Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:54:40.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part I

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2018

Edited by
Marlene Wind
Marlene Wind
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
Get access

Summary

Can international courts deter? Much scholarship relies on the answer being ‘yes’. In this view, the rulings of international courts are thought to have effects beyond a given case, changing global expectations over the measures ruled on and making further violations less likely. Yet public international law explicitly denies the possibility of such deterrence. Little empirical work assesses these competing claims. In this chapter, we describe the novel approach we have taken in our recent work, by looking to financial markets reactions to World Trade Organization rulings. We ask whether investors downgrade a firm when a policy similar to the one it benefits from has been found in violation in another country. Using a quantitative case study of rulings against Canada’s support of its solar industry, we find measured empirical support for such a deterrent effect. Yet a caveat is in order: the Appellate Body’s rulings appear to exert a greater deterrent effect than ad hoc panellists. The debate over the deterrence effects of courts remains open. Yet our findings suggest that financial markets appear willing to bet on courts deterring similar violations in countries not party to a dispute.

Type
Chapter
Information
International Courts and Domestic Politics , pp. 43 - 178
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Secondary Sources

Abbott, K. W. et al. (2000). The Concept of Legalization. International Organization, 54(3), 401–19.Google Scholar
Ackerman, B. (1997). Rise of World Constitutionalism. Virginia Law Review, 83, 771–98.Google Scholar
Alford, R. P. (2000). The Proliferation of International Courts and Tribunals: International Adjudication in Ascendance. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law), 94, 160–65.Google Scholar
Alter, K. J. (2008). Agents or Trustees? International Courts in Their Political Context. European Journal of International Relations, 14(1), 33–63.Google Scholar
Alter, K. J. (2014). The New Terrain of International Law: Courts, Politics, Rights, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Arambulo, K. (1996). Drafting an Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Can an Ideal Become Reality? UC Davis Journal of International Law & Policy, 2(1), 111–36.Google Scholar
Arat, Z. F. K. (2006). Forging a Global Culture of Human Rights: Origins and Prospects of the International Bill of Rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 28(2), 416–37.Google Scholar
Bilchitz, D. (2007). Poverty and Fundamental Rights: The Justification and Enforcement of Socio-economic Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bossuyt, M. (1975). La Distinction Juridique Entre les Droits Civils et Politiques et les Droits Economiques, Sociaux et Culturels. Revue de Droit de l’homme, 8, 783–820.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. E. (1999). Some Reflections on the Relationship of Treaties and Soft Law. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 48(4), 901–13.Google Scholar
Buergenthal, T. (2001). Proliferation of International Courts and Tribunals: Is It Good or Bad? Leiden Journal of International Law, 14(2), 267–75.Google Scholar
Chang, W. (2009). Isolated Nation with Global-Minded Citizens: Bottom-up Transnational Constitutionalism in Taiwan. National Taiwan University Law Review, 4, 203–36.Google Scholar
Chang, W. & Yeh, J. (2012). Internationalization of Constitutional Law. In Rosenfeld, M. & Sajó, A., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1165–84.Google Scholar
Elkins, Z., Ginsburg, T. & Melton, J. (2014). Characteristics of National Constitutions, Version 2.0, Comparative Constitutions Project. Available at www.comparativeconstitutionsproject.org (accessed 27 February 2015).Google Scholar
Epstein, L. (1998). The Choices Justices Make, Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, T. (2008). The Global Spread of Constitutional Review. In Whittington, K. E., Kelemen, R. D. & Caldeira, G. A., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 81–98.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, T. & Versteeg, M. (2014). Why Do Countries Adopt Constitutional Review? Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 30(3), 587–622.Google Scholar
Goodman, R. & Jinks, D. (2004). How to Influence States: Socialization and International Human Rights Law. Duke Law Journal, 54(3), 621–704.Google Scholar
Griffey, B. (2011). Reasonableness Test: Assessing Violations of State Oblations Under the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Human Rights Law Review, 11, 275–328.Google Scholar
Hathaway, O. A. (2002). Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference? Yale Law Journal, 111, 1935–2042.Google Scholar
Helfer, L. R. & Slaughter, A. (2005). Why States Create International Tribunals: A Response to Professors Posner and Yoo. California Law Review, 93(3), 899–956.Google Scholar
Henkin, L. et al. (2009). Human Rights, 2nd edn, New York: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Hirschl, R. (2004). Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism, Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Humphrey, J. P. (1975). International Bill of Rights: Scope and Implementation. William & Mary Law Review, 17, 527–42.Google Scholar
Kelly, J. (2004). International Actors on the Domestic Scene: Membership Conditionality and Socialization by International Institutions. International Organization, 58(3), 425–57.Google Scholar
Keohane, R. O., Moravcsik, A. & Slaughter, A. (2000). Legalized Dispute Resolution: Inter and Transnational. International Organization, 54(3), 457–88.Google Scholar
Klein, C. & Sajo, A. (2012). Constitution-Making: Process and Substance. In Rosenfeld, M. & Sajó, A., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, Oxford University Press, pp. 419–41.Google Scholar
Krommendijk, J. (2014). The Domestic Impact and Effectiveness of the Process of State Reporting under UN Human Rights Treaties in the Netherlands, New Zealand and Finland: Paper-pushing or Policy Prompting? Cambridge: Intersentia.Google Scholar
Langford, M. (2008). The Justiciability of Social Rights: From Practice to Theory. In Langford, M., ed., Social Rights Jurisprudence: Emerging Trends in International and Comparative Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–45.Google Scholar
Moyn, S. (2010). The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pelc, K. J. (2014). The Politics of Precedent in International Law: A Social Network Application. American Political Science Review, 108(3), 547–64.Google Scholar
Perju, V. (2012). Constitutional Transplants, Borrowing, and Migrations. In Rosenfeld, M. & Sajó, A., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1304–27.Google Scholar
Posner, E. A. & Yoo, J. C. (2005). Judicial Independence in International Tribunals. California Law Review, 93(1), 1–74.Google Scholar
Romano, C. P. R. (2004). ‘The International Judiciary in Context: A Synoptic Chart, Version 3.0’, The Project on International Courts and Tribunals. Available at www.pict-pcti.org/publications/synoptic_chart/synop_c4.pdf (accessed 7 January 2015).Google Scholar
Romano, C. P. R. (1999). The Proliferation of International Judicial Bodies: The Pieces of the Puzzle. NYU Journal of International Law and Politics, 31, 709–51.Google Scholar
Sachs, A. (2000). Essay: Social and Economic Rights: Can They Be Made Justiciable. Saint Mary’s University Law Review, 53, 1381–94.Google Scholar
Scheppele, K. L. (2004). Realpolitik Defense of Social Rights. Texas Law Review, 82, 1921–62.Google Scholar
Shapiro, M. M. & Stone Sweet, A., eds. (2002). On Law, Politics, and Judicialization, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, G. (2003). Globalization and the Rule of Law: A Machine That Runs Itself. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 1, 427–445.Google Scholar
Simons, B. A. (2009). Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics, New York; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simmons, B. A. (2011). Should States Ratify Protocol? Process and Consequences of the Optional Protocol of the ICESCR. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 27(2), 64–81.Google Scholar
Slaughter, A. (1995). International Law in a World of Liberal States. European Journal of International Law, 6, 503–38.Google Scholar
Slaughter, A. (1997). The Real New World Order. Foreign Affairs, 76(5), 183–97.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, A. (1994). What Is a Supranational Constitution? An Essay in International Relations Theory. The Review of Politics, 56(3), 441–74.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, A. (2002). Judicialization and the Construction of Governance. In Shapiro, M. M. & Stone Sweet, A., eds., On Law, Politics, and Judicialization, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 55–89.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, A. & Brunell, T. L. (2013). Trustee Courts and the Judicialization of International Regimes: The Politics of Majoritarian Activism in the European Convention on Human Rights, the European Union, and the World Trade Organization. Journal of Law and Courts, 1(1), 61–88.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, A. & Brunell, T. L. Fligstein, N. & Sandholtz, W., eds. (2001). The Institutionalization of Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, A. & Brunell, T. L. & Mathews, J. (2008). Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 47, 72–164.Google Scholar
Udombana, N. J. (2003). So Far, So Fair: The Local Remedies Rule in the Jurisprudence of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights. American Journal of International Law, 97(1), 1–37.Google Scholar
Vierdag, E. W. (1978). The Legal Nature of the Rights Granted by the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, 9, 69–105.Google Scholar
Wachira, G. M. & Ayinla, A. (2006). Twenty Years of Elusive Enforcement of the Recommendations of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights: A Possible Remedy. African Human Rights Law Journal, 6(2), 465–92.Google Scholar
Walker, N. (2008). Taking Constitutionalism Beyond the State. Political Studies, 56(3), 519–43.Google Scholar
Yeh, J. & Chang, W. (2008). Emergence of Transnational Constitutionalism: Its Features, Challenges and Solutions. Penn State International Law Review, 27, 89–124.Google Scholar
Zumbansen, P. (2012). Comparative, Global and Transnational Constitutionalism: The Emergence of a Transnational Legal-Pluralist Order. Global Constitutionalism, 1(1), 16–52.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Part I
  • Edited by Marlene Wind, University of Copenhagen
  • Book: International Courts and Domestic Politics
  • Online publication: 23 June 2018
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Part I
  • Edited by Marlene Wind, University of Copenhagen
  • Book: International Courts and Domestic Politics
  • Online publication: 23 June 2018
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Part I
  • Edited by Marlene Wind, University of Copenhagen
  • Book: International Courts and Domestic Politics
  • Online publication: 23 June 2018
Available formats
×