43 (3): 439–60.Google Scholar
Umurhan, O. S. 2008. ‘Spatial Representation in Juvenal’s Satires: Rome and the Satirist’. Ph.D. thesis, New York: New York University.Google Scholar
Umurhan, O. S. 2011. ‘Poetic Projection in Juvenal’s Satires’. Arethusa 44 (2): 221–43.Google Scholar
Van den Berg, C. 2012. ‘Imperial Satire and Rhetoric’. In A Companion to Persius and Juvenal, edited by Braund, S. and Osgood, J., 262–82. Malden (MA), Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Van der Stockt, L., Titchener, F. B., Ingenkamp, H. G., and Pérez Jiménez, A., eds. 2010. Gods, Daimones, Rituals, Myths and History of Religions in Plutarch’s Works: Studies Devoted to Professor Frederick E. Brenk by the International Plutarch Society. Málaga: Universidad de Málaga, Área de Filología Griega.Google Scholar
van Nortwick, T. 2009. The Unknown Odysseus: Alternate Worlds in Homer’s Odyssey. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Varner, E. R. 2004. Mutilation and Transformation: Damnatio memoriae and Roman Imperial Portraiture. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. 1989. ‘Dim Body, Dazzling Body’. In Fragments for a History of the Human Body, edited by Feher, M., Naddaff, R., and Tazi, N., 18–47. New York.Google Scholar
Veyne, P. 1990. Bread and Circuses: Historical Sociology and Political Pluralism. Edited by Murray, O.. Translated by Pearce, B.. London: Allan Lane.Google Scholar
Vidal-Naquet, P. 2001. ‘Beasts, Humans and Gods: The Greek View’. In Agon, Logos, Polis: The Greek Achievement and Its Aftermath, edited by Arnason, J. P. and Murphy, P., 127–37. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Vincent, H. 2004. ‘‘‘Ieiunum odium”: A Theory of Humor in Juvenal’. Ph.D. thesis, Providence: Brown University.Google Scholar
Vitorino, M. and Vitorino, J. C.. 2008. ‘Gli imperatori nelle satire di Giovenale’. Praesentia 9.Google Scholar
Vout, C. 2003. ‘Embracing Egypt’. In Rome the Cosmopolis, edited by Edwards, C. and Woolf, G., 177–202. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vout, C. 2006. ‘What’s in a Beard? Rethinking Hadrian’s Hellenism’. In Rethinking Revolutions through Ancient Greece, edited by Goldhill, S. and Osborne, R., 96–123. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, B. E. 2006. ‘Moralizing Discourse in Juvenal’s Later Books’. Ph.D. thesis, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 1982. ‘Civilis Princeps: Between Citizen and King’. Journal of Roman Studies 72: 32–48.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. 2008. Rome’s Cultural Revolution. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Warren, J. 2002. Epicurus and Democritean Ethics: An Archaeology of Ataraxia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Warren, J. 2007. Presocratics: Natural Philosophers before Socrates. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Watson, L. and Watson, P.. 2003. Martial: Select Epigrams. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, L. and Watson, P.. 2014. Juvenal: Satire 6. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Watts, W. J. 1976. ‘Race Prejudice in the Satires of Juvenal’. Acta Classica 19: 83–104.Google Scholar
Wehrle, W. T. 1992. The Satiric Voice: Program, Form and Meaning in Persius and Juvenal. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Weiler, I. 1996. ‘Physiognomische Überlegungen zu Mens sana in corpore sano’. In Satura lanx, 153–68. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Weisinger, K. 1972. ‘Irony and Moderation in Juvenal XI’. California Studies in Classical Antiquity 5: 227–40.Google Scholar
Whitby, M., Hardie, P. R., and Whitby, M., eds. 1987. Homo viator: Classical Essays for John Bramble. Bristol: Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2001a. ‘‘Greece Is the World’: Exile and Identity in the Second Sophistic’. In Being Greek under Rome, edited by Goldhill, S., 269–305. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2001b. Greek Literature and the Roman Empire: The Politics of Imitation. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. 2006. ‘‘This In-between Book’: Language, Politics and Genre in the Agricola’. In The Limits of Ancient Biography, edited by McGing, B. C. and Mossman, J. M., 305–33. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
Whitton, C. 2008. ‘The Rhetoric of Accession: Tacitus’ Early Historical Works As Trajanic Legitimation’. Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge: University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Whitton, C. 2010. ‘Pliny, Epistles 8.14: Senate, Slavery and the Agricola’. Journal of Roman Studies 100 (2010): 118–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiedemann, T. E. J. 1986. ‘Between Man and Beasts: Barbarians in Ammianus Marcellinus’. In Past Perspectives: Studies in Greek and Roman Historical Writing. Papers Presented at a Conference in Leeds, 6–8 April 1983, edited by Moxon, I. S., Smart, J. D., and Woodman, A. J., 189–211. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilcox, A. 2005. ‘Sympathetic Rivals: Consolation in Cicero’s Letters’. American Journal of Philology 126 (2): 237–55.Google Scholar
Williams, G. D. 1996. The Curse of Exile: A Study of Ovid’s Ibis. Cambridge: Cambridge Philological Society.Google Scholar
Williams, K. 2010. ‘“Amicus Caesaris”: Vibius Crispus in the Works of Juvenal and Tacitus’. In Latin Historiography and Poetry in the Early Empire: Generic Interactions, edited by Miller, J. F. and Woodman, A. J., 171–88. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. 2003. ‘After the Silence: Tacitus, Suetonius, Juvenal’. In Flavian Rome: Culture, Image, Text, edited by Boyle, A. J. and Dominik, W. J., 523–42. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. 2008. ‘Your Writings or Your Life: Cicero’s Philippics and Declamation’. In Cicero’s Philippics: History, Rhetoric and Ideology, edited by Stevenson, T. and Wilson, M., 305–34. Auckland: Polygraphia.Google Scholar
Winkler, M. 1988. ‘Juvenal’s Attitude Toward Ciceronian Poetry and Rhetoric’. Rheinisches Museum 131: 84–97.Google Scholar
Winkler, M. 1990. ‘A Virgilian Echo in Juvenal’s Eleventh Satire’. Rheinisches Museum 133: 375–78.Google Scholar
Winkler, M. 2009. ‘Juvenal: Zealous Vindicator of Roman Liberty’. In Writing Politics in Imperial Rome, edited by Dominik, W. J., Garthwaite, J., and Roche, P. A., 463–82. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P., ed. 2002. Classics in Progress: Essays on Ancient Greece and Rome. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 2015. The Roman Audience: Classical Literature as Social History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodman, A. J. and Kraus, C. S.. 2014. Tacitus: Agricola. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zadorojnyi, A. V. 2005. ‘‘Stabbed with Large Pens”: Trajectories of Literacy in Plutarch’s Lives’. In The Statesman in Plutarch’s Works: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of the International Plutarch Society, Nijmegen/Castle Hernen, May 1–5, 2002, edited by De Blois, L., Bons, J., Kessels, T., and Schenkeveld, D. M., 113–37. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Zadorojnyi, A. V. 2006. ‘Lords of the Flies: Literacy and Tyranny in Imperial Biography’. In The Limits of Ancient Biography, edited by McGing, B. C. and Mossman, J. M., 351–94. Swansea: Classical Press of Wales.Google Scholar
Zadorojnyi, A. V. 2010. ‘Transcribing Plato’s Voice: The Platonic Intertext between Writtenness and Orality’. In Gods, Daimones, Rituals, Myths and History of Religions in Plutarch’s Works: Studies Devoted to Professor Frederick E. Brenk by the International Plutarch Society, edited by Van der Stockt, L., Titchener, F. B., Ingenkamp, H. G., and Pérez Jiménez, A., 467–91. Universidad de Málaga, Área de Filología Griega.Google Scholar
Zadorojnyi, A. V. 2011. ‘Transcripts of Dissent: Political Graffiti and Elite Ideology under the Principate’. In Ancient Graffiti in Context, edited by Baird, J. A. and Taylor, C., 110–33. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. 1977. ‘Lucilius, Lucretius, and Persius 1. 1’. Classical Philology 72 (1): 40–42.Google Scholar
Zissos, P. A. 2004. ‘Terminal Middle: The Argonautica of Valerius Flaccus’. In Middles in Latin Poetry, edited by Kyriakidis, S. and De Martino, F., 311–44. Bari: Levante.Google Scholar
Zucchelli, B. 1977. L’indipendenza di Lucilio. Parma: Università degli Studi di Parma.Google Scholar