Book contents
- Sight, Touch, and Imagination in Byzantium
- Sight, Touch, and Imagination in Byzantium
- Copyright page
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Tables
- Acknowledgements
- Note to the Reader
- Abbreviations
- Introduction: Can’t Touch This
- Part I How Sight Is Not Touch
- Part II Photios and the Unfolding of Perception
- Part III Mediation, Veneration, Remediation
- Conclusion: Tempted to Touch
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 May 2018
Book contents
- Sight, Touch, and Imagination in Byzantium
- Sight, Touch, and Imagination in Byzantium
- Copyright page
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Tables
- Acknowledgements
- Note to the Reader
- Abbreviations
- Introduction: Can’t Touch This
- Part I How Sight Is Not Touch
- Part II Photios and the Unfolding of Perception
- Part III Mediation, Veneration, Remediation
- Conclusion: Tempted to Touch
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Sight, Touch, and Imagination in Byzantium , pp. 342 - 385Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Primary Sources
Tatius, Achilles, Leucippe et Clitophon.Google Scholar
Tatius, Achilles, Ed. Vilborg, E., Leucippe and Clitophon (Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1955).Google Scholar
Tatius, Achilles, Trans. Winkler, John J., “Leucippe and Clitophon” in Reardon, Bryan P. (ed.), Collected Ancient Greek Novels (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989), 170–284.Google Scholar
Tatius, Achilles, Ed. and trans. Gaselee, S., Leucippe and Clitophon, Loeb Classical Library 45 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Aetios of Amida, Iatricorum liber, or Tetrabiblion.Google Scholar
Aetios of Amida, Ed. Olivieri, Alexander, Libri medicinales, 2 vols., Corpus Medicorum Graecorum 8.1–2 (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1935–1950).Google Scholar
Aetios of Amida, Partial trans. Hirschberg, Julius, The Ophthalmology of Aëtius of Amida, trans. Waugh, Richey L. Jr. (Ostend, Belgium: J. P. Wayenborgh, 2000).Google Scholar
Aetios of Amida, Partial trans. Gowling, Eric, “Libri Medicinales Book 1: A Translation with Commentary,” unpublished PhD thesis, University of Glasgow (2015).Google Scholar
Aetios of Amida, Partial trans. Ricci, James V., The Gynaecology and Obstetrics of the VIth Century, A.D. (Philadelphia: The Blakiston Company, 1950).Google Scholar
Aetios of Antioch (see also Pseudo-Plutarch), De placitis reliquiae (Stobaei excerpta) or (Theodoreti et Nemesii excerpta).Google Scholar
Aetios of Antioch (see also Pseudo-Plutarch), Ed. Diels, H., Doxographi Graeci (Berlin: Reimer, 1879).Google Scholar
Alcinous, , Didaskalikos.Google Scholar
Alexander of Aphrodisias, De anima.Google Scholar
Alexander of Aphrodisias, Ed. Bruns, I., Praeter commentaria scripta minora, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca suppl. 2.1 (Berlin: Reimer, 1887), 1–100.Google Scholar
Alexander of Aphrodisias, Trans. Fotinis, Athanasios P., The De anima of Alexander of Aphrodisias (Washington, DC: University Press of America, 1979).Google Scholar
Alexander of Aphrodisias, De anima libri mantissa, or De anima liber alter.Google Scholar
Alexander of Aphrodisias, Ed. Sharples, Robert W., De anima libri mantissa, Peripatoi 21 (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2008).Google Scholar
Alexander of Aphrodisias, In Aristotelis meteorologicorum libros commentaria.Google Scholar
Alexander of Aphrodisias, Ed. Hayduck, Michael, In Aristotelis meteorologicorum libros commentaria, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 3.2 (Berlin: Reimer, 1899).Google Scholar
Alexander of Aphrodisias, In librum de sensu commentarium.Google Scholar
Alexander of Aphrodisias, Ed. Wendland, P., In librum de sensu commentarium, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 3.1 (Berlin: Reimer, 1901).Google Scholar
Alexander of Aphrodisias, Trans. Towey, Alan, On Aristotle On Sense Perception (London: Duckworth, 2000).Google Scholar
Anonymous, Anthologia Graeca.Google Scholar
Anonymous, Ed. and trans. Paton, W. R., Greek Anthology, 4 vols., Loeb Classical Library 67, 68, 84, 86 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1917–2014).Google Scholar
Anonymous, Anthologia Marciana.Google Scholar
Anonymous, Ed. Lambros, Spyridon P., “Ὁ μαρκιανὸς κῶδιξ 524,” Νέος Ελληνομνήμων, 8:2 (1911): 123–192.Google Scholar
Anonymous, Blachernae synod.Google Scholar
Anonymous, Ed. PG 127:980D–984A.Google Scholar
Anonymous, Decretum concilii iconomachi.Google Scholar
Anonymous, Ed. Alexander, Paul J., “The Iconoclastic Council of St. Sophia (815) and Its Definition (Horos),” Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 7 (1953): 35–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous, Doctrina patrum.Google Scholar
Anonymous, Ed. Diekamp, F., Doctrina patrum de incarnatione verbi (Munich: Aschendorff, 1907).Google Scholar
Anonymous, Itinerarium Egeriae.Google Scholar
Anonymous, Ed. Geyer, P. and Cuntz, O., Itineraria et alia geographica, Corpus Christianorum, Series Latina 175 (Turnhout: Brepols, 1965), 37–90.Google Scholar
Anonymous, Trans. Wilkinson, John, Egeria’s Travels to the Holy Land, revised edition (Jerusalem: Ariel Publishing House, 1981).Google Scholar
Anonymous, Lexica Segueriana, or Synagoge.Google Scholar
Anonymous, Pantokrator Typikon.Google Scholar
Anonymous, Ed. Gautier, Paul, “Le Typikon du Christ Sauveur Pantocrator,” Revue des Études Byzantines, 32 (1974): 1–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous, Trans. Jordan, Robert, “Pantokrator: Typikon of Emperor John II Komnenos for the Monastery of Christ Pantokrator in Constantinople” in Thomas, John and Hero, Angela Constantinides (eds.), Byzantine Monastic Foundation Documents, vol. ii (Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks, 2000), 725–781.Google Scholar
Anonymous, Sacrorum conciliorum.Google Scholar
Anonymous, Ed. Mansi, J. D., Sacrorum conciliorum nova et amplissima collectio, 53 vols. (Paris: H. Welter, 1901–1927).Google Scholar
Anonymous, Scholia in Iliadem.Google Scholar
Anonymous, Ed. Erbse, H., Scholia Graeca in Homeri Iliadem (scholia vetera), 5 vols. (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1969–1977).Google Scholar
Anonymous, Souda, or Suda.Google Scholar
Anonymous, Ed. Adler, A., Suidae Lexicon, 4 vols., Lexicographi Graeci 1.1–1.4 (Leipzig: Teubner, 1928–1935).Google Scholar
,, Ed. and trans. Whitehead, David et al., Suda On Line: Byzantine Lexicography, www.stoa.org/sol (2000–2017).Google Scholar
Anonymous, Story of Abba Pambo.Google Scholar
Anonymous, Ed. and trans. Budge, E. A. Wallis, “The Life of Apa Cyrus,” Coptic Martyrdoms, vol. i (London: British Museum, 1914), 128–136, 381–389.Google Scholar
Anonymous, Trans. Vivian, Tim, “The Story of Abba Pambo” in Vivian, Tim (ed.), Journeying into God: Seven Early Monastic Lives (Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress, 1996), 30–36.Google Scholar
Anonymous, Vita Leonis.Google Scholar
Anonymous, Ed. Alexakis, Alexander G. and trans. Wessel, Susan, The Greek Life of St. Leo Bishop of Catania (Brussels: Société des Bollandistes, 2011).Google Scholar
Anonymous, Vita sanctae Athanasiae.Google Scholar
Anonymous, Ed. Carras, L., “The Life of St. Athanasia of Aegina” in Moffatt, Ann (ed.), Maistor: Classical, Byzantine, and Renaissance Studies for Robert Browning (Canberra: Australian Association for Byzantine Studies, 1984), 212–224.Google Scholar
Anonymous, Trans. Sherry, Lee Francis, “Life of St. Athanasia of Aegina” in Talbot, Alice-Mary (ed.), Holy Women of Byzantium: Ten Saints’ Lives in English Translation (Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks, 1996), 137–158.Google Scholar
Anthemios of Tralles, Περὶ παραδόξων μηχανημάτων.Google Scholar
Anthemios of Tralles, Ed. and trans. Huxley, G. L., A Study in Later Greek Geometry, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies Monographs 1 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1959).Google Scholar
Aphthonios, Progymnasmata.Google Scholar
Aphthonios, Ed. Rabe, Hugo, Progymnasmata, Rhetores Graeci 10 (Leipzig: Teubner, 1926).Google Scholar
Aphthonios, Trans. Kennedy, George A., Progymnasmata: Greek Textbooks of Prose Composition and Rhetoric (Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2003), 89–128.Google Scholar
Aristotle, , De anima.Google Scholar
Aristotle, , Ed. and trans. Hett, W. S., On the Soul, Loeb Classical Library 288 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1957).Google Scholar
Aristotle, , De memoria et reminiscentia.Google Scholar
Aristotle, , Ed. and trans. Hett, W. S., Parva Naturalia, Loeb Classical Library 288 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1957), 287–313.Google Scholar
Aristotle, , De sensu et sensibilibus.Google Scholar
Aristotle, , Ed. and trans. Hett, W. S., Parva Naturalia, Loeb Classical Library 288 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1957), 214–283.Google Scholar
Aristotle, , De somno et vigilia.Google Scholar
Aristotle, , Ed. and trans. Hett, W. S., Parva Naturalia, Loeb Classical Library 288 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1957), 318–345.Google Scholar
Aristotle, , Ethica Nicomachea.Google Scholar
Aristotle, , Ed. and trans. Rackham, H., Nicomachean Ethics, Loeb Classical Library 73 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1926).Google Scholar
Aristotle, , Poetica.Google Scholar
Aristotle, , Ed. Kassel, Rudolf, De arte poetica liber, corrected edition (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1966).Google Scholar
Aristotle, , Ed. and trans. Halliwell, Stephen, Poetics, Loeb Classical Library 199 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Aristotle, , Rhetorica.Google Scholar
Aristotle, , Ed. and trans. Freese, J. H., Art of Rhetoric, Loeb Classical Library 193 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1926).Google Scholar
Asterios of Amaseia, Descriptio picturae sanctae Euphemiae, or Homilia 11.Google Scholar
Asterios of Amaseia, Ed. Halkin, François, Euphémie de Chalcédoine. Légendes Byzantines, Subsidia Hagiographica 41 (Brussels: Société des Bollandistes, 1965), 4–8.Google Scholar
Asterios of Amaseia, Trans. Dehandschutter, Boudewijn, “Ecphrasis on the Holy Martyr Euphemia” in Leemans, J. et al. (eds.),“Let Us Die that We May Live”: Greek Homilies on Christian Martyrs from Asia Minor, Palestine and Syria (London: Routledge, 2003), 173–176.Google Scholar
Asterios of Amaseia, Encomium on Phokas, or Homily 9.Google Scholar
Asterios of Amaseia, Ed. Datema, Cornelis, Homilies I-XIV (Leiden: Brill, 1970), 114–127.Google Scholar
Asterios of Amaseia, Trans. Dehandschutter, Boudewijn, “A Homily on Phocas” in Leemans, J. et al. (eds.), “Let Us Die that We May Live”: Greek Homilies on Christian Martyrs from Asia Minor, Palestine and Syria (London: Routledge, 2003), 167–173.Google Scholar
Athanasios of Alexandria, Vita Antonii.Google Scholar
Athanasios of Alexandria, Ed. G. J. M. Bartelink, Vie d’Antoine, Sources chrétiennes 400 (Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 2004).Google Scholar
Athenaeus, Deipnosophistae.Google Scholar
Athenaeus, Ed. and trans. Douglas Olson, S., The Learned Banqueters, 8 vols., Loeb Classical Library 204, 208, 224, 235, 274, 327, 345, 519 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007–2011).Google Scholar
Augustine, De trinitate.Google Scholar
Augustine, Ed. Mountain, W. J., De trinitate libri XV, Corpus Christianorum, Series Latina 50–50A (Turnhout: Brepols, 1968).Google Scholar
Augustine, Partial ed. Kreuzer, Johann, De trinitate (Bücher VIII-XI, XIV-XV, Anhang: Buch V) (Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 2001).Google Scholar
Augustine, Trans. McKenna, Stephen, On the Trinity: Books 8–15, ed. Matthews, Gareth B. (Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Augustine, Trans. McKenna, Stephen, The Trinity, The Fathers of the Church 45 (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Basil of Caesarea, De spiritu sanctu.Google Scholar
Basil of Caesarea, Ed. Pruche, Benoît, Sur le Saint-Esprit, 2nd edition, Sources chrétiennes 17 bis (Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1968).Google Scholar
Basil of Caesarea, Homilia de invidia, or Homily 11Google Scholar
Basil of Caesarea, Ed. PG 31:372–385.Google Scholar
Basil of Caesarea, Trans. Monica Wagner, M., “Concerning Envy” in Monica Wagner, M. (ed.), Ascetical Works, reprint (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1962), 463–474.Google Scholar
Basil of Caesarea, Homiliae in hexameron.Google Scholar
Basil of Caesarea, Ed. Giet, S., Homélies sur l'hexaéméron, 2nd edition, Sources chrétiennes 26 bis (Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1968).Google Scholar
,, Trans. Jackson, Bloomfield, “The Hexaemeron” in Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, second series, vol. viii, ed. Schaff, Philip and Wace, Henry (New York: Christian Literature Company, 1895), 51–107.Google Scholar
Basil of Caesarea, Homiliae in hexameron 10–11, or Homilies on the Origin of Man 1–2.Google Scholar
Basil of Caesarea, Ed. Smets, Alexis and van Esbroeck, Michel, Sur l’origine de l’homme (Hom. X et XI de l’Hexaéméron), Sources chrétiennes 160 (Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1970).Google Scholar
Basil of Caesarea, Trans. Harrison, Nonna Verna, “On the Origin of Humanity, Discourse 1” and “On the Origin of Humanity, Discourse 2” in Harrison, Nonna Verna (ed.), On the Human Condition (Yonkers, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2005), 31–64.Google Scholar
Basil of Caesarea, In Gordium martyrem, or Homily 18.Google Scholar
Basil of Caesarea, Ed. PG 31:489–508.Google Scholar
Basil of Caesarea, Trans. Allen, Pauline, “A Homily on the Martyr Gordius” in Leemans, J. et al. (eds.),“Let Us Die that We May Live”: Greek Homilies on Christian Martyrs from Asia Minor, Palestine and Syria (London: Routledge, 2003), 56–67.Google Scholar
Blemmydes, Nikephoros, Epitome physica.Google Scholar
Blemmydes, Nikephoros, Ed. PG 142:1004–1320.Google Scholar
Bryennios, Manuel, Harmonica.Google Scholar
Bryennios, Manuel, Ed. and trans. Jonker, G. H., The Harmonics of Manuel Bryennius (Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff, 1970).Google Scholar
Choiroboskos, George, Περὶ τρόπων ποιητικῶν.Google Scholar
Choiroboskos, George, Ed. von Spengel, Leonhard, Rhetores Graeci, vol. iii (Leipzig: Teubner, 1856).Google Scholar
Choumnos, Nikephoros, Opera philosophica.Google Scholar
Choumnos, Nikephoros, Ed. Chrestou, Konstantinos P., Τὸ φιλοσοφικὸ ἔργο τοῦ Νικηφόρου Χούμνου (Thessaloniki: Ekdoseis Kyromanos, 2002).Google Scholar
Chrysostom, John, De Sacerdotio.Google Scholar
Chrysostom, John, Ed. Malingrey, A.-M., Sur le Sacerdoce, Sources chrétiennes 272 (Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1980).Google Scholar
Chrysostom, John, Trans. Stephens, W. R. W., “Six Books on the Priesthood” in Schaff, Philip (ed.), Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, first series, vol. ix (Buffalo: Christian Literature Publishing, 1889), 33–83.Google Scholar
Chrysostom, John, Trans. Neville, Graham, On the Priesthood (Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Chrysostom, John, In epistulam ad Galatas commentarius.Google Scholar
Chrysostom, John, Ed. PG 61:611–682.Google Scholar
Chrysostom, John, In Genesim (homiliae 1–67).Google Scholar
Chrysostom, John, Ed. PG 53:21–385 and PG 54:385–580.Google Scholar
Chrysostom, John, In Matthaeum (homiliae 1–90).Google Scholar
Chrysostom, John, Ed. PG 57:13–472 and PG 58:471–794.Google Scholar
Chrysostom, John, Quod regulares feminae viris cohabitare non debeant.Google Scholar
Chrysostom, John, Ed. Dumortier, Jean, Les Cohabitations Suspectes (Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1955).Google Scholar
Cicero, , Academica.Google Scholar
Cicero, , Ed. and trans. Rackham, H., Academics, Loeb Classical Library 268 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1933).Google Scholar
Clement of Alexandria, Stromata.Google Scholar
Clement of Alexandria, Ed. Früchtel, L., Stählin, O., and Treu, U., Clemens Alexandrinus, vol. iii, 2nd edition (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1970).Google Scholar
Clement of Alexandria, Trans. Chadwick, H. and Oulton, J. E. L., Alexandrian Christianity: Selected Translations of Clement and Origen (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1954).Google Scholar
Constantine VII Porphyrogennetos, Narratio de imagine Edessena.Google Scholar
Constantine VII Porphyrogennetos, Ed. and trans. Guscin, Mark, “The Narratio de Imagine Edessena” in Guscin, Mark (ed.), The Image of Edessa (Leiden: Brill, 2009), 7–69.Google Scholar
Constantine VII Porphyrogennetos, Treatise on Imperial Military Expeditions.Google Scholar
Constantine VII Porphyrogennetos, Ed. and trans. Haldon, John, Three Treatises on Imperial Military Expeditions (Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1990).Google Scholar
Cyril of Jerusalem, Mystagogiae.Google Scholar
Cyril of Jerusalem, Ed. Paris, Pierre and Piédagnel, Auguste, Catéchèses Mystagogiques, 2nd edition, Sources chrétiennes 126 bis (Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1988).Google Scholar
Democritus, , Fragmenta and Testimonia.Google Scholar
Democritus, , Ed. Diels, H. and Kranz, W., Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, vol. ii, 6th edition (Berlin: Weidmann, 1952).Google Scholar
Dio, Cassius, Historiae Romanae.Google Scholar
Dio, Cassius, Ed. Boissevain, U. P., Historiarum Romanarum quae supersunt, 3 vols. (Berlin: Weidmann, 1895–1901).Google Scholar
Diocles, , On Burning Mirrors.Google Scholar
