MS Accession 325/1. Hoccleve’s Regiment and minor Chaucer poems.Google Scholar

MS Accession 325/1. Hoccleve’s Regiment and minor Chaucer poems.Google Scholar

“Anglo-American Legal Tradition.” http://aalt.law.uh.edu.Google Scholar

A Book of London English, 1384–1425. Eds. Chambers, R. W and Daunt, Marjorie, with an Appendix on English Documents in the Record Office by Weale, M. M.. Oxford: Clarendon, 1931.Google Scholar

Calendar of Letter-Books of the City of London: A, 1275–1298. Ed. Sharpe, Reginald R.. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1899.Google Scholar

Calendar of Letter-Books of the City of London: I, 1400–1422. Ed. Sharpe, Reginald R.. London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1909.Google Scholar

Calendar of Select Pleas and Memoranda of the City of London Preserved among the Archives of the Corporation of the City of London at the Guildhall A.D. 1381–1412. Ed. Thomas, A. H. 1932. Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Calendar of Select Pleas and Memoranda of the City of London Preserved among the Archives of the Corporation of the City of London at the Guildhall A.D. 1413–1437. Ed. Thomas, A. H. 1943. Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Carpenter, John. “Will (No. 2) of John Carpenter from the Registry of the Commissary Court of London.” Trans. Thomas Brewer. In Brewer, , Memoir of the Life and Times of John Carpenter, Town Clerk of London. London, 1856: printed by Arthur Taylor. 131–44.Google Scholar

Cartulary of St Bartholomew’s Hospital, founded 1123: A Calendar. Ed. Kerling, Nellie J. M. London: St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, 1973.Google Scholar

Chaplais, Pierre. English Medieval Diplomatic Practice. 2 parts. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1975.Google Scholar

Chaucer, Geoffrey. Autotype Specimens of the Chief Chaucer MSS, Part I. Chaucer Society, Series 1, no. 48. Ed. Furnivall, Frederick J.. London: Trübner, 1876.Google Scholar

Chaucer, Geoffrey. Boece. Eds. Ralph Hanna and Traugott Lawler. In Benson, ed., The Riverside Chaucer. 395–469.Google Scholar

Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Canterbury Tales. Ed. Ralph Hanna. In Benson, ed., The Riverside Chaucer. 23–328.Google Scholar

Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Canterbury Tales: A Facsimile and Transcription of the Hengwrt Manuscript, with Variants from the Ellesmere Manuscript. Ed. Ruggiers, Paul G.. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Canterbury Tales: The New Ellesmere Chaucer Monochromatic Facsimile (of Huntington Library MS El 26 C 9). Eds. Woodward, Daniel and Stevens, Martin. San Marino, CA: Huntington Library, 1997.Google Scholar

Chaucer, Geoffrey. A Critical Edition of Some of Chaucer’s “Minor Poems.” Ed. Koch, John. Berlin: R. Gaertner, 1883.Google Scholar

Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Dd Manuscript: A Digital Edition of Cambridge University Library MS Dd.4.24 of Chaucer’s “Canterbury Tales.” Ed. Da Rold, Orietta. The Norman Blake Editions of The Canterbury Tales. 2013. www.chaucermss.org/dd.Google Scholar

Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Ellesmere Chaucer Reproduced in Facsimile. Preface by Egerton, Alix. 2 vols. Manchester University Press, 1911.Google Scholar

Chaucer, Geoffrey. Geoffrey Chaucer: “The Legend of Good Women.” Eds. Cowen, Janet and Kane, George. East Lansing, MI: Colleagues, 1995.Google Scholar

Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Manuscripts of Chaucer’s “Troilus”, with Collotype Facsimiles of the Various Handwritings. Ed. Root, R. K. London: Oxford University Press, 1914.Google Scholar

Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Multitext Edition: The Norman Blake Editions of “The Canterbury Tales.” Eds. Estelle Stubbs, Michael Pidd, Orietta Da Rold, Simon Horobin, and Claire Thomson with Linda Cross. 2013. www.chaucermss.org/multitext.Google Scholar

Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Pierpont Morgan Library Manuscript M.817: A Facsimile. Intro. Krochalis, Jeanne. Norman, OK: Published for A Variorum Edition of the Works of Geoffrey Chaucer by Pilgrim Books, 1986.Google Scholar

Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Riverside Chaucer. Gen. ed. Benson, Larry D.. 3rd edn. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1987.Google Scholar

Chaucer, Geoffrey. Romaunt of the Rose, The Minor Poems. Vol. 1 of The Complete Works of Geoffrey Chaucer. Ed. Skeat, Walter W.. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon, 1899.Google Scholar

Chaucer, Geoffrey. “The Short Poems: Explanatory Notes.” By Laila Z. Gross. In Benson, ed., The Riverside Chaucer. 1076–91.Google Scholar

Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Text of the Canterbury Tales. Eds. Manly, John M. and Rickert, Edith. 8 vols. University of Chicago Press, 1940.Google Scholar

Chaucer, Geoffrey. Troilus and Criseyde. Ed. Stephen A. Barney. In Benson, ed., The Riverside Chaucer. 471–585 (Introduction, Text), 1020–58 (Explanatory Notes), 1161–77 (Textual Notes).Google Scholar

Chaucer, Geoffrey. Troilus and Criseyde: A New Edition of “The Book of Troilus.” Ed. Windeatt, B. A. London: Longman, 1984.Google Scholar

Chaucer, Geoffrey. A Variorum Edition of the Works of Geoffrey Chaucer: The Minor Poems, Part 1. Eds. Pace, George and David, Alfred. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Court of Common Pleas: The National Archives, CP40 1399–1500. Eds. Mackman, Jonathan and Stevens, Matthew. London: Centre for Metropolitan History, 2010. www.british-history.ac.uk/no-series/common-pleas/1399-1500.Google Scholar

English Court Hand, A.D. 1066 to 1500. Eds. Johnson, Charles and Jenkinson, Hilary. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1915.Google Scholar

Facsimiles of Twelve Early English Manuscripts in the Library of Trinity College Cambridge. Ed. Greg, W. W. Oxford University Press, 1913.Google Scholar

The Fifty Earliest English Wills in the Court of Probate, London, A.D. 1387–1439.1 Ed. Furnivall, Frederick J.. EETS o.s. 78. London: Oxford University Press, 1882.Google Scholar

