Adorno, Theodor W. 1973. Negative Dialectics. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Alaimo, Stacy. 1994. Cyborg and Ecofeminist Interventions: Challenges for an Environmental Feminism. Feminist Studies 20(1): 133–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alaimo, Stacy. 2010. Bodily Natures: Science, Environment, and the Material Self. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Arias-Maldonado, Manuel. 2012. Real Green. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Arias-Maldonado, Manuel. 2015. Environment and Society: Socionatural Relations in the Anthropocene. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Asafu-Adjaye, John, Blomqvist, Linus, Brand, Stewart, et al. 2015. An Ecomodernist Manifesto. Oakland, CA: Breakthrough Institute. http://www.ecomodernism.org/Google Scholar

Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barry, John. 1999. Rethinking Green Politics: Nature, Virtue and Progress. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barry, John. 2005. Ecological Modernization. In Debating the Earth: The Environmental Politics Reader, edited by Dryzek, John and Schlosberg, David, 303–322. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Barry, John. 2007. Environment and Social Theory. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barry, John. 2012. The Politics of Actually Existing Unsustainability: Human Flourishing in a Climate-changed, Carbon Constrained World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barry, John. 2016a. Bio-fuelling the Hummer? Transdisciplinary Thoughts on Techno-Optimism and Innovation in the Transition from Unsustainability. In Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Transitions to Sustainability, edited by Byrne, Edmond, Mullally, Gerard, and Sage, Colin, 106–124. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barry, John. 2016b. Citizenship and (Un)sustainability: A Green Republican Perspective. In The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Ethics, edited by Gardiner, Stephen M. and Thompson, Allen, 304–320. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Barry, John. 2017. What’s the Story of Economic Growth: Understanding our Most Powerful Story as Myth, Ideology, Meme and Religion. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Bennett, Jane. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Bonneuil, Christophe. 2015. The Geological Turn. Narratives of the Anthropocene. In The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis. Rethinking Modernity in a New Epoch, edited by Hamilton, Clive, Bonneuil, Christophe, and Gemenne, François, 17–31. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonneuil, Christophe, and Fressoz, Jean-Baptiste. 2016. The Shock of the Anthropocene. London, New York: Verso.Google Scholar

Braidotti, Rosi. 2013. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Cafaro, Philip. 2014. Expanding Parks, Reducing Human Numbers, and Preserving all the Wild Nature We Can: A Superior Alternative to Embracing the Anthropocene Era. In Keeping the Wild: Against the Domestication of Earth, edited by Wuerthner, George, Crist, Eileen, and Butler, Tom, 137–145. San Francisco, CA: Island Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cannavò, Peter. 2016. Environmental Political Theory and Republicanism. In The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Political Theory, edited by Gabrielson, Teena, Hall, Cheryl, Meyer, John M., and Schlosberg, David. 72–88. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2009. The Climate of History: Four Theses. Critical Inquiry 35 (Winter): 197–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, Nigel. 2011. Inhuman Nature: Sociable Life on a Dynamic Planet. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Clark, Nigel. 2014. Geopolitics and the Disaster of the Anthropocene. The Sociological Review 62 (S1): 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cook, Deborah. 2011. Adorno on Nature. Durham, UK: Acumen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crist, Eileen. 2013. On the Poverty of our Nomenclature. Environmental Humanities 3: 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Curry, Patrick. 2003. Re-Thinking Nature: Towards an Eco-Pluralism. Environmental Values 12(3): 337–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, Erle C. 2011a. Anthropogenic Transformation of the Terrestrial Biosphere. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 369(1938): 1010–1035.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ellis, Erle C. 2011b. Neither Good nor Bad. New York Times, May 23.Google Scholar

Ellis, Erle C. 2012. The Planet of No Return. Human Resilience on an Artificial Earth. Breakthrough Journal (Winter).Google Scholar

Ellis, Erle C. 2013. Using the Planet. Global Change 81: 32–35.Google Scholar

Fremaux, Anne. 2019 (forthcoming). After The Anthropocene: Green Republicanism in a Post-Capitalist World. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gibson, Katherine, Rose, Deborah R., and Fincher, Ruth, eds. 2015. Manifesto for Living in the Anthropocene. New York: Punctum Books.Google Scholar

Giddens, Anthony. 1994. Beyond Left and Right. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Görg, Christoph. 2003a: Gesellschaftstheorie und Naturverhältnisse. Von den Grenzen der Regulationstheorie. In Fit für den Postfordismus? Theoretisch-Politische Perspektiven des Regulationsansatzes, edited by Brand, Ulrich and Raza, Werner, 175–194. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.Google Scholar

Görg, Christoph. 2003b. Nichtidentität und Kritik. Zum Problem der Gestaltung der gesellschaftlichen Naturverhältnisse. In Kritische Theorie der Technik und der Natur, edited by Böhme, Gernot and Manzei, Alexandra, 113–134. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.Google Scholar

Görg, Christoph. 2005. Jenseits von Naturalismus und Naturbeherrschung. Naturverhältnisse in der Kritischen Theorie. In Alle reden vom Wetter. Wir nicht. Beiträge zur Förderung der Kritischen Vernunft, edited by der FH Münster, Asta. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.Google Scholar

Hailwood, Simon. 2015. Alienation and Nature in Environmental Philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamilton, Clive, Bonneuil, Christophe, and Gemenne, François, eds. 2015. The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis: Rethinking Modernity in a New Epoch. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haraway, Donna. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hayward, Tim. 1997. Anthropocentrism: A Misunderstood Problem. Environmental Values 6: 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hegel, G.W.F. 2005. Hegel’s Preface to the Phenomenology of Spirit. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horkheimer, Max, and Adorno, Theodor W.. 2002 [1947]. Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. 2007. “It’s Development, Stupid!” or: How to Modernize Modernization (Unpublished manuscript). Accessed June 20, 2018. http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/107-NORDHAUS&SHELLENBERGER.pdfGoogle Scholar

Latour, Bruno. 2011. Love Your Monsters. In Love Your Monsters: Postenvironmentalism and the Anthropocene, edited by Schellenberger, Michael and Nordhaus, Ted, 17–25. San Francisco: Breakthrough Institute.Google Scholar

Lidskog, Rolf, and Waterton, Claire. 2016. Anthropocene. A Cautious Welcome from Environmental Sociology. Environmental Sociology 2 (4): 395–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lövbrand, Eva, Stripple, Johannes, and Wiman, Bo. 2009. Earth System Governmentality: Reflections on Science in the Anthropocene. Global Environmental Change 19 (1): 7–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lövbrand, Eva, Beck, Silke, Chilvers, Jason, et al. 2014. Taking the (Human) Sciences Seriously: Realizing the Critical Potential of the Anthropocene. Paper presented at the EPCR General Conference. Glasgow, September 6.Google Scholar

Lövbrand, Eva, Beck, Silke, Chilvers, Jason, et al. 2015. Who Speaks for the Future of Earth? How Critical Social Science Can Extend the Conversation on the Anthropocene. Global Environmental Change 32: 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luke, Timothy W. 1997. At the End of Nature: Cyborgs, “Humachines”, and Environments in Postmodernity. Environment and Planning A 29 (8): 1367–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lynas, Mark. 2011. The God Species. London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar

Marcuse, Herbert. 1969. An Essay on Liberation. Victoria, Australia: Penguin Press.Google Scholar

Marris, Emma, Kareiva, Peter, Mascaro, Joseph, et al. 2011. Hope in the Age of Man. New York Times, December 7.Google Scholar

Mathews, F. 1996. Community and the Ecological Self. In Ecology and Democracy, edited by Mathews, F., 66–100. London and Portland, OR: Frank Kass.Google Scholar

Mathews, F. 2003. For Love of Matter: A Contemporary Panpsychism. Albany, NY: Suny Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neyrat, Frederic. 2016. La Part Inconstructible de la Terre – Critique du Géo-constructivisme (Kindle edition). Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Norton, Bryan G. 1984. Environmental Ethics and Weak Anthropocentrism. Environmental Ethics 6 (2): 131–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norton, Bryan G. 1991. Toward Unity among Environmentalists. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ravetz, Jerome R. 2006. Post-normal Science and the Complexity of Transitions Towards Sustainability. Ecological Complexity 3 (4): 275–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rockström, Johan, Steffen, Will, Noone, Kevin, et al. 2009. Planetary Boundaries: Exploring the Safe Operating Space for Humanity. Ecology and Society 14 (2): 32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Mick. 2001. An Ethics of Place: Radical Ecology, Postmodernity, and Social Theory. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Smith, Mick. 2011. Against Ecological Sovereignty: Ethics, Biopolitics, and Saving the Natural World. Minneapolis, MN: The University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Neil. 2006. Nature as Accumulation Strategy. In Coming to Terms with Nature: Socialist Register 2007, edited by Panitch, Leo and Leys, Colin, 16–36. Monmouth: The Merlin Press.Google Scholar

Soulé, Michael, and Lease, Gary, eds. 1995. Reinventing Nature? Responses to Postmodern Deconstruction. San Francisco: Island Press.Google Scholar

Spretnak, Charlene. 1997. The Resurgence of the Real: Body, Nature, and Place in a Hypermodern World. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Steffen, Will, Crutzen, Paul J., and McNeill, John R.. 2007. The Anthropocene: Are Humans Now Overwhelming the Great Forces of Nature? Ambio 36 (8): 614–621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Steffen, Will, Persson, Åsa, Deutsch, Lisa, et al. 2011. The Anthropocene: From Global Change to Planetary Stewardship. Ambio 40 (7): 739–761.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Steffen, Will, Richardson, Katherine, Rockström, Johan, et al. 2015. Planetary Boundaries: Guiding Human Development on a Changing Planet. Science 347 (6223).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Swyngedouw, Erik. 2013. The Non-Political Politics of Climate Change. Acme 12 (1): 1–8.Google Scholar

Symons, Jonathan, and Karlsson, Rasmus. 2015. Green Political Theory in a Climate Changed World: Between Innovation and Restraint. Environmental Politics 24: 2, 173–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Szerszynski, Bronislaw, Kearnes, Matthew, Macnaghten, Phil, et al. 2013. Why Solar Radiation Management Geoengineering and Democracy Won’t Mix. Environment and Planning A 45 (12): 2809–2816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vetlesen, Arne J. 2015. The Denial of Nature: Environmental Philosophy in the Era of Global Capitalism. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alcamo, Joseph. 2017. Evaluating the Impacts of Global Environmental Assessments. Environmental Science and Policy 77: 268–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beck, Silke, and Mahony, Martin. 2017. The IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] and the Politics of Anticipation. Nature Climate Change 7 (5): 311–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beck, Silke, Tim Forsyth, Pia M. Kohler, Myanna Lahsen, and Mahony, Martin. 2016. The Making of Global Environmental Science and Politics. In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (4th edition), edited by Felt, Ulrike, Fouché, Rayvon, Miller, Clark A., and Smith-Doerr, Laurel, chapter 36. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Belmont Forum. 2017. Transformations to Sustainability. Accessed April 5, 2017. http://www.belmontforum.org/news/the-transformations-2-sustainability-call-is-open-today/Google Scholar

Berkhout, Frans. 2012. Adaptation to Climate Change by Organizations. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 3 (1): 91–106.Google Scholar

Berkhout, Frans. 2014. What Does Coordination Achieve. Accessed January 29, 2017. http://www.futureearth.org/blog/2014-may-30/what-does-coordination-achieveGoogle Scholar

Blicharska, Malgorzata, Smithers, Richard J., Kuchler, Magdalena, et al. 2017. Steps to Overcome the North-South Divide in Research Relevant to Climate Change Policy and Practice. Nature Climate Change 7 (1): 21–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brondizio, Eduardo S., O’Brien, Karen, Bai, Xuemei, et al. 2016. Re-conceptualizing the Anthropocene: A Call for Collaboration. Global Environmental Change 39: 318–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Castree, Noel. 2016. Geography and the New Social Contract for Global Change Research. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 41 (3): 328–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chilvers, Jason, and Kearnes, Matthew, eds. 2016. Remaking Participation: Science, Environment and Emergent Publics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Clark, William C., van Kerkhoff, Lorrae, Lebel, Louis, and Gallopin, Gilberto C.. 2016. Crafting Usable Knowledge for Sustainable Development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113 (17): 4570–4578.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cornell, Sarah, Berkhout, Frans, Tuinstra, Willemijn, et al. 2013. Opening up Knowledge Systems for Better Responses to Global Environmental Change. Environmental Science and Policy 28: 60–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dilling, Lisa, and Lemos, Maria Carmen. 2011. Creating Usable Science: Opportunities and Constraints for Climate Knowledge Use and their Implications for Science Policy. Global Environmental Change 21 (2): 680–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Felt, Ulrike, Barben, Daniel, Irwin, A., et al. 2013. Science in Society: Caring for Our Futures in Turbulent Times. Science Policy Briefing 50 for the European Science Foundation.Google Scholar

Felt, Ulrike, Igelsböck, Judith, Schikowitz, Andrea, and Thomas, Völker. 2016. Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research in Practice: Between Imaginaries of Collective Experimentation and Entrenched Academic Value Orders. Science, Technology and Human Values 41 (4): 732–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Future Earth. 2014. Impact. Accessed January 29, 2017. http://futureearth.org/impactGoogle Scholar

Future Earth. 2016. Future Earth Launches New Magazine for the Anthropocene. Accessed May 10, 2017. http://futureearth.org/news/future-earth-launches-new-magazine-anthropoceneGoogle Scholar

German Advisory Council on Global Change. 2011. World in Transition. A Social Contract for Sustainability. Accessed May 5, 2017. http://www.wbgu.de/en/flagship-reports/fr-2011-a-social-contract/Google Scholar

German Council of Science and Humanities. 2015. Grand Societal Challenges as a Topic for Science Policy. Positionspapier. https://www.wissenschaftsrat.de/download/archiv/4594–15_engl.pdf.Google Scholar

Hackmann, Heide, Moser, Susanne C., and St. Clair, Asunción Lera. 2014. The Social Heart of Global Environmental Change. Nature Climate Change 4 (8): 653–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hajer, Maarten. 1995. The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hulme, Mike. 2015. Changing What Exactly, and From Where? A Response to Castree. Dialogues in Human Geography 5 (3): 322–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ignacuik, Ada, Rice, Martin, Bogardi, Janos, Canadell, Josep G., Dhakal, Shobhakar, Ingram, John, Leemans, Rik, and Rosenberg, Mark. 2012. Responding to Complex Societal Challenges: A Decade of Earth System Science Partnership (ESSP) Interdisciplinary Research. Current Opinion on Environmental Sustainability 4: 147–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

International Council for Science. 2010. Grand Challenges in Global Sustainability Research: A Systems Approach to Research Priorities for the Decade. Prepublication Version. Paris: International Council for Science.Google Scholar

International Social Science Council and United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. 2013. World Social Science Report: Changing Global Environments. Paris: OECD Publishing and UNESCO Publishing.Google Scholar

Jasanoff, Sheila, ed. 2004. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jasanoff, Sheila. 2014. To Be Inclusive, You Need More Voices. Accessed May 10, 2016. http://www.futureearth.org/blog/2014-jul-23/be-inclusive-you-need-more-voices-qa-sheila-jasanoffGoogle Scholar

Jerneck, Anne, Olsson, Lennart, Ness, Barry, et al. 2011. Structuring Sustainability Science. Sustainability Science 6 (1): 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kates, Robert W., Clark, William C., Corell, Robert, et al. 2001. Sustainability Science. Science 292 (5517): 641–642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Klenk, Nicole L., and Meehan, Katie. 2015. Climate Change and Transdisciplinary Science: Problematizing the Integration Imperative. Environmental Science and Policy 54: 160–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lahsen, Myanna. 2016. Toward a Sustainable Future Earth: Challenges for a Research Agenda. Science, Technology and Human Values 41 (5): 876–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Latour, Bruno. 2015. Telling Friends from Foes in the Time of the Anthropocene. In The Anthropocene and the Global Environment Crisis: Rethinking Modernity in a New Epoch, edited by Hamilton, Clive, Bonneuil, Christophe, and Gemenne, François, 145–155. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leach, Melissa. 2014. Co-Design for Relevance and Usefulness. Accessed May 10, 2016. http://www.futureearth.org/blog/2014-jul-23/co-design-relevance-and-usefulness-qa-melissa-leachGoogle Scholar

Leemans, Rik. 2016. The Lessons Learned from Shifting from Global-Change Research Programmes to Transdisciplinary Sustainability Science. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 19: 103–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liverman, Diana M. 2009. Conventions of Climate Change: Constructions of Danger and the Dispossession of the Atmosphere. Journal of Historical Geography 35 (2): 279–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lövbrand, Eva, Beck, Silke, Chilvers, Jason, et al. 2015. Who Speaks for the Future of Earth? How Critical Social Science Can Extend the Conversation on the Anthropocene. Global Environmental Change 32: 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, Clark. 2009. Epistemic Constitutionalism in International Governance: The Case of Climate Change. In Foreign Policy Challenges in the 21st Century, edited by Heazle, Michael, Griffiths, Martin, and Conley, Tom, 141–163. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Moser, Susanne C. 2016. Can Science on Transformation Transform Science? Lessons from Co-Design. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 20: 106–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Brien, Karen, and Barnett, John. 2013. Global Environmental Change and Human Security. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 38: 373–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prokopy, Linda S., Carlton, J. Stuart, Haigh, Tonya, et al. 2016. Useful to Usable: Developing Usable Climate Science for Agriculture. Climate Risk Management 15: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Revkin, Andrew. 2016. An Anthropocene Journey. Accessed May 10, 2017. http://anthropocenemagazine.org/anthropocenejourney/Google Scholar

Stafford-Smith, Mark, Gaffney, Owen, Brito, Lidia, Ostrom, Elinor, and Seitzinger, Sybil. 2012. Interconnected Risks and Solutions for a Planet under Pressure – Overview and Introduction. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 4: 3–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steffen, William L., Sanderson, Angelina, Tyson, Peter D., et al. 2004. Global Change and the Earth System: A Planet under Pressure. Executive Summary Stockholm, International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stilgoe, Jack, Owen, Richard, and Macnaghten, Phil. 2013. Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation. Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stirling, Andrew. 2015. Time to Rei(g)n Back the Anthropocene? Accessed January 29, 2017. http://steps-centre.org/2015/blog/time-to-reign-back-the-anthropoceneGoogle Scholar

Strohschneider, Peter. 2014. Zur Politik der Transformativen Wissenschaft. In Die Verfassung des Politischen. Festschrift für Hans Vorländer, edited by Brodocz, André, Herrmann, Dietrich, Schmidt, Rainer, Schulz, Daniel, and Schulze, Julia, 175–194. Berlin: Wessel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strohschneider, Peter. 2016. Foreword – The Contribution of Science in Implementing the SDGs [Sustainable Development Goals]. Accessed May 5, 2017. http://www.dkn-future-earth.org/aktuelles/news/deutschland/new-dkn-future-earth-report-out-now-the-contribution-of-science-in-implementing-the-sdgs.htmlGoogle Scholar

Turnhout, Esther, Dewulf, Art, and Hulme, Mike. 2016. What Does Policy-Relevant Global Environmental Knowledge Do? The Cases of Climate and Biodiversity. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 18: 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

United Nations. 2015. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Outcome Document for the UN Summit to Adopt the Post-2015 Development Agenda: Draft for Adoption. New York. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdfGoogle Scholar

van der Hel, Sandra. 2016. New Science for Global Sustainability? The Institutionalisation of Knowledge Co-production in Future Earth. Environmental Science and Policy 61: 165–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abram, David. 2011. Becoming Animal: An Earthly Cosmology. New York, NY: Vintage Press.Google Scholar

Ahuja, Neel. 2011. Abu Zubayda and the Caterpillar. Social Text 29 (1): 127–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bennett, Jane. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Betsill, Michele M. and Corell, Elizabeth, eds. 2007. NGO Diplomacy: The Influence of Nongovernmental Organizations in International Environmental Negotiations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bozzo, Laura. 2012. Beyond Mountaintop Removal: Pathways for Change in Appalachian Coalfields. Duke Forum for Law and Social Change 4 (1): 115–140.Google Scholar

Burke, Anthony, Fishel, Stefanie, Mitchell, Audra, Dalby, Simon, and Levine, David J.. 2016. Planet Politics: A Manifesto for the End of IR [International Relations]. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 44 (3): 499–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dabbs, W. Corbett. 1996. Oil Production and Environmental Damage. Trade and Environment Database 1996.Google Scholar

Donaldson, Sue, and Kymlicka, Will. 2013. Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Einstein, Albert. 1995. Ideas and Opinions. New York, NY: Broadway Books.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 2003. “Society Must Be Defended”: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976. New York, NY: Picador.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 2014. Lectures on the Will to Know: Lectures at the College of France and Oedipal Knowledge. New York, NY: Picador.Google Scholar

Goode, Erica. 2016. A Wrenching Choice for Alaska Towns in the Path of Climate Change. New York Times. 29 November.Google Scholar

Grusin, Richard. 2015. The Nonhuman Turn. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Hanh, Thich Nhat. 1997. Interbeing: Fourteen Guidelines for Engaging Buddhism. Berkeley, CA: Parallax Press.Google Scholar

Haraway, Donna. 2003. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm.Google Scholar

Haraway, Donna. 2007. When Species Meet (Posthumanities). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Haraway, Donna. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Ingelson, Allan, and Nwapi, Chilenye. 2014. Environmental Impact Assessment Process for Oil, Gas and Mining Projects in Nigeria: A Critical Analysis. Law, Environment and Development Journal 10 (1): 35–56.Google Scholar

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2013. Summary for Policymakers. In Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Keck, Margaret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Klein, Naomi. 2015. This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar

Kohn, Eduardo. 2013. How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology beyond the Human. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. 2004. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lerner, Steve. 2012. Sacrifice Zones: The Frontlines of Toxic Chemical Exposure in the United States. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Livingston, Julie, and Puar, Jasbir. 2011. Interspecies. Social Text 29 (1): 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maniates, Michael, and Meyer, John, eds. 2010. The Environmental Politics of Sacrifice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKibben, Bill. 1989. The End of Nature. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar

Parenti, Christian. 2011. Tropic of Chaos: Climate Change and the New Geography of Violence. New York, NY: Nation Books.Google Scholar

Pollan, Michael. 2002. Botany of Desire: A Plant’s Eye View of the World. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar

Pollan, Michael. 2013. The Intelligent Plant. New Yorker, December 23 and 30.Google Scholar

Quammen, David. 1997. The Song of the Dodo: Island Biogeography in an Age of Extinction. New York, NY: Scribner.Google Scholar

Rosenau, James. 1990. Turbulence in World Politics: A Theory of Change and Continuity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Said, Edward. 1996. Representations of the Intellectual: The 1993 Reith Lectures. New York, NY: Vintage.Google Scholar

Szabo, Sylvia, Brondizio, Eduardo, Renaud, Fabrice G., et al. 2016. Population Dynamics, Delta Vulnerability and Environmental Change: Comparison of the Mekong, Ganges Brahmaputra and Amazon Delta Regions. Sustainability Science 11 (4): 539–554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2016. Hydraulic Fracturing for Oil and Gas: Impacts from the Hydraulic Fracturing Water Cycle on Drinking Water Resources in the United States (Final Report). Doc. no. EPA/600/R-16/236 F. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar

VeRisk Maplecroft. 2010. Risk Calculators and Dashboard. Accessed June 20, 2018. http://maplecroft.com/about/news/ccvi.htmlGoogle Scholar

Wake, Helen. 2005. Oil Refineries: A Review of their Ecological Impacts on the Aquatic Environment. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 62 (1–2): 131–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walters, Colin, Zalasiewicz, Jan, Summerhayes, Colin, et al. 2016. The Anthropocene Is Functionally and Stratigraphically Distinct from the Holocene. Science 351 (6269): aad2622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wapner, Paul. 2016. Climate of the Poor: Suffering and the Moral Imperative of Radical Resilience. In Reimagining Climate Change, edited by Wapner, Paul and Elver, Hilal, 131–149. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weber, Andreas. 2016. Biology of Wonder: Aliveness, Feeling and the Metamorphosis of Science. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar

Youatt, Rafi. 2016. Interspecies. In The Oxford Handbook of Environmental Political Theory, edited by Gabrielson, Teena, Hall, Cheryl, Meyer, John M., and Schlosberg, David, 220–239. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bennett, Elena, Solan, Martin, Biggs, Reinette, et al. 2016. Bright Spots: Seeds of a Good Anthropocene. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 14(8): 441–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biermann, Frank, Bai, Xuemei, Bondre, Ninad, et al. 2016. Down to Earth: Contextualizing the Anthropocene. Global Environmental Change 39: 341–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Castree, Noel. 2014. The Anthropocene and the Environmental Humanities: Extending the Conversation. Environmental Humanities 5: 233–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crutzen, Paul. 2002. Geology of Mankind – the Anthropocene. Nature 415: 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crutzen, Paul, and Stoermer, Eugene. 2000. The “Anthropocene.” Global Change Newsletter 41: 17–18.Google Scholar

Dalby, Simon. 2016. Framing the Anthropocene: The Good the Bad and the Ugly. The Anthropocene Review 3 (1): 31–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duit, Andreas, Feint, Peter, and Meadowcroft, James. 2016. Greening Leviathan: The Rise of the Environmental State? Environmental Politics 25 (1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fournier, Valérie. 2008. Escaping from the Economy: The Politics of Degrowth. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 28 (11/12): 528–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haila, Yrjo. 2017. Biodiversity: Increasing the Political Clout of Nature Conservation. In Conceptual Innovation in Environmental Policy, edited by Meadowcroft, James and Fiorino, Daniel J., 207–232. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hamilton, Clive, and Grinevald, Jacques. 2015. Was the Anthropocene Anticipated? The Anthropocene Review 2(1): 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langhelle, Olus. 1999. Sustainable Development: Exploring the Ethics of Our Common Future. International Political Science Review 20(2): 129–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lövbrand, Eva, Beck, Silke, Chilvers, Jason, et al. 2015. Who Speaks for the Earth? How Critical Social Science Can Extend the Conversation on the Anthropocene. Global Environmental Change 32: 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKibben, Bill. 1989. The End of Nature. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar

Meadowcroft, James. 2012a. Greening the State. In Comparative Environmental Politics, edited by Steinberg, Paul F. and VanDeveer, Stacy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Meadowcroft, James. 2012b. Pushing the Boundaries: Governance for Sustainable Development and a Politics of Limits. In Governance, Democracy and Sustainable Development: Moving beyond the Impasse, edited by Meadowcroft, James, Langhelle, Oluf, and Rudd, Audun. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meadowcroft, James. 2017. The Birth of the Environment and the Evolution of Environmental Governance. In Conceptual Innovation in Environmental Policy, edited by Meadowcroft, James and Fiorino, Daniel, 53–76. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meadowcroft, James, and Fiorino, Daniel J., eds. 2017. Conceptual Innovation in Environmental Policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olsson, Per, Michele-Lee, Moore, Westley, Frances R., and McCarthy, Daniel. 2017. The Concept of the Anthropocene as a Game-Changer: A New Context for Social Innovation and Transformations to Sustainability. Ecology and Society 22(2): 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pearce, Trevor. 2010. From “Circumstances” to “Environment”: Herbert Spencer and the Origins of the Idea of Organism-Environment Interaction. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 41: 241–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rockström, Johan, Steffen, Will, Noone, Kevin, et al. 2009. A Safe Operating Space for Humanity. Nature 461: 472–475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Smil, Vaclav. 2013. Harvesting the Biosphere: What We Have Taken from Nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Steffen, Will, Leinfelder, Reinhold, Zalasiewicz, Jan, et al. 2016. Stratigraphic and Earth System Approaches to Defining the Anthropocene. Earth’s Future 4: 324–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stirling, Andrew. 2014. Emancipating Transformations: From Controlling “the Transition” to Culturing Plural Radical Progress. In The Politics of Green Transformations, edited by Scoones, Ian, Leach, Melissa, and Newell, Peter, 54–67. London and New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Van den Bergh, Jeroen C.J.M. 2010. Environment versus Growth – A Criticism of “Degrowth” and a Plea for “A-Growth.” Ecological Economics 40(5): 881–890.Google Scholar

Victor, Peter A. 2008. Managing without Growth: Slower by Design, Not Disaster. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wapner, Paul. 2014. The Changing Nature of Nature: Environmental Politics in the Anthropocene. Global Environmental Politics 14 (4): 36–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waters, Colin, Zalasiewicz, Jan, Summerhayes, Colin, et al. 2016. The Anthropocene Is Functionally and Stratigraphically Distinct from the Holocene. Science 351 (6269): aad2622.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) 1987. Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar