Annual Reports of SRACI, the ITA and VARTA, 1986 to date.Google Scholar

Assisted Reproductive Treatment Bill 2008.Google Scholar

Beauchamp, T and Childress, J. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 1989, ch. 6, p. 292.Google Scholar

Daily Mail, 27/3/1993a, 9.Google Scholar

Daily Mail, 27/3/1993b, 15.Google Scholar

Deech, R. A reply from the chairman of the HFEA. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 5–6.Google Scholar

Dill, S, International treatment differences: Policy, politics, partnerships and ART. In: Valverde, JL (Ed.) 2050: A Changing Europe. Demographic Crisis and Baby Friend Policies, Pharmaceuticals Policy and Law, Vol. 9, 2007.Google Scholar

Douglas, G, Law, fertility and reproduction, 1991, pp. 119–122, in Medical Law; 2nd edn, Kennedy & Grubb, Butterworths, London, 1994.Google Scholar

Edwards, RG and Beard, HK. UK law dictated the destruction of 3000 cryopreserved human embryos. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 3–5.Google Scholar

European Convention on Human Rights and its Five Protocols, Articles 8 & 12.Google Scholar

Greenhall, E and Vessey, M. The prevalence of subfertility. Fertility Sterility 1990; 54(6): 978–983.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jansen, R and Dill, S. When and how to welcome government to the bedroom. Medical Journal of Australia 2009; 190(5).Google Scholar

Keane, Loanne in video link from the USA at the annual scientific meeting of the Fertility Society of Australia, December 1997.Google Scholar

Kon, A. Infertility: The Real Costs, ISSUE, CHILD for National Fertility Week, 1993.Google Scholar

Medical, Ethical and Social Aspects of Assisted Reproduction (2001: Geneva, Switzerland) Current practices and controversies in assisted reproduction: report of a WHO meeting / editors, Effy Vayena, Patrick J. Rowe and P. David Griffin.Google Scholar

Nicol, M. Loss of a Baby, Understanding Maternal Grief, Transworld, Moorebank, NSW, 1989, 4.Google Scholar

Page, H. Estimation of the prevalence and incidence of infertility in a population: A pilot study. Fertility Sterility 1989; 51(4): 571–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Proceed with Care. Final Report of the Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies, Canada Communications Group, Ottawa, 1993, 19.Google Scholar

Reports of the Victorian IVF Committee, 1982, 1983 and 1984.Google Scholar

Shenfield, F. “Justice and access to fertility treatments”. In: Ethical Dilemmas in Assisted Reproduction, Shenfield, F, Sureau, C (Eds.), Parthenon Publishing Group, London, 1997.Google ScholarPubMed

Skene, L. Law and Medical practice: Rights, Duties Claims and Defences, 3^rd ed., 2008.Google Scholar

Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 16.1, United Nations, 1948.Google Scholar

Vayena, E., Rowe, P. J., and Griffin, D. P., Current Practices and Controversies in Assisted Reproduction; Report of a meeting on “Medical, Ethical and Social Aspects of Assisted Reproduction”, WHO, 2001.Google Scholar

Victorian Law Reform Commission: Assisted Reproductive Technology & Adoption, Final Report 2007.Google Scholar

Waller, L. Australia: the law and infertility – the Victorian Experience. In McLean, SAM (Ed.), Law Reform and Human Reproduction, 1992.Google Scholar

Yancey, P. Soul Survivor, How My Faith Survived the Church, Hodder & Stoughton, London, 2001.Google Scholar