Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T08:01:57.067Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part I - Injury and the Construction of Legal Subjects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2018

Anne Bloom
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
David M. Engel
Affiliation:
State University of New York, Buffalo
Michael McCann
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Injury and Injustice
The Cultural Politics of Harm and Redress
, pp. 25 - 114
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Abel, Richard L. (1989–90). “A Critique of Torts.” UCLA Law Review 37:785831.Google Scholar
Albrecht, Gary L., and Devlieger, Patrick J.. (1999). “The Disability Paradox: High Quality of Life Against All Odds.” Social Science & Medicine 48(8):977–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Asch, Adrienne. (2003). “Disability Equality and Prenatal Testing: Contradictory or Compatible?Florida State University Law Review 30:315–42.Google Scholar
Bagenstos, Samuel R., and Schlanger, Margo. (2007). “Hedonic Damages, Hedonic Adaptations, and Disability.” Vanderbilt Law Review 60:697745.Google Scholar
Bender, Leslie. (1997). “Tort Law's Role as a Tool for Social Justice Struggle.” Washburn Law Journal 37:249–60.Google Scholar
Best, Shaun. (2007). “The Social Construction of Pain: An Evaluation.” Disability & Society 22(2):161–71.Google Scholar
Bloom, Anne, with Miller, Paul Steven. (2011). “Blindsight: How We See Disabilities in Tort Litigation.” Washington Law Review 86:709–53.Google Scholar
tenBroek, Jacobus. (1966). “The Right to Live in the World: The Disabled in the World of Torts.” California Law Review 54(2):841919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calabresi, Guido. (2008). The Cost of Accidents: A Legal and Economic Analysis. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Emens, Elizabeth F. (2012). “Framing Disability.” University of Illinois Law Review 2012:1383–441.Google Scholar
Engel, David M. (2005). “Globalization and the Decline of Legal Consciousness: Torts, Ghosts, and Karma in Thailand.” Law & Social Inquiry 30(3):469514.Google Scholar
Engel, David M. (2010). “Lumping as Default in Tort Cases: The Cultural Interpretation of Injury and Causation.” Loyola LA Law Review 44:3368.Google Scholar
Felstiner, William L. F., Abel, Richard L., and Sarat, Austin. (1980). “The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming.” Law & Society Review 15(3–4):631–54.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha Albertson. (2008). “The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition.” Yale Journal of Law & Feminism 20:123.Google Scholar
Finley, Lucinda M. (2004). “The Hidden Victims of Tort Reform: Women, Children, and the Elderly.” Emory Law Journal 53:1263–314.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. (1999). “Social Justice in the Age of Identity Politics: Redistribution, Recognition, and Participation.” Pp. 2552 in Culture and Economy after the Cultural Turn, edited by Ray, Larry and Sayer, Andrew. London, UK: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence M. (2005). A History of American Law. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. (1974). “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change.” Law & Society Review 9(1):95160.Google Scholar
Gondolf, Edward W., and Fisher, Ellen R.. (1988). Battered Women as Survivors: An Alternative to Treating Learned Helplessness. Lexington Books/DC Heath and Com.Google Scholar
Hensel, Wendy F. (2005). “The Disabling Impact of Wrongful Birth and Wrongful Life Actions.” Harvard Civil Rights–Civil Liberties Law Review 40:141.Google Scholar
Hughes, Bill, and Paterson, Kevin. (1997). “The Social Model of Disability and the Disappearing Body: Towards a Sociology of Impairment.” Disability & Society 12(3):325–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, Dana A., Ma, Yu-Luen, and Schmit, Joan T.. (2009). “A Cross-National Study of Government Social Insurance as an Alternative to Tort Liability Compensation.” Journal of Risk and Insurance 76(2):367–84.Google Scholar
Milani, Adam A. (1998). “Living the World: A New Look at the Disabled in the Law of Torts.” Catholic University Law Review 48:323417.Google Scholar
Minow, Martha. (1992). “Surviving Victim Talk.” UCLA Law Review 40:1411–45.Google Scholar
Mor, Sagit. (2006). “Between Charity Welfare and Warfare: Privilege and Neglect in Israeli Disability Policy.” Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 18:63137.Google Scholar
Mor, Sagit. (2014). “The Dialectics of Wrongful Life/Birth Claims in Israeli Law: A Disability Critique.” Studies in Law, Politics and Society 63:113–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Davis. B. (1991). The Culture of Pain. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Morris, Jenny. (1991). Pride against Prejudice: Transforming Attitudes to Disability. London: The Women's Press.Google Scholar
Officer, Alana, and Posarac, A.. (2011). “World Report on Disability.” World Health Organization.Google Scholar
Oliver, Michael. (1990). The Politics of Disablement. London, UK: Macmillan Education.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, Michael. (1996). Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice. Palgrave, London: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oswald, Andrew J., and Powdthavee, Nattavudh. (2008). “Does Happiness Adapt? A Longitudinal Study of Disability with Implications for Economists and Judges.” Journal of Public Economics 92(5):1061–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shakespeare, Tom. (2006). Disability Rights and Wrongs. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, Torn, and Watson, Nicholas. (2001). “The Social Model of Disability – An Outdated Ideology?” Pp. 928 in Exploring Theories and Expanding Methodologies: Where We Are and Where We Need to Go, edited by Barnartt, Sharon N. and Altmann, Barbara M.. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith N. (1990). The Faces of Injustice. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Stainton, Tim, and Besser, Hilde. (1998). “The Positive Impact of Children With an Intellectual Disability on the Family.” Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability 23(1):5770.Google Scholar
Sugarman, Stephen D. (1985). “Doing Away with Tort Law.” California Law Review 73(3):555664.Google Scholar
Swain, John, and French, Sally. (2000). “Towards an Affirmation Model of Disability.” Disability & Society 15(4):569–82.Google Scholar
Wasserman, David. (2013). “Is Disability Discrimination Different?” In Philosophical Foundations of Discrimination Law, edited by Hellman, Deborah and Moreau, Sophia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Mark C. (2012). “A Common Law of Disability Discrimination.” Utah Law Review 1:429–72.Google Scholar

References

Alperovitz, Gal and Daly, Lew. (2008). Unjust Deserts: How the Rich Are Taking Our Common Inheritance. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Barak, Aharon. (2002). “Foreword: A Judge on Judging: The Role of the Supreme Court in a Democracy.” Harvard Law Review 116:19162.Google Scholar
Boyd, Julian P, editor. (2017). “Letter from Thomas Jefferson to James Madison.” Pp. 392–4 in The Papers of Thomas Jefferson, Volume 15: March 1789 to November 1789.Google Scholar
Brooks, David. (2015). “Op-Ed., The Cost of Relativism.” New York Times, March 10. www.nytimes.com/2015/03/10/opinion/david-brooks-the-cost-of-relativism.html?_r=1 (accessed November 3, 2017).Google Scholar
Chemerinsky, Erwin. (2000). “The Jurisprudence of Justice Scalia: A Critical Appraisal.” University of Hawai'i Law Review 22(2):385402.Google Scholar
Center for Responsive Politics. (2013a). “Lobbying: Agribusiness Sector Profile 2013.” OpenSecrets.org. www.opensecrets.org/lobby/indus.php?id=A&year=2013 (accessed November 3, 2017).Google Scholar
Center for Responsive Politics. (2013b). “Lobbying: Livestock Industry Profile, Summary 2013.” OpenSecrets.org. www.opensecrets.org/lobby/indusclient.php?id=a06&year=2013 (accessed November 3, 2017).Google Scholar
Cohn, Jonathan. (2014). “Leave No Parent Behind.” New Republic 245(12):79.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. (1982). Dilemmas of Pluralist Democracy: Autonomy vs. Control. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
“Food Stamps are Affordable; Corporate Welfare is Not.” (2017). Daily Take. Truth-out.org. www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/19844-food-stamps-are-affordable-corporate-welfare-is-not (accessed November 3, 2017) [cited as Daily Take 2017].Google Scholar
