Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T04:21:40.373Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

21 - Total Spinal Anaesthesia in Labour

from Scenario Section 4 - Neuraxial Analgesia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2019

Kirsty MacLennan
Affiliation:
Manchester University Hospitals NHS Trust
Catherine Robinson
Affiliation:
Manchester University Hospitals NHS Trust
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beckett, V. A., Knight, M. and Sharpe, P. (2017). The CAPS Study: incidence, management and outcomes of cardiac arrest in pregnancy in the UK: a prospective, descriptive study. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 124, 13741381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camorcia, M. and Capogna, G. (2004). Standard lidocaine epidural test dose: isn't it too much? European Journal of Anaesthesiology, 21, 154155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colonna-Romano, P., Lingaraju, N. and Braitman, L. E. (1993). Epidural test dose: lidocaine 100 mg, not chloroprocaine, is a symptomatic marker of i.v. injection in labouring parturients. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, 40(8), 714717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalal, P., Reynolds, F., Gertenbach, C., Harker, H. and O'Sullivan, G. (2003). Assessing bupivacaine 10 mg/fentanyl 20 mcg as an intrathecal test dose. International Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia, 12, 250255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Angelo, R., Smiley, R. M., Riley, E. T. and Segal, S. (2014). Serious complications related to obstetric anesthesia: the serious complication repository project of the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology. Anesthesiology, 120, 15051505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, P. A. (1986). Can epidural catheters penetrate dura mater? An anatomical study. Anaesthesia, 41, 11461147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kar, G. S. and Jenkins, J. G. (2000). High spinal anaesthesia: a survey of 81322 obstetric epidurals. International Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia, 10, 172176.Google Scholar
Michels, M. J., Lyons, G. and Hopkins, P. M. (1995). Lignocaine test dose to detect intravenous injection. Anaesthesia, 50, 211213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NICE (2014). NICE Guidelines CG190: Intrapartum Care: Care of Healthy Women and Their Babies During Childbirth. Manchester: NICE.Google Scholar
Norris, M. C., Ferrenbach, D., Dalman, H., et al. (1999). Does epinephrine improve the diagnostic accuracy of aspiration during labor epidural analgesia? Anesthesia & Analgesia, 88(5), 10731076.Google ScholarPubMed
Palkar, N. V., Boudreaux, R. C. and Mankad, A. V. (1992). Accidental total spinal block: a complication of an epidural test dose. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, 39, 10581060.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poole, M. (2009). Management of high regional block in obstetrics. Update in Anaesthesia. www.esafe-anaesthesia.org/e…/High_regional_block_in_obstetrics_Update_2009.pdfGoogle Scholar
Richardson, M. G., Lee, A. C. and Wissler, R. N. (1996). High spinal anaesthesia after epidural test dose in five obstetric patients. Regional Anesthesia, 21, 119123.Google ScholarPubMed
Servin, M. N., Mhyre, J. M., Greenfield, M. V. and Polley, L. S. (2009). An observational cohort study of the meniscus test to detect intravascular epidural catheters in pregnant women. International Journal of Obstetric Anaesthesia, 18, 215220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trojanowski, A. and Murray, W. B. (1995). A test to prevent subarachnoid and intravascular injections during epidural analgesia. South African Medical Journal, 85, 531534.Google ScholarPubMed
Turnbull, D. K. and Shepherd, D. B. (2003). Post-dural puncture headache: pathogenesis, prevention and treatment. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 91, 718729.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×