Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T10:46:16.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 64 - Practical Medical Education Science for Clinical Teaching Sites

from Section 12 - Miscellaneous

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2021

Tahir Mahmood
Affiliation:
Victoria Hospital, Kirkcaldy
Charles Savona-Ventura
Affiliation:
University of Malta, Malta
Ioannis Messinis
Affiliation:
University of Thessaly, Greece
Sambit Mukhopadhyay
Affiliation:
Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital, UK
Get access

Summary

Trainees in obstetrics and gynaecology are the future of women’s healthcare and they deserve optimal training. This chapter is a cookbook for a high-quality training site. Both trainees and faculty responsible for the training may benefit from reading it. An optimal training site is a co-creation between responsible faculty, trainees and the context in which the training is provided. When we speak to you in this chapter, we address both trainees and faculty. We hope you will enjoy this cookbook and that you will find the best recipe for your own training context.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Scheele, F, Teunissen, P, van Luijk, S, et al. Introducing competency based postgraduate medical education in the Netherlands. Med Teach 2008;30:248253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frank, JR, Snell, LS, Ten Cate, O, et al. Competency-based medical education: theory to practice. Med Teach 2010;32:638645.Google Scholar
Scheele, F, Novak, Z, Vetter, K, Caccia, N, Goverde, A. Obstetrics and gynaecology training in Europe needs a next step. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014;180:130132Google Scholar
van der Aa, JE, Goverde, AJ, Teunissen, PW, Scheele, F. Paving the road for a European postgraduate training curriculum. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016;203:229231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frenk, J, Chen, L, Bhutta, ZA, et al. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet 2010;376:19231958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Aa, JE, Goverde, AJ, Scheele, F. Improving the training of the future gynaecologist: development of a European curriculum in Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG-PACT). Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2018;10:12.Google ScholarPubMed
Scheele, F, Van der Aa, JE, Goverde, AJ. EBCOG PACT: European curriculum for training in obstetrics and gynaecology. Available at: www.uems.eu/areas-of-expertise/postgraduate-training/european-standards-in-medical-training.Google Scholar
van der Aa, JE, Tancredi, A, Goverde, AJ, et al. What European gynaecologists need to master: consensus on medical expertise outcomes of pan-European postgraduate training in obstetrics & gynaecology. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2017;216:143152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frank, JR, Danoff, D. The CanMEDS initiative: implementing an outcomes-based framework of physician competencies. Med Teach 2007;29:642647.Google Scholar
Teunissen, P, Scheele, F, Scherpbier, A, et al. How residents learn: qualitative evidence for the pivotal role of clinical activities. Med Educ 2007;41:763770.Google Scholar
Campo, R, Wattiez, A, Tanos, V, et al. Gynaecological endoscopic surgical education and assessment: a diploma programme in gynaecological endoscopic surgery. Gynecol Surg 2016;13:133137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, D, Garside, S, Levinson, A, et al. What do we mean by web-based learning? A systematic review of the variability of interventions. Med Educ 2010;44:765–745.Google Scholar
Sørensen, JL, van der Vleuten, C, Rosthøj, S, et al. Simulation-based multiprofessional obstetric anaesthesia training conducted in situ versus off-site leads to similar individual and team outcomes: a randomised educational trial. BMJ Open 2015:6;5.Google Scholar
Kare, L, Sigbjorn, H. Excavating the origins of the learning pyramid myths. Cogent Educ 2018;5:10.Google Scholar
Visser, CLF, Ket, JCF, Croiset, G, Kusurkar, RA. Perceptions of residents, medical and nursing students about interprofessional education: a systematic review of the quantitative and qualitative literature. BMC Med Educ 2017;17:77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolb, DA. Experiential Learning; Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2014.Google Scholar
Hattie, J, Timperley, H. The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res 2007;77:81112.Google Scholar
Wass, R, Golding, C. Sharpening a tool for teaching: the zone of proximal development. Teaching Higher Educ 2014:19;671684.Google Scholar
Van der Vleuten, C, Schuwirth, L, Scheele, F, Driessen, EW, Hodges, B. The assessment of professional competence: building blocks for theory development. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2010;24:703719.Google Scholar
Driessen, E, van Tartwijk, J, van der Vleuten, C, Wass, V. Portfolios in medical education: why do they meet with mixed success? A systematic review. Med Educ 2007;41:12241233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ten Cate, O, Scheele, F. Competency-based postgraduate training: can we bridge the gap between theory and clinical practice? Acad Med 2007;82:542547.Google Scholar
Dijksterhuis, MG, Schuwirth, LW, Braat, DD, Teunissen, PW, Scheele, F. A qualitative study on trainees’ and supervisors’ perceptions of assessment for learning in postgraduate medical education. Med Teach 2013;35:e1396e1402.Google Scholar
Van der Vleuten, C, Driessen, E. What would happen to education if we take education evidence seriously? PME 2014:3,222232.Google Scholar
Barnett, R. Improving Higher Education: Total Quality Care. Bristol: Open University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Boor, K, Van Der Vleuten, C, Teunissen, P, et al. Development and analysis of D-RECT, an instrument measuring residents’ learning climate. Med Teach 2011;33:820827.Google Scholar
Lombarts, K, Heineman, M, Arah, O. Good clinical teachers likely to be specialist role models: results from a multicenter cross-sectional survey. PLoS One 2010;5:e15202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deci, E, Olafsen, A, Ryan, R. Self-determination theory in work organizations: the state of a science. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav 2017;4:1943.Google Scholar
Grol, R, Grimshaw, J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet 2003;362:12251230.Google Scholar
Gale, R, Grant, J. Managing change in a medical context: guidelines for action. Med Teach 1997;19:239249.Google Scholar
Maravelias, C. Post-bureaucracy: control through professional freedom. J Organ Change Manag 2003;16:547566.Google Scholar
Hodges, B, Kuper, A. Theory and practice in the design and conduct of graduate medical education. Acad Med 2012;87:2533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×