Diocles, , Ed. and trans. Toomer, G. J., On Burning Mirrors: The Arabic Translation of the Lost Greek Original (Berlin: Springer, 1976).Google Scholar
Doukas Laskaris, Theodore II, Epistula.Google Scholar
Doukas Laskaris, Theodore II, Ed. Festa, N., Epistulae CCXVII (Florence: Istituto di Studi Superiori Pratici e di Perfezionamento, 1898).Google Scholar
Empedocles, , Fragmenta and Testimonia.Google Scholar
Empedocles, , Ed. Diels, H. and Kranz, W., Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, vol. i, 6th edition (Berlin: Weidmann, 1951).Google Scholar
Empiricus, Sextus, Adversus Mathematicos.Google Scholar
Empiricus, Sextus, Ed. and trans. Bury, R. G., Against the Logicians, Loeb Classical Library 291 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1935).Google Scholar
Empiricus, Sextus, Ed. and trans. Bury, R. G., Against Professors, Loeb Classical Library 382 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1949).Google Scholar
Empiricus, Sextus, Pyrrhoniae hypotyposes.Google Scholar
Empiricus, Sextus, Ed. and trans. Bury, R. G., Outlines of Pyrrhonism, Loeb Classical Library 273 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1933).Google Scholar
Epiphanios of Salamis, Panarion (= Adversus haereses).Google Scholar
Epiphanios of Salamis, Ed. Holl, K., Epiphanius, vol. i, Die griechischen christlichen Schriftsteller 25 (Leipzig: Hinrichs, 1915).Google Scholar
Euclid, Catoptrica.Google Scholar
Euclid, Optica.Google Scholar
Euclid, Opticorum recensio Theonis.Google Scholar
Eusebios, , De ecclesiastica theologia.Google Scholar
Eusebios, , Ed. Hansen, G. C. and Klostermann, E., Werke, vol. iv (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1972), 61–182.Google Scholar
Eustathios of Thessaloniki, Commentarii ad Homeri Iliadem.Google Scholar
Eustathios of Thessaloniki, Ed. van der Valk, M., Commentarii ad Homeri Iliadem pertinentes, 4 vols. (Leiden: Brill, 1971–1987).Google Scholar
Eustratios of Nicaea, Dialogus de sacris imaginibus, or Oratione 5.Google Scholar
Eustratios of Nicaea, Ed. Demetrakopoulos, Andronikos, Ἐκκλησιαστικὴ Βιβλιοθήκη, vol. i (Leipzig: Othonos Vigandou, 1866), 127–151.Google Scholar
Eustratios of Nicaea, In Aristotelis ethica Nicomachea vi commentaria.Google Scholar
Eustratios of Nicaea, Ed. Heylbut, G., Eustratii et Michaelis et anonyma in ethica Nicomachea commentaria, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 20 (Berlin: Reimer, 1892).Google Scholar
Eustratios of Nicaea, Syllogistic Demonstrations, or Expositio de imaginibus.Google Scholar
Eustratios of Nicaea, Ed. Demetrakopoulos, Andronikos, Ἐκκλησιαστικὴ Βιβλιοθήκη, vol. i (Leipzig: Othonos Vigandou, 1866), 151–160.Google Scholar
Euthymios Zigabenos, Panoplia Dogmatica.Google Scholar
Euthymios Zigabenos, Ed. PG 130:20–1360.Google Scholar
Evagrios, De malignis cogitationibus.Google Scholar
Evagrios, Ed. Géhin, Paul, Guillaumont, Claire, and Guillaumont, Antoine, Sur les pensées, Sources chrétiennes 438 (Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1998).Google Scholar
Evagrios, De oratione.Google Scholar
Evagrios, Cf. ed. PG 79: 1165–1200.Google Scholar
Evagrios, Trans. Bamberger, John Eudes, Chapters on Prayer (Kalamazoo, MI: Cistercian Publications, 1972).Google Scholar
Evagrios, Life of St. Pankratios of Taormina.Google Scholar
Evagrios, Ed. Stallman, C. J., “The Life of St. Pancratius of Taormina,” unpublished DPhil dissertation, 2 vols., Oxford University (1986).Google Scholar
Evagrios, Practicus.Google Scholar
Evagrios, Ed. Guillaumont, Antoine and Guillaumont, Claire, Traité pratique, ou, le moine, vol. ii, Sources chrétiennes 171 (Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1971).Google Scholar
Galen, , De placitis Hippocratis et Platonis.Google Scholar
Galen, , Ed. and trans. De Lacy, Phillip, On the Doctrines of Hippocrates and Plato, Corpus Medicorum Graecorum 4.1.2 (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1980).Google Scholar
Galen, , De usu partium.Google Scholar
Galen, , Trans. May, Margaret T., Galen on the Usefulness of the Parts of the Body, 2 vols. (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1968).Google Scholar
Galen, , In Hippocratis de natura hominis librum commentarii iii.Google Scholar
Galen, , Ed. Mewaldt, J., In Hippocratis de natura hominis commentarii tria, Corpus Medicorum Graecorum 5.9.1 (Leipzig: Teubner, 1914).Google Scholar
,, Vita sancti Theodori Syceotae.Google Scholar
George of Sykeon, Ed. Festugière, A.-J., Vie de Théodore de Sykeôn, vol. i, Subsidia Hagiographica 48 (Brussels: Société des Bollandistes, 1970).Google Scholar
George of Sykeon, Trans. Dawes, Elizabeth, “St. Theodore of Sykeon,” Three Byzantine Saints: Contemporary Biographies of St. Daniel the Stylite, St. Theodore of Sykeon and St. John the Almsgiver (Oxford: Blackwell, 1948), 88–192.Google Scholar
George the Synkellos, Ecloga chronographica.Google Scholar
George the Synkellos, Ed. Mosshammer, A. A., Ecloga chronographica (Leipzig: Teubner, 1984).Google Scholar
Gorgias of Leonti, Encomium in Helenam, or Fragment 11.Google Scholar
Gorgias of Leonti, Ed. Diels, H. and Kranz, W., Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, vol. ii, 6th edition (Berlin: Weidmann, 1952), 288–294.Google Scholar
Gorgias of Leonti, Trans. Dillon, John and Gergel, Tania, “Encomium of Helen” in Dillon, John and Gergel, Tania (eds.), The Greek Sophists (London: Penguin Books, 2003), 76–84.Google Scholar
Gregoras, Nikephoros, Explicatio in librum Synesii De insomniis.Google Scholar
Gregoras, Nikephoros, Ed. Pietrosanti, P., Explicatio in librum Synesii ‘De insomniis’ (Bari: Levante Editori, 1999).Google Scholar
Gregoras, Nikephoros, Historia Romana.Google Scholar
Gregoras, Nikephoros, Ed. Schopen, L., Historiae Byzantinae, vols. i–ii (Bonn: Weber, 1829–1830).Google Scholar
Gregoras, Nikephoros, Ed. Bekker, I., Historiae Byzantinae, vol. iii (Bonn: Weber, 1855).Google Scholar
Gregoras, Nikephoros, Solutiones questionum.Google Scholar
Gregoras, Nikephoros, Ed. Leone, P. L. M., “Nicephori Gregorae ‘Antilogia’ et ‘Solutiones questionum’,” Byzantion, 40 (1970): 488–513.Google Scholar
Gregory of Nazianzos, Carmina de se ipso, 1.Google Scholar
Gregory of Nazianzos, Ed. PG 37: 970–1017.Google Scholar
Gregory of Nazianzos, Ed. and trans. Meehan, Denis M., Three Poems: Concerning His Own Affairs, Concerning Himself and the Bishops, and Concerning His Own Life (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Gregory of Nazianzos, Contra Julianum imperatorem 1, or Orat. 4.Google Scholar
Gregory of Nazianzos, Ed. PG 35:532–664.Google Scholar
Gregory of Nazianzos, De moderatione in disputando, or Orat. 32.Google Scholar
Gregory of Nazianzos, Ed. PG 36:173–212.Google Scholar
Gregory of Nazianzos, De pace 1, or Orat. 6.Google Scholar
Gregory of Nazianzos, Ed. PG 35:721–752.Google Scholar
Gregory of Nazianzos, De theologia, or Orat. 28.Google Scholar
Gregory of Nazianzos, Ed. Barbel, J., Die Fünf Theologischen Reden (Düsseldorf: Patmos-Verlag, 1963), 62–126.Google Scholar
Gregory of Nazianzos, Trans. Wickham, Lionel, On God and Christ: The Five Theological Orations (Yonkers, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2002), 37–67.Google Scholar
Gregory of Nazianzos, In sanctum baptisma, or Orat. 40.Google Scholar
Gregory of Nazianzos, Ed. PG 36:360–425.Google Scholar
Gregory of Nazianzos, Trans. Harrison, Nonna Verna, Festal Orations (Yonkers, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2008), 99–142.Google Scholar
Gregory of Nyssa, Contra Eunomium.Google Scholar
Gregory of Nyssa, Ed. Jaeger, W. (ed.), Opera, vols. i.1 and ii.2 (Leiden: Brill, 1960).Google Scholar
,, Trans. Karfíková, Lenka, Douglass, Scot, and Zachhuber, Johannes, Contra Eunomium II (Leiden: Brill, 2007).Google Scholar
Gregory of Nyssa, Trans. Hall, Stuart G., Leemans, Johan, and Cassin, Matthieu, Contra Eunomium III (Leiden: Brill, 2010).Google Scholar
Gregory of Nyssa, De opificio hominis.Google Scholar
Gregory of Nyssa, Ed. PG 44:124–256.Google Scholar
Gregory of Nyssa, Trans. Wilson, H. A., “On the Making of Man” in Schaff, Philip and Wace, Henry (eds.), Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, second series, vol. v (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1902), 387–427.Google Scholar
Gregory of Nyssa, De sancto Theodoro.Google Scholar
Gregory of Nyssa, Ed. PG 46:736–748.Google Scholar
Gregory of Nyssa, Cf. ed. Heil, G., Cavarnos, J., Lendle, O., and Mann, F., Sermones, vol. ii (Leiden: Brill, 1990), 61–71.Google Scholar
Gregory of Nyssa, Trans. Leemans, Johan, “A Homily on Theodore the Recruit” in Leemans, J. et al. (eds.), “Let Us Die that We May Live”: Greek Homilies on Christian Martyrs from Asia Minor, Palestine and Syria (London: Routledge, 2003), 82–91.Google Scholar
Gregory of Nyssa, In Canticum canticorum.Google Scholar
Gregory of Nyssa, Trans. McCambley, Casimir, Commentary on the Song of Songs (Brookline, MA: Hellenic College Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Gregory of Nyssa, Trans. Norris, Richard A., Homilies on the Song of Songs (Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2012).Google Scholar
Gregory Referendarios, Sermon.Google Scholar
Gregory Referendarios, Ed. and trans. Guscin, Mark, “The Sermon of Gregory Referendarius” in Guscin, Mark (ed.), The Image of Edessa (Leiden: Brill, 2009), 71–88.Google Scholar
Hermogenes, , Progymnasmata.Google Scholar
Hermogenes, , Trans. Kennedy, George A., Progymnasmata: Greek Textbooks of Prose Composition and Rhetoric (Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2003), 73–88.Google Scholar
Hippocrates, , De visu.Google Scholar
Hippocrates, , Ed. and trans. Crank, Elizabeth M., Two Hippocratic Treatises: On Sight and On Anatomy (Leiden: Brill, 2006), 38–47.Google Scholar
Hippolytus, , Refutatio omnium haeresium, or Philosophumena.Google Scholar
Hippolytus, , Ed. Marcovich, M., Refutatio omnium haeresium, Patristische Texte und Studien 25 (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irenaeus, , Adversus Haereses, 1.Google Scholar
Irenaeus, , Ed. Harvey, W. W., Libri Quinque Adversus Haereses, vol. i (Cambridge University Press, 1857).Google Scholar
Jerome, , Epistula, 46.Google Scholar
Jerome, , Ed. Hilberg, Isidorus, Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum, vol. liv (Vienna: F. Tempsky, 1910), 329–344.Google Scholar
Jerome, , Trans. Fremantle, W. H., “Paula and Eustochium to Marcella” in Schaff, Philip and Wace, Henry (eds.), Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, second series, vol. vi (New York: Christian Literature Company, 1893), 60–65.Google Scholar
Jerome, , Epistula, 108.Google Scholar
Jerome, , Ed. Hilberg, Isidorus, Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum, vol. lv (Vienna: F. Tempsky, 1912), 306–351.Google Scholar
Jerome, , Trans. Fremantle, W. H., “To Eustochium” in Schaff, Philip and Wace, Henry (eds.), Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, second series, vol. vi (New York: Christian Literature Company, 1893), 195–212.Google Scholar
John of Damascus, Expositio fidei.Google Scholar
John of Damascus, Ed. Kotter, P. B., Die Schriften des Johannes von Damaskos, vol. ii, Patristische Texte und Studien 12 (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1973).Google Scholar
John of Damascus, Trans. Salmond, S. D. F., “An Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith” in Schaff, Philip and Wace, Henry (eds.), Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, second series, vol. ix (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1902), 1–101.Google Scholar
John of Damascus, Orationes de imaginibus tres.Google Scholar
John of Damascus, Ed. Kotter, P. B., Die Schriften des Johannes von Damaskos, vol. iii, Patristische Texte und Studien 17 (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1975).Google Scholar
John of Damascus, Trans. Louth, Andrew, Three Treatises on the Divine Images (Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2003).Google Scholar
John of Damascus, Cf. trans. Anderson, David, On the Divine Images: Three Apologies Against Those Who Attack the Divine Images (Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1980).Google Scholar
John VII Grammatikos, Antirrheticus.Google Scholar
John VII Grammatikos, Ed. Gouillard, Jean, “Fragments inédits d’un antirrhétique de Jean le Grammairien,” Revue des Études Byzantines 24 (1966): 171–181.Google Scholar
John of Sardis, Commentarium in Aphthonii progymnasmata.Google Scholar
John of Sardis, Ed. Rabe, H., Commentarium in Aphthonii progymnasmata, Rhetores Graeci 15 (Leipzig: Teubner, 1928).Google Scholar
John of Sardis, Trans. Kennedy, George A., Progymnasmata: Greek Textbooks of Prose Composition and Rhetoric (Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2003), 173–228.Google Scholar
Josephus, Flavius, De bello Judaico.Google Scholar
Josephus, Flavius, Ed. and trans. Thackeray, H. St. J., The Jewish War, 3 vols., Loeb Classical Library 203, 487, 210 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1927–1928).Google Scholar
Kabasilas, Nicholas, Explicatio divinae liturgiae.Google Scholar
Kabasilas, Nicholas, Ed. Bornert, R., Gouillard, J., Périchon, P., and Salaville, S., Explication de la Divine Liturgie, Sources chrétiennes 4 bis (Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1967).Google Scholar
Kabasilas, Nicholas, Trans. Hussey, J. M. and McNulty, P. A., Commentary on the Divine Liturgy (Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1960).Google Scholar
Komnene, Anna, Alexias.Google Scholar
Komnene, Anna, Ed. Kambylis, A. and Reinsch, D. R., Alexias, Corpus Fontium Historiae Byzantinae, Series Berolinensis 40/1 (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2001).Google Scholar
Komnene, Anna, Trans. Sewter, E. R. A., The Alexiad, revised edition (New York: Penguin Classics, 2003).Google Scholar
Komnenos, Isaac, De malorum subsistentia.Google Scholar
Komnenos, Ed. Rizzo, James John, Περὶ τῆς τῶν κακῶν ὑποστάσεως (De malorum subsistentia), Beiträge zur Klassischen Philologie 42 (Meisenheim am Glan: Hain, 1971).Google Scholar
Laertius, Diogenes, Vitae philosophorum.Google Scholar
Laertius, Diogenes, Ed. and trans. Hicks, R. D., Lives of Eminent Philosophers, 2 vols., Loeb Classical Library 184–185 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1925).Google Scholar
Leo of Chalcedon, Epistle to Alexios I Komnenos.Google Scholar
Leo the Physician, De natura hominis synopsis.Google Scholar
Leo the Physician, Ed. and trans. Renehan, Robert, Epitome on the Nature of Man, Corpus Medicorum Graecorum 10.4 (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1969).Google Scholar
Longinus, , De sublimitate.Google Scholar
Longinus, , Ed. and trans. Fyfe, W. H., On the Sublime, revised Donald Russell, Loeb Classical Library 199 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Lucian, , Imagines.Google Scholar
Lucian, , Ed. and trans. Harmon, A. M., Lucian, vol. iv, Loeb Classical Library 162 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1925).Google Scholar
Mauropous, John, Epigrammata.Google Scholar
Mauropous, John, Ed. de Lagarde, P., Joannis Euchaitorum Metropolitae Quae in Codice Vaticano Graeco 676 Supersunt, Abhandlungen der Historisch-Philologischen Classe der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen Bd. 28, reprint (Amsterdam: Hakkert, 1979).Google Scholar
Maximos the Confessor, Ambigua ad Joannem.Google Scholar
Maximos the Confessor, Ed. PG 91:1062–1417.Google Scholar
Maximos the Confessor, Partial trans. Louth, Andrew, Maximus the Confessor (London: Routledge, 1996).Google Scholar
Maximos the Confessor, Ed. and trans. Constas, Nicholas, On Difficulties in the Church Fathers: The Ambigua, 2 vols., Dumbarton Oaks Medieval Library 28–29 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Maximos the Confessor, Capita de caritate.Google Scholar
Maximos the Confessor, Ed. Ceresa-Gastaldo, A., Capitoli sulla carita (Rome: Editrice Studium, 1963).Google Scholar
Maximos the Confessor, Mystagogia.Google Scholar
Maximos the Confessor, Ed. Cantarella, Raffaele, La Mistagogia ed altri scritti (Florence: Testi Cristiani, 1931).Google Scholar
Maximos the Confessor, Trans. Stead, Dom Julian, The Church, the Liturgy, and the Soul of Man: The Mystagogia of St. Maximus the Confessor (Still River, MA: St. Bede’s Publications, 1982).Google Scholar
Meletios the Monk, De natura hominis.Google Scholar
Meletios the Monk, Ed. Cramer, J. A., Anecdota Graeca E Codd. manuscriptis bibliothecarum Oxoniensium, vol. iii, reprint (Amsterdam: Hakkert, 1963).Google Scholar
Mesarites, Nicholas, Descriptio ecclesiae SS. Apostolorum.Google Scholar
Mesarites, Nicholas, Ed. and trans. Downey, Glanville, “Nikolaos Mesarites: Description of the Church of Holy Apostles,” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society n.s. 47:6 (1957): 855–924.Google Scholar
Metochites, Theodore, Γνωμικαί σημειώσεις.Google Scholar
Metochites, Theodore, Ed. Müller, G. and Kiessling, T., Miscellanea philosophica et historica (Leipzig: Teubner, 1821).Google Scholar
Metochites, Theodore, Ed. and trans. Hult, K., Theodore Metochites on Ancient Authors and Philosophy (Semeioseis gnomikai 1–26 et 71) (Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, 2002).Google Scholar
Metochites, Theodore, Paraphrasis in Aristotelis De memoria et reminiscentia.Google Scholar
Metochites, Theodore, Ed. Bloch, David, “Theodoros Metochites on Aristotle’s De Memoria: An Edition,” Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen-Âge Grec et Latin 76 (2005): 3–30.Google Scholar
Metochites, Theodore, Poems.Google Scholar
Metochites, Theodore, Ed. Polemis, Ioannis, Carmina, Corpus Christianorum, Series Graeca 83 (Turnhout: Brepols, 2015).Google Scholar
Metochites, Theodore, Ed. Treu, M., Dichtungen des Gross-Logotheten Theodoros Metochites (Potsdam: Krämer, 1895).Google Scholar
Metochites, Theodore, Στοιχείωσις ἀστρονομική.Google Scholar
Metochites, Theodore, Partial ed. and trans. Bydén, Börje, Theodore Metochites’ Stoicheiosis Astronomike and the Study of Natural Philosophy and Mathematics in Early Palaiologan Byzantium (Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, 2003).Google Scholar
Michael the Deacon, Ekphrasis of Hagia Sophia.Google Scholar
Michael the Deacon, Ed. and trans. Mango, Cyril and Parker, John, “A Twelfth-Century Description of St. Sophia,” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 14 (1960): 233–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michael of Ephesus, Ed. Heylbut, G., In ethica Nicomachea commentaria, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 20 (Berlin: Reimer, 1892).Google Scholar
Michael of Ephesus, In libros de partibus animalium commentaria.Google Scholar
Michael of Ephesus, Ed. Hayduck, M., In libros de partibus animalium, de animalium motione, de animalium incessu commentaria, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 22.2 (Berlin: Reimer, 1904).Google Scholar
Michael of Ephesus, In parva naturalia commentaria.Google Scholar
Michael of Ephesus, Ed. Wendland, P., In parva naturalia commentaria, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 22.1 (Berlin: Reimer, 1903).Google Scholar
Nemesios, , De natura hominis.Google Scholar
Nemesios, , Trans. Sharples, R. W. and van der Eijk, P. J., On the Nature of Man (Liverpool University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Nicholas of Myra (= Nicholas Rhetor), Progymnasmata.Google Scholar
Nicholas of Myra (= Nicholas Rhetor), Ed. Felten, J., Progymnasmata, Rhetores Graeci 11 (Leipzig: Teubner, 1913).Google Scholar
Nicholas of Myra (= Nicholas Rhetor), Trans. Kennedy, George A., Progymnasmata: Greek Textbooks of Prose Composition and Rhetoric (Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2003), 129–172.Google Scholar
Nicholas and Theodore of Andida, Προθεωρία Κεφαλαιώδης.Google Scholar
Nicholas and Theodore of Andida, Ed. PG 140:418-468.Google Scholar
Nikephoros, I, Antirrheticus.Google Scholar
Nikephoros, I, Ed. PG 100:205–534.Google Scholar
Nikephoros, I, Refutatio et eversio definitionis synodalis anni 815.Google Scholar
Nikephoros, I, Ed. Featherstone, J., Refutatio et eversio definitionis synodalis anni 815, Corpus Christianorum, Series Graeca 33 (Turnhout: Brepols, 1997).Google Scholar
Paphlagon, Niketas David, Vita patriarchae Ignatii.Google Scholar
Paphlagon, Niketas David, Ed. and trans. Smithies, Andrew, The Life of Patriarch Ignatius (Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks, 2013).Google Scholar
Oribasios, , Collectiones medicae.Google Scholar
Oribasios, , Ed. Raeder, J., Collectionum Medicarum Reliquiae, vol. iv, Corpus Medicorum Graecorum 6.2.2 (Leipzig: Teubner, 1933).Google Scholar
Origen, , De Principiis.Google Scholar
Origen, , Ed. Görgemanns, H. and Karpp, H., Vier Bücher von den Prinzipien (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1976).Google Scholar
Origen, , Trans. Butterworth, G. W., On First Principles (New York: Harper & Row, 1966).Google Scholar
Pachymeres, George, Quadrivium.Google Scholar
Pachymeres, George, Ed. Tannery, P., Quadrivium de Georges Pachymère, Studi e Testi 94 (Vatican City: Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, 1940).Google Scholar
Paphnutius, , Life of Onnophrius.Google Scholar
Paphnutius, , Ed. Wallis Budge, E. A., “The Life of Apa Onnophrios the Anchorite,” Coptic Martyrdoms, vol. i (London: British Museum, 1914), 205–224, 455–473.Google Scholar
Paphnutius, , Trans. Vivian, Tim, Histories of the Monks of Upper Egypt and the Life of Onnophrius, revised edition (Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press, 2009), 143–166.Google Scholar
Pardos, Gregory, Commentarium in Hermogenis librum περὶ μεθόδου δεινότητοςGoogle Scholar
Paul of Aegina, Epitomae medicae libri septem.Google Scholar
Paul of Aegina, Ed. Heiberg, J. L., Paulus Aegineta, 2 vols., Corpus Medicorum Graecorum 9.1–9.2 (Leipzig: Teubner, 1921–1924).Google Scholar
Paul of Aegina, Trans. Adam, Francis, The Seven Books of Paul Ægineta, 3 vols. (London: Sydenham Society, 1844–1847).Google Scholar
Philo of Alexandria, De Abrahamo.Google Scholar
Philo of Alexandria, Ed. and trans. Colson, F. H., Philo, vol. vi, Loeb Classical Library 289 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1935).Google Scholar
Philo of Alexandria, Ed. and trans. Colson, F. H. and Whitaker, G. H., Philo, vol. i, Loeb Classical Library 226 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1929).Google Scholar
Philoponos, John, In Aristotelis libros de anima commentaria.Google Scholar
Philoponos, John, Ed. Hayduck, M., In Aristotelis de anima libros commentaria, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 15 (Berlin: Reimer, 1897).Google Scholar
Philoponos, John, Trans. van der Eijk, Philip J., On Aristotle’s On the Soul 1.1–2 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Philoponos, John, Trans. van der Eijk, Philip J., On Aristotle’s On the Soul 1.3–5 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Philoponos, John, Trans. Charlton, William, On Aristotle’s On the Soul 2.1–6 (London: Duckworth, 2005).Google Scholar
Philoponos, John, Trans. Charlton, William, On Aristotle’s On the Soul 2.7–12 (London: Duckworth, 2005).Google Scholar
Philoponos, John, Trans. Charlton, William, On Aristotle’s On the Soul 3.1–8 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Philoponos, John, Trans. Charlton, William, On Aristotle’s On the Soul 3.9–13 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Philostratus the Elder, Imagines.Google Scholar
Philostratus the Elder, Ed. and trans. Fairbanks, Arthur, Imagines, Loeb Classical Library 256 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1931).Google Scholar
Philostratus, Flavius, Vita Apollonii.Google Scholar
Philostratus, Flavius, Ed. and trans. Jones, Christopher P., Apollonius of Tyana, 2 vols., Loeb Classical Library 16–17 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Photios, , Bibliotheca.Google Scholar
Photios, , Ed. Henry, R., Bibliothèque, 8 vols. (Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1959–1977).Google Scholar
Photios, , Epistula et amphilochia.Google Scholar
Photios, , Ed. Laourdas, B. and Westerink, L. G., Epistulae et Amphilochia, vols. i–vi.2 (Leipzig: Teubner, 1983–1988).Google Scholar
Photios, , Partial trans. White, Despina Stratoudaki, Patriarch Photios of Constantinople: His Life, Scholarly Contributions, and Correspondence Together with a Translation of Fifty-two of His Letters (Brookline, MA: Holy Cross Orthodox Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Photios, , Homiliae.Google Scholar
Photios, , Ed. Laourdas, B., ΟΜΙΛΙΑΙ (Thessaloniki: Hetaireia Makedonikōn Spoudōn, 1959).Google Scholar
Photios, , Trans. Mango, Cyril, The Homilies of Photius Patriarch of Constantinople (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1958).Google Scholar
Photios, , Lexicon.Google Scholar
Plato, , Phaedo.Google Scholar
Plato, , Ed. and trans. Fowler, Harold North, Phaedrus, Loeb Classical Library 36 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1914).Google Scholar
Plato, , Respublica.Google Scholar
Plato, , Ed. Emlyn-Jones, Christopher and Preddy, William, Republic, 2 vols., Loeb Classical Library 237 and 276 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Plato, , Timaeus.Google Scholar
Plato, , Ed. and trans. Bury, R. G., Timaeus, Loeb Classical Library 234 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1929).Google Scholar
Pliny the Elder, Historia naturalis.Google Scholar
Pliny the Elder, Ed. and trans. Rackham, H., Natural History, 10 vols., Loeb Classical Library 330, 352, 353, 370, 371, 392, 393, 418, 394, 419 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1938–1963).Google Scholar
Plotinos, , Enneades.Google Scholar
Plotinos, , Ed. and trans. Armstrong, A. H., Enneads, 7 vols., Loeb Classical Library 440–445, 468 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1966–1988).Google Scholar
Plotinos, , Trans. Mackenna, Stephen and Page, B. S., The Six Enneads (London: Faber, 1966).Google Scholar
Porphyry, , Εἰς τὰ ἁρμονικὰ Πτολεμαίου ὑπόμνημα.Google Scholar
Porphyry, , Ed. and trans. Barker, Andrew, Porphyry’s Commentary on Ptolemy’s Harmonics: A Greek Text and Annotated Translation (Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Porphyry, , Cf. ed. Düring, I., Kommentar zur Harmonielehre des Ptolemaios (Gothenburg: Elanders, 1932).Google Scholar
Porphyry, , Vita Plotini.Google Scholar
Porphyry, , Ed. and trans. Armstrong, A. H., Porphyry on Plotinus, Loeb Classical Library 440 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Priscian, , Metaphrasis in Theophrastum.Google Scholar
Priscian, , Ed. Bywater, I., Prisciani Lydi Quae Extant, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca suppl. 1.2 (Berlin: Reimer, 1886).Google Scholar
Priscian, , Trans. Huby, Pamela, On Theophrastus On Sense-Perception (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Prodromos, Theodore, Poems.Google Scholar
Prodromos, Ed. Miller, E., “Poésies inédites de Théodore Prodrome,” Annuaire de l’Association Pour l’encouragement des Études Grecques 17 (1883): 18–64.Google Scholar
Proklos, , In primum Euclidis elementorum librum commentarii.Google Scholar
Proklos, , Ed. Friedlein, G., In primum Euclidis elementorum librum commentarii (Leipzig: Teubner, 1873).Google Scholar
Psellos, Michael, Chronographia.Google Scholar
Psellos, Michael, Ed. Reinsch, Diether Roderich, Chronographia, 2 vols. (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2014).Google Scholar
Psellos, Michael, Trans. Sewter, E. R. A., Fourteen Byzantine Rulers (New York: Penguin Books, 1966).Google Scholar
Psellos, Michael, De Euripide et Georgio Piside judicium.Google Scholar
Psellos, Michael, Ed. and trans. Dyck, Andrew R., “Euripedes and George of Pisidia” in Dyck, A. R. (ed.), The Essays on Euripides and George of Pisidia and on Heliodorus and Achilles Tatius (Vienna: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1986), 39–74.Google Scholar
Psellos, Michael, De Heliodoro et Achille Tatio judicium.Google Scholar
Psellos, Michael, Ed. and trans. Dyck, Andrew R., “Heliodorus and Achilles Tatius” in Dyck, A. R. (ed.), The Essays on Euripides and George of Pisidia and on Heliodorus and Achilles Tatius (Vienna: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1986), 89–118.Google Scholar
Psellos, Michael, De omnifaria doctrina.Google Scholar
Psellos, Michael, Ed. Westerink, L. G., De omnifaria doctrina (Nijmegen: Centrale Drukkerij, 1948).Google Scholar
Psellos, Michael, Epistula.Google Scholar
Psellos, Michael, Ed. Sathas, K. N., Μεσαιωνική Βιβλιοθήκη, vol. v (Venice: Typois tou Chronou 1876).Google Scholar
Psellos, Michael, Epistula ad Michaelem Cerularium.Google Scholar
Psellos, Michael, Ed. Criscuolo, U., Epistola a Michele Cerulario, Hellenica et byzantina neapolitana 15, reprint (Naples: Bibliopolis, 1990).Google Scholar
Psellos, Michael, Trans. Kaldellis, Anthony and Polemis, Ioannis, “Letter to the Patriarch Kyr Michael Keroullarios” in Kaldellis, A. and Polemis, I. (eds.), Psellos and the Patriarchs: Letters and Funeral Orations for Keroullarios, Leichoudes, and Xiphilinos (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame, 2015), 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Psellos, Michael, Opuscula logica, physica, allegorica, alia.Google Scholar
Psellos, Michael, Ed. Duffy, J. M., Philosophica minora, vol. i (Leipzig: Teubner, 1992).Google Scholar
Psellos, Michael, Opuscula psychologica, theologica, daemonologica.Google Scholar
Psellos, Michael, Ed. O’Meara, D. J., Philosophica minora, vol. ii (Leipzig: Teubner, 1989).Google Scholar
Psellos, Michael, Orationes hagiographicae.Google Scholar
Psellos, Michael, Ed. Fisher, Elizabeth A., Orationes hagiographicae (Leipzig: Teubner, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Psellos, Michael, Partial trans. Fisher, Elizabeth A., Michael Psellos on Symeon the Metaphrast and on the Usual Miracle at Blachernae: Annotated Translations with Introductions (Washington, DC: Center for Hellenic Studies, 2014).Google Scholar
Psellos, Michael, Oratoria minora.Google Scholar
Psellos, Michael, Ed. Littlewood, A. R., Oratoria minora (Leipzig: Teubner, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Psellos, Michael, Poemata.Google Scholar
Psellos, Michael, Theologica.Google Scholar
Psellos, Michael, Ed. Duffy, J. M. and Westerink, L. G., Theologica, vol. ii (Munich: De Gruyter, 2002).Google Scholar
Pseudo-Alexander of Tralles, De oculis libri tres.Google Scholar
Pseudo-Alexander of Tralles, Ed. Puschmann, T., Nachträge zu Alexander Trallianus, reprint (Amsterdam: Hakkert, 1963).Google Scholar
Pseudo-Dionysios the Areopagite, De divinis nominibus.Google Scholar
Pseudo-Dionysios the Areopagite, Ed. Suchla, B. R., De divinis nominibus, Patristische Texte und Studien 33 (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1990).Google Scholar
Pseudo-Dionysios the Areopagite, Trans. Luibheid, Colm, “The Divine Names” in Luibheid, Colm (ed.), The Complete Works (New York: Paulist Press, 1987), 47–131.Google Scholar
Pseudo-Plutarch (= Aetios of Antioch), De placita philosophorum.Google Scholar
Pseudo-Plutarch (= Aetios of Antioch), Ed. Mau, Jürgen, Plutarchi moralia, vol. v.2.1 (Leipzig: Teubner, 1971).Google Scholar
Pseudo-Plutarch (= Aetios of Antioch), Trans. Goodwin, William W., Plutarch’s Morals (Boston: Colonial Press, 1905).Google Scholar
Ptolemy, Claudius, Apotelesmatica, or Tetrabiblos.Google Scholar
Ptolemy, Claudius, Ed. Boer, E. and Boll, F., Opera quae exstant omnia, vol. iii.1 (Leipzig, 1940).Google Scholar
Ptolemy, Claudius, Optics.Google Scholar
Ptolemy, Claudius, Ed. Lejeune, A., L’Optique de Claude Ptolémée dans la version latine d’après l’arabe de l’émir Eugène de Sicile (Leiden: Brill, 1989).Google Scholar
Ptolemy, Claudius, Trans. Mark Smith, A., Ptolemy’s Theory of Visual Perception: An English Translation of the Optics (Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 1996).Google Scholar
ibn Riḍwān, ‘Ali, Kifāyat at-ṭabīb fīmā ṣaḥḥa ladaya min al-tajārīb.Google Scholar
ibn Riḍwān, ‘Ali, Ed. and French trans. Grand’Henry, Jacques, Le livre de la méthode du médecin de ‘Ali B. Ridwan (998–1067), 2 vols. (Louvain-la-Neuve: Université catholique de Louvain, Institut orientaliste, 1979).Google Scholar
Scholastikos, John (= John Scythopolis), Prologus et scholia in Dionysii Areopagitae librum De divinis nominibus.Google Scholar
John Scholastikos (= John Scythopolis), Ed. Suchla, B. R., Prologus et scholia in Dionysii Areopagitae librum “De divinis nominibus” cum additamentis interpretum aliorum, Corpus Dionysiacum 4.1, Patristische Texte und Studien 62 (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2011).Google Scholar
Seth, Symeon, Conspectus rerum naturalium.Google Scholar
Seth, Symeon, Ed. Delatte, A., Anecdota Atheniensia et alia, vol. ii (Liège: H. Vaillant-Carmanne, 1939).Google Scholar
Seth, Symeon, Oratio antirrhetica ad Galenum.Google Scholar
Seth, Symeon, Ed. and trans. Bouras-Vallianatos, Petros and Xenophontos, Sophia, “Galen’s Reception in Byzantium: Symeon Seth and His Refutation of Galenic Theories on Human Physiology,” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 55 (2015): 431–469.Google Scholar
Sikeliotes, John, Commentarium in Hermogenis librum περὶ ἰδεῶν.Google Scholar
Simplikios, In Aristotelis libros de anima commentaria.Google Scholar
Simplikios, Ed. Hayduck, M., In libros Aristotelis de anima commentaria, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 11 (Berlin: Reimer, 1882).Google Scholar
Simplikios, Trans. Urmson, J. O. and Lautner, P., On Aristotle On the Soul 1.1–2.4 (London: Duckworth, 1995).Google Scholar
Simplikios, Trans. Carlos Steel, On Aristotle On the Soul 2.5–12 (London: Duckworth, 1997).Google Scholar
Simplikios, Trans. Blumenthal, H. J., On Aristotle On the Soul 3.1–5 (London: Duckworth, 2000).Google Scholar
Simplikios, Trans. Steel, C. and Ritups, A., On Aristotle On the Soul 3.6–13 (London: Bristol Classical Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Sophonias, , In Aristotelis libros de anima paraphrasis.Google Scholar
Sophonias, , Ed. Hayduck, M., In libros Aristotelis de anima paraphrasis, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 23.1 (Berlin: Reimer, 1883).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sophonias, , Partial trans. Charlton, W. and Bossier, F., On Aristotle’s On the Intellect (London: Duckworth, 1991).Google Scholar
Sophronios, , Anacreontica.Google Scholar
Sophronios, , Ed. Gigante, M., Anacreontica, Testi per esercitazioni accademiche 10–12 (Rome: Gismondi, 1957).Google Scholar
Sophronios, , Trans. Wilkinson, John, Jerusalem Pilgrims Before the Crusades (Warminster: Aris & Phillips, 1977), 90–92.Google Scholar
Stobaios, John, Anthologium.Google Scholar
Stobaios, John, Ed. Hense, O. and Wachsmuth, C., Anthologium, 5 vols. (Berlin: Weidmann, 1884–1912).Google Scholar
Synesios, , De insomniis.Google Scholar
Synesios, , Ed. and trans. Russell, Donald A. and Nesselrath, Heinz-Günther, On Prophecy, Dreams and Human Imagination: Synesius, De insomniis (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2014).Google Scholar
Syropoulos, Sylvester, Historiae.Google Scholar
Syropoulos, Sylvester, Ed. Laurent, V., Les «Mémoires» du Grand Ecclésiarque de l’Église de Constantinople Sylvestre Syropoulos sur le concile de Florence (1438–1439) (Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 1971).Google Scholar
Themistios, , In Aristotelis libros de anima paraphrasis.Google Scholar
Themistios, , Ed. Heinze, R., In libros Aristotelis de anima paraphrasis, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 5.3 (Berlin: Reimer, 1899).Google Scholar
Themistios, , Trans. Todd, Robert B., On Aristotle On the Soul (London: Duckworth, 1996).Google Scholar
,, Antirrhetici adversus iconomachos.Google Scholar
Theodore of Stoudios, Ed. PG 99:327–436.Google Scholar
Theodore of Stoudios, Trans. Roth, Catharine P., On the Holy Icons (Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Theodore of Stoudios, Cf. trans. Cattoi, Thomas, Writings on Iconoclasm, Ancient Christian Writers (New York: Newman Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Theodore of Stoudios, Epistulae.Google Scholar
Theodore of Stoudios, Ed. Fatouros, Georgios, Epistulae, 2 vols., Corpus Fontium Historiae Byzantinae, Series Berolinensis 31 (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1992).Google Scholar
Theodoret of Cyrrhus, Interpretatio in Psalmos.Google Scholar
Theodoret of Cyrrhus, Ed. PG 80:857–1997.Google Scholar
Theon, Aelius, Progymnasmata.Google Scholar
Theon, Aelius, Trans. Kennedy, George A., Progymnasmata: Greek Textbooks of Prose Composition and Rhetoric (Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2003), 1–72.Google Scholar
Theon of Alexandria, Opticorum recensio Theonis.Google Scholar
Theon of Alexandria, Ed. Heiberg, J. L., Euclidis opera omnia, vol. vii (Leipzig: Teubner, 1895), 144–246.Google Scholar
Theophrastus, , De sensu et sensibilibus, or Fragment 1.Google Scholar
Theophrastus, Ed. and trans. Stratton, G. M., Theophrastus and the Greek Physiological Psychology before Aristotle (New York: Macmillan, 1927).Google Scholar
Theophrastus, , Fragmenta.Google Scholar
Tornikios, George, Orationes.Google Scholar
Tornikios, George, Ed. Darrouzès, J., Lettres et discours (Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 1970).Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Agapitos, P., “Teachers, Pupils, and Imperial Power in Eleventh Century Byzantium” in Too, Yun Lee and Livingstone, Niall (eds.), Pedagogy and Power: Rhetorics of Classical Learning (Cambridge University Press, 1998), 170–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aghiorgoussis, Maximos, “Applications of the Theme ‘Eikon Theou’ (Image of God) according to Saint Basil the Great,” Greek Orthodox Theological Review 21:3 (1976): 265–288.Google Scholar
Akbari, Suzanne Conklin, Seeing through the Veil: Optical Theory and Medieval Allegory (University of Toronto Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Alden Smith, R., The Primacy of Vision in Virgil’s Aeneid (Austin: University of Texas Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Alexander, Paul J., The Patriarch Nicephorus of Constantinople: Ecclesiastical Policy and Image Worship in the Byzantine Empire (Oxford University Press, 1958).Google Scholar
Amand de Mendieta, Emmanuel, “Les deux homélies sur la création de l’homme que les manuscrits attribuent à Basile de Césarée ou à Grégoire de Nysse: le problème de leur rédaction” in Zetesis: Album amicorum door vrienden en collega’s aangeboden aan Prof. Dr. E. de Strycker ter gelegenheid van zijn 65e verjaardag (Antwerp: De Nederlandsche Boekhandel, 1973), 695–716.Google Scholar
Amand de Mendieta, Emmanuel, “Les neuf homélies de Basile de Césarée sur l’hexaéméron,” Byzantion 48 (1978): 337–368.Google Scholar
Anastos, Milton, “The Ethical Theory of Images Formulated by the Iconoclasts in 754 and 815,” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 8 (1954): 151–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andriopoulos, D. Z., “Alcmaeon’s Epistemological Framework,” Philosophical Inquiry 38 (2014): 42–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annas, Julia, “Truth and Knowledge” in Schofield, Malcolm, Burnyeat, Myles, and Barnes, Jonathan (eds.), Doubt and Dogmatism: Studies in Hellenistic Epistemology (Oxford University Press, 1980), 84–104.Google Scholar
Anton, John P., “The Aristotelianism of Photius’s Philosophical Theology” in Schrenk, Lawrence P. (ed.), Aristotle in Late Antiquity (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1994), 158–183.Google Scholar
Arabatzis, George, “Michael of Ephesus on the Empirical Man, the Scientist and the Educated Man (In Ethica Nicomachea x and In Partibus Animalium i)” in Barber, Charles and Jenkins, David (eds.), Medieval Greek Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics (Leiden: Brill, 2009), 163–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arabatzis, George, “Michael of Ephesus and the Philosophy of Living Things (In De Partibus Animalium, 22.25–23.9)” in Bydén, Börje and Ierodiakonou, Katerina (eds.), The Many Faces of Byzantine Philosophy (Athens: Norwegian Institute at Athens, 2012), 51–78.Google Scholar
Arabatzis, George, Παιδεία και Επιστήμη στον Μιχαήλ Εφέσιο. Εις περι ζώων μορίων Α 1,3–2,10 (Athens: Akadēmia Athēnōn, 2006).Google Scholar
Arabatzis, George, “Phantasia et intellect chez Syméon Seth: sur les sources du Conspectus rerum naturalium” in Pacheco, M. C. and Meirinhos, J. F. (eds.), Intellect et imagination dans la philosophie médiévale, vol. i (Turnhout: Brepols, 2006), 483–493.Google Scholar
Armisen, Mireille, “La notion d’imagination chez les anciens: i – Les philosophes,” Pallas 26 (1979): 11–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armisen, Mireille, “La notion d’imagination chez les anciens: ii – La rhétorique,” Pallas 27 (1980): 3–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babut, D., “Sur la notion d’imitation dans les doctrines esthétiques de la Grèce classique,” Revue des Études Grecques 98 (1985): 72–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldes, R. W., “Democritus on the Nature of Perception of ‘Black’ and ‘White’,” Phronesis 23 (1978): 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldes, R. W., “Democritus on Visual Perception: Two Theories or One?,” Phronesis 20 (1975): 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, Barry, “Beyond the House Call: Doctors in Early Byzantine History and Politics,” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 38 (1984): 15–19.Google Scholar
Baltussen, H., “The Purpose of Theophrastus’s “de Sensibus” Reconsidered,” Apeiron 31:2 (1998): 167–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltussen, H., Theophrastus Against the Presocratics and Plato: Peripatetic Dialectic in the De sensibus (Leiden: Brill, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, Charles, Contesting the Logic of Painting: Art and Understanding in Eleventh-Century Byzantium (Leiden: Brill, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, Charles, “Eustratios of Nicaea on the Separation of Art and Theology” in Barber, Charles and Jenkins, David (eds.), Medieval Greek Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics (Leiden: Brill, 2009), 131–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, Charles, Figure and Likeness: On the Limits of Representation in Byzantine Iconoclasm (Princeton University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Barber, Charles, “From Image into Art: Art after Byzantine Iconoclasm,” Gesta 34:1 (1995): 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, Charles, “From Transformation to Desire: Art and Worship after Byzantine Iconoclasm,” The Art Bulletin 75:1 (1993): 7–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, Charles, “Living Painting, or the Limits of Pointing? Glancing at Icons with Michael Psellos” in Barber, C. and Jenkins, D. (eds.), Reading Michael Psellos (Leiden: Brill, 2006), 117–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, Charles, and Papaioannou, Stratis, Michael Psellos on Literature and Art: A Byzantine Perspective on Aesthetics (South Bend, IN: Notre Dame University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Barion, C., “La rôle de la vue dans les arts de la mémoire latins” in Villard, L. (ed.), Études sur la vision dans l’antiquité classique (Rouen: Publications des Universités de Rouen et du Havre, 2005), 199–214.Google Scholar
Bartsch, Shadi, The Mirror of the Self: Sexuality, Self-Knowledge, and the Gaze in the Early Roman Empire (University of Chicago Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartsch, Shadi, “‘Wait a Moment, Phantasia’: Ekphrastic Interference in Seneca and Epictetus,” Classical Philology 102:1 (2007): 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beare, John I., Greek Theories of Elementary Cognition: From Alcmaeon to Aristotle (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1906).Google Scholar
Bellosta, H., “Burning Instruments from Diocles to Ibn Sahl,” Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 12 (2002): 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belting, Hans, Likeness and Presence: A History of the Image before the Era of Art, trans. Jephcott, Edmund (University of Chicago Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Benakis, L. G., “Commentaries and Commentators on the Works of Aristotle (except the Logical Ones) in Byzantium” in Mojsisch, Burkhard and Pluta, Olaf (eds.), Historia philosophiae medii aevi (Amsterdam: B. R. Grüner, 1991), 45–54.Google Scholar
Beneker, Jeffrey and Gibson, Craig A., The Rhetorical Exercises of Nikephoros Basilakes: Progymnasmata from Twelfth-Century Byzantium, Dumbarton Oaks Medieval Library 43 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Bernard, Floris, Writing and Reading Byzantine Secular Poetry, 1025–1081 (Oxford University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, Floris, and Demoen, Kristoffel (eds.), Poetry and Its Contexts in Eleventh-Century Byzantium (Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2013).Google Scholar
Betancourt, Roland, “The Icon’s Gold: A Medium of Light, Air, and Space,” West 86th: A Journal of Decorative Arts, Design History, and Material Culture 23:2 (2016): 252–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betancourt, Roland, “A Liturgical Commentary in Verse: Introduction and Translation,” Orientalia Christiana Periodica 81:2 (2015): 433–472.Google Scholar
Betancourt, Roland, “Medieval Art after Duchamp: Hans Belting’s Likeness and Presence at 25,” Gesta 55:1 (2016): 5–17.Google Scholar
Betancourt, Roland, “Stop Crossing Mediums: Grace Helbig and the YouTuber’s Medium,” Journal of Popular Culture 49:1 (2016): 196–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betancourt, Roland, “Tempted to Touch: Tactility, Ritual, and Mediation in Byzantine Visuality,” Speculum 91:3 (2016): 660–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betancourt, Roland, “Why Sight Is Not Touch: Reconsidering the Tactility of Vision in Byzantium,” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 70 (2016): 1–23.Google Scholar
Betts, E., “Towards a Multisensory Experience of Movement in the City of Rome” in Laurence, R. and Newsome, D. J. (eds.), Rome, Ostia and Pompeii: Movement and Space (Oxford University Press, 2011), 118–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biernoff, Suzannah, Sight and Embodiment in the Middle Ages (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenthal, H. J., Aristotle and Neoplatonism in Late Antiquity: Interpretations of the De Anima (London: Duckworth, 1996).Google Scholar
Blumenthal, H. J., “John Philoponos and Stephanus of Alexandria: Two Neoplatonic Christian Commentators on Aristotle?” in O’Meara, D. J. (ed.), Neoplatonism and Christian Thought (Albany: SUNY Press, 1982), 54–63.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, H. J., “Neoplatonic Interpretations of Aristotle on ‘Phantasia,’” Review of Metaphysics 31:2 (1977): 242–257.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, H. J., “Photius on Themistius (Cod. 74): Did Themistius Write Commentaries on Aristotle?,” Hermes 107 (1979): 168–182.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, H. J., “Plotinus’ Adaptation of Aristotle’s Psychology: Sensation, Imagination, and Memory” in Baine Harris, R. (ed.), The Significance of Neoplatonism (Norfolk, VA: International Society for Neoplatonic Studies, 1976), 41–58.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, H. J., Plotinus’ Psychology: His Doctrines of the Embodied Soul (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1971).Google Scholar
Blumenthal, H. J., “Plutarch’s Exposition of the De Anima and the Psychology of Proclus” in Larsen, Bent Dalsgaard (ed.), De Jamblique à Proclus (Geneva: Fondation Hardt, 1975), 123–147.Google Scholar
Blundell, Sue, Cairns, Douglas, Elizabeth Craik, and Nancy Sorkin Rabinowitz, “Introduction: Vision and Viewing in Ancient Greece,” Helios 40:1–2 (2013): 3–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blyth, P. H., “Apollodorus of Damascus and the Poliorcetica,” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 33 (1992): 127–158.Google Scholar
Bolter, Jay David and Grusin, Richard, Remediation: Understanding New Media (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 1999).Google Scholar
Bouras-Vallianatos, Petros, “Clinical Experience in Late Antiquity: Alexander of Tralles and the Therapy of Epilepsy,” Medical History 58:3 (2014): 337–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouras-Vallianatos, Petros and Xenophontos, Sophia, “Galen’s Reception in Byzantium: Symeon Seth and His Refutation of Galenic Theories on Human Physiology,” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 55 (2015): 431–469.Google Scholar
Brisson, L., “Plato’s Theory of Sense Perception in the Timaeus: How It Works and What It Means,” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 12 (1998): 147–174.Google Scholar
Brittain, Charles, Philo of Larissa: The Last of the Academic Skeptics (Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Broadie, S., “Aristotle’s Perceptual Realism,” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 31 (1993): 137–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browning, Robert, “Enlightenment and Repression in Byzantium in the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries,” Past & Present 69 (1975): 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browning, Robert, “Further Reflections on Literacy in Byzantium” in Reinert, S. et al. (eds.), To Hellenikon: Studies in Honor of Speros Vryonis, Jr. (New Rochelle, NY: Aristide D. Caratzas, 1993), 69–84.Google Scholar
Browning, Robert, “Literacy in the Byzantine World,” Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies 4 (1978): 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browning, Robert, “The Patriarchal School at Constantinople in the Twelfth Century,” Byzantion 32 (1962): 167–202.Google Scholar
Browning, Robert, “The Patriarchal School at Constantinople in the Twelfth Century,” Byzantion 33 (1963): 11–40.Google Scholar
Browning, Robert, “An Unpublished Funeral Oration on Anna Comnena” in Sorabji, Richard (ed.), Aristotle Transformed: The Ancient Commentators and Their Influence (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1990), 393–406.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Leslie, “Perception and Conception: Art, Theory, and Culture in Ninth-Century Byzantium,” Word & Image 5:1 (1989): 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunschwig, Jacques, “En quel sens le sens commun est-il commun?” in Viano, C. and Romeyer Dherbey, G. (eds.), Corps et âme: sur le De anima d’Aristote (Paris: J. Vrin, 1996), 189–218.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, Jacques, “Les multiples chemins aristotéliciens de la sensation commune,” Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 96 (1991): 455–474.Google Scholar
Burkert, W., “Air-Imprints or Eidola: Democritus’ Aetiology of Vision,” Illinois Classical Studies 2 (1977): 97–109.Google Scholar
Butler, Shane and Purves, Alex (eds.), Synaesthesia and the Ancient Senses (Durham: Acumen Publishing, 2013).Google Scholar
Bydén, Börje, Theodore Metochites’ Stoicheiosis Astronomike and the Study of Natural Philosophy and Mathematics in Early Palaiologan Byzantium (Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, 2003).Google Scholar
Cacouros, Michel, “La philosophie et les sciences du trivium et du quadrivium à Byzance de 1204 à 1453 entre tradition et innovation: les textes et l’enseignement, le cas de l’école du Prodrome (Pétra)” in Cacouros, Michel and Congourdeau, M.-H. (eds.), Philosophie et sciences à Byzance de 1204 à 1453: les textes, les doctrines et leur transmission (Leuven: Peeters, 2006), 1–51.Google Scholar
Cairns, Douglas L., “Bullish Looks and Sidelong Glances: Social Interaction and the Eyes in Ancient Greek Culture” in Cairns, Douglas L. (ed.), Body Language in the Greek and Roman Worlds (Swansea: Classical Press of Wales, 2005), 123–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, Douglas L., “Looks of Love and Loathing: Cultural Models of Vision and Emotion in Ancient Greek Culture,” Mètis n.s. 9 (2011): 37–50.Google Scholar
Cantin, Stanislas, “La perception des sensibles communs au moyen du mouvement d’après Aristote,” Laval théologique et philosophique 17 (1961): 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, Annemarie Weyl, “Leo of Chalcedon and the Icons” in Mouriki, Doula et al. (eds.), Byzantine East, Latin West: Art-Historical Studies in Honor of Kurt Weitzmann (Department of Art and Archaeology, Princeton University, 1995), 579–584.Google Scholar
Carr, Annemarie Weyl, “Reflections on the Medium of the Miraculous” in Gerstel, Sharon E. J. (ed.), Viewing Greece: Cultural and Political Agency in the Medieval and Early Modern Mediterranean (Turnhout: Brepols, 2016), 33–52.Google Scholar
Carruthers, Mary, The Craft of Thought: Meditation, Rhetoric, and the Making of Images, 400–1200 (Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Caseau, Béatrice, “Christian Bodies: The Senses and Early Byzantine Christianity” in James, Liz (ed.), Desire and Denial in Byzantium (Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 1999), 101–109.Google Scholar
Castelli, Elizabeth, “Asterius of Amasea: Ekphrasis on the Holy Martyr Euphemia” in Valantasis, Richard (ed.), Religions of Late Antiquity in Practice (Princeton University Press, 2000), 464–468.Google Scholar
Catrein, Christoph, Vertauschte Sinne: Untersuchungen zur Synästhesie in der römischen Dichtung (Munich: K. G. Saur, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, A., “L’imagination, miroir de l’âme selon Proclos” in Schuhl, M. P. M. and Hadot, M. P. (eds.), Le Néoplatonisme (Paris: Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 1971), 241–248.Google Scholar
Chase, Michael, “Porphyry on the Cognitive Process,” Ancient Philosophy 30 (2010): 383–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherniss, Harold, “Galen and Posidonius’ Theory of Vision,” American Journal of Philology 54 (1933): 154–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiaradonna, Riccardo, “Platonismo e teoria della conoscenza stoica tra ii e iii secolo D.C.” in Bonazzi, M. and Helmig, C. (eds.), Platonic Stoicism – Stoic Platonism: A Dialogue between Platonism and Stoicism in Antiquity (Leuven University Press, 2007), 209–241.Google Scholar
Chiaradonna, Riccardo, “Platonist Approaches to Aristotle: From Antiochus of Ascalon to Eudorus of Alexandria (and Beyond)” in Schofield, Malcolm (ed.), Aristotle, Plato and Pythagoreanism in the First Century BC (Cambridge University Press, 2013), 28–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chinn, C. M., “Before Your Very Eyes: Pliny Epistulae 5.6 and the Ancient Theory of Ekphrasis,” Classical Philology 102 (2007): 265–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Elizabeth, The Origenist Controversy (Princeton University Press, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Gordon H., “Plotinus’ Theory of Sensation,” Philosophical Review 51:4 (1942): 357–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coakley, S., “The Resurrection and the ‘Spiritual Senses’” in Coakley, S. (ed.), Powers and Submissions: Spirituality, Philosophy, and Gender (Oxford: Blackwell, 2002), 130–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colish, Marcia, The Stoic Tradition from Antiquity to the Early Middle Ages, 2 vols. (Leiden: Brill, 1985).Google Scholar
Conley, Thomas M., “Aristotle’s Rhetoric in Byzantium,” Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric 8:1 (1990): 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constantinides, C. N., Higher Education in Byzantium in the Thirteenth and Early Fourteenth Centuries (Nicosia: Cyprus Research Center, 1982).Google Scholar
Constas, Maximos (Nicholas), “Beyond the Veil: Imagination and Spiritual Vision in Byzantium,” unpublished paper, University of Chicago Divinity School Workshop (March 2014, revised April 2015).Google Scholar
Constas, Maximos (Nicholas), “Icons and the Imagination,” Logos: A Journal of Catholic Thought and Culture 1:1 (1997): 114–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cormack, Robin, “Living Painting” in Jeffreys, Elizabeth (ed.), Rhetoric in Byzantium: Papers from the Thirty-fifth Spring Symposium of Byzantine Studies, Exeter College, University of Oxford, March 2001 (Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2003), 235–253.Google Scholar
Corrigan, Kevin, Evagrius and Gregory: Mind, Soul and Body in the 4th Century (Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2009).Google Scholar
Cribiore, Rafaella, “The Grammarian’s Choice: The Popularity of Euripides’ Phoenissae in Hellenistic and Roman Education” in Too, Yun Lee and Livingston, Niall (eds.), Pedagogy and Power: Rhetorics of Classical Learning (Cambridge University Press, 1998), 241–259.Google Scholar
Cribiore, Rafaella, Gymnastics of the Mind: Greek Education in Hellenistic and Roman Egypt (Princeton University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curd, P., “A New Empedocles? Implications of the Strasburg Fragments for Presocratic Philosophy,” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 17 (2001): 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagron, Gilbert, “Holy Images and Likeness,” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 45 (1991): 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dain, Alphonse, “La transmission des textes littéraires classiques de Photius à Constantin Porphyrogénète,” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 8 (1954): 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dann, Kevin T., Bright Colors Falsely Seen: Synaesthesia and the Search for Transcendental Knowledge (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Darrigol, Olivier, A History of Optics: From Greek Antiquity to the Nineteenth Century (Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Daryaee, Touraj, “Sight, Semen, and the Brain: Ancient Persian Notions of Physiology in Old and Middle Iranian Texts,” Journal of Indo-European Studies 30:1/2 (2002): 103–128.Google Scholar
Daskas, Beatrice, “Nota sulla theotókos descritta da Fozio, Hom. xvii 2 (p. 167.14–17 Laourdas),” ACME: Annali della Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia dell’Università degli Studi di Milano 64: 2 (2011): 339–351.Google Scholar
De Groot, Jean Christensen, Aristotle and Philoponus on Light (New York: Garland, 1991).Google Scholar
De Groot, Jean Christensen, “Philoponus on De Anima ii.5, Physics iii.3, and the Propagation of Light,” Phronesis 28:2 (1983): 177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delling, Gerhard, “The ‘One Who Sees God’ in Philo” in Greenspahn, Frederick E., Hilgert, Earle, and Mack, Burton L. (eds.), Nourished with Peace: Studies in Hellenistic Judaism in Memory of Samuel Sandmel (Chico, CA: Scholars Press, 1984), 27–41.Google Scholar
Dickie, Matthew W., “The Fathers of the Church and the Evil Eye” in Maguire, Henry (ed.), Byzantine Magic (Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks, 1995), 9–34.Google Scholar
Dickie, Matthew W., “Heliodorus and Plutarch on the Evil Eye,” Classical Philology 86:1 (1991): 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, John, “Byzantine Medicine in the Sixth and Seventh Centuries: Aspects of Teaching and Practice,” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 38 (1984): 21–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, John, “Hellenic Philosophy in Byzantium and the Lonely Mission of Michael Psellos” in Ierodiakonou, Katerina (ed.), Byzantine Philosophy and Its Ancient Sources (Oxford University Press, 2004), 139–156.Google Scholar
Dunbabin, K., and Dickie, M. W., “Invidia rumpantur pectora: The Iconography of Phthonos/Invidia in Graeco-Roman Art,” Jahrbuch für Antike und Christentum 26 (1983): 7–37.Google Scholar
Dundes, A. (ed.), The Evil Eye: A Folklore Casebook (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Düring, Ingemar, Ptolemaios und Porphyrios über die Musik, Göteborgs Högskolas Årsskrift 40 (Gothenburg: Elanders Boktryckeri Aktiebolag, 1934).Google Scholar
Dyson, Henry, Prolepsis and Ennoia in the Early Stoa (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, M., “A Portrait of Plotinus,” Classical Quarterly 43 (1993): 480–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsner, Jaś, Art and the Roman Viewer: The Transformation of Art from the Pagan World to Christianity (Cambridge University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Elsner, Jaś, “Iconoclasm as Discourse: From Antiquity to Byzantium,” The Art Bulletin 94:3 (2012): 368–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsner, Jaś, “Naturalism and the Erotics of the Gaze” in Kampen, N. B. (ed.), Sexuality in Ancient Art (Cambridge University Press, 1996), 247–261.Google Scholar
Elsner, Jaś, Roman Eyes: Visuality and Subjectivity in Art and Text (Cambridge University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsner, Jaś, and Meyer, Michel (eds.), Art and Rhetoric in Roman Culture (Cambridge University Press, 2014), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emilsson, Eyjólfur Kjalar, Plotinus on Sense-Perception: A Philosophical Study (Cambridge University Press, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eyl, J., “Why Thekla Does Not See Paul: Visual Perception and the Displacement of erōs in the Acts of Paul and Thekla” in Futre Pinheiro, M. P., Perkins, J., and Pervo, R. (eds.), The Ancient Novel and Early Christian and Jewish Narrative: Fictional Intersections (Groningen: Barkhuis Publishing, 2012), 3–19.Google Scholar
Fattori, M., and Bianchi, M. (eds.), Phantasia-imaginatio: Atti del V. colloquio internazionale (Centro di studio per il lessico intellettuale europeo), Roma 9–11 gennaio 1986 (Rome: Edizioni dell’Ateneo, 1988).Google Scholar
Featherstone, Jeffrey Michael, “Metochites’s Poems and the Chora” in Klein, Holger A., Ousterhout, Robert G., and Pitarakis, Brigitte (eds.), The Kariye Camii Reconsidered (Istanbul: Istanbul Research Institute, 2011), 213–237.Google Scholar
Frank, Georgia, The Memory of the Eyes: Pilgrims to Living Saints in Christian Late Antiquity (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Frank, Georgia, “‘Taste and See’: The Eucharist and the Eyes of the Faith in the Fourth Century,” Church History 70:4 (2001): 619–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankopan, Peter, “The Literary, Cultural and Political Context for the Twelfth-Century Commentary on the Nicomachean Ethics” in Barber, Charles and Jenkins, David (eds.), Medieval Greek Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics (Leiden: Brill, 2009), 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frede, Dorothea, “The Cognitive Role of Phantasia in Aristotle” in Nussbaum, M. and Rorty, A. O. (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima (Oxford University Press, 1992), 279–295.Google Scholar
Frede, Michael, “Stoics and Skeptics on Clear and Distinct Impressions” in Burnyeat, Myles (ed.), The Skeptical Tradition (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983), 65–93.Google Scholar
Freeman, Elizabeth, Time Binds: Queer Temporalities, Queer Histories (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Frontisi-Ducroux, Françoise, “Eros, Desire and the Gaze” in Kampen, Nathalie B. (ed.), Sexuality in Ancient Art (Cambridge University Press, 1996), 81–100.Google Scholar
Garzya, Antonio, et al., Medici Bizantini (Turin: Unione Tipografico – Editrice Torinese, 2006).Google Scholar
Gaul, Niels, “All the Emperor’s Men (and His Nephews): Paideia and Networking Strategies at the Court of Andronikos II Palaiologos, 1290–1320,” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 70 (2016): 245–270.Google Scholar
Gaul, Niels, Thomas Magistros und die spätbyzantinische Sophistik: Studien zum Humanismus urbaner Eliten der frühen Palaiologenzeit (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2011).Google Scholar
Gibson, Craig A., Libanius’s Progymnasmata: Model Exercises in Greek Prose Composition and Rhetoric (Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2008).Google Scholar
Gifford, Edward, Evil Eye: Studies in the Folklore of Vision (New York: Macmillan, 1958).Google Scholar
Gigineishvili, L. and Van Riel, G., “Ioane Petritsi: A Witness to Proclus’ Works in the School of Psellus” in Segonds, Alain-Philippe and Steel, Carlos (eds.), Proclus et la théologie platonicienne, (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2000), 571–587.Google Scholar
Glavinas, Apostolos, Ἡ ἐπὶ Ἀλεξίου Κομνηνοῦ (1081–1118) περὶ ἱερῶν σκευῶν, κειμηλίων καὶ Ἁγίων εἰκόνων ἔρις (1081–1095) (Thessaloniki: Kentron Vyzantinōn Ereunōn, 1972).Google Scholar
Goldhill, Simon, “The Naïve and Knowing Eye: Ecphrasis and the Culture of Viewing in the Hellenistic World” in Goldhill, S. and Osborne, R. (eds.), Art and Text in Ancient Greek Culture (Cambridge University Press, 1994), 197–223.Google Scholar
Goldhill, Simon, “Refracting Classical Vision: Changing Cultures of Viewing” in Brennan, T. and Jay, M. (eds.), Vision in Context: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives on Sight (New York: Routledge, 1996), 17–28.Google Scholar
Goldhill, Simon, “Review of Ruth Webb, Ekphrasis, Imagination and Persuasion in Ancient Rhetorical Theory and Practice,” Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2009.10.03 (2009), http://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2009/2009–10-03.html.Google Scholar
Goldhill, Simon, “The Seductions of the Gaze: Socrates and his Girlfriends” in Cartledge, P., Millett, P., and von Reden, S. (eds.), Kosmos: Essays in Order, Conflict and Community in Classical Athens (Cambridge University Press, 1998), 105–124.Google Scholar
Goldhill, Simon, “What Is Ekphrasis for?,” Classical Philology 102:1 (2007): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldhill, Simon, (ed.), Being Greek under Rome: Cultural Identity, the Second Sophistic, and the Development of Empire (Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouillard, Jean, “Contemplation et imagerie sacrée dans le christianisme byzantin,” École Pratique des Hautes Etudes, Section des Sciences Religieuses. Annuaire 86 (1977–1978): 29–50.Google Scholar
Grant, Mark, Dieting for an Emperor: A Translation of Books 1 and 4 or Oribasius’ Medical Compilations with an Introduction and Commentary (Leiden: Brill, 1997).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregorić, Pavel, Aristotle on the Common Sense (Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregorić, Pavel, “Aristotle’s ‘Common Sense’ in the Doxographic Tradition” in Allen, J., Emilsson, E. K., Mann, W.-R., and Morison, B. (eds.), Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, vol. xl (Oxford University Press, 2011), 111–131.Google Scholar
Greppin, J. A. C., “The Galenic Corpus in Classical Armenia: A Preliminary Report,” Society for Ancient Medicine 9 (1982): 11–13.Google Scholar
Guilland, Rodolphe, Essai sur Nicéphore Grégoras, l’homme et l’oeuvre (Paris: P. Geuthner, 1926).Google Scholar
Guillory, John, “Genesis of the Media Concept,” Critical Inquiry 36 (2010): 321–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutas, Dimitri, “Avicenna’s Marginal Glosses on De anima and the Greek Commentatorial Tradition,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 47 (2004): 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahm, David E., “Early Hellenistic Theories of Vision and the Perception of Color” in Machamer, P. K. and Turnbull, R. G. (eds.), Studies in Perception: Interrelations in the History of Philosophy and Science (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1978), 60–95.Google Scholar
Hall, James, “Desire and Disgust: Touching Artworks from 1500 to 1800” in Shepherd, Rupert and Maniura, Robert (eds.), Presence: The Inherence of the Prototype within Images and Other Objects (Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2006), 145–160.Google Scholar
Halperin, David J., “Plato and Erotic Reciprocity,” Classical Antiquity 5 (1986): 60–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halton, Thomas, “The Five Senses in Nemesius, De Natura Hominis and Theodoret, De Providentia,” Studia Patristica 20 (1989): 94–101.Google Scholar
Hamm, D., “Sight to the Blind: Vision as Metaphor in Luke,” Biblica 67:4 (1986): 457–477.Google Scholar
Harrison, John E., and Baron-Cohen, Simon (eds.), Synaesthesia: Classic and Contemporary Readings (Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1997).Google Scholar
Harvey, Susan Ashbrook, Scenting Salvation: Ancient Christianity and the Olfactory Imagination (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Heiberg, Johan L., Geschichte der Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften im Altertum, Handbuch der Altertumswissenschaft 5.1.2 (Munich: C. H. Beck, 1926), 75.Google Scholar
Heller-Roazen, Daniel, The Inner Touch: Archaeology of a Sensation (Brooklyn, NY: Zone Books, 2007).Google Scholar
Henry, Patrick, “What Was the Iconoclastic Controversy about?,” Church History 45:1 (1976): 16–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillsdale, Cecily, Byzantine Art and Diplomacy in an Age of Decline (Cambridge University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holman, S. R., “On Phoenix and Eunuchs: Sources for Meletius the Monk’s Anatomy of Gender,” Journal of Early Christian Studies 16:1 (2008): 79–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huby, P. M. “The Transmission of Aristotle’s Writings and the Places Where Copies of His Works Existed,” Classica et Mediaevalia 30 (1969): 241–257.Google Scholar
Hunger, Herbert, Die hochsprachliche profane Literatur der Byzantiner, 2 vols. (Munich: Beck, 1978).Google Scholar
Hunger, Herbert, Schreiben und Lesen in Byzanz: Die byzantinische Buchkultur (Munich: C. H. Beck, 1989).Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, Katerina, “Aristotle on Colours” in Sfendoni-Mentzou, D., Hattiangadi, J., and Johnson, D. M. (eds.), Aristotle and Contemporary Science, vol. ii (New York: P. Lang, 2000), 211–225.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, Katerina, “Basic and Mixed Colours in Empedocles and in Plato” in Carastro, Marcello (ed.), L’antiquité en couleurs: catégories, pratiques, représentations (Grenoble: J. Millon, 2009), 119–130.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, Katerina, “The Byzantine Commentator’s Task: Transmitting, Transforming, or Transcending Aristotle’s Text” in Speer, Andreas and Steinkrüger, Philipp (eds.), Knotenpunkt Byzanz: Wissensformen und kulturelle Wechselbeziehungen (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2012), 199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ierodiakonou, Katerina, “Empedocles and the Ancient Painters” in Cleland, Liza and Stears, Karen, Colour in the Ancient Mediterranean World, British Archaeological Report Series 1267 (Oxford: Hedges, 2004), 91–94.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, Katerina, “Empedocles on Colour and Colour Vision,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 29 (2005): 1–37.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, Katerina, “Galen’s Criticism of the Aristotelian Theory of Colour Vision” in Natali, Carlo and Maso, Stephano (eds.), Antiaristotelismo (Amsterdam: Hakkert, 1999), 123–141.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, Katerina, “On Galen’s Theory of Vision,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies. Supplement 114 (2014): 197–211.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, Katerina, “The Greek Concept of Sympatheia and its Byzantine Appropriation in Michael Psellos” in Magdalino, Paul and Mavroudi, Maria (eds.), The Occult Sciences in Byzantium (Geneva: La Pomme d’Or, 2006), 97–117.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, Katerina, “Hellenistic Philosophers on the Phenomenon of Changing Colours” in Holmes, B. and Fischer, K.-D. (eds.), The Frontiers of Ancient Science: Essays in Honor of Heinrich von Staden (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2015), 227–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ierodiakonou, Katerina, “The Notion of Enargeia in Hellenistic Philosophy” in Morison, Ben and Ierodiakonou, Katerina (eds.), Episteme, etc.: Essays in Honour of Jonathan Barnes (Oxford University Press, 2011), 60–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ierodiakonou, Katerina, “Plato’s Theory of Colours in the Timaeus,” Rhizai 2:2 (2005): 125–140.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, Katerina, “The Western Influence on Late Byzantine Aristotelian Commentaries” in Hinterberger, Martin and Schabel, Chris (eds.), Greeks, Latins, and Intellectual History 1204–1500 (Leuven: Peeters, 2011), 373–384.Google Scholar
Ioppolo, Anna Maria, “Presentation and Assent: A Physical and Cognitive Problem in Early Stoicism,” Classical Quarterly 40:2 (1990): 433–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Liz, “Art and Lies: Text, Image, and Imagination in the Medieval World” in Eastmond, Antony and James, Liz (eds.), Icon and Word: The Power of Images in Byzantium (Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2003), 59–71.Google Scholar
James, Liz, “Senses and Sensibility in Byzantium,” Art History 27:4 (2004): 523–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffreys, Michael, “Literacy” in Cormack, Robin, Haldon, John F., and Jeffreys, Elizabeth (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Byzantine Studies (Oxford University Press, 2008), 796–802.Google Scholar
Ježek, Václav, “Education as a Unifying and ‘Uplifting’ Force in Byzantium,” Byzantinoslavica 65 (2007): 167–200.Google Scholar
Johansen, Thomas K., Aristotle on the Sense-Organs (Cambridge University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Caroline, Eyesight Alone: Clement Greenberg’s Modernism and the Bureaucratization of the Senses (University of Chicago Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Jung, Jacqueline, “The Tactile and the Visionary: Notes on the Place of Sculpture in the Medieval Religious Imagination” in Hourihane, C. (ed.), Looking Beyond: Visions, Dreams, and Insights in Medieval Art and History (Princeton: Index of Christian Art, 2010), 203–240.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H., “Sensation and Consciousness in Aristotle’s Psychology,” Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 48:1 (1966): 43–81.Google Scholar
Kalogeras, Nikolaos M., “Byzantine Childhood Education and Its Social Role from the Sixth Century until the End of Iconoclasm,” unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Chicago (2000).Google Scholar
Kambylis, Athanasios, “Zu Leos Schrift: Σύνοψις εἰς τὴν φύσιν τῶν ἀνθρώπων,” Hermes 101:4 (1973): 483–495.Google Scholar
Kapriev, Georgi, “Die gottgebührenden Phantasien und die Gottesschau bei Photios” in Intellect et Imagination dans la Philosophie Médiévale, vol. i (Turnhout: Brepols, 2006), 473–481.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. A., “Notes on ‘Primary’ and ‘Secondary’ Schools in Late Antiquity,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 113 (1983): 323–346.Google Scholar
Katsaros, V., “Προδρομικοί «θεσμοί» για την οργάνωση της ανώτερης εκπαίδευσης της εποχής των Κομνηνών από την προκομνήνεια περίοδο” in Vlyssidou, V. (ed.), The Empire in Crisis? Byzantium in the 11th Century, 1025–1081 (Athens: Hellenic National Research Foundation, 2003), 452–455.Google Scholar
Katsiampoura, G., “The Quadrivium of 1008 and Pachymeres’ Syntagma: Comparing Two Byzantine Quadrivia” in Del Corso, Lucio and Pecere, Oronzo (eds.), Libri di scuola e pratiche didattiche: dall’antichità al rinascimento, vol. ii (Cassino: Università di Cassino, 2010), 409–424.Google Scholar
Kazhdan, Alexander, “The Image of the Medical Doctor in Byzantine Literature of the Tenth to Twelfth Centuries,” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 38 (1984): 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Mary E., “St. Gregory of Nazianzus and Early Byzantine Medicine,” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 9 (1941): 8–30.Google Scholar
Keenan, Mary E., “St. Gregory of Nyssa and the Medical Profession,” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 15 (1944): 150–161.Google Scholar
Kemp, Simon and Fletcher, Garth J. O., “The Medieval Theory of the Inner Senses,” The American Journal of Psychology 106:4 (1993): 559–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, George A., Greek Rhetoric under Christian Emperors (Princeton University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Kennedy, George A., A New History of Classical Rhetoric (Princeton University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Kennedy, George A., Progymnasmata: Greek Textbooks of Prose Composition and Rhetoric (Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2003).Google Scholar
Knorr, W. R., “The Geometry of Burning-Mirrors in Antiquity,” Isis 74 (1983): 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch Piettre, Renée, “Les dieux crèvent les yeux: l’enargeia dans la représentation du divin” in Mulliez, D. (ed.), Ateliers 21: la transmission de l’image dans l’antiquité (Lille: Cahiers de la Maison de la Recherche, Université Charles-de-Gaulle, Lille 3, 1999), 11–21.Google Scholar
Koortbojian, Michael, “Mimesis or Phantasia? Two Representational Modes in Roman Commemorative Art,” Classical Antiquity 24:2 (2005): 285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosman, L. A., “Perceiving that We Perceive: On the Soul iii.2,” Philosophical Review 84 (1975): 499–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumler, Aden, “The Multiplication of the Species: Eucharistic Morphology in the Middle Ages,” RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics 59/60 (2011): 179–191.Google Scholar
Kyriakis, M. J., “Student Life in Eleventh Century Constantinople,” Byzantina 7 (1975): 375–388.Google Scholar
Lacoste, E., “Les Poliorcétiques d’Apollodore de Damas,” Revue des Études Grecques 3 (1890): 230–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladner, G. B., “The Concept of the Image in the Greek Fathers and the Byzantine Iconoclastic Controversy,” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 7 (1953): 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakey, Christopher, “The Materiality of Light in Medieval Italian Painting,” English Language Notes 53:2 (2015): 119–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lammert, F., “Zu den Poliorketikern Apollodoros und Athenaios und zur Poliorketik des Vitruvius,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 87 (1938): 304–332.Google Scholar
Langslow, D. R., The Latin Alexander Trallianus: The Text and Transmission of a Late Latin Medical Book (London: Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies, 2006).Google Scholar
Lascaratos, J. and Tsirou, M., “Ophthalmological Ideas of the Byzantine Author Meletius,” Documenta Ophthalmologica 74 (1990): 31–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lauritzen, Frederick, “Psellos and Plotinos,” Byzantinische Zeitschrift 107:2 (2014): 711–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lautner, Peter, “The Distinction between Φαντασία and Δόξα in Proclus’ In Timaeum,” Classical Quarterly 52:1 (2002): 257–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lautner, Peter, “Mental Images in Porphyry’s Commentary on Ptolemy’s Harmonics,” Apeiron 48:2 (2015): 220–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lautner, Peter, “Perception and Self-Knowledge: Interpreting Fr. 264 Smith,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 50 (2007): 77–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lautner, Peter, “Philoponean Accounts of Phantasia,” Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 34 (1993): 159–170.Google Scholar
Lautner, Peter, “Philoponus, In de Anima III: Quest for an Author,” Classical Quarterly 42 (1992): 510–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lautner, Peter, “Plutarch of Athens on κοινὴ αἴσθησις and Phantasia,” Ancient Philosophy 20 (2000): 425–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebeck, Anne, “The Central Myth of Plato’s Phaedrus,” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 13 (1972): 267–290.Google Scholar
Lemerle, Paul, Cinq études sur le XIe siècle byzantin (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1977).Google Scholar
Lemerle, Paul, Le premier humanisme byzantin: notes et remarques sur enseignement et culture à Byzance des origines au Xe siècle (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1971).Google Scholar
Leyerle, Blake, “John Chrysostom on the Gaze,” Journal of Early Christian Studies 1:2 (1993): 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Limberis, Vasiliki, “The Eyes Infected by Evil: Basil of Caesarea’s Homily, ‘On Envy’,” The Harvard Theological Review 84:2 (1991): 163–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindberg, David C., Theories of Vision from Al-Kindi to Kepler, revised edition (University of Chicago Press, 1976; revised 1996).Google Scholar
Linnér, S., “Psellus’ Chronographia and the Alexias: Some Textual Parallels,” Byzantinische Zeitschrift 76 (1983): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, A. C., “The Aristotelianism of Eustratius of Nicaea” in Wiesner, J. (ed.), Aristoteles: Werk and Wirkung, vol. ii (New York: De Gruyter, 1987), 341–351.Google Scholar
Long, Anthony A., “Aisthesis, Prolepsis and Linguistic Theory in Epicurus,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 18:1 (1971): 114–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, Anthony A., “Stoic Psychology and the Elucidation of Language” in Asmis, Elizabeth and Manetti, Giovanni (eds.), Knowledge Through Signs: Ancient Semiotic Theories and Practices (Brussels: Brepols, 1996), 938–950.Google Scholar
Long, Anthony A., “Theophrastus’ De Sensibus on Plato” in Algra, K. A., van der Horst, P. W., and Runia, D. T. (eds.), Polyhistor: Studies in the History and Historiography of Ancient Philosophy Presented to Jaap Mansfeld on his Sixtieth Birthday (Leiden: Brill, 1996), 345–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, Anthony A., “Thinking and Sense-Perception in Empedocles: Mysticism or Materialism,” Classical Quarterly 16 (1966): 256–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, Anthony A. and Sedley, David, The Hellenistic Philosophers, 2 vols. (Cambridge University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Lonsdale, Steven H., “If Looks Could Kill: παπταίνω and the Interpenetration of Imagery and Narrative in Homer,” The Classical Journal 84:4 (1989): 325–333.Google Scholar
Lo Presti, R., “Between Distinction and Separation: Rethinking the Centrality of the Brain in Alcmaeon’s Theory of Sense-Perception and Cognition,” Antike Naturwissenschaft und ihre Rezeption 19 (2009): 9–30.Google Scholar
Lorenz, K., “The Ear of the Beholder: Spectator Figures and Narrative Structure in Pompeian Wall-Painting,” Art History 30 (2007): 665–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lories, Danielle, “Des sensibles communs dans le De anima d’Aristote,” Revue Philosophique de Louvain 89 (1991): 401–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louth, Andrew, Greek East and Latin West: The Church AD 681–1071 (Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Lovatt, Helen, The Epic Gaze: Vision, Gender and Narrative in Ancient Epic (Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCoull, Leslie, “Notes on Philoponus’ Theory of Vision,” Byzantion 67:2 (1997): 558–562.Google Scholar
MacIsaac, D. Gregory, “Phantasia between Soul and Body in Proclus’ Euclid Commentary,” Dionysius 19 (2001): 125–136.Google Scholar
Magdalino, Paul, “The Byzantine Reception of Classical Astrology” in Holmes, C. and Waring, J. (eds.), Literacy, Education and Manuscript Transmission in Byzantium and Beyond (Leiden: Brill, 2002), 33–58.Google Scholar
Magdalino, Paul, “The Road to Baghdad in the Thought-World of Ninth-Century Byzantium” in Brubaker, Leslie (ed.), Byzantium in the Ninth Century: Dead or Alive? Papers from the Thirtieth Spring Symposium of Byzantine Studies, Birmingham, March 1996 (Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 1998), 195–213.Google Scholar
Mango, Cyril, The Homilies of Photius Patriarch of Constantinople (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1958).Google Scholar
Mango, Cyril, (ed. and trans.), Art of the Byzantine Empire, 312–1453: Sources and Documents (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1972).Google Scholar
Manieri, Alessandra, “Colori, suoni e profumi nelle Imagines: principi dell’estetica filostratea,” Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica 63 (1999): 111–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manieri, Alessandra, L’immagine poetica nella teoria degli antichi: phantasia ed enargeia (Pisa: Istituti Editoriali e Poligrafici Internazionali, 1998).Google Scholar
Männlein-Robert, Irmgard, “Zum Bild des Phidias in der Antike: Konzepte zur Kreativität des bildenden Künstlers” in Dewender, Thomas and Welt, Thomas (eds.), Imagination – Fiktion – Kreation: Das kulturschaffende Vermögen der Phantasie (Munich: K. G. Saur, 2003), 45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manolova, Divna, “Discourses of Science and Philosophy in the Letters of Nikephoros Gregoras,” unpublished PhD dissertation, Central European University (2014).Google Scholar
Manolova, Divna, “Sophonias the Philosopher: A Preface of an Aristotelian Commentary: Structure, Intention, and Audience,” unpublished MA thesis, Central European University (2008).Google Scholar
Mariev, Sergei, “Echi delle teorie ottiche antiche nelle omelie di Fozio,” Bulgaria Mediaevalis 2 (2011): 71–80.Google Scholar
Marinis, Vasileios, “Piety, Barbarism, and the Senses in Byzantium,” in Promey, Sally M. (ed.), Sensational Religion: Sensory Cultures in Material Practice (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2014), 321–340.Google Scholar
Markopoulos, Athanasios, “De la structure de l’école byzantine: le maître, les livres et le processus éducatif” in Mondrain, B. (ed.), Lire et écrire à Byzance (Paris: Association des Amis du Centre d’Histoire et Civilisation de Byzance, 2006), 85–86.Google Scholar
Markopoulos, Athanasios, “Education” in Cormack, Robin, Haldon, John F., and Jeffreys, Elizabeth (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Byzantine Studies (Oxford University Press, 2008), 785–795.Google Scholar
Markopoulos, Athanasios, “Teachers and Textbooks in Byzantium: Ninth to Eleventh Centuries” in Steckel, Sita, Gaul, Niels, and Grünbart, Michael (eds.), Networks of Learning: Perspectives on Scholars in Byzantine East and Latin West, c. 1000–1200 (Berlin: Lit Verlag, 2014), 3–15.Google Scholar
Marks, Lawrence E., The Unity of the Senses: Interrelations Among the Modalities (New York: Academic Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Martin, Edward James, A History of the Iconoclastic Controversy (London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge, 1930).Google Scholar
Martin-Hisard, B., “Georgian Hagiography” in Efthymiadis, Stephanos (ed.), The Ashgate Research Companion to Byzantine Hagiography, vol. i (Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2011), 285–298.Google Scholar
McCabe, Anne, A Byzantine Encyclopedia of Horse Medicine: The Sources, Compilations, and Transmission of the Hippiatrica (Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, W., “The Shape of the Mirror: Metaphorical Catoptrics in Classical Literature,” Arethusa 22 (1989): 161–196.Google Scholar
McDaniel, Walton Brooks, “The Pupula Duplex and Other Tokens of an ‘Evil Eye’ in the Light of Ophthalmology,” Classical Philology 13 (1918): 335–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meijering, Roos, Literary and Rhetorical Theories in Greek Scholia (Groningen: Egbert Forsten, 1987).Google Scholar
Mergiali, Sophia, L’enseignement et les lettrés pendant l’époque des Paléologues (1261–1453) (Athens: Société des Amis du Peuple, Centre d’Études Byzantines, 1996).Google Scholar
Miles, Graeme, “Living as a Sphinx: Composite Being and Monstrous Interpreter in the ‘Middle Life’ of Michael Psellos” in Kambaskovic, Danijela (ed.), Conjunctions of Mind, Soul and Body from Plato to the Enlightenment (New York: Springer, 2014), 11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, Graeme, “Psellos and His Traditions” in Mariev, Sergei (ed.), Byzantine Perspectives on Neoplatonism (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2017), 79–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, Graeme, “Reforming the Eyes: Interpreters and Interpretation in the Vita Apollonii” in Demoen, Kristoffel and Praet, Danny (eds.), Theios Sophistès: Essays on Flavius Philostratus’ Vita Apollonii (Leiden: Brill, 2008), 129–160.Google Scholar
Miles, Margaret R., “Vision: The Eye of the Body and the Eye of the Mind in Saint Augustine’s De trinitate and Confessions,” Journal of Religion 63:2 (1983): 125–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Patricia Cox, The Corporeal Imagination: Signifying the Holy in Late Ancient Christianity (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Patricia Cox, “‘The Little Blue Flower Is Red’: Relics and the Poetizing of the Body,” Journal of Early Christian Studies 8:2 (2000): 213–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Timothy S., The Birth of the Hospital in the Byzantine Empire, 2nd edition (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Modrak, Deborah, “Koinê Aisthêsis and the Discrimination of Sensible Differences in de Anima iii 2,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 11 (1981): 405–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffatt, Ann, “Early Byzantine School Curricula and a Liberal Education” in Byzance et les Slaves (Paris: Association des Amis des études Archéologiques des Mondes Byzantino-Slaves et du Christianisme Oriental, 1979), 275–288.Google Scholar
Moffatt, Ann, “Schooling in the Iconoclast Centuries” in Bryer, Anthony and Herrin, Judith (eds.), Iconoclasm: Papers Given at the Ninth Spring Symposium of Byzantine Studies, University of Birmingham, March 1975 (Birmingham: Centre for Byzantine Studies, University of Birmingham, 1977), 85–92.Google Scholar
Montefusco, Lucia Calboli, “Ἐνάργεια et ἐνέργεια: l’évidence d’une démonstration qui signifie les choses en acte” in Mireille Armisen-Marchetti (ed.), Demonstrare: voir et faire voir: forme de la démonstration à Rome (Toulouse: Presses Universitaires du Mirail, 2005), 43–58.Google Scholar
Morales, Helen, Vision and Narrative in Achilles Tatius’ Leucippe and Cleitophon (Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Morgan, Teresa, Literate Education in the Hellenistic and Roman Worlds (Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Muradyan, G., “The Rhetorical Exercises (Progymnasmata) in the Old Armenian ‘Book of Chreia’ (Girk‘Pitoyic’): Translation or Original Composition?,” Revue des Études Arméniennes 27 (1998–2000): 399–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neis, Rachel, “Embracing Icons: The Face of Jacob on the Throne of God,” Images 1:1 (2007): 36–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neis, Rachel, The Sense of Sight in Rabbinic Culture: Jewish Ways of Seeing in Late Antiquity (Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Robert S., “The Discourse of Icons, Then and Now,” Art History 12:2 (June 1989): 144–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Robert S., “Image and Inscription: Pleas for Salvation in Spaces of Devotion” in James, Liz (ed.), Art and Text in Byzantine Culture (Cambridge University Press, 2007), 100–119.Google Scholar
Nelson, Robert S., “Michael the Monk and His Gospel Book” in Actes du XVe Congrès International d’Études Byzantines, vol. ii (Athens: Association Internationale des études Byzantines, 1981), 575–582.Google Scholar
Nelson, Robert S., “Review of Charles Barber, Figure and Likeness: On the Limits of Representation in Byzantine Iconoclasm,” The Art Bulletin 85:4 (2003): 797–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Robert S., “To Say and to See: Ekphrasis and Vision in Byzantium” in Nelson, R. S. (ed.), Visuality before and beyond the Renaissance: Seeing as Others Saw (Cambridge University Press, 2000), 143–168.Google Scholar
Newhauser, Richard G. (ed.), A Cultural History of the Senses in the Middle Ages (London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2016).Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. W., “The Philosopher at the Festival: Plato’s Transformation of Traditional theôria” in Elsner, Jaś and Rutherford, Ian (eds.), Pilgrimage in Graeco-Roman and Early Christian Antiquity: Seeing the Gods (Oxford University Press, 2005), 151–180.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. W., “On Wandering and Wondering: Theôria in Greek Philosophy and Culture,” Arion 9:2 (2001): 23–58.Google Scholar
Nousia, Fevronia, Byzantine Textbooks of the Palaeologan Period, Studi e Testi, 505 (Vatican City: Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, 2016).Google Scholar
Nünlist, René, The Ancient Critic at Work: Terms and Concepts of Literary Criticism in Greek Scholia (Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nutton, Vivian, “From Galen to Alexander, Aspects of Medicine and Medical Practice in Late Antiquity,” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 38 (1984): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nutton, Vivian, “Galen in Byzantium” in Grünbart, Michael et al. (eds.), Material Culture and Well-Being in Byzantium (Vienna: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 2007), 171–176.Google Scholar
O’Brien, D., “The Effects of Simile: Empedocles’ Theories of Seeing and Breathing,” Journal of Hellenic Studies 90 (1970): 140–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Brien, D., “Théories atomistes de la vision: Démocrite et le problème de la fourmi céleste” in Benakis, L. (ed.), Proceedings of the First International Congress on Democritus (Xanthi: Bouloukos, 1984), 27–57.Google Scholar
Ogle, B., “The Lover’s Blindness,” American Journal of Philology 41 (1920): 240–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Meara, Dominic J., “Aspects du travail philosophique de Michel Psellus” in Collatz, C. F. et al (eds.), Dissertatiunculae criticae: Festschrift für Günther Christian Hansen (Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann, 1998), 431–439.Google Scholar
O’Meara, Dominic J., Pythagoras Revived: Mathematics and Philosophy in Late Antiquity (Oxford University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Onians, John, “Abstraction and Imagination in Late Antiquity,” Art History 3:1 (1980): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otto, Nina, Enargeia: Untersuchung zur Charakteristik alexandrinischer Dichtung (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2009).Google Scholar
Owens, J., “Aristotle on Common Sensibles and Incidental Perception,” Phoenix 36 (1982): 215–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palazzo, Éric, L’invention chrétienne des cinq sens dans la liturgie et l’art au Moyen Âge (Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 2010).Google Scholar
Papaioannou, Stratis, “Animated Statues: Aesthetics and Movement” in Barber, C. and Jenkins, D. (eds.), Reading Michael Psellos (Leiden: Brill, 2006), 95–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papaioannou, Stratis, “Anna Komnene’s Will” in Sullivan, D., Fisher, E., and Papaioannou, S. (eds.), Byzantine Religious Culture: Studies in Honor of Alice-Mary Talbot (Leiden: Brill, 2011), 99–121.Google Scholar
Papaioannou, Stratis, “Byzantine Enargeia and Theories of Representation,” Byzantinoslavica 69:3 (2011): 48–60.Google Scholar
Papaioannou, Stratis, “Der Glasort des Textes: Selbstheit und Ontotypologie im byzantinischen Briefschreiben (10. und 11. Jh.)” in Hörandner, W., Koder, J., and Stassinopoulou, M. (eds.), Wiener Byzantinistik und Neogräzistik: Beiträge zum Symposion Vierzig Jahre Institut für Byzantinistik und Neogräzistik der Universität Wien. Im Gedenken an Herbert Hunger (Wien, 4.-7. Dezember 2002) (Vienna: Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 2004), 324–336.Google Scholar
Papaioannou, Stratis, Michael Psellos: Rhetoric and Authorship in Byzantium (Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parisinou, E. The Light of the Gods: The Role of Light in Archaic and Classical Greek Cult (London: Duckworth, 2000).Google Scholar
Park, D., The Fire within the Eye: A Historical Essay on the Nature and Meaning of Light (Princeton University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Payton, James R., “John of Damascus on Human Cognition: An Element in His Apologetic for Icons,” Church History 65:2 (1996): 173–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peers, Glenn, “Imagination and Angelic Epiphany,” Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies 21 (1997): 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peers, Glenn, “Real Living Painting: Quasi-Objects and Dividuation in the Byzantine World,” Religion and the Arts 16 (2012): 433–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peers, Glenn, Sacred Shock: Framing Visual Experience in Byzantium (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Pentcheva, Bissera, “Painting or Relief: The Ideal Icon in Iconophile Writing in Byzantium,” Zograf 31 (2006–2007): 7–14.Google Scholar
Pentcheva, Bissera, “The Performative Icon,” The Art Bulletin 88:4 (2006): 631–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pentcheva, Bissera, The Sensual Icon: Space, Ritual, and the Senses in Byzantium (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Pentcheva, Bissera, “Visual Textuality: The Logos as Pregnant Body and Building,” RES: Aesthetics and Anthropology 45 (2004): 225–238.Google Scholar
Perkams, Matthias, “Priscian of Lydia, Commentator on the De anima in the Tradition of Iamblichus,” Mnemosyne, 4th series, 58:4 (2005): 510–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petridou, G., “‘Blessed Is He Who Has Seen’: The Power of Ritual Viewing and Ritual Framing in Eleusis,” Helios 40:1–2 (2013): 309–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pizzone, Aglae, “Late Antique Φαντασία and the Greek Fathers: A Survey” in de la Fuente, David Hernández (ed.), New Perspectives on Late Antiquity (Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2014), 416–432.Google Scholar
Pizzone, Aglae, “Theodore and the Black Man: Imagining (through) the Icon in Byzantium” in Speer, Andreas and Steinkrüger, Philipp (eds.), Knotenpunkt Byzanz (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2012), 47–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pizzone, Aglae, “Toward a Self-Determined and Emotional Gaze: Agathias and the Icon of the Archangel Michael” in Mariev, Sergei and Stock, Wiebke-Marie (eds.), Aesthetics and Theurgy in Byzantium (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2013), 75–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pizzone, Aglae, “When Homer Met Phantasia: Fiction, Epic Poetry, and Entertainment Literature in Byzantium,” British Academy Review 19 (2012): 42–45.Google Scholar
Platt, Verity, Facing the Gods: Epiphany and Representation in Greco-Roman Art, Literature and Religion (Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Platt, Verity, “Making an Impression: Replication and the Ontology of the Graeco-Roman Seal Stone,” Art History 29:2 (2006): 233–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platt, Verity, “Virtual Visions: Phantasia and the Perception of the Divine in The Life of Apollonius of Tyana” in Bowie, Ewen and Elsner, Jaś (eds.), Philostratus (Cambridge University Press, 2009), 131–154.Google Scholar
Platt, Verity and Squire, Michael (eds.), “The Art of Art History in Greco-Roman Antiquity,” Arethusa 43:2 (2010): 133–369.Google Scholar
Plepelits, Karl, Achilleus Tatios: Leukippe und Kleitophon (Stuttgart: A. Hiersemann, 1980).Google Scholar
Plepelits, Karl, “Achilles Tatius” in Schmeling, Garth L. (ed.), The Novel in the Ancient World (Leiden: Brill, 1996), 387–416.Google Scholar
Plett, H., Enargeia in Classical Antiquity and the Early Modern Age: The Aesthetics of Experience (Leiden: Brill, 2010).Google Scholar
Pollitt, J. J., “Peri chromaton: What Ancient Greek Painters Thought about Colors” in Tiverios, M. A. and Tsifakis, D. S. (eds.), Color in Ancient Greece: The Role of Color in Ancient Greek Art and Architecture (Thessaloniki: Aristotle University, 2002), 1–8.Google Scholar
Pormann, Peter E., The Oriental Tradition of Paul of Aegina’s Pragmateia (Leiden: Brill, 2004).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Porter, James I., The Origins of Aesthetic Thought in Ancient Greece: Matter, Sensation, and Experience (Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Porter, Stanley, Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Age, 330 B.C. – AD. 400 (Leiden: Brill, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Praechter, K., “Michael von Ephesus und Psellos,” Byzantinische Zeitschrift 31 (1931): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prier, R. A., Thauma idesthai: The Phenomenology of Sight and Appearance in Archaic Greek (Tallahassee: Florida State University, 1989).Google Scholar
Rakoczy, Thomas, Böser Blick: Macht des Auges und Neid der Götter: Eine Untersuchung zur Kraft des Blickes in der griechischen Literatur (Tübingen: Gunter Narr, 1996).Google Scholar
Rapp, Christof, “Intentionalität und Phantasia bei Aristoteles” in Perler, Dominik (ed.), Ancient and Medieval Theories of Intentionality (Leiden: Brill, 2001), 63–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rashed, Roshdi, “A Pioneer in Anaclastics: Ibn Sahl on Burning Mirrors and Lenses,” Isis 81.3 (1990): 464–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, Baron, “The Stoics’ Account of Cognitive Impression,” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 23 (2002): 147–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renehan, Robert, “Meletius’ Chapter on the Eyes: An Unidentified Source,” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 38 (1984): 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renehan, Robert, “On the Text of Leo Medicus: A Study in Textual Criticism,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie n.s. 113:1 (1970): 79–88.Google Scholar
Rinella, Michael A., Pharmakon: Plato, Drug Culture, and Identity in Ancient Athens (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2010).Google Scholar
Rispoli, G. M., “φαντασία ed ἐνάργεια negli scolî all’Iliade,” Vichiana 13 (1984): 311–339.Google Scholar
Roilos, Panagiotis, “Ancient Greek Rhetorical Theory and Byzantine Discursive Politics: John Sikeliotes on Hermogenes,” in Shawcross, Teresa and Toth, Ida (eds.), Reading in the Byzantine Empire and Beyond (Cambridge University Press, 2018).Google Scholar
Roilos, Panagiotis, “Phantasia and the Ethics of Fictionality in Byzantium: A Cognitive Anthropological Perspective” in Roilos, Panagiotis (ed.), Medieval Greek Storytelling: Fictionality and Narrative in Byzantium (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 2014), 9–30.Google Scholar
Roilos, Panagiotis, “‘Unshapely Bodies and Beautifying Embellishments’: The Ancient Epics in Byzantium, Allegorical Hermeneutics, and the Case of Ioannes Diakonos Galenos,” Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Byzantinistik 64 (2014): 231–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenmeyer, T. G., “Phantasia und Einbildungskraft: Zur Vorgeschichte eines Leitbegriffes der europäischen Ästhetik,” Poetica 18 (1986): 197–248.Google Scholar
Roueché, M., “Byzantine Philosophical Texts of the Seventh Century,” Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Byzantinistik 23 (1974): 61–76.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Philip, “Human Nature and Its Material Setting in Basil of Caesarea’s Sermons on Creation,” Heythrop Journal 49 (2008): 222–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudolph, K., “Democritus’ Ophthalmology,” Classical Quarterly 62 (2012): 496–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudolph, K., “Democritus’ Perspectival Theory of Vision,” Journal of Hellenic Studies 131 (2011): 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runia, David T., Philo and the Church Fathers: A Collection of Papers (Leiden: Brill, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runia, David T., “The Placita Ascribed to Doctors in Aëtius’ Doxography on Physics” in Mansfeld, J. and Runia, D. T. (eds.), Aëtiana: The Method and Intellectual Context of a Doxographer, vol. iii (Leiden: Brill, 2010), 515–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, Ian, “Theoria and Darsan: Pilgrimage and Vision in Greece and India,” Classical Quarterly 50 (2000): 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahas, Daniel J., Icon and Logos: Sources in Eighth-Century Iconoclasm (University of Toronto Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Saint-Pierre, Bernard, “La physique de la vision dans l’Antiquité: contribution à l’établissement des sources anciennes de l’optique médiévale,” unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Montreal (1972).Google Scholar
Sandbach, Francis H., “Phantasia Katalēptikē” in Long, A. A. (ed.), The Problems in Stoicism (London: Athlone, 1971), 9–21.Google Scholar
Savage-Smith, Emilie, “Galen’s Lost Ophthalmology and the Summaria Alexandrinorum,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies. Supplement 77 (2002): 121–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage-Smith, Emilie, “Hellenistic and Byzantine Ophthalmology: Trachoma and Sequelae,” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 38 (1984): 169–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarborough, John, “The Life and Times of Alexander of Tralles,” Expedition 39:2 (1997): 51–60.Google Scholar
Scarborough, John, “Roman Medicine to Galen,” Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt 37:1 (1993): 3–48.Google Scholar
Scarborough, John, “Symposium on Byzantine Medicine: Introduction,” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 38 (1984): ix-xvi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarborough, John, “Theodora, Aetius of Amida, and Procopius: Some Possible Connections,” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 53 (2013): 742–762.Google Scholar
Schacht, Joseph and Meyerhof, Max, The Medico-Philosophical Controversy between Ibn Butlan of Baghdad and Ibn Ridwan of Cairo (Cairo: Egyptian University, 1937).Google Scholar
Schibille, Nadine, Hagia Sophia and the Byzantine Aesthetic Experience (Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2014).Google Scholar
Schmitt, Charles B., “Aristotle as a Cuttlefish: The Origin and Development of a Renaissance Image,” Studies in the Renaissance 12 (1965): 60–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, Malcolm, “Aristotle on the Imagination” in Nussbaum, M. C. and Rorty, A. O. (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima (Oxford University Press, 1995), 249–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholz, B., “Sub oculos subiecto: Quintilian on Ekphrasis and Enargeia” in Robillard, V. and Jongeneel, E. (eds.), Pictures into Words: Theoretical and Descriptive Approaches to Ekphrasis (Amsterdam: VU University Press, 1998), 73–99.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky, Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Sedley, David, “Empedocles’ Theory of Vision and Theophrastus’ De sensibus” in Fortenbaugh, William W. and Gutas, Dimitri (eds.), Theophrastus: His Psychological, Doxographical, and Scientific Writings (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1992), 20–31.Google Scholar
Sedley, David, “Zeno’s Definition of Phantasia Kataleptike” in Scaltsas, Theodore and Mason, Andrew S. (eds.), The Philosophy of Zeno: Zeno of Citium and His Legacy (Larnaca: Municipality of Larnaca, 2002), 135–154.Google Scholar
Ševčenko, Ihor, “The Decline of Byzantium as Seen through the Eyes of Its Intellectuals,” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 15 (1961): 169–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ševčenko, Ihor, Études sur la polémique entre Théodore Métochite et Nicéphore Choumnos (Brussels: Byzanthion, 1962).Google Scholar
Ševčenko, Ihor, “Theodore Metochites, the Chora, and the Intellectual Trends of His Time” in Underwood, Paul A. (ed.), The Kariye Djami, vol. iv (Princeton University Press, 1975), 17–92.Google Scholar
Sheppard, Anne, “Phantasia in De Insomniis” in Russell, Donald A. and Nesselrath, Heinz-Günther (eds.), On Prophecy, Dreams and Human Imagination (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2014), 97–110.Google Scholar
Sheppard, Anne, The Poetics of Phantasia: Imagination in Ancient Aesthetics (London: Bloomsbury, 2014).Google Scholar
Siegel, Rudolph E., Galen on Sense Perception: His Doctrines, Observations, and Experiments on Vision, Hearing, Smell, Taste, Touch, and Pain, and Their Historical Sources (Basel: Karger, 1970).Google Scholar
Silverman, A., “Color and Color-Perception in Aristotle’s De Anima,” Ancient Philosophy 9 (1989): 271–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, Gérard, Le regard, l’être et l’apparence dans l’optique de l’antiquité (Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1988).Google Scholar
Simpson, James, Under the Hammer: Iconoclasm in the Anglo-American Tradition (Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Smith, A. Mark, From Sight to Light: The Passage from Ancient to Modern Optics (University of Chicago Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. Mark, Ptolemy and the Foundations of Ancient Mathematical Optics: A Source Based Guided Study (Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 1999).Google Scholar
Smith, A. Mark, Ptolemy’s Theory of Visual Perception (Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 1996).Google Scholar
Smith, M. M., Sensing the Past: Seeing, Hearing, Smelling, Tasting, and Touching in History (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Sobchack, Vivian, “What My Fingers Knew: The Cinesthetic Subject, or Vision in the Flesh” in Carnal Thoughts: Embodiment and Moving Image Culture (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2004), 53–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorabji, Richard, “Aristotle, Mathematics and Colour,” Classical Quarterly 22 (1972): 293–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorabji, Richard, “Aristotle on Demarcating the Five Senses” in Barnes, J., Schofield, M., and Sorabji, R. (eds.), Articles on Aristotle, vol. iv (London: Duckworth, 1979), 76–92.Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard, “Intentionality and Physiological Processes: Aristotle’s Theory of Sense-Perception” in Nussbaum, M. and Rorty, R. (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992), 195–226.Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard, “Universals Transformed: The First Thousand Years after Plato” in Strawson, P. F. and Chakrabarti, Arindam (eds.), Universals, Concepts and Qualities (Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2006), 105–126.Google Scholar
Speyer, W., “Asterios von Amaseia,” Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum, Supplement 4 (1986), 629–639.Google Scholar
Speyer, W., “Die Euphemia-Reden des Asterios von Amaseia: Eine Missionsschrift für gebildete Heiden,” Jahrbuch für Antike und Christentum 14 (1971), 39–47.Google Scholar
Speyer, W., “Wunderheilige und Bilder: Zur Frage des Beginns der Bilderverehrung,” Poikilia Byzantina 11:3 (1991): 163–247.Google Scholar
Spingou, Foteini, “Byzantine Collections and Anthologies of Poetry” in Hoerandner, Wolfram, Rhoby, Andreas, and Zagklas, Nikolaos (eds.), Brill Companion on Byzantine Poetry (Leiden: Brill) (Forthcoming).Google Scholar
Spingou, Foteini, “Words and Artworks in the Twelfth Century and Beyond: The Thirteenth-Century Manuscript Marcianus gr. 524 and the Twelfth-Century Dedicatory Epigrams on Works of Art,” unpublished DPhil dissertation, Oxford University (2012).Google Scholar
Squire, Michael, “Apparitions Apparent: Ekphrasis and the Parameters of Vision in the Elder Philostratus’s Imagines,” Helios 40:1–2 (2013): 97–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, Michael, “Ecphrasis: Visual and Verbal Interactions in Ancient Greek and Latin Literature,” Oxford Handbooks Online (2015), www.oxfordhandbooks.com.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, Michael, The Iliad in a Nutshell: Visualizing Epic on the Tabulae Iliacae (Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Squire, Michael, “Introductory Reflections: Making Sense of Ancient Sight” in Squire, Michael (ed.), Sight and the Ancient Senses (London: Routledge, 2016), 1–35.Google Scholar
Squire, Michael, “Making Myron’s Cow Moo?: Ecphrastic Epigram and the Poetics of Simulation,” American Journal of Philology 131:4 (2010): 589–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, Michael, and Grethlein, Jonas, “‘Counterfeit in Character but Persuasive in Appearance’: Reviewing the Ainigma of the Tabula Cebetis,” Classical Philology 109:4 (2014): 285–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanford, W. Bedell, Greek Metaphor: Studies in Theory and Practice (Oxford University Press, 1936).Google Scholar
Stephanou, Pelopidas, “La doctrine de Léon de Chalcédoine et de ses adversaires sur les images,” Orientalia Christiana Periodica 12 (1946): 177–199.Google Scholar
Stewart, Columba, “Imageless Prayer and the Theological Vision of Evagrius Ponticus,” Journal of Early Christian Studies 9:2 (2001): 173–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, Denis F., Siegecraft: Two Tenth-Century Instructional Manuals by “Heron of Byzantium” (Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks, 2000).Google Scholar
Sullo, Nicole Paxton, “The Art of Memory in Byzantium during the Later Middle Ages,” unpublished PhD dissertation, Yale University (in progress).Google Scholar
Taft, Robert F., “The Dialogue before the Anaphora in the Byzantine Eucharistic Liturgy, ii: The Sursum Corda,” Orientalia Christiana Periodica 54 (1988): 47–77.Google Scholar
Talbot, Alice-Mary, “Pilgrimage to Healing Shrines: The Evidence of Miracle Accounts,” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 56 (2002): 153–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanner, Jeremy, The Invention of Art History in Ancient Greece: Religion, Society and Artistic Rationalisation (Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Tarrant, Harold, Thrasyllan Platonism (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temkin, Owsei, “Byzantine Medicine: Tradition and Empiricism,” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 16 (1962): 95–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temkin, Owsei, Hippocrates in a World of Pagans and Christians (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Thein, Karl, “Gods and Painters: Philostratus the Elder, Stoic Phantasia, and the Strategy of Describing,” Ramus 31:1/2 (2002): 136–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theobald, Werner, Hypolepsis: Mythische Spuren bei Aristoteles (Sankt Augustin, Germany: Academia Verlag, 1999).Google Scholar
Thomas, John P., Private Religious Foundations in the Byzantine Empire (Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks, 1987).Google Scholar
Tihon, Anne, “L’astronomie byzantine (du ve au xve siècle),” Byzantion 51 (1981): 603–624.Google Scholar
Tihon, Anne, “Numeracy and Science” in Cormack, Robin, Haldon, John F., and Jeffreys, Elizabeth (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Byzantine Studies (Oxford University Press, 2008), 803–819.Google Scholar
Todd, Robert B., “Galenic Medical Ideas in the Greek Aristotelian Commentators,” Symbolae Osloenses 52:1 (1977): 117–134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Todd, Robert B., “Lexicographical Notes on Alexander of Aphrodisias’ Philosophical Terminology,” Glotta 52:3/4 (1974): 207–215.Google Scholar
Todd, Robert B., “The Stoic Common Notions: A Re-examination and Reinterpretation,” Symbolae Osloenses 48:1 (1973): 47–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, Robert B., “ΣΥΝΕΝΤΑΣΙΣ and the Stoic Theory of Perception,” Grazer Beiträge 2 (1974): 251–261.Google Scholar
Treadgold, Warren T., The Nature of the Bibliotheca of Photios (Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks, 1980).Google Scholar
Trentin, L., “Exploring Visual Impairment in Ancient Rome” in Laes, C., Goodey, C. F., and Rose, M. L. (eds.), Disabilities in Roman Antiquity: Disparate Bodies A Capite ad Calcem (Leiden: Brill, 2013), 89–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuominen, Miira, “On Activity and Passivity in Perception: Aristotle, Philoponus, and Pseudo-Simplicius” in Silva, J. F. and Yrjönsuuri, M. (eds.), Active Perception in the History of Philosophy: From Plato to Modern Philosophy (London: Springer, 2014), 55–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, Paul, “The Fountain of Life in Manuscripts of the Gospel,” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 5 (1950): 41–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Campen, Cretien, The Hidden Sense: Synesthesia in Art and Science (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Hoorn, W., As Images Unwind: Ancient and Modern Theories of Visual Perception (Amsterdam: University Press Amsterdam, 1972).Google Scholar
Vasiliu, Anca, Du Diaphane: image, milieu, lumière dans la pensée antique et médiévale (Paris: J. Vrin, 1997).Google Scholar
Velmans, Tania, “L’iconographie de la ‘Fontaine de Vie’ dans la tradition Byzantine à la fin du Moyen Âge” in Grabar, André and Hubert, Jean (eds.), Synthronon: art et archéologie de la fin de l’Antiquité et du Moyen âge (Paris: Librairie C. Klincksieck, 1968), 119–134.Google Scholar
Verbeke, Gérard, L’évolution de la doctrine du pneuma: du stoicisme à S. Augustin (Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 1945).Google Scholar
Verbeke, Gérard, Jean Philopon: commentaire sur le De anima d’Aristote, trans. Guillaume de Moerbeke (Paris: Éditions Béatrice-Nauwelaerts, 1966).Google Scholar
Verbeke, Gérard, “Levels of Human Thinking in Philoponus” in Laga, C., Munitiz, J. A., and Van Rompay, L. (eds.), After Chalcedon: Studies in Theology and Church History Offered to Professor Albert Van Roey for his Seventieth Birthday (Leuven: Peeters, 1985), 451–470.Google Scholar
Verpeaux, J., Nicéphore Choumnos: homme d’état et humaniste byzantin (Paris: Editions A. et J. Picard, 1959).Google Scholar
Volk, Robert, Der medizinische Inhalt der Schriften des Michael Psellos (Munich: Institut für Byzantinistik und Neugriechische Philologie der Universität, 1990).Google Scholar
von Fritz, K., “Democritus’ Theory of Vision” in Underwood, E. A. (ed.), Science, Medicine, and History: Essays on the Evolution of Scientific Thought and Medical Practice Written in Honour of Charles Singer, vol. i (Oxford University Press, 1953), 83–99.Google Scholar
Walker, Andrew, “Erōs and the Eye in the Love-Letters of Philostratus,” The Cambridge Classical Journal 38 (1993): 132–148.Google Scholar
Walker, Jeffrey, “Pathos and Katharsis in ‘Aristotelian’ Rhetoric: Some Implications” in Gross, Alan and Walzer, Arthur (eds.), Reading Aristotle’s Rhetoric (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 2000), 74–92.Google Scholar
Watson, Gerard, “The Concept of ‘Phantasia’ from the Late Hellenistic Period to Early Neoplatonism,” Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt 36:7 (1994): 4766–4810.Google Scholar
Webb, Ruth, “Accomplishing the Picture: Ekphrasis, Mimesis, and Martyrdom in Asterios of Amaseia” in James, Liz (ed.), Art and Text in Byzantine Culture (Cambridge University Press, 2007), 13–32.Google Scholar
Webb, Ruth, “The Aesthetics of Sacred Space: Narrative, Metaphor, and Motion in Ekphraseis of Church Buildings,” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 53 (1999): 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, Ruth, “Ekphrasis Ancient and Modern: The Invention of a Genre,” Word & Image 15:1 (1999): 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, Ruth, Ekphrasis, Imagination, and Persuasion in Ancient Rhetorical Theory and Practice (Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2009).Google Scholar
Webb, Ruth, “Imagination and the Arousal of Emotions in Greco-Roman Rhetoric” in Braund, Susanna Morton and Gill, Christopher (eds.), The Passions in Roman Thought and Literature (Cambridge University Press, 1997), 112–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, Ruth, “Sight and Insight: Theorizing Vision, Emotion and Imagination in Ancient Rhetoric” in Squire, Michael (ed.), Sight and the Ancient Senses (London: Routledge, 2016), 205–219.Google Scholar
Wickert, Jacob, “Die Panoplia dogmatica des Euthymios Zigabenos: Untersuchung ihrer Anlage und ihrer Quellen, ihres Inhaltes und ihrer Bedeutung,” Oriens Christianus 8 (1908): 278–388.Google Scholar
Wilken, Robert L., The Land Called Holy: Palestine in Christian History & Thought (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Wilson, Nigel G., “Aspects of the Transmission of Galen” in Cavallo, Guglielmo (ed.), Le strade del testo (Bari: Adriatica, 1987), 47–64.Google Scholar
Wilson, Nigel G., Scholars of Byzantium (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Wolska-Conus, Wanda, “Les écoles de Psellos et de Xiphilin sous Constantin IX Monomaque,” Travaux et mémoires 6 (1976): 223–243.Google Scholar
Wolska-Conus, Wanda, “Stephanus d’Athènes et Stephanus d’Alexandrie: essai d’identification et de biographie,” Revue des Études Byzantines 47 (1989): 5–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Frances, “Typology” in Porter, Stanley E., Joyce, Paul, and Orton, David E. (eds.), Crossing the Boundaries: Essays in Biblical Interpretation in Honour of Michael D. Goulder (Leiden: Brill, 1994), 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagdoun, Mary-Anne, La philosophie stoïcienne de l’art (Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 2000).Google Scholar
Zahlfleisch, J., “Die Polemik Alexanders von Aphrodisias gegen die verschiedenen Theorien des Sehens,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 8 (1895): 373–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zanker, Graham, “Enargeia in the Ancient Criticism of Poetry,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 124 (1981): 297–311.Google Scholar
Zipser, Barbara, “Deleted Text in a Manuscript: Galen On the Eye and the Marc. gr. 276,” Galenos: Rivista di Filologia dei Testi Medici Antichi 3 (2009): 107–112.Google Scholar
Zipser, Barbara, “Pseudo-Alexander Trallianus. De oculis: Einleitung, Text, Übersetzung und Kommentar,” unpublished PhD dissertation, Universität Heidelberg (2003).Google Scholar
Zipser, Barbara, “Überlegungen zum Text des Σύνοψις ἰατρικῆς des Leo Medicus,” Studia Humanitatis ac Litterarum Trifolio Heidelbergensi Dedicata (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang 2004), 393–399.Google Scholar
Zipser, Barbara, “Zu Aufbau und Quellen der Σύνοψις ἰατρικῆς des Leo Medicus” in Fögen, Thorsten (ed.), Ancient Technical Texts (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2005), 107–115.Google Scholar