Bacon, R. & Hope, C. (2013). Conundrum: Why Every Government Gets It Wrong – And What We Can Do about It. London: Biteback Books.Google Scholar

Barber, M. (2007). Instruction to Deliver: Tony Blair, Public Services and the Challenge of Achieving Targets. London: Politico’s Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar

Basu, O. N., Dirsmith, M. W. & Gupta, P. P. (1999). The Coupling of the Symbolic and the Technical in an Institutionalized Context: The Negotiated Order of the GAO’s Audit Reporting Process. American Sociological Review, 64(4), 506–26.Google Scholar

Baumgartner, F. R. & Jones, B. D. (1994a). Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Baumgartner, F. R. & Jones, B. D. (1994b). Attention, Boundary Effects, and Large-Scale Policy Change in Air Transportation Policy. In Rochefort, D. A. & Cobb, R. W. (Eds.), The Politics of Problem Definition: Shaping the Policy Agenda (pp. 50–66). Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar

BBC Online (2006). Immigration System Unfit – Reid, BBC News Online. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/5007148.stm. Accessed 4 June 2015.Google Scholar

Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage Publishing.Google Scholar

Bevan, G. & Hood, C. (2006). What’s Measured Is What Matters: Targets and Gaming in the English Public Health Care System. Public Administration, 84(3), 517–38.Google Scholar

Bhuta, N. (2012). Governmentalizing Sovereignty: Indexes of State Fragility and the Calculability of Political Order. In Davis, K. E., Fisher, A., Kingsbury, B. & Merry, S. E. (Eds.), Governance by Indicators: Global Power through Quantification and Rankings (pp. 132–64). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Blair, T. (2010). A Journey. London: Arrow Books.Google Scholar

Blinder, S. (Ed.). (2015). Non-European Migration to the UK: Family Unification and Dependents. Oxford: Migration Observatory.Google Scholar

Boswell, C. (2009). The Political Uses of Expert Knowledge: Immigration Policy and Social Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boswell, C. (2012). How Information Scarcity Affects the Policy Agenda: Evidence from Immigration Policy. Governance, 25(3), 367–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boswell, C. & Rodrigues, E. (2016). Policies, Politics and Organisational Problems: Multiple Streams and the Implementation of Targets in UK Government. Policy & Politics, 44(4), 507–24.Google Scholar

Boswell, C., Yearley, S., Fleming, C., Rodrigues, E. & Spinardi, G. (2015). The Effects of Targets and Indicators on Policy Formulation: Narrowing Down, Crowding Out and Locking In. In Jordan, A. J. & Turnpenny, J. R. (Eds.), The Tools of Policy Formulation: Actors, Capacities, Venues and Effects (pp. 225–44). Cheltenham: Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar

Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–68.Google Scholar

Bovens, M. & Hart, P.‘t (1996). Understanding Policy Fiascoes. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Boyne, G. A. & Chen, A. A. (2007). Performance Targets and Public Service Improvement. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(3), 455–77.Google Scholar

Boyne, G. A. & Law, J. (2005). Setting Public Service Outcome Targets: Lessons from Local Public Service Agreements. Public Money & Management, 25(4), 253–60.Google Scholar

Bromley, P. & Powell, W. W. (2012). From Smoke and Mirrors to Walking the Talk: Decoupling in the Contemporary World. The Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 483–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brunsson, N. (1993). Ideas and Actions: Justification and Hypocrisy as Alternatives to Control. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18(6), 489–506.Google Scholar

Brunsson, N. (2002). The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions and Actions in Organizations. Copenhagen: Abstrakt and Liber.Google Scholar

Brunsson, N. (2009). Reform as Routine: Organizational Change and Stability in the Modern World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Brunsson, N. & Jacobsson, B. (2000). A World of Standards. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Brunsson, N. & Olsen, J. P. (1993). The Reforming Organization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Callahan, J. (1983). Cumber and Variableness. In The Home Office: Perspective on Policy and Administration (pp. 19–22). London: Royal Institute of Public Administration.Google Scholar

Campbell, A. (2008). The Blair Years: Extracts from the Alistair Campbell Diaries. London: Arrow Books.Google Scholar

Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy. Political Studies, 47(1), 2–16.Google Scholar

Carter, N. (1988). Measuring Government Performance. The Political Quarterly, 59(3), 369–75.Google Scholar

Carter, N. (1991). Learning to Measure Performance: The Use of Indicators in Organizations. Public Administration, 69(1), 85–101.Google Scholar

Carter, N., Klein, R. & Day, P. (1992). How Organisations Measure Success: The Use of Performance Indicators in Government. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Cheibub, J. A. & Przeworski, A. (1999). Democracy, Elections, and Accountability for Economic Outcomes. In Przeworski, A., Stokes, S. C. & Manin, B. (Eds.), Democracy, Accountability, and Representation (pp. 131–53). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Christensen, T. & Lægreid, P. (2006). Agencification and Regulatory Reforms. In Christensen, T. & Lægreid, P. (Eds.), Autonomy and Regulation: Coping with Agencies in the Modern State (pp. 9–46). Cheltenham: Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cini, M. (1996). The European Commission: Leadership, Organisation and Culture in the European Union Administration. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, J. & Newman, J. (1997). The Managerial State: Power, Politics and Ideology in the Remaking of Social Welfare. London: Sage Publishing.Google Scholar

Clark, J. & Newman, J. (2017). ‘People in This Country Have Had Enough of Experts’: Brexit and the Paradoxes of Populism. Critical Policy Studies, early online, 1–15.Google Scholar

Committee of Public Accounts (2005). Oral Evidence Taken before the Committee of Public Accounts, 26 October 2005. Ev 1. London: House of Commons.Google Scholar

Committee of Public Accounts (2006a). Oral Evidence Taken before the Committee of Public Accounts, 26 April 2006. Ev 1. London: House of Commons.Google Scholar

Committee of Public Accounts (2006b). Home Office Resource Accounts 2004–05 and Follow-up on Returning Failed Asylum Applicants. Sixtieth Report of Session 2005–6. Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence. House of Commons 1079.Google Scholar

Copeland, G. & Johnson-Cartee, K. S. (1997). Inside Political Campaigns: Theory and Practice. London: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar

Cram, L. (1997). Policy-Making in the European Union: Conceptual Lenses and the Integration Process. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Crozier, M. J., Huntingdon, S. P. & Watanuki, J. (1975). The Crisis of Democracy: Report on the Governability of Democracies to the Trilateral Commission. New York: Trilateral Commission.Google Scholar

Davis, K. E., Fisher, A., Kingsbury, B. & Merry, S. E. (2012a). Governance by Indicators: Global Power through Quantification and Rankings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Davis, K. E., Kingsbury, B. & Merry, S. E. (2012b). Indicators as a Technology of Global Governance. Law & Society Review, 46(1), 71–104.Google Scholar

Davis, K. E., Kingsbury, B. & Merry, S. E. (2012c). Introduction: Global Governance by Indicators. In Davis, K. E., Fisher, A., Kingsbury, B. & Merry, S. E. (Eds.), Governance by Indicators: Global Power through Quantification and Rankings (pp. 3–28). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Day, P. & Klein, R. (1987). Accountabilities: Five Public Services. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar

Dickinson, H. T. (1994). The Politics of the People in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Diefenbach, T. (2009). New Public Management in Public Sector Organizations: The Dark Sides of Managerialistic ‘Enlightenment’. Public Administration, 87(4), 892–909.Google Scholar

DiMaggio, P. J. & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–60.Google Scholar

DiMaggio, P. J. & Powell, W. W. (1991). Introduction. In Powell, W. W. & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (pp. 1–38). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Dunleavy, P. & Rhodes, R. A. (1990). Core Executive Studies in Britain. Public Administration, 68(1), 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Easton, D. (1965). A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Edelman, M. (1977). Political Language: Words that Succeed and Policies that Fail. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Edelman, M. (1999). The Politics of Misinformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.Google Scholar

Elliott, Larry (2017). ‘Populism Is the Result of Global Economic Failure’, The Guardian, 26 March.Google Scholar

Espeland, W. N. (1998). The Struggle for Water: Politics, Rationality and Identity in the American Southwest. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Espeland, W. N. & Sauder, M. (2007). Rankings and Reactivity: How Public Measures Recreate Social Worlds. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), 1–40.Google Scholar

Espeland, W. N. & Stevens, M. L. (1998). Commensuration as a Social Process. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 313–43.Google Scholar

Espeland, W. N. & Stevens, M. L. (2008). A Sociology of Quantification. European Journal of Sociology, 49(3), 401–36.Google Scholar

Feldman, M. S. & March, J. G. (1981). Information in Organizations as Signal and Symbol. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(2), 171–86.Google Scholar

Finnemore, M. & Sikkink, K. (1998). International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization, 52(4), 887–917.Google Scholar

Fischer, F. (1990). Technocracy and the Politics of Expertise. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publishing.Google Scholar

Flinders, M. (2001). The Politics of Accountability in the Modern State. Aldgate: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Flinders, M. (2009). Democratic Drift: Majoritarian Modification and Democratic Anomie in the United Kingdom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Freeden, M. (2017). After the Brexit Referendum: Revisiting Populism as an Ideology. Journal of Political Ideologies, 22(1), 1–11.Google Scholar

Gansler, J. (1980). The Defense Industry. Boston, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Geddes, M. (2016). Interpreting Parliamentary Scrutiny: An Enquiry Concerning Everyday Practices of Parliamentary Actors in Select Committees of the House of Commons. PhD, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar

George, A. L. & Bennett, A. (2005). Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Boston, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Giddens, A. (1994). Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Gray, B. (2009). Review of Acquisition for the Secretary of State for Defence. London: Ministry of Defence.Google Scholar

Greening, D. W. & Gray, B. (1994). Testing a Model of Organizational Response to Social and Political Issues. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 467–96.Google Scholar

Grek, S. (2009). Governing by Numbers: The PISA ‘Effect’ in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23–37.Google Scholar

Gupta, P. P., Dirsmith, M. W. & Fogarty, T. J. (1994). Coordination and Control in a Government Agency: Contingency and Institutional Theory Perspectives on GAO Audits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 264–84.Google Scholar

Gusfield, J. R. (1981). The Culture of Public Problems: Drinking, Driving and the Symbolic Order. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Haas, P. (1990). Obtaining International Environmental Protection through Epistemic Consensus. Millennium, 19(3), 347–63.Google Scholar

Haas, P. (1992). Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1976). Legitimation Crisis, tr. McCarthy, T.. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Hacking, I. (1990). The Taming of Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hallett, T. (2010). The Myth Incarnate: Recoupling Processes, Turmoil, and Inhabited Institutions in an Urban Elementary School. American Sociological Review, 75(1), 52–74.Google Scholar

Halpen, C. (2010). Governing Despite Its Instruments? Instrumentation in EU Environmental Policy. West European Politics, 33(1), 39–57.Google Scholar

Hampshire, J. & Bale, T. (2015). New Administration, New Immigration Regime: Do Parties Matter after All? A UK Case Study. West European Politics, 38(1), 145–66.Google Scholar

Hansen, H. K. & Porter, T. (2012). What Do Numbers Do in Transnational Governance? International Political Sociology, 6(4), 409–26.Google Scholar

Hatton, T. J. (2009). The Rise and Fall of Asylum: What Happened and Why? The Economic Journal, 199(535), 183–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hay, C. (1996). Narrating Crisis: The Discursive Construction of the Winter of Discontent. Sociology, 30(2), 253–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hay, C. (2007). Why We Hate Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Heinrich, C. J. (2002). Outcomes-Based Performance Management in the Public Sector: Implications for Government Accountability and Effectiveness. Public Administration Review, 62(6), 712–25.Google Scholar

Heinrich, C. J. (2012). Measuring Public Sector Performance and Effectiveness. In Peters, B. G. & Pierre, J. (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Public Administration (pp. 32–49). London: Sage Publishing.Google Scholar

Hildgartner, S. & Bosk, C. L. (1988). The Rise and Fall of Social Problems: A Public Arenas Model. American Journal of Sociology, 94(1), 53–78.Google Scholar

Hoffman, A. M. (2002). A Conceptualization of Trust in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations, 8(3), 375–401.Google Scholar

Hoggett, P. (1996). New Modes of Control in the Public Service. Public Administration, 74(1), 9–32.Google Scholar

Home Affairs Committee (2003). Fourth Report of Session 2002–03, Asylum Removals (HC 654-I). London: House of Commons.Google Scholar

Home Affairs Committee (2004). Home Office Target-Setting 2004, Third Report of Session 2004–2005. London: House of Commons.Google Scholar

Home Affairs Committee (2006a). Home Affairs Committee: Evidence. 16 May 2006. Ev 148. London: House of Commons.Google Scholar

Home Affairs Committee (2006b). Home Affairs Committee: Evidence. 6 June 2006, Ev 170. London: House of Commons.Google Scholar

Home Affairs Committee (2006c). Home Affairs Committee: Evidence. 12 June 2006, Ev 189. London: House of Commons.Google Scholar

Home Affairs Committee (2013). The Work of the UKBA (January–March 2013), Eighth Report of Session 2013–14. London: House of Commons.Google Scholar

Home Office (2001a). Bridging the Information Gaps: A Conference of Research on Asylum and Immigration in the UK. London: Home Office.Google Scholar

Home Office (2001b). Home Office Departmental Report. London: Home Office.Google Scholar

Home Office (2003). Home Office Departmental Report. London: Home Office.Google Scholar

Home Office (2005). Home Office Departmental Report. London: Home Office.Google Scholar

Home Office (2006). Fair, Effective, Transparent and Trusted: Rebuilding Confidence in Our Immigration System, London: Home Office.Google Scholar

Hood, C. (1991). A Public Management for All Seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.Google Scholar

Hood, C. (2006). Gaming in Targetworld: The Targets Approach to Managing British Public Services. Public Administration Review, 66(4), 515–21.Google Scholar

Hood, C. & Dixon, R. (2010). The Political Payoff from Performance Target Systems: No-Brainer or No-Gainer? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(2), 281–98.Google Scholar

Hood, C. & Peters, B. G. (2004). The Middle Aging of New Public Management: Into the Age of Paradox? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(3), 267–82.Google Scholar

Hooghe, L., Marks, G. & Wilson, C. J. (2002). Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration? Comparative Political Studies, 35(8), 965–89.Google Scholar

Hosmer, L. (1995). Trust: The Connecting Link between Organizational Theory and Philosophical Ethics. The Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 379.Google Scholar

Inglehart, R. & Norris, P. (2016). Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-Nots and Cultural Backlash. Harvard Kennedy School Working Paper No. RWP16–026.Google Scholar

James, O. (2004). The UK Core Executive’s Use of Public Service Agreements as a Tool of Governance. Public Administration, 82(2), 397–419.Google Scholar

James, O. & John, P. (2007). Public Management at the Ballot Box: Performance Information and Electoral Support for Incumbent English Local Governments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(4), 567–80.Google Scholar

Jennings, W. (2009). The Public Thermostat, Political Responsiveness and Error-Correction: Border Control and Asylum in Britain, 1994–2007. British Journal of Political Science, 39(4), 847–70.Google Scholar

Jennings, W. & Stoker, G. (2016). The Bifurcation of Politics: Two Englands. The Political Quarterly, 87(3), 372–82.Google Scholar

Jessop, B. (2017). The Organic Crisis of the British State: Putting Brexit in Its Place. Globalizations, 14(1), 133–41.Google Scholar

Johnson, C. & Talbot, C. (2007). The UK Parliament and Performance Challenging or Challenged? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(1), 113–31.Google Scholar

Jordan, A. J., Wurzel, R. K. W. & Zito, A. R. (2005). The Rise of ‘New’ Policy Instruments in Comparative Perspective: Has Governance Eclipsed Government? Political Studies, 53(3), 477–96.Google Scholar

Jordan, A. J., Wurzel, R. K. W. & Zito, A. R. (2013). Still the Century of ‘New’ Environmental Policy Instruments? Exploring Patterns of Innovation and Continuity. Environmental Politics, 22(1), 155–73.Google Scholar

Keane, J. (2009). The Life and Death of Democracy. London: Pocket Books.Google Scholar

Kette, S. & Tacke, V. (2015). University Rankings: Between Organization and Society. In Holzer, B., Kastner, F. & Werron, T. (Eds.), From Globalization to World Society: Neo-institutional and Systems-Theoretical Perspectives (pp. 215–36). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

King, A. (1975). Overload: Problems of Governing in the 1970s. Political Studies, 23(2–3), 284–96.Google Scholar

Kingdon, J. (1995). Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policy. New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Koopmans, R. (2004). Movements and the Media: Selection Processes and Evolutionary Dynamics in the Public Sphere. Theory and Society, 33(3), 367–91.Google Scholar

Kydd, A. H. (2005). Trust and Mistrust in International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (1993). The Pasteurization of France. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Latour, B. & Woolgar, S. (2013). Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Law, J. & Urry, J. (2004). Enacting the Social. Economy and Society, 33(3), 390–410.Google Scholar

Lazear, E. P. (2000). Economic Imperialism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(1), 99–146.Google Scholar

Lewis, J. D. & Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a Social Reality. Social Forces, 63(4), 967–85.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. (1964). Funktionen und folgen formaler organisation. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and Power: Two Works by Niklas Luhmann. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. (1981). Political Theory in the Welfare State, tr. Bednarz, J. Jr. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. (1991). Soziologie des Risikos. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. (1997). Limits of Steering. Theory, Culture and Society, 14(1), 41–57.Google Scholar

Majone, G. (1989). Evidence, Argument and Persuasion in the Policy Process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Maravall, J. M. (1999). Accountability and Manipulation. In Przeworski, A., Stokes, S. C. & Manin, B. (Eds.), Democracy, Accountability, and Representation (pp. 154–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

March, J. G. & Olsen, J. P. (1976). Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar

March, J. G. & Olsen, J. P. (1983). The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life. American Political Science Review, 78(3), 734–49.Google Scholar

McGoey, L. (2012). Strategic Unknowns: Towards a Sociology of Ignorance. Economy and society, 41(1), 1–16.Google Scholar

Merry, S. E. (2011). Measuring the World. Current Anthropology, 52(S3), S83–S95.Google Scholar

Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., Thomas, G. M. & Ramirez, F. O. (1997). World Society and the Nation-State. American Journal of Sociology, 103(1), 144–81.Google Scholar

Meyer, J. W. & Jepperson, R. L. (2000). The ‘Actors’ of Modern Society: The Cultural Construction of Social Agency. Sociological Theory, 18(1), 100–20.Google Scholar

Meyer, J. W. & Rowan, B. (1991). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. In Powell, W. W. & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (pp. 41–62). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Micheli, P. & Neely, A. (2010). Performance Measurement in the Public Sector in England: Searching for the Golden Thread. Public Administration Review, 70(4), 591–600.Google Scholar

Miller, G. J. & Moe, T. M. (1983). Bureaucrats, Legislators, and the Size of Government. The American Political Science Review, 77(2), 297–322.Google Scholar

Ministry of Defence (2004). Annual Report and Accounts 2003 and 2004. London: Ministry of Defence.Google Scholar

Mitnick, B. M. (1980). The Political Economy of Regulation: Creating, Designing, and Removing Regulatory Forms. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Modell, S. (2001). Performance Measurement and Institutional Processes: A Study of Managerial Reponses to Public Sector Reform. Management Accounting Research, 12(4), 437–64.Google Scholar

Möllering, G. (2001). The Nature of Trust: From Georg Simmel to a Theory of Expectation, Interpretation and Suspension. Sociology, 35(2), 403–20.Google Scholar

Moran, M. (2001). The Rise of the Regulatory State in Britain. Parliamentary Affairs, 5(1), 19–34.Google Scholar

Morgenthau, H. (1948). Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Alfred Kopf.Google Scholar

Mudde, C. (2004). The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–63.Google Scholar

National Audit Office (1997). Ministry of Defence: The Defence Evaluation and Research Agency: Review of Performance (HC 411).Google Scholar

National Audit Office (2001). Measuring the Performance of Government Departments. Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, House of Commons 301 Session 2000–1: 22 March.Google Scholar

National Audit Office (2004). Ministry of Defence: The Rapid Procurement of Capability to Support Operations. Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General. House of Commons 1161 Session 2003–4, 19 November.Google Scholar

National Audit Office (2009). Performance of the Ministry of Defence 2008-09. Briefing for the House of Commons Defence Committee, October 2009. Available at www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/0910_MoD_Performance_200809.pdf. Accessed 4 April 2015.Google Scholar

Nayyar, D. (2013). The Millennium Development Goals beyond 2015: Old Frameworks and New Constructs. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 14(3), 371–92.Google Scholar

Noël, A. (2006). The New Global Politics of Poverty. Global Social Policy, 6(3), 304–33.Google Scholar

Norris, P. (2011). Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Norris, P. (Ed.). (1999). Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Offe, C. (1972). Strukturprobleme des kapitalistischen Staates. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–79.Google Scholar

Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398–427.Google Scholar

Orton, J. D. & Weick, K. E. (1990). Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization. The Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 203–23.Google Scholar

Page, L. (2006). Lions, Donkeys and Dinosaurs: Waste and Blundering in the Military. London: Arrow Books.Google Scholar

Painter, C. (2008). A Government Department in Meltdown: Crisis at the Home Office. Public Money and Management, 28(5), 275–82.Google Scholar

Painter, C. (2012). The UK Coalition Government: Constructing Public Service Reform Narratives. Public Policy and Administration, 28(1), 3–20.Google Scholar

Panchamia, N. & Thomas, P. (2014). Public Service Agreements and the Prime Minister’s Delivery Unit. London: Institute for Government.Google Scholar

Pederson, L. H. (2007). Ideas Are Transformed as They Transfer: A Comparative Study of Eco-taxation in Scandinavia. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(1), 59–77.Google Scholar

Perrow, C. (1986). Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay (3rd edn.). New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar

Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Approach. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.Google Scholar

Pidd, M. (2005). Perversity in Public Service Performance Measurement. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 54(5/6), 482–93.Google Scholar

Poggi, G. (1990). The State: Its Nature, Development and Prospects. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Pollard, S. (2004). David Blunkett. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar

Pollitt, C. (1990). Managerialism and the Public Services: The Anglo-American Experience. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Pollitt, C. (2006a). Performance Indicators for Democracy – The Missing Link? Evaluation, 12(1), 38–55.Google Scholar

Pollitt, C. (2006b). Performance Management in Practice: A Comparative Study of Executive Agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(1), 25–44.Google Scholar

Pollitt, C. (2013). The Logics of Performance Management. Evaluation, 19(4), 346–63.Google Scholar

Pollitt, C. & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis – New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Porter, T. M. (1992). Quantification and the Accounting Ideal in Science. Social Studies of Science, 22(4), 633–51.Google Scholar

Porter, T. M. (1996). Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Power, M. (1996). The Audit Explosion. London: Demos.Google Scholar

Power, M. (1997). The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Power, M. (2000). The Audit Society – Second Thoughts. International Journal of Auditing, 4(1), 111–19.Google Scholar

Power, M. (2003). Auditing and the Production of Legitimacy. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(4), 379–94.Google Scholar

Power, M. (2004). Counting, Control and Calculation: Reflections on Measuring and Management. Human Relations, 57(6), 765–83.Google Scholar

Radaelli, C. (2000). Policy Transfer in the European Union: Institutional Isomorphism as a Source of Legitimacy. Governance, 13(1), 25–43.Google Scholar

Rhodes, R. A. (1994). The Hollowing Out of the State: The Changing Nature of the Public Service in Britain. The Political Quarterly, 65(2), 138–51.Google Scholar

Rhodes, R. A. (1997). Understanding Governance. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Richards, D. (2014). A Crisis of Expectation. In Smith, M. & Hay, C. (Eds.), Institutional Crisis in 21st-Century Britain (pp. 15–38). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan UK.Google Scholar

Richards, D., Talbot, C. & Munro, E. (2015). Targets? More Targets! Even Less Change and More Continuity in the Performance Regime in Whitehall. Retrieved from http://blog.policy.manchester.ac.uk/posts/2015/08/targets-more-targets-even-less-change-and-more-continuity-in-the-performance-regime-in-whitehall/.Google Scholar

Richardson, J. J. (1982). Policy Styles in Western Europe. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Rose, N. (1991). Governing by Numbers: Figuring out Democracy. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16(7), 673–92.Google Scholar

Rose, N. & Miller, P. (1992). Political Power beyond the State: Problematics of Government. The British Journal of Sociology, 43(2), 173–205.Google Scholar

Russell, M. (2005). Must Politics Disappoint? London: Fabian Society.Google Scholar

Sauder, M. & Espeland, W. N. (2009). The Discipline of Rankings: Tight Coupling and Organizational Change. American Sociological Review, 74(1), 63–82.Google Scholar

Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse. Annual Review of Political Science 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneider, A. & Ingram, H. (1993). Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for Politics and Policy. American Political Science Review, 87(2), 334–47.Google Scholar

Scott, R. W. (1995). Institutes and Organizations. London: Sage Publishing.Google Scholar

Scott, R. W. & Meyer, J. W. (1991). The Organization of Societal Sectors. In Powell, W. W. & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (pp. 108–40). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.Google Scholar

Seyd, B. (2016). Exploring Political Disappointment. Parliamentary Affairs, 69(2), 327–47.Google Scholar

Shapiro, S. P. (1987). The Social Control of Impersonal Trust. American Journal of Sociology, 93(3), 623–58.Google Scholar

Shapiro, S. P. (2005). Agency Theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 31(1), 263–84.Google Scholar

Simmel, G. (1950). The Sociology of Georg Simmel, tr. Wolff, K. H.. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Sitkin, S. B. & Roth, N. L. (1993). Explaining the Limited Effectiveness of Legalistic ‘Remedies’ for Trust/Distrust. Organization Science, 4(3), 367–92.Google Scholar

Smith, P. (1990). The Use of Performance Indicators in the Public Sector. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A, 153(1), 53–72.Google Scholar

Smith, P. (1995). On the Unintended Consequences of Publishing Performance Data in the Public Sector. International Journal of Public Administration, 18(2/3), 277–310.Google Scholar

Sniderman, P. M. & Theriault, S. M. (2004). The Structure of Political Argument and the Logic of Issue Framing. In Saris, W. E. & Sniderman, P. M. (Eds.), Studies in Public Opinion: Attitudes, Nonattitudes, Measurement Error, and Change (pp. 133–65). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Star, S. L. & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional Ecology, Translations and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.Google Scholar

St Clair, A. L. (2006). Global Poverty: The Co-production of Knowledge and Politics. Global Social Policy, 6(1), 57–77.Google Scholar

Stiglitz, J. (2009). The Great GDP Swindle. The Guardian, 13 September 2009. www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/sep/13/economics-economic-growth-and-recession-global-economy.Google Scholar

Stoker, G. (2006). Why Politics Matters: Making Democracy Work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Stone, D. A. (2012). Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. New York: W. W. Norton and Co.Google Scholar

Strang, D. & Meyer, J. W. (1993). Institutional Conditions for Diffusion. Theory and Society, 22(4), 487–511.Google Scholar

Strathern, M. (Ed.). (2000). Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics, and the Academy. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar

Streeck, W. (2016). How Will Capitalism End?: Essays on a Failing System. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.Google Scholar

Taggart, P. A. (1996). The New Populism and the New Politics: New Protest Parties in Sweden in a Comparative Perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Talbot, C. (1999). Public Performance – Towards a New Model? Public Policy and Administration, 14(3), 15–34.Google Scholar

Talbot, C. (2010). Theories of Performance: Organizational and Service Improvement in the Public Domain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, J. (2009). Strengthening the Link between Performance Measurement and Decision Making. Public Administration, 87(4), 853–71.Google Scholar

Torres, L. (2004). Trajectories in Public Administration Reforms in European Continental Countries. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 63(3), 99–112.Google Scholar

Treasury, HM (1998). Public Services for the Future: Modernisation, Reform, Accountability, Comprehensive Spending Review: Public Service Agreements 1999–2002 (December), Cm 4181.Google Scholar

Treasury, HM (2000). Spending Review: Public Service Agreements (July), Cm 4808.Google Scholar

Treasury, HM (2002). Outcome Focused Management in the United Kingdom. Working document. London: HM Treasury.Google Scholar

Treasury Committee (1999). Seventh Report, Session 1998–99. London: House of Commons.Google Scholar

Turnhout, E. (2009). The Effectiveness of Boundary Objects: The Case of Ecological Indicators. Science and Public Policy, 36(5), 403–12.Google Scholar

UKBA (2008). UK Border Agency Business Plan, 2008–11. London: Home Office.Google Scholar

UKBA Independent Inspector (2009). Asylum: Getting the Balance Right? A Thematic Inspection: July–November 2009.Google Scholar

UKBA Independent Inspector (2011). A Thematic Inspection of How the UK Border Agency Manages Foreign National Prisoners. Independent Chief Inspector of the UK Border Agency. London.Google Scholar

United Nations (2017). International Migration: Concepts and Definitions, Statistics Division. Available at: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/sconcerns/migration/migrmethods.htm. Accessed January 2017.Google Scholar

Van Dooren, W., Bouckaert, G. & Halligan, J. (2015). Performance Management in the Public Sector. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Walshe, K., Harvey, G. & Jas, P. (Eds.). (2010). Connecting Knowledge and Performance in Public Services. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Waterman, R. W. & Meier, K. J. (1998). Principal-Agent Models: An Expansion? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(2), 173–202.Google Scholar

Waterman, R. W. & Wood, B. D. (1993). Policy Monitoring and Policy Analysis. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 12(4), 685–99.Google Scholar

Weaver, G. R., Trevino, L. K. & Cochran, P. L. (1999). Integrated and Decoupled Corporate Social Performance: Management Commitments, External Pressures, and Corporate Ethics Practices. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 539–52.Google Scholar

Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1–10.Google Scholar

Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391–425.Google Scholar

Werron, T. (2015). What Do Nation-States Compete For: A World-Societal Perspective on Competition for ‘Soft’ Global Goods. In Holzer, B., Kastner, F. & Werron, T. (Eds.), From Globalization to World Society: Neo-institutional and Systems-Theoretical Perspectives (pp. 85–106). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Woelert, P. (2015). The ‘Logic of Escalation’ in Performance Measurement: An Analysis of the Dynamics of a Research Evaluation System. Policy and Society, 34(1), 75–85.Google Scholar

Zucker, L. G. (1986). Production of Trust: Institutional Sources of Economic Structure 1840–1920. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 8(1), 53–111.Google Scholar