Hoccleve, Thomas. “The Formulary of Thomas Hoccleve.” Ed. Elna-Jean Young Bentley. Unpublished Ph.D. diss., Emory University, 1965.Google Scholar

Hoccleve, Thomas. The Regiment of Princes. Ed. Blyth, Charles R.. Kalamazoo, MI: Published for TEAMS by the Medieval Institute Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoccleve, Thomas. Thomas Hoccleve: A Facsimile of the Autograph Verse Manuscripts. Introd. Burrow, J. A. and Doyle, A. I.. EETS s.s. 19. Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Hoccleve, Thomas. “Thomas Hoccleve’s ‘De Regimine Principum,’ Sections 12 and 13: A Critical Edition.” Ed. Marcia Smith Marzec. Ph.D. diss., Northern Illinois University, 1980.Google Scholar

Holsinger, Bruce. The Invention of Fire. London: HarperCollins, 2015.Google Scholar

Kane, George. Kane from Canada. Eds. Kane, Mary and Roberts, Jane. Tempe, AZ: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 2016.Google Scholar

Langland, William. Piers Plowman: The A Version. Ed. Kane, George, rev. edn. London: Athlone, 1988.Google Scholar

Langland, William. Piers Plowman: The B Version. Eds. Kane, George and Talbot Donaldson, E., rev. edn. London: Athlone, 1988.Google Scholar

Langland, William. Piers Plowman: The C Version. Eds. Russell, George and Kane, George. London: Athlone, 1997.Google Scholar

Langland, William. Piers Plowman: Concordance. Ed. Wittig, Joseph S.. London: Continuum, 2001.Google Scholar

Langland, William. Piers Plowman: A Parallel-Text Edition of the A, B, C and Z Versions, Vol. 2: Introduction, Textual Notes, Commentary, Bibliography and Indexical Glossary. Ed. Schmidt, A. V. C. Kalamazoo, MI: Medieval Institute, 2008.Google Scholar

Langland, William. The Piers Plowman Electronic Archive. http://piers.chass.ncsu.edu.Google Scholar

Langland, William. Vol. 2: Cambridge, Trinity College, MS B.15.17 (W). Eds. Thorlac Turville-Petre and Hoyt N. Duggan. 2000.Google Scholar

Langland, William. Vol. 4: Oxford, Bodleian Library MS Laud misc. 581 (S. C. 987) (L). Eds. Hoyt N. Duggan and Ralph Hanna. 2004.Google Scholar

Langland, William. Vol. 5: London, British Library Additional MS 35287 (M). Eds. Eric Eliason, Hoyt N. Duggan, and Thorlac Turville-Petre. 2005.Google Scholar

Langland, William. Vol. 9: The B-Version Archetype. Eds. John Burrow and Thorlac Turville-Petre. 2014.Google Scholar

Langland, William. The Vision of Piers Plowman: A Critical Edition of the B-Text. Ed. Schmidt, A. V. C. London: Dent, 1978; 2nd edn, London: Dent, 1995.Google Scholar

Liber Albus: The White Book of the City of London. Trans. Henry Thomas Riley. London: R. Griffin, 1861.Google Scholar

Munimenta Gildhallae Londoniensis, Vol. 1: Liber Albus Compiled A.D. 1419. Ed. Riley, Henry Thomas. 1859. Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Lydgate, John. Lydgate’s Fall of Princes. Ed. Bergen, Henry. 4 vols. EETS e.s. 121–24. London: Oxford University Press, 1924.Google Scholar

The Medieval Account Books of the Mercers of London: An Edition and Translation. Ed. and trans. Jefferson, Lisa. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2009.Google Scholar

“The Mercers’ Petition.” Ed. Robert Ellis. “Verba Vana: Empty Words in Ricardian London.” 2 vols. Ph.D. diss. Queen Mary, University of London, 2012. 2:430–35. https://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/jspui/handle/123456789/7557.Google Scholar

Pedigrees from the Plea Rolls, Collected from the Pleadings in the Various Courts of Law, A.D. 1200 to 1500. Ed. Wrottesley, George. Great Britain: Public Record Office, ?1905.Google Scholar

The Poll Taxes of 1377, 1379 and 1381, Part 2: Lincolnshire-Westmorland. Ed. Fenwick, Carolyn C.. Oxford: Published for the British Academy by Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Rowland, Amy. The Transcriptionist. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin, 2014.Google Scholar

Scriveners’ Company Common Paper 1357–1628 with a Continuation to 1678. Ed. Steer, Francis W.. London: London Record Society, 1968. www.british-history.ac.uk.Google Scholar

The Siege of Jerusalem. Eds. Hanna, Ralph and Lawton, David. EETS o.s. 320. Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Usk, Thomas. The Testament of Love. Ed. Shawver, Gary W., based on the edition of John F. Leyerle. University of Toronto Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Usk, Thomas. The Testament of Love. Ed. Allen Shoaf, R.. TEAMS. Kalamazoo, MI: Medieval Institute, 1998. http://d.lib.rochester.edu/teams/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wardens’ Accounts and Court Minute Books of the Goldsmiths’ Mistery of London, 1334–1446. Ed. Jefferson, Lisa. Woodbridge: Boydell and Brewer, 2003.Google Scholar

Allen, Rosamund. “Some Sceptical Observations on the Editing of The Awntyrs off Arthure.” In Pearsall, ed., Manuscripts and Texts. 5–25.Google Scholar

Appleford, Amy. “The Dance of Death in London: John Carpenter, John Lydgate, and the Daunce of Poulys.” Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 38 (2008): 285–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bahr, Arthur. Fragments and Assemblages: Forming Compilations of Medieval London. University of Chicago Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, Gary. “Investigating the Socio-Economic Origins of English Archers in the Second Half of the Fourteenth Century.” Journal of Medieval Military History 12 (2014): 173–216.Google Scholar

Barney, Stephen A. “A Revised Edition of the C Text.” YLS 23 (2009): 265–88.Google Scholar

Barney, Stephen A. Studies in “Troilus”: Chaucer’s Text, Meter, and Diction. East Lansing, MI: Colleagues, 1993.Google Scholar

Barron, Caroline M. London in the Later Middle Ages: Government and People 1200–1500. Oxford University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barron, Caroline M. “New Light on Thomas Usk.” Chaucer Newsletter 26.2 (2004): 1. http://newchaucersociety.org.Google Scholar

Bart, Patricia R. “Intellect, Influence, and Evidence: The Elusive Allure of the Ht Scribe.” In Calabrese and Shepherd, eds., Yee? Baw for Bokes. 219–43.Google Scholar

Bart, Patricia R. “The Whole Book: Textual, Codicological, Paleographical and Linguistic Artifacts in Huntington Library Hm 114 (Ht) of Piers Plowman.” Unpublished Ph.D. diss., University of Virginia. 2007.Google Scholar

Baugh, Albert C. “Thomas Chaucer, One Man or Two?” PMLA 48 (1933): 328–39.Google Scholar

Bennett, H. S. Chaucer and the Fifteenth Century. Oxford: Clarendon, 1947.Google Scholar

Benskin, Michael. “Some New Perspectives on the Origins of Standard Written English.” In Dialect and Standard Language in the English, Dutch, German and Norwegian Language Areas, eds. van Leuvensteijn, J. A and Berns, J. B. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1992. 71–105.Google Scholar

Bestul, Thomas H. “Ramona Bressie, the Study of Manuscripts, and the Chaucer Life-Records.” Medieval Feminist Forum 45.1 (2009): 68–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bird, Ruth. The Turbulent London of Richard II. London: Longmans, 1949.Google Scholar

Blackman, Elsie. “Notes on the B-Text MSS. of Piers Plowman.” JEGP 17 (1918): 489–545.Google Scholar

Blake, N. F. “Geoffrey Chaucer: Textual Transmission and Editing.” In Crux and Controversy in Middle English Textual Criticism, eds. Minnis, A. J and Brewer, Charlotte. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1992. 19–38.Google Scholar

Blake, N. F. The Textual Tradition of the “Canterbury Tales.” London: Edward Arnold, 1985.Google Scholar

Boffey, Julia. “Proverbial Chaucer and the Chaucer Canon.” In Lerer, ed., Reading from the Margins. 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boffey, Julia, and Edwards, A. S. G.. “‘Chaucer’s Chronicle,’ John Shirley, and the Canon of Chaucer’s Shorter Poems.” SAC 20 (1998): 201–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bowers, John M. “The House of Chaucer & Son: The Business of Lancastrian Canon-Formation.” Medieval Perspectives 6 (1991): 135–43.Google Scholar

Bowers, John M. “Piers Plowman’s William Langland: Editing the Text, Writing the Author’s Life.” YLS 9 (1995): 65–90.Google Scholar

Bowsher, David, Dyson, Tony, Holder, Nick, and Howell, Isca. The London Guildhall: An Archaeological History of a Neighbourhood from Early Medieval to Modern Times. London: Museum of London Archaeology Service, 2007.Google Scholar

Bressie, Ramona. “Chaucer’s Scrivener.” TLS (May 9, 1929): 383.Google Scholar

Bressie, Ramona. “The Date of Thomas Usk’s Testament of Love.” Modern Philology 26 (1928): 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

The British Inheritance: A Treasury of Historic Documents. Eds. Hallam, Elizabeth and Prescott, Andrew. London: British Library and Public Record Office, 1999.Google Scholar

Brusendorff, Aage. The Chaucer Tradition. Oxford: Clarendon, 1925.Google Scholar

Burnley, David. “Chaucer’s Literary Terms.” Anglia 114 (1996): 202–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burrow, John. “Some Final -e’s in the Hoccleve Holographs.” In Calabrese and Shepherd, eds., Yee? Baw for Bokes. 45–53.Google Scholar

Burrow, John. Thomas Hoccleve. Aldershot: Variorum, 1994.Google Scholar

Calabrese, Michael. Review of Mooney and Stubbs, Scribes and the City. The Medieval Review 14.08.06. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/tmr.Google Scholar

Calabrese, Michael, and Shepherd, Stephen H. A, eds. Yee? Baw for Bokes: Essays on Medieval Manuscripts and Poetics in Honor of Hoyt N. Duggan. Los Angeles, CA: Marymount Institute Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Campbell, Jackson J. “A New Troilus Fragment.” PMLA 73 (1958): 305–308.Google Scholar

Caon, Luigina Marina Domenica. “Authorial or Scribal? Spelling Variation in the Hengwrt and Ellesmere Manuscripts of The Canterbury Tales.” Unpublished Ph.D. diss., University of Leiden, 2008.Google Scholar

Carlin, Martha. “The Host.” In Historians on Chaucer: The “General Prologue” to the “Canterbury Tales,” ed. Rigby, Stephen H. with the assistance of Minnis, Alastair J.. Oxford University Press, 2014. 460–80.Google Scholar

Carlin, Martha. “Thomas Spencer, Southwark Scrivener (d. 1428): Owner of a Copy of Chaucer’s Troilus in 1394?” ChauR 49 (2015): 387–401.Google Scholar

Cawthorne, Andrew. Item for Reuters News Service, July 20, 2004, published at, e.g., www.tribuneindia.com.Google Scholar

Chambers, R. W. “The Manuscripts of Piers Plowman in the Huntington Library, and Their Value for Fixing the Text of the Poem.” Huntington Library Bulletin 8 (1935): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chen, Anna. “Networks of the Pre-Modern Book.” JEGP 114 (2015): 97–114.Google Scholar

Christianson, C. Paul. “A Community of Book Artisans in Chaucer’s London.” Viator 20 (1989): 207–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christianson, C. Paul. A Directory of London Stationers and Book Artisans, 1300–1500. New York, NY: Bibliographical Society of America, 1990.Google Scholar

Clarke, K. P. Chaucer and Italian Textuality. Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Connolly, Margaret. John Shirley: Book Production and the Noble Household in Fifteenth-Century England. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998.Google Scholar

Connolly, Margaret. “What John Shirley Said about Adam: Authorship and Attribution in Cambridge, Trinity College, MS R.3.20.” In Pratt et al., eds., The Dynamics of the Medieval Manuscript. 81–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Connolly, Margaret, and Mooney, Linne R., eds. Design and Distribution of Late Medieval Manuscripts in England. York Medieval Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Cook, Megan L. “‘Here taketh the makere of this book his leve’: The Retraction and Chaucer’s Works in Tudor England.” Studies in Philology 113 (2016): 32–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooper, Lisa H. Artisans and Narrative Craft in Late Medieval England. Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Cooper, R. A., and Pearsall, D. A.. “The Gawain Poems: A Statistical Approach to the Question of Common Authorship.” RES 39 (1988): 365–85.Google Scholar

