Works Cited

Travis Dumsday

doi:10.1017/9781108647502.011

Works Cited

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 January 2019

Travis Dumsday

Show author details

Travis Dumsday: Affiliation:
Concordia University, Edmonton

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: Dispositionalism and the Metaphysics of Science , pp. 199 - 216

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108647502.011 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Ainsworth, Peter (2010) “What is Ontic Structural Realism?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 41, pp. 50–57.Google Scholar

Alexander of Hales (1924) Summa Theologica, Part I (Quaracchi: Collegii s. Bonaventurae).Google Scholar

Alexander of Hales (1928) Summa Theologica, Part II (Quaracchi: Collegii s. Bonaventurae).Google Scholar

Allen, Keith (2011) “Revelation and the Nature of Colour”, Dialectica, 65, pp. 153–176.Google Scholar

Allen, Keith (2015) “Colour Physicalism, Naive Realism, and the Argument from Structure”, Minds & Machines, 25, pp. 193–212.Google Scholar

Aquinas (1920) Summa Theologica. Translated by the Fathers of the English Dominican Province. Accessed online via www.newadvent.org Google Scholar

Aquinas (1956) Summa Contra Gentiles: On the Truth of the Catholic Faith, Book 2: Creation, translated by James F. Anderson (New York, NY: Image Books)Google Scholar

Armstrong, David (1978) Nominalism and Realism: Universals and Scientific Realism, Volume 1 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Armstrong, David (1980) “Identity Through Time”, in: Time and Cause: Essays in Honor of Richard Taylor, ed. van Inwagen, Peter (Dordrecht: Reidel), pp. 67–78.CrossRef Google Scholar

Armstrong, David (1983) What is a Law of Nature? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Armstrong, David (1989) Universals: An Opinionated Introduction (Boulder, CO: Westview Press).Google Scholar

Armstrong, David (1997) A World of States of Affairs (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Armstrong, David (1999) “The Causal Theory of Properties: Properties According to Shoemaker, Ellis, and Others”, Philosophical Topics, 26, pp. 25–37.Google Scholar

Armstrong, David (2005) “Four Disputes about Properties”, Synthese, 144, pp. 309–320.Google Scholar

Arntzenius, Frank (2006) “Time Travel: Double Your Fun”, Philosophy Compass, 1, pp. 599–616.Google Scholar

Ayers, Michael (1991) “Substance: Prolegomena to a Realist Theory of Identity”, Journal of Philosophy, 88, pp. 69–90.Google Scholar

Baker, David (2005) “Spacetime Substantivalism and Einstein’s Cosmological Constant”, Philosophy of Science, 72, pp. 1299–1311.Google Scholar

Baker, David (2016) “Does String Theory Posit Extended Simples?” Philosophers’ Imprint, 16, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar

Balashov, Yuri (2000) “Relativity and Persistence”, Philosophy of Science, 67 (supplement), pp. S549–S562.Google Scholar

Balashov, Yuri (2002) “What is a Law of Nature? The Broken-Symmetry Story”, Southern Journal of Philosophy, 40, pp. 459–475.Google Scholar

Barker, Stephen (2013) “The Emperor’s New Metaphysics of Powers”, Mind, 122, pp. 605–653.Google Scholar

Bartels, Andreas (2013) “Why Metrical Properties are not Powers”, Synthese, 190, pp. 2001–2013.Google Scholar

Bauer, William (2013) “Dispositional Essentialism and the Nature of Powerful Properties”, Disputatio, 5, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar

Beebee, Helen (2000) “The Non-Governing Conception of Laws of Nature”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 3, pp. 571–595.Google Scholar

Beebee, Helen (2011) “Necessary Connections and the Problem of Induction”, Noûs, 45, pp. 504–527.Google Scholar

Belot, Gordon (1999) “Rehabilitating Relationalism”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 13, pp. 35–52.Google Scholar

Benovsky, Jiri (2009) “Presentism and Persistence”, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 90, pp. 291–309.Google Scholar

Bettoni, Efrem (1961) Duns Scotus: The Basic Principles of His Philosophy, translated by Bernardine Bonansea (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press).Google Scholar

Bigelow, John, Ellis, Brian, and Lierse, Caroline (1992) “The World as One of a Kind: Natural Necessity and the Laws of Nature”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 43, pp. 371–388.Google Scholar

Bird, Alexander (2005) “The Ultimate Argument Against Armstrong’s Contingent Necessitation View of Laws”, Analysis, 65, pp. 147–155.Google Scholar

Bird, Alexander (2006) “Potency and Modality”, Synthese, 149: 491–508.Google Scholar

Bird, Alexander (2007) Nature’s Metaphysics: Laws and Properties (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Bird, Alexander (2012) “Are Any Kinds Ontologically Fundamental?”, in: Contemporary Aristotelian Metaphysics, ed. Tahko, Tuomas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 94–104.Google Scholar

Bird, Alexander, Ellis, Brian, Mumford, Stephen, and Psillos, Stathis (2006) “Looking for Laws”, Metascience, 15, pp. 437–469.Google Scholar

Black, Robert (2000) “Against Quidditism”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 78, pp. 87–104.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bobik, Joseph (1961) “St. Thomas on the Individuation of Bodily Substances”, in: Readings in the Philosophy of Nature, ed. Koren, Henry (Westminster, MD: The Newman Press), pp. 327–340.Google Scholar

Bobik, Joseph (1965) Aquinas on Being and Essence: A Translation and Interpretation (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press).Google Scholar

Bobik, Joseph (1998) Aquinas on Matter and Form and the Elements: A Translation and Interpretation of the De Principiis Naturae and the De Mixtione Elementorum of St. Thomas Aquinas (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press).Google Scholar

Borghini, Andrea, and Williams, Neil (2008) “A Dispositional Theory of Possibility”, dialectica, 62, pp. 21–41.Google Scholar

Bostock, Simon (2003) “Are All Possible Laws Actual Laws?” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 81, pp. 517–533.Google Scholar

Bostock, Simon (2008) “A Defence of Pan-Dispositionalism”, Metaphysica, 9, pp. 139–157.Google Scholar

Braddon-Mitchell, David, and Miller, Kristie (2006) “The Physics of Extended Simples”, Analysis, 66, pp. 222–226.Google Scholar

Briceno, Sebastian, and Mumford, Stephen (2016) “Relations All the Way Down? Against Ontic Structural Realism”, in: The Metaphysics of Relations, eds. Marmodoro, Anna and Yates, David (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 198–217.Google Scholar

Broackes, Justin (2006) “Substance”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 106, pp. 131–166.Google Scholar

Broad, C. D. (1923) Scientific Thought (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).Google Scholar

Broad, C. D. (1925) The Mind and Its Place in Nature (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).Google Scholar

Brogaard, Berit (2000) “Presentist Four-Dimensionalism”, Monist, 83, pp. 341–356.Google Scholar

Brower, Jeffrey (2014) Aquinas’s Ontology of the Material World: Change, Hylomorphism, and Material Objects (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Burge, Tyler (2007) Foundations of Mind (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Byrne, Alex (1994) The Emergent Mind (Doctoral Dissertation, Princeton University).Google Scholar

Byrne, Alex, and Hilbert, David (2007) “Color Primitivism”, Erkenntnis, 66, pp. 73–105.Google Scholar

Campbell, Keith (1990) Abstract Particulars (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar

Cartwright, Nancy (1989) Nature’s Capacities and Their Measurement (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Cartwright, Nancy (2004) “No God, No Laws”, in: God and the Laws of Nature, eds. Moriggi, Stefano and Sindoni, Elio (Milan: Angelicum Mondo X), pp. 183–190.Google Scholar

Cartwright, Nancy (2007) “What Makes a Capacity a Disposition?”, in: Dispositions and Causal Powers, eds. Kistler, Max and Gnassounou, Bruno (Aldershot: Ashgate), pp. 195–205.Google Scholar

Cartwright, Nancy (2009) “Causal Laws, Policy Predictions, and the Need for Genuine Powers”, in: Dispositions and Causes, ed. Handfield, Toby (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 127–157.Google Scholar

Chakravartty, Anjan (2003) “The Structuralist Conception of Objects”, Philosophy of Science, 70, pp. 867–878.Google Scholar

Chakravartty, Anjan (2007) A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism: Knowing the Unobservable (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Chakravartty, Anjan (2012) “Ontological Priority: The Conceptual Basis of Non-eliminative, Ontic Structural Realism”, in: Structural Realism: Structure, Object, and Causality, eds. Landry, Elaine and Rickles, Dean (Dordrecht: Springer), pp. 187–206.Google Scholar

Chalmers, David (2006) “Strong and Weak Emergence”, in: The Re-Emergence of Emergence, eds. Davies, Paul and Clayton, Philip (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Choi, Sungho (2005) “Do Categorical Ascriptions Entail Counterfactual Conditionals?” Philosophical Quarterly, 55, pp. 495–503.Google Scholar

Christensen, Jonas (2014) “Determinable Properties and Overdetermination of Causal Powers”, Philosophia: Philosophical Quarterly of Israel, 42, pp. 695–711.Google Scholar

Clarke, Randolph (2008) “Intrinsic Finks”, Philosophical Quarterly, 58, pp. 512–518.Google Scholar

Clarke, William, and Norris, S. J. (2001) The One and the Many: A Contemporary Thomistic Metaphysics (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press).Google Scholar

Cameron, Ross (2016) “On Characterizing the Presentism/Eternalism and Actualism/Possibilism Debates”, Analytic Philosophy, 57, pp. 110–140.Google Scholar

Coleman, Mary (2010) “Could there Be a Power World?” American Philosophical Quarterly, 47, pp. 161–170.Google Scholar

Connolly, Niall (2015) “Yes: Bare Particulars!” Philosophical Studies, 172, pp. 1355–1370.Google Scholar

Corry, Richard (2009) “How is Scientific Analysis Possible?”, in: Dispositions and Causes, ed. Handfield, Toby (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 158–188.Google Scholar

Cowling, Sam (2014) “Instantiation as Location”, Philosophical Studies, 167, pp. 667–682.Google Scholar

Cowling, Sam (2017) Abstract Entities (New York, NY: Routledge).Google Scholar

Creary, L. G. (1981) “Causal Explanation and the Reality of Natural Component Forces”, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 62, pp. 148–157.Google Scholar

Crisp, Thomas (2003) “Presentism”, in: The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics, eds. Loux, Michael and Zimmerman, Dean (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 211–245.Google Scholar

Cross, Richard (1998) The Physics of Duns Scotus: The Scientific Context of a Theological Vision (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Cross, Troy (2005) “What is a Disposition?” Synthese, 144, pp. 321–341.Google Scholar

Daniels, Paul (2012) “Back to the Present: Defending Presentist Time Travel”, Disputatio, 4, pp. 469–484.Google Scholar

Deasy, Daniel (2015) “The Moving Spotlight Theory”, Philosophical Studies, 172, pp. 2073–2089.Google Scholar

Demarest, Heather (2017) “Powerful Properties, Powerless Laws”, in: Causal Powers, ed. Jacobs, Jonathan (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 38–54.Google Scholar

Denby, David (1999) “Determinable Nominalism”, Philosophical Studies, 102, pp. 297–327.Google Scholar

Denby, David (2007) “A Note on Analysing Substancehood”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 85, pp. 473–484.Google Scholar

Denkel, Arda (1996) Object and Property (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Denkel, Arda (1997) “On the Compresence of Tropes”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 57, pp. 599–606.Google Scholar

Dieks, Dennis (2001) “Space–Time Relationism in Newtonian and Relativistic Physics”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 15, pp. 5–17.Google Scholar

Dieks, Dennis (2001a) “Space and Time in Particle and Field Physics”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 32, pp. 217–241.Google Scholar

Dipert, Randall (1997) “The Mathematical Structure of the World: The World as Graph”, Journal of Philosophy, 94, pp. 329–358.Google Scholar

Donnelly, Maureen (2011) “Endurantist and Perdurantist Accounts of Persistence”, Philosophical Studies, 154, pp. 27–51.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dorato, Mauro (2008) “Is Structural Spacetime Realism Relationism in Disguise? The Supererogatory Nature of the Substantivalism/Realism Debate”, in: The Ontology of Spacetime II, ed. Dieks, Dennis (Amsterdam: Elsevier), pp. 17–37.Google Scholar

Dretske, Fred (1977) “Laws of Nature”, Philosophy of Science, 44, pp. 248–268.Google Scholar

Du Maurier, Daphne (1969) The House on the Strand (London: Victor Gollancz).Google Scholar

Dumsday, Travis (2011) “Have the Laws of Nature Been Eliminated?”, in: Reading the Cosmos: Nature, Science and Wisdom, ed. Butera, Giuseppe (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press/American Maritain Association), pp. 111–128.Google Scholar

Dumsday, Travis (2012) “An Argument for Hylomorphism or Theism (But Not Both)”, Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association, 86, pp. 245–254.Google Scholar

Dumsday, Travis (2012a) “Dispositions, Primitive Activities, and Essentially Active Objects”, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 93, pp. 43–64.Google Scholar

Dumsday, Travis (2013) “Laws of Nature Don’t Have Ceteris Paribus Clauses, They Are Ceteris Paribus Clauses”, Ratio, 26, pp. 134–147.Google Scholar

Dumsday, Travis (2013a) “Using Natural-Kind Essentialism to Defend Dispositionalism”, Erkenntnis, 78, pp. 869–880.Google Scholar

Dumsday, Travis (2014) “Nominalist Dispositionalism and a Cosmological Argument”, Philosophia Christi, 16, pp. 423–432.Google Scholar

Dumsday, Travis (2015) “Atoms vs. Extended Simples: Towards a Dispositionalist Reconciliation”, Philosophia: Philosophical Quarterly of Israel, 43, pp. 1023–1033.Google Scholar

Dumsday, Travis (2016) “Dispositionalism and Moral Nonnaturalism”, Journal of Value Inquiry, 50, pp. 97–110.Google Scholar

Dumsday, Travis (2016a) “Lowe’s Unorthodox Dispositionalism”, Res Philosophica, 93, pp. 79–101.Google Scholar

Dumsday, Travis (2016b) “Natural-Kind Essentialism, Substance Ontology, and the Unity Problem: Two Dispositionalist Solutions”, Dialectica, 70, pp. 609–626.Google Scholar

Dumsday, Travis (2017) “MaxCon Extended Simples and the Dispositionalist Ontology of Laws”, Synthese, 194, pp. 1627–1641.Google Scholar

Elder, Crawford (1994) “Laws, Natures, and Contingent Necessities”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 54, pp. 649–667.Google Scholar

Elder, Crawford (1996) “Realism and Determinable Properties”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 56, pp. 149–159.Google Scholar

Elder, Crawford (2004) Real Natures and Familiar Objects (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar

Elder, Crawford (2007) “Realism and the Problem of Infimae Species”, American Philosophical Quarterly 44, pp. 111–127.Google Scholar

Ellis, Brian (2001) Scientific Essentialism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Ellis, Brian (2002) The Philosophy of Nature: A Guide to the New Essentialism (Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press).Google Scholar

Ellis, Brian (2009) The Metaphysics of Scientific Realism (Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press).Google Scholar

Ellis, Brian, and Lierse, Caroline (1994) “Dispositional Essentialism”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 72, pp. 27–45.Google Scholar

Esfeld, Michael (2009) “The Modal Nature of Structures in Ontic Structural Realism”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 23, pp. 179–194.Google Scholar

Esfeld, Michael (2016) “The Reality of Relations: The Case from Quantum Physics”, in: The Metaphysics of Relations, eds. Marmodoro, Anna and Yates, David (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 218–234.Google Scholar

Esfeld, Michael, and Lam, Vincent (2008) “Moderate Structural Realism About Space-Time”, Synthese, 160, pp. 27–46.Google Scholar

Esfeld, Michael, and Lam, Vincent (2011) “Ontic Structural Realism as a Metaphysics of Objects”, in: Scientific Structuralism, eds. Bokulich, Alisa and Bokulich, Peter (Dordrecht: Springer), pp. 143–159.Google Scholar

Esfeld, Michael, and Sachse, Christian (2011) Conservative Reductionism (New York, NY: Routledge).Google Scholar

Everett, Anthony (2009) “Intrinsic Finks, Masks, and Mimics”, Erkenntnis, 71, pp. 191–203.Google Scholar

Evnine, Simon (2016) Making Objects and Events: A Hylomorphic Theory of Artifacts, Actions, and Organisms (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Fales, Evan (1982) “Generic Universals”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 60, pp. 29–39.Google Scholar

Fales, Evan (1990) Causation and Universals (New York, NY: Routledge).Google Scholar

Fales, Evan (1993) “Are Causal Laws Contingent?”, in: Ontology, Causality, and Mind: Essays in Honour of D.M. Armstrong, eds. Bacon, John, Campbell, Keith, and Reinhardt, Lloyd (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 121–151.Google Scholar

Feser, Edward (2014) Scholastic Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction (Heusenstamm: Editiones Scholasticae).Google Scholar

Feser, Edward (2015) Neo-Scholastic Essays (South Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press).Google Scholar

Fine, Kit (1994) “Essence and Modality”, Philosophical Perspectives, 8, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar

Fine, Kit (1999) “Things and their Parts”, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 23, pp. 61–74.Google Scholar

Fisk, Milton (1973) Nature and Necessity: An Essay in Physical Ontology (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press).Google Scholar

Floridi, Luciano (2011) The Philosophy of Information (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Forrest, Peter (2004) “Grit or Gunk: Implications of the Banach-Tarski Paradox”, Monist, 87, pp. 351–370.Google Scholar

Foster, John (2004) The Divine Lawmaker: Lectures on Induction, Laws of Nature, and the Existence of God (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Franklin, James (1986) “Are Dispositions Reducible to Categorical Properties?” Philosophical Quarterly, 36, pp. 62–64.Google Scholar

Franklin, James (2015) “Uninstantiated Properties and Semi-Platonist Aristotelianism”, Review of Metaphysics, 69, pp. 25–45.Google Scholar

French, Steven (2006) “Structure as a Weapon of the Realist”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 106, pp. 167–185.Google Scholar

French, Steven (2010) “The Interdependence of Structure, Objects, and Dependence”, Synthese, 175, pp. 89–109.Google Scholar

French, Steven, and Ladyman, James (2011) “In Defence of Ontic Structural Realism”, in: Scientific Structuralism, eds. Bokulich, Alisa and Bokulich, Peter (Dordrecht: Springer), pp. 25–42.Google Scholar

French, Steven, and Redhead, Michael (1988) “Quantum Physics and the Identity of Indiscernibles”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 39, pp. 233–246.Google Scholar

Frigg, Roman, and Votsis, Ioannis (2011) “Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About Structural Realism but Were Afraid to Ask”, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 1, pp. 227–276.Google Scholar

Funkhouser, Eric (2006) “The Determinable-Determinate Relation”, Noûs, 40, pp. 548–569.Google Scholar

Funkhouser, Eric (2014) The Logical Structure of Kinds (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Gert, Joshua (2008) “What Colors Could Not Be: An Argument for Color Primitivism”, Journal of Philosophy, 105, pp. 128–155.Google Scholar

Gibermam, Daniel (2012) “Against Zero-Dimensional Material Objects (and Other Bare Particulars)”, Philosophical Studies, 160, pp. 305–321.Google Scholar

Gibermam, Daniel (2014) “Tropes in Space”, Philosophical Studies, 167, pp. 453–472.Google Scholar

Gibson, Ian, and Pooley, Oliver (2006) “Relativistic Persistence”, Philosophical Perspectives, 20, pp. 157–198.Google Scholar

Gilmore, Cody, Costa, Damiano, and Calosi, Claudio (2016) “Relativity and Three Four-Dimensionalisms”, Philosophy Compass, 11, pp. 102–120.Google Scholar

Goddu, G. C. (2003) “Time Travel and Changing the Past: (Or How to Kill Yourself and Live to Tell the Tale)”, Ratio, 16, pp. 16–32.Google Scholar

Goyette, John (2002) “Substantial Form and the Recovery of an Aristotelian Natural Science”, Thomist, 66, pp. 519–533.Google Scholar

Greaves, Hilary (2011) “In Search of (Spacetime) Structuralism”, Philosophical Perspectives, 25, pp. 189–204.Google Scholar

Grey, William (1999) “Troubles With Time Travel”, Philosophy, 74, pp. 55–70.Google Scholar

Groff, Ruth, and Greco, John (eds.) (2013) Powers and Capacities in Philosophy: The New Aristotelianism (New York, NY: Routledge).Google Scholar

Hales, Steven, and Johnson, Timothy (2003) “Endurantism, Perdurantism, and Special Relativity”, Philosophical Quarterly, 53, pp. 524–539.Google Scholar

Hall, Thomas (2014) “In Defense of the Compossibility of Presentism and Time Travel”, Logos & Episteme, 5, pp. 141–159.Google Scholar

Handfield, Toby (2005) “Armstrong and the Modal Inversion of Dispositions”, Philosophical Quarterly, 55, pp. 452–461.Google Scholar

Handfield, Toby (2005a) “Lange on essentialism, counterfactuals, and explanation”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 83, pp. 81–85.Google Scholar

Handfield, Toby (2008) “Unfinkable Dispositions”, Synthese, 160, pp. 297–308.Google Scholar

Harré, Rom, and Madden, E. H. (1975) Causal Powers: A Theory of Natural Necessity (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar

Haslanger, Sally (2003) “Persistence Through Time”, in: The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics, eds. Loux, Michael and Zimmerman, Dean (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 315–354.Google Scholar

Hawley, Katherine (2001) How Things Persist (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Hawley, Katherine, and Bird, Alexander (2011) “What Are Natural Kinds?” Philosophical Perspectives 25, pp. 205–221.Google Scholar

Heil, John (2003) From an Ontological Point of View (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Heil, John (2005) “Dispositions”, Synthese, 144, pp. 343–356.Google Scholar

Heil, John (2012) The Universe As We Find It (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Heil, John (2017) “Real Modalities”, in: Causal Powers, ed. Jacobs, Jonathan (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 90–104.Google Scholar

Heller, Mark (1990) The Ontology of Physical Objects: Four-Dimensional Hunks of Matter (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Hoefer, Carl (1996) “The Metaphysics of Space–Time Substantivalism”, Journal of Philosophy, 93, pp. 5–27.Google Scholar

Hoefer, Carl (1998) “Absolute Versus Relational Space-Time: For Better or Worse, the Debate Goes On”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 49, pp. 451–467.Google Scholar

Hoffman, Joshua (2012) “Neo-Aristotelianism and Substance”, in: Contemporary Aristotelian Metaphysics, ed. Tahko, Tuomas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 140–155.Google Scholar

Hoffman, Joshua, and Rosenkrantz, Gary (2003) “Platonistic Theories of Universals”, in: The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics, eds. Loux, Michael andZimmerman, Dean (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 46–74.Google Scholar

Holden, Thomas (2004) The Architecture of Matter: Galileo to Kant (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Hudson, Hud (2014) The Fall and Hypertime (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Huggett, Nick (2006) “The Regularity Account of Relational Spacetime”, Mind, 115, pp. 41–73.Google Scholar

Hughes, Christopher, and Adams, Robert (1992) “Miracles, Laws of Nature and Causation”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 66, pp. 179–224.Google Scholar

Humphreys, P. (1997) “How Properties Emerge”, Philosophy of Science, 64, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar

Humphreys, P. (1997a) “Emergence, Not Supervenience”, Philosophy of Science, 64 (supplement), pp. S337–S345.Google Scholar

Huntelmann, Rafael, and Hattler, Johannes (eds.) (2014) New Scholasticism Meets Analytic Philosophy (Heusenstamm: Editiones Scholasticae).Google Scholar

Ingthorsson, R. D. (2013) “Properties: Qualities, Powers, or Both?” Dialectica, 67, pp. 55–80.Google Scholar

Isaacs, A. (ed.) (2000) Oxford Dictionary of Physics, 4th edition (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Jacobs, Jonathan (2010) “A Powers Theory of Modality: Or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Reject Possible Worlds”, Philosophical Studies, 151, pp. 227–248.Google Scholar

Jacobs, Jonathan (2011) “Powerful Qualities, Not Pure Powers”, Monist, 94, pp. 81–102.Google Scholar

Jaeger, Andrew (2014) “Back to the Primitive: From Substantial Capacities to Prime Matter”, American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 88, pp. 381–395.Google Scholar

Jaeger, Lydia (1999) Croire et connaître: Einstein, Polanyi et les lois de la nature (Paris: Institut Biblique de Nogent).Google Scholar

Jantzen, Benjamin (2011) “No Two Entities Without Identity”, Synthese, 181, pp. 433–450.Google Scholar

Jaworski, William (2016) Structure and the Metaphysics of Mind: How Hylomorphism Solves the Mind–Body Problem (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Johansson, Ingvar (2000) “Determinables as Universals”, Monist, 83, pp. 101–121.Google Scholar

Johnston, Mark (2006) “Hylomorphism”, Journal of Philosophy, 103, pp. 652–698.Google Scholar

Kantorovich, Aharon (2003) “The Priority of Internal Symmetries in Particle Physics”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 34, pp. 651–675.Google Scholar

Kantorovich, Aharon (2009) “Ontic Structuralism and the Symmetries of Particle Physics”, Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 40, pp. 73–84.Google Scholar

Katzav, Joel (2005) “On What Powers Cannot Do”, Dialectica, 59, pp. 331–345.Google Scholar

Kedar, Yael, and Hon, Giora (2017) “‘Natures’ and ‘Laws’: The Making of the Concept of Law of Nature Robert Grosseteste (1168–1253) and Roger Bacon (1214/1220–1292)”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 61, pp. 21–31.Google Scholar

Keinänen, Markku (2011) “Tropes – The Basic Constituents of Powerful Particulars?” Dialectica, 65, pp. 419–450.Google Scholar

Keller, Simon, and Nelson, Michael (2001) “Presentists Should Believe in Time Travel”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 79, pp. 333–345.Google Scholar

Khalidi, Muhammad Ali (2011) “The Pitfalls of Microphysical Realism”, Philosophy of Science, 78, pp. 1156–1164.Google Scholar

Kim, Jaegwon (2006) “Emergence: Core Ideas and Issues”, Synthese, 151, pp. 547–559.Google Scholar

Kistler, Max (2012) “Powerful Properties and the Causal Basis of Dispositions”, in: Properties, Powers, and Structures: Issues in the Metaphysics of Realism, eds. Bird, Alexander, Ellis, Brian, and Sankey, Howard (New York, NY: Routledge), pp. 119–137.Google Scholar

Koons, Robert, and Pickavance, Timothy (2015) Metaphysics: The Fundamentals (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell).Google Scholar

Koslicki, Kathrin (2008) The Structure of Objects (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Kronen, John (1994) “The Substantial Unity of Material Substances According to John Poinsot”, Thomist 58, pp. 599–615.Google Scholar

Kuhlmann, Meinard (2012) “Quantum Field Theory”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2015 edition), Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/quantum-field-theory/Google Scholar

Kutach, Douglas (2003) “Time Travel and Consistency Constraints”, Philosophy of Science, 70, pp. 1098–1113.Google Scholar

LaBossiere, Michael (1994) “Substances and Substrata”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 72, pp. 360–370.Google Scholar

Ladyman, James (1998) “What is Structural Realism?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 29, pp. 409–424.Google Scholar

Ladyman, James (2016) “Structural Realism”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 edition), Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/structural-realism/Google Scholar

Ladyman, James (2016a) “The Foundations of Structuralism and the Metaphysics of Relations”, in: The Metaphysics of Relations, eds. Marmodoro, Anna and Yates, David (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 177–197.Google Scholar

Ladyman, James, and Ross, Don (with David Spurrett and John Collier) (2007) Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Lam, Vincent (2014) “Entities Without Intrinsic Physical Identity”, Erkenntnis, 79, pp. 1157–1171.Google Scholar

Lam, Vincent, and Wuthrich, Christian (2015) “No Categorial Support for Radical Ontic Structural Realism”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 66, pp. 605–634.Google Scholar

Lange, Marc (2004) “A Note on Scientific Essentialism, Laws of Nature, and Counterfactual Conditionals”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 82, pp. 227–241.Google Scholar

Lange, Marc (2006) “Farewell to Laws of Nature?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 37, pp. 361–369.Google Scholar

Lange, Marc (2009) “Why Do the Laws Explain Why?”, in: Dispositions and Causes, ed. Handfield, Toby (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 286–321.Google Scholar

Lange, Marc (2009a) Laws and Lawmakers: Science, Metaphysics, and the Laws of Nature (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Latham, Noa (2011) “Are Fundamental Laws Necessary or Contingent?”, in: Carving Nature at its Joints: Natural Kinds in Metaphysics and Science, eds. Campbell, Joseph K., O’Rourke, Michael, and Slater, Matthew (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 97–112.Google Scholar

Laudan, Larry (1981) “A Confutation of Convergent Realism”, Philosophy of Science, 48, pp. 19–49.Google Scholar

Laudisa, Federico (2015) “Laws Are Not Descriptions”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 29, pp. 251–270.Google Scholar

Le Bihan, Baptiste (2016) “Super-Relationism: Combining Eliminativism About Objects and Relationism About Spacetime”, Philosophical Studies, 173, pp. 2151–2172.Google Scholar

Lehoux, Daryn (2006) “Laws of Nature and Natural Laws”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 37, pp. 527–549.Google Scholar

Legg, Cathy (1999) “Real Laws in Peirce’s ‘Pragmaticism’ (Or: How Scholastic Realism Met the Scientific Method)”, in: Causation and the Laws of Nature, ed. Sankey, Howard (Dordrecht: Kluwer), pp. 125–142.Google Scholar

Lewis, David (1976) “The Paradoxes of Time Travel”, American Philosophical Quarterly, 13, pp. 145–152.Google Scholar

Lewis, David (1983) “Survival and Identity”, in: Philosophical Papers Volume I (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Lewis, David (1986) On the Plurality of Worlds (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar

Lewis, David (2009) “Ramseyan Humility”, in Conceptual Analysis and Philosophical Naturalism, eds. Braddon-Mitchell, David and Nola, Robert (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 203–222.Google Scholar

Lewis, Peter (2006) “GRW: A Case Study in Quantum Ontology”, Philosophy Compass, 1, pp. 224–244.Google Scholar

Loux, Michael (1974) “Kinds and the Dilemma of Individuation”, Review of Metaphysics, 27, pp. 773–784.Google Scholar

Loux, Michael (1978) Substance and Attribute: A Study in Ontology (Dordrecht: Reidel).Google Scholar

Loux, Michael (2002) Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction, 2nd edition (New York, NY: Routledge).Google Scholar

Loux, Michael (2006) “Aristotle’s Constituent Ontology”, in: Oxford Studies in Metaphysics Volume II, ed. Zimmerman, Dean (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 207–250.Google Scholar

Lowe, E. J. (1994) “Primitive Substances”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 54, pp. 531–552.Google Scholar

Lowe, E. J. (1995) “The Metaphysics of Abstract Objects”, Journal of Philosophy, 92, pp. 509–524.Google Scholar

Lowe, E. J. (1998) “Form Without Matter”, Ratio, 11, pp. 214–234.Google Scholar

Lowe, E. J. (2000) “Locke, Martin, and Substance”, Philosophical Quarterly, 50, pp. 499–514.Google Scholar

Lowe, E. J. (2001) “Dispositions and Laws”, Metaphysica, 2, pp. 5–23.Google Scholar

Lowe, E. J. (2005) “Vagueness and Endurance”, Analysis, 65, pp. 104–112.Google Scholar

Lowe, E. J. (2006) The Four-Category Ontology: A Metaphysical Foundation for Natural Science (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Lowe, E. J. (2012) “A Neo-Aristotelian Substance Ontology: Neither Relational Nor Constituent”, in: Contemporary Aristotelian Metaphysics, ed. Tahko, Tuomas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 229–248.Google Scholar

Lowe, E. J. (2013) “Neo-Aristotelian Metaphysics: A Brief Exposition and Defense”, in: Aristotle on Method and Metaphysics, ed. Feser, Edward (New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 196–205.Google Scholar

Macdonald, Cynthia (2005) Varieties of Things: Foundations of Contemporary Metaphysics (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar

Machamer, Peter (2004) “Activities and Causation: The Metaphysics and Epistemology of Mechanisms”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 18, pp. 27–39.Google Scholar

Mackie, J. L. (1977) “Dispositions, Grounds and Causes”, Synthese, 34, pp. 361–369.Google Scholar

Madden, James (2013) Mind, Matter, and Nature: A Thomistic Proposal for the Philosophy of Mind (Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press).Google Scholar

Markosian, Ned (1998) “Simples”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 76, pp. 213–226.Google Scholar

Markosian, Ned (2004) “Simples, Stuff, and Simple People”, Monist, 87, pp. 405–428.Google Scholar

Markosian, Ned (2015) “The Right Stuff”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 93, pp. 665–687.Google Scholar

Marmodoro, Anna (2013) “Aristotelian Hylomorphism Without Reconditioning”, Philosophical Inquiry, 36, pp. 5–22.Google Scholar

Martin, C. B. (1980) “Substance Substantiated”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 58, pp. 3–10.Google Scholar

Martin, C. B. (1997) “On the Need for Properties: The Road to Pythagoreanism and Back”, Synthese, 112, pp. 193–231.Google Scholar

Martin, C. B., and Heil, John (1999) “The Ontological Turn”, Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 23, pp. 34–60.Google Scholar

Maudlin, Timothy (1993) “Buckets of Water and Waves of Space: Why Spacetime is Probably a Substance”, Philosophy of Science, 60, pp. 183–203.Google Scholar

Maudlin, Timothy (2007) The Metaphysics Within Physics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

McCall, Storrs (1994) A Model of the Universe (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

McDaniel, Kris (2007) “Extended Simples”, Philosophical Studies, 133, pp. 131–141.Google Scholar

McDaniel, Kris (2009) “Extended Simples and Qualitative Heterogeneity”, Philosophical Quarterly, 59, pp. 325–331.Google Scholar

McDaniel, Kris (2010) “A Return to the Analogy of Being”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 81, pp. 688–717.Google Scholar

McDaniel, Kris (2010a) “Being and Almost Nothingness”, Noûs, 44, pp. 628–649.Google Scholar

McDaniel, Kris (2013) “Degrees of Being”, Philosophers’ Imprint, 13, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar

McKenzie, Kerry (2014) “Priority and Particle Physics: Ontic Structural Realism as a Fundamentality Thesis”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 65, pp. 353–380.CrossRef Google Scholar

Merricks, Trenton (1995) “On the Incompatibility of Enduring and Perduring Entities”, Mind, 104, pp. 523–531.Google Scholar

Miller, Elizabeth (2015) “Humean Scientific Explanation”, Philosophical Studies, 172, pp. 1311–1332.Google Scholar

Miller, Kristie (2009) “Ought a Four-Dimensionalist to Believe in Temporal Parts?” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 39, pp. 619–646.Google Scholar

Molnar, George (2003) Powers: A Study in Metaphysics, ed. Mumford, Stephen (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Moreland, J. P. (1998) “Theories of Individuation: A Reconsideration of Bare Particulars”, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 79, pp. 251–263.Google Scholar

Moreland, J. P. (2000) “Naturalism and the Ontological Status of Properties”, in: Naturalism: A Critical Analysis, eds. Craig, William Lane and Moreland, J. P. (New York, NY: Routledge), pp. 67–109.Google Scholar

Moreland, J. P. (2001) Universals (Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press).Google Scholar

Moreland, J. P. (2013) “Exemplification and Constituent Realism: A Clarification and Defense”, Axiomathes, 23, pp. 247–259.Google Scholar

Moreland, J. P., and Pickavance, Timothy (2003) “Bare Particulars and Individuation: A Reply to Mertz”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 81, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar

Morganti, Matteo (2004) “On the Preferability of Epistemic Structural Realism”, Synthese, 142, pp. 81–107.Google Scholar

Morganti, Matteo (2011) “Is There a Compelling Argument for Ontic Structural Realism?” Philosophy of Science, 78, pp. 1165–1176.Google Scholar

Morganti, Matteo (2011a) “Substrata and Properties: From Bare Particulars to Supersubstantivalism?” Metaphysica, 12, pp. 183–195.Google Scholar

Mumford, Stephen (1998) Dispositions (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Mumford, Stephen (2004) Laws in Nature (New York, NY: Routledge).Google Scholar

Mumford, Stephen (2006) “The Ungrounded Argument”, Synthese, 149, pp. 471–489.Google Scholar

Mumford, Stephen (2007) “Powers, Dispositions, Properties: Or a Causal Realist Manifesto”, in: Revitalizing Causality: Realism About Causality in Philosophy and Social Science, ed. Groff, Ruth (New York, NY: Routledge), pp. 139–151.Google Scholar

Mumford, Stephen (2009) “Powers and Persistence”, in: Unity and Time in Metaphysics, eds. Honnefelder, Ludger, Runggaldier, Edmund, and Schlick, Benedikt (Berlin: De Gruyter), pp. 223–236.Google Scholar

Mumford, Stephen, and Anjum, Rani Lill (2011) Getting Causes from Powers (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Mumford, Stephen, Anjum, Rani Lill, and Lie, Svein Anders Noer (2013) “Dispositions and Ethics”, in: Powers and Capacities in Philosophy: The New Aristotelianism, eds. Groff, Ruth and Greco, John (New York, NY: Routledge), pp. 231–247.Google Scholar

Nagasawa, Yujin (2012) “Infinite Decomposability and the Mind-Body Problem”, American Philosophical Quarterly, 49, pp. 357–367.Google Scholar

Nerlich, Graham (2003) “Space-Time Substantivalism”, in: The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics, eds. Loux, Michael and Zimmerman, Dean (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 281–314.Google Scholar

Newman, Andrew (2013) “On the Constitution of Solid Objects Out of Atoms”, Monist, 96, pp. 149–171.Google Scholar

Ney, Alyssa (2010) “Are There Fundamental Intrinsic Properties?”, in: New Waves in Metaphysics, ed. Hazlett, Allan (New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 219–239.Google Scholar

Novak, Lukas, Novotny, Daniel, Sousedik, Prokop, and Svoboda, David (eds.) (2013) Metaphysics: Aristotelian, Scholastic, Analytic (Heusenstamm: Ontos Verlag).Google Scholar

Novotny, Daniel, and Novak, Lukas (eds.) (2014) Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives in Metaphysics (London: Routledge).Google Scholar

Oakes, M. Gregory (2004) “Perdurance and Causal Realism”, Erkenntnis, 60, pp. 205–227.Google Scholar

O’Conaill, Donnchadh (2014) “Ontic Structural Realism and Concrete Objects”, Philosophical Quarterly, 64, pp. 284–300.Google Scholar

O’Connor, Timothy (1994) “Emergent Properties”, American Philosophical Quarterly, 31, pp. 91–104.Google Scholar

O’Connor, Timothy (2006) “Emergent Properties”, in: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward, N. Zalta (ed.) https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2006/entries/properties-emergent/Google Scholar

Oderberg, David (1996) “Coincidence Under a Sortal”, Philosophical Review, 105, pp. 145–171.Google Scholar

Oderberg, David (2002) “Hylomorphism and Individuation”, in: Mind, Metaphysics, and Value in the Thomistic and Analytic Traditions, ed. Haldane, John (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press), pp. 125–142.Google Scholar

Oderberg, David (2004) “Temporal Parts and the Possibility of Change”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 69, pp. 686–708.Google Scholar

Oderberg, David (2005) “Hylemorphic Dualism”, Social Philosophy & Policy, pp. 70–99.Google Scholar

Oderberg, David (2007) Real Essentialism (New York, NY: Routledge).Google Scholar

Oderberg, David (2011) “Essence and Properties”, Erkenntnis, 75, pp. 85–111.Google Scholar

Okasha, Samir (2002) Philosophy of Science: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

O’Leary-Hawthorne, John, and Cover, Jan (1998) “A World of Universals”, Philosophical Studies, 91, pp. 205–219.Google Scholar

Paoletti, Michele (2016) “Who’s Afraid of Non-Existent Manifestations?”, in: Metaphysics and Scientific Realism: Essays in Honour of David Malet Armstrong, ed. Calemi, Francesco (Berlin: De Gruyter), pp. 193–206.Google Scholar

Paoletti, Michele (2016a) “How Powers Emerge from Relations”, Axiomathes, 26, pp. 187–204.Google Scholar

Parsons, Josh (2000) “Must a Four Dimensionalist Believe in Temporal Parts?” Monist, 83, pp. 399–418.Google Scholar

Pashby, Thomas (2013) “Do Quantum Objects Have Temporal Parts?” Philosophy of Science, 80, pp. 1137–1147.Google Scholar

Pasnau, Robert (2011) Metaphysical Themes: 1274–1671 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Paterson, Craig, and Pugh, Matthew (eds.) (2006) Analytical Thomism: Traditions in Dialogue (Aldershot: Ashgate).Google Scholar

Paul, Laurie (2002) “Logical Parts”, Noûs, 36, pp. 578–596.Google Scholar

Pawl, Timothy (2017) “Nine Problems (And Even More Solutions) for Powers Accounts of Possibility”, in: Causal Powers, ed. Jacobs, Jonathan (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 105–124.Google Scholar

Persson, Johannes (2010) “Activity-Based Accounts of Mechanism and the Threat of Polygenic Effects”, Erkenntnis, 72, pp. 135–149.Google Scholar

Peterson, John (1996) “Law and Thomistic Exemplarism”, Thomist, 60, pp. 81–108.Google Scholar

Pickavance, T. (2009) “In Defence of ‘Partially Clad’ Bare Particulars”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 87, pp. 155–158.Google Scholar

Pickavance, T. (2014) “Bare Particulars and Exemplification”, American Philosophical Quarterly, 51, pp. 95–108.Google Scholar

Psillos, Stathis (1999) Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth (New York, NY: Routledge).Google Scholar

Psillos, Stathis (2006) “What Do Powers Do When They Are Not Manifested?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 72, pp. 137–156.Google Scholar

Psillos, Stathis (2009) Knowing the Structure of Nature: Essays on Realism and Explanation (New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar

Poincaré, Henri (1905) Science and Hypothesis, reprint edition from 1952 (New York, NY: Dover).Google Scholar

Pooley, Oliver (2013) “Substantivalist and Relationalist Approaches to Spacetime”, in: The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Physics, ed. Batterman, Robert (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 522–586.Google Scholar

Pruss, Alexander (2011) Actuality, Possibility, and Worlds (London: Continuum).Google Scholar

Pruss, Alexander (2013) “Aristotelian Forms and Laws of Nature”, Analiza i Egzystencja, 24, pp. 115–132.Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O. (1966) The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O. (1974) Roots of Reference (La Salle, IL: Open Court).Google Scholar

Rea, Michael (2003) “Four-Dimensionalism”, in: The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics, eds. Loux, Michael and Zimmerman, Dean (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 246–280.Google Scholar

Reck, Erich, and Price, Michael (2000) “Structures and Structuralism in Contemporary Philosophy of Mathematics”, Synthese, 125, pp. 341–383.Google Scholar

Robb, David (2005) “Qualitative Unity and the Bundle Theory”, Monist, 88, pp. 466–492.Google Scholar

Ruby, Jane (1986) “The Origins of Scientific ‘Law’”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 47, pp. 341–359.Google Scholar

Ruse, Michael (2001) Can a Darwinian Be a Christian? The Relationship Between Science and Religion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Russell, Bertrand (1915/1951) “The Ultimate Constituents of Matter”, in: Mysticism and Logic (New Jersey: Barnes and Noble), pp. 94–107.Google Scholar

Schaffer, Jonathan (2003) “Is There a Fundamental Level?” Noûs, 37, pp. 498–517.Google Scholar

Schneider, Susan (2007) “What is the Significance of the Intuition that Laws of Nature Govern?” Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 85, pp. 307–324.Google Scholar

Schnieder, Benjamin (2006) “A Certain Kind of Trinity: Dependence, Substance, Explanation”, Philosophical Studies, 129, pp. 393–419.Google Scholar

Schrenk, Markus (2017) Metaphysics of Science: A Systematic and Historical Introduction (New York, NY: Routledge).Google Scholar

Schroer, Robert (2010) “Is There More Than One Categorical Property?” Philosophical Quarterly, 60, pp. 831–850.Google Scholar

Schumm, Bruce (2004) Deep Down Things: The Breathtaking Beauty of Particle Physics (Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar

Scotus (1975) God and Creatures: The Quodlibetal Questions, translated by Felix Alluntis and Allan Wolter (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

Shiver, Anthony (2014) “Mereological Bundle Theory and the Identity of Indiscernibles”, Synthese, 191, pp. 901–913.Google Scholar

Shoemaker, Sydney (1980) “Causality and Properties”, in: Time and Cause, ed. Inwagen, Peter van (Dordrecht: Reidel); reprinted in (1999) Metaphysics: An Anthology, eds. Kim, Jaegwon and Sosa, Ernest (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 253–268.Google Scholar

Shoemaker, Sydney (1998) “Causal and metaphysical necessity”, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 79, pp. 59–77.Google Scholar

Sider, Theodore (1993) “Van Inwagen and the Possibility of Gunk”, Analysis, 53, pp. 285–289.Google Scholar

Sider, Theodore (2001) Four-Dimensionalism: An Ontology of Persistence and Time (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Sider, Theodore (2006) “Bare Particulars”, Philosophical Perspectives, 20, pp. 387–397.Google Scholar

Simons, Peter (1994) “Particulars in Particular Clothing: Three Trope Theories of Substance”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 54, pp. 553–575.Google Scholar

Simons, Peter (2004) “Extended Simples: A Third Way Between Atoms and Gunk”, Monist, 87, pp. 371–384.Google Scholar

Skow, Bradford (2007) “Are Shapes Intrinsic?” Philosophical Studies, 133, pp. 111–130.Google Scholar

Smart, Benjamin (2013) “Is the Humean Defeated by Induction?” Philosophical Studies, 162, pp. 319–332.Google Scholar

Smart, J. J. C. (2008) “The Tenseless Theory of Time”, in: Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics, eds. Sider, Ted, Hawthorne, John, and Zimmerman, Dean (London: Blackwell), pp. 226–238.Google Scholar

Stachel, John (2006) “Structure, Individuality, and Quantum Gravity”, in: Structural Foundations of Quantum Gravity, eds. Rickles, Dean, French, Steven, and Saatsi, Juha (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 53–82.Google Scholar

Stanford, P. Kyle (2006) Exceeding Our Grasp: Science, History, and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Strawson, Galen (2008) “The Identity of the Categorical and the Dispositional”, Analysis, 68, pp. 271–282.Google Scholar

Suárez, Francisco (1994) Metaphysical Disputations 17, 18, and 10, translated by Alfred Freddoso (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar

Suárez, Mauricio (2007) “Quantum Propensities”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 38, pp. 418–438.Google Scholar

Swoyer, Chris (1982) “The Nature of Natural Laws”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 60, pp. 203–223.Google Scholar

Tabaczek, Mariusz (2013) “The Metaphysics of Downward Causation: Rediscovering the Formal Cause”, Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science, 48, pp. 380–404.Google Scholar

Taylor, Elanor (2015) “An Explication of Emergence”, Philosophical Studies, 172, pp. 653–669.Google Scholar

Tegmark, Max (2007) “The Mathematical Universe”, Foundations of Physics, 38, pp. 101–150.Google Scholar

Thompson, I. J. (1988) “Real Dispositions in the Physical World”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 39, pp. 67–79.Google Scholar

Toner, Patrick (2008) “Emergent Substance”, Philosophical Studies, 141, pp. 281–297.Google Scholar

Toner, Patrick (2010) “On Substance”, American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 84, pp. 25–48.Google Scholar

Toner, Patrick (2011) “Hylemorphic Animalism”, Philosophical Studies, 155, pp. 65–81.Google Scholar

Toner, Patrick (2012) “On Aristotelianism and Structure as Parts”, Ratio, 31, pp. 148–161.Google Scholar

Tooley, Michael (1977) “The Nature of Laws”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 74, pp. 667–698.Google Scholar

Tugby, Matthew (2013) “Platonic Dispositionalism”, Mind, 122, pp. 451–4800.Google Scholar

Tugby, Matthew (2016) “Universals, Laws, and Governance”, Philosophical Studies, 173, pp. 1147–1163.Google Scholar

Tweedale, Martin (1984) “Armstrong on Determinable and Substantival Universals”, in: D. M. Armstrong, ed. Bogdan, R. J. (Dordrecht: Reidel), pp. 171–189.Google Scholar

Vallicella, William (2000) “Three Conceptions of States of Affairs”, Noûs, 34, pp. 237–259.Google Scholar

Van Fraassen, Bas (1980) The Scientific Image (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Van Inwagen, Peter (1981) “The Doctrine of Arbitrary Undetached Parts”, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 62, pp. 123–137.Google Scholar

Van Inwagen, Peter (2011) “Relational Vs. Constituent Ontologies”, Philosophical Perspectives, 25, pp. 389–405.Google Scholar

Van Inwagen, Peter (2016) “In Defense of Transcendent Universals”, in: Metaphysics and Scientific Realism: Essays in Honour of David Malet Armstrong, ed. Calemi, Francesco (Berlin: De Gruyter), pp. 51–70.Google Scholar

Vetter, Barbara (2013) “Multi-Track Dispositions”, Philosophical Quarterly, 63, pp. 330–352.Google Scholar

Vetter, Barbara (2015) Potentiality: From Dispositions to Modality (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Wahlberg, Tobias Hannsson (2009) “4-D Objects and Disposition Ascriptions”, Philosophical Papers, 38, pp. 35–72.Google Scholar

Wahlberg, Tobias Hannsson (2017) “Meso-Level Objects, Powers, and Simultaneous Causation”, Metaphysica, 18, pp. 107–125.Google Scholar

Wasserman, Ryan (2016) “Theories of Persistence”, Philosophical Studies, 173, pp. 243–250.Google Scholar

Watkins, Eric (2016) “The Rise and Fall of Laws of Nature”, in: Rethinking Order: After the Laws of Nature, eds. Cartwright, Nancy and Ward, Keith (London: Bloomsbury), pp. 7–24.Google Scholar

Whittle, Ann (2009) “Causal Nominalism”, in: Dispositions and Causes, ed. Handfield, Toby (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 242–285.Google Scholar

Whittle, Ann (2016) “A Defense of Substance Causation”, Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 2, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar

Wiggins, David (2001) Sameness and Substance Renewed (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar

Wildman, Nathan (2015) “Load Bare-ing Particulars”, Philosophical Studies, 172, pp. 1419–1434.Google Scholar

Williams, Neil (2011) “Putting Powers Back on Multi-Track”, Philosophia: Philosophical Quarterly of Israel, 39, pp. 581–595.Google Scholar

Williams, Neil (2017) “Powerful Perdurance: Linking Parts with Powers”, in: Causal Powers, ed. Jacobs, Jonathan (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 139–164.Google Scholar

Williams, Neil (Forthcoming) The Powers Metaphysic (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Wilson, Jessica (2011) “Non-Reductive Realization and the Powers-Based Subset Strategy”, Monist, 94, pp. 121–154.Google Scholar

Wilson, Jessica (2012) “Fundamental Determinables”, Philosophers’ Imprint, 12, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar

Wilson, Jessica (2013) “A Determinable-Based Account of Metaphysical Indeterminacy”, Inquiry, 56, pp. 359–385.Google Scholar

Wilson, Jessica (2015) “Metaphysical Emergence: Weak and Strong”, in: Metaphysics in Contemporary Physics: Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, Vol. 104, eds. Bigaj, Tomasz and Wuthrich, Christian (Amsterdam: Brill), pp. 345–402.Google Scholar

Wolterstorff, Nicholas (1970) “Bergmann’s Constituent Ontology”, Noûs, 4, pp. 109–134.Google Scholar

Wolterstorff, Nicholas (1991) “Divine Simplicity”, Philosophical Perspectives, 5, pp. 531–552.Google Scholar

Woodward, James (1992) “Realism About Laws”, Erkenntnis, 36, pp. 181–218.Google Scholar

Worrall, John (1989) “Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds?” Dialectica, 43, pp. 99–124.Google Scholar

Young, J. Z. (1971) An Introduction to the Study of Man (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar

Yudell, Zanja (2011) “Structuralism and the New Way of Worlds: A Sellarsian Argument for Necessitarianism About Laws”, Philosophy of Science, 78, pp. 678–695.Google Scholar

Zimmerman, Dean (1996) “Indivisible Parts and Extended Objects: Some Philosophical Episodes from Topology’s Prehistory”, Monist, 79, pp. 148–181.Google Scholar

Zimmerman, Dean (1996a) “Could Extended Objects be Made Out of Simple Parts? An Argument for ‘Atomless Gunk’” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 51, pp. 1–29.Google Scholar

Book contents

Works Cited

Summary

Access options

References

Works Cited

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive