Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 December 2018
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Aristotle's Method in EthicsPhilosophy in Practice, pp. 249 - 258Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Achtenberg, D. (2002). Cognition of Value in Aristotle’s Ethics: Promise of Enrichment, Threat of Destruction. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackrill, J. L. (1981). “Aristotle’s theory of definition: Some questions on Posterior Analytics II.8–10.” In Berti, E. (ed.), Aristotle on Science, Padua, 359–88.Google Scholar
Adkins, A. W. H. (1991). “The connection between Aristotle’s ethics and politics.” In Keyt, D. and Miller, F. D. (eds.), A Companion to Aristotle’s Politics, Oxford, 75–93.Google Scholar
Allan, D. J. (1961). “Quasi-mathematical method in the Eudemian Ethics.” In Mansion, S. (ed.), Aristote et les Problèmes de Méthode, Louvain, 303–18.Google Scholar
Allan, D. J. (1963–4). “Aristotle’s criticisms of Platonic doctrine concerning goodness and the good.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 64, 273–86.Google Scholar
Allen, J. V. (2015). “Practical and theoretical knowledge in Aristotle.” In Henry, D. and Nielsen, K. M. (eds.), Bridging the Gap between Aristotle’s Science and Ethics, Cambridge, 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angioni, L. (2016). “Aristotle’s definition of scientific knowledge (71b9-12).” Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 19, 140–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angioni, L. (2017). “Explanation and method in Eudemian Ethics I.6.” Archai 20, 191–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balme, D. (1972). Aristotle’s De Partibus Animalium I and De Generatione Animalium I (with passages from II.1–3). Oxford.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1975). “Aristotle’s theory of demonstration.” In Barnes, J., Schofield, M., and Sorabji, R. (eds.), Articles on Aristotle vol. I: Science, London, 65–87. (Originally in Phronesis 14 (1969), 123–52.)Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1981). “Aristotle and the methods of ethics.” Revue Internationale de la Philosophie 34, 490–511.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2011). “Philosophy and dialectic.” In Bonelli, M. (ed.), Method and Metaphysics: Essays in Ancient Philosophy I (Jonathan Barnes), Oxford, 164–73.Google Scholar
Barney, R. (2008). “Aristotle’s argument for a human function.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 34, 293–322.Google Scholar
Bayer, G. (1995). “Definition through demonstration: The two types of syllogisms in Posterior Analytics II.8.” Phronesis 40, 241–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berti, E. (1983). “La function de Métaphysique Alpha Elatton dans la philosophie d’Aristote.” In Moraux, P. and Wiesner, J. (eds.), Zweifelhaftes im Corpus Aristotelicum, Berlin, 260–94.Google Scholar
Berti, E. (1996). “Does Aristotle’s conception of dialectic develop?” In Wians, W. (ed.), Aristotle’s Philosophical Development: Problems and Prospects, Lanham, 105–30.Google Scholar
Berti, E. (2005). “The Aristotelian endoxa as a basis for modern reasonableness.” In Dottori, R. (ed.), Reason and Reasonableness/Vernunft und Vernünftigkeit, Münster, 177–90.Google Scholar
Bobonich, C. (2006). “Aristotle’s ethical treatises.” In Kraut, R. (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, Oxford, 12–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, R. (1976). “Essentialism and semantic theory in Aristotle: Posterior Analytics II.7–10.” Philosophical Review 85, 514–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, R. (1978). “Aristotle’s definitions of the soul: De Anima II, 1–3.” Phronesis 23, 258–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, R. (1987). “Definitions in the Posterior Analytics and Generation of Animals.” In Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, Cambridge, 120–66.Google Scholar
Bolton, R. (1991a). “Aristotle on the objectivity of ethics.” In Anton, J. P. and Preus, A. (eds.), Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy II, Albany, 7–28.Google Scholar
Bolton, R. (1991b). “Aristotle’s method in natural science: Physics I.” In Judson, L. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics: A Collection of Essays, Oxford, 1–29.Google Scholar
Bolton, R. (1994a). “The problem of dialectical syllogismos.” Ancient Philosophy 14, 99–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, R. (1994b). “Aristotle’s conception of metaphysics as a science.” In Scaltsas, T., Charles, D., and Gill, M. L. (eds.), Unity, Identity, and Explanation in Aristotle’s Metaphysics, Oxford, 321–54.Google Scholar
Bolton, R. (1996). “Science and the science of substance in Aristotle’s Metaphysics Z.” In Lewis, F. and Bolton, R. (eds.), Form, Matter, and Mixture in Aristotle, Oxford, 231–80.Google Scholar
Bolton, R. (1997). “The material cause: Matter and explanation in Aristotle’s natural science.” In Kullmann, W. and Föllinger, S. (eds.), Aristotelische Biologie: Intentionen, Methoden, Ergebnisse, Stuttgart, 97–126.Google Scholar
Bolton, R. (1999). “The epistemological basis of Aristotelian dialectic.” In Sim, M. (ed.), From Puzzles to Principles? Essays on Aristotle’s Dialectic, Lanham, 57–105.Google Scholar
Bolton, R. (2009). “Two standards for inquiry in Aristotle’s De Caelo.” In Bowen, A. C. and Wildberg, C. (eds.), New Perspectives on Aristotle’s De Caelo, Leiden, 51–82.Google Scholar
Bolton, R. (2012). “The Aristotelian elenchus.” In Fink, J. (ed.), The Development of Dialectic from Plato to Aristotle, Cambridge, 270–95.Google Scholar
Bronstein, D. (2016). Aristotle on Knowledge and Learning: The Posterior Analytics. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, L. (1997). “What is ‘the mean relative to us’ in Aristotle’s Ethics?” Phronesis 42, 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, L. (2009). Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by W. D. Ross. Revised with an Introduction and Notes by L. Brown, Oxford.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1984–5). “Aristotle on arguments without winners or losers.” Wissenschafts Jahrbuch, 31–40.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1990). “Remarques sur la communication de Robert Bolton.” In Devereux, D. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.), Biologie, logique et métaphysique chez Aristote, Paris, 237–61.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1980). “Aristotle on learning to be good.” In Rorty, A. O. (ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s Ethics, Berkeley, 69–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1981). “Aristotle on understanding knowledge.” In Berti, E. (ed.), Aristotle on Science: The Posterior Analytics. Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium Aristotelicum, Padua, 97–139.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (2000). “Plato on why mathematics is good for the soul.” Proceedings of the British Academy 103, 1–81.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (2011). “Episteme.” In Morison, B. and Ierodiakonou, K. (eds.), Episteme, etc.: Essays in Honour of Jonathan Barnes, Oxford, 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, D. (1990). “Aristotle on meaning, natural kinds and natural history.” In Devereux, D. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.), Biologie, Logique et Métaphysique chez Aristote, Paris, 145–67.Google Scholar
Charles, D. (1995). “Aristotle and modern realism.” In Heinaman, R. (ed.), Aristotle and Moral Realism, Boulder, 135–72.Google Scholar
Charles, D. (2012). “Definition and explanation in the Posterior Analytics and Metaphysics.” In Charles, D. (ed.), Definition in Greek Philosophy, Oxford, 286–328.Google Scholar
Charles, D. (2015). “Aristotle on practical and theoretical knowledge.” In Henry, D. and Nielsen, K. M. (eds.), Bridging the Gap between Aristotle’s Science and Ethics, Cambridge, 71–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Code, A. (1986). “Aristotle’s investigation of a basic logical principle: Which science investigates the principle of non-contradiction?” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 16, 341–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Code, A. (1997). “Aristotle’s metaphysics as a science of principles.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 51, 345–66.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. (2004). “Plato and Aristotle on ‘finality’ and ‘(self-)sufficiency’.” In Cooper, J., (ed.) Knowledge, Nature, and the Good: Essays on Ancient Philosophy, Princeton, 270–308. (Originally in R. Heinaman (ed.), Plato and Aristotle’s Ethics, London, 117–47.)Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. (2009). “Nicomachean Ethics VII.1–2: Introduction, method, puzzles.” In Natali, C. (ed.), Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, Book VII, Oxford, 9–39.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. (2010). “Political community and the highest good.” In Lennox, J. G. and Bolton, R. (eds.), Being, Nature, and Life in Aristotle: Essays in Honour of Allan Gotthelf, Cambridge, 212–64.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. (2013). “Aristotelian responsibility.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 45, 265–312.Google Scholar
DaVia, C. (2016). “Universality in Aristotle’s ethics.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 54, 181–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demoss, D. and Devereux, D.. (1988). “Essence, existence, and nominal definition in Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics II.8.” Phronesis 33, 133–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Pater, W. (1965). Les Topiques d’ Aristote et la dialectique platonicienne, Fribourg.Google Scholar
