Aageson, James W. Paul, The Pastoral Epistles and the Early Church. Library of Pauline Studies, edited by Porter, Stanley E.. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2008.Google Scholar

Abrahams, Israel. Studies in Pharisaism and the Gospels. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1917.Google Scholar

Adler, William. “Exodus 6:23 and the High Priest from the Tribe of Judah.” Journal of Theological Studies 48 (1997): 24–47.Google Scholar

Adler, William. “On the Priesthood of Jesus: A New Translation and Introduction.” In New Testament Apocrypha: More Noncanonical Scriptures, edited by Burke, Tony and Landau, Brent, 69–108. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2016.Google Scholar

Aharoni, Reuben. “Three Similar Stories in Genesis.” Beit Mikra 24 (1979): 213–23.Google Scholar

Albeck, Chanoch. “Betrothal and Betrothal Writs.” In Studies in Memory of Moses Schorr, 1874–1941, edited by Ginzberg, Louis and Weiss, Abraham, 12–24. New York: The Professor Moses Schorr Memorial Committee, 1944.Google Scholar

Albeck, Chanoch. Shishah Sidre Mishnah. 6 vols. Jerusalem and Tel-Aviv: Mossad Byalik and Devir, 1952.Google Scholar

Albeck, Chanoch. “הנישואין בימים קדומים.” Sinai 48 (1961): 145–51.Google Scholar

Alexander, James. “Church Councils and Synods.” In Early Christianity: Origins and Evolution to AD 600, edited by Hazlett, Ian, 123–32. London: SPCK, 1991.Google Scholar

Alon, Gedaliahu. “ההלכה באגרת בר נבא.” In Studies in Jewish History, edited by Alon, Gedaliahu, 295–319. Tel Aviv: Hakibutz Hameuchad, 1957.Google Scholar

Alon, Gedaliahu. The Jews in Their Land in the Talmudic Age. Translated by Levi, Gershon. Jerusalem: Magnes, 1984.Google Scholar

Alon, Gedaliahu. “Halakah in the Teaching of the Twelve Apostles (Didache).” In The Didache in Modern Research, edited by Draper, Jonathan Alfred. Arbeiten zur Geschichte des antiken Judentums und des Urchristentums 37, 165–94. Leiden: Brill, 1996.Google Scholar

Amar, Joseph Phillip. The Syriac Vita Tradition of Ephrem the Syrian. CSCO 629–30. 2 vols. Leuven: Peeters, 2011.Google Scholar

Anderson, Gary. “Celibacy or Consummation in the Garden? Reflections on Early Jewish and Christian Interpretations of the Garden of Eden.” Harvard Theological Review 82 (1989): 121–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ando, Clifford. “Law and the Landscape of Empire.” In Figures d’empire, fragments de mémoire: Pouvoirs et identités (sociales et religieuses) dans le monde romain impérial (Ier s. av J.-C. - Ve s. ap. J.-C.), edited by Benoist, Stéphane, Daguet-Gagey, Anne, and Hoët-van Cauwenberghe, Christine, 25–47. Paris: Septentrion, 2011.Google Scholar

Ando, Clifford. Law, Language, and Empire in the Roman Tradition: Empire and After. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Ando, Clifford. “Pluralism and Empire: From Rome to Robert Cover.” Critical Analysis of Law 1 (2014): 1–22.Google Scholar

Ankum, Hans. “La sponsa adultera: Problemes concernant l’accusatio adulterii en droit romain classique.” In Estudios de Derecho Romano en Honor de Alvaro D’Ors, 161–98. Pampalona: Ediciones Universidad de Navarra S. A., 1987.Google Scholar

Anné, Lucien. “La conclusion du mariage dans la tradition et le droit de l’église latine jusqu’au VIe siècle.” In Sylloge Excerptorum e Dissertationibus ad Gradum Doctoris in Sacra Theologia vel in Iure Canonico Consequendum, 5–42. Leuven: Sumptibus Bibliothecae Universitatis, 1935.Google Scholar

Anné, Lucien. Les rites des fiançailles et la donation pour cause de mariage sous le Bas-Empire. Dissertationes ad gradum magistri in Facultate theologica vel in Facultate juris canonici consequendum conscriptae/Universitas catholica lovaniensis ser. 2, t. 33. Leuven: Desclée, de Brouwer, 1941.Google Scholar

Aptowitzer, Victor. Die syrischen Rechtsbücher und das mosaisch-talmudische Recht. Sitzungsberichte der Kais. Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien. Philosophisch-Historische Klasse 163/5. Wien: In Kommission bei Alfred Hölder, 1909.Google Scholar

Aptowitzer, Victor. “Obsevations on the Crimilnal Law of the Jews.” Jewish Quarterly Review 15 (1924–5): 55–118.Google Scholar

Aptowitzer, Victor. “Spuren des Matriarchats im Juedischen Schrifttum.” Hebrew Union College Annual 4 (1927): 207–40.Google Scholar

Aptowitzer, Victor. “Spuren des Matriarchats im Juedischen Schrifttum (Schluss).” Hebrew Union College Annual 5 (1928): 261–97.Google Scholar

Archer, Leonie J. Her Price Is Beyond Rubies: The Jewish Women in Graeco-Roman Palestine. Journal for the Study of the New Testament. Supplement series 60. Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Arendzen, John Peter. “Ante-Nicene Interpretations of the Sayings on Divorce.” Journal of Theological Studies 20 (1919): 230–41.Google Scholar

Ariès, Phillipe. “The Indissoluble Marriage.” Translated by Forster, Anthony. In Western Sexuality: Practice and Precept in Past and Present Times, edited by Ariès, Phillipe and Béjin, André, 140–57. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1985.Google Scholar

Arjava, Antti. “Divorce in Later Roman Law.” Arctos 22 (1988): 5–21.Google Scholar

Arjava, Antti. Women and Law in Late Antiquity. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Arndt, William F., and Gingrich, F. Wilbur. A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature. 4th ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Assad, Assad. The Commentary of Saint Ephrem on Genesis with an Arabic Translation. Dar Mardin: Christian Arabic and Syriac Studies from the Middle East 39. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Assaf, Simha. “לבאור המשנה : בתולה נשאת ליום הרביעי.” In ספר זכרון ליובל השבעים של אלכסנדר זיסקינד רבינוביץ, edited by Zifroni, Abraham, 44–49. Tel Aviv: Hapo’el HaZair 1924.Google Scholar

Atlas, Shemuel. “כל המקדש אדעתא דרבנן מקדש.” Sinai 75 (1974): 119–43.Google Scholar

Atlas, Shemuel. “‘תוספת ל’כל דמקדש אדעתא דרבנן מקדש.” Sinai 79 (1976): 102–16.Google Scholar

Baarda, Tjitze. “Jesus and Mary (John 20, 16f) in the Second Epistle on Virginity Ascribed to Clement.” In Studien zum Text und zur Ethik des Neuen Testaments: Festschrift zum 80. Geburtstag von Heinrich Greeven, edited by Schrage, Wolfgang. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der älteren Kirche 47, 11–34. Berlin: W. de Gruyter, 1986.Google Scholar

Bacher, Wilhelm. “Inedited Chapters of Jehudah Hadassi’s ‘Eshkol Hakkofer.’” Jewish Quarterly Review 8 (1896): 431–44.Google Scholar

Bagnall, Roger S. “Church, State and Divorce in Late Roman Egypt.” In Florilegium Columbianum, edited by Selig, Karl Ludwig and Somerville, Robert, 41–61. New York: Italica Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Balberg, Mira. “‘The Clever among Them Say…’: Pain and Gender in Talmudic Restitution Law. ” In Pain in the Flesh: Representations of the Body in Sickness, Suffering and Jouissance, edited by Meital, Oreet and Stav, Shira, 101–25. Or Yehuda: Kinneret, Zmora-Bitan, Dvir, 2013.Google Scholar

Ball, Warwick. Rome in the East: The Transformation of an Empire. London and New York: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar

Bammel, Ernst. “Markus 10 11f. und das jüdische Eherecht.” Zeitschrift für die Neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der Älteren Kirche 61 (1970): 95–101.Google Scholar

Barnard, Leslie William. Athenagoras: A Study in Second Century Christian Apologetic. Théologie Historique 18. Paris: Beauchesne, 1972.Google Scholar

Barnard, Leslie William. “The Origins and Emergence of the Church in Edessa during the First Two Centuries AD.” Vigiliae Christianae 22 (1968): 161–75.Google Scholar

Barnes, Timothy D. Tertullian: A Historical and Literary Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Barnes, Timothy D. “Foregrounding the Theodosian Code.” Journal of Roman Archeology 14 (2001): 671–85.Google Scholar

Bar-On, Shraga, and Paz, Yakir. “‘The Lord’s Allotment Is His People’: The Myth of the Election of Israel by Casting of Lots and the Gnostic – Christian – Pagan – Jewish Polemic.” Tarbiz 79 (2010): 23–61.Google Scholar

Barrier, Jeremy W. The Acts of Paul and Thecla: A Critical Introduction and Commentary. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament, 2 Reihe 270. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2009.Google Scholar

Baskin, Judith R. “Rabbinic-Patristic Exegetical Contacts in Late Antiquity: A Bibliographical Reappraisal.” In Approaches to Ancient Judaism, edited by Green, William Scott. Brown Judaic Studies 32, 53–80. Missoula, MT: Scholars Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Baudry, Etienne. “À propos du rigorisme de Saint Basile: gravité du péché, libération du pécheur.” In Commandements du seigneur et libération évangélique, edited by Gribomont, Jean. Studia Anselmiana 70, 139–73. Rome: Editrice Anselmiana, 1977.Google Scholar

Bauer, Walter. Orthodoxy and Heresy in Earliest Christianity. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Bauman, Richard A. Crime and Punishment in Ancient Rome. London and New York: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar

Baumgarten, Joseph M. Studies in Qumran Law. Studies in Judaism in Late Antiquity 24, edited by Neusner, Jacob. Leiden: Brill, 1977.Google Scholar

Baumgarten, Joseph M. “Hanging and Treason in Qumran and Roman Law.” Eretz-Israel 16 (1982): 7–16.Google Scholar

Baumgarten, Joseph M. “The Laws of ‘Orlah and First Fruits in the Light of Jubilees, The Qumran Writings and Targum Ps. Jonathan.” Journal of Jewish Studies 38 (1987): 195–202.Google Scholar

Baumgarten, Joseph M. “The Qumran-Essene Restraints on Marriage.” In Archaeology and History in the Dead Sea Scrolls: The New York University Conference in Memory of Yigael Yadin, edited by Schiffman, Lawrence H.. Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha. Supplement Series 8, 13–24. Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Baumgarten, Joseph M. “The Avoidance of the Death Penalty in Qumran Law.” In Reworking the Bible: Apocryphal and Related Texts at Qumran, edited by Chazon, Esther G., Dimant, Devorah and Clements, Ruth A.. Studies on the Texts of the Desert of Judah 58, 31–38. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2005.Google Scholar

Beaucamp, Joëlle. Le statut de la femme à Byzance (4e–7e siècle). Travaux et mémoires du centre de recherche d’histoire et civilisation de Byzance. Monographies 5–6. 2 vols. Paris: De Boccard, 1990.Google Scholar

Beck, Edmund. Des heiligen Ephraem des Syrers Hymnen de fide. CSCO 154–5. 2 vols. Leuven: L. Durbecq, 1955.Google Scholar

Beck, Edmund. Des heiligen Ephraem des Syrers Hymnen contra haereses. CSCO 169–70. 2 vols. Leuven: Peeters, 1957.Google Scholar

Beck, Edmund. Des heiligen Ephraem des Syrers Hymnen de paradiso und contra Julianum. CSCO 78–9. 2 vols. Leuven: Secretariat du CorpusSCO, 1957.Google Scholar

Beck, Edmund. Des heiligen Ephraem des Syrers: Hymnen de nativitate (Epiphania). CSCO 186-187. 2 vols. Leuven: Secrétariat du CorpusSCO, 1959.Google Scholar

Beck, Edmund. Des heiligen Ephraem des Syrers Hymnen de ecclesia. CSCO 198–9. 2 vols. Leuven: Secrétariat du CorpusSCO, 1960.Google Scholar

Beck, Edmund. Des heiligen Ephraem des Syrers carmina nisibena. CSCO 218–19, 240–1. 4 vols. Leuven: Secrétariat du CorpusSCO, 1961.Google Scholar

Beck, Edmund. Des heiligen Ephraem des Syrers Sermones de fide. CSCO 212–13. 2 vols. Leuven: Secrétariat du CorpusSCO, 1961.Google Scholar

Beck, Edmund. Des heiligen Ephraem des Syrers Hymnen contra haereses. CSCO 169–70. 2 vols. Leuven: Peeters, 1957.Google Scholar

Beck, Edmund. Des heiligen Ephraem des Syrers Hymnen de virginitate. CSCO 223–4. 2 vols. Leuven: Secrétariat du CorpusSCO, 1962.Google Scholar

Beck, Edmund. Des heiligen Ephraem des Syrers Hymnen de ieiunio. CSCO 246–7. 2 vols. Leuven: Secrétariat du CorpusSCO, 1964.Google Scholar

Beck, Edmund. Des heiligen Ephraem des Syrers Paschahymnen (de azymis, de crucifixione, de resurrectione). CSCO 248–9. Leuven: Secrétariat du CorpusSCO, 1964.Google Scholar

Beck, Edmund. Des heiligen Ephraem des Syrers Sermo de Domino Nostro. CSCO 270–1. 2 vols. Leuven: Secrétariat du CorpusSCO, 1966.Google Scholar

Beck, Edmund. Des heiligen Ephraem des Syrers Sermones I. CSCO 305–6. 2 vols. Leuven: Secrétariat du CorpusSCO, 1970.Google Scholar

Beck, Edmund. Des heiligen Ephraem des Syrers Sermones II. CSCO 311–12. 2. Vols. Leuven: Secrétariat du CorpusSCO, 1970.Google Scholar

Beck, Edmund. Des heiligen Ephraem des Syrers Sermones III. CSCO 320–1. 2 vols. Leuven: Secrétariat du CorpusSCO, 1972.Google Scholar

Beck, Edmund. Des heiligen Ephraem des Syrers Hymnen auf Abraham Kidunaya und Julianos Saba. CSCO 322–3. 2 vols. Leuven: Secrétariat du CorpusSCO, 1972.Google Scholar

Beck, Edmund. Des heiligen Ephraem des Syrers Sermones IV. CSCO 334–5. 2 vols. Leuven: Secrétariat du CorpusSCO, 1973.Google Scholar

Beck, Edmund. “Ephraems Brief an Hypatios.” Oriens Christianus 58 (1974): 76–120.Google Scholar

Beck, Edmund. Nachträge zu Ephraem Syrus. CSCO 363–4. 2 vols. Leuven: Secrétariat du CorpusSCO, 1975.Google Scholar

Beck, Edmund. “Ephräms Rede gegen eine philosophische Schrift des Bardaisan.” Oriens Christianus 60 (1976): 24–68.Google Scholar

Beck, Edmund. “Der Syrische Diatessaronkommentar zu der Perikope von der Samariterin am Brunnen.” Oriens Christianus 74 (1990): 1–24.Google Scholar

Becker, Adam H. Fear of God and the Beginning of Wisdom: The School of Nisibis and Christian Scholastic Culture in Late Antique Mesopotamia. Divinations: Rereading Late Ancient Religion. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Becker, Adam H., and Yoshiko Reed, Annette. The Ways That Never Parted: Jews and Christians in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages. Texte und Studien zum antiken Judentum 95. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2003.Google Scholar

Belkin, Samuel. “Levirate and Agnate Marriage in Rabbinic and Cognate Literature.” Jewish Quarterly Review 60 (1970): 275–329.Google Scholar

Benin, Stephan D. “Commandments, Covenants and the Jews in Aphrahat, Ephrem and Jacob of Sarug.” In Approaches to Judaism in Medieval Times, edited by Blumenthal, David R.. Brown Judaic Studies 54, 135–57. Chico, CA: Scholars Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Benke, Nikolaus. “On the Roman Father’s Right to Kill His Adulterous Daughter.” The History of the Family 17 (2012): 284–308.Google Scholar

Ben Menahem, Hanina. “הוא עשה שלא כהוגן.” Sinai 81 (1977): 156–8.Google Scholar

Ben Menahem, Hanina. “Is There Always One Uniquely Correct Answer to a Legal Question in the Talmud.” Jewish Law Annual 6 (1987): 164–75.Google Scholar

Ben Menahem, Hanina. Judicial Deviation in Talmudic Law, Governed by Men, Not by Rules. Jewish Law in Context 1, edited by Hecht, Neil S.. New York: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1991.Google Scholar

Ben Menahem, Hanina. “Postscript: The Judicial Process and the Nature of Jewish Law.” In An Introduction to the History and Sources of Jewish Law, edited by Hecht, Neil S., Jackson, Bernard S., Passamaneck, Stephen M., Piattelli, Daniela, and Mordechai Rabello, Alfredo, 421–37. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Ben-Shalom, Israel. The School of Shammai and the Zealots’ Struggle against Rome. Jerusalem: Yad Izhak Ben-Zvi, 1993.Google Scholar

Berger, Adulf. “Vis.” In Encyclopedic Dictionary of Roman Law. Philadelphia: The American Philosophical Society, 1991.Google Scholar

Berger, Michael S. Rabbinic Authority. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Berkovitz, Eliezer. תנאי בנשואין ובגט. Jerusalem: Mossad Harav Kook, 1966.Google Scholar

Berkowitz, Beth A. “Decapitation and the Discourse of Antisyncretism in the Babylonian Talmud.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 70 (2002): 743–69.Google Scholar

Berkowitz, Beth A. Execution and Invention: Death Penalty Discourse in Early Rabbinic and Christian Cultures. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Berlin, Adele. “Sex and the Single Girl in Deuteronomy 22.” In Mishneh Todah: Studies in Deuteronomy and Its Cultural Environment in Honor of Jeffrey H. Tigay, edited by Fox, Nili Sacher, Glatt-Gilad, David A., and Williams, Michael J., 95–112. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2009.Google Scholar

Bernstein, Moshe J. “Women and Children in Legal and Liturgical Texts from Qumran.” Dead Sea Discoveries 11 (2004): 191–211.Google Scholar

Betz, Hans Dieter. The Sermon on the Mount: A Commentary on the Sermon on the Mount, Including the Sermon on the Plain (Matthew 5:3–7:27 and Luke 6:20–49). Hermeneia: A Critical and Historical Commentary on the Bible. Collins, Adela Yarbro, ed. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Beyer, Klaus. The Aramaic Language: Its Distribution and Subdivisions. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1986.Google Scholar

Bianchi, Francesco. “‘La Semence Sacrée’: La polémique sur le mariages mixtes dans les textes bibliques d’époque achéménide et hellénistique.” Transeuphratène 29 (2005): 83–102.Google Scholar

Biddle, Mark E. “The ‘Endangered Ancestress’ and Blessing for the Nations.” Journal of Biblical Literature 109 (1990): 599–611.Google Scholar

Black, Matthew. “The Tradition of Hasidaean-Essene Asceticism: Its Origins and Influence.” In Aspects du Judéo-Chrstianisme: colloque de Strasbourg 23–25 avril 1964, 19–33. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1965.Google Scholar

Blidstein, Gerald I. “The Personal Status of Apostate and Ransomed Women in Medieval Jewish Law.” Shenaton Ha-Mishpat Ha-ivri 3–4 (1976–7): 35–116.Google Scholar

Blinzler, Josef. “Die Strafe für Ehebruch in Bibel und Halacha: Zur Auslegung von Joh. VIII. 5.” New Testament Studies 4 (1957–58): 32–47.Google Scholar

Blinzler, Josef. “The Jewish Punishment of Stoning in the New Testament Period.” In The Trial of Jesus: Cambridge Studies in Honour of C. F. D. Moule, edited by Bammel, Ernst. Studies in Biblical Theology, Second Series 13, 147–61. London: SCM Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Bockmuehl, Markus N. A. Jewish Law in Gentile Churches: Halakhah and the Beginning of Christian Public Ethics. Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 2000.Google Scholar

Bohak, Gideon. Joseph and Aseneth and the Jewish Temple in Heliopolis. Society of Biblical Literature: Early Judaism and Its Literature 10. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Bonis, Constantine G. “Problem Concerning Faith and Knowledge, or Reason and Revelation, as Expounded in Letters of St. Basil the Great to Amphilochius of Iconium.” Greek Orthodox Theological Review 5 (1959): 27–44.Google Scholar

Bonnard, Émile. Saint Jérôme. Commentaire sur saint Matthieu. SC 242, 259. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1977.Google Scholar

Botha, Philippus Jacobus. “Theological Progress and Artistic Regress in the Hymns on Abraham Kidunaya Attributed to St. Ephrem.” Acta Patristica et Byzantina 1 (1990): 77–98.Google Scholar

Botha, Philippus Jacobus. “The Rhetoric Function of Polarity in One of Ephrem the Syrian’s Hymns on the Church.” Journal for Semitics 3 (1991): 188–201.Google Scholar

Botha, Philippus Jacobus. “Ephrem the Syrian’s Treatment of Tamar in Comparison to That in Jewish Sources.” Acta Patristica et Byzantina 6 (1995): 15–26.Google Scholar

Botha, Philippus Jacobus. “Original Sin and Sexism: St. Ephrem’s Attitude towards Eve.” Studia Patristica 33 (1997): 483–9.Google Scholar

Botha, Philippus Jacobus. “Tamar, Rahab, Ruth and Mary: The Bold Women in Ephrem the Syrian’s Hymn De Nativitate 9.” Acta Patristica et Byzantina 17 (2006): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouhot, Jean-Paul. “Remarques sur l’histoire du texte de l’Opus Imperfectum in Matthaeum.” Vigiliae Christianae 24 (1970): 197–209.Google Scholar

Boyarin, Daniel. “An Inquiry into the Formation of the Middle Aramaic Dialects.” In Bono homini donum: Essays in Historical Linguistics in Memory of J. Alexander Kerns, edited by Arbeitman, Yoël L. and Bomhard, Allan R.. Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science 16, pt. 1–2, 613–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins B.V, 1981.Google Scholar

Boyarin, Daniel. “Martyrdom and the Making of Christianity and Judaism.” Journal of Early Christian Studies 6 (1998): 577–627.Google Scholar

Boyarin, Daniel. Dying for God: Martyrdom and the Making of Christianity and Judaism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Boyarin, Daniel. “The Diadoche of the Rabbis; or, Judah the Patriarch at Yavneh.” In Jewish Culture and Society under the Christian Roman Empire, edited by Kalmin, Richard Lee and Schwartz, Seth. Interdisciplinary Studies in Ancient Culture and Religion 3, 285–347. Leuven: Peeters, 2003.Google Scholar

Boyarin, Daniel. Border Lines: The Partition of Judaeo-Christianity. Divinations. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Boyarin, Daniel. “Two Powers in Heaven; or, the Making of a Heresy.” In The Idea of Biblical Interpretation: Essays in Honor of James Kugel, edited by Najman, Hindy and Newman, Judith H.. Supplements to the Journal for the Study of Judaism 83, 331–70. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2004.Google Scholar

Boyarin, Daniel. “Rethinking Jewish Christianity: An Argument for Dismantling a Dubious Category (to Which Is Appended a Correction of my Border Lines).” Jewish Quarterly Review 99 (2009): 7–36.Google Scholar

Bradshaw, Paul F. The Search for the Origins of Christian Worship: Sources and Methods for Early Liturgy. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Bradshaw, Paul F., and Hoffman, Lawrence A.. Life Cycles in Jewish and Christian Worship. Two Liturgical Traditions 4. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Bradshaw, Paul F., and Hoffman, Lawrence A.. Passover and Easter: The Symbolic Structuring of Sacred Seasons. Two Liturgical Traditions 6. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Braun, Oscar. Das Buch der Synhados oder Synodicon Orientale. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Philo Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Bremmer, Jan N. “The Acts of Thomas: Place, Date and Women.” In The Apocryphal Acts of Thomas, edited by Bremmer, Jan N.. Studies on Early Christian Apocrypha 6, 74–90. Leuven: Peeters, 2001.Google Scholar

Brin, Gershon. “Divorce at Qumran.” In Legal Texts and Legal Issues, Proceedings of the Second Meeting of the International Organization for Qumran Studies, Cambridge 1995, Published in Honor of Joseph M. Baumgarten, edited by Bernstein, Moshe, García Martínez, Florentino, and Kampen, John, 231–44. Leiden: Brill, 1997.Google Scholar

Brock, Sebastian Paul. “An Unpublished Letter of St. Ephrem.” Parole de l’Orient 4 (1973): 317–23.Google Scholar

Brock, Sebastian Paul. “Sarah and the Aqedah.” Le Muséon 87 (1974): 67–77.Google Scholar

Brock, Sebastian Paul. “St. Ephrem on Christ as Light in Mary and in the Jordan: Hymnus de Ecclesia 36.” Eastern Church Review 7 (1975): 137–44.Google Scholar

Brock, Sebastian Paul. “Ephrem’s Letter to Publius.” Le Muséon 89 (1976): 261–305.Google Scholar

Brock, Sebastian Paul. “Abraham and the Ravens: A Syriac Counterpart to Jubilees 11–12 and Its Implications.” Journal for the Study of Judaism 9 (1978): 135–52.Google Scholar

Brock, Sebastian Paul. “Jewish Traditions in Syriac Sources.” Journal of Jewish Studies 30 (1979): 212–32.Google Scholar

Brock, Sebastian Paul. “From Antagonism to Assimilation: Syriac Attitudes to Greek Learning.” In East of Byzantium: Syria and Armenia in the Formative Period (Dumbartonoaks Symposium, 1980), edited by Garsoïn, Nina G., Mathews, Thomas F. and Thompson, Robert, 17–34. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks, 1982.Google Scholar

Brock, Sebastian Paul. “Some Syriac Legens Concerning Moses.” Journal of Jewish Studies 33 (1982): 237–55.Google Scholar

Brock, Sebastian Paul. “Dialogue Hymns of the Syriac Churches.” Sobornost 5 (1983): 35–45.Google Scholar

Brock, Sebastian Paul. “Aspects of Translation Technique in Antiquity.” In Syriac Perspectives on Late Antiquity, edited by Brock, Sebastian Paul III. London: Variorum Reprints, 1984.Google Scholar

Brock, Sebastian Paul. “Christians in the Sasanian Empire; A Case of Divided Loyalties.” In Syriac Perspectives on Late Antiquity, edited by Brock, Sebastian Paul VI. London: Variorum Reprints, 1984.Google Scholar

Brock, Sebastian Paul. “Some Aspects of Greek Words in Syriac.” In Syriac Perspectives on Late Antiquity, edited by Brock, Sebastian Paul IV. London: Variorum Reprints, 1984.Google Scholar

Brock, Sebastian Paul. “Syriac Dialogue Poems: Marginalia to a Recent Edition.” Le Muséon 97 (1984): 29–58.Google Scholar

Brock, Sebastian Paul. “The Transmission of Ephrem’s Madrashe in the Syriac Liturgical Tradition.” Studia Patristica 33 (1997): 490–505.Google Scholar

Brock, Sebastian Paul. “A Brief Guide to the Main Editions and Translations of the Works of St. Ephrem.” The Harp 3 (1990): 7–25.Google Scholar

Brock, Sebastian Paul. Hymns on Paradise. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Brock, Sebastian Paul. “The Two Ways and the Palestinian Targum.” In A Tribute to Geza Vermes: Essays on Jewish and Christian Literature and History, edited by Davies, Philip R. and White, Richard R.. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament Supplement Series 100, 139–52. Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Brock, Sebastian Paul. “Eusebius and Syriac Christianity.” In Eusebius, Christianity, and Judaism, edited by Attridge, Harold W. and Hata, Gohei. Studia post-Biblica 42, 212–34. Leiden: Brill, 1992.Google Scholar

Brock, Sebastian Paul. The Luminous Eye: The Spiritual World Vision of Saint Ephrem. Cistercian Studies Aeries 124. Kalamazoo, MI: Cistercian Publications, 1992.Google Scholar

Brock, Sebastian Paul. Bride of Light: Hymns on Mary from the Syriac Churches. Mōrān ʾEthō 6. Kerala, India: St. Ephrem Ecumenical Research Institute, 1994.Google Scholar

Brock, Sebastian Paul. “Ephrem’s Verse Homily on Jonah and the Repentence of Nineveh: Notes on the Textual Tradition.” In Philohistôr, edited by Schoors, Antoon and van Deun, Peter. Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta 60, 71–86. Leuven: Peeters, 1994.Google Scholar

Brock, Sebastian Paul. “A Palestinian Targum Feature in Syriac.” Journal of Jewish Studies 46 (1995): 271–82.Google Scholar

Brock, Sebastian Paul. “The Peshitta Old Testament: Between Judaism and Christianity.” Cristianesimo nella Storia 19 (1998): 483–502.Google Scholar

Brock, Sebastian Paul. “The Changing Faces of St. Ephrem as Read in the West.” In Abba: The Tradition of Orthodoxy in the West: Festschrift for Bishop Kallistos (Ware) of Diokleia, edited by Behr, John, Louth, Andrew, and Conomos, Dimitri E., 65–80. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Brock, Sebastian Paul. “Creating Women’s Voices: Sarah and Tamar in Some Syriac Narrative Poems.” In The Exegetical Encounter between Jews and Christians in Late Antiquity, edited by Grypeou, Emmanouela and Spurling, Helen. Jewish and Christian Perspectives Series 18, 125–41. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2009.Google Scholar

Brock, Sebastian Paul. “Midrash in Syriac.” In Midrash Unbound: Transformations and Innovations, edited by Fishbane, Michael A. and Weinberg, Joanna, 83–95. Portland, OR: Littman Library of Jewish Civilization, 2013.Google Scholar

Brody, Robert. “ספרות הגאונים והטקסט התלמודי.” In Meḥqerei Talmud edited by Bar Asher, Moshe and Rosenthal, David, 237–303. Jerusalem: Magnes, 1993.Google Scholar

Brody, Robert. “Evidence for Divorce by Jewish Women.” Journal of Jewish Studies 50 (1999): 230–4.Google Scholar

Brown, Peter. The Body and Society: Men, Women and Sexual Renunciation in Early Christianity. New York: Columbia University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Brown, Raymond E. The Birth of the Messiah, a Commentary on the Infancy Narratives in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke. The Anchor Bible Referance Library. 2nd ed. New York: Doubleday, 1993.Google Scholar

Brundage, James A. Law, Sex, and Christian Society in Medieval Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Buchanan, George W. “Worship, Feasts and Ceremonies in the Early Jewish-Christian Church.” New Testament Studies 26 (1980): 279–97.Google Scholar

Büchler, Adolph. “Die Todesstrafen der Bibel und der jüdisch-nachbiblischen Zeit.” Monatsschrift für Geschichte und Wissenschaft des Judentums 50 (1906): 539–62, 664–706.Google Scholar

Büchler, Adolph. “Die Strafe der Ehebrecher in der nachexilischen Zeit.” Monatsschrift für Geschichte und Wissenschaft des Judentums 55 (1911): 196–219.Google Scholar

Büchler, Adolph. “Family Purity and Family Impurity in Jerusalem before the Year 70 CE.” In Studies in Jewish History: The Adolph Büchler Memorial Volume, edited by Brodie, Israel and Rabbinowitz, Joseph B.. Jews’ College publications, N.S. 1, 64–98. London: Oxford University Press, 1956.Google Scholar

Büchler, Adolph. “The Jewish Betrothal and the Position of a Woman Betrothed to a Priest in the First and Second Centuries.” In Studies in Jewish History: The Adolph Büchler Memorial Volume, edited by Brodie, Israel and Rabbinowitz, Joseph B.. Jews’ College publications N.S. 1, 126–59. London: Oxford University Press, 1956.Google Scholar

Büchler, Adolph. “The Minim in Sepphoris and Tiberias in the Second and Third Centuries.” In Studies in Jewish History: The Adolph Büchler Memorial Volume, edited by Brodie, Israel and Rabbinowitz, Joseph B.. Jews’ College publications N.S. 1, 245–74. London: Oxford University Press, 1956.Google Scholar

Bundy, David “The Pseudo-Ephremian Commentary on Third Corinthians: A Study in Exegesis and Anti-Bardaisanite Polemic.” In After Bardaisan, Studies on Continuity and Change in Syriac Christianity in Honour of Professor Hans J. W. Drijvers, edited by Reinink, Gerrit Jan and Klugkist, Alexander Cornelis, 51–63. Leuven: Peeters, 1999.Google Scholar

Burchard, Christoph. “Joseph and Aseneth.” In The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha, edited by Charlesworth, James H., 177–247. Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company, 1985.Google Scholar

Burgess, Henry. The Repentance of Nineveh: A Metrical Homily on the Mission of Jonah. London: R. B. Blackader, 1853.Google Scholar

Burkitt, Francis Crawford. Early Eastern Christianity St. Margaret’s Lectures, 1904, on the Syriac-Speaking Church. London: John Murray, 1904.Google Scholar

Butts, Aaron Michael. Language Change in the Wake of Empire: Syriac in Its Greco-Roman Context. Linguistic Studies in Ancient West Semitic 11. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2016.Google Scholar

Cain, Andrew. “Jerome’s Epistula CXVII on the Subintruductae: Satire, Apology and Ascetic Propaganda in Gaul.” Augustinianum 49 (2009): 119–43.Google Scholar

Callam, Daniel. “Clerical Continence in the Fourth Century: Three Papal Decretals.” Theological Studies 41 (1980): 3–50.Google Scholar

Canevaro, Mirko. “Making and Changing Laws in Ancient Athens.” In Oxford Handbook of Ancient Greek Law, edited by Harris, Edward M. and Canevaro, Mirko. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Capogrossi Colognesi, Luigi. Law and Power in the Making of the Roman Commonwealth. Translated by Kopp, Laura. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Carmichael, Calum M. The Laws of Deuteronomy. Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell University Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Cassingena-Trévedy, François. Éphrem de Nisibe: hymnes pascales. SC 502. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 2006.Google Scholar

Cassuto, Umberto. A Commentray on the Book of Genesis. Translated by Abrahams, Israel. Jerusalem: Magnes, 1964.Google Scholar

Cerbelaud, Dominique. Ephrem: célébrons la paqûe. Les pères dans la foi 58. Paris: Migne, 1995.Google Scholar

Cerbelaud, Dominique. “L’Antijudaïsme dans les hymnes de pascha d’Éphrem le Syrien.” Parole de l’Orient 20 (1995): 201–7.Google Scholar

Cerbelaud, Dominique. “Je t’aime, je te hais: Éphrem le Syrien et le judaïsme.” In Le judaïsme à l’eube de l’ère chrétienne, edited by Abadie, Philippe and Lémonon, Jean-Pierre. Lectio devina 186, 345–61. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 2001.Google Scholar

Chabot, Jean Baptiste. Synodicon orientale ou recueil de synodes nestoriens. 3 vols. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale, 1902.Google Scholar

Chabot, Jean Baptiste. Anonymi auctoris chronicon ad annum Christi 1234 pertinens. CSCO 81–2. Leuven: L. Durbecq, 1953.Google Scholar

Chadwick, Henry. Origen: Contra Celsum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Cholij, Roman. Clerical Celibacy in East and West. Leominster: Fowler-Wright Books, 1989.Google Scholar

Clark, Elizabeth A. “John Chrysostom and the ‘Subintroductae.’” Church History 46 (1977): 171–85.Google Scholar

Clark, Elizabeth A. Women in the Early Church. Message of the Fathers of the Church 13. Wilmington, DE: Michael Glazier, 1983.Google Scholar

Clark, Elizabeth A. “‘Adam’s Only Companion’: Augustine and the Early Christian Debate on Marriage.” Recherches Augustiniennes 21 (1986): 139–62.Google Scholar

Clark, Elizabeth A. “Antifamilial Tendencies in Ancient Christianity.” Journal of the History of Sexuality 5 (1995): 356–80.Google Scholar

Clark, Elizabeth A. “Constraining the Body, Expanding the Text: The Exegesis of Divorce in the Later Latin Fathers.” In The Limits of Ancient Christianity: Essays on Late Antique Thought and Culture in Honor of R. A. Markus, edited by Klingshirn, William E. and Vessey, Mark, 153–71. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Clark, Elizabeth A. Reading Renunciation: Asceticism and Scripture in Early Christianity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Clark, Elizabeth A. “The Celibate Bridegroom and His Virginal Brides: Metaphor and the Marriage of Jesus in Early Christian Ascetic Exegesis.” Church History 77 (2008): 1–25.Google Scholar

Clark, Gillian. “‘Spoiling the Egyptians’: Roman Law and Christian Exegesis in Late Antiquity.” In Law, Society, and Authority in Late Antiquity, edited by Mathisen, Ralph W., 133–47. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Cohen, Boaz. “On the Theme of Betrothal in Jewish and Roman Law.” Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research 18 (1948–9): 67–135.Google Scholar

Cohen, Boaz. Jewish and Roman Law: A Comparative Study. 2 vols. New York: Jewish Theological Seminary of America, 1966.Google Scholar

Cohen, Naomi G. “Taryag and the Noahide Commandments.” Journal of Jewish Studies 43 (1992): 46–57.Google Scholar

Cohen, Shaye J. D. “The Origins of the Matrilineal Principle in Rabbinic Law.” AJS Reviews 10 (1985): 19–53.Google Scholar

Cohen, Shaye J. D. The Beginnings of Jewishness: Boundaries, Varieties, Uncertainties. Hellenistic Culture and Society 31. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Cohen, Shaye J. D. “Sabbath Law and Mishnah Shabbat in Origen De Principiis.” Jewish Studies Quarterly 17 (2010): 160–89.Google Scholar

Cohen, Shaye J. D. “Sabbath Labor Prohibitions in ‘The Book of the Laws of Countries’ by Bardaisan the Syrian.” In Between Babylonia and the Land of Israel: Studies in Honor of Isaiah M. Gafni, edited by Ben Shahar, Meir, Herman, Geoffrey, and Oppenheimer, Aharon, 169–82. Jerusalem: Zalman Shazar Center for Jewish History, 2016.Google Scholar

Cohn, Haim Hermann. The Trial and Death of Jesus. New York: Harper & Row, 1971.Google Scholar

Cook, Edward M. “A New Perspective on the Language of Onqelos and Jonathan.” In The Aramaic Bible: Targums in Their Historical Context, edited by Beattie, Derek Robert George and McNamara, Martin J.. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament Supplement Series 166, 142–56. Sheffield: JSOT Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Cook, John Granger. The Interpretation of the New Testament in Greco-Roman Paganism. Studies and Texts in Antiquity and Christianity = Studien und Texte zu Antike und Christentum 3. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2000.Google Scholar

Cook, Michael J. “The Problem of Jewish Jurisprudence and the Trial of Jesus.” In Pondering the Passion: What’s at Stake for Christians and Jews, edited by Cunningham, Philip A., 13–25. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004.Google Scholar

Cooper, Catherine Fales. The Virgin and the Bride: Idealized Womanhood in Late Antiquity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Corbett, Percy Ellwood. The Roman Law of Marriage. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1930.Google Scholar

Corbier, Mireille. “Constructing Kinship in Rome: Marriage and Divorce, Filiation and Adoption.” In The Family in Italy from Antiquity to the Present, edited by Kertzer, David I. and Saller, Richard P., 127–44. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Corbier, Mireille. “Divorce and Adoption as Roman Familial Strategies (Le divorce et l’adoption ‘en plus’).” In Marriage, Divorce, and Childern in Ancient Rome, edited by Rawson, Beryl, 47–78. Canberra and Oxford: Humanities Research Centre and Clarendon Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Corbier, Mireille. “Child Exposure and Abandonment.” In Childhood, Class, and Kin in the Roman World, edited by Dixon, Suzanne, 52–73. London and New York: Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar

Coriden, James A. An Introduction to Canon Law. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Corrigan, Kevin. The Life of Saint Macrina. Peregrina translations series 12. Toronto: Peregrina Publishing, 1997.Google Scholar

Cotton, Hannah M., and Qimron, Elisha. “XḤev/Se ar 13 of 134 or 135 C.E.: A Wife’s Renunciation of Claims.” Journal of Jewish Studies 49 (1998): 108–18.Google Scholar

Cover, Robert. “The Supreme Court, 1982 Term – Foreword: Nomos and Narrative.” Harvard Law Review 97 (1983–4): 4–68.Google Scholar

Cox, James J. C. “Prolegomena to a Study of the Dominical Logoi as Cited in the Didascalia Apostolorum.” Andrews University Seminary Studies 13 (1975): 23–33, 249–59.Google Scholar

Cox, James J. C. “Prolegomena to a Study of the Dominical Logoi as Cited in the Didascalia Apostolorum.” Andrews University Seminary Studies 15 (1977): 1–15, 97–133.Google Scholar

Cox, James J. C. “Some Prolegomena and Addenda to a Study of the Dominical Logoi as cited in the Didascalia Apostolorum.” Studia Patristica 16 (1985): 82–7.Google Scholar

Cozijnsen, Bert A. “A Critical Contribution to the Corpus Hellenisticum Novi Testamenti: Jude and Hesiod.” In The Use of Sacred Books in the Ancient World, edited by Rutgers, Leonard Victor. Contributions to Biblical Exegesis and Theology 22, 79–109. Leuven: Peeters, 1998.Google Scholar

Crane, Daniel A. “A ‘Judeo-Christian’ Argument for Privatizing Marriage.” Cardozo Law Review 27 (2006): 1221–59.Google Scholar

Crogiez-Pétrequin, Sylvie, Jaillette, Pierre, and Poinsotte, Jean Michel. Codex Theodosianus: Le Code Théodosien V. Turnhout: Brepols Publishers, 2009.Google Scholar

Crook, John Anthony. “Women in Roman Succession.” In The Family in Ancient Rome, edited by Rawson, Beryl, 58–82. London: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar

Crouzel, Henri. “Les pères de l’eglise ont-ils permis le remariage après séparation.” Bulletin de Littérature Ecclésiastique 70 (1969): 3–43.Google Scholar

Crouzel, Henri. “Le canon 10 (ou 11) du concile d’Arles de 314 sur le divorce.” Bulletin de Littérature Ecclésiastique 72 (1971): 128–31.Google Scholar

Crouzel, Henri. L’eglise primitive face au divorce: du premier au cinquième siècle. Theologie historique 13. Paris: Beauchesne, 1971.Google Scholar

Crouzel, Henri. “Le texte patristique de mattieu V.32 et XIX.9.” New Testament Studies 19 (1972–3): 98–119.Google Scholar

Crouzel, Henri. “Deux textes de Tertullien concernant la procédure et les rites du mariage chrétien.” Bulletin de Littérature Ecclésiastique 74 (1973): 3–13.Google Scholar

Crouzel, Henri. “A propos du concile d’Arles: Faut-il mettre non avant prohibentur nubere dans le canon 10 (ou 11) du concile d’Arles de 314 sur le remariage après divorce?” Bulletin de Littérature Ecclésiastique 75 (1974): 25–40.Google Scholar

Crouzel, Henri. “Divorce et remariage dans l’église primitive: Quelques réflexions de méthodologie historique.” Nouvelle Revue Théologique 108/10 (1976): 891–917.Google Scholar

Crouzel, Henri. “Quelques remarques concernant le texte patristique de Mt 19.9.” Bulletin de Littérature Ecclésiastique 82 (1981): 83–92.Google Scholar

Crouzel, Henri. Mariage et divorce, célibat et caractère sacerdotaux dans l’église ancienne: études diverses. Etudes d’histoire du culte et des institutions chretiennes 2. Torino: Bottega D’Erasmo, 1982.Google Scholar

Crouzel, Henri. “Marriage and Virginity, Has Christianity Devalued Marriage?” In Mariage et divorce, célibat et caractère sacerdotaux dans l’église ancienne, edited by Crouzel, Henri, 45–65. Torino: Bottega d’Erasmo, 1982.Google Scholar

Csillag, Pál. The Augustan Laws on Family Relations. Translated by Decsényi, Jósef. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 1976.Google Scholar

Czajkowski, Kimberley. Localized Law: The Babatha and Salome Komaise Archives. Oxford Studies in Roman Society and Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Danby, Herbert. The Mishnah. London: Oxford University Press, 1950.Google Scholar

Daniélou, Jean. Das Judenchristentum und die Anfänge der Kirche. Geisteswissenschaften (Opladen, Leverkusen, Germany) 121. Köln: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1964.Google Scholar

Daniélou, Jean. The Theology of Jewish Christianity. London: Darton, Longman & Todd, 1964.Google Scholar

Darling, Robin A. “The ‘Church from the Nations’ in the Exegesis of Ephrem.” Symposium Syriacum 4 (1984): 111–21.Google Scholar

Daube, David. “Origen and the Punishment of Adultery in Jewish Law.” Studia Patristica (1957): 109–13.Google Scholar

Daube, David. “Historical Aspects of Informal Marriage.” Revue internationale des droits de l’antiquité 25 (1978): 95–107.Google Scholar

Dauvillier, Jean, and de Clercq, Carlo. Le Mariage en droit canonique oriental. Paris: Recueil Sirey, 1936.Google Scholar

Davies, Eryl W. “Inheritance Rights and the Hebrew Levirate Marriage: Part 1.” Vetus Testamentum 31 (1981): 138–44.Google Scholar

Davies, Eryl W. “Inheritance Rights and the Hebrew Levirate Marriage: Part 2.” Vetus Testamentum 31 (1981): 257–68.Google Scholar

Davies, William David, and Allison, Dale C.. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to Saint Matthew. International Critical Commentary on the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments. 3 vols. Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1988.Google Scholar

de Halleux, André. “Saint Éphrem le Syrien.” Revue théologique de Leuven 14 (1983): 328–55.Google Scholar

de Halleux, André. “À propos du sermon éphrémien sur Jonas et la pénitence des Ninivites.” In Lingua Restituta Orientalis: Festgabe für Julius Assfalg, edited by Schulz, Regine and Görg, Manfred. Ägypten und Altes Testament 20, 155–60. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz, 1990.Google Scholar

De Jonge, Marinus. “Hippolytus’ ‘Benedictions of Isaac, Jacob and Moses’ and the Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs.” Bijdragen, tijdschrift voor filosofie en theologie 46 (1985): 245–60.Google Scholar

de Lange, Nicholas Robert Michael. Origen and the Jews: Studies in Jewish-Christian Relations in Third-Century Palestine. University of Cambridge Oriental Publications 25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Del Verme, Marcello. Didache and Judaism: Jewish Roots of an Ancient Christian-Jewish Work. New York: T & T Clark, 2004.Google Scholar

Deming, Will. Paul on Marriage and Celibacy: The Hellenistic Background of 1 Corinthians 7. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 2004.Google Scholar

DePalma Digeser, Elizabeth. “Lactantius and Constantine’s Letter to Arles: Dating the Divine Institutes.” Journal of Early Christian Studies 2 (1994): 33–52.Google Scholar

Depauw, Mark. “The Use of Mothers’ Names in Ptolemaic Documents: A Case of Greek-Egyptian Influence?” The Journal of Juristic Papyrology 37 (2007): 21–9.Google Scholar

Depauw, Mark. “Do Mothers Matter? The Emergence of Metronymics in Early Roman Egypt.” In The Language of the Papyri, edited by Evans, T. V. and Obbink, Dirk, 120–39. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Derrett, J. Duncan M. Law in the New Testament. London: Darton, Longman & Todd, 1970.Google Scholar

Desreumaux, Alain. “La doctrine d’Addaï: Essai de classement des témoins syriaques et grecs.” Augustinianum 23 (1983): 181–6.Google Scholar

de Ste. Croix, Geoffrey Ernest Maurice. Christian Persecution, Martyrdom, and Orthodoxy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Deutsch, Yaacov. “New Evidence of Early Versions of ‘Toldot Yeshu.’” Tarbiz 69 (2000): 177–97.Google Scholar

Dirksen, Pieter B. “The Old Testament Peshitta.” In Mikra: Text, Translation, Reading, and Interpretation of the Hebrew Bible in Ancient Judaism and Early Christianity, edited by Mulder, Martin Jan and Sysling, Harry. Compendia rerum Iudaicarum ad Novum Testamentum, 255–97. Assen and Philadelphia: Van Gorcum and Fortress Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Dixon, Suzanne. “The Marriage Alliance in the Roman Elite.” Journal of Family History 10 (1985): 353–78.Google Scholar

Dixon, Suzanne. The Roman Family. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Donahue, John R. “Divorce: New Testament Perspectives.” In Marriage Studies: Reflections in Canon Law and Theology, edited by Michael Doyle, Thomas Patrick, 1–19. Washington, DC: Canon Law Society of America, 1982.Google Scholar

Döring, Lutz. Schabbat: Sabbathalacha und -praxis im antiken Judentum und Urchristentum. Texts and Studies in Ancient Judaism 78. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1999.Google Scholar

Döring, Lutz. “Parallels without ‘Parallelomania’: Methodological Reflections on Comparative Analysis of Halakhah in the Dead Sea Scrolls.” In Rabbinic Perspectives: Rabbinic Literature and the Dead Sea Scrolls: Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium of the Orion Center for the Study of the Dead Sea Scrolls and Associated Literature, 7–9 January, 2003, edited by Fraade, Steven D., Shemesh, Aharon, and Clements, Ruth. Studies on the Texts of the Desert of Judah 62, 13–42. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2006.Google Scholar

Döring, Lutz. “Marriage and Creation in Mark 10 and CD 4–5.” In Echoes from the Caves: Qumran and the New Testament, edited by Martínez, Florentino García. Studies on the Texts of the desert of Judah 85, 133–63. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2009.Google Scholar

Dossey, Leslie. “Judicial Violence and Ecclesiastical Courts in Late Antique North Africa.” In Law, Society, and Authority in Late Antiquity, edited by Mathisen, Ralph W., 98–114. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Drijvers, Han Jan Willem. Bardaisan of Edessa. Studia Semitica Neerlandica 6. Assen: Van Gorcum & Company, 1966.Google Scholar

Drijvers, Han Jan Willem. “Hatra, Palmyra und Edessa: Die Städte der syrisch-mesopotamischen Wüste in politischer, kulturgeschichtlicher und religionsgeschichtlicher Beleuchtung.” In Politische Geschichte: Provinzen und Randvölker: Syrien, Palästina, Arabien, edited by Haase, Wolfgang and Temporini, Hildegard. Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt. T. 2, Principat 8, 799–906. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1977.Google Scholar

Drijvers, Han Jan Willem. Cults and Beliefs at Edessa. Études préliminaires aux religions orientales dans l’empire romain 82. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1980.Google Scholar

Drijvers, Han Jan Willem. “The Persistence of Pagan Cults and Practices in Christian Syria.” In East of Byzantium: Syria and Armenia in the Formative Period, edited by Garsoïan, Nina G., Mathews, Thomas F., and Thomson, Robert W., 35–43. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks, 1982.Google Scholar

Drijvers, Han Jan Willem. “Addai und Mani: Christentum und Manichäismus im dritten Jahrhundert in Syrien.” Orientalia Christiana Analecta 221 (1983): 171–85.Google Scholar

Drijvers, Han Jan Willem. East of Antioch: Studies in Early Syriac Christianity. Variorum Reprint 198. London: Variorum Reprints, 1984.Google Scholar

Drijvers, Han Jan Willem. “Jews and Christians at Edessa.” Journal of Jewish Studies 36 (1985): 88–102.Google Scholar

Drijvers, Han Jan Willem. “Marcionism in Syria: Principles, Problems, Polemics.” Second Century 6 (1987–1988): 153–72.Google Scholar

Drijvers, Han Jan Willem. “Syrian Christianity and Judaism.” In The Jews among Pagans and Christians: In the Roman Empire, edited by Lieu, Judith, North, John A., and Rajak, Tessa, 124–46. London and New York: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar

Drijvers, Han Jan Willem. “The School of Edessa: Greek Learning and Local Culture.” In Centres of Learning: Learning and Location in Pre-Modern Europe and the Near East, edited by Drijvers, Jan Willem and MacDonald, Alasdair. Brill’s Studies in Intellectual History 61, 49–58. Leiden, New York and Köln: E. J. Brill, 1995.Google Scholar

Drijvers, Han Jan Willem. “The Protonike Legend, The Doctrina Addai and Bishop Rabbula of Edessa.” Vigiliae Christianae 51 (1997): 298–315.Google Scholar

Drijvers, Han Jan Willem. “The Image of Edessa in the Syriac Tradition.” In The Holy Face and the Paradox of Representation: Papers from a Colloquium Held at the Bibliotheca Hertziana, Roma and the Villa Spelman, Florence 1996, edited by Kessler, Herbert L. and Wolf, Gerhard. Villa Spelman Colloqui 6, 13–31. Bologna: Nouva Alfa Editoriale, 1998.Google Scholar

Drijvers, Han Jan Willem, and Healey, John F.. The Old Syriac Inscriptions of Edessa and Osrhoene. Handbuch der Orientalistik 42. Leiden, Boston, and Köln: Brill, 1999.Google Scholar

Drijvers, Jan Willem. Cyril of Jerusalem: Bishop and City. Supplements to Vigiliae Christianae 72. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2004.Google Scholar

Dunn, Geoffrey D. “The Ancestry of Jesus According to Tertullian: ex David per Mariam.” Studia Patristica 36 (2001): 349–55.Google Scholar

Dunn, Geoffrey D. “The Validity of Marriage in Cases of Captivity, The Letter of Innocent I to Probus.” Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses 83 (2007): 107–21.Google Scholar

Dunn, James D. J. Jesus, Paul and the Law: Studies in Mark and Galatians. London SPCK, 1990.Google Scholar

Dunn, James D. J. Jews and Christians: The Parting of the Ways, A.D. 70 to 135: The Second Durham-Tübingen Research Symposium on Earliest Christianity and Judaism (Durham, September 1989). Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 66, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (P. Siebeck), 1992.Google Scholar

Dunn, James D. J. Paul and the Mosaic Law: The Third Durham-Tübingen Research Symposium on Earliest Christianity and Judaism (Durham, September, 1994). Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 89. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (P. Siebeck), 1996.Google Scholar

Duval, Rubens. Histoire, politique, religieuse et littéraire d’Édesse jusqu’à le première croisade. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale, 1892.Google Scholar

Eck, Werner. “The Emperor, the Law and Imperial Administration.” Translated by Thomas Roberts. In The Oxford Handbook of Roman Law and Society, edited by du Plessis, Paul J., Ando, Clifford, and Tuori, Kaius, 98–110. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Edrei, Arye. “The Beit Din’s Prerogatives in Marital Law.” Shenaton Ha-Mishpat Ha-ivri 21 (1998–2000): 1–36.Google Scholar

Edrei, Arye, and Mendels, Doron. “Preliminary Thoughts on Structures of ‘Sovereignty’ and the Deepening Gap between Judaism and Christianity in the First Centuries CE.” Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha 23 (2014): 215–38.Google Scholar

Ehlers, Barbara. “Kann das Thomasevangelium aus Edessa Stammen?” Novum Testamentum 12 (1970): 283–317.Google Scholar

Ehreman, Bart D. “Jesus and the Adulteress.” New Testament Studies 34 (1988): 24–44.Google Scholar

Eichler, Barry L. “On Reading Genesis 12:10–20.” In Tehillah Le-Moshe: Biblical and Judaic Studies in Honor of Moshe Greenberg, edited by Cogan, Mordechai, Eichler, Barry L., and Tigay, Jeffrey H., 23–38. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 1997.Google Scholar

Elliott, Dyan. Spiritual Marriage: Sexual Abstinence in Medieval Wedlock. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Elm, Susanna. “Virgins of God”: The Making of Asceticism in Late Antiquity. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Elm, Susanna. “Othodoxy and the True Philosophical Life: Julian and Gregory of Nazianzus.” Studia Patristica 37 (2001): 69–85.Google Scholar

Elm, Susanna. “Hellenism and Historiography: Gregory of Nazianzus and Julian in Dialogue.” Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 33 (2003): 493–515.Google Scholar

Elman, Yaakov. “Marriage and Marital Property in Rabbinic and Sasanian Law.” In Rabbinic Law in Its Roman and Near Eastern Context, edited by Hezser, Catherine, 227–76. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2003.Google Scholar

Elon, Menachem. Jewish Law: History, Sources, Principles. Translated by Auerbach, Bernard and Sykes, Melvin J.. 4 vols. Philadelphia and Jerusalem: The Jewish Publication Society, 1994.Google Scholar

Emerton, John Adney. “Unclean Birds and the Origin of the Peshitta.” Journal of Semitic Studies 7 (1962): 204-11.Google Scholar

Enker, Arnold N. “Aspects of Interactions between the Torah Law, the King’s Law, and the Noahide Law in Jewish Criminal Law.” Cardozo Law Review 12 (1991): 1137–56.Google Scholar

Epstein, Isidore. Hebrew-English Edition of the Babylonian Talmud. London: Soncino Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Epstein, Jacob Nahum. “Notizen zu den jüdisch-aramäischen Papyri von Assuan.” Jahrbuch der Jüdischen Gesellschaft 6 (1908): 359–73.Google Scholar

Epstein, Jacob Nahum. “Maasim li-bne Erez Israel (Palestinian Halachic Practice).” Tarbiz 1, 2 (1930): 33–42.Google Scholar

Epstein, Jacob Nahum. Introduction to the Mishnaic Text. 3rd ed. 2 vols. Jerusalem: Magnes, 2000.Google Scholar

Epstein, Louis M. The Jewish Marriage Contract, a Study in the Status of the Woman in Jewish Law. New York: Jewish Theological Seminary of America, 1927.Google Scholar

Epstein, Louis M. Marriage Laws in the Bible and the Talmud. Harvard Semitic Series 12. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1942.Google Scholar

Erhart, Victoria. “The Development of Syriac Christian Canon Law in the Sasanian Empire.” In Law, Society, and Authority in Late Antiquity, edited by Mathisen, Ralph W., 115–29. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Eshel, Ben-Zion. Jewish Settlements in Babylonia during Talmudic Times. Jerusalem: Magnes, 1979.Google Scholar

Eskhult, Mats. “The Syro-Roman Lawbook and Local Legal Custom.” Symposium Syriacum 7 (1998): 149–57.Google Scholar

Evans-Grubbs, Judith. “Abduction Marriage in Antiquity: The Law of Constantine and Its Social Context.” Journal of Roman Studies 79 (1989): 59–83.Google Scholar

Evans-Grubbs, Judith. “Constantine and Imperial Legislation on the Family.” In The Theodosian Code, edited by Harries, Jill and Wood, Ian, 120–42. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Evans-Grubbs, Judith. Law and Family in Late Antiquity: The Emperor Constantine’s Marriage Legislation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Evans-Grubbs, Judith. “‘Pagan’ and ‘Cristian’ Marriage: The State of the Question.” Journal of Early Christian Studies 2 (1994): 361–412.Google Scholar

Evans, Robert F. Four Letters of Pelagius. London: Adam & Charles Black, 1968.Google Scholar

Everson, David L. “The Vetus Latina and the Vulgate of the Book of Genesis.” In The Book of Genesis: Composition, Reception, and Interpretation, edited by Evans, Craig A., Lohr, Joel N., and Petersen, David L.. Supplements to Vetus Testamentum 152, 519–36. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar

Falk, Zeev W. Jewish Matrimonial Law in the Middle Ages. Scripta Judaica 6. London: Oxford University Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Falk, Zeev W. Introduction to Jewish Law in the Second Commonwealth. Arbeiten zur Geschichte des antiken Judentums und des Urchristentums 11. 2 vols. Leiden: Brill, 1978.Google Scholar

Fassberg, Steven E. “Did Final ī>ē in the Language of Naḥal Ṣeʼelim 13?” Lesonénu 74 (2012): 95–107.Google Scholar

Fedwick, Paul Jonathan. The Church and the Charisma of Leadership in Basil of Caesarea. Studies and Texts 45. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1979.Google Scholar

Fedwick, Paul Jonathan. “A Chronology of the Life and Works of Basil of Caesarea.” In Basil of Caesarea: Christian, Humanist, Ascetic, edited by Fedwick, Paul Jonathan, 3–19. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1981.Google Scholar

Feghali, Joseph. “Origine et formation du mariage dans le droit des eglises de langue syriaque.” In Mélanges offerts à Pierre Andrieu Guitrancourt. L’année canonique 17, 413–31. Paris: Faculté de droit canonique, 1973.Google Scholar

Feghali, Joseph. “Influence des Targums sur la Pensée Exégétique d’Éphrem?” Symposium Syriacum 4 (1984): 71–82.Google Scholar

Fiensy, David A. Prayers Alleged to Be Jewish: An Examination of the Constitutiones Apostolorum. Brown Judaic Studies 65. Chico, CA: Scholars Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Fiore, Benjamin. The Pastoral Epistles: First Timothy, Second Timothy, Titus. Sacra Pagina Series 12. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Fischer, Bonifatius. Genesis. Vetus Latina: Die Reste der Altlateinischen Bibel. 4 vols. Freiburg: Verlag Herder Freiburg, 1951–4.Google Scholar

Fitzmyer, Joseph A. “A Re-Study of an Elphantine Aramaic Marriage Contract (AP 15).” In Near Eastern Studies in Honor of William Foxwell Albright, edited by Goedicke, Hans, 137–68. Baltimore and London: John Hopkins Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Fitzmyer, Joseph A. “The Matthean Divorce Texts and Some New Palestinian Evidence.” Theological Studies 37 (1976): 197–226.Google Scholar

Fitzmyer, Joseph A. “Divorce among First-Century Palestinian Jews.” Eretz-Israel 14 (1978): 103*–10*.Google Scholar

Fitzmyer, Joseph A. The Gospel According to Luke. The Anchor Bible 28. 2 vols. Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company, 1981.Google Scholar

Fitzmyer, Joseph A. The One Who Is to Come. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2007.Google Scholar

Fleishman, Joseph. “Socio-Legal Aspects of Genesis 34.” Shnaton: An Annual for Biblical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies 13 (2002): 141–55.Google Scholar

Fleishman, Joseph. “Exodus 22:15–16 and Deuteronomy 22:28–29: Seduction and Rape? Or Elopement and Abduction Marriage?” Jewish Law Association Studies 14 (2004): 59–73.Google Scholar

Flusser, David. “Some of the Precepts of the Torah from Qumran (4QMMT) and the Benedictions Against the Heretics.” Tarbiz 61 (1991–2): 333–74.Google Scholar

Flusser, David. Jesus. 3rd ed. Jerusalem: Magnes, 2001.Google Scholar

Fonrobert, Charlotte Elisheva. Menstrual Purity: Rabbinic and Christian Reconstructions of Biblical Gender. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Fonrobert, Charlotte Elisheva. “The ‘Didascalia Apostolorum’: A Mishnah for the Disciples of Jesus.” Journal of Early Christian Studies 9 (2001): 483–509.Google Scholar

Ford, J. Massingberd “Mary’s Virginitas Post-Partum and Jewish Law.” Biblica 54 (1973): 269–72.Google Scholar

Forni, Giovanni. “Il ruolo della menzione della tribù nell’ onomastica romana.” In L’Onomastique Latine, Paris 13–15 octobre 1975, edited by Pflaum, Hans Georg and Duval, Noël. Colloques internationaux du Centre national de la recherche scientifique 564, 73–101. Paris: Centre national de la recherche scientifique, 1977.Google Scholar

Fowden, Garth. “Late Polytheism.” In The Cambridge Ancient History, edited by Bowman, Alan K., Garnsey, Peter, and Cameron, Averil XII, 521–37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Fraade, Steven D. “Ascetical Aspects of Ancient Judaism.” In Jewish Spirituality: From the Bible through the Middle Ages, edited by Green, Arthur. World Spirituality 13, 253–88. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1986.Google Scholar

Fraade, Steven D. “Review of Halakhah in the Making: The Development of Jewish Law from Qumran to the Rabbis. By Aharon Shemesh.” Journal for the Study of Judaism 43 (2012): 131–5.Google Scholar

Fraade, Steven D. “‘A Heart of Many Chambers’: The Theological Hermeneutics of Legal Multivocality.” Harvard Theological Review 108 (2015): 113–28.Google Scholar

Francus, Israel. “’עוד ל‘כל דמקדש אדעתא דרבנן מקדש”. Sinai 77 (1975): 91–3.Google Scholar

Francus, Israel. “The Halakhic Status of Children Born from Mixed Marriages in Talmudic Literature.” Sidra 4 (1988): 89–110.Google Scholar

Fränkel, Siegmund. Die aramäischen Fremdwörter im Arabischen. Hildesheim: G. Olms, 1962.Google Scholar

Frazer, James George. Folk-Lore in the Old Testament. 3 vols. London: Macmillan, 1919.Google Scholar

Fredriksen, Paula, and Irshai, Oded. “Christian Anti-Judaism: Polemics and Policies.” In The Late Roman-Rabbinic Period, edited by Katz, Steven T., 977–1034. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Friedman, Mordechai Akiva. “The Ransom Clause of the Jewish Marriage Contract.” In Gratz College Anniversary Volume, edited by Passaw, Isidore David and Lachs, Samuel Tobias, 63–71. Philadelphia: Gratz College, 1971.Google Scholar

Friedman, Mordechai Akiva. Jewish Marriage in Palestine, A Cairo Geniza Study. 2 vols. Tel-Aviv and New York: Tel-Aviv University and The Jewish Theological Seminary of America, 1980.Google Scholar

Friedman, Mordechai Akiva. “המחזיר גרושתו משנישאת וטומאת הסוטה והאנוסה.” In Saul Lieberman Memorial Volume, edited by Friedman, Shamma, 189–232. New York and Jerusalem: Jewish Theological Seminary of America, 1993.Google Scholar

Friedman, Shamma. “A Critical Study of Yevamot X with a Methodological Introduction.” In Texts and Studies, edited by Dimitrovsky, Haim Zalman, 277–441. New York: The Jewish Theological Seminary of America, 1977.Google Scholar

Friedman, Shamma. “The Case of the Woman with Two Husbands in Talmudic and Ancient Near Eastern Law.” Israel Law Review 15 (1980): 530–58.Google Scholar

Friedman, Shamma. Talmud Arukh: BT Bava Meẓiʿa VI. New York and Jerusalem: Jewish Theological Seminary of America, 1990.Google Scholar

Friedman, Shamma. “On the Origin of Textual Variants in the Babylonian Talmud.” Sidra 7 (1991): 67–102.Google Scholar

Friedman, Shamma. “Variant Readings in the Babylonian Talmud: A Methodological Study Marking the Appearance of 13 Volumes of the Institute for the Complete Israeli Talmud’s Edition.” Tarbiz 68 (1998): 129–62.Google Scholar

Friedman, Shamma. “The Beraitot in the Talmud and Their Relation to the Tosefta.” In Atara L’Haim, Studies in the Talmud and Medieval Rabbinic Literature in Honor of Prefessor Haim Zalman Dimitirovsky, edited by Boyarin, Daniel, Friedman, Shamma, Hirshman, Marc, Schmelzer, Menahem, and Tashma, Israel M., 163–201. Jerusalem: Magnes, 2000.Google Scholar

Friedman, Shamma. Tosefta Atiqta, Pesah Rishon. Ramat Gan: Bar Ilan University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Fröhlich, Ida. “Mamzer in Qumran Texts: The Problem of Mixed Marriages from Ezra’s Time. Law, Literature and Practice.” Transeuphratène 29 (2005): 103–15.Google Scholar

Frymer-Kenskey, Tikva. “The Strange Case of the Suspected Sotah (Numbers V 11–31).” Vetus Testamentum 34 (1984): 11–26.Google Scholar

Frymer-Kenskey, Tikva. “Virginity in the Bible.” In Gender and Law in the Hebrew Bible and the Ancient Near East, edited by Matthews, Victor H., Levinson, Bernard M., and Frymer-Kenskey, Tikva. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament Supplement Series 262, 79–96. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Gaca, Kathy L. The Making of Fornication: Eros, Ethics, and Political Reform in Greek Philosophy and Early Christianity. Hellenistic Culture and Society 40. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Gafni, Isaiah M. “The Institution of Marriage in Rabbinic Times.” In The Jewish Family Metaphor and Memory, edited by Kraemer, David, 13–30. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Gafni, Isaiah M. The Jews of Babylonia in the Talmudic Period: A Social and Cultural History. Jerusalem: The Zalman Shazar Center for Jewish History, 1990.Google Scholar

Gagarin, Michael. “The Unity of Greek Law.” In The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Greek Law, edited by Gagarin, Michael and Cohen, David, 29–40. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Gager, John G. The Origins of Anti-Semitism: Attitudes toward Judaism in Pagan and Christian Antiquity. New York: Oxford University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Gardner, Jane F. Women in Roman Law and Society. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Gardner, Jane F. Family and Familia in Roman Law and Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Gardner, Jane F. “Status, Sentiment and Strategy in Roman Adoption.” In Adoption et fosterage, edited by Corbier, Mireille. De l’archéologie à l’histoire, 63–79. Paris: De Boccard, 1999.Google Scholar

Garitte, Gérard. “Le sermon des Éphrem sur Jonas en géorgian.” Le Muséon 80 (1967): 75–119.Google Scholar

Garnsey, Peter. Social Status and Legal Privilege in the Roman Empire. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Garnsey, Peter. “Roman Citizenship and Roman Law in the Late Empire.” In Approaching Late Antiquity: The Transformation from Early to Late Empire, edited by Swain, Simon and Edwards, Mark, 133–55. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Gathercole, Simon J. The Gospel of Thomas: Introduction and Commentary. Texts and Editions for New Testament Study 11. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar

Gaudemet, Jean. “L’originalité des fiançailles romaines.” Iura 6 (1955): 47–77.Google Scholar

Gaudemet, Jean. Sociétés et mariage. Recherches institutionnelles 4. Strasbourg: CERDIC, 1980.Google Scholar

Gaudemet, Jean. Église et cité: histoire du droit canonique. Paris: Éditions du Cerf et Montchrestien, 1994.Google Scholar

Gaughan, Judy H. Murder Was Not a Crime: Homicide and Power in the Roman Republic. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Geiger, Abraham. Urschrift und Übersetzungen der Bibel in ihrer Abhängigkeit von der innern Entwicklung des Judentums. 2nd ed. Frankfurt am Main: Madda, 1928.Google Scholar

Geiger, Abraham. Urschrift und Übersetzungen der Bibel in Ihrer Abhängigkeit von der innern Entwicklung des Judentums. Translated by Baruch, J. L.. Jerusalem: Bialik Foundation, 1949.Google Scholar

Genot-Bismuth, Jacqueline. “La terminologie de la loi à l’époque du second temple, archéologie d’un vocabulaire occulte de l’anachronisme du terme ‘halakha.’” In Jewish Studies at the Turn of the Twentieth Century: Proceedings of the 6th EAJS Congress, Toledo, July 1998, edited by Targarona Borrás, Judit and Sáenz-Badillos, Angel, 260–8. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 1999.Google Scholar

Gerhards, Albert, and Wahle, Stephan. Kontinuität und Unterbrechung: Gottesdienst und Gebet in Judentum und Christentum. Studien zu Judentum und Christentum. Paderborn: Schöningh, 2005.Google Scholar

Gerhards, Albert, Doeker, Andrea, and Ebenbauer, Peter. Identität durch Gebet: zur gemeinschaftsbildenden Funktion institutionalisierten Betens in Judentum und Christentum. Studien zu Judentum und Christentum. Paderborn: Schöningh, 2003.Google Scholar

Gero, Stephen. Barṣauma of Nisibis and Persian Christianity in the Fifth Century. CSCO 63. Leuven: Peeters, 1981.Google Scholar

Gerson, David. “Die Commentarien des Ephräm Syrus im Verhältnis zur Jüdischen Exegese.” Monatsschrift für Geschichte und Wissenschaft des Judentums 17 (1868): 15–33, 64–72, 98–109, 41–9.Google Scholar

Gibson, John C. L. “From Qumran to Edessa or the Aramaic Speaking Church before and after 70 AD.” The Annual of Leeds Univesity Oriental Society 5 (1966): 24–39.Google Scholar

Giet, Stanislas. “Le rigorisme de Saint Basile.” Revue des Sciences Religieuses 23 (1949): 333–42.Google Scholar

Gilat, Yitzhak D. Studies in the Development of the Halakha. Jerusalem: Bar Ilan University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Giltaij, Jacob. “Greek Philosophy and Classical Roman Law.” In The Oxford Handbook of Roman Law and Society, edited by du Plessis, Paul J., Ando, Clifford, and Tuori, Kaius, 188–99. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Ginzberg, Louis. Die Haggada bei den Kirchenvätern und in der Apokryphischen Litteratur. Berlin: S. Calvary & Co, 1900.Google Scholar

Ginzberg, Louis. The Legends of the Jews. Translated by Szold, Henrietta. Philadelphia: The Jewish Publication Society of America, 1947.Google Scholar

Goldberg, Abraham. “The Tosefta: Companion to the Mishnah.” In The Literature of the Sages, edited by Safrai, Shmuel, 283–302. Assen: Van Gorcum, 1987.Google Scholar

Goldberg, Abraham. “סדר ההלכות ותכונות התוספתא על פי שני הפרקים הראשונים של מסכת בבא קמא בתוספתא.” In Meḥqerei Talmud, edited by Bar Asher, Moshe and Rosenthal, David, 151–96. Jerusalem: Magnes, 1993.Google Scholar

Goldberg, Nechemia Zalman. “אין הפקעת קידושין ללא גט (תגובה).” Tehumin 23 (2003): 165–8.Google Scholar

Goldberg, Nechemia Zalman. “(הפקעת קידושין אינה פתרון לעגינות (תגובה.” Tehumin 23 (2003): 158–60.Google Scholar

Goodenough, Erwin R. The Jurisprudence of the Jewish Courts in Egypt. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1929.Google Scholar

Goodman, Martin. “Galilean Judaism and Judaean Judaism.” In The Cambridge History of Judaism, edited by Horbury, William, Davies, William David, and Sturdy, John, 596–617. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Goshen-Gottstein, Alon. “Polemomania: Methodological Reflection on the Study of the Judeo-Christian Controversy between the Talmudic Sages and Origin over the Interpretations of the Song of Songs.” Jewish Studies 42 (2003–4): 119–90.Google Scholar

Graffin, François. “Hymnes de saint Éphrem sur la perle.” L’Órient Syrien 12 (1967): 129–49.Google Scholar

Graffin, François, and Cassingena-Trévedy, François. Éphrem de Nisibe: Hymnes sur la nativité. SC 459. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 2001.Google Scholar

Graumann, Thomas. “The Conduct of Theology and the ‘Fathers’ of the Church.” In A Companion to Late Antiquity, edited by Rousseau, Philip and Raithel, Jutta. Blackwell Companions to the Ancient World, 539–55. Chichester and Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.Google Scholar

Greenfield, Jonas C. “The Genesis Apocryphon: Observations on Some Words and Phrases.” In Studies in Hebrew and Semitic Languages Dedicated to the Memory of Prof. Eduard Yechezkel Kutscher, edited by Sarfatti, Gad Ben-Ami, Artzi, Pinhas, Greenfield, Jonas C., and Kaddari, Menahem, xxxii–xxxix. Ramat Gan: Bar-Ilan University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Gribomont, Jean. “La tradition liturgique des hymnes pascales des Éphrem.” Parole de l’Orient 4 (1973): 191–246.Google Scholar

Griffith, Sidney H. “Ephraem the Syrian’s Hymns ‘Against Julian’: Meditations on History and Imperial Power.” Vigiliae Christianae 41 (1987): 238–66.Google Scholar

Griffith, Sidney H. “Images of Ephrem: The Syrian Holy Man and His Church.” Traditio 45 (1989–90): 7–33.Google Scholar

Griffith, Sidney H. “Julian Saba, ‘Father of the Monks’ of Syria.” Journal of Early Christian Studies 2 (1994): 185–216.Google Scholar

Griffith, Sidney H. “Asceticism in the Church of Syria: The Hermeneutics of Early Syrian Monasticism.” In Asceticism, edited by Wimbush, Vincent L. and Valantasis, Richard, 220–45. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Griffith, Sidney H. “Setting Right the Church of Syria: Saint Ephraem’s Hymns against Heresies.” In The Limits of Ancient Christianity: Essays on Late Antique Thought and Culture in Honor of R. A. Markus, edited by Klingshirn, William E. and Vessey, Mark, 97–114. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Griffith, Sidney H. “The Thorn among the Tares: Mani and Manichaeism in the Works of St. Ephraem the Syrian.” Studia Patristica 35 (2001): 395–427.Google Scholar

Griffith, Sidney H. “Christianity in Edessa and the Syriac-Speaking World: Mani, Bar Daysan, and Ephrem: The Struggle for Allegiance on the Aramean Frontier.” Journal of the Canadian Society for Syriac Studies 2 (2002): 5–20.Google Scholar

Griffith, Sidney H. “The Doctrina Addai as a Paradigm of Christian Thought in Edessa in the Fifth Century.” Hugoye 6 (2003): 269–92.Google Scholar

Griffiths, John. “What Is Legal Pluralism?” Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 24 (1986): 1–55.Google Scholar

Griffiths, John. “The Idea of Sociology of Law and Its Relation to Law and to Sociology.” In Law and Sociology, edited by Freeman, Michael. Current Legal Issues 8, 49–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Grillet, Bernard, and Ettlinger, Gérard. Jean Chrysostome: A une jeune veuve sur le mariage unique. SC 138. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1968.Google Scholar

Gruber, Mayer I. “Matrilineal Determination of Jewishness: Biblical and Near Eastern Roots.” In Pomegranates Golden Bells: Studies in Biblical Jewish and Near Eastern Ritual Law and Literature in Honor of Jacob Milgrom, edited by Wright, David Pearson, Freedman, David Noel, and Hurvitz, Avi, 437–43. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 1995.Google Scholar

Gruenwald, Ithamar. “The Problem of the Anti-Gnostic Polemic in Rabbinic Literature.” In Studies in Gnosticism and Hellenistic Religions: Presented to Gilles Quispel on the Occasion of His 65th Birthday, edited by van den Broek, Roelof and Vermaseren, Maarten Jozef. Études préliminaires aux religions orientales dans l’Empire romain 91, 171–89. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1981.Google Scholar

Gryson, Roger. “Dix ans de recherches sur les origines du célibat écclesiastique.” Revue théologique de Leuven 11 (1980): 157–85.Google Scholar

Guignard, Christophe. La lettre de Julius Africanus à Aristide sur la généalogie du Christ: analyse de la tradition textuelle, édition, traduction et étude critique. Texte und Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der altchristlichen Literatur 167. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter, 2011.Google Scholar

Guillaumont, Antoine. “Un Midrash d’Exode 4, 24–26 chez Aphraate et Ephrem de Nisibe.” In A Tribute to Arthur Vööbus: Studies in Early Christian Literature and Its Environment, Primarily in the Syrian East, edited by Fischer, Robert H., 89–95. Chicago: Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago, 1977.Google Scholar

Gulak, Asher. “Deed of Betrothal and Oral Stipulations in Talmudic Law.” Tarbiz 3 (1932): 361–76.Google Scholar

Gulak, Asher. “σύμφωνον in Betrothal According to the Jer. Talmud.” Tarbiz 5 (1934): 126–33.Google Scholar

Gulak, Asher. “Justinian Caesar’s Novella No. 97 and Its Talmudic Antecedents.” Shenaton Ha-Mishpat Ha-ivri 9-10 (1982–3): 5–13.Google Scholar

Gulak, Asher. Legal Documents in the Talmud, edited by Katzoff, Ranon. Jerusalem: Magnes, 1994.Google Scholar

Gunkel, Hermann. Genesis. Translated by Biddle, Mark E.. Macon, GA: Mercer University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Gwynn, John. “Selections Translated into English from the Hymns and Homilies of Ephraim the Syrian.” A Select Library of Nicene and Post Nicene Fathers 13 (1898): 115–341.Google Scholar

Gwynn, John. Remnants of the Later Syriac Versions of the Bible. London: Published for the Text and Translation Society by Williams and Norgate, 1909.Google Scholar

Gzella, Holger. “The Heritage of Imperial Aramaic in Eastern Aramaic.” Aramaic Studies 6 (2008): 85–109.Google Scholar

Haase, Richard. “Justinian I. und der Frauenraub (raptus).” Zeitschrift der Savigny Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte, Romanistische Abteilung 111 (1994): 458–70.Google Scholar

Hadas-Lebel, Mireille. “Jacob et Esau ou Israel et Rome dans le Talmud et le Midrash.” Revue de l’histoire des religions 201 (1984): 369–92.Google Scholar

Hadas-Lebel, Mireille. “Les mariages mixtes dans la famille d’hérode et la halakha prétalmudique sur la patrilinéarité.” Revue des études juives 152 (1993): 397–404.Google Scholar

Haider, Peter W. “Tradition and Change in the Beliefs at Assur, Nineveh and Nisibis between 300 BC and AD 300.” In The Variety of Local Religious Life in the Near East in the Hellenistic and Roman Periods, edited by Kaizer, Ted. Religions in the Graeco-Roman World 164, 193–207. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2008.Google Scholar

Halbertal, Moshe. Interpretative Revolutions in the Making: Values as Interpretative Considerations in Midrashe Halakhah. Jerusalem: Magnes, 1999.Google Scholar

Halbertal, Moshe. “The History of Halakhah and the Emergence of Halakhah.” Diné Israel 29 (2013): 1–23.Google Scholar

Halbertal, Moshe, and Shemesh, Aharon. “The Meʾun (Refusal): The Complex History of Halakhic Anomaly.” Tarbiz 82 (2014): 377–93.Google Scholar

Halivni, David. Sources and Traditions: A Source Critical Commentary on Seder Nashim. Toronto: Otsreinu, 1993.Google Scholar

Halpern-Amaru, Betsy. The Empowerment of Women in the Book of Jubilees. Supplements to the Journal for the Study of Judaism 60, edited by Collins, John J.. Leiden: Brill, 1999.Google Scholar

Harper, Kyle. From Shame to Sin: The Christian Transformation of Sexual Morality in Late Antiquity. Revealing Antiquity 20. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Harries, Jill. Law and Empire in Late Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Harries, Jill. “Tertullianus and Son?” In A Wandering Galilean: Essays in Honour of Seán Freyne, edited by Rodgers, Zuleika, Daly-Denton, Margaret, and Fitzpatrick-McKinley, Anne. Supplements to the Journal for the Study of Judaism 132, 385–99. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2009.Google Scholar

Harries, Jill. “Law.” In The Oxford Handbook of Roman Studies, edited by Barchiesi, Alessandro and Scheidel, Walter, 637–50. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Harries, Jill. “Roman Law and Legal Culture.” In The Oxford Handbook of Late Antiquity, edited by Johnson, Scott Fitzgerald, 789–814. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Harris, Edward M. “Did the Athenian Courts Attempt to Achieve Consistency? Oral Tradition and Written Records in the Athenian Administration of Justice.” In Politics of Orality, edited by Cooper, Craig R.. Orality and Literacy in Ancient Greece 6, 343–70. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2007.Google Scholar

Harris, Edward Monroe. Democracy and the Rule of Law in Classical Athens: Essays on Law, Society, and Politics. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Harris, Edward Monroe. The Rule of Law in Action in Democratic Athens. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Harris, Rendel. “Ephrem’s Use of the Odes of Solomon.” The Expositor 8, 3 (1912): 113–19.Google Scholar

Harris, William J. “The Roman Father’s Power of Life and Death.” In Studies in Roman Law in Memory of A. Arthur Schiller, edited by Bagnall, Roger S. and Harris, William J.. Columbia Studies in the Classical Tradition 13, 81–95. Leiden: Brill, 1986.Google Scholar

Hauptman, Judith. Rereading the Rabbis: A Woman’s Voice. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Hayes, Christine E. “Legal Truth, Right Answers and Best Answers: Dworkin and the Rabbis.” Diné Israel 25 (2008): 73–121.Google Scholar

Hayes, Christine E. “Theoretical Pluralism in the Talmud: A Response to Richard Hidary.” Diné Israel 26–27 (2009–10): 257*–307.*Google Scholar

Hayes, Christine E. “Legal Realism and the Fashioning of Sectarians in Jewish Antiquity.” In Sects and Sectarianism in Jewish History, edited by Stern, Sacha. IJS Studies in Judaica 12, 119–46. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2011.Google Scholar

Hayes, Christine E. What’s Divine about Divine Law? Early Perspectives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Hayes, Christine E. “Law in Classical Rabbinic Judaism.” In The Cambridge Companion to Judaism and Law, edited by Hayes, Christine E., 76–127. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Hayman, Allison P. “The Image of the Jew in the Syriac Anti-Jewish Polemical Literature.” In “To See Ourselves as Others See Us”: Christians, Jews, “Others” in Late Antiquity, edited by Neusner, Jacob and Frerichs, Ernest. Scholars Press Studies in the Humanities, 423–41. Chico, CA: Scholars Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Hayun, Haim. “Allusions: Between Dina’s Rape (Genesis 34) and Biblical Historiography Narratives.” Hebrew University, 2009.Google Scholar

Hayward, Charles Thomas Robert. Saint Jerome’s Hebrew Questions on Genesis. Oxford Early Christian Studies. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Heaney-Hunter, Joan. “‘Disobedience and Curse’ or ‘Affection of the Soul?’: John Chrysostom, Marriage and Sin.” Diakonia 24 (1991): 171–86.Google Scholar

Heinemann, Isaak. Philons Griechische und Jüdische Bildung. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1962.Google Scholar

Hemmerdinger-Iliadou, Democratie. “Saint Éphrem le syrien: Sermon sur Jonas.” Le Muséon 80 (1967): 47–74.Google Scholar

Henne, Phillippe. “Justin, la Loi et le Juifs.” Revue théologique de Leuven 26 (1995): 450–62.Google Scholar

Henze, Matthias. “Nebuchadnezzar’s Madness (Daniel 4) in Syriac Literature.” In The Book of Daniel: Composition and Reception, edited by Collins, John J. and Flint, Peter W.. Supplements to Vetus Testamentum, 83, 550–71. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2001.Google Scholar

Herlihy, David. Medieval Households. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Herman, Aemilius. “Die Schliessung der Verlobnisse im Recht Justinians und der späteren byzantinischen Gesetzgebung.” Analecta Gregoriana 8 (1935): 79–107.Google Scholar

Herr, Moshe David. “Persecutions and Martyrdom in Hardrian’s Days.” Scripta Hierosolymitana 23 (1972): 85–125.Google Scholar

Herr, Moshe David. “הנישואין מבחינה סוציו-אקונומית לפי ההלכה.” In משפחות בית ישראל :המשפחה בתפיסת היהדות, edited by Sason, Yonah Ben, 37–46. Jerusalem, 1976.Google Scholar

Herrin, Judith. “‘Femina Byzantina’: The Council in Trullo on Women.” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 46 (1992): 97–105.Google Scholar

Hershberg, A. S. “מנהגי האירוסין והנשואין בזמן התלמוד.” Ha’atid 5 (1923): 75–102.Google Scholar

Hidary, Richard. “Right Answer Revisited: Monism and Pluralism in the Talmud.” Diné Israel 26–7 (2009–10): 229*–55.*Google Scholar

Hidary, Richard. Dispute for the Sake of Heaven: Legal Pluralism in the Talmud. Brown Judaic Studies 353. Providence, RI: Brown Judaic Studies, 2010.Google Scholar

Hiebert, Robert J. V. “Deuteronomy 22:28–29 and Its Premishnaic Interpretations.” The Catholic Biblical Quarterly 56 (1994): 203–20.Google Scholar

Hill, James Hamlyn. A Dissertation on the Gospel Commentary of S. Ephraem the Syrian with a Scriptural Index to His Works. Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1896.Google Scholar

Hirshman, Marc. “Midrash Qohelet Rabbah: Chapters 1–4, Commentary (Ch. 1) and Introduction.” Jewish Theological Seminary of America, 1983.Google Scholar

Hirshman, Marc. “The Greek Fathers and the Aggada on Ecclesiastes: Formats of Exegesis in Late Antiquity.” Hebrew Union College Annual 59 (1988): 137–65.Google Scholar

Hoffmeier, James K. “The Wifes’ Tales of Gen 12, 20 and 26 and the Covenants at Beer-Sheba.” Tyndale Bulletin 43 (1992): 81–99.Google Scholar

Holl, Karl. Amphilochius von Ikonium in seinem Verhältnis zu den grossen Kappadoziern. Tübingen und Leipzig: Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1904.Google Scholar

Hollander, Harm W., and De Jonge, Marinus. The Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs: A Commentary. Studia in Veteris Testamenti Pseudepigrapha 8. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1985.Google Scholar

Honoré, Tony. “‘Imperial’ Rescripts A.D. 193–305: Authorship and Authenticity.” The Journal of Roman Studies 69 (1979): 51–64.Google Scholar

Honoré, Tony. “The Making of the Theodosian Code.” Zeitschrift der Savigny Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte 103 (1986): 133–222.Google Scholar

Honoré, Tony. “Some Quaestors of the Reign of Theodosius II.” In The Theodosian Code, edited by Harries, Jill and Wood, Ian, 68–94. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Honoré, Tony. Law in the Crisis of Empire, 379–455 AD: The Theodosian Dynasty and Its Quaestors. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Hopkins, Keith. A World Full of Gods: Romans, Jews, and Christians in the Roman Empire. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1999.Google Scholar

Hopkins, Simon, and Brock, Sebastian Paul. “A Verse Homily on Abraham and Sarah in Egypt: Syriac Original with Early Arabic Translation.” Le Muséon 105 (1992): 87–146.Google Scholar

Horner, Tim. “Jewish Aspects of the Protoevangelium of James.” Journal of Early Christian Studies 12 (2004): 313–35.Google Scholar

Hovhanessian, Vahan S. “The Commentary of St. Ephrem the Syrian on the Apocryphal Third Corinthians.” In The School of Antioch: Biblical Theology and the Church in Syria, edited by Hovhanessian, Vahan S., 69–84, 116–18. New York: Peter Lang, 2016.Google Scholar

Humfress, Caroline. Orthodoxy and the Courts in Late Antiquity. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Humfress, Caroline. “Law in Practice.” In A Companion to Late Antiquity, edited by Rousseau, Philip and Raithel, Jutta. Blackwell Companions to the Ancient World, 377–91. Chichester and Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.Google Scholar

Humfress, Caroline. “Law and Custom under Rome.” In Law, Custom, and Justice in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages: Proceedings of the 2008 Byzantine Colloquium, edited by Rio, Alice. Centre for Hellenic Studies Occasional Publications 2, 23–47. London: King’s College London School of Humanities, 2011.Google Scholar

Humfress, Caroline. “Laws’ Empire: Roman Universalism and Legal Practice.” In New Frontiers: Law and Society in the Roman World, edited by Du Plessis, Paul J., 73–101. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Humphrey, Edith M. Joseph and Aseneth. Guides to Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Hunter, David G. “Helvidius, Juvinian and the Virginity of Mary in Late Fourth-Century Rome.” Journal of Early Christian Studies 1 (1993): 47–71.Google Scholar

Hunter, David G. “Clerical Celibacy and the Veiling of Virgins: New Boundaries in Late Ancient Christianity.” In The Limits of Ancient Christianity: Essays on Late Antique Thought and Culture in Honor of R. A. Markus, edited by Klingshirn, William E. and Vessey, Mark, 139–52. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Hunter, David G. “The Virgin, The Bride, and the Church: Reading Psalm 45 in Ambrose, Jerome and Augustine.” Church History 69 (2000): 281–303.Google Scholar

Hunter, David G. “Augustine and the Making of Marriage in Roman North Africa.” Journal of Early Christian Studies 11 (2003): 63–85.Google Scholar

Hunter, David G. Marriage, Celibacy, and Heresy in Ancient Christianity, The Juvinianist Controversy. Oxford Early Christian Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Hunter, David G. “Marrying and the Tabulae Nuptiales in Roman North Africa from Tertullian to Augustine.” In To Have and to Hold: Marrying and Its Documentation in Western Christendom, 400–1600, edited by Reynolds, Philip Lyndon and Witte, John, 95–113. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Hyldahl, Niels. “Die Versuchung auf der Zinne des Tempels.” Studia Theologica 15 (1961): 113–27.Google Scholar

Ibbetson, David. “Sources of Law from the Republic to the Dominate.” In The Cambridge Companion to Roman Law, edited by Johnston, David, 25–44. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Ilan, Tal. “‘Man Born of Woman…’ (Job 14:1) The Phenomenon of Men Bearing Matronymes at the Time of Jesus.” Novum Testamentum 34 (1992): 23–45.Google Scholar

Ilan, Tal. “Biblical Women’s Names in the Apocryphal Traditions.” Journal for the Study of the Pseudepigrapha 11 (1993): 3–67.Google Scholar

Ilan, Tal. “Premarital Cohabitation in Ancient Judea: The Evidence of the Babatha Archive and the Mishnah (Ketubbot 1.4).” Harvard Theological Review 86 (1993): 247–64.Google Scholar

Ilan, Tal. “On a Newly Published Divorce Bill from the Judaean Desert.” Harvard Theological Review 89 (1996): 195–202.Google Scholar