Anderson, M. L. (2010). Neural reuse: A fundamental organizational principle of the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(4), 245–66.Google Scholar

Arai, T. (2002). An effective method for education in acoustics and speech science: Integrating textbooks, computer simulation and physical models. Paper presented at the Proc. Forum Acusticum Sevilla.Google Scholar

Arai, T. (2012). Education in acoustics and speech science using vocal-tract models. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(3), 2444–54. doi:10.1121/1.3677245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Arai, T. (2013). Learning acoustic phonetics by listening, seeing, and touching. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, 19(1), 025017. doi:10.1121/1.4799629.Google Scholar

Armstrong, L. E. & Ward, I. C. (1931). A Handbook of English Intonation. Oxford: W. Heffer & Sons.Google Scholar

Ashby, M. & Przedlacka, J. (2013). Towards a history of teaching, learning and assessment in phonetics. In Proceedings of the Phonetics Teaching and Learning Conference, University College London, pp. 11–14.Google Scholar

Ashby, M., Maidment, J. & Abberton, A. (1996). Analytic listening: A new approach to ear-training. In V. Hazan, S. Rosen & M. Holland, eds., Speech Hearing and Language: Work In Progress 1996 (vol. 9), UCL Department of Phonetics and Linguistics. www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/shl9/ashby/ma.htm, last accessed 17 September 2020.Google Scholar

Ashby, M., Yanagisawa, K., Kim, Y., Maidment, J. & Przedlacka, J. (2009). Achieving interactivity in online learning of phonetic skills. In Proceedings of the Phonetics Teaching and Learning Conference, University College London, pp. 15–18.Google Scholar

Ashby, P. (2016). Interacting with phonetics: A synopsis. Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan, 20(3), 121–3.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A., Gathercole, S. & Papagno, C. (1998). The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological Review, 105(1), 158–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bell-Berti, F. (2017). Teaching phonetics and speech science: What’s changed and what hasn’t. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142(4), 2616–2616.Google Scholar

Benjamin, A. S. & Tullis, J. (2010). What makes distributed practice effective? Cognitive Psychology, 61(3), 228–47.Google Scholar

Bent, T. (2017). Teaching phonetics in an active-learning classroom: The role of teaching assistants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142(4), 2617–2617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bent, T. & Garl, E. (2013). Spectrogram puzzles: A tool for teaching acoustic phonetics. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, 19(1), 025008. doi:10.1121/1.4799246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biggs, J. & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University, 4th ed. Buckingham: Society for Research Into Higher Education.Google Scholar

Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2017). Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [computer program]. www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/.Google Scholar

Bolinger, D. (1986). Intonation and Its Parts: Melody in Spoken English. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Bolinger, D. (1989). Intonation and Its Uses: Melody in Grammar and Discourse. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Brazil, D., Coulthard, M. & Johns, C. (1980). Discourse Intonation and Language Teaching. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Cauldwell, R. (2002). The functional irrhythmicality of spontaneous speech: A discourse view of speech rhythms. Apples – Journal of Applied Language Studies, 2(1), 1–24. Available from http://apples.jyu.fi.Google Scholar

Child Speech Disorder Research Network. (2017). Good Practice Guidelines for Transcription of Children’s Speech Samples in Clinical Practice and Research. www.nbt.nhs.uk/sites/default/files/BSLTRU_Good%20practice%20guidelines_Transcription_2Ed_2017.pdf, last accessed 17 September 2020.Google Scholar

Clark, J. M. & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149–210.Google Scholar

Clark, R., Nguyen, F. & Sweller, J. (2006). Efficiency in Learning: Evidence-Based Guidelines to Manage Cognitive Load. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.Google Scholar

Clarke, W. D. (1996). A study of lecture and computer‐based teaching of articulatory and acoustic aspects of American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99(4), 2550–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coey, C., Esling, J. H. & Moisik, S. R. (2014). iPA Phonetics [app for iPhone]. Version 1.0, Department of Linguistics, University of Victoria.Google Scholar

Collins, B. S., Mees, I. M. & Carley, P. (2019). Practical Phonetics and Phonology: A Resource Book for Students, 4th ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Cotton, D. R. E., Miller, W. & Kneale, P. (2018). The Cinderella of academia: Is higher education pedagogic research undervalued in UK research assessment?. Studies in Higher Education, 43(9), 1625–36.Google Scholar

Cousin, G. (2006). An introduction to threshold concepts. Planet, 17, December, 4–5. http://neillthew.typepad.com/files/threshold-concepts-1.pdf, last accessed 17 September 2020.Google Scholar

Denes, P. B. & Pinson, E. (1993). The Speech Chain, 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Entwistle, N. J. & Peterson, E. R. (2004). Conceptions of learning and knowledge in higher education: Relationships with study behaviour and influences of learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 41(6), 407–28.Google Scholar

Farmer, A. (1997). Spectrography. In Ball, M. J. & Code, C., eds., Instrumental Clinical Phonetics. Chichester, UK: Whurr Publishers, pp. 22–63.Google Scholar

Finan, D. S. (2008). Speech science education: Roll over Beethoven. Perspectives on Speech Science and Orofacial Disorder, 18, 22–30.Google Scholar

Grabe, E., Nolan, F. & Farrar, K. J. (1998). IViE-A comparative transcription system for intonational variation in English. In Fifth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, 30th November – 4th December 1998, Sydney, Australia. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/df0e/b538a639bb83ae99932f1655856d4453a873.pdf, last accessed 17 September 2020.Google Scholar

Grasso, M. (2017). Reflecting upon students’ problems in phonemic dictation. In Proceedings of the Phonetics Teaching and Learning Conference 2017, University College London, pp. 54–7.Google Scholar

Harrison, A. G. & Treagust, D. F. (2006). Teaching and learning with analogies. In Aubusson, P. J., Harrison, A. G. & Ritchie, S. M., eds., Metaphor and Analogy in Science Education, vol. 30. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media, pp. 11–24.Google Scholar

Hayes, B. (1995). Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hayward, K. (2000). Experimental Phonetics. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar

HEA (2011). The United Kingdom Professional Standards Framework. www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/downloads/uk_professional_standards_framework.pdf, last accessed 17 September 2020.Google Scholar

Heselwood, B. (2013). Phonetic Transcription in Theory and Practice. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Hockings, C., Thomas, L., Ottaway, J. & Jones, R. (2018). Independent learning: What we do when you’re not there. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(2), 145–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howard, S. J. & Heselwood, B. C. (2002). Learning and teaching phonetic transcription for clinical purposes. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 16(5), 371–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Huckvale, M. (2017). SFS/RTPITCH version 1.3. www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/resource/sfs/rtpitch/, last accessed 17 September 2020.Google Scholar

International Phonetic Association (IPA). (1999). Handbook of the International Phonetic Association. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Jenkins, A. (2002). Pedagogic research at Brookes: Achievements, opportunities and questions. Teaching Forum, 50 (Autumn), 3–6.Google Scholar

Jones, D. (1909). The Pronunciation of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Journal of the International Phonetics Association (no date). Illustrations of the IPA www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-the-international-phonetic-association/illustrations-of-the-ipa-free-content.Google Scholar

Knight, R.-A. (2010a). Transcribing nonsense words: The effect of numbers of voices and repetitions. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 24(6), 473–84.Google Scholar

Knight, R.-A. (2010b). Sounds for study: Speech and language therapy students’ use and perception of exercise podcasts for phonetics. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 22(3), 269–76.Google Scholar

Knight, R.-A. (2011). Towards a cognitive model of phonetic transcription. Phonetics Teaching and Learning Conference 2011, University College London.Google Scholar

Knight, R.-A. (2012). Phonetics: A Coursebook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knight, R.-A. & Maguire, E. (2011). The relationship between short-term memory and the phonetic transcription accuracy of speech and language therapy students. In Proceedings of the Phonetics Teaching and Learning Conference 2011, University College London, pp. 21–4.Google Scholar

Knight, R.-A. & Whitworth, N. (2014). Introduction. In Whitworth, N. & Knight, R.-A., eds., Methods in Teaching Clinical Phonetics & Linguistics. Guildford: J&R Press, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar

Knight, R.-A., Bandali, C., Woodhead, C. & Vansadia, P. (2018). Clinicians’ views of the training, use and maintenance of phonetic transcription in speech and language therapy. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 53, 776–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Knight, R.-A., Boguka, O., Gruenstern, H. & Marlin, C. (in prep). Effects of orthography on phonemic transcription of English.Google Scholar

Ladefoged, P. (1975). A Course in Phonetics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Ladefoged, P. & Johnson, K. (2014). A Course in Phonetics, 7th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar

Land, R., Cousin, G., Meyer, J. H. & Davies, P. (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (3): Implications for course design and evaluation. Improving Student Learning Diversity and Inclusivity, 4, 53–64.Google Scholar

Land, R., Cousin, G., Meyer, J. H. F & Davies, P. (2006). Implications of threshold concepts for course design and evaluation. In Meyer, J. H. F & Land, R., eds., Overcoming Barriers to Student Understanding: Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge. London: Routledge, pp. 195–207.Google Scholar

Lawson, E., Stuart-Smith, J., Scobbie, J. M. & Nakai, S. (2015). Seeing Speech: An Articulatory Web Resource for the Study of Phonetics. University of Glasgow. http://seeingspeech.ac.uk, last accessed 17 September 2020.Google Scholar

Liberman, M. & Prince, A. (1977). On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry, 8(2), 249–336.Google Scholar

Macfarlane, B. (2011). Prizes, pedagogic research and teaching professors: Lowering the status of teaching and learning through bifurcation. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(1), 127–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mackenzie Beck, J. (2003). Is it possible to predict students’ ability to develop skills in practical phonetics? In Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 2833–6.Google Scholar

Maidment, J. (2000–2012). PLATO. http://blogjam.name/plato/, last accessed 17 September 2020.Google Scholar

Maidment, J. (2001–2016). Online Intonation (Oi!). http://blogjam.name/oi/, last accessed 17 September 2020.Google Scholar

Maidment, J. (2012). Newton. http://blogjam.name/newton/, last accessed 17 September 2020.Google Scholar

Mompeán, J. A., Ashby, M. & Fraser, H. (2011). Phonetics teaching and learning: An overview of recent trends and directions. Paper presented at the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences.Google Scholar

Mwangi, W. & Sweller, J. (1998). Learning to solve compare word problems: The effect of example format and generating self-explanations. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 173–99.Google Scholar

O’Connor, J. D. & Arnold, G. F. (1973). Intonation of Colloquial English, 2nd ed. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Oller, K. & Eilers, R. E. (1975). Phonetic expectation and transcription validity. Phonetica, 31(3–4), 288–304.Google Scholar

Raimy, E. and Cairns, C. (2015). The Segment in Phonetics and Phonology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ramírez Verdugo, D. (2006). A study of intonation awareness and learning in non-native speakers of English. Language Awareness, 15(3), 141–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Raphael, L. J., Borden, G. J. & Harris, K. S. (2007). Speech Science Primer: Physiology, Acoustics, and Perception of Speech. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar

Rato, A. (2014). Effects of perceptual training on the identification of English vowels by native speakers of European Portuguese. Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech – Concordia Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 5, 529–46.Google Scholar

Roach, P. (2001). Phonetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Roach, P. (2009). English Phonetics and Phonology: A Practical Course, 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Roediger, III, Putnam, H. L., A. L. and Smith, M. A. (2011). Ten benefits of testing and their applications to educational practice. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 55, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rohrer, D. (2012). Interleaving helps students distinguish among similar concepts. Educational Psychology Review, 24(3), 355–67.Google Scholar

Seikel, J. A., Drumright, D. G., Whites, M. M. & Seikel, P. J. (1995). A ‘hands-on’ approach to speech science. Computers & Education, 24(2), 107–16.Google Scholar

Seikel, J. A., Drumright, D. G. & King, D. W. (2015). Anatomy & Physiology for Speech, Language, and Hearing. Toronto: Nelson Education.Google Scholar

Sell, D. (2005). Issues in perceptual speech analysis in cleft palate and related disorders: A review. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 40, 103–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Setter, J. & Sebina, B. (2017). English lexical stress, prominence and rhythm. In Kang, O., Thomson, R. I. & Murphy, J. M., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Contemporary English Pronunciation. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 137–53.Google Scholar

Silverman, K., Beckman, M., Pitrelli, J., Ostendorf, M., Wightman, C., Price, P. et al. (1992). ToBI: A standard for labeling English prosody. In Second International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, 12–16 October 1992, Banff, Canada, pp. 867–70.Google Scholar

Soames, L. (1891). An Introduction to Phonetics (English, French, and German). London: Swan Sonnenschein.Google Scholar

Staal, F. (1965). Euclid and Pāṇini. Philosophy East and West, 15(2), 99–116.Google Scholar

Starr-Marshall, T. (2018). Slow-motion video for learning and teaching phonetic transcription. In 17th International Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics Association Congress, University of Malta.Google Scholar

Stern, N. (2016). Building on Success and Learning From Experience: An Independent Review of the Research Excellence Framework, London: Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, HM Government.Google Scholar

Sweet, H. (1877). A Handbook of Phonetics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Thalmann, M., Souza, A. S. & Oberauer, K. (2018). How does chunking help working memory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(1), 37–55.Google Scholar

Titterington, J. & Bates, S. (2018). Practice makes perfect? The pedagogic value of online independent phonetic transcription practice for speech and language therapy students. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 32(3), 249–66.Google Scholar

Walden, P. R. & Bell-Berti, F. (2013). Effect of reflective practice on student recall of acoustics for speech science. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 34(4), 248–55.Google Scholar

Wells, J. C. (2006). English Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wells-Jensen, S. (2005). The Braille international phonetic alphabet and other options: The blind student in the phonetics classroom. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 35(2), 221–30.Google Scholar

Whitworth, N. (2014). Acoustic phonetics. In Whitworth, N. & Knight, R.-A., eds., Methods in Teaching Clinical Phonetics & Linguistics. Guildford: J&R Press, pp. 47–71.Google Scholar

Windsor, F. (2011). The broad or narrow way? Speech & Language Therapy in Practice, Winter 2011, 14–16.Google Scholar

Wlodkowski, R. J. & Ginsberg, M. B. (2017). Enhancing Adult Motivation to Learn: A Comprehensive Guide for Teaching All Adults. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Aliaga-García, C. & Mora, J. C. (2009). Assessing the effects of phonetic training on L2 sound perception and production. In New Sounds 2007: Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.424.6702&rep=rep1&type=pdf, last accessed 21 September 2020.Google Scholar

Aoyama, K., Guion, S. Flege, J. E., Yamada, T. & Akahane-Yamada, R. (2008). The first years in an L2-speaking environment: A comparison of Japanese children and adults learning American English. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 46, 6–190.Google Scholar

Best, C. T. 1995. A direct realist perspective on crosslanguage speech perception. In Strange, W., ed., Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research. Timonium MD: York Press, pp. 167–200.Google Scholar

Best, C. T. & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In Bohn, O. & Munro, M. J., eds., Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning: In Honor of James Emil Flege. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 13–34.Google Scholar

Binasfour, H., Setter, J. & Aslan, E. (2017). Enhancing L2 learners’ perception and production of the Arabic emphatic sounds. In Proceedings of the Phonetics Teaching and Learning Conference, University College London, 9–11 August 2017, pp. 16–20.Google Scholar

Brazil, D. (1994). Pronunciation for Advanced Learners of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brazil, D. (1997). The Communicative Value of Intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brazil, D., Coulthard, M. & Johns, C. (1980). Discourse Intonation and Language Teaching. London: Longman.Google Scholar

British Council. (2018). The Future Demand for English in Europe: 2025 and Beyond. www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/future_demand_for_english_in_europe_2025_and_beyond_british_council_2018.pdf, last accessed 23 September 2020.Google Scholar

Brumfit, C. J. & Johnson, K., eds. (1979). The Communicative Approach to Language Teaching, vol. 308. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Canagarajah, S. (2006). Changing communicative needs, revised assessment objectives: Testing English as an international language. Language Assessment Quarterly: An International Journal, 3(3), 229–42.Google Scholar

Cauldwell, R. (2013). Phonology for Listening: Teaching the Stream of Speech, Birmingham: Speechinaction.Google Scholar

Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. M. & Goodwin, J. M. (2010). Teaching Pronunciation: A Reference for Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Chapman, M. (2007). Theory and practice of teaching discourse intonation. ELT Journal, 61(1), 3–11.Google Scholar

Chen, Y. (2018). The Effect of Explicit Instruction and Auditory/Audiovisual Training on Chinese Learners’ Perception of English Intonation. Unpublished PhD thesis, Newcastle University.Google Scholar

Chung, H. (2017). Review of the lingua franca core for English pronunciation teaching in Korea. In Proceedings of the Phonetics Teaching and Learning Conference, University College London, 9–11 August 2017, pp. 35–8.Google Scholar

Coleman, J. S. (1968). Equality of educational opportunity. Integrated Education, 6(5), 19–28.Google Scholar

Cruttenden, A. (1997). Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dalton, C. & Seidlhofer, B. (1994). Pronunciation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dauer, R. M. (1983). Stress-timing and syllable-timing reanalyzed. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 51–62.Google Scholar

Demenko, G., Wagner, A. (2007), Prosody annotation for unit selection text-to-speech synthesis. Archives of Acoustics, 32(1), 25–40.Google Scholar

Demenko, G., Wagner, A. & Cylwik, N. (2010). The use of speech technology in foreign language pronunciation training. Archives of Acoustics, 35(3), 309–29.Google Scholar

Derwing, T. M. & Munro, M. J. (2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research‐based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 379–97.Google Scholar

Derwing, T. M. & Munro, M. J. (2015). Pronunciation Fundamentals: Evidence-based Perspectives for L2 Teaching and Research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Deterding, D. (2013). Misunderstandings in English as a Lingua Franca: An Analysis of EFL Interactions in South-East Asia. Boston, MA: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Motivation in second and foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 31(3), 117–35.Google Scholar

Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K. & Przedlacka, J., eds. (2005). English Pronunciation Models: A Changing Scene. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Eckman, F. R. (1977). Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis. Language Learning, 27(2), 315–30.Google Scholar

Edulearn (nd). English Pronunciation in a Global World. www.futurelearn.com/courses/english-pronunciation, last accessed 18 September 2020.Google Scholar

Engwall, O. (2012). Analysis of and feedback on phonetic features in pronunciation training with a virtual teacher. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(1), 37–64.Google Scholar

Engwall, O. & Bälter, O. (2007). Pronunciation feedback from real and virtual language teachers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20, 235–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher, J. & Kayes, G. (2016). This Is A Voice: 99 Exercises to Train, Project and Harness the Power of Your Voice. London: Wellcome Collection.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E. (1995). Second-language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, W., ed., Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Theoretical and Methodological Issues. Baltimore, MD: York Press, pp. 229–73.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E., 1999. Age of learning and second-language speech. In Birdsong, D. P., ed., Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 101–32.Google Scholar

Flege, J. E. & Wayland, R. (2019). The role of input in native Spanish late learners’ production and perception of English phonetic segments. Journal of Second Language Studies, 2(1), 1–44. http://jimflege.com/files/final_compact2.pdf, last accessed 18 September 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flege, J. E., Bohn, O. S. & Jang, S. (1997). Effects of experience on non-native speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25(4), 437–70.Google Scholar

Garibaldi, C. L. & Bohn, O. S. (2015). Phonetic similarity predicts ultimate attainment quite well: The case of Danish /i, y, u/ and /d, t/ for native speakers of English and of Spanish. Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Glasgow. www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2015/Papers/ICPHS0245.pdf, last accessed 18 September 2020.Google Scholar

Gilbert, J. (1984). Clear Speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Grenon, I. & White, L. (2008). Acquiring rhythm: A comparison of L1 and L2 speakers of Canadian English and Japanese. In Proceedings of the 32nd Boston University conference on language development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, pp. 155–66.Google Scholar

Hancock, M. (2017a). English Pronunciation in Use: Intermediate, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hancock, M. (2017b). PronPack 1–4. Chester: Hancock McDonald.Google Scholar

Hazan, V., Sennema, A., Iba, M. & Faulkner, A. (2005). Effect of audiovisual perceptual training on the perception and production of consonants by Japanese learners of English. Speech Communication, 47(3), 360–78.Google Scholar

Hewings, M. (2017). English Pronunciation in Use: Advanced, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hwang, H. & Lee, H. Y. (2015). The effect of high variability phonetic training on the production of English vowels and consonants. In Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Glasgow. www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2015/Papers/ICPHS0466.pdf, last accessed 18 September 2020.Google Scholar

International Phonetic Association. (1999). Handbook of the International Phonetic Association. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ioup, G. & Weinberger, S. H., eds. (1987). Interlanguage Phonology. New York: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Iverson, P., Pinet, M. & Evans, B. G. (2012). Auditory training for experienced and inexperienced second-language learners: Native French speakers learning English vowels. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(1), 145–60.Google Scholar

Iwasaki, S. (2002). Japanese. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jenkins, J. (2000). The Phonology of English as an International Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jenkins, J. (2002). A sociolinguistically based, empirically researched pronunciation syllabus for English as an international language. Applied linguistics, 23(1), 83–103.Google Scholar

Jones, D. (2011). Cambridge English Pronouncing Dictionary, 18th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Jones, T., ed. (2016). Pronunciation in the Classroom: The Overlooked Essential, Anapolis Junction, MD: TESOL Press.Google Scholar

Kaiser, D. (2018). Mobile-assisted pronunciation training: The iPhone pronunciation app project. IATEFL Pronunciation Special Interest Group Journal, 58, 38–52.Google Scholar

Kelly, L. G. (1969). 25 Centuries of Language Teaching, Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Kenworthy, J. (1987). Teaching English Pronunciation. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Lengeris, A. & Hazan, V. (2010). The effect of native vowel processing ability and frequency discrimination acuity on the phonetic training of English vowels for native speakers of Greek. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(6), 3757–68.Google Scholar

Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative Language Teaching: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Logan, J. S., Lively, S. E. & Pisoni, D. B. (1991). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: A first report. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89(2), 874–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Macmillan Education ELT. (2011). Introduction to teaching pronunciation workshop – Adrian Underhill (COMPLETE). www.youtube.com/watch?v=1kAPHyHd7Lo&t=21s, last accessed 18 September 2020.Google Scholar

Marks, J. (2017). English Pronunciation in Use: Elementary, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Miyawaki, K., Jenkins, J. J., Strange, W., Liberman, A. M., Verbrugge, R. & Fujimura, O. (1975). An effect of linguistic experience: The discrimination of [r] and [l] by native speakers of Japanese and English. Perception & Psychophysics, 18(5), 331–40.Google Scholar

Mohibul Hasan, S. M. (2017). LSC instruction on L2 pronunciation development. Proceedings of the Phonetics Teaching and Learning Conference, University College London, 9–11 August 2017, pp. 59–62.Google Scholar

Murphy, J. M & Baker, A. A. (2015). History of ESL pronunciation teaching. In Reed, M. & Levis, J., eds., The Handbook of English Pronunciation. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 36–65.Google Scholar

O’Brien, M. G., Derwing, T. M., Cucchiarini, C., Hardison, D. M., Mixdorff, H., Thomson, R. I. et al. (2018). Directions for the future of technology in pronunciation research and teaching. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 4(2), 182–207.Google Scholar

O’Connor, J. D. & Arnold, G. F. (1973). Intonation of Colloquial English, 2nd ed. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Richards, J. C. (2008). Second language teacher education today. RELC Journal, 39(2), 158–77.Google Scholar

Roach, P. (1982). On the distinction between ‘stress-timed’ and ‘syllable-timed’ languages. In Crystal, D., ed., Linguistic Controversies: Essays in Linguistic Theory and Practice in Honour of F. R. Palmer. London: Edward Arnold, pp. 73–9.Google Scholar

Saito, K. & Lyster, R. (2012). Effects of form‐focused instruction and corrective feedback on L2 pronunciation development of /ɹ/ by Japanese learners of English. Language Learning, 62(2), 595–633.Google Scholar

Setter, J. (2005). Communicative patterns of intonation in L2 English teaching and learning. In Dziubalska-Kolaczyk, K. & Przedlacka, J., eds., English Pronunciation Models: A Changing Scene. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 367–89.Google Scholar

Setter, J. (2019). Your Voice Speaks Volumes: It’s Not What You Say, but How You Say It. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Setter, J. & Jenkins, J. (2005). Pronunciation. Language Teaching, 38(1), 1–17.Google Scholar

Smith, R., Holmes-Elliott, S., Pettinato, M. & Knight, R. A. (2014). Cross-accent intelligibility of speech in noise: Long-term familiarity and short-term familiarization. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(3), 590–608.Google Scholar

Stockwell, R. P. (1968). Contrastive analysis and lapsed time. In Alatis, J. E., ed., Contrastive Linguistics and Its Pedagogical Implications. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 11–26.Google Scholar

Swan, M. & Smith, B. (2001). Learner English, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Van den Doel, R. 2008. The blind spots of Jenkins’s Lingua Franca. In Waniek-Klimczak, E., ed., Issues in Accents of English. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 140–9.Google Scholar

Walker, R. (2010). Teaching the Pronunciation of English as a Lingua Franca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Spence, M. M., Jongman, A. & Sereno, J. A. (1999). Training American listeners to perceive Mandarin tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106(6), 3649–58.Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Jongman, A. & Sereno, J. A. (2003). Acoustic and perceptual evaluation of Mandarin tone productions before and after perceptual training. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113(2), 1033–43.Google Scholar

Wells, J. C. (2006). English Intonation: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wells, J. C. (2008). Longman Pronouncing Dictionary, 3rd ed. Harlow, UK: Longman.Google Scholar

Witkin, H. (1962). Psychological Differentiation. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Wong, J. W. (2014). The effects of high and low variability phonetic training on the perception and production of English vowels/e/-/æ/by Cantonese ESL learners with high and low L2 proficiency levels. HKBU Institutional Repository. https://repository.hkbu.edu.hk/hkbu_staff_publication/6234/, last accessed 18 September 2020.Google Scholar

Wright, T. (2002). Doing language awareness: Issues for language study in language teacher education. In Trappes-Lomax, H. & Ferguson, G., eds., Language in Language Teacher Education. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 113–30.Google Scholar

Zoghbor, W. S. (2018). Teaching English pronunciation to multi-dialect first language learners: The revival of the lingua franca core (LFC). System, 78, 1–14.Google Scholar

Adank, P. M., Smits, R. & van Hout, R. (2004). A comparison of vowel normalization procedures for language variation research. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116(5), 3099–107. doi.org/10.1121/1.1795335.Google Scholar

Ash, S. (1992). Controlling for dialect in contextless vowel identification: Revisiting the Peterson-Barney experiment. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91(4), 2386. doi.org/10.1121/1.403331.Google Scholar

Babel, M. (2010). Dialect divergence and convergence in New Zealand English. Language in Society, 39(4), 437–56. doi.org/10.1017/S0047404510000400.Google Scholar

Babel, M. (2012). Evidence for phonetic and social selectivity in spontaneous phonetic imitation. Journal of Phonetics, 40(1), 177–89. doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.09.001.Google Scholar

Baker, A., Archangeli, D. & Mielke, J. (2011). Variability in American English s-retraction suggests a solution to the actuation problem. Language Variation and Change, 23(3), 347–74. doi.org/10.1017/S0954394511000135.Google Scholar

Baranowski, M. (2013). Sociophonetics. In Bayley, R., Cameron, R. & Lucas, C., eds., Oxford Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 403–24.Google Scholar

Beckner, C., Rácz, P., Hay, J., Brandstetter, J. & Bartneck, C. (2016). Participants conform to humans but not to humanoid robots in an English past tense formation task. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 35(2), 158–79. doi.org/10.1177/0261927X15584682.Google Scholar

Blackwood Ximenes, A., Shaw, J. A. & Carignan, C. (2017). A comparison of acoustic and articulatory methods for analyzing vowel differences across dialects: Data from American and Australian English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142(1), 363–77. doi.org/10.1121/1.4991346.Google Scholar

Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2017). Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [computer program]. Version 6.0.33, www.praat.org/.Google Scholar

Bowie, D. (2000). Perception and production in processes of merger. Proceedings of the Deseret Language and Linguistic Society Symposium, 26(1), 137–43. scholarsarchive.byu.edu/dlls/vol26/iss1/18.Google Scholar

Campbell-Kibler, K. (2007). Accent, (ING), and the social logic of listener perceptions. American Speech, 82(1), 32–64. doi.org/10.1215/00031283–2007-002.Google Scholar

Campbell-Kibler, K. (2011). Intersecting variables and perceived sexual orientation in men. American Speech, 86(1), 52–68. doi.org/10.1215/00031283–1277510.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Clark, L. (2009). Variation, Change and the Usage-Based Approach. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.Google Scholar

Clark, L. (2014). Phonological repetition effects in natural conversation: Evidence from TH-fronting in Fife. In Lawson, R., ed., Sociolinguistics in Scotland. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 153–76.Google Scholar

Clopper, C. G., Pierrehumbert, J. B. & Tamati, T. N. (2010). Lexical neighborhoods and phonological confusability in cross-dialect word recognition in noise. Laboratory Phonology, 1(1), 65–92. doi.org/10.1515/labphon.2010.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corneau, C. (2000). An EPG study of palatalization in French: cross-dialect and inter-subject variation. Language Variation and Change, 12(1), 25–49.Google Scholar

Costa, P. & Mattingly, I. G. (1981). Production and perception of phonetic contrast during phonetic change. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 69, 191–6. doi.org/10.1121/1.386167.Google Scholar

Coupland, N. (1980). Style-shifting in a Cardiff work-setting. Language in Society, 9(1), 1–12. doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500007752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coupland, N. (2014). Social context, style, and identity in sociolinguistics. In Holmes, J. & Hazen, K., eds., Research Methods in Sociolinguistics: A Practical Guide. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 290–303.Google Scholar

De Decker, P. (2010). Sounds shifty: Gender and age differences in perceptual categorization during a phonetic change in progress. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 15(2), 50–60.Google Scholar

De Decker, P. & Mackenzie, S. (2017). Tracking the phonological status of /l/ in Newfoundland English: Experiments in articulation and acoustics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142(350), 350–62. doi.org/10.1121/1.4991349.Google Scholar

De Decker, P. & Nycz, J. (2012). Are tense [æ]s really tense? The mapping between articulation and acoustics. Lingua, 122(7), 810–21. doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.01.003.Google Scholar

De Decker, P. & Nycz, J. (2013). The technology of conducting sociolinguistic interviews. In Mallinson, C., Childs, B. & Van Herk, G., eds., Data Collection in Sociolinguistics. New York: Routledge, pp. 118–26.Google Scholar

DiPaolo, M. & Yaeger-Dror, M. (2011). Sociophonetics: A Student’s Guide. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

D’Onofrio, A. (2015). Persona-based information shapes linguistic perception: Valley girls and California vowels. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 19(2), 241–56. doi.org/10.1111/josl.12115.Google Scholar

D’Onofrio, A. (2016). Social Meaning in Linguistic Perception. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar

Docherty, G., Langstrof, C. & Foulkes, P. (2013). Listener evaluation of sociophonetic variability: Probing constraints and capabilities. Linguistics, 51(2), 355–80. doi.org/10.1515/ling-2013–0014.Google Scholar

Docherty, G., Foulkes, P., Gonzalez, S. & Mitchell, N. (2018). Missed connections at the junction of sociolinguistics and speech processing. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(4), 759–74. doi.org/10.1111/tops.12375.Google Scholar

Drager, K. (2010). Sensitivity to grammatical and sociophonetic variability in perception. Laboratory Phonology, 1(1), 93–120. doi.org/10.1515/labphon.2010.006.Google Scholar

Drager, K. (2011). Speaker age and vowel perception. Language and Speech, 54(1), 99–121. doi.org/10.1177/0023830910388017.Google Scholar

Drager, K. (2018). Experimental Research Methods in Sociolinguistics. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Drager, K., Hay, J. & Walker, A. (2010). Pronounced rivalries: Attitudes and speech perception. Te Reo, 53, 27–53.Google Scholar

Eckert, P. (2000). Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Eckert, P. (2008). Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12(4), 453–76. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9841.2008.00374.x.Google Scholar

Eckert, P. (2012). Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41, 87–100. doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611–145828.Google Scholar

Eckert, P. & Labov, W. (2017). Phonetics, phonology and social meaning. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 21(4), 467–96. doi.org/10.1111/josl.12244.Google Scholar

Floccia, C., Goslin, J., Girard, F. & Konopcznski, G. (2006). Does a regional accent perturb speech processing? Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(5), 1276–93. doi.org/10.1037/0096–1523.32.5.1276.Google Scholar

Foulkes, P. & Docherty, G. (2006). The social life of phonetics and phonology. Journal of Phonetics, 34(4), 409–38. doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2005.08.002.Google Scholar

Foulkes, P., Docherty, G. & Watt, D. (1999). Tracking the emergence of sociophonetic variation. In Proceedings of the International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences 99, San Francisco, pp. 1625–8.Google Scholar

Foulkes, P., Scobbie, J. M. & Watt, D. J. L. (2010). Sociophonetics. In Hardcastle, W., Laver, J. & Gibbon, F., eds., Handbook of Phonetic Sciences, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 703–54.Google Scholar

Fridland, V. & Kendall, T. (2012). Exploring the relationship between production and perception in the mid front vowels of US English. Lingua, 122(7), 779–93. doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2011.12.007.Google Scholar

German, J. S., Carlson, K & Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2013). Reassignment of consonant allophones in rapid dialect acquisition. Journal of Phonetics, 41(3/4), 228–48. doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2013.03.001.Google Scholar

Gooskens, C., Heeringa, W. & Beijering, K. (2008). Phonetic and lexical predictors of intelligibility. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing, 2(1–2), 63–81. doi.org/10.3366/E1753854809000317.Google Scholar

Gordon, E., Campbell, L., Hay, J., Maclagan, M., Sudbury, A. & Trudgill, P. (2004). New Zealand English: Its Origins and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gratton, C. (2017). Non-binary identity construction and intraspeaker variation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Austin, TX, 7 January.Google Scholar

Guy, G. R. (1991). Contextual conditioning in variable lexical phonology. Language Variation and Change, 3(2), 223–39. doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500000533.Google Scholar

Hall-Lew, L. (2013). ‘Flip-flop’ and mergers-in-progress. English Language and Linguistics, 17(2), 359–90. doi.org/10.1017/S1360674313000063.Google Scholar

Hall-Lew, L. & Fix, S. (2012). Perceptual coding reliability of (L)-vocalization in casual speech data. Lingua, 122(7), 794–809. doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2011.12.005.Google Scholar

Hall-Lew, L. & Plichta, B. (2013). Technological challenges in sociolinguistic data collection. In Mallinson, C., Childs, B. & Van Herk, G., eds., Data Collection in Sociolinguistics. New York: Routledge, pp. 127–30.Google Scholar

Hardeman Guthrie, K. (2016). Gender and second language style: American learner perceptions of Mandarin sajiao. Asia Pacific Language Variation, 2(2), 157–87. doi.org/10.1075/aplv.2.2.03har.Google Scholar

Harrington, J., Palethorpe, S. & Watson, C. (2000). Monophthongal vowel changes in Received Pronunciation: An acoustic analysis of the Queen’s Christmas broadcasts. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 30(1/2), 63–78. doi.org/10.1017/S0025100300006666.Google Scholar

Hay, J. & Drager, K. (2007). Sociophonetics. Annual Review of Anthropology, 36, 89–103. doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120633.Google Scholar

Hay, J. & Drager, K. (2010). Stuffed toys and speech perception. Linguistics, 48(4), 865–92. doi.org/10.1515/ling.2010.027.Google Scholar

Hay, J. & Foulkes, P. (2016). The evolution of medial /t/ over real and remembered time. Language, 92(2), 298–330. doi.org/10.1353/lan.2016.0036.Google Scholar

Hay, J., Warren, P. & Drager, K. (2006). Factors influencing speech perception in the context of a merger-in-progress. Journal of Phonetics, 34(4), 458–84. doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2005.10.001.Google Scholar

Hildebrandt, K. A., Jany, C. & Silva, W. (2017). Introduction: Documenting variation in endangered languages. Language Documentation & Conservation, 13, 1–5. hdl.handle.net/10125/24746.Google Scholar

Holliday, N. (2016). Identity performance among Black/biracial men through intonation: Examining pitch accent and peak delay. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 22(2), 71–80.Google Scholar

Holliday, N. (2017). ‘My presiden(t) and firs(t) lady were Black’: Style, context, and coronal stop deletion in the speech of Barack and Michelle Obama. American Speech, 92(4), 459–86. doi.org/10.1215/00031283–6903954.Google Scholar

Holmquist, J. C. (1985). Social correlates of a linguistic variable: A study in a Spanish village. Language in Society, 14(2), 192–203. doi.org/10.1017/S004740450001112X.Google Scholar

Huettig, F., Rommers, J. & Meyer, A. S. (2011). Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: A review and critical evaluation. Acta Psychologica, 137(2), 151–71. doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.11.003.Google Scholar

Jacewicz, E. & Fox, R. A. (2012). The effects of cross-generational and cross-dialectal variation on vowel identification and classification. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(2), 1413–33. doi.org/10.1121/1.3676603.Google Scholar

Janson, T. (1983). Sound change in perception and production. Language, 59(1), 18–34. doi.org/10.2307/414059.Google Scholar

Janson, T. & Schulman, R. (1983). Non-distinctive features and their use. Journal of Linguistics, 19(2), 321–36. doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700007763.Google Scholar

Kendall, T. (2013). Speech Rate, Pause, and Sociolinguistic Variation: Studies in Corpus Sociophonetics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Kettig, T. & Winter, B. (2017). Producing and perceiving the Canadian Vowel Shift: Evidence from a Montreal community. Language Variation and Change, 29(1), 79–100. doi.org/10.1017/S0954394517000023.Google Scholar

Khattab, G. (2013). Phonetic convergence and divergence strategies in English–Arabic bilingual children. Linguistics, 51(2), 439–72. doi.org/10.1515/ling-2013–0017.Google Scholar

Kiesling, S. F. (2009). Style as stance: Stance as the explanation for patterns of sociolinguistic variation. In Jaffe, A., ed., Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 171–94.Google Scholar

Kim, J. & Drager, K. (2017). Sociophonetic realizations guide subsequent lexical access. In Proceedings of INTERSPEECH 2017, pp. 621–25. doi.org/10.21437/INTERSPEECH.2017–1742.Google Scholar

Kim, J. & Drager, K. (2018). Rapid influence of word-talker associations on lexical access. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(4), 775–86. doi.org/10.1111/tops.12351.Google Scholar

Kirtley, M. J. (2015). Language, Identity, and Non-Binary Gender in Hawaiʻi. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI.Google Scholar

Kleinschmidt, D. F., Weatherholtz, K. & Jaeger, T. F. (2018). Sociolinguistic perception as inference under uncertainty, Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(4), 818–34. doi.org/10.1111/tops.12331.Google Scholar

Koops, C., Gentry, E. & Pantos, A. (2008). The effect of perceived speaker age on the perception of PIN and PEN vowels in Houston, Texas. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 14, 93–101.Google Scholar

Labov, W. (1963). The social motivation of a sound change. Word, 19(3), 273–309. doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1963.11659799.Google Scholar

Labov, W. (1969). Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language, 45(4), 715–62. doi.org/10.2307/412333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Labov, W. (2006) [1966]. The Social Stratification of English in New York City, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Labov, W., Yaeger, M. & Steiner, R. (1972). A Quantitative Study of Sound Change in Progress. Report on National Science Foundation Contract NSF-GS-3287.Google Scholar

Labov, W., Ash, S. & Boberg, C. (2006). Atlas of North American English: Phonology and Phonetics. Berlin: Mouton/de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Labov, W., Ash, S., Ravindranath, M., Weldon, T. & Nagy, N. (2011). Properties of the sociolinguistic monitor. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 15(4), 431–63. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9841.2011.00504.x.Google Scholar

Labov, W., Rosenfelder, I. & Fruehwald, J. (2013). One hundred years of sound change in Philadelphia: Linear incrementation, reversal, and reanalysis. Language, 89(1), 30–65. doi.org/10.1353/lan.2013.0015.Google Scholar

Ladefoged, P. & Broadbent, D. E. (1957). Information conveyed by vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29(1), 98–104. doi.org/10.1121/1.1908694.Google Scholar

Lambert, W. E., Hodgson, R. C., Gardner, R. C. & Fillenbaum, S. (1960). Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60(1), 44–51. doi.org/10.1037/h0044430.Google Scholar

Lawson, E., Scobbie, J. M. & Stuart-Smith, J. (2011). The social stratification of tongue shape for postvocalic /r/ in Scottish English. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 15(2), 256–68. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9841.2011.00464.x.Google Scholar

Leemann, A. (2017). Analyzing geospatial variation in articulation rate using crowdsourced speech data. Journal of Linguistic Geography, 4(2), 76–96. doi.org/10.1017/jlg.2016.11.Google Scholar

Leemann, A., Kolly, M. J. & Britain, D. (2016). English Dialects, iPhone app. Accessed 28 June 2017 from itunes.apple.com/us/app/english-dialects/id882340404?mt=8.Google Scholar

Lev-Ari, S. & Peperkamp, S. (2014). An experimental study of the role of social factors in language change: The case of loanword adaptations. Laboratory Phonology, 5(3), 379–401. doi.org/10.1515/lp-2014–0013.Google Scholar

Levon, E. (2007). Sexuality in context: Variation and the sociolinguistic perception of identity. Language in Society, 36, 533–54. doi.org/10.1017/S0047404507070431.Google Scholar

Levon, E. (2014). Categories, stereotypes, and the linguistic perception of sexuality. Language in Society, 43(5), 539–66. doi.org/10.1017/S0047404514000554.Google Scholar

Llamas, C. & Watt, D. (2014). Scottish, English, British? Innovations in attitude measurement. Language and Linguistics Compass, 8(11), 610–17. doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12109.Google Scholar

Llamas, C., Watt, D. & Johnson, D. E. (2009). Linguistic accommodation and the salience of national identity markers in a border town. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 28(4), 381–407. doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09341962.Google Scholar

Llompart, M. & Simonet, M. (2018). Unstressed vowel reduction across Majorcan Catalan dialects: Production and spoken word recognition. Language and Speech, 61(3), 430–65. doi.org/10.1177/0023830917736019.Google Scholar

Maegaard, M. (2010). Linguistic practice and stereotypes among Copenhagen adolescents. In Quist, P. & Svendsen, B. A., eds., Multilingual Urban Scandinavia: New Linguistic Practices. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 189–206.Google Scholar

Mallinson, C., Childs, B. & Van Herk, G. (2013). Data Collection in Sociolinguistics: Methods and Applications. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

McCloy, D. (2016). phonR: Tools for phoneticians and phonologists, R-package version 1.0–7.Google Scholar

McGowan, K. (2011). The Role of Socioindexical Expectation in Speech Perception. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar

McGowan, K. (2015). Social expectation improves speech perception in noise. Language and Speech, 58(4), 1–20. doi.org/10.1177/0023830914565191.Google Scholar

Mendoza-Denton, N. (2008). Homegirls: Language and Cultural Practice among Latina Youth Gangs. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Meyerhoff, M. (2017). Writing a linguistic symphony: Analyzing variation while doing language documentation. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 62(4), 525–49. doi.org/10.1017/cnj.2017.28.Google Scholar

Mielke, J. (2015). An ultrasound study of Canadian French rhotic vowels with polar smoothing spline comparisons. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137(5), 2858–69. doi.org/10.1121/1.4919346.Google Scholar

Mielke, J., Carignan, C. & Thomas, E. R. (2017). The articulatory dynamics of pre-velar and pre-nasal /æ/-raising in English: An ultrasound study. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142(1), 332–49. doi.org/10.1121/1.4991348.Google Scholar

Milroy, J. & Milroy, L. (1978). Belfast: Change and variation in an urban vernacular. In Trudgill, P., ed., Sociolinguistic Patterns in British English. London: Edward Arnold, pp. 19–36.Google Scholar

Mougeon, R. & Nadasdi, T. (1998). Sociolinguistic discontinuity in minority language communities. Language 74(1), 40–55. doi.org/10.1353/lan.1998.0077.Google Scholar

Munson, B. (2011). The influence of actual and imputed talker gender on fricative perception, revisited. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(5), 2631–4. doi.org/10.1121/1.3641410.Google Scholar

Nagy, N. (2017). Documenting variation in (endangered) heritage languages: How and why? Language Documentation and Conservation Special Publication, 13, 33–64. hdl.handle.net/10125/24748.Google Scholar

Niedzielski, N. (1999). The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18(1), 62–85. doi.org/10.1177/0261927X99018001005.Google Scholar

Nycz, J. (2015). Second dialect acquisition: A sociophonetic perspective. Language and Linguistics Compass, 9(11), 469–82. doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12163.Google Scholar

Pardo, J. S. (2012). Reflections on phonetic convergence: Speech perception does not mirror speech production. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6(12), 753–67. doi.org/10.1002/lnc3.367.Google Scholar

Pharao, N., Maegaard, M., Møller, J. S. & Kristiansen, T. (2014). Indexical meanings of [s+] among Copenhagen youth: Social perception of a phonetic variant in different prosodic contexts. Language in Society, 43(1), 1–31. doi.org/10.1017/S0047404513000857.Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, J. (2006). The next toolkit. Journal of Phonetics, 34(6), 516–30. doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2006.06.003.Google Scholar

Pitt, M. A., Dilley, L., Johnson, K., Kiesling, S., Raymond, W., Hume, E. et al. (2007). Buckeye Corpus of Conversational Speech, 2nd release, Columbus, OH: Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University. www.buckeyecorpus.osu.edu/.Google Scholar

Podesva, R. J. (2007). Phonation type as a stylistic variable: The use of falsetto in constructing a persona. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(4), 478–504. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9841.2007.00334.x.Google Scholar

Podesva, R. J. (2011). Salience and the social meaning of declarative contours: Three case studies of gay professionals. Journal of English Linguistics, 39(3), 233–64. doi.org/10.1177/0075424211405161.Google Scholar

Purnell, T., Idsardi, W. & Baugh, J. (1999). Perceptual and phonetic experiments on American English dialect identification. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18(1), 10–30. doi.org/10.1177/0261927X99018001002.Google Scholar

Rickford, J. R. & McNair-Knox, F. (1994). Addressee- and topic- influenced style shift: A quantitative sociolinguistic study. In Biber, D. & Finegan, E., eds., Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 235–76.Google Scholar

Rubin, D. L. (1992). Nonlanguage factors affecting undergraduates’ judgments of nonnative English-speaking teaching assistants. Research in Higher Education, 33(4), 511–31.Google Scholar

Sankoff, D. (1975). VARBRUL version 2, Unpublished program and documentation.Google Scholar

Scanlon, M. & Wassink, A. B. (2010). African American English in urban Seattle: Accommodation and intraspeaker variation in the Pacific Northwest. American Speech, 85(2), 205–24. doi.org/10.1215/00031283–2010-011.Google Scholar

Schilling-Estes, N. (2004). Constructing ethnicity in interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 8(2), 163–95. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9841.2004.00257.x.Google Scholar

Schüppert, A., Hilton, N. H. & Gooskens, C. (2015). Swedish is beautiful, Danish is ugly? Investigating the link between language attitudes and spoken word recognition. Linguistics, 53(2), 375–403. doi.org/10.1515/ling-2015–0003.Google Scholar

Scobbie, J. M., Lawson, E. & Stuart-Smith, J. (2012). Back to front: A socially-stratified ultrasound tongue imaging study of Scottish English /u/. Rivista di Linguistica/Italian Journal of Linguistics, 24(1), 103–48.Google Scholar

Sonderegger, M., Bane, M. & Graff, P. (2017). The medium-term dynamics of accents, on reality television. Language, 93(3), 598–640. doi.org/10.1353/lan.2017.0038.Google Scholar

Sóskuthy, M. (2017). Generalised Additive Mixed Models for dynamic analysis in linguistics: A practical introduction. arxiv.org/abs/1703.05339.Google Scholar

Staum Casasanto, L., Jasmin, K. & Casasanto, D. (2010). Virtually accommodating: Speech rate accommodation to a virtual interlocutor. In Ohlsson, S. & Catrambone, R., eds., Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society, pp. 127–32.Google Scholar

Strand, E. & Johnson, K. (1996). Gradient and visual speaker normalization in the perception of fricatives. In Gibbon, D., ed. Natural Language Processing and Speech Technology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 14–26.Google Scholar

Sumner, M. & Samuel, A. G. (2009). The effect of experience on the perception and representation of dialect variants. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 487–501. doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.01.001.Google Scholar

Szakay, A. (2012). Voice quality as a marker of ethnicity in New Zealand: From acoustics to perception. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 16(3), 382–97. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9841.2012.00537.x.Google Scholar

Szakay, A., Babel, M. & King, J. (2016). Social categories are shared across bilinguals’ lexicons. Journal of Phonetics, 59, 92–109. doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2016.09.005.Google Scholar

Tamminga, M. (2014). Persistence in the Production of Linguistic Variation. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar

Tamminga, M. (2017). Matched guise effects can be robust to speech style. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America Express Letters, 142(1), EL18–EL23. doi.org/10.1121/1.4990399.Google Scholar

Thomas, E. R. (1997). A rural/metropolitan split in the speech of Texas Anglos. Language Variation and Change, 9(3), 309–32. doi.org/10.1017/S0954394500001940.Google Scholar

Thomas, E. R. (2000). Spectral differences in /ai/ offsets conditioned by voicing of the following consonant. Journal of Phonetics, 28(1), 1–25. doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2000.0103.Google Scholar

Thomas, E. R. (2002). Instrumental phonetics. In Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, P. & Schilling-Estes, N., eds., The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 168–200.Google Scholar

Thomas, E. R. (2011). Sociophonetics: An Introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Thomas, E. R. & Kendall, T. (2007). NORM: The vowel normalization and plotting suite, ncslaap.lib.ncsu.edu/tools/norm/.Google Scholar

Trudgill, P. (1974). The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Van Hofwegen, J. (2017). Everyday Styles: Investigating the Full Scope of Variation in the Life of an Individual Speaker. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar

Vaux, B. & Golder, S. (2003). The Harvard Dialect Survey. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Linguistics Department.Google Scholar

Walker, A. & Campbell-Kibler, K. (2015). Repeat after whom? Exploring variable selectivity in a cross-dialectal shadowing task. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(546), 1–18. doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00546.Google Scholar

Walker, A. & Hay, J. (2011). Congruence between ‘word age’ and ‘voice age’ facilitates lexical access. Laboratory Phonology, 2(1), 219–37. doi.org/10.1515/labphon.2011.007.Google Scholar

Walker, A., Hay, J., Drager, K. & Sanchez, K. (2017). Divergence in speech perception. Linguistics, 56(1), 257–78. doi.org/10.1515/ling-2017–0036.Google Scholar

Warren, P. (2014). Sociophonetic and prosodic influences on judgments of sentence types. In Hay, J. & Parnell, E., eds., Proceedings of the 15th Australasian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology. Christchurch: ASSTA, pp. 185–8.Google Scholar

Wassink, A. B. (2015). Sociolinguistic patterns in Seattle English. Language Variation and Change, 27(1), 31–58. doi.org/10.1017/S0954394514000234.Google Scholar

Watson, K. & Clark, L. (2015). Exploring listeners’ real-time reactions to regional accents. Language Awareness, 24(1), 38–59. doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2014.882346.Google Scholar

Weinreich, U. (1954). Is a structural dialectology possible? Word, 10(2–3), 388–400. doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1954.11659535.Google Scholar

Wells, J. C. (1982). Accents of English, vol. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wieling, M., Tomaschek, F., Arnold, D., Tiede, M., Bröker, F., Thiele, S. et al. (2016). Investigating dialectal differences using articulography. Journal of Phonetics, 59, 122–43. doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2016.09.004.Google Scholar

Willis, C. (1972). Perception of vowel phonemes in Fort Erie, Ontario, Canada, and Buffalo, New York: An application of synthetic vowel categorization tests to dialectology. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 15(2), 246–55. dx.doi.org/10.1044/jshr.1502.246.Google Scholar

Wolfram, W. (1969). A Sociolinguistic Description of Detroit Negro English. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar

Yaeger-Dror, M. & Thomas, E. R. (2009). African American English Speakers and Their Participation in Local Sound Changes: A Comparative Study. Publication of the American Dialect Society (PADS) 94(1). Durham, NC: Duke University Press. doi.org/10.1215/-94–1-1.Google Scholar

Yaeger-Dror, M., Takano, S., Granadillo, T. & Hall-Lew, L. (2011). The sociophonetics of prosodic contours on NEG in three language communities: Teasing apart sociolinguistic and phonetic influences on speech. In Preston, D. & Niedzielski, N., eds., Sociophonetic Reader. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 133–76.Google Scholar

Zhang, Q. (2005). A Chinese yuppie in Beijing: Phonological variation and the construction of a new professional identity. Language in Society, 34(3), 431–66. doi.org/10.1017/S0047404505050153.Google Scholar

Zimman, L. (2017). Gender as stylistic bricolage: Transmasculine voices and the relationship between fundamental frequency and /s/. Language in Society, 46(3), 339–70. doi.org/10.1017/S0047404517000070.Google Scholar

Adriaans, F. & Kager, R. (2010). Adding generalization to statistical learning: the induction of phonotactics from continuous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 62(3), 311–31.Google Scholar

Barlow, J. A. (1997). A Constraint-Based Account of Syllable Onsets: Evidence from Developing Systems. PhD dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar

Baum, S. R. & McNutt, J. C. (1990). An acoustic analysis of frontal misarticulation of /s/ in children. Journal of Phonetics, 18(1), 51–63.Google Scholar

Becker, M. & Tessier, A.-M. (2011). Trajectories of faithfulness in child-specific phonology. Phonology, 28(2), 163–96.Google Scholar

Bernhardt, B. H., Bacsfalvi, P., Gick, B., Radanov, B. & Williams, R. (2005). Exploring the use of electropalatography and ultrasound in speech habilitation. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology/Revue d’orthophonie et d’audiologie, 29(4), 169–82.Google Scholar

Bernhardt, B. H. & Stoel-Gammon, C. (1996). Underspecification and markedness in normal and disordered phonological development. In Johnson, C. E. & Gilbert, J. H. V., eds., Children’s Language: Volume 9. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 33–54.Google Scholar

Bosma, J. F. (1975). Anatomic and physiologic development of the speech apparatus. In Tower, D. B., ed., The Nervous System, vol. 3. New York: Raven Press, pp. 469–81.Google Scholar

Crelin, E. S. (1987). The Human Vocal Tract: Anatomy, Function, Development, and Evolution. New York: Vantage Press.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. (1877). A biographical sketch of an infant. Mind, 2, 285–94.Google Scholar

Demuth, K. (1996). The prosodic structure of early words. In Morgan, J. L. & Demuth, K., eds., From Signal to Syntax: Bootstrapping from Speech to Grammar in Early Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 171–84.Google Scholar

Deville, G. (1891). Notes sur le développement du langage II. Revue de Linguistique et de Philologie Comparée, 24, 10–42, 128–43, 242–57, 300–20.Google Scholar

Dinnsen, D. A. (1996). Context effects in the acquisition of fricatives. In Bernhardt, B. H., Gilbert, J. & Ingram, D., eds., Proceedings of the UBC International Conference on Phonological Acquisition. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, pp. 136–48.Google Scholar

Dinnsen, D. A. & Gierut, J. A., eds. (2008). Optimality Theory, Phonological Acquisition and Disorders, London: Equinox.Google Scholar

Edwards, J., Fourakis, M., Beckman, M. E. & Fox, R. A. (1999). Characterizing knowledge deficits in phonological disorders. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42(1),169–86.Google Scholar

Eilers, R. E., Oller, D. K. & Benito-Garcia, C. R. (1984). The acquisition of voicing contrasts in Spanish and English learning infants and children: A longitudinal study. Journal of Child Language, 11, 313–36.Google Scholar

Ferguson, C. A. (1964). Baby talk in six languages. American Anthropologist, 66(6.2), 103–14.Google Scholar

Ferguson, C. A. (1978). Fricatives in child language acquisition. In Honsa, V. & Hardman-de-Bautista, M. J., eds., Papers on Linguistics and Child Language, vol. 6. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 93–115.Google Scholar

Ferguson, C. A. & Farwell, C. B. (1975). Words and sounds in early language acquisition. Language, 51, 419–39.Google Scholar

Fikkert, P. (1994). On the Acquisition of Prosodic Structure. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar

Fikkert, P. & Levelt, C. (2008). How does place fall into place? The lexicon and emergent constraints in children’s developing grammars. In Avery, P., Dresher, B. E. & Rice, K., eds., Contrast in Phonology: Theory, Perception, Acquisition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 231–68.Google Scholar

Fletcher, P. (1992). Language development from two to three. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 6(4), 329–30.Google Scholar

Fletcher, S. G. (1973). Maturation of the speech mechanism. Folia Phoniatrica, 25, 161–72.Google Scholar

Fletcher, S. G. (1989). Palatometric specification of stop, affricate, and sibilant sounds. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 32, 736–48.Google Scholar

Forrest, K., Weismer, G., Hodge, M., Dinnsen, D. A. & Elbert, M. (1990). Statistical analysis of word-initial /k/ and /t/ produced by normal and phonologically disordered children. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 4(4), 327–40.Google Scholar

Freitas, M. J. (2003). The acquisition of onset clusters in European Portuguese. Probus, 15, 27–46.Google Scholar

Gibbon, F. E. (1999). Undifferentiated lingual gestures in children with articulation/ phonological disorders. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 42(2), 382.Google Scholar

Gibbon, F. E., Hardcastle, B. & Dent, H. (1995). A study of obstruent sounds in school-age children with speech disorders using electropalatography. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 30(2), 213–25.Google Scholar

Gick, B., Allen, B., Roewer-Després, F. & Stavness, I. (2017). Speaking tongues are actively braced. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(3), 494–506.Google Scholar

Gnanadesikan, A. E. (2004). Markedness and faithfulness constraints in child phonology. In Kager, R., Pater, J. & Zonneveld, W., eds., Constraints in Phonological Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 73–108.Google Scholar

Goad, H. (1997). Consonant harmony in child language: An optimality-theoretic account. In Hannahs, S. J. & Young-Sholten, M., eds., Focus on Phonological Acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 113–42.Google Scholar

Goad, H. (2001). Assimilation phenomena and initial constraint ranking in early grammars. In Do, A. H.-J., Domínguez, L. & Johansen, A., eds., Proceedings of the 25th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, pp. 307–18.Google Scholar

Goad, H. & Rose, Y. (2004). Input elaboration, head faithfulness and evidence for representation in the acquisition of left-edge clusters in West Germanic. In Kager, R., Pater, J. & Zonneveld, W., eds., Constraints in Phonological Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 109–57.Google Scholar

Green, J. R., Moore, C. A., Higashikawa, M. & Steeve, R. W. (2000). The physiologic development of speech motor control: Lip and jaw coordination. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 239–55.Google Scholar

Gulian, M. & Levelt, C. (2009). An acoustic analysis of child language productions with reduced clusters. In Chandlee, J., Franchini, M., Lord, S. & Rheiner, M., eds., BUCLD Online Proceedings Supplement. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar

Gulian, M. & Levelt, C. (2011). Temporal measures of reduced/sC/-clusters in toddler speech: Evidence for a detailed lexical specification. In Online Proceedings ICPhS XVII Hong Kong. https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2011/OnlineProceedings/RegularSession/Gulian/Gulian.pdf.Google Scholar

Hale, M. & Reiss, C. (1998). Formal and empirical arguments concerning phonological acquisition. Linguistic Inquiry, 29(4), 656–83.Google Scholar

Hall, P. K., Jordan, L. S. & Robin, D. A. (1993). Developmental Apraxia of Speech: Theory and Clinical Practice. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar

Hardcastle, W. J., Morgan Barry, R. A. & Clark, C. J. (1987). An instrumental phonetic study of lingual activity in articulation-disordered children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 30(2), 171–84.Google Scholar

Hayes, B. & Wilson, C. (2008). A maximum entropy model of phonotactics and phonotactic learning. Linguistic Inquiry, 39(3), 379–440.Google Scholar

Hewlett, N. (1988). Acoustic properties of /k/ and /t/ in normal and phonologically disordered speech. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 2(1), 29–45.Google Scholar

Howard, S. J. (1998). Phonetic Constraints on Phonological Systems: Combining Perceptual and Instrumental Analysis in the Investigation of Speech Disorders. PhD dissertation, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.Google Scholar

Ingram, D. (1974). Phonological rules in young children. Journal of Child Language, 1, 49–64.Google Scholar

Ingram, D. (1989). First Language Acquisition: Method, Description, and Explanation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ingram, D. (2004). The representation of voice and contrasts in children’s early phonological systems. Folia Linguistica, 38(1–2), 145–55.Google Scholar

Inkelas, S. & Rose, Y. (2003). Velar fronting revisited. In Beachley, B., Brown, A. & Conlin, F., eds., Proceedings of the 27th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, pp. 334–45.Google Scholar

Inkelas, S. & Rose, Y. (2007). Positional neutralization: A case study from child language. Language, 83(4), 707–36.Google Scholar

Jakobson, R. (1941). Kindersprache, Aphasie, und allgemeine Lautgesetze. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar

Kent, R. D. (1992). The biology of phonological development. In Ferguson, C. A., Menn, L. & Stoel-Gammon, C., eds., Phonological Development: Models, Research, Implications. Timonium, MD: York Press, pp. 65–90.Google Scholar

Kewley-Port, D. & Preston, M. S. (1974). Early apical stop production: A voice onset time analysis. Journal of Phonetics, 2(3), 195–210.Google Scholar

Kuhl, P. K., Ramírez, R. R., Bosseler, A., Lin, J.-F. L. & Imada, T. (2014). Infants’ brain responses to speech suggest analysis by synthesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(31), 11238–45.Google Scholar

Levelt, C. (1994). On the Acquisition of Place. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar

Levelt, C. & van Oostendorp, M. (2007). Feature co-occurrence constraints in L1 acquisition. In Los, B. & van Koppen, M., eds., Linguistics in the Netherlands 2007, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 162–72.Google Scholar

Lewis, B. A., Freebairn, L. A., Hansen, A. J., Iyengar, S. K. & Taylor, H. G. (2004). School-age follow-up of children with childhood apraxia of speech. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 35(2), 122–40.Google Scholar

Li, F. (2012). Language-specific developmental differences in speech production: A cross-language acoustic study. Child Development, 83(4), 1303–15.Google Scholar

Li, F., Edwards, J. & Beckman, M. E. (2009). Contrast and covert contrast: The phonetic development of voiceless sibilant fricatives in English and Japanese toddlers. Journal of Phonetics, 37(1), 111–24.Google Scholar

Li, F., Munson, B., Edwards, J., Yoneyama, K. & Hall, K. (2011). Language specificity in the perception of voiceless sibilant fricatives in Japanese and English: Implications for cross-language differences in speech-sound development. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 129(2), 999–1011.Google Scholar

Lin, S. & Demuth, K. (2015). Children’s acquisition of English onset and coda /l/: Articulatory evidence. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58(1), 13.Google Scholar

Lin, Y. & Mielke, J. (2008). Discovering place and manner features: What can be learned from acoustic and articulatory data. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 14(1), 19.Google Scholar

Macken, M. A. & Barton, D. (1980). The acquisition of the voicing contrast in English: A study of voice onset time in word-initial stop consonants. Journal of Child Language, 7, 41–74.Google Scholar

MacKenzie, C. L., Marteniuk, R. G., Dugas, C., Liske, D. & Eickmeier, B. (1987). Three-dimensional movement trajectories in Fitts’ Task: implications for control. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 39(4), 629–47.Google Scholar

MacNeilage, P. F. & Davis, B. L. (1990). Acquisition of speech production: Frames, then content. In Jeannerod, M., ed., Attention and Performance XIII: Motor Representation and Control. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 453–76.Google Scholar

MacWhinney, B. (2020). The TalkBank Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk – Electronic Edition. Part 1: The CHAT Transcription Format, Retrieved from https://talkbank.org/manuals/CHAT.pdf.Google Scholar

Majorano, M., Vihman, M. M. & DePaolis, R. A. (2013). The relationship between infants’ production experience and their processing of speech. Language Learning and Development, 10(2), 179–204.Google Scholar

Marshall, C. & Chiat, S. (2003). A foot domain account of prosodically-conditioned substitutions. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 17(8), 645–57.Google Scholar

McAllister Byun, T. (2009). The Articulatory Basis of Positional Asymmetries in Phonological Acquisition (Ph.D. Dissertation), Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar

McAllister Byun, T. (2012). Positional velar fronting: An updated articulatory account. Journal of Child Language, 39(5), 1043–76.Google Scholar

McAllister Byun, T. & Tessier, A.-M. (2016). Motor influences on grammar in an emergentist model of phonology. Language and Linguistics Compass, 10(9), 431–52.Google Scholar

McAllister Byun, T., Inkelas, S. & Rose, Y. (2016). The A-map Model: Articulatory reliability in child-specific phonology. Language, 92(1), 141–78.Google Scholar

McCune, L. & Vihman, M. M. (2001). Early phonetic and lexical development: A productivity approach. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44(3), 670–84.Google Scholar

McLeod, S. & Crowe, K. (2018). Children’s consonant acquisition in 27 languages: A cross-linguistic review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 27(4), 1546–71.Google Scholar

McLeod, S., van Doorn, J. & Reed, V. A. (1998). Homonyms in children’s productions of consonant clusters. In Ziegler, W. & Deger, K., eds., Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics. London: Whurr Publishers, pp. 99–110.Google Scholar

McLeod, S., Harrison, L. J., McAllister, L. & McCormack, J. (2013). Speech sound disorders in a community study of preschool children. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 22(3), 503.Google Scholar

Morrisette, M. L., Dinnsen, D. A. & Gierut, J. A. (2003). Markedness and context effects in the acquisition of place features. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La Revue Canadienne de Linguistique, 48(3/4), 329–55.Google Scholar

Munson, B., Edwards, J., Schellinger, S., Beckman, M. E. & Meyer, M. K. (2010). Deconstructing phonetic transcription: Language-specificity, covert contrast, perceptual bias, and an extraterrestrial view of vox humana. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 24, 245–60.Google Scholar

Munson, B., Edwards, J. & Beckman, M. E. (2011). Phonological representations in language acquisition: climbing the ladder of abstraction. In Cohn, A. C., Fougeron, C. & Huffman, M. K., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Laboratory Phonology. Oxford University Press, pp. 288–309.Google Scholar

Nam, H., Goldstein, L. M., Giulivi, S., Levitt, A. G. & Whalen, D. H. (2013). Computational simulation of CV combination preferences in babbling. Journal of Phonetics, 41(2), 63–77.Google Scholar

Pater, J. (1997). Minimal violation and phonological development. Language Acquisition, 6(3), 201–53.Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, J. B. (2003). Phonetic diversity, statistical learning, and acquisition of phonology. Language and Speech, 46(2–3), 115–54.Google Scholar

Priestly, T. M. S. (1977). One idiosyncratic strategy in the acquisition of phonology. Journal of Child Language, 4, 45–65.Google Scholar

Pye, C., Ingram, D. & List, H. (1987). A comparison of initial consonant acquisition in English and Quiché. In Nelson, K. E. & van Kleeckl, A., eds., Children’s Language, vol. 6. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 175–90.Google Scholar

Richtsmeier, P. T. (2010). Child phoneme errors are not substitutions. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, 33(1).Google Scholar

Rose, Y. (2000). Headedness and Prosodic Licensing in the L1 Acquisition of Phonology. PhD dissertation, McGill University, Quebec, Canada.Google Scholar

Rose, Y. (2003). Place specification and segmental distribution in the acquisition of word-final consonant syllabification. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La Revue Canadienne de Linguistique, 48(3/4), 409–35.Google Scholar

Rose, Y. (2014). The emergence of first language phonology: Perception, articulation and representation. In Costa, J., Fiéis, A., Freitas, M. J., Lobo, M. & Santos, A. L., eds., New Directions in the Acquisition of Romance Languages: Selected Proceedings of the Romance Turn V. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 35–61.Google Scholar

Rose, Y. (2017). Child phonology. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. http://oxfordre.com/linguistics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.001.0001/acrefore-9780199384655-e-150.Google Scholar

Rose, Y. & Inkelas, S. (2011). The interpretation of phonological patterns in first language acquisition. In Ewen, C. J., Hume, E., van Oostendorp, M. & Rice, K., eds., The Blackwell Companion to Phonology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 2414–38.Google Scholar

Rose, Y. & MacWhinney, B. (2014). The PhonBank Project: Data and software-assisted methods for the study of phonology and phonological development. In Durand, J., Gut, U. & Kristoffersen, G., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Corpus Phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 380–401.Google Scholar

Scobbie, J. M., Gibbon, F. E., Hardcastle, W. J. & Fletcher, P. (1996). Covert contrast as a stage in the acquisition of phonetics and phonology. In Broe, M. B. & Pierrehumbert, J. B., eds., Papers in Laboratory Phonology V: Acquisition and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 43–62.Google Scholar

Smith, B. L. (1979). A phonetic analysis of consonantal devoicing in children’s speech. Journal of Child Language, 6(1), 19–28.Google Scholar

Smith, N. V. (1973). The Acquisition of Phonology: A Case Study, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Spencer, A. (1986). Towards a theory of phonological development. Lingua, 68, 3–38.Google Scholar

Stoehr, A., Benders, T., Hell, J. G. V. & Fikkert, P. (2018). Heritage language exposure impacts voice onset time of Dutch–German simultaneous bilingual preschoolers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(3), 598–617.Google Scholar

Stoel-Gammon, C. (1996). On the acquisition of velars in English. In Bernhardt, B. H., Gilbert, J. & Ingram, D., eds., Proceedings of the UBC International Conference on Phonological Acquisition. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, pp. 201–14.Google Scholar

Stoel-Gammon, C. (2011). Relationships between lexical and phonological development in young children. Journal of Child Language, 38(1), 1–34.Google Scholar

Stoel-Gammon, C. & Cooper, J. A. (1984). Patterns of early lexical and phonological development. Journal of Child Language, 11, 247–71.Google Scholar

Stoel-Gammon, C. & Stemberger, J. P. (1994). Consonant harmony and underspecification in child phonology. In Yavas, M., ed., First and Second Language Phonology. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group, pp. 63–80.Google Scholar

Stone, M. (2005). A guide to analysing tongue motion from ultrasound images. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 19(6–7), 455–501.Google Scholar