Detel, W. A. (1997). “Why all animals have a stomach. Demonstration and axiomatization in Aristotle’s Part of Animals.” In Kullmann, W. and Föllinger, S. (eds.), Aristotelische Biologie: Intentionen, Methoden, Ergebnisse, Stuttgart, 63–84.Google Scholar
Devereux, D. (1986). “Particular and universal in Aristotle’s conception of practical knowledge.” The Review of Metaphysics 39, 483–504.Google Scholar
Devereux, D. (1990). “Comments on Robert Bolton.” In Devereux, D. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.), Biologie, logique et métaphysique chez Aristote, Paris, 263–86.Google Scholar
Devereux, D. (2015). “Scientific and ethical methods in Aristotle’s Eudemian and Nicomachean Ethics.” In Henry, D. and Nielsen, K. M. (eds.), Bridging the Gap between Aristotle’s Science and Ethics, Cambridge, 130–47.Google Scholar
Distelzweig, P. M. (2013). “The intersection of mathematical and natural sciences: The subordinate sciences in Aristotle.” Apeiron 46, 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Düring, I. (1960). “Aristotle on ultimate principles from ‘nature and reality’: Protrepticus fr. 13.” In Düring, I. and Owen, G. E. L. (eds.), Aristotle and Plato in the Mid-Fourth Century, Göteborg, 35–55.Google Scholar
Falcon, A. and Leunissen, M.. (2015). “The scientific role of Eulogos in Aristotle’s Cael II 12.” In Ebrey, D. (ed.), Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Science, Cambridge, 217–40.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, M.(2013). Formal Causes: Definition, Explanation, and Primacy in Socratic and Aristotelian Thought. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frede, D. (2012). “The endoxon mystique: What endoxa are and what they are not.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 43, 185–215.Google Scholar
Frede, D. (2013). “The political character of Aristotle’s ethics.” In Deslauriers, M. and Destrée, P. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle’s Politics, Cambridge, 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frede, M. (1987). “The unity of special and general metaphysics.” In Frede, M. (ed.), Essays in Ancient Philosophy, Minneapolis, 81–95.Google Scholar
Gigon, O. (1971). “Das Prooimion der Eudemischen Ethik.” In Moraux, P. and Harlfinger, D. (eds.), Untersuchungen zur Eudemischen Ethik, Berlin, 93–133.Google Scholar
Goldin, O. (1996). Explaining an Eclipse: Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics 2.1–10. Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gotthelf, A. (1985). “Notes towards a study of substance and essence in Aristotle’s Parts of Animals II–IV.” In Gotthelf, A. (ed.), Aristotle on Nature and Living Things: Philosophical and Historical Studies presented to David M. Balme on his Seventieth Birthday, Pittsburgh, 27–54.Google Scholar
Gotthelf, A. (1987). “First principles in Aristotle’s Parts of Animals.” In Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, Cambridge, 167–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gotthelf, A. (1997). “The elephant’s nose.” In Kullmann, W. and Föllinger, S. (eds.), Aristotelische Biologie: Intentionen, Methoden, Ergebnisse, Stuttgart, 85–96.Google Scholar
Graham, W. (1975). “Counterpredicability and Per Se accidents.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 57, 182–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granger, H. (1981). “The differentia and per se accident in Aristotle.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 63, 118–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (2011). “Avant nous le déluge: Aristotle’s notion of intellectual grasp.” In Morison, B. and Ierodiakonou, K. (eds.), Episteme, etc.: Essays in Honour of Jonathan Barnes, Oxford, 30–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasper, P. S. (2013). “Between science and dialectic: Aristotle’s account of good and bad peirastic arguments in the Sophistical Refutations.” Logical Analysis & History of Philosophy 15, 286–322.Google Scholar
Heinaman, R. (1993). “Rationality, eudaimonia and kakodaimonia in Aristotle.” Phronesis 33, 31–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, D. (2015). “Holding for the most part: the demonstrability of moral facts.” In Henry, D. and Nielsen, K. M. (eds.), Bridging the Gap between Aristotle’s Science and Ethics, Cambridge, 169–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, D. and Nielsen, K. M.. (2015). Bridging the Gap between Aristotle’s Science and Ethics. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höffe, O. (2006). “Ethik als Praktische Philosophie.” In Höffe, O. (ed.), Aristoteles: Die Nicomachische Ethik, Berlin, 13–38.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. H. (1977). “Aristotle’s discovery of metaphysics.” Review of Metaphysics 31, 210–29.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. H. (1980). “The metaphysical and psychological basis of Aristotle’s ethics.” In Rorty, A. O. (ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s Ethics, Berkeley, 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, T. H. (1981). “Aristotle’s methods of ethics.” In O’Meara, D. J. (ed.), Studies in Aristotle, Washington, 193–223.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. H. (2000). “Ethics as an inexact science: Aristotle and the ambitions of moral theory.” In Hooker, B. W. and Little, M. (eds.), Moral Particularism, Oxford, 100–29.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. R. (2015). “Aristotle’s architechtonic sciences.” In Ebrey, D. (ed.), Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Science, Cambridge, 163–86.Google Scholar
