Abe, H. (2004). Lesbian bar talk in Shinjuku, Tokyo. In Okamoto, S. & Shibamoto Smith, J. S. (Eds.), Japanese Language, Gender, and Ideology: Cultural Models and Real People (pp. 205–21). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Abu-Lughod, L. (1990). The romance of resistance: Tracing transformations of power through Bedouin women. American Ethnologist, 17(1), 41–55.Google Scholar

Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–37.Google Scholar

Akiyama, T. (2004). Introducing speaking tests into a Japanese Senior High School entrance examination. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar

Althusser, L. (1971). Lenin and Philosophy, and Other Essays (B. Brewster, Trans.). New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar

Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. (Revised edn). London: Verso.Google Scholar

‘The art of elocution. No. 2. Correct pronunciation’. (1912). In Every Woman’s Encyclopaedia. Available at: http://chestofbooks.com/food/household/Woman-Encyclopaedia-3/The-Art-Of-Elocution-No-2-Correct-Pronunciation.html, accessed 22.1.2018.Google Scholar

Atkinson, J. M. & Drew, P. (1979). Order in Court: The Organisation of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Atkinson, J. M. & Heritage, J. (Eds.) (1984). Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words: The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955 (Urmson, J. & Sbisá, M., Eds.). Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Baker, C. D. (2000). Locating culture in action: Membership categorization in texts and talk. In Lee, A. & Poynton, C. (Eds.), Culture and Text: Discourse and Methodology in Social Research and Cultural Studies (pp. 99–113). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Baker, P. (2002). Polari: The Lost Language of Gay Men. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Baker, P.(2006). Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: ContinuumCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, P.(2008). Sexed Texts: Language, Gender and Sexuality. London: Equinox.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). Discourse in the novel. In Holquist, M. (Ed.), The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.) (pp. 259–422). Austin: University of Texas Press. (Original work published in 1975.)Google Scholar

Banki, P. (2018). The Forgiveness to Come: The Holocaust and the Hyper-ethical. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar

Baron-Cohen, S. (2003). The Essential Difference: Male and Female Brains and the Truth about Autism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Bartrop, P. R. & Eisen, G. (Eds.) (1990). The Dunera Affair: A Documentary Resource Book. South Yarra, Victoria: Schwartz & Wilkinson with the Jewish Museum of Australia.Google Scholar

Bauman, Z. (2004). Identity: Conversations with Benedetto Vecchi. Cambridge; Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Baynham, M. (2017). Intersections of necessity and desire in migration research: Queering the migration story. In Canagarajah, S. (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Migration and Language (pp. 431–47). Oxford and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bennington, G. & Derrida, J. (1993). Jacques Derrida (G. Bennington, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Benwell, B. & Stokoe, E. (2013). Discourse and Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Billig, M. (1999a). Conversation analysis and the claims of naivety. Discourse and Society, 10(4), 572–6.Google Scholar

Billig, M.(1999b). Whose terms? Whose ordinariness? Rhetoric and ideology in conversation analysis. Discourse and Society, 10(4), 543–58.Google Scholar

Block, D. (2007). Second Language Identities. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Block, D. & Cameron, D. (Eds.) (2002). Globalization and Language Teaching. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Blommaert, J. (2009. Language, asylum, and the national order. Current Anthropology, 50(4), 415–25.Google Scholar

Blum, D. (1997). Sex on the Brain: The Biological Differences between Men and Women. New York: Viking.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1977). The economics of linguistic exchanges. Social Science Information, 16, 645–68.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P.(1991). Language and Symbolic Power. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Brown, A. (2003). Interviewer variation and the co-construction of speaking proficiency. Language Testing, 20(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, A.(2005). Interviewer Variability in Language Proficiency Interviews. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Brown, A. & McNamara, T. (2004). ‘The devil is in the detail’: Researching gender issues in language assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 38(3), 524–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, P. & Levinson, S. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Goody, E. (Ed.), Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction (pp. 56–310). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brutt-Griffler, J. (2002). World English: A Study of its Development. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burchfield, R. W. (1998). The New Fowler’s Modern English Usage: Revised 3rd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Burck, C. (2005). Multilingual Living: Explorations of Language and Subjectivity. Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Butler, C. W. & Fitzgerald, R. (2010). Membership-in-action: Operative identities in a family meal. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 2462–74.Google Scholar

Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Butler, J. (1997). The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, J.(1999). Subjects of Desire: Hegelian Reflections in Twentieth-Century France. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Cambier-Langeveld, T. (2010). The role of linguists and native speakers in language analysis for the determination of speaker origin. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 17(1): 67–93.Google Scholar

Cameron, D. (1995). Verbal Hygiene. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Cameron, D.(1997). Performing gender identity: Young men’s talk and the construction of heterosexual masculinity. In Johnson, S. & Meinhoff, U. H. (Eds.), Language and Masculinity (pp. 47–64). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Cameron, D.(2007). The Myth of Mars and Venus: Do Men and Women Really Speak Different Languages? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cameron, D.(2010). Sex/gender, language and the new biologism. Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 173–92.Google Scholar

Cameron, D. & Kulick, D. (2003). Language and Sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Campbell, C. P. (Ed.) (2010). Race and News: Critical Perspectives. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Canagarajah, S. (1999). Resisting Linguistic Imperialism in English Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Carr, J. & Pauwels, A. (2005). Boys and Foreign Language Learning: Real Boys Don’t Do Languages. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Castles, S. (2003). Towards a sociology of forced migration and social transformation. Sociology, 37(1), 13–34.Google Scholar

Cheshire, J. & Trudgill, P. (Eds.) (1998). The Sociolinguistics Reader: Gender and Discourse (Vol. II). London: Arnold.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N.(1966). Linguistic theory. In Mead, R. C. (Ed.), Reports of the Working Committee (pp. 43–49). New York: Northeast Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Languages.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N.(1972) Language and Mind. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Cicourel, A. V. (1992). The interpenetration of communicative contexts: Examples from medical encounters. In Duranti, A. & Goodwin, C. (Eds.), Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon (pp. 291–310). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Clayman, S. & Heritage, J. (2002). The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Coates, J. (1986). Women, Men, and Language: A Sociolinguistic Account of Sex Differences in Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Coates, J.(1997a). One-at-a-time: The organisation of men’s talk. In Johnson, S. & Meinhof, U. (Eds.), Language and Masculinity (pp. 107–29). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Coates, J.(1997b). The construction of a collaborative floor in women’s friendly talk. In Givón, T. (Ed.), Conversation: Cognitive, Communicative and Social Perspectives (pp. 55–89). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Coates, J. (2013). Women, Men and Everyday Talk. Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Corder, S.P. (1967). The significance of learners’ errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 5(4), 161–70. Repr. in S. P. Corder (1981) Error Analysis and Interlanguage (pp. 5–13). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Council of Europe (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Damousi, J. (2010). Colonial Voices: A Cultural History of English in Australia, 1840–1940. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Davidson, J. (1984). Subsequent versions of invitations, offers, requests, and proposals dealing with potential or actual rejection. In Atkinson, J. M. & Heritage, J. (Eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp. 102–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Davies, A. 1997. Australian immigrant gatekeeping through English language tests: How important is proficiency? In Huhta, A., Kohonen, V., Kurki-Suonio, L. & Luoma, S. (Eds.), Current Developments and Alternatives in Language Assessment (pp. 71–84). Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä and University of Tampere.Google Scholar

Davies, J. (2003). Expressions of gender: An analysis of pupils’ gendered discourse styles in small group classroom discussions. Discourse and Society, 14(2), 115–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Day, D. (2013). Conversation analysis and membership categories. In Chapelle, C. A. (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics (pp. 1050–5.) Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

De Beauvoir, S. (2010). The Second Sex (C. Borde & S. Malovany-Chevallier, Trans.). London: Vintage. (Original work published in 1949.)Google Scholar

De Certeau, M. (1984). The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Derrida, J. (1998). Monolingualism of the Other, or, The Prosthesis of Origin (P. Mensah, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Derrida, J. (2005). Shibboleth: For Paul Celan. In T. Dutoit & O. Pasanen (Eds.), Sovereignties in Question: The Poetics of Paul Celan (pp. 1–64). New York: Fordham University Press. (Original work published in 1986.)Google Scholar

Derrida, J. & Roudinesco, E. (2004). For What Tomorrow: A Dialogue (J. Fort, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Dewaele, J.-M. (2010). Emotions in Multiple Languages. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Drew, P. (1984). Speakers’ reportings in invitation sequences. In Atkinson, J. M. and Heritage, J. (Eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp. 129–51). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Drew, P. & Heritage, J. (1992). Analyzing talk at work: An introduction. In Drew, P. & Heritage, J. (Eds.), Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings (pp. 3–65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Eades, D. (2005). Applied linguistics and language analysis in asylum seeker cases. Applied Linguistics, 26(4), 503–26.Google Scholar

Eades, D.(2009). Testing the claims of asylum seekers: The role of language analysis. Language Assessment Quarterly, 6(1), 30–40.Google Scholar

Eades, D. & Arends, J. (2004). Using language analysis in the determination of the national origin of asylum seekers. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 11(2), 179–99.Google Scholar

Eades, D., Fraser, H., Siegel, J., McNamara, T. & Baker, B. (2003). Linguistic identification in the determination of nationality: A preliminary report. Language Policy, 2(2), 179–99.Google Scholar

Eckert, P. & McConnell-Ginet, S. (1992). Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, 461–90.Google Scholar

Essed, P. (1990). Everyday Racism: Reports from Women of Two Cultures (C. Jaffé, Trans.). Claremont, CA: Hunter House.Google Scholar

Essed, P. (1991). Understanding Everyday Racism: An Interdisciplinary Theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Fairclough, N.(2001) Language and Power (2nd edn). London: Longman.Google Scholar

Fairclough, N.(2013). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Fairclough, N. & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical Discourse Analysis. In Van Dijk, T. A. (Ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction (pp. 258–84). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Fanon, F. (1963). The Wretched of the Earth (C. Farrington, Trans.). New York: Grove Press. (Original work published in 1961.)Google Scholar

Fanon, F. (1967). Black Skin, White Masks (C. L. Markmann, Trans.). New York: Grove Press. (Original work published in 1952.)Google Scholar

Fichte, J. G. (1922). Reden an die deutsche Nation [Addresses to the German nation] (R. F. Jones and G. H. Turnbull, Trans.). Chicago; London: The Open Court Publishing Company. (Original work published in 1808.)Google Scholar

Fishman, J. (1972). Language and Nationalism: Two Integrative Essays. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Fishman, P. (1978). Interaction: The work women do. Social Problems, 25(4), 397–406.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, R. (2015). Membership Categorisation Analysis. In K. Tracy, C. Ilie & T. L. Sandel (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction. Boston: John Wiley & Sons. DOI: 10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi018.Google Scholar

Flannery, T. (Ed.) (2002). The Birth of Melbourne. Melbourne: Text Publishing.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1967). Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason (R. Howard, Trans.). London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1973). The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception (A. M. Sheridan, Trans.). London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (A. M. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1978). The History of Sexuality (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1980) Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977 (C. Gordon, Ed., C. Gordon, L. Marshall, J. Mepham & K. Soper, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1998). Aesthetics, Method, and Epistemology. Vol. II of Essential Works of Foucault, 1954–1984 (Faubion, J. D., Ed., R. Hurley and others, Trans.). New York: New Press.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (2003). Abnormal. Lectures at the Collège de France 1974–1975 (G. Burchell, Trans.). London: Verso.Google Scholar

Fraser, H. (2011). The role of linguists and native speakers in language analysis for the determination of speaker origin: A response to Tina Cambier-Langeveld. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 18(1), 121–30.Google Scholar

Freud, S. (1955). A difficulty in the path of psycho-analysis. In Strachey, J. (Trans. and Ed.), The Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. XVII, pp. 135–44). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published in 1917.)Google Scholar

Frosh, S. (2005). Hate and the ‘Jewish Science’: Anti-Semitism, Nazism, and Psychoanalysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Fulcher, G. (2004). Deluded by artifices? The Common European Framework and harmonization. Language Assessment Quarterly, 1(4), 253–66.Google Scholar

Gardner, R. C. & Lambert, W. E. (1959). Motivational variables in second-language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 13, 266–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Gee, J. (2015). Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses (5th edn). Hoboken, NJ: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Goffman, E.(1963). Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Goffman, E.(1964). The neglected situation. American Anthropologist, 66(2), 133–6.Google Scholar

Goffman, E.(1983). The interaction order. American Sociological Review, 48, 1–17.Google Scholar

Gowers, Sir E. (1965). Fowler’s Modern English Usage, 2nd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Grosz, E. (1990). Jacques Lacan: A Feminist Introduction. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Hall, S. (1996). Introduction: Who needs ‘identity’? In Hall, S. & du Gay, P. (Eds.), Questions of Cultural Identity (pp. 1–17). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Hall, S. (1997). The work of representation. In Hall, S. (Ed.), Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices (pp. 13–64). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. (1985). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F. (1977). Phenomenology of Spirit (A. V. Miller, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Original work published in 1807.)Google Scholar

Heggoy, A. A. (1973). Education in French Algeria: An essay on cultural conflict. Comparative Education Review, 17(2), 180–97.Google Scholar

Henriques, J. (1984). Social psychology and the politics of racism. In Henriques, J., Hollway, W., Urwin, C., Venn, C., & Walkerdine, V. (Eds.), Changing the Subject: Psychology, Social Regulation and Subjectivity (pp. 60–89). New York: Methuen.Google Scholar

Heritage, J. (1984) Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Heritage, J.(2009). Conversation Analysis as social theory. In Turner, B. S. (Ed.), The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory (pp. 300–20). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Heritage, J. & Sorjonen, M.-L. (1994). Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences: And-prefacing as a feature of question design. Language in Society, 23, 1–29.Google Scholar

Hester, S. & Eglin, P. (Eds.) (1997). Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis. Washington, DC: University Press of America.Google Scholar

Hill, J. (1998). Language, race, and white public space. American Anthropologist, 100, 680–9.Google Scholar

Hill, Jane H. (2008). The Everyday Language of White Racism. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hoffman, E. (1989). Lost in Translation: A Life in a New Language. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Holmes, J. (1986). Functions of you know in women’s and men’s speech. Language in Society, 15(1), 1–21.Google Scholar

Housley, W. & Fitzgerald, R. (2015). Introduction to membership categorization analysis. In Fitzgerald, R. & Housley, W. (Eds.), Advances in Membership Categorization Analysis (pp. 1–21). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar

Hulstijn, J. H. (2007). The shaky ground beneath the CEFR: Quantitative and qualitative dimensions of language proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 663–7.Google Scholar

Humboldt, W. von. (1999). On Language: On the Diversity of Human Language Construction and its Influence on the Mental Development of the Human Species (M. Losonsky, Ed., P. Heath, Trans.). Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published in 1836.)Google Scholar

Hutton, C. (1999). Linguistics and the Third Reich: Mother-Tongue Fascism, Race, and the Science of Language. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hyde, J. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581–92.Google Scholar

Inglis, K., Spark, S., Winter, J. & Bunyan, C. (2018). Dunera Lives: A Visual History. Clayton, Victoria: Monash University Publishing.Google Scholar

James, H. 1999. The speech of American women. In Walker, P. A. (Ed.), Henry James on Culture: Collected Essays on Politics and the American Cultural Scene (pp. 58–81). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

Jefferson, G. (1990). List construction as a task and interactions resource. In Psathas, G. (Ed.), Interactional Competence (pp. 63–92). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Kane, M. (2006). Validation. In Brennan, R. (Ed.), Educational Measurement (4th edn, pp. 17–64). Westport, CT: American Council on Education and Praeger.Google Scholar

Kane, M.(2012). Validating score interpretations and uses. Language Testing, 29(1), 3–17.Google Scholar

Kapuściński, R. (2008). The Other. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Kinsman, G. (2004). The Canadian Cold War on queers: Sexual regulation and resistance. In Cavell, R. (Ed.), Love, Hate and Fear in Canada’s Cold War (pp. 108–32). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Kissau, S. (2006). Gender differences in motivation to learn French. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 62(3): 401–22.Google Scholar

Kitzinger, C. (2000) Doing Feminist Conversation Analysis. Feminism & Psychology, 10, 163–93.Google Scholar

Kitzinger, C.(2005). Speaking as a heterosexual: (How) does sexuality matter for talk-in-interaction? Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38(3), 221–65.Google Scholar

Kitzinger, C.(2006) Talking sex and gender. In Drew, P., Raymond, G. & Weinberg, D. (Eds.), Talk in Interaction in Social Research Methods (pp. 155–70). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Kitzinger, C.(Ed.) (2007). Feminist Conversation Analysis: Research by students at the University of York, UK. Special issue of Feminism and Psychology, 17(2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kitzinger, C. & Frith, H. (1999). Just say no? The use of conversation analysis in developing a feminist perspective on sexual refusal. Discourse and Society, 10(3), 293–316.Google Scholar

Klemperer, V. 2000. The Language of the Third Reich (M. Brady, Trans.). London: Continuum. (Originally published in 1947 as LTI: Notizbuch eines Philologen. Berlin: Aufbau-Verlag.)Google Scholar

Kramsch, C. (2005). Post 9/11: Foreign languages between knowledge and power. Applied Linguistics, 26(4): 545–67.Google Scholar

Kramsch, C. (2009). The Multilingual Subject: What Foreign Language Learners Say about their Experience and Why It Matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kubota, R. 2011. Questioning linguistic instrumentalism: English, neoliberalism, and language tests in Japan. Linguistics and Education, 22, 248–60.Google Scholar

Lado, R. 1949. Measurement in English as a foreign language. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar

Lakoff, R. T. (1975). Language and Woman’s Place. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Lakoff, R. T.(2004). Language and Woman’s Place: Text and Commentaries (Bucholtz, M., Ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lalu, P. (2000). The grammar of domination and the subjection of agency: Colonial texts and modes of evidence. Historical Theory, 39(4),45–68.Google Scholar

Land, V. & Kitzinger, C. (2005). Speaking as a lesbian: Correcting the heterosexist assumption. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38(4), 371–416.Google Scholar

Land, V. & Kitzinger, C.(2008). Closet talk: The contemporary relevance of the closet in lesbian and gay interaction. In Clarke, V. and Peel, E. (Eds.), Out in Psychology: Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Queer Perspectives (pp. 147–71). Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Language and National Origin Group. 2004. Guidelines for the use of language analysis in relation to questions of national origin in refugee cases. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 11(2), 261–6.Google Scholar

Lanzmann, C. (1985). Shoah: An Oral History of the Holocaust. The Complete Text of the Film. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar

Lerner, G. (2004). Collaborative turn sequences. In Lerner, G. (Ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation (pp. 225–56). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Liddicoat, A. J. (2007). An Introduction to Conversation Analysis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Lindström, A. & Sorjonen, M-.L. (2013). Affiliation in conversation. In Sidnell, J. & Stivers, T. (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 350–69). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Louw-Potgieter, J. (1989). Covert racsim: An application of Essed’s analysis in a South African context. Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 8(5), 307–19.Google Scholar

Lucy, N. (2004). A Derrida Dictionary. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Mahmood, S. (2005). Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Manley, R. (1691). The History of the Rebellions: In England, Scotland and Ireland: wherein, the most material passages, sieges, battles, policies and stratagems of war, are impartially related on both sides; from the year 1640 to the beheading of the Duke of Monmouth in 1685. In three parts. London: printed for L. Meredith at the Angel in Amen-Corner, and T. Newborough at the Golden Ball in St. Paul’s-Church-Yard.Google Scholar

Mansfield, N. (2000). Subjectivity: Theories of the Self from Freud to Haraway. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Maryns, K. (2004). Identifying the asylum speaker: Reflections on the pitfalls of language analysis in the determination of national origin. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 11(2), 240–60.Google Scholar

Maryns, K.(2005). Monolingual language ideologies and code choice in the Belgian asylum procedure. Language and Communication, 25, 299–314.Google Scholar

Maryns, K.(2006). The Asylum Speaker: Language in the Belgian Asylum Procedure. Manchester: St Jerome Press.Google Scholar

McNamara, T. (1987a). Language and social identity. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 33–58.Google Scholar

McNamara, T.(1987b). Language and social identity: Israelis abroad. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 6(3/4), 215–28.Google Scholar

McNamara, T.(1996). Measuring Second Language Performance. London: Longman.Google Scholar

McNamara, T.(1997). What do we mean by social identity? Competing frameworks, competing discourses. TESOL Quarterly, 31(3), 561–7.Google Scholar

McNamara, T.(2005). 21st century Shibboleth: Language tests, identity and intergroup conflict. Language Policy, 4(4), 1–20.Google Scholar

McNamara, T.(2010). Reading Derrida: Language, identity and violence. Applied Linguistics Review, 1(1), 23–44.Google Scholar

McNamara, T.(2011a). Managing learning: Authority and language assessment. Language Teaching 4(4), 500–15.Google Scholar

McNamara, T.(2011b) Measuring deficit. In Candlin, C. N. & Crichton, J. (Eds.), Discourses of Deficit (pp. 311–26). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

McNamara, T.(2012). Poststructuralism and its challenges for Applied Linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 33(5), 473–82.Google Scholar

McNamara, T.(2013). Crossing boundaries: Journeys into language. Language and Intercultural Communication, 13(3), 343–56.Google Scholar

McNamara, T.(2014). 30 years on – Evolution or revolution? Language Assessment Quarterly, 11(2), 226–32.Google Scholar

McNamara, T. & Roever, C. (2006). Language Testing: The Social Dimension. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

McNamara, T. & Ryan, K. (2011). Fairness vs justice in language testing: The place of English literacy in the Australian Citizenship Test. Language Assessment Quarterly, 8(2): 161–78.Google Scholar

McNamara, T. & Schüpbach, D. (2012). Validating Lnguage and Country Knowledge Analyses in Asylum Cases: Report on the Project ‘Updating the Minimum Criteria Used by LINGUA’ for the Swiss Federal Office for Migration. Melbourne: School of Languages and Linguistics, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar

McNamara, T. & Schüpbach, D.(2018). Fairness and justice in Language Analysis for the Determination of Origin of asylum seekers (LADO). In I. M. Nick (Ed.), Forensic Linguistics: Asylum-Seekers, Refugees and Immigrants (pp. 155–74). Wilmington, DE: Vernon Press.Google Scholar

McNamara, T. & Schüpbach, D.(2019). Quality assurance in LADO: Issues of validity. In Patrick, P., Schmid, M. S. & Zwaan, K. M. (Eds.), Language Analysis for the Determination of Origin. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

McNamara, T., van den Hazelkamp, C. & Verrips, M. (2016). LADO as a language test: Issues of validity. Applied Linguistics, 37(2), 262–83.Google Scholar

Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In Linn, R. L. (Ed.), Educational Measurement (3rd edn, pp. 13–103). New York: American Council on Education & Macmillan.Google Scholar

Milani, T. (2018). Queering Language, Gender and Sexuality. London: Equinox.Google Scholar

Moir, A. & Jessel, D. (1992). Brain Sex: The Real Difference between Men and Women. New York: Dell.Google Scholar

Moir, A. & Moir, B. (2000). Why Men Don’t Iron: The Fascinating and Unalterable Differences between Men and Women. New York: Birch Lane Press.Google Scholar

Muyskens, P., Verrips, M. & Zwaan, K. (Eds.) (2010). Language and Origin: The Role of Language in European Asylum Procedures: A Linguistic and Legal Survey. Nijmegen: Wolf Legal Publishers.Google Scholar

Myers, K. A. (2005). Racetalk: Racism in Plain Sight. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Myers, K. A. & Williamson, P. (2001). Race talk: The perpetuation of racism through private discourse. Race & Society, 4, 3–26.Google Scholar

Nguyen, H. & Nguyen, M. (2017). ‘Am I a good boy?’: Explicit membership categorization in parent–child interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 121, 25–39.Google Scholar

Nirenberg, D. (2013). Anti-Judaism: The History of a Way of Thinking. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

North, B. (2000). The Development of a Common Framework Scale of Language Proficiency. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Norton, B. (2000). Identity and Language Learning: Gender, Ethnicity and Educational Change. Harlow: Longman/Pearson.Google Scholar

Norton, B. (2013). Identity and Language Learning: Extending the Conversation. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Norton Peirce, B. (1995). Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 9–31.Google Scholar

Nunan, D. & Choi, J. (2010). Language and Culture: Reflective Narratives and the Emergence of Identity. New York; London: Routledge.Google Scholar

O’Barr, W. & Atkins, B. (1980). ‘Women’s language’ or ‘Powerless language’? In S. McConnell-Ginet, R. Borker & Furman, N. (Eds.), Women and Language in Literature and Society (pp. 93–110): New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Ogden, R. (2006). Phonetics and social action in agreements and disagreements. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(10), 1752–75.Google Scholar

O’Loughlin, K. (2001). The Equivalence of Direct and Semi-direct Speaking Tests. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

O’Loughlin, K.(2002). The impact of gender in oral proficiency testing. Language Testing, 19, 169–92.Google Scholar

Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2008). OECD Annual Report 2008. Paris: OECD Publications.Google Scholar

Orwell, (1968). Antisemitism in Britain. In Orwell, S. & Angus, I. (Eds.), As I Please: 1943–1945 (pp. 332–41). Vol. III of The Collected Essays, Journalism and Letters of George Orwell. London: Secker and Warburg. (Original work published in 1945.)Google Scholar

Park, J. S.-Y. 2011. The promise of English: Linguistic capital and the neoliberal worker in the South Korean job market. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 14(4), 443–55.Google Scholar

Patrick, P. L., Schmid, M. & Zwaan, K. (Eds.) (2019). Language Analysis for the Determination of Origin. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Pavlenko, A. (2006). Emotions and Multilingualism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pavlenko, A.(2007). Autobiographic narratives as data in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 28(2): 163–88.Google Scholar

Pavlenko, A. & Blackledge, A. (Eds.) (2004). Negotiation of Identities in Multilingual Contexts. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Pavlenko, A., Blackledge, A., Piller, I. & Teutsch-Dwyer, M. (Eds.) (2001). Multilingualism, Second Language Learning, and Gender. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Pennycook, A. (1994). Incommensurable discourses? Applied Linguistics, 15(2), 115–38.Google Scholar

Pennycook, A.(2001). Critical Applied Linguistics: A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Picca, L. H. & Feagin, J. R. (2007). Two-Faced Racism: Whites in the Backstage and Frontstage. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Pigna, F. (2005). The Myths of Argentine History: The Construction of a Past as a Justification of the Present. Buenos Aires: Grupo Editorial Norma.Google Scholar

Pinker, S. (2002). The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature. New York: Viking.Google Scholar

Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In Atkinson, J. M. & Heritage, J. (Eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp. 57–101). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Porat, R. (2015). The Ausraeli approach: The Diasporic identity of Israelis in Australia. J-Wire, 11 August 2015. Available at www.jwire.com.au/the-ausraeli-approach-the-diasporic-identity-of-israelis-in-australia/#more-54708, retrieved 28.2.2018.Google Scholar

Porat, R.(2018) The Ausraelis: Israelis in Australia as a test case of distinctiveness vis-à-vis the Jewish diaspora. Israel Affairs, 24(1), 167–90.Google Scholar

Potter, J. & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Price, S. (1996). Comments on Bonny Norton Peirce’s ‘Social identity, investment, and language learning’. TESOL Quarterly, 30(2), 331–7.Google Scholar

Reath, A. 2004. Language analysis in the context of the asylum process: Procedures, validity, and consequences. Language Assessment Quarterly, 1(4), 209–33.Google Scholar

Reisigl, M. & Wodak, R. (Eds.) (2001). Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Reynolds, J. & Roffe, J. (Eds.) (2004). Understanding Derrida. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Ricœur, P. (1992). Oneself as Another (K. Blamey, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Ros i Solé, C. & Fenoulhet, J. (2013a). Romanticising language learning: Beyond instrumentalism. Language and Intercultural Communication, 13(3), 257–65.Google Scholar

Ros i Solé, C. & Fenoulhet, J. (Eds.) (2013b). Romanticising language learning (Special issue). Language and Intercultural Communication, 13(3).Google Scholar

Roth, J. K. (2000). What does the Holocaust have to do with Christianity? In Rittner, C., Smith, S. D. & Steinfeldt, I. (Eds.), The Holocaust and the Christian World (pp. 5–10). New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Ryave, A. L. (1978). On the achievement of a series of stories. In Schenkein, J. (Ed.), Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction (pp. 113–32). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on Conversation (Vols. I & II, Jefferson, G., Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Said, E. W. (1979). Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

Saussure, F. de (2013). Course in General Linguistics (R. Harris, Trans.). London: Bloomsbury. (Original work published in 1916.)Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A. (1972). Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In Sudnow, D. (Ed.), Studies in Social Interaction (pp. 75–119). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A.(1992a). In another context. In Duranti, A. & Goodwin, C. (Eds.), Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon (pp. 191–227). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A.(1992b). Introduction. In Sacks, H., Lectures on Conversation (Jefferson, G., Ed.) (Vol. I, pp. ix–lxii). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A.(1997). Whose text? Whose context? Discourse and Society, 8, 165–87.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A.(1998a). Naïveté vs sophistication or discipline vs self-indulgence: A rejoinder to Billig. Discourse and Society, 10(4), 577–82.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A.(1998b). Reply to Wetherell. Discourse and Society, 9(3), 413–16.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A.(1999). ‘Schegloff’s texts’ as ‘Billig’s data’: A critical reply. Discourse and Society, 10(4), 558–72.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A.(2007a). A tutorial on membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(3), 462–82.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A.(2007b). Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schüpbach, D. (2009). Testing language, testing ethnicity? Policies and practices surrounding the ethnic German Aussiedler. Language Assessment Quarterly, 6(1), 78–82.Google Scholar

Seedhouse, P. (2005). Conversation Analysis and language learning. Language Teaching, 38(4), 165–87.Google Scholar

Seidlhofer, B. (Ed.) (2003). Controversies in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 10(3): 209–32.Google Scholar

Senghor, L. S. (1948). Anthologie de la nouvelle poésie nègre et malgache de langue française. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Sheldon, A. (1990). Pickle fights: Gendered talk in preschool disputes. Discourse Processes, 13, 5–31.Google Scholar

Shnukal, A. (1983). Torres Strait Creole: The growth of a new Torres Strait language. Aboriginal History, 7, 173–85.Google Scholar

Shohamy, E. (2001). The Power of Tests: A Critical Perspective on the Uses of Language Tests. London: Pearson.Google Scholar

Shohamy, E. 2006. Language Policy: Hidden Agendas and New Approaches. Routledge.Google Scholar

Sidnell, J. (2010). Conversation Analysis: An introduction. New York: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar

Silverman, D. (1998). Harvey Sacks: Social Science and Conversation Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Soyinka, W. (1963). Telephone conversation. In Moore, G. & Beier, U. (Eds.), Modern Poetry from Africa (p. 111). Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Speer, S. A. (2002). What can conversation analysis contribute to feminist methodology? Putting reflexivity into practice. Discourse and Society, 13, 783–803.Google Scholar

Speer, S. A.(2005). Gender Talk: Feminism, Discourse and Conversation Analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Speer, S. A.(2011). On the role of reported, third party compliments in passing as a ‘real’ woman. In Speer, S. A. & Stokoe, E. (Eds.), Conversation and Gender (pp. 155–82). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Speer, S. A. (2012) Feminist Conversation Analysis: Who needs it? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 9(4), 292–7.Google Scholar

Speer, S. A. & Green, R. (2007) On passing: The interactional organization of appearance attributions in the psychiatric assessment of transsexual patients. In Clarke, V. & Peel, E. (Eds.), Out in Psychology: Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Queer Perspectives (pp. 335–68). Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Speer, S. A. & Stokoe, E. (Eds.) (2011). Conversation and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Spolsky, B. (1995). Measured Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Stirling, L. & Manderson, L. (2011). About you: Authority, objectivity and the generalised you. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(6), 1581–602.Google Scholar

Stivers, T. (2008). Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(1), 31–57.Google Scholar

Stokoe, E (2010) ‘I’m not gonna hit a lady’: Conversation analysis, membership categorization and men’s denials of violence towards women. Discourse and Society, 21(1), 1–24.Google Scholar

Stokoe, E(2012). Moving forward with membership categorization analysis: Methods for systematic analysis. Discourse Studies, 14(3), 277–303.Google Scholar

Tajfel, H. (1981). Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tannen, D. (1989). Interpreting interruption in conversation. In Music, B., Graczyk, R. & Wiltshire, C. (Eds.), Papers from the 25th Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Part Two: Parasession on Language in Context (pp. 266–87). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar

Tannen, D. (1990). You Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar

Ten Have, P. (2007). Doing Conversation Analysis (2nd edn). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar

Turner, L. (2002). Belonging, being friends and learning to write in a second language: The social construction of self and mind. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar

University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate (2000). Cambridge IELTS 2: Examination Papers from the University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Van Dijk, T. A. (1987). Communicating Racism: Ethnic Prejudice in Thought and Talk. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Van Dijk, T. A.(1991). Racism and the Press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Van Ek, J. A. & Trim, J. L. M. (1998a). Waystage 1990 (Revised and corrected edn). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Van Ek, J. A. & Trim, J. L. M.(1998b) Threshold 1990 (Revised and corrected edn). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Van Ek, J. A. & Trim, J. L. M.(2001) Vantage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Van Lier, L. (1989) Reeling, writhing, drawling, stretching and fainting in coils: Oral proficiency interviews as conversations. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 480–508.Google Scholar

Verrips, M. (2011). LADO and the pressure to draw strong conclusions: A response to Tina Cambier–Langeveld. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 18(1), 131–43.Google Scholar

Watson, D. R. (1997). Some general reflections on ‘categorization’ and ‘sequence’ in the analysis of conversation. In Hester, S. & Eglin, P. (Eds.), Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis (pp. 49–75). Washington, DC: University Press of America.Google Scholar

Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and poststructuralism in dialogue. Discourse and Society, 9(3), 387–412.Google Scholar

Wilkins, D. (1973). Notional Syllabuses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wilkinson, S. & Kitzinger, C. (2007) Conversation Analysis, gender and sexuality. In Wetherall, A., Watson, B. & Gallois, C. (Eds.), Language, Discourse and Social Psychology (pp. 206–30). Houndmills: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar

Williams, G. (1992). Sociolinguistics: A Sociological Critique. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Wistrich, R. S. (2010) A Lethal Obsession: Anti-Semitism from Antiquity to the Global Jihad. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Wolfson, N. (1989). Perspectives: Sociolinguistics and TESOL. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Wong, J. & Waring, H. Z. (2010). Conversation Analysis and Second Language Pedagogy. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Wood, G. (Ed.) (1985). Labelling in Development Policy. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Wooffitt, R. (2005). Conversation Analysis and Discourse Analysis: A Comparative and Critical Introduction. London; New York: Sage.Google Scholar

Woolard, K. (1998). Introduction: Language ideology as a field of inquiry. In Schieffelin, B. B., Wollard, K. A. & Kroskrity, P. V. (Eds.), Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory (pp. 3–47). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Young, R. & He, A. (Eds.) (1998). Talking and Testing: Discourse Approaches to the Assessment of Oral Proficiency. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Zetter, R. (1991). Labelling refugees: Forming and reforming a bureaucratic identity. Journal of Refugee Studies, 4(1), 39–62.Google Scholar

Zetter, R. (2007). More labels, fewer refugees: Remaking the refugee label in an era of globalization. Journal of Refugee Studies, 20(2), 172–92.Google Scholar