Dauber, Michele Landis. (2012). The Sympathetic State: Disaster Relief and the Origins of the American Welfare State. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dayen, David. (2015). “A Needless Default.” The American Prospect Longform, February 8. www.prospect.org/article/needless-default (accessed November 3, 2017).Google Scholar
Deneen, Patrick J. (2012). “Unsustainable Liberalism.” First Things (August/September 2012):2531.Google Scholar
Deschamps, Jean-Claude. (2010). “Social Identity and Relations of Power between Groups,” In Social Identity and Intergroup Relations, ed. Tajfel, Henri. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eberstadt, Nicholas. (2015). “American Exceptionalism and the Entitlement State.” National Affairs 22(Winter):2538. www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/american-exceptionalism-and-the-entitlement-state (accessed November 3, 2017).Google Scholar
Eichner, Maxine. (2005). “Dependency and the Liberal Polity: On Martha Fineman's ‘The Autonomy Myth.’California Law Review 93(4):1285–86.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha Albertson. (2004). The Autonomy Myth: A Theory of Dependency. New York, NY: The New Press.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha Albertson. (2008). “The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition.” Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 20(1):123.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha Albertson. (2010). “The Vulnerable Subject and the Responsive State.” The Emory Law Journal 60:251–75.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha Albertson. (2012a). “Beyond Identities: The Limits of an Antidiscrimination Approach to Equality.” Boston University Law Review 92:1713–70.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha Albertson. (2012b). “‘Elderly’ as Vulnerable: Rethinking the Nature of Individual and Societal Responsibility.” The Elder Law Journal 20(1):101–41.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha Albertson. (2013). “Feminism, Masculinities, and Multiple Identities.” Nevada Law Journal 13(2):619–39.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha Albertson. (2014). “Vulnerability, Resilience, and LGBT Youth.” Temple Political and Civil Rights Law Review 23:307–29.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha Albertson. (2015). “Equality and Difference – The Restrained State.” Alabama Law Review 66(3):609–23.Google Scholar
Frick, Walter. (2015). “Welfare Makes America More Entrepreneurial.” The Atlantic, March 26. www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/03/welfare-makes-america-more-entrepreneurial/388598/ (accessed November 3, 2017).Google Scholar
Johnston, David Kay. (2014). “The Shocking Numbers Behind Corporate Welfare.” Al Jazeera America, February 25. america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2014/2/corporate-welfaresubsidiesboeingalcoa.html.Google Scholar
Katzand, Cheryl. (2012). “People in Poor Neighborhoods Breathe More Hazardous Particles.” Scientific American, November 1. www.scientificamerican.com/article/people-poor-neighborhoods-breate-more-hazardous-particles/ (accessed November 3, 2017).Google Scholar
Kiel, Paul. (2012). “The Bailout: By the Actual Numbers.” ProPublica, September 6. www.propublica.org/article/the-bailout-by-the-actual-numbers (accessed November 3, 2017).Google Scholar
Kirby, Michael. (2001). “Think Globally.” The Green Bag 2d (Spring):287–95. www.greenbag.org/v4n3/v4n3_dialogue_kirby.pdf (accessed November 3, 2017).Google Scholar
Kirby, Peadar. (2006). Vulnerability and Violence: The Impact of Globalization. Ann Arbor, MI: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Kordana, Kevin A. (1997). “Tax Increases in Municipal Bankruptcies.” Virginia Law Review 83:1035–108.Google Scholar
Kotowitz, Y. (1987). “Moral Hazard.” Pp. 549–51, In The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, Volume 3, ed. Eatwell, John, Milgate, Murray and Newman, Peter. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Leef, George. (2013). “Op-Ed., Trickle-Down Economics – The Most Destructive Phrase of All Time?Forbes, December 6. www.forbes.com/sites/georgeleef/2013/12/06/trickle-down-economics-the-most-destructive-phrase-of-all-time/ (accessed November 3, 2017).Google Scholar
Levi, Lili. (2011). “Plan B for Campaign-Finance Reform: Can the FCC Help Save American Politics After Citizens United?Catholic University Law Review 61:97104.Google Scholar
Liptak, Adam. (2012). “We the People’ Loses Appeal with People around the World.” New York Times, February 6. www.nytimes.com/2012/02/07/us/we-the-people-loses-appeal-with-people-around-the-world.html.Google Scholar
Locke, John. ([1689] 1988). Two Treaties of Government, ed. Laslett, Peter. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nixon, Ron. (2014). “Senate Passes Long-Stalled Farm Bill, With Clear Winners and Losers.” New York Times, February 4. www.nytimes.com/2014/02/05/us/politics/senate-passes-long-stalled-farm-bill.html (accessed November 3, 2017).Google Scholar
Offer, Avner. (2012). “Self-Interest, Sympathy and the Invisible Hand: From Adam Smith to Market Liberalism.” www.nuff.ox.ac.uk/economics/history/Paper101/offer101.pdf (accessed November 3, 2017).Google Scholar
Pildes, Richard H. (2011). “Why the Center Does Not Hold: The Causes of Hyperpolarized Democracy in America.” California Law Review 99:1047.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. (2015). Our Kids: The American Dream in Crisis. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Rooney, Kathy et al. eds. (2001). Microsoft Encarta College Dictionary 501.Google Scholar
Ross, Catherine E. and Van Willigen, Marieke. (1997). “Education and the Subjective Quality of Life.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior 38(3):275–97.Google Scholar
Senior, Jennifer. (2013). “In Conversation: Antonin Scalia.” New York Magazine, October 6. http://nymag.com/news/features/antonin-scalia-2013-10/ (accessed November 3, 2017).Google Scholar
Shilling, Chris. (1993). The Body and Social Theory. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Story, Louise. (2012). “As Companies Seek Tax Deals, Government Pays High Price.” New York Times, December 1. www.nytimes.com/2012/12/02/us/how-local-taxpayers-bankroll-corporations.html?_r=1& (accessed November 3, 2017).Google Scholar
Titlestad, Peter James Hilary (2010). “Liberalism.” English Academy Review 27(2):94100.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Richard and Pickett, Kate. (2010). The Spirit Level: Why Greater Equality Makes Societies Stronger. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
Witte, John Jr. and Nichols, Joel A.. (2016). Religion and the American Constitutional Experiment, 4th ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yang, Jia Lynn. (2013). “Maximizing Shareholder Value: The Goal That Changed Corporate America.” The Washington Post, August 26. www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/maximizing-shareholder-value-the-goal-that-changed-corporate-america/2013/08/26/26e9ca8e-ed74-11e2-9008-61e94a7ea20d_story.html?utm_term=.78e4f69c3c4f (accessed October 19, 2018).Google Scholar

References

Belivaqua, C. B. (2013). “Chimpanzees in Court: What Difference Does it Make?” Pp. 7187 in Law and the Question of the Animal: A Critical Jurisprudence, edited by Otomo, Y. and Mussawir, E.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (1879). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Brown, K. (2011). “‘Vulnerability’: Handle with Care.” Ethics and Social Welfare 5(3):313–21.Google Scholar
Brown, K. (2012). “Re-moralising ‘Vulnerability.’People, Place and Policy 6(1):4153.Google Scholar
Bryant, T. L. (2007). “Sacrificing the Sacrifice of Animals: Legal Personhood for Animals, the Status of Animals as Property, and the Presumed Primacy of Humans.” Rutgers Law Journal 39:247330.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (1997a). Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (1997b). The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (2003). “Violence, Mourning, Politics.” Studies in Gender and Sexuality 4(1):937.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (2004). Undoing Gender. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Calarco, M. (2004). “Deconstruction is Not Vegetarianism: Humanism, Subjectivity, and Animal Ethics.” Continental Philosophy Review 37(2):175201.Google Scholar
Dayan, C. (2011). The Law is a White Dog: How Legal Rituals Make and Unmake Persons. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Deckha, M. (2007). “Animal Justice, Cultural Justice: A Posthumanist Response to Cultural Rights in Animals.” Journal of Animal Law and Ethics 2:189230.Google Scholar
Deckha, M. (2008). “Disturbing Images: PETA and the Feminist Ethics of Animal Advocacy.” Ethics and the Environment 13(2):3576.Google Scholar
Deckha, M. (2012). “Toward a Postcolonial, Posthumanist Feminist Theory: Centralizing Race and Culture in Feminist Work on Nonhuman Animals.” Hypatia 27(3):527–45.Google Scholar
Deckha, M. (2015). “Vulnerability, Equality, and Animals.” Canadian Journal of Women and the Law 27(1):4770.Google Scholar
Denbow, J. M. (2015). Governed Through Choice: Autonomy, Technology, and the Politics of Reproduction. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Elder, G., Wolch, J., and Emel, J.. (1998). “Race, Place, and the Bounds of Humanity.” Society and Animals 6:183202.Google Scholar
Feder, E. K. (2007). “The Dangerous Individual('s) Mother: Biopower, Family, and the Production of Race.” Hypatia 22(2):6078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fineman, M. A. (2008). “The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition.” Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 20(1):840.Google Scholar
Fineman, M. A. (2010). “The Vulnerable Subject and the Responsive State.” Emory Law Journal 60(2):251–76.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1997). The History of Sexuality, vol. 1. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Gill, E. (2001). Becoming Free: Autonomy and Diversity in the Liberal Polity. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Gunnarsson, L. (2008). “The Great Apes and the Severely Disabled: Moral Status and Thick Evaluative Concepts.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11(3):305–26.Google Scholar
Herzog, H. (2010). Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Hunt, A. (2011). “Rightlessness: The Perplexities of Human Rights.” CR: The New Centennial Review 11(2):115–42.Google Scholar
Huss, R. J. (2008). “Lessons Learned: Acting as a Guardian/special Master in the Bad Newz Kennels Case.” Animal Law 15:6985.Google Scholar
Keller, J. (1997). “Autonomy, Relationality, and Feminist Ethics.” Hypatia 12(2):152–64.Google Scholar
Kennedy, M. (2013). “Judge Rejects Habeas Petition for Tommy the Captive Chimpanzee.” Courthouse News Service, January 23. www.courthousenews.com/2013/12/23/63980.htm.Google Scholar
Kerr, J. S., Bernstein, M., Schwoerke, A., Strugar, M. D., and Goodman, J. S.. (2013). “A Slave by Any Other Name is Still a Slave: The Tilikum Case and Application of the Thirteenth Amendment to Nonhuman Animals.” Animal Law 19:221497.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, C. and Stoljar, N.. (2000). Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mills, C. (2000). “Efficacy and Vulnerability: Judith Butler on Reiteration and Resistance.” Australian Feminist Studies 15(32):265–79.Google Scholar
Mussawir, E. and Otomo, Y.. (2013). “Law's Animal” in Law and the Question of the Animal: A Critical Jurisprudence, edited by Otomo, Y. and Mussawir, E.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nagy, K. and Johnson, P. D.. (2013). Trash Animals: How We Live with Nature's Filthy, Feral, Invasive, and Unwanted Species. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Nonhuman Rights Project (NhRP). (2013). “Memorandum of Law in Tommy Case.” www.nonhumanrightsproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Memorandum-of-Law-Tommy-Case.pdf.Google Scholar
Oliver, K. (2009). Animal Lessons: How They Teach Us to Be Human. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, C. (2011). The Autonomous Animal: Self-Governance and the Modern Subject. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, C. (2015). “Domesticating Bodies: Race, Species, Sex, and Citizenship,” in Political Theory and the Animal/Human Relationship, edited by Grant, J. and Jungkunz, V.. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Shukin, N. (2009). Animal Capital: Rendering Life in Biopolitical Times. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Siebert, C. (2014). “Should a Chimp Be Able to Sue Its Owner?New York Times Magazine, 23 April.Google Scholar
Smith, K. K. (2012). Governing Animals: Animal Welfare and the Liberal State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. and Nussbaum, M. C., eds. (2004). Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trouwborst, A., Caddell, R., and Couzens, E.. (2013). “To Free or Not to Free? State Obligations and the Rescue and Release of Marine Mammals: A Case Study of ‘Morgan the Orca.’Transnational Environmental Law 2(1):117–44.Google Scholar
Wolfe, C. (2010). What is Posthumanism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

References

Ali, Y. (1983). The Holy Qur'an: Text, Translation, and Commentary. Lahore: Amana Corp.Google Scholar
Arjomand, S. (1988). The Turban for the Crown: The Islamic Revolution in Iran. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, J. H. (2002). An Introduction to English Legal History, 4th ed. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Banani, A. (1961). The Modernization of Iran, 1921–1941. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bassiouni, C. M. (2014). The Shari'a and Islamic Criminal Justice in Time of War and Peace. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Behzadi, K. (1994). “Interpersonal Conflict and Emotions in an Iranian Cultural Practice: Qahr and Ashti.” Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry 18(3):321–59.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clough, P. T. (2007). “Introduction.” Pp. 133 in The Affective Turn: Theorizing the Social. Edited by Clough, P. T. with Halley, J.. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Corbin, H. (1973). Traites Des Compagnons – Chevaliers: Recueil de sept ‘Fotowwat-Nameh.’ Téhéran: Institut Français de Recherche en Iran.Google Scholar
Edgar, I. (2011). The Dream in Islam: From Qur'anic Tradition to Jihadist Inspiration. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Gholami, H. (1999). “The Islamisation of Criminal Justice and Its Developments in Iran.” Tilburg Foreign Law Review 7(3):213–20.Google Scholar
Hay, D. (1975). “Property, Authority and the Criminal Law.” Pp. 1763 in Albion's Fatal Tree: Crime and Society in Eighteenth-Century England, edited by Hay, D., Linebaugh, P., Rule, J. G., Thompson, E. P., and Winslow, C.. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Izutsu, T. (2002). Ethico-Religious Conceptions in the Qur'an. Montreal, QC: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Koenig, T. (2008). “Crimtorts: A Cure for the Hardening of the Categories.” Widener Law Review 17:733–81.Google Scholar
Koenig, T. and Rustad, M.. (1998). “‘Crimtorts’ as Corporate Just Deserts.” University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 31:289352.Google Scholar
Langbein, J. H. (1983). “Albion's Fatal Flaws, Past and Present.” Yale Faculty Scholarship Series Paper 545:96120. digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/545.Google Scholar
Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. Translated by Lingis, Alphonso. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Lewisohn, L. (2006). “Ali ibn Abi Talib's Ethics of Mercy in the Mirror of the Persian Sufi Tradition.” Pp. 109–46 in The Sacred Foundations of Justice in Islam, edited by Lakhani, M. A.. Bloomington, IN: World Wisdom Inc.Google Scholar
McCann, M., Haltom, W., and Fisher, S.. (2013). “Criminalizing Big Tobacco: Legal Mobilization and the Politics of Responsibility for Health Risks in the United States.” Law & Social Inquiry 38:288321.Google Scholar
Messick, B. (1993). In the Calligraphic State: Textual Domination and History in a Muslim State. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Mir-Hosseini, Z. (1993). Marriage on Trial: A Study of Islamic Family Law. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
Mittermaier, A. (2011). Dreams that Matter: Egyptian Landscapes of the Imagination. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Mohammadi, M. (2014). Judicial Reform and Reorganization in 20th Century Iran: State-Building, Modernization and Islamicization. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Momen, M. (1985). An Introduction to Shi'i Islam. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Navaro-Yashin, Y. (2012). The Make-Believe State: Affective Geography in a Postwar Polity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Redfield, R. (1964). “Primitive Law.” University of Cincinnati Law Review 33:122.Google Scholar
Rosen, L. (1989). The Anthropology of Justice: Law as Culture in Islamic Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schacht, J. (1964). An Introduction to Islamic Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Tucker, J. (2000). In the House of Law. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1978). Max Weber: Selections in Translation. Edited by Runciman, W. G.. Translated by Matthews, E.. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zubaida, S. (2005). Law and Power in the Islamic World. New York: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×