Jost, L. (1991). “Eudemian ethical method.” In Anton, J. P. and Preus, A. (eds.), Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy II, Albany, 29–40.Google Scholar
Judson, L. (1995). “Chance and ‘always or for the most part’ in Aristotle.” In Judson, L. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics, Oxford, 73–100.Google Scholar
Karbowski, J. (2012). “Slaves, women, and Aristotle’s natural teleology.” Ancient Philosophy 32, 323–50.Google Scholar
Karbowski, J. (2013). “Aristotle’s scientific inquiry into natural slavery.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 51, 331–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karbowski, J. (2014a). “Aristotle on the deliberative abilities of women.” Apeiron 47, 435–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karbowski, J. (2014b). “Deliberating without authority: Fortenbaugh on the psychology of women in Aristotle’s Politics.” Philosophical News 8, 88–106.Google Scholar
Karbowski, J. (2014c). “Empirical eulogōs argumentation in Aristotle’s Generation of Animals III.10.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22, 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karbowski, J. (2015a). “Endoxa, facts, and the starting points of the EN.” In Henry, D. and Nielsen, K. M. (eds.), Bridging the Gap between Aristotle’s Science and Ethics, Cambridge, 113–29.Google Scholar
Karbowski, J. (2015b). “Complexity and progression in Aristotle’s treatment of Endoxa in the Topics.” Ancient Philosophy 35, 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karbowski, J. (2015c). “Phainomena as witnesses and examples: The methodology of Eudemian Ethics 1.6.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 49, 193–225.Google Scholar
Karbowski, J. (2015d). “Is Aristotle’s Eudemian Ethics quasi-mathematical?” Apeiron 48, 368–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karbowski, J. (2016a). “Aristotle on the outline status of ethical first principles.” In Strobel, B. and Wӧhrle, G. (eds.), Angewandte Epistemologie in antiker Philosophie und Wissenschaft, Trier, 115–35.Google Scholar
Karbowski, J. (2016b). “Justification ‘by argument’ in Aristotle’s natural science.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 51, 117–58.Google Scholar
Kelsey, S. (2013). “Truth and value in Plato’s Republic.” Philosophy 88, 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsey, S. (2015). “Empty words.” In Ebrey, D. (ed.), Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Science, Cambridge, 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosman, L. A. (1973). “Understanding, explanation, and insight in Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics.” In Lee, E. N., Mourelatos, A. P. D., and Rorty, R. M. (eds.), Exegesis and Argument: Studies in Greek Philosophy Presented to Gregory Vlastos, Assen, 374–92.Google Scholar
Kraut, R. (1998). “Aristotle on method and moral education.” In Genzler, J. (ed.), Method in Ancient Philosophy, Oxford, 271–90.Google Scholar
Kraut, R. (2006). “How to justify ethical propositions: Aristotle’s method.” In Kraut, R. (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, Malden, Oxford, and Victoria, 76–95.Google Scholar
Kullmann, W. (1974). Wissenschaft und Methode: Interpretationen zur aristotelischen Theorie der Naturwissenschaft. Berlin and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kullmann, W. (1981). “Die Funktion der mathematischen Beispele in Aristoteles’ Analytica Posteriora.” In Berti, E. (ed.), Aristotle on Science: The Posterior Analytics. Proceedings of the Eighth Symposium Aristotelicum, Padua, 245–70.Google Scholar
Kullmann, W. (2011). “Aristotle’s gradual turn from dialectic.” In Fink, J. (ed.), The Development of Dialectic from Plato to Aristotle, Cambridge, 296–315.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. (1987a). “Divide and explain: the Posterior Analytics in practice.” In Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, Cambridge, 90–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lennox, J. G. (1987b). “Kinds, forms of kinds, and the more and the less in Aristotle’s biology.” In Gotthelf, A. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, Cambridge, 339–59.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. (1997). “Material and formal natures in Aristotle’s De Partibus Animalium.” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 11, 217–40.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. (2001b). “Between data and demonstration.” In Lennox, J. G. (ed.), Aristotle’s Philosophy of Biology: Studies in the Origins of Life Science, Cambridge, 39–71.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. (2004). “The place of zoology in Aristotle’s natural philosophy.” In Sharples, R. W. (ed.), Philosophy and the Sciences in Antiquity, London, 58–70.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. G. (2010). “Aristotle’s natural science: the Many and the One.” In Lesher, J. H. (ed.), From Inquiry to Demonstrative Knowledge: New Essays on Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics, Apeiron 43, 1–23.Google Scholar
Lesher, J. H. (2001). “On Aristotelian epistēmē as ‘understanding’.” Ancient Philosophy 21, 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leunissen, M. (2010). Explanation and Teleology in Aristotle’s Science of Nature, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leunissen, M. (2015), “Aristotle on knowing natural science for the sake of living well.” In Henry, D. and Nielsen, K. M. (eds.), Bridging the Gap between Aristotle’s Science and Ethics, Cambridge, 214–31.Google Scholar
Mann, W. (2016). “Review of Bridging the Gap Between Aristotle’s Science and Ethics.” Classical World 109, 570–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDavid, B. (2015). “Review of D. Heny and K. M. Nielsen, Bridging the Gap between Aristotle’s Science and Ethics.” Notre Dame Philosophical Review 10. 18. 2015.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. (1996). “Deliberation and moral development in Aristotle’s ethics.” In Engstrom, S. and Whiting, J. (eds.), Aristotle, Kant, and the Stoics: Rethinking Happiness and Duty, Cambridge, 19–35.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. (1998). “Some issues in Aristotle’s moral psychology.” In Everson, S. (ed.), Ethics: A Companion to Ancient Thought, Cambridge, 107–28.Google Scholar
McKirahan, R. (1992). Principles and Proofs: Aristotle’s Theory of Demonstrative Science. Princeton.Google Scholar
McKirahan, R. (2010). “The place of the Posterior Analytics in Aristotle’s thought, with particular reference to the Poetics.” In Lesher, J. H. (ed.), From Inquiry to Demonstrative Knowledge: New Essays on Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics, Apeiron 43, 75–104.Google Scholar
Menn, S. (2002). “Aristotle’s definition of soul and the programme of the De Anima.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 22, 83–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menn, S. (2012). “Critique of earlier philosophers on the good and the causes.” In Steel, C. (ed.), Aristotle’s Metaphysics Alpha, Oxford, 201–24.Google Scholar
Mignucci, M. (1981). “Hos epi to polu et necessaire dans la conception Aristotelicienne de la science.” In Berti, E. (ed.), Aristotle on Science: the Posterior Analytics, Padua, 173–203.Google Scholar
Moraux, P. (1968). “La joute dialectique d’après le huitième livre des Topiques.” In Owen, G. E. L. (ed.), Aristotle on Dialectic: the Topics, Oxford, 277–311.Google Scholar
Moss, J. (2012). Aristotle on the Apparent Good: Perception, Phantasia, Thought, and Desire. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natali, C. (2007). “Rhetorical and scientific aspects of the Nicomachean Ethics.” Phronesis 52, 364–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natali, C. (2009). “Particular virtues in the Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle.” In Sharples, R. (ed.), Particulars in Greek Philosophy, Leiden, 73–96.Google Scholar
Natali, C. (2010). “Posterior Analytics and the definition of happiness in NE I.” Phronesis 55, 304–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natali, C. (2015). “The search for definitions of justice in Nicomachean Ethics 5.” In Henry, D. and Nielsen, K. M. (eds.), Bridging the Gap between Aristotle’s Science and Ethics, Cambridge, 148–68.Google Scholar
Nielsen, K. M. (2008). “The private parts of animals: Aristotle on the teleology of sexual difference.” Phronesis 53, 373–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, K. M. (2015). “Aristotle on principles in ethics: political science as the science of the human Good.” In Henry, D. and Nielsen, K. M. (eds.), Bridging the Gap between Aristotle’s Science and Ethics, Cambridge, 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. (1960). “Logic and metaphysics in some early works of Aristotle.” In Düring, I. and Owen, G. E. L. (eds.), Aristotle and Plato in the Mid-Fourth Century, Göteborg, 163–90.Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. (1961). “Tithenai ta phainomena.” In Mansion, S. (ed.), Aristote et les problèmes de mèthode, Louvain, 83–103.Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. (1965). “Aristotle on the snares of ontology.” In Bambrough, R. (ed.), New Essays on Plato and Aristotle, London, 69–95.Google Scholar
