Abraham, R. & Marsden, J. E. (1978). Foundations of Mechanics, 2nd edn. London: Benjamin/Cummmings.Google Scholar

Almeida, M. A., Moreira, I. C. & Santos, F. C. (1998). On the Ziglin-Yoshida analysis for some classes of homogeneous Hamiltonian systems. Brazilian Journal of Physics, 28, 470–480.Google Scholar

Almeida, M. A., Moreira, I. C. & Yoshida, H. (1992). On the non-integrability of the Störmer problem. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 25, L227–L230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, J. L. (1990). Newton’s first two laws of motion are not definitions. American Journal of Physics, 58, 1192–1195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andersson, K. G. (1994). Poincaré’s discovery of homoclinic points. Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 48, 133–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aravind, P. K. (1989). Geometrical interpretation of the simultaneous diagonalization of two quadratic forms. American Journal of Physics, 57, 309–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arfken, G. B. & Weber, H. J. (1995). Mathematical Methods for Physicists, 4th edn. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Armitage, J. V. & Eberlein, W. F. (2006). Elliptic Functions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Arnold, V. I. (1963). Proof of a theorem of A. N. Kolmogorov on the preservation of conditionally periodic motions under a small perturbation of the Hamiltonian. Russian Mathematical Surveys, 18(5), 9–36.Google Scholar

Arnold, V. I. (1989). Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, 2nd edn. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnold, V. I., Kozlov, V. V. & Neishtadt, A. I. (2006). Mathematical Aspects of Classical and Celestial Mechanics, 3rd edn. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Arnowitt, R., Deser, S. & Misner, C. W. (1962). The Dynamics of General Relativity. In Witten, L., ed., Gravitation: An Introduction to Current Research. New York: Wiley, pp. 227–264. arXiv:gr-qc/0405109v1.Google Scholar

Barrow-Green, J. (1994). Oscar II’s prize competition and the error in Poincaré’s memoir on the three body problem. Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 48, 107–131.Google Scholar

Barrow-Green, J. (1997). Poincaré and the Three Body Problem. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar

Barrow-Green, J. (2010). The dramatic episode of Sundman. Historia Mathematica, 37, 164–203. www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0315086009001360.Google Scholar

Bartucelli, M. & Gentile, G. (2002). Lindstedt series for perturbations of isochronous systems: A review of the general theory. Reviews in Mathematical Physics, 14, 121–171.Google Scholar

Barut, A. O. (1980). Electrodynamics and Classical Theory of Fields and Particles. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Bateman, H. (1931). On dissipative systems and related variational principles. Physical Review, 38, 815–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benettin, G., Galgani, L., Giorgilli, A. & Strelcyn, J.-M. (1984). A proof of Kolmogorov’s theorem on invariant tori using canonical transformations defined by the Lie method. Nuovo Cimento B, 79, 201–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bergmann, P. G. (1976). Introduction to the Theory of Relativity. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Berry, M. V. (1978). Regular and Irregular Motion. In Jorna, S., ed., Topics in Nonlinear Dynamics: A Tribute to Sir Edward Bullard. New York: American Institute of Physics, pp. 16–120.Google Scholar

Berry, M. V. (1985). Classical adiabatic angles and quantal adiabatic phase. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 18, 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bertrand, J. (1873). Théorème relatif au mouvement d’un point attire vers un centre fixe. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences de Paris, 77, 849–853. English translation by Santos, F. C., Soares, V. and Tort, A. C. (2011). An English translation of Bertrand’s theorem. Latin American Journal of Physics Education, 5, 694–696. arXiv:0704.2396.Google Scholar

Boas, R. P. Jr. (1996). A Primer of Real Functions, 4th edn. Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America.Google Scholar

Bordemann, M. (2008). Deformation quantization: A survey. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 103, 1–31.Google Scholar

Bottazzini, U. & Gray, J. (2013). Hidden Harmony-Geometric Fantasies: The Rise of Complex Function Theory. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Braun, M. (1981). Mathematical remarks on the Van Allen radiation belt: A survey of old and new results. SIAM Review, 23, 61–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bricmont, J. (1996). Science of chaos or chaos in science? arXiv:chao-dyn/9603009.Google Scholar

Cadoni, M., Carta, P. & Mignemi, S. (2000). Realization of the infinite-dimensional symmetries of conformal mechanics. Physical Review D, 62, 086002–1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Callen, H. (1960). Thermodynamics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Cary, J. R. (1981). Lie transform perturbation theory for Hamiltonian systems. Physics Reports, 79, 129–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casasayas, J., Nunes, A. & Tufillaro, N. (1990). Swinging Atwood’s machine: Integrability and dynamics. Journal de Physique, 51, 1693–1702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Casey, J. (2014). Applying the principle of angular momentum to constrained systems of point masses. American Journal of Physics, 82, 165–168. Casey, J. (2015). Erratum. American Journal of Physics, 83, 185.Google Scholar

Cercignani, C. (1998). Ludwig Boltzmann: The Man Who Trusted Atoms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Chagas, E. F. das & Lemos, N. A. (1981). Um exemplo de como não usar teoremas matemáticos em problemas físicos. Revista Brasileira de Física, 11, 481–488.Google Scholar

Chandre, C. & Jauslin, H. R. (1998). A version of Thirring’s approach to the Kolmogorov-Arnold-Moser theorem for quadratic Hamiltonians with degenerate twist. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 39, 5856–5865.Google Scholar

Chenciner, A. (2007). Three Body Problem. www.scholarpedia.org/article/Three body problem.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christ, N. H. & Lee, T. D. (1980). Operator ordering and Feynman rules in gauge theories. Physical Review D, 22, 939–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corben, H. C. & Stehle, P. (1960). Classical Mechanics. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Courant, R. & Hilbert, D. (1953). Methods of Mathematical Physics. Vol. I. New York: Interscience Publishers.Google Scholar

Crawford, F. S. (1990). Elementary examples of adiabatic invariance. American Journal of Physics, 58, 337–344.Google Scholar

Davydov, A. S. (1973). The theory of contraction of proteins under their excitation. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 38, 559–569.Google Scholar

Deser, S., Jackiw, R. & Templeton, S. (1982). Topologically massive gauge theories. Annals of Physics, 140, 372–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Desloge, E. A. (1982). Classical Mechanics, 2 vols. Malabar, FL: Robert E. Krieger.Google Scholar

Dettman, J. W. (1986). Introduction to Linear Algebra and Differential Equations. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Dhar, A. (1993). Nonuniqueness in the solutions of Newton’s equations of motion. American Journal of Physics, 61, 58–61.Google Scholar

Diacu, F. (1996). The Solution of the n-body Problem. The Mathematical Intelligencer, 18(3), 66–70.Google Scholar

Diacu, F. & Holmes, P. (1996). Celestial Encounters: The Origins of Chaos and Stability. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dilão, R. & Alves-Pires, R. (2007). Chaos in the Störmer problem. arXiv:0704.3250v1.Google Scholar

Dirac, P. A. M. (1964). Lectures on Quantum Mechanics. New York: Yeshiva University.Google Scholar

Dugas, R. (1988). A History of Mechanics. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Dumas, H. S. (2014). The KAM Story. New Jersey: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eisenbud, L. (1958). On the classical laws of motion. American Journal of Physics, 26, 144–159.Google Scholar

Eliasson, L. H. (1996). Absolutely convergent series expansions for quasi periodic motions. Mathematical Physics Electronic Journal, 2(4), 1–33.Google Scholar

Elsgoltz, L. (1969). Ecuaciones Diferenciales y Cálculo Variacional. Moscow: Mir Publishers.Google Scholar

Epstein, S. T. (1982). The angular velocity of a rotating rigid body. American Journal of Physics, 50, 948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farina de Souza, C. and Gandelman, M. M. (1990). An algebraic approach for solving mechanical problems. American Journal of Physics, 58, 491–495.Google Scholar

Fasano, A. & Marmi, S. (2006). Analytical Mechanics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fetter, A. L. & Walecka, J. D. (1980). Theoretical Mechanics of Particles and Continua. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Feynman, R. P. (1985). Surely You’re Joking, Mr. Feynman! New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar

Feynman, R. P. & Hibbs, A. (1965). Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R. B. & Sands, M. (1963). The Feynman Lectures on Physics, 3 vols. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Flanders, H. (1989). Differential Forms with Applications to the Physical Sciences. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Fox, C. (1987). An Introduction to the Calculus of Variations. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Gallavotti, G. (1983). The Elements of Mechanics. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gallavotti, G. (1999). Statistical Mechanics: A Short Treatise. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Gangopadhyaya, A. & Ramsey, G. (2013). Unintended consequences of imprecise notation: An example from mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 81, 313–315.Google Scholar

Gantmacher, F. (1970). Lectures in Analytical Mechanics. Moscow: Mir Publishers.Google Scholar

Gelfand, I. M. & Fomin, S. V. (1963). Calculus of Variations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Giorgilli, A., Locatelli, U. & Sansottera, M. (2013). Kolmogorov and Nekhoroshev theory for the problem of three bodies. arXiv:1303.7395v1.Google Scholar

Gleiser, R. J. & Kozameh, C. N. (1980). A simple application of adiabatic invariance. American Journal of Physics, 48, 756–759.Google Scholar

Goldstein, H. (1980). Classical Mechanics, 2nd edn. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Goriely, A. (2001). Integrability and Nonintegrability of Dynamical Systems. New Jersey: World Scientific.Google Scholar

Gradshteyn, I. S. & Ryzhik, I. M. (1980). Tables of Integrals, Series and Products. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Gray, C. G. & Taylor, E. F. (2007). When action is not least. American Journal of Physics, 75, 434–458.Google Scholar

Gutiérrez-López, S., Castellanos-Moreno, A. & Rosas-Burgos, R. A. (2008). A new constant of motion for an electric charge acted on by a point electric dipole. American Journal of Physics, 76, 1141–1145.Google Scholar

Halmos, P. R. (1974). Finite-Dimensional Vector Spaces. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Hamermesh, M. (1962). Group Theory and Its Application to Physical Problems. New York: Dover.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamilton, W. R. (1834). On a General Method in Dynamics. In Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Part II, 247–308.Google Scholar

Hamilton, W. R. (1835). Second Essay on a General Method in Dynamics. In Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Part I, 95–144.Google Scholar

Hand, L. N. & Finch, J. D. (1998). Analytical Mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hartmann, H. (1972). Die Bewegung eines Körpers in einem ringförmigen Potentialfeld. Theoretica Chimica Acta, 24, 201–206.Google Scholar

Havas, P. (1957). The range of application of the Lagrange formalism - I. Nuovo Cimento Supplement, 5, 363–388.Google Scholar

Hawking, S. W. & Ellis, G. F. R. (1973). The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Henneaux, M. & Shepley, L. C. (1982). Lagrangians for spherically symmetric potentials. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 23, 2101–2107.Google Scholar

Henneaux, M. & Teitelboim, C. (1992). Quantization of Gauge Systems. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Hietarinta, J. (1984). New integrable Hamiltonians with transcendental invariants. Physical Review Letters, 52, 1057–1060.Google Scholar

Hoffman, K. & Kunze, R. (1971). Linear Algebra, 2nd edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Huang, K. (1963). Statistical Mechanics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Ichtiaroglou, S. (1997). Non-integrability in Hamiltonian mechanics. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 65, 21–31.Google Scholar

Ivancevic, S. & Pearce, C. E. M. (2001). Poisson manifolds in generalised Hamiltonian biomechanics. Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society, 64, 515–526.Google Scholar

Jackson, J. D. (1999). Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd edn. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Jacobi, C. G. J. (1837). Über die reduction der partiellen Differentialgleichungen erster Ordnung zwischen irgend einer Zahl Variabeln auf die Integration eines einzigen Systems gewöhnlicher Differentialgleichungen. Crelle Journal fur die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik, 17, 97–162. Vol. IV of Oeuvres Complètes. http://sites.mathdoc.fr/OEUVRES/.Google Scholar

Jones, R. S. (1995). Circular motion of a charged particle in an electric dipole field. American Journal of Physics, 63, 1042–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

José, J. V. & Saletan, E. J. (1998). Classical Dynamics: A Contemporary Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karatas, D. L. & Kowalski, K. L. (1990). Noether’s theorem for local gauge transformations. American Journal of Physics, 58, 123–131.Google Scholar

Kolmogorov, A. N. (1954). Preservation of conditionally periodic movements with small change in the Hamiltonian function. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, 98, 527–530 (in Russian). English translation in Appendix A of Dumas (2014).Google Scholar

Kolmogorov, A. N. (1957). The general theory of dynamical systems and classical mechanics. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians 1954 (in Russian). Amsterdam: North-Holland. English translation in the Appendix of Abraham & Marsden (1978).Google Scholar

Konopinski, E. J. (1969). Classical Descriptions of Motion. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar

Kot, M. (2014). A First Course in the Calculus of Variations. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kotkin, G. L. & Serbo, V. G. (1971). Collection of Problems in Classical Mechanics. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Kozlov, V. V. (1983). Integrability and non-integrability in Hamiltonian mechanics. Russian Mathematical Surveys, 38, 1–76.Google Scholar

Lagrange, J. L. (1888). Mécanique Analytique. Vol. XI of Oeuvres Complètes. http://sites.mathdoc.fr/OEUVRES/.Google Scholar

Lam, K. S. (2014). Fundamental Principles of Classical Mechanics: A Geometrical Perspective. New Jersey: World Scientific.Google Scholar

Lanczos, C. (1970). The Variational Principles of Mechanics. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Landau, L. D. & Lifshitz, E. (1976). Mechanics, 3rd edn. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar

Laplace, P. S. (1840). Essai Philosophique sur les Probabilités. Paris: Bachelier. https://archive.org/stream/essaiphilosophiq00lapluoft#page/n5/mode/2up.Google Scholar

Laskar, J. (2013). Is the Solar System stable? Progress in Mathematical Physics, 66, 239–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lawden, D. F. (1989). Elliptic Functions and Applications. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, T. D. (1981). Particle Physics and Introduction to Field Theory. New York: Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Lemos, N. A. (1979). Canonical approach to the damped harmonic oscillator. American Journal of Physics, 47, 857–858.Google Scholar

Lemos, N. A. (1991). Remark on Rayleigh’s dissipation function. American Journal of Physics, 59, 660–661.Google Scholar

Lemos, N. A. (1993). Symmetries, Noether’s theorem and inequivalent Lagrangians applied to nonconservative systems. Revista Mexicana de Física, 39, 304–313.Google Scholar

Lemos, N. A. (1996). Singularities in a scalar field quantum cosmology. Physical Review D, 53, 4275–4279.Google Scholar

Lemos, N. A. (2000a). Short proof of Jacobi’s identity for Poisson brackets. American Journal of Physics, 68, 88.Google Scholar

Lemos, N. A. (2000b). Uniqueness of the angular velocity of a rigid body: Correction of two faulty proofs. American Journal of Physics, 68, 668–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lemos, N. A. (2003). Sutilezas dos vínculos não-holônomos. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física, 25, 28–34.Google Scholar

Lemos, N. A. (2005). Formulação geométrica do princípio de d’Alembert. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física, 27, 483–485.Google Scholar

Lemos, N. A. (2014a). On what does not expand in an expanding universe: A very simple model. Brazilian Journal of Physics, 44, 91–94.Google Scholar

Lemos, N. A. (2014b). Comment on “Unintended consequences of imprecise notation: An example from mechanics”, [Am. J. Phys. 81, 313–315 (2013)]. American Journal of Physics, 82, 164–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lemos, N. A. (2014c). Incompleteness of the Hamilton-Jacobi theory. American Journal of Physics, 82, 848–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lemos, N. A. (2015). Vínculos dependentes de velocidades e condição de integrabilidade de Frobenius. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física, 37, 4307–1–8.Google Scholar

Lemos, N. A. (2017a). Oscilador quártico e funções elípticas de Jacobi. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física, 39, e1305–1–8.Google Scholar

Lemos, N. A. (2017b). Atwood’s machine with a massive string. European Journal of Physics, 38, 065001.Google Scholar

Lemos, N. A. & Natividade, C. P. (1987). Harmonic oscillator in expanding universes. Nuovo Cimento B, 99, 211–225.Google Scholar

Leubner, C. (1979). Coordinate-free rotation operator. American Journal of Physics, 47, 727–729.Google Scholar

Lewis, H. R. Jr. & Riesenfeld, W. B. (1969). An exact quantum theory of the time-dependent harmonic oscillator and of a charged particle in a time-dependent electromagnetic field. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 10, 1458–1473.Google Scholar

Lissauer, J. L. (1999). Chaotic motion in the Solar System. Reviews of Modern Physics, 71, 835–845.Google Scholar

Lorentz, H. A., Einstein, A., Minkowski, H. & Weyl, H. (1952). The Principle of Relativity. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Lutzky, J. L. (1978). Symmetry groups and conserved quantities for the harmonic oscillator. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 11, 249–258.Google Scholar

Mann, R. A. (1974). The Classical Dynamics of Particles. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Marion, J. B. & Heald, M. A. (1980). Classical Electromagnetic Radiation, 2nd edn. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Marion, J. B. & Thornton, S. T. (1995). Classical Dynamics of Particles and Systems, 4th edn. Fort Worth: Saunders College Publishing.Google Scholar

Markus, L. & Meyer, K. R. (1974). Generic Hamiltonian dynamical systems are neither integrable nor ergodic. Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, no. 144. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar

Marsden, J. E. & Ratiu, T. S. (1999). Introduction to Mechanics and Symmetry, 2nd edn. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Marsden, J. E., O’Reilly, O. M., Wicklin, F. J. & Zombro, B. W. (1991). Symmetry, stability, geometric phases, and mechanical integrators (Part I). Nonlinear Sciences Today 1(1), 4–21; Symmetry, stability, geometric phases, and mechanical integrators (Part II). Nonlinear Sciences Today 1(2), 14–21.Google Scholar

Mathews, P. M. & Lakshmanan, M. (1974). On a unique non-linear oscillator. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, 32, 215–218.Google Scholar

Maxwell, J. C. (1891). A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, 3rd edn. 2 vols. New York: Dover (1954 reprint).Google Scholar

Mehra, J. (1994). The Beat of a Different Drum. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Montgomery, R. (1991). How much does a rigid body rotate? A Berry’s phase from the 18th century. American Journal of Physics, 59, 394–398.Google Scholar

Morales-Ruiz, J. J. & Ramis, J. P. (2001). A note on the non-integrability of some Hamiltonian systems with a homogeneous potential. Methods and Applications of Analysis, 8, 113–120.Google Scholar

Moriconi, M. (2017). Condition for minimal harmonic oscillator action. American Journal of Physics, 85, 633–634.Google Scholar

Moser, J. (1962). On invariant curves of area-preserving mappings of an annulus. Nachrichten von der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse II, 1–20.Google Scholar

Moser, J. (1967). Convergent series expansions for quasi-periodic motions. Mathematische Annalen, 169, 136–176.Google Scholar

Moser, J. (1973). Stable and Random Motions in Dynamical Systems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Nakagawa, K. & Yoshida, H. (2001). A necessary condition for the integrability of homogeneous Hamiltonian systems with two degrees of freedom. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 34, 2137–2148.Google Scholar

Nakane, M. & Fraser, C. G. (2002). The early history of Hamilton-Jacobi dynamics 1834– 1837. Centaurus, 44, 161–227.Google Scholar

Neĭmark, J. I. & Fufaev, N. A. (1972). Dynamics of Nonholonomic Systems. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar

Nekhoroshev, N. N. (1977). An exponential estimate of the time of stability of nearly-integrable Hamiltonian systems. Russian Mathematical Surveys, 32(6), 1–65.Google Scholar

Noether, E. (1918). Invariante Variationsprobleme. Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse, 2, 235–257. English translation by M. A. Tavel: arXiv:physics/0503066.Google Scholar

Núñes-Yepes, H. N., Delgado, J. & Salas-Brito, A. L. (2001). Variational equations of Lagrangian systems and Hamilton’s principle. arXiv:math-ph/0107006.Google Scholar

Ohanian, H. C. (1976). Gravitation and Spacetime. NewYork: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar

Ott, E. (1993). Chaos in Dynamical Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pais, A. (1982) “Subtle is the Lord …” The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pars, L. (1965). A Treatise on Analytical Dynamics. Woodbridge, CT: Ox Bow Press.Google Scholar

Pathria, R. K. (1972). Statistical Mechanics. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Pauli, W. (1958). Theory of Relativity. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Pearlman, N. (1967). Vector representation of rigid body rotation. American Journal of Physics, 35, 1164.Google Scholar

Peterson, I. (1993). Newton’s Clock: Chaos in the Solar System. NewYork: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar

Protter, M. H. & Morrey, C. B. Jr. (1985). Intermediate Calculus. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Pullen, R. A. & Edmonds, A. R. (1981). Comparison of classical and quantum spectra for a totally bound potential. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 14, L477– L484.Google Scholar

Reid, C. (1986). Hilbert-Courant. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Rindler, W. (1982). Introduction to Special Relativity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Romer, R. H. (1978). Demonstration of the intermediate-axis theorem. American Journal of Physics, 46, 575–576.Google Scholar

Rosen, G. (1969). Formulations of Classical and Quantum Dynamical Theory. NewYork: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Rund, H. (1966). The Hamilton-Jacobi Theory in the Calculus of Variations. London: D. Van Nostrand.Google Scholar

Russell, J. S. (1844). Report on Waves. 14th Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, 311–390.Google Scholar

Saari, D. G. (1990). A visit to the Newtonian N-body problem via elementary complex variables. American Mathematical Monthly, 97, 105–119.Google Scholar

Saletan, E. J. & Cromer, A. H. (1970). A variational principle for nonholonomic systems. American Journal of Physics, 38, 892–897.Google Scholar

Saletan, E. J. & Cromer, A. H. (1971). Theoretical Mechanics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Scheck, F. (1994). Mechanics – From Newton’s Laws to Deterministic Chaos. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Schiff, L. I. (1968). Quantum Mechanics, 3rd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Schrödinger, E. (1982). Collected Papers on Wave Mechanics. New York: Chelsea Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Schwartz, L. (2008). Mathematics for the Physical Sciences. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Sharan, P. (1982). Two theorems in classical mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 50, 351–354.Google Scholar

Shinbrot, T., Grebogi, G., Wisdom, J. & Yorke, J. A. (1992). Chaos in a double pendulum. American Journal of Physics, 60, 491–499.Google Scholar

Siegel, C. L. & Moser, J. (1971) Lectures on Celestial Mechanics. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Sivardière, J. (1983). A simple mechanical model exhibiting a spontaneous symmetry breaking. American Journal of Physics, 51, 1016–1018.Google Scholar

Sivardière, J. (1986). Using the virial theorem. American Journal of Physics, 54, 1100–1103.Google Scholar

Sommerfeld, A. (1952). Mechanics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Soper, D. E. (1976). Classical Field Theory. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Spiegel, M. R. (1963). Advanced Calculus. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Spivak, M. (1965). Calculus on Manifolds. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin.Google Scholar

Spivak, M. (1994). Calculus, 3rd edn. Houston, TX: Publish or Perish.Google Scholar

Stadler, W. (1982). Inadequacy of the usual Newtonian formulation for certain problems in particle mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 50, 595–598.Google Scholar

Sternberg, S. (1994). Group Theory and Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stillwell, J. (2010). Mathematics and Its History, 3rd edn. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Störmer, C. (1907). Sur les trajectoires des corpuscules électrisés dans le espace sous l’action du magnétisme terrestre avec application aux aurores boréales. Archives des Sciences Physiques et Naturelles, 24, 5–18, 113–158, 221–247, 317–364. www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/93687#page/5/mode/1up.Google Scholar

Sudarshan, E. C. G. & Mukunda, N. (1983). Classical Dynamics: A Modern Perspective. Malabar, FL: Robert E. Krieger.Google Scholar

Sundermeyer, K. (1982). Constrained Dynamics. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Sussman, G. J. & Wisdom, J. with Mayer, M. E. (2001). Structure and Interpretation of Classical Mechanics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Symon, K. R. (1971). Mechanics, 3rd edn. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Synge, J. L. & Griffith, B. A. (1959). Principles of Mechanics, 3rd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Tabor, M. (1989). Chaos and Integrability in Nonlinear Dynamics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Taylor, J. R. (2005). Classical Mechanics. Mill Valley, CA: University Science Books.Google Scholar

Terra, M. S., Souza, R. M., and Farina, C. (2016). Is the tautochrone curve unique? American Journal of Physics, 84, 917–923.Google Scholar

Thirring, W. (1997). Classical Mathematical Physics. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Tiersten, M. S. (1991). Moments not to forget – The conditions for equating torque and rate of change of angular momentum around the instantaneous center. American Journal of Physics, 59, 733–738.Google Scholar

Tiersten, M. S. (1992). Erratum. American Journal of Physics, 60, 187.Google Scholar

Tufillaro, N. (1986). Integrable motion of a swinging Atwood’s machine. American Journal of Physics, 54, 142–143.Google Scholar

Tufillaro, N. B., Abbott, T. A. & Griffiths, D. J. (1984). Swinging Atwood’s machine. American Journal of Physics, 52, 895–903.Google Scholar

Tung, W. (1985). Group Theory in Physics. Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar

Van Dam, N. & Wigner, E. (1966). Instantaneous and asymptotic conservation laws for classical relativistic mechanics of interacting point particles. Physical Review, 142, 838–843.Google Scholar

van der Waerden, B. L. (ed.) (1967). Sources of Quantum Mechanics. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

van Kampen, N. G. & Lodder, J. J. (1984). Constraints. American Journal of Physics, 52, 419–424.Google Scholar

Weinstock, R. (1961). Laws of classical motion: What’s F? What’s m? What’s a? American Journal of Physics, 29, 698–702.Google Scholar

Weinstock, R. (1974). Calculus of Variations. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Westfall, R. (1983). Never at Rest: A Biography of Isaac Newton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Whittaker, E. T. (1944). A Treatise on the Analytical Dynamics of Particles and Rigid Bodies. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Whittaker, E. T. (1951). A History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity, Vol. I: The Classical Theories. London: Thomas Nelson and Sons.Google Scholar

Whittaker, E. T. & Watson, G. N. (1927). A Course of Modern Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wiggins, S. (2003). Introduction to Applied Nonlinear Dynamical Systems and Chaos, 2nd edn. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Wisdom, J. (1987). Chaotic behaviour in the Solar System. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical, 413, 109–129.Google Scholar

Yandell, B. H. (2002). The Honors Class: Hilbert’s Problems and Their Solvers. Natick, MA: A K Peters.Google Scholar

Yoshida, H. (1987). A criterion for the nonexistence of an additional integral in Hamiltonian systems with a homogeneous potential. Physica D, 29, 128–142.Google Scholar

Yoshida, H. (1989). A criterion for the non-existence of an additional analytic integral in Hamiltonian systems with n degrees of freedom. Physics Letters A, 141, 108–112.Google Scholar

Yourgrau, W. & Mandelstam, S. (1968). Variational Principles in Dynamics and Quantum Theory. New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Zia, R. K. P., Redish, E. F. & McKay, S. R. (2009). Making sense of the Legendre transform. American Journal of Physics, 77, 614–622.Google Scholar

Ziglin, S. L. (1983). Branching of solutions and nonexistence of first integrals in Hamiltonian mechanics I. Journal of Functional Analysis and Applications, 16, 181–189; Branching of solutions and nonexistence of first integrals in Hamiltonian mechanics II. Journal of Functional Analysis and Applications, 17, 6–17.Google Scholar