Andrén, M. (2010). Children’s gestures from 18 to 30 months. Lund: Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University.Google Scholar

Andrén, M.(2014). Multimodal constructions in children: Is the headshake part of language? Gesture 14(2), 141–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bavelas, J. B., Chovil, N., Lawrie, D. A., and Wade, A. (1992). Interactive gestures. Discourse Processes, 15, 469–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beate, H. (ed.). (2005). From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Beattie, G. and Shovelton, H. (1999). Mapping the range of information contained in the iconic hand gestures that accompany spontaneous speech. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18, 438–62.Google Scholar

Beaupoil-Hourdel, P., Boutet, D., and Morgenstern, A. (2015). A child’s multimodal negations from 1 to 4: The interplay between modalities. In Larrivée, P. and Lee, C. (Eds.), Negation and polarity: Experimental perspectives, language, cognition, and mind (pp. 95–123). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar

Bergmann, K., Aksu, V., and Kopp, S. (2011). The relation of speech and gestures: Temporal synchrony follows semantic synchrony. Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Gesture and Speech in Interaction (GeSpIn 2011).Google Scholar

Bhatia, V. (2004). Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Boutet, D. (2010). Structuration physiologique de la gestuelle: modèles et tests. Lidil, 42, 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bressem, J. (2012). Repetitions in gesture: Structures, functions, and cognitive aspects. Ph.D. diss., Europa-Universtität Viadrina, Frankfurt (Oder).Google Scholar

Bressem, J.(2013). A linguistic perspective on the notation of form features in gestures. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S., McNeill, D., and Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body – Language – Communication: An international handbook on multi-modality in human interaction (pp. 1079–98). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Bressem, J. and Müller, C. (2014a). The family of Away gestures: Negation, refusal, and negative assessment. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S., McNeill, D., and Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body – Language – Communication: An international handbook on multi-modality in human interaction (pp. 1592–604). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Bressem, J. and Müller, C. (2014b). A repertoire of German recurrent gestures with pragmatic functions. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S., McNeill, D. and Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body – Language – Communication: An international handbook on multi-modality in human interaction (pp. 1575–91). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Bressem, J. and Müller, C. (2017). The ‘Negative-Assessment-Construction’ – A multimodal pattern based on a recurrent gesture? Linguistics Vanguard, 3(s1). https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0053Google Scholar

Bressem, J., Ladewig, S., and Müller, C. (2013). Linguistic annotation system for gestures. In Müller, C., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S., McNeill, D., and Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body – Language – Communication: An international handbook on multi-modality in human interaction) (pp. 1098–124). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Bressem, J., Stein, N., and Wegener, C. (2015). Structuring and highlighting speech – Discursive functions of holding away gestures in Savosavo. Proceedings of the GESPIN 2015 Gesture Conference, September 2015, Nantes, France.Google Scholar

Bressem, J., Stein, N., and Wegener, C. (2017). Multimodal language use in Savosavo: Refusing, excluding and negating with speech and gesture. Pragmatics, 27(2), 173–206.Google Scholar

Brookes, H. (2014). Gesture in the communicative ecology of a South African township. In Seyfeddinipur, M. and Gullberg, M. (Eds.), From gesture in conversation to visible action as utterance (pp. 59–73). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Brookes, H.(2015). The social nature of cognitive-semiotic processes in the semantic expansion of gestural forms. In Ferré, G. and Tutton, M. (Eds.), Proceedings of Gesture and Speech in Interaction 4. www.gespin4.univ-nantes.frGoogle Scholar

Calbris, G. (1990). The semiotics of French gesture. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Calbris, G.(2003). From cutting an object to a clear-cut analysis: Gesture as the representation of a preconceptual schema linking concrete actions to abstract notions. Gesture, 3(1), 19–46.Google Scholar

Calbris, G.(2005). La négation: son symbolisme physique. Paper presented at the Interacting Bodies, Corps en interaction. http://gesture-lyon2005.ens-lyon.fr/IMG/pdf/CalbrisFinal.pdfGoogle Scholar

Calbris, G.(2011). Elements of meaning in gesture. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Calbris, G. and Porcher, L. (1989). Geste et communication. Paris: Credif-Hatier.Google Scholar

Carter, R. and McCarthy, M. (2006). Cambridge grammar of English: A comprehensive guide: Spoken and written English grammar and usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Celce-Murcia, M. and Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999). The grammar book. Rowley, MA: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar

Cheshire, J. (1999). English negation from an interactional perspective. In Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I., Gunnel, T., and van der Wurff, W. (Eds.), Negation in the history of English (pp. 29–53). London: Longman.Google Scholar

Chilton, P. (2006). Negation as maximal distance in discourse space theory. In Bonnefille, S. and Salbayre, S. (Eds.), Negation: Form, figure of speech, conceptualization (pp. 351–78). Tours: Publications universitaires François Rabelais.Google Scholar

Chilton, P.(2014). Language, space and mind: The conceptual geometry of linguistic meaning.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chui, K. (2005). Temporal patterning of speech and iconic gestures in conversational discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 871–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chui, K.(2009). Conversational coherence and gesture. Discourse Studies, 11(6), 661–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chui, K.(2015). Mimicked gestures and the joint construction of meaning in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 70, 68–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cibulka, P. (2015). When the hands do not go home: A micro-study of the role of gesture phases in sequence suspension and closure. Discourse Studies, 17(1), 3–24.Google Scholar

Cienki, A. (2012). Usage events of spoken language and the symbolic units we (may) abstract from them. In Kosecki, K. and Badio, J. (Eds.), Cognitive processes in language (pp. 149–58). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Cienki, A.(2013). Cognitive Linguistics: Language and gesture as expressions of conceptualization. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., and Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body – Language – Communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (pp. 182–201). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Cienki, A.(2016). Cognitive linguistics, gesture studies, and multimodal communication. Cognitive Linguistics, 27(4), 603–18.Google Scholar

Cienki, A. and Müller, C. (Eds.). (2008). Metaphor and gesture. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coupland, N. (2007). Style: Language variation and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cuffari, E. and Jensen, T. W. (2014). Living bodies: Co-enacting experience. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S., McNeill, D., and Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body – Language – Communication. An international handbook on multi-modality in human interaction (pp. 2016–25). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Cutting, J. (2008). Pragmatics and discourse: A resource book for students (2nd ed.). Routledge: Routledge English Language Introductions.Google Scholar

de Brabanter, P. (2007). Uttering sentences made up of words and gestures. In Romero, E. and Soria, B. (Eds.), Explicit communication: Robyn Carston’s pragmatics (pp. 199–216). Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar

de Ruiter, J. P. (2000). The production of gesture and speech. In McNeill, D. (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 284–311). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dahl, Ö. (1979). Typology of sentence negation. Linguistics, 17, 79–106.Google Scholar

Dahlmann, I. and Adolphs, S. (2009). Spoken corpus analysis: Multimodal approaches to language description. In Baker, P. (Ed.), Contemporary corpus linguistics (pp. 136–50). London: Continuum International Publishing.Google Scholar

Debras, C. (2015). Stance-taking functions of multimodal constructed dialogue during spoken interaction. In Ferré, G. and Tutton, M. (Eds.), Proceedings of Gesture and Speech in Interaction 4.Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dosse, F. (2010). Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari: Intersecting lives. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Downing, A. and Locke, P. (2006). English grammar: A university course. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Duffley, P. and Larrivée, P. (2012). Collocation, interpretation and explanation: The case of just any. Lingua, 122, 24–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edley, N. and Litosseliti, L. (2010). Contemplating interviews and focus groups. In Litosseliti, L (Ed.), Research methods in linguistics (pp. 155–79). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Emmorey, K. (2002). Language, cognition, and the brain: Insights from sign language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Enfield, N. (2009). The anatomy of meaning: Speech, gesture, and composite utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fauconnier, G. (1997). Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M. (2000). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar

Ferré, G. (2010). Timing relationships between speech and co-verbal gestures in spontaneous French. Proceedings of Language Resources and Evaluation, Workshop on Multimodal Corpora, Malta.Google Scholar

Fricke, E. (2012). Grammatik multimodal: Wie Wörter und Gesten zusammenwirken. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Fricke, E.(2013). Towards a unified grammar of gesture and speech: A multimodal approach. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D, and Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body – Language – Communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (pp. 733–54). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Fricke, E.(2014a). Kinesthemes: Morphological complexity in co-speech gestures. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., and Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body – Language – Communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (pp. 1618–29). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Fricke, E.(2014b). Syntactic complexity in co-speech gestures: Constituency and recursion. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S. H., McNeill, D., and Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body – Language – Communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (pp. 1650–61). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Gee, Paul (2014). How to do discourse analysis: A tool kit. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Givón, T. (1993). English grammar: A function-based introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Givón, T.(2001). Syntax. Volume 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar

Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1489–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodwin, C.(2007). Environmentally coupled gestures. In Duncan, S., Cassell, H., and Levy, E. (Eds.), Gesture and the dynamic dimension of language. Essays in honor of David McNeill. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Green, J. (2014). Signs and space in Arandic sand narratives. In Seyfeddinipur, M. and Gullberg, M. (Eds.), From gesture in conversation to visible action as utterance: Essays in honor of Adam Kendon (pp. 219–43). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Hadar, U. (1989). Two types of gesture and their role in speech production. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 8(3–4), 221–8.Google Scholar

Haddington, P., Keisanen, T., Mondada, L. and Nevile, M. (Eds.). (2014). Multiactivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Handford, M. (2010). The language of business meetings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Harré, R. and Secord, P. F. (1972) The explanation of social behavior. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Harrison, S. (2009a). The expression of negation through grammar and gesture. In Zlatev, J., Andrén, M., Johansson Falck, M., and Lundmark, C. (Eds.), Studies in language and cognition (pp. 421–35). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar

Harrison, S.(2009b). Grammar, gesture, and cognition: The case of negation in English. Ph.D. diss., Université de Bordeaux.Google Scholar

Harrison, S.(2010). Evidence for node and scope of negation in coverbal gesture. Gesture, 10(1), 29–51.Google Scholar

Harrison, S.(2013). The creation and implementation of a gesture code for factory communication. Proceedings of GESPIN 2011: Gesture and speech in interaction, Bielefeld, 5–7 September 2011.Google Scholar

Harrison, S.(2014a). The organisation of kinesic ensembles related to negation. Gesture, 14(2), 117–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, S.(2014b). Head shakes: Variation in form, function, and cultural distribution of a head movement related to ‘no’. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., McNeill, D., and Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body – Language – Communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (pp. 1496–501). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Harrison, S.(2014c). Gestures in industrial settings. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., McNeill, D., and Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body – Language – Communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (pp. 1413–19). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Harrison, S.(2015). Organisation of kinesic ensembles associated with negation. Gesture, 14(2), 117–41.Google Scholar

Harrison, S. and Larrivée, P. (2015). Morphosyntactic correlates of gestures: A gesture associated with negation in French and its organisation with speech. In Larrivée, P. and Chungmin, L. (Eds.), Negation and negative polarity. Experimental and cognitive perspectives (pp. 75–94). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Harrison, S. and Williams, R. F. (2017). Monitoring the swimzone whilst finding south. Sustained orientation in multiactivity among beach lifeguards. Text & Talk, 37(6), 683–711.Google Scholar

Hassemer, J. (2015). Towards a theory of gesture form analysis: Principles of gesture conceptualisation, with empirical support from motion-capture data. Ph.D. diss., RWTH Aachen University.Google Scholar

Heine, B. (1997). Cognitive foundations of grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Holmes, J. and Stubbe, M. (2003). Power and politeness in the workplace. A sociolinguistic analysis of talk at work. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar

Horn, L. R. (1989). A natural history of negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Horn, L. R.(Ed.). (2010). The expression of negation. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Horn, L. R. and Wansing, H. (2017). Negation. In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/negation/Google Scholar

Hoza, J. (2008). The discourse and politeness functions of hey and well in American sign language. In Roy, C. B. (Ed.), Discourse in signed languages. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar

Huddleston, R. D. and Pullum, G. K. (2002). The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Huddleston, R. D. and Pullum, G. K.(2005). A student’s introduction to English grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hutchins, E.(2005). Material anchors for conceptual blends. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1555–77.Google Scholar

Hutchins, E. and Nomura, S. (2011). Collaborative construction of multimodal utterances. In Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., and LeBaron, C. (Eds.), Embodied interaction: Language and body in the material world (pp. 289–304). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Jensen, T. W. and Cuffari, E. (2014). Doubleness in experience: Toward a distributed enactive approach to metaphoricity. Metaphor and Symbol, 29(4), 278–97.Google Scholar

Jespersen, O. (1924). The philosophy of grammar. London: Unwin Brothers.Google Scholar

Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Johnston, T. (2013). Towards a comparative semiotics of pointing actions in signed and spoken languages. Gesture, 13(2), 109–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnston, T. and Schembri, A. (2007). Australian sign language: An introduction to sign language linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, J. H. (1994). All together now. Managing people in the business world in the 90s. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Kendon, A. (1980). Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. In Key, M. R. (Ed.), The relation between verbal and nonverbal communication (pp. 207–27). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Kendon, A. (1988). How gestures can become like words. In Poyatos, F. (Ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives in nonverbal communication (pp. 131–41). Toronto: Hogrefe.Google Scholar

Kendon, A.(1994). An agenda for gesture studies. Semiotic Review of Books, 7(3). www.univie.ac.at/wissenschaftstheorie/srb/srb/gesture.htmlGoogle Scholar

Kendon, A.(1995). Gestures as illocutionary and discourse structure markers in southern Italian conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 23, 247–79.Google Scholar

Kendon, A.(2002). Some uses of the head shake. Gesture, 2(2), 147–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kendon, A.(2004). Gesture. Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kirchhof, C. (2011). So what’s your affiliation with gesture? In: Kirchhof, C., Malisz, Z., and Wagner, P. (Eds.) GeSpIn. Bielefeld.Google Scholar

Kirchhof, C.(2017). The shrink point: Audiovisual integration of speech-gesture synchrony. Bielefeld: Universität Bielefeld.Google Scholar

Kita, S. (2009). Cross-cultural variation of speech-accompanying gesture: A review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(2), 145–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kita, S., van Gijn, I., and van der Hulst, H. (1998). Movement phases in signs and co-speech gestures, and their transcription by human coders. In Wachsmuth, I. and Fröhlich, M. (Eds.), Gesture and sign language in human-computer interaction (pp. 23–35). Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar

Klima, E. and Bellugi, U. (1979). The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Kok, K. (2016). The grammatical potential of co-speech gesture: A Functional Discourse Grammar perspective. Functions of Language, 23(2), 149–78.Google Scholar

Kok, K. and Cienki, A. (2016). Cognitive grammar and gesture: Points of convergence, advances and challenges. Cognitive Linguistics, 27(1), 67–100.Google Scholar

Krysthaliuk, A. (2012). The image-schematic dimension of English negation. In Kosecki, K. and Badio, J. (Eds.), Cognitive processes in language (pp. 99–108). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Labov, W. and Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis. In Helm, J. (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (pp. 12–44). Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar

Ladewig, S. H. (2011). Putting the cyclic gesture on a cognitive basis. CogniTextes, 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ladewig, S. H.(2012). Syntactic and semantic integration of gestures into speech: Structural, cognitive, and conceptual aspects. Ph.D. diss., European University Viadrina, Frankfurt (Oder).Google Scholar

Ladewig, S. H.(2014a). The cyclic gesture. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S., McNeill, D., and Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body – Language – Communication: An international handbook on multi-modality in human interaction (pp. 1605–17). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Ladewig, S. H.(2014b). Recurrent gestures. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S., McNeill, D., and Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body – Language – Communication: An international handbook on multi-modality in human interaction (pp. 1558–74). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M.(1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Langacker, R. (1991a). Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Langacker, R. (1991b). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 2: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Langacker, R. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lapaire, J.-R. (2005). La grammaire anglaise en mouvement. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar

Lapaire, J.-R.(2006a). Negation, reification and manipulation in a cognitive grammar of substance. In Bonnefille, S. and Salbayre, S. (Eds.), La négation (pp. 333–49). Tours: Press universitaires François-Rabelais.Google Scholar

Lapaire, J.-R.(2006b). From sensory to propositional modality. Towards a phenomenology of epistemic modal meanings. Corela, 4(1).Google Scholar

Lapaire, J.-R.(2007). The meaning of meaningless grams – or emptiness revisited. In Oleksy, W. and Stalmaszczyk, P. (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to language and linguistic data (pp. 241–58). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Lapaire, J.-R.(2011). Grammar, gesture and cognition: Insights from multimodal utterances and applications for gesture analysis. Visnyk of Lviv University, Philology Series 52, 88–103.Google Scholar

Lapaire, J.-R.(2013). Gestualité cogrammaticale: de l’action corporelle spontanée aux postures de travail métagestuel guidé. Maybe et le balancement épistémique en anglais. Langages, 192, 57–72.Google Scholar

Lapaire, J.-R.(2016). From ontological metaphor to semiotic make-believe: Giving shape and substance to fictive objects of conception with the ‘globe gesture’. Santa Cruz do Sul, 41(70), 29–44.Google Scholar

Lapaire, J. R. and Rotgé, W. (2002). Linguistique et grammaire de l’anglais. Tours: Presses Universitaires du Mirail Toulouse.Google Scholar

Larrivée, P. (2017). Negation and polarity. In Stark, E. and Dufter, A. (Eds.), Manual of Romance morphosyntax and syntax (pp. 449–71). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Larrivée, P.(2001). L’interprétation des phrases négatives: portée et foyer des négations en français. Paris: Duculot.Google Scholar

Larrivée, P. and Lee, C. (Eds). (2016). Negation and polarity: Experimental perspectives. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Lawler, J. (2005). Negation and NPIs. www-personal.umich.edu/~jlawler/NPIs.pdfGoogle Scholar

Leech, G. and Svartvik, J. (1994). A communicative grammar of English (2nd ed.). London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Lemmens, M. (2016). Idiogests: Semantically motivated gestural idiolects. Paper presented at the 7th Conference of the International Society of Gesture Studies. Paris, 18–20 July.Google Scholar

Lempert, M. (2011). Barrack Obama, being sharp. Indexical order in the pragmatics of precision-grip gesture. Gesture, 11(3), 241–70.Google Scholar

Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B. (2006). A cognitive-interactional model of direct and indirect negation. GRAAT, 35, 379–402.Google Scholar

Licoppe, C. and Tuncer, S. (2014). Attending to a summons and putting other activities ‘on hold’: Multiactivity as a recognisable interactional accomplishment. In Haddington, P., Keisanen, T., Mondada, L., and Nevile, M. (Eds.), Multiactivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking (pp. 167–90). Amsterdam and Berlin: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Liddell, S. K. (2003). Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American sign language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Liskova, E. (2012). Negation of KNOW, WANT, LIKE, HAVE, and GOOD in American Sign Language. Master’s diss., University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar

McCleary, L. and Viotti, E. (2010). Sign-gesture symbiosis in Brazilian sign language narrative. In Parrill, F., Tobin, V., and Turner, M. (Eds.), Meaning, form, and body (pp. 181–201). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

McNeill, D.(1998). Models of speaking (to their amazement) meet speech-synchronized gestures. http://cogprints.org/665/1/McNeill_Catchments.htmlGoogle Scholar

McNeill, D.(2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

McNeill, D.(2012). How language began: Gesture and speech in human evolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McNeill, D.(2016). Why we gesture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mondada, L. (2016). Challenges of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20(3), 336–66.Google Scholar

Morgenstern, A., Beaupoil-Hourdel, P., Blondel, M., and Boutet, D. (2016). A multimodal approach to the development of negation in signed and spoken languages: Four case studies. In Ortega, L., Tyler, A., Park, H., and Uno, M. (Eds.), The usage-based study of language learning and multilingualism (pp. 15–36). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Mori, J. and Hayashi, M. (2006). The achievement of intersubjectivity through embodied completions: A study of interactions between first and second language speakers. Applied Linguistics, 27(2), 195–219.Google Scholar

Morris, D. (1994). Bodytalk: A world guide to gestures. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar

Morris, D.(2002). People watching: A field guide to human behaviour (rev. rpt edn). London: Vintage.Google Scholar

Müller, C. (2004). Forms and uses of the Palm Up Open Hand. A case of a gesture family? In Posner, R. and Müller, C. (Eds.), The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures (pp. 234–56). Berlin: Weidler Buchverlag.Google Scholar

Müller, C.(2010). Wie Gesten bedeuten. Eine kognitiv-linguistische und sequenzanalytische Perspektive. Sprache und Literatur, 41(1), 37–68.Google Scholar

Müller, C.(2013). Gestures as a medium of expression: The linguistic potential of gestures. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S., McNeill, D., and Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body –Language – Communication: An international handbook on multi-modality in human interaction (pp. 202–17). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Müller, C.(2014). Gestural modes of representation as techniques of depiction. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S., McNeill, D., and Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body – Language – Communication: An international handbook on multi-modality in human interaction (pp. 1687–702). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Müller, C. and Tag, S. (2010). The dynamics of metaphor: Foregrounding and activating metaphoricity in conversational interaction. Cognitive Semiotics, 10(6), 85–120.Google Scholar

Müller, C., Bressem, J., and Ladewig, S. (2013a). Towards a grammar of gestures: A form-based view. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S., McNeill, D. and Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body – Language – Communication: An international handbook on multi-modality in human interaction (HSK) (pp. 707–33). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S., McNeill, D., and Teßendorf, S. (2013b) Body – Language – Communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S., McNeill, D., and Bressem, J. (2014) Body – Language – Communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Neidle, C., Kegl, J., MacLaughlin, D., Bahan, B., and Lee, R. G. (2000). The syntax of American sign language: Functional categories and hierarchical structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Nobe, S. (2000). Where do most spontaneous representational gestures actually occur with respect to speech? In McNeill, D. (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 186–98). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Oakley, T. and Hougaard, A. (Eds.). (2008). Mental spaces in discourse and interaction. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Olsher, D. (2004). Talk and gesture: The embodied completion of sequential actions in spoken interaction. In Gardner, R. and Wagner, J. (Eds.), Second language conversations (pp. 221–45). London: Continuum International Publishing.Google Scholar

Oxford Concise English Dictionary, 9th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Parrill, F. (2007). Metagesture: An analysis of theoretical discourse about multimodal language. In Duncan, S. D, Cassell, J. and Levy, E. T. (Eds.), Gesture and the dynamic dimension of language (pp. 83–9). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Parril, F., Bergen, B. K. and Lichtenstein, P. V. (2013). Grammatical aspect, gesture, and conceptualization: Using co-speech gesture to reveal event representations. Cognitive Linguistics, 24(1), 135–58.Google Scholar

Poletto, C. (2008). On negative doubling. Quaderni di lavoro ASIT, 1, 57–84.Google Scholar

Prieto, P., Borràs-Comes, J., Tubau, S., and Espinal, M. T. (2013) Prosody and gesture constrain the interpretation of double negation. Lingua 131, 136–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.02.008Google Scholar

Pruszynski, A. J. and Johansson, R. S. (2014). Edge-orientation processing in first-order tactile neurons. Nature Neuroscience, 17(10), 1404–9.Google Scholar

Pullum, G. (2012). A few notes on negative clauses, polarity items, and scope. www.lel.ed.ac.uk/~gpullum/grammar/negationGoogle Scholar

Quinto-Pozos, D. (2007). Why does constructed action seem obligatory? An analysis of classifiers and the lack of articulator-referent correspondence. Sign Language Studies, 7(4), 458–506.Google Scholar

Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., and Svartvick, J. (2000). Comprehensive grammar of the English language. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar

Reddy, J. (1979). The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In Ortony, A. (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 284–310). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sacks, H. and Schegloff, E. A. (2002). Home position. Gesture, 2, 133–46.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A. (1984). On some gestures’ relation to talk. In Atkinson, J. M. and Heritage, J. (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 266–98). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schoonjans, S. (2018). Modalpartikeln als multimodale Konstruktionen: Eine korpusbasierte Kookkurrenzanalyse von Modalpartikeln und Gestik im Deutschen. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Schoonjans, S.(2017). Multimodal construction grammar issues are construction grammar issues. Linguistics Vanguard, 3(s1). https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0050CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schoonjans, S., Sambre, P., Brône, G. and Feyaerts, K. (2016). Vers une analyse multimodale du sens. Perspectives constructionnelles sur la gestualité co-grammaticale [Towards a multi-modal meaning analysis. Constructional perspectives on co-grammatical gesture]. Langages 201(1), 33–49.Google Scholar

Shogan, D. (2002) Characterizing constraints of leisure: A Foucaultian analysis of leisure constraints. Leisure Studies, 21(1), 27–38.Google Scholar

Silverstein, M. (1981). The limits of awareness. Sociolinguistic Working Paper Number 84.Google Scholar

Sime, D. (2008). ‘Because of her gesture, it’s very easy to understand’: Learner’s perceptions of teacher’s gestures in the foreign language class. In McCafferty, S. G. and Stam, G. (Eds.), Gesture in second language acquisition and classroom research (pp. 259–279). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Smotrova, T. (2014). Instructional functions of speech and gesture in the L2 classroom. Ph.D. diss., The Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar

Steen, F. and Turner, M. (2013). Mutlimodal construction grammar. In Brokent, M., Dancygier, B., and Hinnell, J. (Eds.), Language and the creative mind (pp. 255–74). Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar

Stivers, T. and Rossano, F. (2010). Mobilizing response. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 43(1), 3–31.Google Scholar

Stokoe, W. (1960). Sign language structure. An outline of the visual communication systems of the American Deaf. Studies in linguistics: Occasional papers (No. 8). Buffalo: Dept. of Anthropology and Linguistics, University of Buffalo.Google Scholar

Streeck, J. (2009). Gesturecraft. The manufacture of meaning. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sweetser, E. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sweetser, E.(1998). Regular metaphoricity in gesture: Bodily-based models of speech interaction Actes du 16e Congrès International des Linguistes (CD-ROM).Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Sweetser, E.(2006). Negative spaces: Levels of negation and kinds of spaces. In Bonnefille, S. and Salbayre, S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the conference ‘Negation: Form, figure of speech, conceptualization’. Publication du groupe de recherches anglo-américaines de l’Université de Tours. Tours: Publications universitaires François Rabelais.Google Scholar

Sweetser, E.(2007). Looking at space to study mental spaces. Co-speech gesture as a crucial data source. In Gonzalez-Marquez, M., Mittleberg, I., Coulson, S., and Spivey, M. (Eds.), Methods in cognitive linguistics (pp. 203–26). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Sweetser, E. and Sizemore, M. (2008). Personal and interpersonal gesture space: Functional contrasts in language and gesture. In Tylet, A. (Ed.), Language in the context of use: Cognitive and discourse approaches to language and language learning (pp. 25–51). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics. Volume 1: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Taub, S. (2001). Language from the body: Iconicity and metaphor in American sign language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Teßendorf, S. (2014). Pragmatic and metaphoric – combining functional with cognitive approaches in the analysis of the ‘brushing aside gesture’. In Cornelia, M., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S., McNeill, D., and Bressem, J. (Eds.), Body – Language – Communication. An international handbook on multi-modality in human interactionHandbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science (pp. 1540–57). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Wehling, E. (2010). Argument is gesture war: Function, form and prosody of discourse structuring gestures in political argument. Paper presented at the 35th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Williams, R. F. (2008). Gesture as a conceptual mapping tool. In Cienki, A. and Mueller, C. (Eds.), Metaphor and Gesture (pp. 55–92). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Williams, R. F.(2011). Coordinating and sharing gesture space in collaborative reasoning. Paper presented in the theme session ‘Within and across spaces: Towards multi-dimensional models of gesture space’ at the 3rd Conference of the Scandinavian Association for Language and Cognition, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, 14–16 June.Google Scholar

Williams, R. F.(2013). Distributed cognition and gesture. In Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S., McNeill, D., and Tessendorf, S. (Eds.), Body – Language – Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction (pp. 240–258). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Williams, R. F. and Harrison, S. (2014). Distributed cognition and gesture: Propagating a functional system through impromptu teaching. In Polman, J. L., Kyza, E. A., O’Neil, D. K., Tabak, I., Penuel, W. R., Jurow, A. S., O’Connor, K., Lee, T., and D’Amico, L. (Eds.), Learning and becoming in practice: The International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS), Vol. 3 (pp. 1655–6). Boulder, CO: International Society of the Learning Sciences.Google Scholar

Wilson, R. A. and Foglia, L. (2017). Embodied cognition. In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring edition).Google Scholar

Xiao, R. and McEnery, T. (2008). Negation in Chinese: A corpus based study. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 36(2), 333–67.Google Scholar

Yerian, K. (2016). The performative ‘ring’: Semi-conventionalized gesture as a resource for constructing social stance and identity. Presentation at ISGS 2016, Sorbonne Nouvelle Paris, 18–22 July.Google Scholar

Zeshan, U. (2004). Hand, head, and face: Negative constructions in sign languages. Linguistic Typology, 8, 1–58.Google Scholar

Zima, E. (2013). English multimodal motion constructions. A construction grammar perspective. Studies van de BKL 8, 14–28.Google Scholar

Zima, E.(2014). Gibt es multimodale Konstruktionen? Eine Studie zu [V(motion) in circles] und [all the way from X PREP Y]. Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion, 15, 1–48. www.gespraechsforschung-ozs.de/fileadmin/dateien/heft2014/ga-zima.pdfGoogle Scholar

Zima, E.(2017). On the multimodality of [all the way from X PREP Y]. Linguistics Vanguard, 3(s1). https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0055Google Scholar

Zima, E and Bergs, A. (2017). Multimodality and Construction Grammar. Linguistics Vanguard, 3(s1). https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-1006Google Scholar