Patzig, G. (1960). “Theologie und ontology in der ‘Metaphysik’ des Aristoteles,” Kant-Studien 52, 185–205. Translated and reprinted as “Theology and ontology in Aristotle’s Metaphysics.” In Barnes, J., Schofield, M., and Sorabji, R. (eds.) (1975), Articles on Aristotle III: Metaphysics, London, 33–49.Google Scholar
Polansky, R. (2014). “Introduction: ethics as a practical science.” In Polansky, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, Cambridge, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Primavesi, O. (1996). Die Aristotelische Topik: Ein Interpretationsmodell und seine Erprobung am Beispiel von Topik B. Munich.Google Scholar
Reeve, C. D. C. (1998). “Dialectic and philosophy in Aristotle.” In Genzler, J. (ed.), Method in Ancient Philosophy, Oxford, 227–52.Google Scholar
Reeve, C. D. C. (2012). Action, Contemplation, and Happiness: An Essay on Aristotle. Harvard.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roche, T. (1988). “On the alleged metaphysical foundation of Aristotle’s ethics.” Ancient Philosophy 8, 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roche, T. (1992). “In defense of an alternative view of the foundation of Aristotle’s moral theory.” Phronesis 37, 46–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, C. J. (1971). The Eudemian and Nicomachean Ethics: A Study in the Development of Aristotle’s Thought. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Salmieri, G. (2009). “Aristotle’s non-‘dialectical’ methodology in the Nicomachean Ethics.” Ancient Philosophy 29, 311–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, M. (2006). “Aristotle’s political ethics.” In Kraut, R. (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, Malden, Oxford, and Victoria, 305–22.Google Scholar
Scott, D. (2015). Levels of Argument: A Comparative Study of Plato’s Republic and Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shields, C. (2002). Order in Multiplicity: Homonymy in the Philosophy of Aristotle. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shields, C. (2015). “The science of soul in Aristotle’s ethics.” In Henry, D. and Nielsen, K. M. (eds.), Bridging the Gap between Aristotle’s Science and Ethics, Cambridge, 232–53.Google Scholar
Smith, R. (1999). “Dialectic and method in Aristotle.” In Sim, M. (ed.), From Puzzles to Principles? Essays on Aristotle’s Dialectic, Lanham, 39–55.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (1980). “Aristotle on the role of intellect in virtue.” In Rorty, A. O. (ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s Ethics, Berkeley, 201–19.Google Scholar
Tierney, R. (2001a). “Aristotle’s scientific demonstrations as expositions of essence.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 20, 149–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tierney, R. (2001b). “On the senses of ‘sumbebekos’ in Aristotle.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 21, 61–82.Google Scholar
Tuozzo, T. (1996). “The function of human beings and the rationality of the universe: Aristotle and Zeno on parts and wholes.” Phoenix 50, 146–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, J. K. (1995). “Focal reference in Aristotle’s account of Philia: Eudemian Ethics VII.2.” Apeiron 28, 183–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weil, E. (1951). “The place of logic in Aristotle’s thought.” Revue de Métaphysique et Morale 56, 283–315.Google Scholar
Whiting, J. (1988). “Aristotle’s function argument: A defense.” Ancient Philosophy 8, 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wians, W. (1996). “Scientific examples in the Posterior Analytics.” In Wians, W. (ed.), Aristotle’s Philosophical Development: Problems and Prospects, Lanham, 131–50.Google Scholar
Winter, M. (1997). “Aristotle hōs epi to polu relations, and a demonstrative science of ethics.” Phronesis 42, 163–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witt, C. (2015). “‘As if by convention alone’: the unstable ontology of Aristotle’s ethics.” In Henry, D. and Nielsen, K. M. (eds.), Bridging the Gap between Aristotle’s Science and Ethics, Cambridge, 276–92.Google Scholar
Wlodarczyk, M. (2000). “Aristotelian dialectic and the discovery of truth.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 18, 153–210.Google Scholar
Yurdin, J. and Hasper, P. S.. (2014). “Between perception and scientific knowledge: Aristotle’s account of experience.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 47, 119–50.Google Scholar
Zingano, M. (2007). “Aristotle and the problems of the method in ethics.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 32, 297–330.Google Scholar
Zuppolini, B.(2018). “Aristotle on per se accidents.” Ancient Philosophy 38, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar