References

doi:10.1017/9781108641517.015

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 January 2022

Edited by

Caleb Cohoe

Show author details

Caleb Cohoe: Affiliation:
Metropolitan State University of Denver

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: Aristotle's On the Soul
A Critical Guide
, pp. 265 - 278

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108641517.015 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackrill, J. L. 1972. “Aristotle’s Definitions of psuchē.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 73: 119–133. Reprinted in Barnes, Schofield, and Sorabji 1979, 65–75.Google Scholar

Alvarez, Maria. 2013. “Agency and Two‐Way Powers.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 113: 101–121.Google Scholar

Angioni, L. 2001. “Explanation and Definition in Physics I 1.” Apeiron 34: 307–320.CrossRef Google Scholar

Aphrodisias, Alexander. 1887. De Anima Cum Mantissa. Bruns, I. (ed.). Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. 1984. “Sentencia Libri De Anima.” In Gauthier, A. R. (ed.),Sancti Thomae de Aquino Opera Omnia, vol. 45. Rome: Commissio Leonina, 1–313.Google Scholar

Armstrong, A. H. 1984. Plotinus: Ennead V. Cambridge, MA: Loeb Classical Library.Google Scholar

Balme, D. M. 1992. Aristotle. De Partibus Animalium I and De Generatione Animalium I (with passages from II. 1–3) With a Report on Recent Work and an Additional Bibliography by A. Gotthelf, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Baltussen, H. 2000. Theophrastus against the Preoscratics and Plato: Peripatetic Dialectic in the De Sensibus. Leiden: Brill.CrossRef Google Scholar

Barnes, Jonathan. 1982. The Presocratic Philosophers. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Barnes, Jonathan 1994. Posterior Analytics. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bastit, M. 1996. “Qu’est-ce qu’une Partie de l’Âme pour Aristote?.” In Viano, Christina, (ed.), Corps et âme – sur le De anima d’Aristote, Paris: Vrin, 13–36.Google Scholar

Beare, John I. 1906. Greek Theories of Elementary Cognition from Alcmaeon to Aristotle. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Beere, J. 2009. Doing and Being: An Interpretation of Aristotle’s Metaphysics Theta. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bergeron, Martin and Richard, Dufour. (eds.), 2008. Alexandre d’Aphrodise: De l’âme. Texte grec introduit, traduit et annoté. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.Google Scholar

Bernard, Wolfgang. 1987. “Philoponus on Self-Awareness.” In Sorabji, R. (ed.), Philoponus and the Rejection of Aristotelian Science. London: Duckworth, 195–206.Google Scholar

Berti, Enrico. 1978. “The Intellection of ‘Indivisibles’ according to Aristotle, De anima III 6.” In Lloyd, G. E. R. and Owen, G. E. L (eds.), Aristotle on Mind and the Senses, Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium Aristotelicum, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 141–163.Google Scholar

Berti, Enrico 1994. “Encore sur l’intellection des ‘indivisibles’ selon Aristote, De anima III 6.” In Alberti, A. (ed.), Realtà e ragione. Studi di filosofia antica. Florence: Leo S. Olschki, 123–136.Google Scholar

Berti, Enrico 1996. “Does Aristotle’s Conception of Dialectic Develop?.” In Wians, William Robert (ed.), Aristotle’s Philosophical Development: Problems and Prospects, Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield, 105–130.Google Scholar

Betegh, Gábor. 2020. “Thinking with Empedocles: Aristotle on Soul as Harmonia.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 59.Google Scholar

Blair, G. A. 1992. Energeia and Entelecheia: “Act” in Aristotle. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar

Block, Irving. 1960. “Aristotle and the Physical Object.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 21(1): 93–101.Google Scholar

Block, Irving 1961. “Truth and Error in Aristotle’s Theory of Sense Perception.” The Philosophical Quarterly 11(42): 1–9.CrossRef Google Scholar

Blumenthal, H. J. 2000. “Simplicius”: On Aristotle On the Soul 3.1–5. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Bolton, Robert. 1978. “Aristotle’s Definitions of the Soul: De Anima II, 1–3.” Phronesis 23(3):258–278.Google Scholar

Bolton, Robert 1987. “Definition and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics and Generation of Animals.” In Gotthelf, A., and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,120–166.Google Scholar

Bonitz, Hermann. 1955. Index Aristotelicus. Zweite Auflage. Graz: Akademische Druck u. Verlagsanstalt.Google Scholar

Boyle, Matthew. 2012. “Essentially Rational Animals.” In Abel, Günter and Conant, James (eds.), Rethinking Epistemology, vol. 2. Berlin: De Gruyter, 395–428.Google Scholar

Brentano, Franz. 1977. The Psychology of Aristotle, edited and translated by George, Rolf. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Brittain, Charles. 2003. “Attention Deficit in Plotinus and Augustine: Psychological Problems in Christian and Platonist Theories of the Grades of Virtue.” Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 18: 223–275.CrossRef Google Scholar

Broackes, Justin. 1999. “Aristotle, Objectivity and Perception.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 17: 57–114.Google Scholar

Broadie, Sarah. 1993. “Aristotle’s Perceptual Realism.” Ancient Minds (Southern Journal of Philosophy 31, suppl.): 137–159.Google Scholar

Bronstein, David. 2016. Aristotle on Knowledge and Learning: The Posterior Analytics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Brunschwig, Jacques. 1991. “Les multiples chemins aristotéliciens de la sensation commune.” Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 96: 455–74.Google Scholar

Brunschwig, Jacques 1996. “En quel sens le sens commun est-il commun?.” In Viano, C. (ed.), Corps et âme. Sur le De Anima d’Aristote, Paris: Vrin, 189–218.Google Scholar

Burnyeat, Myles. 1992. “How Much Happens When Aristotle Sees Red and Hears Middle C? Remarks on De Anima 2. 7–8.” In Nussbaum and Rorty 1995: 421–434.Google Scholar

Burnyeat, Myles 2008. Aristotle’s Divine Intellect. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar

Carter, J. 2017. “Aristotle’s Critique of Timaean Psychology.” Rhizomata 5: 51–78.Google Scholar

Carter, J. 2018. “Does the Soul Weave? Reconsidering De Anima 1.4, 408a29–b18.” Phronesis 63: 25–63.CrossRef Google Scholar

Carter, J. 2019. Aristotle on Earlier Greek Psychology: The Science of Soul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cashdollar, Stanford. 1973. “Aristotle’s Account of Incidental Perception.” Phronesis 18: 156–175.Google Scholar

Castelli, L. 2018. Aristotle: Metaphysics Book Iota: Translated with an Introduction and Commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Caston, Victor. 1996. “Why Aristotle Needs Imagination.” Phronesis 41: 20–55.Google Scholar

Caston, Victor 1997. “Epiphenomenalisms, Ancient and Modern.” Philosophical Review 106(3): 309–363.CrossRef Google Scholar

Caston, Victor 1998. “Aristotle and the Problem of Intentionality.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58: 249–298.Google Scholar

Caston, Victor 1999. “Aristotle’s Two Intellects: A Modest Proposal.” Phronesis 44: 199–227.CrossRef Google Scholar

Caston, Victor 2000. “Aristotle’s Argument for Why the Understanding Is Not Compounded with the Body.” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 16: 135–174.Google Scholar

Caston, Victor 2002. “Aristotle on Consciousness.” Mind 111(2002): 751–815.Google Scholar

Caston, Victor 2005. “The Spirit and the Letter: Aristotle on Perception.” In Salles, Ricardo (ed.), Metaphysics, Soul and Ethics: Themes from the Work of Richard Sorabji. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 245–320.Google Scholar

Caston, Victor 2012a. “Higher-Order Awareness in Alexander of Aphrodisias.” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 55: 31–49.CrossRef Google Scholar

Caston, Victor 2012b. Alexander of Aphrodisias: On the Soul. Part I: Soul as Form of the Body, Parts of the Soul, Nourishment, and Perception. London: Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar

Caston, Victor 2018. “Aristotle on the Reality of Colours and Other Perceptible Qualities.” Res Philosophica 95(1): 35–68.Google Scholar

Caston, Victor 2020. “Aristotle on the Transmission of Information: Receiving Form without the Matter.” In Bennet, D. and Tovanen, J. (eds.), Philosophical Problems in Sense Perception: Testing the Limits of Aristotelianism, Berlin: Springer Verlag, 15–55.CrossRef Google Scholar

unpublished. “Aristotle on Common Perceptibles.”Google Scholar

Charles, David. 1984. Aristotle’s Philosophy of Action. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Charles, David. 2000. Aristotle on Meaning and Essence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Charlton, W. 1987. “Aristotle on the Place of the Mind in Nature.” In Gotthelf, Allan and Lennox, James J. (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle’s Biology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 408–423.Google Scholar

Charlton, W. 1991. “Aristotle’s Definition of Soul.” Phronesis 25: 170–186.CrossRef Google Scholar

Charlton, W. 2000. “Philoponus”: On Aristotle On the Soul 3.1–8. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Cherniss, H. 1935. Aristotle’s Criticism of Presocratic Philosophy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar

Cherniss, H. 1944. Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato and the Academy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar

Coates, Cameron F. and Lennox, James G. 2020. “Aristotle on the Unity of the Nutritive and Reproductive Functions.” Phronesis 65(4): 414–466.Google Scholar

Cohoe, Caleb M. 2013. “Why the Intellect Cannot Have a Bodily Organ: De Anima 3.4.” Phronesis 58(4): 347–377.Google Scholar

Cohoe, Caleb 2016. “When and Why Understanding Needs Phantasmata: A Moderate Interpretation of Aristotle’s De Memoria and De Anima on the Role of Images in Intellectual Activities.” Phronesis: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy 61(3): 337–372.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cohoe, Caleb 2020. “Living without a Soul: Why God and the Heavenly Movers Fall Outside of Aristotle’s Psychology.” Phronesis 65(3): 281–323.Google Scholar

Connell, Sophia M. 2016. Aristotle on Female Animals: A Study of the Generation of Animals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cook, Kathleen C. 1996. “Sexual Inequality in Aristotle’s Theories of Reproduction and Inheritance.” In Ward, J. (ed.), Feminism and Ancient Philosophy, New York, NY, USA: Routledge, 51–67.Google Scholar

Cooper, John M. 1982. “Aristotle on Natural Teleology.” In Schofield, Malcolm and Nussbaum, Martha Craven, (eds.), Language and Logos, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 197–222.Google Scholar

Cooper, John M. and Hutchinson, D. S. (eds.), 1997. Plato: Complete Works. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar

Corcilius, Klaus. 2008. “Two Jobs for the Practical Syllogism?” History of Philosophy and Logical Analysis 2: 163–184.Google Scholar

Corcilius, K. 2009. “How are Episodes of Thought Initiated According to Aristotle?” In Riel, G. V. and Destrée, P. (eds.), Ancient Perspective on Aristotle’s De Anima, Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press, 1–17.Google Scholar

Corcilius, K. 2014. “Activity, Passivity and Sensory Discrimination in Aristotle.” In Silva, J. F. and Yrjönsuuri, M., (eds.), Active Perception Ancient And Modern, New York: Springer, 31–53.Google Scholar

Corcilius, K. 2018. “Ideal Intellectual Cognition in Timaeus 37a2-c5.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 54: 51–106.Google Scholar

Corcilius, K. and Gregoric, Pavel. 2010. “Separability vs. Difference: Parts and Capacities of the Soul in Aristotle.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 39: 81–120.Google Scholar

Corcilius, Klaus and Gregoric, Pavel. 2013. “Aristotle’s Model of Animal Motion.” Phronesis 58 (1):52–97.Google Scholar

Corkum, Phil. 2008. “Aristotle on Ontological Dependence.” Phronesis 53(1): 65–92.Google Scholar

Corkum, Phil 2010. “Attention, Perception, and Thought in Aristotle.” Dialogue 49: 1–24.Google Scholar

Corkum, Phil 2013. “Substance and Independence in Aristotle.” In Schnieder, B., Steinberg, A. and Hoeltje, M. (eds.), Varieties of Dependence: Ontological Dependence, Supervenience, and Response-Dependence. Basic Philosophical Concepts Series, Munich, Germany: Philosophia Verlag, 36–67.Google Scholar

Correia, F. 2008. “Ontological Dependence.” Philosophy Compass 3: 1013–32.Google Scholar

Craver, Carl and Tabery, James. 2019. “Mechanisms in Science,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2019 ed.), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/science-mechanisms/.Google Scholar

Damasio, A. 1994. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain . New York: Putnam.Google Scholar

De Corte, Marcel. 1934. La Doctrine de l’intelligence chez Aristote. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar

De Haan, Daniel D. 2017. “Hylomorphism, New Mechanisms, and Explanations in Biology, Neuroscience, and Psychology.” In M. R. Simpson, William, Koons, Robert C., Teh, Nicholas J. (eds.), Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives on Contemporary Science, New York: Routledge, 293–326.Google Scholar

De Haas, Frans. 2005. “The Discriminating Capacity of the Soul in Aristotle’s Theory of Learning.” In Salles, R. (ed.), Metaphysics, Soul, and Ethics in Ancient Thought, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 321–44.Google Scholar

Delcomminette, S. 2020. “De Anima III 6.” In Guyomarc’h, G., Louguet, C., and Murgier, C. (eds.), Aristote et l’ame humaine: Lectures de “De anima” III offertes a Michel Crubellier. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar

de Ribera-Martin, Ignacio. 2019. “Seed (Sperma) and Kuēma in Aristotle’s Generation of Animals.” Journal of the History of Biology 52: 87–124.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Destrée, Pierre. 2007. “Aristotle on the Causes of Akrasia. in Akrasia.” In Bobonich, Christopher and Destrée, Pierre (eds.), Greek Philosophy, Leiden: Brill, 139–166.Google Scholar

Düring, I. 1957. “Aristotle in the Ancient Biographical Tradition. Sweden: Göteborg.” Ancient Philosophy 29: 1–37.Google Scholar

Driscoll, J. 1992. “The Anaxagorean Assumption in Aristotle’s Account of Mind.” In Anton, J. and Preus, A. (eds.), Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy 5, New York: State University of New York Press, 273–92.Google Scholar

Drossaart Lulofs, J. H. (ed.), 1965. Aristotle, De Generatione Animalium. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Emilsson, Eyjólfur. 1988. Plotinus on Sense-Perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Emilsson, Eyjólfur 2017. Plotinus. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar

Engmann, J. 1976. “Imagination and Truth in Aristotle.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 14(3): 259–265.CrossRef Google Scholar

Epstein, S. 1994. “Integration of the Cognitive and the Psychodynamic Unconscious.” American Psychologist 409: 709–724.Google Scholar

Evans, J. and Frankish, K.. (eds.), 2009. In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Everson, Stephen. 1997. Aristotle on Perception. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Falcon, Andrea. 2009. “The Scope and Unity of Aristotle’s Investigation of the Soul.” In Van Riel, G. and Destrée, P. (eds.), Ancient Perspectives on Aristotle’s De Anima. Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press, 167–181.Google Scholar

Fiecconi, Elena. Forthcoming. “Aristotle on attention,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie. www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/agph-2018-0014/html.Google Scholar

Fine, G. 1984. “Separation.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 2: 31–88.Google Scholar

Förster, Aurelius. (ed.), 1912. Aristotelis De anima libri III. Budapest: Acad. litt. Hungary.Google Scholar

Frankish, K. 2010. “Dual-Process and Dual-System Theories of Reasoning.” Philosophy Compass 5: 914–926.Google Scholar

Frede, Dorothea, 1992. “The Cognitive Role of Phantasia in Aristotle.” In Nussbaum and Rorty 1992, 279–95.Google Scholar

Frede, Dorothea 1996. “The Philosophical Economy of Plato’s Psychology: Rationality and Common Concepts in the Timaeus.” In Frede, Michael and Striker, Gisela (eds.), Rationality in Greek Thought, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 29–58.CrossRef Google Scholar

Frede, Dorothea 2012. “The Endoxon Mystique: What Endoxa Are And What They Are Not.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 43 (Winter 2012): 185–215.Google Scholar

Frede, Michael. 1996. “La theorie aristotelicienne de l’intellect agent.” In Dherbey, Gilbert Romeyer (ed.), Corps et Ame: Sur le De Anima d’Aristote, Paris: Libraire Philosophique J. Vrin, 377–390.Google Scholar

Freeland, Cynthia. 1994. “Aristotle on Perception, Appetition, and Self-Motion” In Gill, M. L. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.), Self-Motion, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 35–63.Google Scholar

Frey, Christopher. 2007. “Organic Unity and the Matter of Man.” OSAP 32: 167–204.Google Scholar

Frey, Christopher 2015a. “Two Conceptions of Soul in Aristotle.” In Ebrey, David (ed.), Theory and Practice in Aristotle’s Natural Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 137–160.Google Scholar

Frey, Christopher 2015b. “From Blood to Flesh: Homonymy, Unity, and Ways of Being in Aristotle.” Ancient Philosophy 35(2): 375–394.Google Scholar

Gabbe, M. 2016. “Aristotle on the Metaphysics of Emotions.” Apeiron 49(1): 33–56.Google Scholar

Grasso, R. 2013. “Receiving Forms without the Matter in Aristotle’s DA II 12.” Philosophical Inquiry, 36(1–2): 23–44.Google Scholar

Gelber, Jessica. 2020. “Soul’s Tools.” In Heat, Pneuma and Soul in Ancient Philosophy and Medicine, King, C. and Bartoš, H. (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 243–259.Google Scholar

Gendler, Tamar. 2008. “Alief in Action (And Reaction).” Mind and Language 23: 552–585.Google Scholar

Gerson, Lloyd. 2004. “The Unity of Intellect in Aristotle’s ‘De Anima.’” Phronesis 49, 4: 348–373.Google Scholar

Gill, Mary Louise. 1989. Aristotle on Substance: The Paradox of Unity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Golitsis, Pantelis. 2016. “John Philoponus’ Commentary on the Third Book of Aristotle’s De Anima, Wrongly Attributed to Stephanus.” In Sorabji, R. (ed.), Aristotle Re-Interpreted. New Findings on Seven Hundred Years of the Ancient Commentators. London: Bloomsbury, 393–412.Google Scholar

Gottschalk, H. B. 1971. “Soul as Harmonia.” Phronesis 16(1):179–198.Google Scholar

Graham, D. 2010. The Texts of Early Greek Philosophy: The Complete Fragments and Selected Testimonies of the Major Presocratics, 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Graeser, Andreas. 1977. “On Language, Thought, and Reality in Ancient Greek Philosophy.” Dialectica 31(3–4):359–388.Google Scholar

Graeser, Andreas 1978. “Aristotle’s Framework of Sensibilia.” In Lloyd, G. E. R. and Owen, G. E. L. (eds.), Aristotle on Mind and the Senses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 69–97.Google Scholar

Greco, John and Groff, Ruth. (eds.), 2012. Powers and Capacities in Philosophy: The New Aristotelianism. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gregoric, Pavel. 2007. Aristotle on the Common Sense. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gregoric, Pavel 2020. “Alexander of Aphrodisias on the Common Sense.” In Mousavian, S. and Fink, J. (eds.), The Internal Senses in the Aristotelian Tradition. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 29–44.Google Scholar

Gregoric, Pavel 2021. “Perceiving that We are Not Seeing and Hearing: Reflexive Awareness in Aristotle.” In Fink, J. and Gregoric, P. (eds.), Encounters with Aristotelian Philosophy of Mind. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 119–138.Google Scholar

Gregoric, G. and Pfeiffer, C.. 2015. “Grasping Aristotle’s Intellect.” Documenti e Studi sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale 26: 13–31.Google Scholar

Guthrie, W. K. C. 1962–1981. A History of Greek Philosophy, 6 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hadot, Ilsetraut. 1997. “Aspects de la théorie de la perception chez les néoplatoniciens: sensation (aisthēsis), sensation commune (koinē aisthēsis) at de conscience de soi (sunaisthēsis).” Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 8: 33–87.Google Scholar

Hahmann, Andree. 2014. “Kann man Aristoteles’ Philosophie der Wahrnehmung noch für wahr nehmen?.” Philosophisches Jahrbuch 121: 3–32.Google Scholar

Hamlyn, D.W. 1968. Aristotle De Anima, Books II and III (with passages from Book I). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Hamlyn, D.W. 1968b. “Koine aisthesis.” The Monist 52: 195–209.Google Scholar

Hardie, W. F. R. 1976. “Concepts of Consciousness in Aristotle.” Mind 85: 388–411.Google Scholar

Heinaman, Robert. 1990. “Aristotle and the Mind-Body Problem.” Phronesis 35 (1): 83–102.CrossRef Google Scholar

Henry, Devin. 2006. “Understanding Aristotle’s Reproductive Hylomorphism.” Apeiron 39: 257–287.Google Scholar

Hicks, Robert Drew. (ed.), trans., and commentary, 1907. Aristotle, De Anima. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Huby, Pamela. 1997. Priscian: On Theophrastus On Sense Perception. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Hussey, Edward. 2012. “Aristotle on Earlier Natural Science.” In Shields, Christopher (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 17–45.Google Scholar

Hutto, Daniel D. and Myin, Erik. 2013. Radicalizing Enactivism: Basic Minds Without Content. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Ibn, Sīnā. 1959. Avicenna’s De anima, Rahman, F., ed., Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ierodiakonou, K. 2005. “Empedocles on Colour and Colour Vision.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 29: 1–37.Google Scholar

Jackson, Frank. 1977. Perception: A Representative Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Jannone, A. and Barbotin, E. (ed.), 2002. De l’âme. Paris: Belles Lettres.Google Scholar

Johansen, Thomas Kjeller. 1997. Aristotle on the Sense-Organs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kjeller, Johansen Thomas . 2002. “Imprinted on the Mind: Active and Passive in Aristotle’s Theory of Sense-Perception.” In Saunders, B. and van Brakel, J. (eds.), Theories, Tecnologies, Instrumentalities of Colour, United States: University Press of America, 169–188.Google Scholar

Johansen, Thomas Kjeller 2005. “In Defense of Inner Sense: Aristotle on Perceiving that One Sees.” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 21: 235–276.CrossRef Google Scholar

Johansen, Thomas Kjeller 2009. “From Plato’s Timaeus to Aristotle’s De Caelo: The Case of the Missing World Soul.” In Bowen, Alan and Wildberg, Christian (eds.), New Perspectives on Aristotle’s De Caelo, Leiden, Netherlands: Brill, 9–28.Google Scholar

Johansen, Thomas Kjeller 2012. The Powers of Aristotle’s Soul. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Johnstone, Mark. 2012. “Aristotle on Odour and Smell.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 43: 143–183.Google Scholar

Johnstone, Mark 2015. “Aristotle and Alexander on Perceptual Error.” Phronesis 60(3): 310–338.Google Scholar

Johnstone, Mark 2021. “Aristotle on the Unity of Touch.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 59(1): 23–43.Google Scholar

Judson, L. 1991. “Chance and ‘Always or for the Most Part’ in Aristotle.” In Judson, Lindsay (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics: A Collection of Essays, New York: Oxford University Press, 73–99.Google Scholar

Judson, L. 2018. “Physics I.5.” In Quarantotto, D. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics Book I: A Systematic Exploration, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 130–153, DOI: 10.1017/9781108181853.007.Google Scholar

Kahn, Charles H. 1960. “Religion and Natural Philosophy in Empedocles’ Doctrine of the Soul.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 42: 3–35.Google Scholar

Kahn, Charles H. 1992. “Aristotle on Thinking.” In Craven Nussbaum, Martha and Rorty, Amélie (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 359–380.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar

Kalderon, Mark Eli. 2015. Form Without Matter: Empedocles and Aristotle on Color Perception. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Karbowski, J. 2019. Aristotle’s Method in Ethics: Philosophy in Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

King, Colin Guthrie. 2020. “Δόξαι and the Tools of Dialectic in De Anima I.1–3.” In Fink, J. and Gregoric, P. (eds.), Encounters with Aristotelian Philosophy of Mind., New York: Routledge, 119–138.Google Scholar

Kirk, G., Raven, J., and Schofield, M. [KRS]. 1983. The Presocratic Philosophers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Koons, Benjamin Robert. 2019. “Aristotle’s Infallible Perception.” Apeiron 52(4): 415–443.Google Scholar

Kosman, Aryeh. 1975. “Perceiving that We Perceive: On the Soul III, 2.” The Philosophical Review 84: 499–519.Google Scholar

Kosman, Aryeh 1992. “What Does the Maker Mind Make.” In Nussbaum, Martha Craven and Rorty, Amélie (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 343–358.Google Scholar

Kosman, Aryeh 2005. “Commentary on Johansen.” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 21: 277–286.Google Scholar

Kosman, Aryeh 2013. The Activity of Being: An Essay on Aristotle’s Ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.Google Scholar

Kosman, Aryeh 2014. Virtues of Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.Google Scholar

Kullman, Wolfgang. 2012. “Aristotle’s Gradual Turn from Dialectic.” In Fink, Jakob Leth (ed.), The Development of Dialectic from Plato to Aristotle, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 296–315.Google Scholar

Lautner, Peter. 1992. “Philoponus, In De Anima III: Quest for an Author.” The Classical Quarterly 42: 510–522.Google Scholar

Lautner, Peter 1994. “Rival Theories of Self-Awareness in Late Neoplatonism.” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 39: 107–116.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lautner, Peter 2000. “Plutarch of Athens on koinē aisthēsis and phantasia.” Ancient Philosophy 20: 425–146.Google Scholar

Lautner, Peter 2004. “The koinē aisthēsis in Proclus and Ps.-Simplicius.” Philosophy, Science, and Exegesis in Greek, Arabic and Latin Commentaries, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies Supplement 83: 163–173.Google Scholar

Lautner, Peter 2014. “Perceptual Awareness in the Ancient Commentators.” In Remes, P. and Slaveva-Griffin, S. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Neoplatonism, London: Routledge, 323–338.Google Scholar

Lear, Jonathan. 1988. Aristotle: The Desire to Understand. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lebrecht, S., Bar, M., Feldman Barrett, L. and Tarr, M. J.. 2012. “Micro-Valences: Perceiving Affective Valence in Everyday Objects.” Frontiers in Psychology 3: 1–5.Google Scholar

Lee, Mi-Kyoung. 2011. “The Distinction between Primary and Secondary Qualities in Ancient Greek Philosophy.” In Nolan, Lawrence (ed.), Primary and Secondary Qualities: The Historical and Ongoing Debate, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 15–40.Google Scholar

Lefebvre, David, 2021. “Looking for the Formative Power in Aristotle’s Nutritive Soul.” In Koromplii, G. and Lo Presti, R. (eds.), Nutrition and Nutritive Soul in Aristotle and Aristotelianism, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Lennox, J. 2014. “Aristotle on the Emergence of Material Complexity.” HOPOS 4(2): 272–305.Google Scholar

Lewis, F. 1996. “Self-Knowledge in Aristotle.” Topoi 15: 39–58.Google Scholar

Lewis, F. 2003. “Is there Room for Anaxagoras in an Aristotelian Theory of Mind?” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 25: 89–129.Google Scholar

Long, A. 1966. “Thinking and Sense-perception in Empedocles: Mysticism or Materialism?” Classical Quarterly 16: 256–276.Google Scholar

Lorenz, Hendrik. 2006. The Brute Within: Appetitive Desire in Plato and Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lorenz, Hendrik 2007. “The Assimilation of Sense to Sense-Object in Aristotle.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 33: 179–220.Google Scholar

Lorenz, Hendrik 2009. “Review of Pavel Gregoric, Aristotle on the Common Sense.” Rhizai 6: 225–231.Google Scholar

Machamer, Peter, Darden, Lindley, and Craver, Carl F. 2000. “Thinking about Mechanisms.” Philosophy of Science 67(1):1–25.Google Scholar

MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1999. Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues. Chicago, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar

Mansfeld, J. 1990. “Doxography and Dialectic: the Sitz in Leben of the Placita.” In Haase, W. and Temporini, H. (eds.), Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, Teil II: Principat, Band, 36.4. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter, 3056–3229.Google Scholar

Marmodoro, Anna. 2014. Aristotle on Perceiving Objects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

McKirahan, R. 2010. Philosophy Before Socrates: An Introduction with Texts and Commentary (2nd ed.). Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar

Menn, Stephen. 2002. “Aristotle’s Definition of Soul and the Programme of the De Anima.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 22: 83–139.Google Scholar

Mignucci, M. 1994. “Truth and Thought in the De Anima.” In Alberti, A. (ed.), Realtà e ragione. Studi di filosofia antica, Florence: Leo S. Olschki, 137–55.Google Scholar

Miller, Fred D. 2012. “Aristotle on the Separability of Mind.” In Shields, Christopher (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Aristotle, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 306–339.Google Scholar

Miller, Fred D. 2018. Aristotle: On the Soul and Other Psychological Works. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mirus, Christopher V. 2001. “Homonymy and the Matter of a Living Body.” Ancient Philosophy 21 (2):357–373.Google Scholar

Modrak, Deborah. 1981a. “An Aristotelian Theory of Consciousness?.” Ancient Philosophy 1: 160–170.Google Scholar

Modrak, Deborah 1981b. “Koinē aisthēsis and the Discrimination of Sensible Differences in de Anima III.2.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 11: 405–423.Google Scholar

Modrak, Deborah 1986. “Φαντασία Reconsidered.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 68(1): 47–69.Google Scholar

Modrak, Deborah 1987. Aristotle: The Power of Perception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Morsink, Johannes. 1982. Aristotle on the Generation of Animals: A Philosophical Study. Washington, DC: University Press of America.Google Scholar

Moss, Jessica. 2012. Aristotle on the Apparent Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Moss, Jessica 2014. “Right Reason in Plato and Aristotle: On the Meaning of ‘Logos.’” Phronesis 59: 181–230.Google Scholar

Mourelatos, A. 1984. “Aristotle’s Rationalist Account of Qualitative Interaction.” Phronesis 29: 1–16.Google Scholar

Noë, Alva. 2009. Out of Our Heads: Why You Are Not Your Brain, and Other Lessons From the Biology of Consciousness. New York, NY: Hill & Wang.Google Scholar

Nolan, Lawrence. (ed.), 2011. Primary and Secondary Qualities: The Historical and Ongoing Debate. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha C. 1978. Aristotle’s De Motu Animalium. Princeton UP.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha C. and Oksenberg Rorty, Amélie (eds.). 1992. Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Ogden, Stephen R. 2016. “Individuation and the Afterlife in Thomas Aquinas and Some Muslim Philosophers.” In Ogden, Stephen, Klima, Gyula, and Hall, Alexander, (eds.), The Metaphysics of Personal Identity, Proceedings of the Society for Medieval Logic and Metaphysics, Cambridge Scholars, 33–62.Google Scholar

Osborne, Catherine. 1983. “Aristotle, De Anima 3.2: How Do We Perceive that We See and Hear.” Classical Quarterly 33: 401–411.Google Scholar

Owen, G. E. L. 1968. Aristotle on Dialectic: The Topics. Proceedings of the Third Symposium Aristotelicum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Owens, Joseph. 1982. “Aristotle on Common Sensibles and Incidental Perception.” Phoenix 36: 215–236.Google Scholar

Papish, Laura. 2014. “Aristotle on Common Perception.” Apeiron 47(3): 342–355.Google Scholar

Pasnau, Robert. 2011. “Scholastic Qualities, Primary and Secondary.” In Nolan, Lawrence (ed.), Primary and Secondary Qualities: The Historical and Ongoing Debate, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 41–61.Google Scholar

Peck, A. L. 1942. Aristotle: Generation of Animals. Loeb.Google Scholar

Pellegrin, Pierre. 2018. “What is Aristotle’s Generation of Animals about?” In Falcon, A. and Lefebvre, D. (eds.), Aristotle’s Generation of Animals: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 77–88.Google Scholar

Perälä, Mika. 2019. “Perceiving that We Hear and See in Aristotle’s De anima.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 101: 317–344.Google Scholar

Peramatzis, Michail. 2011. Priority in Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Perkams, Matthias. 2005. “Priscian of Lydia. Commentator on the De anima in the Tradition of Iamblichus.” Mnemosyne 58: 510–530.Google Scholar

Perkams, Matthias 2008. Selbstbewusstsein in der Spätantike. Die neuplatonische Kommentare zu Aristoteles’ De anima. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Philoponus, John. 1966. Commentaire sur le de anima d’Aristote, traduction de Guillaume de Moerbeke. Verbeke, G. (ed.), Paris: Editions Béatrice-Nauwelaerts.Google Scholar

Philoponus, John 2014. On Aristotle on the Soul 1.3–5. Trans. Philip J. van der Eijk. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Platt, Arthur. 1910. De Generatione Animalium. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Polansky, Ronald M. 2007. Aristotle’s De Anima. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Politis, Vasilis. 2001. “Aristotle’s Account of the Intellect as Pure Capacity.” Ancient Philosophy 21(2): 375–402.Google Scholar

Rapp, C. 2002. Aristoteles:Rhetorik: Übersetzt and erläutert von Chrisof Rapp. Be rlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar

Remes, Pauliina. 2007. Plotinus on Self. The Philosophy of the “We”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Reeve, C. D. C. 1998. “Dialectic and Philosophy in Aristotle.” In Gentzler, J., (ed.), Method in Ancient Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 227–252.Google Scholar

Reeve, C. D. C. 2017. Aristotle: De Anima. Translated with Introduction and Notes. Indianapolis, IN/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Richardson, Henry S. 1992. “Desire and the Good in De Anima.” In Nussbaum, Martha C and Oksenberg Rorty, Amélie (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 381–400.Google Scholar

Robinson, H. M. 1994. Perception. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Rodier, G. 1900. Aristote: Traité de l’âme. Paris: Leux.Google Scholar

Ross, W. D. 1923. Aristotle. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ross, W. D. (ed.), 1924. Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Ross, W. D. (ed.),1955. Aristotle: Parva Naturalia. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Ross, W. D. (ed. and commentary), 1961. Aristotle, De Anima. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Scaltsas, T. 1996. “Biological Matter and Perceptual Powers in Aristotle’s De anima.” Topoi 14: 25–37.Google Scholar

Scheiter, Krisanna. 2012. “Images, Appearances and Phantasia in Aristotle.” Phronesis 57(3): 251–278.Google Scholar

Schofield, M. 1992/1995. “Aristotle on the Imagination”. In Craven Nussbaum, Martha and Rorty, Amélie (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 249–278.Google Scholar

Sedley, David. 1997. “‘Becoming Like God’ in the Timaeus and Aristotle.” In Calvo, T. and Brisson, L. (eds.), Interpreting the Timaeus-Critias, Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag 9, 327–339.Google Scholar

Sedley, David 2007. Creationism and its Critics in Antiquity. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Segvic, H. 2002. “Aristotle’s Metaphysics of Action.” In Meixner, Uwe and Newen, Albert (eds.), Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy, Volume 5, Issue 1: Focus: Medieval Philosophy, Leiden: Brill, 23–53.Google Scholar

Sharples, Robert W. 1994. Alexander of Aphrodisias: Quaestiones 2.16–3.15. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Sharples, R. W 2004. Alexander of Aphrodisias: Supplement to On the Soul. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Sharples, Robert W. 2008. Alexander Aphrodisiensis, De anima Libri Mantissa: A New Edition of the Greek Text, with Introduction and Commentary. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Shields, Christopher John. 1993. “The Homonymy of the Body in Aristotle.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 75(1): 1–30.Google Scholar

Shields, Christopher John 2007. “The Priority of Soul in Aristotle’s De Anima: Mistaking Categories?” In Frede, Dorothea and Reis, Burkhard (eds.), Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy, Berlin: Gruyter, 267–290.Google Scholar

Shields, Christopher John 2011. “Die Seele.” In Rapp, C. and Corcilius, K. (eds.), Beiträge zur Aristotelischen Handlungstheorie, Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 313–323.Google Scholar

Shields, Christopher John 2013. “The Phainomenological Method in Aristotle’s Metaphysics.” In Feser, E. (ed.), Aristotle on Method and Metaphysics, Oxford, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 7–27.Google Scholar

Shields, Christopher John 2016. De Anima. Translation and Commentary. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Shields, Christopher John 2020. “In Dialogue about Harmony.” In Revisiting Aristotle’s Fragments, Mesquita, A. P., Noriega-Olmos, S., and Shields, C. J., (eds.), Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 141–162.Google Scholar

Simons, Peter. 1987. Parts: A Study in Ontology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

[Simplicius]. 1995. On Aristotle’s On the Soul 3.1–5, Blumenthal, H. J., (trans.), London: Duckworth and Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Simpson, William M. R., Koons, Robert Charles, and Teh, Nicholas. (eds.), 2017. Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives on Contemporary Science. Routledge.Google Scholar

Singpurwalla, Rachel. 2010. “The Tripartite Theory of Motivation in Plato’s Republic.” Philosophy Compass 5(11): 880–892.Google Scholar

Sisko, John E. 1999. “On Separating the Intellect from the Body: Aristotle’s De Anima III.4, 429a10-b5.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 81(3): 249–267.Google Scholar

Siwek, Paulus. ed. and commentary, 1965. Tractatus De Anima; Graece et Latine. Roma: Desclée, Editori Pontifici.Google Scholar

Smith, Robin. 1993. “Aristotle on the Uses of Dialectic.” Synthese 96: 335–358.Google Scholar

Sophonias. 1883. In Libros Aristotelis De Anima Paraphrasis. Hayduck, M. (ed.), Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar

Sorabji, Richard. 1971. “Aristotle on Demarcating the Five Senses.” The Philosophical Review 80: 55–79.Google Scholar

Sorabji, Richard 1972. “Aristotle, Mathematics and Colour.” The Classical Quarterly 22(2): 293–308.Google Scholar

Sorabji, Richard 1992/1995. “Intentionality and Physiological Processes: Aristotle’s Theory of Sense-Perception.” In Nussbaum, Martha Craven and Rorty, Amélie (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 195–225.Google Scholar

Sorabji, Richard 1993. Animal Minds and Human Morals: The Origins of the Western Debate. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Sorabji, Richard 2003. The Philosophy of the Commentators, 200–600 AD: A Sourcebook. Vol. 1: Psychology. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Sorabji, Richard 2004. “Aristotle’s Perceptual Functions Permeated by Platonist Reason.” In Mace, C. and van Riel, G. (eds.), Platonic Ideas and Concept Formation in Ancient and Medieval Thought, Leuven: Leuven University Press, 99–118.Google Scholar

Stanovich, K. 2011. Rationality and the Reflective Mind. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Steel, Carlos. 1997. “Simplicius”: On Aristotle’s On the Soul 2.5–12. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

Steel, Carlos 2006. “Proklos über Selbstreflexion und Selbstbegründung.” In Perkams, M. and Piccione, R. M. (eds.), Proklos: Methode, Seelenlehre, Metaphysik. Leiden: Brill, 230–55.Google Scholar

Steel, Carlos 2013. “Simplicius”: On Aristotle On the Soul 3.6–13. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Steel, Carlos 2017. “Newly Discovered Scholia from Philoponus’ Lost Commentary on De anima III.” Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie Médievale 84: 223–243.Google Scholar

Stevens, Annick. 2009. “L’apparition de la conscience dans le De anima et d’autres œuvres d’Aristote.” In van Riel, G. and Destrée, P. (eds.), Ancient Perspectives on Aristotle’s De anima, Leuven: Leuven University Press, 35–48.Google Scholar

Steward, Helen. 2012. A Metaphysics for Freedom. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Striker, Gisela. 2009. Aristotle: Prior Analytics Book 1. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, C. C. W. 1983. “The Arguments in the Phaedo Concerning the Thesis that the Soul is a harmonia.” In Anton, John P. and Preus, Anthony (eds.), Essays in Ancient Greek philosophy, vol. 2. Albany: SUNY, 217–231.Google Scholar

Taylor, R. C. 2009. (tr.), Averroes (Ibn Rushd) of Cordova: Long Commentary on The De Anima of Aristotle. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Themistius. 1899. Themistii in libros Aristotelis De anima paraphrasis (Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, 5.3). Berlin: G. Reimer.Google Scholar

Thompson, Evan. 2007. Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Torstrik, A. (ed.), 1862. Aristotelis De Anima Libri III. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar

Trendelenburg, Friedrich Adolph. 1833. Aristotelis De anima libri tres Jena: Sumtibus Walzii.Google Scholar

Twomey, R. 2019. “Aristotle’s Disjunctivism.” In Hetherington, Stephen and Smith, Nicolas D. (eds.), What the Ancients Offer to Contemporary Epistemology. What the Ancients Offer to Contemporary Epistemology, New York: Routledge, 140–156.Google Scholar

Varela, Francisco J., Thompson, Evan, and Rosch, Eleanor. 1991. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Vasiliou, I. 1996. “Perception, Knowledge, and the Sceptic in Aristotle.” OSAP XIV: 83–131.Google Scholar

Viano, Cristina. 1996. “La Doxographie du De Anima (I, 2–5), ou le Contre-modele de l’Ame.” In Viano, Cristina and Dherbey, Gilbert Romeyer (eds.), Corps et âme: Études sur le De Anima, Paris: Vrin, 51–79.Google Scholar

von Perger, M. 1997: Die Allseele in Platons Timaios. Stuttgart: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar

Ward, Julie K. 1996. “Souls and Figures: Defining the Soul in De anima II.” Ancient Philosophy 16 (1): 113–128.Google Scholar

Ward, Julie K. 1988. “Perception and Logos in De anima ii 12.” Ancient Philosophy 8(2): 217.Google Scholar

Ward, Julie K. 2008. “Is Human a Homonym for Aristotle?” Apeiron 41(3):75–98.Google Scholar

Warren, J. 2007. Presocratics. Stocksfield: Acumen.Google Scholar

Wedin, Michael V. 1988. Mind and Imagination in Aristotle. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Westerink, Leendert Gerrit, ed. and trans. 1976. The Greek Commentaries on Plato’s Phaedo. Vol. 2, Damascius. Netherlands: North-Holland.Google Scholar

Williams, Bernard. 1986. “Hylomorphism.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 4: 189–199.Google Scholar

Wilson, J. C. 1904. “On the Platonic Doctrine of the asumbletoi arithmoi.” Classical Review 18: 247–260.Google Scholar

Book contents

References

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive