Book contents
- Interpreting Mach
- Interpreting Mach
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- 1 Ernst Mach’s Piano and the Making of a Psychophysical Imaginarium
- 2 Mother’s Milk and More
- 3 Meaningful Work
- 4 Mach on Analogy in Science
- 5 Ernst Mach’s Enlightenment Pragmatism
- 6 On the Philosophical and Scientific Relationship between Ernst Mach and William James
- 7 Ernst Mach and Friedrich Nietzsche
- 8 Abstraction, Pragmatism, and History in Mach’s Economy of Science
- 9 Holding the Hand of History
- 10 Ernst Mach and the Vienna Circle
- 11 Narratives Divided
- 12 Phenomenalism, or Neutral Monism, in Mach’s Analysis of Sensations?
- 13 The Case for Mach’s Neutral Monism
- Index
- References
9 - Holding the Hand of History
Mach on the History of Science, the Analysis of Sensations, and the Economy of Thought
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 March 2021
Edited by
Book contents
- Interpreting Mach
- Interpreting Mach
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- 1 Ernst Mach’s Piano and the Making of a Psychophysical Imaginarium
- 2 Mother’s Milk and More
- 3 Meaningful Work
- 4 Mach on Analogy in Science
- 5 Ernst Mach’s Enlightenment Pragmatism
- 6 On the Philosophical and Scientific Relationship between Ernst Mach and William James
- 7 Ernst Mach and Friedrich Nietzsche
- 8 Abstraction, Pragmatism, and History in Mach’s Economy of Science
- 9 Holding the Hand of History
- 10 Ernst Mach and the Vienna Circle
- 11 Narratives Divided
- 12 Phenomenalism, or Neutral Monism, in Mach’s Analysis of Sensations?
- 13 The Case for Mach’s Neutral Monism
- Index
- References
Summary
I analyse the relation of two important doctrines of Ernst Mach’s epistemology – namely the theory of the elements, exposed in The Analysis of Sensations, and the economy of thought, mainly explored in Knowledge and Error and elsewhere – to his historical-critical approach. After discussing Erwin Hiebert’s seminal work on Mach’s philosophical use of the history of science, I defend the thesis that there is a more profound, structural relationship between Mach’s conception of history and the anti-metaphysical remarks which open The Analysis of Sensations and introduce his theory of the elements. Finally, I contend that this can provide novel insights into the doctrine of the economy of thought.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Interpreting MachCritical Essays, pp. 164 - 183Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Banks, Erik C. 2003. Ernst Mach’s World Elements: A Study in Natural Philosophy. Kluwer.Google Scholar
Banks, Erik C. 2004. ‘The Philosophical Roots of Ernst Mach’s Economy of Thought’, Synthese 139, 23–53.Google Scholar
Banks, Erik C. 2013. ‘Metaphysics for Positivists: Mach versus the Vienna Circle’, Discipline filosofiche 23: 57–77.Google Scholar
Banks, Erik C. 2014. The Realistic Empiricism of Mach, James, and Russell: Neutral Monism Reconceived. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blackmore, John T. 1972. Ernst Mach: His Work, Life, and Influence. University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackmore, John T. (ed.) 1992. Ernst Mach – A Deeper Look: Documents and New Perspectives. Kluwer.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, Paul K. 1970. ‘Philosophy of Science: A Subject with a Great Past’, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5: 172–183.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, Paul K. 1984. ‘Mach’s Theory of Research and Its Relation to Einstein’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 15: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael 1999. Reconsidering Logical Positivism. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giere, Ronald N. 1973. ‘History and Philosophy of Science: Intimate Relationship or Marriage of Convenience?’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24: 282–297.Google Scholar
Guzzardi, Luca 2002. ‘Teorie stravaganti di un redattore invadente. Un positivista italiano nel dibattito scientifico europeo’, Intersezioni 3: 419–440.Google Scholar
Guzzardi, Luca 2014. ‘Energy, Metaphysics, and Space: Ernst Mach’s Interpretation of Energy Conservation as the Principle of Causality’, Science & Education 23: 1269–1291.Google Scholar
Hiebert, Erwin N. 1970. ‘Mach’s Philosophical Use of the History of Science’, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5: 184–203.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 2004 Prolegomena zu einer jeden künftigen Metaphysik, die als Wissenschaft wird auftreten können. Johann Friedrich Hartknoch, 1783. Edited and translated by Gary Hatfield as Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics That Will Be Able to Come Forward as Science. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst 1872/1911. Die Geschichte und die Wurzel des Satzes von der Erhaltung der Arbeit. J. A. Barth). Translated by P. E. B. Jourdain as History and Root of the Principle of the Conservation of Energy. Open Court, 1911.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst 1883/1960. The Science of Mechanics: A Critical and Historical Account of its Development. Open Court.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst 1886/1886/1959. Beiträge zur Analyse der Empfindungen. Gustav Fischer, 1886. Further German editions in 1900, 1902, 1903, 1906, 1911, 1918, and 1922. Translated by C. M. Williams and S. Waterlow as The Analysis of Sensations and the Relation of the Physical to the Psychical. Open Court, 1914 (reprinted Dover Publications, 1886/1959).Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst 1896/1986. Die Prinzipien der Wärmelehre, historisch-kritisch entwickelt. J. A. Barth, 1896. Further German editions in 1900 and 1919. Translated as Principles of the Theory of Heat, Historically and Critically Elucidated, ed. B. F. McGuinness. D. Reidel, 1986.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst 1905/1976. Erkenntnis und Irrtum. Skizzen zur Psychologie der Forschung. J. A. Barth, 1905. Further German editions in 1906, 1917, 1920, and 1926. Translated by T. J. McCormack and P. Foulkes as Knowledge and Error: Sketches on the Psychology of Enquiry. D. Reidel, 1976.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst 1910. ‘Die Leitgedanken meiner naturwissenschaftlichen Erkenntnislehre und ihre Aufnahme durch die Zeitgenossenʼ, Scientia 4: 225–240.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst 1921/1926. Die Prinzipien der Physikalischen Optik. Historisch und erkenntnispsychologisch entwickelt. J. A. Barth, 1921. Translated by John S. Anderson and A. F. A. Young as The Principles of Physical Optics: An Historical and Philosophical Treatment. Dover Publications, 1926.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst 2016. Die Prinzipien der Wärmelehre: historisch-kritisch entwickelt, Neudruck der 2. Auflage (1900). Xenomoi.Google Scholar
Mormann, Thomas 2007. ‘The Structure of Scientific Theories in Logical Empiricism’, in Richardson, A. and Uebel, T. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Logical Empiricism. Cambridge University Press, pp. 136–162.Google Scholar
Planck, Max 1909. Die Einheit des Physikalischen Weltbildes: Vortrag gehalten am 9. Dezember 1908 in der naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät des Studentenkorps an der Universität Leiden. Hirzel.Google Scholar
Richardson, Alan W. 1997. Carnap’s Construction of the World: The Aufbau and the Emergence of Logical Empiricism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stadler, Friedrich 1997. Studien zum Wiener Kreis: Ursprung, Entwicklung, und Wirkung des logischen Empirismus im Kontext. Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Stadler, Friedrich 2007. ‘The Vienna Circle: Context, Profile, and Development’, in Richardson, A. and Uebel, T. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Logical Empiricism. Cambridge University Press, pp. 13–40.Google Scholar
Stadler, Friedrich (ed.) 2017. Integrated History and Philosophy of Science: Problems, Perspectives, and Case Studies. Springer.Google Scholar
Stubenberg, Leopold 2018. ‘Neutral Monism’, The Stanford Online Encyclopedia of Philosophy, updated autumn 2018. Available from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/neutral-monism/Google Scholar
Wolters, Gereon 1987. Mach I, Mach II, Einstein und die Relativitätstheorie. de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2
- Cited by