Cummins, Neil. “Longevity and the Rise of the West: Lifespans of the European Elite, 800–1800.” London School of Economics and Political Science Department of Economic History Working Papers 209 (September 2014): 1–51. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/60555.Google Scholar

Da Rold, Orietta. Review of Mooney and Stubbs, Scribes and the City. AMARC Newsletter 61 (October 2013): 27–29.Google Scholar

Danbury, Elizabeth. “The Decoration and Illumination of Royal Charters in England, 1250–1509: An Introduction.” In England and Her Neighbours, 1066–1453: Essays in Honour of Pierre Chaplais, eds. Jones, Michael and Vale, Malcolm. London: Hambledon, 1989. 157–79.Google Scholar

Dane, Joseph A. “Copy-Text and Its Variants in Some Recent Chaucer Editions.” SB 44 (1991): 164–83.Google Scholar

Dane, Joseph A. Review of Cowen and Kane, eds., Legend of Good Women. SAC 18 (1996): 200–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Hamel, Christopher. Meetings with Remarkable Manuscripts. London: Allen Lane, 2016.Google Scholar

Dempster, Germaine. “On the Significance of Hengwrt’s Change of Ink in the Merchant’s Tale.” Modern Language Notes 63 (1948): 325–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dinshaw, Carolyn. Chaucer’s Sexual Poetics. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Dinshaw, Carolyn. Getting Medieval: Sexualities and Communities, Pre- and Postmodern. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Doyle, A. I. “The Copyist of the Ellesmere Canterbury Tales.” In Stevens and Woodward, eds., The Ellesmere Chaucer. 49–67.Google Scholar

Doyle, A. I. “The Manuscripts.” In Middle English Alliterative Poetry and its Literary Background: Seven Essays, ed. Lawton, David. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1982. 88–100.Google Scholar

Doyle, A. I. “Remarks on Surviving Manuscripts of Piers Plowman.” In Medieval English Religious and Ethical Literature: Essays in Honour of G. H. Russell, eds. Kratzmann, Gregory and Simpson, James. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1986. 35–48.Google Scholar

Doyle, A. I., and Parkes, M. B.. “The Production of Copies of the Canterbury Tales and the Confessio Amantis in the Early Fifteenth Century.” In Medieval Scribes, Manuscripts and Libraries: Essays Presented to N. R. Ker, eds. Parkes, M. B and Watson, Andrew G.. London: Scolar Press, 1978. 163–210.Google Scholar

Duggan, Hoyt N. “Langland’s Dialect and Final -e.” SAC 12 (1990): 157–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duggan, Hoyt N. “Notes on the Metre of Piers Plowman: Twenty Years On.” In Approaches to the Metres of Alliterative Verse, eds. Jefferson, Judith and Putter, Ad. Leeds: Leeds Texts and Monographs, 2009. 159–86.Google Scholar

Dutschke, C. W., with the assistance of Rouse, R. H., and Hodson, Sara S., Rust, Virginia, Schulz, Herbert C., Compte, Ephrem. Guide to Medieval and Renaissance Manuscripts in the Huntington Library. 2 vols. San Marino, CA: Huntington Library, 1989. http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/digitalscriptorium/huntington.Google Scholar

Echard, Siân. “House Arrest: Modern Archives, Medieval Manuscripts.” Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 30 (2000): 185–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edden, Valerie. “The Phillipps Manuscript of Chaucer’s Troilus and Criseyde.” The Library, ser. 5, 27.1 (1972): 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eddy, Nicole. “The Romance of History: Lambeth Palace MS 491 and Its Young Readers.” In New Directions in Medieval Manuscript Studies and Reading Practices: Essays in Honor of Derek Pearsall, eds. Kerby-Fulton, Kathryn, Thompson, John J., and Baechle, Sarah. University of Notre Dame Press, 2014. 300–23.Google Scholar

Edwards, A. S. G. “Chaucer and ‘Adam Scriveyn’.” MÆ 81 (2012): 135–38.Google Scholar

Edwards, A. S. G. “Hoccleve’s Regiment of Princes: A Further Manuscript.” Edinburgh Bibliographical Society Transactions 5:1 (1984): 32.Google Scholar

Edwards, A. S. G. “Reading John Walton’s Boethius in the Fifteenth and Sixteenth Centuries.” In Spaces for Reading in Later Medieval England, eds. Flannery, Mary C. and Griffin, Carrie. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. 35–49.Google Scholar

Edwards, A. S. G. Review of Mooney and Stubbs, Scribes and the City. The Library, ser. 7, 15.1 (2014): 79–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, A. S. G., and Pearsall, Derek. “The Manuscripts of the Major English Poetic Texts.” In Book Production and Publishing in Britain 1375–1425, eds. Griffiths, Jeremy and Pearsall, Derek. Cambridge University Press, 1989. 257–78.Google Scholar

Ekserdjian, David. Review of de Hamel, Meetings with Remarkable Manuscripts. Literary Review 446 (September 2016). https://literaryreview.co.uk/the-illuminati.Google Scholar

Ezard, John. “The Scrivener’s Tale: How Chaucer’s Sloppy Copyist Was Unmasked after 600 Years.” The Guardian, July 20, 2004. www.theguardian.com/uk.Google Scholar

Farrell, Thomas J. “Secretary a in Ellesmere’s Latin Quotations.” ChauR 52 (2017): 396–425.Google Scholar

Fisher, John H. “Piers Plowman and Chancery Tradition.” 1988. Repr. in The Emergence of Standard English. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky, 1996. 109–20.Google Scholar

Fisher, Matthew. “The Cost of Copying.” Public Books, February 1, 2015. www.publicbooks.org/the-cost-of-copying.Google Scholar

Fisher, Matthew. “‘Librum meum de Canterbury Tales’: Chaucer’s Other Scribe?” Presented at the Twenty-First Biennial Congress of the New Chaucer Society, Toronto, July 2018.Google Scholar

Fletcher, Alan J. “The Criteria for Scribal Attribution: Dublin, Trinity College, MS 244, Some Early Copies of the Works of Geoffrey Chaucer, and the Canon of Adam Pynkhurst Manuscripts.” RES 58 (2007): 597–632.Google Scholar

Fletcher, Alan J. “What Did Adam Pynkhurst (Not) Write?: A Reply to Dr Horobin.” RES 61 (2010): 690–710.Google Scholar

Francis, W. Nelson. “Graphemic Analysis of Late Middle English Manuscripts.” Speculum 37 (1962): 32–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Galloway, Andrew. “Fame’s Penitent: Deconstructive Chaucer among the Lancastrians.” In Chaucer and Fame: Reputation and Reception, eds. Davis, Isabel and Nall, Catherine. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2015. 103–26.Google Scholar

Gillespie, Alexandra. “Reading Chaucer’s Words to Adam.” ChauR 42 (2008): 269–83.Google Scholar

Gillespie, Alexandra, and Wakelin, Daniel, eds. The Production of Books in England 1350–1500. Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green, Richard Firth. “The Early History of the Scriveners’ Common Paper and its So-Called ‘Oaths’.” In Middle English Texts in Transition: A Festschrift Dedicated to Toshiyuki Takamiya on his 70th Birthday, eds. Horobin, Simon and Mooney, Linne R.. York Medieval Press, 2014. 1–20.Google Scholar

Green, Richard Firth. “Notes on Some Manuscripts of Hoccleve’s Regiment of Princes.” British Library Journal 4 (1978): 37–41.Google Scholar

Greetham, David. “Phylum-Tree-Rhizome.” In Lerer, ed., Reading from the Margins. 99–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greetham, David. Textual Transgressions: Essays toward the Construction of a Biobibliography. New York, NY: Garland, 1998.Google Scholar

Greg, W. W. “The Rationale of Copy-Text.” SB 3 (1950–51): 19–36.Google Scholar

Griffiths, Jeremy. “Confessio Amantis: The Poem and Its Pictures.” In Gower’s “Confessio Amantis”: Responses and Reassessments, ed. Minnis, A. J. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1983. 163–78.Google Scholar

Guthrie, Steven R. “Prosody and the Study of Chaucer: A Generative Reply to Halle-Keyser.” ChauR 23 (1988): 30–49.Google Scholar

Hanna, Ralph. Introducing English Medieval Book History: Manuscripts, Their Producers and Their Readers. Liverpool University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Hanna, Ralph. “John Shirley and British Library, MS Additional 16165.” SB 49 (1996): 95–105.Google Scholar

Hanna, Ralph. London Literature, 1300–1380. Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanna, Ralph. Pursuing History: Middle English Manuscripts and Their Texts. Stanford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Hanna, Ralph. Review of Mooney and Stubbs, Scribes and the City. TLS 5750 (June 14, 2013): 29.Google Scholar

Hanna, Ralph. “The Scribe of Huntington HM 114.” SB 42 (1989): 120–33.Google Scholar

Hanna, Ralph. “Sir Thomas Berkeley and His Patronage.” Speculum 64 (1989): 879–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horobin, Simon. “Adam Pinkhurst and the Copying of British Library, MS Additional 35287 of the B Version of Piers Plowman.” YLS 23 (2009): 61–83.Google Scholar

Horobin, Simon. “Adam Pinkhurst, Geoffrey Chaucer, and the Hengwrt Manuscript of the Canterbury Tales.” ChauR 44 (2010): 351–67.Google Scholar

Horobin, Simon. “The Criteria for Scribal Attribution: Dublin, Trinity College MS 244 Reconsidered.” RES 60 (2009): 371–81.Google Scholar

Horobin, Simon. “Langland’s Dialect Reconsidered.” In Pursuing Middle English Manuscripts and their Texts: Essays in Honour of Ralph Hanna, eds. Horobin, Simon and Nafde, Aditi. Turnhout: Brepols, 2017. 63–75.Google Scholar

Horobin, Simon. The Language of the Chaucer Tradition. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2003.Google Scholar

Horobin, Simon. “Mapping the Words.” In Gillespie and Wakelin, eds., Production of Books. 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horobin, Simon. “The Nature of Material Evidence.” In Imagining Medieval English: Language Structures and Theories, 500–1500, ed. Machan, Tim William. Cambridge University Press, 2016. 147–65.Google Scholar

Horobin, Simon. “The Scribe of Bodleian Library, MS Digby 102 and the Circulation of the C Text of Piers Plowman.” YLS 24 (2010): 89–112.Google Scholar

Horobin, Simon. “Thomas Hoccleve: Chaucer’s First Editor?” ChauR 50 (2015): 228–50.Google Scholar

Horobin, Simon, and Mooney, Linne R.. “A Piers Plowman Manuscript by the Hengwrt/Ellesmere Scribe and Its Implications for London Standard English.” SAC 26 (2004): 65–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horobin, Simon, and Mosser, Daniel W.. “Scribe D’s SW Midlands Roots: A Reconsideration.” NM 106 (2005): 289–305.Google Scholar

Hughes, Susan E. “Guildhall and Chancery English 1377–1422.” Guildhall Studies in London History 4 (1980): 53–62.Google Scholar

Jefferson, Judith A. “The Hoccleve Holographs and Hoccleve’s Metrical Practice.” In Pearsall, ed., Manuscripts and Texts. 95–109.Google Scholar

Kaske, R. E. “Clericus Adam and Chaucer’s Adam Scriveyn.” In Chaucerian Problems and Perspectives: Essays Presented to Paul E. Beichner C.S.C., eds. Vasta, Edward and Thundy, Zacharias P.. University of Notre Dame Press, 1979. 114–18.Google Scholar

Kellaway, William. “John Carpenter’s Liber Albus.” Guildhall Studies in London History 3 (1978): 67–84.Google Scholar

Kelly, Henry Ansgar. “Vance Ramsey on Manly-Rickert.” SAC 32 (2010): 327–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ker, Neil, ed. Medieval Libraries of Great Britain: A List of Surviving Books. 2nd edn. London: Royal Historical Society, 1964. http://mlgb3.bodleian.ox.ac.uk.Google Scholar

Kerby-Fulton, Kathryn. “The Clerical Proletariat: The Underemployed Scribe and Vocational Crisis.” JEBS 17 (2014): 1–34.Google Scholar

Kerby-Fulton, Kathryn. Review of Mooney and Stubbs, Scribes and the City. MÆ 84 (2015): 154–56.Google Scholar

Kerby-Fulton, Kathryn, Hilmo, Maidie, and Olson, Linda. Opening up Middle English Manuscripts: Literary and Visual Approaches. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Kerby-Fulton, Kathryn, and Justice, Steven. “Scribe D and the Marketing of Ricardian Literature.” In The Medieval Professional Reader at Work: Evidence from Manuscripts of Chaucer, Langland, Kempe, and Gower, eds. Kerby-Fulton, Kathryn and Hilmo, Maidie. University of Victoria, 2001. 217–37.Google Scholar

Killick, Helen. “Thomas Hoccleve as Poet and Clerk.” Unpublished Ph.D. diss. University of York, 2010.Google Scholar

Killick, Helen. “Treason, Felony and Lollardy: A Common Petition in the Hand of Richard Osbarn, Clerk of the Chamber of the Guildhall, 1400–c.1437.” Historical Research 89 (2016): 227–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koch, John. “Textkritische Bemerkungen zu Chaucers ‘Kleineren Dichtungen’.” Anglia 53 (1929): 1–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koster, Josephine. “Masters and Commanders: Considering the Concept of the Edited Text.” Textual Cultures 9.2 (2015): 19–26.Google Scholar

Krauss, Russell. “William Chaumbre, Kinsman of Thomas Chaucer.” PMLA 49 (1934): 954–55.Google Scholar

Lawton, David. Chaucer’s Narrators. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1985.Google Scholar

Lerer, Seth, ed. Reading from the Margins: Textual Studies, Chaucer, and Medieval Literature. San Marino, CA: Huntington Library, 1996.Google Scholar

Lindenbaum, Sheila. “London Texts and Literate Practice.” In The Cambridge History of Medieval English Literature, ed. Wallace, David. Cambridge University Press, 1999. 284–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

A Linguistic Atlas of Late Mediaeval English. Eds. McIntosh, Angus, Samuels, M. L, and Benskin, Michael, with the assistance of Laing, Margaret and Williamson, Keith. 4 vols. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

“London Guildhall: Cradle of English Literature.” August 9, 2010, University of York.Google Scholar

“A Look Back at the Glasgow Congress.” The Chaucer Newsletter 26.2 (2004): 2. http://newchaucersociety.org.Google Scholar

Lucas, Peter J. From Author to Audience: John Capgrave and Medieval Publication. University College of Dublin Press, 1997.Google Scholar

McIntosh, Angus. “The Analysis of Written Middle English.” 1956. In McIntosh et al., Middle English Dialectology. 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McIntosh, Angus. “A New Approach to Middle English Dialectology.” English Studies 44 (1963): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McIntosh, Angus, Samuels, M. L., and Laing, Margaret. Middle English Dialectology: Essays on Some Principles and Problems. Ed. Laing, Margaret. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

McNamara, Rebecca. “‘Diversity in setting of words makes diversity in understanding’: Bureaucratic and Political Language in Thomas Usk’s Testament of Love.” New Medieval Literatures 14 (2012): 165–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manly, John Matthews. “Chaucer’s Scrivener.” TLS (May 16, 1929): 403.Google Scholar

Marzec, Marcia Smith. “The Latin Marginalia of the Regiment of Princes as an Aid to Stemmatic Analysis.” TEXT 3 (1987): 269–84.Google Scholar

Middle English Dictionary. Eds. Kurath, Hans et al. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1953–2001. http://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/med.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Jerome. Thomas Hoccleve: A Study in Early Fifteenth-Century English Poetic. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Mize, Britt. “Adam, and Chaucer’s Words unto Him.” ChauR 35 (2001): 351–77.Google Scholar

Mooney, Linne R. “Chaucer’s Scribe.” Speculum 81 (2006): 97–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mooney, Linne R. “A Holograph Copy of Thomas Hoccleve’s Regiment of Princes.” SAC 33 (2011): 263–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mooney, Linne R. “Locating Scribal Activity in Late-Medieval London.” In Connolly and Mooney, eds., Design and Distribution. 183–204.Google Scholar

Mooney, Linne R. “Pinkhurst, Adam (fl. 1385–1410).” Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Eds. Matthew, H. C. G and Harrison, Brian. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. Online ed., ed. David Cannadine, January 2008. www.oxforddnb.com.Google Scholar

Mooney, Linne R. “Some New Light on Thomas Hoccleve.” SAC 29 (2007): 293–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mooney, Linne R. “Vernacular Literary Manuscripts and Their Scribes.” In Gillespie and Wakelin, eds., Production of Books. 192–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mooney, Linne R., and Stubbs, Estelle. Scribes and the City: London Guildhall Clerks and the Dissemination of Middle English Literature, 1375–1425. York Medieval Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Mooney, Linne, Horobin, Simon, and Stubbs, Estelle. Late Medieval English Scribes. www.medievalscribes.com.Google Scholar

Mosser, Daniel W. “‘Chaucer’s Scribe,’ Adam and the Hengwrt Project.” In Connolly and Mooney, eds., Design and Distribution. 11–40.Google Scholar

Mosser, Daniel W. “A Digital Catalogue of the Pre-1500 Manuscripts and Incunables of the Canterbury Tales.” 2nd edn. http://mossercatalogue.net/index.html.Google Scholar

Mosser, Daniel W. “Manuscript Description.” In The Hengwrt Chaucer Digital Facsimile (2000): Manuscript Description: Aberystwyth, National Library of Wales, Peniarth MS 392 D (olim Hengwrt MS 154), ed. Estelle Stubbs. Via http://server30087.uk2net.com/canterburytalesproject.com.Google Scholar

Mosser, Daniel W., and Mooney, Linne R.. “The Case of the Hooked-g Scribe(s) and the Production of Middle English Literature, c.1460-c.1490.” ChauR 51 (2016): 131–50.Google Scholar

Mustanoja, Tauno F. A Middle English Syntax, Part I: Parts of Speech. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique, 1960.Google Scholar

Myers, A. R. London in the Age of Chaucer. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, 1972.Google Scholar

A New Index of Middle English Verse. Eds. Boffey, Julia and Edwards, A. S. G. London: British Library, 2005.Google Scholar

O’Connell, Brendan. “Adam Scriveyn and the Falsifiers of Dante’s Inferno: A New Interpretation of Chaucer’s Wordes.” ChauR 40 (2005): 39–57.Google Scholar

Olson, Glending. “Making and Poetry in the Age of Chaucer.” Comparative Literature 31 (1979): 272–90.Google Scholar

Oxford English Dictionary. OED online. http://oed.com.Google Scholar

Parkes, M. B. English Cursive Book Hands, 1250–1500. 1969; repr. with minor revisions 1979. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008.Google Scholar

Parkes, M. B. “Richard Frampton: A Commercial Scribe c. 1390–c.1420.” In The Medieval Book and a Modern Collector: Essays in Honour of Toshiyuki Takamiya, eds. Matsuda, Takami, Linenthal, Richard A., and Scahill, John. Woodbridge: D. S. Brewer, 2004. 113–24.Google Scholar

Parkes, M. B. Their Hands Before Our Eyes: A Closer Look at Scribes. The Lyell Lectures Delivered in the University of Oxford 1999. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008.Google Scholar

Partridge, Stephen. “‘The Makere of this Boke’: Chaucer’s Retraction and the Author as Scribe and Compiler.” In Author, Reader, Book: Medieval Authorship in Theory and Practice, eds. Partridge, Stephen and Kwakkel, Erik. University of Toronto Press, 2012. 106–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Partridge, Stephen. “A Newly Identified Manuscript by the Scribe of the New College Canterbury Tales.” English Manuscript Studies 1100–1700 6 (1997): 229–36.Google Scholar

Pearsall, Derek. “The Ellesmere Chaucer and Contemporary English Literary Manuscripts.” In Stevens and Woodward, eds., The Ellesmere Chaucer. 263–80.Google Scholar

Pearsall, Derek. The Life of Geoffrey Chaucer: A Critical Biography. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992.Google Scholar

Pearsall, Derek. ed. Manuscripts and Texts: Editorial Problems in Later Middle English Literature. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1987.Google Scholar

Pearsall, Derek. ed. New Directions in Later Medieval Manuscript Studies: Essays from the 1998 Harvard Conference. York Medieval Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Peck, Russell A. “Public Dreams and Private Myths: Perspective in Middle English Literature.” PMLA 90 (1975): 461–68.Google Scholar

Pérez-Fernández, Tamara. “Shared Exemplars and the Creation of Miscellanies in the Manuscripts of Troilus and Criseyde.” In Pratt et al., eds., The Dynamics of the Medieval Manuscript. 241–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perkins, Nicholas. “Haunted Hoccleve? The Regiment of Princes, The Troilean Intertext, and Conversations with the Dead.” ChauR 43 (2008): 103–39.Google Scholar

Phillips, Noelle. “Compilational Reading: Richard Osbarn and Huntington Library MS HM 114.” YLS 28 (2014): 65–104.Google Scholar

Phillips, Noelle. “Seeing Red: Reading Rubrication in Oxford, Corpus Christi College MS 201’s Piers Plowman.” ChauR 47 (2013): 439–64.Google Scholar

Pollard, Graham. “The Company of Stationers before 1557.” The Library, ser. 4, 18.1 (1937): 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poos, L. R., and Rust, Martha D.. “Of Piers, Polltaxes and Parliament: Articulating Status and Occupation in Late Medieval England.” Fragments 5 (2016). http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.9772151.0005.004.Google Scholar

Pratt, Karen, Besamusca, Bart, Meyer, Matthias, and Putter, Ad, eds. The Dynamics of the Medieval Manuscript: Text Collections from a European Perspective. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prescott, Andrew. “Administrative Records and the Scribal Achievement of Medieval England.” English Manuscript Studies 1100–1700 17 (2012): 173–99.Google Scholar

Ramsey, Roy Vance. “The Hengwrt and Ellesmere Manuscripts of the Canterbury Tales: Different Scribes.” SB 35 (1982): 133–54.Google Scholar

Rand, Kari Anne. “The Authorship of The Equatorie of the Planetis Revisited.” Studia Neophilologica 87 (2015): 15–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

“Research Reveals Cradle of English Literature.” October 12, 2011, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar

Rickert, Edith. “Thou Vache.” Modern Philology 11 (1913): 209–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roberts, Jane. Guide to Scripts Used in English Writings up to 1500. London: British Library, 2005; Liverpool University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Roberts, Jane. “On Giving Scribe B a Name and a Clutch of London Manuscripts from c. 1400.” MÆ 80 (2011): 247–70.Google Scholar

Robertson, Mary. “The Name of the Scribe: Solving a Mystery behind the Huntington’s Canterbury Tales.” Huntington Frontiers 2.1 (Spring–Summer 2006): 3–4.Google Scholar

Robinson, Pamela. Review of Mooney and Stubbs, Scribes and the City. JEBS 17 (2014): 395–98.Google Scholar

Russell, G. H., and Nathan, Venetia. “A Piers Plowman Manuscript in the Huntington Library.” Huntington Library Quarterly 26 (1963): 119–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Samuels, M. L. “Chaucer’s Spelling.” 1983. In Samuels and Smith, The English of Chaucer and His Contemporaries. 23–37.Google Scholar

Samuels, M. L. “Chaucerian Final ‘-E’.” 1972. In Samuels and Smith, The English of Chaucer and His Contemporaries. 7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Samuels, M. L. “Langland’s Dialect.” 1985. In Samuels and Smith, The English of Chaucer and His Contemporaries. 70–85.Google Scholar

Samuels, M. L. “The Scribe of the Hengwrt and Ellesmere Manuscripts of the Canterbury Tales.” 1983. In Samuels and Smith, The English of Chaucer and His Contemporaries. 38–50.Google Scholar

Samuels, M. L. “Scribes and Manuscript Traditions.” In Regionalism in Late Medieval Manuscripts and Texts: Essays Celebrating the Publication of “A Linguistic Atlas of Late Mediaeval English,” ed. Riddy, Felicity. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1991. 1–7.Google Scholar

Samuels, M. L. “Some Applications of Middle English Dialectology.” 1963. In McIntosh et al., Middle English Dialectology. 64–80.Google Scholar

Samuels, M. L., and Smith, J. J.. The English of Chaucer and His Contemporaries. Ed. Smith, J. J. Aberdeen University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Sánchez-Martí, Jordi. “Adam Pynkhurst’s ‘Necglygence and Rape’ Reassessed.” English Studies 92 (2011): 360–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scase, Wendy. “Prelates and the Provision of Books: Bishop John Carpenter’s Carnary Library.” In The Prelate in England and Europe 1300–1560, ed. Heale, Martin. York Medieval Press, 2014. 127–41.Google Scholar

Scase, Wendy. “Two Piers Plowman C-Text Interpolations: Evidence for a Second Textual Tradition.” Notes and Queries n.s. 34 (1987): 456–63.Google Scholar

Schmidt, Kari Anne Rand. The Authorship of “The Equatorie of the Planetis.” Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1993.Google Scholar

Schulz, H. C. “Thomas Hoccleve, Scribe.” Speculum 12 (1937): 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scott, Kathleen L. “An Hours and Psalter by Two Ellesmere Illuminators.” In Stevens and Woodward, eds., The Ellesmere Chaucer. 87–119.Google Scholar

“Scribes and the City of London.” May 16, 2012, updated January 29, 2013. The City of London.Google Scholar

Seymour, M. C. “The Manuscripts of Hoccleve’s Regiment of Princes.” Edinburgh Bibliographical Society Transactions 4.7 (1974): 255–97.Google Scholar

Shuffelton, George. “John Carpenter, Lay Clerk.” ChauR 48 (2014): 434–56.Google Scholar

Smith, Jeremy J. “Language.” In A Concise Companion to Middle English Literature, ed. Corrie, Marilyn. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. 145–65.Google Scholar

Smith, Jeremy J. “The Trinity Gower D-Scribe and His Work on Two Early Canterbury Tales Manuscripts.” 1988. In Samuels and Smith, The English of Chaucer and His Contemporaries. 51–69.Google Scholar

Smith, Jeremy, and Kay, Christian. “The Pragmatics of Punctuation in Older Scots.” In Communicating Early English Manuscripts, eds. Pahta, Päivi and Jucker, Andreas H.. Cambridge University Press, 2011. 212–25.Google Scholar

Sobecki, Sebastian. “A Southwark Tale: Gower, the 1381 Poll Tax, and Chaucer’s The Canterbury Tales.” Speculum 92 (2017): 630–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stanley, E. G. “The B Version of ‘Piers Plowman’: A New Edition.” Notes and Queries n.s. 23 (1976): 435–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stevens, Martin, and Woodward, Daniel, eds. The Ellesmere Chaucer: Essays in Interpretation. San Marino, CA: Huntington Library, 1997.Google Scholar

Stevenson, Jane. The “Laterculus Malalianus” and the School of Archbishop Theodore. Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stubbs, Estelle V. “‘Here’s One I Prepared Earlier’: The Work of Scribe D on Oxford, Corpus Christi College, MS 198.” RES 58 (2007): 133–53.Google Scholar

Stubbs, Estelle V. “A New Manuscript by the Hengwrt / Ellesmere Scribe? Aberystwyth, National Library of Wales, MS Peniarth 393D.” JEBS 5 (2002): 161–68.Google Scholar

Stubbs, Estelle V. “Richard Frampton and Two Manuscripts in the Parker Library.” Digital Philology 4 (2015): 225–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Summit, Jennifer. Memory’s Library: Medieval Books in Early Modern England. University of Chicago Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sutton, Anne F. “Fifteenth-Century Mercers and the Written Word: Mercers and their Scribes and Scriveners.” In Recording Medieval Lives: Proceedings of the 2005 Harlaxton Symposium, eds. Boffey, Julia and Davis, Virginia. Donington: Shaun Tyas, 2009. 42–58.Google Scholar

Tatlock, J. S. P. “The Canterbury Tales in 1400.” PMLA 50 (1935): 100–39.Google Scholar

Taylor, Karla. “Proverbs and the Authentication of Convention in Troilus and Criseyde.” 1979. In Chaucer’s “Troilus”: Essays in Criticism, ed. Barney, Stephen A.. London: Scolar, 1980. 277–96.Google Scholar

Thaisen, Jacob. “Adam Pinkhurst’s Short and Long Forms.” In Scribes, Printers, and the Accidentals of Their Texts, eds. Thaisen, Jacob and Rutkowska, Hanna. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2011. 73–90.Google Scholar

Thaisen, Jacob. “Overlooked Variants in the Orthography of British Library, Additional MS 35286.” JEBS 11 (2008): 121–43.Google Scholar

Thompson, John J. “After Chaucer: Resituating Middle English Poetry in the Late Medieval and Early Modern Period.” In Pearsall, ed., New Directions in Later Medieval Manuscript Studies. 183–98.Google Scholar

Tolmie, Sarah. “The Professional: Thomas Hoccleve.” SAC 29 (2007): 341–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tucker, Penny. Law Courts and Lawyers in the City of London 1300–1550. Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turner, Marion. “Conflict.” In Middle English, ed. Strohm, Paul. Oxford University Press, 2007. 258–73.Google Scholar

Turner, Marion. “Thomas Usk and John Arderne.” ChauR 47 (2012): 95–105.Google Scholar

Turner, Marion. “Usk and the Goldsmiths.” New Medieval Literatures 9 (2007): 139–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turville-Petre, Thorlac. “Putting It Right: The Corrections of Huntington Library MS Hm 128 and BL Additional MS. 35287.” YLS 16 (2002): 41–65.Google Scholar

Van Gelder, Lawrence. “Books: Arts Briefing: Identity Revealed.” The New York Times (July 21, 2004). www.nytimes.com.Google Scholar

Wagner, Bernard M. “Chaucer’s Scrivener.” TLS (June 13, 1929): 474.Google Scholar

Wakelin, Daniel. Scribal Correction and Literary Craft: English Manuscripts 1375–1510. Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Warner, Lawrence. “Adventurous Custance: St. Thomas of Acre and Chaucer’s Man of Law’s Tale.” In Place, Space, and Landscape in Medieval Narrative, ed. Howes, Laura L.. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press, 2007. 43–59.Google Scholar

Warner, Lawrence. “Impossible Piers.” RES 66 (2015): 223–39.Google Scholar

Warner, Lawrence. The Lost History of “Piers Plowman”: The Earliest Transmission of Langland’s Work. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Warner, Lawrence. The Myth of “Piers Plowman”: Constructing a Medieval Literary Archive. Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Warner, Lawrence. “Scribes, Misattributed: Hoccleve and Pinkhurst.” SAC 37 (2015): 55–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waters, Claire M. “Makyng and Middles in Chaucer’s Poetry.” In Readings in Medieval Textuality: Essays in Honour of A. C. Spearing, eds. Cervone, Cristina Maria and Vance Smith, D.. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2016. 31–44.Google Scholar

Weiskott, Eric. “Adam Scriveyn and Chaucer’s Metrical Practice.” MÆ 86 (2017): 147–51.Google Scholar

Whiting, B. J., with the collaboration of Whiting, Helen Wescott. Proverbs, Sentences, and Proverbial Phrases from English Writings Mainly before 1500. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar