ABA (American Bar Association). (2013). Supported decision-making. www.americanbar.org/groups/disabilityrights/resources/article12.htmlGoogle Scholar

ABA (American Bar Association) (2017). Model rules of professional conduct. www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_rules_of_professional_conduct/model_rules_of_professional_conduct_table_of_contents.htmlGoogle Scholar

Abery, B. H. (1994). A conceptual framework for enhancing self-determination. In Hayden, M. F & Abery, B. H (eds.), Challenges for a service system in transition: Ensuring quality community experiences for persons with developmental disabilities (pp. 345–380). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar

ACL (Administration for Community Living). (2014). Supported decision making (Grant No. HHS-2014-ACL-AIDD-DM-0084). www.grants.gov/web/grants/view-opportunity.html?oppId=256168Google Scholar

Agran, M. & Krupp, M. (2011). Providing choice making in employment programs: The beginning or end of self-determination? Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 565–575.Google Scholar

Agran, M., Blanchard, C., Hughes, C., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2002). Increasing the problem-solving skills of students with developmental disabilities participating in general education. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 279–288.Google Scholar

Agran, M., Wehmeyer, M. L., Cavin, M., & Palmer, S. (2008). Promoting student active classroom participation skills through instruction to promote self-regulated learning and self-determination. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals. Special Issue: New Horizons for Self-determination, 31, 106–114. doi: 10.1177/0885728808317656Google Scholar

Algozzine, B., Browder, D., Karvonen, M., Test, D. W., & Wood, W. M. (2001). Effects of interventions to promote self-determination for individuals with disabilities. Review of Educational Research, 71, 219–277.Google Scholar

American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th edn.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.Google Scholar

Americans with Disabilities Act of (1990). 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.Google Scholar

Anctil, T. M., Ishikawa, M. E., & Scott, A. T. (2008). Academic identity development through self-determination: Successful college students with learning disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 31, 164–174. doi: 10.1177/0885728808315331Google Scholar

Arstein-Kerslake, A., Browning, M., Watson, J., Martinis, J., & Blanck, P. (2017). Future directions in supported decision-making. Disability Studies Quarterly, 37.Google Scholar

Bailey, R., Willner, P., & Dymond, S. (2011). A visual aid to decision-making for people with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32, 37–46. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2010.08.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baron, J. & Brown, R. V. (eds.). (1991). Teaching decision making to adolescents. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Baumgart, D., Brown, L., Pumpian, I., Nisbet, J., Ford, A., Sweet, M., … Schroeder, J. (1982). Principle of partial participation and individualized adaptations in educational programs for severely handicapped students. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 7, 17–27.Google Scholar

Beyth-Marom, R., Fischhoff, B., Quadrel, M. J., & Furby, L. (1991). Teaching decision making to adolescents: A critical review. In Baron, J & Brown, R. V (eds.), Teaching decision making to adolescents (pp. 19–59). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Blackorby, J. & Wagner, M. (1996). Longitudinal postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities: Findings from the national longitudinal transition study. Exceptional Children, 62, 399–413.Google Scholar

Blanck, P. (1992a). Empirical study of the employment provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act: Methods, preliminary findings, and implications. New Mexico Law Review, 22, 119–234.Google Scholar

Blanck, P.(1992b). On integrating persons with mental retardation: The ADA and ADR. New Mexico Law Review, 22, 259–276.Google Scholar

Blanck, P.(2014). eQuality: The struggle for web accessibility by persons with cognitive disabilities. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Blanck, P.(2016a). The first “A” in the ADA: And 25 more “A”s toward equality for Americans with disabilities. Inclusion, 4, 46–51.Google Scholar

Blanck, P.(2016b). ADA at 25 and persons with cognitive disabilities: From action to inclusion. Inclusion, 4, 1–5.Google Scholar

Blanck, P.(2017). eQuality: The right to the web. In Blanck, P & Flynn, E (eds.), Routledge handbook of disability law and human rights. London: Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar

Blanck, P.(in press). Fluidity and intersectionality, sexual orientation and gender identity, and disability: The human experience. Touro Law Review.Google Scholar

Blanck, P. & Flynn, E. (eds.) (2017). Routledge handbook of disability law and human rights. London: Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar

Blanck, P. & Martinis, J. (2015). “The right to make choices”: National Resource Center for Supported Decision-Making, Inclusion, 3, 24–33.Google Scholar

Blanck, P. & Martinis, J.(in press). Supported decision-making as an alternative to guardianship: Law, policy, research, and practice, Washington, DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AAIDD).Google Scholar

Blanck, P., Waterstone, M., Myhill, N., & Siegal, C. (2014). Disability civil rights law and policy: Case and materials. St. Paul, MN: West Publishers.Google Scholar

Blanck, P., Wehmeyer, M. L., & Shogren, K. A. (2015). Understanding and increasing supported decision-making’s positive impact on community living and participation outcomes. Proposal submitted and funded by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research.Google Scholar

Bravo, G. H., Kim, S. Y., Dubois, M.-F., Cohen, C. A., Wildeman, S. M., & Graham, J. E. (2013). Surrogate consent for dementia research: Factors influencing five stakeholder groups from the SCORES study. IRB: Ethics and Human Research, 35, 1–11.Google Scholar

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bronfenbrenner, U.(ed.) (2005). Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Browning, M., Bigby, C., & Douglas, J. (2014). Supported decision making: Understanding how its conceptual link to legal capacity is influencing the development of practice. Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 1, 34–45. doi: 10.1080/23297018.2014.902726CrossRefGoogle Scholar

CACL (Canadian Association for Community Living). (1992). Report of the CACL Task Force on Alternatives to Guardianship.Google Scholar

Campanella, T. M. (2015). Supported decision-making in practice. Inclusion, 3, 35–39. doi: 10.1352/2326–6988-3.1.35Google Scholar

Carney, T. (2013). Participation and service access rights for people with intellectual disability: A role for law? Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 38, 59–69. doi: 10.3109/13668250.2012.738810Google Scholar

Carter-Ludi, D. & Martin, L. (1995). The road to personal freedom: Self-determination. Intervention in School and Clinic, 30, 164–169.Google Scholar

Center for Parent Information and Resources. (2016). Getting ready for independent living at the age of majority. www.parentcenterhub.org/repository/aom-series-independence/Google Scholar

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (2014). Fact sheet: Summary of key provisions of the 1915(c) home and community-based services (HCBS) waivers final rule. www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/hcbs/downloads/1915c-fact-sheet.pdfGoogle Scholar

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services(2016). FAQs concerning Medicaid beneficiaries in home and community-based settings who exhibit unsafe wandering or exit-seeking behavior. www.medicaid.gov/federal-policy-guidance/downloads/faq121516.pdfGoogle Scholar

Chen, X., Wang, L., Chen, H., & Liu, M. (2002). Noncompliance and child-rearing attitudes as predictors of aggressive behavior: A longitudinal study in Chinese children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 225–233.Google Scholar

Cobb, B., Lehmann, J., Newmann-Gonchar, R., & Alwell, M. (2009). Self-determination for students with disabilities: A narrative metasynthesis. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 108–114.Google Scholar

Colvin, A. D. & Larke, P. J. (2013). Family members’ views on seeking placement in state-supported living centers in Texas. Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 6, 208–224.Google Scholar

Cooper, K. J. & Browder, D. M. (2001). Preparing staff to enhance active participation of adults with severe disabilities by offering choice and prompting performance during a community purchasing activity. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 22, 1–20.Google Scholar

Crickard, E. L., O’Brien, M. S., Rapp, C. A., & Holmes, C. L. (2010). Developing a framework to support shared decision making for youth mental health medication treatment. Community Mental Health Journal, 46, 474–481. doi: 10.1007/s10597-010–9327-zGoogle Scholar

CRPD (Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities) Committee (2014). General Comment No. 1. Article 12: Equal recognition before the law, UN Doc. CRPD/C/GC/1, adopted April 11, 2014. https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G14/031/20/PDF/G1403120.pdf?OpenElementGoogle Scholar

Davies, D. K., Stock, S. E., King, L., Wehmeyer, M. L., & Shogren, K. A. (2017). An accessible testing, learning, and assessment system for people with intellectual disability. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 63, 204–210. doi: 10.1080/20473869.2017.1294313Google Scholar

Davies, D. K., Stock, S. E., King, L., Woodard, J., & Wehmeyer, M. (2008). “Moby Dick is my favorite”: Evaluating the use of a cognitively accessible portable reading system for audio books by people with intellectual disability. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 290–298.Google Scholar

Davies, D., Stock, S., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2001). Enhancing independent Internet access for individuals with mental retardation through the use of a specialized web browser: A pilot study. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 36, 107–113.Google Scholar

Davies, D., Stock, S., & Wehmeyer, M. L.(2003). A palmtop computer-based intelligent aid for individuals with intellectual disabilities to increase independent decision making. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 28, 182–193.Google Scholar

Davis-Sowers, R. (2012). “It just kind of like falls in your hands”: Factors that influence Black aunts’ decisions to parent their nieces and nephews. Journal of Black Studies, 43, 231–250. doi: 10.1177/0021934711415243CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

DCPS (District of Columbia Public Schools). (n.d.). Supported decision-making, DCPS website. https://dcps.dc.gov/page/supported-decision-makingGoogle Scholar

Deci, E. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Deci, E. L. & Chandler, C. L. (1986). The importance of motivation for the future of the LD field. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 587–594.Google Scholar

Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (eds.). (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar

Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M.(2012). Motivation, personality, and development within embedded social contexts: An overview of self-determination theory. In Ryan, R. M (ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 85–110). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Developmental Disabilities and Bill of Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 15001 (2006).Google Scholar

Devlin, P. (2011). Enhancing job performance. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 49, 221–232. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-49.4.221Google ScholarPubMed

Dinerstein, R. (2012). Implementing legal capacity under article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: The difficult road from guardianship to supported decision making. Human Rights Brief, 19, 8–12.Google Scholar

Dinerstein, R., Grewal, E., & Martinis, J. (2016). Emerging international trends and practices in guardianship law for people with disabilities. ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law, 22(2), 436–460.Google Scholar

Douglas, J., Bigby, C., Knox, L., & Browning, M. (2015). Factors that underpin the delivery of effective decision-making support for people with cognitive disability. Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 2, 37–44.Google Scholar

Etscheidt, S. (2006). Issues in transition planning: Legal decisions. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 29, 28–47.Google Scholar

Ewalt, P. L. & Mokuau, N. (1995). Self-determination from a Pacific perspective. Social Work, 40, 168–175.Google Scholar

Field, S. (1996). Self-determination instructional strategies for youth with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 40–52.Google Scholar

Field, S. & Hoffman, A. (1994). Development of a model for self-determination. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 17, 159–169.Google Scholar

Field, S., Martin, J. E., Miller, R., Ward, M. J., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (1998). A practical guide to teaching self-determination. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.Google Scholar

Fisher, Z., Bailey, R., & Willner, P. (2012). Practical aspects of a visual aid to decision making. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56, 588–599. doi: 10.1111/j.1365–2788.2011.01498.xGoogle Scholar

Fleming, R. & Robinson, C. (1993). Care of incompetent adults: A brief history of guardianship. The Arizona Attorney, 30, 16–42.Google Scholar

Frankland, H. C., Turnbull, A. P., Wehmeyer, M. L., & Blackmountain, L. (2004). An exploration of the self-determination construct and disability as it relates to the Diné (Navajo) culture. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 39, 191–205.Google Scholar

Frolik, L. (1998). Guardianship reform: When the best is the enemy of the good. Stanford Law and Policy Review, 9, 347–355.Google Scholar

Frolik, L.(2002). Promoting judicial acceptance and use of limited guardianship. Stetson Law Review, 31, 735.Google Scholar

Furby, L. & Beyth-Marom, R. (1992). Risk taking in adolescence: A decision-making perspective. Developmental Review, 12, 1–44. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(92)90002-jGoogle Scholar

Glen, K. B. (2015). Supported decision-making and the human right of legal capacity. Inclusion, 3, 2–16.Google Scholar

Gooding, P. (2015). Navigating the “flashing amber lights” of the right to legal capacity in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Responding to major concerns. Human Rights Law Review, 15, 45–71.Google Scholar

Green Mountain Self Advocates (2016). Disability and intersection with wellness. www.gmsavt.org/healthday1/Google Scholar

Gustin, J. & Martinis, J. (2016). Change the culture, change the world: Increasing independence by creating a culture of coordinated support. Apostrophe Magazine. www.apostrophemagazine.com/Vermont-change-culture-disabilitiesGoogle Scholar

Hart, K. E. & Sasso, T. (2011). Mapping the contours of contemporary positive psychology. Canadian Psychology, 52, 82–92.Google Scholar

Hatch, M. J., Crane, S. A., & Martinis, J. G. (2015). Unjustified isolation is discrimination: The Olmstead case against overbroad and undue organizational and public guardianship. Inclusion, 3, 65–74.Google Scholar

Hickson, L. & Khemka, I. (2013). Problem solving and decision making. In Wehmeyer, M. L (ed.), The Oxford handbook of positive psychology and disability (pp. 198–225). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hickson, L. & Khemka, I.(2014). The psychology of decision making. International Review of Research in Developmental Disabilities, 47, 185–229.Google Scholar

House of Representatives (1987). Abuses in guardianship of the elderly and infirm: A national disgrace. A briefing by the chairman of the Subcommittee on Health and Long-term Care of the Select Committee on Aging, 100th Congress Session 1, House of Representatives Report No. 100–641 (opening statement of Chairman Claude Pepper). http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED297241.pdfGoogle Scholar

Hunt, J. B., Watkins, D., & Eisenberg, D. (2012). How do college campuses make decisions about allocating resources for student mental health? Findings from key participant interviews. Journal of College Student Development, 53, 850–856.Google Scholar

I’m Determined (n.d.). Student-led IEPs: Increasing self-determination through involvement in the IEP process. https://www.international-guardianship.com/pdf/IGN-Yokohama_Declaration_2010.pdfGoogle Scholar

International Guardianship Network (2010). Yokohama Declaration. First World Conference on Adult Guardianship, October 4, International Guardianship Network, Yokohama. www.international-guardianship.com/pdf/IGN-Yokohama_Declaration_2010.pdfGoogle Scholar

Jabes, J. (1978). Individual processes in organizational behavior. Arlington Heights, IL: Harlam Davidson.Google Scholar

James, K. & Watts, L. (2014). Understanding the lived experiences of supported decision-making in Canada. www.bcli.org/project/understanding-lived-experience-supported-decision-makingGoogle Scholar

Jameson, J. M., Riesen, T., Polychronis, S., Trader, B., Mizner, S., Martinis, J., & Hoyle, D. (2015). Guardianship and the potential of supported decision making with individuals with disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 40, 36–51.Google Scholar

Jeste, D., Eglit, G., Palmer, B., Martinis, J., Blanck, P., & Saks, E. (in press). Supported decision-making by people with serious mental illnesses: An overview. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes.Google Scholar

Kapp, M. (1999). Geriatrics and the law: Understanding patient rights and professional responsibilities. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Katsiyannis, A., deFur, S., & Conderman, G. (1998). Transition services – systems change for youth with disabilities? A review of state practices. The Journal of Special Education, 32, 55–61.Google Scholar

Khemka, I. (2000). Increasing independent decision-making skills of women with mental retardation in simulated interpersonal situations of abuse. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 105, 387–401.Google Scholar

Khemka, I. & Hickson, L. (2008). ESCAPE-DD: An effective strategy-based curriculum for abuse prevention and empowerment for adults with developmental disabilities. New York: Center for Opportunities and Outcomes for People with Disabilities, Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar

Khemka, I. & Hickson, L.(2017). The role of positive psychology in interpersonal decision making. In Shogren, K. A, Wehmeyer, M. L, & Singh, N (eds.), Handbook of positive psychology in intellectual and developmental disabilities (pp. 145–171). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Khemka, I., Hickson, L., & Reynolds, G. (2005). Evaluation of a decision-making curriculum designed to empower women with mental retardation to resist abuse. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 110, 193–204.Google Scholar

Kohn, N. A. & Blumenthal, J. A. (2014). A critical assessment of supported decision-making for persons aging with intellectual disabilities. Disability and Health Journal, 7, S40–S43. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2013.03.005Google Scholar

Kohn, N. A., Blumenthal, J. A., & Campbell, A. T. (2013). Supported decision-making: A viable alternative to guardianship? Penn State Law Review, 117, 1111–1157.Google Scholar

Konrad, M., Fowler, C. H., Walker, A. R., Test, D. W., & Wood, W. M. (2007). Effects of self-determination interventions on the academic skills of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 30, 89–113. doi: 10.2307/30035545Google Scholar

Lachapelle, Y., Wehmeyer, M. L., Haelewyck, M. C., Courbois, Y., Keith, K. D., Schalock, R., … Walsh, P. N. (2005). The relationship between quality of life and self‐determination: An international study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49, 740–744.Google Scholar

Laplante-Lévesque, A., Hickson, L., & Worrall, L. (2010). Factors influencing rehabilitation decisions of adults with acquired hearing impairment. International Journal of Audiology, 49, 497–507. doi: 10.3109/14992021003645902Google Scholar

Late Corporation of the Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter Day Saints v. United States, 136 U.S. 1 (1890).Google Scholar

Lee, S. H., Wehmeyer, M. L., Palmer, S. B., Soukup, J. H., & Little, T. D. (2008). Self-determination and access to the general education curriculum. The Journal of Special Education, 42, 91–107.Google Scholar

Lindsey, P., Guy, B., Wehmeyer, M. L., & Martin, J. (2001). Age of majority and mental retardation: A position statement of the Division on Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 36, 3–15.Google Scholar

Lisi, L. B., Burns, A., & Lussenden, K. (1994). National study of guardianship systems: Findings and recommendations. Center for Social Gerontology.Google Scholar

Little, T. D., Hawley, P. H., Henrich, C. C., & Marsland, K. (2002). Three views of the agentic self: A developmental synthesis. In Deci, E. L & Ryan, R. M (eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 389–404). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar

Lopez, S. J., Magyar-Moe, J. L., Petersen, S. E., Ryder, J. A., Krieshok, T. S., O’Byrne, K. K., … Fry, N. A. (2006). Counseling psychology’s focus on positive aspects of human functioning. Counseling Psychologist, 34, 245–259.Google Scholar

Lotan, G. & Ells, C. (2010). Adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities and participation in decision making: Ethical considerations for professional-client practice. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 48, 112–125. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-48.2.112Google Scholar

Luckasson, R., Coulter, D. L., Polloway, E. A., Reiss, S., Schalock, R. L., Snell, M. E., … Stark, J. A. (1992). Mental retardation: Definition, classification, and systems of supports (9th edn.). Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.Google Scholar

Martin, J. E. & Marshall, L. H. (1996). ChoiceMaker: Infusing self-determination instruction into the IEP and transition process. In Sands, D. J & Wehmeyer, M. L (eds.), Self-determination across the life span: Independence and choice for people with disabilities (pp. 215–236). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar

Martinez, J. G. (2015). Supported decision-making: Protecting rights, ensuring choices. American Bar Association Bifocal, 36, 107–110.Google Scholar

Martinis, J. (2014). One person, many choices. Using special education transition services to increase self-direction and decision-making and decrease overbroad or undue guardianship. http://jennyhatchjusticeproject.org/docs/publications/jhjp_publications_draft_article_guardianship.pdfGoogle Scholar

Martinis, J.(2015a). “The right to make choices”: How vocational rehabilitation can help young adults with disabilities increase self-determination and avoid guardianship. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 42, 221–227.Google Scholar

Martinis, J.(2015b). Supported decision-making: Protecting rights, ensuring choices. American Bar Association Commission on Law and Aging, 36, 107–110.Google Scholar

Martinis, J.(2015c). Moving supported decision-making from theory to practice: Youth in transition. http://supporteddecisionmaking.org/sites/default/files/event_files/041615_ppt_handouts.pdfGoogle Scholar

Martinis, J. & Gustin, J. (2017a). An equal right to make choices: Supported decision-making. The Advocate.Google Scholar

Martinis, J. & Gustin, J.(2017b). Supported decision-making as an alternative to overbroad and undue guardianship. The Advocate, 60, 41–46.Google Scholar

Martinis, J. & Gustin, J.(2017c). An equal right to make choices: Supported decision-making. Disability Rights Idaho. https://disabilityrightsidaho.org/equal-right-make-choices-supported-decision-making-jonathan-martinis-jesselyn-gustin/Google Scholar

Martinis, J. & Gustin, J.(2017d). A culture of coordinated support. The Frontline Initiative, 14, 14–15.Google Scholar

Mason, C. Y., McGahee-Kovac, M., & Johnson, L. (2004). How to help students lead their IEP meetings. Teaching Exceptional Children, 36, 18–24.Google Scholar

McDaid, S. & Delaney, S. (2011). A social approach to decision-making capacity: Exploratory research with people with experience of mental health treatment. Disability & Society, 26, 729–742.Google Scholar

McDougall, J., Evans, J., & Baldwin, P. (2010). The importance of self-determination to perceived quality of life for youth and young adults with chronic conditions and disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 31, 252–260.Google Scholar

McGlashing-Johnson, J., Agran, M., Sitlington, P., Cavin, M., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2003). Enhancing the job performance of youth with moderate to severe cognitive disabilities using the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 28, 194–204.Google Scholar

Millar, D. S. (2003). Age of majority, transfer of rights and guardianship: Considerations for families and educators. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 378–397.Google Scholar

Millar, D. S.(2007). “I never put it together”: The disconnect between self-determination and guardianship – Implications for practice. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 42, 119–129.Google Scholar

Millar, D. S.(2014). Addition to transition assessment resources: A template for determining the use of guardianship alternatives for students who have intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 49, 171–188.Google Scholar

Mithaug, D. E. (1996). The optimal prospects principle: A theoretical basis for rethinking instructional practices for self-determination. In Sands, D. J & Wehmeyer, M. L (eds.), Self-determination across the lifespan: Independence and choice for people with disabilities (pp. 147–165). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar

Morris, M., Rodriguez, C., & Blanck, P. (2016). ABLE accounts: A down payment on freedom, Inclusion, 4, 21–29.Google Scholar

Moye, J., Karel, M. J., Azar, A. R., & Gurrera, R. J. (2004). Capacity to consent to treatment: Empirical comparison of three instruments in older adults with and without dementia. Gerontologist, 44, 166–175.Google Scholar

Moye, J. & Naik, A. (2011). Preserving rights for individuals facing guardianship. Journal of the American Medical Association, 305, 936–937.Google Scholar

Moye, J., Wood, S., Edelstein, B., Armesto, J., Bower, E. H., Harrison, J., & Wood, E. (2007). Clinical evidence in guardianship of older adults is inadequate: Findings from a tri-state study. The Gerontologist, 47, 604–612.Google Scholar

Ng, T., Harrington, C., Musumeci, M., & Ubri, P. (2016). Medicaid home and community-based programs: 2013 data update. Kaiser Family Foundation. www.kff.org/medicaid/report/medicaid-home-and-community-based-services-programs-2013-data-update/Google Scholar

NGA (National Guardianship Association) (2015). Position statement on guardianship, surrogate decision making, and supported decision making. www.guardianship.org/documents/NGA_Policy_Statement_052016.pdfGoogle Scholar

Nirje, B. (1972). The right to self-determination. In Wolfensberger, W (ed.), Normalization: The principle of normalization in human services (pp. 176–193). Toronto: National Institute on Mental Retardation.Google Scholar

O’Connor, B. P. & Vallerand, R. J. (1994). Motivation, self-determination, and person environment fit as predictors of psychological adjustment among nursing home residents. Psychology and Aging, 9, 189.Google Scholar

Olmstead v. L.C., ex rel. Zimring, 527 U.S. 581 (1999).Google Scholar

O’Sullivan, J. (2002). Role of the attorney for the alleged incapacitated person. Stetson Law Review, 31, 687–734.Google Scholar

Parsons, M. B., Harper, V. N., Jensen, J. M., & Reid, D. H. (1997). Assisting older adults with severe disabilities in expressing leisure preferences: A protocol for determining choice-making skills. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 18, 113–126.Google Scholar

Payton, S. (1992). The concept of the person in the parens patriae jurisdiction over previously competent persons. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 17, 605–645.Google Scholar

Pell, E. (2017). Supported decision making pilot: Pilot program evaluation year 2 report. http://supporteddecisions.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Evaluation-Year-2-Report_HSRI-2016_FINAL-2-1.pdfGoogle Scholar

Pickett, S., Diehl, S., Steigman, P., Prater, J., Fox, A., Shipley, P., … Cook, J. (2012). Consumer empowerment and self-advocacy outcomes in a randomized study of peer-led education. Community Mental Health Journal, 48, 420–430. doi: 10.1007/s10597-012–9507-0Google Scholar

Powers, L. E., Geenen, S., Powers, J., Pommier-Satya, S., Turner, A., Dalton, L., … Swand, P. (2012). My life: Effects of a longitudinal, randomized study of self-determination enhancement on the transition outcomes of youth in foster care and special education. Children and Youth Services Review, 34, 2179–2187.Google Scholar

Powers, L. E., Sowers, J., Turner, A., Nesbitt, M., Knowles, E., & Ellison, R. (1996). TAKE CHARGE! A model for promoting self-determination among adolescents with challenges. In Powers, L. E, Singer, G. H. S, & Sowers, J (eds.), On the road to autonomy: Promoting self-competence in children and youth with disabilities (pp. 69–92). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar

Quality Trust for Individuals with Disabilities (2013). Supported decision-making: An agenda for action. http://jennyhatchjusticeproject.org/node/264Google Scholar

Regan, J. (1972). Protective services for the elderly: Commitment, guardianship and alternatives. William and Mary Law Journal, 13, 569–622.Google Scholar

Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. 701 (1973).Google Scholar

Reynolds, S. L. (2002). Guardianship primavera: A first look at factors associated with having a legal guardian using a nationally representative sample of community-dwelling adults. Aging and Mental Health, 6, 109–120.Google Scholar

Ross and Ross v. Hatch, Case No. CWF-120000–426 (Circuit Court of Newport News, 2013). A selection of materials from the case, including partial transcripts and the Final Order can be viewed at http://jennyhatchjusticeproject.org/trialGoogle Scholar

Saaltink, R., MacKinnon, G., Owen, F., & Tardif‐Williams, C. (2012). Protection, participation and protection through participation: Young people with intellectual disabilities and decision making in the family context. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56, 1076–1086. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01649.xGoogle Scholar

Saks, E. (2016). Supported decision-making: Giving mental health a voice. Proposal submitted and funded by the Battery Powered Foundation.Google Scholar

Saks, E.(2017). Supported decision-making: Giving mental health a voice. Progress report submitted to the Battery Powered Foundation.Google Scholar

Salkovskis, P. M., Rimes, K. A., Bolton, J., & Wroe, A. L. (2010). An experimental investigation of factors involved in the decision to undertake genetic testing for schizophrenia. Journal of Mental Health, 19, 202–210. doi: 10.3109/09638230903469160Google Scholar

Salzman, L. (2010). Rethinking guardianship (again): Substituted decision making as a violation of the integration mandate of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act. University of Colorado Law Review, 81, 157–244.Google Scholar

Salzman, L.(2011). Guardianship for persons with mental illness – a legal and appropriate alternative? St. Louis Journal of Health Law and Policy, 4, 279–329.Google Scholar

Sands, D. J. & Wehmeyer, M. L. (eds.). (1996). Self-determination across the life span: Independence and choice for people with disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar

Schalock, R. L., Borthwick-Duffy, S., Bradley, V., Buntix, W. H. E., Coulter, D. L., Craig, E. P. M., … Yeager, M. H. (2010). Intellectual disability: Definition, classification, and systems of support (11th edn.). Washington, DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.Google Scholar

Schalock, R. L., Luckasson, R. A., Shogren, K. A., Borthwick-Duffy, S., Bradley, V., … Yeager, M. H. (2007). The renaming of mental retardation: Understanding the change to the term intellectual disability. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 116–124.Google Scholar

Schalock, R. L. & Verdugo, M. A. (2012). A conceptual and measurement framework to guide policy development and systems change. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 9, 70–79.Google Scholar

Schloss, P. J., Alper, S., & Jayne, D. (1994). Self-determination for persons with disabilities: Choice, risk, and dignity. Exceptional Children, 60, 215–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmidt, C. K., Raque-Bogdan, T. L., Piontkowsi, S., & Schaefer, K. L. (2011). Putting the positive in health psychology: A content analysis of three journals. Journal of Health Psychology, 16, 607–620.Google Scholar

Schmidt, W. C. (1995). Guardianship: Court of last resort for the elderly and disabled. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar

Schur, L., Kruse, D., & Blanck, P. (2013). People with disabilities: Sidelined or mainstreamed? New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Scott, S. (ed.) (1910). The Visigothic Code (Forum Judicium). Jamaica Plain, MA: Boston Book Company.Google Scholar

Seligman, M. E. P. (1999). The president’s address. American Psychologist, 54, 559–562.Google Scholar

Seligman, M. E. P. & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14.Google Scholar

Serna, L. A. & Lau-Smith, J. (1995). Learning with a PURPOSE: Self-determination skills for students who are at risk for school and community failure. Intervention in School and Clinic, 30, 142–146.Google Scholar

Shogren, K. A. (2013). Positive psychology and disability: A historical analysis. In Wehmeyer, M. L (ed.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology and disability (pp. 19–33). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Shogren, K. A., Dean, E., Griffin, C., Steveley, J., Sickles, R., Wehmeyer, M. L., & Palmer, S. B. (2017). Promoting change in employment supports: Impacts of a community-based change model. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 47, 19–24.Google Scholar

Shogren, K. A., Gotto, G. S., Wehmeyer, M. L., Shaw, L., Seo, H., Palmer, S., Barton, K. N. (2016). The impact of the Self-Determined Career Development Model on self-determination outcomes. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 45, 337–350.Google Scholar

Shogren, K. A., Luckasson, R., & Schalock, R. L. (2014). The definition of context and its application in the field of intellectual disability. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 11, 109–116. doi: 10.1111/jppi.12077Google Scholar

Shogren, K. A., Luckasson, R., & Schalock, R. L.(2015). Using context as an integrative framework to align policy goals, supports, and outcomes in intellectual disability. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 53, 367–376. doi: 10.1352/1934–9556-53.5.367Google Scholar

Shogren, K. A., Palmer, S. B., Wehmeyer, M. L., Williams-Diehm, K., & Little, T. D. (2012). Effect of intervention with the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction on access and goal attainment. Remedial and Special Education, 33, 320–330. doi: 10.1177/0741932511410072Google Scholar

Shogren, K. A., Plotner, A. J., Palmer, S. B., Wehmeyer, M. L., & Paek, Y. (2014). Impact of the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction on teacher perceptions of student capacity and opportunity for self-determination. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 49, 440–448.Google Scholar

Shogren, K. A. & Shaw, L. A. (2016). The role of autonomy, self-realization, and psychological empowerment in predicting early adulthood outcomes for youth with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 37, 55–62. doi: 10.1177/0741932515585003Google Scholar

Shogren, K. A. & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2015a). A framework for research and intervention design in supported decision-making. Inclusion, 3, 17–23. doi: 10.1352/2326–6988-3.1.17Google Scholar

Shogren, K. A. & Wehmeyer, M. L.(2015b). Editors’ note: Special topic issue on supported decision-making. Inclusion, 3, 1. doi: 10.1352/2326–6988-3.1.1Google Scholar

Shogren, K. A. & Wehmeyer, M. L.(2016a). Relationship between basic psychological needs, motivation, causal action, and self-determination. Lawrence, KS: Kansas University Center on Developmental Disabilities.Google Scholar

Shogren, K. A. & Wehmeyer, M. L.(2016b). Supported Decision-Making Inventory System (SDMIS) [pilot version]. Lawrence, KS: Kansas University Center on Developmental Disabilities.Google Scholar

Shogren, K. A. & Wehmeyer, M. L.(2017). Self-determination interventions. Lawrence, KS: Kansas University Center on Developmental Disabilities.Google Scholar

Shogren, K. A., Wehmeyer, M. L., Lassman, H., & Forber-Pratt, A. J. (2017). Supported decision-making: A synthesis of the literature to guide assessment and intervention development. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 52, 144–157.Google Scholar

Shogren, K. A., Wehmeyer, M. L., Palmer, S. B., Forber-Pratt, A. J., Little, T. J., & Lopez, S. J. (2015a). Causal agency theory: Reconceptualizing a functional model of self-determination. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 50, 251–263.Google Scholar

Shogren, K. A., Wehmeyer, M. L., Palmer, S. B., Rifenbark, G. G., & Little, T. D. (2015b). Relationships between self-determination and postschool outcomes for youth with disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 53, 30–41. doi: 10.1177/0022466913489733Google Scholar

Shogren, K. A., Wehmeyer, M. L., Palmer, S. B., Soukup, J. H., Little, T. D., Garner, N., & Lawrence, M. (2007). Examining individual and ecological predictors of the self-determination of students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 73, 488–510.Google Scholar

Shogren, K. A., Wehmeyer, M. L., Pressgrove, C. L., & Lopez, S. J. (2006). The application of positive psychology and self-determination to research in intellectual disability: A content analysis of 30 years of literature. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 31, 338–345.Google Scholar

Shogren, K. A., Wehmeyer, M. L., & Singh, N. N. (eds.). (2017). Handbook of positive psychology in intellectual and developmental disabilities: Translating research into practice. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Shogren, K. A., Wehmeyer, M. L., Uyanik, H., & Heidrich, M. (2017). Development of the Supported Decision Making Inventory System. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 55, 432–439. doi: 10.1352/1934–9556-55.6.432Google Scholar

Snyder, C. R. & Lopez, S. J. (eds.). (2009). Oxford handbook of positive psychology (2nd edn.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Stancliffe, R. J. (1997). Community living-unit size, staff presence, and residents’ choice-making. Mental Retardation, 35, 1–9.Google Scholar

Stancliffe, R. J.(2001). Living with support in the community: Predictors of choice and self‐determination. Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 7, 91–98.Google Scholar

Stancliffe, R. J. & Wehmeyer, M. L. (1995). Variability in the availability of choice to adults with mental retardation. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 5, 319–328.Google Scholar

Standen, P., Rees, F., & Brown, D. (2009). Effect of playing computer games on decision making in people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Assistive Technologies, 3, 4–12.Google Scholar

Stock, S., Davies, D. K., Davies, K. R., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2006). Evaluation of an application for making palmtop computers accessible to individuals with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 31, 39–46.Google Scholar

Stock, S. E., Davies, D. K., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2009). Design and evaluation of a computer-animated simulation approach to support vocational social skills training for students and adults with intellectual disabilities. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 3, 43–55.Google Scholar

Suto, W. M. I., Clare, I. C. H., Holland, A. J., & Watson, P. C. (2005). Capacity to make financial decisions among people with mild intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49, 199–209. doi: 10.1111/j.1365–2788.2005.00635.xGoogle Scholar

Teaster, P., Wood, E., Karp, N., Lawrence, S., Schmidt, W., & Mendiondo, M. (2005). Wards of the state: A national study of public guardianship. http://216.92.207.158/reports/2005/Wardsofthestate.pdfGoogle Scholar

Teaster, P., Wood, E., Lawrence, S., & Schmidt, W. (2007). Wards of the state: A national study of public guardianship. Stetson Law Review, 37, 193–241.Google Scholar

Test, D. W., Fowler, C. H., Richter, S. M., White, J., Mazzotti, V., Walker, A. R., … Kortering, L. (2009). Evidence-based practices in secondary transition. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 115–128. doi: 10.1177/0885728809336859Google Scholar

Test, D. W., Mazzotti, V. L., Mustian, A. L., Fowler, C. H., Kortering, L., & Kohler, P. (2009). Evidence-based secondary transition predictors for improving postschool outcomes for students with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 160–181. doi: 10.1177/0885728809346960Google Scholar

Texas Council on Developmental Disabilities (n.d.). Guardianship alternatives: Supported decision-making www.tcdd.texas.gov/resources/guardianship-alternatives/supported-decision-making/Google Scholar

Texas Est. Code Ann. §1357.056 (2015).Google Scholar

Texas Est. Code Ann. § 1357.051 (2015).Google Scholar

Tex. Est. Code § 1002.031 (2015).Google Scholar

Tex. Est. Code § 1101.101 (2015).Google Scholar

Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 531.02446 (2009) (expired on Sept. 1, 2013).Google Scholar

Thoma, C. A. & Getzel, E. E. (2005). “Self-determination is what it’s all about”: What post-secondary students with disabilities tell us are important considerations for success. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 40, 234–242.Google Scholar

Thompson, J. R. (2013). Presidential address – race to catch the future. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 51, 512–521.Google Scholar

Thompson, J. R., Bradley, V., Buntinx, W. H. E., Schalock, R. L., Shogren, K. A., Snell, M. E., Yeager, M. H. (2009). Conceptualizing supports and the support needs of people with intellectual disability. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 47, 135–146.Google Scholar

Thompson, J. R., Bryant, B., Schalock, R. L., Shogren, K. A., Tasse, M. J., Wehmeyer, M. L., Rotholz, D. (2015a). Supports Intensity Scale – adult version. Washington, DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.Google Scholar

Thompson, J. R., Bryant, B. R., Schalock, R. L., Shogren, K. A., Tasse, M. J., Wehmeyer, M. L., Silverman, W. P. (2015b). Supports Intensity Scale – adult (SIS-A). User’s manual. Washington, DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.Google Scholar

Thompson, J. R., Doepke, K., Holmes, A., Pratt, C., Myles, B. S., Shogren, K. A., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2017). Person-centered planning with the Supports Intensity Scale – adult version: A guide for planning teams. Washington, DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.Google Scholar

Thompson, J. R., Schalock, R. L., Agosta, J., Teninty, L., & Fortune, J. (2014). How the supports paradigm is transforming the developmental disabilities service system. Inclusion, 2, 86–99. doi: 10.1352/2326–6988-2.2.86Google Scholar

Thompson, J. R., Wehmeyer, M. L., Hughes, C., Shogren, K. A., Seo, H., Little, T. D., … Tassé, M. J. (2016). Supports Intensity Scale – children’s version user’s manual. Washington, DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.Google Scholar

Thompson, J. R., Wehmeyer, M. L., Shogren, K. A., & Seo, H. J. (2017). The supports paradigm and intellectual and developmental disabilities. In Shogren, K. A, Wehmeyer, M. L, & Singh, N (eds.), Handbook of positive psychology in intellectual and developmental disabilities: Translating research into practice (pp. 23–35). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Thorkildsen, T. A. (2007). Adolescents’ moral engagement in urban settings. Theory Into Practice, 46, 113–120.Google Scholar

Ticha, R. & Abery, B. (2012). An eco-behavioral approach to understanding factors associated with the exercise of self-determination. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56, 812.Google Scholar

Timmons, J. C., Hall, A. C., Bose, J., Wolfe, A., & Winsor, J. (2011). Choosing employment: Factors that impact employment decisions for individuals with intellectual disability. Intellectual and developmental disabilities, 49, 285–299.Google Scholar

Trevena, L. & Barratt, A. (2003). Integrated decision making: Definitions for a new discipline. Patient Education and Counseling, 50, 265–268.Google Scholar

Tymchuk, A. J., Andron, L., & Rahbar, B. (1988). Effective decision-making/problem-solving training with mothers who have mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 92, 510–516.Google Scholar

U.S. Surgeon General. (2005). The 2005 surgeon general’s call to action to improve the health and wellness of people with disabilities. www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/disabilityandhealth/pdf/whatitmeanstoyou508.pdfGoogle Scholar

Uekert, B. (2010). Adult guardianship court data and issues: Results from an online survey. Retrieved from Center for Elders and the Courts, National Center for State Courts website. www.eldersandcourts.org/~/media/Microsites/Files/cec/GuardianshipSurveyReport_FINAL.ashxGoogle Scholar

Uekert, B. & Van Duizend, R. (2011). Adult guardianships: A “best guess” national estimate and the momentum for reform. In Future trends in state courts 2011: Special focus on access to justice. www.ncsc.org/~/media/Microsites/Files/Future%20Trends/Author%20PDFs/Uekert%20and%20Van%20Duizend.ashxGoogle Scholar

Uyanik, H., Shogren, K. A., & Blanck, P. (2017). Supported decision-making: Implications from positive psychology for assessment and intervention in rehabilitation and employment. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 27, 498–506.Google Scholar

VA H.J.R. 190, 2014 Session (2014).Google Scholar

Van Reusen, A. K., Bos, C. S., Schumaker, J. B., & Deshler, D. D. (1994). The self-advocacy strategy for education and transition planning. Lawrence, KS: Edge Enterprises, Inc.Google Scholar

Vansteenkiste, M. & Ryan, R. M. (2013). On psychological growth and vulnerability: Basic psychological need satisfaction and need frustration as a unifying principle. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 23, 263–280. doi: 10.1037/a0032359Google Scholar

Vargas, T. (2013). Woman with down syndrome seeks power to live the way she wants. The Washington Post, July 20. www.washingtonpost.com/local/virginia-woman-with-down-syndrome-seeks-power-to-live-the-way-she-wants/2013/07/20/76102a82-d789-11e2-a9f2-42ee3912ae0e_story.html?utm_term=.5d04c0dd656bGoogle Scholar

Vermont Code, 18 VSA 9302Google Scholar

Vermont Developmental Disabilities Services Division (2016). Vermont task force on supported decision making holds first meeting. www.facebook.com/vtddsd/posts/1067901303303736:0Google Scholar

Waldrop, D. (2014). Exploring hospice decisions: The road from the Institute on Aging and Social Work to an ARRA challenge grant. Educational Gerontology, 40, 248–257.Google Scholar

Ward, M. J. (1996). Coming of age in the age of self-determination: A historical and personal perspective. In Sands, D. J & Wehmeyer, M. L (eds.), Self-determination across the life span: Independence and choice for people with disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar

Watson, S., Thorburn, K., Everett, M., & Fisher, K. R. (2014). Care without coercion – mental health rights, personal recovery and trauma-informed care. Australian Journal of Social Issues (Australian Social Policy Association), 49, 529–549.Google Scholar

Wehmeyer, M. L. (1992). Self-determination and the education of students with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 27, 302–314.Google Scholar

Wehmeyer, M. L.(1996). Self-determination as an educational outcome: Why is it important to children, youth and adults with disabilities? In Sands, D. J & Wehmeyer, M. L (eds.), Self-determination across the life span: Independence and choice for people with disabilities (pp. 15–34). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar

Wehmeyer, M. L.(2005). Self-determination and individuals with severe disabilities: Re-examining meanings and misinterpretations. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30, 113–120. doi: 10.2511/rpsd.30.3.113Google Scholar

Wehmeyer, M. L.(2013a). The story of intellectual disability. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar

Wehmeyer, M. L.(2013b). Oxford handbook of positive psychology and disability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wehmeyer, M. L. & Abery, B. H. (2013). Self-determination and choice. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 51, 399–411. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-51.5.399Google Scholar

Wehmeyer, M. L., Abery, B., Mithaug, D. E., & Stancliffe, R. (2003). Theory in self-determination: Foundations for educational practice. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Wehmeyer, M. L., Abery, B., Zhang, D., Ward, K., Willis, D., Amin, W. H., Walker, H. (2011). Personal self-determination and moderating variables that impact efforts to promote self-determination. Exceptionality, 19, 19–30.Google Scholar

Wehmeyer, M. L., Agran, M., & Hughes, C. (1998). Teaching self-determination to students with disabilities: Basic skills for successful transition. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar

Wehmeyer, M. L., Bersani, H Jr., & Gagne, R. (2000). Riding the third wave: Self-determination and self-advocacy in the 21st century. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 15, 106–115.Google Scholar

Wehmeyer, M. L. & Bolding, N. (1999). Self-determination across living and working environments: A matched-samples study of adults with mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 37, 353–363.Google Scholar

Wehmeyer, M. L. & Bolding, N.(2001). Enhanced self‐determination of adults with intellectual disability as an outcome of moving to community‐based work or living environments. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 45, 371–383.Google Scholar

Wehmeyer, M. L. & Gragoudas, S. (2004). Centers for independent living and transition-age youth: Empowerment and self-determination. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 20, 53–58.Google Scholar

Wehmeyer, M. L., Kelchner, K., & Richards, S. (1995). Individual and environmental factors related to the self-determination of adults with mental retardation. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 5, 291–305.Google Scholar

Wehmeyer, M. L., Kelchner, K., & Richards, S.(1996). Essential characteristics of self-determined behavior of individuals with mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 100, 632–642.Google Scholar

Wehmeyer, M., Lattimore, J., Jorgensen, J., Palmer, S., Thompson, E., & Schumaker, K. M. (2003). The Self-Determined Career Development Model: A pilot study. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 19, 79–87.Google Scholar

Wehmeyer, M. L. & Metzler, C. A. (1995). How self-determined are people with mental retardation? The National Consumer Survey. Mental Retardation, 33, 111–119.Google Scholar

Wehmeyer, M. L. & Palmer, S. (2003). Adult outcomes for students with cognitive disabilities three years after high school: The impact of self-determination. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 131–144.Google Scholar

Wehmeyer, M. L., Palmer, S. B., Agran, M., Mithaug, D. E., & Martin, J. E. (2000). Promoting causal agency: The Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction. Exceptional Children, 66, 439–453.Google Scholar

Wehmeyer, M., Palmer, S., Shogren, K., Williams-Diehm, K., & Soukup, J. (2013). Establishing a causal relationship between interventions to promote self-determination and enhanced student self-determination. Journal of Special Education, 46, 195–210.Google Scholar

Wehmeyer, M. L., Parent, W., Lattimore, J., Obremski, S., Poston, D., & Rousso, H. (2009). Promoting self-determination and self-directed employment planning for young women with disabilities. Journal of Social Work in Disability and Rehabilitation, 8, 117–131.Google Scholar

Wehmeyer, M. L. & Schwartz, M. (1997). Self-determination and positive adult outcomes: A follow-up study of youth with mental retardation or learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 63, 245–255.Google Scholar

Wehmeyer, M. L. & Schwartz, M.(1998). The relationship between self-determination and quality of life for adults with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 33, 3–12.Google Scholar

Wehmeyer, M. L. & Shogren, K. A. (2017). Decision making. In Wehmeyer, M. L, Shogren, K. A, Little, T. D, & Lopez, S. J (eds.), Handbook on the development of self-determination. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Wehmeyer, M. L., Shogren, K. A., Palmer, S. B., Williams-Diehm, K., Little, T. D., & Boulton, A. (2012). Impact of the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction on student self-determination. A randomized-trial placebo control group study. Exceptional Children, 78, 135–153.Google Scholar

Wennberg, B. & Kjellberg, A. (2010). Participation when using cognitive assistive devices – from the perspective of people with intellectual disabilities. Occupational Therapy International, 17, 168–176. doi: 10.1002/oti.296Google Scholar

WHO (World Health Organization) (1980). International classification of impairment, disability and handicap. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar

WHO (World Health Organization)(2001). International classification of functioning, disability, and health. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar

Wiliner, P., Bailey, R., Parry, R., & Dymond, S. (2010). Performance in temporal discounting tasks by people with intellectual disabilities reveals difficulties in decision-making and impulse control. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 115, 157–171. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-115.2.157Google Scholar

Williams-Diehm, K., Wehmeyer, M. L., Palmer, S., Soukup, J. H., & Garner, N. (2008). Self-determination and student involvement in transition planning: A multivariate analysis. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 14, 25–36.Google Scholar

Winick, B. (1995). The side effects of incompetency labeling and the implications for mental health law. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 1, 6–42.Google Scholar

Wolfensberger, W. (1972). Normalization: The principle of normalization in human services. Toronto: National Institute on Mental Retardation.Google Scholar

Woltmann, E. M. & Whitley, R. (2010). Shared decision making in public mental health care: Perspectives from consumers living with severe mental illness. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 34, 29–36. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2975/34.1.2010.29.36Google Scholar

Wong, J. G., Clare, I. C. H., Gunn, M. J., & Holland, A. J. (1999). Capacity to make health care decisions: Its importance in clinical practice. Psychological Medicine, 29, 437–446.Google Scholar

Wood, E. (2005). History of guardianship. In Quin, M. J (ed.), Guardianship of adults: Achieving justice, autonomy, and safety. Springer: New York.Google Scholar

Woods, L. L. & Martin, J. E. (2004). Improving supervisor evaluations through the use of self determination contracts. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 27, 207–220. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/088572880402700206Google Scholar

World Congress on Adult Guardianship (2013). Bifocal, 34.Google Scholar

Wright, J. (2004). Protecting who from what, and why, and how? A proposal for an integrative approach to adult protective proceedings. Elder Law Journal, 12, 53–118.Google Scholar

Wright, J.(2010). Guardianship for your own good: Improving the well-being of respondents and wards in the USA. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 33, 350–368.Google Scholar