Ackermann, Wilhelm 1924. Begründung des “tertium non datur” mittels der Hilbertschen Theorie der Widerspruchsfreiheit. Mathematische Annalen 93, 1–36.Google Scholar

Allison, Henry 2001. Kant’s Theory of Taste. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ambrose, Alice (ed.) 1979. Wittgenstein’s Lectures: Cambridge, 1932–1935. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield. (AWL)Google Scholar

Ammereller, Erich & Fischer, Eugen 2004. Wittgenstein at Work: Method in the Philosophical Investigations. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anscombe, G. E. M. 2011. The Simplicity of the Tractatus. In Geach, Mary & Gormally, Luke (eds.), From Plato to Wittgenstein: Essays by G. E. M. Anscombe. Exeter, UK: Imprint Academic, 171–180.Google Scholar

Appelqvist, Hanne 2013. Why Does Wittgenstein Say That Ethics and Aesthetics Are One and the Same? In Sullivan, Peter & Potter, Michael, (eds.), Wittgenstein’s Tractatus: History and Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 40–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Appelqvist, Hanne 2016. On Wittgenstein’s Kantian Solution of the Problem of Philosophy. The British Journal for the History of Philosophy 24 (4), 697–719.Google Scholar

Arrington, Robert L. & Addis, Mark. (eds.) 2001. Wittgenstein and Philosophy of Religion. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ayer, A. J. (ed.) 1959. Logical Positivism. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Baker, Gordon 1979. Verehrung und Verkehrung: Waismann and Wittgenstein. In Luckhardt, C. G. (ed.), Wittgenstein: Sources and Perspectives. Hassocks: Harvester Press, 243–285.Google Scholar

Baker, Gordon 2004. Wittgenstein’s Method: Neglected Aspects. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Baker, Gordon & Hacker, P. M. S. 1980. An Analytical Commentary on Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Revised second edition, Oxford: Blackwell, 2005.Google Scholar

Baker, G. & Hacker, P. M. S. 1980a. Wittgenstein, Meaning and Understanding. Essays on the Philosophical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Revised second edition, Oxford: Blackwell, 2005.Google Scholar

Baker, G. & Hacker, P. M. S. 1985. Wittgenstein: Rules, Grammar and Necessity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Revised second edition, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.Google Scholar

Baker, G. & Hacker, P. M. S. 2005. Wittgenstein. Meaning and Understanding. Essays on the Philosophical Investigations. Revised second edition, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Baker, G. & Hacker, P. M. S. 2009. Wittgenstein: Rules, Grammar and Necessity – Volume 2 of an Analytical Commentary on the Philosophical Investigations. Revised second edition, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Bakhurst, David. 2001. Wittgenstein and “I.” In Glock, Hans-Johann (ed.), Wittgenstein: A Critical Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, 224–245.Google Scholar

Barwise, Jon & Perry, , 1981. Situations and Attitudes. Journal of Philosophy 78, 668–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, David 1987. The Art of Judgment. Mind 96 (382), 221–244.Google Scholar

Bernays, Paul 1951. Über das Induktionsschema in der Rekursiven Zahlentheorie. In Menne, A., Wilhelmy, A. & Angstl, H. (eds.), Kontrolliertes Denken. Freiburg/Munich: Karl Alber Verlag, 10–17.Google Scholar

Biesenbach, Hans 2014. Anspielungen und Zitate im Werk Ludwig Wittgensteins. Revised edition, Sofia: Sofia University Press.Google Scholar

Biletzki, Anat 2002. Overinterpreting vs. Misinterpreting Wittgenstein. In Haller, Rudolph & Puhl, Klaus (eds.), Wittgenstein and the Future of Philosophy. Kirchberg am Wechsel: ALWS, 13–20.Google Scholar

Biletzki, Anat 2003. (Over)Interpreting Wittgenstein. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biletzki, Anat 2010. The “Language and World” of Religion. In Munz, Volker A., Puhl, Klaus & Wang, Joseph (eds.), Language and World. Kirchberg am Wechsel: ALWS, 147–156.Google Scholar

Biletzki, Anat 2011. Ludwig Wittgenstein: Middle Works. In Oxford Bibliographies Online. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Biletzki, Anat & Matar, 2016. Ludwig Wittgenstein. In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2016 Edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/wittgenstein/.Google Scholar

Boncompagni, Anna. 2016. Wittgenstein and Pragmatism. On Certainty in the Light of Peirce and James. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Boncompagni, A. Forthcoming. William James and Wittgenstein. In Klein, A. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of William James. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bouwsma, O. K. 1996. Bouwsma’s Notes on Wittgenstein’s Philosophy 1965–1975. Craft, J. L. & Hustwit, R. (eds.). Lewiston/Queenston/Lampeter: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar

Breithaupt, Fritz, Raatzsch, & Bettina, Kremberg (eds.) 2003. Goethe and Wittgenstein: Seeing the World’s Unity in Its Variety. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Britton, Karl 1955. Portrait of a Philosopher. The Listener 53 #1372, June 16, 1955, 1071–1072. In Flowers 1999, 2, 205–206; Flowers 2016, 2, 491–497.Google Scholar

Brusotti, Marco 2014. Wittgenstein, Frazer und die “ethnologische Betrachtungsweise”. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Cahill, Kevin 2011. The Fate of Wonder. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Calendar section (no author listed) 1929. Cambridge Review 51 (1248), November 15, 1929, viii.Google Scholar

Calcaterra, Rosa M. (ed.) 2006. Le Ragioni del Conoscere e dell’Agire: Scritti in onore di Rosaria Egidi. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar

Carnap, Rudolf 1931–1932. Überwindung der Metaphysik durch Logische Analyse der Sprache. Erkenntnis II, 219–241. (Translated as “The Elimination of Metaphysics Through Logical Analysis of Language” in Ayer 1959.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carroll, Thomas D. 2014. Wittgenstein within the Philosophy of Religion. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Cavell, Stanley 1962. The Availability of Wittgenstein’s Later Philosophy. Philosophical Review 71 (1), 67–93.Google Scholar

Cavell, Stanley 1965/1969. Aesthetic Problems of Modern Philosophy. Reprinted in Cavell 1969, 73–96.Google Scholar

Cavell, Stanley 1969. Must We Mean What We Say? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cavell, Stanley 1979. The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, Scepticism, Morality and Tragedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Chesterton, G. K. 1990. Orthodoxy. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Child, William 2011. Wittgenstein on the First Person. In Kuusela, Oskari & McGinn, Marie (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Wittgenstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 375–401.Google Scholar

Church, Alonzo 1932. A Set of Postulates for the Foundation of Logic. Annals of Mathematics 33, 346–366 & 34, 839–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Church, A. 1941. The Calculus of Lambda-Conversion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Cioffi, Frank 1998. Wittgenstein on Freud and Frazer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Citron, Gabriel 2012. Simple Objects of Comparison for Complex Grammars: An Alternative Strand in Wittgenstein’s Later Remarks on Religion. Philosophical Investigations 35 (1), 18–42.Google Scholar

Citron, Gabriel 2013. Religious Language as Paradigmatic of Language in General: Wittgenstein’s 1933 Lectures. In Venturinha, Nuno (ed.), The Textual Genesis of Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations. London: Routledge, 19–36.Google Scholar

Conant, James 2000. Elucidation and Nonsense in Frege and Early Wittgenstein. In Crary, & Read, (eds.), The New Wittgenstein. London: Routledge, 174–217.Google Scholar

Conant, James 2002. The Method of the Tractatus. In Reck, E. (ed.) From Frege to Wittgenstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 374–462.Google Scholar

Conant, James 2007. Mild Mono-Wittgensteinianism. In Crary, (eds.), Wittgenstein and the Moral Life: Essays in Honor of Cora Diamond. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 31–142.Google Scholar

Conant, James 2011. Wittgenstein’s Methods. In Kuusela, Oskari & McGinn, Marie (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Wittgenstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 620–645.Google Scholar

Cornforth, Maurice 1939. Recollections of Cambridge Contemporaries. In Guest, Carmel Haden (ed.), David Guest: A Scientist Fights for Freedom (1911–1938). London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar

Cornish, Kimberley 1998. The Jew of Linz: Wittgenstein, Hitler and Their Secret Battle for the Mind. London: Century.Google Scholar

Crary, Alice (ed.) 2007. Wittgenstein and the Moral Life: Essays in Honor of Cora Diamond. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Crary, Alice & Rupert, Read, (eds.) 2000. The New Wittgenstein. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Curry, Haskell B. 1941. A Formalisation of Recursive Arithmetic. American Journal of Mathematics, 63, 263–282.Google Scholar

Czernin, Franz Josef 2006. Poesie, Propositionen und nicht-propositionale Erfahrung. In Electronic Journal Literatur Primär. http://www.ejournal.at/Essay/czernwitt.html, last accessed May 29, 2015.Google Scholar

Diamond, Cora 1991. The Realistic Spirit: Wittgenstein, Philosophy and the Mind. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diamond, Cora 2004. Criss-Cross Philosophy. In Erich Ammereller, & Fischer, (eds.), Wittgenstein at Work: Method in the Philosophical Investigations. London: Routledge, 201–220.Google Scholar

Diamond, Cora 2005. Wittgenstein on Religious Belief: The Gulfs between Us. In Phillips, D. Z. & von der Ruhr, Mario (eds.), Religion and Wittgenstein’s Legacy. Aldershot: Ashgate, 99–137.Google Scholar

Drury, M. O’C. 1984. Conversations with Wittgenstein. In Rhees, Rush (ed.), Recollections of Wittgenstein, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 97–171. In Flowers, 1999, 3, 188–252.Google Scholar

Dummett, Michael 1977. Elements of Intuitionism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Engelmann, Mauro L. 2011. What Wittgenstein’s “Grammar” Is Not (On Garver, Baker and Hacker, and Hacker on Wittgenstein on “Grammar”). Wittgenstein-Studien 2, 71–102.Google Scholar

Engelmann, Mauro L. 2013. Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Development: Phenomenology, Grammar, Method, and the Anthropological View. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Engelmann, Mauro L. 2016. The Faces of Necessity, Perspicuous Representation, and the Irreligious Cult of the Useful (The Spenglerian Background to the Remarks on Frazer). In Albinus, L., Rothhaupt, J. G. F. & Seery, A. (eds.), Wittgenstein’s Remarks on Frazer: The Text and the Matter. Göttingen: De Gruyter, 129–174.Google Scholar

Engelmann, Mauro L. 2017. What Does a Phenomenological Language Do? (Revisiting “Some Remarks on Logical Form” in Its Context). In Silva, M. (ed.), Colors in Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Development. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Engelmann, Mauro L. 2018 Phenomenology in Grammar: Explicitation-verificationism, Arbitrariness, and the Vienna Circle. In: Kuusela, O., Ometita, M. & Urcan, T. (eds.), Wittgenstein and Phenomenology. London: Routledge, 22–46.Google Scholar

Evans, Gareth 1982. The Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Flowers III, F. A. (ed.) 1999. Portraits of Wittgenstein. 4 volumes, Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar

Flowers III, F. A. & Ground, Ian (eds.) 2016. Portraits of Wittgenstein. 2 vols., second edition. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Floyd, Juliet 1998. The Uncaptive Eye: Solipsism in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. Boston University Studies in Philosophy and Religion, 19, 79–108.Google Scholar

Floyd, Juliet 2012. Wittgenstein’s Diagonal Argument: A Variation on Cantor and Turing. In Dybjer, P., Linström, S., Palmgren, E. & Sundholm, G. (eds.), Epistemology versus Ontology. Dordrecht: Springer, 25–44.Google Scholar

Fogelin, Robert 1987. Wittgenstein. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Fogelin, Robert 1994. Pyrrhonian Reflections on Knowledge and Justification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forster, Michael N. 2004. Wittgenstein on the Arbitrariness of Grammar. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Frascolla, Pasquale 1997. The Tractatus System of Arithmetic. Synthese 122, 353–378.Google Scholar

Frazer, Sir James George 1922. The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion. One volume abridged edition. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob 1956. The Thought: A Logical Inquiry. Mind 65 (259) 289–311.Google Scholar

Fronda, Earl Stanley, B. 2010. Wittgenstein’s (Misunderstood) Religious Thought. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

De Gaynesford, Maximilian 2017. Wittgenstein on “I” and the Self. In Glock, H-J. & Hyman, J. (eds.), A Companion to Wittgenstein. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 478–490.Google Scholar

Gibson, Arthur 2010. The Wittgenstein Archive of Francis Skinner. In Venturinha, Nuno ed., Wittgenstein after His Nachlass. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 64–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glock, Hans-Johann 1990. Philosophical Investigations: Principles of Interpretation. In Haller, Rudolf & Brandl, Johannes (eds.), Wittgenstein – Towards a Re-Evaluation. Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, 152–162.Google Scholar

Glock, Hans-Johann 1992. Cambridge, Jena, or Vienna? The Roots of the Tractatus. Ratio 5 (1), 1–23.Google Scholar

Glock, Hans-Johann 1996. A Wittgenstein Dictionary. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Glock, Hans-Johann 1997. Kant and Wittgenstein: Philosophy, Necessity and Representation. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (2), 285–305.Google Scholar

Glock, Hans-Johann(ed.) 2001. Wittgenstein: A Critical Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Glock, Hans-Johann 2001a. The Development of Wittgenstein’s Philosophy. In Glock, Hans-Johann (ed.), Wittgenstein: A Critical Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, 1–25.Google Scholar

Glock, Hans-Johann 2007. Perspectives on Wittgenstein: An Intermittently Opinionated Survey. In Kahane, , Guy, Edward Kanterian & Oskari Kuusela (eds.), Wittgenstein and his Interpreters. Oxford: Blackwell 37–65.Google Scholar

Glock, Hans-Johann & Hacker, P. M. S. 1996. Reference and the First-Person Pronoun. Language and Communication 16, 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldfarb, Warren 1997. Metaphysics and Nonsense: On Cora Diamond’s The Realistic Spirit. Journal of Philosophical Research 22, 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldstein, Laurence 1999. Clear and Queer Thinking: Wittgenstein’s Development and His Relevance to Modern Thought. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Goodstein, Reuben L. 1939. Mathematical Systems. Mind 48, 58–73. Reprinted in Goodstein, 1965, 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodstein, R. L. 1944. On the Restricted Ordinal Theorem. Journal of Symbolic Logic 9, 33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodstein, R. L. 1945. Function Theory in an Axiom-Free Equation Calculus. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 48, 401–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodstein, R. L. 1947. Transfinite Ordinals in Recursive Number Theory. Journal of Symbolic Logic 12, 123–129.Google Scholar

Goodstein, R. L. 1951. Constructive Formalism. Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar

Goodstein, R. L. 1954. Logic-Free Formalisations of Recursive Arithmetic. Mathematica Scandinavica 2, 247–261.Google Scholar

Goodstein, R. L. 1957. Recursive Number Theory. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

Goodstein, R. L. 1961. Recursive Analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

Goodstein, R. L. 1965. Mathematical Logic. Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar

Goodstein, R. L. 1971. The Development of Mathematical Logic. London: Logos Press.Google Scholar

Goodstein, R. L. 1972. Wittgenstein’s Philosophy of Mathematics. In Ambrose, A. & Lazerowitz, M (eds.), Ludwig Wittgenstein. Philosophy and Language. London: Allen & Unwin: 271–286.Google Scholar

Graham, Gordon 2014. Wittgenstein and Natural Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hacker, P. M. S. 1972. Insight and Illusion: Wittgenstein on Philosophy and the Metaphysics of Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Revised second edition, 1986.Google Scholar

Hacker, P. M. S. 1986. Insight and Illusion: Themes in the Philosophy of Wittgenstein. Revised second edition. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Hacker, P. M. S. 1990. Wittgenstein: Meaning and Mind. An Analytical Commentary on the Philosophical Investigations, vol. 3. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hacker, P. M. S. 1996. Wittgenstein: Mind and Will. An Analytical Commentary on the Philosophical Investigations, vol. 4. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hacker, P. M. S. 1996a. Wittgenstein’s Place in Twentieth-Century Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hacker, P. M. S. 2001. Wittgenstein: Connections and Controversies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hacker, P. M. S. 2010. Human Nature: The Categorical Framework. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hacker, P. M. S. 2010a. Wittgenstein’s Anthropological and Ethnological Approach. In Gálvez, Jesús Padilla (ed.), Philosophical Anthropology: Wittgenstein’s Perspective. Heusenstamm: Ontos, 15–32.Google Scholar

Hacker, P. M. S. 2013. Two Conceptions of Language. In Hacker, Wittgenstein: Comparisons and Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 128–151.Google Scholar

Hadot, Pierre 2002. What Is Ancient Philosophy? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hancock, P. & Martin-Löf, P. 1975. Syntax and Semantics of the Language of Primitive Recursive Functions. Preprint no. 3, Department of Mathematics, University of Stockholm.Google Scholar

Haugeland, John 1998. Truth and Rule-Following. In , Haugeland (ed.), Having Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 305−361.Google Scholar

Herbrand, Jacques 1971. Écrits Logiques. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Hertz, H. R. 1899. The Principles of Mechanics Presented in a New Form. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Hilbert, David & Bernays, P. 1934. Grundlagen der Mathematik. Vol. 1. Berlin: Springer (Second edition, 1968.)Google Scholar

Hilbert, David & Ackermann, W. 1928. Grundzüge der Theoretischen Logik. Berlin: Springer (Second edition, 1938.)Google Scholar

Hilbert, David 1967. On the Foundations of Logic and Arithmetic. In van Heijenoort, (ed.), From Frege to Gödel. A Sourcebook in Mathematical Logic, 1879–1931. Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press, 130–138. First published as “Über die Grundlagen der Logik und der Arithmetik,” in Verhandlungen des dritten Internationalen Mathematiker-Kongresses in Heidelberg vom 8. bis 13. August 1904. Leipzig: Teubner, 1904, 174–85.Google Scholar

Hilbert, D. 1998. The New Grounding of Mathematics. First Report. In Mancosu, P. (ed.), From Brouwer to Hilbert. The Debate on the Foundations of Mathematics in the 1920s. New York: Oxford University Press 198–214. First published as “Neubegründung der Mathematik. Erste Mitteilung,” Abhandlungen aus dem Mathematischen Seminar der Hamburgischen Universität, vol. 1, 1922, 57–177.Google Scholar

Hilmy, S. S. 1987. The Later Wittgenstein: The Emergence of a New Philosophical Method. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hintikka, Jaakko 1991. An Impatient Man and His Papers. Synthese 87, 183–201.Google Scholar

Hintikka, Merrill & Hintikka, Jaakko 1986. Investigating Wittgenstein. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hrachovec, Herbert 2006. Wittgenstein’s Paperwork. An Example from the Big Typescript. In Papers of the 29th International Wittgenstein Symposium. Gasser, G., Kanzian, Chr, Runggaldier, E. (eds.), Kirchberg a.W.: ALWS, 131–133.Google Scholar

Hyman, John 2001. The Gospel According to Wittgenstein. In Arrington, Robert L. & Addis, Mark (eds.), Wittgenstein and Philosophy of Religion. London and New York: Routledge, 1–11.Google Scholar

James, William 1975. Pragmatism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Johannessen, Kjell S. 1988. The Concept of Practice in Wittgenstein’s Later Philosophy. Inquiry 31 (3), 357–369.Google Scholar

Johannessen, Kjell S. 1994. Philosophy, Art and Intransitive Understanding. In Kjell S. Johannessen, Rolf O. Larsen & Knut Olav Åmås (eds.),Wittgenstein and Norway. Oslo: Solum, 217–250.Google Scholar

Joseph, H. W. B. 1931. Some Problems in Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Kahane, Guy, Kanterian, Edward & Kuusela, Oskari (eds.) 2007. Wittgenstein and His Interpreters. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Kannisto, Heikki 1986. Thoughts and Their Subject. Helsinki: Acta Philosophica Fennica 40.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Edited and translated by Guyer, Paul and Wood, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (CPR)Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel 2000. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Edited by Guyer, Paul and translated by Guyer, Paul & Matthews, E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (CPJ)Google Scholar

Kaplan, David 1989. Demonstratives. In Almog, J., Perry, J. & Wettstein, H. (eds.), Themes from Kaplan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 481–564.Google Scholar

Kenny, Anthony 1973. Wittgenstein. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Revised second edition, 2006.Google Scholar

Kienzler, Wolfgang 1997. Wittgensteins Wende zu seiner Spätphilosophie 1930–1932. Eine Historische und Systematische Darstellung [Wittgenstein’s turn to his late philosophy 1930–1932: a historical and systematic presentation]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Kienzler, Wolfgang 2013. Wittgenstein und Spengler. In: , Rothhaupt/, Vossenkuhl, (eds.), Kulturen und Werte. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 317–336.Google Scholar

Kirby, Laurie & Paris, J. 1982. Accessible Independence Results for Peano Arithmetic. Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society 14, 285–293.Google Scholar

Klagge, James 2013. Wittgenstein and His Audience: Esotericist or Evangelist? In Nuno Venturinha (ed.), The Textual Genesis of Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kukla, Rebecca 2006. Aesthetics and Cognition in Kant’s Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wolfgang, Künne 2009. Wittgenstein and Frege’s Logical Investigations. In Hans-Johann, Glock & John, Hyman (eds.), Wittgenstein and Analytic Philosophy: Essays for P.M. S. Hacker. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kuusela, Oskari 2001. Wittgenstein’s Way out of Kantian Philosophy. Papers of the 24th International Wittgenstein Symposium IX (1), 435–439.Google Scholar

Kuusela, Oskari 2008. The Struggle against Dogmatism: Wittgenstein and the Concept of Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Kuusela, Oskari 2011. The Development of Wittgenstein’s Philosophy. In Kuusela, Oskari & McGinn, Marie (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Wittgenstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 597–619.Google Scholar

Kuusela, Oskari & McGinn, Marie, (eds.) 2011. The Oxford Handbook of Wittgenstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Labron, Tim 2013. Wittgenstein’s Religious Point of View. London, New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Lambek, J. 1988. On the Unity of Algebra and Logic. In Borceux, F. (ed.), Categorical Algebra and Its Applications. Berlin: Springer, 221–229.Google Scholar

Lazenby, J. Mark 2006. The Early Wittgenstein on Religion. London, New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Lee, Desmond 1979. Wittgenstein 1929–1931. Philosophy 54, 211–220. Reprinted in Flowers, & Ground, 2016, vol. 2, 476–485.Google Scholar

Lewy, Casimir 1976. Meaning and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Locke, John 1689. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Edited by Nidditch, P. H.. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1975.Google Scholar

Longuenesse, Béatrice 1998. Kant and the Capacity to Judge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Luckhardt, C. G. (ed.) 1979. Wittgenstein: Sources and Perspectives. Hassocks: Harvester Press.Google Scholar

Lugg, Andrew 2013. Wittgenstein in the Mid-1930s: Calculi and Language-games. In Venturinha, Nuno (ed.), The Textual Genesis of Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations. London: Routledge, 135–154.Google Scholar

Maatsch, Jonas (ed.) 2014. Morphologie und Moderne. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Mácha, Jakub 2015. Wittgenstein on Internal and External Relations: Tracing All the Connections. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar

Malcolm, Norman 1954. Math Notes by [sic] Ludwig Wittgenstein. San Francisco. (A bootleg printing of Malcolm’s notes from the 1939 lectures.)Google Scholar

Malcolm, Norman 1984. Ludwig Wittgenstein. A Memoir with a Biographical Sketch by G. H. von Wright. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mancosu, Paulo & Marion, Mathieu 2003. Wittgenstein’s Constructivization of Euler’s Proof of the Infinity of Primes. In Stadler, F. (ed.), The Vienna Circle and Logical Empiricism: Re-evaluation and Future Perspectives. Netherlands: Kluwer, 171–188.Google Scholar

Marconi, Diego 2013. Wittgenstein and the “Idly Turning Wheels”. In Rovatti, P. A. & Vattimo, G., (eds.), Weak Thought. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Marion, Mathieu 1995. Wittgenstein and Finitism. Synthese 105, 141–176.Google Scholar

Marion, M. 1998. Wittgenstein, Finitism and the Foundations of Mathematics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Marion, M. 2011. Wittgenstein on the Surveyability of Proofs. In Kuusela, Oskari & McGinn, Marie (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Wittgenstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 138–161.Google Scholar

McDowell, John 2009. How Not to Read Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations: Brandom’s Wittgenstein. In McDowell, The Engaged Intellect: Philosophical Essays, 96–112. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

McGuinness, Brian 1981. Freud and Wittgenstein. In Brian McGuinness, 2002, 224–235.Google Scholar

McGuinness, Brian 2002. Approaches to Wittgenstein. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

McGuinness, Brian 2016. Arthur MacIver’s Diary: Cambridge (October 1929 – March 1930). Wittgenstein-Studien 7, 201–256.Google Scholar

Misak, Cheryl 2016. Cambridge Pragmatism. From Peirce and James to Ramsey and Wittgenstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Monk, Ray 1990. Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Moore, Adrian 1985. Transcendental Idealism in Wittgenstein, and Theories of Meaning. The Philosophical Quarterly 35 (139), 134−155.Google Scholar

Moore, Adrian 2013. Was the Author of the Tractatus a Transcendental Idealist? In Sullivan, Peter & Potter, Michael (eds.), Wittgenstein’s Tractatus: History and Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 239–255.Google Scholar

Moore, Adrian & Sullivan, Peter, 2003. Ineffability and Nonsense. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 77 (1), 195−223.Google Scholar

Moore, G. E. Add. 8875, 15/10 Wittgenstein’s use of “grammar.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Library.Google Scholar

Moore, G. E. 1942. Autobiography. In: Schilpp, P. A., (ed.), G. E. Moore (The Library of Living Philosophers). Evanston, IL: Open Court, 1–38.Google Scholar

Moore, G. E. 1955. “Wittgenstein’s Lectures in 1930–33.” First published in three parts in Mind in 1954–1955. References are to PO, 45–114. (MWL)Google Scholar

Moore, G. E. 1959. Philosophical Papers, London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Moore, G. E., Joseph, H. W. B. & Taylor, A. E. 1932. Symposium: Is Goodness a Quality? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 11, 116–168.Google Scholar

Moore, Gregory H., 1988. The Emergence of First-Order Logic. In Aspray, W. & Kitcher, P. (eds.), History and Philosophy of Modern Mathematics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 95–135.Google Scholar

Mulhall, Stephen 2011. Wittgenstein on Religious Belief. In Oskari Kuusela & Marie McGinn (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Wittgenstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 755–774.Google Scholar

Nielsen, Kai 1967. Wittgensteinian Fideism. Philosophy 42, 191–209.Google Scholar

Nielsen, Kai & Phillips, D. Z. 2005. Wittgensteinian Fideism? London: SCM Press.Google Scholar

Noë, Alva 1994. Wittgenstein, Phenomenology and What It Makes Sense to Say. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54, (1), 1–42.Google Scholar

Nordmann, Alfred 2005. Wittgenstein’s Tractatus: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nyíri, J. C. 1986. Gefühl und Gefüge: Studien zum Entstehen der Philosophie Wittgensteins [Structure and Sentiment: Studies on the Emergence of the Philosophy of Wittgenstein]. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar

Nyíri, J. C. 1992. Tradition and Individuality. Essays. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Ogden, C. K. & Richards, I. A., 1960. The Meaning of Meaning. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Okada, Mitsuhiro & Scott, P. J. 2000. A Note on Rewriting Theory for Uniqueness of Iteration. Theory and Application of Categories 6 (4), 47–64.Google Scholar

Okada, Mitsuhiro 2007. On Wittgenstein’s Remarks on Recursive Proofs: A Preliminary Report. In Okada, M. (ed.), Essays in the Foundations of Logical and Phenomenological Studies. Tokyo: Keio University Press, 121–131.Google Scholar

Pears, David 1987. The False Prison vol. I. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pears, David 1988. The False Prison vol. II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Perissinotto, Luigi & Sanfélix, Vincente (eds.) 2010. Doubt, Ethics and Religion: Wittgenstein and the Counter-Enlightenment. Heusenstamm: Ontos.Google Scholar

Phillips, D. Z. & von der Ruhr, Mario. (eds.) 2005. Religion and Wittgenstein’s Legacy. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Pichler, Alois 1994. Untersuchungen zu Wittgensteins Nachlaß. Working Papers from the Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen 8. Bergen: WAB.Google Scholar

Pichler, Alois 2004. Wittgensteins Philosophische Untersuchungen: Vom Buch zum Album. Studien zur Österreichischen Philosophie 36 (Edited by Haller, Rudolf). Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar

Pichler, Alois 2007. The Interpretation of the Philosophical Investigations: Style, Therapy, Nachlass. In Guy Kahane, , Edward Kanterian & Oskari Kuusela (eds.) Wittgenstein and his Interpreters. Oxford: Blackwell, 123–144.Google Scholar

Pichler, Alois & Säätelä, Simo (eds.) 2005. Wittgenstein: The Philosopher and his Works. Bergen: Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen. Second edition, 2006. Frankfurt am Main: Ontos Verlag.Google Scholar

Potter, Michael 2000. Reason’s Nearest Kin. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Potter, M. 2011. Wittgenstein on Mathematics. In Kuusela, Oskari & McGinn, Marie (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Wittgenstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 122–137.Google Scholar

Ramsey, Frank. P. 1923. Critical Notice: Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Mind 32, 465–478.Google Scholar

Ramsey, Frank P. 1990. Philosophical Papers. Edited by Mellor, David H.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Reid, L. A., Knight, H. & Joad, C. E. M. 1932. The Limits of Psychology in Aesthetics. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 11, 169−215.Google Scholar

Rhees, Rush, (ed.), 1984. Recollections of Wittgenstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Richards, I. A. 1972. Internal Colloquies: Poems and Plays of I.A. Richards. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Richter, Duncan 1996. Nothing to Be Said: Wittgenstein and Wittgensteinian Ethics. The Southern Journal of Philosophy 34, 243–256.Google Scholar

Ricketts, Thomas 2018. Sketches of Blurred Landscapes: Wittgenstein and Ethics. In Wittgenstein’s Moral Thought, Reshef Agam-Segal & Edmund Dain (eds.), 153–173. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ricketts, Thomas 2013. Logical Segmentation and Generality in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. In Sullivan, Peter & Potter, Michael (eds.), Wittgenstein’s Tractatus: History and Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 125–142.Google Scholar

Rose, H. E. 1988. Obituary: R. L. Goodstein. Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society 20, 159–166.Google Scholar

Rothhaupt, Josef 1996. Farbthemen in Wittgenstein’s Gesamtnachlass [Colour Themes in Wittgenstein’s Complete Writings] Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar

Rothhaupt, Josef 2007. Moores Statement über “Wittgenstein’s Expressions ‘Rule of Grammar’ or ‘Grammatical Rule.’” In W. Lütterfelds, (ed.), Wittgenstein Jahrbuch 2003/2006. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 209–229.Google Scholar

Rothhaupt, Josef 2008. Kreation und Komposition. München: LMU Habilitationsschrift.Google Scholar

Russell, Bertrand 1921. The Analysis of Mind. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Russell, Bertrand 1927. An Outline of Philosophy. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Russell, Bertrand 1935–1936. The Limits of Empiricism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society New Series, 36.Google Scholar

Russell, Bertrand 1998. Autobiography. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Schönbaumsfeld, Genia 2007. A Confusion of the Spheres: Kierkegaard and Wittgenstein on Philosophy and Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Schroeder, Severin 2001. The Coded-Message Model of Literature. In Allen, R. & Turvey, M. (eds.), Wittgenstein, Theory, and the Arts. New York: Routledge, 210–228.Google Scholar

Schulte, Joachim 1982. Chor und Gesetz: Zur “morphologischen Methode” bei Goethe und Wittgenstein. In Schulte 1990, 11–42.Google Scholar

Schulte, Joachim 1990. Chor und Gesetz: Wittgenstein im Kontext. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Schulte, Joachim 1992. Wittgenstein: An Introduction. Transl. Brenner, William H. & Holley, John F.. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Schulte, Joachim 1998. Review of Wolfgang Kienzler Wittgensteins Wende zu seiner Spätphilosophie 1930–1932. European Journal of Philosophy 6, 379–385.Google Scholar

Schulte, Joachim 2002. Wittgenstein’s Method. In Haller, Rudolf & Puhl, Klaus (eds.), Wittgenstein and the Future of Philosophy. Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, 399–410.Google Scholar

Schulte, Joachim 2003. Goethe and Wittgenstein on Morphology. In Breithaupt, Fritz, Richard, Raatzsch and Bettina, Kremberg (eds.), Goethe and Wittgenstein: Seeing the World’s Unity in Its Variety. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 55–72.Google Scholar

Schulte, Joachim 2005. What Is a Work by Wittgenstein? In Pichler, Alois & Säätelä, Simo (eds.), Wittgenstein: The Philosopher and his Works. Bergen: Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen, 356–363.Google Scholar

Schulte, Joachim 2006. The Pneumatic Conception of Thought. Grazer Philosophische Studien 71, 39–55.Google Scholar

Schulte, Joachim 2006a. Phenomenology and Grammar. In Calcaterra, Rosa M. (ed.), Le Ragioni del Conoscere e dell’Agire: Scritti in onore di Rosaria Egidi. Milano: Franco Angeli, 228–240.Google Scholar

Schulte, Joachim 2011. Waismann as Spokesman for Wittgenstein. In McGuinness, B.F., (ed.), Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook, 15. Dordrecht: Springer, 225–241.Google Scholar

Schulte, Joachim 2014. Ideen mit den Augen sehen: Goethe und Wittgenstein über Morphologie. In Maatsch, Jonas (ed.), Morphologie und Moderne. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 141–156.Google Scholar

Sedmak, Clemens 1996. Kalkül und Kultur: Studien zu Genesis und Geltung von Wittgensteins Sprachspielmodell [Calculus and Culture: studies of the genesis and validity of Wittgenstein’s language game model]. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar

Shoemaker, Sydney 1968. Self-Reference and Self-Awareness. Journal of Philosophy 65, 555–567.Google Scholar

Skolem, Thoralf 1967a. Some Remarks on Axiomatized Set Theory. In van Heijenoort 1967, 291–301. First published as Einige Bemerkungen zur axiomatischen Begründung der Mengenlehre, reprinted in Skolem, 1970, 137–152.Google Scholar

Skolem, Thoralf 1967b. “The Foundations of Elementary Arithmetic established by Means of the Recursive Mode of Thought, without Use of Apparent Variables Ranging over Infinite Domains.” In van Heijenoort 1967, 303–333. First published as Begründung der elementaren Arithmetik durch die rekurrierende Denkweise ohne Anwendung scheinbarer Veränderlichen mit unendlichen Ausdehnungsbereich, reprinted in Skolem, , 1970, 153–188.Google Scholar

Skolem, Thoralf 1970. Selected Works in Logic. Fenstad, J. E. (ed.). Oslo: Universtetsforlaget.Google Scholar

Sloan, Pat (ed.) 1938. John Cornford: A Memoir. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar

Sluga, Hans 1996. “Whose House Is That?” Wittgenstein on the Self. In Sluga, Hans & Stern, D., (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 320–353.Google Scholar

Sluga, Hans 2004. Wittgenstein and Pyrrhonism. In Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter (ed.), Pyrrhonian Skepticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sluga, Hans 2011. Wittgenstein. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Sluga, Hans 2013. Beyond the “New” Wittgenstein. In Greif, Hajo & Weiss, Martin Gerhard (eds.), Ethics, Society, Politics. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 11–34.Google Scholar

Sluga, Hans & Stern, David G. (eds.) 1996. The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Second, revised edition, 2018.Google Scholar

Stenius, Erik 1960. Wittgenstein’s Tractatus: A Critical Exposition of Its Main Lines of Thought. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Stern, David G. 1991. The “Middle Wittgenstein”: From Logical Atomism to Practical Holism. Synthese 87, 203–226.Google Scholar

Stern, David G. 1995. Wittgenstein on Mind and Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Stern, David G. 1996. The Availability of Wittgenstein’s Philosophy. In Sluga, Hans & Stern, D. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 442–476.Google Scholar

Stern, David G. 2004. Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stern, David G. 2005. How Many Wittgensteins? In Pichler, Alois & Säätelä, Simo (eds.), Wittgenstein: The Philosopher and his Works. Bergen: Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen, 164–188.Google Scholar

Stern, David G. 2010. Another Strand in the Private Language Argument. In Ahmed, Arif (ed.) Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 178–196.Google Scholar

Stern, David G. 2010a. Tracing the Development of Wittgenstein’s Writing on Private Language. In Venturinha, Nuno (ed.), Wittgenstein after His Nachlass. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 110–127.Google Scholar

Stern, David G. 2014. The “Middle Wittgenstein” Revisited. In Moyal-Sharrock, Danièle, Munz, Volker A. & Coliva, Annalisa (eds.), Mind, Language and Action. Göttingen: de Gruyter, 181–204.Google Scholar

Stern, David G. 2017. Wittgenstein’s Texts and Style. In Glock, Hans-Johann & Hyman, John (eds.), A Companion to Wittgenstein. Oxford: Blackwell, 41–55.Google Scholar

Stern, David G. 2018. Wittgenstein in the 1930s. In Hans, Sluga, & David, Stern (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein, second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 126–151.Google Scholar

Strawson, P. F. 1959. Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Strawson, P. F. 1994. The First Person – And Others. In Cassam, Q. (ed.), Self-Knowledge, 210–215. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sturgeon, Nicholas & Brown, Stuart Jr. 1991. Memorial Minutes for Max Black. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Association 64 (5), January 1991.Google Scholar

Peter, Sullivan & Potter, Michael 2013. Wittgenstein’s Tractatus: History and Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sullivan, Peter 1996. The Truth in Solipsism, and Wittgenstein’s Rejection of the A Priori. European Journal of Philosophy 4 (2), 195–219.Google Scholar

Sullivan, Peter 2013. Idealism in Wittgenstein: A Further Reply to Moore. In Sullivan, Peter & Potter, Michael (eds.), Wittgenstein’s Tractatus: History and Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 256–270.Google Scholar

Szeltner, Sarah 2013. “Grammar” in the Brown Book. In Moyal-Sharrock, Danièle, Munz, Volker A. & Coliva, Annalisa (eds.), Mind, Language and Action: Contributions to the 36th International Wittgenstein Symposium. Kirchberg am Wechsel: Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society, 403–405.Google Scholar

Trevelyan, Julian 1957. Indigo Days. London: MacGibbon & Kee.Google Scholar

van Heijenoort, Jean (ed.) 1967. From Frege to Gödel. A Sourcebook in Mathematical Logic, 1879–1931. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Venturinha, Nuno (ed.) 2010. Wittgenstein after His Nachlass. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Venturinha, Nuno (Ed.) 2013. The Textual Genesis of Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

von Plato, Jan 2014. Generality and Existence: Quantificational Logic in Historical Perspective. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 20, 417–448.Google Scholar

von Wright, Georg Henrik 1982. Wittgenstein. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

von Wright, Georg Henrik 1984. A Biographical Sketch. In Malcolm, Norman (ed.), Ludwig Wittgenstein. A Memoir with a Biographical Sketch by G. H. von Wright. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3–20.Google Scholar

von Wright, Georg Henrik 1993. The Wittgenstein Papers. In PO, 480–515.Google Scholar

Waismann, Friedrich 1997. The Principles of Linguistic Philosophy. Second edition; first edition 1965. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Waismann, Friedrich 2003. Introduction to Mathematical Thinking: The Formation of Concepts in Modern Mathematics. Mineola, NY: Dover. Reprint of the fourth, 1966, printing of the Harper Torchbook edition. A translation of Einführung in das mathematische Denken by Benac, Theodore J..Google Scholar

Wallgren, Thomas 2006. Transformative Philosophy. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1922. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Translation on facing pages by Ogden, C. K.. Second edition, 1933. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (TLP)Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Translation on facing pages by Anscombe, G. E. M.. Oxford: Blackwell. Second edition, 1958. Third, revised edition, 2001. Revised fourth edition. Edited by Hacker, P. M. S. & Schulte, Joachim, 2009. Translation on facing pages by Anscombe, G. E. M., Hacker, P. M. S. & Schulte, Joachim. (PI)Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1958. The Blue and Brown Books. Preliminary Studies for the “Philosophical Investigations”. References are to The Blue Book (BLBK) or The Brown Book (BRBK). Second edition, 1969. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1961a. Notebooks 1914–1916. Edited by von Wright, G. H. & Anscombe, G. E. M., translated by Anscombe, G. E. M.. Second edition, 1979. Oxford: Blackwell. (NB)Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1961b. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Translated by Pears, D. F. & McGuinness, B. F.. London: Routledge. (TLP)Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1964. Philosophical Remarks. First published as Philosophische Bemerkungen, German text only. Edited by Rhees, R.. Oxford: Blackwell. Second edition, 1975, translated by Hargreaves, R. & White, R.. Oxford: Blackwell. (PR)Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1966. Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology and Religious Belief. Edited by Barrett, Cyril. Berkeley: University of California Press. (LC)Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig 1967a. Remarks on Frazer’s Golden Bough. In PO, 118–155.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. 1967b. Zettel. Anscombe, G. E. M. & von Wright, G. H. (eds.) translation on facing pages by Anscombe, G. E. M.. Oxford: Blackwell. Second edition, 1981.(Z)Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. 1974a. On Certainty. Anscombe, G. E. M. & von Wright, G. H. (eds.). Oxford: Blackwell. Second revised edition, first published in 1969. (OC)Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. 1974b. Philosophical Grammar. First published in 1969 as Philosophische Grammatik, German text only. Edited by Rhees, R.. Oxford: Blackwell. English translated by Kenny, A., 1974. Oxford: Blackwell. (PG)Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. 1976. Wittgenstein’s Lectures on the Foundations of Mathematics, Cambridge 1939. Edited by Diamond, C.. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. (LFM)Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. 1978. Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics. Revised edition, von Wright, G. H. & Anscombe, G. E. M. (eds.) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (RFM)Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. 1979a. Wittgenstein and the Vienna Circle. Edited by McGuinness, B., translated by Schulte, J. & McGuinness, B.. Oxford: Blackwell. First published in German in 1967. (WWK)Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. 1979b. Wittgenstein’s Lectures, Cambridge 1932–1935: From the Notes of Alice Ambrose and Margaret MacDonald. Edited by Ambrose, Alice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (AWL)Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. 1980a. Wittgenstein’s Lectures: Cambridge, 1930–1932, from the Notes of John King and Desmond Lee. Edited by Lee, Desmond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (LWL)Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. 1980b. Remarks on the Philosophy of Psychology. Edited by Anscombe, G. E. M. & von Wright, G. H.. Two volumes. Oxford: Blackwell. (RPP)Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. 1988. Wittgenstein’s Lectures on Philosophical Psychology: 1946–47. Edited by Geach, Peter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. 1993a. Philosophical Occasions 1912–1951. Edited by Klagge, James & Nordmann, Alfred. Indianapolis: Hackett. (PO)Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. 1993b. Wiener Ausgabe [Vienna Edition]. Edited by Nedo, Michael. Vienna: Springer.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. 1994. Wiener Ausgabe, vol. 2. Edited by Nedo, M.. Vienna: Springer. (Wi2)Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. 1995. Wiener Ausgabe, vol. 3. Edited by Nedo, M.. Vienna: Springer. (Wi3)Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. 1996. Wiener Ausgabe, vol. 5. Edited by Nedo, M.. Vienna: Springer. (Wi5)Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. 1998. Culture and Value. Edited by von Wright, G. H. & Pichler, A., translated by Winch, P.. Oxford: Blackwell. First edition, 1977; second edition, 1980. Revised edition by von Wright, G. H., Nyman, Heikki & Pichler, Alois, with a new translated by Winch, Peter, 1998. (CV)Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. 2000. Wittgenstein’s Nachlass: The Bergen Electronic Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (TS/MS)Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. 2001. Philosophische Untersuchungen. Kritisch-genetische Edition. [Philosophical Investigations. Critical-genetic edition.] Edited by Schulte, Joachim. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. 2003. Ludwig Wittgenstein: Public and Private Occasions. Edited by Klagge, James & Nordmann, Alfred. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. (PPO)Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. 2005. The Big Typescript: TS 213. Edited by Luckhardt, C. Grant & Maximilian, A. E. Aue, translation on facing pages. Oxford: Blackwell. (BT)Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. 2008. Wittgenstein in Cambridge: Letters and Documents 1911–1951. Edited by McGuinness, Brian. Oxford: Blackwell. Revised edition, 2012. (WC)Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. 2009. Wittgenstein Source Bergen Nachlass Edition. Edited by the Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen under the direction of Alois Pichler. Bergen: WAB. [Ts/Ms]Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. 2016. Wittgenstein: Lectures, Cambridge 1930–1933, From the Notes of G. E. Moore. Edited by Stern, David, Rogers, Brian, & Citron, Gabriel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Citations are to print and MS pages. (M)Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. 2017. Wittgenstein’s Whewell’s Court Lectures, Cambridge 1938–1941. Edited by Munz, Volker A. & Ritter, Bernhard. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. (WWCL)Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig & Waismann, Friedrich, 2003. The Voices of Wittgenstein: The Vienna Circle. Edited by Baker, Gordon and translated by Baker, et al. London: Routledge. (VW)Google Scholar

Zach, Richard 2003. The Practice of Finitism: Epsilon Calculus and Consistency Proofs in Hilbert’s Program. Synthese 137, 211–259.Google Scholar