Book contents
- Atheism, Fundamentalism and the Protestant Reformation
- Atheism, Fundamentalism and the Protestant Reformation
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 The Unfinished Reformation
- 2 Things Fall Apart
- 3 An Inductive Theology
- 4 The Secret Sympathy
- 5 A House Divided
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 June 2018
Book contents
- Atheism, Fundamentalism and the Protestant Reformation
- Atheism, Fundamentalism and the Protestant Reformation
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 The Unfinished Reformation
- 2 Things Fall Apart
- 3 An Inductive Theology
- 4 The Secret Sympathy
- 5 A House Divided
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Atheism, Fundamentalism and the Protestant ReformationUncovering the Secret Sympathy, pp. 248 - 265Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Abrams, Douglas Carl. Selling the Old-Time Religion. Atlanta and London: University of Georgia Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Addinall, Peter. Philosophy and Biblical Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Denis. Creation and Evolution: Do We Have to Choose? Oxford: Monarch Books, 2008.Google Scholar
Allemayer, Bob. ‘Atheism and Secularity in North America’. In Atheism and Secularity, vol. II, edited by Zuckerman, Phil, 1–22. Santa Barbara: Praeger, 2010.Google Scholar
Anderson, David. Creation or Evolution: Why We Must Choose. Littlethorpe: J6D Publishers, 2009.Google Scholar
Answers in Genesis. Journey through the Creation Museum. Green Forest: Master Books, 2008.Google Scholar
Avalos, Hector. ‘Why Biblical Studies Must End’. In The End of Christianity, edited by Loftus, John W., 107–29. Amherst: Prometheus Books, 2011.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis. The New Organon. Translated by Jardine, Lisa and Silverthorne, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagg, Samuel, and Voas, David. ‘The Triumph of Indifference’. In Atheism and Secularity, vol. II, edited by Zuckerman, Phil, 91–112. Santa Barbara: Praeger, 2010.Google Scholar
Baggini, Julian. Atheism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Oswald. ‘Martin Luther’. In The Reformation Theologians, edited by Lindberg, Carter, 51–66. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002.Google Scholar
Beattie, James. An Essay in the Nature and Immutability of Truth. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Bebbington, David W. Evangelicalism in Modern Britain. London and New York: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
Beeke, Joel R. What did the Reformers Believe about the Age of the Earth? Petersburg: Answers in Genesis, 2014.Google Scholar
Beit-Hallahmi, Benjamin. ‘Morality and Immorality among the Irreligious’. In Atheism and Secularity, vol. I, edited by Zuckerman, Phil, 113–48. Santa Barbara: Praeger, 2010.Google Scholar
Bentley, Richard. Eight Sermons Preach’d at the Honourable Robert Boyle’s Lecture. Cambridge: Cornelius Crownfield, 1724.Google Scholar
Bergman, Jerry. Hitler and the Nazi Darwinian Worldview. Kitchener: Joshua Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Boghossian, Peter. A Manual for Creating Atheists. Durham, NC: Pitchstone Publishing, 2013.Google Scholar
Boone, Kathleen C. The Bible Tells Them So. Albany: State University of New York, 1989.Google Scholar
Bozeman, Theodore Dwight. Protestants in an Age of Science. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Brooke, John Hedley. Science and Religion: Some Historical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Brooke, John Hedley, and Cantor, Geoffrey. Reconstructing Nature: The Engagement of Science and Religion. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1998.Google Scholar
Brown, Callum G. ‘“The Unholy Mrs Knight” and the BBC’. English Historical Review 128 (2012): 345–76.Google Scholar
Brown, Robert E. ‘Edwards, Locke and the Bible’. Journal of Religion 79, no. 3 (1999): 361–84.Google Scholar
Bruce, Steve. ‘The Problems of a Liberal Religion’. In The Future of Liberal Theology, edited by Chapman, Mark D., 221–41. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2002.Google Scholar
Buckley, Michael J. At the Origins of Modern Atheism. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Budd, Susan. ‘The Loss of Faith: Reasons for Unbelief among Members of the Secular Movement in England 1850–1950’. Past and Present 36 (1967): 106–25.Google Scholar
Bullivant, Stephen. ‘The New Atheism and Sociology’. In Religion and the New Atheism: A Critical Appraisal, edited by Amarasingam, Amarnath, 109–24. Leiden: Brill, 2010.Google Scholar
Bullivant, Stephen. ‘Defining “Atheism”’. In The Oxford Handbook of Atheism, edited by Bullivant, Stephen and Ruse, Michael, 11–21. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Burnet, Gilbert. Rational Method for Proving the Truth of the Christian Faith. London, 1875.Google Scholar
Cabal, Ted, ed. The Apologetics Study Bible. Nashville: Holman Bible Publishers, 2007.Google Scholar
Calhoun, David B. Princeton Seminary, vol. I. United States: Banner of Truth Trust, 1994.Google Scholar
Calvin, John. Institutes of the Christian Religion. Translated by Beveridge, Henry. Peabody: Hendrickson, 2008.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Joel A. Revive Us Again. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Chadwick, Owen. ‘The Established Church Under Attack’. In The Victorian Crisis of Faith, edited by Symondson, Anthony, 91–105. London: SPCK, 1970.Google Scholar
Chaffey, Tim. ‘How Should We Interpret the Bible?’ In How Do We Know the Bible Is True?, edited by Ham, Ken and Hodge, Bodie, 121–37. Green Forest: Master Books, 2011.Google Scholar
Champion, J. A. I. The Pillars of Priestcraft Shaken. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Chandler, Edward. A Defence of Christianity from the Prophecies of the Old Testament. London: James Knapton, 1725.Google Scholar
Chapman, Mark D. Introduction to The Future of Liberal Theology, edited by Chapman, Mark D., 3–17. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2002.Google Scholar
Chillingworth, William. The Religion of Protestants a Sure Way to Salvation. London: Henry G. Bohn, 1846.Google Scholar
Cimino, Richard, and Smith, Christopher. ‘The New Atheism and the Empowerment of American Freethinkers’. In Religion and the New Atheism: A Critical Appraisal, edited by Amarasingam, Amarnath, 139–56. Leiden: Brill, 2010.Google Scholar
Cimino, Richard, and Smith, Christopher. Atheist Awakening. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Clark, David K. ‘Is Logic Arbitrary?’ In The Apologetics Study Bible, edited by Cabal, Ted, 930–1. Nashville: Holman Bible Publishers, 2007.Google Scholar
Clark, J. C. D. English Society 1688–1832. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Clark, J. C. D. ‘Religion and Origins of Radicalism in Nineteenth-Century Britain’. In English Radicalism 1550–1850, edited by Burgess, Glenn and Festenstein, Matthew, 241–84. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Clarke, Samuel. A Demonstration of the Being and Attributes of God. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Coleman, Simon, and Carlin, Leslie. Introduction to The Cultures of Creationism, edited by Coleman, Simon and Carlin, Leslie, 1–28. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004.Google Scholar
Copan, Paul. ‘Does the Moral Argument Show There Is a God?’ In The Apologetics Study Bible, ed. Cabal, Ted, 1687. Nashville: Holman Bible Publishers, 2007.Google Scholar
Copan, Paul. ‘Isn’t That Just Your Interpretation?’ In The Apologetics Study Bible, edited by Cabal, Ted, 1858. Nashville: Holman Bible Publishers, 2007.Google Scholar
Cotter, Christopher R. ‘Consciousness Raising’. International Journal for the Study of New Religions 2, no. 1 (2011): 77–103.Google Scholar
Cupitt, Don. ‘After Liberalism’. In The Weight of Glory, edited by Hardy, Daniel W. and Sedgwick, Peter H., 251–6. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1991.Google Scholar
Currid, John D. A Study Commentary on Genesis, vol. I. Darlington: Evangelical Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Daniels, George H. American Science in the Age of Jackson. New York: Columbia University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Dawkins, Richard. ‘Convert’s Corner’. Richard Dawkins Foundation. Last modified 4 September 2015. Accessed 2 December 2015. https://richarddawkins.net/community/convertscorner/.Google Scholar
Dawkins, Richard. ‘The Atheist’. Salon.com. Last modified 30 April 30 2005. Accessed 5 December 2015. www.salon.com/2005/04/30/dawkins/.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel C. ‘The Selfish Gene as a Philosophical Essay’. In Richard Dawkins: How a Scientist Changed the Way We Think, edited by Grafen, Allan and Ridley, Mark, 101–15. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Desmond, Adrian. ‘Artisan Resistance and Evolution in Britain, 1819–1848’. Osiris 3 (1987): 77–110.Google Scholar
DeWitt, David A. Unravelling the Origins Controversy. Lynchburg: Creation Curriculum, 2007.Google Scholar
Ditchfield, George M. The Evangelical Revival. London: University College London Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Dorrien, Gary. The Making of American Liberal Theology: Imagining Progressive Religion 1805–1900. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Draper, John W. History of the Conflict between Religion and Science. London: Kegan Paul, Trench & Co, 1887.Google Scholar
Drummond, Andrew L., and Bulloch, James. The Church in Victorian Scotland, vol. II. Edinburgh: Saint Andrew Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Drummond, Andrew L., and Bulloch, James. The Church in Late Victorian Scotland, vol. III. Edinburgh: Saint Andrew Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Dupree, A. Hunter. ‘Christianity and the Scientific Community in the Age of Darwin’. In God and Nature, edited by Lindberg, David C. and Numbers, Ronald L., 351–68. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Eldridge, Niles. The Triumph of Evolution and the Failure of Creationism. New York: W. H. Freeman, 2000.Google Scholar
Ellegård, Alvar. Darwin and the General Reader. Göteborg: Göteborgs Universitet, 1958.Google Scholar
Eller, David. ‘Christianity Evolving’. In The End of Christianity, edited by Loftus, John W., 23–51. Amherst: Prometheus Books, 2011.Google Scholar
Eller, Jack David. ‘What Is Atheism?’ In Atheism and Secularism, edited by Zuckerman, Phil, 1–18. Santa Barbara: Praeger, 2010.Google Scholar
Emsley, Clive. British Society and the French Wars 1793–1815. London: Macmillan, 1979.Google Scholar
Endersby, Jim. Introduction to On the Origin of Species, by Charles Darwin, ix-lxv. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Evans, Gillian R. Problems of Authority in the Reformation Debates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Falcioni, Ryan C. ‘Is God a Hypothesis? The New Atheism and the Philosophy of Religion’. In Religion and the New Atheism: A Critical Appraisal, edited by Amarasingam, Amarnath, 203–24. Leiden: Brill, 2010.Google Scholar
Farias, Miguel. ‘The Psychology of Atheism’. In The Oxford Handbook of Atheism, edited by Bullivant, Stephen and Ruse, Michael, Oxford, 468–82. Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Ferreira, M. Jamie. ‘Locke’s ‘Constructive Skepticism’ – A Reappraisal’. Journal of the History of Philosophy 24, no. 2 (1986): 211–22.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, Paul K. ‘Classical Empiricism’. In The Methodological Heritage of Newton, edited by Butts, Robert E. and Davis, John W., 150–70. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1970.Google Scholar
Fiala, Andrew. ‘Militant Atheism, Pragmatism, and the God-Shaped Hole’. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 65 (2009): 139–51.Google Scholar
Finlay, Graeme, and Pattermore, Stephen. ‘Christian Theology and Neo-Darwinism Are Compatible’. In Debating Darwin, edited by Finlay, Graeme, 31–67. Milton Keynes: Paternoster, 2009.Google Scholar
Firma, Terry. ‘Reddit’s Biggest Atheism Hangout Scores Sky-High for Toxic Content and Bigotry’. Last modified 16 March 2015. Accessed 30 November 2015. www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2015/03/16/reddits-biggest-atheism-hangout-scores-sky-high-for-toxic-content-and-bigotry-data-analysts-say/.Google Scholar
Foote, F. W., and Ball, W. P.. The Bible Handbook. London: Progressive Publishing, 1888.Google Scholar
Frei, Hans. The Eclipse of Biblical Narrative. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Fuller, Steve. ‘What Has Atheism Ever Done for Science?’ In Religion and the New Atheism: A Critical Appraisal, edited by Amarasingam, Amarnath, 57–77. Leiden: Brill, 2010.Google Scholar
Funkenstein, Amos. Theology and the Scientific Imagination. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Fyfe, Aileen. ‘William Paley’s Natural Theology in the University of Cambridge’. British Journal for the History of Science 30 (1997): 321–35.Google Scholar
Gericke, Jaco. ‘Can God Exist if Yahweh Doesn’t?’ In The End of Christianity, edited by Loftus, John W., 131–54. Amherst: Prometheus Books, 2011.Google Scholar
Gillispie, Charles C. Genesis and Geology. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1951.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Michael Allen. The Theological Origins of Modernity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Gish, Duane T. Evolution? The Fossils Say No! San Diego: Creation-Life Publishers, 1973.Google Scholar
Gish, Duane T. Evolution: The Fossils Still Say No! El Cajon: Institute for Creation Research, 1995.Google Scholar
Glover, Willis B. Evangelical Nonconformists and Higher Criticism in the Nineteenth Century. London: Independent Press, 1954.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles W. ‘On the Mosaic Cosmogony’. In Essays and Reviews, 206–53. London: J. W. Parker & Son, 1860.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay. ‘Evolution as Fact and Theory’. In Science and Creationism, edited by Montagu, Ashley, 117–25. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Goring, Jeremy. Introduction to The English Presbyterians, edited by Bolam, C. Gordon, 17–28. London: George Allan and Unwin, 1968.Google Scholar
Goring, Jeremy. ‘The Break-Up of the Old Dissent’. In The English Presbyterians, edited by Bolam, C. Gordon, 175–218. London: George Allan and Unwin, 1968.Google Scholar
Gregory, Brad S. The Unintended Reformation. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Grislis, Egil. ‘The Hermeneutical Problem in Hooker’. In Studies in Richard Hooker, edited by Hill, W. Speed, 159–206. Cleveland: Case Western Reserve University, 1971.Google Scholar
Groothuis, Douglas R. ‘How Should a Christian Understand Postmodernism’. In The Apologetics Study Bible, edited by Cabal, Ted, 1385–6. Nashville: Holman Bible Publishers, 2007.Google Scholar
Guenther, Katja M., Mulligan, Kerry and Papp, Cameron. ‘From the Outside In’. Social Problems 60, no. 4 (2013): 457–75.Google Scholar
Ham, Ken. ‘Atheists Outline Their Global Religious Agenda’. In A Pocket Guide to Atheism, edited by Ham, Ken, 11–17. Petersburg: Answers in Genesis, 2014.Google Scholar
Ham, Ken. Introduction to A Pocket Guide to Atheism, edited by Ken Ham, 7–10. Petersburg: Answers in Genesis, 2014.Google Scholar
Ham, Ken, and Ware, A. Charles. Darwin’s Plantation. Green Forest: Master Books, 2007.Google Scholar
Harding, Susan Friend. The Book of Jerry Falwell. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Hardy, Daniel W. ‘Epilogue: The Strategy of Liberalism’. In The Future of Liberal Theology, edited by Chapman, Mark D., 299–304. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2002.Google Scholar
Hardy, Daniel W. ‘Epilogue: The Structures of Liberalism’. In The Weight of Glory, edited by Hardy, Daniel W. and Sedgwick, Peter H.. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1991.Google Scholar
Harold, Francis, Eve, Raymond, and Taylor, John. ‘Creationism: American-Style’. In The Cultures of Creationism, edited by Coleman, Simon and Carlin, Leslie, 67–84. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004.Google Scholar
Harris, Harriet A. ‘How Helpful Is the Term “Fundamentalist?”’ In Fundamentalisms, edited by Partridge, Christopher H., 3–18. Carlisle: Paternoster, 2001.Google Scholar
Harris, Harriet A. ‘Fundamentalism in a Protestant Context’. In Fundamentalism: Church and Society, edited by Percy, Martyn and Jones, Ian, 7–24. London: SPCK, 2002.Google Scholar
Harrison, Peter. The Bible, Protestantism, and the Rise of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Harrison, Peter. The Fall of Man and the Foundations of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Peter. The Territories of Science and Religion. Chicago and London: Chicago University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Hauerwas, Stanley, and Fish, Stanley. ‘Miltonian Rebukes in an Age of Reason’. In ‘God Is Dead’ and I Don’t Feel So Good Myself, edited by Davis, Andrew, 108–19. Eugene: Cascade Books, 2010.Google Scholar
Haughen, Kristine L. Richard Bentley: Poetry and Enlightenment. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Haught, John F. God and the New Atheism. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Herrick, Jim. Vision and Realism: A Hundred Years of the Freethinker. London: G. W. Foote & Co, 1982.Google Scholar
Higgens-Biddle, John C. Introduction to The Reasonableness of Christianity, by John Locke, xv-cxv. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Hill, Christopher. Some Intellectual Consequences of the English Revolution. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 1980.Google Scholar
Hill, Christopher. ‘Irreligion in the “Puritan” Revolution’. In Radical Religion in the English Revolution, edited by McGregor, J. F. and Reay, B., 191–211. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Hill, Christopher. The English Bible and the Seventeenth-Century Revolution. London: Allen Lane, 1993.Google Scholar
Hill, Christopher. ‘Freethinking and Libertinism: The Legacy of the English Revolution’. In The Margins of Orthodoxy, edited by Lund, Roger D., 54–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Hobsbawn, Edward. ‘Methodism and Revolution’. In Religion and Revolution in Early-Industrial England, edited by Olsen, Gerald W., 145–51. Lanham: University Press of America, 1990.Google Scholar
Hodge, A. A., and Warfield, B. B.. ‘Inspiration’. The Presbyterian Review 6 (1881): 225–60.Google Scholar
Hodge, Bodie. ‘Cock-a-Doodle One or Two?’ In Demolishing Supposed Bible Contradictions, edited by Ham, Ken, Hodge, Bodie, and Chaffey, Ted, 123–8. Green Forest: Master Books, 2012.Google Scholar
Hodge, Bodie. ‘Evolutionary Humanism: The Bloodiest Religion Ever’. In A Pocket Guide to Atheism, edited by Ham, Ken, 19–33. Petersburg: Answers in Genesis, 2014.Google Scholar
Hodge, Charles. Systematic Theology, vol. I. London and Edinburgh: Thomas Nelson & Sons, 1880.Google Scholar
Hodge, Charles. ‘What Is Darwinism?’ and Other Writings on Science and Religion, edited by Noll, Mark A. and Livingstone, David N.. Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 1994.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Peter C. Liberal Theology: A Radical Vision. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Holder, R. Ward. John Calvin and the Grounding of Interpretation. Leiden: Brill, 2006.Google Scholar
Hood, Ralph W., and Chen, Zhuo. ‘Conversion and Deconversion’. In The Oxford Handbook of Atheism, edited by Bullivant, Stephen and Ruse, Michael, 537–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Hovenkamp, Herbert. Science and Religion in America. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Hunter, Michael. ‘The Problem of ‘Atheism’ in Early Modern England’. Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 35 (1985): 125–57.Google Scholar
Huxley, Thomas H. Collected Essays, vol. II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Huxley, Thomas H. Collected Essays, vol. IV. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Huxley, Thomas H. Collected Essays, vol. V. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Huxley, Thomas H. Lay Sermons, Addresses and Reviews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Hyman, Gavin. ‘Postmodern Theology: The Apotheosis or Scourge of Liberalism?’ In The Future of Liberal Theology, edited by Chapman, Mark D., 191–207. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2002.Google Scholar
Inchausti, Robert. ‘Thomas Merton’s Apologies to an Unbeliever’. In ‘God Is Dead’ and I Don’t Feel So Good Myself, edited by David, Andrew, 2–8. Eugene: Cascade Books, 2010.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Margaret C. The Newtonians and the English Revolution 1689–1720. Hassocks: Harvester Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Jacoby, Susan. Freethinkers: A History of American Secularism. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2004.Google Scholar
Jowett, Benjamin. ‘On the Interpretation of Scripture’. In Essays and Reviews, 330–433. London: J. W. Parker, 1860.Google Scholar
Kerby, Carl, and Ham, Ken. ‘The ‘Evolutionising’ of a Culture’. In War of the Worldviews, edited by Vaterlaus, Gary, 7–14. Hebron: Answers in Genesis, 2005.Google Scholar
Kors, Alan C. Atheism in France 1650–1729. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Kuipers, Ronald A. ‘The New Atheism and the Spiritual Landscape of the West’. In ‘God Is Dead’ and I Don’t Feel So Good Myself, edited by David, Andrew, 120–8. Eugene: Cascade Books, 2010.Google Scholar
Kuklick, Bruce. A History of Philosophy in America 1720–2000. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Lardas, John. Secularism in Antebellum America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Lash, Nicholas. Theology for Pilgrims. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Leask, Ian. ‘Personation and Immanent Undermining: On Toland’s Appearing Lockean’. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18, no. 2 (2010): 231–56.Google Scholar
Lienesch, Michael. In the Beginning. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Lindbeck, George A. The Nature of Doctrine. Louisville, Ken.: Westminster John Knox, 2009.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Stephen. ‘Christian Theology and Neo-Darwinism Are Incompatible’. In Debating Darwin, edited by Finlay, Graeme, 1–29. Milton Keynes: Paternoster, 2009.Google Scholar
Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Edited by Nidditch, Peter H.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Loftus, John W. Introduction to The End of Christianity, edited by Loftus, John W., 9–20. Amherst: Prometheus Books, 2011.Google Scholar
Longfield, Bradley J. The Presbyterian Controversy. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Lubac, Henri de. Medieval Exegesis, vol. I. Translated by Sebanc, M.. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 1998.Google Scholar
Lubac, Henri de. Medieval Exegesis, vol. III. Translated by Macierowski, E. M.. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 1999.Google Scholar
Luther, Martin. ‘How Christians Should Regard Moses’. In Martin Luther’s Basic Theological Writings, edited by Lull, Timothy F., 135–48. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Luther, Martin. ‘The Freedom of a Christian’. In Martin Luther’s Basic Theological Writings, edited by Lull, Timothy F., 585–629. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Luther, Martin. ‘Preface to the Old Testament’. In Martin Luther’s Basic Theological Writings, edited by Lull, Timothy F., 118–34. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Machen, J. Gresham. Christianity and Liberalism. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 2009.Google Scholar
Mack, Phyllis. Heart Religion in the British Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Mahieu, D. L. Le. The Mind of William Paley. Lincoln, Neb.: University of Nebraska Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Martin, T. T. Hell and the High Schools. Kansas City: Western Baptist Publishing, 1923.Google Scholar
Marty, Martin E., and Appleby, R. Scott. The Power and the Glory. Boston: Beacon Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Marty, Martin E., and Appleby, R. Scott, eds. The Fundamentalism Project. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1993–1995.Google Scholar
Marsden, George M. Fundamentalism and American Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Marsden, George M. ‘Understanding Fundamentalist Views of Science’. In Science and Creationism, edited by Montagu, Ashley, 95–116. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Marsden, George M. Understanding Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1991.Google Scholar
Marsh, Joss L. ‘“Bibliolatry” and “Bible-Smashing”: G. W. Foote, George Meredith, and the Heretic Trope of the Book’. Victorian Studies 34 (1991): 315–36.Google Scholar
McGrath, Alister. The Intellectual Origins of the European Reformation. London: Blackwell, 2004.Google Scholar
McGrath, Alister, and McGrath, Joanna Collicutt. The Dawkins Delusion?. London: SPCK, 2007.Google Scholar
McGregor, J. F. ‘Seekers and Ranters’. In Radical Religion in the English Revolution, edited by McGregor, J. F. and Reay, Barry, 129–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
McNaughton, Ian, and Taylor, Paul. Darwin and Darwinism 150 Years Later. Leominster: Day One, 2009.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Elizabeth. ‘What Are the Tactics of the New Atheists?’ In A Pocket Guide to Atheism, edited by Ham, Ken, 35–50. Petersburg: Answers in Genesis, 2014.Google Scholar
Moore, J. T. ‘Locke’s Analysis of Language’. Journal of the History of Ideas 37 (1976): 707–14.Google Scholar
Moore, James R. The Post-Darwinian Controversies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Moorhead, James H. Princeton Seminary in American Religion and Culture. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2012.Google Scholar
More, Thomas. Complete Works of St Thomas More, vol. VIII. Edited by Schister, Louis A., Marius, Richard, Lusardi, James P.. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
More, Thomas. Complete Works of St Thomas More, vol. VI. Edited by Lawler, Thomas M. C., Marc’hadour, Germain and Marius, Richard. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Morris, Henry M., and Morris, John D.. The Modern Creation Trilogy, vol. I. Green Forest: Master Books, 1996.Google Scholar
Morris, Henry M., and Morris, John D.. The Modern Creation Trilogy, Vol III. Green Forest: Master Books, 1996.Google Scholar
Morris, Henry M., and Morris, Henry M. III. Many Infallible Proofs. Green Forest: Master Books, 1996.Google Scholar
Morris, Henry M., and Clark, Martin E.. The Bible Has the Answer. Green Forest: Master Books, 1999.Google Scholar
Mortenson, Terry. ‘Did Bible Authors Believe in a Literal Genesis?’ In The New Answers Book 3, edited by Ham, Ken, 81–9. Green Forest: Master Books, 2010.Google Scholar
Murphy, Nancey. ‘Engaging Robert J. Russell’s Alpha and Omega’. Zygon 45, no. 1 (2010): 193–212.Google Scholar
Nesbitt, G. L. Benthamite Reviewing: the First Twelve Years of the Westminster Review. New York: Columbia University Press, 1934.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac. Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica. Translated by Cohen, I. Bernard and Whitman, Anne. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Noll, Mark A. ‘Common Sense Tradition and American Evangelical Thought’. American Quarterly 37, no. 2 (1985): 212–38.Google Scholar
Noll, Mark A. ‘The Irony of the Enlightenment for Presbyterians in the Early Republic’. Jounral of the Early Republic, 5, no. 2 (1985): 149–75.Google Scholar
Noll, Mark A. Between Faith and Criticism. Vancouver: Regent College Publishing, 1998.Google Scholar
Numbers, Ronald L. ‘Creationists and Their Critics in Australia’. In The Cultures of Creationism, edited by Coleman, Simon and Carlin, Leslie, 109–23. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004.Google Scholar
Numbers, Ronald L. The Creationists. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Nuovo, Victor. Introduction to Vindications of the Reasonableness of Christianity, by Locke, John, xvii–cxi. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Oberman, Heiko A. Luther: Man between God and the Devil. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Ocker, Christopher. ‘Scholastic Interpretation of the Bible’. In A History of Biblical Interpretation, vol. II, edited by Hauser, Alan J. and Watson, Duane Frederick, 254–79. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 2009.Google Scholar
O’Higgins, James. Anthony Collins: the Man and His Work. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1970.Google Scholar
Olsen, Gerald W., ed. Religion and Revolution in Early-Industrial England. Lanham: University Press of America, 1990.Google Scholar
Ozment, Steven E. The Age of Reform 1250–1550. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Park, Robert L. Superstition: Belief in an Age of Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Partridge, Christopher H. Introduction to Fundamentalisms, edited by Partridge, Christopher H., 1–16. Carlisle: Paternoster, 2001.Google Scholar
Pasquale, Frank L. ‘A Portrait of Secular Group Affiliates.’ In Atheism and Secularity, vol. I, edited by Zuckerman, Phil, 43–87. Santa Barbara: Praeger, 2010.Google Scholar
Patterson, Roger. ‘Self-Refuting Skepticism’. In A Pocket Guide to Atheism, edited by Ham, Ken, 67–73. Petersburg: Answers in Genesis, 2014.Google Scholar
Perkin, Harold. The Origins of Modern English Society 1780–1880. London: Routledge, 1969.Google Scholar
Pigliucci, Massimo. ‘New Atheism and the Scientistic Turn in the Atheism Movement’. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 38 (2013): 142–53.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Barbara. ‘John Calvin and the Interpretation of the Bible’. In A History of Biblical Interpretation, vol. II, edited by Hauser, Allen J. and Watson, Duane Frederick, 341–71. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 2009.Google Scholar
Pius, Pope IX. ‘The Syllabus of Errors Condemned by Pius IX’. Last modified 2002. Accessed 15 September 2015. www.papalencyclicals.net/Pius09/p9syll.htm.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin. ‘The Dawkins Confusion: Naturalism “Ad Absurdam”’. In God Is Great, God Is Good, edited by Craig, William Lane and Meister, Chad, 247–58. Downers Grove: Inter-Varsity Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. ‘Within the Margins: the Definition of Orthodoxy’. In The Margins of Orthodoxy, edited by Lund, Roger D., 33–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. The History of Scepticism from Erasmus to Spinoza. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Rectenwald, Michael. ‘Secularism and the Cultures of Nineteenth-century Scientific Naturalism’. The British Journal for the History of Science 46, no. 2 (2013): 231–54.Google Scholar
Reid, Thomas. Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1983.Google Scholar
Reid, Thomas. Enquiry into the Human Mind. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Reid, William H. The Rise and Dissolution of the Infidel Societies of the Metropolis. London, 1800.Google Scholar
Reventlow, Henning Graf. The Authority of the Bible and the Rise of the Modern World. Translated by. Bowden, J.. London: SCM Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Rhodes, Ron. ‘Has the Bible’s Text Been Changed over the Years?’ In How Do We Know the Bible Is True?, edited by Ham, Ken and Hodge, Bodie, 265–74. Green Forest: Master Books, 2011.Google Scholar
Riesen, Richard A. ‘‘Higher Criticism’ in the Free Church Fathers’. Records of the Scottish Church History Society 20 (1980): 119–42.Google Scholar
Roberts, Jon H. Darwinism and the Divine in America. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Rogers, Jack B., and McKim, Donald K.. The Authority and Interpretation of the Bible. San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1979.Google Scholar
Ross, T. M. ‘The Implicit Theology of Carl Sagan’. Pacific Theological Review 18, no. 2 (1985): 24–32.Google Scholar
Royle, Edward. Radicals, Secularists and Republicans. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Royle, Edward, and Walvin, James. English Radicals and Reformers 1760–1848. Brighton: Harvester Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Rummel, Erika. ‘The Renaissance Humanists’. In A History of Biblical Interpretation, vol. II, edited by Hauser, Allen J. and Watson, Duane Frederick, 280–98. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 2009.Google Scholar
Ruse, Michael. ‘Naturalism and the Scientific Method’. In The Oxford Handbook of Atheism, edited by Bullivant, Stephen and Ruse, Michael, 383–97. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. Why I am Not a Christian and Other Essays. London: Unwin Books, 1967.Google Scholar
Ruthven, Malise. Fundamentalism: The Search for Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Sagan, Carl. ‘The Shores of the Cosmic Ocean’. Cosmos: Carl Sagan Episode Scripts. Last modified 14 September 2012. Accessed 5 December2015. www.springfieldspringfield.co.uk/view_episode_scripts.php?tv-show=cosmos-carl-sagan&episode=s01e01.Google Scholar
Sandeen, Ernest R. The Roots of Fundamentalism. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Savage, Sara. ‘A Psychology of Fundamentalism’. In Fundamentalism: Church and Society, edited by Percy, Martyn and Jones, Ian, 25–52. London: SPCK, 2002.Google Scholar
Schaefer, Donovan O. ‘Blessed, Precious Mistakes: Deconstruction, Evolution, and New Atheism in America’. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 76 (2014): 75–94.Google Scholar
Schulzke, Marcus. ‘The Politics of New Atheism’. Politics and Religion 6 (2013): 778–99.Google Scholar
Sell, Allan P. F. John Locke and the Eighteenth-Century Divines. Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Shermer, Michael. ‘The Skeptic’s Chaplain’. In Richard Dawkins: How a Scientist Changed the Way We Think, edited by Grafen, Allan and Ridley, Mark, 227–35. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Smith, Jess M. ‘Becoming an Atheist in America’. Sociology of Religion 72, no. 2 (2011): 215–37.Google Scholar
Spencer, Nick. Atheists: The Origin of the Species. London: Bloomsbury Continuum, 2014.Google Scholar
Stahl, William A. ‘One-Dimensional Rage’. In Religion and the New Atheism: A Critical Appraisal, edited by Amarasingam, Amarnath, 97–108. Leiden: Brill, 2010.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, David C. ‘John Calvin as an Interpreter of the Bible’. In Calvin and the Bible, edited by McKim, Donald K., 282–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Stenger, Victor J. ‘What’s New About the New Atheism?’ Philosophy Now April/May 2010: 16–17.Google Scholar
Stent, Gunther S. ‘Scientific Creationism: Nemesis of Sociobiology’. In Science and Creationism, edited by Montagu, Ashley, 136–41. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Stephen, Leslie. History of English Thought in the Eighteenth Century, vol. I. London: Harbinger, 1962.Google Scholar
Stewart, M. A. ‘Rational Religion and Common Sense’. In Thomas Reid: Context, Influence and Significance, edited by Houston, Joseph, 123–60. Edinburgh: Dunedin Academic Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Suderman, Jeffrey M. ‘Religion and Philosophy’. In Scottish Philosophy in the Eighteenth Century, edited by Garrett, Aaran and Harris, James A., 196–238. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Robert E. John Toland and the Deist Controversy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Suriano, Ben. ‘Three Questions on Modern Atheism: An Interview with John Milbank’. In ‘God Is Dead’ and I Don’t Feel So Good Myself, edited by David, Andrew, 58–66. Eugene: Cascade Books, 2010.Google Scholar
Temple, Frederick. ‘The Relations between Science and Religion’. In Science and Religion in the Nineteenth Century, edited by Cosslett, Tess, 190–216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Thomas, Roger. ‘Presbyterians in Transition’. In The English Presbyterians, edited by Bolam, C. Gordon, 113–174. London: George Allan and Unwin, 1968.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. The Making of the English Working Class. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1980.Google Scholar
Thompson, Mark D. ‘Biblical Interpretation in the Works of Martin Luther’. In A History of Biblical Interpretation, vol. II, edited by Hauser, Allen J. and Watson, Duane Frederick, 299–318. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 2009.Google Scholar
Tillotson, John. A Sermon Concerning the Unity of the Divine Nature and the Blessed Trinity. London, 1693.Google Scholar
Torrey, Reuben A., and Dixon, Andrew C., eds. The Fundamentals: A Testimony to the Truth. Grand Rapids, Baker Books, 1917.Google Scholar
Turner, James. Without God, Without Creed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Tyndale, William. An Answere Vnto Sir Thomas Mores Dialoge. Edited by O’Donnell, Anne M. and Wicks, Jared. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Upchurch, John. ‘Confessions of a Former Atheist’. In A Pocket Guide to Atheism, edited by Ham, Ken, 83–91. Petersburg: Answers in Genesis, 2014.Google Scholar
Varghese, Roy A., Preface to Flew, Anthony, There Is a God, vii–xxiv. New York: HarperOne, 2008.Google Scholar
Waligore, Joseph. ‘The Piety of the English Deists’. Intellectual History Review 22, no. 2 (2012): 181–97.Google Scholar
Walsh, John. ‘Methodism at the End of the Eighteenth Century’. In A History of the Methodist Church in Great Britain, vol. I, edited by Davies, Rupert E. and Rupp, E. Gordon, 277–315. London: Epworth Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Ward, Keith. ‘The Importance of Liberal Theology’. In The Future of Liberal Theology, edited by Chapman, Mark D., 39–53. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2002.Google Scholar
Warren, Sidney. American Freethought 1860–1914. New York: Columbia University Press, 1943.Google Scholar
Waterman, A. M. C. ‘The Nexus between Theology and Political Doctrine’. In Enlightenment and Religion, edited Haakonssen, Knud, 193–218. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Webb, R. K. ‘The Emergence of Rational Dissent’. In Enlightenment and Religion, edited by Haakonssen, Knud, 12–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Whiston, William. Essay Towards Restoring the True Text of the Old Testament. London, 1772.Google Scholar
Whitcomb, John C., and Morris, Henry M.. The Genesis Flood. Phillipsburg: P&R Publishing, 1961.Google Scholar
White, Andrew D. A History of the Warfare of Science and Theology. New York: Dover Publications, 1960.Google Scholar
White, Paul. Thomas Huxley: Making the ‘Man of Science’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
White, Peter. ‘The Via Media in the Early Stuart Church’. In Reformation to Revolution, edited by Todd, Margo, 78–94. London: Routledge, 1995.Google Scholar
Wigelsworth, Jeffrey R. Deism in Enlightenment England. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Wood, Paul. Introduction to Thomas Reid on the Animate Creation, by Reid, Thomas, 3–78 Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Woodridge, John D. Biblical Authority: A Critique of the Rogers/McKim Proposal. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1982.Google Scholar
Woolhouse, Roger. ‘Locke’s Theory of Knowledge’. In The Cambridge Companion to Locke, edited by Chappell, V. C., 147–71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Young, B. W. Religion and Enlightenment in Eighteenth-Century England. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998Google Scholar
Zenk, Thomas. ‘New Atheism’. In The Oxford Handbook of Atheism, edited by Bullivant, Stephen and Ruse, Michael, 245–60. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar