Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T00:20:47.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - The Arctic Ocean’s Melting Ice

Institutions and Policies to Manage Black Carbon

from Part IV - Changing Polar Seas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2019

Paul G. Harris
Affiliation:
Education University of Hong Kong
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Climate Change and Ocean Governance
Politics and Policy for Threatened Seas
, pp. 236 - 252
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aakre, S., Kallbekken, S., Van Dingenen, R., and Victor, D. G. (2017). Incentives for small clubs of Arctic countries to limit black carbon and methane emissions. Nature Climate Change, 8(1), 8589.Google Scholar
Air Transport Action Group. (2015). Aviation Climate Solutions. Geneva: Air Transport Action Group.Google Scholar
Andreae, M. O. and Gelencser, A. (2006). Black carbon or brown carbon? The nature of light-absorbing carbonaceous aerosols. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 6(10), 3131–48.Google Scholar
Arctic Council. (2009). Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment. Tromsoe, Norway: Arctic Council [blog post].Google Scholar
Arctic Council. (2011a). The Arctic Environment and Climate Change. Tromsoe, Norway: Arctic Council [blog post].Google Scholar
Arctic Council. (2011b). An Assessment of Emissions and Mitigation Options for Black Carbon for the Arctic Council. Tromsoe, Norway: Arctic Council [blog post].Google Scholar
Arctic Council. (2011c). Task Force on Short-Lived Climate Forcers: Progress Report and Recommendations for Ministers. Tromsoe, Norway: Arctic Council [blog post].Google Scholar
Arctic Council. (2012). 2012 Arctic Report Cards Describe Dramatic Changes in the Arctic. Arctic Council, December 5 [blog post].Google Scholar
Arctic Council. (2013). Task Force on Black Carbon and Methane, 2nd meeting, Stockholm, December 11–13 [blog post].Google Scholar
Arctic Council. (2014). Addressing Black Carbon and Methane in the Arctic. Tromsoe, Norway: Arctic Council [blog post].Google Scholar
Arctic Council. (2015). Enhanced Black Carbon and Methane Emissions Reductions: An Arctic Council Framework for Action. Tromsoe, Norway: Arctic Council [blog post].Google Scholar
Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme of the Arctic Council (AMAP). (2011). The Impact of BC on Arctic Climate. Oslo: AMAP.Google Scholar
Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme of the Arctic Council (AMAP). (2015). AMAP Assessment 2015: BC and Ozone as Arctic Climate Forcers. Oslo, Norway: AMAP.Google Scholar
Asariotis, R. and Benamara, H. eds. (2012) Marine Transport and the Climate Challenge. London and New York: Routledge and Earthscan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azzara, A. (2013). Arctic Sea Shipping: Emissions Matter More Than You Might Think, From the ICCT Blogs, 2013. Washington, DC: International Council on Clean Transportation.Google Scholar
Azzara, A. (2015). BC Emissions from Shipping: Fact-Checking Conventional Wisdom. From the Blogs. Washington, DC: International Council on Clean Transportation.Google Scholar
Azzara, A. and Rutherford, D. (2009). Marine BC Emissions: Identifying Research Gaps. Washington, DC: International Council on Clean Transportation.Google Scholar
Azzara, A., Minjares, R., and Rutherford, D. (2015). Needs and Opportunities to Reduce BC Emissions from Maritime Shipping. Washington, DC: International Council on Clean Transportation.Google Scholar
Azzara, A. and Rutherford, D. (2015). Air Pollution from Marine Vessels in the U.S. High Arctic in 2025. Washington, DC: International Council on Clean Transportation.Google Scholar
Bond, T. C., Doherty, S. J., Fahey, D. W., et al. (2013). Bounding the role of BC in the climate system: A scientific assessment. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 118(11), 5380–552.Google Scholar
Bows-Larkin, A. (2015). All adrift: Aviation, shipping, and climate change policy. Climate Policy, 15(6), 681702.Google Scholar
Brasseur, G. P., Gupta, M., Anderson, B. E., et al. (2016). Impact of aviation on climate, Bulletin of the American Meterological Society, 97(4), 561–83.Google Scholar
Brewer, T. L. (2015a). Arctic Black Carbon from Shipping: A Club Approach to Climate-and-Trade Governance. Geneva: ICTSD.Google Scholar
Brewer, T. L. (2015b). Arctic black carbon: The challenge for international governance, BioRes, 9(5), 16–9.Google Scholar
Brewer, T. L. (2016a). Arctic warming: Context and issues for an Arctic Black Carbon (ABC) agreement, ICTSD Dialogue Process – Background Paper Update.Google Scholar
Brewer, T. L. (2016b). Black Carbon Problems in Transportation: Technological Solutions and Governmental Policy Solutions. Working Paper. MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Brewer, T. L., Derwent, H., and Blachowicz, A. (2016). Carbon market clubs and the new Paris regime. Discussion Paper for the World Bank Group’s Networked Carbon Markets Initiative.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clean Air Task Force. (2014). The Last Climate Frontier: Leveraging the Arctic Council to Make Progress on Black Carbon and Methane. Boston, MA: Clean Air Task Force.Google Scholar
Clean Arctic Alliance. (2017). Overview. Available at www.hfofreearctic.org.Google Scholar
Climate and Clean Air Coalition (CCAC). (2014). Health: Urban Health Initiative. Paris: CCAC.Google Scholar
Climate and Clean Air Coalition (CCAC). (2015). Diesel Factsheet. Paris: CCAC.Google Scholar
Climate and Clean Air Coalition (CCAC). (2016a). Ports and Marine Factsheet. Paris: CCAC.Google Scholar
Climate and Clean Air Coalition (CCAC). (2016b). Reducing BC from Ports. Paris: CCAC.Google Scholar
Climate and Clean Air Coalition (CCAC). (2016c). Reducing BC Emissions from Heavy-Duty Diesel Vehicles and Engines: Results to Date and Strategy for Continued Success. Paris: CCAC.Google Scholar
Comer, B., Olmer, N., Mao, X., Roy, B., and Rutherford, D. (2017). Prevalence of Heavy Fuel Oil and BC in Arctic Shipping, 2015–2025. Washington, DC: ICCT.Google Scholar
Corbett, J., Lack, D., and Winebrake, J. (2010). Arctic shipping emissions inventories and future scenarios. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 10(19), 9689–704.Google Scholar
Corbett, J. J. and Winebrake, J. (2008). The Impacts of Globalization on International Maritime Transport Activity: Past Trends and Future Perspectives. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Corbett, J. J., Winebrake, J. J., Green, E. H., et al. (2007). Mortality from ship emissions: A global assessment. Environmental Science & Technology, 41(24), 8512–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cornes, R. and Sandler, T. (1996). The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods, and Club Goods. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeSombre, E. R. (2008). Globalisation, competition, and convergence: Shipping and the race to the middle. Global Governance, 14(2), 179–98.Google Scholar
European Environmental Agency (EEA). (2013). Status of BC monitoring in ambient air in Europe. EEA Technical Report No. 18/2013.Google Scholar
Falkner, R. (2015). A Minilateral Solution for Global Climate Change? On Bargaining Efficiency, Club Benefits and International Legitimacy. Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy Working Paper No. 222; Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment Working Paper No. 197.Google Scholar
Fuglestvedt, J. S., Shine, K. P., Berntsen, T., et al. (2010). Transport impacts on atmosphere and climate: Metrics, Atmospheric Environment, 44(37), 4648–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, E. D. (1985). Black Carbon in the Environment: Properties and Distribution. New York: J. Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Hansen, J. and Nazarenko, L. (2004). Soot climate forcing via snow and ice albedos. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(2), 423–28.Google Scholar
Hegg, D. A., Warren, S. G., Grenfell, T. C., et al. (2009). Source attribution of BC in Arctic snow. Environmental Science & Technology, 43(11), 4016–21.Google Scholar
Hughes, E. (2013). A new chapter for MARPOL Annex VI – requirements for technical and operational measures to improve the energy efficiency of international shipping, Marine Environment Division, IMO.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2013). The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2014a). Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2014b). Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). (2016). Long-Term Traffic Forecasts. Montreal: ICAO.Google Scholar
International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT). (2011b). Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Ships: Cost Effectiveness of Available Options. Washington, DC: ICCT.Google Scholar
International Council on Clean Transport (ICCT). (2015). A 10-year projection of maritime activity in the U.S. Arctic region, report prepared for the U.S. Committee on the Maritime Transportation System, January 1.Google Scholar
International Maritime Organization (IMO). (2017). International Maritime Organization moves ahead with oceans and climate change agenda, press briefing 17, July 11.Google Scholar
Keohane, R. O. and Victor, D. G. (2011). The regime complex for climate change, Perspectives on Politics, 9(1), 723.Google Scholar
Masiello, C. A. (2004). New directions in black carbon organic geochemistry, Marine Chemistry, 92(1), 201–13.Google Scholar
Rutherford, D. (2016). Brother, Can You Spare Three Cents (for the Climate)? Washington, DC: ICCT.Google Scholar
RTCC (Responding to Climate Change). (2013). Norwegians issue shipping warming as Arctic sea lanes open. Available at www.rtcc.org.Google Scholar
Sandler, T. (1997). Global Challenges: An Approach to Environmental, Political, and Economic Problems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sims, R., Gorsevski, V., and Anenberg, S. (2015). BC Mitigation and the Role of the Global Environment Facility: A STAP Advisory Document. Washington, DC: Global Environment Facility.Google Scholar
Stettler, M.E.J., Eastham, S., and Barrett, S.R.H. (2011). Air quality and public health impacts of UK airports. Part I: Emissions. Atmospheric Environment, 45(31), 5415–24.Google Scholar
Stettler, M.E.J, Eastham, S., and Barrett, S.R.H. (2013). Air quality and public health impacts of UK airports. Part II: Impacts and policy assessment. Atmospheric Environment, 67, 184–92.Google Scholar
Stettler, M. E., Boies, A. M., Petzold, A., and Barrett, S. R. (2013). Global civil aviation BC emissions, Environmental Science & Technology, 47(18), 10397404.Google Scholar
Stuards, M. (2016). Artic shipping passage ‘still decades away,’ The Guardian, February 10.Google Scholar
UN Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). (1979). 1979 Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution. Geneva: UNECE.Google Scholar
UN Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). (1999). The 1999 Gothenburg Protocol to Abate Acidification, Eutrophication and Ground-level Ozone. Geneva: UNECE.Google Scholar
UN Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). (2013). 1999 Protocol to Abate Acidification, Eutrophication and Ground-level Ozone to the Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution, as Amended on 4 May 2012. Geneva: UNECE.Google Scholar
UN Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). (2015). Protocol to Abate Acidification, Eutrophication and Ground-level Ozone. Geneva: UNECE.Google Scholar
US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2012). Report to Congress on BC. Washington, DC: US EPA.Google Scholar
US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2015). Ocean Vessels and Large Ships, 2015. Washington, DC: US EPA.Google Scholar
US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2016). Methane and Black Carbon Impacts on the Arctic: Communicating the Science. Washington, DC: US EPA.Google Scholar
US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2017). Mitigating BC. Washington, DC: US EPA.Google Scholar
US National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Committee on Propulsion and Energy Systems to Reduce Commercial Aviation Carbon Emissions. (2015). Commercial Aircraft Propulsion and Energy Systems Research: Reducing Global Carbon Emissions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
US National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). (2017). End-of-Summer Artic Sea Ice Extent Is Eighth Lowest on Record. Washington, DC: NASA.Google Scholar
US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). (2017). Arctic Report Card. Washington, DC: NOAA.Google Scholar
US National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC). (2017). Arctic Sea Ice News and Analysis. Boulder, CO: NSIDC.Google Scholar
US White House (2013). National Strategy for the Arctic Region. Available at www.whitehouse.gov. [N.B. This document was produced by the Obama administration before the Trump administration entered office in January 2017.]Google Scholar
Victor, D. G. (2015a). The Case for Climate Clubs. E15 Initiative. Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD) and World Economic Forum.Google Scholar
Victor, D. G. (2015b). Join the club: Group approaches to tackling climate change. BioRes, 9, 1819.Google Scholar
Victor, D. (2017). Three-Dimensional Climate Clubs: Implications for Climate Cooperation and the G20. Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD).Google Scholar
Weischer, L., Morgan, J., and Patel, M. (2012). Climate clubs: Can small groups of countries make a big difference in addressing climate change? Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 21(3), 177–92.Google Scholar
Yeo, S. (2015). How successfully can the Arctic Council tackle climate change? The Carbon Brief, blog, April 28.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×